Rolling Brexit Links/UK politics in the neo-Weimar era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

To avoid cluttering up the discussion threads and because there is so much going on everywhere at once rn.

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

Angry thread from a NI tweeter, points out how none of Leave are even talking about the impossibility/sheer danger of what they want in NI. Starts here: https://twitter.com/shockproofbeats/status/747362070576898048

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

@jennyhillBBC: German business institute tell us that Boris claim ( see article ) re single market is not true http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/26/i-cannot-stress-too-much-that-britain-is-part-of-europe--and-alw/

https://twitter.com/jennyhillBBC/status/747340633744908288

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

Germany rules out any negotiations pre-A50
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36637232

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

LABOUR’S popularity would be boosted significantly if the party dumped Jeremy Corbyn as leader, according to a new poll.

The UK-wide BMG survey for The Herald, carried out before the shock Brexit result, found that just over one-third, 36 per cent, said that they could vote for a Corbyn-led Labour party.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14581225.Dumping_Jeremy_Corbyn_would_give_Labour_s_popularity_12_point_boost__according_to_new_poll/

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/GRkvp73.jpg

The pound since Osborne spoke this morning to reassure investors.

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:06 (seven years ago) link

Vote Leave wipes website, including all speeches
http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

10 year gilt yield is down to below 1% for the first time on record.

Records go back to the 1700s.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-10-year-gilt-yields-falls-below-1-for-the-first-time-1467023195

The article mentions the FTSE 250 had fallen 3.5% this morning. It's now down 5.5%.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

How quickly can I join the Labour party? I want to have a say so the right wing Tories are held at bay. I only voted Tory for David

https://twitter.com/emilysheffield/status/746303490755039232

(Cameron's sister-in-law)

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

i know the guy who posted those tweets about norn iron

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Monday, 27 June 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

claim 2 fame

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Monday, 27 June 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

John Healey has quit shad cab

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

Old news (10 mins ago) but Amanda Eagle has gone too

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Emergency debate on Brexit under way in NI Assembly http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-36635182

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

Sweden also says no negotiations before A50

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/1h63etK.jpg

The FTSE, 5 min ago

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:39 (seven years ago) link

Maria Eagle's out

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

Juncker spokesperson says he will meet with Scottish representatives

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

Someone made an Article 50 Clock

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Number Ten says Oliver Letwin to take charge of Brexit negotiations

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn spokes: "We are not moving. A coup in the corridors of parliament will not succeed"

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:54 (seven years ago) link

I don't think we need to rush this process, during the campaign there was talk about triggering article 50 and its process of leaving the EU right away, literally Friday morning, and I think quite rightly the PM has paused on that which allows the dust to settle, allows people to go away on holiday, have some informal discussions about it, and then think about it come September, October time.

Matthew Elliott, Vote Leave chair

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Constitutional Law Assc says parliament must assent to A50
https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/06/27/nick-barber-tom-hickman-and-jeff-king-pulling-the-article-50-trigger-parliaments-indispensable-role/

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

That and this = re-assuring stuff: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/27/stop-brexit-mp-vote-referendum-members-parliament-act-europe

nashwan, Monday, 27 June 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

Election of leader of the Conservative party by 2nd September. Nominations close Thursday

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Dunno about JC retaining the young vote...

LYL Statement on Jeremy Corbyn

http://londonyounglabour.co.uk/uncategorized/lyl-statement-on-jeremy-corbyn/

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 27 June 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Young Labour has next to nothing to do with the vast majority of young Labour members.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Is there any point to this thread? There isn't going to be much going on in he main politics thread for oooh the next two years which won't have something to do with Brexit.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

Tory vote expected now to be Johnson v May

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

xp I was just doing links and updates, leaving the chat elsewhere

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

Cameron to rule out second referendum in 2.30p statement

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Two sources: 1922 ctte pencilling in Oct 13 for general election

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

Why would they want an election?

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

I guess they figure they can't lose, and it will give whatever plan they come up with legitimacy?

{wrong polling figs snipped}

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

Idk, a few Tory MPs who backed leaving have said they explicitly do not want a general election as it has the potential to be run as a proxy second referendum. If the economy tanks even further over the next few months all bets would be off. I'd be interested if the 1922 had another reason in mind.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Also if that poll is right the Lib Dems have lost over a fifth of their support since backing remain which seems unusual.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

Poll seems nuts to me. {Edit: was wrong figs}

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

Corrected figures:
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 36% (+2)
LAB: 32% (+2)
UKIP: 15% (-4) (!)
LDEM: 7% (-1)
GRN: 5% (+1)
(via ICM, online / 24 - 26 Jun)
https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Voting-27thJun16_pv-only-BPC.pdf

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

Poland wants UK to hold 2nd Brexit referendum, 'foresees efforts aimed at making UK return', ruling party leader says -AFP

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

@GuardianAnushka: Labour has agreed to no confidence tonight and secret ballot tomorrow.

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

Scotland should be fast-tracked back into the European Union if it votes for independence, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin has said.

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/ireland-should-help-fasttrack-scotland-back-into-eu-fianna-fil-34836790.html

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Thanks for starting this thread stet. Jaw dropping quote from Matthew elliott. Let's all just chill have a bit of a holiday and we'll see what's high on the things to do list when the kids go back to school eh?

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Monday, 27 June 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

Incredible.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 27 June 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

Cameron talking in the house now. Nothing shattering, but says no Article 50 till successor, he wants to stay in the single market (and hence freedom of movement?), and that the house should shape what Brexit actually means.

Clegg calls for an election. Robertson makes threatening noises about devolution. Everybody talking about race attacks. Corbyn attacks his backbenchers and says country need stability.

Cameron says new PM can decide on general election.

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

Gove and Johnson not in the house

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

@lbcbreaking: National Police Chiefs' Council: Reports to online hate crime reporting site have increased 57% compared with four weeks ago.

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

I know Paul Mason gets some stick around here for his weirdo futurism etc but this seems pretty right to me

Our strategic problem is to reconnect not only with the Labour core voters who backed Brexit but also with those who have drifted to Ukip.

I don’t know whether the present leadership can do that; I do know all the previous leaderships failed to do it

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/26/corbyn-leader-brexit-labour-rebels-sabotage

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 June 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

I did read recently that UKIP got more support from defecting Lib Dems than Labour voters in 2015 but idk if that's true.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 27 June 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

Yvette Cooper demands cross-party ctte, says "dangerous political vacuum" being left by Cameron

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Cameron on N. Ireland border: "oh, that's complicated".

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

So the real nightmare scenario is not Brexit – it is what happens, socially and economically, when Brexit does not work.

What happens when the investment banks move to Frankfurt, the carmakers to Hungary, the offshore finance wizards to Dublin, the tech companies to newly independent Scotland? What happens when, instead of Poles, it is poor white English people herded into the polytunnels of Kent to pick strawberries for union-busting gangmasters?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/27/global-order-britain-survive-eu-alternative-economic-model

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

Scottish Lab leader Dugdale rejects case for independence:

I understand why people may move to support independence at this stage, but when you have just removed yourself from your second biggest market, why would you want to leave your first?

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/uk/kezia-dugdale-case-scottish-independence-stronger-now-brexit/

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

(Cameron is a dangerous political vacuum)

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 27 June 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

Pretty big turnout at the pro-Corbyn rally outside parliament https://twitter.com/PeoplesMomentum/status/747472894268162049

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

Tim Harford just posted this, hollow lolz galore http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/22/future-britons-will-find-it-hard-to-believe-that-anyone-voted-to/

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Monday, 27 June 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

Curtice says there is a small majority for independence in Scotland, but points out all the polls are shaky at best
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-36646789

stet, Monday, 27 June 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

This thread is interesting, wasn't sure where best to post it:
https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/746765092218277888

Gist of it being that, in the wake of WWII, corporations were seen as saner and safer than nations, and now...

Any Given User (Eazy), Monday, 27 June 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

And we're off.

"Juncker says he has imposed a Presidential Ban on all contact between EU officials and UK officials until Art 50."

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 08:35 (seven years ago) link

'I know none of you has ever had a proper job in your lives', Farage tells MEPs to boos. Schulz urges calm: 'Don't act like UKIP'
@dannyctkemp

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

Farage:

"You all laughed at me. Well, you're not laughing now, are you?"

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 09:47 (seven years ago) link

BBC has cut coverage wtf. Alyn Smith gets a standing ovation for

I speak for Scotland in this house ... Scotland did not let you down, do not let Scotland down now

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

British fishermen have been warned that, despite the promises made by the leave campaign, they cannot expect to be granted greater catches after the UK leaves the European Union, and they may face increased economic turmoil.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/28/british-fishermen-warned-brexit-will-not-mean-greater-catches

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 09:58 (seven years ago) link

"You all laughed at me. Well, you're not laughing now, are you?"

omg did he actually say this

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

is that a quote from a serial killer movie?

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/747729114828779521 (Alyn Smith video)

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

xp Bob Monkhouse: "They laughed when I said I was going to be a comedian. Well, they're not laughing now."

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:12 (seven years ago) link

haha yes!

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

I'm told Boris Johnson has made clear to Tory right he WILL end EU free movement after Telegraph column y'day angered ppl.

https://twitter.com/SamCoatesTimes/status/747737590451814400

The big think-pieces drying up today, huh

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Farage:

"You all laughed at me. Well, you're not laughing now, are you?"
― stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 10:47

Farage is Walder Frey.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Here's Farage's speech if you can stomach it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36650014

the toast of every coast (cajunsunday), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

Family rifts over Brexit: ‘I can barely look at my parents’

Jamie, 28, grew up in a council flat with a single mother who worked hard to make their difficult life better for her children. “I’ve always been so proud of her for all the things she sacrificed for us. She’s warm, kind, generous and funny. She has such acute sympathy that she’s been known to cry hearing about the illness of other people’s relatives. Oh, and she also hates immigrants.”

It is not a prejudice that Jamie shares. “My mum voted to leave the EU because she doesn’t want non-British citizens here. Despite the fact that my brother and I have been extremely vocal about our reasons for staying in, she’s chosen to vote out because she doesn’t like the local Asian population. It makes no sense to me.

“When she tells me wildly embellished stories about how disgusting the local peaceful, quiet, mostly elderly immigrant community are, I laugh at her and calmly tell her she’s wrong. Most of the time, I can see past her views. But right now, I’m angry and ashamed.”

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/06/another-media-setup/

Craig Murray is an unreliable weirdo but this did raise eyebrows. I didn't know the Pride heckler was a PR.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:32 (seven years ago) link

Has farage had a proper job? Wasn't he a trader? Did he have some old productive work I haven't heard about?

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

Wasn't he a commodity broker for a while?

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

He worked on the London Metals Exchange, the only open-outcry exchange left in Europe (and the exchange with the highest levels of drunkenness, allegedly).

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Crabb is standing for Tory leader

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

too ugly

conrad, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

bit of a sideways move?

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

xp the Corbyn Pride heckler was outed as a PR shill almost the second the footage was made public. Corbyn was at the Orlando vigil with all of the shadow cabinet and has gone to Pride and similar longer than that silly little twink yuppie has been alive.

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

Why is Farage like he is? When he says "you're not laughing now" he's practically reverberating with emotion. I'm really intrigued by the psychology / identity politics of it.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

have you ever heard of egomania

conrad, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

Well yeah, but why is he also a fascist, why does he have this victim thing going on?

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

Oh, his dad left the family home when Nige was 5.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

xp That's basically what fascism is?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

And was an alcoholic.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

That's what he is but why.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

MPs are choosing between Watson and Angela Eagle to be the Corbyn challenger, Sky says

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

Oh, his dad left the family home when Nige was 5.

someone could find this sort of thing very offensive Hey Bob

conrad, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

cool we've reached the pop psychoanalysis bit of the links thread

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

Sept 9th for announcement of new Tory leader

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn loses no confidence vote 172 to 40

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

212 out of 229(?) voted

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Corrected figs from @iainjwatson: 176 no confidence, 40 support, 4 abstentions

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

Passed an old Greek guy in the street earlier, "The English! They've gone crayzy!" Don't think he was too sane himself though.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

George Eaton Verified account
‏@georgeeaton

40 MPs back Corbyn. That means he'd need 10 MEPs if not on the ballot automatically.

https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/747816359325761537

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

That Farage speech is O_O. EU has UK over a barrel and he's just baring his ass and telling them to pucker up. Reminded of Rhodes in Day of the Dead, pointlessly frothing and indignant to the bitter end as he's being pulled to pieces.

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

Kippers will be lapping up Farage (and Nuttall) behaviour in Euro Parliament. I'm a bit surprised The Sun still aren't cheering him on in public.

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

The Sun is behaving very oddly. That they've even admitted this is having a "rocky start" is unusual too.

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Ben Judah
‏@b_judah
As in the USSR, there is immensely charismatic out of control Boris promising a fraudulent "independence" the elite are unable to check.

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

Can only be a matter of time before the tanks roll in to shell Parliament.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

Any chance of a revolution? Or is this inherently one, just in totally the wrong direction.
Is there any way this won't be negative for way too many.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

One of the 40 who voted for Corbyn has now recanted so he's down to 39.

Paul Mason is reporting that if Corbyn wins, he'll devolve more power to the members and put mandatory reselection in place so MPs can be replaced if they don't have the backing of their local party.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

https://www.amazon.com/Pounded-Pound-Socioeconomic-Implications-European-ebook/dp/B01HJXVP8G?ie=UTF8&ref_=asap_bc#navbar

Humorous gay erotica writer Chuck Tingle's newest book Pounded By The Pound: Turned Gay By The Socioeconomic Implications Of Britain Leaving The European Union.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

George Eaton so take with a massive pinch of salt but he's reporting that the reason nobody has challenged Corbyn officially is that they still think he'll resign, which is optimistic.

It's pretty funny to see part of the anti-Corbyn group stomping their feet, abusing him and the "£3 members" and generally acting like spoiled children and another section saying "Corbyn needs to go immediately but in a leadership election against someone supporting an end to free movement / who voted for Iraq / etc I'd vote for him".

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

@JenWilliamsMEN: Wow. Farage on Mcr's racist tram thugs: 'I'd say to them that if they had those feelings those feelings should not be as strong this week'

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

xyzzz was asking in the other thread about what the work on the civil service/whitehall side might look like - think this might be a solid guess:

http://infacts.org/henry-viii-perils-brexit/
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/europe/index/edit/constitution-unit/research/europe/briefing-papers/briefing-paper-1

might be some shortcuts, but this is just digital govt geeks taking a guess:
https://twitter.com/richardjpope/status/747788280192708609

woof, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

tx looking now.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/LOS_Fisher/status/747682225143984128

TIMES POLL: Should Jeremy Corbyn resign?
Public: 49% Yes, 30% No
Labour voters: 54% No, 35% Yes
(YouGov/Times)

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

Oh the fannies

There's obligations to be met to be the official opposition in the HofC. Lab now can't meet then. Tomorrow the SNP will seek to replace them
https://twitter.com/PeteWishart/status/747898026157608965

stet, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgflip.com/16lg9z.jpg

cozen, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

@tnewtondunn Wow, Merkel wants a #Brexit rethink. Chf of stf Peter Altmaier, UK "should have the possibility to reconsider the consequences of an exit"

The Associated Press ‏@AP 10m10 minutes ago
BREAKING: Germany's Merkel says she sees no way to reverse British EU exit vote.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

Dutch PM Rutte gives delay on Art 50 triggering, because: "England has collapsed politically, monetarily, constitutionally and economically"

^ gets it.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 06:58 (seven years ago) link

Would be about the only thing he gets tbf

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 07:26 (seven years ago) link

That New Yorker article gets closest to the thread that's been running through my mind - that the thing that has made Britain (or parts of it) a dynamic, exciting, multicultural place are broadly the same factors that have made it a jingoistic, exceptionalist, mistrustful and belligerent place. The twin consequences of the legacy of empire run right through this referendum.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 07:45 (seven years ago) link

It's amazing how poorly the politicians are coping. For a bunch of scheming power mongers they're exceptionally poor at seizing the moment.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:13 (seven years ago) link

Crabb's trying his best.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:26 (seven years ago) link

Yes. Javid was terrible on Today.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:27 (seven years ago) link

Although maybe he was "good" because he didn't actually say anything other than Crabb's name a lot.

Guys I'm kind of sick of two threads..?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:29 (seven years ago) link

^ me too tbh

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:29 (seven years ago) link

Possibly one new consolidated thread needed now that we have moved past the neo-Con era into a period of sustained chaos.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:31 (seven years ago) link

question is who will have the brass balls required to trigger "Article 50: the thread"

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 09:12 (seven years ago) link

John Kerry now making noises about whether Brexit will happen

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/29/john-kerry-brexit-could-be-walked-back-david-cameron

Alba, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/moyeenislam/status/748096432465453057

stet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

Not an official Facebook page, is it? It was praising Marine le Pen earlier.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

Bleakly comic to imagine reaction of the volksgenossen in left behind by globalization places when they realise their vote has left them with an asian chancellor pursiung yet more punishing austerity... not going to happen though. I expect this is just Crabb and Javed trying to bid up the price of their eventual support for whoever.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

Crabb's trying his best.

He needs to come out of his shell more

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

idk, could be an effective pincer movement with Javid.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

I can't see him elevated in a Johnson or May cabinet. Can probably only move sideways.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

Pat 'Im never coming back to wherever this is' Glass has resigned after less than 48 hours in the Shadow Cabinet.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:39 (seven years ago) link

ffs!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:41 (seven years ago) link

she wrote to her CLP yesterday to inform them that she was stepping down as an MP at the next election, 24 hours after getting her 'dream job'

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

dreams that shatter like glass

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

@ReutersJamie "Our base case is that Scotland will vote for independence and institute a new currency" - JP Morgan

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:49 (seven years ago) link

and another one's gone:

Emma Lewell-Buck has announced she is resigning as a shadow communities minister

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

He needs to come out of his shell more

Or his closet.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

now now

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

actually no, fuck him

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

He voted against gay marriage

Oh right

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

thread shd've been called "UK Politics: Dark, Gritty Reboot"

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a6HNXtdvVQ

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

Cameron telling Corbyn to resign atm. Presumably an attempt at reverse psychology.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

to be fair to stephen crabb mp he had to clarify that he doesn't believe in or endorse the "gay cure" only because he has links to an organisaton that financially supported a conference on the subject

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

lots of labour mps have been very clear about their sympathy with cameron over the years so he's just returning the favour I guess

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:20 (seven years ago) link

"That New Yorker article gets closest to the thread that's been running through my mind - that the thing that has made Britain (or parts of it) a dynamic, exciting, multicultural place are broadly the same factors that have made it a jingoistic, exceptionalist, mistrustful and belligerent place. The twin consequences of the legacy of empire run right through this referendum."

always the way. anything challenging the established order will always come with a parallel, nasty reactionary wave waiting to explode.

could just be my own feelings, but does feel like there is a lot of fear and tension in the air right now. cant imagine what its like elsewhere in the country, outside of london.

StillAdvance, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

It might take the queens intervention for this not to end terrible - and that depends on whether leave voters will listen to her.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

If you read the Mail you'd think every thing was pretty much fine. No coverage of the financial collapse or nowt.

stet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

If the Remain campaign had talked about the consequences for weekly bin collections they'd have won by a landslide.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

the plp are still waiting for someone to take their byn away tbh

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

best possible outcome would be the queen somehow saying in a binding way i decree u must have a do-over thereby also exploding the existence of the monarchy?

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

Alan Duncan describing Bojo as "Silvio Borisconi" was pretty pointed.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

Miliband Minor and Harman calling for Jezza to GTF

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

I'd suggest that us yanks might start offering you our hands in marriage but I suppose we still need to wait a few months to see if that would be anything more than a frying pan > fire situation.

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

Good summary: http://piercepenniless.tumblr.com/post/146651963407/keepcorbyn-corbynism-in-its-crisis

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

@BBCBreaking: UK access to the EU's single market requires freedom of movement, European Council President Donald Tusk says http://bbc.in/292x3B0

stet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:38 (seven years ago) link

Not much breaking about that, tbh.

Alba, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

braek tory hearts news maybe. Though important because it's Tusk, who is apparently the one who matters most here (Merkel aside)

stet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

xp haha yeah its a non-starter. UK have nothing to negotiate with. Seeing a few things around how Paris and Berlin could carve out the London Banking industry for themselves in the coming years.

Look at the news to read how Corbyn has resigned yet the man hangs on - and seems to be unruffled so far.

The road to deselection sounds long but looks like the only one left if Corbyn hangs on for long enough to win the contest. Only the unions can save the Lab right I think something something Clause 4 something something.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:47 (seven years ago) link

'This is f***ing personal': Labour rebel Jess Phillips screams at Corbyn's right-hand man Seumas Milne after left-winger 'threatened to take a blow-torch to her neck'

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3665343/This-f-ing-personal-Labour-rebel-Jess-Phillips-screams-Corbyn-s-right-hand-man-Seumas-Milne-left-winger-threatened-blow-torch-neck.html

this has to be a new low in the field of intentionally misleading headlines, right? (IE the alleged left-winger who threatened Phillips is some random on twitter, not Milne)

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/b_judah/status/748097437047332864

Ben Judah ‏@b_judah 2h2 hours ago Hackney, London

It is crucial to understand EU must at all costs stop Le Pen winning in 2017. Best way to do this? Reward France the banks and their taxes.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, saw that earlier, with screengrabbed headline, and even in today's "all bets are off" times, it seemed worth checking.

xpost

Alba, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:52 (seven years ago) link

xps
Corbyn probably won't win even if he hangs on. The inevitable moderate/right join-the-labour-party campaign/push is already beginning. Normally it'd stand no chance of getting the numbers to beat the Corbyn membership, but this isn't normal.

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

there seem to be a fair number of centrist or centre-right journalists and commentators and celebs tweeting about how they are joining Labour specifically to vote against Corbyn, partly because they are disillusioned with the tories after brexit - don't know if that represents a movement bigger thana handful of high profile ppl on twitter though. also, seems like mail and spectator journalists tweeting about joining to axe Corbyn could rally wavering Labour party members behind him if anything.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

It's crazy how hated jess Philips is - she's known by assholes all over the world from right wing YouTube videos. It's troubling that all she did was laugh at a Tory who claimed men are underrepresented in parliament and all of a sudden she's on everyone's hit list. I've seen Americans bring her up who can't name the uk prime minister, never mind any other mp.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

xp
I think that'll take off once there's a candidate and it'll define the future of Labour - this will be sold as basic civic duty to everyone:

1. join labour
2. kill corbyn
3. provide effective opposition
4. save the nation

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

If Corbyn (or the other candidate for that matter) loses on member votes but wins after £3 votes are carried then there's a whole new clusterfuck in the making.

I can't really see, from a practical view, how Corbyn can possibly carry on here. Like, what does he actually do if he wins? They can't deselect 3/4 of their MPs.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

self xp

sorry, forgot to add

3.5 have an open and honest conversation about people's very real fears concerning immigration

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

In some ways it's easier to sell the idea of "not Corbyn" than an actual candidate with baggage. People are signing up without any idea who they're supposed to be supporting. There will be a major recruitment drive, and efforts have started already, but getting Spectator columnists or high-profile wet Tories piling in runs a risk of inflaming the left even further.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

at the risk of enraging people, http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/article-50

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

5. disengage from politics again for the foreseeable

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

Labour rebel publicity junkie Jess Phillips

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

@janemerrick23
If your opponent is calling on you to resign, the game is up. #pmqs

Really has been a banner week for liberal journalists too.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

assuming Corbyn doesn't resign and that he is on the ballot in the leadership election, the plan seems to be to have a single anti-Corbyn candidate run against him (probably Angela Eagle) rather than multiple challengers? but surely a single challenger means that Eagle becomes the candidate of the Blairite right by default, regardless of her soft-left credentials? it would allow Corbyn to run against the new labour establishment again, point to the fact that his opponent is supported by Blair and by Progress and John McTernan and the most hated elements of the right, that seems like a mistake from the anti-Corbyn camps pov?

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Doing it a week before Chilcot when you're backing someone who voted for invading Iraq would also seem to be a mistake tbh.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

we can only hope

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

‏@janemerrick23
I don't think some people quite grasp Cameron's comments. Any Tory leader would want a weak Labour leader to stay in place.

haha, she's *almost* there xxxp

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

oh wait, am I misreading her, and she *does* get that Cameron knows his remarks make it more likely Corbyn will stay? anyway.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't say who told him this but...

Robert Peston ‏@Peston 2m2 minutes ago

I am told 13,000 people joined Labour last week, with 60% giving the reason they are "supporting Corbyn"

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

I hope that's true, I'm pretty much at the stage of ignoring any Labour leadership related tweet from a pundit that includes the phrases "I am told", "I understand" "a source tells me" etc

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

Constant bitter leadership battles gonna leave labour rolling in cash tbf can't knock the hustle

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

wd also be cool if labour right now starts taking seriously the leader election process they insisted on adopting

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

lol, PLP is turning into a the most sophisticated ponzi scheme ever

calzino, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

@joncraig
Corbyn backers tell me plotters can't agree because can't find candidate who opposed Iraq war. Claim they need that with Chilcot next week.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

That one actually sounds credible.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

Yep, only about a third of the MPs left backed Iraq iirc but pretty much all the big names. Would need one of the 2010 / 2015 intake really.

The Spanish prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, has said he will oppose any attempts to hold talks with Scotland over its EU membership in the wake of Brexit.

Speaking as Nicola Sturgeon arrived on the second day of an emergency summit in Brussels, Mr Rajoy said that "if the UK goes, Scotland goes too".

Not unexpected.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

lol a shortage of people who took a principled stance on iraq among the corbyn-haters eh? Gee wiz, hot dog, etc

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Would need one of the 2010 / 2015 intake really

2005 intake would be okay surely?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

Possibly but apart from Sadiq, who is there?

Filter MPs who have not alienated Corbyn supporters, voted against Iraq, have extensive experience, have demonstrated some degree willingness towards cross-party collaboration and who aren't full JC acolytes and you are pretty much left with Graham Allen, who i would stick a fiver on if enough people knew who he was for anyone to be offering odds.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Dawn Butler joined in 2005 but is unlikely to appeal to anyone with Very Real Concerns about immigration, Mary Creagh ran a hopeless campaign last time and Jamie Reed...

In his maiden speech, Reed declared himself to be a Jedi

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

some sites are offering 100/1 on Clive Lewis becoming the next leader, which seems worth a fiver (don't think he's likely to become leader if Corbyn goes this year, but I can see a scenario where Corbyn wins re-election, staggers on for another three or four years and then hands over to Lewis as younger/more telegenic candidate)

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

remember to filter also for charisma sex appeal and magic

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

Unions have still to weigh in.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

Lewis was born in London but grew up on a council estate in Northampton. He studied economics at the University of Bradford before being elected to various student union roles and then serving as vice president of the National Union of Students. Lewis then worked as a TV reporter for BBC News, becoming BBC Look East's chief political correspondent. He was also one of the Labour government's National Black Role Models. In 2006, he passed out of Sandhurst as an infantry officer with the Territorial Army, and he served a three month tour of duty in Afghanistan in 2009.

Selected as a candidate for Norwich South in 2011, Lewis often broke the party line on issues including nuclear weapons, tuition fees and immigration. Describing himself as a "proud socialist", he was elected by a comfortable margin as a MP for Norwich South. He was subsequently appointed as the Chair of the Humanist APPG. During the 2015 Labour leadership election, he was one of 36 MPs to nominate Jeremy Corbyn, and remains a strong supporter of him. He is currently Labour's shadow defence secretary

That does appear to appeal to a lot of different voting groups.

In April 2015, Lewis made controversial comments when, in an interview for the New Statesman, he said (in jest), in response to a question on whether he was taking his upcoming victory for granted, he would only lose if he was "caught with [his] pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end". He subsequently apologised for the remark, saying he was "sincerely sorry" if anyone had been offended by the comment.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

Clive Lewis: hotter than Chuka....

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

He's also a very good public speaker fwiw.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

image that the bbc website used to accompany its story about the goat joke:

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/82384000/jpg/_82384899_labour_goat_624-2.jpg

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

I like how in 2016 discussions about effective opposition don't have to touch on policies

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Angela Eagle looks too much like Boris #challengingoptics

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

yeah Lewis was pretty impressive when I saw him speak - I'd thought about him for that 3 yrs Corbyn + handover hypothetical.

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

wd look forward to him having an open and honest conversation about people's very real concerns

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

I can't see how someone who voted for the Iraq war could be trusted to respond to the criticisms. That's assuming it's hard in it's approach (which I think it has to be given the delays). If it's a whitewash we can't trust blairites to object.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

xp, part of Lewis' appeal is that he was vocally opposed to the rightward shift in immigration rhetoric underr Brown and Miliband and has continued that as an MP.

http://www.clivelewis.org/ukip_and_immigration_policy

He'd be considerably further to the left than almost any of the Labour rebels on most things.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

I'd forgotten about this, make him leader this instant imo:

https://twitter.com/labourlewis/status/322624105083985920

(sorry for more non-policy based posting)

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

(that's from 2013 before either of them became MPs to be clear)

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

(I didn't mean discussions on here tbf)

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

and yeah quality tweet

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

great tweet, primed for pmqs

nxd, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

not sure i like the nudge nudge wink deployment of Open And Honest Discussion About Immigration; it feels like conceding a point

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

A1 tweet, Clive for leader

more generally, Keir Starmer seems plausible - what's the case against? not around parliament long enough? Bit wooden?

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

xpost

how so? just a legitimate dig at Dickensian grotesques like Frank Field whose main political point since 2010 has been "Labour needs to seem more racist". I mean, I assume he means "seem".

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

it's like "hard-working families", Nu Labour deserve some credit for developing some of the best dog whistles of the last decade

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

There is literally no difference between seeming and being more racist

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

by the by anyone read anything decent projecting how things on the whole might look in a months time (Spoilers)? This collapse of British politics is taking too long for my liking.

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

What are you hoping to emerge from the rubble of British politics?

Alba, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

There is no next series

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

If there is it'll be with a whole new cast, Fargo style

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

richard dawkins has a hot take for you all...

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/boris-johnson-prime-minister-brexit-second-eu-referendum

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

I mean, the ghost of Iraq coming back to haunt everyone is such an awesome callback, well done writers, A+

xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

buck up kids, some of us got thru the whole Thatcher era

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Well that's the problem, can't see any way forward for labour as currently constituted and a split party seems just as useless in real terms. Fight for Tory leadership in the midst of Brexit furore could potentially lead to a similar implosion.

Can't really see anything beyond that.

xps

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

It is impossible to doubt that, if the referendum were to be held again today, the knife-edge “Leave” majority would be reversed and “Remain” would win handsomely.

Dorks brings it right out of the gate

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Richard Dawkins: Ignoramuses should have no say on our EU membership—and that includes me

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Boris has broken virtually every promise he's ever made so I assume the likelihood of a second referendum is basically 1.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

This collapse of British politics is taking too long for my liking.

a sentence that has been highly relatable for at least 200 years

ogmor, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

We are a parliamentary democracy, not a mob-rule plebiscite democracy (yob-rule, one might say, in the light of Nigel Farage’s oafish grin).

Picturing the self-satisfied grin as he wrote this. Sick in my mouth.

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Yeah but it feels so close! The most devastating eventuality would be things just somehow limping on in a some malformed version of the status-quo

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

Another highly relatable sentence

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

that's how it's felt since 1979 tbh

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

when Dorks says "referendums are bad we need another referendum" I just wanted to phone the relevant social services crisis team tbh

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

But this time for sure....

xp

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I'll just save you the trouble.

tsrobodo, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

BBC Newsnight ‏@BBCNewsnight 2m2 minutes ago
45 out of 50 constituency Labour party chairs contacted by #newsnight say they still back Jeremy Corbyn - and many are furious at Labour MPs

Labour rebels keen to oust Jeremy Corbyn are investigating whether they would have a legal case for using the party’s name if they formed a breakaway group in parliament, and have set up a website to try to gain support of “moderate” members.

“It comes down to what would be the legalities around retaining the name ‘the Labour party’,” one MP told the Guardian, in the latest evidence that Corbyn’s detractors are ready to use every weapon in their armoury in the escalating war in the party.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/anti-corbyn-labour-mps-plan-breakaway-group-in-parliament

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

"never mind the principles, just give us the Trademark"

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

If there was really that much support for a (lol) Moderate Party or whatever then there would easily be enough three quidders to beat Corbyn.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

9 Ways In Which The Labour Party Resemble mid-1980s Deep Purple

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

what would you even call a Labour party that hated working class voters?

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

the Stipend party?

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

imagining something like how Bobby G got the rights to the name "Bucks Fizz" so the other three have to tour as " Cheryl Baker, Mike Nolan and Jay Aston, formerly of BUCKS FIZZ"

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

I don't want to say I'd be happy with the Parliamentary Labour Party and the Labour Party, but if you do want a whatever-the-cost build-things-from-the-ground-up Labour Party, that's one way to do it.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

we're now at full "Corbyn = Gandalf, PLP = Balrog"

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

Continuity Labour Party / Real Labour Party split has a ring to it.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

xxxp Bobby Gillespie owns the name rights to Bucks Fizz?

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Workers by Hand/Workers by Brain

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

This is fucking insane. They don't have enough time to form a new party, attract funding, choose a leader and get their act together before any snap election. In the event of Corbyn being annihilated in a snap election he would even now surely stand down. So why destroy a party in order to win an election you wouldn't be able to win in either eventuality?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

something something land of make believe amirite?

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

because they're crazed ideological extremists

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

xp

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Pure spite.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

all this reminds me that the rump of the Liberal Party that rejected the merger with the SDP in 1988 still exists and insists that it is the legitimate successor to Gladstone, Asquith et al:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_(UK,_1989)

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

still not over how the anti-corbyn brigade has ensured that political conversation over the last 3 days has been labour's contortions rather than the kicking the tories sorely need

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

xp
nice! clinging on to 33 councillors

ALso, see SDP councillors since 1999:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party_(UK,_1990%E2%80%93present)

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

what's wrong with "new labour"?

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

Why Angela Eagle is exactly what Labour needs
by
John McTernan

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

still not over how the anti-corbyn brigade has ensured that political conversation over the last 3 days has been labour's contortions rather than the kicking the tories sorely need

i admittedly don't know a great deal about parliamentary intrigue, but yeah why is everyone -- even cameron! -- shitting on corbyn now? he didn't call the referendum

mookieproof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Have there been any non-idiotic thought experiments regarding what a net positive exit from the EU could ultimately look like?

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

This is a terrifyingly batshit vision of Singapore with worse weather: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/28/now-the-vote-is-over-lets-move-on-with-six-steps-to-a-bright-fut/

"Finally, keep immigration at high levels. Many people who voted for Brexit wanted it to come down, but that is a debate for another day."

Stevie T, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Yes, i think the idea has always been that if you can combine the culture and corporate / legal security of the UK with ultra-low taxes, loose employment laws and a concerted effort to shift away from reliance on traditional markets you can future-proof the UK against a declining Europe and aim to compete head-to-head with Singapore, Dubai and Shanghai as a tech / financial services hub.

Part of the challenge is that Singapore, Dubai, Shanghai and all effectively cities rather than complex nation states. Some people have suggested it could give a boost to manufacturing as well but nobody really seems to have sketched out how. The general idea is that the West is held back by the social welfare and will get steamrollered by 'ruthless' Asian capital if it doesn't get in the same lane.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

And that's just the PLP's stance

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

thaaaaat's right - it was jeremy hunt who presumably is still seriously considering offering himself as a candidate for conservative leader last year who was banging on about how the british needed to work harder: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/05/hunt-tax-credit-cuts-make-britons-work-like-chinese-or-americans

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Future proof it for the fuckers that is, not for us. Increasingly dreading this EEA option, which is essentially "Europe without the employment or consumer protections"

stet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

xps
right - that's how the Raab, Britannia Unchained sort of Brexiter wants it to play out right? Fuck it, go all the way, get Nick Land in as a Spad.

woof, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

LOOOOL that Sarah Vine email. Marina Hyde: 'Claire Blunderwood'.

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

Dubai, Singapore and China are also military/totalitarian states (actually don't know enough about Dubai but its too small). Doubt the Unchained guys could organise the repression of opposition that would be needed.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

Dubai is an absolute monarchy that runs along technocratic lines, more or less. That's the thing - how do you get anyone other than Londoners - who are among the likely to be the most hostile to it anyway - to vote for it. You have to present it as an inevitability and remove any sense that an alternative is viable. It is a pipedream in its pure form but elements will be forced through.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

simple "abolish minimum wage/force unemployed loafers into jobs" policy shd carry enough popular support

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

https://cucrblog.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/photo-1.jpg

hoarding for a building that is actually being built at old st roundabout as we type

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

such piquant self-awareness

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

it is actually a factory making white collars though

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Other than maybe Sturgeon, do any hyper-effective machine politicians exist in the UK any more or are we reduced to literally everyone running around like headless chickens?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

we like our politicians like the Eng football team

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

suspect Frank Field is not fully organic

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

Watson not standing against Corbyn according to Sky.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

and watson apparently says that corbyn wants to quit but mcdonnell won't let him

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

That's the thing - how do you get anyone other than Londoners - who are among the likely to be the most hostile to it anyway - to vote for it.

people just have tho

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

(xp)

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

I thought it was Seamus Milne who was supposedly preventing Corbyn from resigning?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

Two little urchins with thick-ass East London accents just pulled up on some kind of weird go-kart and offered to take away the three sacks of rubble I've had in my front garden for six weeks. How much do you want for it? I said. 'A tenner'. Do you have a truck? I asked, smirking at them. They gestured to their weird go-kart. "Nah we'll use this." OK. What are you going to use it for? "We need to harden up our garden". I keep a straight face. OK go on then. Those strong little boys, one about 8, the other maybe 12, hoisted these incredibly heavy sacks of rubble up into their thingy, balancing one in their laps, and pootled off. I'm telling you it's a sign. It won't be long before the rag and bone man starts coming round.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Where I live you get scrapper vans circulating the estate every day, occasionally some guy shouting "any old iron". When I got a new cooker last year the old one was gone in minutes.

calzino, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Real England FTW

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Entrepreneurial frontiersmen of the new economy.

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Leave anything outside in Hackney and it will be gone in ten minutes.

There are people who roam around the streets looking for anything they can conceivably sell or use themselves. It came in pretty handy when i was moving out. There's something enormously grim about people very politely asking if they can sort through black bags of your rubbish to see if they can find a pair of shoes that will fit them.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

Angela Eagle has now said she won't stand against Corbyn.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

not only do we have scrappers in Hull but they still use a horse and cart

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

go-kartoneros

oh, amazonaws (wins), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

Lol! It is probably a few years since I've seen the old trap and cart variety scrapper, but I've seen plenty of them.

calzino, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

Saw the full trap and cart variety in Hounslow a couple of years ago, but none since then

cherry blossom, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

Kevin SchofieldVerified ‏@PolhomeEditor
Angela Eagle will NOT challenge Jeremy Corbyn. She will only stand when/if there is a contest. "It's a Mexican stand-off", says senior MP.

so does this mean someone will stand as a stalking horse? Corbyn's people seem to be pushing for rebels to put up or shut up and start a leadership challenge, would his opponents prefer that we have a few more days/weeks of Corbyn trying to struggle on without support from PLP to emphasise that his position is untenable? or is it just Eagle's reluctance to be seen as disloyal (and the pressure she's under from her local party)? if the latter, it seems pretty hollow/unconvincing given the fact that a contest of some sort now seems inevitable.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

Recycling in that manner would be a healthy thing to have come back but it may just reflect how broke some people are right now. Would be good to get back to a paradigm where things were built to last and be repairable rather than throwing everything away all the time.
When the traveller park up was here they had a not very safe method of smelting copper fro various sources which stank the place out.

But there was some comment on people relearning various crafts thanks to recessions etc. Would at least mean they were practising some forms of self reliant activity. Learning to sew, grow your own veg, repair your own car whatever. On the other hand watching Hidden Killers of the Post-war Home talking about how dodgy some people's attempts at d.i.y. when it was first coming to prominence were one hopes that might be something that wouldn't repeat.

Could be some good come of things though or am I pollyannaing?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

Fwiw, since everyone's a brexpert or Nostradamus these days, but this is bleak.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

@ DPJHodges: Told Angela Eagle will declare tomorrow at 3.00 pm.

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

corbyn must look a wee bit deranged to the great_british_public at this point

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

his opponents have been successful in spinning this as "Corbyn vs almost all of his MPs" rather than "almost all Labour MPs vs the Labour membership", unfortunately.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

crace (lol) commons sketch for the guardian:

"He rose in almost total silence, his face twisted in anger: the dividing line between stubborn ambition and personal principle has become increasingly opaque."

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

this idea that his refusal to resign is a sign of his ego or personal ambition: this seems crazy to me, everything I've read leads me to think that, at a personal level, Corbyn would have been much happier continuing to pootle along as a back-bencher, attending to his pet causes, but feels duty bound to fight on now the leadership has fallen into his lap. but his opponents are pushing the arrogant ego-manic angle hard, can see how it might look that way to a lot of people.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

must've been hard for the PLP to spin this given the media's adoration of Corbyn

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

Goes beyond "Corbyn the egomaniac" into "Corbyn the personality cult" when they want to dismiss his supporters. How you can simultaneously accuse someone of cultivating a personality cult and not having a personality, i don't know.

He looked stubborn, wildly overoptimistic and pig-headed but idk if those are values that the British public disdains more than the bullying / cowardice / elitism / incompetence of the plotters. Everyone comes out of this looking terrible.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

I think it would leave him heartbroken if the members didn't get to vote.

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

announcement of an announcement: angela eagle press conference tomorrow at 3

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

xps I know that being a horrible sneering cunt is part of the job description for a parliamentary sketch writer, but Crace is something else, just vile

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

sweet, we can have a repeat of "everybody who votes for Corbyn is a misogynist"

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

oh good, a return to recycling, self-reliance and crafts, using nothing but one's own honest hard-working hands and the copper out of people's phone lines and school roofs

good luck Labour Party, wish I could see a way for you to unfuck yourself, for the media to become something other than a pack of right-wing hyenas, etc

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

hm that probably read as anti-traveller, but have had both of those happen round here recently and as far as I know neither was done by travellers

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

...I mean that it probably sounded anti-traveller because Stevo's post which I was replying to mentioned travellers, not just because...

I am digging a p. deep hole here huh

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

this small gang of irreconcilables

Labour paper The Grauniad on Corbyn's enemies

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

http://www.vox.com/2016/6/29/12060072/brexit-economic-forecast-economist

economics intelligence unit view on what the brexit will mean for the british economy in next few years told in 7 tweets. grim reading.

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

worth looking at his twitter feed as he offers additional comments re: rise of radical right after uk makes some concessions to Europe on migration in order to get (somewhat reduced) access to the European economic area

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

hear, hear
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmJAsBTXIAQ6INS.jpg

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

that is from when she was standing for deputy leadership and Corbyn was standing for leadership, right? I remember getting that email at the time.

soref, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

Union statement on Corbyn:

https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/748235818758709248

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

best way to clear the air after a leadership election would be for every MP who supports the loser to resign from the party. maybe take cyanide.

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

<I>“It’s a great tragedy. He does have a members’ mandate, but those members who join a political party know that you also need a parliamentary mandate if you’re to form a government,” Watson told the BBC.

“You have to have the authority of the members and your members of parliament, and I’m afraid he doesn’t have that with our MPs.”</I>

mmmmonomaniacal dissonance

conrad, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

xp because of the Wangland...

I'm part of the 48.1 percent (snoball), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

can you take your meme and throttle it please

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

is that Alan Johnson the MP for a third of a city that voted to Leave by a margin of 2 to 1?

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

I never liked that flat-footed wanker Johnson. The Tories lead is not exactly "way ahead" either.

calzino, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

Defiant Tom Watson has warned plotting Labour MPs that Jeremy Corbyn will be their leader for at least a decade.

Speaking to the Mirror, Labour’s new deputy leader slapped down “disrespectful” backbenchers already discussing ways to bring down his new boss.

“We’ve got another decade of Jeremy - at least,” Mr Watson said.

sep 2015

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Johnson's right tho, "anti-austerity" is not a policy like "we hate our leader" is

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

otoh i am prepared to believe basically anything said about Seumas Milne

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

I am sure Corbyn could have done better than Milne, but probably from a very short shortlist of people he can actually trust.

calzino, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

he should probably choose a moment to step down for his own dignity now. these clowns won't be stopped, we're heading for the logical conclusion of post-Thatcher politics, vote for the face of the free market you find most amenable. the middle England Labour voters can continue to salve their consciences by talking about electability and maybe even winning the occasional election so that they can have 5 years of state charity projects that do fuck all to change the structural misery of the poorest people in this country, and we can slide inexorably into a new Victorian economics

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

which the EU has been a lightly applied handbrake to for the last few years

taking straight talking honest politics a little too literally (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

Alan Johnson in Sep 2014:

At the beginning of this parliament the Labour party lost precious months conducting an overlong leadership campaign that allowed the coalition government to develop its big fat lie about the global recession, while we in Labour examined our collective navel. The question of the leadership was settled then. It must not be re-opened.

Miliband will lead us into an election that I am convinced we can win.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmJaS7SWkAAkda4.jpg

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

my mouth is opening and closing and nothing is coming out @ that

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

So many MPs showing their true colours atm but, tbf to Reed, he has never made any attempt to hide his.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

yes he has form:

https://twitter.com/jreedmp/status/642649854624309248

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

have to admit I had no idea who he was until wikipedia revealed he was the jedi guy

He also helped out his party leader, Ed Miliband, who declared he felt "respect" on seeing a white van, following Emily Thornberry's "White Van Gate" tweet prior to the Rochester and Strood by-election, 2014 result, stating during PMQs: "When I see a white van, I wonder whether it's my father or my brother who is driving".

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

Photocopy of his arse attached.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

imagine being a politician whose hobby-horse is nuclear energy

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

um i follow paul mason on twitter now. and he actually addresses his followers as "comrades"? unironically? do i have that right?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

considering unfollowing him. preferred when he was a journalist journalist

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

I like him tbh

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

He's gone a bit feral.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

his futurism is bobbins imo

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

has he been drinking tonight

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

Paul Mason Retweeted
SANamtab: @jreedmp enjoy deselection, traitor

cozen, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

ooft.

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

he did a pleasantly mad speech/interview thingy on gravity's rainbow

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

he's one of us really

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

start posting to ilx, paul

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/leave-donor-plans-new-party-to-replace-ukip-without-farage

cannot even comprehend the pain i want this cunt to suffer before his death

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

i'm actually panicking a bit, like panicking, like physically

imago, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

I've had a few panic attacks this week and terrible acid anxiety in my stomach and migraines like crazy.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

I went ti my meditation class tonight and yoga last night. It helped.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

He is essentially right that UKIP can't continue as a viable party when it's manned primarily by ex-BNP lumps and a variety of elderly eccentrics. The thought of an organised, well-funded and 'legitimate' far right springing up is pretty scary but Banks is a deeply unpleasant man who can't keep his trap shut so he'll hopefully poison the chances of any new party being taken seriously. Farage isn't giving up without a fight so they can argue amongst themselves for a while.

It was heartening to see that another of Leave's biggest donors lost £330m in the subsequent downturn.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

Small crumbs of comfort. Things are looking so fucking bleak now that a hideous right-wing Gove-Johnson-led perpetual Tory government sticking with austerity and trying to appease leave voters with some kind of immigration caps is beginning to look like *the best* we can hope for. Argh.

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

Joking around with my workmates from EU countries, "You can always go to Scotland! They will welcome you with open arms there!" My heart's not really in it though.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

So Theresa May looking good in some polling for the Tory leadership that I just saw and promptly forgot the source and my phone died.

"thatcher 2: electric boogaloo"

3 results (0.47 seconds)

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

Lots of glowing press, with the FT asking if she was "Britain's Merkel".

She hasn't had that many boosters in the papers for a couple of years but the stop-Boris campaign and need for a perceived calm head has changed that.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

Lots of glowing press, with the FT asking if she was "Britain's Merkel".

No way, that's obviously Nicola Sturgeon.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

xp was literally just reading a quote from a Labour source describing Angela Eagle as "Britain's Merkel"

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:27 (seven years ago) link

though I guess Eagle does project an aura of low-key, non-hectoring even-temperedness that is quite Merkel-esque

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like pre-Bismarck Germany and Austria, in this customs union or that but not in the Holy Roman Empire, being an elector or not, could even be room for freistadt London. Makes for interesting maps in the penguin atlas of world history but sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:33 (seven years ago) link

worth remembering that the BNP had 50 something councillors elected in 2008 and by 2015 were wiped off the map completely? mainly because of what ShariVari is saying about Banks; the then-leader couldn't keep his mouth shut about his true feelings. they rise, they get exposure, they die; that's the British way with these clowns. i mean thus far anyway.

piscesx, Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:47 (seven years ago) link

on Singapore:

What about Singapore? This is the one that really gets on my nerves. A lot of right-wing people imagine that Singapore is a libertarian utopia because the public sector share of GDP is quite low. But this is silly. Singapore doesn’t have big spending ministries, but it does have a huge sovereign-wealth fund that owns major industrial and infrastructure projects in the country as well as financial investments worldwide. Rather than pay welfare benefits out of tax money, Singapore made it compulsory to pay into private insurance, through the so-called central provident fund, a little like a much more comprehensive version of Obamacare. Oh, and basically everyone lives in a council flat.

After independence (from Malaysia, and Britain) the Singaporean political and business class took a joint decision to develop the port as the major regional transport hub, and to take advantage of that to build up industry around it, notably chemicals and computer/semiconductor manufacturing. Their thinking was that economic development in Asia would create a huge opportunity for this role. This worked really well, but it’s worth noting that it was very much a succession of joint decisions by government technocrats, political leaders, and investors rather than some sort of idealised libertarian hands-off process. That is supposedly more true of Hong Kong, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that was a myth too. You’ll note they didn’t start off by creating a new tariff barrier between their massive port facility and the market it serves.

http://www.harrowell.org.uk/blog/2016/05/15/brexit-strategic-incompetence-for-fun-and-profit/

LOOOOL that Sarah Vine email. Marina Hyde: 'Claire Blunderwood'.

― jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 16:08 (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

First actual laugh out loud moment since last Thursday on the train this morning.

Fizzles, Thursday, 30 June 2016 01:33 (seven years ago) link

thanks for that LSE link, stet.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 30 June 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

Great to see the parliament benches all having such a great laugh though. What a great bunch of lads.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 30 June 2016 01:58 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/ormondroyd/status/747160476870651904

Q: How many Brexiters does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: We never said there was a lightbulb.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmG2SZ0WQAASpAq.jpg

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 05:56 (seven years ago) link

Dan Hodges, who seems to be neck and neck with George Eaton as the plotters' favourite leaking tool, is suggesting that Eagle won't declare but Own Smith will.

Smith didn't vote for Iraq as he wasn't elected until 2010 but was one of the first to come out in favour of 'a progressive case for ending free movement'.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 06:25 (seven years ago) link

Owen*

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 06:25 (seven years ago) link

I like the bit in jamie reed mp's letter where he's like "now we've exited the eu" and would like him to type another one after someone tells him how far we have to go still

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 06:47 (seven years ago) link

YouGov has May 17 points clear of Johnson in the leadership contest that matters more. Johnson's favourability rating has apparently dropped 18%.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:13 (seven years ago) link

May has form for wanting to obliterate Human Rights legislation and it was only EU law being knit into devolution and the Good Friday Agreement that stopped her from doing it. Boris hasn't attended Parliament since the vote result.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:28 (seven years ago) link

worth remembering that the BNP had 50 something councillors elected in 2008 and by 2015 were wiped off the map completely? mainly because of what ShariVari is saying about Banks; the then-leader couldn't keep his mouth shut about his true feelings. they rise, they get exposure, they die; that's the British way with these clowns. i mean thus far anyway.

It's because all the racists voted UKIP instead.

I'd believe some random fairground psychic before I believe that YouGov poll, but I suspect May will outperform Johnson in the debates because she can slip between authoritarian and touchy-feely with relative ease. Boris only has one register and even that is fundamentally a register for good times and not leading us through the biggest crisis since the war.

They probably need another Leaver to declare if they really want to stop Boris, anyone who can split the Eurosceptic vote.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:29 (seven years ago) link

Talking of questionable YouGov polls, this one on who Labour voters would replace Corbyn with if he stepped down is a treat:

http://i.imgur.com/UlsXCDc.jpg

Eagle and Smith are the least popular of the named options.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:54 (seven years ago) link

Now Gove's throwing his hat into the ring because he's reluctantly come to the conclusion that Boris is evil.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:06 (seven years ago) link

Fuck me, this is getting nuts.

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:08 (seven years ago) link

"I have come, reluctantly, to the conclusion that Boris cannot provide the leadership."

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:08 (seven years ago) link

It's no May for certain, unless Johnson drops out, no?

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:12 (seven years ago) link

no=now

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:12 (seven years ago) link

Sorry, still processing

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:12 (seven years ago) link

Just mental.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

STAB IN THE BACK!

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:17 (seven years ago) link

Leadsome also in!

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:19 (seven years ago) link

Eagerly awaiting the Sarah Vine column that makes it all about her.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:22 (seven years ago) link

Yes surely this is May, with Gove as Chanx and Osborne as Foreign.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:38 (seven years ago) link

Gove as chancellor Jesus Christ almighty.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:38 (seven years ago) link

DREAM TEAM

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:39 (seven years ago) link

Still can't quite work out how May would square her Remain position with ongoing Brexit.

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:41 (seven years ago) link

She'll push for withdrawal from European Convention for Human Rights for sure, which will help get at least some of the brexiteers onside with her..

bingo dabber acid, Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:59 (seven years ago) link

Can't get that without fucking up devolution and NI even more.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

Theresa May: "Boris did a deal with the Germans.....The last time he did, he came back with three nearly new water cannon."

Pitching on civil liberty is an odd look for her.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:03 (seven years ago) link

Also said she will not pull out of ECHR so bad news for fans of hanging.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:18 (seven years ago) link

hey guys 1 of the candidates is called crab

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:30 (seven years ago) link

Gove May Crabb Johnson

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

^ expecting numbers on that

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

with a side order of Fox Hunt

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:43 (seven years ago) link

A confederacy of cockfarmers

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:50 (seven years ago) link

Gove has the support of Murdoch right? Boris might not be the sure bet we all thought. Thankfully. Not that I want Gove either.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:54 (seven years ago) link

Boris may not even stand now.

May backtracking on ECHR, but doubling-down on "free market with no free movement" fantasy. Is anybody anywhere going to sit them down and explain this to them?

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Gove is a Brexit true believer, right? I'd been consoling myself with the idea that May or Johnson would probably end up compromising on some version of EEA status, but Gove could just blow everything up.

ǂbait (seandalai), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Yes, Gove is true out afaict

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

Don't think it'll be Gove. In fact, I think there's a decent chance that it may not even get to a membership vote, with May being the sole candidate after the others drop out in return for preferment, a bit like with Michael Howard.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

^ my hot political tip 4 the day

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, Boris is smart enough to want to avoid the madness, Gove just .. isn't.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:01 (seven years ago) link

Hunt is out, backing May

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

https://vine.co/v/hgbab1H2LH7

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

Giving it to May without a contest would also provide a helpful contrast with the current uh difficulties afflicting Labour. Expect to see this option getting quite a push in the media in forthcoming days.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

How is BJ's retreat and silence since the vote being perceived by Tory mp's? Are you there no 'you wanted this, show yourself' questions? Or are they mostly ignoring him? Trying to parse this.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

It's difficult to tell as they haven't been very vocal about it, other than the wing that actively wants him to die in a fire. There are certainly some who have questioned his Telegraph stream of consciousness, particularly around the immigration angle, but until he pins his colours to the mast it's not quite clear what people are going to be opposing. His disappearance does feed into a broader trend of 'step back and think about it'.

@jimwaterson
Tory MP Philip Hollobone in the House of Commons formally complaining about Lindsay Lohan's referendum night Twitter attacks on Kettering.

Good luck, Theresa.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

can one or more of you please supply a comprehensive bullet-point list of stuff about theresa may pls

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

* She's bad

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

Thx SV

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

i know that, want the deets tho

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

- * is utterly despicable racist homophobe who is anti-civil liberties, pro-snooping
Fin

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

she had that rad jacket that gave her the look of someone who would feel at home on the bridge of a star destroyer

ogmor, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

it is as i suspected

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

she blocked Johnson's canon

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

Here's an example of May in action from 2011, channelling the frustration of the plain people of england at being unable to break-up a foreign family into 'you couldn't make it up' ridicule of the EHCR by, er, making something up: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2011/oct/04/theresa-may-wrong-cat-deportation

one to remember when anyone tries to contrast May favourably with dishonest demagogues like Farage or Johnson.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:28 (seven years ago) link

can one or more of you please supply a comprehensive bullet-point list of stuff about theresa may pls

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/10426/theresa_may/maidenhead/votes#welfare

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

oof

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

Recently famous for signing off on vans with GO HOME plastered all over them being driven around minority-heavy areas.

She is a die-hard on immigration and has been successful in implementing a lot of bad reform / blocking a lot of positive reform to student visa statuses against strong opposition from Osborne and others. If you were a Little England Leave voter you couldn't really ask for anyone nominally within the remain camp to represent you better.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

It's an impressive feat of evil tbh - keeping the Home Office for 6 years in racist paranoid Tory Britain, with the press screaming every time made-up immigration targets are missed, I mean fuck she must have some wolverine indestructible regeneration thing going on.

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

So who is the lesser of three evils?

groovypanda, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

boris johnson is improbably the lesser evil i think

however, he probably won't even run

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Three heads on the same Hydra TBH

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

Still can't quite work out how May would square her Remain position with ongoing Brexit.

That can be spun as "respecting the decision of the British people" without too much trouble. And having not actively campaigned to leave means she'll be better-placed than Gove or Johnson to negotiate with the EU.

It's an impressive feat of evil tbh - keeping the Home Office for 6 years in racist paranoid Tory Britain, with the press screaming every time made-up immigration targets are missed, I mean fuck she must have some wolverine indestructible regeneration thing going on.

I was thinking that, the Home Office tends to chew ministers up and spit them out - how many New Labour Home Secretaries were there? Then I remembered that Cameron kept IDS in a job despite his manifest failings until such point as he knifed him in the front.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

I'll bullet point this for you

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/28/who-should-be-the-next-pm-theresa-may-gets-my-vote/

* she definitely deserves snaps for refusing an honorary membership of the Carlton Club, because it doesn’t admit women
* She’s been married to the same man since 1980 (morally sound: check),
* doesn’t have any children (could be a turn-off for some but it does mean she’s less likely to be distracted on the job)
* She cooks a new recipe every week
* she goes to church every Sunday
* she knows there’s more to life than Westminster

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

:D

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

That can be spun as "respecting the decision of the British people" without too much trouble.

I get that she can say that (and has done, today), but it seems kind of unprecedented for a government to press ahead year on year with a policy that it doesn't believe in, which it could change, but doesn't. That's the bollocks of referendums and I just have a feeling she'll come unstuck with it. Maybe she'll just be forced to eventually say "actually, I was wrong, and life outside the EU is actually better for Britain."

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:49 (seven years ago) link

In her speech she said it just isn't fair how some kids in London speak English only as a second language. FOAD now.

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

Crime committed on buses rather than by buses.
Such a great set up to not get a single laugh?

Stevolende, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

I guess I have to do some delving into anti-EEC politicians who became ministers after 1975 handled it.

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

boris has pulled out

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

yeah she was pretty quiet during the campaign - 'secret brexiter who acted as moderate remainer out of loyalty' gets support within her party, I think, and works ok with the policy shift.

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

disappointing 9 minutes in between me saying it and it happening

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

boris wants to 'stick up for the forgotten*(i think he said forgotten) people in this country' instead.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

the legerrnd lives on

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I think Boris knows that a) he won't win and b) the next PM is very likely to be the least popular in British history.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

I thought this might be his angle. He has nothing to gain from running and everything from waiting a few years to swoop in to clear up the mess.

May should pull out too, tbh, and let Gove get on with a 7% approval rating in 2018.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

boris has pulled out

*snigger*

This is the happiest day since the Referendum. Matt OTM.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure Boris thinks he will be the PM after the next one, but we'll cross that bridge whenwe come to it.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmMV378WMAI3uqU.jpg

^^ from Theresa May this morning. Fuck this shit.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

it seems kind of unprecedented for a government to press ahead year on year with a policy that it doesn't believe in, which it could change, but doesn't.

Hence snap GE, which they'll hold if they think Labour can't win it.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

if that's the case, at least charisma's not going to be a major deciding factor anymore

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

Boris phrasing - "that person cannot be me" = "the next PM cannot be as good as me"

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

wonder who he will back though? not gove obv

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

eye on the ball...

Corbyn: "Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions of Israel than our Muslim friends are for the self-styled Islamic State"

ǂbait (seandalai), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

I think he might have just committed seppuku there.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

http://reaction.life/boris-undone-newspaper-column/

It seems that the highly confused and implausible Boris version of Leave that emerged in that Daily Telegraph column helped convince Michael Gove that he should challenge Boris for the leadership, or rather it gave those who want to stop Boris the ammunition to persuade Gove that Boris cannot do it. Team Boris is pointing out that Gove read and helped edit the Boris column before it went to press, but that does not preclude him having pushed it through while having doubts.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

gove's strategy was not unlike a sprint finish in a bike race - let boris do the work and then nip round him in the last 500 metres

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:08 (seven years ago) link

or pushing it through seeing his big chance xp

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

Boris' strategy looks like convincing your mate to go base jumping with you and having a fag at the top of the building while he plummets to his doom.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

I mean if Gove really did push that column through knowing full well it was a turkey then I've got to say I'm impressed.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

Theresa May is tacking markedly towards the centre in her campaign launch statement: https://www.facebook.com/TheresaMayForPM/posts/1349767708373332

mike t-diva, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

Jesus.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

have tories and labour agreed to alternate rest days and full-on batshit days now

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Well Labour anti-semitism report launch leading to charges of anti-semitism and leaving at least one Jewish MP in tears suggests not

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

lol guess not then

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

leadsom
gove
may
fox
crabb

our kind of people

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmMOoOCWYAAXJuE.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

somebody at work just told me about Boris, I lolled here as fast as I could

look slow down I can't keep up with the comedy

Johnny Cage - 4'33" Fatality (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

Not a fan of the phrase "Jewish friends", but people getting stoked up about that Corbyn sentence is such disingenuous idiocy - I love people Jewsplaining my needs as a Jew back to me.

On the other hand this Ruth Smeeth thing sounds fucking dark

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

How on earth do you manage to get yourself reported for antisemitism at the launch of your own antisemitism report? That is genuinely astonishing.

Last night I floated the idea of mandatory reselection of literally everyone in the Commons and that seems like a more and more appealing idea right now.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

JUst slightly taken aback that Boris'd bung something as naff as the bus joke into a speech that should be that significant. He wasn't guaging things by whether anybody laughed at it or anything? Like oh yeah got a couple of guffaws i'll stand, no nothing better stand down.
Or is he going to claim he's losing it which is why he's coming out with utter banalities.

Stevolende, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

sorry did corbyn literally just compare the nation of israel to ISIS on the day the anti-semitism report was launched?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

No.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

ah ok - his quote sort of looks like that

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

The point is pretty clearly that a lot of morons on the left expect British Jews to be held accountable for the actions of Israel when they'd be the first to say it's wrong to do the same thing with British Muslims and terrorism.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

can't believe some people might be deliberately misinterpreting Corbyn

It wasn't a direct comparison but he really should have thought twice about it under the FFS Don't Mention Hitler rule.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

yeah it seems needlessly inflammatory. 'i'd no more expect ordinary Labour voters to be held responsible for the actions of a few Momentum activists than all Italians to be tarnished by what Mussolini did'

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

'hey it's just a thought experiment'

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

corbyn making mistake of thinking anyone cares about anti-semitism in labour except as a stick to beat him with lol

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

I mean, if he'd resigned on Tuesday, release of this report wd be some page 94 shit right now

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:50 (seven years ago) link

Not sure why there was a need for the report. You won't keep the morons who go on about this quiet. xp = not sure how much attention its going to get, especially compared to this other report next week.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

He does mention Hitler later in fairness - he says FFS Don't Mention Hitler.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/30/angela-eagle-to-launch-labour-leadership-bid-in-battle-for-the-s/#update-20160630-1136

(scroll down a bit to get the full text)

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

If you want me I'll be in the Snooker Loopy thread.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

@Peston
Am told @angelaeagle may not announce candidacy at 3, so MPs can have "period of reflection" about why they have lost confidence in leader

Has this not been it?

