OH MY GOD HE'S OOGLY: nu-Who season 8

I thought she was the personification of the Tardis which first appeared played by a different actress in The Doctor's Wife. She refers to him as her boyfriend at one point.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-08-23/doctor-who-who-is-missy

Mostly speculation in there, but a couple of minor spoilers also, for those who are picky about such things.

Though I actually think Stevolende's theory makes more sense. But I'm not sure how the robot/robot consciousness goes from London to a Tardis-controlled simulation.

Vastra/jenny/Strax are great but they were not introduced well into the series; that episode (whatever it was...a good man goes to war?) where they get people formerly impacted by the doctor to come and help him out was problematic in that none of those people had ever been shown before and it didn't make any sense at all at the time. I still feel like the real introduction never happened.

it was during the era where they just crammed 1000 things into every episode and stuff was continually confusing to me

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bv0HN0FCIAEtjJ9.jpg

i thought the "lol u old" bit was in many ways a message to the nextgen who fan as personified by the "HE'S OOGLY!" girl who were all hung up on the optics and Moffat's not-so-gently pointing out we're here for the DOCTOR guys

Well yes. And it was delivered with the subtlety of a live Skrillex show when standing about six centimeters away from the speakers.

I wonder if that Vastra investigates was thought to be the introduction to the character that had been missed. It looks like the same actress plays her and the amenable member of her species that turned up in the Welsh episode. Which again might be why they didn't think she needed any further introductin though why not escapes me.
HOw mush red tape/depts do any story ideas have to go through before they get greenlighted, just wondering if anything is getting lost in taht way. If introductory elements are sheared off in streamlining in group scriptwriting meetings or something.

xp hence "not-so-gently"

I liked this episode, I thought it did a decent job of introducing the new Doctor's quirks and exploring how the regeneration might feel for a companion. IIRC, in the Nu-Who era Rose is the only companion who has gone through this before, so it didn't feel overplayed or anything. (Agree that the "lol he's old" jokes were a bit tired.) I loved that this episode finally gave Clara some room to develop, though admittedly the "control freak" and "egomaniac" descriptions of her felt wrong, seems they just put there for that one the gag.

The villain part of plot was kinda meh, but since the episode was more about the new Doctor, I didn't mind it having a bit of an excuse plot. I didn't think it had too much humour, though I did like the tearjerker moments more than the gags: the Vastra/Jenny kiss (IMO it wasn't there for titillation or anything, I simply felt it was about time, since they haven't actually shown these two kissing before, even though the doctor now seems to snog everyone he meets, so not having them kiss would've reeked of gay panic), and especially the "the Doctor will always have my back" scene, which was so simple and touching, a brilliant way of refining cliche into gold.

Here's a few geeky questions and speculations that came to my mind, maybe some of you can comment on them?

* What was up with the dinosaur's size? It seems they made it way bigger than it should've been just so that they would get that cool opening scene... But previously, when Dr. Who has twisted historical facts, they've at least tried to give it some justification, and here there was none.

* So the robots were the same kind as those aboard the spaceship in "The Girl in the Fireplace"? It's been ages since I saw that episode, so correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the robots in it go crazy and start replacing the spaceship parts with human parts only because they were stranded in space, and had nothing else to use? But the robots here would have had all the inorganic raw materials they need, yet harvesting organs now seems to be their default mode? Does not compute.

* What was the point of making it so ambiguous whether the robot guy committed suicide, or whether the Doctor killed him? He's not Superman or anything, previously we've seen that he is perfectly willing to kill loads of people in order to protect the innocents, so what's with the ambiguity now?

* The woman at the end... My first thought too was that it was the human incarnation of the TARDIS, but then I thought she felt too nefarious and crazy and possessive of the Doctor to be the TARDIS. I'm thinking it must be River Song, right? The last time they met (chronologically) he left her living inside that computer simulation, and maybe spending an eternity there has made her a bit crazy? Also, the robot guy dies and goes into "afterlife", and what could be a better afterlife for a robot than a computer-simulated paradise? That garden could easily be inside the simulation, maybe River even learned how to control the computer? (That would also explain how she's able to manipulate the Doctor's life while still remaining a virtual being.) The only thing that doesn't fit into this theory is the woman calling the Doctor her "boyfriend", not "husband", but maybe the writers thought using the latter word would've it too obvious who she is.

