Explain Nas' Illmatic To Me

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (565 of them)
On the other hand i was probably a bit frustrated and came off bad when I replied to Sam.

I like Hua's essay lots but it sorta misses the "uplift" side that ppl get from him which was there well before "I Can" and also I'm a bit skittish about the teleology reading Illmatic as a prophecy of future downfall or something. Something in nas' "there-i-said-it delivery" (great line) implies to some people at least, some sort of spiritual redemption in itself -- not quite the seamless valorization of a fall from grace. I've been listening to Illmatic less than ever, really and don't even think I've unpacked it after my move this summer. But I thought of Nas recently when I thought of the trying-too-hard-teen-poetry quality of the Pac verses on the Biggie duet.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:14 (twenty years ago) link

"whole reactionary, tired dullness of it."

Explain what is reactionary, tired and dull about Illmatic. Other than the fact that there is a consensus of opinion about it, which obviously bothers you.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:23 (twenty years ago) link

okay, it's mostly the consensus of opinion that's reactionary. but-- you've heard it before, right?--it's a dull album. it's a boring early-90s hip-hop record with boring hip-hop beats and a pretty uncharismatic, low energy rapper on it. from things other people have said about it, i'm not the only one that thinks that way look at top of the thread, even.

it's still a great album and i love nas.

cloverlandthug, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:42 (twenty years ago) link

o-w: nastradamus isn't one of my favorite albums ever or anything but the best stuff is as good as the best stuff on illmatic. lyrically, i mean. 'life we chose,' the first and last verses on 'project windows,' the closing verse on 'last words,' kicking that story on 'shoot em up,' so many good verses on it. in most categories, i'd probably put illmatic over it but, lyrically, nastradamus nas embarrasses illmatic nas.

cloverlandthug, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:44 (twenty years ago) link

it's a dull album. it's a boring early-90s hip-hop record with boring hip-hop beats and a pretty uncharismatic, low energy rapper on it. from things other people have said about it, i'm not the only one that thinks that way look at top of the thread, even.

it's still a great album and i love nas.

It's great but it's dull? Say what?

And how are you drawing on the consensus dissenting opinion in your critcism of the "reactionary" consensus? I'm confused.

ben welsh (benwelsh), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

So why is the consensus of opinion "reactionary"?

I like Illmatic very much. I also like early 90s hip-hop production style. I like old funk and soul music, and I like when producers sample it.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

"Mike Skinner seems poised to to an oddly similar thing, except he has a way better sense of humor and lyrical touch."

Dear fucking GOD. Kill me now. I don't want to live on the same earth as someone who can say this without feeling physically ill.

e-factor, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

I also love early-mid 90s production style. Pete Rock, Large Professor, DJ Primier, etc. What's not to like?

ben welsh (benwelsh), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:56 (twenty years ago) link

i'm not very good at explaining these things. the consensus of opinion is reactionary because, like, people are sort of prizing or whatever certain things about it. like, it's good because it's got, like, that good early-90s sound before rap everyone was wearing shiny suits. it's authentic and sticks to the script and people like that and say that that's what they like about it. and they don't like the albums that came after, which i think are better, but people don't like because he hired timbaland and got ginuwine on his songs. do you understand?

the hua hsu thing is the differentest thing i've ever seen written about it and most of the stuff he likes about it is all over the other albums, too.

cloverlandthug, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 21:59 (twenty years ago) link

in retrospect skinner is a footnote. but then dizzee probably will be one too. skinner had the sound but there was nothing to be a refoundationalist *from*.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:11 (twenty years ago) link

I guess I just don't really see people saying those things about it. Obviously it is very highly rated, but I've never read anyone using it as a stick to beat shiny suits with. Perhaps you can give me some examples. Why is it reactionary to prize certain qualities?

I have read people saying that he never did anything as good as Illmatic, and that he went in a different direction musically because he wanted to sell more records. Is that what you mean?

