I will keep doing, but not worth it! The 2016 Presidential Primary Voting Thread

Rubiobot still waiting for Windows updates to load

Fiorina printed speech on HP printer

No official statement from Christie yet.

Fiorina was only really 'in' for about three days after one good moment in an early debate.

http://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/02/11/us/11rubio-web3/11rubio-web3-articleLarge.jpg

Stacks of empty pizza boxes nearly reaching the ceiling of Mr. Rubio’s campaign headquarters in Manchester, N.H.
Credit Hilary Swift for The New York Times

lying about planned parenthood and promising simultaneous war with russia, china and iran is good for about 5 days' worth of "credibility"

i hope rubio takes his old West Miami Commission spot back (by a LANDSLIDE election) and stocks up the local vending machines with affordable, tasty, AND healthy snacks.

you go get 'em Rubes! now get on out there, ya hear?

those are "nearly reaching the ceiling" in the same way that rubio "nearly won" the last two contests

Horse racy questions: how poorly must Rubio do in SC to completely dispel with this notion that he knows exactly what he's doing? And how entertaining will the inevitable Rock'em Sock'em Robots Battle Royale between Señor Cruz and The Donald be, where each vies to hurl the ultimate ball-shriveling insults at and to out-smirk the other for the duration of the campaign?

that is a question for another thread but yeah I think left-wing there means lefty on other non-Israel related issues

xp

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:57 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and yeah, left-wing does not necessarily imply post-colonialism, tho i think a post-colonialism case for the jewish state is not very difficult to make but this is not really the thread for it

― Mordy, Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:58 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'll take the "question for another thread" way out here. i don't have the energy right now to go to that other thread and try to sort out my thoughts about this, but just wanted to acknowledge that you did respond.

Did I see that Sanders is (nominally) the first Jewish person, and first non-Christian, to win a presidential primary, ever? And Cruz was the first Latino, and Clinton first female. History in the making, regardless of outcome.

yup

what's with the "nominally"

granted he's not Joe Loserman but still

number of times my family ever self-described as polish (or ukrainian) immigrants: 0

My family all came from Poland/Russia/Germany/Austria well before WW2, and we definitely sometimes referred to them as Russian, Polish, German, etc.

I would most likely say "Russian-Jewish immigrants" or "German-Jewish immigrants"

that a little bit more common. but what do i know, maybe some polish-jewish immigrants strongly identified as polish before they emigrated

ugh if hillary wants to get hip with da kids I dont think slavish support of israel is going to help any

no it's almost certainly about soliciting donations, right? or maybe being more competitive in florida?

whoever wrote that WaPo editorial today about how her campaign has no strong narrative is otm, that's her real problem.

I wouldn't be surprised if my German Jewish ancestors had strongly identified as German. Maybe the dynamic would be different with Polish Jews. I'm curious to ask my dad if his dad had any Polish identity.

‏@CNN
.@JohnKasich: "I'm not just going to sit there and be a marshmallow" http://cnn.it/1Qs4Pt6

I didn't link the tweet because the first response is NSFW but this quote deserves to be enjoyed

It seems like Hillary's big problem with voters is honesty/trustworthiness. Maybe she should try a little jujitsu along with a pivot toward the general and say something like: Look the GOP is probablygoing to nominate Trump or Cruz, either of whom will say/do anything to get elected. Either of them would eat Sanders for breakfast with demagoguery/dirty tricks. You need someone who's survived the GOP slime machine and knows how to fight fire with fire.

the problem is that is demonstrably untrue - since she can't even put out fires in her own party

she kinda already does that, campaigns on the spectre of a republican presidency xpost

I thought that was one of her biggest talking points. I agree that the "I'm still standing" approach is one of her better ones. "Demonstrably untrue" or not (I'm not even sure how you'd demonstrate that), the image of her as some kind of grizzled veteran who knows how to play the game is one of the few that seems to resonate.

