JFK assassination: was any consensus ever reached as to who actually did it and why?

Cuban gay mafia is the only conspiracy I will accept.

It's been decades since I saw JFK or thought about the assassination in any depth but given how antsy the mob gets over even whacking one of their own* the idea that they'd straight-up take out the President of the USA has always seemed v difficult to swallow.

(* my knowledge of the inner machinations of the mob is entirely gleaned from watching movies and The Sopranos)

I always thought the theory was they sent Ruby to take out Oswald to make people think they were also involved in taking out JFK when in fact they had nothing to do with it.

fuck yeah!

My dad's theory, after a few beers, was JFK was killed because he was a Catholic.

... usually in between verses from that song about how the British murdered James Connolly.

Is the prevailing theory now that the whole thing was a complete fuck-up on someone's part? Because most things are, despite the best efforts of conspiracy theorists to convince you that some shadowy cabal are in total control of their actions.

over/under on how many times the word "cocksucker" appears in this film

gonna guess "not enough"

felt like the irishman already told this story in a compelling way by merely hinting at it as a likely reason. in fact what i sort appreciated about that film was how it overlapped with the oliver stone JFK narrative for precisely one scene (frank delivering a truck shipment to david ferrie) and as with everything else in his life, frank was watching it all from the outside looking in and not knowing all the details, or caring to.

When are we ever getting our "his head just DID that" movie

The Behind The Bastards episodes on the Illuminati had some interesting stuff about a one time friend of Lee Harvey Oswald's who looked a lot like him who wound up convincing himself that he had been involved. Kerry Wendell Thornley.
He turns up in the 3rd of 4 parts on the history. Also apparently very influential in the rise of the underground magazine but pretty unstable.

Shia LaBeouf... and Courtney Love

this is the real crime

https://i.imgur.com/OFVJXdK.gif

the thornley brothers were named tom dick and kerry

no wonder the church of the subgenius beckoned

trueanon podcast has a 6 part deep dive

Hah. Dave Emory has hundreds of hours on it. He goes so far down the rabbit hole he comes out the other side.

(He's convinced it was a CIA op, btw.)

I'm pretty sure it was a time travel unit trying to stave off the Woke Mind Virus for another few decades

interesting Louisiana footnote in the wikipedia entry for Kerry Thornley:

Garrison charged Thornley with perjury after Thornley denied that he had been in contact with Oswald in any manner since 1959. The perjury charge was eventually dropped by Garrison's successor Harry Connick Sr.

When are we ever getting our "his head just DID that" movie?

Where was Michael Ironside that day?

given how antsy the mob gets over even whacking one of their own

I don't know if they got antsy about whacking their own or not, but they got over it pretty quick especially around this time period

Is the prevailing theory now that the whole thing was a complete fuck-up on someone's part?

My personal theory is that They (CIA/Mafia/etc.) wanted to spook JFK with an attempt and their patsy accidentally pulled it off.

jfk's head wanted to spook him by showing it could just do that on its own and accidentally etc

I read somewhere that Paul Krassner's comments about compromising positions between LBJ and JFK's corpse became pretty widely known and believed to greater degree than he'd expected
https://soundcloud.com/eptc/episode-8-side-a-paul-krassner

that is read it somewhere over teh last several months and now found a soundfile supporting it

best JFK assassination book i've read is still Not In Your Lifetime by Anthony Summers. he's not deluded enough to subscribe to specific theories, but he does line up all the unusual aspects of the shooting, the possible motives of those who might be suspected, and seems to conclude that there's something to it, but it's impossible to know the real truth. he seems to lean more mob involvement/oswald involvement/oswald as minor CIA asset who lost it, and while he completely dismisses Oliver Stone and his theories, what's interesting is just what from the film he nails down as factual (such as the time when Oswald met a Cuban exile for a brief moment and later a phone call come to her, telling her things about Oswald she didn't even ask about.)

The Summers book is the most plausible; I appreciated how he didn't address every what-about. I told the story about the Silvia Odio incident in the other thread, still the eeriest of the purported Oswald encounters.

while he completely dismisses Oliver Stone and his theories, what's interesting is just what from the film he nails down as factual (such as the time when Oswald met a Cuban exile for a brief moment and later a phone call come to her, telling her things about Oswald she didn't even ask about.)

oh lol this is what I referred to -- I'm friends with her nephew!

i think it's kind of a shame that the jfk conspiracy has become the one conspiracy everybody in america apparently believes in some form or another. what interests me about conspiracy theories is less whether or not they're _true_ and more _why_ people believe them - and most of the time, the answer is "they're racist". in other words i feel like the legitimization of conspiracy theories the jfk conspiracy has enabled also enables racism and bigotry.

the thing i love about the jfk conspiracy theory is that the more you dig into it the less sense anything makes. it's like what happens if you repeat a word, any word, enough times. pharmacy, for instance. just say "pharmacy" enough times over and over and it becomes really strange and bizarre sounding. so that's what i like about it, it's a way to deconstruct the basic assumptions and associations we have about the nature of reality itself. i'm into that kinda shit.

we don't need no gates out there with that swamp! plenty of em gone in there. ain't none of em come out!

just say "pharmacy" enough times over and over and it becomes really strange and bizarre sounding.

