Paul Thomas Anderson: C or D?

Treating the book like a ZAS sketch is the best approach, but I dunno if this guy has it in him.

Trailer seems like it's got the ZAZ timing down!

Looks like jackie brown too. Anyway. I don't see the point in movies anymore.

good, we're trying to get all of you out, esp the rep theaters

PTA's "Big Lebowski?"

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:03 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I was about to post the same thing, but I have a feeling it's more the trailer than the movie.

But you know, Hollywood being Hollywood. Literally impossible to market a movie without trying to convince people it's like some other movie they've already seen.

I dunno, stoner shaggy dog So Cal detective story? Got its similarities no matter what. Though given his MO surely PTA had "The Long Goodbye" in mind.

jeez, PTA looks like he's aged ten years since PSH died. he looks pretty gaunt compared to those photos from february of him at the funeral

http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/files/2014/02/anderson.jpg

2012:

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Paul+Thomas+Anderson+Philip+Seymour+Hoffman+wyhPLfcvfL4l.jpg

he still smokes, yea?

didn't bother with the book but this looks great

i had no use for the book but ripping good trailer

I literally took a shit on the book but can't wait for the movie.

geez toilet paper isn't THAT expensive

it and Lot 49 are the only Pynchon I can stand.

i.e. read it – it's fun

xp i liked the book, it was pretty fun.

books should be fun!

Lot 49 is def my favorite - found V a slog and Vineland sort of stupid but Inherent Vice is working in a vein I have a fondness for

xp

book was great fun, and made me think of big lebowski a lot so not surprised at any similarities.

To get a grip on the project, he adapted the entire 384-page novel sentence by sentence. “I basically just transcribed it so I could look at it like it was a script,” he said. “It looked like a doorstop. But I can understand this format. As big as it was, it was easier for me to cut down.”

kinda wished he just filmed the whole thing as a mini-series.

kind of loved the book tbh

it's fun

Josh Brolin looks like exceedingly good value in this. My enthusiasm dissipated when I saw Owen Wilson though.

his skin doesn't look good in that photo up above, but his hair looks good

i feel like that NYT photo was just an exceedingly bad picture following quite closely on from the death of his pal.

he should shave that beard thing though.

PTA used to be pretty cute

can't fathom hatin on the Butterscotch Stallion

xp

i love that this is where this thread is at. he has made some pretty good movies but he mainly exists in my head as just such a handsome guy. the nyt picture's taken under that tunnel on central park west, somewhere in the sixties, isn't it? all blustery. i am p sure there will be a nyff premiere pic at which he looks his usual dapper salt & pepper ruggedly urbane self & we will all be able to stand down & not worry so much. even if we are in an autumn of paul thomas anderson's handsomeness, it is still a while until wintertime.

My enthusiasm dissipated when I saw Owen Wilson though.

Right? I had the same reaction.

Oh, wow, this looks grea...oh, uh huh.

http://41.media.tumblr.com/2da8d04916414e3fed0abb86148845a6/tumblr_mjplw2womU1s2u10mo1_400.png

you get what you give

shave + bucket hat = no longer looks 60

(or is that from 1998?)

That's got to be old, when he was dating Fiona.

Yeah, uh, Fiona herself looks like she's been suffering through some tough times, if the recent pictures I've seen of her are anything to go by.

man, that photo. he's wearing sandals on the red carpet! should be a crime IMO.

http://www.vulture.com/2015/07/paul-thomas-anderson-will-write-rdjs-pinocchio.html

was hoping that would be the other RDJ

New documentary out today, who knew?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLhSyy6UM94

yeah they've been emailing me about it and yet i have no desire to bother

A local rep started a PTA series tonight: Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, Magnolia, and There Will Be Blood.

First time I've seen Hard Eight in 15 years--I watched it at home not too long after Boogie Nights. Didn't like it at all at the time; not surprisingly, I wanted to see The Father of Boogie Nights. Tonight's print, as the series host pointed out, looked like it had never been screened. (He also said you can't get it on DVD at the moment.)

