Come anticipate CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR with me

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (543 of them)

He's not being continually ground down by Great Responsibility, for a start.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 8 May 2016 06:44 (eight years ago) link

they just allude to it for a second and then it's quickly forgotten among all the banter about his hot Aunt May

Nhex, Sunday, 8 May 2016 06:57 (eight years ago) link

are we doing full spoilers now?

ok if not now then when is cap gonna die already? i thought his contract was up like 4 movies ago

tbh marvel should always leak false info about contracts ending, actually build some stakes

qualx, Sunday, 8 May 2016 07:45 (eight years ago) link

Xpost I meant the scene stealing Quicksilver in the X-Men movies, who is young and funny and irrelevant, vs the one in the real Marvel movies, who is not. And is dead.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 8 May 2016 11:58 (eight years ago) link

Just like Civil War itself, this was mainly Captain America: The Talkening. It never really got going, plus Zero's plan was utterly ludicrous and way more complex than it needed to be. It really only works if he always knew that PLOT SPOILERS REDACTED and if then all he needed was the film then what was all the "mission debrief" in aid of?

Airport scene was cool but felt incongruous, if Cap movies are conspiracy thrillers (see also "hey, Manchurian Candidate").

I also wasn't keen on the overly kinematic way the fights were filmed, especially early on.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 8 May 2016 12:33 (eight years ago) link

what on earth does 'kinematic' mean in that sentence

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

ok if not now then when is cap gonna die already? i thought his contract was up like 4 movies ago

at the scene in the end where he smashes the thing, i was like, hm, let me just google to see if that thing has the significance it has in the first movie it was introduced, oh, guess it does, well, that was some bathos for me

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:21 (eight years ago) link

Friggin' loved this, unsurprisingly. I don't go into these movies expecting groundbreaking cinematic works or novel takes on the narrative form but I'm always thoroughly satisfied. Marvel makes a certain type of movie and they do what they set out to do so well.

Boring reiteration of the points everyone in the world has already made: Spider-Man was spectacular, and it was such a great choice picking an actor whose voice hasn't even properly broken. The moment with Ant-Man (you know the one) was genuinely thrilling and, while I should've totally expected it, I was totally surprised. Action scenes were great and startlingly coherent throughout (cinematic fight scenes have come a loooooong way in my time). I'm pretty sure I was grinning like an idiot throughout.

The only real criticism I have is on the behalf of the casual fan inasmuch as this definitely felt like the thirteenth film in a series. As a Marvel Zombie, I love that it feels like you picked up a random issue in the middle of a years-long comic run, but I can see where the multitude of references to previous films and lack of clear resolution could be off-putting to people who just want to dip in and enjoy a Captain America movie.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

xpost Google failed you, then, because the thing Cap smashed lost its significance at the end of the third movie of the guy in possession of said thing. But I definitely saw that scene in the context of audience members who maybe hadn't seen or didn't remember said third movie and were probably like, "holy shit, did Cap actually just (REDACTED)?!?"

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:25 (eight years ago) link

You guys, GIANT-MAN

a 47-year-old chainsaw artist from South Carolina (Phil D.), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:31 (eight years ago) link

I guess we're officially doing spoilers, then.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

@thomp xpost

I'm using kinematic to means the in-close, constantly moving camera that imo distracts from the action. All the early fights leading up to that thing that happens w Scarlet Witch are particularly bad for it.

I'm sure it's a word I've seen used before, I'd guess a portmanteau of kinetic and cinematic, if not then I've invented it.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

Remove Bookmark from this Thread

jason waterfalls (gbx), Sunday, 8 May 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

You mean the Greengrass/Spielberg you're right there in the action shake-cam? Yeah, it could have been a little smoother, I guess.

I just saw this yesterday and I have no idea what any of you are talking about re: Captain America smashing something. I mean, there is a lot of smashing.

