looks like they avoided V completely in favour of Brittan?!
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:35 (seven years ago) link
http://images.usatoday.com/sports/_photos/2006/07/22/dombrowski.jpg
― mookieproof, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:08 (seven years ago) link
Verlander 2nd (more 1st-place votes), Kluber third. Sounds like an obvious case of old-stat guy edging out sabermetric vote-splitting.
depends on which metrics you're using. by fangraph WAR, which leans more heavily on FIP to reward what "should" have happened given things completely within the pitcher's control (Ks, walks, HRs), porcello was actually tied with verlander and sale for the AL lead in WAR (5.2). by baseball-reference WAR, which leans more heavily on the actual results on the field, porcello was 5th with 5.0 bWAR, far behind verlander (6.4) and kluber (6.2).
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:32 (seven years ago) link
You're right, not the clear split I thought.
Rick Porcello, Red Sox (1st-8, 2nd-18, 3rd-2, 4th-1, 5th-1; 137 points)Jason Verlander, Tigers (1st-14, 2nd-2, 3rd-5, 4th-4, 5th-3; 132 points)Corey Kluber, Indians (1st-3, 2nd-6, 3rd-12, 4th-8, 5th-1; 98 points)Zach Britton, Orioles (1st-5, 2nd-3, 3rd-2, 4th-5, 5th-9; 72 points)
(Has a winner ever had six fewer 1st-place votes than the runner-up?)
Eighteen of the 22 people who didn't put Porcello first had him second. That means that of the 17 first-place votes for Verlander and Kluber, at least 13 of them put Porcello second over whichever of Verlander or Kluber they didn't vote for, and theoretically all 17 could have done that.
That's weird. I would have guessed all 17 Verlander/Kluber 1st-place ballots would have had Kluber/Verlander 2nd.
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:33 (seven years ago) link
rWAR otm
― mookieproof, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:34 (seven years ago) link
You weren't kidding about Kate Upton...
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:48 (seven years ago) link
@ScottLauberPorcello on reax of Verlander bro, fiancee Kate Upton: "I honestly don't care." Eager to resume drinking "some really good bottles of wine"
― Andy K, Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:09 (seven years ago) link
same
― mookieproof, Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:23 (seven years ago) link
no one deserved it this year tbh
― k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:34 (seven years ago) link
I thought any one of the top 3 would be a fine Cy Young winner in a normal year. Those season's like Verlander's MVP, or Kershaw's, or last year's NL top 3, those are still the exception, no?
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link
Stunned at JV's difference between rWAR and fWAR ( I'm more inclined to follow fWAR if only because the website is easier to use, ahem)
― Van Horn Street, Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link
even this year in the NL there are at least 4 or 5 guys who would easily be the top pitcher in the AL if they switched leagues xp
― k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:46 (seven years ago) link
xxpost Kluber's 2014 season was one of the best this decade, if not the best in the AL. Felix was considered to be not too far behind. Even last year you had four better fWAR performances better than the 2016's leader this year (Porcello) so yeah, in the AL, it has been 'less deserving' (I blame Price and Sale).
― Van Horn Street, Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link
Verlander and Kluber led both leagues in bWAR (although, yes, 7 of the next 8 were from the NL).
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2016-pitching-leaders.shtml
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:56 (seven years ago) link
ah, yeah i tend to use fWAR for pitching, it's much more intuitive for me
― k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link
I like the idea of combining them--I can see the arguments for both--which gives you these guys over 10.0:
1. Fernandez - 12.5
2. Verlander - 11.8 / Scherzer - 11.8 / Syndergaard - 11.8
5. Kluber - 11.6
6. Cueto - 11.1
7. Porcello - 10.2
8. Sale - 10.1
9. Tanaka - 10.0
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link
You can add Kershaw at #2 (12.1) - he wasn't on one of the leaders lists because of IP, so I missed him.
― clemenza, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link
Rick Porcello, Red Sox (1st-8, 2nd-18, 3rd-2, 4th-1, 5th-1; 137 points)Jason Verlander, Tigers (1st-14, 2nd-2, 3rd-5, 4th-4, 5th-3; 132 points)
Yeah, I can't recall such a strange result. I think one-third of the voters had written off Verlander as a top pitcher after two sub par years (and not a great first half in 2016) and didn't even notice that he was having a great year.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link
maybe they thought he was going to get enough votes with others and wanted to throw some love to their pet-favs?
either way, Kate Upton losing her shit on twitter has been a sight to behold.
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link
Kluber seemed to be the favorite down the stretch.
― earlnash, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link
disappointed that kate upton didn't start ranting about xFIP and curveball RPM etc
― mookieproof, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link
great that ppl have never given less of a shit about these than now
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link
No vote-splitting--Trout cleaned up.
― clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link
woo-hoo!
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iUahRdeHJTdPyI3qPU_k4_53i0zgYlVENVV_He7_a14/pubhtml#
one guy put cabrera in front of trout, for old time's sake
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link
good job john hickey
― mookieproof, Friday, 18 November 2016 00:35 (seven years ago) link
i'm startled
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link
Was a little surprised there weren't any Red Sox after Betts and Ortiz to show up down-ballot--Pedroia, at least.
― clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link
Top four AL MVP matched the top four bWAR finishers, and the vote spread also looks similar to the bWAR spread.
― clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link
Ortiz with a 1st place vote :|
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 18 November 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link
@DetroitTigersPRPer @EliasSports, Cabrera is the 4th player to receive a MVP vote in 14 straight seasons, joining Hank Aaron, Yogi Berra and Barry Bonds.
― mookieproof, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link
that's odd, because he's only played 14 seasons. so he received a MVP vote for his 2003 rookie season (87 games played, .268/.325/.468, 106 wRC+)?
― Karl Malone, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link
he's amazing, though. if his defense wasn't awful he would have had a better chance of catching up with Pujols, at least by fWAR. even now, he might have a chance. he trails him by 23 right now (68 to 91), but it's not hard to imagine a scenario where pujols five more years (!!!!?!?!?) of -1.0 to 1.0 level seasons while cabrera cranks out another handful of 3-4 WAR seasons.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link
taking sides: Ryan Howard in 2015-16 or your idea of how Pujols will be doing in 2020-21
― Karl Malone, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link
he got one 8th place vote for some reason
― qualx, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link
If Trout were to win the MVP unanimously next year, he'd be tied with Schmidt for 11th on the all-time MVP-share list; a unanimous Cy Young for Kershaw would move him to third on the Cy list.
― clemenza, Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link
BP podcast pointed out that this pool of 30 writers on this award was relatively analytics- and Trout-friendly
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link
Conceding James has a heavy bias here, I think this is an excellent breakdown of why Verlander's big bWAR advantage over Porcello is illusory.
http://www.billjamesonline.com/porlander_and_vercello/
― clemenza, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:13 (seven years ago) link
sean forman's response (to pos, not james): https://twitter.com/sean_forman/status/800775742724325376
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link
So James is saying Verlander would have given up just as many hits on balls in play even with a great defense behind him? If that's true, what does it mean to say that the Tigers were 50 runs worse than average on defense? It means they should have given up more hits than the average defense, which translates into more runs, unless they so happened to be not as bad when Verlander pitched. I think this is Forman's point ...?
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link
more on various WARs: http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/18114272/miller-going-war-mystery-robbie-ray
― mookieproof, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link
that's a fantastic article
― k3vin k., Friday, 25 November 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link
yes
― mookieproof, Saturday, 26 November 2016 04:52 (seven years ago) link
Rick Porcello, Anthony Rendon Win 2016 MLB Comeback Player of the Year Awards
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link