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

How on earth do you manage to get yourself reported for antisemitism at the launch of your own antisemitism report? That is genuinely astonishing.

Trump has been calling people out on the racism of calling him out on his racism so, y'know.

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmJcNx0WkAEIRGo.jpg

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:22 (seven years ago) link

Is the PLP just trying to make Corbyn go insane by doing basically nothing and leaking wildly contradictory rumours to idiots like George Eaton in the meantime or wha

Wonder if any of them have a nihilistic desire for Chilcot oblivion to hurry up at this point

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

corbyn making mistake of thinking anyone cares about anti-semitism in labour except as a stick to beat him with lol

yep.

i dont see it as inflammatory. you cant pretend the two views dont exist, or that they arent frequently intertwined.

left wingers are always held up to near unreachable levels of scrutiny. they have to be absolutely perfect and spotless.

FFS, what is really so wrong about these sentences?

"Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions of Israel or the Netanyahu Government than our Muslim friends are for those of various self-styled Islamic states or organisations.

"Nor should Muslims be regarded as sexist, antisemitic or otherwise suspect, as has become an ugly Islamophobic norm. We judge people on their individual values and actions, not en masse.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

“I will continue - as Labour Leader - to pursue the causes of peace and justice in Israel-Palestine, the wider Middle East and all over the world. But those who claim to do so with hateful or inflammatory language do no service to anyone, especially dispossessed and oppressed people in need of better advocacy.

“Of course we as Labour Party members must all be free to criticise and oppose injustice and abuse wherever we find it. But as today's Report recommends, can we please leave Hitler and Nazi metaphors alone (especially in the context of Israel). Why? Because the Shoah is still in people's family experience.

"If every human rights atrocity is described as a Holocaust, Hitler's attempted obliteration of the Jewish people is diminished or de-recognised in our history.

"Other human rights atrocities from African slavery to the killing fields of Cambodia, the Armenian and Rwandan Genocides are all of course to be remembered, but diluting their particularity or comparing degrees of evil does no good.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

xp http://youtu.be/7qnd-hdmgfk

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

jesus christ Corbs nobody's interested in the language of nuance don't you get it?

must admit my first thoughts on Boris were in line with Ewan McGregor's
https://twitter.com/mcgregor_ewan/status/748477453631426560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I don't want him anywhere near power, but the lazy cowardly irresponsible twat has helped fuck us all. Get to fucking work on cleaning this shit up and take the fucking blame when the far-right violence ramps up.

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:37 (seven years ago) link

why would he do that when cameron isnt going to clean up the shit hes left for everyone either?

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

That might be the only classy thing Seaumas Milne has written

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

xp true, Cameron setting the example I guess - he seems to be broadly getting away with walking away from the corpse.

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm somebody on the 'hard' left who has constantly argued that the left has a problem with anti semitism. And it was rejected within the SSP, the stop the war coalition and the Labour Party. The people of Israel are consistently 'othered' in a way I can't think of other any other people being. And we all tolerate groups that cross into anti-semitism protesting along side us. Whenever I complained about groups or banners which I felt were, if not hateful at least unhelpful, I was just told that this was how people oppose Israel (and apparently the only way to discuss what is happening there). It was never cool. There is, of course, much more anti semitism on the right, but that doesn't excuse the fact that we made a safe space on the left for people who are just antisemitic.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

(I should add that I bowed out of politics after the invasion of Iraq, and things might be better now - I just doubt it)

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

"The people of Israel are consistently 'othered' in a way I can't think of other any other people being."

are you sure about that?

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

No, I'm not. I'm just having a hard time thinking if a people who are directly associated with the worst actions o their governments in the way Israelis are.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

Hold on here did he actually say "self-styled Islamic states"? Not "the self-styled Islamic State"? Then wtf's the problem?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

(A rule of thumb I would suggest for the left would be 'if the cause isn't directly related to Israel, don't allow anti-Israel banners etc. People are good at finding reasons why their anti-Israel actions are allowed, but it's basically just the usual conspiracy theories that Israel controls evrything in the Middle East)

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

Iraq-era was the high-water mark of 'Mossad did it' for the far left IIRC *headdesk*

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

Yup. And it was tolerated.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Ugh the number of Mossad/Israel banners at the big Iraq march in 2003 was depressing to me - I think it's just white noise for non-Jews though

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

I can think of a few minorities who get it way worse than us, though, re: crass generalisation

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

clive lewis, cat smith and couple others calling for corbo to go (according to noted moron g.3aton so)

if true, can probably stick a fork in this

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

There is only ONE reason to hold Israel the nation (and its government) to a higher level of accountability than its neighbours: it is the only country in the region that claims to be a democracy, and democracies are supposed to be accountable.

I've done a lot of work on friends from non-Levantine secular Muslim backgrounds (Turkish/Persian/Iraqi/Pakistani/Somali) and British people who've never known Jews beyond the acquaintance level, who automatically slag off 'Israel'. They never knew something basic about the history of those places: many countries in the ME expelled Jews once it was possible to tell people to FO to Israel. Then I tell them it's a bit rich of those countries to refuse to recognize Israel's existence, while blaming internal problems on this external threat. I hope my interventions do something to reduce casual anti-semitism, and I think they do. Bottom line, the public are being ideologically shell-gamed by their governments for immediate political advantage right across the world, and we are all poorer for it.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

If Clive Lewis is calling for his resignation then the game really is up.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Is he though?

calzino, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

that was quick

‏@georgeeaton
Clive Lewis and Cat Smith have said they are not calling for Corbyn to resign.

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Good long article in the Grauniad about how we ended up here. It doesn't really say a lot new but it's an interesting read and does a good job of explaining why Britain's going down the toilet

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/30/brexit-disaster-decades-in-the-making

paolo, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

george...eaton

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Intrepid boy reporter. One of these days he'll be right.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

he is so bad & I am sorry to have tarnished my reputation by quoting him

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Ugh the number of Mossad/Israel banners at the big Iraq march in 2003 was depressing to me - I think it's just white noise for non-Jews though

Not at all, the anti-Israel aspects of the first march were the reason I didn't go on the second one.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

Oh - good to know

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

There are strong rumours flying around, which is why Eagle might've delayed her leadership challenge.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

by 'strong rumours' = bullshit tweets that could be right, just because..

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

trouble at t'rumour mill lol

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Anyone know what was actually said to Smeeth? She's not quoted it in her statement.

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/we-need-to-build-a-new-left-labour-means-nothing-jeanette-winterson

What I’d like is for the Women’s Equality Party to remake itself as the Equality Party. It’s a relevant name, a powerful name, and naming matters. I’d like to drop Labour and New Labour as words that don’t mean anything anymore. If you still needed proof of that after the last election, Brexit just gave it to you....

Change is what we need now, and an invigorated left, with a strong economic argument and some real solutions for what the world of work is going to look like in the future. The world of work isn’t going to be heavy industry, labour-intensive agriculture, office jobs, careers for life. The middle class is feeling the hit as much as the working class. The old story is told. It’s history....

The media is mainly run by the rich and the right-wing....

It reads to me like Labour, as a party, is finished. The creative forces that make up the left are far from finished. We can find a narrative that unites us, not one that divides us. We can find a left alliance for the 21st century.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Lib Dem supporter says Labour Party is finished. Hold the front page.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

"We'll take the 'Lib Dem' from my party, and the 'Party' from yours..."

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link

I like Jeanette a lot but she voted for Thatcher because she was a woman.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

speaking of which, i just realised the uk, us and germany could all have female leaders by the end of the year

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

the problem with forming a new left party is there's fucking dozens of them already

xp France too!

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

Hang on, that's next year.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

xp France too!

terrifying

Mordy, Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

cue morbs to lecture us all on how it doesn't matter whether they're male or female cuz they're all corporate puppets anyway

lowercase christ (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

the problem with forming a new left party is there's fucking dozens of them already

Caroline Lucas, Steven Agnew, Alice Hooker Stroud and I [Natalie Bennett] have reached out to Jeremy Corbyn, Tim Farron, and Leanne Wood in an open letter, proposing to forge a progressive alliance in the event of snap election.

I wanna whole Dior hand (ledge), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

Stick some quotes around that, I'm not Natalie Bennett.

I wanna whole Dior hand (ledge), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

I and I Natalie Bennett

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

the problem with forming a new left party is there's fucking dozens of them already

obviously no great problem founding them then lol

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-activist-who-berated-mp-ruth-smeeth-says-he-did-not-know-she-was-jewish-and-denies-momentum-a7111366.html

Ruth Smeeth was confronted for her role in the coup. She's in Progress, BTW.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

Lots of monster right-wing loony parties too. Bring on the traffic light tricolore. xp

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

Peter Baynham‏ @PeterBaynham

Don't panic but I think I just saw 10 Downing St on Airbnb
30 Jun 2016, 3:26 pm

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Wadsworth's excuse seems pretty convincing

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

the point is that to form a new party (or movement if you like) away from Labour is to almost certainly fall into the void. the same reason that a bunch of MPs with no real interest in left politics are clinging so tenaciously to the party name now

yeah, i know, just cracking wise to try and keep darkness at bay

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

I imagine 'logic' amongst labour 'moderates' must be something like "look we've bungled this so badly - we wanted you to go and did everything we could to ensure you did but you haven't - that now you really must go to save us from compounded embarrassment and let us get on with doing the important clever and serious things of which everyone is convinced we are capable"

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

the gary younge article paolo posted upthread is a good read, although the vague optimistic vision of the future feels suitably bolted on

ogmor, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

What was the anti-semitic remark to Ruth Smeeth? I can't find anything about it anywhere. Only something about being accused of conspiring with the Telegraph. idgi

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

she thought he was saying that jewish people control the media

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

said this was a "traditional antisemitic slurs to attack me for being part of a 'media conspiracy'" and criticised a lack of response from Corbyn or his office

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

the typo at the end
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/748537120499830784

nxd, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

they should settle it in boats on the thames

nxd, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

The problem with any alliance involving Labour and the LibDems is that there's a big European faultline running right down the middle of it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

sad lols at this

https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/748524206632091648

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

To quote a friends I believe She is claiming that he was insinuating she was part of a media conspiracy bc Jews control the media.

He is claiming that he didn't know she was jewish

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

aka a use of anti-Semitic tropes

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

Seems like he didn't mention or know anything about her being Jewish? Accusation might be bonkers (or not) but seems far-fetched to call it deliberate, or even unintentional-but-offensive

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

The Labour MP Ruth Smeeth walked out of the press conference after being accused of colluding with the Daily Telegraph in a row over leaflets criticising MPs opposed to Corbyn’s continued leadership.

In a later statement, Smeeth said: “I was verbally attacked by a Momentum activist and Jeremy Corbyn supporter who used traditional antisemitic slurs to attack me for being part of a ‘media conspiracy’.

“It is beyond belief that someone could come to the launch of a report on antisemitism in the Labour party and espouse such vile conspiracy theories about Jewish people, which were ironically highlighted as such in Ms Chakrabarti’s report, while the leader of my own party stood by and did absolutely nothing.”

She called on Corbyn to resign, and said she had made a formal complaint to the Labour party general secretary and the chair of the parliamentary Labour party.

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

This is a joy. The moment Nadine Dorries finds out Boris has shafted them

https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/748547049361117184

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

afaict
1. Wadsworth was at the event handing out a press release to journalists calling for the deselection of anti-Corbyn MPs,
2. he refused to give a copy to Smeeth
3. a Telegraph journalist passed Smeeth a copy of Wadsworth's press release
4. in the Q & A following the event Wadsworth said "I saw that the Telegraph handed a copy of a press release to Ruth Smeeth MP so you can see who is working hand in hand"
5. Smeeth claimed this was an anti-semitic trope about jews controlling the media, Wadsworth claimed that he didn't know she was jewish

is that right?

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

so... nobody wants to be in charge of the UK? so weird

Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

I dunno, if you are small-time lefty oddball obsessed with media conspiracies, it's likely you'll accidentally accuse a Jewish person at some point, under the "even a broken clock..." rule.

That's why would be interesting to hear his direct quote. (Although story itself is pretty tangential.)

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

so... nobody wants to be in charge of the UK? so weird

Not really. State o' this place.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

'here, take a nice big swig from this poisoned chalice'

lowercase christ (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

The chalice from the palace... of Westminster

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Basically imagine being given a big bag of shit full of holes and being told it's likely to explode before you can get rid of it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

in a lot of the coverage of the Labour party's implosion over the past week there seems to have been a particular focus on the idea of female Labour MPs "in tears" (Smeeth today, but the press also went hard with this angle when talking about Eagle's resignation and accounts of Monday's PLP meeting before the no-confidence vote), I'm not sure quite how to feel about this?

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

when I put "in tears" in quotes I don't mean to suggest that their distress is counterfeit in any way, to be clear, but the press seems to have singled in on this aspect, I guess partly because it's dramatic/

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Emotionally blackmailed is one way to feel about it.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

(Speaking as a 'girl', obvs)

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Heseltine on Bojo, kicking a man when he's down, go on Hezza, my son!

"He's ripped the party apart. He's created the greatest constitutional crisis of modern times. He knocked billions off the value of the nation's savings. He's like a general who leads his army to the sound of guns and at the sight of the battlefield abandoned the field. I have never seen so contemptible and irresponsible a situation. He must live with the shame of what he has done."

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

margaret beckett sounded close to tears on today yesterday but oddly didn't see it mentioned in any reports

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Nah, she sounded like she was on her deathbed in a bad film.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

It was like something from Beckett.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

haw

imago, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

just put "Margaret Beckett" into google news and these were the top results:

Margaret Beckett breaks down as she calls for Jeremy Corbyn to quit
Daily Mail-29 Jun 2016
Margaret Beckett 'in tears' on radio as she begs Jeremy Corbyn to ...
Mirror.co.uk-29 Jun 2016
Former Labour leader Dame Margaret Beckett says Jeremy Corbyn ...
The Independent-29 Jun 2016
Worst mistake of my life: Margaret Beckett in tears & says Labour ...
Express.co.uk-29 Jun 2016
Margaret Beckett's Voice Cracks As She Tells Jeremy Corbyn To Quit
Huffington Post UK-29 Jun 2016

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson "in pie" as he calls on Corbyn to resign

A beerful Tom.

nashwan, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

Cool...

Asked about Boris Johnson not standing for leader, Ruth Davidson said: "It's not for everyone. Some people just haven't got it. Maybe he's one of them."

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

following the hezza verbal onslaught,
i wonder how long it will be before boris comes out to face the masses/media again.
cue press release re exhaustion and need for a break from public life.

mark e, Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

when's his next column due?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

Uxbridge by-election soon?

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

http://www.wsj.com/articles/out-of-the-brexit-turmoil-opportunity-1467151419

Too much of the Europe of today is absorbed in management of structural problems rather than the elaboration of its purposes. From globalization to migration, the willingness to sacrifice is weakening. But a better future cannot be reached without some sacrifice of the present. A society reluctant to accept this verity stagnates and, over the decades, consumes its substance.

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

SNP due to fall apart tomorrow then?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

just in case this hasn't been linked: https://vine.co/v/hgbab1H2LH7

mookieproof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

I went back and looked at the day Cameron pledged the referendum and there are some very prescient posts here, Tom D OTM especially.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

We didn't mention Boris at all fwiw.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

I went back and looked at the day Cameron pledged the referendum and there are some very prescient posts here, Tom D OTM especially.

"...you all laughed at me – well I have to say, you’re not laughing now, are you? The reason you’re so upset, you’re so angry, has been perfectly clear, from all the angry exchanges this morning."

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

Telegraph:

News Most Viewed

30 Jun 2016, 4:21pm

1 ‘World’s saddest orangutan’ kept in chains for years enjoys new life

30 Jun 2016, 2:48pm

2 Boris Johnson announces he will not run for Prime Minister as Michael Gove declares his bid

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

I don't really see how this situation can end without something that is basically like the EU but without any of the democratic control. Even the most ardently pro-Brexit Tory candidates are fundamentally pro-free markets, and pro-not fucking up the economy when they have votes at stake. They will view access to the single market as the most pressing priority. There's very little reason for the EU to offer too many concessions in return for that access, and certainly not on free movement, so whoever is PM they are going to have to cave on that, no matter how they spin it.

Thing is, a substantial chunk of the population who voted Leave just don't really care that much about the single market, even as they get the benefits (and there are plenty who don't). The backlash over immigration could be so furious that it destabilises whoever is PM, but they'll take the gamble that a backlash over the economy would be worse. Result = rise of the Far Right in big chunks of Britain, with UKIP drifting further in that direction once its core aim of leaving the EU is achieved.

I can't see any way to unfuck this situation that doesn't involve a) ending austerity and b) some kind of economic plan to attract proper industry to areas like the Midlands and the North East in particular. There's basically zero chance of a Tory government doing that, not with any of this lot at least.

Now that the terms of Brexit are the #1 electoral issue, watch as the deficit issue is taken off the table altogether.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

Now that the terms of Brexit are the #1 electoral issue, watch as the deficit issue is taken off the table altogether.

pretty sure May has said this exact thing earlier actually ..

(read so many articles today, so i could be confused !)

mark e, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

The Budget surplus was a stupid, unachievable, self-defeating goal in the first place, I'm not surprised she wants to shitcan it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

good point about UKIP, and a depressing picture indeed

is someone able to give me a clear explanation of the economic argument for freedom of movement in layperson's terms or maybe post a link to one? i think i sort of grasp it, but i feel at this point i ought to be arming myself with a more robust understanding

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

On phone so this is not a good one but basically if goods and business can move but not people, there's nothing to equalise wages. So low-wage areas of the zone can outcompete high-wage areas and businesses can't tempt their labour away with better rates.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

I think the way out of this if a Tory wanted to totally avoid it might be repeating the Euro trick. "We have investigated the impact on the economy and it will not be responsible to Article 50 until these five key economic tests are met." The tests are never met.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Xps
I think that's about the best-case scenario now: soft or no brexit, semi-stable economy and rise of ukip or a rebrand or replacement far-right party.

One cynical way out for for tories, that would dodge doing anything about about the north and Midlands, would be electoral reform - PR, then have 20-30 ukippers propping you up for permanent right-wing government, with someone to blame the racist policies on. Feels improbable, but managing fake brexit will be strange times.

woof, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

are there economic (i.e. non moral) arguments for freedom of movement of people in the absence of freedom of movement of goods?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

Unrestricted immigration is probably a net GDP benefit if I had to guess but who wants to admit that.

Sean, let me be clear (silby), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

keeps wage costs down

EU migration has had a positive impact on GDP according to every study i have read. The UK has an aging population, a skills and language gap in a wide variety of sectors and (though it may have passed) an expanding economy. The alternative would be more people coming in under points-based immigration rules but they are a drag and take a lot of time and effort to get around.

I export X and i need a highly trained and highly skilled expert to create Y. Having the option of selecting from a talent pool covering the whole of Europe is of direct benefit to my business. Having to go through a six-to-nine month process of recruiting someone from China, for example, offering a job, getting them a visa when there's no guarantee it'll be granted, etc, etc, etc is not.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

I know this arguments isn't persuasive at all but freedom of movement has brought some of the most awesome people I know into my life, and I'll Stan hard for it based on nothing more than that tbh

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

otm

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

the ft and a few other places were making the point that freedom of movement isn't a one way street and that one reason that brexit would be a tragedy is because of the young people in the UK who will not have the chance to live in, work in and explore other countries, friendships and love affairs that will never happen etc - all true as far as it goes, but I get the impression that going to live abroad is a mostly middle class thing? (this is just anecdotal, so I may be wrong), seems like it might not be a convincing argument in the areas that voted most strongly for Leave (another example of arguments about the benefits of EU membership that failed to resonate because a lot of ppl felt excluded from those benefits?)

soref, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

keeps wage costs down

Except foreign workers can lower wages whether they come here or not.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Also going to live somewhere sunny (usually Spain) is the end point of the aspirational working class dream.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

I know this arguments isn't persuasive at all but freedom of movement has brought some of the most awesome people I know into my life, and I'll Stan hard for it based on nothing more than that tbh

― stet, Thursday, June 30, 2016 6:59 PM (15 minutes ago)

this to the power of ∞

mark e, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

EU freedom of movement is how i (and most of the people i worked with at the time) lived in germany for four years, and lead directly to my living in the US now. totally buy that argument. was more interested in the economic argument.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

Please join my campaign & let's rebuild a country that works for everyone who was born here theresa2016.co.uk

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Caek the economic argument for it separate to freedom of goods is I think that it allows comparative advantage to take hold across the whole zone. If all the, eh, solar engineers congregate in one area we (the EU) can then have one world-beating solar industry instead of eight also-rans.

Like the US has Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Wall Street etc etc.

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

60k new labour members this week according to laura k & peston

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

About 10k fewer than the entire Lib Dem membership iirc.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Are they joining to vote for Corbyn or against him?

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

For him, afaik

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

There's also a chatterati-based campaign to join to vote him out.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

Hope the chatterati get bored as soon as possible. & surely they wouldn't join in quite as large numbers as it sounds like genuine people are.

Is this the Blairite faction being got rid of in the one way that it could actually happen. Which would possibly be a good thing at any other time and it's just the timing that is the problem? Though I guess it will take however long to unfold.

& in the interim people will keep trying to throw shit at Corbyn and hope something sticks?

Stevolende, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

Ah "genuine" people. I thought they voted ukip?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Ah "genuine" people. I thought they voted ukip?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

I joined just to negate chris d33r1n's vote

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

How many people can there really be on Caitlin Moran's FB friends list?

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Cher tells it like it is:

https://twitter.com/cher/status/748616854684348416

Alba, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Put that another way, people who are joining genuinely not just as a ruse to oust him.
Or do the chatterati equate to right wing Labour anyway?

Stevolende, Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

thanks a lot for your thoughts on free movement. so basically it allows for the redistribution of the workforce to facilitate efficient growth across the region. interesting point about it enabling zones of specialization, stet, i can see that the uk has greatly benefitted from that in areas like technology and banking.

are there economic (i.e. non moral) arguments for freedom of movement of people in the absence of freedom of movement of goods?

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:42 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

caek, i was digging around on the net and i found this which suggests a case for both or either:

The founders of the EU believed there were large economic benefits of free movement of workers, namely allowing the allocation of labour to its most efficient use (ie labour should move from areas of high unemployment to low). However, as Portes points out, in fact, economic theory is ambiguous on whether factor mobility (in this context, the free movement of labour and capital) is a complement or a substitute to free trade (the free movement of goods and services). He continues:

‘In a standard Heckscher-Ohlin model, they are pure substitutes. Either free trade or factor mobility will increase the efficiency of resource allocation and will maximise overall welfare; it is not necessary to have both[…] However, the general consensus among economists is that labour mobility, like trade, is welfare-enhancing, although there may be significant distributional effects.’

The advent of the single currency may have changed this situation. According to Mundell, in the absence of the ability by states to use their exchange rate as an adjustment mechanism, an optimal currency area needs other adjustment mechanisms, in particular labour mobility. Thus free movement of persons is no longer just politically desirable but it is also economically essential for the operation of the single currency. Free movement is a safety valve.

https://www.freemovement.org.uk/brexit-briefing-free-movement-and-the-single-market/

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

ahh, this page is really helpful:

http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/1386/economics/free-movement-of-labour/

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

surely no way gove see this all the way through. ppl may doubt his intelligence but he does seem canny/self-awaren, & he has to know he's not a big_tent_pol. with a GE looming...

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOmplVWEAAtq2u.jpg

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/MiriamElder/status/748521892663930880 i didn't know why the original statement (when not willfully misread) was supposed to be bad and i don't know why this is either, adapting to this new world of never understanding what anyone is talking about is difficult

despite the fact its not a scotland only groove, i am loving that cover.

mark e, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/cher/status/748627801838747648

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

xxp what is the implication - if you're a jew who does have a positive (or nuanced) opinion about israel then you're comparable to pro-isis muslims and fair game?

Mordy, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

the point that jewish people should not be expected to be held accountable for the actions of israel is fair enough, and correct. the intentional, or otherwise, inference that israel and isis are comparable is one i would've avoided making at a press conference regarding a report into anti-semitism in the political party i lead

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

I mean, let's be charitable, let's say no equivalence was intended ... why mention israel at all? think of the optics for the love of christ

The Nickelbackean Ethics (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

yes essentially that imo. my take is i find a lot of this stuff not particularly offensive but there has been plenty of gross stuff (and some questionable from corbyn himself in the past) that i understand why ppl are feeling particularly raw.

Mordy, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Hard to avoid mentioning Israel if the report was prompted by Labour Party members crossing the line between being anti-Israel and anti-Semitic perhaps? Corbyn has a tin ear, that much we know.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

apparently the report wasn't particularly good at delineating what type of talk crosses the line either so all in all a fail

Mordy, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

original comparison wasn't to isis tho it was to "various self-styled islamic states and organisations", and certainly there are plenty of people who accept isis as an extreme of islam but would still want individual muslims to answer for the actions of e.g. saudi arabia. but perhaps it is let's say optically unwise to use the phrase 'islamic states' when not referring to isis

MDC's point stands: try do yourself a favour & not get reported for anti-semitism at the launch of your report on anti-semitism in your party

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

especially when usually your comments get given the most adverse of spins in the most benign of environments

cozen, Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

I know this arguments isn't persuasive at all but freedom of movement has brought some of the most awesome people I know into my life, and I'll Stan hard for it based on nothing more than that tbh

― stet, Thursday, June 30, 2016 6:59 PM (15 minutes ago)

this to the power of ∞

― mark e, Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:18 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Post of the week, really.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 30 June 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

Don't know if YouGov have the numbers of the 60k

YouGov/Times (Labour leadership, selectorate):

CORBYN 50 (-14)
NOT CORBYN 47 (+14)

27th-30th Jun
N=1,200

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

Ooh now

Leatherhead North (Mole Valley) result:
LDEM: 56.6% (+27.4)
CON: 22.3% (-11.7)
UKIP: 10.3% (-7.9)
LAB: 8.9% (-5.7)
GRN: 1.8% (-2.1)

stet, Thursday, 30 June 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

... looks like (very) disgruntled Remain voters lashing out?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

I tend to think that there is a real problem with anti-semitism on the left, particularly on the specific strand of the left that forms Corbyn's base, and that it is a problem that is often downplayed; but it seems to me that Marc Wadsworth is being thrown under the bus here in a quite appalling way? numerous Labour MPs taking the opportunity to vilify Corbyn for allegedly standing by whilst a colleague is "abused" and "verbally attacked". this sort of thing:

Ruth Cadbury MP Verified account @RuthCadbury
JC did nothing while @PeoplesMomentum activist launched unprovoked attack on Lab MP #StanduptoBullying

idk, there are enough people I respect who feel differently about this that I don't trust my own judgement, and I certainly don't blame Smeeth for being upset, but it seems like character assassination?

soref, Friday, 1 July 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

I'm always bugged by the supposed left-wingers who keep calling for a "cultural boycott" of Israel, as though 1) the artists of Israel are the problem, rather than Netanyahu and his ilk, and 2) Israel has some monopoly and shitty behaviour. In Australia the same people don't call for a cultural boycott on the US (what boxsets would they watch, after all?) or Australia itself, with its offshore refugee rape-and-torture camps.

there are plenty of reasons why BDS is being applied to Israel and not to other places, maybe the biggest one being that its origin is not the result of some Euro-American activist brainstorm but rather as a call coming from Palestinian civil society. But it seems true that the unquestioning acceptance of it is a prime source for incubating antisemitism in these movements - taken as dogma rather than as one political tactic among others it does seem to suggest some evilness exceptionalism applied to Israel, and certainly pro-Palestinian groups are in my experience an awful lot better at telling people how to defend themselves against claims of antisemitism than they are at ensuring people aren't antisemitic.

Don't know if this has already been posted, but Robert Peston has posted this on hi FB page:

Boris Johnson is persuaded he is the victim of a beautifully and ruthlessly exercised coup by Michael Gove and his longstanding adviser, Dominic Cummings, I understand.

Here is what his people tell me.

1. Johnson's Telegraph article on Monday, which outraged some Leave supporters because it appeared to row back on controlling EU immigration, was edited and approved by Gove.

2. Johnson neither offered George Osborne the post of foreign secretary nor leaked that he had done this. His people say Gove had those talks with Osborne.

3. On Saturday night, Gove asked for and was offered the post of chancellor in a Johnson government, with the added responsibility of negotiating the terms of Brexit.

4. Gove insisted on bringing his controversial adviser Dominic Cummings into the team. Johnson refused.

5. Even so, Gove brought Cummings to a meeting with Johnson and Sir Lynton Crosby on Monday.

6. Gove wanted Johnson to replace his media advisor Will Walden with Paul Stephenson. Johnson refused.

7. Gove persuaded Johnson not to offer any future cabinet posts to high profile supporters, so as not to reduce his flexibility in government. So Johnson should not be blamed if some potential big-hitting backers, like Andrea Leadsom, could not be won over.

8. Gove told the media he was quitting the Johnson camp and running to be leader without personally telling Johnson.

9. Yesterday, the media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who News Corp owns the Sun and Times newspapers, told the Times's business summit that he had doubts about Johnson and wished Gove was a candidate.

Ain't politics a lovely business.

groovypanda, Friday, 1 July 2016 06:53 (seven years ago) link

3. On Saturday night, Gove asked for and was offered the post of chancellor in a Johnson government, with the added responsibility of negotiating the terms of Brexit.

Not that a specific Stephen Collins cartoon has been far from our minds in general the last few days...

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 1 July 2016 07:07 (seven years ago) link

Come on, with the exception of any American posters here we all surely know that that part of the speech was written, edited and/or approved by Seamus Milne and that he is exactly the sort of fraud who would blithely conflate an elected government with a terrorist organisation.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 07:08 (seven years ago) link

Sorry, compare not conflate.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 07:19 (seven years ago) link

bloody hell i take one day off gorging on politics to go to wimbledon and it turns into even more of a clusterfuck

seeing a disturbing amount of "theresa may, at last, a sensible option and clear head" talk.

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Friday, 1 July 2016 07:50 (seven years ago) link

^^ Dutch Guardian-like paper had a headline saying "Theresa May: Britian's Angela Merkel'. So cringeworthy.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 07:51 (seven years ago) link

Yes, including from Martin Kettle in The Guardian.

Nine months ago her keynote Conservative Party Conference speech was described as "dangerous and factually wrong" and "fanning the flames of prejudice in a cynical attempt to become Conservative leader" and summarised as "immigrants are stealing your job, making you poorer and ruining your country. Never mind the facts, just feel angry at foreigners" by The Telegraph of all papers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11913927/Theresa-Mays-immigration-speech-is-dangerous-and-factually-wrong.html

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 07:55 (seven years ago) link

She absolutely 100% bears more responsibility than any other cabinet politician for the current atmosphere of fear, ignorance and hatred towards immigrants.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 07:56 (seven years ago) link

Important to stay on message re: May's appalling racism and homophobia as evidenced by racist vans, turning a blind eye to detainee rapes in asylum centres, and all the other things that make her a despot, albeit one who can imitate an adult in public.

jedi slimane (suzy), Friday, 1 July 2016 07:56 (seven years ago) link

PM material then

xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 July 2016 08:04 (seven years ago) link

albeit one who can imitate an adult in public

a skill sorely lacking among british politicians tbh

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Friday, 1 July 2016 09:10 (seven years ago) link

As is this: @tnewtondunn New Opinium poll: 7% of Leavers regret the way they voted, 3% of Remainers do. That would wipe out #Brexit's majority.

stet, Friday, 1 July 2016 09:15 (seven years ago) link

so thankful i've reached my telegraph free articles limit!!!

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Friday, 1 July 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

The article is amazingly tin-eared in a lot of ways, but it's hard to beat "One move that would help it a lot would be scrapping the bank levy - it is currently forecast to bring in more than £900m a year, cash the industry could use to get it through a difficult period."

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 1 July 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

difficult period huh

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 1 July 2016 09:40 (seven years ago) link

We should scrap EU-mandated labour market regulations and social protections as fast as possible. ... Issues such as parental leave can be freely agreed between companies and staff.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 July 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

^ my god

conrad, Friday, 1 July 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah top of the things that are fucking up this country - parental leave.

mark e, Friday, 1 July 2016 09:58 (seven years ago) link

We have just got to trust that the inherent humanity of big business will always be there and they will always do the right thing, as they always have done.

calzino, Friday, 1 July 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

not sure humanity is a consideration in that piece, if we want to make britain great again we really do have to roll back social change to the victorian era. except obviously replace the mills with sports direct warehouses

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

was thinking it would be fun to hack itv and start broadcasting auf wiedersehen pet during prime time, but maybe dub it all into polish with english subtitles

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

gove's hammering this line in his speech: "I will end free movement, introduce an Australian-style points system and bring numbers down. With my leadership, it will be delivered."

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

Good work by Gove there, ensuring the split in the Tory Party remains as wide as ever.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 10:41 (seven years ago) link

I was wondering earlier, did Australia ever get over the White Australia policy. Do hope colour isn't something feeding into a point system that Gove is attempting to implement.
He did actually just say that the population had already voted on a points system. Are people tripping over their words in live press meetings or does he actually believe that/ hadn't heard anything about that before today anyway.

& God, not been exposed to Gove for long periods before and now have him at a live press conference on tv in the background. God he's a slimeball.

Stevolende, Friday, 1 July 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

Australia has much higher rates of migration than the UK and is seen as far more open for skilled workers and student visas. It has been the chief beneficiary of the Theresa-May-cultivated suggestion that the UK doesn't want people to come.

It is, however, famously brutal on refugees and migrants coming without permits.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

fwiw, lots of centrists in both parties pushing for a points-based-system seem to view "you should get more points for being European" as unproblematic.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

I don't think any incoming PM would be stupid enough to fuck with parental leave, short of lowering holiday entitlement it's about as surefire a vote-loser as I can think of.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

Any points based system is completely tied to losing free market access. Any suggestion otherwise is either economically suicidal or just lying to the public again. Fuck's sake Gove.

stet, Friday, 1 July 2016 11:06 (seven years ago) link

What they'll probably aim for is free market access in return for a points-based-system where EU nationals with a secure job offer get maximum points. That seemed to be the direction Hannan was heading. No particular reason why the EU should agree to it but i'd assume that would be the starting point.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

I was wondering earlier, did Australia ever get over the White Australia policy.

We pretend we did, but if you have brown skin and you overstay and they catch you it's the detention camps for you, but if you are a white british backpacker and you do the same nobody gives a fuck

^^ Dutch Guardian-like paper had a headline saying "Theresa May: Britian's Angela Merkel'. So cringeworthy.

Cathy Newman wrote an equivalent for the Torygraph yesterday.

nashwan, Friday, 1 July 2016 11:23 (seven years ago) link

May is profiting from having even worse loonies to her right isn't she? Making her seem like a 'moderate, safe' choice. Ugh.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

She presumably thinks she has it sewn up, hence her hug a hoodie moment built into the speech.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 1 July 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

I can't see how she can lose, look at the clowns she's up against. She'll be as a disaster, of course.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 11:50 (seven years ago) link

I was wondering earlier, did Australia ever get over the White Australia policy.

We pretend we did, but if you have brown skin and you overstay and they catch you it's the detention camps for you, but if you are a white british backpacker and you do the same nobody gives a fuck

― 🐸a hairy howling toad torments a man whose wife is deathly ill (James Morrison), Friday, 1 July 2016 9:14 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Australia does like to indefinitely lock up and deport kiwis who moved to Australia and commit minor offences as adults but not to tropics concentration camps.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 1 July 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

http://thebrexitplan.com/

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

imo May should be made PM by this time next week to allow us a full summer of Labour battles

xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:03 (seven years ago) link

I want click on the Blue button

xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:03 (seven years ago) link

I think we need to explore how we can develop a fairly funded, flexible and robust union for our new circumstances

RIP barnett

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

you'd think the conservatives would learn the lesson about how propagandising everyone in england into unthinking resentment can and does come back & bite them on the actual arse sometimes

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

You can get 10/1 on Gove. Leadsom is 9/2.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 1 July 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

McDonnell says "when Britain leaves the European Union, free movement of labour and people will then come to an end."

http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/07/01/john-mcdonnell-freedom-of-movement-will-end

though he has clarified on twitter that he was "stating the formal reality as it stands - not talking about Labour's position on free movement"

soref, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

rejecting freedom of movement seems to be the one things that pretty all factions in the PLP agree on?

soref, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:22 (seven years ago) link

Not that a specific Stephen Collins cartoon has been far from our minds in general the last few days...

http://gove2016.co.uk/

(Collins denies any involvement)

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:23 (seven years ago) link

I see there's a Remain march in London tomorrow

don't quite know what that's supposed to achieve but have fun on that, guys, and try not to make 48% of the population look too much like bitter sore losers and/or brick-throwing lunatics

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

funny how Theresa May was ostensibly 'Remain' but 10x less visible during Brexit campaigns than Corbyn, yet is now held up as the future of the party

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 July 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/WHIJtU5.png

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:42 (seven years ago) link

I don't watch GoT but I assume it's not a compliment

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

funny how Theresa May was ostensibly 'Remain' but 10x less visible during Brexit campaigns than Corbyn, yet is now held up as the future of the party

An advantage in her case, a disadvantage in Corbyn's, given how voters of the respective parties voted.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

He's fantasising about torturing Gove for several days, letting him think he's escaped, catching him, torturing him again, and then cutting his penis off at the end of it.

That's actually what he's doing.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 12:52 (seven years ago) link

!!SPOILERS!!

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Friday, 1 July 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

I see there's a Remain march in London tomorrow

don't quite know what that's supposed to achieve but have fun on that, guys, and try not to make 48% of the population look too much like bitter sore losers and/or brick-throwing lunatics

way i view it is
1) nothing about how leave will be handled or the extent to which it will happen has been decided yet and popular protest seems as decent a way as any to make your voice heard at the moment
2) to protest at a leave campaign whose messages were lies (either to deceive or inflame or both) and things that could not be carried out. a defence of democracy, tho i know that many won't see it like that
3) to stand and make a show of standing with people from other backgrounds and countries living, working, not working, and visiting this country.
4) to express the anger that i and others feel.

all of those seemed a bit more important than not appearing to be a sore loser tbh.

Fizzles, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

RIP barnett

it's fine, the shadow scottish secretary will tear this to shreds... oh...

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

shd add I'm not a natural marcher - co-opted by banners into groups or beliefs I don't share. but at times I don't see what else you can do.

Fizzles, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

Fizzles otm

I have hearing problems and probably shouldn't attend loud marches, but going anyway

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

you're right Fizzles and standing up and being counted is a good idea

I was just bristling slightly because I was told about it by someone who's been getting v "London vs ignorant turnip-farming provincials" abt this, and I am not a Londoner

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

Oh no you're supposed to go quietly to the detention camps cos otherwise you'll seem like a sore loser.

At the moment I think doing anything you can to try to prevent an event that has as yet not physically happened and has already created a great deal of hassle is an intelligent pursuit.

Stevolende, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

The most effective approach would probably be protesting to demand either a second referendum or (more likely) a proper general election before Article 50 is triggered.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

I don't think there's anything wrong with standing up for London, a heterogeneous city of 8.5 million people that mostly (even Barnet!) voted to Remain.

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

Also we're about to see involuntary repatriation used as a bargaining chip by the incoming PM, and if you can't protest about that then...

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

understand, spacecadet. that "provincial thickos/racists" line is enraging - and have heard it from a few city types.

Fizzles, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

Owen Paterson MP
@Owen_PatersonMP

Supporting @andrea4leader 4 clear, optimistic vision 4 UK outside EU. Economic experience w honesty, integrity & commitment 2 social justice
1:56 PM - 1 Jul 2016

How Andrea Leadsom voted on Social Issues

Has never voted on equal gay rights
Has never voted on allowing marriage between two people of same sex
Generally voted against laws to promote equality and human rights

How Andrea Leadsom voted on Welfare and Benefits

Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices
Generally voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability
Almost always voted for a reduction in spending on welfare benefits
Consistently voted against spending public money to create guaranteed jobs for young people who have spent a long time unemployed

How Andrea Leadsom voted on Taxation and Employment

Consistently voted against increasing the tax rate applied to income over £150,000
Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax
Consistently voted against an annual tax on the value of expensive homes (popularly known as a mansion tax)

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

Surprised to see M Gove self-identifying as QPR.

It occurs to me that this makes today's surprises rather less surprising than yesterday's surprises.

Tim, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Worse is the London Elite v. The Genuine Voice of the English Working Class narrative.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

i think it's because they have her madge in their name? xp

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

xp That's true too! Take your pick of enraging/nebulous dichotomies

(and all very selectively applied - when Boris was still in the running there was a Sun article linked on this thread which described Cameron and Oliver Letwin as out-of-touch Etonians and then went on to talk about brilliant Boris would save us all or something. Er, but...)

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 1 July 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Honestly curious why people would care about these pseudo-media-invented A vs B narratives

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 1 July 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

IS THE PLURAL OF CANNONS CANNON?!

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

lol

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Cannii?

nashwan, Friday, 1 July 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

canneloni

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Friday, 1 July 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

this week of all fucking weeks geo. hill dies

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Friday, 1 July 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

modernism is a great way to stop shitheel politicians appropriating your work

the idea that londoners voted for remain because of their uniquely multicultural cosmopolitan weltanschauung and therefore they deserve be to treated differently to the loiners, liverpudlians and mancunians who voted similarly (& whose motives & existence are not really worth thinking about) is actually very good and I like it a lot

ogmor, Friday, 1 July 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

Have definitely been trolling my white fb friends who keep sharing deeply silly petitions about separatist woketopia fka london

oh, amazonaws (wins), Friday, 1 July 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

Manchester and Liverpool are quite welcome to join any secessionist movement afaic.

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Apparently there are students in Manchester, so that explains why that city betrayed its working class roots. Don't know how they explain Liverpool though. Or Bristol. Or Cardiff.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Leicester is pretty obvious though.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Friday, 1 July 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

some guy was in local paper the other day suggesting that brighton gains independence and basically turns into monaco

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 1 July 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

don't forget warwick :)

nxd, Friday, 1 July 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Liverpool doesn't read the sun

stet, Friday, 1 July 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

https://www.rt.com/news/349149-zeman-eu-czech-referendum/

Here we go...

Matt DC, Friday, 1 July 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

http://www.gove2016.co.uk

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 July 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

xpost I can't quite figure out these countries that have both a prime minister and a president. Does the authority of one usurp the other?

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Friday, 1 July 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

legislature/govt and executive/head of state, normally, so their duties don't overlap

ogmor, Friday, 1 July 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Apologies if this seems like a very navel-gaze-y response to the whole thing, but is anyone aware of any decent articles on why Scotland voted differently on Brexit from England/Wales? Or have any views on this themselves?
I'm glad that Scotland voted the way it did (though whether it will matter in the long run is obv. unclear), but I was surprised by how significant the difference was in terms of support/lack of support for Remain. A lot of the social issues that have been pointed to as factors influencing the win for Leave exist here too, so I've been struggling to fully get my head round it.

Option 1 : Do Nothing (Mr Andy M), Friday, 1 July 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

not read any analyses but here's my hunches
- lower levels of immigration + less press 'monstering' of immigrants (not less racism, scots can be insular & as nativist as the best)
- no senior politicians (kez, sturgeon, wee ruthy d) campaigned for leave
- UKIP are a /joke/ up here
- questions around why we were even having this question asked? ppl understood it was a tory obsesh & tories get short shrift in scotland (on the whole)
- scots always felt more 'european'; well, I've always felt I was european more than british. european for me = inclusive, outward looking, peaceful. british = well...

that's before you even get into the historiological aspects concerning the hollowing out of the labour base vote going to the SNP (pro-EU) in scotland, but UKIP (pro-leave) in england

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

plus we also have our own 'sovereignty' bête noir up here (whatever you think about the perceived inconsistencies of the SNP's position of 'independent within the EU')

cozen, Friday, 1 July 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

Consequences of Brexit are possibly more severe for Scotland. Also Project Fear's xenophobia was designed to resonate with some people who regard the Scots in a similar way as they regard immigrants -,ie. A drain on the welfare state.

everything, Friday, 1 July 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

i do find myself a bit surprised by how even my most reactionary of scottish relatives seem relatively unconcerned about migration. but yes, contrary to the ideas of scottish ppl who think of us as far more enlightened than our neighbours, racism more generally continues unhindered

I think that part of the reason Scotland voted remain is because of the popularity of the SNP, who are a liberal party with an optimistic vision of Europe. Obviously there are still economic problems and racism here but I'd say that since the referendum most people are feeling more confident in politics itself and more positive about the future. There aren't any parties in England that are really providing something positive to believe in - the referendum campaign in England was basically project fear v let's stop all the foreigners coming and taking our jobs

I also think that pretty much everyone in Scotland recognises that we're a small country and that being in a union with a whole bunch of other small countries would be to our advantage (and most EU member states aren't big world powers). It seems like a lot of people in England still see themselves as being a big player on the world stage and that there's significant numbers of English people who see themselves as being somehow better than the rest of Europe

paolo, Saturday, 2 July 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

One other factor, possibly - Scottish Sun far less militantly Brexit than the English edition and broadly supportive of SNP, national Scottish newspapers generally pro-Remain

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Saturday, 2 July 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

there's a significant number of English people who see themselves as being somehow better than the rest of the world

from there stems the ~optimism~ that it'll all work out vis-a-vis single market vs. free movement - we're too important for people not to let us do what we want

conrad, Saturday, 2 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

yep, we had an empire, we dictate to the rest of the world, it does not dictate to us, a world-view still predicated on Hitlerian dominate or be dominated

It's a difficult balance between 'we are too big and important to marginalise' and 'the rest of the world is out to get us' neither of which is remotely true.

The Mail has been complaining about a "Japanese-owned newspaper" (the Financial Times) talking the economy down today.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 2 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

oh man eye-rolling at my dad's stern conviction that in all international sporting events involving England every official would cheat against them because they were jealous and hated our values

Good analysis with no conclusions.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 2 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

i read a sort of conclusion that i'm already at in terms of the micro-climate and the conversations we have with our friends and neighbours and work colleagues. it accounts for the near revulsion i've felt all along at the more hysterical, declamatory, "you thick bastards have ruined our country" spiel we've experienced since the referendum. if we are in a culture war i've got a foot placed square in both camps and not much love for the militants in either party.

yes I see that except I'm not sure how this operates to something substantial (and this is all left open) and also its just as much "you thick grandma" so those conversations will begin at home except I think everyone will shut the door and not even start.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

Robert Kimbell @RedHotSquirrel
Ghana (population 28 million, 2016 GDP growth +4.5% and 2017 +7.7% says IMF, GDP larger than Latvia's) wants a post-Brexit FTA with the UK.

yay!

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

yep, we had an empire, we dictate to the rest of the world, it does not dictate to us, a world-view still predicated on Hitlerian dominate or be dominated

I'm still suddenly remembering with bemusement in the shower or wherever the headlines after Cameron's EU visit last week, the ones where they would have it he "demanded" changes to immigration, as if we had the slightest ability to demand a single thing from them.

Conrad OTM.

stet, Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

the two people I know who I know voted leave (work colleagues) "don't think that people should talk about politics" - this without being given a hard time by anyone - although they presumably do sort of with someone somewhere

conrad, Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

That piece from the nondom-owned Mail is genuinely horrific. Total enemy-within fascist posturing. None of the enduring chaos could be down to experts being correct or the Mail being wrong — it must be saboteurs in big business and fifth columnists.

Xp the lala-can't-hear-you school of "vote with your gut, not with consideration"

stet, Saturday, 2 July 2016 12:32 (seven years ago) link

i've seen enough people act like hectoring arseholes when discussing politics (or anything else i guess) at work or in social settings that i have some sympathy for the "let's not talk about this here" attitude

Talking of hectoring arseholes there was so much nauseousness on last night's/todays re-run of Any Questions. The combination of Caroline Flint and some scouse-gobshite UKIP twat is too much to take, one of them moments where I feel like taking a lump hammer to the wireless.

calzino, Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

callmejez has to be 'held back' after he 'lunged' at a female reporter
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/02/jeremy-corbyn-urged-to-retire-with-dignity-as-hard-left-recruit/

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

Doesn't help when you embed a video of him not lunging at the reporter within your story but all clicks are good clicks.

Aaron Banks has apparently decided May is too much of an Islamist to lead the country so is backing Leadsom. idk how much this helps her but she'll have a huge warchest to draw from if she gets on the ballot.

https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/status/749198783813152768

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

I know leave voter, and he admitted this morning he regrets the decision. He cited guilt talking to our mutual Spanish friend and watching the instant political mess. He's a 51 year old Sun reader from Barking.

plums (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

My partner voted Leave, despite initially intending to Remain and also put £25 on Leave when it was 6/1. She doesn't read The Sun and is a pro-Corbyn Labour voter, so doesn't neatly fit into demographic models. i suspect there was probably a lot like that.

calzino, Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:45 (seven years ago) link

callmejez

??

glumdalclitch, Saturday, 2 July 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

It was just refreshing to hear him say it. I have felt so terrible about leave voters as a big group of 'other' whilst never actually talking to any. Nice to remember not everyones a fascist.

plums (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 2 July 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

Her sister is a Sun reader in that pejorative sense that she always talks ignorant racist shite, and also is a vociferous Leaver, but was also married to a Polish national for 20 odd years. I feel that if some Remain campaigner's (espesh the Tory ones) had tried to address people like this as human beings rather than using transparent scare tactics or trying to threaten them or arrogantly hectoring them they might have got more positive results.

calzino, Saturday, 2 July 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Gove-fish is one of the more upsetting things I've seen in a political cartoon

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmQw0nlUsAAOmra.jpg

soref, Saturday, 2 July 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

well, thats tonights nightmare sorted.

mark e, Saturday, 2 July 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

JC speaks
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeremy-corbyn-exclusively-reveals-hes-8335834

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

As does Gove:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/07/02/my-confidence-in-boris-johnson-evaporated-after-the-vote-for-bre/

You can get 16/1 on him winning, compared to 5/2 on second-placed Leadsom.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

This fucking paper.
http://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/749356437873238017/photo/1

stet, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

everything in this guardian article is dispiriting:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/02/corbyn-keeps-watson-arms-length

A senior Labour source, close to the embattled leader, said they had blocked Watson from talking privately to Corbyn because they have a “duty of care. They [Watson’s aides] want Watson to be on his own with Corbyn so that he can jab his finger at him,” the source said.

“We are not letting that happen. He’s a 70-year-old [sic] man. We have a duty of care … This is not a one-off. There is a culture of bullying. Maybe it’s a Blairite/Brownite thing.”

this does seem to square with the theory that Corbyn is being pushed into staying by people around him, maybe Mcdonnell and Milne, unless the quoted source is in fact intentionally trying to undermine Corbyn by presenting him as a vulnerable invalid. at this stage part of me would like Corbyn to go just for the sake of his own health and happiness - I can't think of many politicians who have sustained so much vitriol from so many sides for such an extended period of time, and it seems particularly cruel when the recipient is someone who afaict never really sought to be a frontline politician but rather had the position thrust upon him.

soref, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Under the supposed extraction deal – allegedly sketched out last Wednesday by Corbyn’s director of policy, Andrew Fisher – Corbyn would have stood down as leader in return for staying in the shadow cabinet, senior Labour sources claimed.

His close ally, John McDonnell, would have remained as shadow chancellor and both men’s staff would have been retained. A place in a future leadership election would have been secured for a candidate on the left, such as the shadow defence secretary, Clive Lewis.

There would also have been a commitment to Labour retaining an anti-austerity policy platform.

Sources said that the plan was swiftly dropped by Corbyn on Wednesday evening, with one claiming that McDonnell was “keeping Corbyn hostage”.

if this plan is in any way feasible, this would surely be the best deal that the Labour left could hope for? If Corbyn is forced to resign without a guarantee that a successor will be a candidate in the subsequent leadership election, or defeated in a leadership election himself, then it's over for the hard left, the party's right will immediately set about making sure that nothing like Corbyn can ever happen again, yes?

soref, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

it seems very optimistic, a deal that left McDonnell as shadow chancellor and risked another left-winger becoming leader (one who may be harder to get rid of in the long term) would surely be just as unpalatable as the current situation for a lot of the PLP?

soref, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

thought the claim in that guardian article that andy burnham had sought to speak w/corbyn had been denied by andy b himself. throws doubt on the rest of the story imo

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

corbyn in shadow cab + mcdonnell chancellor + lewis on the ticket + anti-austerity platform would be a blinding result from this shitshow. don't see it happening

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

A delegation of shadow cabinet ministers, led by shadow home secretary Andy Burnham, also failed to secure a meeting with Corbyn last Thursday to try to negotiate a resolution.

https://twitter.com/andyburnhammp/status/748542119703363588

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

Wouldn't trust The Guardian and the 49 quid they keep asking to keep producing this 'journalism' can fuck off.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 2 July 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

xp some people were saying on twitter that Corbyn's aides refused to pass on Burnham's request for a meeting, so both Burnham's denial that Corbyn *himself* refused to speak to him and the story a meeting was nixed are true, who knows who or what to believe at this point, though.

soref, Saturday, 2 July 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

basically everycunt's at it & george 34ton is the useful-est idiot

cozen, Saturday, 2 July 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn must be desperate to get shot of this whole situation by now and I suspect that his main concern is ensuring that the party doesn't immediately fall into the hands of a centre-right, pro-austerity, anti-immigration clique. Why on earth anyone would agree to keeping McDonnell on as Shadow Chancellor I don't know, and this is speaking as someone who thinks he's generally grown into the role in recent months.

I'm not sure that, given the current situation, I'm that bothered whether or not the new leader comes from "the left". What's important for me, more than anything, is that they will oppose austerity. Labour can't and will not win if they support it, and the collapse of the Osborne project *might* mean the end of the austerity trap that did for Miliband and created the conditions for Corbyn's election. That's not to suggest that the Tories will suddenly become pro-big state overnight, but they might calculate that Brexit uncertainty + fiscal waterboarding is unlikely to be a vote-winner.

No party and no politician currently has a mandate to negotiate the terms of exit from the EU. Labour needs to be in a situation where they can demand a snap election before Article 50 is triggered. I just don't see how they can do that with Corbyn.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

the entire PLP thinks that opposing austerity means being on the left

It should be reasonably straightforward to make the case against austerity as part of a generally pro-business pitch to the country, it's not like every economist making the case is a raging Trot, but the imagination just doesn't seem to be there within the PLP.

The bulk of the PLP appear to be trapped in some bout of collective Stockholm Syndrome where they internalise and absorb every lie that is told by the right and then just regurgitate it endlessly. Some of them probably believe it, but I'm sure the majority don't and yet they continue to bang this shit out. If they didn't, the chances are that Corbyn would have been nowhere near the leadership in the first place.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

Austerity has been put on hold so it won't be a massive issue. Corbyn's team were the only ones coming up with an alternative kind of plan at he time. There is no vision on the PLP and Angela Eagle would lose against Teresa May.

The coup can only succeed by Corbyn being defeated in a leadership challenge - if he is forced out many people in London and other Metropolitan areas would stay at home at election time.

Corbyn must be desperate to get shot of this whole situation by now

Doesn't sound like it - among all the ton of rumour flying, and even with the 'a week is a long time in politics' business he is pretty defiant in the Mirror to the extent that the events of the week don't appear to have had an effect.

There would have to be huge ongoing concessions and a plan to democratise the party in such a way that he would consider standing down. And this has never been about Corbyn's media management, but about his politics.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

Austerity has not been put on hold fwiw, Osborne has abandoned his surplus targets, which were unachieveable anyway, but the basic fact of an ongoing squeeze on public spending remains. Depends on the extent to which the incoming leader wants to make it an election issue.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

This looks increasingly like it's going to be a May v Leadsom contest, with Leadsom refusing to rule out a Cabinet post for Farage, and being thrown by an extremely predictable interview question about publishing her tax return.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

That looks like no contest then. LOL Gove though, what a disaster.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

Well the target was the major driver for austerity. That and the AAA rating which is also gone. Yes there will be ongoing cuts as the economy tanks. Why Labour has to oppose but pre-Corbyn they were so awful at it..

Any upcoming gen election would be on Brexit and various issues surrounding freedom of movement. The line from Labour on this partic issue might be key.

Corbyn (should he survive to fight it lol) has not wavered on complicating the issue of immigration - so yes the cuts are what generates the fights among people on the ground over what is left - and immigrants get the worst of it. That may never get a fair hearing but unfortunately the climate is one for a long game, beyond elections - and there is politics beyond this election..

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

But Farage is over. I get the old Enoch Powellthing where it was better for the Tories having him 'inside the tent pissing out rather than having him outside the tent pissing in', but who could even trust Farage's aim?

Mark G, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

Did Gove actually expect to win or did he just want to detail the Johnson bandwagon?

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Gove just wanted to destroy Johnson's challenge.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

He is, comically, reusing the Brexit slogans. He's trying not to win, surely?

Mark G, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

Hang on did'? You mean the EU vote or the upcoming leadership vote?

Mark G, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure Gove thought he could win.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Gove probably thought he could win, until about 30 minutes after his announcement.

He's like the upwardly-mobile guy in Alan Hollinghurst's The Line of Beauty, who finds himself embraced by posh people and treated as family, until something happens that causes the posh people to feel betrayed by this arriviste and shut him out of their lives. Wagons are circled, etc.

Gove is in the process of being oiked by every posh mate he's ever made, and I for one am delighting in this oiking.

jedi slimane (suzy), Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

If in the unlikely event that Corbyn were to suddenly die, what would happen. Would Eagle be immediately promoted or who would take over?

Stevolende, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

'unlikely event that Corbyn were to suddenly die' = how you do a proper Coup!

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Deputy Leader (Tom Watson) would take over and a leadership contest would follow shortly afterwards.

The Rob Marris incident is bizarre. He deleted a load of work preparing a rebuttal to the Finance Bill when he resigned as Shadow Treasury Minister and claims he was entirely justified in doing so because Labour didn't pay for it directly.

One Labour source said those at the top of the party were livid when it emerged that files on a shared Labour party hard drive relating to the finance bill going through parliament had been deleted as the shadow finance secretary Rob Marris resigned.

An internal email seen by this newspaper said: “Unfortunately, it looks like someone from Rob Marris’s office has deleted the vast majority of the finance bill records and notes on each clause from the shared drive.”

A Labour source raised the spectre of deselection, adding that it fitted in with a campaign of sabotage. He said: “The finance bill is a hugely important bit of legislation. Under normal times the party’s severest punishment to my knowledge for such transgression could go as high as deselection.

https://twitter.com/WSW_Labour/status/749388575075172352

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

Austerity has not been put on hold fwiw, Osborne has abandoned his surplus targets, which were unachieveable anyway, but the basic fact of an ongoing squeeze on public spending remains. Depends on the extent to which the incoming leader wants to make it an election issue.

^ yes. the rather thin "reason" for austerity was budget surplus, but austerity might continue. they're making quite a lot of "one nation tories" noises atm. as someone said (here?), wdnt put a bout of keynesianism beyond them for strategic reasons.

went to march yesterday. I'm so crap at them, really dislike the speeches, when you can hear them (tannoy words drifting on the breeze like at a school fete) and so i end up in the absurd position of feeling extremely irritable about the whole business. someone read a *terrible* poem about brexit, which brought me to the edge of panic. owen jones kept on saying "we have to *understand* the leavers", which you know, really? you can analyse why, but fucked if I'm accommodating weird british empire fantasists and kippers. tim farron doing his decent politician thing, you know I'm sure it's true but you fuckers propped up tory austerity for five years.

but anyway i was with friends from across europe and we all went and got drunk and then watched italy germany.

speaking of "make britain great again" fantasists, going to have lunch with my mum now, who seems to have been goosestepping to the right of hitler in recent years but whose loathing of thatcher remains undimmed. nope, me neither.

Fizzles, Sunday, 3 July 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

The way Gove has often been described as a heavyweight intellectual and one of the brightest right wing ideologues of the Tories, if did actually harbour plans to be PM rather than just stopping Boris - then he is a genuine moron.

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

*if he did. I'm so shit at typing

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:06 (seven years ago) link

At some point the surplus replaced just plain old getting the deficit down in Osborne's rhetoric but they were both the excuse rather than the aim. Abandoning the surplus target means that austerity will no longer be enshrined in law but the Tories are still fundamentally committed to shrinking the welfare state regardless of who leads them and Brexit won't change that.

It may, however, no longer be the issue to which Labour is unable to adequately respond - that will be immigration instead. But abandoning austerity, and making the point forcefully so that people listen, *might* give them a way out of that quagmire. Whether anyone exists who is willing and capable of doing that is another question.

As an aside, it's amazing how quickly all the noble words in the aftermath of the Jo Cox shooting have dried up.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:08 (seven years ago) link

his marr interview was awful. expected him to set out how his leadership would see britain govestepping to the sunlit uplands post-brexit but just spent the whole thing saying boris wasn't capable of being PM over and over

cozen, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

basic machiavelli 101 for Gove: you've at least got to win over a majority of a rival's supporters before you stab them in the back.

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:13 (seven years ago) link

Also WTF Liam Fox is in the race? When did that happen? Or did it happen ages ago and is considered so inconsequential that no one really mentioned it?

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

The way Gove has often been described as a heavyweight intellectual and one of the brightest right wing ideologues of the Tories, if did actually harbour plans to be PM rather than just stopping Boris - then he is a genuine moron.

― calzino, Sunday, July 3, 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A genuine moron. Gove is a 'heavyweight intellectual' to idiots.

Or journalists.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

Liam Fox declared early but is thought to only have the backing of five or six MPs. An achievement in itself when people still preface your name with "the disgraced".

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

i always mix Liam Fox up with Niall Ferguson for some reason

can't take liam fox seriously cos he sounds like a lesser character in my dad's social life. like "i met liam fox at the supermarket" and my mum just says "oh right".

see also, the welsh rugby player "ken owens".

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

He's very direct, opinionated, controversial and has a no-nonsense, black and white attitude.

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

Not sure why they've placed a melting waxwork of Rod Stewart in all those photos.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

When you see a pic of his young plumbing apprentices it is a very diverse mix, especially for a S. London company!

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

Haha, there's a girl there though, sorted!

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Sunday, 3 July 2016 12:04 (seven years ago) link

Never trust a plumber with "electrics" written on the side of the van without any proper NICEIC electrical accreditation on there as well. Always guaranteed to be rough as fuck.

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 12:08 (seven years ago) link

typical ILX sneering at wealth-creators

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 3 July 2016 12:11 (seven years ago) link

The punchline in the final picture is just too perfect.

Matt DC, Sunday, 3 July 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

What's the story on Kinnock. I thought he was supposed to be ok around the time he was most active. Did I get that wrong?
From today he sounds like I had him wrong. Or have other interests intervened.
I just read something saying he wasa millionaire, was he always?

Stevolende, Sunday, 3 July 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

He had some of the PR skills/leadership qualities that Corbyn lacks ... Not! I was actually going to vote for Kinnock in '91, but somehow found myself in London on election night when most of the early editions called a Labour victory. I can't stand him these days but tbf his so called "centre-left" position back in the 80's would probably mark him as a Trotskyist these days, the so-called "centre" has moved on so much.

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

oops I was talking about the '92 election

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

He expelled "far-left"/Militant people from Labour in the '80s and started the process of appealing to middle-class centrists, am surprised they didn't pursue that line of questioning.

jedi slimane (suzy), Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

And he suddenly rescinded his CND membership before the '92 election and said he would press the button, just to prove his electoral credibility. it did fuck all good for him tho. And then he + his family spent the next two decades fiddling EU expense sheets. The End. pure joke obv:P

calzino, Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, very much the proto-Blair. Oversaw the first big lurch to the centre, the removal of opposition to nuclear weapons, brought in Mandelson, did the dirty on Tony Benn to make the shadow cabinet more centrist, launched a forerunner to the abolition of Clause IV, wasn't equivocal in support of the striking miners and criticised Scargill in public.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 3 July 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

end of season finale for real now

imago, Monday, 4 July 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

LILY ALAN FOR PRESIDETN

Mark G, Monday, 4 July 2016 06:57 (seven years ago) link

wtf was she doing at a party like that though? i guess some celebs are content to be the artsy window dressing at random power functions?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 4 July 2016 07:23 (seven years ago) link

Saw it on Twitter but somehow managed to miss Farage's shoes

kinder, Monday, 4 July 2016 08:08 (seven years ago) link

Farage has quit. Again.

stet, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:15 (seven years ago) link

cameron gone, johnson gone, farage gone, gove just about gone - thanks a million guys.