Also a lot of power-splainin' going on - "Falcon, go get your little Falcon out and use it to run recon and set a trap." "Spider-man, use your adhesive webbing and great powers of agility to stop that thing." "Scarlet Witch, is it true that your ill-defined powers allow you to move things with your mind?" That kind of thing. No real problem with it, because it's largely used in service of fun. I liked Tony Stark's self-conscious "does anyone else have any surprise new powers that can help us out of this mess?" I like that the Vision's powers are as-yet totally ill-defined here. Keeps him mysterious. That's a great example of comics people being at an advantage, because even if a newbie saw him first in Avengers and now here, I think they would still have trouble telling exactly what he is - human? robot? Spock?- and what he can do. Clearly he will become more important in the next Avengers films.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 8 May 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

Josh, we're talking about the very final instance of Cap smashing.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

box office records amirite

i do not sense the entity ted (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 8 May 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

xpost I still don't know what you mean! You mean the iconic part of that other character's costume that he crushes with his shield? What's the significance of that? Oh, I see, you're saying it's *not* significant anymore, because it serves a different purpose than it initially did. I think I get it. Though clearly said character with a shield does not kill the other character, so I'm not sure why anyone would think it significant, other than how long they linger on the twisting the knife, as it were.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 8 May 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

Josh, yes, that's the cam I mean. I'm not a fan I guess.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 8 May 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

The reactor. He smashes the reactor in Iron Man's chest.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 8 May 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

box office records amirite

― i do not sense the entity ted (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:49 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

In its US opening weekend after being open for a week overseas (so based on like eight days' receipts total), Civil War's global box office is currently just $200 million shy of Superman v Batman's lifetime gross, which I'd guess it's almost guaranteed to surpass by the time it's been open in the US for a full seven days. Such beautiful schadenfreude.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

It's already the 87th highest grossing movie of all time. Globally. After it's been open for like two days in the US.

I don't usually give that much of a shit about this stuff but they deserve the success.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

i just remembered the brief shot from the final fight of Bucky yelling 'you killed cap!' at iron man which was in one of the trailers but isn't in the movie - i guess they shot that just to fuck with freeze-framing nerds huh

i do not sense the entity ted (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 8 May 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

It's already the 87th highest grossing movie of all time. Globally. After it's been open for like two days in the US.

You, ah, you do know what globally means, right?

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

Xpost got it. Reactor used to be needed to keep Stark alive, but in this movie it's ... Just a chest reactor.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

xpost I, ah, I do know what globally means, yes. If you scroll up just a scooch you'll see the part where I acknowledge that it's been open for a week elsewhere.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

Heading in to see this now

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Sunday, 8 May 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

he's breakin his heart guys don't you get it *THE SYMBOLISM*

Nhex, Sunday, 8 May 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Reactor is just a power source for a suit of armor that also is a rocket, smartphone, life support system, etc.

I was actually slightly curious to see if the suit would still allow Stark move after it had been disabled, tbph

nintenderizer (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 8 May 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

I am in the theater now, so you guys can start posting spoilers in ten minutes when I turn off my phone

μpright mammal (mh), Sunday, 8 May 2016 22:52 (eight years ago) link

The villain is the guy from Mungo Jerry

Neanderthal, Sunday, 8 May 2016 23:31 (eight years ago) link

This movie would have been 10% better if they didn't bother with a bad guy at all and just had our heroes getting mad at each other and beating one another up. Because this bad guy was barely even there. I wasn't even sure if he was a villain from the books? Because he's not the villain of the same name from the comics, right, just some Euro shlub with a grudge?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 8 May 2016 23:47 (eight years ago) link

Daniel Brühl is one hell of a soporific screen presence.

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 9 May 2016 00:02 (eight years ago) link

i saw some idiot alleged-adult on the subway w/ a CaptAm shield/backpack and wanted to hulksmash

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 9 May 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link

Airport scene was cool but felt incongruous, if Cap movies are conspiracy thrillers (see also "hey, Manchurian Candidate").

Only Winter Soldier had aspects of conspiracy thriller. The first CA flick was Joe Johnston finally getting to do a proper WWII-action-with-some-dieselpunk flick that he attemped to do with the Rocketeer.

I enjoyed this a lot. Not sure if it tops CA:WS overall, but I read something a coupla days that I agree with: that the airport sequence was when they really did finally pull off everything that a grand superhero comic book film should be.

Interesting that you deliberately have this film coming out so close after BvS and the contrast between two different views of collateral damage.