I liked it more tonight than I did then, but I still see Boogie Nights as a quantum leap forward. (I'll put that to the test next week, but I have no reason to believe I'll change that viewpoint.) Hard Eight was more interesting to me than compelling. Thought it built pretty well for the first half, then you have that endless scene in the hotel room where things go bad. It regained its footing after that, and offered some credible backstory to Philip Baker Hall's character (which I'd completely forgotten, so I was again "I don't get this guy at all"). I think there's one fantastic performance--not Hall, and not Philip Seymour Hoffman (he's good, but he's there and gone in the blink of an eye), but Sam Jackson. It's nestled in there between Jungle Fever/Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown--he was so unbelievably good during that run. As tedious as I found the hotel room scene between Hall, Baker, and Reilly, I thought the long scene where Jackson set Baker straight balanced the scale. (And Baker sitting waiting in the chair could very well have been on Tarantino's mind when he made Jackie Brown.)

Besides the cast (extending to Robert Ridgely and Melora Walters), there are a couple of unmistakable links to Boogie Nights. The main theme--this weirdly still bit where it sounds like a bell is being rung--is used again in Boogie Nights when Wahlberg hooks up with that guy in the parking lot. And when Jackson harangues Hall about the old-time gangsters, he mentions Floyd Gondolli; that's Hall's character in Boogie Nights (who may or may not be the same Gondolli).

If you think Hard Eight is better than Boogie Nights, I'm guessing you're someone who's content with the direction Anderson started to take with There Will Be Blood. I thought of Truffaut's famous quote on the way home tonight, about all great movies either being about the joy or the agony of making cinema. (Flowery, I know, but memorable.) Boogie Nights is the one film of PTA's that is completely--well, give or take a couple of scenes during the Hello-'80s meltdown--about the joy. And it's still far and away my favourite. (Before the film, they had a trailer for the series cut from all four films, scored to Three Dog Night's "One." The trailer got an ovation and deserved to.)

You can't get it cheap, but you can get it:

http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Eight-Special-Samuel-Jackson/dp/B00000K3D3/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1513402441&sr=8-2&keywords=hard+eight

Supposedly Criterion is working on an edition of Hard Eight/Sydney.

As tedious as I found the hotel room scene between Hall, Baker, and Reilly

Better than if I'd written "between Philip, Baker, and Hall," but what I meant was Hall, Paltrow, and Reilly.

If you think Hard Eight is better than Boogie Nights, I'm guessing you're someone who's content with the direction Anderson started to take with There Will Be Blood.

How so? I don't much like There Will Be Blood but like Hard Eight. The Master and Inherent Vice are his best.

I regard Hard Eight as a one-off chamber piece, an exercise by a young filmmaker testing his limits.

What I meant was that Hard Eight is dark and brooding and slow, that Boogie Nights is anything but (except for those couple of scenes from the 1980 section), and that that's where his films have resided since There Will Be Blood at least. (Inherent Vice was probably an attempt to loosen up some again--I think it's the least interesting film he's ever done.) If you take his career from start to finish, Boogie Nights is the anomaly. And, for me, the best.

70mm screenings of PT's PT

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/12/phantom-thread-70mm-screenings-1201905384/

You can't get it cheap, but you can get it:

You could have bought that film print yourself, too.

Before the Boogie Nights screening tonight--a 35mm print that Warners supposedly gave them a hard time over, suggesting they play a Blue-Ray instead--Brendan, host of the series, brought a friend with guitar up and they played "Feel My Heat." Pretty funny.

Notwithstanding that I have watched it too many times (not for quite a while, though), the film still amazes me. Even the dark, slow section, where I can understand the argument that it seems layered on--things fall apart now, because they have to fall apart--the way PTA cuts between Wahlberg in the parking lot and Reynolds/Graham in the limo, and then links both of those scenes to Cheadle in the donut store, all of that is masterful (punctuated by immediately going into the spectacular Alfred Molina scene). And I love everything after that: Wahlberg's apology, and the beautiful--except for the Colonel--grace note of the last five minutes. Really, the '80s third of the film is no less great, I'd say, than what comes before it.

Looks like the new one doesn't have a credited cinematographer, yet again--I wonder what happened between him and Elswit.