There are some things in episode 2 that might go against your last point, but I'll not say anything more. & will be looking forward to seeing that in better version.
Not seen any of the others yet

The thing about Clara as a control freak is that as far as I know, she is the first companion to tell the Doctor directly from the jump "I have a life, this is how you fit into it, see you next week", so it's not like it came completely from nowhere.

also, aside from the totally nothing plot I thought this ruled

Capaldi rules

I was curious about this episode's mention that some woman (apparently it was "Missy", the mystery woman at the end of the ep) deliberately gave Clara the Doctor's number when she phoned him in "The Bells of St. John", thinking it was the tech helpline. I thought this was just a bit of a retcon... But I rewatched the earlier episode, and when the Doctor asks where Clara got his number, she does say, "The woman in the shop wrote it down... She said it's the best helpline out there, in the universe". So apparently they really were setting up this plotline back then already, I'd just totally missed that bit, I thought Clara managed to ring the Doctor by accident, because the universe wanted them to meet or something.

But that made me think, maybe this Missy character isn't actually a villain, even though she has the aura of one? Because she caused Clara and the Doctor to meet, and if they hadn't, he would've died at Trenzalore, and Missy probably knew that. (This of course would support the theory that Missy is TARDIS.)

seems unlikely to me that she's the Tardis, they already did that with Idris in the Gaiman episode and what would the point be in recasting the character or changing it in such a way? If anything holds weight it's Miss/Mistress/Master, to me.

When she started filming in public, BBC put out a press release that Michelle Gomez was cast as Gatekeeper of the Nethersphere.

...Matrix?

If anything holds weight it's Miss/Mistress/Master, to me.

I'm not sure about that one... The two major things we know Missy was responsible for (setting the Doctor and Clara to meet up in "The Bells of Saint John", and bringing them to the cyborg guy's restaurant in this ep) have been helpful to the Doctor, so it seems she's not (at least not intentionally) antagonistic to the Doctor, which would rule out the Master. (Unless his experiences in "Last of the Time Lords" made him into a good guy or something.)

A nefarious supervillain could help their rival in the short-term only to set them up for some operatic revenge.

oh missy

http://media.tumblr.com/258ac50dc271a5782a747082ae1faa2a/tumblr_inline_n8ziibZZ8g1rnlhg5.gif

Vastra/jenny/Strax are great but they were not introduced well into the series; that episode (whatever it was...a good man goes to war?) where they get people formerly impacted by the doctor to come and help him out was problematic in that none of those people had ever been shown before and it didn't make any sense at all at the time. I still feel like the real introduction never happened

Most of those people had been shown before, in the previous six episodes, when they shot their appearances for Good Man (pirate captain and son, space spitfires, idrc what else) [actually pirate ep might not even have been shot yet?]. Vastra/Jenny and Strax NOT having been seen before was EXCELLENT AND FUN storytelling, not bad storytelling: the Doctor has had thousands of years of off-screen adventures in which he has met thousands of people that we haven’t seen. Note also in the same episode, the girl who life-changingly remembers him from her childhood but he doesn’t, possibly because he’s not even had that adventure yet.

i thought the "lol u old" bit was in many ways a message to the nextgen who fan as personified by the "HE'S OOGLY!" girl who were all hung up on the optics

http://37.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyp986r8fv1qcwhkeo1_400.gif

If introductory elements are sheared off in streamlining in group scriptwriting meetings or something

There are no group scriptwriting meetings.

* What was up with the dinosaur's size? It seems they made it way bigger than it should've been just so that they would get that cool opening scene... But previously, when Dr. Who has twisted historical facts, they've at least tried to give it some justification, and here there was none.

Yes there was, in dialogue between Jenny and Vastra.

so what's with the ambiguity now?

We’ve never seen this Doctor before, we don’t know if he would kill. We don’t know if he knows if he would.

when the Doctor asks where Clara got his number, she does say, "The woman in the shop wrote it down... She said it's the best helpline out there, in the universe". So apparently they really were setting up this plotline back then already

When that was written, the woman in the shop was a splinter of Clara; by the time they made Name Of The Doctor, there wasn’t room to include it.

So Missy is The Rani, rite?

FPd you for that

maybe it's Iris Wildthyme

Vastra/Jenny and Strax NOT having been seen before was EXCELLENT AND FUN storytelling, not bad storytelling: the Doctor has had thousands of years of off-screen adventures in which he has met thousands of people that we haven’t seen.

