I will keep doing, but not worth it! The 2016 Presidential Primary Voting Thread

that sounds like Jessica Rabbit is going to burst into frame waving an incriminating email

xp: damn you dmac

no i understand they're meant to upset different ppl but these are just such boring scandals. benghazi was a little sexy since there were dead bodies but emails and paid speeches zzzzzzzzzz

sexiest scandal

http://www.motherjones.com/files/kissingerclinton.jpg

I think bill already depleted the sexy scandal quota in that family

hillary is an equal opportunity kisser

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-suha-arafat.jpg

hmmmm, who killed more ppl, Mrs Arafat or Kissinger... tough one...

HRC's buddy-buddy thing w/ kissinger is so nauseating

Not to defend FB, but pretty sure he was kidding about the whole "my opinions are right all the time" thing. Right?

.

"I would like to point out that I have been OTM on this thread"

Rogues gallery!

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/29/252BB6D300000578-2931868-image-a-3_1422569556266.jpg

worst three-way ever

Preliminary exit poll results show that Republican primary voters in New Hampshire are roughly twice as likely as Democratic primary voters to say that they want their next president to be from outside the political establishment.

Nearly three quarters of Democrats said they preferred a candidate with political experience rather than an outsider. In contrast, Republicans were about evenly split between those looking for an experienced candidate and those favoring someone who is not a career politician. (NYT)

Not sure if that means Hillary might outperform expectations or if NH voters consider Bernie an experienced insider.

no way, Tuomas' thing is more like "What is congress? I don't know how to find out"

Ha, I posted something kind of like this. In my defence, though, caucuses are fucking confusing. Several articles later, I'm still not totally clear on how the Iowa county and state conventions work and how those percentages we saw are derived from the actual caucus result.

lol neither are those of us in the US!

What is it that you're trying to say? Why on earth would that word-choice be important?

― Frederik B

caring about word choice matters because it helps me keep my head above water in the land of toxic political discourse i call my home. word choice is not a big deal, apparently, to Leninist Hilary Clinton supporters from Denmark

― rap is dad (it's a boy!),

x-post: Compared to dismantling white supremacy, then yeah, it seems pretty petty and insignificant to harp on whether Sanders self-describes as 'radical'. But hey, good for you that you can keep you're head over water that way, that's a real privilege, y'know.

― Frederik B

What does anyone hope to achieve by arguing on the internet? I'm interested in American politics, they're hugely important to the whole world. Plus I've lived in the US for a year. What's hard to understand?

Why are people so focused on personally attacking me instead of looking at my arguments? They happen to be correct most of the time. Oh wait, I just answered my own question?

― Frederik B

smh at the *privilege* of 'let's argue about us politics, it's an interesting hobby, don't you understand how hobbies work?'

Btw, I was right that Bernie Sanders is a self-described radical. As I most often am.

Okay morbs

haha

sorry i’m late to thread and this is just me banging my head against a fleshy wall but whatever.

i agree that there are a ton of important issues concerning which there is very little, if any, air between clinton (and obama) and several of the GOP candidates. and that you prioritize those issues.

however there are a lot of other issues where there is more than a little sunlight. many of those issues have to do with domestic policy, particularly in re. entitlements.

maybe this is unfair, but i sometimes wonder if the folks who make the "tweedledee, tweedledum" argument are insulated by their privilege from the effects of the sort of policies on which the two parties clearly differ.

that’s the nice version. the not-nice version is that people who can’t hold in their mind two propositions—

1) hillary is a corporatist candidate who embraces many policies that are odious (and has a very unfortunate tendency to a warlike foreign policy) (simple translation = Hillary Is Shit)

2) a clinton presidency would likely have many real advantages over a rubio (or bush/trump/kasich/whatever) presidency. (simple translation = Rubio/etc. Is Much Worse Shit)

—seem to me to have some kind of problem with critical thinking.

