― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 October 2006 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 13 October 2006 15:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:09 (seventeen years ago) link
So, you're Tony La Russa and it's the sixth inning of a scoreless NLCS opener. At this point in time, you've got:
1) a faltering if not tiring starter nearing the 100-pitch mark and working on a scoreless string that probably adds up to the number of zeroes he put up during his entire Anaheim tenure
1a) Jeff Weaver, a guy who ends up yelling into his glove a lot as he turns around to admire the flight path of a projectile he helped launch
2) two lefties in the bullpen, rookie Tyler Johnson and veteran Randy Flores
3) Dos Carloses--Beltran and Delgado--next in the batting order, both with major platoon splits that say BRING IN THE SOUTHPAW (Beltran .247/.352/.482, a 220-point difference in OPS; Delgado .226/.311/.440, a 244-point difference)
4) Oh, and this: Beltran has a career SLG of .619 against Weaver in 42 at-bats, while Delgado has hit .500/.620/.974 off of him in 38 at-bats.
This isn't a three-alarm fire yet, but rest assured, if you don't pick up the phone, it may well be. The sample sizes are small, particularly the one that tells you that your two lefties have held the sluggers to a combined 1-for-8 with a walk in their careers. In the big picture of his career, Beltran's platoon difference disappears. Delgado's, however, is very real. In short, just about every piece of matchup data you have favors making this move.
Now, you being Tony La Russa, you figure that you'll get to do the same thing again, probably in the eighth inning, with whichever reliever you don't tap here. You made your name and fame as a manager pursuing exactly these kinds of matchups, and while the result--12-man staffs and endless commercial breaks for those four-pitcher innings--isn't pretty, you've reached the postseason so many times you now have to use your toes to count.
Seems like an easy decision, right? I pointed it out as something to watch for in my NLCS preview.
Except you're Tony La Russa, and you let Beltran jack it out of the park against Weaver for a 2-0 lead, and then after an emphatic double surrendered to Delgado and an intentional walk to David Wright, you finally bring in your first lefty, Johnson, to face Endy Chavez, a guy with a reverse platoon split the last two years...
Now, neither Johnson or Flores is anyone's idea of a championship caliber lefty one-out guy (or LOOGY, as coined by John Sickels). However, unlike your righty setup men--Looper, Brad Thompson, and Josh Hancock--they both average about a strikeout per inning, which offers some hint of their abilities. Based on WXRL, Flores is your third-best reliever on the roster now that Jason Isringhausen's season is toast, and frankly, your bullpen is so thin that the thought of hauling Sidney Ponson off of the nearest barstool for the purposes of ballast has probably crossed your mind. If there's a reason you're even bothering to carry these two lefties on the roster, it's to face the key hitters, right?
Tony La Russa, Genius.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― mattbot (mattbot), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 13 October 2006 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=260822121
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 October 2006 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 13 October 2006 21:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― mattbot (mattbot), Friday, 13 October 2006 21:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 13 October 2006 21:32 (seventeen years ago) link
4-4 in the third.
― boldbury (boldbury), Saturday, 14 October 2006 00:05 (seventeen years ago) link
Pujols, whose repeated comments that Glavine "wasn't good" bothered Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, did not back down when the words were repeated to him Friday.
"Is that what I said?" Pujols said before Game 2. "OK, then. Keep that one.
"You guys," he added, "already wrote what you were going to say."
Minutes earlier, La Russa had vented to two reporters about how he thought the treatment of Pujols' comments in local newspapers was unfair. Following the game, Pujols said about Glavine, "He wasn't good. He wasn't good at all." "You get a guy who's a hot competitor as soon as it's over, he's not happy about losing," La Russa said. "So he makes a statement. It's not a good statement. Glavine deserves credit. Now it gets blown up like he's some sort of disrespectful pro."
La Russa had a simple solution.
"The answer is, that player does not talk," La Russa said. "And he'll never get embarrassed, right? And they'll complain, say, ‘Oh, he won't talk to the press.' Somebody takes the guy right after the competition. They're very vulnerable to saying something."
Asked whether Pujols should have known better than to demean Glavine, La Russa shouted at a pair of reporters.
"No," he said. "You guys should know better than to make a big issue out of it. This guy is a great pro. That's what the answer is. Use common sense."
Pujols, coming off his sixth season, won the NL MVP award last season and could win it again this year. With a flyout in his first at-bat of Game 2, though, he is 0 for his last 11 in the playoffs, adding another struggling player to a Cardinals' lineup full of them.
― gear (gear), Saturday, 14 October 2006 00:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 14 October 2006 02:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Saturday, 14 October 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 14 October 2006 02:49 (seventeen years ago) link
Crap baseball-refence doesn't give PS HRs or BSs.
― boldbury (boldbury), Saturday, 14 October 2006 03:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 14 October 2006 03:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― maura (maura), Saturday, 14 October 2006 05:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 14 October 2006 08:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Monday, 16 October 2006 23:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 16 October 2006 23:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 16 October 2006 23:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 16 October 2006 23:53 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 16 October 2006 23:55 (seventeen years ago) link
I kept dozing off during the fourth game.
― Andy_K (Andy_K), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 00:18 (seventeen years ago) link
FUK YU
― fergie-ferg meluvulongtime~~~ (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 04:01 (seventeen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 05:24 (seventeen years ago) link
Also, last row of the section = wind blowing directly on you for 5 hours.
Nice touch: Psycho theme on PA when LaRussa comes out to mound.
I don't wanna see Trachsel throw another pitch.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 13:48 (seventeen years ago) link
this is really funny though (mainly because he was a Yankees fan)
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 13:56 (seventeen years ago) link
= I DON'T LIKE WHITES AND LATINOS.
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 14:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 14:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 15:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― ▒█▄█ ▄▄▄ ▒█▄█ , Tuesday, 17 October 2006 19:29 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 23:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 01:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 02:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 02:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 03:01 (seventeen years ago) link
i guess on the plus side there's a chance for the Cards to get swept three years in a row. 12 consecutive WS game losses has to be some kind of record, if 8 isn't already.
― ▒█▄█ ▄▄▄ ▒█▄█ , Wednesday, 18 October 2006 03:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 03:13 (seventeen years ago) link
To be fair, Weaver has been a much better pitcher in the last few weeks, not just against the Mets.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 05:01 (seventeen years ago) link
tigers/mets series would have been so good.
This shit ain't ovah, you ninnies! Carpenter didn't exactly stump them on Friday.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 12:23 (seventeen years ago) link