Saturday Night Live

Internet Rejoices After Larry David Nails It As Bernie Sanders On 'SNL'

Beloved Homophobe Tanks Comeback From Near-Fatal Crash Hey Look Larry David

alec baldwin was in a car crash?

it was called rock of ages

why do they have a 30yo cast member playin HilRod? they could at least eyebag 'er up.

Yeah, for real. It's like she and fake Coop weren't even trying. Aykroyd's mustachioed Carter was a better impression.

I liked kate mckinnon's hilary!

SNL history buff Morbs remembers when cast members weren't decades younger than the politicians they played oh wait right that never happened

Coop was horrible, and Chaffee yiiikes

Leslie Jones would have been a more age-appropriate Hillary.

Aykroyd's mustachioed Carter was a better impression.

It was indeed, but when you don't have out-of-this-world talent, you have to get literal.

"out-of-this-world talent"

is that a UFO allusion and is it in reference to Aykroyd, Carter, or both?

also when you have an old coot playing Sanders, you should go across the board.

Even accounting for the SNL myopia everyone suffers from, in what universe is Dan Aykroyd more of an out-of-this-world talent than Kate McKinnon?

lol wat

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZTRNR-pPowQ/T8yyYerIZlI/AAAAAAAABbg/cPBc_I_8ao0/s1600/5799156_std.jpg

I know the OG cast is sacrosanct (except not really if you've rewatched that stuff within the last 30 years) but, yeah, there have been a number of subsequent performers who were equally good if not better. Not saying Aykroyd is bad but McKinnon is at least his equal.

If we're talking about work done outside of SNL, there are plenty of talented people from old casts and newer casts alike who've done brilliant work (and also plenty who've been pitiful). If we're talking about work within the confines of SNL, though, there's Phil Hartman and then there's everyone else.

don't know Kate McKinnon's work, nor shall i

I respect your position on this divisive issue.

McKinnon is skilled, but too many of her characters have the same manic traits. Maybe I am not watching close enough, but would like to see more range from her

Kate McKinnon is great but, as I see her do more stuff, I see her getting Wiiged by the writing staff. It seems like they have less of an idea of what Aidy Bryant and Vanessa Bayer's true schticks are and, as a result, they end up with a wider range of characters to portray (in fairness, Bryant does get pigeonholed a lot too but I feel like I've seen her do more surprising things than I've seen from McKinnon).

Re: range, I've said for years that Lorne needs to branch out and hire more performers with a theatrical background beyond the improv stage. But I guess that doesn't necessarily suit the current tone of the show, for better or worse.

x-post upward

http://deadline.com/2015/10/donald-trump-saturday-night-live-protest-moveon-1201586581/

A coalition of Latino groups and liberal online activist platform MoveOn.org are calling for NBC to disinvite GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump from hosting Saturday Night Live on November 7, which happens to be exactly one year from Election Day 2016. MoveOn.org’s petition has climbed from 15,000 signatures Friday evening to 117,000 and counting as of Sunday evening.

...

Trump hosted SNL back in 2004, but his upcoming gig would mark the first time a Presidential candidate will host the show. As Hillary Clinton did on October 3, other political figures such as Steve Forbes, Rudy Guiliani and John McCain and have appeared in skits but not hosted the show. Former Vice President Al Gore appeared as a host in 2002.

Uh, McCain totally hosted. And let's not forget Giuliani.

Trump hosting is totally gross, as if it even needs to be said.

Wait, Forbes hosted, too. I'm not sure I understand the end of that quote.

I think they mean this is the first time someone has hosted the show while simultaneously running for President.

controversy = ratings, Trump is going to host

xpost I got that from the first sentence (and again: gross, Lorne), but the second seems to suggest that McCain and Giuliani and Forbes have only appeared in sketches a la Clinton's recent appearance. Which is incorrect.

Having Trump host SNL is a total Trump move.

McKinnon is skilled, but too many of her characters have the same manic traits. Maybe I am not watching close enough, but would like to see more range from her

You mean like how Bill Murray has played himself in every movie since Meatballs, only demonstrating "range" by barely talking at all (Lost in Translation, Broken Flowers)?

that's p unfair to Kingpin

Bill Murray has played himself in every movie since Meatballs

he is not "himself" in Rushmore or Mad Dog and Glory, for starters

yeah Mad Dog and Glory is an odd one

Not really himself in Wild Things, is he? Or Tootsie? Or ... well, I guess he is himself in Zombieland.

Bill Murray did not play himself in St. Vincent

he played himself with an accent

didn't he play FDR recently in some bullshit

Would even send SNL a check if they put Jorge Ramos in the audience and then had him stand up in the middle of Trump's monologue and ask serious questions. It would be one of the best TV moments of all time, though a backup guest would probably be wise.

It'd be nice to at least see some of the cast members pull a Nora Dunn wrt the Trump show.

Or dump a bucket of pig's blood on his head.

If the jokes are bad, we'll know why

I just want to see Trump's post-hosting tweets about how disgusting all the women on the show are

scroll up for a preview

loooooooooooooool

Also Trump hosting is fucking awesome.

Toooootally. I wish they'd given David Duke a platform back when he was running for president. I guess it's never too late, Lorne!

I wonder if native NYC-metro area people respond to Trump differently than most other Americans. I still identify Trump as a sort of 80's tabloid clown on par with Geraldo Rivera, Cutis Sliwa, George Steinbrenner etc. Clearly a dick but also an obviously pretend ideologue, posing no threat except in his own sphere, played for laffs.

The David Duke analogy wld work if maybe Ted Cruz or somebody was hosting.

I viewed Trump in that way until he began his presidential campaign. Given that his new platform grants an air of legitimacy to the hateful views that he shares with a segment of the population, I definitely think he's dangerous.

those hateful views have been granted an air of legitimacy since plymouth rock