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:18 (seven years ago) link

Farage quits UKIP, says he wants his life back.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

oops.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

Johnson pens Telegraph column on sunday saying Remainers moaning about nothing.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

will it last longer than three hours this time? will he just pop up in the house of lords or a perpetual talking head or advisor or oh god there's no way to actually get rid of him now is there

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

Quitting UKIP might open up room for him to join a Leadsom cabinet if he gets made a Lord. There's been a suspicion for a while that Aaron Banks wanted to get rid of him and replace him with someone younger though.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:30 (seven years ago) link

guys this is hardly good news

imago, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

ukip 2.0 will be much scarier

imago, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

Carswell is happy though.

https://twitter.com/DouglasCarswell/status/749892870606381056

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

Just hearing Farrage has just resigned as head of UKIP on the BBC news channel.
I am wondering what news channel I'd be getting best reporting from but only have BBC, Sky, CNN, and Euronews as part of Virgin tv package.

Sounds like he's going to be bothering Brussels for the next couple of years though. He must be so popular now after last week's snideness.

Stevolende, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

Does Farrage shop at some mod shop or something. THose Union Jack shoes look like something the Jam might have worn in the early 80s. Or some cheapo carnaby Street emporium knocked off in China.

Stevolende, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:34 (seven years ago) link

Q: What do you think of the attacks on people like Poles since the referendum?

Farage says some appalling things have been said. But he says bad things have been done on both sides.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Monday, 4 July 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

Somebody was saying that since the Poles are still doing a couple of years conscription they are well trained so not the easiest people to f*** with. They were going to form a vigilante gang to get rid of the illegal traveler park-up which was causing a lot of hassle here a few weeks ago. This because their kids were getting messed with and having toys stolen etc.

Stevolende, Monday, 4 July 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

http://gbrexit.com/brexit/eu-march-london-2016/

groovypanda, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

I think one of the most important things in politics is to do what you think is right. In the end you might be right or wrong but ultimately I think leadership is about assessing the situation as you see it and doing what you think is right, even if it’s not always very popular.

find this sort of thing really odd. that's from tony blair. had some similar spiel about conviction with a concomitant vagueness about how decisions are made from my MP re: resigning from the shadow cabinet and the Very Difficult Time we are in. does anyone ever say it when they've done the right thing?

ogmor, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

I think that fellow on groovypanda's link is confused as to what a swastika actually is.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 4 July 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

xp have always said that conviction is no excuse for doing really heinous shit

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 July 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

"I did what I thought was right" = "seemed like a good idea at the time lol ¯\_(ツ)_/"

oh, amazonaws (wins), Monday, 4 July 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

What is the story on possibility of an election? Is there any way of triggering one other than a Tory prime minister calling one?
Does seem a bit wrong that this can go ahead as is without the public having any more say for the next 4 years.
Is this when we get the revolution?

Stevolende, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:50 (seven years ago) link

guys this is hardly good news

― imago, Monday, July 4, 2016 9:31 AM (1 hour ago)

ukip 2.0 will be much scarier

― imago, Monday, July 4, 2016 9:31 AM (1 hour ago)

UKIP is basically the Farage personality cult though, it may just break up or otherwise sink below the radar now that it's basic aim is (more or less) achieved. It does depend on who takes over and the idea of it becoming a specific anti-immigration party or other general repository for far right votes is horrible, but I have a feeling this is basically the end of the line for it.

Matt DC, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

Two thirds of the House have to vote in favour of a motion calling for one. Doesn't mean the PM has to table the motion.

Also happens if there's a vote of no confidence in the government.

xpost

Alba, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

it's just odd that conviction is invoked even as decisions are made, as if it's a good idea for elected officials to use some incomprehensible, private sense of morality as their main criteria. sometimes multilateral decisions are too tough and you should just do what you feel and plead this weird sort of individualist immunity

ogmor, Monday, 4 July 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

A friend points out that when the presumed next PM, while still in the "needs people to vote for her" stage of the context, can dip her toe into "send them back", there's nowhere really for UKIP to go except into literal fascism, which other parties have covered. They've won.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Also happens if there's a vote of no confidence in the government.

*and* if the opposition can't form a government - after a no-confidence vote the leader of the opposition is invited to try.

stet, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

UKIP can quite easily be revived as a force if the Leave camp doesn't get their own way in the negotiations. If Banks is backing Leadsom and she wins, pulls out of Europe completely, etc, then there's limited point to them continuing. If May wins, keeps an element of free movement, signs up to trade deals that mean UK business are still bound by EU laws, etc, then there's huge scope for them to capitalise on disaffection.

Their biggest problem is that it's pretty much a collection of thugs and aging seaside eccentrics beyond Farage and Carswell. idk how they are going to change that.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 4 July 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

Liam Fox is launching his leadership campaign. Says he'd be prepared to give up access to the single market in order to end freedom of movement.

Alba, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

He's starting to look like the only authentic voice of Brexit.

Alba, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

@MichaelLCrick

We reckon on Tory MP supporters, Andrea Leadsom (32), has now overtaken Michael Gove (31). Theresa May now on 113.

groovypanda, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

he's obviously trying to carve out a position for himself, but if he thinks that's in britain's best interest then the man's deranged xp

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 4 July 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

Remember him this way

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dmG0qCVIDNc/hqdefault.jpg

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 4 July 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

3m signatures on petition to fund Europe-wide research for travel to the alternative dimension where it was fatal.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

Electorate tends to like its racist candidates to be a little more discreet, can't see a BNP plus real ale UKIP being a major voice

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 July 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

Liam Fox is launching his leadership campaign. Says he'd be prepared to give up access to the single market in order to end freedom of movement.

this is what michael gove says too?

conrad, Monday, 4 July 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Not interested in Corbyn resigning. However the road to deselections is a long one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/07/01/bernie-sanders-is-winning-some-big-victories-over-the-dem-platform/

Saw this with an eye over on our shores and thinking about what a Corbyn resignation could look like - on his own terms if the Lab right could actually put their weight on a programme with his fingerprints all over it, one which at least bridges the gap between the PLP and the base. They probably won't accept it.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 July 2016 12:08 (seven years ago) link

So what is Corbyn being declared incompetent at, being a neoliberal?
Or a right wing member of labour?
I thought he sounded pretty competent from what i've heard so far. Hope to hear a great deal more.

Stevolende, Monday, 4 July 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

CONKIP 2020 still a real danger im-pessimistic-o

nashwan, Monday, 4 July 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

There was <a href="Rolling Brexit Links/UK politics in the neo-Weimar era;>this</a> from Saturday, though it sounds like bullshit to be honest, designed to make him seem more arrogant every day he doesn't take this deal.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

only just noticed the title change :)

ǂbait (seandalai), Monday, 4 July 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

this is what michael gove says too?

Gove didn't say he would give up access to the single market: he said he'd leave it, but retain access through EFTA membership (which makes it hard to avoid freedom of movement). I thought Fox seemed to be going one step further by admitting he'd be prepared to lose access if the price was freedom of movement, but I may be wrong.

Alba, Monday, 4 July 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

i know these things have always been with us, but we seem to have reversed back to the 1970s in how brazenly hateful people are being. semi-wondering if this is going to start manifesting itself at football matches again

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 4 July 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

There are still the same number of racists as there were pre-referendum, it's just that the result made them think that they could get away with beingmore open about it.

I'm part of the 48.1 percent (snoball), Monday, 4 July 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

and that there's a groundswell of overt support for them now.

Mark G, Monday, 4 July 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36708844

#UKClosedForBusiness

xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 July 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

just need to monetise racism and we'll be set for the foreseeable

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 4 July 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

it's just that the result made them think realise that they could get away with being more open about it.

Fixed

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 4 July 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

It's amazing how a supposedly free market government is managing to tank this so badly.

Matt DC, Monday, 4 July 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

LOL #1

Michael Crick ‏@MichaelLCrick 3h3 hours ago

Kinnock tells Labour MPs he will not allow the party to split after being a member 60 years, and gets standing ovation and huge cheers

xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 July 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

LOL #2, more crocodile tears:

Michael Crick ‏@MichaelLCrick 3h3 hours ago

One woman Labour MP, thought to be Lucy Powell, left the PLP meeting in tears and had to be comforted by colleagues

xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 July 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

LOL #3, this is my favourite:

Michael Crick ‏@MichaelLCrick 3h3 hours ago

MPs at PLP meeting complain they want their "party back" according to one source. At least one complaint about Marxist-Leninism taking over

First Farage wants his life back, now this. Needless to say, Corbyn cannot give these awful ppl their "party back".

Also - this could be a lot of fiction too. One source blah blah.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 July 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Johnson has endorsed Leadsom and she came out more or less neck and neck with May in a poll of members earlier. She has also hired the extremely litigious ex-Thatcher, ex-Pinochet, ex-Berezovsky, ex-Lukashenko PR man Tim Bell to assist on her campaign.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 4 July 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

https://welfaretales.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/list-of-welfare-related-deaths-of-the-uks-sick-and-disabled/
None of this Lucy Powell cry though

calzino, Monday, 4 July 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

made*

calzino, Monday, 4 July 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock said "we've got our party back" after Ed Miliband was elected leader, interesting to see all the competing, sometimes overlapping, versions of "our party". I wonder if the trade union delegate he quotes considers Corbyn's Labour as still being his/her party? Or if they're like Kinnock and their version of "our party" = "to the left of New Labour but to the right of the socialist campaign group"?

Lord Kinnock has hailed Ed Miliband's "magnificent" first speech as Labour leader, telling activists: "We've got our party back." The former Labour leader heaped praise on his successor in an impassioned speech at a Tribune rally at the party's conference in Manchester.
He said Mr Miliband would unify Labour and "set us on a course to earn victory at the next election"
"A trade union delegate leaned over and said 'Neil, we've got our party back'. I thought that was so accurate as an instantaneous response to the leader's speech."

soref, Monday, 4 July 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmi0UmUWIAAPkUo.jpg

cozen, Monday, 4 July 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

soref, Monday, 4 July 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Fair dos

There was a meme getting reposted on Facebook last week which you probably all saw but it does bear repeating: not everyone who voted for Bexit was a racist but every racist in the country now thinks that 52% of the population agrees with them.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 4 July 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

the "don't vote for the same cause as racists" argument is logical and important which is why i'll never vote for any party that has anything to do with Jack Straw

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 July 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

Raheem Kassam seems to be mulling over a UKIP leadership bid, which would be...interesting. The Breitbart-Trumpification of the party would be one possible direction to go in.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 4 July 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

can't see rank-and-file ukippers being thrilled about a dude named 'raheem kassam' leading their party no matter what his ties to farage

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 4 July 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

Yep. On paper he'd be ideal - the only UKIP member under 50 with any name recognition (apart from Carswell, who has ruled himself out), ties to the international hard-right, media-savvy despite not being particularly bright, deeply unpleasant, an irl ideologue, etc - if it wasn't for one small detail. They might calculate that having him as leader will make accusations of racism harder to stick as they professionalise their new agenda but it could be a hard sell to the party faithful.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 07:33 (seven years ago) link

I'm assuming Carswell's planning to rejoin the Tories as soon as he can.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:13 (seven years ago) link

Re. Kassam: https://twitter.com/hrtbps/status/750217375270576128

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:14 (seven years ago) link

As i said, not particularly bright.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

Farage positioning himself as more liberal on immigration than May - fun times.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm assuming Carswell's planning to rejoin the Tories as soon as he can.

I watched question time last week for the first time in ages and david dimbleby asked douglas carswell why he didn't rejoin the conservative party as he is always distancing himself from nigel farage and would he do so now and he said well last time I changed I asked my constituents to approve it by re-electing me and I wouldn't want to give them the hassle of having to vote again

conrad, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:46 (seven years ago) link

Wanker.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:03 (seven years ago) link

:(

conrad, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:17 (seven years ago) link

Next level chutzpah

@Gove2016
We need to renegotiate a new relationship with the EU, based on free trade and friendly cooperation. #Gove2016

groovypanda, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:24 (seven years ago) link

hahah .. we piss them all off, enforce years and years of paperwork chaos, and then ask if we can be friendly.

mark e, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:30 (seven years ago) link

We're helping create work in the EU.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:37 (seven years ago) link

I like this david graeber piece on the distaste for corbyn:

What all this suggests is the possibility that the remarkable hostility to Corbyn displayed by even the left-of-centre media is not due to the fact they don’t understand what the movement that placed him in charge of the Labour party is ultimately about, but because, on some level, they actually do.

After all, insofar as politics is a game of personalities, of scandals, foibles and acts of “leadership”, political journalists are not just the referees – in a real sense they are the field on which the game is played.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/05/political-establishment-momentum-jeremy-corbyn

ogmor, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 09:50 (seven years ago) link

Starting to think that the solution to this whole problem is to ban anyone over the age of 30 from joining Momentum.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

It's a solution in that it'll create a stable state, I suppose...

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

what?

ogmor, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

idgi

conrad, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

science joke

imago, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

Logan's Run?

calzino, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

Er, no I just mean that it'll be permanent Torygeddon - it's a solution if you want to call it that.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

Is stable state one without any reaction going on? Came across something like that in reading James Lovelock talking about looking for signs of life on Mars which lead to him coming up with the Gaia theory.
Which had him saying that any planet that had no continual reaction going on would be inherently dead & a living planet would have most chemicals in an imperfect balance and continual reaction.
Which would presumably mean that a stable state in a political situation would be nearly totalitarian. Or have everybody represented needing to be dead.

Or am I reading too much into that?

Stevolende, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

Does anyone in the Conservative Party rate Gove even remotely highly or was his advancement almost entirely down to being mates with Cameron and having handy Murdoch links?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

he seems beloved by a particular type of nutcase right-wing pundit (eg. this encomium from the National Review's Jay Nordlinger), don't know about actual boring Tory party politicians and members, though

soref, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

The line I keep seeing bandied about regarding Gove is that the party loves him and the media loves him. Not entirely sure either bit of that is true.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

pound falls to 31-year low, new twist added to end-of-season finale

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

M&G and Aviva have also suspended their property funds fwiw.

Gove seems to have a reputation as an intellectual within the Tory party. People really rate his education reforms for some reason.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

People really rate his education reforms... all apart from teachers, pupils and parents ime

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

for all of michael gove's "we've had enough of experts" he could easily be mistaken either for someone who thinks he's an expert or, by an idiot, an expert

conrad, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

his idea to reform the history syllabus to get rid of all that social history guff and instead to teach an unabashed apologia of empire through the study of battles and great men mustve endeared him to the faithful

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

met and spent some time a couple of years ago the ceo of ofqual who seemingly was a fan of michael gove - looked her up just now and she has recently been "made a dame" for "services to education" and is now...chief inspector of probation which presumably means they still get to hang out together

conrad, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

lol so cool that we'll be taking back control from unaccountable bureaucrats in brussels

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

I didn't realise Gl3nys had left, which shows how much attention i pay.

Crabb and Fox have both backed May now.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

it's a little sad that Crabb and Fox leaving the race this early has deprived us on animal name based jokes and headlines. There is a species of fox called the "Crab-eating fox", I would have enjoyed seeing pictures of this fellow on the yahoo homepage etc:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Crab-eating_Fox.JPG/460px-Crab-eating_Fox.JPG

http://www.mainlesson.com/books/raju/fables/zpage028.gif

soref, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Anyone else reckon Crabb was at risk of tabloid embarrassment due to a very specific type of hypocrisy?

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

i did wonder

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom's shady behaviour about her tax return probably hasn't done her any favours. What's the big deal? She is a Tory after all.

Listening to Gove not seem to realise he is finished was nice. I am starting to think that the fucking idiot actually thought he could pull this off, rather than just stopping Boris.

calzino, Tuesday, 5 July 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

(xp) Said it the first time I clapped eyes on him.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

Couple of verrrry interesting threads on my FB timeline cough*closet*cough

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

advocate for homosexuality cure in 'might be homosexual' shocker

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

instagram affirmation culture comes to brexit

https://twitter.com/SteveHiltonx/status/750472858480943104

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 07:28 (seven years ago) link

yes and ho

imago, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 07:31 (seven years ago) link

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v472/birdnestsoup/sad.jpg

lonely car just thinking baout things

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 08:52 (seven years ago) link

sadness in its eyes

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 08:53 (seven years ago) link

Disappointed, was looking forward to a few more days of Crab jokes to lighten the general gloom

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

the claws are out

conrad, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 09:30 (seven years ago) link

He's getting a bit of stick

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 09:53 (seven years ago) link

he's going to need a hard shell if he... oh what's the point?

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/PickardJE/status/750608854036152320/photo/1

A suggestion that advertised job vacancies halved following the referendum.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

guys

chilcot's going in quite hard

imago, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Yep. Has come as close as he is able within his remit to saying the war was illegal, badly planned and justified with spun evidence.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Which we all knew already but it'll be interesting to see how the likes of Mike Gapes and John McTernan who were on the news earlier saying they'd do it all over again respond.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

some of these fuckers will have spent months preparing their spin but still here it is out in the open at last

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

The party line seems to be laying all the blame on MI6.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

^^That's so ridiculous

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

yeah i noticed a bit where Chilcot suggests that the intelligence services hadn't made the dubiousness of the WMD evidence clear to the gov. don't buy it.

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Dude on bbc now saying Blair, unbeknown to anyone else, was already gearing up, pushing and accelerating "this drift to war". Pre-ordained agenda etc. Using MI6 as a shelter to make decisions etc etc etc. the ugly truth.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

what are the irl consequences likely to be for blair?

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

None.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

xp, it's hardly like nobody else knew. It was obvious to everyone and should have been obvious to the cabinet and Parliament.

I don't think there'll be any damage to Blair, other than his reputation. It's possible there might be civil suits brought against him but that would be tough.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:50 (seven years ago) link

Joshua Rosenberg thinks the rapport opens a door to prosecute: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/06/iraq-war-inquiry-chilcot-tony-blair-prosecute

Can't see it happening tbh.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

there's a case, i'm sure, but zero will to bring it from the people that could

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

Relative of a dead soldier at press conference: "Tony Blair is the world's worst terrorist."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38820000/jpg/_38820833_blair_afp.jpg

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

Stat meant from Bliar: http://www.tonyblairoffice.org/news/entry/statement-from-tony-blair-on-chilcot-report/

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

Statement*

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

*B.Liar

imago, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:06 (seven years ago) link

if that fatuous corrupt fuck had any sense he'd keep his mouth shut but i guess the old gaslighting spin technique is hard to let go

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

The AG did say that there was a legal basis for war and used the expert opinion of Sir Chr1st0pher Gr33nwood to justify that. There is absolutely no doubt that he was picked specifically because he was open to that interpretation of the UN resolutions when the overwhelming majority of international lawyers would have dismissed them. AFAIK, Sir Chr1st0pher has publicly stood by the advice he gave but there's no way he would have considered it a legally solid assessment. Prior to the Iraq advice he told me personally that the UK's reading into the Afghanistan resolutions of a justification for war stretched credibility and would almost certainly be contrary to the intentions of the signatories (which is the key criteria). Afghanistan was much more clear cut than Iraq. There has never been a credible legal basis for Iraq and Blair cherry picked his legal advice like he cherry picked his intelligence advice.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

lol russia i guess

https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/750643372948348928/

coygbiv (NickB), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Ian Austin (Labour MP) shouts 'sit down and shut up, you're a disgrace' at Corbyn as he speaks on Iraq enquiry

That's the good stuff.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

guess how austin voted on iraq!

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

best and indeed only acceptable use of keep calm meme from the russian embassy there, best trolls on twitter since day

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

List of Labour MPs who voted for the war makes gruesome reading.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn trying to give them all an out by saying parliament was misled

stet, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

russian embarrassy more like

nashwan, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

googling how Labour MPs vote has been a recurring theme for so long now that about 90% of my search returns are in purple text.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

Campbell blaming the intelligence agencies, quel surprise.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

Blair: "nobody should blame the British armed forces" - they're not, you douche

then 20 minutes of 9/11 changed everything

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

Same old garbage from Blair but at inordinate and deadening length this time round.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Somebody should have pulled the trigger right after he'd finished his very first sentence, which was about "our decision to remove Saddam from power".

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Blair and Corbyn mirroring one another in mourning dress; the former for himself, the latter for everyone else.

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

Campbell appears to come out of this fairly lightly if anything, surprised there's so little focus on him in the report.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

@lukeakehurst
Iraq. In my name. Proud to have supported liberation of a country from fascism. I thought that was what being on the left was about.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

Blair trying to bore people into submission with a history lesson which, appropriately enough, has an almost Old Testament quality to it.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

Campbell's blog post
http://www.alastaircampbell.org/blog/2016/07/06/many-mistakes-yes-but-no-lies-no-deceit-no-secret-deals-no-sexing-up-and-ultimately-a-matter-of-leadership-and-judgement/

Keeps going back to how Blair was right to 'stand up to Saddam, worst dictator ever' like it makes any sense.

nashwan, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Sky News Newsdesk
‏@SkyNewsBreak
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has told MPs the Government will impose a contract on junior doctors across England

wonder what else we can sneak out under the radar today

Someone chuck a shoe at the cunt and shut him up.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

Just sent him to an ISIS-controlled area and let him work it out for himself.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

he absolutely rejects any connection between completely destabilizing Iraq and any terrorism that may have happened along afterward

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/LCA49CU.jpg

ogmor, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

fucking hell, some people actually believe that apologist bullshit as well

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

foresight is always 20:20

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

He keeps being asked what exactly he is apologizing for, he keeps answering for the mistakes that were made, he's then asked what mistakes are those and was he responsible for any of them, brick wall.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

George W's birthday today.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

surely the apogee of the style of political speech wherein a demeanour and tone which suggests information and opinion are being communicated and even that a response to something specific is being given while successfully saying nothing whatever of substance or meaning - the rest can only learn at the feet of the master

conrad, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

https://t.co/Vs2ibwLuwr

cozen, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

he doesn't miss, does he?

tb is bold as brass.

still raging about the iraq war tbh.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

whatever else happens i'll be forever grateful to corbyn for that apology

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

yeah that is tempered in the summative fires of what's left of left-wing speechwriting

imago, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

obv it wasn't written by Milne then :p

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

Corbz has probably been waiting for this moment for the whole last year, it's probably why he hasn't resigned because if I was him you would have to pull that opportunity from my cold dead fingers.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Perfect moment for Angela Eagle to take over.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

ha

imago, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Yeah that whole thing went quiet pretty quickly.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

they had 9 months to plan it and was a feeble attempt at a coup, their whole strategy seems to be based on Corbyn resigning. Since the 23rd he has gained another 100000 supporters.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

hard to believe these are the same Machiavellis who voted to attack Iraq

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

But Corbyn has had his moment now - time to go pal, leave it to the professionals and the media managers.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

If I was a regicidal Labour MP I'd want to have a much stronger rallying point than Angela Eagle. She's too prominent to be a stalking horse and too poorly positioned to be a serious contender.

How many sitting Labour MPs are there who didn't vote for the Iraq War? It's been 13 years there must be enough of them by now, so I can only assume they all know that Corbyn would win in any contest and don't want to be tainted by association.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

i think there are 65 current Labour MPs who voted in favour

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

Also every fucking Tory MP voted for it and those cunts get off scot-free.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

i think there are 65 current Labour MPs who voted in favour

Which leads them with about 164 to choose from, it can't be that big a dividing line any more.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

Minus Corbyn minus Miliband obviously.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

nobody expects any better of Tories tbf

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

i guess the problem for the Corbyn Out camp is that most of the MPs that didn't vote for the war weren't in Parliament at the time. difficult to complain that Corbyn lacks media presence and then stand somebody nobody's ever heard of against him.

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

Oh shit also a load of them voted to bomb Syria, that probably reduces the pool a bit.

Thing is, being the guy nobody's ever heard of actually works - it worked for Cameron, it worked for Major, who had only made the Cabinet a year or so before he became PM. It works because you're not tainted by association.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

yeah but it contradicts the alleged reason for deposing Corbyn

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

Cameron and Major - that ended well too.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

if they'd just been honest and said "this anti-austerity shit is scaring off our sponsors and we didn't join the Labour party to fight for some hippy equality bullshit" they could've stood whoever they wanted

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

Cameron and Major - that ended well too

Hey, they won elections, which is all these guys care about.

All Prime Ministerial stints end in failure of one kind or another, it's just the degree of ignominy that varies. Major's doesn't look as bad all of a sudden and he nearly wiped his party out in most of Britain.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

Major was awful and the eurospectics are running the show today.

Thank the almighty the people who only care about elections won't have a say on the next contest for leader of the Labour Party.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately the split between the pro- and anti-Corbyn factions is less about positioning on a left-right spectrum (although that does come into it) and more with a fundamental disconnect on what the role of an opposition should be.

On one hand you have the win-at-all-costs brigade who don't actually care whether they support austerity or not as long as it wins swing votes. Whether or not that approach would fail on its own terms is never actually properly considered by these guys. Politics as marketing without actually considering whether or not it's really a winning message.

The Corbyn camp sees its role as developing a grassroots movement aimed at generating real societal change over a long period of time, and many of them don't particularly care about winning the next election. The question of whether or not that approach would survive even one election without a severe move in the other direction doesn't seem to be considered either, nor is the question of whether or not the Labour Party as its currently comprised is the best place for that. Labour has arguably never experienced any major electoral pressure from the left, and it may function better as a pressure group to pull it further in that direction.

A lot of the panic is from the much larger group in the middle who believe that there just isn't time for the latter approach with the Tories wreaking havoc, that not caring about elections at all is a luxury that just doesn't exist right now. I have some sympathy for that tbh, but not if it only leads to short-termist fudges that can be rolled back within five minutes of the next Tory government.

Both the Corbyn camp and the Tristram & Chuka brigade feel wholly inadequate for our current times but I don't see who is out there that could possibly find a way through this mess.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

The space was there to hijack the 'brand' and drag people along kicking and screaming - it has to be given a go. Considering questions sounds like thinking to a coma.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

The space was never really there to do that, you have to actually sell your vision and convince people that you an actually deliver it, and that's only happening in a very lopsided way.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

There wasn't much of a vision beyond notions of what is you are fighting against - war, cuts and the like. The door was left open and the opportunity was taken. Convincing people sounds like election winning talk and as you say you got to build a different ground to play on over a period of time. It might fail, but at least that aren't any more lies. Its a start, and important.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

who was the last good Prime Minister? Seems like it's been a series of unmitigated disasters from Thatcher through to Blair's Iraq enthusiasm to post-2008 economic crash austerity policies

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

(says this American who is frequently baffled by the complexities of UK politics)

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

Probably Harold Wilson (legalised homosexuality, ended capital punishment, kept Britain out of Vietnam) and his first stint was 50 years ago.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

New Statesman journalist Stephen Bush was making the case for Harold Wilson on twitter earlier:

@stephenkb Weird echo. Blair and Cameron both shattered by failure to emulate Wilson: to stay out of American horror show, to win referendum.

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

Aneurin Bevan left a good legacy, which even Thatcher/Blair/Neo-Cons still haven't managed to fully destroy yet.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

I mean Thatcher was a terrible, destructive, evil presence but you can't deny she broadly succeeded at what she was trying to do, which is more than you can say about any other PM since Attlee.

Most of the others have been lightweights, although Cameron may turn out to have profoundly remade the UK through sheer fecklessness.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

right, Thatcher's successors seem more generally inept, just poor decision-makers

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

re the legalisation of homosexuality, from what I've read Wilson was not particularly enthusiastic about this (or the other social reforms of the 64-70 goverment), according to Crossman's diaries he feared that the 1967 sexual offences bill would cost Labour six million votes, Roy Jenkins deserves more credit

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

To be fair to Wilson he had to take into consideration the views of his KGB handlers.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

@stephenkb Weird echo. Blair and Cameron both shattered by failure to emulate Wilson: to stay out of American horror show, to win referendum.

Not that Wilson got any credit from the (non-parliamentary) Left for keeping the UK out of Vietnam, he was like the devil incarnate to them. He botched Rhodesia/UDI and allowed a bunch of racist shits to thumb their nose at the world. He (and Barbara Castle) did try to reform the Unions but got torpedoed, from the right, by Jim Callaghan and we all know how that turned out for industrial relations in the 70s

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Generally, the left thought he was an unprincipled traitor to socialism and the right thought he was just devious and unprincipled.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

maybe there is a case to be made for Alec Douglas-Home as Britain's last good prime-minister

http://cdn.quotationof.com/images/alec-douglas-home-6.jpg

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Supermac!

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

A plot to kidnap Douglas-Home in April 1964 was foiled by the Prime Minister himself. Two left-wing students from the University of Aberdeen followed him to the house of John and Priscilla Buchan, where he was staying. He was alone at the time and answered the door, where the students told him that they planned to kidnap him. He responded, "I suppose you realise if you do, the Conservatives will win the election by 200 or 300." He gave his intending abductors some beer, and they abandoned their plot.[n 13]

a more civilised era

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

lol oh man

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

Are there any novels or plays about Douglas Home? There's surely some Beckettian absurdity to be wrung out of a very short premiership in which virtually nothing happened.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

according to wikipedia the incident described above was dramatised as Radio 4 play called The Night They Tried to Kidnap the Prime Minister in 2009, with Tim McInnerny playing Douglas-Home

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

At Eton, his contemporaries included Cyril Connolly, who later described him as:

"... a votary of the esoteric Eton religion, the kind of graceful, tolerant, sleepy boy who is showered with favours and crowned with all the laurels, who is liked by the masters and admired by the boys without any apparent exertion on his part, without experiencing the ill-effects of success himself or arousing the pangs of envy in others. In the 18th century he would have become Prime Minister before he was 30. As it was, he appeared honourably ineligible for the struggle of life."

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

He could be describing David Cameron.

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

So, is that good or bad?

It's nice, but.

Mark G, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

Douglas-Home went on to serve as foreign secretary under Ted Heath - there's a bit in Philip Ziegler's biography of Heath where the two of them are talking about some ceremony which was to be attended by Macmillan and Wilson as well as Heath himself, and Douglas-Home says that there's no need for the foreign secretary to attend if there are already two former prime ministers going, Heath reminds Home that he himself is also a former prime minister and Home says "oh yes, I'd forgotten"

soref, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

RIP journalism

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

That wallpaper gives an appropriate getting burned in hades effect.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

Is spinning on graves a thing?

koogs, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

Do they still mock up a front page for a non existent paper?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Is spinning on graves a thing?

― koogs, Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:08 PM (40 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
>

Does seem to be a hybrid of spitting on their and turning in their dunnit?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

maybe spinning adds a sense of loopiness

like

you know

he is loopy

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

maybe Blair's become a whirling dervish

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

he's also 'the wold's worst terrorist' which keeps sounding to me like a mark of ineptness not magnificence.

Just had the news on in the background all day so hearing the same comment all the time.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

a fantastic terrorist, really terrific

I would have thought PLP might have tried to get Dan Jarvis to say some bullshit about the war, but he only seems capable of saying yessir! at the best of times. They really have gone into full silence mode now.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

I think it's spinning as in spinning the facts

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

Who photoshopped the lines onto Blair's forehead?

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

it still sounds like a very clunky malapropism

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

it's a pun on spin via humour guys

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

it's kinda like something that Tony Soprano would say

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

Is this report going to be available to the general public at all. I don't know how they handle these things, or is it just available to the need to know?
Or does it tend to come down in some kind of mediated print, abridged book or anything?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

right, thanks

Stevolende, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

It wasn't an "unnecesary" invasion, as the Independent puts it.

Was it misrepresented? Was it Blair hardmanning w/ lies and deceit? Was it bombing a dictator with absolutely no plan whatsoever for the situation afterwards, Blair not in the least caring about what would happen after the dust settled because he wanted to be "everyone's friend"? Yes. He's an utterly inadequate imbecile.

But his biggest crime, to me, is him starting a war and not having the guts, or intelligence, or think about the consequences. Invading Iraq isnt the problem. Not as much as doing so by a) doing it on a personal agenda and lying to everyone and no one to get it done, and b) having no plan or clue whatsoever to what happens after all the bombs are dropped, Saddam captured etc.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

Seeing Dubya in those tight blue jeans turned his head.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

That and his psychotic will to create his legacy.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

at any cost.

calzino, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

Oh he did that alright.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

not to beat a dead horse but

that on is what throws people off i think

i mean spin lies
lies is the object right?

spinning on doesnt have an object

that preposition makes you doubt like

on should be in but then theres spinning not turning and why their
i dunno mebbe its a mistake but surely theyre wordsmiths

im just a casual reader

but spinning (a web of lies) from his/their graves

okay okay he is spinning a web of lies
spider like

and now hes on the graves of the dead british troops and civilians
big like
monster like

okay okay

i dunno

took a bit of thinkin but yer right i spose

im just a casual reader

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

no it's just "spinning" as in what a spin doctor does. and he's doing it on the graves of people killed in the iraq war.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

^^^

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

spin doctors

say no more

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 6 July 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever. ♥ I will be with you, whatever.

I thought that was Steve Kilbey posting for a moment there

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 7 July 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

Spoke to a friend who's head of a dept. at Glasgow Uni. They have people who've been working on establishing relationships with continental partners over the past decade, building Erasmus exchanges, funding research. All of it gone to shit in the past fortnight. So sad.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 7 July 2016 00:38 (seven years ago) link

Are Erasmus schemes necessarily gone if Brexit goes ahead? The Uni I was at here in Galway had a lot of Americans who I assume were Erasmus. So wonder if it would mean a more complex story on funding rather than ending full stop?
Thought it a pretty vital part of some courses, languages especially.

Stevolende, Thursday, 7 July 2016 07:30 (seven years ago) link

American students have a separate Year Abroad programme. The UK could potentially still stay in Erasmus if it stays within the EEA (Norway, Turkey, etc still qualify) but leaving all forms of economic union / freedom of movement arrangements would probably end it.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 07:34 (seven years ago) link

Jeez

No way of saying this without sounding incredibly mawkish but I've seen genuine understandings develop between people from different countries on Erasmus courses. Not just 3AM spliffepiphanies either, I mean like Turks and Greeks and Irish and Northern Irish young people having a multi-way discussion about their situations etc

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 7 July 2016 07:55 (seven years ago) link

(Which seemed somehow to be facilitated by being in the UK as a neutral backdrop with lots of pubs they could go in)

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 7 July 2016 07:56 (seven years ago) link

Interesting take on what neutral means to an irish person tbh

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Thursday, 7 July 2016 07:58 (seven years ago) link

Erasmus is definitely A Good Thing but it's only one part of a broader international student picture and the whole sector is in turmoil. I was at a conference for international student support officers last week and nobody has an idea of what happens next. There has been a battle in the cabinet for years between May, who puts reducing migration numbers ahead of the economic benefits of international students, and Osborne, who prefers to have the $8bn a year they contribute to the country. If, as seems inevitable, May is the next PM, that has the potential to radically change the whole industry. Even without that, we probably have at least two years of uncertainty and sector-wide paralysis, not to mention the clear message that the UK is increasingly hostile towards outsiders. It's a gift to Ireland, tbh.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:13 (seven years ago) link

some great nominative determinism:

As well as omitting mention of her family buy-to-let business, Leadsom’s CV also glosses over her directorship at Seaperfect, a company that invested heavily in clam and scallop farming in Chile and America during the 90s.

However, the company lost millions after the investments failed and her brother in law, Peter de Putron, subsequently took control of the business through an offshore vehicle called Wildernesse Holdings. Leadsom, working under her maiden name of Andrea Salmon, became a director of Seaperfect from February 1998 to May 1999.

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:31 (seven years ago) link

put that in your lobster pot, stephen crabb

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:33 (seven years ago) link

she still seems to be acting a bit koi about making her tax return public

calzino, Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:42 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it does all sound very fishy to me ..

mark e, Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:47 (seven years ago) link

I am pretty sure Marcus Fysh MP is one of the 66 who voted for her.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:48 (seven years ago) link

C'mon, this is the party with an MP called Fabricant.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:55 (seven years ago) link

you couldn't make it up

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:59 (seven years ago) link

So called, i believe, because of his Fabricated hair

http://i1.birminghammail.co.uk/incoming/article336807.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/fabricant.jpg

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

He is a fascinating creature, the Fabricant.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

Its a combi word.

There's Fabri, from fabrication...

Mark G, Thursday, 7 July 2016 09:07 (seven years ago) link

& cant cos he loves Emmanuel but can't spell?

Stevolende, Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

... and Cant, from his hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, right?

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

At the very least.

Mark G, Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:32 (seven years ago) link

Feel like Peter de Putron is being overlooked here

kinder, Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

Indeed, he's like something from some 13th century text.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:49 (seven years ago) link

Bloody Normans, coming over here with their yokes etc etc

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:52 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom said she did not like the gay marriage law. She would prefer to offer equality by letting heterosexual people have civil partnerships, she said.

Theresa May, the home secretary and favourite in the Tory leadership contest, has accused her rival Andrea Leadsom of being willing to let foreign criminals stay in the UK. Picking up on Leadsom’s declaration in her speech that she would let EU nationals who are in the UK legally remain after Brexit (see 9.49am), a spokesman for the May campaign said:

Andrea Leadsom’s commitment to give permanent residence to foreign criminals is concerning - and is exactly the kind of misjudgment that her inexperience can cause. That’s why we need strong, proven leadership - something only Theresa can offer.

What a fabulous choice the party has.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

oh the tory electorate will be loving this stuff

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

foreign criminals stealing the jobs of our fine english burglars

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 12:21 (seven years ago) link

Or marrying them - i don't know which is considered worse these days.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

Maybe you shouldn't laugh but Leadsomites on the march.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

If that was old b/w Pathe footage none of them would sound out of time, timeless braying poshos!

calzino, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

jesus how do you reason with some of these people if not at gunpoint?

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

Leadsomites on the march

read this as "Leadsodomites"

soref, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Leadsomoids

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmxAy9AWcAAB4kV.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

new shakespeare play

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

;)

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

could totally see a play in the vein of king charles iii

conrad, Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmxC0HXWEAA6QAf.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 7 July 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

otm but it's like poking a nest of very radge ants

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 7 July 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

things i've learned about andrea leadsom today:

- her cv has so many holes she must have stolen it from the trypophobia thread
- disagrees with gay marriage as it's insensitive to homophobes
- wants to scrap hs2, eh so what
- intends to hold a vote to repeal the ban on fox hunting
- hates molluscs

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

- disagrees with gay marriage as it's insensitive to homophobes

It's the new thing! Decrying racism is suppression of the racist's freedom of expression, for example. Very insensitive.

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm for civil partnerships being extended to heterosexual couples but wouldn't like it to happen for her purpose in that way it's a bit like leaving the eu writ small

conrad, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom beats Gove to join May on shortlist for Conservative leadership ballot

Here are the results.

Theresa May - 199

Andrea Leadsom - 84

Michael Gove - 46

lol gove

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom has the party shook. Gove's campaign manager was sending texts last night to May voters which boiled down to 'i don't care if you back Gove or not, we can't let this woman on the ballot so vote for him'.

She's not really less liberal than May or much more of a crackpot than Gove but the campaign to ridicule her has been fairly effective today (helped in large part by the fact she's ridiculous).

xp, lol

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

this story about leadsom's connection to a gay-cure church group is doing the rounds btw

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/andrea-leadsoms-ugandan-project-has-ties-to-an-anti-gay-chri?utm_term=.paeBzddKb#.ceaQ2WWBp

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

How can Brexit be getting worse? Fuck's sake, Tories.

stet, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

Gove out.

Matt DC, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

Not to play Captain Save A Leadsom but the culture May has fostered where women who have long hair or wear makeup are at risk of being deemed insufficienty lesbian enough to avoid deportation to countries where their physical safety at risk doesn't really mark her out as much of an ally either.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03583/gove_3583746b.jpg

man was such a zealot that shortly after this photo was taken, he ended up binning himself

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

May is *awful* but Leadsom, from my extensive three-day experience appears not only awful but also really terrifyingly dim.

stet, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

Not that intelligence in the service of evil is a virtue

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

Missed the 'fuck marry kill' portion of this contest.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

There's really no good outcome here unless we get a snap election that some non-Tory thing wins.

I'm more concerned by the dimness, though. Leadsom appears to think that we just need to buck up, dig deep, put our backs into it, roll our sleeves up, buy British and be optimistic for all the Brexit problems to go away. May has horrible answers, but does appear to understand the questions.

stet, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmxayBjWIAEV9i_.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom appears to have the support of both Nadine Dorries *and* Louise Mensch so we're probably doomed.

Matt DC, Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

this is really scraping the barrel in terms of finding something to be optimistic about but may has displayed more of a willingness to pivot to wherever is politically expedient; she may have encapsulated the nastiest of the nasty party in recent years but she coined the phrase in the first place. it's not much of a silver lining given where might be politically expedient.

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

BYE GOVE THO

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

I can't think of many things May has pivoted on. She is deeply committed to restricting human rights and immigration. She just never votes against the party line.

Idk, a friend's fiancee was put in handcuffs, detained for two days and deported yesterday because she hadn't booked the return part of her trip and a couple of her friends couldn't agree on when she had said she was going back. It is hard to warm to her.

Leadsom is continuity 90s Tory but that doesn't sound like the worst possible outcome right now.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

I've been reading the FT every day since the Brexit vote (American who'd prefer to understand what's happening without trying to slog through the mire of US media), and I missed a day because I was out of town...was Leadsom's name even floated before this week? What on earth is happening over there, you guys?

There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

A Leadsom win would lead to the almost certainly unprecedented situation where both party leaders have the support of the majority of their members and a minority of their MPs, which surely isn't sustainable for very long? General Election before the year's out is my guess.

Matt DC, Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

she was floated but wasn't expected to make it to the postal election of the final 2 with boris in the race. the guardian put together "reading lists" about her earlier this week when it became clear she was in the running.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom was one of the few prominent Leave Tories considered presentable enough to take part in debates. Two of the others stabbed each other in the back and the third has already had a go at being leader.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

my hunch is that leadsom will be a huge disaster and make the tories eminently beatable. but will that just open the door for the return of boris?

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Praying for inertia: the joy of UK politics

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

admittedly i don't live in the UK any more, but i discovered this morning that i'd been pronouncing her name wrong all week simply because i'd never heard anyone else say it out loud. that's how famous she is.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

led or leed?

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I don't remember. I'd been transposing the s and the d, so a more basic error.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

that makes jim's question all the more pressing imo

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

There's no way of knowing

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

Or caring.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

Readers of Private Eye, I know there's not many of them these days, will have been aware of her and her husband long before the rest of us.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

'Andrea Leadsom' is an anagram of 'some anal dread'.

Matt DC, Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

BRB there's people on FB that need telling about that anagram.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Thank you.

some anal dread (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

if someone had told me 12 months ago that May was going to be the sensible choice i would have laffed my socks off.

and yeah, i would love to share that anagram with my FB crew, but my blood relatives are raging right wing twats, and would never talk to me again ...

(hmm ... )

mark e, Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

Also available in 'some dread anal'.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

anyone have any examples of this from the dreda say mitchell article: "The barrage of hatred and intolerance unleashed by sections of the remain vote against the working class has been horrifying." ?

not sure in what sense the working class is less europeanised than the middle class

ogmor, Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

Whatever europeanised means.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

harsh: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/07/more-on-chilcot

El Tomboto, Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

It's the new thing! 1) Do/say/support something objectionable, 2) wait for opponents to object, 3) construct a strawman of your opponents objecting in a fashion similar to objectionable thing you did/said/supported and feign aghast disbelief and hope no one calls you out for your overt fabrication.

some anal dread (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

I think 'Andrea Jacqueline Leadsom (Min. Energy)' is an anagram of 'Real England joy (mad EEA racism queen in)', which would be trenchant social commentary applied to either of them, but i haven't counted the letters particularly diligently.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

^my hero

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

Twitter person sitting next to obvious Westminster Tory has snapped this intriguing photo:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmyBrpQXEAE7Cst.jpg

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

fuck.
even more of t0by y0ung re schools ..

mark e, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

Talk to Toby Young. That's just going too far.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

Wonder if this was a Goveite?

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

'for her'

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

poll, obviously

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

I'm suspicious. Boris supports Leadsom, Young seems to think she's crazy. Idk why you would put references to someone who has described you as a lunatic in your platform.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Glad to see they're addressing the important issues like poverty, housing, unemployment,
the nhs, climate change, racism, chilcot, public transport, impending economic oblivian et cet

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

don't see why leadsom wouldn't want to 'win around' someone from the tory right who's been critical

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

they're addressing racism, nick!

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

I've been reading the FT every day since the Brexit vote (American who'd prefer to understand what's happening without trying to slog through the mire of US media), and I missed a day because I was out of town...was Leadsom's name even floated before this week? What on earth is happening over there, you guys?

― There must be some magic clue inside these gentle walls (Old Lunch)

i feel like some of it is that nobody actually wants to run the country after this vote? because whoever is next is going to have invoke 50, and nobody wants to be responsible for that particular disaster?

i'm mostly staying out of it because america has our own disasters to deal with, but i must say i am amused by the little cadaver synod corbyn has going on right now. (incidentally whenever i forget corbyn's name, which is often, and have to google him, google immediately comes back to tell me ed miliband is the leader of the labour party. i'm not sure if that says more about google, or about corbyn.)

the event dynamics of power asynchrony (rushomancy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

But come on, we must slay the evil of political correctness to truly make our island proud

coygbiv (NickB), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

It's just incredible to me that article 50 ranks third there. The monumental upheaval it will unleash ranks behind some shit about Sharia law.

This has to be Leadsome, yeah?

stet, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

"Theresa May was right"

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

That's some properly shit handwriting btw

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

Even as his standing in British politics slid in the run up to the publication of Chilcot’s inquiry into the Iraq war, the earnings soared in one of Blair’s key companies, Windrush Ventures. The turnover of the entity, through which Blair’s post-premiership commercial activities are conducted, rose £5m in 2015 to £19.4m, and profits tripled to £2.6m. Since leaving power, the 63-year-old and his family have also built up a property portfolio worth an estimated £27m.

He isn't up there with the Clintons, but he has become a very profitable international bullshit merchant since stepping down. Good luck to the people taking civil lawsuits against him, but psycho robber barons like this piece of shit always win, sadly.

calzino, Thursday, 7 July 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

WINDRUSH Ventures? This must be some kind of next-level trolling.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/11/25/1259143969787/Blair-cash4-251109.gif
"The business dealings of the former PM are shrouded in mystery because his companies are meshed together in such a complex fashion"

calzino, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

Guys, while you're all concentrating on the possibilities of Andrea Leadsom anagrams, I think you've missed an amazing one. An anagram of Theresa May is...

...
...
...

THERE'S A YAM.

emil.y, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

(sorry)

emil.y, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

The Arse, May

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if Theresa May has ever heard of Karen Finlay? :p

calzino, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

Andrea Leadsom/Theresa May = "some arse may dread the anal"

emil.y, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

:D

imago, Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

LOL

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

It's also AH YES, MASTER but that's just scary.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

LOL x2

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 July 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

I posted this on the previous thread but it's really worth watching. Pascal Lamy can't believe what leadsom is saying - because she doesn't have a clue what she's talking about. His body language and facial expressions are priceless.

https://youtu.be/Z6LVNpfES8k

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 7 July 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

A+ anagrams itt.

The US looks like it's dodging the bullet (this time) but I honestly fear that you guys are going to see Trump's horrifying 'I don't know fucking anything but I don't care because I think I'm right' attitude put into practice. If we have to elect sociopaths, can't we go back to electing those that have some air of authority about them?

some anal dread (Old Lunch), Friday, 8 July 2016 00:47 (seven years ago) link

feel like the enduring black mark of 47% of the electorate having got behind muslim deportation resonates in a way things didn't beyond other recent election cycles. can't imagine feeling comfortable in a country in which this wd be so unambiguously enshrined

schlump, Friday, 8 July 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

o wait sorry wrong thread/electorate

schlump, Friday, 8 July 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

Andrea Jacqueline Salmon (birth name) = Maniac Rand Queen As Jello

Michael Jones, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:08 (seven years ago) link

Oh, wait, A Jello Randian Scam Queen is better.

Can't get away from Jello. Probably why she doesn't use her middle name much.

Michael Jones, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

Jello is called jelly in the UK so she probably wouldn't really think about that.

Stevolende, Friday, 8 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

The pound is now performing worse than the Argentinian peso. Ed Miliband must have superhuman levels of restraint to be not just letting rip, all the time.

And we have at least two more months of this...

Matt DC, Friday, 8 July 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Consensus seems to be that it could drop as low as 1.2 but a couple of people have suggested it might get down to 1:1 if the period of uncertainty looks like being years not months.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 8 July 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

i liked Soros' quip that a slide toward 1:1 would be "a method of joining the euro that no one in Britain would want"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 8 July 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

suppliers at work have wasted no time in letting me know that significant price rises are on the way

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 8 July 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

so here comes inflation, and with it interest rate hikes, and with that a drop in home sales, and eventually falling house prices. which is kind of good right?

plus a weak pound helps wipe out the trade deficit? i.e. raises price of imported goods and lowers the price of our exports, making them more attractive?

am i missing something?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

I bought the June 22nd "Please Don't Go!"* Der Spiegel with dual-language pre-Brexit editorials from WH Smith for £3.

I looked at this week's "Oh Shit You Went"** Der Spiegel in WH Smith yesterday. It cost £5.20. I assume the actual Euro cover price was the same for both. Felt a bit funny thinking about that.

* actual cover text
** not actual cover text

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

price of imported goods will rise with the weak pound, but there might also be a fall in demand in some sectors too so that might mitigate inflation?

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

Devaluing the Yuan makes sense because China is a huge manufacturer and net exporter. The UK isn't, really. I effectively work as an exporter and it's pretty good for my company - selling something for $250 and recognising the revenue in GBP = more revenue than ever.

The UK doesn't have a strong manufacturing base and is unlikely to get one in the near future without serious investment that won't happen during periods of extended uncertainty though. We import almost everything and it's going to get more expensive.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sceptical of the idea that we are stuck with perennial Tory govt from now on - all the Conservatives really have is a reputation for economic competence and that's taking one hell of a battering at the moment. Hard to see how they win extra seats even allowing for Labour being in a mess.

Matt DC, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

I looked at this week's "Oh Shit You Went"** Der Spiegel in WH Smith yesterday. It cost £5.20.

sad lol

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

we've had nothing but Tory government since 1979, i'm kind of getting used to it

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

im a bit tired of party politics, important and fascinating though it is (though slightly demoralised by gove making people feel some sort of pity for poor old boris)

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/07/stories-buried-brexit-child-poverty-un-austerity

StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

Tracer: FT sort-of says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

https://next.ft.com/content/16e5a42e-4441-11e6-9b66-0712b3873ae1#axzz4Dl1tt2Ar

stet, Friday, 8 July 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Spoke to a friend who's head of a dept. at Glasgow Uni. They have people who've been working on establishing relationships with continental partners over the past decade, building Erasmus exchanges, funding research. All of it gone to shit in the past fortnight. So sad.

― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:38 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i work in scottish higher education, and i've been out of the country on holiday since the day of the vote until yesterday. just had a chat over the phone with my boss about the vote - he said in our institution alone he knows of at least a couple of major research projects which have been cancelled already and one prominent foreign academic who was due to join us but has backed out because of the uncertainty. boss said he was at a meeting with his equivalents from other uk universities last week and the overriding atmosphere was disbelief, fear and anger. can't wait to get back to work :(

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

so here comes inflation, and with it interest rate hikes, and with that a drop in home sales, and eventually falling house prices. which is kind of good right?

plus a weak pound helps wipe out the trade deficit? i.e. raises price of imported goods and lowers the price of our exports, making them more attractive?

am i missing something?

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:03 (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

biggest sectors of British exports are like: financial services, tech services, consulting

which don't intuitively obey the rules of the invisible hand the same way , but i wd want to leave the explanation to someone who knows what they're talking about

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

https://telescoper.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/the-brexit-threat-to-british-science/

It has been guaranteed that funding commitments will be honoured until the end of Horizon 2020, but that assumes that holders of such grants don’t leave the UK taking the grants with them. I know of four cases of this happening already. They won’t come back even if we’re still in the European Union then.

Another probable outcomes are that:

the shrinking economy will cause the UK government to abandon its ring-fence on science funding, which will lead to cuts in domestic provision also;
a steep decline in EU students (and associated income) will halt the expansion of UK science departments, and may cause some to shrink or even close;
non-UK EU scientists working in the UK decide to leave anyway because the atmosphere of this country has already been poisoned by xenophobic rhetoric.

British science may “endure” after BrExit but it definitely won’t prosper.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

I still have yet to see a single persuasive argument for why leaving the EU is beneficial to the UK.

some anal dread (Old Lunch), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

Or, rather, a persuasive argument for how leaving the EU is anything but an actively bad decision.

some anal dread (Old Lunch), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

The positive would be that it becomes more affordable for non-EU students though with a PM who seems dead set on driving them away, that isn't much of a comfort.

Xps

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

WE'VE TAKEN BACK OUR COUNTRY

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

all these reports across so many sectors are like the sound of 1,000 toilets flushing

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

I still have yet to see a single persuasive argument for why leaving the EU is beneficial to the UK.

they don't exist

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

i suppose a salmon would be exactly the right person to lead us back out of these lavatorial rapids xp

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

It means we can now elect a government that will bring about full communism without interference from Brussels. Which given the political climate in this country will definitely happen.

Matt DC, Friday, 8 July 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

I have tended to view Lexit as pie in the sky stuff, but I suppose that's how centre-left/liberals view people who still support Corbyn, which I loosely do.

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 8 July 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

Crabb must be pretty grateful that this is overshadowing the other story on that front page

soref, Friday, 8 July 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

Is his body not beach-ready?

Nicholas Nickelback (Leee), Friday, 8 July 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

so leadsom actually said that being a mother puts her at a disadvantage against may?

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 8 July 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

there are some direct quotes from the article here. I can see how the Times may have stitched her up with leading questions/taking stuff out of context, but even if that's what happened it makes her look incompetent to fall into that trap

https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/751528074295009280

soref, Friday, 8 July 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

She is such a treat <3

coygbiv (NickB), Friday, 8 July 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

lol at Crabb but disappointed the texts were to a woman tbh

so many pro-Leadsom replies to that tweet blaming the ~mainstream media~ for being biased against good honest British Brexiters, a conspiracy theory I keep seeing in comments sections (why oh why do I read them?), because obviously the Sun and the Mail aren't mainstream media. it's quite hard to find out about such underground little zines, always telling the truth about everything

the science/research/higher ed situation is really v v depressing and I haven't heard a single politician even mention the importance of funding for any of the above

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 8 July 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

Apparently Australia's about to elect a climate denier/anti-vaxxer and Trump shares those two hobby-horses, so it's conspiracies all round. It's the new thing?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 8 July 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

Andrea Leadsom supporter Lousie Mensch doing a bang up job of defending Andrea Leadsom:

Louise Mensch ‏@LouiseMensch 34m
@chrisshipitv @andrealeadsom @thetimes @RSylvesterTimes I'm not on the campaign. Andrea is a trusting soul. Produce unedited tape

soref, Friday, 8 July 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

this transcript seems pretty unambiguous, despite her "not saying, just saying" preface:

https://twitter.com/emmatimes2/status/751551212495986688/photo/1

soref, Friday, 8 July 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

This is going to get really fucking dog whistle nasty in ways that will put the London mayoral election to shame.

Matt DC, Friday, 8 July 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom seems notably bad at dog whistling i.e. not understanding that you don't actually come out and explicitly say the awful things instead of just implying them, what with this and the "overrun by foreigners" tweet

soref, Friday, 8 July 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

Well, whistle be damned - let's not forget she's more of a hunting bugle type anyway

coygbiv (NickB), Saturday, 9 July 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

as it is important try find a gender-matching comparison andrea leadsom seems in her being thrust close to power from practically nowhere (and her ineptitude and superficiality) more like an english sarah palin than a 21st c. margaret thatcher

conrad, Saturday, 9 July 2016 05:58 (seven years ago) link

The amount of deluded anti-EU conspiracy theorists flooding twitter is genuinely terrifying to me. And also how young some of them are.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Saturday, 9 July 2016 06:05 (seven years ago) link

this is terrifying not really because distant outsider andrea leadsom is still batshit and awful but because the "sensible option/safe pair of hands" narrative around theresa may is more and more iron-clad

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Saturday, 9 July 2016 06:08 (seven years ago) link

My dad just got spam from Delta airlines:

Now is a historically great time to discover adventure in the U.K.

Don't miss this incredible opportunity to experience everything London has to offer, including once-in-a-lifetime exchange rates and travel savings. Book a trip to select U.K. cities by July 14, 2016, and travel between August 23, 2016 and March 31, 2017 to seize this perfect London moment.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 9 July 2016 08:43 (seven years ago) link

once-in-a-lifetime

Citation needed

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 9 July 2016 08:46 (seven years ago) link

Apparently Australia's about to elect a climate denier/anti-vaxxer and Trump shares those two hobby-horses, so it's conspiracies all round. It's the new thing?

― Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 8 July 2016 23:50 (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There really does seem to be a lack of trust in experts these days. I remember at the anti-EU flotilla event some journalist asked Farage why he'd started smoking again and he said that he thought the doctors were wrong about it, and I definitely feel like a lot of people in the UK and the US (and apparently Australia) are taking Homer Simpson's 'eggheads - what do they know?' approach to life

paolo, Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

A lot of people don't know which public figures to trust so they don't trust any of them. 'They're all a bunch of crooks'

paolo, Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

I can sort of understand why people would feel that way (just look at the Chilcot report) but it's deeply worrying

paolo, Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YM8t29gD8J8

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:20 (seven years ago) link

I can't judge that mentality when applied to one's own health, because I'm too busy cooking a greasy processed meat fryup for brunch, while nursing a standard hangover.

calzino, Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

Well there's ignoring health advice and there's discounting its validity

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

truedat

calzino, Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

But let us consider this further point: Is not he who can best strike a blow in a boxing match or in any kind of fighting best able to ward off a blow?

Certainly.

And he who is most skilful in preventing or escaping from a disease is best able to create one?

True.

And he is the best guard of a camp who is best able to steal a march upon the enemy?

Certainly.

Then he who is a good keeper of anything is also a good thief?

That, I suppose, is to be inferred.

Then if the just man is good at keeping money, he is good at stealing it.

That is implied in the argument.

Then after all the just man has turned out to be a thief. And this is a lesson which I suspect you must have learnt out of Homer; for he, speaking of Autolycus, the maternal grandfather of Odysseus, who is a favourite of his, affirms that He was excellent above all men in theft and perjury. And so, you and Homer and Simonides are agreed that justice is an art of theft; to be practised however 'for the good of friends and for the harm of enemies,' --that was what you were saying?

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

once-in-a-lifetime

Into the blue again after the money's gone

and all the politicians making crazy sounds (snoball), Saturday, 9 July 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

NV with the potent reminder of how awful philosophy is

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 July 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

xp there is water at the bottom of the ocean lol crabb

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 9 July 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

http://cdn.lrb.co.uk/assets/covers/m/cov3814.jpg

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Saturday, 9 July 2016 11:13 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5nI_4uXzD4

Stevolende, Saturday, 9 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Eagle is now officially standing against Corbyn.

Whatever the question is, Angela Eagle is not the answer.

Matt DC, Saturday, 9 July 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Unless the question is name someone who voted for Iraq and against the Chilcot inquiry,

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:03 (seven years ago) link

So, two leadership elections where nobodys going to vote for the not-winner.

Mark G, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

The question now is whether Corbyn will be on the ballot. He seems to think he'll be on there automatically. Kinnock says that when he was challenged by Tony Benn, as the incumbent he still had to secure the requisite parliamentary nominations.

If they do keep Corbyn off the ballot altogether then the backlash will be enormous and will probably lead to a straight up split.

Matt DC, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

https://www.buzzfeed.com/robinedds/brexit-tweets-that-will-make-you-laugh-despite-everything?utm_term=.dhV7Xq25g

there is a lighter side I guess. Though maybe some fo you saw it already

Stevolende, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

What is Eagle's constituency saying to her now? Can the constituency call for a vote of no confidence. & if so would that have any effect on her? Though I didthink that was pretty much what they had said a week or so back.

Does Eagle's position in the Labour Party no longe rhave anything to do with the people that voted her in.

Still not looked into what deselection actually means but am assuming that would mainly come from the Party not the electorate.

Stevolende, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

Deselection of longstanding MPs by people who may have paid £3 to vote the previous week would be a whole other clusterfuck that I suspect even Corbyn would like to avoid.

Matt DC, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

my constituency labour party passed a motion backing corbyn last night with a resounding 78-76 vote. really not sure how the party would split, everything about a split would be so contrary to all the values of the right of the party it's hard to imagine them pushing ahead with it

ogmor, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:25 (seven years ago) link

There may be pressure for a mass breakaway on the left with Corbyn as a figurehead, but he would probably resist that and it would have like 10 MPs if that.

Matt DC, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

all this peace talks bs wherein there's an impasse if jeremy corbyn doesn't agree to resign and it's his fault

neil fucking kinnock saying at all costs there cannot be a split please join the labour party to vote against jeremy corbyn

conrad, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock knows plenty about getting voted against

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

Maybe Kinnock can get some shite pop stars to campaign for Eagle, it worked so well for him.

calzino, Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

How Angela Eagle got to be MP for Wallasey

conrad, Saturday, 9 July 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Such a sickening read, and that is what you call electoral credibility.

calzino, Saturday, 9 July 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

So yeah does sound like she is a professional inner circle politician or however you want to put it.
Have the Labour voters of the area had other reason to complain about her since or has she been helpful?
Would assume that if she could retain a ward for a decade and a half she can't have exactly rocked the boat.

Stevolende, Saturday, 9 July 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cm7jqqPWcAAsdrk.jpg

https://twitter.com/MattTurner4L/status/751788568436244480

Len McCluskey making Tom Watson seem like a disingenuous prick pretty unequivocally here, the CWU also just put out a very similar statement

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Saturday, 9 July 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

despair doesn't help but shit like that makes you realise there's no meaningful place in the Labour party for anybody left of the Lib Dems any more. Corbyn felt like a last chance to recover the party for democracy and socialism but what's the fucking point?

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 9 July 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

As much as the "hordes of pro-Corbyn £3 members joining opportunistically" thing seems like it would fuel performative faux-outrage from the Labour right, there is some kind of amusing poetic justice to loads and loads of them signing up during the massive cowardly gap between Angela Eagle announcing that she was going to announce a leadership challenge and her actually announcing it

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Saturday, 9 July 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

Though Eagle was successful, the 1992 election saw Labour suffer its fourth consecutive defeat and Neil Kinnock duly resigned as party leader. In the ensuing election to replace him, she had the good sense to support Bryan Gould, against the winning candidate John Smith, though she was critical of the expense and length of the contest.

‘If we carry on like this,’ she argued, ‘we will become the party of the perpetual ballot, frantically spending our time and money organising elections for everything under the sun. We will have no money left to campaign except in our own internal elections. And the Tories, who have no internal democracy, will laugh all the way to Downing Street.’ As she pointed out, the Conservatives had displayed ruthless efficiency in dumping Margaret Thatcher, a process ‘which had as much to do with democracy as Ivan the Terrible had with tolerance’, but which nonetheless secured victory in the next election. And she suggested, perhaps not entirely seriously, that the Labour leadership should instead be decided on a penalty shoot-out.

Despite having voted against him, her response to Smith’s unexpected death in 1994 saw her break down in the Commons, weeping so much that ‘Tory MPs came over to see if I was okay.’ But this, it turned out, was entirely characteristic; crying came easily to her: ‘I was in floods of tears over E.T. and when Babe was on, I just had to flee the room.’ Those who saw or heard her appearances on the media this past week, after resigning from Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet, may be reassured by the knowledge that her lachrymose performances were nothing unusual.

conrad, Saturday, 9 July 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

No, she's announced that she's announcing. LOL pic going around Twitter of Eagle side by side with Alan Johnson where she looks like AJ in a Boris wig.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Saturday, 9 July 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

He did not directly comment on the potential leadership challenge, but hinted his resolve would not be broken, saying his patience was "infinite".

He added that he had been asked how he was coping with the pressure on him, and had replied "there is no pressure on me".

"The real pressure is when you don't have enough money to feed your kids, when you don't have a roof over your head, when you're wondering if you're going to be cared for," he said.

