Anticipate LA LA LAND, the musical starring Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (183 of them)

their work superseding their relationship ... hardly enough to necessitate that ending or give it any resonance

it was this, it was enough to give it resonance (for me) ymmv. it was a good ending imo

flopson, Sunday, 16 April 2017 00:24 (seven years ago) link

SPOILEr, but there's kinda the same ending in Chazelle's first film. He likes that whole theme of what artists has to sacrifice. This time it seemed as something only Hollywood would find tragic: They get everything, fame, money, jazz bars, spouses, kids, they just don't get each other. Boo hoo. The really stupid thing is that it's modeled on Umbrellas of Cherbourg, where the melancholy comes from the Algerian War interfering. Not exactly the same.

Frederik B, Sunday, 16 April 2017 00:38 (seven years ago) link

Have you seen the film, darragh?

― Frederik B, Sunday, 16 April 2017 00:08 (forty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yep

It was good.

Thought the ending worked

Other endings would also have worked.

Not sure it can bear too much weight tho tbph

virginity simple (darraghmac), Sunday, 16 April 2017 00:51 (seven years ago) link

ya Mordy + Fred both overthinking it. it came as a surprise, but was emotionally v effective

flopson, Sunday, 16 April 2017 01:05 (seven years ago) link

Liked this so much I had to pause it and make popcorn.

I felt the ending was saying something like you can't have cake and eat it but you can always love the idea of cake and feast on the memory whenever you experience hollywood magic (or jazz?).

The opening number is so stupendous that I wish they'd somehow managed to end the film there. But I suppose a smile passing each other on the freeway would have been a bit impersonal.

Finally, the lighting was like an exact cross between Wong Kar-wai and the original Star Trek series.

Spencer Chow, Saturday, 22 April 2017 15:49 (seven years ago) link

one year passes...

I checked the DVD out of the public library and my wife and I watched it last night. I see most ilxors were pretty tepid about this one and I agree. Gosling and Stone were barely able to dance or sing at an acceptable level, let alone rise to the sort of magnetism of Astaire and Rogers. Other than Gosling being handsome, there was zero reason why Stone would have been attracted to him in the first place; he was an asshole. The tired theme of "fulfilling your dreams" was so exhausted in this as to be moribund.

otoh, it gave employment to a lot of dancers in the big production numbers. The candy-colored costumes, set design and cinematography were sort of fun, in a Disney kind of way. But its use of music was blandly safe and colorless, and no human motions were harmed in the making of this movie, because they were touched so lightly one never even noticed them.

Gosling and Stone did what they could with weak material. The script was at the heart of all the problems and Damien Chazelle's superficiality was all over the script.

A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 30 December 2018 20:05 (five years ago) link

er, human eee-motions

A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 30 December 2018 20:23 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.