http://www.openlettersmonthly.com/issue/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dysentery.jpeg
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 29 February 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link
Seeing this was a much better way to spend 2.5 hrs than any awards show.
― WilliamC, Monday, 29 February 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link
Struggling to think of a lower bar tbh
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Monday, 29 February 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link
There are a lot of ILM threads that will meet you halfway (and a lot of ILE threads in fairness, and they're less likely to have decent music)
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 29 February 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link
Slightly higher bar: I liked it.Next rung up: it was worth the $9.50 I paid to see it.Beyond that, I'm not qualified to say.
― WilliamC, Monday, 29 February 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link
I thought it was a great movie.
― akm, Monday, 29 February 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link
Yeah, I had no problem with it, it was a great Movie. That is, big screen, spectacle, well-made, had a vision. It just didn't have anything to say, imo, which left it kind of shallow/hollow.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 29 February 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link
I thought it implied a lot about white settlement in native land
― akm, Monday, 29 February 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link
Yeah, that was there, but I didn't get anything deeper from it. That's not what the movie was "about" really, was it? it was about dogged revenge, or toughness or something vague and violent. Like I may have noted, like poor-man's Malick, with the craft and vision but minus the courage of ambiguity/mystery/natural magic or whatever.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 29 February 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link
Like a malick, u mean
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Monday, 29 February 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/xeCbQws.jpg
― gr8080, Monday, 29 February 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link
when is he playing Welles
― glumdalclitch, Monday, 29 February 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link
lol gr80 that pic...
leo was good in this and i figured he'd get the oscar. anyway mostly i'm just glad eddie redmayne didn't win. also, Josh in Chicago otm
― davey, Monday, 29 February 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link
I thought it implied a lot about white settlement in native land― akm, Monday, February 29, 2016 11:54 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― akm, Monday, February 29, 2016 11:54 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah, that's in the film, but then there's also the Arikara leader who speaks only in exposition, where like 70% of his lines are "Maybe they have Powaqa" or "If we go this way, we might find Powaqa" like his men (or the audience) are too stupid to remember their goal.
― intheblanks, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:53 (eight years ago) link
I thought the most perplexing stuff was why this hyper-realistic movie of people in the real world doing real historically stuff real-y tossed in those bits of magical realism, of floating wives and ghost kids. Worked in "Tree of Life," but not here.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 29 February 2016 23:54 (eight years ago) link
Kind of happy this didn't win last night. I enjoyed parts of it I guess, but overall it was like if Malick, Tarantino, and Herzog collaborated on a film, but decided to remove any of the mystery, wit, or weirdness of their own work.
― intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:44 (eight years ago) link
otm. Best director I can see, best picture nah.
― WilliamC, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link
Rescreening this film after reading the source novel... if you didn't like the movie than do yourself a favor and avoid the book.
― citation needed (Steve Shasta), Monday, 10 July 2023 01:45 (nine months ago) link