I notice you're arguing that his lyrics got better. I haven't listened closely enough to tell. But what about the music? Did that get better? I don't think so, personally.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:13 (twenty years ago) link

Dude, all I can say is if the first time you heard Illmatic was last year, i can't imagine that you'd have the perspective to honestly think you could come on here and tell people who've been listening to it since it was released that its a wack album.
I don't like it cuz its canonized, or because its "real"er than shiny suits, I like it because it makes me euphoric to listen to it.

djdee2005, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:18 (twenty years ago) link

where did i say the first time i heard illmatic was last year? i'd been confused by what people saw in it for a long time. also i never said it was wack, only that i didn't "get" it and i wanted someone to help me see what THEY saw in it. and cloverland obviously knows more about Nas' catalog than plenty of people.

anyway what the fuck is "perspective" worth? this is mark s' point about how rockism fails on its OWN terms. If you value long-term critical perspective then you can't retreat to rad-subjective "i like it coz it makes me feel happy" simultaneously & what does it say that yr. leaping to assumptions about who heard what when anyway?

why does it make you feel euphoric? which lines do? what do they remind you of, how is the delivery especially effective? is it a euphoria like sniffing ether or like drinking red wine or like getting a backrub? what are you afraid of?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:25 (twenty years ago) link

I see the limits of rockist-critique because my apprecation and enjoyment for the album has grown the more hip hop I've heard. Because there are so few hip hop albums that approach the level of production and perfection in each track that I hear. Because I have yet to hear a rapper that makes me feel the way Nas does when I listen to him.

Besides what everyone else has said, the beats make me happy. I love the sound of the production, the way it all comes together. I love how Nas voice sounds, I love the lyrics because I can envision virtually everything he says, I love it because of its cinematic imagery, the darkness present in it, and I enjoy it because it is exquisite music. Frankly, I think the burden is on YOU to provide reasoning for why you hate it beyond this bizarre "I find it boring" argument.

It seems like you are just trying to be provacative here...I just plain enjoy listening to the album on its own terms. It is one of the few albums that I listen to with ANY regularity - the others being Organized Konfusion's "Stress" and Biggie's "Ready To Die" and Mingus' "Black Saint" and "Mingus x5" and Miles Davis' "Porgy and Bess" and "Astral Weeks" by V Morrison...I just plain LOVE listening to it; its as near to perfection as any music I have ever heard.

djdee2005, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:33 (twenty years ago) link

So... what does "rockism" have to do with it? I don't follow.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:44 (twenty years ago) link

He's discrediting my argument that because I've been listening to the album longer I would have a better perspective on it...I don't think its quite that black and white tho.

djdee2005, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:47 (twenty years ago) link

I'm pretty happy with what I said on this thread.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:51 (twenty years ago) link

We really should to a streets in retrospective discussion in maybe a coupla years. (or is skinner gonna make a comeback!?)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:52 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah new single out in a month or two.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:57 (twenty years ago) link

I have no idea why having a long perspective would be called "rockism."

I didn't buy your argument either tho. Not because I don't think opinions formed over a period of time aren't likely to be more accurate and insightful--they are. But you have to back it up with some concrete detailed examples (which are notably absent from cloverlandthug's posts too).

So Skinner is over now? How quickly the hipsters move on.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:59 (twenty years ago) link

PS Since the long-term critical perspective in question was djdee2005's own, it's not at all contradictory for him to also talk about his subjective experience of the album.

Slow day at work today...

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:02 (twenty years ago) link

I'm selling an argument? (skinner might not be over, but its gonna be real weird for him re-entering this totally changed garage-rap/grime context)

(ps there are no grounds on which to argue for a standpoint of "informed subjectivity" -- hell, maybe he listened to too much rap and it made him cynical and burnt out!)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:04 (twenty years ago) link

I guess... Skinner's first album never sounded to me like it was part of the "garage rap" context in the first place, so I don't think that should be a problem.

ps there are no grounds on which to argue for a standpoint of "informed subjectivity"

I have no idea what this means.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:07 (twenty years ago) link

it was part of the *old* garage rap context! it almost invented parts of it!

re: grounds, the point is that there's no basis to argue that "informed" euphoria is any more valid than "uninformed" euphoria. if you want to argue about "quality" then you need other criteria than "my subjectivity is better than yours".