I like this little number from the Mourinho playbook

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Saturday, 9 July 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

@JenWilliamsMEN
I've just asked one well placed Labour MP what happens if Corbyn is re-elected. 'No plan', apparently.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

soref, Saturday, 9 July 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

scientific breakdown of lachrymose female mp also known to cry at films not rly moving things along helpfully here

schlump, Saturday, 9 July 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

she does come across as do most of these herberts as a grade A phony

conrad, Saturday, 9 July 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Cryingeagle.jpg

coygbiv (NickB), Saturday, 9 July 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

'No plan', apparently

Fuck's sake. The last two or three weeks just seems to have been an idiotic shooting-yourself-in-the-foot competition from just about everyone in British politics.

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 9 July 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

What could they say though?

It would either end up as a threat to split the party or an admission they would have to work with Corbyn if he is returned with a new mandate. Neither is good for them.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 9 July 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

equally I don't think the left of the party has a plan if they lose

ogmor, Saturday, 9 July 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

guardian going p hard for eagle, as they did for yvette cooper.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Saturday, 9 July 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

"However, analysis of her voting record by theyworkforyou.com shows her having voted against the bedroom tax and consistently voting against reducing spending on benefits."

The Graun conveniently doesn't mention her and her sister's backing for the Conservatives’ Welfare Reform and Work Bill that has contributed towards the spike in child poverty and many other ills.

calzino, Saturday, 9 July 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

you guys i am so so sick of centrists who are proud of being left-wing but not too left-wing

i mean we have all been sick of them in general but i'm REALLY sick of seeing their terrible opinions these days. absolutely principle-free.

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Sunday, 10 July 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

a labour split is very overdue though imo. current situation is just untenable.

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Sunday, 10 July 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Lex OTMFM. I have wanted to shout that from the rooftops recently.

plums (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 10 July 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn good/coming across as reasonable on Marr, Eagle a bit shit on Peston. Entire media filled with PLP centrists on message about holding Corbyn to a contest based on rules used to challenge Kinnock in 1988; Corbyn saying basically contest away, but we'll be using the rules agreed by all sides of the party in 2010.

I haven't really opined much about it out loud, but what kind of example are the PLP setting if they have to resort to textbook bullying tactics to achieve their goals? Is this appropriate behaviour at all? What kind of example is that to 500,000 members?

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Sunday, 10 July 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

It was interesting to see 'an unnamed cabinet minister' suggesting that talks were already underway to form a new centrist 'pro-business' amalgam of the Tories and Labour if Corbyn and Leadsom both won their leadership contests and split the parties. It is probably little more than an attempt to get Tory members to vote for May (which could backfire) but it would explain how a breakaway ex-Labour party could survive. They would struggle enormously without the member donations and union funds unless they could tap into the well of pro-Europe Conservative donors.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 10 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm actually starting to feel a little bit sorry for Tim Farron*, sitting there faintly bleating about making the Lib Dems into a kind of soft social democratic pro-European party and being entirely ignored. Even the most disgruntled Labour MP doesn't seem to be considering defecting to them.

*not really, it's hilarious

Matt DC, Sunday, 10 July 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

It's in times like this that having a preferential voting system would really make a difference. If the Labour Party splits in two now, it means the Tories are in power for the next generation, as the centre/left vote will always be split. In a preferential system on the other hand, you could have a soft-left party and a Corbynist party preferencing each other to ensure a non-Tory candidate always wins in seats where there is a centre/left majority. This is basically what happens in Australia, where the Labor Party would never get anywhere near government without preferences from the Greens.

Zelda Zonk, Sunday, 10 July 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

what proportion of the country is open to the idea of potentially voting for either labour or the tories? where do they live?

ogmor, Sunday, 10 July 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn is (still) the best hope for social democracy in this country, but if he isn't careful he may also be the catalyst that, once again, sets it back decades. I'm seeing the "parliamentary route to socialism" line trotted out by anti-Corbyn figures, although curiously you didn't hear it very much during the Blair years.

He will win comfortably in any contest UNLESS there's a rival left challenger looking to take advantage of Corbyn's personal weaknesses. And those weaknesses do exist and it doesn't do any favours pretending otherwise, especially Corbyn himself.

I feel like the best way forward for Corbyn now would be to stop pretending that he's doing well because he continues to command the support of the majority of members. An acceptance that 'electability' isn't just for dead-eyed technocratic sellouts but essential for anyone who genuinely wants the ability to change the country. It would help him to set out how he would do better in his second year, which means actually attacking the Tories over glaringly obvious fuckups, getting out of his comfort zone and targeting people who aren't active supporters, putting together an actual strategy and set of policies for swing seats that goes beyond just oppposing austerity - actual flagship policies that resonate, and that he would be trusted to deliver on. He needs to work out how to behave like an actual Prime Minister in waiting, and no that doesn't mean behaving like Blair or Miliband. Even his biggest supporters here acknowledge that there "wasn't much vision", and shrug like that's not a problem. There has to be some purpose to his leadership that goes beyond just "realigning the party", because if he fails at the next election then the realignment in the other direction will be fast, and brutal.

It's fanciful for anyone on the anti-Corbyn wing to believe that they can just go back to triangulating to a centre that either no longer exists or has shifted so far to the right that it would require Labour to dismantle its entire legacy. It's stupid to believe that there have been half a million entryist Trots just sitting around waiting for the right figurehead, they have to understand why Corbyn is popular, and how their stupid, short-termist and disgraceful behaviour as contributed to that popularity.

If they somehow do win, then those Corbyn supporters aren't just going to go away, but fuck it, just let them get on with it and let the full Pasokification of Labour commence.

Matt DC, Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

^ seems p otm

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

pretty much otm, but in the week of the Chilcot report part of what Corbyn has to offer is a change from the "hardman leader doing what I think its right and you peons will follow me or shut up" shtick. the country doesn't need more leadership, it needs more democracy. agreed it may take a savvy leader to get you there.

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:08 (seven years ago) link

hey we can at least hope that by the time people are asked to choose between corbynite labour and old new labour the tory vote will be split by the great strides ukip will by then have made as a seat-winning force

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

what do proponents of electability think are the core beliefs of the view they are agitating against? to me it seems that the primary goal in british politics is to change what electability means, because it's a fundamental part of the current political dynamic and has led to where we are now. I think it's only sensible to have a degree of scepticism about it because as it stands it tends to be a conservative force which prioritises the concerns of e.g. the print media and swing constituencies. what it means is changing - the boom in people voting for anti-establishment candidates is a rejection of what 'electability' has stood for - but despite a seemingly endless pummelling from the electorate a lot of people seem overly confident that they understand it

also, on the flip side, there is a real question over how short-termist a genuinely progressive party can be. the threat of imminent political annihilation puts a huge pressure on labour MPs and makes the formation of a more substantial plan much more difficult

ogmor, Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

genuine PR might be as important a target as anything - it will surely alter the future shape of government even if its hard to predict exactly how

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

equally I don't think the left of the party has a plan if they lose

― ogmor, Saturday, July 9, 2016 8:57 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If Corbyn were to lose the election then I'd guess the left's plan would be to carry on plugging along in the same way they did for years before Corbyn became leader while also trying to keep Momentum going, prevent newly joined Corbyn-supporters from walking away from the party in frustration, mobilise the membership to push for reforms to give members a bigger say over party policy etc. I've seen some speculation about Corbyn + his handful of loyalist MPs forming a new left party with the support of some of the unions if he's beaten in the leadership election, but this seems like it would be a complete dead end - if there's a stitch up where he's kept off the ballot altogether I suppose this becomes more likely, but I still think it would be a disaster.

what the left's plan is if Corbyn wins seems like a maybe more difficult question? if he's still leader at the time of the next general election idk how they will deal with the fact that so many of his MPs have said on the record that they have no confidence in him and don't think he's fit to lead the party. obviously all those MPs will be asked "in that case why should anyone should vote Labour and make Corbyn prime-minister?", I can't see what answer there is to that. unless they really are gearing up for large numbers of de-selections, the best case scenario for the left that I can see would be: that a second Corbyn leadership election victory is followed by some kind of agreement that he'll step down in favour of another leader from the same wing of the party before the next election, convinces a significant number of the PLP to work with him and the blairite irreconcilables leave to form a new centrist party.

soref, Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

I'd guess the left's plan would be to carry on plugging along in the same way they did for years before Corbyn became leader

the only issue being that before corbyn was leader a good chunk of the left wasn't in the labour party

ogmor, Sunday, 10 July 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

It's important to distinguish between the old left (basically a hardcore minority that hasn't really changed in size or behaviour in 25 years) and the new left (a MUCH larger group that feels like its life prospects are being shredded and sees Corbyn as its only real hope). There's a real risk that individuals in the older group fuck things up for the latter.

Much of Labour hadn't really come to terms with the latter group and how to harness it, especially given that group's embrace of Corbyn is a de facto rejection of them, so it's easier for them to pretend that Corbyn's support us just a load of macho Trots settling a score from two or three decades ago. Heaven knows the behaviour of some Momentum activists isn't helping here.

It does show up how hollow the whole "why not join the Labour Party and influence policy?" hook was.

Matt DC, Sunday, 10 July 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

In previous eras the Lib Dems might have expected to mop that support up but that seems very unlikely now unless the EU pledge trumps everything else.

Either way that constituency isn't going away and will only get bigger. The question is which other interest groups it might align itself with.

A split in both parties followed by proper PR is the only real hope right now but both Labour and the Tories have historically resisted PR so I dunno.

Matt DC, Sunday, 10 July 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

McDonnell is pro PR and I think JC is persuadable. I think a popular front alliance for PR - as outlined by Jeremy Gilbert https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/jeremy-gilbert/facing-facts-progressive-strategy-for-2020 - is the one workable idea for progressive politics I've seen. As opposed to Blairism 2.0 with added Dan Jarvis and more racism which is all the supposed geniuses of electability of the PLP seem to have on offer. Genuinely don't understand what the Brownites/soft Left think they have to gain from allying with the Mandelson wing, for whom even Ed M was too left wing.

Stevie T, Sunday, 10 July 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

That is an excellent piece fwiw, for its clear diagnosis of the problem as much as anything.

Matt DC, Sunday, 10 July 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

In previous eras the Lib Dems might have expected to mop that support up but that seems very unlikely now unless the EU pledge trumps everything else.

Not going to lie, the EU pledge is swinging me closer in their direction than I've ever been.

Oh baby, if only you knew / Gabnebb hit a hundred-and-two (stevie), Sunday, 10 July 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

I remember reading that UKIP would have got 80 odd seats under a PR system in the last election and shuddering. I know it would also reduce a Tory majority and give a bigger say to the Greens and the Lib Dems, but sheit, that is still scary.

calzino, Sunday, 10 July 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

We have PR and the gains for the parties at the extremes that every poll threatens never materialise fwiw

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Sunday, 10 July 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

UKIP have commanded the airtime and column inches of a party with significant parliamentary representation and helped to take UK out of the eu, worrying about them having some seats in parliament seems redundant now.

Gains of PR offset downsides. Instructive to look at composition of Scottish Parliament vis a vis composition of MPs from Scottish constituencies.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 10 July 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

(altho we have no UKIP because we vote for UKIP at vastly lower rate than English and Welsh)

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 10 July 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

I from UKP rather more the scens

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Sunday, 10 July 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Good article from Jeremy Gilbert but I fear things will have to get really bad before the main parties (or the electorate) put aside party politics or a party which has ever got in on FPTP abolishes FPTP.

This may be too obvious to everyone else itt but the last paragraphs seem otm and are not making me feel any better about the future (sorry if I got the link from here in the first place): http://election-data.co.uk/what-next-for-ukip

a passing spacecadet, Sunday, 10 July 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

can never work out whether this guy is dim, dishonest or both. sadly he's blocked me on twitter so I can't ask him directly
http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/euan-mccolm-prepare-for-corbyn-style-coup-in-the-tories-1-4173800

cozen, Sunday, 10 July 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

the only issue being that before corbyn was leader a good chunk of the left wasn't in the labour party

Also a chunk of the left was in the Labour Party as "We're not comfortable with a lot of this but it's possible to do good work in here, and push towards the left at local levels and Diane Abbott and and " - possibly foolish but hopes for the future can keep things going past their natural ending. If the PLP just take Corbyn out behind the barn and shoot him (EG by denying him a nomination), I imagine a lot of them will go as well.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 10 July 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

While you guys are asking for PR, you might want to look at having a democratically elected upper house too

Leadsom: "I'm a bit sorry, now."

Mark G, Sunday, 10 July 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

It's important to distinguish between the old left (basically a hardcore minority that hasn't really changed in size or behaviour in 25 years) and the new left (a MUCH larger group that feels like its life prospects are being shredded and sees Corbyn as its only real hope). There's a real risk that individuals in the older group fuck things up for the latter.

Matt DC with some very OTM points in his last few posts, especially this one.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 11 July 2016 04:56 (seven years ago) link

can never work out whether this guy is dim, dishonest or both.

lol recognise this wee guy used to turn up at the national pop league and stuff

conrad, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:20 (seven years ago) link

Guido Fawkes is reporting rumours that Leadsom is quitting within the hour.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

Leadsome out, beeb says

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

Xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

the lady was for turning then

pandemic, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Gove back in? ;)

imago, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

So what happens now? Does May stand unopposed, does the 3rd choice (was that Gove?) get back on the ballot, is there another call for contenders?

Sorry for ignorance.

a passing spacecadet, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

...xp

a passing spacecadet, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

There seems to be an assumption that it would be a May coronation.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

Surely you would have to put Gove back on the ballot paper?

A coronation + no election proved to be disastrous for Brown and we're hardly in more benign circumstances now. I'd guess that May would be looking to call an election almost immediately to take advantage of Labour disarray?

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

So what does that mean in terms of what is happening for teh country.
Is May going to automatically try to put Article 50 into place as soon as she gets the role.
Is there still a vote in Parliament that might go against Brexit?

& after hearing talk that there was bound to be an election later this year on the News Channel yesterday is that still likely.
So Labour would need to be in shape rapidly.
Do wish Eagle would vanish before she launches her candidacy.

Stevolende, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:52 (seven years ago) link

Does May need to call an election, I thought she was trying to say she was against doing so.

Stevolende, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

The Tories seem weirdly terrified of an election right now. They can't be scared of Labour, so I wonder what it is?

May says no A50 until next year earliest.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

They've just banjaxed the economy and don't need to hold an election for another four years. I don't know why they would hold one.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

She's not going to call an election.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

(xp) exactly!

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

Eagle came fourth out of five candidates when she ran for Deputy Leader less than a year ago so she must be banking that desperation to get rid of Corbyn trumps literally everything else.

Under the fixed term parliaments act that the coalition introduced in 2010, they don't technically need to call an election until 2020, although it would probably help them to call one as soon as possible. They will need a mandate for the terms of Brexit, May or whoever will need a personal mandate, and if things deteriorate seriously in the next four years then they could be annihilated at the next election. If they called an election now, they'd probably win it, or finish as the largest party if nothing else.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

tory/ukip coalition possibly, ugh

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

Nobody knows the terms of Brexit yet and putting off the annihilation by 14 months if everything goes sideways wouldn't offer much reward. Four years of power vs 'they'd probably win' looks fairly attractive.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

speaking of Brown, he made the same calculation right? He probably would have won if he'd called an election right away.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

can't really see the point of the conservatives letting gove back on the ballot - a few days ago he was a treacherous unelectable worm in most people's eyes, can't see that suddenly changing overnight. but all the same, there might still be a push for a pro-leave candidate - could boris sneak back in?

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

speaking of Brown, he made the same calculation right? He probably would have won if he'd called an election right away.

He would have, probably, but nobody wants to be the clown who waits for years to become PM and gets voted out a matter of months later.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

I bet he's trying to.

AlanSmithee, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

ceiling_david_miliband_is_watching_you_masturbate.jpg

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

As someone who'd like to see the Tories in as much trouble as possible, for the next 4 or 42 months, I think that keeping a voice of Brexit off the final ballot is a great achievement.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

May really hammering home the "Brexit means Brexit" message today, which was probably something she offered to Leadsom?

I hope it turns out as one of those promises that is one a selection of possibilities.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

if they call an election immediately then all Labour has to do is stand on a platform of no Brexit, and the massive silent majority that would have voted to stay at the referendum had they only known will swing solidly behind Labour. easy.

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:23 (seven years ago) link

xp Also have a Leaver on will complicate May's presumed plan of a flurry of winks and eyebrow-waggling to indicate that really now, she may have voted one way, but she's really quite sympathetic to the other side.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

I think the 1922 committee has confirmed May as leader now? Does that technically mean we might have a new PM by the end of the day?

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:39 (seven years ago) link

Seems not. She has to see the Queen first etc. Wed 20th is the date being floated.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

Gove is kind of hated by his own party and prone to gaffes that people overlook because a) the media is full of his mates and b) the divide-and-rule shit he's doing with the education system is popular with enough voters. In the event of the Tories committing regicide they'd surely go with May or Hague over Gove (or Boris if he's around in time).

Pretty sure D-Mili can do more good running the International Rescue Committee than running the Labour Party in any case.

― Matt DC, Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:07 AM (3 years ago)

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

closing episode of the season is surely her majesty snuffing it just before she signs the papers xp

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

She was a Leaver too wasn't she? Time for her to quit.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

I don't know that anyone's suggesting he'd win, mind, just that if you have a fractious segment of your party (that you will have to disappoint and piss off over the next while), giving a champion of theirs (particularly of the branch furthest away from you) a decent chance of being defeated in public would seem a good plan - particularly they're likely to be drubbed.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Don't think it'll be Gove. In fact, I think there's a decent chance that it may not even get to a membership vote, with May being the sole candidate after the others drop out in return for preferment, a bit like with Michael Howard.

― So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:00 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 11 July 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

think it might be time to call it all off for good

― twunty fifteen (imago), Thursday, 5 November 2015 21:07 (8 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

imago, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:57 (seven years ago) link

Hahahahaha every political journalist has just left Eagle's campaign launch midway through. The comic timing of the Leadsom announcement was perfect.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

:D

AF otm

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 11 July 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

Eagle should stand for the tory leadership and then everyone's happy?

^ 諷刺 (ken c), Monday, 11 July 2016 12:04 (seven years ago) link

BBC News channel comentator 'accidentally' said that was the Conservative Party when they cut away from Eagle waffle. Is that even Freudian?

Stevolende, Monday, 11 July 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

both labour & LDs calling for GE

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

and the Greens

§, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:07 (seven years ago) link

if this were Borgen, Corbyn would strike a breaktaking pact with UKIP to destroy the Tories on a platform of PR

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 11 July 2016 13:10 (seven years ago) link

If nothing else I would expect UKIP's sources of funding to dry up almost entirely once Article 50 is invoked.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

I kind of think the leadsom thing is really trivial as far as leadership goes. It was a terrible thing to say, but what about it caught people's attention? Would it have been forgotten about if she hadn't denied it? She could have (and probably has) said that single mothers are causing the downfall of western society and no one would have blinked.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Monday, 11 July 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

terrible thing to say significantly amplified by fact large proportion of press corps in bark stripping mode

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

Yep. If you want sympathetic press, don't accuse a journalist of lying.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

It was more the "I didn't say it" became "I was misquoted" then "The emphasis I gave it was changed" to "They made me say it" and a side-swerve of "Sorry if I upset anyone" towards "I apologise to Theresa May" but never quite.

Made Gordon's handling of the "Bigoted Woman" issue look like a master of calm and rational action.

Mark G, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Murdoch press would've happily flagged lack of kids as a PM candidate weakness/deficiency. But they'll give May an easy ride as long as she deports enough foreigns.

nashwan, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Hahahahaha every political journalist has just left Eagle's campaign launch midway through. The comic timing of the Leadsom announcement was perfect.

The Thick of It Xmas Special basically.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

So we're basically 12 Tory votes away from a snap election/

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

A snap election right now would also require Labour MPs to go out an campaign on behalf of a prospective Prime Minister they're on record as having no confidence in. May might take the opportunity to kill Labour as an electoral force as soon as she can.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link

If she was feeling in a sadistic frame of mind, possibly. I don't think anyone is any shape to fight a General Election though.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

So, let me get this:

The 12 votes that stet says are the Tories that would have to vote 'no conf' in the govt/Cameron, to allow a mid-term general election to be called?

But what if Labour all voted against? Like, they have confidence in the govt? Purely to prevent a General Election "right now" as they are all washing their hair?

Mark G, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Karma is a bitch, Angela Eagle. xp

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

And alternately, if May called an election on the basis that she's a bit maybe possibly leaning towards Brexit if, you know, um.

Whereas Labour could come boldly forward and say "Vote for us and we will not invoke Article 50"...

And the Greens come out all in favour of Nuclear power?

And Boris Johnson votes to leave himself by accident.

Mark G, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

> Whereas Labour could come boldly forward and say "Vote for us and we will not invoke Article 50"...

is there anything stopping the tories from saying the same thing?

koogs, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:17 (seven years ago) link

If she was feeling in a sadistic frame of mind, possibly.

Is she ever not?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

omg the Eagle video where she's scanning the room and calling out "Robert Peston?..Michael Crick?..." and can't find a single journalist to ask her a question is brutal.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Satire Is Dead.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

Mike Smithson
‏@MSmithsonPB
New ICM poll doesn't bode well for Corbyn's LAB
CON 38% +1
LAB 30%=
UKIP: 15%=
LD: 8%=
GRN: 4%=

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

And alternately, if May called an election on the basis that she's a bit maybe possibly leaning towards Brexit if, you know, um..

May can't call an election because of the fixed-term parliaments act. The only routes here are:

1. Repeal the act -- will take a good while, and would need to pass the house.

2. Vote of no confidence in the govt: they won't want this, as the opportunity then passes to Labour to form a government, and I bet Corbyn would try

3. 2/3s majority of house agrees on election. Given Labour is calling for one, it would then be interesting to see if all the PLP would vote for it.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

> Whereas Labour could come boldly forward and say "Vote for us and we will not invoke Article 50"...

is there anything stopping the tories from saying the same thing?

― koogs, Monday, July 11, 2016 2:17 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, nothing except that there's a whole bunch of Tories and RWers that will go "whaidaminit, we won that referendum? WHERE'S OUR PRIZE!!!?"

Mark G, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

Whatever Jeremy Corbyn's faults, he can count.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

xpost yes, point three, quite.

So, everyone votes for the thing they don't want, so that they get the thing they do want by winning for the other team. Or some such.

Mark G, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

the idea that Corbyn could win a general election at this moment is pure moonshine surely

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

2. Vote of no confidence in the govt: they won't want this, as the opportunity then passes to Labour to form a government, and I bet Corbyn would try

I don't know much about constitutional issues, but if there is a no confidence vote isn't the way that it works that who ever is best placed to "command a majority of the house" (or whatever) gets a go at forming a govt? as Corbyn only has a dozen or so MPs actually supporting him, could another Labour MP from the right of the party technically have a go at forming a govt on the basis that they are more likely to command a majority than Corbyn? (I know this is silly politics fanfic that won't happen, but I was wondering what exactly the rules are)

soref, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

lol Eagle has had a mare today. REAL LEADERSHIP, yeah sure - you keep telling yourself that if it helps.

calzino, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

yeah, her launch couldn't have been any flatter if she was eddie the fucking eagle

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 11 July 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

there seems to be some speculation that she may still withdraw in favour of Owen Smith, and negotiations are going on as to who is best placed to defeat Corbyn? (everyone seems convinced that if Corbyn is on the ballot then it will have to be one single challenger)

soref, Monday, 11 July 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

"command a majority of the house" (or whatever) gets a go at forming a govt? as Corbyn only has a dozen or so MPs actually supporting him,

I think this was resolved when the SNP made its bid to become the official opposition last week: the no confidence vote in Corbyn is an internal Labour party matter, not a matter for the house. If the PLP members reject the whip that's when it starts to count for this sort of thing.

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

Keir Starmer seems to be the stalking horse to beat Corbyn, but the right of the party are terrified of him too, apparently

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

angela eagle supporting calls for GE

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

presumably a (ballsy?) (dumb?) bluff cos they don't expect may to call one & they can then argue she has no mandate

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

MPs feel like they're not doing their job if they're not spouting fatuous shit at all opportunities

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 11 July 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

I'm with Arzehe, uh, what?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Monday, 11 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

i'm with angola

coygbiv (NickB), Monday, 11 July 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

comments are brutal

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

@stephenkb Her logo looks uncomfortably close to "argh" to my eyes. Which I suppose is one of few unifying messages in Labour.

soref, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

LOOOOOOOL it's Cameron's epitaph.

https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCDanielS/status/752526624722194433/video/1

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Monday, 11 July 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

So, for a non-Tory supporter, is May an improvement on Cameron, or not? Hard to tell.

Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 11 July 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

No. Much, much worse. She has constantly tried to push Cameron and Osborne to the right on immigration, civil liberty and a variety of other things.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

She's better than Gove, Johnson or Leadsom though surely?

paolo, Monday, 11 July 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

She's been talking about reducing social inequality and cracking down on tax avoidance, which is a plus (though obviously it remains to be seen what she'll actually do)

paolo, Monday, 11 July 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

this appears to be her work:

http://www.thisis2020.com/theresa-may-immigration-agamben/

koogs, Monday, 11 July 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Lol arguing about best Tory

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Monday, 11 July 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Bloody hell. I knew she was right wing on immigration but not to that extent

paolo, Monday, 11 July 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

That is nowhere near the shadiest stuff. She has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to impair successful parts of the economy and circumvent due process to cut immigration. Tens of thousands of people have been deported, many of then probably illegally, she has implemented set of systems that aren't simply designed to be 'tough' on immigration but to broadcast hostility to foreigners all around the world.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

I know I have said this a million times but I don't think we would have left the EU if it wasn't for her concerted effort to demonise migrants.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

xxxp Least worst Tory?

and all the politicians making crazy sounds (snoball), Monday, 11 July 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

Her Birmingham speech has many great things in it. If she's going to let us down on all of them (as her voting record suggests she will) I hope that also includes "Brexit means Brexit"

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

i'm guessing that snooper's charter will be coming into effect then.

piscesx, Monday, 11 July 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

Dreading the appearance of Dave and Sam at our farmer's market, where they will be shunned by elderly remainers.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Monday, 11 July 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

Also where the hell did this policy of workers representation on company boards come from? It doesn't make any sense except as a kind of play for the whole blue collar Tory thing that Osborne half-heartedly flirted with a year or so back.

Matt DC, Monday, 11 July 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

24,000 comments on tht angela eagle post now all seemingly some variation of keep corbyn. lmbo

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Finding it hard to work out why May has been pivoting towards the centre if she doesn't expect an election.

ǂbait (seandalai), Monday, 11 July 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

Farmers market in Chipping Norton or San Giminiano? Can't see him showing his face inside thre m25 any time soon.

Matt DC, works council board members are very common in Getmany, both due to pension fund share ownership and collective bargaining agreements. Between that and family ownership, it's one of the things that helps preference long term sustainability over quarterly profits in the German system. The cosy relationship may also have a part to play in things like the the VW emissions scandal.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 11 July 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

Cuts Blue Labour off at the pass. It's a Miliband era policy. Whether she will do anything about it or not remains to be seen but throwing a few bones to the Cameron centrists who think she's a 'bloody difficult woman' while indicating she wants to steal some of the ground anti-Corbyn Labour wants to move in to makes sense.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

I see that, but why now?

ǂbait (seandalai), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

how many policies like that can she get away with introducing while still maintaining she has a mandate under the 2015 manifesto

cozen, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

It makes Eagle or whoever challenges look more irrelevant if the distance between the party the Conservatives are moving towards and the party the rebels want to be closes. She is also fairly far to the right of a large chunk of her own MPs and needs to have some kind of messaging that says she's going to represent them along with the pro-Brexit message she delivered this morning.

Xp

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

It heads off the immediate unease within her own party, is the key thing. She needs to build a cabinet with both wings.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

MDC: farmer's market nearest the school attended by the younger Cameron and Gove kids (have never seen the Goves, Cameron turned up in February, got a barracking from a tomato vendor, and snidely had his PA ring the vendor's boss in an effort to have the employee sacked for sticking up for Syrian refugees).

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnHBmlYXYAA2X1P.png

stet, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

Polls are so reliable these days

calzino, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

xps jeez at cameron tomato story

Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

i keep misunderstanding why an anti-Brexit ticket wouldn't be a guaranteed election winner. Clues?

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

remainers were concentrated in pockets which wouldn't necessarily translate to electoral success under the current system. buzzfeed did a rough analysis
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisapplegate/why-a-pro-eu-party-could-be-screwed-in-the-next-election?utm_term=.uk2k2Y29b#.jwPQDzDoY

cozen, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 05:48 (seven years ago) link

but what about all the people that voted leave and now know they were lied to?

koogs, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 08:24 (seven years ago) link

and have also seen how the prominent Leavers behaved when they won.

koogs, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 08:25 (seven years ago) link

Many of the lies were comprehensively debunked as such during the referendum campaign and people chose to either ignore that, or not pay that much attention and vote with their gut instinct.

Ultimately democracy is nothing without transparency and both have been in very short supply, but going back on the referendum could prove disastrous in terms of feeding the far right in this country.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 08:57 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, what happens from now on is going to be boring, trust me.

May will be the "OK, I'll handle the Brexit, didn't really want to but hey. Things will be tough, oh yes, and I did say so at the time it was the others who lied."

And, of course, the DM will be "The Birth of the New Magii" from now on.

Mark G, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 09:04 (seven years ago) link

McNicol did not respond to a request for a comment. But a source close to the party said the protests make little sense.

“We’ve just seen David Cameron hand power to Theresa May in under five hours but Unite want a meeting in eight days’ time because some of them work outside London,” the source said.

shameless envy

ogmor, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

xp And everything that goes against the promises of the Leave campaign (which many things will) will meet a chorus of "we the people ~democratically voted~ to fix this country, but then the democracy-fearing ~establishment~ bullied Leadsom into standing down and now we can't have nice things because ~political establishment media elite spoilt immigrant-loving middle classes with their occasional European holidays~", which could take things to some quite bad places

Murdoch, Boris and a poor lying flip-flopping interview-fluffing former investment banker/hedge fund owner strange choices as spokespeople for the downtrodden everyman but people seem to be buying it somehow

I know NV is being sarcastic abt deluded m/c Remain handwringing rather than posing an actual q, but cozen's link otm and also who is going to vote against their entrenched party-politics position just because The Other Lot/some unknown quantity upstart party/the hapless Lib Dems campaign on a single issue? not enough people to swing an election any time soon. which is too bad not just for this but because the current FPTP two-party* system is really not looking like providing any good options any time soon. I make this obvious and unasked-for point just in case anyone can convince me otherwise

* mainly just one party now, unless/until UKIP convert the failed-Brexit discontent of the 1st paragraph into actual seats, because right now that seems more likely than Labour getting its two sides to play nice together and act like a convincing alternative, though I do v much hope I'm wrong there

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

Well, at least we'll never hear the phrase "A safe pair of hands" ever again..

Mark G, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

i keep misunderstanding why an anti-Brexit ticket wouldn't be a guaranteed election winner. Clues?

Unfortunately an awful lot of Leave voters are clustered in Labour constituencies in the Midlands and North of England.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

... even though most Labour voters voted Remain.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

Well, at least we'll never hear the phrase "A safe pair of hands" ever again..

― Mark G, Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:48 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

apart from this being theresa may's entire raison d'être right now

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

i mean, i agree that we shouldn't hear it, but

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

The wealthy elite controls the press and most of the other media in this country. This does not mean that they can control all of our minds (we are not programmable robots). But it does mean that they can influence the opinions of the 50,000 people who matter to electoral outcomes, when they really want to. At the last election, the Conservative party literally had a list of these 50,000 people (or a good proportion of them, anyway) and they targeted individually crafted electoral messages at each and every one of them, writing to them individually, knocking on their doors. Yes, they really did.

Oh shit, enemy competence alert.

nashwan, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

the Tories managed to convince people that bankers did NOT drive the world economy off a cliff, that the global recession was the fault of feckless government spending. people can be convinced of any goddamn thing.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

^^^ If this is true then it's utterly fucking absurd, although no more so than then 900 other completely ludicrous things to have happened in our politics in the last fortnight.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

Forget Season Finale politics, the past two weeks have been like closing the curtains and power-cycling through an edgy drama box-set for your every waking moment.

woke newt (stevie), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

Like, a box-set a day.

woke newt (stevie), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

It is has already been repeatedly said, but how the fuck did these bunglers spend 9 months planning this travesty and still have no discernible plan?

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Which travesty are you talking about? That could apply to a number of things right now.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

Labour putsch I guess, although, yeah.

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

the PLP leadership travesty. It is like watching a very bad improv band who have never rehearsed before, dying on stage.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

.. after telling everybody how tight and shit hot they are!

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

"The Birth of the New Magii"

The reality will be more O Henry, of course. "I tanked the economy to give you the gift of independence!" "Oh, I got you some great trade deals but they need a good economy and free movement of people!" Oh well, it's the thought that counts...

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

Quality posts today itt

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

Yeah after a certain point, after you've quit in a huff, taking focus away from the Tories and allowing them to get their shit together, it doesn't matter how shit you say your leader is, you have just proven that you yourself are terrible at the job you are supposed to be good at.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

This is clearly going to be the most entertaining Cabinet reshuffle in many many years. Trying to work out which of George Osborne or Jeremy Hunt leads the line in my demotion dream team.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

wonder if george osborne has some specific interest in energy and climate change that could be harnessed

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Drugs Czar?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

idk who they could replace Osborne with. Javid? If he wanted to stay on, it would probably go down well with the markets.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

A Brexiter probably.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

British politics is actually like The Thick of It, isn't it?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

i've seen gove mooted as home secretary, i think he would probably may look benign by comparison

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

*make

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

If May was even partially honest in her Birmingham speech — which it's appalling that this is basically all we have to go on re her manifesto — she is talking about a total U-turn from Osbornomics. Can't see him stomaching that much humble pie

stet, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

i've seen gove mooted as home secretary

http://kenfrost.0catch.com/obc.JPG

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

They'll go for unity - most leadership contenders will be given a post. Dunno about boris.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

Culture, Media and Sport?

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnKmNsLWAAEaCwC.jpg

LibDems 404 page

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Xp. Would not be a terrible position for him. Assuming guillotines are not an option.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/magnusmcg/status/752551501617328128

Best bit of reporting of the day. Shostakovich's 5th of course being his ostensible capitulation to Stalin so make of that what you will.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Ha, just coming here to comment on that. The D-Es-C-H theme that was hummed is also a theme of personal persecution and suffering. So a bit self-absorbed by the prime minister right there.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Response to just criticism etc etc.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

And that Morrissey's "The Teachers are afraid of the Pupils" is somewhere between Cameron and Shostie.

Mark G, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

lol @ the labour party

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

glanced at the archives the now and it appears no one ever reposted this:

Jeremy Corbyn for leader
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 7 September 2006 14:23 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

haha yessss

imago, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

it was what everyone was systems thinking though

imago, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

this was on a thread When will Blair go?

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

ok i'm voting for him to go

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

Blair?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

you mean corbyn rather than blair xpost

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

never underestimate the darkwave voting bloc

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

a heartwarming tale of neighbourly compassion here:

http://m.newsshopper.co.uk/news/14613471._Vile__and__hateful__protest_leads_to_eviction_of_asylum_seekers_in_Sidcup/

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Oh that Martian post is beyond beautiful.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

Only MATTY TAYLOR can save us now.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

i won't have this hate-speech about se london

imago, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

From Peston's Facebook:

So we will have the new occupants of the big cabinet posts in T May's government announced tomorrow, I am told.

And that is partly because the fastidious May will not want her own job of Home Secretary to be vacant even for a few hours.

And if she is filling Home, it makes sense for her to do Chancellor, Foreign and the all-new Brexit post at the same time.

I also expect the total reshuffle - which will go on for two or three days - to be substantial. May has been training and preparing to be PM for too long not to want to make a government in her own image.

And since in the first flush of office she will be more powerful than she will probably ever be again, this is her best chance of creating the team able to deliver her agenda.

So who is up, who down and who out?

Well George Osborne was in effect told yesterday, in May's Birmingham speech, that he is out of the Treasury. This was his dismissal notice:

"For a government that has overseen a lot of public service reforms in the last six years, it is striking that, by comparison, there has not been nearly as much deep economic reform".

And then she denigrated the Chancellor's cherished Northern Powerhouse in no uncertain terms - in that she called for a "plan to help not one or even two of our great regional cities but every single one of them".

Ouch.

After that lampooning, it is pretty hard to see May offering Osborne any job at all.

By contrast there is quite a lot of talk that Gove could stay on at Justice to complete his ambitious prison-reform programme.

But all change more-or-less everywhere else.

Who is on the up?

Well, as I mentioned earlier, I expect big jobs to go to Philip Hammond, Justine Greening, Chris Grayling and Amber Rudd.

As one of May's supporters said to me, the Cameron/Osborne "chumocracy" will be buried.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

Gove's prison reform, does that include the fucking state they are all currently in with legal high epidemics etc or?

plums (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

that's more Grayling's fault, and that of a succession of previous Home Secretaries, to be fair

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Philip Hammond, the most boring man in England?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn will be on the ballot.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

with the NEC ruling that the 3 pound members of the last 6 months don't get a vote. you have to have been a member longer than 6 months or to have paid the full 25 quid fee to be able to vote.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

i mean im not sure what the consequences of that may be, iirc corbyn won with the existing membership the first time around - i.e. he would have won, albeit more narrowly, if all the 3 quid member votes had been ignored.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

yes that's right. one thing it tells me is that a lot of these fuckers are still not interested in broad Left coalition-building or PR.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

For the labour party as was, it's the end of the beginning of the end.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

Re NV post I think they believe there is a parallel quantum state where their convictions rule

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

Convictions?

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

Even when presented with their own voting records they have zero conviction.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure they stand for private ownership of NHS premises, SureStarts for all and freewheeling military intervention against random states

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

say what you will about the tenets of third way blairism, dude, at least it's an ethos

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

I trust the Tories more tbh, ever since Thatcher took my milk when I was at a poor as fuck sink school in Brackenhall in the 70's. You can always rely on them to make your life worse as part of their ethos. It is these slippery snakes that affect to be part of the solution while doing much the same that are even worse in my book.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

Of course dude

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

Discussion to be had about which are actually worse, but I would say in terms of ability to fuck you up the the Tories are way out ahead of the Blairites

Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

Well maybe you should ask the family of ATOS related suicides or deaths what they think of Blairite/Brown legacies?

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

[families]

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

I tend to see that as a case of B and B handing a loaded gun to their successors under the belief no-one would possibly fire it, but I can see that, they still primed it and handed it over

Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

right, so much better than Tories then :p

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

@rafaelbehr Tomorrow's column. Grown-up politics in England is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Conservative party.

feel that all broadsheet columnists should be required to wear a device that administers a large electric shock every time they type the phrase "grown-up politics"

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnMfFI2W8AAzfzd.jpg

this is a breakdown of the first preference votes in last year's contest broken down by party members, registered supporters (i.e. the ppl who paid £3 to be able to vote) and affiliated supporters. some anti-Corbyn types of twitter have been arguing that on the basis that Corbyn received just under half of first preference votes in September, and some party members who voted for him then have become disenchanted with his leadership, he could be beaten in a race against a single opponent (this is assuming that the registered supporters have been more or less taken out of the equation by increasing the fee to £25).

from what I can gather, though, quite a lot of £3 ppl had already signed up to become full members between September and the Feb 2016 cut-off point, and there seem to have been a fair few anti-Corbyn people who cancelled their Labour membership after his election (some of whom seem to have rejoined to vote against him over the last few weeks, but have been thwarted by the February cut-off- some folks on twitter very unhappy about this - there seems to be some debate as to how long it takes for a membership cancellation to go through, and if people who cancelled over the last few months may still be able to vote)

my general impression is that the electorate who decides this Labour leadership contest may be slightly more Corbyn-sceptic than the electorate that decided the last, but probably not enough to defeat him?

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

on the basis that Corbyn received just under half of first preference votes in September

half of first preference votes from full party members that should say

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 02:39 (seven years ago) link

Well, Owen smith is running now too, which should help Corbyn.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 07:02 (seven years ago) link

Unless it's a precursor to Eagle dropping out. She has become a laughing stock and Smith doesn't have baggage over Iraq, etc.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 07:08 (seven years ago) link

She was born into Labour and she'll be there a lot longer. Even if she's deselected. Apparently
Did anybody watch that Newsnight with her last night?
Is she aware of activity in her constituency branch?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

is it me or is football team rhetoric like "born into Labour" part of the problem? think and talk like adults who genuinely value your goals over how you reach them, please.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 07:18 (seven years ago) link

Lol "grown up politics" from the party that brought you Boris Johnson.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 07:49 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/fEiIAWt.png

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

This speech is so far left it's shouting through the Overton window

stet, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

Theresa May anagram time: hate my arse

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

What's she saying?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

Same stuff as Birmingham speech -- and stuff literally out of Labour playbook. Govt for all, not for the few. Taxes that prioritise you, not the wealthy.

Basically, is thundering for the centre. Makes Labour positioning difficult (until the actions start speaking louder, natch).

Thinking about it, and its brief mention of Europe, it might fundamentally be acknowledging real reasons for ref result.

stet, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Hey, the core Tory vote has nowhere else to go now.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah been thinking that she needed to at least acknowledge some of the base reasons for people in the neglected parts of the country to be voting to leave, even if she isn't going for an election. & making some comment on trying to deal with work to try to bring money back to some areas of the uk is a step in that direction.
Still hope we do get an election and she does get to be the shortest living active PM

Stevolende, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Taxes that prioritise you, not the wealthy.

sorry if i'm being dim, but what does that mean?

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

She is speaking in a register that the wealthy can't hear.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Awesome, may making egalitarian populist noises while labour continues to fuck itself. Can anyone loan me an enormous solid oaken desk for me to smash my head against, thx

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

wake up sheePLPe

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

If jeremy corbyn achieved anything it was getting theresa may to briefly pretend to want to realign party policy slightly leftward, again

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

gideon's resigned

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

a nation mourns

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

Hammond confirmed as Chancellor.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

Osborne seemed invincible barely a year ago, and Hammond a non-entity.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

He was Foreign Secretary! But yeah, weirdly anonymous as far as they generally go.

Boris made it into #10 remarkably early in the running as far as Cabinet appointments go. They can't be giving him one of the big jobs can they?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Boris at Downing Street. This apparently denotes he will likely be getting one of the big jobs, perhaps Foreign Secretary. David Davis there too, possible Brexit minister.

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

Better to have Boris inside pissing out and also a - the? - Brexit voice to sell the fudge?

stet, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

The idea of Boris being given Foreign Secretary is just fucking preposterous. She must be giving him Transport or Culture, Media & Sport or something?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

people were speculating earlier that Chris Grayling could be Brexit minister *shudder*

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

johnson is foreign sec

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

unbefuckinglievable

goole, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

DELETE THIS FUCKING COUNTRY NOW.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

I thought May would have been as boring as she would be shit but Boris as foreign secretary means she knows how to LOL

plums (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

Gets him out of the country

calumerio, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Amber Rudd in as Home Secretary.

David Davis just rocked up looking extremely smug.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Cameron made almost the same speech at the last Tory conference, prompting Dan Hodges to claim that Cameron was 'the new leader of the British Left' - remember those lolz?

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

is Johnson getting foreign secretary because an he'd be more likely to launch a leadership challenge at some point down the line if he didn't get a good job?

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Presume Corbyn has settled into his armchair with a nice cup of tea to watch mastermind. Might pop out for a walk tomorrow if the weather is nice.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Has he even acknowledged the new PM at all?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

guardian liveblog says that Liam Fox is is arriving at Number 10, which sounds ominous

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

xp he's said that she and Hammond have his "full support" on twitter

soref, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

Fox is being tipped for International Trade, apparently. Good news for the international [CONTROVERSIAL MODERATOR EDIT] industry.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

i can't deal with any more of these end-of-season finale twists i need to lie down

or emigrate

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

just realised i literally did not know what Philip Hammond looks like

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

Boris Johnson dealing with Syria. Boris Johnson negotiating with Israel and Palestine. Boris Johnson effectively in charge of MI6. Oh dear fucking Lord.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

tbf he's already demonstrated a deft hand in international relations

http://static.businessinsider.com/image/561f682ddd089574588b4693/image.gif

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

Xp looks like that commander off the death star in civvies

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

Johnson was stabbed in the back; that means time and sympathy could let him come back. Especially if he can play the "other people ruined my lovely Brexit" card. Being in the government means he now has to answer for the fuck-ups, and for the inevitable fudge to come. I more and more think this is savvy.

Interesting too that all the intl jobs have gone to Brexiters, all the home jobs to Remainers. Being charitable, I think her plan is to succeed at home while the Brexiteers disappoint their voters and finally kill this thing.

stet, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/rfkrIO1.jpg

xpost

conrad, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

does Davis as Brexit minister tell us much? are they really gonna go full Out?

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

this ends with Walmart on every street corner right

imago, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

xp give the Brexiteers the Brexit jobs, watch them fuck it up, pull back from botched Brexit with reputation intact?

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

Davis interesting. Currently suing the government to try and enforce an EU law in his favour, lol. Also prone to prima-Donna resignations when things get tough, so job possibly another way to neutralise another Outer.

That Guardian commenter needs to do a v2 of his viral this time about how this is May positioning the Brexites to carry the can again.

stet, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

Davis wrote this two days ago, abt his views on how brexit should materialize: http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2016/07/david-davis-trade-deals-tax-cuts-and-taking-time-before-triggering-article-50-a-brexit-economic-strategy-for-britain.html

Good luck UK etc

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

Good thing the shadow cabinet is well-placed to start challenging these fuckers

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

just realised i literally did not know what Philip Hammond looks like

To call him a dessicated calculating machine would do a grave disservice to dessicated calculating machines.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

tbh he's got a look of Theresa May about him

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

he really is a grey blur, probably the next Tory pm.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

the first time I noticed him was when he said Ed was treacherous and untrustworthy because he stood against his bro.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

pmqs-cameron-may-reshuffle-labour-leadership-bid-as-mcdonnell-defends-claim-that-anti-corbyn-plotters-fucking-useless-politics-live

schlump, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

McDonnell got caught saying what everyone has been thinking for the last week, on R4 this morning some hack was giving him a hard time and trying to suggest him saying "fucking useless plotters" was inciting armed Corbyn brigades to throw bricks throw windows.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah i heard that, rightly told them to fuck off

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

last time a pm was announced, i hung with l0u1s jagg3r and saw boredums, i feel like today was missing ilx fun times and a bunch of Japanese drummers

plums (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Fox, davis, johnson - the dream team for delivering brexit

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure it has been pointed out a number of times but Johnson recently won a poetry competition for writing the most insulting rhyme about the President of Turkey, a NATO ally. That will be fun.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

xp jeez I'd forgotten that

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

last time a pm was announced, i hung with l0u1s jagg3r and saw boredums, i feel like today was missing ilx fun times and a bunch of Japanese drummers

I was at this! Missed connections ;_;

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

Never mind that. Johnson also said 'bravo for Assad' and praised Putin.

But does it matter? Of course not. In 2016 people detest 'experts' and facts, and prefer laughing over BJ hanging in the air, and his hairdo, over his thoughts. And the other way around, Johnson: you don't like my ideas? That's cool, I have others.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

It matters if you want to be taken seriously by people like the 'part Kenyan' and his probable successor the 'sadistic nurse'.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

The inherently anti-British half-Kenyan

♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

Heh. Still, wanting to be taken seriously seems to be something of the past for politicians in beloved Albion and beyond tbh. Xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

Reminiscent of the different attitude towards diplomatic appointments between Russia, who send the best and brightest foreign policy graduates, and the US who send people they have no use for at home.

The fact we need to be either in highly skilled hands or begging favours in bowing and scraping mode hasn't sunk in yet.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Is there anything to know about Amber Rudd besides what's on her Wikipedia page?

ǂbait (seandalai), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

No mentions on ILX until yesterday it seems.

ǂbait (seandalai), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

What if she gives Gove the NHS?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

Is there any chance she won't give him anything?

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

re amber rudd: she talked a good in her previous role (energy & climate change) but i don't think she actually managed to achieve anything much? but that's about par for the course for that post really

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

How does fox keep getting jobs?

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

like most of these, just by persistently turning up.

calzino, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

With his best man in tow.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

Incredible to me how often I still hear interviews with Brexit supporters who claim not to have understood what they were voting for and what the consequences would be. I don't know if I'm impressed or scared that over here I get the impression that Trump voters, otoh, know *exactly* what to expect from him, and would be disappointed at anything less.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

Good thing the shadow cabinet is well-placed to start challenging these fuckers

New season of New Blood starts tonight at 9pm. Then I'll probably turn in. Having such a big clear mandate to lead the party does get tiring at my age.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Thursday, 14 July 2016 05:52 (seven years ago) link

@DanMilmo 16m16 minutes ago
Philip Hammond says UK will leave single market. So that rules out the EEA option.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 07:11 (seven years ago) link

pack your bags kids, we're heading for China

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 July 2016 07:17 (seven years ago) link

Philip Hammond on Radio 4 just now effectively said don't worry about Boris, the grown-ups will keep him in line

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 July 2016 07:24 (seven years ago) link

Where the fuck is the mandate for leaving the market? Polling shows 2/3 of country wants it, way more than care about immigration. Fucking hell.

stet, Thursday, 14 July 2016 08:32 (seven years ago) link

May, Hammond... now just waiting for Clarkson...

koogs, Thursday, 14 July 2016 08:33 (seven years ago) link

Polling shows 2/3 of country wants it

wants it or wants to leave it?

woke newt (stevie), Thursday, 14 July 2016 08:34 (seven years ago) link

Where the fuck is the mandate for leaving the market? Polling shows 2/3 of country wants it, way more than care about immigration. Fucking hell.

Been some clarification since:

‏@DanMilmo 1 hour ago

Reuters:HAMMOND SAYS WE'LL COME OUT OF SINGLE MARKET AS A RESULT OF THE DECISION TO LEAVE EU AND I WOULD LIKE US TO NEGOTIATE ACCESS TO IT

groovypanda, Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

Come on, these guys will sacrifice virtually everything to remain in the single market.

Matt DC, Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:06 (seven years ago) link

Davis said he expected the EU to continue to allow the UK tariff-free access to the single market, even with the UK imposing new border controls.

This leaves the question of Single Market access. The ideal outcome, (and in my view the most likely, after a lot of wrangling) is continued tariff-free access. Once the European nations realise that we are not going to budge on control of our borders, they will want to talk, in their own interest. There may be some complexities about rules of origin and narrowly-based regulatory compliance for exports into the EU, but that is all manageable.

i don't really understand this. if the eu raise barriers to uk imports, won't that favour eu producers and manufacturers and be a net gain for the eu in the long run? is there anything we produce in this country that can't be made elsewhere for less? or is he talking about tariffs on goods that we import? the eu wouldn't want their costs to increase and it would only cause inflation here anyway, so surely that would be undesirable for both parties.

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:29 (seven years ago) link

also: Michael Gove has been sacked as justice secretary

maracas.jpeg etc

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:30 (seven years ago) link

unless priti patel gets promoted to that post of course

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

Clarification makes things better. But yes polling said 2/3 value single market over immigration controls.

Davis confusing: some people rate him as a big brain (who has negotiated EU treaties in the past!) but his statements and proposals are all denying reality. Single market isn't about tariffs anyway; it's about regs and non-tariff barriers.

He is either lying or something else going on.

stet, Thursday, 14 July 2016 09:45 (seven years ago) link

jeremy hunt rumoured to have taken a bullet, a nation(al health service) mourns

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:01 (seven years ago) link

Today is about to be declared a national holiday in Lewisham.

Matt DC, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

it's always etc etc

imago, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

nicky morgan sadness in her eyes jpg

nashwan, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like Hunt may not have been altogether fired from what they've just been saying on BBC News channel. Just moved to another dept.

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:30 (seven years ago) link

That's interesting. Morgan had a reputation for competence within the party, if not the teaching profession. Gove and Osborne getting the boot is personal above anything else. May doesn't like either of them.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

could it be as simple as nicky morgan being a backer of michael gove

conrad, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Yes, quite possibly.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

I probably prefer Morgan to most Labour MPs, as far as Tories go she didn't seem that bad. Although this might be a misconception on my part.

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

remember when she told members of the second largest teachers' union that it was no wonder that people didn't want to join the profession when they complain so much about how bad it has become

conrad, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

She made some good noises abou SEN teaching the other day, but alas still a Tory!

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

Liz Truss just been given Justice.

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

oy

The first of the Britannia Unchained cru to get a top role, presumably not the last.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

Greening got Education.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

have been reading The Maisky Diaries recently, his rants about the "coarse oaf" German Foreign secretary Ribbentrop - portray him as very similar in character to Boris.

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

Greening is also Equalities Minister

On 16 Apr 2013:
Justine Greening voted to remove the duty on the Commission for Equality and Human Rights to work to support the development of a society where people's ability to achieve their potential is not limited by prejudice or discrimination and there is respect for human rights.

On 16 Apr 2013:
Justine Greening voted against making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of caste

On 26 May 2016:
Justine Greening voted in favour of repealing the Human Rights Act 1998;

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

Global trade deals will be bigger outside than in the EU, says David Davis

The biggest trade deals you've ever seen!

ǂbait (seandalai), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

Somebody just said taht Hunt appears to have voluntarily stepped down.

Defence secretary is the one person staying in place.

Liam Fox secretary of state for international trade. (& Foreign Secretary job seems to have been somewhat downsized)

Business dept been hollowed out and partially given over to Greening.
Possibly the rest going to Fox.

So what happens in a couple of months when labour gets in? Or do people normally shuffle what depts do what between different governments.

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

"So what happens in a couple of months when labour gets in?"

I hope you are willing to bare your arse on the Town Hall steps if this impossible outcome occurs!

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Gavin Williamson as chief whip

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

@SharonBarbour
BBC understands Jeremy Hunt now expected to stay in his post at the Department of Health.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

This is all a fabulous example of why you should maybe wait two or three days before deciding a PM is "a safe pair of hands".

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

Global trade deals will be bigger outside than in the EU, says David Davis

i don't know what that means exactly, but shifting most of our trade to non-eu partners is so nuts from the pov of meeting our carbon targets

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

I was the first person to bring TM up as a PM possibility and I haven't once referred to her as that.

a nice cup of tea and a sit-in (suzy), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

Gavin Williamson as chief whip

Read that as: Gavin Williamson as chief wimp

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

the pov of meeting our carbon targets

biggest lol of the month so far

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:39 (seven years ago) link

well it's something we barely had a grip on anyway, but it is an important issue. one of a huge many though obv

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

talking of which:

Christopher Hope Verified account
‏@christopherhope

Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, Department for Energy and Climate Change and Department for Transport are set to be closed.

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

if those are all merged, climate change will just get buried as a concern surely?

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

honi soit qui mal y pense

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Department of A New Life Under The Sea

nashwan, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:54 (seven years ago) link

Crabb's a shoo-in lol

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/753553917435318272

@jon_bartley
I’m on a hospital ward with my son, awaiting a delayed and postponed operation. Huge cheer just erupted at news Jeremy Hunt has been sacked.

@LouiseMensch
Well scumbag enjoy the fact you were wrong you loathsome tit. Jeremy is staying

groovypanda, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Hang on, I've missed this. Where is Transport going?

stet, Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

(xp) WTF?!?!?!

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 14 July 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

I don't know who any of those people are but calling someone taking their kid to hospital a loathsome tit seem nagl

plums (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

ok so Louise Mensch is barred from voting in the Green leadership election

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy Hunt otoh seems to fit that description perfectly.

plums (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

haha she's gone feral

imago, Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

bartley is the running for leadership of the greens as a job share with caroline lucas btw, hence the animosity i s'pose xps

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

OK, so just realized Jon Bartley is the Ekklesia guy.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

News just confirmed that Hunt thing, what a shame.

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:04 (seven years ago) link

xp yup. am always wary of religion and politics mixing. is ekklesia something to be suspicious of?

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

How the fucking fuck does Hunt not get sacked?

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:06 (seven years ago) link

(xp) Nah, completely harmless afaik

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

Hunt was an early backer of May's leadership and she's returning the favour.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

Mensch is loathsome obviously but she also has genuinely awful reading comprehension and only looks at about three words in every tweet.

Matt DC, Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

tbh a few more jesus hippies in politics probably a good thing at this point

imago, Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

Mensch has gone full Ann Coulter since getting hired for this stupid right-wing-Gawker Newscorp project nobody can remember the name of. She has always been a horrible person but a lot of the recent stuff looks performative.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:21 (seven years ago) link

absolutely and her follower count goes up around 4k a month

nashwan, Thursday, 14 July 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

urely May knows that Johnson is a hated figure in Brussels. Surely she guessed that the reaction to his appointment would be laughter in Washington. But she doesn’t care because — like the leaders of all small countries without aspirations to international leadership — her concerns are more parochial. She doesn’t need a foreign secretary who is taken seriously in foreign capitals.

This is put more eloquently but basically what I meant yesterday, too.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

I don't particularly want Britain to "aspire to be a leading Western power" tbh.

Tim, Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

Dutch (Labour) Foreign Secretary's first response to BoJo as FS on the radio just now: "I look forward to working with him, he's very flamboyant!"

*chucks radio out the window*

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:07 (seven years ago) link

Anne Applebaum's disapproval is the first thing i've seen that has made me wonder whether Johnson won't be so bad after all.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:08 (seven years ago) link

applebaum providing the neocon tears to cheer us up

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

Wikipedia claims that May and her creepy-looking husband were introduced to one another at a Tory Party disco by Benazir Bhutto.

Matt DC, Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

RIP Stephen Crabb, we hardly knew you thankfully

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

Wikipedia claims that May and her creepy-looking husband were introduced to one another at a Tory Party disco by Benazir Bhutto.

Wow, that's a story to tell the grandki... oh.

They could have been Stackridge. (Tom D.), Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

tbh a few more jesus hippies in politics probably a good thing at this point

― imago

pretty sure the jesus hippies went all "time of the last persecution" on us some time ago

the event dynamics of power asynchrony (rushomancy), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

leadsom is the new environment secretary. gets to clear up all the cancelled farming subsidies, hope that keeps her busy enough to prevent her pushing her pro-hunting agenda

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

Does hunting come under environment? Or what? Or could it be spun that way?

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Sajid Javid is the new Communities Secretary.

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

department for environment, farming and rural affairs innit xp

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom as Environment Secretary really is the climate-change-agnostic cherry on top of this cake of shit.

Matt DC, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

That's a huge step down for Javid.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

"Labour's Yvette Cooper thinks it looks like a "very right-wing" cabinet so far. She says there's often a "very big gap between the rhetoric and the reality with Theresa May" and says that's what we are seeing."

Lol! at the hypocrisy

calzino, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

they'd better start prioritising the search for a new houses of parliament cuz the current one's gonna be underwater soon

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

tories in right-wing cabinet shocker

brexit through the rift shock (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

Pritti Patel as International Development secretary

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

Lolololol

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Former accountant and co-chair of the 1922 Karen Bradley in at Culture.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

Leadsom will now be able to fuck up the world for her children and their children - May instinctively understands that she instinctively doesn't understand.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 14 July 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

guys i don't think anybody should question Yvette Cooper's credibility on identifying a right wing cabinet

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

When Cabinet positions are dished out as punishment.

nashwan, Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

For the minister as well as us I mean.

nashwan, Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like Leadsom got exactly what she wanted to rid the world of foxes. Do hope there is some hope of preventing that. But these stewards of the state seem to not be the greatest stewards of nature. Innit.

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

Just seen this shared on facebook, Bristol has had funding pulled on anti-Corbyn MPs by local Union.
http://www.bristol247.com/channel/news-comment/daily/politics/union-withdraws-funds-to-bristols-labour-mps

Stevolende, Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

thumbs up

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 July 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

I lol'd
https://twitter.com/junayed_/status/753355203693383680

Οὖτις, Thursday, 14 July 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/753845837269118976 the responses to corbyns tweet are appalling, though not sure if I'm getting them in an odd order because it's mobile.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Friday, 15 July 2016 07:23 (seven years ago) link

I heard that NEC has suspended all 6000 members of Brighton and Hove Labour Party for passing a motion to support Corbyn. Can see headlines on google but phone won't connect to full story.

Stevolende, Friday, 15 July 2016 07:50 (seven years ago) link

http://brightonandhoveindependent.co.uk/brighton-hove-district-labour-party-suspended-nec/

This is such nonsense, I don't see how the NEC/the factions behind think this could possibly wash or that they have any chance of succeeding with these tactics

ogmor, Friday, 15 July 2016 08:09 (seven years ago) link

Jesus fuck. This is honestly the most blatant attempt to rig a democratic vote that I can remember in this country.

It shows that they just don't believe they can win an argument or beat Corbyn. And if you can't beat Jeremy Fucking Corbyn now, how on earth do you propose to beat Theresa May?

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:18 (seven years ago) link

I mean it's a good job they've done it in an area with no left wing alternative. It would have been a complete disaster if they had.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:20 (seven years ago) link

Every time I read about Leadsom, it's as though she had to spend the night before Googling whatever it is she's talking about

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/energy-minister-andrea-leadsom-asked-whether-climate-change-was-real-when-she-started-the-job-a6710971.html

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Friday, 15 July 2016 09:26 (seven years ago) link

It is the standard editorial line of the Spectator so I guess she is far from alone among Tory MPs.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

THere's apparently a bit more to the Brighton & Hove story about a worker at the venue taht they held a conference allegedly being spat on, though there also appears to have been no complaint made at the time. Also the chairman's signature is on a petition put out by a leftist group which is supposed to have some negative history with Labour though it dissolved and all members joined Labour. & he is being accused of being associated with that faction which is apparently a total no-no.

Both of which do seem to be rather underhanded attempts to discredit the local members.

Just thinking of which I read yesterday that the Eagle faction were supposed to be announcing fictional abuse which was what lead the hotel venue last week to cancel on them. Not sure if anything was said about that on here or the other thread.

Stevolende, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:29 (seven years ago) link

Although Smith has postponed his leadership launch it sounds like it was going be an attempt to project his "left-wing credentials" and his experience of Thatcherism and the miner's strike etc.. It all sounds completely bogus when you look at his actual record but BBC reporters actually keep repeating this bullshit with straight faces.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

Smith was born in Morecambe, Lancashire, in 1970. He is the son of the Welsh historian and writer David "Dai" Smith, the former chair of the Arts Council of Wales.

Owen Smith attended Barry Comprehensive School in Barry, Wales, and joined the Labour Party at the age of 16. He later studied History and French at the University of Sussex. He worked for the BBC as a radio producer for 10 years, working on a variety of programmes in both Wales and London, including Today for BBC Radio Four and the weekly politics programme Dragon's Eye for BBC Cymru Wales television.

Smith then entered the biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industry for five years, and in 2005 became head of policy and government relations for pharmaceutical corporation Pfizer, where he was paid £80,000 a year to lobby for the company. Leaving Pfizer in September 2008 he subsequently joined Amgen, another pharmaceutical company.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 09:39 (seven years ago) link

yeah, the Thatcher years must have hit him really hard.

in case you ever wonder why creating a more just economic system seems to matter less to some members of the PLP than it does to the majority of working class people, there's some clues.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 09:41 (seven years ago) link

former lobbyists for global business should never have been allowed in the Labour party in the first place

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah but he has a Welsh accent.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:45 (seven years ago) link

I did wonder about the conflict of interests there (Labour /Pfizer etc). Hoping that the electorate are aware of this and what effect it might have.
There is at least a meme going around showing his history. Can't find it now but saw it on Facebook recently.

Stevolende, Friday, 15 July 2016 09:50 (seven years ago) link

am trying to wean myself off the use of the phrase "these fuckers" every other sentence

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

never mind some guy from Brighton and Hove CLP who possibly has some connections to the Alliance for Workers' Liberty, according to Stephen Kinnock 10% of the PLP are "entryists":

"The thing with splits is it almost gives the impression that there is a 50-50 divide," Stephen Kinnock MP told me. "But there so clearly isn’t. I think it would be better to call it a spin-off. About 10 per cent of our PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] would be very welcome to go and form the Socialist Workers Party. That’s what they’ve always wanted to do, they’re entryists. What an entryist does is come in through the back door, squats inside the house for a while until he’s wrecked it and then leaves through the front. And that is exactly what they’re wanting to do here. They’ve very welcome to go off and form their own party. We are the Labour Party, we represent the mainstream 9.3 million people that voted Labour and the others are very welcome to go off and do their own thing."