I totally agree with this... When I saw the episode, I thought they were just a pair of cool characters, everything you needed to know about them at that point was in that episode. When they became recurring characters, a little more background info was needed, and it was given. Introducing characters without any backstory and then slowly revealing the backstory is such a basic plot device, I don't get why people would be so confused by this?

* What was up with the dinosaur's size? It seems they made it way bigger than it should've been just so that they would get that cool opening scene... But previously, when Dr. Who has twisted historical facts, they've at least tried to give it some justification, and here there was none.

Yes there was, in dialogue between Jenny and Vastra.

That wasn't a justification though, it was just Vastra saying, "you're wrong, dinosaurs actually were that big!". Admittedly this is a very minor thing to complain about, but it just bugged me for some reason.

so what's with the ambiguity now?

We’ve never seen this Doctor before, we don’t know if he would kill. We don’t know if he knows if he would.

If all the previous incarnations have been willing to kill, why would any viewer think this Doctor wouldn't do it? I dunno, it just felt like they were trying to introduce ambiguity where no ambiguity has existed before, which was a bit weird. I guess it's possible the no killing thing will become a plot element later on, though; in that case, mea culpa.

when the Doctor asks where Clara got his number, she does say, "The woman in the shop wrote it down... She said it's the best helpline out there, in the universe". So apparently they really were setting up this plotline back then already

When that was written, the woman in the shop was a splinter of Clara; by the time they made Name Of The Doctor, there wasn’t room to include it.

So Clara meeting the Doctor was originally going to be a Grandfather Paradox? (She gave her past self the number so that Past Clara would meet the Doctor, but if Past Clara hadn't already met the Doctor, she wouldn't have had the number to begin with.)

The Claras sent throughout the Doctors' timeline were not linear, each one existed separately.

(Moffatt did happily do a recursive paradox in the resolution of the Pandorica though.)

That wasn't a justification though, it was just Vastra saying, "you're wrong, dinosaurs actually were that big!". Admittedly this is a very minor thing to complain about, but it just bugged me for some reason.

I don't even know that Vastra is definitively saying that they were that big, it's more the first hint of the verbal d/s play that the episode makes a point of, establishing her primacy over Jenny in public just for the sake of it, rather than making an actual correction. You can assume that Lady Dino got made too big as a side-effect of the TARDIS' dimensional controls, during the trip through the vortex. cf. Planet Of Giants and ep 4 of The Time Meddler.

The Claras sent throughout the Doctors' timeline were not linear, each one existed separately.

But they still wouldn't have existed if Clara hadn't met the Doctor; and if one of them had caused Clara to meet the Doctor, it still would've been a paradox.

It seem these kind of predestination paradoxes (the time traveller was always meant to change the past, there is no version of history where she didn't travel back and change things) are perfectly okay in the Who universe, since they happen all the time. (For example, in "The Shakespeare Code" the Doctor quotes plays that Shakespeare hadn't written them yet, and he "borrows" the quotes from the Doctor.) It's only when a time traveller changes an already established chain of events that things get messy. Or at least they should get messy, but it seems the latter type of paradoxes are okay too if the writers feel like using them. (For example, in "The Time of the Doctor" he changes his own timeline so that he doesn't die on Trenzalore, even though "The Name of the Doctor" had already established that he dies there and his body is left behind. For some reason this doesn't seem to be problematic in any way, even though in "The Wedding of River Song" a similar paradox [saving the Doctor when it had already been established he will die] almost made the whole universe implode.)

This has always been my biggest problem with time travel in Dr. Who. IMO good time travel sci-fi (like the Back to the Future trilogy ) always establishes rules for time travel and sticks to them; the challenge the characters then face is how they can get what they want without breaking the rules. But with Dr. Who the rules change on the whim of the writers: something that was a universe-breaking paradox in one episode is no big deal in another one.

With the introduction of Vastra, as I say above the same actress had played a different member of her species in that episode set in the Welsh mining town with the same Doctor and sidekicks. Which might count as enough of an introduction to some degree. I also think the same species had been introduced with earlier Doctors. I'm picturing a Peter Davison episode where the costume dept had slipped to the point where there is a hobby horse running around in the background that I think may have otherwise been an encounter with that species. I think that itself was a reintroduction of this species from one of the early doctors.

