Sorry - but your life sounds really dull, Hurting.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:04 (nine years ago) link
You're projecting an awful lot onto what I said.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:06 (nine years ago) link
I am responding to what you said!
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:07 (nine years ago) link
I'm not sure where you got from my post that we don't have jobs, never go out, don't have friends, don't visit family, don't have hobbies, as though I literally meant the same exact job-home routine every day.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:08 (nine years ago) link
dull can be pretty fun though.
xp
― festival culture (Jordan), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link
yeah yeesh sarahell
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link
Wait so is this thread not about me
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link
pretty sure Hurting wasn't meaning he literally comes home from work every day to a partner that is sitting on the couch anticipating his arrival, but was more making a broad statements about routines, but ymmv
― Neanderthal, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:11 (nine years ago) link
xxp - it sure sounded like you meant the same exact routine every day. That is the appeal you were attempting to convey, right? Also, based on other things you posted in this thread. Lots of people are boring. It doesn't mean you are deficient as a human being. Just own up to your boring-ness.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:11 (nine years ago) link
lol that isn't how it read at all.
considering your user name ...
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link
I think I also just like the reliability of the monogamous relationship, like after a long day of work you know that the same person you love will be there waiting for you instead of wondering whether she'll be somewhere else or whether you're going somewhere else.
He never said home; we wait for each other at the pub tbh
― kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:13 (nine years ago) link
The larger point still stands -- just because a couple is monogamous, doesn't mean that their lives are routine and just because a couple is poly, doesn't mean they aren't.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:15 (nine years ago) link
― sarahell, Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:12 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://media.giphy.com/media/eruN8g7BhO4uc/giphy.gif
― Neanderthal, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:16 (nine years ago) link
sarahell you are literally the only person who read it that way
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:16 (nine years ago) link
xp don't think "routine" was the point, the point I got in the context of the discussion was that you don't have to make a special appointment
― kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:17 (nine years ago) link
I think the thing that is the most salient to me (and what struck me as traditionalism) is the consistency of "waiting for one another" -- when plenty of couples I know don't have those routines. The other person will have things come up, make spontaneous plans with other people, etc.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:17 (nine years ago) link
you've heard of figurative language, right?
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:18 (nine years ago) link
well that's you then, no need to project so much onto what was a completely innocuous comment xp
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:19 (nine years ago) link
xp - the phrase "fuck off douchebag" rings a few bells for me, so yes
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:19 (nine years ago) link
so glad we're discussing this
― kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:20 (nine years ago) link
xp j - it was innocuous! I am not saying that there's anything wrong with it! I am just saying it is traditional and a bit boring "to me" -- not that there is anything wrong with it.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:21 (nine years ago) link
polyanomie
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:21 (nine years ago) link
xp, oh does it really? Good then. Fuck off, douchebag.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link
That it doesn't jibe with my experience or that of most of my friends. However, I imagine it is probably how the vast majority of people are.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link
the less fun people
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link
That must feel nice and comfy and smug to think
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link
not you or your friends, though
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link
got it
it doesn't seem that wise to be calling out people's relationships or lives for being boring in the middle of an actual decent discussion of polyamory, but now that we know you're a bold risk-taker couldn't you just let it lie and stop trying to own your overstep? xxxxxp
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link
To be perfectly honest though, yeah my life is more routine now with a child. But having a two-year-old run up to you like a maniac when you walk in the door and say a new completely ridiculous thing every night has not gotten boring yet.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:30 (nine years ago) link
xp - not really, conventional and boring is nicer and more comfortable.
But back to polyamory (sorry for the derail -- really) - and what I was saying is somewhat related to my take on it:
Jealousy is mostly unhealthy (hell, maybe entirely), but there is jealousy in relationships over many things that aren't just your partner having sex with another person. There is jealousy over time spent with family, children, friends, at work, doing creative pursuits. I think the key issue is to isolate the "sexual" aspect from the equation.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:31 (nine years ago) link
Jesus folks
― dn/ac (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:32 (nine years ago) link
And the comment about making a "special appointment"! I mean, "date night" is a real thing! Monogamous couples have to make special plans to have time alone together!
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:33 (nine years ago) link
I wish, I've to give ten weeks notice for pints
― dn/ac (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:35 (nine years ago) link
i think it's established (out there) that polyamorists must often deal with time-jealousy that is not strictly sexual
maybe even time-jealousy over things that would not be paid as much attention between monogamous partners, who do still have their own time-sharing problems
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:37 (nine years ago) link
I think a lot of people also find that sexual involvement with a second person can interfere with your emotional connection with the first person. I'm not saying there aren't people for whom this isn't true, I'm just saying I think that's another reason most people aren't comfortable with polyamory. It's a fair point that people get jealous of other pursuits too, for sure, but I don't feel like, idk, getting together with friends and jamming gets in the way of my connection with my wife -- if anything it makes it stronger when I come back. Whereas spending a lot of one-on-one time with a woman I'm attracted to will tend to get in the way of things with my wife.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:39 (nine years ago) link
If that's boring, so be it. Everyone gives up some things to gain others. Sometimes I feel like polyamory is presented as having your cake and eating it too.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:41 (nine years ago) link
I think a lot of people also find that sexual involvement with a second person can interfere with your emotional connection with the first person.
