I will keep doing, but not worth it! The 2016 Presidential Primary Voting Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5570 of them)

you should update your prior in favour of polls and unfavour of prediction markets given that they failed to predict trump and were stable on Jeb winning until not so long ago

flopson, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

2) how many of you are still convinced that trump can't win? i admit that i'm growing more terrified by the day.

my gut says he can't beat bernie or hillary but anyone who thinks they know for sure what will happen at this pt is a fool

Mordy, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

polls too far out r p much useless tho xp

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

xpost oh, yeah, I mean, I know that, just playing games.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

prediction markets are nothing but conventional wisdom turned into numbers. especially with something like 'who's gonna win the presidency' when there's not any insider info or anything to move the markets. we're currently in a period where convention wisdom has been totally torn to shreds.

iatee, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

smug meme posting blowhards on Facebook?

well i never...

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

i love Hillary supporter's brilliant tactic of constantly insulting Bernie supporters. makes me like her even more.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

im voting bernie m8

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

prediction markets are useful to answer

1) has conventional wisdom changed?
2) what is conventional wisdom?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

ive actually voted for bernie before so plz worship me make a meme of me

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/AndrewKirell/status/703066346469400576

ulysses, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

the pundit CW was "No one like Trump has ever been nominated," and that's true. When something new happens it's called history though, which happens now and then. See also "Wall Street always comes back from a downturn..." I'm sorry I may not be around to see that one smashed to widdy biddy pieces.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

i mean flooded to rushing gushing fllortrader exploding lungs

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

the people answering those prediction market questions are answering with head not heart, which is not to say they know more than the pundit class (or even that they are different people), but that they care more about being right than they do changing things or being seen to be right.

also empirically prediction markets have done better than polls. being better than something very bad and increasingly useless is damning with faint praise though, i know.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

Trump will lose and I'm a fool.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

i love Hillary supporter's brilliant tactic of constantly insulting Bernie supporters. makes me like her even more.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, February 26, 2016 7:44 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

bernie stans 'hillary is worse than hitler Im not voting for her' tactics dont make me like him either.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 26 February 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

the supporters are bad but the candidates...the candidates are extremely good

ciderpress, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

idk if prediction markets reflect conventional wisdom exactly, if expert wisdom disagrees with conventional wisdom and an expert places a bit that changes the probabilities it becomes expert wisdom.

i donated 50 beans to bernie's campaignrevolution yet a lot of the smug memes annoy the hell outta me and tempt the smoldering neoliberal within me. i'm also cool with hilary and try to defend her against haters from the left. i actually find her kinda likable and smart-seeming in the debates

flopson, Friday, 26 February 2016 19:58 (eight years ago) link

also even if they don't fuck or whatever i find the idea of a couple where both husband and wife have commanded the most powerful nation in the world really hot

flopson, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

if you guys don't want to see smug memes maybe you shouldn't logon to Facebook

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

if you don't want to smell piss don't walk around downtown

flopson, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

if you guys don't want to see smug memes maybe you shouldn't logon to Facebook

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, February 26, 2016 3:01 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

reasonable tbh

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

i know what you mean flopson, when they deregulated banks and took food away from poor children my boner was goin'

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

the people answering those prediction market questions are answering with head not heart, which is not to say they know more than the pundit class (or even that they are different people), but that they care more about being right than they do changing things or being seen to be right.

also empirically prediction markets have done better than polls. being better than something very bad and increasingly useless is damning with faint praise though, i know.

I'm not anti-prediction markets, I think having some marker of conventional wisdom is useful, but it's important to remember that these markets are really small. like for the previous few elections there was evidence that one or two people single-handedly pushed the intrade market. I made some money off those people. in any case, it makes sense that prediction markets that can take information from tons of polls and contextualize them would outperform polls alone.

iatee, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

My only request, if it becomes clear that Trump will be elected, is that we keep building that wall higher until it's a dome covering the entire country. And then we detonate all of the nukes for the sake of the rest of the world that maybe still has a chance.

Lisa Welchel's Madcap Macrame Adventure for Windows 2000 (Old Lunch), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

the people answering those prediction market questions are answering with head not heart, which is not to say they know more than the pundit class (or even that they are different people), but that they care more about being right than they do changing things or being seen to be right

how do we know this? i mean, the actual financial markets often lack a strong connection to irl circumstances despite having a lot of data that these predictors presumably don't.

at least the presidential prediction market has an endpoint in time, i suppose

mookieproof, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

i wld actually like to see trump attempt to build his beautiful wall tbh and to make mexico pay for it

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

trump is in this mostly to build that wall/out negotiate mexico imo

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

look we all know it is ridiculous to think that mexico could be bullied into paying for it

canada otoh...

iatee, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

he just really wants to build a fantastic wall hes the best at building things

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

a good burn wld be if hillary promised to make trump secretary of building the wall and getting the money for it from mexico

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

building a wall would be a p dope public employment program tbf, def pay people to build stuff and if the money comes from mexico all the better. maybe president trump could get congress to compromise -- build the wall but at the same time liberalize immigration policy

k3vin k., Friday, 26 February 2016 20:16 (eight years ago) link

build walls against the ocean might be a good idea

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

would the wall read TRUMP on it like his skyscraper in chicago?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

i can hardly make jokes about this guy anymore, the laughter sticks in my throat. if someone kills him i'll be ready to make jokes again.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

hmmm xxp

k3vin k., Friday, 26 February 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

Trump returns to his roots in prop comedy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7kfT4xRFhk

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

building the wall and getting Canada to pay for it is part of the plot of infinite jest iirc

petulant dick master (silby), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

he really is a pure fascist the american mussolini what a bizarre dude

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

build walls against the ocean might be a good idea

― lag∞n, Friday, February 26, 2016 3:17 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ha otm

crüt, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

would the wall read TRUMP on it like his skyscraper in chicago?

http://design.newcity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/rump.jpeg

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

is there a prediction market meme

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

how do we know this? i mean, the actual financial markets often lack a strong connection to irl circumstances despite having a lot of data that these predictors presumably don't.

― mookieproof, Friday, February 26, 2016 3:09 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is fair. i guess the argument is that empirically they have worked (in the sense of doing better than pretty much anything else) for the last few years. i'm guilty of post hoc here though i know.

iatee if the market was that small then it would be less stable, not more stable (unless you think there's almost no one betting).

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

Meantime in right wing swamp fever land:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/02/breaking-christie-endorses-trump.php

I spoke with a prominent person in Washington just now—a name you’d recognize—who told me he thinks the Obama administration is behind this, with a threat to Christie that he’d be prosecuted for “Bridgegate” unless he endorsed Trump.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

compared to real markets, yeah I think there's almost no one betting.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/09/23/one-big-trader-lost-millions-betting-on-romney-study-finds

iatee, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

lmao nice xp

lag∞n, Friday, 26 February 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

now we know what Bachmann has been up to

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

i dont really get the rubio is a water bottle joke

spirited ai weiwei (Treeship), Friday, 26 February 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.