(just to add more evidence for #2, who do you think even "moderate" kasich will appoint to the NLRB?)

keep in mind that i live in state that, as of 2011, is controlled — in every branch — by activist republicans. the state has gone to shit faster than i could ever have imagined. walker et al have undone unions, undone the civil service code, undone almost every protection the safety net afforded the poor, undone the schools (K-12 and high ed)…. it will take decades, maybe longer, to undo the damage. it is a fucking nightmare and i have students every semester who tell me about the very real effect of GOP policies on their lives and those of their parents, sisters, brothers….

need i add that i have no love whatever for clinton, sanders, kasich, bush, obama, or any other establishment politician? but my choice is not to pretend — or to insist, over and over and over and over and over and over again, in the face of the evidence — that there are no substantial differences among them.

bottom line: the world is shit! but that doesn’t mean it can’t get much worse. (with or without our help.)

i don’t know why this makes me so mad. maybe it’s because this attitude seems so smug in its infantile misanthropy, its "edginess," but is actually so fucking corny and stupid.

"you" == some folks. i can't even remember what post i was responding to!

oh it's just your standard perfect (although Bernie is far from perfect) being the enemy of the good

It should make you mad! The morons like Chris Matthews who dare to run ads touting their Love of the Game don't understand how clean water and hacks operating state bureaucracies affect your children.

i guess as a teacher it just really frustrates me when seemingly smart people are so obstinately stupid about something!

also, a reminder that SC nominees matter: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-puts-obamas-clean-power-plan-on-hold/2016/02/09/a56476f8-cf84-11e5-90d3-34c2c42653ac_story.html

btw the democrats in wisconsin suck! they really do. not all of them, by any means. but the party machinery, most of the prominent state politicians. they suck! they got lazy! they lack vision! that's one reason they lost so badly this decade. but the GOP --again, most, not quite all, of it -- is SO MUCH WORSE. SO. MUCH. WORSE.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/campaign-stops/the-destruction-of-progressive-wisconsin.html

http://www.openprocessing.org/sketch/306571/embed/?width=900&height=350&border=true

generate semi-random NH results, and NYT headlines that would go with them

maybe this stuff is harder to perceive from NY or California or whatever.

xpost

see also kansas

Yes, let's peek into Kansas: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/kansas-gov-sam-brownback-cut-45-million-public-school-funding

btw Shakey in the Supreme Court thread reminded me why elections matter: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-puts-obamas-clean-power-plan-on-hold/2016/02/09/a56476f8-cf84-11e5-90d3-34c2c42653ac_story.html

i don’t know why this makes me so mad. maybe it’s because this attitude seems so smug in its infantile misanthropy, its "edginess," but is actually so fucking corny and stupid.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, February 9, 2016 4:04 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

Yeah, like Holden Caulfield ranting against all the "phonies."

all those crumb-bums in politics, they kill me, they really do

banging my head against a fleshy wall

i just realized this could also describe the pre-natal months

and now i have this song in my head

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miT-rJx5nKQ

oops, rong thread !

it isn't!

ha, you might be right, in an oblique way.

LOL at AP declaring winners with less than 10% of precincts reporting in both races

so is NBC.

everywhere is calling for sanders and trump

lol @ Chris Matthews freaking out

http://gawker.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-new-hampshires-attemp-1758164713

Andrea Mitchell reporting that HRC campaign released a three-page memo a half hour ago explaining how they're gonna kick ass in March.

CNN too. I mean, I don't think there's any question--Trump's up by 20%, Sanders by 15%.

Kasich might finish second. Can't see him winning, so I'm sure Trump would welcome that.

Wonder what the Clinton reaction would be tonight if she hadn't escaped Iowa with the win.

I mean, this one would always have been easy to spin with the whole "neighboring state, liberal like him, etc." thing. I'm sure they would have loved to win, and at some point a ways back probably still thought that was a viable possibility had Sanders's campaign kind of fizzled in toto. That didn't happen so they'll rest on basically saying it's an irrelevant non-surprise.

Kasich and Bush in second and third for now