Zemo in the comics looks like this:

http://images-cdn.moviepilot.com/images/c_fill,h_540,w_960/t_mp_quality/igodeuuz5oapfau1imjf/could-baron-helmut-zemo-become-marvel-s-smartest-movie-villain-655834.jpg

and we seriously didn't need him in this flick.

Also, we live in a time where the majority of trailers in front of a tentpole superhero films are other superhero films(and Rogue One, in my screening, which was fun to see projected that big. Those klaxons sound GREAT on a theater's sound system).

Most surprising aspect of this film was that there were still great moments not spoilered by trailers or advance hype.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Monday, 9 May 2016 00:15 (eight years ago) link

I love that the 'punch you in your perfect teeth' line that was so RMDE-worthy in the trailers is totally recontextualized as a friendly jab in the movie and works just fine.

Peanut Duck (Old Lunch), Monday, 9 May 2016 00:34 (eight years ago) link

I love that the 'punch you in your perfect teeth' line that was so RMDE-worthy in the trailers is totally recontextualized as a friendly jab in the movie and works just fine.

totally. I didn't love this as much as I thought I might - the setup felt a bit forced and the preposterous appearance of some ~incriminating footage~ kinda dulled the edge of what should have been a big moment, but scene by scene it was great. spidey was both hilarious and unexpectedly profound. "can you move your seat up" and attendant schtick a total delight.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Monday, 9 May 2016 01:14 (eight years ago) link

yeah one of the best recurring jokes is def the relationship between Bucky and Falcon, like two jealous little bros/BFs

Nhex, Monday, 9 May 2016 01:25 (eight years ago) link

I really liked this

Set-up felt a little dull-draggy but mostly bcz I'm like a 5 year old I WANNA SEE IRON MAN & CAP FLY AROUND AND PUNCH EACH OTHER

Black Panther, Giant Man, Spidey all A+ ... and I got kinda teary towards the end. Daniel Bruhl great, needed more imo

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 9 May 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

Yeah hopefully Zemo'll be developed. Nice to have an antagonist survive the movie, tho. Also, thanks to the casting of someone young and dorky I actually liked this Spiderman.

albvivertine, Monday, 9 May 2016 02:01 (eight years ago) link

Black Panther the only one who abides by a moral high ground was great

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 9 May 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

Yea he was great

Neanderthal, Monday, 9 May 2016 02:27 (eight years ago) link

I really appreciated that no one clapped for the Stan Lee cameo. enough already.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Monday, 9 May 2016 05:59 (eight years ago) link

i can't be sore at those. i mean, how much longer can that guy possibly live?
plus "Tony Stank"

Nhex, Monday, 9 May 2016 07:07 (eight years ago) link

I don't have a lot of respect for him but I kinda like his cameos, esp this one

albvivertine, Monday, 9 May 2016 07:21 (eight years ago) link

his best cameo is ant-man, b/c it's a split second and that's about all it needs; no point in dragging it out.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 9 May 2016 08:09 (eight years ago) link

the preposterous appearance of some ~incriminating footage~ kinda dulled the edge of what should have been a big moment

I thought this was great, the slow burn of what happened back in 1991, what could possibly be so important, and then when it appears it's what flips the switch from "We have become grudging allies because I, maverick millionaire Tony Stark, have fucked up yet again" to "I am going to take your head off".

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 9 May 2016 11:03 (eight years ago) link

pretty much the only plot element in the movie to make me sympathetic to Tony

btw how damn weird is that youngening tech they used in Ant-Man and this, like crazy uncanny valley stuff, but it's actually working? it helps that they have plenty of film reference for both Douglas and Downey but still kinda surreal

Nhex, Monday, 9 May 2016 12:01 (eight years ago) link

That was the "uncanny valley moment" I referred to upthread -- at first I was like, "OK, this is weird and kind of unreal, we all know what RDJ looked like in 1991 and this looks like an RDJ Realdoll or something." Then it's revealed as some kind of sophisticated VR/hologram thing that Tony Stank is demo-ing for MIT students and was like, "Oh, well that makes sense then."

I can't believe Roger Slattery and Hope Davis are the same age. He must have gone gray Steve Martin-style.

a 47-year-old chainsaw artist from South Carolina (Phil D.), Monday, 9 May 2016 12:25 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.