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:10 (twenty years ago) link

I don't think Skinner's remotely over though I'd be surprised if his next album defines my year the way OPM did 2002 for me.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:14 (twenty years ago) link

Oh. Well, no, there are no objective guarantees. And what would we need them for with art, anyway?

As long as people are still arguing about Illmatic, it holds its place in the quote-unquote canon.

If people start arguing about all the other albums, they might displace it.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:15 (twenty years ago) link

And to my ears the old garage rap context was So Solid, etc., and Skinner sounded nothing like them, and the new one is Dizzee, etc., and they sound nothing like him. Obviously there's some connection, but I think he stands off to the side a bit.

just saying, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:20 (twenty years ago) link

I don't see why concrete examples are necessary...other people have provided them throughout the thread, and if you wanted me to I could describe specific examples of Nas lyrics or Whats So Cool About the Production but people have done that throughout the thread and dude's response was entirely "I don't see it. Its just boring."

Perhaps instead of asking us to defend Illmatic, he needs to better think out his argument against it other than "its just boring."

djdee2005, Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

btw, wtf is with the Streets comparisons? I see very little similarity (and frankly I enjoyed the Streets album but it has failed to move me the same way Illmatic has.)

What exactly do you mean by "objective" criticism? You mean like Explain Why The Album Is Important? Cuz I can do that too. But ultimately the reason I like it is just because I find it more enjoyable than 99% of albums.

djdee2005, Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:29 (twenty years ago) link

Why should he? If he doesn't like it, he doesn't. So what?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:29 (twenty years ago) link

He's the one that made the damn thread!

djdee2005, Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:32 (twenty years ago) link

See: Oliver Wang's first post in this thread.

djdee2005, Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago) link

clovelandthug /= Sterling Clover.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago) link

djdee is OTM, methinks

sym (shmuel), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:36 (twenty years ago) link

clovelandthug /= Sterling Clover.

I am aware...I'm talking about Sterling. As was OWang.

djdee2005, Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:39 (twenty years ago) link

Sterling seems to be saying a lot more than this album is just boring (so is d k, actually.) to me. He wrote quite a lot of stuff about the record at the top. I happen to think asking everyone else to explain what's so great about it and then ARGUING with them about it is kind of weird, but to say he hasn't provided any reasons for "not getting" the record is disingenous. It's there, you're just ignoring it.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:43 (twenty years ago) link

but at some point these arguments just become "well it makes me happy". Formal analysis, such as it was, seems to have been tried, and failed to convince anyone.

sym (shmuel), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:50 (twenty years ago) link

Like, this line moves me:
I need a new nigga, for this black cloud to follow
Cause while it's over me it's too dark to see tomorrow

If you don't find it moving, whatever.

Ben Williams' rundown is about as good of an 'objective' explanation as Sterling is gonna get:a) The lyrics. He introduced a new level of realism (exaggerated or not) to hip-hop. You already mentioned that a while back. "A feeling like 'he's taking it to what hip-hop was about at the start' except of course he's taking it someplace new" is exactly it.
b) The flow. Really, his rhymes are very tightly coiled. You could strip the beats away and still hear the rhythms.
c) The voice. He projects authority (also, to me, one of the reasons why Rakim was great) and he enunciates very clearly. Every word is hard and direct.
d) Production. It doesn't hurt to have a great setting to shine in. All the "great MCs" have had that, I think.

sym (shmuel), Thursday, 29 January 2004 00:53 (twenty years ago) link

Cloverthug's right about one thing - Illmatic has been held up as an example or foil for why rap post-96 sucked (in people's opinions). In that respect, I understand why he thinks the consensus around the album might also be potentially reactionary though I don't think he can make thar argument based on the opinions expressed on this thread. No one's bashing on shiny suits here - maybe you're thinking of Okayplayer.com?

I respect that Clover thinks that Nas got better with age. I personally don't concur. "Illmatic" was, in my book, Nas' finest moment and if saying that makes me seen like the nostalgia new schooler ala "The Big Chill(in)" so be it. To me, Nas wasn't happy with respect, he wanted to sell more records and "It Was Written" was a calculated attempt at pushing himself towards a crossover audience that resulted in some very bad songs being made, "If I Ruled the World" being a stand-out in my book, though really, it's the production that really fell the fuck off.