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/07/labour-won-t-split-if-jeremy-corbyn-wins-rebels-will-fight-him-again

soref, Friday, 15 July 2016 12:08 (seven years ago) link

nice. extent of the problem doesn't seem too bad then. his candidate should easily be able to rout them in a democratic & fair leadership election

cozen, Friday, 15 July 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

Got ballot password and stuff for the NEC. Don't know what I can vote for that will sort this out, of course.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Friday, 15 July 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

The kinnock description seems like exactly how I feel about the right wing plp who have ruined everything for people who believe in... You know... Labour policies and ideals, not his way around.

plums (a hoy hoy), Friday, 15 July 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

arguments about entryism are pretty bollocksy, but then the apple doesn't fall far from the tree in Kinnock's case. if Owen Smith isn't an entryist, if Liz Kendall isn't an entryist, if Blair wasn't an entryist then nobody is afaic.

the Kinnocks of the party give these interviews where they rewrite the party's constitution and history on the fly, make a narrative up to support their own craven money-grubbing cynicism, and won't get called on it because TV interviews aren't about that shit

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

this is somewhat bizarre: a whole Daily Express article reporting Socialist Party (i.e. the successor to Militant) general secretary Peter Taaffe's view on the current Labour crisis. They must be loving this publicity.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/689436/Jeremy-Corbyn-Labour-MPs-resignations-shadow-cabinet-NEC-Peter-Taaffe-socialist-party

soref, Friday, 15 July 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

the idea that the thousands of people who have become involved in the Labour party to support Corbyn are all entryists is laughable of course, I do get the impression though that in some places where Corbyn supporters have been successful in gaining some control over local parties the orchestrators have been older veterans of the Labour struggles of the 80s and 90s who have recently rejoined the party after being involved in smaller left sects. obv the Labour right have a vested interest in pushing this line so maybe it's exaggerated, expelling and suspending people like this would be wrong anyway imo

soref, Friday, 15 July 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

so momentum are the facehuggers of the labour party, corbyn is a chestburster, and neil kinnock plays the party of ripley jones, the nostromo's ginger cat?

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Friday, 15 July 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Might as well say "until hell freezes over", not sure they mean this though

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-scotland-may-idUKKCN0ZV1HU

stet, Friday, 15 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Person all i love the idea that new people who join the party aren't worth listening to, which is a strategy to surely win at a general election when you need people who dont generally vote for the party to get interested.

plums (a hoy hoy), Friday, 15 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

call me a cybernat conspiracy theorist but I smell a trap there. would like to think may's conciliatory tone is genuine but fully expect she'll use this 'can't agree a uk wide approach due to jumped up scotland's stubbornness' as a lever to mobilise english nationalist votes

cozen, Friday, 15 July 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

At the heart of it is the PLP and Labour right's refusal to accept that the world has changed massively since 2006 and they haven't got the slightest fucking clue what to do about it.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

does stephen kinnock know that the socialist workers party is already a thing. (and a thing that's thought to have a ludicrously low membership nowadays, probably under 2,000.)

call me a cybernat conspiracy theorist but I smell a trap there. would like to think may's conciliatory tone is genuine but fully expect she'll use this 'can't agree a uk wide approach due to jumped up scotland's stubbornness' as a lever to mobilise english nationalist votes

very likely, but Sturgeon's response to that is likely to be

http://31.media.tumblr.com/a11339e9507e90abfe586ea81bde2830/tumblr_n7id5wi4J71qebc9so2_400.jpg

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 15 July 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

that seems mainly otm as a diagnosis of the problems facing Corbynism, I'm not sure about this concluding paragraph though:

Secondly, the idea that Corbyn retaining the leadership is worth a Labour split (before any implementation of PR) has to be rejected outright. In the light of Brexit, the collapse of Labour as an institution would be an utter disaster. Corbyn should have cut a deal in the weeks after the mass resignations, using his influence among a membership which has decisively turned left to ensure there was a left candidate on the ballot, and then walked. Given that he has not done so, the possibility remains open for another candidate on the left to use Corbyn’s perceived ‘radicalism’ as a means of presenting themselves as a ‘realistic’ moderate — and being recognised as such by the media, even if their actual policy programme was more or less identical to that of the current leadership (save, perhaps, for the simplistic Counterfire-style presentation of foreign policy). That is an unprecedented opportunity, and one which would be Corbyn’s greatest gift to the Labour left, if only they would grasp it.

I agree that Corbyn cutting a deal that he'd resign if a left candidate could be on the ballot and for his replacement would have been a better deal that what's happening now, but was that ever a realistic possibility? I don't see why his opponents would have agreed to that. And the idea that someone with basically the same policy program as Corbyn will be able to present themselves as a moderate and avoid a split seems deluded as well - I think the only way to avoid some kind of split at this point would be a defeat for the left, can't see any way around that (which tbf makes his other point about pushing for PR even more important)

soref, Friday, 15 July 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

except again, majority of the PLP don't seem interested in PR. and i think his idea that campaigning at a general election that isn't going to happen on a second referendum ticket would be a successful plan is as wildly optimistic as anything he's accusing Corbynistas of thinking

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

there's enough delusion to go round on all sides, basically. but until the "soft left" or whatever it wants to call itself comes to terms with the fact that a large swathe of the politically-inclined working class are no longer prepared to vote for an "at least we're not Tories" approach to policy then this rift can't be fixed. they may as well expel everybody they don't like now and get back to being the TV-focused modern nullity that they dream of

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

The problem is that the debate (if you can even call it that) has become extremely polarised, with-us-or-against us and if someone doesn't pull back soon then both sides will be destroyed.

Clearly this isn't a straight fight between Corbynism and Blairism (or maybe Harmanisn) but anything else has been flattened or erased. If someone from a non-Corbyn wing made a genuine and unambiguous commitment to oppose austerity then Corbyn might be in trouble. But as it is, he'll win. And I don't think he or anyone else has a plan for what happens when he does.

The single glaringly obvious problem with the whole "this is a 15-year ground up project" is that, from the perspective of other parts of the party, there just isn't time. People are suffering NOW. And unless you believe there's genuinely no difference at all between even the right of the Labour Party and the Tories, then there's an irresponsibility to just accepting a further decade of Tory rule and the catastrophic impact that will have on thousands of people's lives.

If course, Harriet Harman and everyone who voted with her have done their absolute best to ensure that thousands of people in the Labour Party genuinely do believe that those people wouldn't be any better off. And who can blame them? It still remains the single stupidest and most destructive political decision I can remember (apart from Iraq and the referendum).

I suppose a genuinely pragmatic, democratic, Parliamentary route to socialism would probably accept there's a limit to how much even if the most secure and best intentioned government can achieve in five years. That you'd use broad church vaguely Blairite tactics to get in and then move to the left in stages, taking the electorate and the Overton window with you. It's what the Tories have generally done in the opposite direction - even Thatcher didn't implement full neoliberalism from day one.

Trouble is, the conditions for that no longer exist within the Labour Party and it would take a once in a generation politician to achieve that.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

(Obviously Blair wasn't remotely interested in moving to the left once he was in, even though the space was clearly there for the government to do so from 2001 onwards).

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

that's where the trust has gone more than Harman's "vote austerity eeeh it's the Blitz all over again" bullshit - best part of 10 years of the solidest mandate any government could wish for and no effort to roll back neoliberalism. there might be fatalists, fantasists and god knows what else on the left of the party but for everybody who feels betrayed it is going to take some effort from the right to convince them back - and that effort means explicitly articulating policies

do i srsly think right wing Labour is "as bad as the Tories"? well maybe not quite but the difference is negligible enough to make me wish that the party would fall apart rather than continue to offer false hope to people based on the language of trust

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

I mean fundamentally there will always be a level of demand for a social democratic party or at least some redistribution of wealth, if only because votes are more evenly distributed than money. Whether it needs to be the Labour Party I very much doubt.

High parties feel antiquated and incoherent in this day and age, the Tories will find new ways to tear themselves apart before long, but Labour feels like its reached the end of the road.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

The "People are suffering NOW" is always what is in store for people. Opposing austerity is crumbs as a platform at this point and should only be a beginning. So what can you build so that people (and the most marginalised at that) don't suffer and aren't brutalised now or in future? Labour have been offering crumbs for a long time and that has to stop. One way or another.

Corbyn should have cut a deal in the weeks after the mass resignations, using his influence among a membership which has decisively turned left to ensure there was a left candidate on the ballot, and then walked.

Weak sauce. Only a left candidate? How about making sure a wide left program was on the ballot whoever in Labour won a leadership contest that did not involve Corbyn - whether from the right or left? How about wider democracy within the party so the shambles in Brighton doesn't happen?

xyzzzz__, Friday, 15 July 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

I don't want to start coming across like an agitpoop/shouty lefty, but I can't even see a fucking slightly negligible difference between Tory/Right Labour these days. Sometimes I think the slight difference is in the Labour dialogue sounding even more habitually dishonest and slippery than the Tory version atm. Maybe this is irrational but I feel like I really do have a desire to see the party die sometimes, just to see these smug complacent arsewipes facing their own extinction. Probably not a good thing to admit as it plays up to a lot of their rhetoric about "Corbynistas", but there you go. I went 20 years without troubling a polling station and will happily go back to that if it is going to be the same stark choice of Tories vs Tories. I will stfu now because this is a good thread + this feels like message board rinse.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

that's how i feel most of the time, i'm just trying hang on to a thread of hope

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

or rather, not just give up on the world

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

I think that an Ed Miliband led Labour government would have been a lot better than what we have now.

jim in vancouver, Friday, 15 July 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

Well, no brexit for a start.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Friday, 15 July 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

yup

jim in vancouver, Friday, 15 July 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

what do you imagine that government would be doing to advance economic equality?

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

not much, but this is really akin to Clinton v Trump in many ways tbh. Shitty centrist technocrats vs right-wing crazies.

jim in vancouver, Friday, 15 July 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

well as i say, if people want democracy to be "vote for the least horrible" for the rest of forever then i understand that and bon chance.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

It seems like Labour Right are still repeating that "Ed failed because his austerity lite lacked electoral credibility line", despite since then The Tories doing complete u-turns and seeming to be pausing austerity atm. The fact you have to wait for them to react to Tory shifts highlights how useless and morally bankrupt they are as a party of opposition.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Normally I would be contributing to this thread but this whole business is depressing me too much.

24 Hour Sex Ban Man (Tom D.), Friday, 15 July 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

"Vote for the least horrible" is grim as fuck but better than "endure the most horrible while you wait for something that doesn't currently exist to come along". Which is a shitty way of saying that I don't think we'll get a better Labour until they are put under some serious electoral pressure from the left. The Tories definitely responded to UKIP even if it was in the way very few of us wanted.

Basically we need a Momentum Party or similar.

Matt DC, Friday, 15 July 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

I voted for Ed as an austerity lite option, because at the time Osborne seemed like a demonic force who was hellbent on wiping out the disabled, and tbf he did give it a good try, but his plans were so transparently evil that even some tories couldn't stomach them. Since then they don't even seem like a less horrible option, if anything they seem even more murky and untrustworthy than even Blair's lot did. At least they subsidised the working poor out of poverty with tax credits, which is a wank short-termist policy, but at least it had a positive effect on lots of people in that era. I don't see anything at all that is positive about this lot.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

https://medium.com/@harrygiles/whats-going-on-in-the-labour-party-and-what-does-it-mean-fe0131744fac#.ez7a68q5x

Keeping Labour on a strong left-wing course isn’t just about staying involved with the Party (though it does mean that, if that’s what you enjoy), but continuing to build grassroots social strength. Protest movements, street movements, organisations to defend migrants and benefit claimants and women and LGBT people and people facing eviction — the stronger and more active these organisations are, the harder a time the Tory party will have, and the stronger a left-led Labour Party’s hand will be. Make yourselves ungovernable.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

"Then Corbyn surprised this attempted coup by refusing to resign, and the coup surprised everyone by having no more good cards to play."

This was such a heartening event, my favourite moment in politics ever tbh.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

" Stay classy. There are some utter arseholes in our ranks and they’re costing us. "
absolutely otm

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, good piece and attenpts to deal with the "what if Corbyn is eventually thrown out" question

xyzzzz__, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

If only Corbyn would have recruited someone more savvy like that, rather than Milne.

calzino, Friday, 15 July 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn's natural affiliations were unlikely to play out that way sadly

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

good piece tho, yeah

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 July 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

Barbara Ntumy was excellent on Any Questions tonight

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 15 July 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

People are calling for May to fire Leadsom over comments she made about male nannies and paedophilia last week.
Did wonder if there was a specific purpose she was being saved to be fall guy for, so if she goes now would she serve that purpose?

Stevolende, Friday, 15 July 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

that harry giles winner of the forward prize?

cozen, Friday, 15 July 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

Is May deliberately putting her rivals in positions where she expects them to discredit themselves as quickly and as thoroughly as possible?

Matt DC, Saturday, 16 July 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

Like making Boris, whose grandfather was killed by a Turkish lynch mob, Foreign Secretary?

24 Hour Sex Ban Man (Tom D.), Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

Raab is out. Another Gove ally.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

not doing another Gove's mate's out: Raab dn

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Anna Soubry, one of the more liberal One Nation Conservatives, has just resigned and has been making a great deal of use of the MoreInCommon hashtag since. She had backed May in the leadership election but it looks like another strong indicator that she's going to govern from the hard right, despite the centrist rhetoric of the initial speeches.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

Ed Vaizey, another relative liberal, sacked overnight.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 16 July 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

"Politics is not about taking sides" should be the party's epitaph.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 08:47 (seven years ago) link

“Allowing an important and legitimate political actor, ie the leader of the main opposition party, to develop their own narrative and have a voice in the public space is paramount in a democracy. Denying such an important political actor a voice or distorting his views and ideas through the exercise of mediated power is highly problematic.”

Quelle surprise really, LSE study states the glaringly obvious.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-media-bias-attacks-75-per-cent-three-quarters-fail-to-accurately-report-a7140681.html

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 09:07 (seven years ago) link

As far as i can tell, Owen Smith appears to have just said that austerity is right and necessary and agreed with Angela Eagle that they were "both against austerity" within the space of ten minutes.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

the visionary leadership this country needs

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

none of them seem to have drawn any conclusions from their belief that Corbyn is useless and what their own inability to convincingly challenge him must indicate

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Oh so we're back to "we're going to give you another dose of austerity but we'll be really sad about it". That worked well last time.

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

Do you have a source for that, ShariVari?

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

They were both on the Marr show this morning.

His big policy message is £200bn in investment so there is more to it than a simple return to austerity but the inability to convey any kind of coherent message is amazing.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:41 (seven years ago) link

fwiw, ITV has just reported him saying he is voting in favour of renewing Trident despite being a member of CND so a degree of confusion is to be expected.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

Beating Corbyn really shouldn't be an insurmountable task for a well organised candidate who knows how to present a coherent policy vision but these two just seem entirely incompetent.

The again why would any competent politician go anywhere near this clusterfuck?

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

"Anyone can become registered supporters - giving them a one-off vote - if they pay £25 and "share" Labour's aims and values. There is a two-day window for people to sign up, expected to be between 18 to 20 July"

I'm a pathological liar and think PFI's have massively improved the NHS so I can safely say I share Labour's aims and values, but how the heck are you supposed to prove that after coughing up the pony?

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

someone started a crowdfunding page in which users could pay for recent members who could not afford the £25 shakedown to vote. they got a cease-and-desist.

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

people's party, social democracy etc etc etc

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

weird how at general elections they want your vote and they don't give a fuck what your values aren't

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

not weird obviously but there's the disconnect in their lip-service to democracy

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

At a guess, that means keeping with / furthering cuts to welfare / public services but attempting economic stimulus though infrastructure projects, but who knows?

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

Even the Tories have stopped talking about further austerity, although obv that doesn't mean there isn't more to come - but I don't think it is quite the fashionable vote winner with the electorate any more that Smith seems to think it is. Lol at him rhyming austerity with prosperity, what a dynamic communicator!

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

At least he didn't try to avoid people who were organising a coup against him?

Haven't heard the non-communicative thing about Jeremy Corbyn from any objective source so wonder if it is just spin or all spin or what.
From what I've seen the media doesn't seem to want to represent his comments with any accuracy and I don't know what he can do about that. Is taht a sustainable thing or is taht likely to cost him any ground he might gain if he was more fairly represented?

I'm just hoping he does get to retain his place and then becomes PM, but lookks like things are working against that.

How much are the 2 rebels getting paid by the tory party to waste time while the new government gets entrenched?

Stevolende, Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

No payments necessary. Not sure if that's better or worse. Voted in the NEC - just want with the straight ticket momentum recommended.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

Did he mean to say "anti-austerity" instead of "austerity"? Literally do not understand why he would say that.

woke newt (stevie), Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

Because they done a survey and it said that voters like austerity.

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

He has talked about being anti-austerity recently. Either he bungled the line or he wants to take the position that 'austerity plus structural investment' is the best of both worlds. Either way, he isn't doing his perception of competence much good.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Because they done a survey and it said that voters 80% of PLP like austerity.

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

That's from https://twitter.com/gusbbaker/status/754612709950382080

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 17 July 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn's office claim that at no point she was sacked, but i guess they would. It sounds more like a bungled and indecisive appointment rather than an actual sacking to me though, not that I'm sticking up for such insensitive behaviour towards someone undergoing cancer treatment though, that shit is inexcusable.

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Except, as will come as no surprise, it's not true. For example, she claims not to have met Corbyn before getting the job - the picture from the press story marking her appointment however...

http://m.bristolpost.co.uk/jeremy-corbyn-appoints-bristol-mp-thangam/story-28529472-detail/story.html

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 17 July 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

Also she had spoken to the press about how she had beaten cancer and was just having follow-up radiography and was already on a planned return to work schedule the day before her appointment so she's being more than a little disingenuous.

http://m.bristolpost.co.uk/bristol-mp-thangam-debbonaire-cancer-gone-m/story-28520824-detail/story.html

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 17 July 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

Finally, an alternative version of the anti-Momentum story the BBC, Thangam and a Blairite blogger ran after the last Bristol West CLP meeting.

https://labourbriefing.squarespace.com/home/2016/7/10/so-i-went-to-a-clp

Also worth noting she has had her union funding withdrawn.

http://www.bristol247.com/channel/news-comment/daily/politics/union-withdraws-funds-to-bristols-labour-mps

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 17 July 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like Corbyn had been letting his hostiles.xls game slip.

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

If you have yet to take a course of radiotherapy I think that can be accurately described as "in the middle of cancer treatment".

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

If I'd been off work for 8 months and was back part-time as part of a 4 week planned return to work then I'm pretty sure I wouldn't call it the middle.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 17 July 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Also pretty sure I wouldn't be declaring to the press I had beaten cancer if I thought I was in the middle of my treatment.

suffeeciant attreebution (aldo), Sunday, 17 July 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

If anyone has time to enlighten a stupid foreigner: What is the procedure for choosing candidates for each constituency? It seems amazing the way the PLP completely disregards their voters, and I would think most of them would face some kind of challenge to their seats from their area. If it was the US, they would be primaried, each and every one of them. Now, I can figure out that probably isn't the case. But then I'm stuck as to what the point of FPTP is, if not to have each MP beholden to the people of their constituency. The UK seems remarkably undemocratic from afar, but, well, you don't need me to tell you.

Frederik B, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

There is an enormous variance in what the voters of different Labour consistencies believe and how they want the party to behave. It's part of the whole problem.

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

Prospective MPs are selected by their constituencies but, if they're successful in an election, they're very rarely voted out by them. The local party can choose to put the seat of a current MP up for a contest if they want to but it has typically been done under fairly extreme circumstances in the past.

There have been calls for mandatory reselection votes in the future and there is a strong risk that local parties could choose to deselect anti-Corbyn MPs under the current rules.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

Admittedly individual MPs don't always represent that voter base very well, especially those with minimal connection to their constituency who have been parachuted in to safe seats.

Labour's electoral strategy (maybe all electoral strategies are like this) has been to vocally prioritise the people who don't vote for them over the people who do, which is another reason they're in this mess.

Matt DC, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

I am still unclear under what circumstances an MP can be removed and by whom, I've heard lots of contradictory things over the past few weeks. once they've been voted in by the whole constituency of tens of thousands it wouldn't be very democratic for the local party of a few hundred to be able to get rid of them

ogmor, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

but no, the UK is not very democratic at all, we just had a prime minister appointed through a mixture of tory MPs and trial by media

ogmor, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

& the tory party voted in by 24% of the population last year. Which should mean taht 76% might be against them if there was any level of unity. Probably not though.
Is this what teh US invented teh Silent Majority to represent, though I would think that there was some pretty heavy anti-Tory feeling. Just a lack of a strong opposition to vote for, which I was hoping labour might just become if it got rid of the elements still hanging around fro the last couple of decades of the party. Tory Lites etc.

Stevolende, Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

I am still unclear under what circumstances an MP can be removed and by whom, I've heard lots of contradictory things over the past few weeks. once they've been voted in by the whole constituency of tens of thousands it wouldn't be very democratic for the local party of a few hundred to be able to get rid of them

They can't boot them out of the seat after an election but they can choose to make someone else the party candidate at the next one.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 17 July 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

the duties of a constituency MP vs the party allegiance of the MP has always been an unresolved problem in UK politics i think

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 July 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

I find it hard to believe that Corbyn is rejecting much needed support.

inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Sunday, 17 July 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

so, did the UK ever get this sorted? /deems

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 17 July 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

"...would think that there was some pretty heavy anti-Tory feeling. Just a lack of a strong opposition to vote for..."

There is a lot of anti-Tory feeling, but it comes from lots of different groups of people who all want very different things so it's not as if they could all unite behind one party. We really need to get rid of First Past The Post, but the problem is no government is ever going to want to do it if they've been elected with an overall majority using that system.

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 17 July 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah saw owen smith say I love austerity - he just fluffed his line

conrad, Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/07/17/angela-eagle-lied-about-her-office-window-being-vandalised-by-a-corbyn-supporting-bully/
looks like that window on Eagle's office that was broken last week was actually on a stairwell shared by a number of non-related offices and subsequently unlikely to be targeted at Eagle. Her constituency office appears to be on the ground floor so would have been more easily attacked if that was what the target was.
Odd innit?

Stevolende, Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

There's a video that makes that clearer still
http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=167&v=ppnKHmuVA1s

Stevolende, Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

labour party getting a bit infowars dot com vs midsomer murders these days :-(

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

if was not targeted at Eagle, it seems quite a coincidence that it happened the weekend she announced her leadership bid - I don't think that article really justifies its "there is now no doubt" it "was nothing to do with her" intro

soref, Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

what's the closest we've got to a british alex jones (apart from the one who presents the one show?) xp

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 17 July 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

David Icke?

AlanSmithee, Sunday, 17 July 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

Ken Livingstone

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

Pete Doherty

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 17 July 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

Probably someone itt tbrr

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Sunday, 17 July 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Funy I thought Eagler pretty much milked the idea that her office had been attacked. Isn't it one noted example of the threats and abuse that the NEC are blocking having CLP meetings until after the leadership election over.

Stevolende, Sunday, 17 July 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

xp
There is an Asian taxi driver in my area who is clearly on the autism spectrum and he plays Alex Jones podcasts to his passengers #Real England

calzino, Sunday, 17 July 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

Richard Murphy is often, ahem, over-excitable but he has no skin in the Labour fight and as the guy behind Corbyn's economic policies last year he has a vested interest in his doing well, but this is pretty damning:

http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2016/07/17/the-rise-and-fall-of-corbyns-economics/

Third, I had the opportunity to see what was happening inside the PLP. The leadership wasn’t confusing as much as just silent. There was no policy direction, no messaging, no direction, no co-ordination, no nothing. Shadow ministers appeared to have been left with no direction as to what to do. It was shambolic. The leadership usually couldn’t even get a press release out on time to meet print media deadlines and then complained they got no coverage.

Matt DC, Monday, 18 July 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

he seems like a fantastic egoist but yes he had an article in the guardian at the end of june saying he'd gone off corbyn - he's happy if anyone appears to use his brilliant ideas

conrad, Monday, 18 July 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

is that the British Alex Jones (or David Dees)

imago, Monday, 18 July 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Oh, and I'm really not sure about that Murphy character. His justifications for favouring Owen Smith are weak afaic

imago, Monday, 18 July 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

"The Trident renewal will cost £179bn throughout the course of its life, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Crispin Blunt tells MPs."

Good grief. You could also put that kind of money down to appoint a decent England manager.

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 18 July 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

Christ, that would probably work as a campaign promise,too.

Two crickets was sassing each other (dowd), Monday, 18 July 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

I know deselection is a long road but seeing Lab MPs fall into the Tory trap of this trident debate makes me want to push the button on these morons.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

MPs love war crimes

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 July 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

"The Trident renewal will cost £179bn throughout the course of its life, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Crispin Blunt tells MPs."

Good grief. You could also put that kind of money down to appoint a decent England manager.

A decent England manager of what did you have in mind?

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Monday, 18 July 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

Simon Hedges @Orwell_Fan
@TristramHuntMP Have got loads of my mates to sign-up down my boozer, they are all eager to #savelabour

Tristram Hunt ‏@TristramHuntMP
That's fantastic @Orwell_Fan. Just make sure you stand over them while they do it!

Matt DC, Monday, 18 July 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

Not quite up there with Luke Akehurst retweeting someone claiming to have voted for @lukeakehurst, @russia and @justice4harambe on the NEC ballot but close.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 18 July 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Definitely no Article 50 this year, govt tells High Court

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

everyone relax we'll get around to it honest we will

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

“Brexit means Brexit – and we’re going to make a success of it,”

hot bars from teresa mane

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

So are we listening to the voters now, or not? Because I don't think leave voters meant 'when you get around to it', or 'when it's politically convenient'.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

non-binding referendum = glorified consultation.

Even if I wasn't being cynical, the referendum result approved a negative. It seems reasonable to try and come up with what the positive action should be as a consequence before leaping into the abyss, right?

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

A lot of leave voters believed a lot of different things including that they'd voted to end immigration while securing single market access and that we would leave immediately.

Any trade negotiations are likely to take considerably longer than two years and it would be stupid to invoke Article 50 before work had even begun on that.

There also appears to be some legal disagreement on whether or not May can push the button without parliamentary approval and that is almost certainly going to delay proceedings for longer than four or five months.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

sad lol that we're now in the position of wondering when our unelected, remain-supporting pm will officially begin our democratically-determined national tantrum

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

the EU shd force us to get on with it, that'll confuse UKIP

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Haha.

Chewshabadoo, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

They really should - if we're going to do this stupid thing we should bear the consequences, rather than waiting in the hope of a good time to act, harming everyone.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

barmy bleedin' faceless eu bureaucrats, tryin' to force us to do what we want to do

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

Yeah we should definitely do the stupid thing at the stupid time, that'll show the Leavees not to do it next time we have a vote to leave the EU.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

I'm talking about what the eu should do, not what the uk should do.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

from the eu's perspective pushing the uk into doing the stupid thing at the stupid time is likely their most effective defence against other member states deciding to leave

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

Polls across EU seem to suggest an uptick in pro-EU sentiment because of Brexit. Everyone has seen the chaos it's causing, nobody wants any of it. Prolonged uncertainty probably good on this front (bad for certain banks though)

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

Or, the quicker the bad effects are seen the better?

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Not for us! And when push comes to shove, the costs of not triggering Article 50 are going to have to be much, much higher than they are now to making forcing an immediate A50 seem like the least-worst-option

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

To what extent is the UK's trade deficit actually likely to play to our advantage when it comes to negotiating the terms of Brexit? Germany alone has a pretty chunky trade surplus with Britain but other countries with a right of veto probably don't?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

X-post of course not for us. For the eu, if Britain is going to leave. If we're talking about what's good for us we wouldn't leave at all. If we're talking about the mandate given in the referendum we should leave, having already chosen a terrible path.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Yes, but again the referendum didn't specify what was meant by that, and neither campaign gave any specifics -- there's no policy paper here (in stark contrast to indyref).

"We should leave the European Union". OK, by when? And on what terms? Replacing it with what? Nobody has any mandate for any answers to any of those questions.

We're still a representative democracy. Even Leave voters would be entitled to look at the carnage that surrounded a poorly-timed and badly planned exit and say to the Govt "these consequences are your fault, it was your job to fill in the blanks and get the best possible outcome for us here".

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

To what extent is the UK's trade deficit actually likely to play to our advantage when it comes to negotiating the terms of Brexit? Germany alone has a pretty chunky trade surplus with Britain but other countries with a right of veto probably don't?

― Matt DC, Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:53 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

From a Dutch perspective: the UK is our third most important trade partner, behind Germany and Belgium. In export the UK is second, only behind Germany. Our national stats bureau has calculated that of our total production/services, 3.7% stems from UK demand. This supposedly comes down to 330.000 jobs. Making the Netherlands most dependent on the UK after Ireland and Malta.

Now that Brexit won, I can't deny feeling 'oh ffs you morons, get the fuck on with it then' and wishing for a swift departure. It's not what I wanted, but it is what it is I suppose. It really is like a break up of a relationship tbh, I lived and loved in Albion long enough to care deeply about it,, but you voted leave, it triggers 'then get the hell out asap' feelings within me. Not proud of that, but it seems to work that way. And I suppose lots of member states will feel the same way if the UK in the near future will try some delaying techniques to get the best deal out of this. Sad state of affairs all round.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

boris off to a roaring start

Johnson was holding a press conference designed to showcase the continuing closeness of the UK-US special relationship in the wake of Brexit, as well as the joint commitment to finding a solution to the crisis in Syria.

Johnson twice referred to the crisis in Egypt, but was believed to be referring to Turkey.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/19/boris-johnson-grilled-past-outright-lies-uneasy-press-conference-john-kerry

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

I'm guessing May will be swilling her brandy and cackling at this, like some Bond movie baddie.

calzino, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

To what extent is the UK's trade deficit actually likely to play to our advantage when it comes to negotiating the terms of Brexit? Germany alone has a pretty chunky trade surplus with Britain but other countries with a right of veto probably don't?

― Matt DC, Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:53 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A lot of what we buy from Germany does not have obvious substitutes, especially in things like industrial machinery. The magnitude of trade may go down because of a slump in the UK but the demand will still be there as its not like we can easily buy from Japan, the US or China or easily reverse 50 years of industrial decline and chronic underinvestment. So as far as negotiations go Germany does need the UK but not as much as the UK needs them.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

Would guess that car sales account for a significant chunk of our imports from germany, not sure that the sort of people that buy bmws and mercedes and porsches and whatnot are going to switch to hyundai or whatever just cos the price has gone up by a few hundred quid

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

Or grands if we take the WTO 10% hit

stet, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

They would still get the Audi but maybe let their gym membership slide for a year

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

make the housekeeper redundant

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

she's probably getting deported anyway

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

Grim lols

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

A new cross-party movement for progressive liberalism that could endorse candidates in favour of the EU and immigration at the next election is being set up by politicians, celebrities and intellectuals.

The initiative has the support of Jonathon Porritt, the environmentalist, Caroline Criado-Perez, the feminist writer, and Luke Pritchard from the band Kooks, as a space for people who want a voice for openness and tolerance.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/19/liberals-celebrities-and-eu-supporters-set-up-progressive-movement

Alba, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 07:38 (seven years ago) link

already seen it. lolled.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 07:54 (seven years ago) link

Luke Pritchard from the band Kooks

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

no gaz coombes, no credibility

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 08:42 (seven years ago) link

Have we all seen the Boris/Kerry video?

woke newt (stevie), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 08:51 (seven years ago) link

I'm guessing May will be swilling her brandy and cackling at this, like some Bond movie baddie.

If you're trying to prove that your (still) biggest rival for the leadership is completely incapable of standing on the international stage there are worse ways than putting them on the international stage. As long as he doesn't actually start a major diplomatic incident and May doesn't end up looking like a complete moron for putting him there in the first place.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 09:04 (seven years ago) link

Oh I'm sure she'll be fine, it always works out ok when Tory leaders take international policy gambles in an effort to strengthen their own position.

JimD, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

Hang on, Luke Pritchard? Lead singer of the band The Kooks, and he's also a

Mark G, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

(sorry, fell asleep)

Mark G, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

Latest YouGov poll:

Westminster voting intention:
CON: 40% (+10)
LAB: 29% (-4)
UKIP: 12% (-8)
LDEM: 9% (+3)
GRN: 3% (-)

I know lol polls etc but even so that is a BIG drop for UKIP - if this continues it suggests that, without Farage, without a raison d'etre (other than 'ban immigration'), and perhaps without adequate funding, it may just shrivel up altogether. The projected UKIP surge in Labour heartlands is so central to the strategy of both the Labour and Tory right that they may be bombing off down the wrong road entirely.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

looking forward to the resurgence of the bnp as ukip voters head back to their natural ideological heartland, their anti-eu mission accomplished

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

The Resolution Foundation think tank, which has long supported Universal Credit, said the government should consider whether the "current design is right for the new economic conditions Britain faces".
"With most independent economic forecasts pointing to higher inflation and lower real wage growth in the coming years, implementing Universal Credit in its current form risks deepening the squeeze on living standards facing low and middle income families," said the foundation's senior economic analyst David Finch.

So they are pausing universal credit until 2022, but basically fuck the areas where it has already been rolled out and contributing towards the child poverty spike and many other social ills.

calzino, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

sorry I forgot to add #One nation

calzino, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

nice to see the guardian editorial team concur that theresa may's unfunny, unpleasant jeering at pmqs is the kind of charisma the country needs

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

"her final words suddenly took on the resonant tone of Britain’s only other female prime minister. It was a spine-tingling moment"

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

"The Guardian editorial team" is a somewhat misleading way of sourcing that. Those are the words of Mark Wallace of ConservativeHome, the token Tory on the panel the Guardian put together for a roundtable verdict:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/20/theresa-may-first-pmq-prime-minister-questions-panel

Alba, Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:23 (seven years ago) link

sorry i meant to quote the other three clowns as well but was overwhelmed by listlessness when doing so; i appreciate the correction, tho

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:41 (seven years ago) link

Polly Toynbee:
"Serious and commanding, she showed how PMQs should be done – with forensic fact and deadly precision alongside flick-knife jabs."

Ayesha Hazarika, "a senior Labour adviser to Harriet Harman and Ed Miliband and now a political commentator":
"Theresa May had a brutally brilliant PMQs debut ... rose to the occasion and hit the back of the net again and again. "

Joseph Harker, Guardian 'deputy opinion editor':
"Corbyn ... sounds self-righteous, more at home in student politics."

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:46 (seven years ago) link

i feel demeaned that i'm saying this, but thank god for john crace /:

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:48 (seven years ago) link

May did seem a tad snide at the time. Do hope the members that benefit from JC do get the full benefit and he isn't stuck with clowns for the next few years.
Is the party just going to remain dysfunctional or is it going to be purged of its 5th column?
Would bet that further voting fees that don't come with full membership will have people either looking elsewhere or giving up.
& further rebel stooges will be beyond a joke.

Stevolende, Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:50 (seven years ago) link

Is Toynbee right wing Labour or where does she lie? I know her from strips in the Guardian etc that I thought were at least semi political. Does she have a regular column now?

Stevolende, Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:53 (seven years ago) link

There's a world of difference between acknowledging that Theresa May performed well at PMQs and thinking she is what the country needs!

Alba, Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:55 (seven years ago) link

xp she's a Brown-ite ultra basically

not xp no there isn't

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 06:59 (seven years ago) link

celebrating those values is playing the same stupid game unless i'm misreading "more at home in student politics"

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:00 (seven years ago) link

politics as spectacle, as arena sport, yay leadership, etc etc etc

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:01 (seven years ago) link

Moving towards a position I agree with there, I guess, but wary of asserting that what happens within the parameters of current political culture just doesn't matter.

Alba, Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:07 (seven years ago) link

it's not that it doesn't matter - it probably matters less than a lot of players like to believe, but still - but that the politics as sport approach is only fine providing you've given up on the hope of politics as force for change

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:10 (seven years ago) link

there is a deliberate, vicious circularity to hack telling us how impressed the public are by a "good performance" in Parliament at the same time as they're hyping and defining what constitutes a performance

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:12 (seven years ago) link

Last week, in David Cameron’s final PMQs, Corbyn played a blinder: full of warmth, humour and self-deprecation. This week that seemed to disappear. We know he can do better than this: if he’s to hold off Owen Smith’s challenge he will need to.

Even this mildly supportive comment doesn't get it: the people who put Corbyn in don't care a damn for PMQs - only weirdos do.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:14 (seven years ago) link

there is a deliberate, vicious circularity to hack telling us how impressed the public are by a "good performance" in Parliament at the same time as they're hyping and defining what constitutes a performance

― PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:12 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ty i was trying to work out how to articulate this but i am so very tired rn

the ghost of tom, choad (thomp), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:20 (seven years ago) link

for some reason i find "In the real world, these just people with ideas" stuck in my head a lot the last couple of months

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:21 (seven years ago) link

there is a deliberate, vicious circularity to hack telling us how impressed the public are by a "good performance" in Parliament at the same time as they're hyping and defining what constitutes a performance

Yes, that's often the way things go, I've been thinking lately. It's a bit like the old "Now, I'm not racist myself, but I can tell you a lot of people are going to have a problem with you doing x" thing where people (maybe unconsciously) use others a proxy for their own prejudice. Don't piss on me and tell me its raining.

On the other hand, to continue with the urine theme, one media player refusing to acknowledge a strong dispatch box performance on the grounds that parliamentary competence is a bourgeois construct would maybe be pissing in the wind.

Alba, Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:21 (seven years ago) link

if you have a voice in the media as a "commentator" then i assume you're free to construct whatever narrative you see fit, either that or gtfo of the job

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:26 (seven years ago) link

even "strong dispatch box performance" - what does that actually mean? because "strong" and "performance" are doing a lot of unexamined work there

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:27 (seven years ago) link

"fired off a few lazy zings" i thought 4 weeks ago we'd decided as a nation that this was bad politics

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:28 (seven years ago) link

It should matter, it should be the opportunity for the Leader of Opposition to hold the PM to account. Unfortunately it isn't and it doesn't matter to most people who aren't political hacks or wonks.

It matters a lot to the media obviously and it feeds right into the way they shape the narrative around any given leader. And unfortunately that does feed into how the public perceive them, often to the detriment of the country - Cameron was regularly judged to have "won" PMQs, usually by blustering and obsfufating and shooting back a few zines and generally refusing to answer questions. And look how that turned out.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:36 (seven years ago) link

Argh zings not zines. He wasn't hurling badly photocopied reviews of indie-pop bands across the Commons.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:37 (seven years ago) link

not having a go at you personally Alba here. there's something ludicrous about politics pundits' failure to acknowledge or recognise what Corbyn's support is, what the appetite for a new politics is: not somebody in shirt sleeves with some young people cheering for them, but a real demand to debureaucratize and dehierarchize the mouldering corpse of the Labour Party, to form a politics that has more connection to people than the 19th century tableaux presented by the mother of parliaments to distract us from where power really lies

i may be fantasising but i see no choice between attempting to build on that fantasy or giving up on political engagement

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:39 (seven years ago) link

i agree Matt that it is part of forming a narrative - i think the connections of that narrative to how people vote or act are more complex than party nerds are able to conceive, and i think people who want change have a duty to question the whole narrative and not just slip into their accustomed role within it

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:41 (seven years ago) link

I half wonder whether that process of democratisation within Labour could be a viable way for the centre/right of the party to get rid of Corbyn if he beats Smith - or a better way to have gone about deposing him this time.

If he wins, centrists could agree to support his leadership in the interim, join the shadow cabinet and back a programme of breaking down hierarchies (possibly including mandatory reselection every two terms, or something similar) in return for him agreeing to put the leadership up to a vote of members every year - which he himself has proposed. It would remove the need for plotting, give the party a viable out if things aren't going well and give the membership a sense of more control.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:47 (seven years ago) link

if the right is as populist as it believes then why not? but it's bureaucracy as well as democracy - it's ludicrous that only the people able to dedicate the most time to a party have the helm, which is how it's worked for a long time. political parties are still built to deal with a 20th century media landscape and 19th century notion of what constitutes "winning the debate" - that needs to be addressed too.

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:50 (seven years ago) link

and this needs to happen in the context of a demand for genuine PR

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:51 (seven years ago) link

and no more Labour isolationism - form links with the Greens, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, hell even the left leaning Lib Dems if they're willing - build a coalition of the Not Neolib ffs

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 07:53 (seven years ago) link

The SNP is the big problem there - you can't build popular support for that coalition without fundamentally changing the narrative in England around them, and possibly by actively changing their chosen goals, which just wouldn't happen short of a second failed referendum. Not to mention that the SNP themselves have a huge vested interest in putting as much distance between themselves and Labour as possible.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:07 (seven years ago) link

The SNP is the big problem there - you can't build popular support for that coalition without fundamentally changing the narrative in England around them, and possibly by actively changing their chosen goals, which just wouldn't happen short of a second failed referendum. Not to mention that the SNP themselves have a huge vested interest in putting as much distance between themselves and Labour as possible.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:07 (seven years ago) link

from the English perspective i tend not to worry about the sort of jerks who are instinctively anti-SNP but i have to admit (English) nationalism is my big blind spot anyway - i don't understand it and i have no idea how to work around it. i just assume or hope it isn't an over-riding factor in the votes of most sane people

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:14 (seven years ago) link

I suppose my issue with Corbyn is that he seems to have no idea how to even begin channelling all that support and genuine demand for change into anything useful. And that approach may do more damage than good to the whole project.

Fundamentally whatever happens to Corbyn over the next few months and years, the forces that put him there are not going to go away, if anything they'll grow and they will probably coalesce around someone more capable than him - either within the Labour Party or outside it. It doesn't really matter to me which. Corbynism will outlast Corbyn and may in time turn out to be more popular than him.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

agreed. he is still maybe at heart a party man and a committee man and a tribalist up to a point.

re nationalism/anti-immigration etc. ultimately i don't think you can pander to bigotry - sure you have to try to persuade and try to avoid being snide unless you're dealing with full on hate but what can you seriously do about it except change the economic/political landscape in a direction that takes people's thoughts away from it?

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:17 (seven years ago) link

but Corbyn's refusal to play the grandstanding leader is also good and important in the longer term i think, even if people seem lost without a nice demagogue on hand right now

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:18 (seven years ago) link

There's a lot of "look, you don't understand, it's Corbyn or it's the end of the left in this country" coming from some commentators (not really here fwiw), and that strikes me as fundamentally untrue.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:19 (seven years ago) link

a lot of that is because the PLP have consistently demonstrated an absence of any principle other than the desire for power. Owen Smith's deathbed socialism being the latest example of that.

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:21 (seven years ago) link

but Corbyn's refusal to play the grandstanding leader is also good and important in the longer term i think, even if people seem lost without a nice demagogue on hand right now

NV otm here - and Corbyn's (near-?) uniqueness here is one of the direct causes of the vibe Matt is seeing in the next comment - to put it crudely it's (some sort of) AV/PR vs FPTP.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:44 (seven years ago) link

No it isn't, there's a difference between playing the grandstanding leader and having a proper strategy.

The whipped Labour line was to abstain on Caroline Lucas's PR vote, the people who defied that and voted in favour are not the people you would immediately think of as natural PR supporters.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:48 (seven years ago) link

i seem to remember not so long ago it was thought of as good strategy not to tie yourself to too many detailed policies early in a period of opposition - i didn't agree, but i'm sure that was conventional wisdom.

i was under the impression that Corbyn and his people had been working on developing policy backstage. i wonder if it's possible that by inadequately communicating with the right wing of the PLP the Corbynistas new that they would provoke the current confrontation? this situation was always likely to come about, from the moment he was elected leader.

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

Obviously I'd take what former shadow ministers have to say with a huge pinch of salt, but the broad pattern seems to be that they were failing to communicate with their own Shadow Cabinet and other staff. Basically I believe that it was shambolic, even if I distrust their motives for choosing to make a big deal out of it now.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:05 (seven years ago) link

i do believe that communication had broken down and that this down to Corbyn's people, yes. the reasons are interesting and i don't buy the "poor old man couldn't cope" line, at least not on its own

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:08 (seven years ago) link

Getting shot of Seumas Milne would be a good start.

24 Hour Sex Ban Man (Tom D.), Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

in any hypothetical situation

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:35 (seven years ago) link

this is a refreshing discussion, less cynical than most political discussion I read!

the pinefox, Thursday, 21 July 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

I could have been clearer there - the distinction I was trying to make was between "what does best for the various members of our coalition" and "where will the leader take us" - like Tom Ewing's line about "New Labour architect Peter Mandelson declared of the old Labour vote that they had “nowhere else to go”. On June 23, after decades of contempt, they finally went there."

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

the guardian does seem unusually out of step with its own readership, but rather than being down to the personalities or peculiarities of that paper, it highlights the genuinely anti-systemic nature of corbyn's support, and naturally the guardian, like all other elements that are comfortable in, or worse, proud of their place in the system, doesn't understand it

I think it's interesting the way certain political values around strong leadership and electability have been made to seem essential, to the extent that if you don't support these things you don't deserve to be taken seriously in politics. there's good data around what different sorts of values people prioritise and in what circumstances, and strong leadership is, unsurprisingly, prized by authoritarians, those most concerned about immigration and terrorism, and those least concerned about climate change and inequality. but this is the criteria that what I am reluctantly going to call the systemic left use to judge corbyn, even though it's obviously not what his support prioritises. honest leadership is more important to a lot of people, and not even especially difficult to report on, and yet there's no way near as much importance attached to it by the media. part of objective, serious political coverage is reporting what people say, and knowing you'll be taken seriously is obviously very useful for politicians (notable semi-exception being self-styled amiable buffoons), because journalists are much quicker to say you look weak than you're being dishonest

concerns about immigration and terrorism are real concerns, and the people who hold them are real voters. the right is not harangued about climate change or global economic crisis in the same manner, and if those are your main concerns then politics is too real for you. which, for an anti-systemic movement, is exactly the point. & so this is the systemic left and the guardian's problem with corbyn: he's not real enough to belong in politics

I think graeber was right that the fact that this movement is happening within mainstream politics is unusual, it presents a lot of problems, and the reception is has received has been ignorant and uncomprehending. but I'm very suspicious of those that say the movement perhaps doesn't belong in the labour party, or in westminster politics at all, as there's no attractive alternative being offered (a lot of ppl will happily suggest people holding these views relegate themselves to local level organization), just disenfranchisement and further disaffecting people from the governing of their country, which just seems confused given that that is the driver behind all this anyway

anyway scotland is obviously the big problem for labour, with or without corbyn, and I don't see how they could get into govt without a solution

ogmor, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

@benrileysmith 26m26 minutes ago
Every Labour MP must be reselected for their seats after 2018 boundary review, Corbyn says.

BOOM.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

That'll be the boundary review that creates about 20 more Tory seats.

nashwan, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

Still, it's quite a strong incentive for Labour MPs to stop acting like pissy little children if he does get re-elected.

On the other hand, they might just go "fuck it, we're not getting back in anyway, it's nu-SDP time".

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Hollande has just said no freedom of movement = no access to European markets, though i suspect May will get on rather better with Le Pen when the time comes.

Corbyn has a huge problem with the broadsheet establishment but is also fairly badly suited to the culture of political diarism delegated to journalism grads in their early twenties (both in print and online). Aside from the access issues, his low-key presentation doesn't fit the politics-as-showbiz 'omg Theresa May just BODIED Michael Gove' stuff that get the most traction atm.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

so this is the scenario I remain a bit confused by. if there's no general election, then what does reselection mean? is there a threat of kicking sitting MPs out of the labour party?

ogmor, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Has the hierarchy of the labour party just been majorly reinforced by 180,000 people signing up to be not full members?
Does anybody know if there si a difference in status between that reigistered/Affiliated Supporter and full member or is taht just a different designation meaning the same thing? After the £3 thing last year it would appear taht it might well have different status.

I tried looking at what being a member was over teh last couple fo days but that whole part of the labour website was dedicated to the £25 sign up at the time. So wondering what the story is.

Stevolende, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

if there's no general election, then what does reselection mean? is there a threat of kicking sitting MPs out of the labour party?

It would only affect who gets to stand as the Labour candidate at the next election. There'd be no point in kicking sitting MPs out of the party before one and it's the individual rather than the party that holds the seat.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

Either by ignorance or malice, the Guardian pissed me off massively with the subhead earlier in the week "Corbyn's re-election may split party" - that might happen either way, and also if it does happen, it's not him that'll be taking his ball and going.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

xp right, sorry for making you repeat yourself, it's what I always thought was the case but the way it's presented seems very misleading, made to sound as if the process is happening in 2018. either it's happening for the 2020 election, in light of the 2018 change, or we will have two years of havoc caused by labour MPs who can't be put on gardening leave

ogmor, Thursday, 21 July 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

We may have that anyway but the careerists will surely be mindful of their future lobbying jobs

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

is there also a chance gov will call a snap general election after labour leadership vote is done to take advantage of ensuing chaos

^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 21 July 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

Can't see a rationale for that but rationality seems thin on the ground at the moment

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

I don't suppose the investigation into Tory election fraud would affect any decision on an election date.

nashwan, Thursday, 21 July 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

nationale could be to get a bigger working majority?

^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 21 July 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

One reason for doing it would be that it gives at least a year of extra time for the economy to recover between actual Brexit and the next general election. As it stands things could be at their worst by the time the country finally leaves. That's also an incentive for May to keep kicking the can down the road.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 July 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

By rationale I'm thinking at least a gossamer excuse for the national good but May must recognize she's on dodgy Brexit ground herself, it would be a shot in the dark too far for her I think

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 July 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

For the ages:

Conor McGinn MP ‏@ConorMcGinn 23m23 minutes ago

My Dad was Sinn Féin councillor. When I - as a Labour MP - challenged Jeremy, he demanded an apology and said he was going to ring my Dad.

Conor McGinn MP ‏@ConorMcGinn 32m32 minutes ago

.@jeremycorbyn Did you threaten to ring my Dad - who you don't know - to 'get him to talk to me' after reading my @theHouse_mag interview?

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 21 July 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

So we can't deselect anybody in 2018, right? Ok, I'll go to sleep now.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 21 July 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

Oof some unhappy Tory voters in Northampton

@britainelects: Westone (Northampton) result:
LDEM: 49.7% (+36.4)
CON: 27.2% (-28.7)
LAB: 23.0% (-7.6)

stet, Thursday, 21 July 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

interesting! isn't northampton in andrea leadsom's constituency?

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Thursday, 21 July 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

What kind of election was it?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 21 July 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

Northampton Borough Council

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 21 July 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

Incredible swing.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 21 July 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

I think that's the second gigantic swing from Tory to Lib Dem in council by-elections since You Know What.

24 Hour Sex Ban Man (Tom D.), Thursday, 21 July 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

Tory to Lib Dem not a swing imo

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 06:54 (seven years ago) link

Same meat, different gravy as they say.

calzino, Friday, 22 July 2016 07:03 (seven years ago) link

Would a Lib Dem government be less profoundly evil than a Tory one right now?

Stevolende, Friday, 22 July 2016 07:07 (seven years ago) link

we had one 2 year ago so my answer is "no"

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:08 (seven years ago) link

i'm a hungover Trot riddled with class prejudice tho so you might want to ask a wet liberal apologist

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:12 (seven years ago) link

you couldn't ask that question to these people, but they'd probably say no.
http://calumslist.org/

calzino, Friday, 22 July 2016 07:12 (seven years ago) link

great bunch of lads the Lib Dems

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

certainly not just Tories wi'out their kicking boots on

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

Southcote (Reading) result:
LAB: 64.1% (+21.4)
CON: 26.1% (-8.8)
LDEM: 5.3% (+1.0)
GRN: 4.5% (+0.1)

idk if much more than 1000 people vote in these things though.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:46 (seven years ago) link

people are really psyched for Owen Smith huh?

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 07:49 (seven years ago) link

No UKIP candidate in Southcote this time.

Alba, Friday, 22 July 2016 07:55 (seven years ago) link

the tories are building a progressive alliance

conrad, Friday, 22 July 2016 08:04 (seven years ago) link

unless they've got somebody from a shit indie band onboard i'm not interested

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 08:35 (seven years ago) link

A decent LibDem performance in local elections doesn't strike me as particularly unusual and they tend to follow their own rules to some extent but that does look like a complete collapse in support for the two main parties.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 08:36 (seven years ago) link

Not the Reading result.

Mark G, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:00 (seven years ago) link

I was talking about the Northampton one.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

Sure, but the Reading result doesn't bear out a complete collapse.

Mark G, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:23 (seven years ago) link

A complete collapse in Northampton.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

It doesn't make any sense to draw many UK-wide or even England-wide conclusions from anything right now.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

noh.

Mark G, Friday, 22 July 2016 09:59 (seven years ago) link

so many local factors influence council elections. the greens got booted out here basically because they didn't sort out the dustbins.

frank field of the nephilim (NickB), Friday, 22 July 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

thanks to our glorious FPTP system I just have to vote for Anyone Who Isn't The Tories so it would be really nice if the parties could make it clear who has and hasn't collapsed by the time of the next general election so I know who that should be, thx

but yes, too early to tell and council elections always hard to draw any wider conclusions from

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 22 July 2016 10:20 (seven years ago) link

I tried to vote for 'anyone who wasn't the Tories a couple of generals back. Lib dems the alternative here. Got a Tory government. Never again.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 22 July 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

tbf in my 4 general elections I have never voted for the party that has won my constituency anyway so I don't know why I bother arsing with "tactical voting", but vote splitting in the face of perpetual Tory govt makes me sad

this was a Lib Dem seat until the boundaries shifted in 2010 and the Tories won by <200 votes - post-coalition LDs lost 13% of the vote here but I suppose if they can win any seat back it might be this one as it's in a fairly strongly pro-Remain area. Labour or Greens don't have much hope here, at least not on past performance

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 22 July 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

I think my constituency, even going back to to older version a century ago, has never returned a labour mp. I don't know if that's unique in Scotland, maybe the borders are similar.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 22 July 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

It's not true (as seems implied above at times) that voting Lib Dem is as bad as voting Con, or that getting a Lib Dem / Con coalition is as bad as getting a Con government.

One example: a Lib Dem / Con coalition elected in 2015 would probably not have held an EU referendum.

If your choice is voting Lib Dem or Con you should always vote Lib Dem.

the pinefox, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

The problem is you have no idea which way the Lib Dems would swing in the event of being kingmakers in a coalition. If you vote for them and they end up propping up a Tory government that otherwise wouldn't be in power, you have in effect voted for the Tories. They had few public qualms about rubber stamping the dismantling of the welfare state under the last lot, and if they hadn't propped the Tories up we would probably still be in the EU today.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

A vote for a party that could make up the numbers in either a Corbyn or May-led government is in effect a complete shot in the dark.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

Those are good arguments, though I am still not sure voting Lib Dem = voting Con as LD would claim to moderate what the Cons do.

I think that there are or have been decent Lib Dem MPs and activists.

If LDs had done better in 2015 (eg vs Cons in the SW) they might be in another coalition and then the referendum wouldn't have happened, though other bad things would happen.

In that sense the collapse of the LD vote has not been a good thing.

the pinefox, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

We have never had a Lab / Lib coalition in recent times. It would have been interesting to see.

the pinefox, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

If a Tory or a Lib Dem are the only realistic winners in your particular constituency then ending up with the Lib Dem is always better.

AlanSmithee, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

2010-2014 >>> 2015-2019

nashwan, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Figured the Trident decision was postponed entirely in the hope of a Tory majority although with such support for it from Labour anyway any hope of LDs being against it enough to delay it another 5+ years probably just wishful thinking.

nashwan, Friday, 22 July 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

The LDs didn't need to go in coalition at all, I think a minority Tory govt would have done less damage, the decision seemed entirely about the party

ogmor, Friday, 22 July 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

We have never had a Lab / Lib coalition in recent times. It would have been interesting to see.

Well, we had one in Scotland. But yes, i couldn't see another GE then, it would have been a minority government, which wouldn't have been able to hurt us so much.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 22 July 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

I was wondering about a straight Lib Dem govt not a coalition. Thinking that Labour might still be in disarray if there was a sudden election some time this year and wondering if Lib Dem might be any less bad than Tory.
So standing on their own are they altogether Evil?

Stevolende, Friday, 22 July 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Also, the fact that we had a lab/lib coalition is kind of the point. Where they were competing with labour they were firmly left of centre, anti-Tory. So if you voted for them you ended up with the south east version of the lds which is centre right.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 22 July 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

The chance of that happening is virtually zero, but Tim Farron does seem to have moved them back into the Charles Kennedy zone of slushily vague social democracy with added business-is-great, but hardly anyone is paying him any attention even now.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

Right, but they were kind of slushy lovey-dovy liberals before - then they got a chance at power and joined up with the Tories. It's understandable why some folks like myself wouldn't consider voting for them again (I'm fairly hard left, and I've voted lib more often than lab)

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 22 July 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I made that point a few posts up. I wonder whether they might just ditch the whole LibDem 'brand' altogether at some point, it's been pretty comprehensively toxified and it's not like it has a long and noble history.

Matt DC, Friday, 22 July 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

it's a bit of an awkward name but I think there are still a lot of old people out there who 'vote liberal'

ogmor, Friday, 22 July 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

Clegg was pushing the party significantly towards the right before the opportunity for coalition occurred. Farron was actively pushing in the opposite direction. He's definitely more centre-left than Clegg was but idk how badly his religious convictions are going to, unfairly perhaps, impair positioning as a social liberal.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 22 July 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

I don't think the suggestion that they were a "moderating force" would cut much mustard by those hit the hardest by austerity, or would have with those who are no longer available for comment.

calzino, Friday, 22 July 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

hey the Tories are on their own might have killed even more people, thumbs up Lib Dems

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Friday, 22 July 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

Looks like they're finally gonna do something about Britain First and that one weird kid who tried to shoot Trump

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-uk-government-introduce-mandatory-deradicalisation-scheme-746303354

nashwan, Friday, 22 July 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

"We will also be introducing a new deradicalisation scheme, which will be mandatory where the law allows, for those who are further down the path to radicalisation and who need a particularly intensive type of support"

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OADfGS3c3rI/Vpo7g2T-CDI/AAAAAAAAm_A/Z5s82jFmLsY/s1600/ClockworkOrange_196Pyxurz.jpg

report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 22 July 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n15/john-lanchester/brexit-blues

I've just read this, apologies if it's already been posted somewhere

remain in the privacy of the booth (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 22 July 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

The Jeremy Grantham's commentary on Brexit has been making the rounds of other forums I frequent, and I think its fairly spot-on. Among other thoughts on income equality fostering social cohesion, and the pernicious role UK tabloids, it points out the vision of a Europe widely open to others faces "intractable" mathematical problems, which would inevitably come to threaten Europe's liberal traditions. Brought me to reread Garrett Hardin, too.

Abandon hype all ye who enter here (Sanpaku), Saturday, 23 July 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

Marr to Paddy Ashdown on this More United rinse: "It does sound very similar to the Lib Dems...

calzino, Sunday, 24 July 2016 08:50 (seven years ago) link

Great minds think alike:

https://mobile.twitter.com/laurevans311/status/757177054886555648

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 24 July 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

More United's twitter account is amazing, it almost seems like a mean-spirited parody of vacuous, platitude heavy liberal smugness:

https://twitter.com/MoreUnitedUK

Caroline CriadoPerez ‏@CCriadoPerez 5h5 hours ago
Many of us are tired of tribalism. We just want to see change happen & we will work with whoever shares our goals: http://www.moreunited.uk

Caroline CriadoPerez ‏@CCriadoPerez 4h4 hours ago
The political system in this country leads us to tribal extremes. We believe we have more in common than our system suggests. #MoreUnited

Caroline CriadoPerez ‏@CCriadoPerez 4h4 hours ago
This isn't about left or right. This is about a common, internet generation purpose to make the UK a more progressive country. #moreunited

Caroline CriadoPerez ‏@CCriadoPerez 5h5 hours ago
You can join @MoreUnitedUK if you are a member of any party or no party. The only requirement is that you want change & to get stuck in.

soref, Sunday, 24 July 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

there are some proposed policies on the website tbf, but this also includes a lot of bromides. keeping Britain in the EU, some sort of voting reform and phasing out fossil fuels seem to be the most clearly defined goals:

http://www.moreunited.uk/policy-details

soref, Sunday, 24 July 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

fucking liberals man

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 24 July 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

there was a sick-making Smith profile on R4 that I had to switch off before I'd end up putting a lump hammer to my radio. It included such gems as someone saying that Smith's stint as a lobbyist for big pharma gave him a "wider experience of life that other politicians lack" or words to that effect.

calzino, Sunday, 24 July 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Also his having lived in Surrey. He actually said that.

Matt DC, Sunday, 24 July 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

ha, bunch of Labour MPs have been retweeting this

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CoCrDsUXgAAaQGo.jpg

soref, Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

I mean, who on earth is that supposed to convince?

soref, Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

finally the truth about crypto-tory jeremy corbyn can be told

DORNALDO TROOMPS for PRESIDETN (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

all you'd have have to do is post a few links to the PLP's record of voting with the Tories or standing off + abstaining to debunk this nonsense. They don't seem to have any self awareness of how bad constantly keeping the dialogue with the electorate so dishonest and infantile is, like they are addressing gullible children and nobody will notice or remember how appalling their behaviour has been.

calzino, Sunday, 24 July 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

That might work in a big election where a proportion of gullible uninformed so-and-so have a vote but I assume most of the Labour membership are much more informed and are electing Corbyn precisely because they know things like his working record in some detail - which comes from things like having unwavering values (which can be made a fetish of etc.)

Smith has to run on competence - but he is such an unknown quantity who hasn't had the setting to prove that, has no (or little) cabinet or shadow cab experience. I really have v little memory of anything he has done.

Burnham and Cooper might have run him closer this time and I wouldn't be surprised if either of them tried before 2020. They are very compromised by their past though - and were laughable last year.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 24 July 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

sitting in one's seat and voting as one is told to vote now constitutes valuable experience?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 24 July 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

they have to stand up at some point too

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 24 July 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

The point of Parliament should be to hold the government to account, just sitting down and doing as you're told is one of those things that is admirable only to idiots.

Matt DC, Sunday, 24 July 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

Not that Smith has ever had to vote either for or against a Labour government.

Matt DC, Sunday, 24 July 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

This pic of Hammond in China makes it look like he has just literally bored a diplomat rigid.
http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/180CE/production/_90501589_philiphammond.jpg

calzino, Sunday, 24 July 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

"I'm off, me"

Mark G, Sunday, 24 July 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

Isn't the initial speech traditionally one where the newly appointed exaggerates the positive about things. Then has it pointed to thenceforth as they head in the opposite direction.
Supposed to be a temporary salve until people get used to the speaker and know and hate them for ther real self?

Stevolende, Monday, 25 July 2016 08:26 (seven years ago) link

Sure, but the number of people who bought it and started talking about 'sensible, moderate politics', 'parking the tank on Labour's lawn' and 'One Nation conservatism' despite May's political leanings and track record is still surprising.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 25 July 2016 08:34 (seven years ago) link

This happened every time Cameron made a speech like that as well, people whose literal job is to see through PR flim-flam start clapping like seals.

Matt DC, Monday, 25 July 2016 08:37 (seven years ago) link

I can recall when the "living wage" was brought in at the expense of working tax credits, there was some similar laughable shite + fawning in the media over Cameron's socialist policies completely stealing a march on Labour.

calzino, Monday, 25 July 2016 08:57 (seven years ago) link

yeah i don't think the media are being "fooled" by this shit

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Monday, 25 July 2016 08:59 (seven years ago) link

I'd be intrigued by what stops there would be in that employment rights suspended for new companies idea. Like the way that's been abused in the intern incentive which was bad enough over here but I thought worse in the UK. Continually taking on new employees to replace those about to move onto better standing.

I was wondering how long it would be before A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift was suggested as the ideal model for future policy.

Stevolende, Monday, 25 July 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

xp but they will credulously report what she says, which is hugely damaging and is of course the only reason she bothers to say it in the first place

ogmor, Monday, 25 July 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

Put it this way, my resp to the May speech was "Yeah, that's what's supposed to happen".

Where Thatch's "Where there is disharmony" one was pure bull.

Mark G, Monday, 25 July 2016 09:23 (seven years ago) link

it's almost as if the Conservative Party and its supporters in the media have to rely on suckering large numbers of people to vote against their own best interests

Guangchang, thank you man (Noodle Vague), Monday, 25 July 2016 09:24 (seven years ago) link

Actually, "1066 and all that" had it correct:

The Pheasants' Revolts were therefore purely educational movements and were thus easily suppressed.

