New Christgau Consumer Guide From MSN Music

That too. :)

The most clearly I've seen him spell it out:

It never seems to occur to him that, for many of us, metal's classical affinities are the very thing that renders it unlistenable--that as far as we're concerned, the instrumentally dexterous, rhetoric-drenched, and often melodramatic approach to meaning the two musics share is what rock and roll was put on earth to save us from.

https://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/bkrev/walser-cp.php

Where to begin…

if the debarge record is in a special way, xgau is not overrating it

yeah, what? pretty much the only thing I wish I'd listened to him about sooner.

I've always sensed that Xgau's anti-metal stance stems at least in part from his anti-prog stance. Both at their absolute best he'll sort of acknowgdlge begrudgingly, though he's always remained thoroughly suspicious of each. For example, here is his review of "USA," his highest rated King Crimson album, which invokes a lot of the tropes we've just discussed:

Since the nearness of death was good for this band, I figured a posthumous live album might be even better, and though lyrics and vocals are still pompous annoyances, these musical themes (including the off-the-cuff "Asbury Park") are among their best. In Central Park they have no choice but to skip the subtlety and turn it up. The excitement thus generated is more Wagner than Little Richard--this record is a case study in the Europeanness of English heavy metal. But that doesn't mean it's not classic.

Herr Christgau's tendency to conflate Europe and Germany betrays his Teutonic roots, come to think of it.

Master of Puppets [Elektra, 1986]
I feel at a generational disadvantage with this music not because my weary bones can't take its power and speed but because I was born too soon to have my dendrites rerouted by progressive radio. This band's momentum can be pretty impressive, and as with a lot of fast metal (as well as some sludge) they seem to have acceptable political motivations--antiwar, anticonformity, even anticoke, fine. But the revolutionary heroes I envisage aren't male chauvinists too inexperienced to know better; they don't have hair like Samson and pecs like Arnold Schwarzenegger. That's the image Metallica calls up, and I'm no more likely to invoke their strength of my own free will than I am The 1812 Overture's.

You go, Carola, for choosing Here, My Dear.

Yeah, that too - great album, I remember when it wasn't easy to find for a little while.

Btw, just glancing at his best of the last decade list essay, I've got to admit, I'm pretty impressed *and* perplexed that so many decades down the line he still puts the New York Dolls on par with, say, Thelonious Monk as far as his personal favorites go. Like, even if you like the Dolls a lot, that's just two records and if it was between those first two and, say, the first four from the Ramones, I'm still surprised anyone would pick the two Dolls, even if they loved them.

idk, makes sense to me. I think the world of the Dolls, and in their case, their legacy really is that concentrated, and for a pretty logical reason. I think they had it in them to record a third great album in 1975, but they only had a two-record contract and there was no interest in renewing. David Johansen went on to make a great debut solo LP, Johnny formed the Heartbreakers, etc...I would only pick one rather than both, but it's not an easy call. The first gets the edge for the songs, but the second has an edge for other reasons as well.

if the debarge record is in a special way, xgau is not overrating it

Yeah, I didn't really know it before so I'll give it time. I like it, but it probably wasn't a great idea to approach it with lofty expectations.

No doubt Christgau can come across as an opinionated asshole in his writing. I guess that's part of his brand. Unfortunately that kind of brand for a writer is very out of fashion these days. Or at least it has a way of provoking social media pile-ons in a way that didn't exist way back when. Being intentionally provocative hasn't aged well, in the era of the 24-hour online outrage cycle. He was ahead of his time in championing underrated black musical styles and calling out (predominantly white) rock critics for being provincial about not taking them seriously, and also made an effort to nurture and provide space for up and coming black critics at the Voice, but he also could use provocative racial terms in a way that provokes a lot of cringe today (and probably did to some extent even back then). He contains multitudes.

I haven't really listened to him talk before. I think he actually comes across better here than he often does in his writing. Maybe having Carola there softened him a bit, but he sounds fairly self-deprecating. He admits that he has a personal allergy to the European classical tradition, which also makes metal mostly a blind spot for him. I have no problem with that. I don't think critics should strive to be objective judges of all music, because it's impossible and kind of boring. I think sometimes his writing is too condensed and somehow a bit superficial, like he is sketching out the bones of an argument without really filling in enough of the sinew that should hold it together, and he's a bit too reliant on the sort of wise-guy dismissal of other views, but his intelligence really shines through when you listen to him in conversation. I think part of his style as a critic is importing high-brow terms and concepts from academic criticism to the rock sphere, so perhaps for him using street-level insults and moaning about "Yurrup" is a way to balance that out and show he's not an egghead.

metallica's pecs weren't that impressive

here is his review of "USA," his highest rated King Crimson album, which invokes a lot of the tropes we've just discussed

He actually rated Red even higher, with an A-. (Maybe the only prog album he rated that high too.)