As someone who enjoyed listening to Pete Rock, DJ Premier and Large Professor in their prime, "Illmatic" was the best of all possible worlds - once the Trackmasterz took over circa "It was Written", Nas' beats ceased to be that compelling. Their tracks sounded listless and generic - Nas didn't "own" them the way he owned something like "NY State of Mind" or "One Love" (despite the fact that other rappers have used the same Heath Bros. sample as Q-Tip did for "One Love"). I don't remember what "Street Dreams" sounded like and unfortunately, I do remember what "If I ruled the World" sounded like, though I wish I had a memory erase function for that particular song.

This isn't an authenticity issue. Rappers sell out all the time but the better ones do it in style. In my book, Nas doesn't rank with those guys (example: "LIfe After Death" was a calculated, crossover album too but Biggie still pulled some insane hits off that LP - "Hypnotize," "Ten Crack Commandments," "Kick in the Door," "Mo Money, Mo Problems," et. al. Apart from "God's Son", which I thought showed a lot more thought and focus that Nas' previous LPs, he can't really boast of having hit the same balance as Biggie and especially Jay-Z have shown.

Oliver Wang (Oliver Wang), Thursday, 29 January 2004 02:22 (twenty years ago) link


i only heard illmatic for the first time within the last year,and i'd count it as one of the best hip hop albums i've heard so far,only 36 chambers,ready to die,doggystyle and the blueprint can compare as far as i'm concerned (possibly one or two of the wu tang solo albums as well)

this thread has made me think a lot about why i like it so much,so i may as well explain my reasons...

first of all,i really love the production...
this might be a debate for another thread,but i always find it weird when people refer to boring mid nineties premier beats,or whatever...
i mean,obviously hip hop production has moved on,but i don't see how that makes a difference...
the fact that i love mingus doesn't make ellington sound "played out" or whatever...
similarly,timbaland may have moved things on a lot,but i still hear stuff the rza did ten years ago that actually astounds me (recent example (for me)-the strings on that my man is going insane song off only built 4 cuban lynx fucking freaked me out,i was out for a joint before bed and it really sounded amazing,even after listening to a lot of other wu tang)

premier is no different,some his production on illmatic (and the stuff by other producers,whose names i dont know off hand) is amazing,the menacing bassline on new york state of mind,for example

maybe its just cause i live in ireland where hip hop culture is a lot less pervasive and i grew up listening to guitar music and only got into hip hop recently enough,but i dont think so...

i mean,i'm sure there are people who don't think,say,mcs act like they dont know is chunky as fuck,but in general if you're into hip hop i don't see how you can dismiss that type of production out of hand,and there are some excellent examples of it on illmatic...


as for nas himself,i can't figure out why i enjoy listening to him rap so much...i mean,he's not someone whose charisma and wit carries them through,like jay z,or someone who commands attention through sheer vocal presence and character like biggie,although he does have those attributes to a lesser extent...

whatever the technical judgement of it,the first verse of ny state of mind is like two and half minutes of relentless flow,with the bassline weaving around the lyrics,which are themselves tight as fuck...

a lot of people describe nas as humourless,which puzzles me...i mean,there is a lot of the kind of "street poet" posing on the album,granted,but at times he seems to me to be half poking fun at the bravvado in rap,or at least knowingly going along with it with tongue partially in cheek...the line mentioned in that article above,something like "catch me in the street with my hat turned back/love committing sins and my friends sell crack" always strikes me as at least a little knowing...
and as far as "i'm the baddest" style raps go,
"when i'm chillin' i grab the
buddha,
get my crew to buy beers,
and watch a flick,illin'
and root for the villain"
is fairly damn classic,and there's certainly more character and wit there than a lot of people would have you believe nas is capable of...
its also just a great way to start a track...
there's a rake of great lines like that,they may not look as good on paper,but nas deliver's them exceptionally well,sincere but with a wry smile at the same time,or at least it seems like that to me...