II. How Quelled: (a) the Pheasants were met at Smithfield by the King who (b) riding forward alone on a white horse answered object (c) by announcing (I) `I am your King', and (II) `I will be your leader'. (c) the real leader was then slain quickly by one of the Barons. (d) a free pardon was granted to the Pheasants [see object (a)]. (e) all were then put to death on the ground that they were Villeins [see object (d)].

Mark G, Monday, 25 July 2016 09:25 (seven years ago) link

People seem to have forgotten Cameron's speech at the last Tory conference which had the likes of Mad Dan Hodges hailing him as 'the new leader if the British Left'.

24 Hour Sex Ban Man (Tom D.), Monday, 25 July 2016 09:45 (seven years ago) link

Mrs May’s problems are only just beginning, judging by the response of one Eurosceptic MP to a report in The Observer that the EU might consider offering the UK a very generous Brexit deal: a seven-year “emergency brake” on free movement and full access to the single market.

“The UK did not recently vote for a slightly beefed up version of Mr Cameron’s attempted renegotiation with the EU,” said John Redwood. “We voted to leave, to take back control of our laws, our money and our borders.”

https://next.ft.com/content/eafb88f6-5174-11e6-9664-e0bdc13c3bef

Fucking Redwood.

stet, Monday, 25 July 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

what's he gonna do? challenge her to a leadership contest?

nashwan, Monday, 25 July 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

Given majority of 12, there are probably enough of the loons to seriously fuck shit up in there

stet, Monday, 25 July 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/youve-got-mail

A Vote Leave campaign source told BuzzFeed News the anti-EU campaign had access to the media mailing lists of Stronger In throughout the referendum campaign, enabling it to prepare strong rebuttals before the original stories had even appeared in the press.

What’s more, Stronger In was baffled.

“The campaign couldn’t understand who was leaking,” recalled one Labour politician involved in the pro-EU campaign.

Matt DC, Monday, 25 July 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

JUst heard that Sarah Champion who resigned a few weeks back has asked for her front bench job back and Corbyn etc seem to be giving it to her. Hope she's happy with sticking with him this time and not playing musical chairs or something. BBC News was wondering if this was a sign of more MPs doing similar which could be good, if genuine.
Also said that it was expected taht several might ask after the end of the leadership campaign so this was a bit of a surprise.

Stevolende, Monday, 25 July 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Read an MSN news story [MSN fires up when I open my browser, wouldn't choose to otherwise] about the Italian politician who wrote Article 50 and how it was never meant to be used, the story was followed by a bunch of comments from clear Brexiters that were this terrifying mix of triumphalist and racist and suicidal, which I could sum up as "Fuck off pizza man, sour grapes because you lost, we don't even need to do Article 50 we could just repeal [some law from 1972], we are going to be fine just you watch."

This country has been doomed by a marauding mass of 60 year old lemmings who've fed on a diet of solely the Daily Mail and The Sun for years. And this mess is the direct result of a culture of inequality and anti-intellectualism and racism for decades.

An artsy picture, but you know, she was a model. Really successful. (stevie), Wednesday, 27 July 2016 06:56 (seven years ago) link

> MSN fires up when I open my browser, wouldn't choose to otherwise

you can change this.

koogs, Wednesday, 27 July 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

lol, i had missed this:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/if-owen-smith-beats-corbyn-but-retains-his-ideology-he-will-be-slaughtered-by-the-savvy-and-savage-a7146776.html

Smith will find himself equally easily brushed aside by her mastery of policy and the power of her sheer reasonableness. This daughter of the Manse speaks leftish rhetoric like a trendy vicar. No-one is used to Tory leaders saying that sort of thing

This is the editorial.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 27 July 2016 08:07 (seven years ago) link

If you want to talk about undue Russian oligarch influence in politics, you could start with the Lebedevs gutting what was once a vaguely centrist paper.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 27 July 2016 08:08 (seven years ago) link

Smith trying to woo the unions is just a temp tactic anyway, by the the time he became leader his policies wouldn't probably diverge that much from Theresa's and be "brushed aside".

calzino, Wednesday, 27 July 2016 08:47 (seven years ago) link

you can change this.

aye, and i have on chrome, but i've never bothered to change internet explorer and had to fire that up this morning and so stepped in the shite

An artsy picture, but you know, she was a model. Really successful. (stevie), Wednesday, 27 July 2016 08:57 (seven years ago) link

found this interesting reading through Yesterday's Guardian this morning
"Woolfe said he was determined to champion social mobility and appeal to voters on the left, denying that Ukip was a rightwing political party. " so wonder what they are then.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/28/ukip-must-ditch-sixth-form-politics-to-win-elections-says-leadership-hopeful

Stevolende, Saturday, 30 July 2016 11:59 (seven years ago) link

Finally, something good comes out of Brexit

http://www.denofgeek.com/uk/movies/mrs-browns-boys/42679/mrs-brown-s-boys-d-movie-2-in-doubt-after-brexit

groovypanda, Monday, 1 August 2016 09:33 (seven years ago) link

Do wonder what UKIP are if not a right wing party. Do any of the other leadership candidates think that?

Stevolende, Monday, 1 August 2016 09:58 (seven years ago) link

God bless the Telegraph for saying the unsayable

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/01/david-cameron-is-right-to-reward-his-friends-with-honours/

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 1 August 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

MP Paul Flynn was on Vine this afternoon saying the govt should go all the way - sell honours to the highest bidder and invest the money in the NHS

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 1 August 2016 12:37 (seven years ago) link

only terrible people accept "honours" so why not?

oh Shi (Noodle Vague), Monday, 1 August 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

OTM. Sir Van Morrison should have paid for his knighthood, the miserable cunt has avoided paying any UK tax for years so he can certainly afford it.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Monday, 1 August 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

I find john mcternan's continued existence something with which it is difficult to come to terms

conrad, Monday, 1 August 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

unelected stooges like McTernan serve an important role in telling the rest of us how democracy should work

oh Shi (Noodle Vague), Monday, 1 August 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

which is super ironic cos he seems to actually /hate/ democracy

cozen, Monday, 1 August 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

for the McTernans of this world it's at best an inconvenience to be gamed

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Monday, 1 August 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

He is a serial failure, I genuinely have no idea why anyone bothers to seek his opinion about anything.

Well, I do, he'll shoot his mouth of about anything and it's easy work for journalists/editors.

Matt DC, Monday, 1 August 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

smith was alright on ch4 (even if his deathbed socialism is fully ~at it~) until he repeated his mcdonnell wants to split LAB line

cozen, Monday, 1 August 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Fuck a blue passport, seriously.

stet, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

Steven Woolfe currently not on the UKIP leadership list, is there anybody who is that thinks UKIP are not a right wing party.
After seeing them being interviewed on the BBC News yesterday morning I can see exactly why none of them should ever be in any kind of power. Quite apart from the inherent political thing.

They want to help Islamists become westernised and liberate them from the burkah seemingly forcefully. How generous of them.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 12:25 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully by the time the UK is actually out of the EU passports will not exist be more like Oyster cards and you can have any colour you like.

nashwan, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

am i wasting my time hoping we ultimately don't brexit or is everything fubared and i should just start drinking heavily/adjust?

i realise us not brexiting will deeply upset many Leave voters but we've all got scars they should have them too

An artsy picture, but you know, she was a model. Really successful. (stevie), Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

David Allen Green is good on "Waiting for Brexit" https://twitter.com/DavidAllenGreen & sort of gives me some hope.

John Lanchester (yes I know) in the LRB is also interesting on this:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n15/john-lanchester/brexit-blues

None of this is what working-class voters had in mind when they opted for Leave. If it’s combined with the policy every business interest in the UK wants – the Norwegian option, in which we contribute to the EU and accept free movement of labour, i.e. immigration, as part of the price – it will be a profound betrayal of much of the Leave vote. If we do anything else, we will be inflicting severe economic damage on ourselves, and following a policy which most of the electorate (48 per cent Remain, plus economically liberal Leavers) think is wrong. So the likeliest outcome, I’d have thought, is a betrayal of the white working class. They should be used to it by now.

ghosts that don't exist (Neil S), Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

Thanks Neil

An artsy picture, but you know, she was a model. Really successful. (stevie), Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Specifically, I found this David Allen Green article heartening (which may or may not mean 'realistic', but Jesus I'll take it where I can get it these days)

http://blogs.ft.com/david-allen-green/2016/08/01/brexit-and-the-challenges-of-reality/

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

yeah that's a good one. Summary: Brexit may (should? will?) turn out to be far more work than can possibly be done in the time available to the British government.

Neil S, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

Woolfe excluded from the UKIP leadership race. Talk of the party splitting.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 August 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

this profile of the UKIP leadership hopefuls is interesting, Woolfe seems to have been the only halfway competent candidate aside from Diane James. Elizabeth Jones's radio debate freak-out is worth listening to

http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/08/02/know-your-ukip-leadership-candidate

soref, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

If they're still conducting meetings in a fucking Starbucks then expect them to invoke Article 50 sometime around the Qatar World Cup.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

Yeah UKIP hopefuls did seem to be not worth the bother on that BBC News thing yesterday morning.
It's a bit unsettling that anybody's rooting for each of them or indeed any of them to come to take over.
This is somebody's idea of reasoned representation?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

DExEU machina

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Thursday, 4 August 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newstatesman.com/2016/08/explaining-love-jeremy-corbyn

article starts from the assumption that anyone's support for JC needs to be 'explained', as though it's a strange phenomenon.

It avoids the first simple starting point that some people agree with some things JC says.

This is interestingly symptomatic of the author's / perhaps New Statesman's / perspective.

However the article is not necessarily all rubbish and contains some reasonable good sense too.

the pinefox, Thursday, 4 August 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

SPECTATOR mocks Paul Mason

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/08/paul-mason-brexit-bulletin-fails-to-make-the-cut/

the pinefox, Thursday, 4 August 2016 10:30 (seven years ago) link

enjoyed the irony of helen lewis complaining about the mainstream media being lumped together and dismissed while lumping these criticisms together with the anti-expert gumpf

ogmor, Thursday, 4 August 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

after listening to a few outraged mittelenglanders on the radio this morning i thought about starting a thread about the morality of money (a particularly incensed gentleman used a phrase like this) but i'm probably in too lazy and bad-tempered a place to follow it thru.

anyway, the notion that saving = moral goodness and borrowing = a sin, however venial, is one of the great underpinning stupidities of our whole economic system, a stupidity only deepened by the fact that many irate savers have probably been voting for the kinds of government that have kept interest rates so low for the last couple of decades. fuck off back to your over-priced homes that you own and stop whining about how hard you've worked for your pots of cash and wah wah waaah

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

"own"? you mean "virtuously went into mountains of debt for" surely?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

the ppl who think like that are not in charge, even if lip service is paid to their ideals

ogmor, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

well ja to you both. the whole broader thing here where "borrowing" is wicked and "saving" is virtuous is just a fever dream of would-be capitalists

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

but some days it GRINDS MY GEARS

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Not real capitalists obviously, capital is based on debt and disincentives to save.

It's about the morality of work as well as the morality of money. There will need to be a fundamental realignment of these attitudes in our society if demand for labour continues to decline but the whole Protestant work ethic is so ingrained in this culture that it's really difficult to shake. Morality of work and morality of money overlap hugely but not entirely - I've met wholly unmaterialistic stern Scottish protestants who are completely puritanical about Hard Work.

Also the notion that tax = "punishing the virtuous".

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

There's a good Galbraith quote about this shit somewhere.

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

it obviously doesn't reflect how capitalism works now, so why it's ingrained is interesting. totally ties into the Protestant work ethic, which feels like it comes from a place of early capitalist entrepreneurship/mercantilism. like a fossil idea from an earlier economic era, but still gestured towards by cynical politicians today when it suits.

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

John Kenneth Galbraith - a good Presbyterian name if ever I saw one.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:43 (seven years ago) link

thinking about it there's a whole bit about it in the introduction to The Affluent Society

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

protestant work ethic is our "know your place and respect your betters", basically.

stet, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately this would make a lot more sense if personal wealth was actually tied to how hard you've worked, and if all types of work were valued in the same way, but until that happens then it's all basically self-justifying guff.

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

"Carney rips his shirt off" - Beeb getting more clickbaity by the hour

nashwan, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:57 (seven years ago) link

"May flashes ankle of prosperity"

nashwan, Thursday, 4 August 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

a different kind of example of the rich inner fantasy life of economics wonks

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 August 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

I think the PWE goes beyond 'respect your betters' into 'identify with your betters'.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Thursday, 4 August 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

except our betters are all idle shiftless wasters dependent on handouts

stet, Thursday, 4 August 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

UKIP leadership contest is making me feel slightly less depressed about the Labour leadership contest

@MichaelLCrick
Gambling Commission tell me they and Ukip are investigating suspicious betting relating to Ukip leadership election

@MichaelLCrick 3m3 minutes ago
I understand suspicious Ukip betting may involve senior Ukip figure who put big bet on Diane James before Ukip NEC blocked S Wolfe

soref, Thursday, 4 August 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

lots of fully justified social media guffawing at that idiotic Telegraph leader today, e.g. https://twitter.com/AlexWhite1812/status/761475320377663488

Neil S, Friday, 5 August 2016 08:32 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson complains that Shami Chakrabarti should not be elevated to the House of Lords at this time.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/05/tom-watson-criticises-shami-chakrabarti-peerage-nomination

He says he was not informed of this. I don't see how he can be surprised that JC doesn't inform him of things as TW has, rightly or wrongly, campaigned against JC.

Whatever one thinks of the Lords, the procedures for nomination etc etc, I can't think of many people who more deserve to be in it and who would do more to improve policy and governance than ms Chakrabarti - who is principled, brave, intelligent, a force for good.

So it's a pity that her well merited elevation should be received this way.

the pinefox, Friday, 5 August 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

I completely agree, it's a ridiculous argument from Tom Watson. She deserves the appointment entirely on merit. What does he think he will achieve by decrying her appointment?

AlanSmithee, Friday, 5 August 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

THis nomination's also got people claiming anti-semitism citing the report as a white wash. But that may be expected from some parties.

But also has people saying it should be investigated as to whether there was any idea pre-report that she would get the nomination, since this might put question to the independence of the findings.

Stevolende, Friday, 5 August 2016 11:50 (seven years ago) link

I'm torn on this, I agree that Chakrabarti will be a force for good in the Lords, but the optics of Corbyn appointing her to run a supposedly independent inquiry into Labour anti-semitism and then giving her a peerage a few weeks later are not great, to say the least.

soref, Friday, 5 August 2016 11:54 (seven years ago) link

xp
Commenting on my own previous comment
Which I'd find questionable in itself. Just looks like some people didn't get the results they wanted in the report.

& Owen Smith was out in the hustings yesterday saying that he'd never heard any talk of anti-semitism in the Labour Party before the last 9 months. Wonder fi there was more actual talk of it because there was a report underway anyway. Corbyn said that some of the situations investigated in the report had happened a long time before he took over leadership.

Don't know what to make of those hustings anyway beyond Owen Smith still trotting out several of the same verbatim phrases that he trots out every time he's on microphone. & it looks like the ovation at the end was largely for Corbyn and several times louder tahn the attempted standing ovation for Owen Smith.
Not sure how these things work, is BBC going to show all 5 of the other meetings. & is Owen Smith going to have as much support outside of Wales?

Stevolende, Friday, 5 August 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

bung the tories a ton of cash, get a knighthood = report that jeremy corbyn doesn't condone or promote antisemitism, get membership of the house of lords

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

conrad, Friday, 5 August 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

I'm torn on this, I agree that Chakrabarti will be a force for good in the Lords, but the optics of Corbyn appointing her to run a supposedly independent inquiry into Labour anti-semitism and then giving her a peerage a few weeks later are not great, to say the least.

Corbyn is so dim sometimes.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Friday, 5 August 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

it just seems like another example of ham-fistedness from Corbyn's team, particularly when dealing with this issue of anti-semitism.

I think that the left, and particularly the section of the left that Corbyn represents, has a real problem wrt anti-semitism, but Owen Smith's repeated suggestions that this is something that has only been an issue in Labour over the last 9 months is cynical in the extreme, it has really turned me against him more than anything else he's done or said

soref, Friday, 5 August 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

otfm, the hand-waving over this shit is ridiculous, "saying Israel has no right to exist isn't anti-semitism it's just their media stooges trying to smear us" etc, it's embarrassing tbh

the Zenga bus is coming (Noodle Vague), Friday, 5 August 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

"Don't know what to make of those hustings anyway beyond Owen Smith still trotting out several of the same verbatim phrases that he trots out every time he's on microphone."

this is how you reach people who aren't closely following the labour party

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 5 August 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

Yeah did occur to me that I keep seeing them cos I keep seeing him. Whereas they might well be new to somebody who didn't. Wonder how long they take to get old though.

Stevolende, Friday, 5 August 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

lol does anyone actually think the flap about anti-semitism in labour has anything to do with actual concerns about anti-semitism in labour?

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 5 August 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

this is how you reach people who aren't closely following the labour party

among whom labour party members probably underrepresented

So you are a hippocrite, face it! (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 5 August 2016 13:25 (seven years ago) link

People who spent literally years banging on about how Ed Miliband was "weird-looking" or somehow not British enough suddenly discovering antisemitism is terrible when it suits them.

Matt DC, Friday, 5 August 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

Matt DC OTM !

the pinefox, Saturday, 6 August 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

whineyWhoGivesAShit.jpg

glumdalclitch, Monday, 15 August 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

never has an arrow been more unnecessary

llandfillpollgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch (wins), Monday, 15 August 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

a well-placed arrow a few years ago might have kept us in the eu tbf

pokemon go speed run (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 15 August 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

'.. It is I, Farage.."

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 07:03 (seven years ago) link

Danczuk appears to have become completely unmoored. Arrested in Spain 'shirtless and shouting' after attacking Karen.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

I blame Corbyn

Tom Watson in a fedora (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

The Wild Shirtless Policies of the Labour Right.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

clearly this latest outburst is yet further evidence that danczuk is being slowly poisoned and driven deranged by mi5 in response to his establishment-worrying expose of westminster child abuse

pokemon go speed run (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

just looking at his wiki page, and I hadn't heard about this coda to the teen sexting scandal:

Danczuk later asked the former job applicant, now 18-year-old, for a meeting to apologise, suggesting she could receive a fee if she allowed a media agency to take photographs of them together; this request was rejected.[53][54]

wonder if he'll join UKIP if Labour revoke his party membership permanently? would even UKIP want him now?

soref, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

His recent 'kiss and tell scandal' was a set-up as well. The pictures all came from the media company he does consultancy work for. He does this periodically to get a bit of cash from the tabloids.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

I'd always thought of him as broadly pro-European but I'm not sure where I got that from. His next move is probably either the I'm A Celebrity jungle or a low-security prison.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

popbitch was reporting a week or two ago that he was recently seen at the close of an event wandering around and pouring the dregs of other people's drinks into a bottle so he could drink the resultant paste himself, so hopefully the next move is rehab

pokemon go speed run (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Hey we've all been there

Tom Watson in a fedora (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

what, "an event" ?

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-23/merkel-ally-says-u-k-based-banks-face-loss-of-eu-market-access

If banking leaves the UK the economy won't recover

beer say hi to me (stevie), Thursday, 25 August 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

i can't see any way in which it won't be reduced to a fraction of it's current capacity or power.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 26 August 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

Everyone can agree the economy is not balanced and if something like this provokes a change of direction...this piece was good and touched on it:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/20/brexit-eu-referendum-economy-project-fear

The counter would be that you wouldn't trust the current lot to fuck this up: Tories don't want a re-balanced economy, they wouldn't have answers to those questions, so a prolonged and deep recession that busts the country is on the cards.

So why should May not trigger Article 50? I don't get this campaign to have a vote through parliament. If Parliament votes Remain they go against the people - yes the referendum was a badly designed fuck-up but it was also a manifesto commitment that was voted in with a Tory majority. I actually would like to see Leavers screwed but this also ties in with Owen Smith's promise of another referendum or what have you - its pretty weak stuff.

To me its a question of timing and the kind of deal we can get or whether the current government would be up to the task - May, in her cabinet appointments, has potentially put an explosive situation together.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 28 August 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

there seems to be a growing narrative around the left end of the guardian and other outlets that May explicitly set up the Johnson-Fox-Davis triumvirate knowing that they would fail to come up with any cogent solutions so that she can backpedal on leaving the EU or EEA. while i think this is wishful thinking or wishful naivety there does seem to be some kind of grain of truth in there. i think it disregards May's actual wish for an exit, in spite of the fact that she voted to remain as a cabinet-faithful hard-liner and also is willfully ignoring her stance to not have a parliamentary vote on article 50. she's certainly playing an extremely confusing game here though - why, for example, did she make Johnson foreign secretary knowing that he is loathed in every country outside of england and wales? if she deliberately set him up to fail she also deliberately risked making the UK a complete laughing stock internationally and she's too canny for that but maybe she's not as shrewd of smart as her reputation says she is? would she really vouch for staying in the EEA knowing that the UK would have a seat at the EU table? i have no idea what's going on to be honest.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 29 August 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

it may not be a case of setting Johnson up to fail so much as setting him up to take responsibility for whatever the outcome is. if May or the rest of her party cared much about the UK's place in the world at the moment then we'd never have had a referendum in the first place.

Len Bincowank (Noodle Vague), Monday, 29 August 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't think that May *wants* the brexit project to be a disaster, but I guess she knows there is a good chance that it will be a disaster, and giving Johnson-Fox-Davis responsibility for it means that if everything does go horribly wrong they will be tainted as well and not be able to use brexit as pretext to lead a rebellion against her?
xp

soref, Monday, 29 August 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

"would she really vouch for staying in the EEA knowing that the UK would have a seat at the EU table?" obviously i meant "would not have"

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 29 August 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

Also if it's a disaster, they are the only people who can actually say "let's not do this" without it looking like a crypto-europhile stitch-up.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 29 August 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

Who's "they"?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 29 August 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

liam fox and his ilk are salivating at the thought of the economic struggle that the uk leaving the eu will mean and the vital increase in "belt-tightening" and privatisation that it will behoove so if after staring into the abyss they said "ok actually bad idea" then something very dark indeed will have been glimpsed and it will be obvious to even the most ardent tory eu-hater - not that the significance would filter through to your average leave voter and it will still be a stitch-up

conrad, Monday, 29 August 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

I always thought brexit voters were giving an extra free hand to the Tories to throttle them with and it would done in a "you voted for this, now take your medicine" style. It is quite scary tbh, because the idea of further austerity makes me feel the next stage of poverty lived by many in this country will truly belong to the 30's era evoked by this thread's title.

calzino, Monday, 29 August 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

"They" are Johnson-Fox-Davis from the post I was replying to - apart from anything else, who else matches the "the only people" from my post?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 09:00 (seven years ago) link

Eh? It wasn't a dig, I just needed clarification.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

Ah it's alright, just cranky this morning.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

I think it's more likely that May was secretly pro-Brexit all along but kept her head down because she knew full well what would happen to Boris.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

she was even more lukewarm and anonymous during the campaign than Corbyn, which is saying soemthing

Neil S, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Still don't really get this idea that Corbyn could've made the difference to the result by doing more.

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

oh I don't necessarily subscribe to that view either, it's just that May was absolutely nowhere, whereas Corbyn did at least make some half-hearted "Europe and workers' rights" noises

Neil S, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

xp a professional footballer should try hard regardless of whether they have the personal capacity to influence the result. the ones that don't are loathed by fans. same deal.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

I think that's pretty absurd. He gave well enough the impression of one too deeply concerned with the EU to be able to lead in favour of remaining effectively. I get that people are angry with him for not feeling the same way they do I guess. But I'm not, because I don't think he alone could've done more to persuade enough of those hell-bent on voting Leave (just as Cameron and other ruthlessly slated by the pro-Leave press couldn't, only more so).

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

xp a professional footballer should try hard regardless of whether they have the personal capacity to influence the result. the ones that don't are loathed by fans. same deal.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 16:39 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this has to be one of the most brainless things someone has bothered to type out

conrad, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

thank u

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

as corbyn's team seems to believe that straight-talking honesty is what the electorate wants from politicians - I don't think it is - the brexit is a little bit of a weak point for corbyn because he has been in favour of it for decades and seemingly adopted a remain stance for reasons of political expediency and, as rare as it is for him, not to cause ructions with the overwhelmingly pro-remain party apparatus. this lack of confidence in the sincerity of his pro-remain campaigning makes it harder for him to deflect accusations of letting the side down during the referendum - he can't passionately and convincingly sell his pro-eu credentials as they don't exist

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

on a separate note BBC neutrality on asylum seekers and refugees seems to mean journalists asking the same narrow range of UKIP-inspired questions day in day out at the moment. it's very inspiring, but perhaps they don't have a duty of balance towards non-nationals.

Len Wankobinc (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

xp yup. the "idea" is not that he could have swung the referendum. it's that he didn't seem to try. this may not be true, but is a pretty mainstream belief afaict.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

it's a belief that cuts both ways - i know quite a few Labour-sympathetic Brexiters for whom that "lukewarm" response is another mark in Corbyn's favour

i don't really buy that his efforts were lukewarm tho - flogging his way around the country addressing public meetings rather than popping in for a 10-minute chat on This Morning is pretty much his approach to campaigning in general, for better or worse. afaik he put the hard yards in on the ground during the referendum campaign.

Len Wankobinc (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

BBC will happily report e.g. "Five illegal immigrants from Iran detained after arriving on Sussex coast in dinghy" as opposed to say 'Five people detained after arriving on Sussex coast in dinghy'. Use of 'arriving' would suggest illegal entry well enough and referring to nationality doesn't feel helpful at that stage either (if ever).

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

i've heard 3 or 4 reporters on different radio stations run thru the same questions in the last few days re: Calais. "why did they travel through all those other countries?" "isn't feeding them and helping them to survive just exacerbating the problem?" "most of them have no right to be in the UK do they?" and round and round

Len Wankobinc (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

any analysis of what drives people here in the first place is absent from these discussions, at least on the BBC side

Len Wankobinc (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

it's that he didn't seem to try. this may not be true, but is a pretty mainstream belief afaict.

Yeah it's somehow both a mainstream belief that he wanted to Leave and that he didn't try hard enough to convince us otherwise. Remarkable fucking times for us all.

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

it's unfair to say that Corbyn campaigned to remain in bad faith; it doesn't then follow that he set the campaign trail alight, but he was hardly the only remain campaigner to be deficient in that regard, and of course remain didn't have the "lying" option available to them to make their case

Neil S, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

His campaigning was a) Conservative-led Brexit is a scam to remove human/workers' rights, b) freedom of movement cuts both ways and how can it be right for capital to be mobile if people can't also move around c) TTIP is eeeevil and best to stay in Europe to fight it because a Conservative government would happily sign up for it and d) on balance, better in than out at this point in time.

Quite a few commentators praised Corbyn for being a lukewarm Remainer during the campaign because there were a great deal of people who had complaints about straight bananas etc but at the same time, were very happy to be able to retire to Spain and go through the quickie EU channel at the airport. Blaming him for Brexit is VERY disingenuous.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Not enough people listen to Corbyn or give a shit about what he says for him to really have swung the vote but he didn't really seem that arsed and probably isn't. But if your problem is that you're widely seen as well-intentioned but ineffectual then lukewarm campaigning on anything is going to be seized on.

The way May campaigned at the time wasn't particularly important given she wasn't leading a political party at the time. But it was extremely obvious to anyone paying attention that she was deliberately keeping her head down in order to alienate as few Tories as possible.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

xp a professional footballer should try hard regardless of whether they have the personal capacity to influence the result. the ones that don't are loathed by fans. same deal.

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:39 (two hours ago) Permalink

LOL @ this thrash comparison.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

See this has been pointed out but you know just making sure..

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Going for a curry now lads.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Was he getting coverage for what campaigning he was doing anyway?
If he wasn't getting on tv because what coverage of the campaign there was was being devoted to other parties, then he's not going to be appearing to be doing his bit. When he could very easily be doing what he could and just getting media indifference.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

He scored high on media appearances statistically but yes the extent of media hostility obscured his understandably timid reasoning with ease.

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

As for May I am not really sure she know quite what she's doing. Yes possibly making the Brexiters more accountable, or playing them against one another in her cab appointments except Johnson or Fox anywhere near negotiations could really fuck things up, making a bad deal with Europe even worse.

Hard to know what anyone could do - its such a fuck-up. Management of decline indeed.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

I agree that I'm not sure she knows what she's doing - but then nobody does. My guess is that those appointments were a defensive move to ensure that a slender voting majority remains so. It was tactical rather than strategic and we all know where that got Cameron.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

Maybe if Corbyn had rolled up his sleeves, sweated profusely and pointed his fingers at things it would have made it look like he was trying harder. What did more damage to the Remain campaign more than any of Corbyn's perceived lukewarmness was all these arrogant old Blairite lags getting wheeled out from their £1m per annum day jobs in the banking system to tell people how to vote and of course Eddie Izzard on QT.

calzino, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

Geldof on the Thames is often mentioned too.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah, that was double-nauseating as well.

calzino, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

pointed his fingers at things

his inside leg measurement?

conrad, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

Almost all Leave-voters knew how they would vote long before all the shit stunts and campaigning. They just didn't know they'd actually win.

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

I feel like boris won it, actually.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

When he was comparing the EU to the third reich he was probably connecting to more of the UK electorate than anyone patiently talking about pertinent issues like employment rights and the dangers of giving the Tory right another free hand on you.

calzino, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

I think the EU as a political entity is so complex and such a new type of thing that traditional political rhetoric, the idea of people on opposite podiums being passionately for or against something in front of the public, is just not capable of dealing with the topic. To really understand the benefits of membership you need to have a certain level of education and/or a professional interest in the subject. Likewise, the genuine problems with the EU (not the made-up square bananas, but things like the treatment of Greece) are equally complex.

But the 'referendum' framing device, with its only two answers, a yes or a no, enforces this trad thing of people getting on podiums and being for or against, which is great news for bullshitters who don't mind lying through their teeth about square bananas but bad news for people like Corbyn.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 30 August 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn 62%. Purge the time-wasters.

nashwan, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Another day, another great Cardamon post.

calzino, Tuesday, 30 August 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

I've talked to the mods about having a fb-style 'like' button on ILX but that is only on my posts and it can't actually be pressed

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 00:33 (seven years ago) link

was with you until the "a certain level of education" bit

Neil S, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 06:45 (seven years ago) link

The electorate are a bunch of hateful bastards, but if you are trying to say those without further education are too thick to vote - it is a pretty fucked up post is what I was driving at.

calzino, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 08:02 (seven years ago) link

I think 'education in the subject' and 'education' are different in this context though. The positives and negatives of the EU are not always easy to grasp but the fault lies with the people who are supposed to be able to convey them in a clear and professional manner rather than the electorate.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 08:09 (seven years ago) link

Owen Smith is proof that even people with a top class education in this country can be still be thick as pigshit.

I might be reading Cardamons post wrong, but he does have previous for making ridiculous and hateful comments about the working classes.

calzino, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 08:12 (seven years ago) link

I think 'informed' is better to use in this context than 'educated'. I don't think it's controversial to say that the public has been badly informed by the press and by politicians - which is distinct from 'education' in a more general context.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 08:23 (seven years ago) link

well yes, all the high octane hate speak going doing the rounds during the referendum was certainly not informing anybody about the real consequences of a brexit.

calzino, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 08:33 (seven years ago) link

Just wanna remake the old point that as a voter the extent to which you try to inform yourself is at least partly a consequence of how much good you believe any outcome will do you

Len Wankobinc (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 09:14 (seven years ago) link

I'm hugely uncomfortable to the extent to which Brexit has been laid squarely at the door of post-industrial (primarily) working class constituencies, whilst the MASSIVE prosperous-but-disgruntled Southern shire Tory Brexit vote (without which Leave would not have won) gets ignored completely.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

I know of a few shire Tory voters who went Brexit for reasons of 'oh, fuck it' thinking Leave would lose. One of them thinks Farage is absolutely a fascist who is giving voice to some truly disgusting people, so I cannot for the life of me figure out why a Leave vote would appeal, even as protest (this particular person isn't a racist).

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

Been interested in the parallel between Leave votes as a fuck you to X and Corbyn votes as a fuck you to Y. There is similar reaction and behaviour within both camps (with some evident if slight overlap).

nashwan, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

Yep, and also a pretty big parallel with Trump votes as a fuck you to Z, I think.

JimD, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

NS dross of the week:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/08/jeremy-corbyns-fans-must-learn-art-compromise

Similarly, while Corbyn and his supporters know what they’re against, they have not yet articulated a clear vision of what they’re for, much less how it can be achieved.

Amazing how this is trotted out again and again, doing the exact same convenient ignoring of things that have actually happened that he accuses supporters of.

if Labour is to have a future as a political force, Corbyn’s supporters must learn to respect the historic purpose of the Labour party at least as much as they admire the high principles of its current leader. There isn’t long for that realisation to take hold.

The fuck does this even mean? There's no explanation of suggestion beyond 'learn to compromise'.

nashwan, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Sorry I realise this should all be on the Corbyn thread, keep conflating.

nashwan, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

I'm hugely uncomfortable to the extent to which Brexit has been laid squarely at the door of post-industrial (primarily) working class constituencies, whilst the MASSIVE prosperous-but-disgruntled Southern shire Tory Brexit vote (without which Leave would not have won) gets ignored completely.

^^^^^^^^^ Same old same old though, only working class tossers are racist.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

In this context, idk if anyone would be able to argue that the Tory Brexit shires were any more 'informed' about the EU than anyone else.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

the MASSIVE prosperous-but-disgruntled Southern shire Tory Brexit vote (without which Leave would not have won)

Are there any analyses of this vote, or articles which even speculate in passing?

I grew up in or at least on the edge of these places, much of my family lives in them, and I don't really understand it. I was surprised by it on results night tbh

I live in a bubble now because I live in 90%-Remain university town and meet people mostly through evening classes for European languages so duh, but I still don't really get what is different between the very pro-EU retired teachers who make up half my evening class and own big houses in Oxfordshire, and the leave-voting retired teachers at my mum's language classes who own big houses in Dorset

Another dumb and naive observation but hey: before the election whenever I travelled through the countryside there were big Leave banners up on fields, which initially didn't surprise me because I always expect to disagree with political banners on farmland and country estates, but then I thought, surely these people get a lot of money from EU farming subsidies and will be keen to hang on to that?

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

the heart wants what the heart wants

conrad, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Tory MPs themselves were only around 42% in favour of Leave. Even if you add on most undeclared it'd surely stay under half. I'd have though Southern (or just nationwide as a whole) Tory voters could only amount to slightly higher than that in turn.

nashwan, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

58% of Tory voters voted Leave. Labour voters, 37% .

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

The electorate are a bunch of hateful bastards, but if you are trying to say those without further education are too thick to vote - it is a pretty fucked up post is what I was driving at.

I wasn't trying to say that, but 'certain education' basically implies that regardless of my intention, so fair enough.

I meant something more like, if you worked in B&Q and you were supposed to explain to someone which particular screws and timbers you thought were most suitable for the job, but it had to be YES or NO and said with great conviction.

Anyone who actually cared about screws and timbers and wanted to give an honest, helpful answer would perform badly, because in reality the best buy depends on a bunch of factors and it's a technical rather than a passionate discussion. Whereas someone who's willing to just say 'These screws over here are just as bad as the Third Reich, you want THESE screws because they'll make you free' is basically going to sell the most screws.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

Like, it seems as though people are saying that Corbyn should have somehow found a way to argue strongly and with enough theatrics to convince people to vote Remain, and yet also to be honest and not to lapse into spin/project fear. I mean, yeah, that would have been nice, but in terms of how you'd go about it, I'm all out. Not a clue how one would do that or if anyone even could. As far as I can see the YES/NO framing makes it impossible.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

perhaps 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 has some suggestions

conrad, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

xp
sorry, i probably overreacted to + misread your post a bit on reflection. I'm going through a bit of a stressful period atm and am tetchy + thin skinned, definitely not interested in getting into or maintaining any online beefs.

calzino, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

No yeah it wouldn't be the first time my phrasing has been so poor as to not really be an excuse

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

if i'm concern trolling by pointing out what is, rightly or wrongly, a pretty endemic belief outside the canarysphere then i apologise

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

seemed worth explaining since some people here seem genuinely mystified that corbyn isn't doing better.

i don't think i've said at any point whether i think it's a justified criticism so to be clear: it isn't. unfortunately people who we disagree with have the right to vote in general elections.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 31 August 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

As far as I can see the YES/NO framing makes it impossible

xps yes I should keep up at the back here but I still don't understand why Cameron made the EU referendum just Y/N - was the weasel-free wording also a pledge? s'pose it must have been

after all, the "change" option on the voting reform referendum (hardly such a hot-button issue - if only it could be!) was a deliberately lame compromise couched in a great deal of abstruse waffle to put off those not very interested either way

(and was it paired with some pro-Tory gerrymandering to make it extra unappealing or did we get that anyway as a result of the bill which proposed the referendum in the first place? can't remember now, think I may have, ahem, misunderstood at the time - in which case, note to self, cannot be snooty re others voting on issues without being informed)

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

I think it was only connected in the sense that the Lib Dems said they would only back boundary changes if they got the constitutional reforms they wanted. Clegg got his useless AV referendum, but the Tories backed out of Lords reform so the Lib Dems got cross and withdrew backing for the boundary changes. So the Tories lost that vote and couldn't get it through under the Coalition, which is why it's now come back.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/aug/06/nick-clegg-blocks-boundary-changes
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21235169

Alba, Wednesday, 31 August 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

Just came across this piece on the 'loony left' in Lambeth. A left-wing leadership offers possibilities of a more co-ordinated fight at local level against much of what is to come.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 1 September 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

Derek Hatton of Militant was on bbc news's Hardtalk earlier this week getting grilled by the presenter. He saw similarities between his vilification and the way Corbyn was being viewed by the media.

Interview is probably up on i-player

Stevolende, Thursday, 1 September 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

Hmm, I mean Derek Hatton legitimately was a Trotskyist entryist, maybe not the kind of support Corbyn really needs

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 1 September 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Hairsplitting aside if he had any sense he'd keep out of it, perception of him won't change

wan bobolink (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 1 September 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Maybe a sense in which the perception of Corbyn can change is by influencing outcomes that directly affect people that are poor, in a precarious situation job and homes-wise. One way of doing that could be aligning with Labour councils in the manner described above, and certainly by not obstructing.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 1 September 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

Definitely. The uneasy history of the PLP's relationship to questionable local councillors has always been coloured more by perceived orthodoxy than by how bent the councillors actually were

wan bobolink (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 1 September 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

There are some pretty nasty local Labour parties in London certainly, but that's not what we're talking about here.

Matt DC, Thursday, 1 September 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

Not a single reference to the new Junior doctor strike on newsnight tonight. I guess it's just not a big deal to the editors.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 1 September 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

I love the idea that a whole generation of doctors have become politicised and probably hate the tories now, although this might be some cloud dwelling thinking here.

calzino, Thursday, 1 September 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

Doctor's strike has been discussed on BBC News channel a lot today. I flicked by the channel at several times during the day and it seemed to be the topic each time. So hadn't noticed it wasn't actually on that.

Stevolende, Thursday, 1 September 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

I guess it's just naive of me to think that the formerly more analytical, or at least discussion based, news programme might actually engage with this event.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 1 September 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

Would seem to be an important thing to cover. Hate to think the NHS something that I've been aware of being around all my life being demolished.

THink I've seen the clip of Theresa May saying that Junior Doctors should stop playing at politics way too frequently. Does she want them to leave the playing at all to her or something?

Stevolende, Thursday, 1 September 2016 23:53 (seven years ago) link

Tory PM in undermining unions shocker. Cameron basically sanitised his hands of this issue and left it to Hunt so she probably senses a defining moment here.

Matt DC, Friday, 2 September 2016 08:49 (seven years ago) link

I guess it's just naive of me to think that the formerly more analytical, or at least discussion based, news programme might actually engage with this event.

lol, the one with Evan Davies as main presenter?

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 2 September 2016 09:33 (seven years ago) link

I know, I know....

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 2 September 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Trying to think what they did have prioritised over it in terms of news stories.
Maybe they'll come back to it next week.
It's now several more days between here and Xmas.

But at least the BBC news channel was giving it some coverage. looked like quite a bit since it was on there several times over the day with different people talking about it.

Stevolende, Friday, 2 September 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

JUnior doctor's strike lead story in the Friday night newsnight.
Currently on . Repeated in an hour on BBC news channel.

Stevolende, Friday, 2 September 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

lol. John Redwood sets out his Action Plan For Brexit

Send Article 50 letter explaining we are leaving using our own constitutional arrangements as per previous Article, which will be an Act of Parliament.

Offer talks on trade and tariffs if they wish to change anything, saying we are happy to offer them no change to current arrangements. In other words we stay in the Single Market as now, without the freedom of movement and the contributions. The advantage we have is when it comes to trading we are happy with the status quo, so they are the ones with a problem if they wish to change it. This reverses the presumption of many commentators that the UK needs to negotiate with the rest of the EU, and is the supplicant.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 3 September 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

Install MATTY TAYLOR as PRESIDENT of Board of TRADE.

There Will Be Ducks (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 3 September 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

That gets extremely close to the centre of Brexit hubris there.

Matt DC, Saturday, 3 September 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

Wait, does Britain not have freedom of movement and contributions now?

Frederik B, Saturday, 3 September 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

saying we are happy to offer them no change to current arrangements. In other words we stay in the Single Market as now, without the freedom of movement and the contributions.

This seems to reveal an imperfect understanding of the current arrangements.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 3 September 2016 12:19 (seven years ago) link

Install MATTY TAYLOR as PRESIDENT of Board of TRADE.

― There Will Be Ducks (Noodle Vague), Saturday, September 3, 2016 11:05 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Drucker was writing about businesses when he wrote that, but the same principles apply to any purposeful system. Given the obvious interdependence of the UK with the EU, what light can systems thinking shed on the reasons behind Brexit – this dramatic breaking of a socio-economic system?

ǂbait (seandalai), Saturday, 3 September 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

May is getting a very harsh lesson in international diplomacy and Britain's current standing in the world right now.

Matt DC, Monday, 5 September 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

BBC News channel has a special discussion audience thing on the Junior Doctors strike on Wednesday morning. Heard that earlier so thought I'd pass it on.

Stevolende, Monday, 5 September 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

when the Japanese are openly trash-talking you then, uh good luck uk lol

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 5 September 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/04/observer-view-bma-junior-doctors-dispute

the observer comes out against the junior doctors strike, a fine example of moderate extremism

the same old story: yes they tried to and ultimately would like to do bad things for bad reasons but you should make way in the interest of making it easier

conrad, Monday, 5 September 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

sure is strange that people r losing faith in moderate liberal centrism as an effective counter to the tory agenda

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 5 September 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

britain and france will start the construction of the wall in calais

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/britain-to-start-construction-of-great-wall-of-calais-to-keep-migrantsout/article31741277/

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

imagine thousands of foreigners with nothing but contempt for your culture and values swarming into your country just to plunder your resources. good work France and the UK.

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

not that i agree or disagree with you but that's what some white americans say about mexican immigrants

it's interesting hearing similar "words" with various interpretations on both sides of the atlantic

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

I think he's joking about colonialism.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

i'm sorry ∞ i was being sarcastic with reference to the colonial history of the nations i named.

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

not too familiar with french/british race dynamics so i don't want to get too involved

but it's the first i've heard of the wall in calais

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

There's a meme going around with a map of the world showing all of at least the historical UK colonies and asking how they have the nerve to complain about the amount of people attempting to enter the country.

I heard taht France was pretty nasty about the way it pulled out of its colonies on them gaining independence. Things like removing jetties and quays and things when they left. Sounds a lot like removing lightbulbs on leaving a house you're moving out of, maybe worse.

Calais is a seaport so the construction of a wall is presumably metaphorical.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

nope, they're building a wall along the sides of the main road to try to stop asylum seekers from boarding UK-bound lorries

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

Just repeating that it's still just 55 years ago that French police massacred hundreds of North African immigrants and threw their bodies in the Seine. Yeah, they were nasty.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

just in the last week they seriously enhanced the huge razor wire fence at calais. also a significant army presence. quite unsettling to see soldiers with machine guns hanging around against a background of an endless sea of razor wire

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

i just moved to Bordeaux and the state of emergency means that every now and again you turn a corner and there's a detachment of troops with machine guns kind of lightly trotting down an alley and it's a little bit whoa

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigipirate

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

Shit, you left, TH? It always happens so quietly damn

stet, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

i didn't go far :)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

the east end is bereft, only me here now :(

mark s, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

That's not true, you have a Local Garda.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

me too 8)

conrad, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

hurrah!

mark s, Wednesday, 7 September 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37305581

Another reminder that a commitment to 'x number of new jobs' without commitments around standards is a waste of time.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 8 September 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

David Runciman pulling no punches on the Clegg autobiog: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/sep/08/politics-by-nick-clegg-review

Neil S, Thursday, 8 September 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

I was listening to the self-pitying deluded fuckwit on R4 this morning, lol this will be giving the Ed Balls book a run for it's money in the straight to the bargain bin stakes.

calzino, Thursday, 8 September 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Disclosure of the agreement over the flat will raise questions over whether it would have been possible for McCluskey to raise money through a mortgage. David Hollingworth, an associate director at the mortgage brokers London & Country, said that some 66-year-old men on equivalent salaries could still, under certain circumstances, obtain mortgages.

and instead raise money for mccluskey & the bank rather than the union...

not enough halpert emojis itw

self-clowning cozen of ILX (cozen), Thursday, 8 September 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

It was pretty much May in the same unpleasant and wooden style as her PMQ debut a few months back that was trumped up by some desperados (even at the Graun) as a bravado performance. I suppose it something when she is starting to make Corbyn look dynamic :p

calzino, Friday, 9 September 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

Unlike Cameron she isn't a natural showboater and it's extremely cringeworthy watching her try. Still, millions of middle-class parents will now no longer have to worry about their children going to school with a load of poor kids so she'll probably win the next election by a landslide.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 September 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

if memory serves, the hostility back in the day to the grammar / non-grammar split was largely driven by middle-class* parents whose kids didn't make the cut

*which is to say, ppl who considered themselves middle-class finding out that actually THEY didn't make the cut

mark s, Friday, 9 September 2016 10:32 (seven years ago) link

It's still a fairly divisive policy - more people support opening new grammar schools than closing the existing ones but i think the former is still a minority.

A lot will depend on how many middle-class parents try and fail to get their children into them. It's easy to support in the abstract but less so if other people are getting the advantage and your children are missing out.

xps, Mark S otm

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 9 September 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

ppl who considered themselves middle-class finding out that actually THEY didn't make the cut

wonder to what extent this has effectively been happening for years due to league tables

nashwan, Friday, 9 September 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

This is an extraordinary statement to make:

Greening, who was educated at a comprehensive school, said she had a huge respect for Wilshaw but the proposals being set out by May would insist that new grammars accept more children from poorer backgrounds or sponsor other schools.

The education secretary said children from poorer backgrounds who got into grammars did twice as well as other children in grammars. But she had no answer to why it would improve the education and prospects of poorer children overall, including those who do not get into grammar schools.

It implies that children of richer parents are getting in to grammar schools based on qualities other than academic ability which surely can't be true...

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 9 September 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

Plus that kind of school can't be very good at 'stretching' the 'brightest' kids if they end up with some of them doing twice as well as others.

nashwan, Friday, 9 September 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

'improve the education and prospects of poorer children overall' = the ones who don't shine will have their dreams crushed swiftly and efficiently and productively take up their pick and helmet er hang on.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 September 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

The area i live in retained a largely selective system and has literally twice as many under-performing schools as the second-worst in the country - along with a selection of the best.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 9 September 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Wonder what the best way of doing things really is.
think that problems come out of trying to make everybody do the same thing at the same time when people move at different speeds.
So keeping class sizes from being over large would be a starting point.

& maintaining the whole create work fodder out of individuals bit would hopefully gradually be being phased out.

Stevolende, Friday, 9 September 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

My niece who is from a poor council estate/single parent background got a grammar scholarship, her older brother went to the same sink shithole school as me. He is very much a high flyer in the sciences and is doing research on Alzheimer's these days. He had such a rough time at school because he was very bright and didn't hide it and has ginger hair. This is where I am conflicted about grammar schools, because my nephew Peter went through 5 years of quite hellish bullying, so i wouldn't have disapproved if he had got a scholarship as well. Idk, it is a complicated multifaceted issue, but I don't still feel enough hostility towards grammar schools to follow the classic Labour line of outright condemnation of them. Possibly I am hypocrite on this issue, idk.

calzino, Friday, 9 September 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

I knew plenty of people who received horrible treatment at grammar school fwiw, which (naturally) doesn't diminish yr nephew's misery in any way.

Tim, Friday, 9 September 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone disputes that the system benefits certain individuals well? I mean, if it didn't then only the most blindly ideologically-driven people would care.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 September 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

yeah plenty of people are defending this move by saying "well i benefited from going to grammar school" and, well, yeah, that's the point, it can work well if you're lucky enough to get in, but if not, eyyyy.

i remember in my youth wishing that grammar school was a thing in scotland so i could get away from my chump classmates, wee tory shitebag that i was.

I desperately wanted to go to public school (as the raf would have paid for it/some of it). Thankfully my parents thwarted that plan. I think it was part of my 'family romance' stage (as Freud described it).

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Friday, 9 September 2016 13:08 (seven years ago) link

there are lots of people whose experience of sub par comprehensive schools makes them open to almost any alternative

ogmor, Friday, 9 September 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely. I think quite a few people who oppose the idea of grammar schools would probably want their kids to benefit if someone has to. Living within walking distance of three outstanding grammar schools and a couple of absolutely terrible comps, i wouldn't begrudge my neighbours from wanting to send their children to the former. It also intersects with other issues of privilege - i know a lot of parents from minority backgrounds see getting their children into the best possible schools as one way of ameliorating the disadvantages they'll face vs white kids in later life.

There's a difference between that and believing they're a positive thing in general or a solution to improving schools.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 9 September 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

there are lots of people whose experience of sub par comprehensive schools makes them open to almost any alternative

― ogmor, Friday, September 9, 2016 2:34 PM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah - a fantasy world opens up where no-one in selective schools gets bullied, where selective schools truly select for ability without money distorting the process, etc. A sort of drug effect where in your escapist rapture you can't focus on the arguments being made by proponents of selection.

It isn't just the experience of comprehensive schooling but of what comes after - 'If only I'd been able to go to the posh school I'd be more confident communicating and getting my way in job interviews/I'd be married with kids by now'.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 9 September 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

Has there been much change in the way schools are run over the last 30 odd years?
Just thinking that advances in media technology etc could make things far more accommodating of individual creativity and move away from the old Victorian model of simply creating a somewhat (but not overly) functional workforce. But the powers that control such things would be unlikely to want to shake things up too much.

& that the focus is likely to remain the same until things are totally rethought.

Also that anyone trying to run a school covering the teenage years is likely to be dealing with a bunch of individuals that are just learning how to deal with great physical changes and the idea of how to fit in . Which often revolves around pointing out individuals that don't fit in to whatever picture. So subsequently you will always have some elements of bullying or other enforced estrangement going on. Until you can find some way of changing that and it's probably been the same since the species evolved or certainly large scale society did.

Stevolende, Friday, 9 September 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

the move has been largely towards standardization, uniformity, and increasingly shutting out children who don't conform sufficiently to those goals

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 September 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

plus onscreen teaching and testing as a relatively new thing, the main point of which seems to be to fire teachers and save money, plus a lot of targeting and stats

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 9 September 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

yeah, children remodeled as data subjects

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 September 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Hiiiiiiyyaaa mark s btw, ilx east end represent

plums (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 10 September 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

the disgraced former defence secretary speaks out about the glittering brexit future

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/09/fat-and-lazy-britain-is-ill-prepared-to-secure-future-outside-eu-says-fox?CMP=share_btn_fb

beer say hi to me (stevie), Saturday, 10 September 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/home-affairs/immigration/news/78854/amber-rudd-work-permit-immigration-system-certainly-has

Ms Rudd also said she was “completely committed” to the Tory target of reducing net migration to the “tens of thousands” – though she added that it “will take some time”.

She said further restrictions on international students would form part of the Government’s efforts to bring down the figure, which currently stands at well over 300,000.

“We’re looking at a number of options but students do make an important contribution,” she said.

“There’s going to be no blanket ban on students coming to the UK but we are looking at bringing down the numbers overall.”

Of all the monumentally stupid ideas May is committed to, this must rank near the top. It's openly diverting billions of £ in revenue to Australia and Canada with zero benefit.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 September 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

surely the benefit is eventually massaging inaccurate figures enough to be able to convince your racist supporters that you're helping to keep the UK as white as possible?

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 11 September 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

Yes. Of that widely-quoted figure of "well over 300,000" about half are international students.

mahb, Monday, 12 September 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

(xp) That's about the size of it.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 12 September 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

coming here, contributing to our economy while adding international prestige to our academic institutions, outrageous stuff

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Monday, 12 September 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

and then for the most part getting booted straight back out again once their degrees are over

a very in-your-face, hard-edged machine bottom (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 September 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

so it makes about as much economic sense as reducing the numbers of foreign tourists

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Monday, 12 September 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Lololol @sun leader today. "We need to control immigration but any idea that we would have to get visas to go to other countries is a scandal"

stet, Monday, 12 September 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link

cameron's standing down? wonder what skeleton in his closet is about to come out in the media...

a very in-your-face, hard-edged machine bottom (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 September 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

talking of odious hasbeens there is an excruciating interview with Balls on R4. No accountability for New Labour's failings, they lost in 2015 because they were perceived as too left wing and increased inequality under their watch was a symptom of globalism blah blah. .. please go and swill some broken glass down with some brasso you delusional slimeball.

calzino, Monday, 12 September 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

cameron's standing down? wonder what skeleton in his closet is about to come out in the media...

Wanting to make a shit-ton of money on the after-dinner speaking/warlord consulting circuit is hardly a skeleton.

Matt DC, Monday, 12 September 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

coulsonchappell.com/jobs

nashwan, Monday, 12 September 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Has Cameron been in parliament since he stood down as PM?

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Monday, 12 September 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

so, now we know why cameron resigned.

mark e, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

lol, you just xped me, faster than Cameron doing a runner :p

calzino, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

David and Tony sitting in a tree
F-u-c-k-i-n-g up the world by basically starting wars everywhere, the massive bellends.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

in other new - the legacy of IDS rolls on.
re a friend of mine (low income single parent with 3 young kids).
a few months ago without any reason, they stopped her family tax credits.
when she realised, she rang for information as to why as she had not heard anything.
their answer : 'we have reason to believe that you are living with your ex-husband'
when she asked for more detail as to what the information was, they refused to say, as it was impossible to explain.
instead she had to prove to them that he was not living with her via bank statememts, mortgage statements, etc etc going back YEARS
she had to get electoral registry entries, credit card statements, legal documents to prove she was officially divorced (4 years divorced)
the demands were insane.
and getting through to them was impossible.
it was horrid for her
she really suffered a lot of anxiety and stress about it all, as concentrix just would not accept her proof !
they were by all accounts, total b*stards about the whole thing.
seems that this was, as i thought at the time, a fishing game to reduce the numbers on the books.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37356646

mark e, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like the standard appalling way arbitrary cuts are made to people that are a trapdoor into abject poverty. I think the idea is to kill them off or disenfranchise them out of the system and onto the streets before they go through the painfully slow appeals procedures.

calzino, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

sounds like the deserving and undeserving poor thing from the Victorian era.
Also sounds like trying to prove somebody's a witch by trying to drown them.

If you're deserving poor then a simple thing like cutting all your money off won't drown you, will it?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

I just remembered that these Concentrix fuckers ran a compliance check on me a couple of years back, thankfully nothing came of it. There is a lot of similar practice going on with disabled people switching from DLA to PIP, some people are going through long periods of stressful poverty/uncertainty while they appeal completely unwarranted PIP rejections. I'm sure the Taxpayers Alliance would probably say this method doesn't save enough money.

calzino, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

one gets the feeling that they would rather transfer the equivalent money or perhaps more to a business rather than to the people who currently receive it - the question of whether these people need it or "deserve" it or not not being a factor

conrad, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 12:11 (seven years ago) link

I think the understanding behind the Victorian deserving /non-deserving poor idea was that society was a meritocracy and the good prospered while the bad didn't. So everybody at the bottom of society was there for a reason, lazyness or non-commitment to the right ideals. Also if any charity was extended to the poor it might not be used the most wisely. So there were normally major constraints and hurdles placed around doling it out. So you'd get austerity measures like hard repetitive labour being one of the provisos of being acceptance into a workhouse to make sure only he really deserving got any good out of it and the non-deserving were winnowed out and left to their own devices.
Would hope that that picture was thought of as ancient. It did seem to be bound into an epistemology that had a certain form of Xianity at its centre that is no longer as widely believed in. Though not sure it doesn't still form the basis of a more right wing perspective.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like the standard appalling way arbitrary cuts are made to people that are a trapdoor into abject poverty. I think the idea is to kill them off or disenfranchise them out of the system and onto the streets before they go through the painfully slow appeals procedures.

Yep and the numbers in that situation are so large that the social engineers don't gaf about experimenting with data sets. Of humans.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

Can't think of anything clever to add, it's just horrible

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 15 September 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

The tax credits/having kids situation is a whole other world to me

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 15 September 2016 01:59 (seven years ago) link

Yesterday, for almost the only time ever, the media or commentariat was quite united in thinking Jeremy Corbyn had done well in attacking the Con party! (over grammar schools)

I liked this.

the pinefox, Thursday, 15 September 2016 05:52 (seven years ago) link

I think milestones/anomalies of that kind deserve to be recorded on the angela eagle thread

conrad, Thursday, 15 September 2016 06:13 (seven years ago) link

thanks pal now I see that thread and I remember Angela Eagle seems like a long time ago !!

the pinefox, Thursday, 15 September 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/sep/15/tory-mp-suspended-from-commons-for-leaking-report-to-wonga?CMP=share_btn_tw

More dignity in the President of Malaysia accepting a billion dollar personal gift from Saudi Arabia than in this cheap graft.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 15 September 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

Totally shameless. They just hash it all out in email, we're all mates here, let me sponsor your football team, sweet.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 15 September 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

Newcastle U and Blackpool fc both suffered bad ju ju after sponsorship deals with W#ng@, and one of their chairman is a modern day workhouse owner and the other a convicted rapist.

calzino, Thursday, 15 September 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

that's the class of people who like to work with payday loan hucksters

calzino, Thursday, 15 September 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CseqR_pXEAAwcwS.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 September 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

Paul Mason is on Any Questions at 8 pm, it might make it at least 20% less annoying than usual.

calzino, Friday, 16 September 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

I defy anyone to read to the end of Stephen Kinnock's immigration article from today's Guardian without feeling disorientated, like the room is spinning around them - it's written in this bland matter-of-fact style, but it's like some Lewis Carroll-esque masterpiece of broken logic and non sequiturs

soref, Monday, 19 September 2016 03:04 (seven years ago) link

also Kinnock's twitter bio is "Pro-business, but not pro-business as usual." which is maybe the worst twitter bio ever. (though it looks like that's a line first used by Ed Miliband's people as far back as 2011? https://twitter.com/search?q=Pro-business%2C%20but%20not%20pro-business%20as%20usual.&src=typd)

soref, Monday, 19 September 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

if you like to wave your pro-business credentials around then maybe don't be a member of the Labour Party tbh

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 September 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

these fucking Blairites and their nauseating "we nice tory" slogans is one thing I won't miss if there is a good purge. Without any irony Stephen's dad was referred to as "a true man of the left" on R4 yesterday.

calzino, Monday, 19 September 2016 07:05 (seven years ago) link

Interesting to see a lot of the deeply anti-Corbyn people who pop up in my Twitter timeline completely repulsed by the juvenile backlash to 'Momentum Kids'. Quite a few Corbyn-sceptical journalists too.

Stephen Bush ‏@stephenkb 9h9 hours ago
Sad that Corbyn can't even propose a creche with child-friendly activities that are relevant to their mum's interests without being mocked.

I get the sense that yr Kinnocks, Streetings etc, have pretty much tanked their reputations with a lot of the people who'll end up voting for Smith as well as the wider party.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 19 September 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

It's almost as if the people in Wales who voted Brexit didn't do so because of UKIP, but because the people who benefited most from EU projects in Wales were the already quite privileged relatives of people like Neil Kinnock and Dai Smith.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 19 September 2016 08:36 (seven years ago) link

Must hear Mason's Any Questions !

the pinefox, Monday, 19 September 2016 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Mason popped up also at the very end of a Guardian essay on the new left - the journo said she liked everyone else but fiery Mason scared her.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 September 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

There is a kind of aggressive proselytism that's harder to excuse in people who aren't at the sharp end of inequality

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 September 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

he was very polite and accommodating to Angela Eagle on Any Questions, but idk how he acts in less public situations

calzino, Monday, 19 September 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

What is his evidence that Corbyn can’t provide the necessary leadership in opposition? And even if that proves compelling, was nine months really enough time before MPs tried to oust a politician elected by the party’s membership?

“I wasn’t in favour of there being a challenge,” says Smith quickly. “But once a challenge had been made then I felt I needed to stand because I felt that I had something to say about the future of the Labour party, and a lot of other people in the PLP [parliamentary Labour party] felt that about me, which is why they asked me to stand.”

So Smith would have preferred to see Corbyn allowed to carry on for longer?

“Yes, is the honest answer,” he says.

Not that this is an admission of regret about his bid to topple the sitting leader.

“The truth is, things weren’t going well, things aren’t going well. Nine months may be a short period of time but it’s a period of time in which the Labour party has gone backwards,” he says. “We are at a lower ebb than we’ve been in the polls at any time since 1982, and we’re six years into a Tory government and right now they are unfettered, they feel able to act with total impunity.”

Matt DC, Monday, 19 September 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

solid, unwavering, statesmanlike performance from the boy smith there

a very in-your-face, hard-edged machine bottom (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 September 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

That's either staggeringly inept for someone hoping to unseat him, or he's just given up now.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 September 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

'i didn't like the idea of a challenge but then the plp asked me to stand so i did but jeremy should have carried on for longer but despite that we were going backwards and something something tories and that is what i did on my holidays can i go to the bathroom now miss please i've been bursting for hours'

a very in-your-face, hard-edged machine bottom (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 September 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

Delightful Moyesian wordplay. Sounds like he's given up.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 19 September 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

the terrible Kinnock article is here btw: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/19/cure-divided-britain-managed-immigration-work-permits

would have more respect for them if they just came out and said "the case against freedom of movement is based on reactionary nativism and is economically incoherent, but immigration is really unpopular with people whose votes we need to ever to get into government again, and frankly we think that arguing for it is a losing battle, so we're just going to admit defeat on this one". instead you get all this day-is-night blather about how our "openess" as a country isn't compromised by letting fewer ppl in, and how copying UKIP policies is actually "rooted in leftwing values". (I'm sure that the Corbynite wing of Labour does not spend half as much time droning on about "leftwing values" as the right does- does this phrase ever get used apart from when someone needs to justify something awful?)

in other depressing "Labour right responds to brext" news, this has just been published as well today as well: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2016/09/rachel-reeves-mp-ending-free-movement-should-be-red-line-labour-post-brexit

both are chapters from this, apparently: http://www.fabians.org.uk/publications/facing-the-unknown/

soref, Monday, 19 September 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Rachel Reeves is so terrible. I presume she isn't stupid, and knows that communities like the one she represents are likely to be decimated by withdrawal from the single market, but hey it's better to just compartmentalise the short-termist bit.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 September 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

"...We are at a lower ebb than we’ve been in the polls at any time since 1982.."

This isn't true, fwiw, things were much worse under Gordon Brown

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 19 September 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Really?

Matt DC, Monday, 19 September 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

He's given up but is slyly asking for a shadow cabinet post is what I suspect that OS thing is about

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 19 September 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

You can get 20/1 on him beating Corbyn at this stage so he knows the game is up. I think he'd like another crack at it in a few years and wants to be in the clear with the voting membership.

Remarkable that immigration seems to be the only thing they have in their pocket. They aren't going to win votes from it and they aren't going to be able to implement anything so the only effect it'll have is to boost May in her attempts to justify imposing harsh restrictions on EU migrants.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 19 September 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

The gall of any Brit, PM especially, to revert to the old 'should claim asylum in the first country you arrive at' chestnut.

nashwan, Monday, 19 September 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

Really?