specifically it loses meaning-- "semiotic satiation" iirc-- which might seem the opposite of the rabbit-hole disease (which is more like nabokov's "referential mania" in "signs and symbols")-- unless everything meaning the same thing and nothing meaning anything are on some mechanical level identical? (notes towards a horseshoe theory of conspiracy people / anti-conspiracy people.) anyway people in the mongoose/mob complex obviously had something to do w this lol

refs in the summers book to the stone movie are funny because he consistently condemns it in strong terms, laments its influence etc.; meanwhile i was scarcely turning a page without thinking "whoa i always assumed they made that up for the stone movie"

i feel like the legitimization of conspiracy theories the jfk conspiracy has enabled

I don't really know how to measure this but I think the effects of Iraq are far more consequential in terms of public trust or credulousness than the effects of JFK. 'Everything is fake' for me has its roots or at least its liftoff from Iraq. It existed before that, but far less prevalent. There are likely other factors like social media, like people knowing how to hone and weaponise this stuff, but Iraqs erosion of public trust meant the soil in which conspiratorial thinking could be watered reached almost all gardens

refs in the summers book to the stone movie are funny because he consistently condemns it in strong terms, laments its influence etc.; meanwhile i was scarcely turning a page without thinking "whoa i always assumed they made that up for the stone movie"

Haha yeah I mean based on having read that I believe fairly early in the book I thought it would be a takedown of conspiracy theory rather than an open-minded book musing about the possibilities. It does seem he draws the line with the specific named alleged conspirators in that film and the military industrial complex angle, but the other stuff that stone touches on he absolutely is willing to entertain as a likely possibility.

Specifically the mob, Cuban exiles, and Oswald floating like an unmoored buoy among all.

An inspired act of God shoo happen here and put a Texan in the White House!

I don't really know how to measure this but I think the effects of Iraq are far more consequential in terms of public trust or credulousness than the effects of JFK. 'Everything is fake' for me has its roots or at least its liftoff from Iraq. It existed before that, but far less prevalent. There are likely other factors like social media, like people knowing how to hone and weaponise this stuff, but Iraqs erosion of public trust meant the soil in which conspiratorial thinking could be watered reached almost all gardens

― anvil

i think it's different from person to person... for a lot of people iraq brought about that sort of shift in perspective, but for me it wasn't really until trump was elected president that i had that shift.

the complicated thing is that from a liberal perspective, a rejection of that worldview is... differences between us are _immaterial_ to them, i think that's where horseshoe theory comes from. the paradox is that material facts matter just as little to them as they do to any conspiracy-minded person.

i am at the point where i don't just ask myself _why_ people believe in conspiracies, but... whatever the term for it is, there's something in me that asks, you know, what even _is_ a conspiracy?

like, the thread revive about the bilderbergs, i'm looking at the alleged conspiracy and as far as i can tell it's literally just capitalism. is capitalism a conspiracy? i mean, there's an argument to be made!

three days after my egg cracked a lady named cassie labelle made a medium post titled "Being Trans Is Like Believing A Conspiracy Theory About Yourself". and maybe it's my background, i did the subgenius thing in the '90s, but i do have a tendency to look at it in those terms. like there was a coverup, right? some people knew the truth but they were dismissed as being "crazy" and didn't get listened to, and it was incredibly far-reaching, incredibly effective, it affected millions of lives, and one of them was mine. i was both a victim of this and complicit in the perpetuation of this state of affairs.

in some sense maybe the truth-value of a conspiracy theory _is_ relevant. believing a conspiracy theory like... there's a conspiracy theory, mia mulder did a video about it. it's a minor one, but it claims that every celebrity is secretly trans. except for elliot page who the conspiracy theory claims was amab and his "transition" was actually a detransition. anyway you look into it and you can kind of pretty clearly see the anxieties and insecurities that lead the person perpetuating it to believe it. believing something like that, or believing there was a cia conspiracy to kill jfk, to me that's different from saying something like "capitalism is bad", i mean you can't prove that in an absolute sense but there's a lot of evidence for that hypothesis, you know?

in some sense, just like what rumsfeld said about "known unknowns" basically makes sense, the idea of "alternative facts", i think there's a legitimate basis for that. it's a radical rejection of hegemonic narratives, and i've done that just as much as the people who say, i don't know, covid vaccines will turn you trans have done. the only way to differentiate the two is to take the truth-value of our respective beliefs into consideration.

idk. clearly i'm just rambling. hopefully some of that makes sense?

Back in 2002, during the build-up to the invasion of Iraq I heard Glenn Beck talking about how he'd been brought in to the Bush White House to look at evidence about Iraq's involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing. It was right then that I decided that all the talk about WMDs was bullshit, because if they had any actual evidence for that stuff then why would they be fucking around with conspiracy theories?

i think it's different from person to person... for a lot of people iraq brought about that sort of shift in perspective, but for me it wasn't really until trump was elected president that i had that shift

So far, I've lived through the bombing of Cambodia and the end of Vietnam, Iran-Contra, the CIA and cocaine trafficking, gaslighting of cancer victims downwind from nuclear tests, both Gulf Wars and dozens more I can't recall at the moment.. Go ahead, ask me about my perspective shift - worse every year and never once getting better.

like, the thread revive about the bilderbergs, i'm looking at the alleged conspiracy and as far as i can tell it's literally just capitalism. is capitalism a conspiracy? i mean, there's an argument to be made!

C. Wright Mills' The Power Elite to thread!