As to scale of Dinosaur, I thought it odd that the T-rex was able to swallow the Tardis which must have happened at the earlier prehistoric time they then traveled from. & I thought the external skin of the TArdis was supposed to be some protection from the external forces during time and space travel. Not sure where I'm getting that from but think I've heard it. Could be that there is some kind of bubble thrown up by the Tardis that would include things in its immediate vicinity. Have just remembered seeing things like Donna waving from the open door of a flying Tardis and Matt Smith and possibly David Tennant hanging from a flying one, all of which are at low speed in space and time. just surprised that a dinosaur would be able to fly through millions of years on the outside of a Tardis.
EDIT & now i find that the previous Xmas episode had Clara hanging on the outside of the TARDIS causing the Tardis to extend its shielding and slow the journey down. Which wouldn't make a great deal of sense with its ability to bring the Dinosaur forward in time. & surely it would just dematerialise from inside the beastie anyway.

Just trying to think what had been seen previously of Capaldi as the doctor, I was thinking he'd been introduced but I guess that was just the extracurricular stuff like the Zoe Ball introduction show and however many seconds you see of him in the Day Of The Doctor. Now looking up the episode title I find taht he was introduced. So did they crash into a prehistoric era, encounter the dinosaur in a Tardis that had lost sync with its surrounding dimensions in terms of size since the Doctor wasn't in control? Or are there any other continuity flaws that one can retrofit?

Sorry, just realising that the end of that needed more explanation if you hadn't seen the way Capaldi was introduced. Just seen it said that he regenerates in the control room, complains about his kidneys and asks Clara if she can fly the Tardis which he says is crashing.

I don't think it's worth worrying about the dinosaur and the Tardis too much - it's just a fun bit of spectacle to open the episode. They've established the shield thing throughout the Moffat era - the Doctor taking Amy for a space walk in S5 etc. Sure, it's a bit of a stretch to bring the dinosaur along for the ride, but hey, it's not hard SF.

Re the Doctor potentially murdering the droid... surely this is a big deal. Yes there have been times when he's done dark shit, but he's hardly one to off villains with gung-ho gusto. He always tries to find another way - that was the point of the Day of the Doctor. So for the 12th to potentially go back on that is disturbing. The deliberate ambiguity of the Droid's demise seems to tie into the 'Am I a good man?' theme.

Fair point that they've introduced new character traits for Clara rather out of the blue, but at least they've recognised the need to write her properly.

Yes there have been times when he's done dark shit, but he's hardly one to off villains with gung-ho gusto.

Was it really "gung-ho custo" when he was struggling for his life? The cyborg guy was trying to kill him! Previous Doctors have had no problem killing villains in similar situations, that's why I found it weird that all of sudden it was a big thing.

I thought this could probably have done with being a good half an hour shorter than it actually was, most of what was between the credits and the restaurant scene felt like padding, although it got a lot better after that. A big part of this is that regeneration crises are just boring, especially when the stakes aren't actually rising as a result of the Doctor's (physical or mental) absence.

The "you don't see him, you're only seeing his face" stuff was forced and lame, but then again I'm increasingly irritated by Moffatt shows' tendency towards real-time knowing meta-dialogue with the audience. The most recent series of Sherlock did it as well, isn't it enough to just tell a good story without having to pre-emptively address every social media criticism that might emerge at the same time?

I'm a fan of the Vastra/Jenny/Strax characters, though, and I'm fairly sure some people on this thread hate them so wouldn't really have enjoyed a large swathe of this

I don't hate them by any means but they're being overused at this point, the Strax joke was great for a while but is starting to wear thin. I don't think the actress who plays Jenny is particularly good, she mostly comes across as a bit wet, and I'm sure that's not the intention. Vastra is cool but they should do more with her. I like how we're now at the stage where they can show a lesbian kiss on prime-time kids' TV without even the Mail bothering to act outraged.

The breath-holding bit was silly really, a bit of a rehash of "don't blink", except everyone watching is capable of holding their breath more than once in a row.

But Capaldi really was excellent I thought, and there's the making of some decent onscreen chemistry between him and Jenna Coleman, in a way there wasn't with Matt Smith. The restaurant scene in particular was great, both in terms of the two characters bouncing off one another and then the creepiness that followed.

xp Added to that, the droid in the skin blimp was the master-droid - if he/it was destroyed, the others would all power down and themselves be destroyed. Along with being in a struggle, the Doctor seemed to be aware of that, which mitigates, if not excuses, his actions.

Vastra is cool but they should do more with her.