I don't think critics should strive to be objective judges of all music, because it's impossible and kind of boring.

Agree. The problem for me is that Christgau-worship among critics as a class leads to the kind of music Christgau likes ("smart" rock with "acceptable political motivations") becoming the kind of music rock critics like. His personal biases became institutional biases, basically.

I still sigh when I think of Here, My Dear being in every delete bin in the early '80s for $1.99 and me not buying it. I liked other Marvin Gaye albums at that point well enough that my inaction baffles me.

Not aimed at anyone specifically, but agree with Thus Sang Freud above. He's written a few million words...a lot, anyway. I've written a tenth of 1% of that and routinely come across something from years ago that makes me wince.

I think part of his style as a critic is importing high-brow terms and concepts from academic criticism to the rock sphere, so perhaps for him using street-level insults and moaning about "Yurrup" is a way to balance that out and show he's not an egghead.

Replace 'Yurrup' with another slurred continent, and see how that sounds.

Look, I simply have a hard time respecting a critic who repeatedly and consistently insults me because I was born on the wrong side of the Atlantic. Surely that's an understandable position? I also have a hard time with, say, French critics who automatically dismiss anything that comes out of the US (although I can't recall the last time I actually came across such a case).

I haven't really listened to him talk before. I think he actually comes across better here than he often does in his writing. Maybe having Carola there softened him a bit, but he sounds fairly self-deprecating.

I think this is pretty common with critics, and it's probably a reflection of how often people in general behave better when they're talking to someone (especially in-person but even on the phone). I'm sure that applies to everyone here, or at least I would hope.

He deals explicitly with this topic (not with metal) in his 2002 EMP Pop Conference presentation, "U.S. and Them: Are American Pop (and Semi-Pop) Still Exceptional? And by the Way, Does That Make Them Better?", included in his book.

French critics who automatically dismiss anything that comes out of the US (although I can't recall the last time I actually came across such a case)

Surprised by this. I'm not familiar with French music criticism, but isn't French culture famously more respective and appreciative of American culture than Americans? Not everything obviously, but stuff like jazz to classic Hollywood to even comic books?

It's a love-hate relationship. Or perhaps it's fairer to say that it's not the same people.

To be clear, the snooty knee-jerk anti-Americans have been on the wave for several decades now.

*wane

I find Joe Levy funny in these last two editions. He's pretty sly at deflating Christgau--like the way he pushes back on the idea that he hates What's Going On, and then goes on to pretty much say exactly that. (I actually agree with Christgau on the album: three amazing songs plus stuff I can't remember.)

I guess I've just never quite understood the Dolls as much more than a concept, let alone as a band anyone would say is vying to be their absolute favorite. Those albums are good, I just don't think they're *that* good. Maybe you had to be there.

Funny, this is exactly what I would say about the Ramones! (I’m not a huge Dolls fan, but I would take them over the Ramones any day.)

To be clear, the snooty knee-jerk anti-Americans have been on the wave for several decades now.

Interesting. My first time in Paris was during the tail end of the (second) Bush years, and I was surprised how many Parisians my age didn't seem anti-American at all. Almost to a fault - McDonald's seemed depressingly popular - but I remember they were all enthusiastically planning to visit L.A. or NYC or just came back from there, and that stuck out after putting up with "freedom fry" twits in America. I think soon after I saw a new film (Assayas's Summer Hours?) where they mention how the "kids" these days were all into American things. Maybe it's a generational thing?

Ah now I see the "wane" correction, I thought it was on the upswing!

I love What's Going On, as much as I love Sgt. Pepper. Neither would be among my top 3 albums of their respective years, but they're still great albums in my book. The "3 songs + filler" is the most common knock on What's Going On but I didn't learn to hear past that when I stopped trying to judge it by the individual parts. It's hard to explain, but it's like a book where you have scenes or chapters that don't feel remarkable out of context, but without them, the book isn't a masterpiece. Like you need to read those to get the whole thing. The album works brilliantly for me as a stream-of-consciousness immersion into a stoned, traumatized mind, but that's only if I hear it all - that narrative doesn't actually reveal itself without swimming through the entire first side.

*hear past that until I stopped trying to judge it by the individual parts

Oh, I get that, it's just a bore for me after the three sinles.

*singles

The Paula Deen of American Rock Critics TM