and within the context of a rap culture all about boasting about who is the "baddest"/most dangerous/etcetc,i don't see how you couldn't be
charmed by a line like "they call me nas i'm not your legal type of fella,moet drinking marijuana smoking street dweller"
he just bangs out these lines so effortlessly,i mean i know a lot of it is more "keep it real/street" focused,and some of the really dense,gritty verses are great too,but i think there is a degree of good natured,relaxed attitute to the album too...
maybe i just pick up on that cause i'm so removed from the circumstances,i dunno,but i do know that illmatic is one of the albums that really made me see what hip hop was about and accept it on its own terms...

robin (robin), Thursday, 29 January 2004 03:28 (twenty years ago) link

also something that i really did want to see was an explanation of his technical proficiency which people claim he has. like i know with my fav rappers i could pick a line or a verse and go through all the ways the metaphors click into one another and the siblants roll and other things that make it like... damn! (or even like... whoa!) but i was listening to Nas' verses and people who claim him as one of the greats do so on the basis of is technical ability and i'm like -- where is it to you? what things does he excel at?

now, looking at it again, i really see the "street poet" side but just like nas took rap "back" where it never was i think he did it with the notion of "poetry" too coz the lines scan to me like over-rhymed blank verse.

hip-hop is a social thing, a party thing, a crew thing, and nas is this romantic byron dude all alone (maybe the most alone rapper ever?) and rhyming like a romantic loner.

its another one of these puzzlers to me, those outliers that become the "canon".

so another question is how do you feel about nas when you listen to illmatic? do you identify with him, pity him, want to pick him up and cuddle him, want to be his soulmate, fear him, stand in awe?

he makes me feel more alienated from him than perhaps any other rapper, like there's this knee-jerk feeling i have "fine, you don't need me or my respect, you want to go commune with the lyrical plane or whatever, that's cool, do your own thing." like he doesn't talk about any emotions that i can recall having, even. nor do i *know* anybody who has emotions like his.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 January 2004 03:50 (twenty years ago) link

the beats for the album are pretty great though, yeah.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 January 2004 03:53 (twenty years ago) link

as i was saying above,i think he comes across (*on illmatic*) as being a lot more good natured and relaxed than he is usually portrayed...
i think a lot of what is written about nas is people reading into what they now know about him-ie the attempts to sell out,the feuds he didn't come out of too well,things like that
on illmatic theres a world weariness,theres some fairly depressing themes,but overall,its reasonably upbeat,especially with the last track,the michael jackson sample,which is judiciously used,incidentally,cheesy in the way the chorus of juicy is,ie gets away with it somehow...

robin (robin), Thursday, 29 January 2004 04:28 (twenty years ago) link

illmatic nas sounds almost like he's trying to sound like illmatic nas. he sounds young and not very convincing but intense and smart. i don't hear any world-weariness or jadedness, he sounds like a kid. mostly from memory because i haven't listened to illmatic in a minute.

cloverlandthug, Thursday, 29 January 2004 04:45 (twenty years ago) link

People rate Nas much more for the lyrics than the technique.

"I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death."

Did he actually invent that line? It sounds like one of the greatest movie quotes ever.

I like that Nas doesn't need me. I can identify with that. It's power.

bugged out, Thursday, 29 January 2004 04:48 (twenty years ago) link

(nah, says google, of course he didn't invent it!)

bugged out, Thursday, 29 January 2004 04:53 (twenty years ago) link

I love how the attempt to sound world-weary is so transparent, espescially on AZ's spot. convincing != good.

But as Robin said, I don't think it's a very dark album. It's just a kid discovering his mic (hohoho). That was my main prob w/ the Hsu essay that revived this thread. I don't think it's that nihilistic, and in hip-hop nihilism is more of a genre convention than a statement anyways. The World Is Yours is just such a great happy hopeful song.

sym (shmuel), Thursday, 29 January 2004 04:57 (twenty years ago) link

he didn't invent it?? what is it from?

cloverlandthug, Thursday, 29 January 2004 05:03 (twenty years ago) link

google sez its an african proverb from the congo.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 January 2004 05:10 (twenty years ago) link

Speaking of which, if Nas did a whole album like "I Can" but maybe over all different sorts of classical music then i'd love it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 January 2004 05:11 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.