Yep, for three or four months in the summer of 2008 the gap was enormous - Tories 20% ahead on average with some polls putting the difference nearer to 30%. It narrowed a bit after that, but was almost as bad again the following summer.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 19 September 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

I occasionally wonder why Carswell hasn't either taken over as leader of UKIP or been ushered back into the Conservative Party, but...

https://twitter.com/kevverage/status/778139865493958658

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 20 September 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

Post-Miliband, pre-Corbyn Labour policymaking basically amounts to 'do a survey -> read the results -> adopt whatever people are talking the loudest about regardless of whether you believe in it or have really thought it through'. Say what you will about Blair but he was a lot more sophisticated than this shower.

I'm not exactly enamoured by Corbyn's 'make up some shit on the hoof whenever you're asked a question' approach either, but at least you know he actually believes it.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

Wait is it true that Labour has somehow contrived to purge away its majority on Bristol City Council?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

yes

http://www.bristol247.com/channel/news-comment/daily/politics/bristol-labour-party-hit-by-suspensions

The suspensions leave Labour with 34 councillors in City Hall - one below what is needed for an overall majority.

soref, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Anyone else think they may have suspended enough by now to steal the vote?

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 20 September 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

I might have a nibble on that 20/1 if it is still there

calzino, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

So like what does happen when Owen Smith and Donald Trump get in over the next few months.
Does everything line up for the rapture or something?

Stevolende, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

if the PLP managed to steal this I will be very drunk and on suicide watch, business as usual really! According to the YouGov poll they would have to ban a shitload of people to win it, probably more than they have the resources and time to ban. But you never know what these fuckers are capable of, especially when they are becoming increasingly desperate.

calzino, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 11:59 (seven years ago) link

The purges and reasons given for them have that air of erratic desperation that suggests they lack both sufficient data on new supporters and members and sufficient confidence in Smith. BBC offers some useful figures here - 105,598 £3 supporters for Corbyn last year. Would love to know how many of them are now voting Smith against how many have been purged but can't see either figure getting up to half of 100k. Could be wrong hope not.

nashwan, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 12:08 (seven years ago) link

The purge purpose may be more damage limitation in trying to ensure that the overall turnout isn't greater than last year's - would be understandable if you take the membership surge this year as an indication of support for Corbyn.

nashwan, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

Honestly I think a competent candidate who members believed could actually win an election could probably have beaten Corbyn, but both Smith and Eagle were very obviously neither of those things.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

I was charmed by the Eagle/Mason interactions on Any Questions, particularly when she was yicked out by the idea of skinny-dipping Nigel Farage.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 20 September 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

didn't Tim Farron have Fuck The Police unexpectedly blasting out of his phone recently or something? I don't think aligning himself with Blair '97 is going win him much ground, either in terms wooing battle weary Blairite MPs or connecting with the tiny part of the electorate that actually still gives a fuck what a Lib-Dem clown says.

calzino, Tuesday, 20 September 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

For a lot of Labour MPs, switching to the LibDems would be tantamount to just resigning their seat at the next election, it's a non-starter.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 September 2016 08:56 (seven years ago) link

Labour's Jonathan Reynolds joins team legitimate concerns:

The Remain-campaigning Reynolds told HuffPost UK that people’s “genuine emotional concerns” about uncontrolled immigration cannot be dealt with just by pointing to reports and statistics which talk up the economic benefit of freedom of movement.

In a dig at colleagues such as Chuka Umunna who are calling for the Government to try and negotiate a compromise over freedom of movement in a Brexit deal, Reynolds said a “tweak” to the status quo “would not wash with people.”

His comments come days after three other high profile Labour MPs – Rachel Reeves, Emma Reynolds and Steven Kinnock – all called for an end to free movement to the UK.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-freedom-of-movement-jonathan-reynolds_uk_57e2be9ee4b0db20a6e82ba3?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:28 (seven years ago) link

morbidly curious which way Owen Smith jumps on this issue once his leadership challenge finally limps to its conclusion

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

Do the "no free movement" guys have a coherent economic framework that supports their position or are they just racist dicks?

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

Reynolds and Kinnock jr both pretty much explicitly admit that there's no economic case against freedom of movement, but voters are "concerned" about it so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. (also in Kinnock jr's case there is a weird "we have to be a bit racist to placate slighty-racist voters who would otherwise start being REALLY REALLY racist" argument.)

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

Reynolds again:

“And that’s not always about personal impact on wages or personal impact on their community it is about a concern about what is, frankly, a record level of immigration to the UK and concerns about our ability as a nation to absorb that scale of immigration.

so if the concern is NOT about wages, or the impact on their community (by which I guess he means things like pressure on public services, housing etc), what does that leave exactly?

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

lol it very well might be "very genuine concerns about our nation's ability to not be racist dicks" which is a kind of pro-level concern trolling

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

actually, he's just made himself even clearer on twitter just now:

Dirk Singer ‏@dirktherabbit
One final question @jreynoldsMP if I may. Do you *personally* believe EU migrants are a strain on the job market & public services


Jonathan Reynolds ‏@jreynoldsMP
@dirktherabbit No. But I can recognise the desire to see immigration controlled and that concerns are cultural as well as economic

also agrees with Stephen Kinnock's argument that "to deny the reality of white working class people, quite frankly, smacks of ‘class privilege’."

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

is there a credible argument that "cultural concerns" is anything other that a weaselly euphemism for racism + xenophobia? what would that argument look like?

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

It's literally just the perceived racism of the working classes. There are a million things affecting 'community feeling' in deprived areas they've ignored or cheered on for decades - from the decline of traditional local industries to cuts to communal council resources to the ongoing encouragement to demonise each other as less deserving of assistance - none of which they appear to be interested in fixing now. They've just decided that everyone outside of the fancy bits is a diehard racist and pandering to that imagined sentiment will turn the clock back to 1960.

There was an interesting suggestion that the Tories are planning to plough huge amounts of 'financial aid' into the Visegrad countries as an attempt to bribe them into not doing this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37396805

idk how well that would go down in the UK or Poland.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

this "large numbers of voters feel this way and we must respect their wishes" stuff feels borderline Powell-esque at times:

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

there's obviously an argument that gentrification (for example) is (at least partly) a "cultural concern" (rather than a purely class concern) -- but this is the wing of the party that has embraced development-as-renewal most uncritically, while undermining extant versions of planning*, local or country-wide, which were accessible to democratic oversight and discussion

*not that these have ever been unflawed: cf our friends in the north etc

mark s, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

The most sober arg you will get from MigrationWatch, News Corps etc. is that no free movement is the best chance at cutting net migration down by their desired 80% (over, what is it? 10 years?). It's their fantasy of a nation such as Britain remaining economically and perhaps even infra-structurally strong(er), yet magically repellent to more than 30-60,000 people a year (and that's just 'skilled workers'). Possibly within that they think/hope racial harassment and scapegoating dissipates - more likely they don't give a shit as long as they just see fewer foreigners everywhere.

nashwan, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

'working class reality'!

there have been plenty of arguments over the effect of immigration on 'social cohesion'. there's one famous study (from the US) which purported to show that more diverse communities had lower levels of trust across the board (inc. within ethnic groups) and this has been seized upon by the likes of david goodhart but ofc there's a study (from london) showing the exact opposite, with no one entirely clear what trust or social cohesion mean

ogmor, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:43 (seven years ago) link

it's interesting to see how the Labour right is split on this issue; Progress have recently published a few articles defending freedom of movement and criticising the Reeves/Kinnock/Reynolds×2 position

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2016/09/19/no-compromise-with-reality/

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2016/09/22/labour-must-stand-by-the-single-market/

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

(lol at Angell's argument that if the left hadn't opposed ID cards we might still be in the EU)

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

Accusing all white working class people of being racist is the kind of ignorant stereotyping you'd expect from people with real contempt for the working class, not from Labour MPs oh never mind

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 September 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

"She was just a sort of bigoted woman who said she used to be Labour"

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Rachelwikinew.jpg/220px-Rachelwikinew.jpg

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 September 2016 12:23 (seven years ago) link

I can well believe they have people banging on about immigration at them constantly fwiw, it's the question of whether you take that at face value or you actually try and do something about the underlying reasons. This might just be impossible territory for Labour, I dunno.

Matt DC, Thursday, 22 September 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

It shouldn't be impossible for the PLP's conviction free marketeers unless they think the electorate is best lied to

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 September 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Umunna also now saying that he backs end to freedom of movement, even if that means leaving single market:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/chuka-umunna-single-market-free-movement-brexit_uk_57e3e201e4b0db20a6e8b057?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

who is there in the PLP who has come out in favour of freedom of movement and single market membership? David Lammy, anyone else? Obviously the Corbynite wing of the party is sceptical of freedom of movement and single market as well. Clive Lewis has said some good stuff in the past about the importance of immigration to UK economy and futility of trying to mimic UKIP's policies.

soref, Thursday, 22 September 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

fuck this party. all of them. except Lammy.

tongue and cheek (stevie), Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

This is proving to be an excellent barometer of the general cowardliness of our politicians. They clearly know that leaving the single market will be a disaster but hey fuck it, most people don't even understand what the single market is whereas everyone knows what an immigrant is, so just go with it and worry about the consequences later.

May appears to be moving very cautiously on this issue, probably because she'll be the one actually carrying the can for the clusterfuck that would follow.

This whole thing is an excellent illustration of the danger of promising things without taking account how you're actually going to get there. There appears to be no way of actually implementing Brexit without either trashing the economy or pissing a lot of people of.

Matt DC, Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

Not "appears", there *is* no way. It's always been a fetish/fantasy. It's the closest I've seen in real life to the emperor's new clothes, tbh

stet, Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Basically the Labour party is, on the whole, stuck replaying the minutes after Gordon Brown was caught (correctly) calling that woman a racist for eternity, like some grim Groundhog Day.

tongue and cheek (stevie), Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

May appears to be moving very cautiously on this issue, probably because she'll be the one actually carrying the can for the clusterfuck that would follow.

Yes, the strategy seems to be 'hold May to account for the inevitably disappointing-to-the-hard-right failure to cut immigration to five figures even if you know that successfully cutting immigration to five figures would be a disaster'.

It's disgraceful short-termism and isn't even going to work - xenophobes aren't going to rush to Labour because they'll never believe the rhetoric.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

Can genuinely see myself voting lib-dem at this rate.

tongue and cheek (stevie), Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

Bit too busy to frame the question right now but I was thinking earlier today of starting a "T.May: subtle macchiavellian or hopelessly out depth" thread

pretext for it was this: https://cpianalysis.org/2016/09/20/hinkley-c-power-project-offers-a-lesson-in-how-not-to-deal-with-china/
(the hollowing out of senior civil service competence is actually a cross-party blunder but this was apparently precipitated by a key advisor of may's)

also this by Robert Peston re May's decision to make The Disgraced Liam Fox head of a dept for international trade: https://www.facebook.com/pestonitv/posts/1697230203935051
(where the error is actually the title of the department and not that she picked Mr Disgraced to head it)

I generally agree that she has been super-cautious but both these are unforced errors -- also faint but scary pre-echoes sounding in the shipping and shipping finance markets to add to the many burdens of economic life outside the single market (viz the means to get stuff to and from can, aus, nz, china etc soon likely to be much pricier)
:( :( :(

mark s, Thursday, 22 September 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

the rhetoric of Kinnock jr and pals boils down to "we are listening to you fucking idiotic racists" while feigning a soap actor's concerned face. Which is just another (but with added condescension) version of the "we can do austerity as harsh as the tories" line that failed them in the last election. People who want nasty or racist are more likely to vote Tory or UKIP these days, albeit probably in dwindling numbers for the latter. Too many of the PLP are smug degenerates who seem to suffer from some kind of lobotomised "we are the good guys" delusion, whilst being transparently unscrupulous. I mean this is just imo, but I do think even the most politically indifferent of the electorate these days have an awareness of the current lack of ideology and therefore trustworthiness of the Labour right.

calzino, Thursday, 22 September 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

I do think even the most politically indifferent of the electorate these days have an awareness of the current lack of ideology and therefore trustworthiness of the Labour right.

I think in the later days of Blair up until 2010 a lot of people would have generally shrugged when asked the question "what is Labour for?" And that would have been inconceivable even a decade earlier.

Matt DC, Thursday, 22 September 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

Wanted to quote Polly Toynbee's list of glorious new Labour achievements as a response to your post but fuck it, too depressing

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Brexiteers: "Soon we'll have the freedom to do deals and trade with whoever we want in the wider world!"
The wind, gently whispering: "How did EU membership affect the Hinkley C deal and its quality or indeed lack of either way?"
Brexiteers: "STFU you're not even from here."

nashwan, Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

from what i understand hinkley is essentially a UK bailout of EDF. given that EDF own ALL the other nuclear reactors in britain, which account for approx a fifth of UK energy generation, they have May over a barrel. "you want to drop this deal? fine - have your ancient, vastly expensive reactors back and good luck decommissioning them and finding a way to replace the energy they generate"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

is there a credible argument that "cultural concerns" is anything other that a weaselly euphemism for racism + xenophobia? what would that argument look like?

imo it's very difficult to separate legit cultural concerns from xenophobia, because the concerns tend to include a clause that says 'immigrants have magic powers to change a town or district beyond recognition in the space of one generation'. Which always sounds bullshitty to me? Dunno?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

what are "legit" cultural concerns?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Arranged marriages might be one, I suppose? Traditional African or Asian parents rejecting their kids thru homophobia? These things go on, but then the idea that they go on enough to be a concern (one that should affect immigration policy) also sounds bullshitty

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

Forced marriages not arranged. Pointing to misogyny or homophobia as symptoms of "other" cultures is always eyebrow-raising anyway

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

Yup

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

The Foreign Secretary chips in:

https://mobile.twitter.com/faisalislam/status/779017614286880769

Idk if I have mentioned it in the past but the media coverage of the Brain family, who have simply refused to acknowledge UK immigration law and been indulged by the Home Office for months, probably points to the direction they'll try to move in - opening up more spaces for the right kind of white people (Australians, Canadians, Americans, maybe French and Germans etc) and restricting the wrong kind (Poles, Bulgarians, etc).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-37421599

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

Islam is right though - tough to have close trade deals with the wider world and shut the door on immigration from outside the EU.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

opening up more spaces for the right kind of white people (Australians, Canadians, Americans, maybe French and Germans etc) and restricting the wrong kind (Poles, Bulgarians, etc).

I'm guessing that some brown people will be acceptable, e.g., highly educated middle class Indians - as long as they're not Muslim of course.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

The lack of IT expertise in the UK makes that inevitable, though I suspect that'll slow,y change.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Still not sure who will be doing all the shitty jobs for shitty money though, that asparagus in Cambridgeshire won't pick itself y'know.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

Seasonal workers with no rights - Ukrainians pick half if it now.

The situation with Indians is an odd one as the government has responded reasonably quickly to a business demand for skilled tech people but, at the same time, signposted a lot of hostility to Indian students / made it virtually impossible for them to stay on after degrees. The majority are post-grads with lots in areas the UK has struggled to train people in (engineering, natural sciences, etc).

It's good news for the rest of the EU, though. I was speaking to someone from the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst last week and they reckon every post-grad they can recruit and retain will mean four more jobs in the German economy on average.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

Earlier part of the Faisal Islam tweet-story on BJ says he still insisting that it's entirely obvious that the EU will soon recognise it's in their interests to split the single market issue from freedom of movement issue. Wait to see whether May lets this go unchallenged or slaps Boris down, maybe, before I start my TMay thread…

mark s, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

I was speaking to someone from the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst last week and they reckon every post-grad they can recruit and retain will mean four more jobs in the German economy on average.

What about the rival 'legitimate concerns' over there re migrant influx?

nashwan, Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

aiui, and I know very little, there is a broad understanding that skilled migration is essential to maintain the economy but the position of semi-skilled EU workers (and, increasingly, refugees) is much more ambiguous.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

TMay has already slapped Johnson down in the FT. So that's all three Brexit ministers slapped for talking about Brexit.

stet, Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

I actually did one of them crop cutting jobs in about '92 -93 ish for about 6 months. There was a minimum wage for agricultural workers at the time which was a whopping £3.83 ph - which isn't a problem when you are still living in yr mum's house, but it was also sometimes boosted by double pay or time and a half for o/t etc. Shit money, but in the realm of shit jobs 25 years ago - that was actually above average. I'd imagine these days the unfortunate people that do this type of work are infinitely worse off than back then.

I thought these Tories liked "strivers", these folks are dogging hard in all types of weather for shit money and all they get is lying demagogues demonising them and trying to legitimise anti-Slavic hate for their own short-term gains.

calzino, Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

The flip side of that is the idea that Eastern European workers wouldn't have to take on so much manual work if the British weren't so indolent, etc. If, by any chance, immigration is severely curtailed expect a renewed push to force people into low-paid work, off disability allowance, into unpaid work schemes, etc.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

It wouldn't surprise me at all, and pushing disabled people onto unpaid work schemes would pander to the "making work pay" narrative they love so much and also probably finish off loads more of them.

Looking back the Crops company I worked for (Huntapac) must have had major recruitment problems, because they were based in Preston and had crews working from all over the place in the North. Scousers, Woolybacks and from all over Yorkshire and Lancashire all travelling to sites at least an hour or two away. But yeah, the Tories also love that punishment narrative against the working classes. "It's all your fault you lazy bastards, so take your medicine"

calzino, Thursday, 22 September 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

Yes, to which they can now add 'you told us you wanted to do the jobs immigrants were doing, so go and do them'. It's one of the more rarely acknowledged issues with unfairly putting the blame for the economic consequences of ending freedom of movement on disadvantaged communities - we all know who is going to be strongarmed into picking up any perceived slack.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 22 September 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

OTM

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 22 September 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

FWIW I do wonder what happens when sizeable numbers of UKIP voters realise that the glorious British jobs for British workers future they'd envisaged involves throwing dead chickens onto a conveyor belt all day.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 September 2016 08:19 (seven years ago) link

It does look like a huge opportunity for Labour to outline why jobs are not enough - the decline in pay / terms and conditions, the ongoing casualisation of labour, the decline in union strength, the massive over concentration of opportunities in the south east, etc all need to be looked at as well.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 23 September 2016 08:38 (seven years ago) link

Remain should have made a grimy Hard To Be A God style video of a British worker covered in chicken guts and shit, looking very much like a scene from medieval serfdom. "I hope you are going to be as grateful to do these shit jobs as our EU friends are"

calzino, Friday, 23 September 2016 08:45 (seven years ago) link

just saw a tweet from the resolution foundation that more than a third of private renters aren't even registered to vote (which given precariousness of rental sector isn't a surprise: much too much else to think about, basically, esp.if you feel voting won't make a difference)

can't see all this being solved without a significant return to the equivalent of post-war planning, local, national, europe-wide, global -- a *huge* ask in an era so (justifiably) sceptical of technocrats, but also an urgent one… "let the market decide" being in a sense the (whispered: despairing) response to a mounting truculent demand for democratic involvement (if usually a select involvement)

mark s, Friday, 23 September 2016 08:53 (seven years ago) link

It does look like a huge opportunity for Labour

Aha. Ha.

Ahahahahahahahaha

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 23 September 2016 09:00 (seven years ago) link

xp, well we've no shortage of technocrats at the moment- they tend to be the ones most insistent that 'the market will decide'.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 23 September 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

can't see all this being solved without a significant return to the equivalent of post-war planning, local, national, europe-wide, global

This is certainly correct. Unfortunately it's going to need another global war to arrive there.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 23 September 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I wasn't making a pro-technocrat argument -- but what exact shape the politics of re-combining authoritative specialist expertise with full-bore* democratic involvement is going to take I literally have no idea (and I don't think anyone else has, either).

*(i.e. not "genuine concerns"-style selective)

mark s, Friday, 23 September 2016 09:11 (seven years ago) link

just saw a tweet from the resolution foundation that more than a third of private renters aren't even registered to vote (which given precariousness of rental sector isn't a surprise: much too much else to think about, basically, esp.if you feel voting won't make a difference)

This is a big factor in the boundary changes in London, iirc. They count registered voters and not population when reviewing how many seats an area gets.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 23 September 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

The market will decide. It will (sensibly) decide not to bother with Britain.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 September 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

there's a small part of me which sees all this as the very long-rising payback for the fuckery of empire* -- we rose to "greatness" on the back of centuries of exciting piratical robbery with menaces, two-thirds of the globe coloured red, sun never sets and blood never dries -- and now (as a distant but direct consequence of the structure of deceit and reward that involved) we've placed ourselves in the worst POSSIBLE position for negotiation with the ENTIRE world, a busted flush, our diplomatic strengths reduced to pitiful clownish bluster, and no one beyond these islands cares (and many are glad)

the ugly side of this -- as self-loathing schadenfreude, if you like -- is who's really going to suffer as a consequence

mark s, Friday, 23 September 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

*haha the asterisk was to a digression about the TUDORS (= it is all the fault of jonathan rhys myers and his cankered p3nis) but i will spare you that on this thread

mark s, Friday, 23 September 2016 09:37 (seven years ago) link

Britain is the ageing divorcee of the world, confidently swiping right on more attractive countries half its age, not asking itself why no one's reciprocating.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 September 2016 09:45 (seven years ago) link

fit as fuck back it the day tho. Old celebrities you would travel back in time to have lots of trade deals with

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 23 September 2016 10:12 (seven years ago) link

first ministerial resignation: http://uk.businessinsider.com/former-goldman-sachs-economist-jim-oneill-quits-treasury-2016-9

(jim o'neill, from the treasury, over hinckley point, grammar schools, northern powerhouse issue)

mark s, Friday, 23 September 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

Good quote from Schulz:

"I refuse to imagine a Europe where lorries/hedge funds are free to cross borders but citizens cannot"

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Friday, 23 September 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

mark s and Matt DC on fire today!

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 23 September 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Former Justice secretary Michael Gove has upped the pressure on Theresa May to back a £100million replacement for the Royal Yacht Britannia by joining score of Tory MPs supporting the idea.

Mr Gove is one of 75 Conservative backbenchers who have signed a letter to the Prime Minister urging her to set up a commission to examine how the new yacht can be funded.

The Daily Telegraph has launched a campaign to return a modern-day version of HMY Britannia to the seas to help secure trade deals once Britain has left the European Union.

Yassssssss

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:18 (seven years ago) link

is that a joke?

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

the boat i mean...

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

Apparently not.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:20 (seven years ago) link

Gunyacht Diplomacy

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

I can think of no better statement that Britain is open for business than making the Cutty Sark seaworthy again.

Matt DC, Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:26 (seven years ago) link

if we hung even a few criminals it would show that the empire has not lost its steel

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

surely the annexation of a minor Caribbean island would be a signal to the rest of the world

you can't drowned a duck (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

Gunboats circling Millport in case Sturgeon gets too big for her boots.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:40 (seven years ago) link

EU finance ministers openly mocking BJ

mark s, Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

"If he likes I can read it to him in simple English"

mark s, Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

hey Gove is described as an "intellectual heavyweight" by such alumni as John Redwood, his radical ideas are obviously on a higher level than us mere plebs.

calzino, Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Let's sail a 50ft statue of Wayne Rooney into Bombay Harbour.

Matt DC, Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

let's recommission john terry

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

"The vessel is estimated to have helped secure £3 billion of trade deals between 1991 and 1995."

Not sure about the veracity of this from the Telegraph, who are also backing the campaign. I bet some of these Russian oligarchs have more impressive and expensive yachts anyway, be a cheaper option to rent a model that doesn't evoke colonial arrogance if you are trying to win friends.

calzino, Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

I assume that is a generous estimate of the total value of PR jaunts made by the queen and the fact that some of them were made by boat means it 'contributed'.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Saturday, 24 September 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

I suppose it's more glamorous than hiring a lot of new civil servants and diplomates and whoever else it is who sorts out trade deals but you'd think that would be the priority

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 24 September 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

"We need to find an alternative that means we can stay in the single market, but stop free movement as we know it"

Amazing nobody has thought of this before, Chuka.

The last poll I saw had the Lib Dems down one point to 8%. If they can not get a bump in the current circumstances, I'm not sure when it will ever happen.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Sunday, 25 September 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37469047

i see absolutely no way this is going to happen. Brexit is going to be an unprecedented economic disaster for the UK, one that is self-inflicted and entirely avoidable. any decent opposition party would be fighting it. Spreading fairy tales promising to match the spending (with what?) is irresponsible and will fool nobody.

tongue and cheek (stevie), Monday, 26 September 2016 08:04 (seven years ago) link

Matching EU structural funding was a key promise of the Leave camp and something that Johnson was personally committed to. This is presumably designed to put additional pressure on May to follow through with it.

£9.3bn over the course of seven years is eminently doable. Whether Labour should be 'fighting Brexit' rather than trying to influence its shape is another question, though.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 26 September 2016 08:23 (seven years ago) link

They can probably do both, what with the actual government pursuing contradictory policies at the moment.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:10 (seven years ago) link

The last poll I saw had the Lib Dems down one point to 8%. If they can not get a bump in the current circumstances, I'm not sure when it will ever happen.

b-but what about all the journalists and solicitors and tech start-up guys on twitter who are joining!

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:11 (seven years ago) link

quote rather than bold

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:11 (seven years ago) link

i think the lib dems just did p well in a by-election, or possibly a council election (which labour won w/increased vote but LDs were second w/*massively* increased vote, a lot of it from tories apparently)

^^^caveat, i don't remember where, it was just a tweet i saw

mark s, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

Seems to be a lot of anti-May briefing going on at the moment from the 'Cameron camp'.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:25 (seven years ago) link

I'm assuming Osborne still wants to be Prime Minister one day.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:26 (seven years ago) link

... ha, I see there's another thread on it!

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

I find the idea instinctively risible, but then I remember that you could have made a lot of money in 2003 betting on IDS having 6 years in Cabinet ahead of him (and nearly Boris's Chancellor if not for the double-headed dildo that is Michael Gove).

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:33 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't rule out Osborne looking like a safe pair of hands in three or four years. The City still loves him.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 26 September 2016 09:35 (seven years ago) link

in a field where literally everyone's damaged i think osborne's in a curiously strong position

(obv assumes tmay damage to emerge in coming months -- see tmay thread)

mark s, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, it hadn't struck me he still wants it, but it makes sense and he doesn't look too bad - after that first few days of post-referendum invisibility, he came out & managed to give the impression of being the only politician who was actually doing stuff.

woof, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

Yeah no my advice is never ever to trust my instincts :)

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:53 (seven years ago) link

He might have trouble getting through the party-in-the-shires vote though. They'd rather go for a piece of dogshit with 'brexit now' taped to it.

woof, Monday, 26 September 2016 09:58 (seven years ago) link

omg "portillo: the longest long game, so tanned, so rested, so ready" :0

^^^hyper-challopsy theory of mine basically since MP's first arrival on TV

mark s, Monday, 26 September 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

Also he's visited a lot of Tory heartlands on the train these last few years

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Monday, 26 September 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

Pledges 2 nationalize rail in bold 'Nixon in China' gambit

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 26 September 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

vote-winner among customers of southern rail imo

mark s, Monday, 26 September 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

post-brexit, i can't see voters lining up to welcome a filthy spaniard's son as pm

the devastation is very important to me (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 26 September 2016 11:54 (seven years ago) link

looks like we need to reset team Corbyn's "days without a self-inflicted PR disaster" scoreboard back to zero again

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/review/79326/clive-lewis-trident-speech-changed-seumas-milne

soref, Monday, 26 September 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

[CONTROVERSIAL MILNE EDIT]

soref, Monday, 26 September 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

If the Corbyn team sidelined Seumas Milne it would play really well with the Westminster bubble - but they'd need him replaced with someone like Owen Jones, who used to work for McDonnell, anyway.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 26 September 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

If the Corbyn team sidelined Seumas Milne it would play really well with the Westminster bubble everyone except Mr Milne

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 26 September 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

You can't have anyone in that role whose loyalty is in the slightest doubt. Tho maybe Corbyn should offer a job in his team to David Cameron for the lols- extensive experience in PR and at the top of British politics, at a loose end right now.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 26 September 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

Poor track record though.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 26 September 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

Tough call for me whether him or Milne is more of a tosser tho

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Monday, 26 September 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

Etonian v. Wykehamist. Take yer pick.

Bottlerockey (Tom D.), Monday, 26 September 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

I'm just a simple working class oaf tbh, they're all " my betters" to me

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Monday, 26 September 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

May or may not be paywalled but an interesting response from the FT to the McDonnell speech:

https://www.ft.com/content/afad36c4-83d7-11e6-8897-2359a58ac7a5?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct

The gist is that it was not particularly radical but seems a fairly moderate set of proposals for tackling a couple of the country's core problems.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 12:35 (seven years ago) link

I thought more would be made of the eternally useless twat Milne's latest gaffe today, especially from the PLP. Mind you as soon as Lewis starts bigging up the armed forces everyone across the political spectrum starts nodding and blindly making "powerful stuff" type comments en masse and whatever else happens gets lost.

calzino, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

Not to be Cap'n Save-a-milne, but do we know for sure it was his fuck up? Sounds like it might have been carelessness on Corbyn's part, skim-reading or not reading the speech before signing it off, then having it belatedly pointed out to him.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

if it was Corbyn's mistake all the more reason he needs to replace Milne with someone competent who should be shadowing everything he does and heading off these things before they become full blown incidents.

calzino, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

according to Stephen Bush:

My understanding is that Milne was not freelancing but acting on clear instruction. Although Team Corbyn are well aware a nuclear deal could ease the path for the wider project, they also know that trying to get Corbyn to strike a pose he doesn’t agree with is a self-defeating task.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/09/why-clive-lewis-was-furious-when-trident-pledge-went-missing-his-speech

meanwhile, Rachel Reeves is echoing the Nigel Farage line that we need to restrict immigration to prevent race riots, also whinging about being called "Red Ukip"

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/rachel-reeves-brexit-immigration-riots_uk_57ea791ee4b00e5804ef5ae0

soref, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

It's weird how making the case for immigration is never on the to do list of these people

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Oh bless she said legitimate concerns

"there has been a spate of legitimate concerns attacks in my constituency"

"my colleague Jo Cox was killed by a legitimate concernist"

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

Not surprised Rachel Reeves is really upset and angry at being called 'red'.

Odysseus, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/Tom_Gann/status/780814926776532996/photo/1

Too far even for John Harris.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

nah Harris automatically retweets anything with the words "Enoch Powell" in it

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

irl lol

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

I am sure people who are struggling to get by in Reeves constituency will have sleepless nights thinking about freedom of movement in the EU + UK, especially when the root of all their problems is austerity which she has consistently supported.

Ugh! Tom Watson's speech is x-rated

PLP have sneaked 2 more onto the NEC, this is all getting so depressing I feel like switching it off indefinitely.

calzino, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Reeves of blood lol

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

I am only 15 miles down the road from her constituency and 3 times in the last 5 years these England First type morons have tried to light this "tinderbox" she alludes to, every time has been a non-event. Despite these Reeves types predicting race riots. The only thing of note from these events was that one of the idiots from the gaggle of England First protesters, who would no doubt agree with what Reeves says on immigrants, would later murder an MP in cold blood.

calzino, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

"It's what Jo['s killer] would have wanted"

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

No doubt she will claim Rachel Discrimination

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2016/09/28/rachel-reeves-comments-on-immigration-could-encourage-hate-a

Odysseus, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

"more in common [with Hitler] than that which divides us"

calzino, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Er surely Jackie Walker has to go?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

She is making Ken Livingstone look good atm

calzino, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Yep, get rid, great way for this woman to mark Holocaust Memorial Day.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

Both Walker and Reeves should be kicked out.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

There was some grudging acceptance that Corbyn's speech was good. Its not their politics, and the 'electrifying delivery' brigade were in full force (no JC doesn't look or sound like you bland grads fuck off) but ppl are giving it an easier time, possibly because no mass of intervention could move Corbyn. Pretty much the only game in town for Labour for the next 18 months or so at the least.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

So happy at the immigration line, especially after the racist claptrap from the likes of Reeves.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

^^^^^^

conrad, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

Momentum/Cobynista types I follow on twitter etc seem fairly unanimous in their opinion that Walker should go, I don't know if this is an actual consensus though, or just the consensus in my self-selected bubble?

soref, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Yes

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Was an xp but either way. This is what we're fighting against

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely. Reeves inflammatory hate speak (albeit disguised as concern) is just as appalling as Walker's horrible outbursts. Both of these idiots are not fit for the party.

calzino, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah, I took it for granted that pretty much everyone on ilx would agree with that. I was thinking more along the lines of what level of support Walker still has among Momentum members in general

soref, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

goysplaining

About 925 results (0.28 seconds)

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

FFF ‏@UKIPBIackpool 4h4 hours ago

Cut my Labour Membership Card into pieces
This is my last resort

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

FFF ‏@UKIPBIackpool 4h4 hours ago

Snap Election
Wes Streeting
Got Ejected From
The Local CLP Meeting

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

this is p full-throated full-throated (partly driven by oborne's loathing of blair of course)

mark s, Thursday, 29 September 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

he is right to loathe Blair and right about Corbyn's mandate

i bill everything i duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 September 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

corbyn interview with oborne and david hearst from a month ago, mainly on foreign policy (this may have been linked before -- apologies if so)

mark s, Thursday, 29 September 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

Coming to post that. Fucking Hannan is the slipperiest, most odious, most cunt of all the Brexiters.

stet, Thursday, 29 September 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Jesus, what a repulsive cast of characters in that piece.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 September 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

“It passes by as the idle wind that I respect not”

0_o

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 September 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

not sure how well sam kriss goes down on ilx but I agree with him on the (never spoken) terrifying incoherence and unpredictability of how people vote and the concomitant desperate pretentiousness behind the obsession with electability
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/labour-and-electability-sam-kriss

ogmor, Friday, 30 September 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

It's a good article but I don't know why he's surprised that people love Corbin less than his policies - the papers have been against him since Day 1, and people as he says trust personalities over people kit is - if he does do that thing you like, he'll do it wrong because he's Wrong.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 30 September 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

I don't know whether papers have been against him since Day 1 explains it. Its a number of things. Corbyn doesn't look like a leader and (he would admit this) wasn't meant to be one.

Was just reading that piece. I kinda like Sam although he wastes energy attacking Nick Cohen or some shit bag easy target but there is a feeling that doing the thinking and doing the doing are a problem for him, me, all of us - which is why his stuff on Harambe and flat earthers reads so much better to me.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 30 September 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/30/labour-suspends-jackie-walker-over-holocaust-comments

But former London mayor Ken Livingstone defended some of Walker’s comments, saying “there’s a difference between ignorance and antisemitism”.

AARGH SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

soref, Friday, 30 September 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

I mean, I know ppl keep asking him about this stuff, but would it kill him to just say "no comment"? who does he think he's helping at this point?

soref, Friday, 30 September 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

they both seem to have the same anti-Israel state virus that goes way beyond casual anti-semitism, it is like they are fucking possessed.

calzino, Friday, 30 September 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

cf swathes of SWP-influenced leftists

Still D.U.C.K. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 1 October 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

Article 50 will be triggered by March 2017, according to May.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 2 October 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

stoked for the madness

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 October 2016 09:09 (seven years ago) link

Lee Westwood would approve.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 2 October 2016 09:14 (seven years ago) link

good luck UK

minimal hat spiritualism (seandalai), Sunday, 2 October 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

it still might not happen

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 2 October 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

pma

conrad, Sunday, 2 October 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I keep wondering if May is being all "yep, Brexit, gonna do that on April 1st" to stir the moneyed interests in the UK that will suffer to do what they can to change the "conversation" and ease an exit from Brexit somehow. But this is probably wishful thinking on my part and May is going to steer the country into Brexit and oblivion.

But surely the inevitable subsequent financial fallout of Brexit will ruin the Tories for at least an election or two?

A bear made of Tetris blocks (stevie), Sunday, 2 October 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

I think they have started to believe their own hype — that everyone will give them what they want and they'll get a Brexit bounce straight into the 2020 election. A breakout session at conference this week has them planning for power until 2035

stet, Sunday, 2 October 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

the Hunt thing about getting rid of EU medical staff being fine because we'll train up more doctors of our own makes me hunger for his head on a spike

A bear made of Tetris blocks (stevie), Sunday, 2 October 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

I have been away and have missed some of these great stories

but before I left, I did hear something about Rachel Reeves and thought: well, that sounds like Enoch Powell in a way! and was annoyed that she gets a 'free ride' because she is against Mr Corbyn, probably

I sadly missed Corbyn's speech and hope to catch up on it, some time !!

the pinefox, Monday, 3 October 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-news-andrea-leadsom-young-britons-fruit-picking-eu-migrants-a7342196.html

"My absolute hope is that with more apprenticeships, with more young people being encouraged to engage with countryside matters, that actually the concept of a career in food production is going to be much more appealing going forward."

lol!

calzino, Monday, 3 October 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

"why wages aren't higher and so on"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 3 October 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/783047118235787265

Momentum decision on Jackie Walker. this seems kind of like a fudge that will satisfy precisely no-one? (sacked as vice-chair of steering committee, but remains on the committee and a member of Momentum, Momentum say that none of her individual statements were anti-semitic in and of themselves, but that Walker has shown poor judgment and should have "done more to explain herself to mitigate the upset caused", and call for Labour party not to expel her)

soref, Monday, 3 October 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

no explanation necessary, she made herself perfectly clear.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 3 October 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Kristall cleat

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Monday, 3 October 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

Clear obv

poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Monday, 3 October 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

Momentum complaining about footage of the meeting where Walker made these comments being leaked to the press also seems particularly ill-judged

soref, Monday, 3 October 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

Doesnt countryside matters mean fucking? It did in hamlet.

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Tuesday, 4 October 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

What is going to be the main selling point for these 3 day long crop cutting "apprenticeships"?

Smuggle the fucking cabbages under your jacket, then you won't need the foodbank:p

calzino, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

damn son https://twitter.com/Peston/status/783034000801685601

Neil S, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 06:29 (seven years ago) link

Tomorrow belongs to Amber Rudd.

The fund will build on work we have done to support local authorities …to stop giving housing benefit to people that have no right to be in the country … to reduce rough sleeping by illegal immigrants … and to crack down on the rogue landlords who house illegal migrants in the most appalling conditions.

And for those that are here legally, we will provide more English language support. And with it, the obvious benefits of being able to join the way of life in the country they have chosen to call home.

nashwan, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

Ms Rudd said she would consider for the first time whether student immigration rules should be tailored to the quality of the course and the educational institution.

This idea was mooted a year ago by Nick Timothy, the prime minister’s chief of staff, who said there were only 70,000 foreign students at Russell Group universities compared to 113,000 at less prestigious universities.

This seems the direction they're heading in. Their own figures shows that 38% of students are going to 20% of the universities (those in the RG) so international students are far more likely to be on high-achieving courses than the average Brit.

There are plenty of very good universities (in their own right and particularly in comparison to the international average) outside the Russell Group. Idk what message it's supposed to send to British kids at Loughborough (7th in the UK), Surrey (11th) or Bath (joint 11th), let alone the rest, about the value of their own degrees.

One recurring criticism levelled by home office ministers is that some foreign students, even those studying English language degrees, are not proficient English speakers.

The level requirements were set by the Home Office, not universities. The choice of test below-degree-level was set by the Home Office, not universities. If the Home Office believes the test they recommend universities use is problematic (and there are arguments that it is) maybe they shouldn't have given them a monopoly on immigration assessment as well.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 4 October 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

The level requirements were set by the Home Office, not universities. The choice of test below-degree-level was set by the Home Office, not universities. If the Home Office believes the test they recommend universities use is problematic (and there are arguments that it is) maybe they shouldn't have given them a monopoly on immigration assessment as well.

otm

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

Reading twitter and you'd think the sky is going to fall. That we'll bar students, kick out foreign doctors and nurses, jail landlords (probably good except its for housing illegal immigrants) but idk a lot of this is to get through conference. Can't see so many doctors being trained in time, and implementing these things will be difficult.

As will closing the borders to immigrants. They get through.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

Don't get me wrong its awful but there is a long way to go and many of the ppl involved are incompetent.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

ukip

conrad, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

Diane James ‏@DianeJamesMEP 10h10 hours ago
The borderless European Union encourages the free movement of criminals.

RIP bigot woman

nashwan, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

ukip

Truer words have not been spoken! :)

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Reading twitter and you'd think the sky is going to fall. That we'll bar students, kick out foreign doctors and nurses, jail landlords (probably good except its for housing illegal immigrants) but idk a lot of this is to get through conference. Can't see so many doctors being trained in time, and implementing these things will be difficult.

As will closing the borders to immigrants. They get through.

Nobody believes this will actually happen. The terrifying thing is that a mainstream political party can actually stand up and say all this shit with a straight face, let alone government ministers. This is miles away from what used to pass for centre ground in the U.K., and it's the opposite of the multicultural manifesto that got them elected.

Having the unelected PM turn out to be leading a literally fascist government is cause for concern, even if it's an incompetent one that can't do what it says it will.

stet, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

Fuck a "we don't elect PMs" btw. Even though that's true, we do elect on manifestos and this is burning theirs.

stet, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Still, shoes.

Mark G, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

More Rudd

"But a student immigration system that treats every student and university as equal only punishes those we should want to help."

As opposed to those we shouldn't want to help.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 06:02 (seven years ago) link

any working class person who votes Tory is a fucking idiot who deserves whatever they get tbh

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 06:23 (seven years ago) link

Not to keep banging on about this but the routes into a student visa are so restrictive these days it's virtually impossible to come to the UK unless you are going to somewhere approved and continually vetted by the Home Office. The idea that Tier Four Sponsor status can be withdrawn, meaning a ban on international students, is held over literally every university to make them jump through the compliance hoops the Home Office sets out - all seen as ludicrous as it is and all implemented by T. May. Go back six years and you did have a lot of people coming to study on questionable college courses and working to support their study. Now people are coming to universities, not allowed to work to support their studies and are kicked out when they graduate. That combination has led to the number of people from Nepal, for example, dropping from around 9000 to 192 (poorer students need to work side jobs, so they go to Aus) but the overall number is sustained by the growing Chinese middle class and the fact that 'unfashionable' universities like Hull still offer a really good quality of education compared to the US, and arguably Aus, average.

They are literally telling decent students going to UK state universities and paying huge amounts of money for the privilege that they are not welcome. The effect won't just be on students, who can go to Ireland, Canada, NZ or any of the emerging TNE hubs like UAE and Malaysia, it will be on the sustained viability of half the universities in this country. Stop them taking international students and you risk them closing. You also risk one of the key sources of income and regeneration in 'the regions'. Students have transformed the economies of towns and cities all across the country - putting billions into housing, entertainment, retail, etc. This is just so unfathomably stupid.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 07:09 (seven years ago) link

https://s22.postimg.org/dua5xtjxd/maxresdefault_1.jpg

Private housing developers should build homes with smaller rooms that do not meet existing minimum space standards so that young people can afford to buy them, the housing minister has said.

Gavin Barwell told the Conservative conference in Birmingham that he wanted the private sector to “innovate” to solve the housing crisis and that relaxing the rules on how cramped a flat can be might stop young people from being priced out.

Tory housing minister says building more council homes will increase inequality

https://s22.postimg.org/4vj9t510h/d80db928df1a759cc390e92f6fd59052.jpg

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

Reading twitter and you'd think the sky is going to fall. That we'll bar students, kick out foreign doctors and nurses, jail landlords (probably good except its for housing illegal immigrants) but idk a lot of this is to get through conference. Can't see so many doctors being trained in time, and implementing these things will be difficult.

As will closing the borders to immigrants. They get through.

― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, October 4, 2016 9:47 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I just watched Adam Ruins Everything #18 which talks about the US/Mexico border having a clampdown actually meaning that there were more undocumented transient workers staying in the States than in a more lax time. This because when the border wasn't being heavily enforced workers would come in from Mexico do the work, get paid, take the money home to family in Mexico. When the crossing is more heavily clamped down it is harder to cross so less people are heading back in the opposite direction and remaining longer in the country that has the immigration fear. I would assume that a situation like that was a constant when the directive about policing a border changes. That there are a number of factors that seem counterintuitive if one doesn't know how things work on the ground and so on.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 08:25 (seven years ago) link

"Tory housing minister says building more council homes will increase inequality"

that conclusion takes some real warped tory logic, but saying that much of Labour aren't any better - including Sadiq "The Power" Khan.

calzino, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

Nobody believes this will actually happen. The terrifying thing is that a mainstream political party can actually stand up and say all this shit with a straight face, let alone government ministers.

part of it though is that this kind of discourse becoming mainstream gradually changes the territory of what can happen. a whole lot of shit that not long ago nobody believed would actually happen has since happened...

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

Why hasn't Lanbour signed up to this as I presume they were asked.

SNP, Plaid and the Green Party join forces to resist Tories' ‘toxic politics’
Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Caroline Lucas and Jonathan Bartley, the co-leaders of the Green Party - and their counterparts in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales - have joined forces with Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister of Scotland and Leanne Wood of Plaid Cymru to call for progressive parties to work together to resist the ‘Tories' toxic politics’.

The leaders have released a statement ahead of Theresa May’s first major conference speech as Conservative Party leader.

In the statement - signed by Sturgeon, Leanne Wood of Plaid Cyrmu, Jonathan Bartley and Caroline Lucas from the Green Party of England and Wales and the leaders of the Green Parties of Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales - the politicians attack the Conservatives for the ‘the most toxic rhetoric on immigration seen from any government in living memory.’

The statement goes on to say:

“This is not a time for parties to play games, or meekly respect the tired convention whereby they do not break cover during each other's conferences. It is an occasion for us to restate the importance of working together to resist the Tories' toxic politics, and make the case for a better future for our people and communities.”

The statement was drawn up this morning between the parties as a response to increasingly hostile rhetoric from the Conservative Party Conference.

Caroline Lucas, who has long urged progressive parties to work together more, said:

“Now more than ever it is vital that we present a real opposition to the Conservatives. This conference has seen them attempt to inflame tensions in our communities and set out a vision for a ‘hard brexit’ that will do untold damage to the places we represent. By uniting we have the best chance of facing them down and protecting the people who elected us.”

ENDS

Full statement, signed by:

Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland

Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party of England and Wales

Caroline Lucas, co-leader of the Green Party of England and Wales

Leanne Wood, Leader of Plaid Cymru

Steven Agnew, Leader of the Green Party of Northern Ireland

Patrick Harvie, Co-convener of the Scottish Green Party

Alice Hooker-Stroud, Leader of the Wales Green Party

The countries of the United Kingdom face a spiralling political and economic crisis. At the top of the Conservative Party, the narrow vote in favour of leaving the EU has now been interpreted as the pretext for a drastic cutting of ties with Europe, which would have dire economic results - and as an excuse for the most toxic rhetoric on immigration we have seen from any government in living memory.

This is a profoundly moral question which gets to the heart of what sort of country we think we live in. We will not tolerate the contribution of people from overseas to our NHS being called into question, or a new version of the divisive rhetoric of 'British jobs for British workers'. Neither will we allow the people of these islands, no matter how they voted on June 23rd, to be presented as a reactionary, xenophobic mass whose only concern is somehow taking the UK back to a lost imperial age. At a time of increasing violence and tension, we will call out the actions of politicians who threaten to enflame those same things.

This is not a time for parties to play games, or meekly respect the tired convention whereby they do not break cover during each other's conferences. It is an occasion for us to restate the importance of working together to resist the Tories' toxic politics, and make the case for a better future for our people and communities. We will do this by continuing to work and campaign with the fierce sense of urgency this political moment demands.

ENDS

Cosmic Slop, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

or indeed Labour. (I'm using my dads laptop while mine is away getting fixed and I'm not used to it so typos galore)

Cosmic Slop, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Why hasn't Labour signed up to this as I presume they were asked.

incompetence?

Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

Update: Jeremy Corbyn has been spotted buying upcycled knitwear in Bardon’s Mill, a village in Northumberland. He is on a trip walking a section of Hadrian’s wall with his wife, Laura.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/8-tory-conference-policies-which-jeremy-corbyn-has-not-respo

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

"Never again let left wing activist human rights lawyers harass the bravest of the brave, the men and women of our armed forces" says the PM

Maybe they could...stop committing war crimes?

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

He is on a trip walking a section of Hadrian’s wall with his wife, Laura.

Yeah, it's Tory conference week, nothing really for the opposition to do, why not take a week off, eh?

Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

he's just patrolling the border like a good citizen

imago, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

if you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere

this nugget needs to be in this thread. the idea of exclusion runs right to the core of May's worldview. find it amazing that the embrace of the idea of a disconnected, internationalist elite has now led to beefing with epictetus. not sure what she'd say to his insistence that political communities depend on the wider world & thus our obligations to them are secondary to our obligations to nature. but I don't really understand localism.

ogmor, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

Already quoted approvingly by Marine le Pen.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

It's basically a fascist sentiment so sure

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

it's basically a fascist sentiment so sure: the 2016 story

florence foster wallace (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

she's totally talking about me. born in one country, moved to another, now living temporarily in another. it's been an amazing experience. i've learned a lot in each place. london is full of people like me, moving, settling for awhile, sending money back home, making plans. on behalf of all of us let me say as diplomatically as i can, fuck you theresa may!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

This very much ^^^.

Now available at Russell & Bromley: Fuck-You Pumps.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

That there is the history of the world and why nationalism is moronic

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

it's all getting pretty scary. i'm on holiday this week and it feels strange to be watching this from afar, then writing/swimming/reading/getting completely smashed and making a point of not watching it.

the tories are scarily good at keeping power. i'm in spain and i was in this exact apartment when they got in for the first time of this era. never, ever could i have dreamt how bad it would be, in my innocence.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

her pallid and alienating vision of a pre-war Britain will be another booster for the ISIS recruitment division, she almost makes me feel like joining them.

calzino, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

it feels like she's weighed things up over the last few weeks and finally decided on the blend she believes will keep her in power. there is nothing to do with the good of the country in what they're doing. the only glimmer of hope i see is in the irrationality of it all.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

He is on a trip walking a section of Hadrian’s wall with his wife, Laura.

Yeah, it's Tory conference week, nothing really for the opposition to do, why not take a week off, eh?

― Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well there is nothing for the opposition to do besides putting out statements (which Corbyn did as soon as May finished her speech), the odd tweet. Counteracting the noise with some other noise.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

I think this is as worrying: https://twitter.com/labourpress/status/783266273266429952

Really need to get rid of McNicol and get hold of the machinery. Otherwise its another year of pain for Labour - shambolic.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

Jeez, this shit about british soldiers being exempt from human rights law ... saying the lawyers are 'harassing' them ... they're 'the bravest of the brave' amazing superheroes but try to make a court case against them and that's 'harassment'.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

never, ever could i have dreamt how bad it would be, in my innocence

b-b-but....they're Tories?

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

They're seems to always come at a time when the reality of that just hits you - winding you. The fucking Tories are in.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

i knew how awful they were but i guess i didn't quite understand the mechanics of how they rule (i hadn't moved to the uk yet) - even with that taken into account i doubt many could have predicted us ending up where we are today.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

it was the last thing lots of disabled people noticed post 2010, while the slightly more cuddly one nation neo-con possie + the fucking Lib Dems partnership took them out of the game.

calzino, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

LocalGarda I'm in Spain too, watching from afar. I deliberately planned this as my final blowout since I knew what was coming but didn't quite register how hard. The universities thing is quite clearly insane.

Everything is being destroyed. There isn't really any hope, is there?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

They're seems to always come at a time when the reality of that just hits you - winding you. The fucking Tories are in.

^^ and each new release seems more twisted than the previous version

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Thursday, 6 October 2016 05:45 (seven years ago) link

Was just coming here to post that. 0_o

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:03 (seven years ago) link

hope he dies

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:06 (seven years ago) link

:D

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

can't wait for the jo cox false equivalency horseshit if so

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

Kate McCann Verified account
‏@KateEMcCann

Sources tell Telegraph Woolfe is suffering from bleeding of the brain after he was punched. One witness said he fell into a window.

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

Punched by a fellow UKIP MEP apparently.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

wow.

arron banksy (cajunsunday), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:11 (seven years ago) link

Lucy Fisher Verified account
‏@LOS_Fisher 31m31 minutes ago

Ukip sources claim a party MEP punched Steven Woolfe several times following a charged meeting, as MEPs angry he was considering defection

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

Mike Hookem allegedly

groovypanda, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:25 (seven years ago) link

Hookem by name, Hookem by oh forget it

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Yeah if there's any measure of the impact of May's speech it's that it's getting UKIPpers to consider returning to the fold.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

xp nv's mep, smashing chap he is

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IT8Zo1BQ2qU/maxresdefault.jpg

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

heartwarming political story of the day, might get even better after a few Is He Dead Yet? refreshes

calzino, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

Lol xp

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

who's going to bump the arshavin thread then

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

the picture on the itv news site is o_O

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-10-06/ukip-mep-steven-woolfe-collapses-in-european-parliament/

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

Wow, indeed...

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

who's going to bump the arshavin thread then

― imago, Thursday, October 6, 2016 12:40 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

xxp ugh awful, however much of a terrible person he might be

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

yeah that wasn't necessarily a serious suggestion

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

More info: Hookem offered Woolfe out. Wolfe was up for it. They left the parliament building. Hookem lamped him and he hit his head on a railing. They shook hands and walked back in to parliament building and Woolfe collapsed about 15 minutes later. From SKY.

groovypanda, Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

European Arrest Warrant out for Hookem yet?

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

our brave soldiers can't be convicted of human rights violations overseas amirite

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

is hookem definitely British? I mean "full British"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Cos this sounds like a deporting offence

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Woolfe for Top Gear

nashwan, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

Ukip sources claim a party MEP punched Steven Woolfe several times following a charged meeting, as MEPs angry he was considering defection

Did anyone else misread that as 'considering defecation'?

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

kinda wanna know if the rest of the ukip mob filed outside to watch when wolfe got it on with hookem. kinda wondering what i would do if this was two colleagues in my workplace

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

this is sad and horrible, but silver lining is that UKIP is now probably finished?

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Is that a silver lining when the current government seems to be adopting everything UKIP stood for?

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

I doubt it - hard to imagine people who hate foreigners also hating violence.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Because one racist politician smacked another over the head? Nothing their voters will be upset about tbf

xxp

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

kinda wanna know if the rest of the ukip mob filed outside to watch when wolfe got it on with hookem. kinda wondering what i would do if this was two colleagues in my workplace

crying out for a facebook live stream tbh

spongeboy bigpants (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

so Theresa May's speech has already inspired one violent attack :-<

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:25 (seven years ago) link

Hookem in a car chase with French police?

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

waht

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

@DaveKeating 22m ago Berlin, Germany
Reports that UKIP MEP who punched MEP Steven Woolfe is Mike Hookem, UKIP's defence spokesman, say he is now on the run from French police

Apparently Woolfe now confirmed as OK and not life threatening.

groovypanda, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

@DaveKeating 1m ago Berlin, Germany

In fact Hookem, if he is indeed the person who punched Woolfe, would have parliamentary immunity so this would not involve French police.

groovypanda, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

he'd have done well to get to France in an hour from Brussels. Something doesn't add up...

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

spoilsports

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Parliamentary immunity can be revoked - as can diplomatic immunity. I'd assume the European Parliament / British government would waive either or both in this case.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

he'd have done well to get to France in an hour from Brussels. Something doesn't add up...

fracas happened in Strasbourg?

Robby Mook (stevie), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

https://partridge.cloud/grabs/S02E01/S02E01-I6sKJ9J6-subtitled.jpg

conrad, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

xp ah right! sorry...

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:45 (seven years ago) link

getting my Brussels Eurocrats mixed up with my European Parliament Gravy-Train :-/

Neil S, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure the Tory mood would easily permit any EU interference in two English yeoman knocking the shit out of each other.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

despite how unpleasant things have been in the Labour party over the last few months, I've not heard any reports of people coming to blows? this documentary from the 90s has Neil Kinnock and Jon Lansaman reminiscing about Kinnock beating up an unnamed Bennite in the gents toilets at the 1981 conference, Kinnock palpably somewhat pleased with himself while recounting the details:

https://youtu.be/6ITCj38dLgk?t=28m10s

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

(starts at 28:10)

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

i'm calling it now: hookem, forced into hiding among the refugees in the calais jungle, must overcome his prejudices to form an alliance with a group of syrians and find his way back to the uk a stowaway in an eddie stobart, arriving in dover a changed man

spongeboy bigpants (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

starring dean gaffney

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

one can only hope

spongeboy bigpants (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Rhys ‏@rhysbart 5m5 minutes ago
Mike Hookem has been apprehended by top French police detective Michele Catchem. YOU COULDN'T MAKE THIS UP.

He's gonna do 20 to 10 in LE PEN

nashwan, Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Brits abroad eh?

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

gonna be incredible if hookem goes full moaty with this shit

xxp damn

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

lol

https://twitter.com/MikeHookemMEP/status/780513725929447428

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

(relating to Lewis allegedly punching a wall in frustration after his speech was altered, if that wasn't clear)

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

imagine if woolfe wakes up and has Mitchell&Webb/Nazis-type revelation "Hang on, maybe we're the bad guys?"

Robby Mook (stevie), Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

http://news.images.itv.com/image/file/1113296/stream_img.jpg

almost sprawled out in the shape of a swastika imo

Robby Mook (stevie), Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

Gives him a great excuse to join the Tories though.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

The police in Strasbourg have confirmed that they were not called to the incident and that, so far, there is no police investigation.

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

Mike Hookem MEP ‏@MikeHookemMEP Oct 5
We selected our last leader based on style. Perhaps next time we should try substance.

Don't over-reach.

nashwan, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

cynical(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING)

(yes that's probably it)

conrad, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

Gives him a great excuse to join the Tories though.

apparently it was Woolfe who suggested to Hookem that they take it outside, so he doesn't really come out of this looking particularly good, aggro *and* hapless. would the Tories want him now?

trying to imagine the counterfactual version of UK political history where Prescott killed that Welsh guy who threw an egg at him in 2001.

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

Well this ended sadly

don't even see how this was a duck (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

You never know NV, he might arise a born-again socialist

imago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

I suppose it's worth remembering that Fascists have a much better record than the left when it comes to killing fascists.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

another chance for a good ol' death sweepstake bites the dust :(

calzino, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

useful to be reminded of this stuff when some people are pushing the idea that post-Brexit anti-immigrant sentiment just came out of nowhere, or that Labour have not been complicit in enabling it:

Labour Shadow Cabinet ministers have been accused of ‘rank hypocrisy’ after it emerged that Ed Miliband had called for lists of firms which employ high numbers of foreign workers.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/amber-rudd-ed-miliband-name-and-shame-list-foreign-workers-migrants_uk_57f66063e4b0efc7e3c529b8?87xeshi1cqs1t6gvi

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

really hope the rumours that Corbyn is going to make Diane Abbott Home Secretary are true

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

Wishing Steven Woolfe a speedy recovery from this 'altercation'

And now for something else:

Dawn Foster ‏@DawnHFoster 41m41 minutes ago

"Why won't Corbyn put more women in shadow cabinet?

Wait, not those women"

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 6 October 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

I think it is the Labour right's turn to start taking disciplinary action against members making offensive/racist comments about Diane Abbott, it would make them look a bit less like hypocritical self-victimising arseholes. There is some real poisonous stuff out there tonight.

calzino, Thursday, 6 October 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 2h2 hours ago
McBride definitely in the running to replace Milne, Labour sources say.

self-clowning cozen of ILX (cozen), Thursday, 6 October 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

hey, they have legitimate concerns

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 October 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

xxp yes, even aside from the explicitly racist/misogynistic stuff, there's a huge number of people acting like the decision to appoint Abbott to a senior role is *obviously* ridiculous, without feeling the need to explain or justify that in any way

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

It's not ideal to have three MPs whose constituencies border each other (and in London of course) in the most highly regarded positions but slim pickings I guess.

nashwan, Thursday, 6 October 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I've said it before about Abbott, that she has an unfortunate habit of talking quite publicly about stuff she's not been properly briefed on. But she's been on the right side of pretty much any issue I can name. (This combo is perhaps the hallmark of Corbyn-led leadership more than any other..)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 October 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

On the right side on immigration. Important given what has happened this week.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 6 October 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

Nice gloss from Tom E:

http://tomewing.tumblr.com/post/151385928631/mays-day

etc, Thursday, 6 October 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

jeez, this defense of Jackie Walker is a complete train wreck: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/theresa-may-jeremy-corbyn-momentum-jackie-walker-anti-semitism-working-class-saying-wrong-thing-a7349071.html

soref, Thursday, 6 October 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

Yep. That is terrible.

The GBP continues to crash. On Tuesday it hit a 31-year low at 1.27 to the USD, yesterday people were talking about if / when it might go to 1.25 - today it is 1.24.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 7 October 2016 05:38 (seven years ago) link

Jesus, it went down to 1.13 overnight.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 7 October 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link

Great news for innovative jam exporters tho.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 7 October 2016 06:05 (seven years ago) link

no big deal, just the entire economy tanking because we've handed the keys over to the lunatic moron racist demographic

Robby Mook (stevie), Friday, 7 October 2016 06:40 (seven years ago) link

This country is a stain on history, it deserves to disappear, says this citizen of the world

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 06:46 (seven years ago) link

If only we still had Liz Truss opening new pork markets.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 7 October 2016 08:51 (seven years ago) link

don't worry about sterling folks, I've just seen a plastic fiver going for £10.50 on e-bay.

I need another feelgood event today, but hopefully not one where I am wishing death on a fellow sub-human. Tom Watson getting pumped will suffice!

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

what does "pumped" mean to you?

conrad, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:12 (seven years ago) link

sacked

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:14 (seven years ago) link

omg

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 7 October 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

don't know if you can just "sack" someone from a democratically elected position - can you?

conrad, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:31 (seven years ago) link

isn't deputy leader a position that could be subject to change in the current re-shuffle? idk

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

He can't be sacked as deputy leader, but I don't know if deputy leader automatically gives him a slot in the shadow cabinet- if not he can be booted off the front bench.

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 7 October 2016 09:41 (seven years ago) link

I don't think so. could er pump him from his BS honorific position as "labour party chair"? would be terribly shaming and productive~

conrad, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:43 (seven years ago) link

This overnight 'flash crash' in Asia- people are talking like it's some kind of mistake/anomaly. Is it one of those algorithms otm situations, where human traders and analysts can't quite believe what is obvious to a, well, artificial intelligence?

I like it when you shoot inside me Dirk (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 7 October 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

they will all be going to join Blair's SDP 2 shortly anyways

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

This overnight 'flash crash' in Asia- people are talking like it's some kind of mistake/anomaly. Is it one of those algorithms otm situations, where human traders and analysts can't quite believe what is obvious to a, well, artificial intelligence?

ft initially suggested fat finger algos but JP Morgan suggested symptoms weren't same:

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/10/07/2176851/fat-fingered-algos/

Fizzles, Friday, 7 October 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

sorry, that's not correct - ft suggested either fat fingers or algos. i like the idea of fat fingered algos tho. haphazardly applying their logic to the wrong detail.

Fizzles, Friday, 7 October 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/07/steven-woolfe-mike-hookem-ukip-mep-clash-party-chair

Steven Woolfe has “reached out the hand of friendship” to a fellow Ukip MEP with whom he was involved in an altercation that led to him having to spend three days in hospital, a colleague has said.

Another MEP for the party, Nathan Gill, told journalists that Woolfe would remain in hospital until Sunday “as a precaution” but said his health was not in danger. “He is sick of croissants and looking forward to a full English breakfast,” Gill told journalists outside the hospital in Strasbourg, after visiting his colleague.

Fuck me I'm embarrassed to be from this country sometimes*

*all the time

めんどくさかった (Matt #2), Friday, 7 October 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Still, all's well that ends well eh

めんどくさかった (Matt #2), Friday, 7 October 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Wish these choads would take their racist death cult to its logical conclusion.

Robby Mook (stevie), Friday, 7 October 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

have already expressed that wish

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Jesus, it went down to 1.13 overnight.

Friend at an investment bank says they had a trade at 1.03 last night

sktsh, Friday, 7 October 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

No foreign expertise here thanks. We do brexit the English way
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/07/lse-brexit-non-uk-experts-foreign-academics?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
I look forward to the purge of non English teaching staff from all English university faculties next.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Friday, 7 October 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

University English. Not the other way round.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Friday, 7 October 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

This really is getting a bit dismal. Wish it felt like there was any way to stop this horrible slide into... whatever we're sliding into.

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 7 October 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

xp came here to post that. Did not know about how far the pound has dropped.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 7 October 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

It's all so fucking stupid

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 7 October 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

what????? in the US that would be unconstitutional i'm pretty sure

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

Re: no foreign expertise. Saw someone on twitter calling it May's "Little Britain pathology".

