Bringing back the dead: de-extinction, should we bring back extinct animals?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (59 of them)

http://www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2075122016/2069586825/gr3.jpg

jmm, Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

That's from the scientific paper. There are more images there. http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)31193-9

jmm, Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

so beautiful

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

"primitive plumage" is a great name

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

where is the love for the 99-million-yr-old ant entombed alongside the feather

mark s, Thursday, 8 December 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

the paper is full of so much great stuff

intermediate between stages IIIa (rachis with naked barbs) and IIIb (barbs with barbules, lacking a rachis), but it does not exactly fit stage IIIa+b (rachis with barbs bearing barbules)

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

Fantastic!

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 8 December 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

I just read that out to my husband forgetting he is extremely well-versed in rachises and barbules and reticulating splines and he was like 'well yeah, of course'

kinder, Thursday, 8 December 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

long, naked, filamentous barbs

jmm, Thursday, 8 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

I feel sorry for the Burmese traders.

jmm, Friday, 9 December 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.