Well, I think the primary race is a different thing. Sanders isn't attacking her. He's attracting true believers because of his ideological purity. She needs to make the case that purity is not going to help against fundamentally shameless and dishonest opponents. It's going to take someone who's willing to get down into the mud pit and wrestle with the pig.

xxp

You need someone who's survived the GOP slime machine and knows how to fight fire with fire.

yes, someone else who will say/do anything to get elected

she would have to murder a million vince fosters to be as bad as trump or whoever. i think that's a fine platform to run on. Never gonna be as bad as those losers!

"i'm a progressive and Henry Kissinger likes me"

btw Bubba affectionately invoked Henry the K after she did in the debate!

no wonder they were shitty hippies too

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/18841/hillary_rodham_bill_clinton_and_the_1971_yale_strike

scott she has been complicit in assorted state bloodiness perpetrated by the Peace Prizee and recommended worse, if that counts

New favorite headline:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/south-carolina-primary-2016-live-updates-and-results/2016/02/marco-rubio-debate-performances-219093

the image of her as some kind of grizzled veteran who knows how to play the game is one of the few that seems to resonate

maybe but "grizzled" is more Sanders' thing and also - she's NOT a grizzled veteran, she's never won a national campaign, she's never even really won a hard-fought state campaign. If she's going to argue that she's "battle tested" she needs to start actually, y'know, battling. Which means destroying Sanders. Which would not be pretty and would potentially backfire. And that's why she hasn't done it yet.

Bernie's narrative is relatively easy to grasp - "I am an old morally upright angry guy that hates the rich!". Hillary has no such narrative at the moment. She's relying on party mechanics and long-standing relationships to carry her along, rather than on enthusiastic voters.

xp

still not as bad as any of the republicans. even with all the drone murders and everything else.

x-post

man, the guys she faced for the Senate in NY were total tomato cans. Rick Lazio!

It seems like Hillary's big problem with voters is honesty/trustworthiness. Maybe she should try a little jujitsu along with a pivot toward the general and say something like: Look the GOP is probablygoing to nominate Trump or Cruz, either of whom will say/do anything to get elected. Either of them would eat Sanders for breakfast with demagoguery/dirty tricks. You need someone who's survived the GOP slime machine and knows how to fight fire with fire.

hi, i'm Hillary Clinton. i understand some of you don't think i'm trustworthy. but Trump/Cruz will do absolutely anything to get elected. you know they'll use every dirty trick they can think of to defeat the democrat in this election. so let be me clear: i will also use every dirty trick I can think of to defeat them, and you better believe i have more than they do. buuuuut, i'm also honest and trustworthy.

free hotdogs for everyone if i'm elected!

o.nate, do you Read The Comments much? that is a go-to rationale for many/most Clinton partisans.

have to say, yr killin it these days KM

hey, let's put those violent metaphors in the corner

haha, sadly my productivity on ilx is inverse to however i'm doing in the regular world

that crazy buzzfeed article was kind of haunting. it's amazing (1) how little i identify her with the message/theme/reason for living she's trying to articulate, to the extent i understand that message, and (2) how largely incomprehensible that message is.

speaking of violence, i took note of the NYT front page just after the Iowa caucuses:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CaRB55xWkAU6kNb.jpg

Cruz brings it (this ad is v v good imo):
https://youtu.be/onUaRyvfv1A

one of the best cruz ads I've seen, as cruz is not in it

politics ain't beanbag, but i'd bet HRC is better at beanbag.

I admit that whenever my children declare eminent domain over someone else's land, I need to give them a stern talking-to

she would have to murder a million vince fosters to be as bad as trump or whoever. i think that's a fine platform to run on. Never gonna be as bad as those losers!

― scott seward, Wednesday, February 10, 2016 9:30 PM (25 minutes ago)

tbh HRC is complicit in policies that have resulted in a pretty horrific death toll, in terms of foreign policy she's not much better than some of the republican candidates.