This is totally true: she's supposed to be this sci-fi Sherlock Holmes, with Jenny as her Watson, but we never actually see her doing any detective stuff. That's why a spinoff series featuring the three would be a cool thing, then they'd be able to develop Strax and Jenny too, beyond the two-dimensional roles they occupy now. According to Wikipedia, BBC has actually suggested a spinoff, but Moffat has declined because he doesn't have the time to do it. Couldn't they just get someone else as a producer/showrunner?

Though I suspect production costs are also one reason there hasn't yet been a spinoff, because the Victorian-era setting would make it more expensive than Torchwood and Sarah Jane Adventures were.

Want to know how Silurians had giant dinosaurs? Did they experiment with genetic modification? To find out listen to: http://www.bigfinish.com/releases/v/bloodtide-647

Couldn't they just get someone else as a producer/showrunner?

Even if current Who contracts allow this in a way that classic ones didn't, do you think "they" would choose to alienate the head writer and executive producer of two of their biggest worldwide successes currently(/ever)?

I've seen my first "MOFFATT IS THE NEXUS OF ALL MISOGYNY" reaction to this episode of Facebook and I don't get it.

I do agree that it was semi-aggravating that every character was fixated on The Doctor but that tends to happen in regeneration stories, so I got over it after about a second.

Also, afterward BBC America was showing random hodgepodge episodes and literally every single time a 10/Rose interaction came up it was horrible in a way I don't think the show has really been since. I don't get why that whole Thing was okay (especially when they circled back to Rose at the end of Donna's season and gave her her own pet Doctor) and Moffatt showing that a terrified person can still stand up to a murderous android by drawing entirely on her own experiences is the epitome of misogyny, particularly when the show later goes on to explicitly acknowledge all of the ways they fucked up 11/Clara during their goodbye conversation.

I don't get it either; this episode was almost less bad about women than the entire series has been since inception.

I guess accusing a woman of being a control freak when she's shown no real evidence of that beyond wanting a bit of independence is dodgy. But I'd still probably put that down to clumsy writing rather than moffat hating women.

Like, I understood the arguments people were making re: Amy/11, I just disagreed with them. I also understood all of the ways in which the plot mechanics were set up almost by design to sideline and marginalize Clara, (although as sic says I think some of this was meant to be intentionally unflattering for the Doctor and Smith's charisma carried a lot of fans past that realization) and how that's shitty. I don't understand how hitting the reset button on the entire Doctor/companion relationship and having a character whose was most notable for being at the center of a mystery no one really cared about start to become more than just a cipher who asks the right questions is proof that the show has fallen into an irredeemable pit of misogyny.

Having said that, I think there's always been more to Clara as a character than people have said (most notably in "Cold War" and "Hide", where she is clearly terrified of and bothered by what's happening around her but fighting through that to participate in events anyway) but the aforementioned stupid mystery was so hamfistedly done that it never had a chance to coalesce. I'm hoping that the trend continues and Clara becomes as cool as she was when she was a helpful Dalek.

cp: the "control freak" thing is a fair point; I think they intended to sow the seeds for that throughout her original stories but it got downplayed/overshadowed by the stupid mystery

I skipped the last Doctor and tuned in to watch this season cuz hey maybe this new Capaldi guy will be good and while I was predisposed to him I felt like I was watching an episode of Buffy and just gave up after 20 minutes

lol it got much, much better after 20 minutes

I'm just not interested in the emotional politics jibber-jabber, I couldn't even keep up with it some of it was rattled off so fast

Buffy is awesome so I do not understand how that is a complaint.

sometimes I like different shows to do different things but I mean the critique only in a general way - supporting cast soap opera hijinks were never what interested me most about Dr. Who, and seeing them become so central is sort of disconcerting. It makes sense that it's filling that cultural gap of nerd-soap-opera, I get why it's happened and it explains why the re-launched show has achieved an entirely different level of popularity/reached a new audience that is much different from the one I grew up with. Whatever, it's fine, I'm old, I can always watch my Tom Baker DVDs if I want glacially paced, intermittently humorous, high-concept sci-fi nonsense.

it did get much better after twenty minutes btw
though it never completely stopped being nonsense
i'm old too.

I liked this, but the first part was just so badly directed. Those loooong shots might have been good for the melancholic and unsettling scenes, but it just killed all the humor in the first part.

I haven't seen Ben Wheatleys A Field in England yet, and now I'm less inclined to.