i need to know what the nutcases are talking about. you know, keep your friends closer, enemies closer type of thing.
peggy is out of control, though. was wondering if what she was talking about was even a dialogue feminists were having these days, but she seems out of the loop.
― F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 28 October 2015 00:03 (eight years ago) link
Dumb article, but I have to admit I had a similar reaction at least to the opening of the NYMag piece in question -- wasted sex is more likely than not to be bad and perhaps an anecdote about it is not the best setup for an article about how gender power imbalance results in bad consensual sex.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 28 October 2015 18:22 (eight years ago) link
What is the origin of all these "No, Women Can't Have it All" pieces that pop up ad infinitum? Was there once a piece that said "Women Can Have it All?" The first time I remember this coming up at all was in the context of some mainstream news magazine cover asking "Can Women Have it All?" already kind of challenging the idea, and I want to say it was at least 15-18 years ago that I remember seeing that.
― a man a plan alive (man alive), Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link
"Women Can Have it All?"
there's a book iirc
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link
that was supposed to read "Can Women Have it All?" obvs. It just feels like people are beating a dead cliché at this point, so to speak.
― a man a plan alive (man alive), Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link
1982https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fbackstorywriting.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F08%2Fhaving-it-all.jpg&f=1
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/magazine/the-complicated-origins-of-having-it-all.html
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link
huh, well that p much explains it, thx
― a man a plan alive (man alive), Tuesday, 31 May 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link