This is totally true! When my now-ex and I were first getting together, he was dating another woman (who had a primary partner), and it was problematic for me. And when we talked about it, it came down to, "I have trouble getting in the mood because you are seeing someone else." And then he stopped seeing her, and that part of our relationship was fine.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:48 (nine years ago) link
His previous relationship was an on-again/off-again poly thing (his gf's desires). He was fine either way.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:51 (nine years ago) link
if it's not too personal to ask, did you get any psychological insight into why that would be (the getting in the mood thing)? you can imagine a sorta no-nonsense pro-poly saying 'why should that matter right now, let's just be together' etc
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:52 (nine years ago) link
well, in our case, sex was a key part of "being together," and the fact that I had trouble getting off, basically made sex "not good" -- as far as what caused it? Anxiety and insecurity. Envisioning him with this other woman. Worrying that she was a better lay than I was. Normal stuff.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:56 (nine years ago) link
i had a fairly normal monogamous relationship with a woman with some non-sexual… entanglements when i first met her, she wasn't poly, just had kind of a very jealous eye on her own social/relationship freedom, and i didn't think i felt much sex-related anxiety, but the plain not-knowing involved in her maintaining some of her privacy really tended to eat at me especially when we were precluded from spending time together. it was kind of impenetrable to me at the time.
i am not too prone to thinking in terms of 'is someone else better?' in many kinds of relationships, it seems like an interesting thing to keep in mind when considering the emotional aspects of polyamory. a much more poly-inclined woman i was involved with made some offhand remark about how easily someone else in her life made her laugh and that was waaaay worse than the fact that she slept with him sometimes.
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:06 (nine years ago) link
maybe aside from all the other junk one reason people feel secure with monogamy is that it tends to quiet the question (in whatever form), 'is someone else better?'.
as if 'they're with you' -> 'no one else is better'
― j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:09 (nine years ago) link
Many of my friends are musicians in bands that tour for weeks/months at a time, and a lot of them are in monogamous relationships that have "special" rules for when the musician is on tour, which is a bit different from standard polyamory, but it is related in terms of rules, sex, and communication. One friend of mine who is poly, let's call him, Jeff, seems to suffer from chronic sleep deprivation, that some of us (friends of his) joke is due to the large amount of time spent processing with all of his polyamorous partners.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:12 (nine years ago) link
I hate monogamy and I hate polyamory. For me, the perfect relationship would be the old-fashioned marriage with well-managed affairs. I imagine that's still understood to be the norm among certain types. Certainly, I never expect to be totally faithful but what I can promise is that they'll never find out. And that's what I want in return. People doing things with other people can really hurt me, but just be clever and don't let me know! (this is difficult, though, and has been for thousands of years.) Anyone who said to me with a straight face 'I want you and nobody else till I die' I could never respect the opinion of.
― Eyeball Kicks, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:19 (nine years ago) link
Your predilections are on record, though, Mr de Sade: The 'Incest Laws': What's The Point?
;)
― xelab V¸¸ (imago), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:26 (nine years ago) link
― j., Wednesday, June 4, 2014 7:09 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
See, this is where I do think all the forced "You must change yourself and destroy your jealousy!" stuff isn't totally off the mark, just because these are unpleasant, sad feelings to have that aren't really driven by something the other person's doing, right? I mean it gets at issues of self esteem, being able to believe other people when they say they love you, being happy being who you are and not needing to be Superperson, etc. I'm not articulating this well I think, but there's an area here where when questions like that need to be quieted, it might be interesting to face down why we're asking them of ourselves.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 5 June 2014 00:42 (nine years ago) link
I think sometimes "self-esteem" means knowing what won't make you feel good and not accepting it.
― ₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Thursday, 5 June 2014 00:48 (nine years ago) link
I mean it gets at issues of self esteem, being able to believe other people when they say they love you, being happy being who you are and not needing to be Superperson, etc. I'm not articulating this well I think, but there's an area here where when questions like that need to be quieted, it might be interesting to face down why we're asking them of ourselves.
No, I think you are articulating it well! I feel like it comes down to whether working on quieting these questions, depending on how much work it entails, is worth having the relationship with the other person/people? For me, I couldn't imagine getting to a point where I was okay with it, and I gave my partner an ultimatum (her or me). I think the most important thing is to stand up for yourself and communicate in an honest and respectful way: whether you are poly - ok, or poly - not ok.
― sarahell, Thursday, 5 June 2014 00:51 (nine years ago) link