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

i thought i'd see the usual smug liberal whining about this but what you people forget is that those academics are taking jobs away from British experts

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmNLK3lXEAAPQnI.jpg

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

i dunno i was just listening to a story on voter registration i think i'd call it a tie

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

really disappointed that true Briton and war enthusiast Mike Hookem hasn't got the basic guts to admit to attempting to murder his fellow MEP

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

at least it is amusing listening to him lying his arse off that not a punch was thrown and then using pugilist metaphors about how he is going "fight his corner" on his position of absolute innocence.

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson has just been demoted to Shadow culture secretary, you see Conrad I was onto something:p

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

i guess having a love of landfill, Marr, Roses etc is doesn't preclude one from having a "culture" job title.

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Can he still be deputy leader and hold a position on the shadow cabinet?

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

excuse some of the dumbass posting, I have a bad chest infection and am high on codeine today

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

finally a boost for all the guitar bands

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 October 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

All british bands forced to declare how many of their tunes aren't influenced by the Beatles

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Friday, 7 October 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Had a theory tonight... is this all part of May's plan to show how bad Brexit could get and then force a second vote at some point?

Jill, Friday, 7 October 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

No

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 7 October 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

@Jill, I've had the same thought hovering around in my head watching all this unfold.

On the one hand people with that much wealth and power are probably prone to swilling xenophobia around as a strategy (fun game plan if you'll never be at risk yourself) to get more wealth and power, so that's what this could be. The endpoint being a situation where she says, 'Well everyone, unfortunately it looks as though the Brexit is not viable, but you'll agree, I did everything I could to be as nationalistic as possible'.

On the other hand, in this house, IIRC, we are not too sure if there's much difference between opportunistic and sincerely-felt bigotry, and if there is a difference I don't think I can read her well enough to decide what it is in her case.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 7 October 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

Theresa May is an earnestly bigoted person

ælərdaɪs (jim in vancouver), Friday, 7 October 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

brought up by a fucking Anglican couple with a clergyman dad in Oxfordshire is a very "character building" upbringing.

calzino, Friday, 7 October 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

We’re marching towards extreme Brexit. Someone must speak for the 48%

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/07/marching-mad-brexit-someone-speak-48-per-cent

haven't read the article but do you have anyone in mind?

conrad, Friday, 7 October 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

lol, he describes Nick Clegg as a "serious asset" for ref2 propaganda in that piece.

calzino, Saturday, 8 October 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

if you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere

vs.

It is the people who are at home both nowhere and everywhere, who do not have anywhere a soil on which they have grown up, but who live in Berlin today, in Brussels tomorrow, Paris the day after that, and then again in Prague or Vienna or London, and who feel at home everywhere. [Man in audience shouts 'The Jews!'] They are the only ones who can be addressed as international, because they conduct their business everywhere, but the people cannot follow them.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 8 October 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

wow

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 8 October 2016 09:39 (seven years ago) link

...404 error.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Saturday, 8 October 2016 09:45 (seven years ago) link

Many will recall the conflict in the Conservative party in the late 1960s and early 1970s between its then leader, Ted Heath, and its great ideologue, Enoch Powell. Powell took issue with Heath on various points, and two resonate today.

One was mass immigration, in those days from the Commonwealth rather than Europe, which had happened without the British people being consulted, and which Powell saw from his perspective as an MP in Wolverhampton was causing tension and unhappiness. The other was Heath’s ill-fated project to take Britain into what was then called the Common Market, which Powell saw as an outrageous sacrifice of British sovereignty, the end not just of our nationhood but of the right of the British government to do what its electorate wanted.

It was hardly surprising that, as I listened to Theresa May’s speech last Wednesday, I was reminded of Powell. When she told some of her colleagues, and their tame pundits in the media, to stop whining about Brexit and instead to respect the votes of more than 17 million people who had found the EU unpalatable, she made a profoundly Powellite point. She accused such people of sneering at the majority who voted in the referendum. In truth, it is a sneer that has lasted for decades.

Even during the Thatcher government, when it sought to return power from the all-knowing state to the individual, there was still a coterie of ministers who thought they really did know best. Powell understood the feelings of the people: it made him, in the eyes of his opponents, a dangerous politician and rival, which was why they rushed to accuse him (falsely) of racism for his warnings about the unpopularity of mass immigration and of Little Englandism for his views about Europe. Mrs May seems to have learned from this – and, as prime minister, is in a strong position to invite those in her party who disagree with her to defy her if they dare.

Britain has lurched slowly towards democracy since the Great Reform Act of 1832. It has taken some in our political class 184 years to realise what democracy really means: the paramountcy of the will of the people. Ironically, it required not a general election but a plebiscite to have that will properly expressed.

Those who for decades have wanted to leave the EU went to one general election after another feeling utterly disfranchised, because neither party likely to be elected had any intention other than to stay in the club, at vast expense to the taxpayer, at ever greater sacrifice of our sovereignty, and with an open borders policy imposed upon us that caused social problems and made us more vulnerable to crime and terrorism. That we now have a prime minister who sees the irreconcilability of those policies with the views of the majority of the British people is a great advance for democracy.

In a country such as ours referendums are only acceptable when a matter of potentially huge constitutional significance is contemplated, as it was on 23 June. They cannot be a substitute for thoughtful, responsive government that understands, as all governments should, what the public really wants. Nor does this mean governments have to engage in followership rather than leadership. But the lead a government should give is one that goes with the grain of public opinion rather than against it. The growing vote for Ukip in recent elections was a portent of the referendum result, even if Ukip has only one semi-detached MP as a result. That the Cameron government chose to ignore this before June was just one aspect of its fatal arrogance.

With the sort of clear choice before them that did not exist between potential governing parties at the last election, the British people gave a clear signal in June not just of their true view on the EU, but of the frustration and annoyance they felt at being treated with contempt by the political class. Mrs May has received and understood this. Her fellow Western leaders have generally not.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

Its by Simon Heffer - have avoided that cunt for years.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

er, Sorry the rest of it:

For them, democracy is a tiresome advisory process that they can feel free to interpret as they wish, not a guide to public opinion which, if ignored, will build up to a quiet – or perhaps not so quiet – revolution of the sort we have just had in Britain. It is why Donald Trump stands such a good chance of winning the American presidential election next month. It is why Marine Le Pen will do so well in next May’s presidential election in France. And it is why Frauke Petry’s AfD party is eating into support for Angela Merkel in Germany, and may well help depose her as head of the ruling coalition there next autumn.

Given the pitiful state of the Labour party, Mrs May could have ignored public opinion and allowed the Government to carry on sneering. That she did not is a refreshing sign that she genuinely understands that things cannot carry on as before.

Not every aspect of her conference speech was so admirable, though. If she is seriously thinking of pursuing a sub-Keynesian approach to the economy, with state intervention in the private sector, she should think again before the markets force her to do so. In the post-Brexit world she is commendably determined to bring about, interfering with a free-market approach in business and imposing regulation will be the easiest way to shoot our new economic and trading arrangements in the foot. There are certainly abuses of remuneration in some companies, but it is the shareholders’ job, and not the state’s, to sort that out.

That vital consideration aside, our new Prime Minister has connected with the Zeitgeist of the British people. She can lead them properly and confidently once she has won their respect in this way. She deserves the unqualified support of her colleagues for this. It has taken almost 50 years to learn Enoch’s lessons about accommodating the will of the people, but better late than never.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

fuck the telegraph for publishing it, and double-fuck them for taking it down. have the courage of your repugnant convictions you miserable cunts

spongeboy bigpants (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:28 (seven years ago) link

I got in a lift with Simon Heffer once. Sorry to say all I did was give him a dirty look.

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

Democracy is ok in regards to immigrants except when the undemocratically elected markets say they are unhappy with May's "sub-Keynesian" approach.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

There's a lot of people in the UK (and the rest of Europe) who would agree with Heffer's views, and they're not going to change those views anytime soon.

paolo, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

(I'm not one of them by the way, I'm a Guardian reading Green voter)

paolo, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

I really don't know what lefty liberals can do to counter that type of thinking :(

paolo, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

gonna suggest that one way to start would be for politicians who don't share those views to argue against them rather than pander to them

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

That would seem the obvious thing to do and yet...

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

secondly i think immigration tends to be far less pressing a concern for people with a good degree of material security and personal fulfilment and maybe the people who lack those things might be a good constituency to aim your economic policies towards helping

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

Don't worry Paolo our undemocratically elected markets will get the UK running off to the IMF in no time and defeat May's Powellist project! It will be ok in the end.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

there is a lot of projection going on towards people who are living thereabouts the poverty line, even the Brexit vote doesn't mean they are all rabid racists who are losing sleep over the immigration numbers. Most of them would probably be happier with either a higher minimum wage or a restoration of in work benefits rather than having wankers like Reeves insultingly describing them as a "tinderbox situation".

calzino, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:42 (seven years ago) link

there is a lot of projection going on

And how.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

Heffer has been unashamedly writing "Enoch was right" pieces for years:

2007 - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643837/When-will-Tories-admit-that-Enoch-was-right.html

2012 - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2158958/Enoch-Powell-A-prophet-outcast.html

2015 - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/12009577/Paris-is-tragic-proof-that-Enoch-Powell-was-right-about-threats-to-our-country.html

I was always kind of surprised he got away with this, but it looks like he was just ahead of his time.

apparently the new article is back up again:

@timothy_stanley
Guys, just so you know the Heffer piece on Enoch Powell was published early by accident & then repubbed at the proper time. Nothing changed!

soref, Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

A lot of Tories are unabashed about their worship of Powell.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

This guy, for one, whatever happened to him?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/aug/26/conservative-daniel-hannan-enoch-powell

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Saturday, 8 October 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

When you look at his colourful bibliography it becomes apparent he has the same kind of myopia that Enoch was afflicted with, seems like a fun guy.

calzino, Saturday, 8 October 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Oh dear: https://twitter.com/piercepenniless/status/784789209160744961

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 8 October 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

'Russia deploys nuclear-capable missiles in Kaliningrad'

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 8 October 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

Hahaha

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 9 October 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

real nasty fucker, but also sort of hilarious.

calzino, Sunday, 9 October 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Mano el Mano is one for the ages

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 9 October 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

mano el tough

Har-@-Iago (wins), Sunday, 9 October 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

A Ukip MEP accused of punching a leadership candidate today claimed his colleague’s collapse was ‘pure Hollywood’ as he threatened to sue him for defamation.

Mike Hookem escalated the bitter row dividing the party by suggesting Steven Woolfe had staged a photograph of him passed out on the ground before he was rushed to hospital.

He told the Mail: ‘Now I’m not a medical man, but that was pure Hollywood to me the way he was face down.

Hookem has redeemed 2016.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 9 October 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

if he didn't just forget the word "doctor" then what else is included in the category "medical man"?

ogmor, Sunday, 9 October 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

‘I was expecting a police squad to come and draw a line around him. People I have met who have had seizures they do not go down like that. It’s very suspect.’

lol!

calzino, Sunday, 9 October 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

just how many people does he meet that have seizures shortly thereafter?

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Sunday, 9 October 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

they sequentially meet his fist and a Strasbourg pavement

Robby Mook (stevie), Sunday, 9 October 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

Davis brushed off complaints about the lack of transparency, telling parliament that May had an overwhelming mandate to negotiate the terms of leaving the EU.

How on earth is this remotely true?

- She supported the Remain side, which lost
- She didn't lead her party to an election victory

I still don't get how Cameron's leadership was untenable because of his Remain failure. May was Remain too, and she failed tooz

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 10 October 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

Sorry phone ate that. I get the Cameron thing - but May is in the same position. How can she be a strong advocate for something she doesn't believe in?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 10 October 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

It was Cameron's doing, though - May may feel she is bound by the referendum's result, but if it wasn't for Cameron there'd be no referendum.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 00:31 (seven years ago) link

May has spent an inordinate amount of energy as Home Secretary trying to get people eveicted from the country and spent a great deal of energy on particular families deportations - really much more that any home Sec should. She's a maniac about immigration who only voted remain because she was well whipped.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

No I agree, but however much she wanted it, she didn't pull the trigger - David Cameron did, and when you pissed off people on your side, people not on your side and people who don't think there should have been a referendum in the first place (and there only was one because of your spinelessness wrt your own party), then your position is untenable.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 08:47 (seven years ago) link

Sure, I just don't see how she has any credibility either. She was part of the same front-bench that created this whole mess. And she voted Remain. And she's never herself received a national mandate from the ballot box.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

nothing is true, grasshopper, and everything is permitted

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:24 (seven years ago) link

https://s22.postimg.org/mfmvlnd0x/Untitled.jpg

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Then there was foreign secretary Boris Johnson describing his new offices: “When I go into the Map Room of Palmerston I cannot help remembering that this country over the last two centuries has directed the invasion or conquest of 178 countries.”

surprised to see this mentioned, are the tories going to try to own this history now?

ogmor, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

Luckily only a largish handful of the 178 are current EU members so this won't affect trade negotiations much.

mark s, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

perhaps they'll wish to rejoin britain now it's free from the eu

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

That would solve the Irish border issue.

mark s, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

It didn't before

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

piirca

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

second time as fararce

mark s, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

There's a genuine premium to Britishness in international business ime but, tbqh, a lot of that is attached to a perception of fairness / affability and the effects of the soft power of British cultural institutions - not least British education. This kind of brash tub-thumping, in combination with the 'fortress Britain' approach to immigration and study, is about as effective a way to kill that premium off as i can imagine.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

it feels like at some level of business every country's bullshit image of itself probably wins them business - i guess that's soft power generally.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

Fucking hell this yacht thing though.

nashwan, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

The yacht thing is the greatest. Can Labour please bring up the yacht every chance they get for the next 10 years

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

This has got to be at least 70% because the Barclay brothers are obsessed with superyachts, doesn't it? I've barely seen anything in favour outside of The Telegraph but they're riding this like they've got shares in the shipyard.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

according to The Telegraph the last model could barely float it was that stuffed with fucking trade deals that Brenda + co had brought back from their hols

calzino, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

What's the appeal of the yacht? Some throwback to simpler (deadlier) times like 'Brittania rules the waves' in this dire brexit era or something? How should it "get the economy going"?

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

1) 'recognise strength of passion' for a new royal yacht
2) build yacht
3) ???
4) profit

spongeboy bigpants (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

(from this 2012 Vice piece)

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

So now Parliament does get the chance to debate/approve triggering Article 50, sterling rebounds almost immediately.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 11:20 (seven years ago) link

WHy do you think gov agreed on the motion? Veigning transparancy or something? Making labour take some blame too when Article 50 is finally triggered?

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

They were going to lose — they didn't have the votes.

Meanwhile, Keir Starmer is fucking *killing it* during Brexit questions

stet, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

He's my MP. Expect nothing less, he's been brilliant at every aspect of his job so far.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, he seems like one of the best of the moment. Headlines the other day suggested that he wants an open and honest conversations about people's very real concerns, but I didn't dig into it - I hope he's better than that.

woof, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

i was gonna say, didn't he give it the 'legitimate concerns' thing recently...

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

And Corbyn had a pretty great PMQs, only for his spokesperson to fuck it all up by prevaricating hard over whether we should blame Russia or is it maybe actually the US that's really to blame for Aleppo, when you think about it?

stet, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

^^ that was really lame, yeah.

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

Legitimate concerns: yes, he did mention those. Starmer was crossing the country most weeks seeking out voters' opinions on immigration issues before the Brexit vote (and even after he resigned from the first shad cab) so I assume he means the concerns Labour are on record as finding legitimate. That's the pay and conditions of migrants, their dodgy employers (who often charge back young migrants to live 10 to a 3-bed semi next to families, who hate this), the perception of strained facilities and *not* the standard UKIPpy send-'em-back bullshit. I don't think the voters he consulted GAF where their doctors, nurses and appropriately housed neighbours come from, and it isn't Labour encouraging blame of immigrants for a paucity of school places or NHS waiting times or competition for housing. You want the Mail for that!

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

He has tried to be clever in his explanation: "by increasing the skills of British workers" - but imo he's still pandered to xenophobes by saying he wants lower immigration.

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Anna Soubry also banging today

stet, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

It's funny how immigration is literally the only working class concern that anyone gives a shit about, isn't it?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

'legitimate concerns' is like a verbal swastika these days.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Is there a way that Labour could become better at strategy (exploiting tory weaknesses) that doesn't involve chasing 'electability' in out of date '97 terms?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Re: 'legitimate concerns' and what suzy is saying I think my standard is, if a politician can bring up the actually-existing exploitation, then contextualise it, without actually saying 'immigration' then they may be on to something but otherwise ...

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Because you could solve that exploitation by employing people to crack down on min wage avoidance by employers, without having to limit immigration (which special unit would as ever cost some taxes in the short term but be better for everyone in the long term)

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

She's creating a situation where Jeremy Corbyn of all people is able to position himself as more in tune with what business wants than her government. For a Tory Prime Minister that is completely astonishing and probably unprecedented.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Yes -- and while slapping the govt around in parliament itself may not get much favourable coverage yet even in the liberal UK broadsheets, except as slapstick, it'll be a big deal for the city.

Also it's probably actually p good for team-lab unity to win some things in their own wheelhouse -- once the tories stop being a bogey you need to imitate and become a clown you can successfully lob sponges at, the actually practical feel of being (more or less) on the same side again is going to re-emerge. Maybe. (This is a long tough climb.)

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

It's funny how immigration is literally the only working class concern that anyone gives a shit about, isn't it?

Hello, yes, nailed it.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

Yup. And any other concerns - employment, childcare, education, housing - magically turn into 'immigration' thanks to Tories and the media arm of everyone's favourite right-wing tax dodgers. I admire Corbyn for pushing back but how do others in his party find better words without exposing Labour to 'oooh, they won't even say the word!'

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

Neil Carmichael another good Tory in this debate. They're all coming out of the woodwork today.

stet, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

I wonder how bad this will have to get before anyone admits they made a mistake.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

the regrexit scale:

boris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dan hannan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>falange >>>>>>>>>>>>> arron fkn banks

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

@ITVJoel: Unilever told Tesco it wanted to up its prices by 10% due to weak £. Tesco refused and so, as of today, Unilever is not supplying them.

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

marmexit

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

>>>>>>>>>>>>> arron fkn banks >>>>>>>>>>>>> Liam fkn Fox

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

what's on Paul Dacre's ipod?

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlmhlWECMUk

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

I'm hoping that the reason my online grocery supplier has sent me inferior substitutes for Nutella for the last 2 weeks isn't related to the Unilever situation. Christ, looking at how many brands these grotesque fuckers own is a fair indictment of unfettered globalisation tho.

calzino, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

welcome return of another traditional element in british life:
https://poolemuseumsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/smugglers_cove.jpg

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

stimulating the coastal economy

Het schaduwkabinet reshuffle (seandalai), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

I am not selling my retirement Marmite until the famine comes!

I was really annoyed how May dismissed Paula Sherriff's very pertinent opening question about crooked Virgin Care practice today with that hackneyed "you lot started this" defence. True, but she was referring to damage done under the ConDem coalition.

calzino, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

This unilever thing is a wake up call I hope

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

you'd hope, but the tories are pretty heavy sleepers

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

Can't really blame Tesco for not bowing to Unil£v£r's greedy impulses, but it does seem like a tell-tale sign of things to come. Thumbscrews are turned on.

the tightening is plateauing (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2016/10/facts-of-life-and-death.html

The UK is not self-sufficient in food. The UK imports roughly 40% of the total food consumed, and the proportion is rising. Nor is it obvious that we can produce more food: to get close to self-sufficiency from 1939-45 required a world war, mobilization, and the conversion of all private gardens into kitchen gardens, along with rationing, and the UK population has grown by roughly 25% since then. While modern technology-intensive agricultural techniques can improve productivity, this is capital intensive, and the one thing a Post-hard Brexit Britain with a crashed currency and a financial sector fleeing to the continent is going to be short of is capital. Also, it takes years to roll out that sort of infrastructure upgrade, even if the will is there.

Food bank use is at record levels and hunger is a desperate concern for low-income (including low-earning employed) families. And the currency we buy our food imports with just crashed 10% this week, and 25% over the past four months.

If a Hard Brexit happens, then Sterling will almost certainly dip below Dollar parity for the first time in history. Imported foods will cost 40% more in real terms than they did in 2015. And there will be additional 20% tarrifs levelled on top.

I'm calling Hard Brexit a road to mass starvation and famine-grade deaths on a scale not seen in the UK since the Hungry Forties (that's the 1840s, not the 1940s).

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

Project Fear didn't do their job properly!

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

LOL its written by an SF writer

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

it's ok, all those people who only eat locally sourced seasonal produce will be fine

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

Dacre the Deranged
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/oct/12/daily-mail-bremoaners-brexit-mps-cbi-bbc-paul-dacre

nashwan, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

i can't find anything recent on the shipping market crash forecasts from around jan/feb 2016 apart from the stories surrounding the collpase of hanjin (and the performance artist stranded on a container carrier off the coast of korea): http://qz.com/779187/three-thousands-sailors-and-one-british-performance-artist-are-stranded-at-sea-after-the-collapse-of-koreas-shipping-giant-hanjin/

but this -- which is not directly linked to brexit -- will add to the uk's costs and hence troubles re the import market :(

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

off the coast of japan, sorry -- the shipping firm is korean

mark s, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

it's ok, all those people who only eat locally sourced seasonal produce will be fine

Picked by sturdy British yeomen availing themselves of the newfound opportunities presented by working in agriculture.

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Starmer on immigration - seems reasonable enough
http://www.camdennewjournal.com/starmer-immigration

“What we need to say is listen to what people are saying, understand properly what the reasons are for their concerns and then appreciate that the problem isn’t really about immigration at all. The problem is skills, housing, public services and one thing that Labour wasn’t strong enough when it was last in power – the question of cohesion, immigration and how you make communities work.”

Or at least reasonable until the last bit where he seems to contradict himself.

nashwan, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

suspicious of Blairite omission of the key failure of New Lab: without fulfilling, well-paid, meaningful jobs and plenty of them yr skills are meaningless. of course creating those jobs means dropping the economic orthodoxy but it's the absolute key imo, it underpins every other aspect of UK anomie

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

I don't trust him as far as i could throw him tbh.

calzino, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

nv otm

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

not trying to put a downer on Labour looking briefly like a functioning today, but still don't trust that fucker.

calzino, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

^^functioning party

calzino, Wednesday, 12 October 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

not even sure which thread to post this in any more, as all topics merge into a single hideous neolib fatberg of toxic jism…

…BUT falange's "travel for the racism, stay for the sexual assaults" jaunt is turning out well for him

mark s, Thursday, 13 October 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

just stumbled across this piece this morning

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jan/13/polly-toynbee-harriet-harman-social-mobility

funny how Polly reads a lot less bullish about New Lab's achievements in 2009 than she has been in 2016

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 13 October 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

xp re Matt's post

maybe worth its own thread - "things we know about how politics works in 2016". somewhere at the top of that list would be "appeals to reason are useless".

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 13 October 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

ffs

“Where there are people who come to this country to use our health service - and who should be paying for it - the health service identifies those people and makes sure it gets the money from them"

the phrase 'where there are' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there - where's the fucking evidence that this is happening on a scale that would justify id'ing thousands of pregnant women a year?

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 13 October 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

It's the usual 'someone could in theory exploit this, so we need to crack down in practice' mentality taken to worst extreme

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 13 October 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

I thought there were already pretty stringent rules in place for not allowing pregnant women to fly. Seemed to be after a certain stage in pregnancy and seemed to have cropped up in a lot of the customs programmes I'd caught over the last few years

Stevolende, Thursday, 13 October 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

My dad just sent these to me and they seem apropos of Britain's situation at the moment. From FDR's 1936 'rendez-vous with destiny' speech:

"Liberty requires opportunity to make a living — a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man (sic) not only enough to live by, but something to live for.”

and

"Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15314

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

fdr otm tbh

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:10 (seven years ago) link

These fuckwits do understand that not every British woman of child-bearing age owns a passport, right?

Matt DC, Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Regardless inevitably as nobody brings passport with them the time and money spent chasing people up to provide documentation or pay a heavy fine will no doubt cost more money than they ever make back.

nashwan, Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

i assume/hope they'll walk this one back as quickly as they did the foreign-worker stats stuff

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

from a survey by 82 academics scoring Uk PMs in the modern era, Cameron has only narrowly been beaten to the absolute worst ever by Anthony Eden - by dint of his 2nd term. Obv an indictment of Miliband and his shower as well.

Ed Balls would no doubt be calling FDR a utopian cloud dweller or a Trot or something similar.

calzino, Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

https://www.ft.com/content/939c7ed0-8e32-11e6-a72e-b428cb934b78

Yet this is far from all. Mrs May also stated that “if you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere”. She denied the possibility that one might be both a citizen of the world and a citizen of somewhere. But many of the skilled foreigners on whom the UK depends view themselves as just that. Why should they wish to stay in a country whose prime minister appears to despise them? Xenophobia was also an important part of the Brexit campaign, whatever Brexiters claim. Does anybody believe such language has no effect on potential workers and investors or, not least, our EU partners?

Unwise words have consequences. The UK government’s extreme goals are now clear. Investors have duly marked down the value of the country’s assets in the simplest way, by selling the pound... Policymakers could face a predicament familiar to emerging economies that lose the confidence of investors: the need to raise interest rates and close fiscal deficits during a crisis. Is this likely? No. Is the government’s loose talk making it rather more likely? Yes.

What drove Leavers was, we are also told, “the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK”. The currency markets demonstrate the emptiness of that principle. Britain’s EU partners are about to do the same. The premise of the Leave campaign was false: a host of decisions that affect the UK will always be taken outside it. But this truth is unlikely to stop the train towards a complete Brexit from departing on its timetabled journey. Stopping it would take a miracle, or rather a crisis. Is that likely? No. Is it possible? Yes.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

king cnut comes to mind

conrad, Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

while liam fox mp extols the virtues of of globalisation's waves he insists we'll stay dry by force of will

conrad, Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

It's time to listen to this (it used to be my fave by them)
http://www.soundstagedirect.com/media/selling_england_by_the_pound.jpg

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

I know this is the canary and all that but they did report on daily mail comments thread about an Eritrean man (who was killed by a lorry) and his wife who was badly injured.

Comments:

"Good one less to illegally enter British soil"

"Wife’s still alive? Good, now make her pay for a new bumper!"

"Best Bloody News I’ve Heard This Morning"

"1 down only 10,000 to go!Keep up the good work"

"These illegals are in pain. Should have reversed over him to make sure"

"Good. eliminate all the vermins [crying with laughter emoticon x3]"

"Just line all the convoy trucks over them. Problem solved"

"About time. At last something positive to keep the vermin out of our beloved country"

http://www.thecanary.co/2016/10/11/daily-mail-readers-respond-news-migrant-killed-bring-shame-us-images/

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 13 October 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

i can't find anything recent on the shipping market

this is only specifically about hanjin but does contain some communist observations on shipping.

For years, the best analysts and experts have preached the need to change the business model of the container shipping companies. Nothing happened, they just moved ahead, almost always at the expense of workforce costs. And consequently, the port managers behaved in the same way. In recent years, as the market got more and more out of control, they continued to build ever larger ports, an infrastructure delusion favored and promoted by insane policies of the European Union. Only recently in 2015, the first signs of reconsideration were felt. The risks of naval gigantism were denounced: New ports, built from scratch in Europe, were empty.

Some A+ rhetoric as well:

These high-level managers, who are paid fabulous salaries, do not generate business ideas. They are devoid of animal spirit and totally irresponsible. They do not care if the companies go bankrupt. They are interchangeable objects and almost, it seems, not real people.

Fizzles, Friday, 14 October 2016 06:17 (seven years ago) link

truth bombs

legitimate concerns about ducks (Noodle Vague), Friday, 14 October 2016 06:20 (seven years ago) link

indeed

and was in answer to mark s upthread which wasn't v clear.

Fizzles, Friday, 14 October 2016 08:16 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan/status/786486251394207744

I hope you are all commemorating this in a suitably sombre manner.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 14 October 2016 09:53 (seven years ago) link

norman yokeba

mark s, Friday, 14 October 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

so not gonna happen II

(SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Monday, 17 October 2016 08:42 (seven years ago) link

oh god i entered into the twitter discussion surrounding this story when will i ever learn?

Robby Mook (stevie), Monday, 17 October 2016 08:53 (seven years ago) link

LOOOOOOL but I did love the joek Tweet that said the councillor in question, Christian Holliday, had to change his surname from Christmas so as not to discomfit users of other religions and the PC elites.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 17 October 2016 09:14 (seven years ago) link

ordinary supermarkets denuded of fresh fruit and veg except that picked by men and women let out of prison camp for the day: this was nagl for the mighty soviet union and is unlikely add to the lustre and soft power of the New British Empire

(am assuming fancy supermarkets for the financier-nomenklatura would still stock delicacies flown in from wherever, now far too expensive not just for the median shopper but for several layers above except on special days)

mark s, Monday, 17 October 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

the plot thickens https://twitter.com/PaulKGB/status/788000120591777792

Neil S, Monday, 17 October 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/JU56ur9.png

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 17 October 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

Cardomon, that first concrete evidence is from July. Wondering if its even worse now.

Robby Mook (stevie), Monday, 17 October 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

In the BBC interview, Mr Woolfe said he had told Mr Hookem "let's go outside and discuss this man-to-man"

Its "mano el mano" get it right ffs.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 17 October 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

None of that foreign shite.

Matt DC, Monday, 17 October 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

I love it when Kippers try to use European expressions...

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 17 October 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

I think the chances of May being able to invoke Article 50 without a legal challenge from someone seem very slim.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

stoked for the madness

good luck uk

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

Had someone done something about restricting royal prerogative over the last 200 years it might be an interesting line of enquiry but I can't see any legal challenge being successful as it is.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

I think the chances of May being able to invoke Article 50 without a legal challenge from someone seem very slim.

There's a pretty serious challenge being heard in the High Court right now. I think the Govt. will win, though.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

FM 17 has got in on the Brexit debate

http://i.imgur.com/mIaZbxL.jpg

Cosmic Slop, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

shit just got real

pandemic, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

FM18: league cancelled as remoaners herded into larger stadiums while all small grounds converted to allotments in Dig for the New British Empire campaign

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

There's a pretty serious challenge being heard in the High Court right now. I think the Govt. will win, though.

This morning it has turned into a win-win for Bremoainairners. I think. The case is hinging on whether or not Article 50 is reversible. If it isn't, then triggering it will mean people lose rights granted under EU treaties (eg to appeal to the EU courts), and that's a power reserved to parliament — so parliament has to vote and it can't be done under prerogative.

If it *is* reversible, then then govt very likely wins the case and so can trigger A50 — but — then it has conceded it can be reversed and we get two years to do as Tusk suggests and spell out the real economic consequences of this to an electorate that is already starting to realise all may not be quite right here, with the hope of another vote or something to shitcan this awful idea.

stet, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

The very juicy part of that last one, though, is that the govt would have to *prove* it can be reversed, and the High Court is likely to say it can't rule on that, will send it the Supreme Court, which has to refer it to the ECJ. Christ it might finally give Dacre a fatal stroke to think that a EURO JUDGE gets to RULE ON OUR SOVEREIGNTY

stet, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

L O L

conrad, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.eu/article/theresa-may-commits-to-targeted-visa-immigration-system-uk-government-hard-brexit/

May has also asked the taskforce to help cut migration numbers by “making it harder for illegal immigrants to stay in the country.”

Makes you wonder how they work out how many people to add on top of the figure for those moving here legally.

nashwan, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/18/british-tea-jam-and-biscuits-will-be-at-the-heart-of-britains-br/

i see we're back at a trade strategy built round comedy marmalades

also lol where/how are british teas grown exactly? as picked by prison-camp coolies in the post-climate-change plantations i guess

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

it will be uniquely British tea made from domestic ingredients like erm.. dandelions, nettles and purple loosestrife

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

BEEF TEA

ROAST BEEF TEA

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

things that we can't even grow and processed foods that can practically be produced anywhere is a real fucking winner!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

(haha bcz i am very old and brought up in the actual real country, my brain spasmed briefly towards a "well, actually… " when you said nettles etc)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

my pisshead granddad used to make dandelion/nettle tea when he was skint, but that was Irish ingenuity!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

Actually tea is grown in Scotland and in Cornwall. It's quite expensive though. I had a fine caddy of Xmas Chai grown in the Dalreoch Estate lsdy Christmas . I think you were aware of this mark?

Cosmic Slop, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

rich tea? yes
bourbons? NO
jaffa cakes? NO
gypsy creams? NO
shrewsbury biscuits? *grimaces briefly* yes i suppose so

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

What's the Scottish one called? You'll Have Had Your?

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

lol scotland will be back in europe and off the list in no time flat

as will hobnobs apparently (and mcvities generally)

tunnock's teacakes? NO

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

for tom
http://weeteacompany.com/index.php/scottish-tea.html

Cosmic Slop, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Abernethy? YES (surprisingly)

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

wee tea is even less enticing than dandelion tea imo

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

c'mon they've got their own kirk and everything

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

also the french for dandelion is pissenlit = piss the bed) but i guess we aren't trying to tell it there anyway

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

sell it there i mean (sorry for typos i'm watching a gripping film feat.keanu reeves as a disgraced samurai)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

That's what we called them when I was growing up. Piss-the-beds, that is.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

I think it might be interesting to watch Larry Elliott over the coming months: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/16/let-the-pound-fall-and-the-economy-rise

He is probably the one pro-Brexit voice that doesn't make me scream, except I do now and then. In the above you are following the logic and then you get this:

Will dearer food and the coming squeeze on living standards will prompt a change of heart about Brexit? Remainers should not bank on it. Life has not been great for many in recent years anyway. What’s more, Britain is a country with a streak of cussedness that delights in having its back to the wall.

He has said it would take a prolonged and brutal recession for him to regret his vote for Brexit #stokedForTheMadness

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

authentic austerity >>> spectacular austerity

^^^bold argument

mark s, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Is this true Brits: Do you like having your backs to the wall? I did not know this about you..

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, that's why people are still bellyaching about some bin bags being piled up in Leicester Square 37 years after it happened.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

I don't think these people going to food banks for sustenance are taking selfies and labelling them #Blitz Spirit - Why aren't the Mail celebrating our backs to the wall stoicism?

No don't worry people The Graun loves ya!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

anyway, in another 40 years or so, after the famine and at the beginning of the North Sea reclamation of London. The Uk will start looking more like the chain of tropical islands it allegedly was in the Cenzoic era... and then we will be able to start growing proper tea!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

Proper tea is theft

Stevolende, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

kudos

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

Normal -uh!- tea !

calzino, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/10/highland-clearances/

We do not know when they will get the 5am knock on the door and be taken into custody. They have been unable to sell the Wayfarers’ Rest, in which they invested £240,000, because just as before they came, nobody else wants to run it. In an act of supreme pettiness, the Home Office have confiscated Jason’s driving licence, which makes life in the Highlands near impossible. Also as a former pastor Jason used to pay community visits on elderly and vulnerable people in isolated locations, which he cannot now do.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

Welcome to Britain!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37700074

Monmouth MP David Davies said one of the migrants "looks older than I am"

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/A418/production/_91980024_tv026806317.jpg

Neil S, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:10 (seven years ago) link

"If they are desperate enough to jump on lorries we need to check that they haven't had their teeth replaced with stolen kiddies' gnashers. Not to vilify anyone but just to be sure."

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:32 (seven years ago) link

Do you remember in the summer when everyone thought Theresa May was a safe and competent pair of hands?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:37 (seven years ago) link

Every credulous Guardian fuck who parroted that line, or banged on in the New Statesman about Cameron being the leader of the British left, should be blacklisted from journalism for their failure to display even a basic willingness to subject the government to any scrutiny.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:39 (seven years ago) link

Not quite getting this teeth thing, are they talking about lining kids up and getting them to open their mouths to inspect their teeth like cattle or doing a longer dental check up which would surely be costly? I mean even x-raying or normally photographing and checking the results isn't free neither is getting a trained dental technician to look in every mouth.
Or is practicality not an issue in a speech anyway?

Stevolende, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:48 (seven years ago) link

Quiite apart from basic human rights issues. But presumably whoever suggested teh teeth thing had some vision of how that would be done.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:55 (seven years ago) link

It's opportunistic racist anti-immigrant sabre-rattling from impotent, flailing Tory pols who look like paedophiles fashioned from foreskin, and should be treated with the according level of disdain.

I am seriously fucked off with everything that has been going on this year, and the past six years, and I don't know what to do about any of it.

Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:56 (seven years ago) link

I love these Tory Brexitons saying "Well actually the pound's been overvalued for years so its fall in value is a JOLLY GOOD THING". No doubt they'd be saying the same if some action or policy of Corbyn/MacDonnell had a similar result.

mahb, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:57 (seven years ago) link

checking migrant children's teeth also proposed in 2007 by.... Liam Byrne

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-437629/Young-illegal-immigrants-face-teeth-x-ray-test-real-age.html

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:58 (seven years ago) link

In normal times, a fall in the pound is a good thing if you're an exporter because you're likely to shift more units overseas. But we're not in any normal times and any nominal gains that might be made by Britain's undersized home-owned manufacturing sector are likely to be wiped out by the imposition of tariffs and the knock-on effect of multinationals moving their operations elsewhere. Although British people have suddenly become a lot cheaper for them to employ.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 09:02 (seven years ago) link

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/hard-brexit-only-if-its-free/

Now this really should be put in front of the Cabinet straight away. Surely the clearest signal yet that the British public won't take a tanking economy in exchange for Controls On Immigration.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

The GBP has lost 35% of its value against the Ruble this year!

The UK is a net importer and basic things - food included - are going to have to go up. It's going to be interesting to see if an increase in the cost of living, in combination with wiping off 10-20% against most European currencies, makes migration to the UK less attractive - remittances are going to decline significantly.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

<i>In normal times, a fall in the pound is a good thing if you're an exporter because you're likely to shift more units overseas.</i>

Better economic brains than mine round here are saying that even this isn't really true any more. We're so enmeshed with the EU and global supply chains that there's almost no exporter who doesn't also rely on imports of one thing or another. Britain is out of the business of turning its own raw materials into exports, so any gains you make in sales are more than offset by your massively increased costs.

stet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

I am seriously fucked off with everything that has been going on this year, and the past six years, and I don't know what to do about any of it.

― Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 09:56 (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Really feeling this post

ultros ultros-ghali, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

presumably whoever suggested teh teeth thing had some vision of how that would be done

no the only thing that matters is that it would be done and what it would mean

conrad, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 10:50 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking that the vision included a way that it was somehow doable on a mass scale. But I guess that would show the impracticality.

Just wondering how long it takes to do a mass batch of x-rays of people's teeth and process them and then work out what to do with those people while the x-rays are being processed. Or is it understood that people will already be accepted into processing camps while they're being processed. Which would itself involve having more responsibility over them instead of being able to directly reject them before they got into the process. Which presumably means a difference in whatever status they held
& all of that is viewing human beings as commodities.

& is all dehumanising red tape.

But in order to think that way in the first place one would presumably need to reduce these individuals to abstract figures on paper anyway.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:05 (seven years ago) link

on that lse blog, do people actually blame the government for the cost of things and a worse standard of living? doesn't look like it. nor do i think people think they're "paying" for less immigration when the price is a decline in living standards. if you actually charged them a specific tax then they might.

similarly they only "get" a reduction in immigration via what they hear on the news, not via any actual visible or meaningful change in their lives.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

As the spokesman from the BDA says on the link, X-Raying to determine age just isn't accurate (or an ethical thing to do for non-medical reasons).

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

the reality is that leaving eu will save uk money and reduce bureaucracy

in theory to e.g. analyse the teeth of prospective refugees in order to determine whether in fact they are as they claim to be children might cost money and involve a huge amount of bureaucracy

but that's a secondary issue so in effect it can't and won't

and even if it did well uk will have money and bureaucracy-endurance to spare outside of the eu so why not

it's necessary therefore the idea that there's any question of affordability or efficiency or ethicality or whatever is unwarranted

conrad, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

on that lse blog, do people actually blame the government for the cost of things and a worse standard of living? doesn't look like it.

Well, a lot of the people at the sharp end don't vote Tory anyway, but yes people do blame the government. It's not just rising food prices, there'll be a whole range of issues, including evaporating jobs. Even if they don't explicitly blame the government, general disgruntlement is hardly going to persuade them to favour the status quo.

Whether they'll explicitly link it to Brexit is another matter, but there's a perfect storm of rising anti-immigrant hysteria and increasing economic instability that is frankly terrifying.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

yeah i agree with your last point - i think the blame will go on minorities, immigrants, whoever, but not the state. never the state.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

or if it does go towards the state it won't result in a government that redistributes wealth.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

I saw JC at PMQs and I appreciated his work and it sounded like his own side was supporting him, a little bit

on the other side was BJ who muttered away fecklessly while the PM was earnestly talking -- he is a disgusting sight

the pinefox, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 11:59 (seven years ago) link

The UK is a net importer and basic things - food included - are going to have to go up.

Yep. Even homegrown food is likely to go up without EU farming subsidies, plus the cost of importing agricultural supplies and equipment.

But I agree with LG, I fear the blame will go mainly onto immigrants/the EU for not giving into all our demands/"Remoaners" and any other even slightly dissenting voices for "talking the nation down" etc. Even if the govt gets any blame it'll be for not showing enough determination for the mighty cause of Brexit, must find a new set of even more fascist anti-Europe Tories/Kippers to stride even more firmly, blindly towards a plan-less hard Brexit.

What can we do? What can anyone do?

(Hmm, maybe I'll feel less gloomy after lunch)

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:37 (seven years ago) link

Those people, and the Mail, will always be with us. But I don't (want to) believe they're the majority, and polling strongly suggests they aren't. So if there's a credible alternative for them to vote for, they'll vote for it at the first chance they get.

That's the line of thought stopping me from looking at jobs in Berlin, anyway. (Who am I kidding; I'm looking at jobs all over Europe tbh)

stet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

(xp) If only my German was above faltering basics, I had any exportably employable skills, and I'd have any chance of persuading my loved ones. I suppose Brexiters would laugh; "if you love it so much why don't you go live there - oh, you're not clever enough? well how very rich" etc etc

(post to self) Former DEFRA Secretary of State Owen Paterson thinks Brexit will be great for UK agriculture because we can give the £370 million a week to farmers to replace the EU subsidies, use bee-killing pesticides without hippies asking if we've noticed how bees are integral to the whole ecosystem
https://www.owenpaterson.org/news/uk-agriculture-would-be-better-outside-eu-oxford-farming-conference-january-2016

but then we're talking about someone who was (Shadow then actual) Secretary of State for Northern Ireland for 5 years without apparently understanding that Brexit effectively sets fire to the Good Friday Agreement and this might not be a good thing, so

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

Yep. Even homegrown food is likely to go up without EU farming subsidies, plus the cost of importing agricultural supplies and equipment

not to mention the real possibility of a sudden scarcity of workers willing to harvest crops etc

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

(but thanks stet, probably otm, will go and look for some cheering polls. tbf have seen a few "people don't actually want Hard Brexit / want to be poorer for Brexit" polls but the cheer brought by a few of those was wiped out by a single one to the contrary and accidentally reading some below-the-line comments)

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

I don't believe the hard brexiteers are in the majority, but they are loud and they are being listened to. Perhaps we need to get louder.

Robby Mook (stevie), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

We have legitimate concerns

stet, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

That's the line of thought stopping me from looking at jobs in Berlin, anyway. (Who am I kidding; I'm looking at jobs all over Europe tbh)

yeah i tend to want to move back to dublin when i think about it for any amount of time. i'm far from the sharper end of the current climate but i think a sense of not being welcome here still registers. or at least combines with the quintessential immigrant longing to move to some fantasised version of home.

i am sort of tied to english-speaking countries as my job is very word-based, but a little less so as time goes on. i would also like to live in the usa but not that easy with visas etc.

xpost there's not always a lot of unity among those of us who aren't determined to unite as one big bloc of massive cunts.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

There'll be a fair amount of people- not a majority, but a fair amount- who actively want acute economic dislocation, as that way they can be sure that 'proper' Brexit is really happening. Shouldn't underestimate the sociopathic nihilism of the Leave core vote.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

i think a sense of not being welcome here still registers

knowing that there must be tons of people feeling like this is one of the most soul destroying things about this whole shitty mess imo

sktsh, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

yeah and if a white irish person is feeling it, it must be gigantically amplified for many others.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

Do you remember in the summer when everyone thought Theresa May was a safe and competent pair of hands?

Wasn't that because her husband said she could do a good soufflé?

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/hard-brexit-only-if-its-free🔗/

Now this really should be put in front of the Cabinet straight away. Surely the clearest signal yet that the British public won't take a tanking economy in exchange for Controls On Immigration.

Won't they be interested only if the author can provide solid British heritage?

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

This is not so good, Red UKIP:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/19/british-patriots-welcome-refugees

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

xp I thought this was good on why "progressive patriotism" is a bad idea:

http://flyingrodent.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/in-my-world-of-liberal-journalism.html

(I know that the Nick Cohen article quoted there isn't really the angle from which Abi Wikinson is approaching it in that Guardian piece, but still)

soref, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

The SNP exists and thrives not because it has a big smiley, happy-happy attitude to patriotism, but because it has something clearly defined to push back against. All it says, week in and week out, is that we *could* have awesome hospitals and more jobs and better education, if it weren't for the BASTARD SWINE at Westminster.

especially this bit, the SNP's argument that Westminster has not tended to act with Scotland's best interests at heart obv has a lot of truth to it, but who would an English Nationalism be pushing against? hard to think of a candidate that wouldn't immediately negate any claim it had to being a "progressive" movement.

soref, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

who would an English Nationalism be pushing against?

The EU. Westminster."Elites". Scots. Immigrants. Political Correctness. Spoiled for choice really.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

the thing about scotland's progressive nationalism is that it exists due to a variety of specific cultural and historical factors. the idea, not necessarily truthful, that scottish people are especially egalitarian is embedded in the culture. "we're aw jock thamson's bairns". the scottish parliament being opened with the burn's song "is there for honest poverty". the general animus towards tories that basically everyone in scotland displays - apart from actual tories. a lot of people in scotland with quite conservative politics will self-identify as left-leaning, or at least definitely not tory. and last but not least the tend for smaller nations to define themselves as different from their nearest big neighbour, and that nearest big neighbour's increasing tendency towards xenophobia and conservatism. all of this lends towards making a progressive vision of scotland the most credible and culturally viable. while some people are nationalist fundamentalists - scotland must be independent no matter what the consequences because it is a nation - a large chunk of pro-indy people see scottish nationalism as purely, or mainly, a tactic to pursue social justice.

british nationalism also serves as a pressure valve for the right-wing, militaristic, and xenophobic tendencies in scottish society. loyalism is a small but not insignificant organic working-class movement in the central belt. and anyone to whom the idea of the power and might of the nation appeals to has the glorious history of the empire and scottish people's prominent role in that colonial conquest to believe in and cling to.

*-* (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

conclusion: this kind of progressive nationalism can never flourish in england

*-* (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

well maybe if England was under the thumb of an external colonial power for several hundred years but the special relationship doesn't work quite like that

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

Scotland wasn't under the thumb of an external colonial power for several hundred years either though. Really.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

i actually have been mulling writing a thinkpiece about the problematic nature of some progressive scottish nationalists contending that scotland can be thought of as colonized, while effectively ignoring the overrepresentation of the scots in british colonialism, especially with reference to the scot nat solidarity with the quebec independence movement and their complete lack of interest in the actually colonized population of quebec.

*-* (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

I am deeply suspicious of Scottish nationalism despite being a guy who goes on about Scotland and being Scottish far too much.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

Scotland was never colonized, Scots enthusiastically helped colonize plenty of other places though.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

If there was any money to be made, we were right in there.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

i agree it's not straightforward in the same way that non-Latin citizens became prominent in the Roman empire, all the way to the emperorship, but there was still a hegemonic centre and gee it's late

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Still pretty unimpressed by the SNP accepting the Souter/Gloag fam as donors TBH.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

Michael Gray arguing that the SNP's surge in membership over the last two years has not led to a noticeable shift to the left:

Many expected that the rush of 100,000 new members into the party would lead to new policies and a more left-wing focused agenda. It hasn’t. In fact SNP loyalists and the party’s current leadership emerged with a fresh, commanding mandate – and largely unchallenged over their direction and strategy.

Angus Robertson’s landslide in the party’s depute leader contest (52 per cent in a contest of four candidates) epitomised this. It was a vote of confidence and loyalty in the current, cautious direction of the party.

Robertson, who led the SNP policy change to support the NATO military alliance, was the continuity candidate. Tommy Sheppard MP, who called for extra investment in grassroots organising, trailed a distant second place on 25 per cent

http://www.thenational.scot/comment/michael-gray-is-caution-a-good-tactic-for-the-snp.23699

soref, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

To military hating space cadets like me nationalism has always seemed primitive and dangerous. But i don't have any answers either, but flag wavers do my fucking head in and it is fair to say they are damned by history.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

"The NHS is a good idea, Britain has a history of taking in refugees" is pretty far from Red UKIP, though.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

"This is the first of Britain’s self-inflicted wounds, phase I of Britain’s economic hara-kiri..."

http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/10/18/brexit-death-of-british-business/

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 20 October 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

I do occasionally wonder whether the Mail editors are trying to undermine the paper from within:

https://twitter.com/thistlejohn/status/788853796315226112

The NYRB article is good.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 October 2016 08:11 (seven years ago) link

Witney by-election today. Don't see any realistic chance of anyone except the Tories winning but it was a pro-Remain seat full of mostly trad Tories who may be more interested in the economy than getting the immigrants out (or maybe not) so we'll see who picks up the protest votes. I'm in the neighbouring constituency with some demographic overlap, alas, so I'll be watching with interest.

Lots of exciting candidates to choose from (including Bernie Sanders' brother) and deposits to be lost:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-37489444

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 20 October 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

iirc Lord Toby Jug left the Monster Raving Loonies after the Mad Hatter punched him in the arse for suggesting that they weren't eccentric enough.

nashwan, Thursday, 20 October 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

"A left united in Witney could have changed Theresa May’s Britain" - Anne Perkins argues that Labour and the Lib Dems should have made a deal that only one of them would field a candidate in Witney, as under these circumstances the Tories could have lost the seat, says the fact that they both stood shows "British politics’ destructive preference for the narcissism of small differences".

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/17/left-united-witney-theresa-mays-britain-byelection-lib-dems-labour

what do people think about this "progressive alliance of the left" idea? it's kind of amazing to me how many people are happy to consider the Lib Dems part of the left, considering that it's only 18 months ago that they were in coalition with the Conservatives

soref, Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:08 (seven years ago) link

Never get involved with fringe parties, that's my advice to the Labour Party.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

Never get involved with fringe parties, that's my advice to the Labour PartyLib Dems.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

My advice to the Lib Dems is a mass suicide pact.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

Still pretty unimpressed by the SNP accepting the Souter/Gloag fam as donors TBH.

― jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 19 October 2016 22:19(yesterday) Bookmark Flag

I can't stress how important this is to me in determining I will never cast a vote to the SNP until they admit this was a colossal error. It's amazing how many pro-Indy voices are willing to overlook this in their vision of a socialist utopian Scotland.

boxedjoy, Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

I'd be up for scrapping the existing parties, mb make it constitutionally mandated every fifty years or so

Master Ballsmith (ogmor), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

No more parties in UK

nashwan, Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

xpost

Yes, plus Salmond's continual sucking up to Murdoch and Trump was truly gruesome:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/apr/25/alex-salmond-rupert-murdoch-ties

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/20/alex-salmond-donald-trump-scotland

And was also irked by this T in the Park story, partly because it came to light at the same time that Glasgow City Council closed down the Arches, which the SNP did nothing to prevent:

http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/snp-in-cronyism-row-over-t-in-the-park-grant-1-3855346

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

this brexit thing gonna tank british business so much swiftlier and surelier than full socialism could ever have dreamed of

conrad, Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

conviction Lib Dem - oxymoron y/n?

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Chris Huhne

nashwan, Thursday, 20 October 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

The Lib Dems just don't have a strong party line on anything that Labour or the Tories have historically prioritised, so it's very easy for them to just get carried along in the slipstream of whoever they happen to be working with. The rump of the SDP distorted public perception for a long time and that appears to be happening again.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 October 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

Young Irish think twice about living in Britain after Brexit

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 20 October 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

"A left united in Witney could have changed Theresa May’s Britain" - Anne Perkins argues that Labour and the Lib Dems should have made a deal that only one of them would field a candidate in Witney, as under these circumstances the Tories could have lost the seat, says the fact that they both stood shows "British politics’ destructive preference for the narcissism of small differences".

She's living in a fantasy world. Results from the 2015 election: Tories 60%, Labour 17%, UKIP 9%, Lib Dem 7%, Green 5%. That's at a time when the polls suggested it would be neck-and-neck nationally between Labour and the Tories. Given Labour's post-coup implosion and the huge post-referendum switch from UKIP to the Tories, there's no reason to think the result would be closer now, if anything the opposite. And presumably she's arguing that the Lib Dems and the Greens should stand down to leave the field clear for Labour (as they were the second placed party last time), but what would the Lib Dems gain from that? They've already been almost completely destroyed, why would they want to send out the message that there's no point voting for them in the south of England as only Labour can challenge the Tories? And Labour would lose anyway.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 20 October 2016 12:47 (seven years ago) link

Plucky independent or nothing really.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 October 2016 13:08 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, the only time all the not-Tory/UKIP candidates added up to more than the Tories was in 2001, by less than 1% (iirc - I closed the window and can't be bothered to check). Lib Dems and Labour swapped places post-coalition but neither of them have ever been anywhere near the Tories in Witney. So not gonna happen etc.

It might actually work over the border here in Oxford West & Abingdon but is still not going to happen for all the reasons above, obv.

xp, can an independent ever pick up enough votes without a long political/media career behind them? This list isn't making it look like a particularly good career choice:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_minor_party_and_independent_MPs_elected

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 20 October 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Shaun Woodward was Labour MP for Witney between 1999 and 2001 RIP never forget etc.

Neil S, Thursday, 20 October 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

He started as a Tory and switched, though.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 20 October 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

there's a lad you could never accuse of being a Tory entryist

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 October 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

dammit xp

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 October 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

xxp I know, I lived in that constituency at the time

his Wikipedia entry makes for interesting reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_Woodward

In March 2001, he was said to be the only Labour MP with a butler.

Neil S, Thursday, 20 October 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

Oh I forgot that happened twice, Oxfordshire Tory MPs defecting to New Labour: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jackson_%28Wantage_MP%29

SW did so at a slightly more defensible point in the timeline i.e. pre-Iraq though

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 20 October 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

He was a contemporary of figures including Christopher Hitchens, John Redwood, William Waldegrave, Edwina Currie, Stephen Milligan, John Scarlett, William Blair, Bill Clinton and Gyles Brandreth

Neil S, Thursday, 20 October 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Great bunch of lads

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 October 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

May is now pledging that the net migration target will include foreign students. Of all the stupid, obviously self-defeating shit her government is doing, this is right up there. A massive financial hit to the UK's entire higher education sector, economy and a lot of people's future life chances to further mollify a load of miserable fucking bigots.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 October 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

What on earth?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 20 October 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Is happening?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 20 October 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

That has always been the policy.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 October 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Yep, it *is* fucking stupid, but she's been doing this for years

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 20 October 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

That has always been the policy.

Yeah, at the CLP meeting last month people seemed fairly sure it would include foreign students. Which is interesting here because St Andrews is obviously fairly sensitive to foreign student levels.

two crickets sassing each other (dowd), Thursday, 20 October 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

May had the opportunity to exclude foreign students when she was Home Secretary (which was the preferred policy of the Treasury) but chose to fight against it, despite knowing it would make the pledge impossible and the failure to meet it politically embarrassing for her. She is a firm believer in restricting numbers no matter the cost.

If anyone has a few million quid lying about, invest in student accommodation in Toronto, Victoria and Vancouver.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 October 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

Tories hold Witney, combined Lib Dem and Labour vote *just* higher than the Tory vote (by 0.1%!)

CON: 45.1% (-15.1)
LDEM: 30.2% (+23.5)
LAB: 15.0% (-2.2)
GRN: 3.5% (-1.5)
UKIP: 3.5% (-5.6)

soref, Friday, 21 October 2016 02:19 (seven years ago) link

Ha. I was wrong, then - didn't expect the Lib Dem vote to treble. Not really sure what's happened there: in absolute terms (rather than percentages) the Lib Dems have climbed back up to 2010 levels from a very low base, while Labour and the Tories have both lost half their support. You'd expect the latter given the lower turnout, but why have the Lib Dems surged like that (when nationally nothing like that is happening at all)? Are these people who were determined to vote in the by-election to protest about Brexit?

I'm still not convinced a single opposition candidate could have won. For one thing, I don't see how the Lib Dems could have convinced Labour not to stand seeing as Labour got more than twice as many votes as them in 2015 (and the Lib Dems were a very distant fourth place). Also, if there was any danger of the Tories losing the seat, I imagine more of their supporters would have bothered to vote.

The Tory response isn't terribly convincing: "Home Office minister Brandon Lewis said it was a "great result" for the party, despite the reduced majority. "You have to really look at what David Cameron got in 2002, when he first stood, which was 45%," he told the BBC." Obviously it was 2001, not 2002, and at that time Labour were about 14 percentage points ahead of the Tories nationally, instead of about 18 behind.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 21 October 2016 07:27 (seven years ago) link

The Lib Dems are the only explicitly pro-European party left and the wider area voted Remain. People have short memories but the reason for the surge isn't exactly mystifying.

Matt DC, Friday, 21 October 2016 07:47 (seven years ago) link

Also Tory voters voting Lib Dem, and vice versa, no great surprise there.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Friday, 21 October 2016 08:13 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you can separate the Tory majority in previous years from the fact it was David Cameron's former seat. Replacing the PM with a largely unknown personal injury lawyer is going to have an impact.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 21 October 2016 08:16 (seven years ago) link

If Labour or Lib Dems stood down a few of those would've voted Tory. Anne Perkins is just terrible.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 October 2016 08:20 (seven years ago) link

I think there was a case for Labour to stand aside and let a Lib Dem try to beat the Con -- because it would further reduce the small Con majority.

This would conceivably also have the benefit of putting the LDs in Lab's debt as it were, or generating good will.

But such calculations are difficult -- it is quite possible that the Con would still have won even against a united opposition, as things would have shaken out differently; and many in Labour would have accused Mr Corbyn of incompetently giving up on a Labour battle, etc (as they will always accuse him of anything they can think of). Even some on the Labour left would have been angry 9as they may despise the LDs)- though probably not the Neal Lawson progressive coalition types. I wonder what Paul Mason would have done.

Still, if it had been up to me? I think I would have stood aside and let them LD take on the Con, and tried to build the ever elusive progressive coalition we have talked about for 30 years.

the pinefox, Friday, 21 October 2016 08:56 (seven years ago) link

I wonder what Paul Mason would have done.

Driven big red tanks up to the polling station probably.

Matt DC, Friday, 21 October 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

blasting techno or gtfo

mark s, Friday, 21 October 2016 09:58 (seven years ago) link

The Batley & Spen by-election meanwhile suggests that perhaps there aren't as many frothing racists in the North of England as the political establishment thinks?

Matt DC, Friday, 21 October 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

it seems there were a few fringe nutters heckling Tracy yesterday, but only a few people making a lot of noise - as per...

calzino, Friday, 21 October 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

I saw a picture this morning and realised it was her out of Coronation Street for the first time

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Friday, 21 October 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

I used to often see her on the trans-Pennine express, it seems ridiculous that in this country in 2016 she would probably consider public transport a major h+s risk now she's an MP.

calzino, Friday, 21 October 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Mr Juncker, how did the evening go with Theres May? um...

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 21 October 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

lol

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 21 October 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

lol, what a clown: https://twitter.com/DavidTCDavies/status/789489639182704640

soref, Friday, 21 October 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

#Conservative MP for #Monmouth

A report from the Home Affairs Committee showed Monmouthshire was one of 17 Welsh local authorities that failed to take in a single refugee from the UK government’s Syrian vulnerable persons resettlement scheme.
...
An official from MCC said the figures were ‘misleading’ and the council had every intention of honouring its commitment, with three families set to arrive later this summer.

(This Brexit era is very weird, to find myself agreeing with Piers Morgan)

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 21 October 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

tbf davies has a point about treating piers moron as a serious journalist

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 21 October 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/britainelects/status/789483101466558464

Scottish Westminster voting intention:

SNP: 49% (-1)
CON: 20% (+5)
LAB: 17% (-7)
LDEM: 8% (-)
(via BMG / 28 Sep - 04 Oct)
Chgs. vs. GE2015

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 21 October 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

if those numbers held, does anyone know if the distribution is likely to lead to the Tories gaining any more seats in Scotland? when was the last time the Tories had more MPs representing Scottish constituencies than Labour? (the Tories already have more MSPs than Labour, right?) is there any plausible way back for Scottish Labour?

soref, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

if Scotland did gain independence, would the SNP be likely to split without that issue to hold them together? which I guess could lead to a wholesale realignment of parties in the country?

soref, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

No, because the SNP aren't Tartan UKIP (sorry) - they're an actual political party with a broad range of policies who've held power in Holyrood for some time now.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

SNP are a big tent party, and definitely a part of their success owes to the fact that a lot of independence supporters of different political hues have latched onto the party as "the best vehicle for independence". post-independence they would be a major party, but there would definitely be some realignment. The swing from Labour to Tories in Scotland that that poll would seem to suggest I think stems from a few factors: the fact that many of Labour's left-wing supporters in Scotland have already decamped to the SNP and therefore the rump of Labour voters is more likely to be nearer the centre and more likely to be enticed by the Tories; the predominance of the constitutional question in people's political identity in contemporary Scotland and the perception that Labour are not as hardline Unionist as the Tories; and the real similarity of the social justice rhetoric of the SNP and Labour in Scotland which makes Labour seem like less of an alternative to the status quo.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 21 October 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

Also Ruth Davidson.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 21 October 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

Do people really like Ruth Davidson? This is something that I read in the papers but I've yet to see any polling regarding the popularity of the Scottish leaders - it definitely exists I've just not seen it. Definitely a more effective leader than Dugdale mind you.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 21 October 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

I think a lot of people do and she certainly has a less toxic personality than most Tories. She's certainly given the impression of distancing herself from the worst aspects of Westminster.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 21 October 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

morons answering polls love personalities tbf

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 22 October 2016 00:20 (seven years ago) link

most overrated politician in the UK.

||||||||, Saturday, 22 October 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

Oh I agree. I'm not saying she's good in any sense but she has had a huge effect on the growth of the Tory vote in Scotland, which was the question being addressed.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Saturday, 22 October 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

she has the rare ability to be both scottish and a tory without overtly visible swivel-eyed-loon tendencies, which has definitely contributed to her appeal, yeah - especially when she's up against the most piss-weak scottish labour party in living memory

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 22 October 2016 10:39 (seven years ago) link

jim's analysis v much otm

doo-doo diplomacy (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 22 October 2016 10:40 (seven years ago) link

She seems to have moved the Scottish Tories back towards the old Unionist Party trick of being simultaneously more pro-Union but more Scottish than the Labour Party.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Saturday, 22 October 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

... or less identified with Westminster and That London.

Patti Labelle is in here with her high but mediocre singing voice. (Tom D.), Saturday, 22 October 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

As a non UK person, what i see of her makes her seem like someone able to recognise the boorish stupidity of the English tories and recognise its ridiculousness. Of course, she is hardly repudiating them, and she aligns with them, and broadly supports their agenda.

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Saturday, 22 October 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

Can anyone check my Brexit maths here? Given that the estimated cost of Britain leaving the Single Market is £66bn a year, and the government is apparently willing to pay that in exchange for reducing net migration to the tens of thousands.

Current net migration sits at 327,000, so if the govt were to reduce it to 99,000 that's a gap of 228,000 people. Or (and this is rounding down), a cool £289,473 per migrant.

In other words, it would be cheaper to buy each of them a house than to make this particular trade-off.

Matt DC, Monday, 24 October 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

ah but you fail to price in the boom effects we'll have when a) the jobs are no longer being stolen and b) plucky Brits pick up the call to be innovative, and c) can succeed without red tape on their backs.

stet, Monday, 24 October 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/world/europe/scotland-gay-politicians.html?_r=0

this was p heartening for me to find in the ny times

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 24 October 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely delighted at that

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 24 October 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

Weird that it mentions Souter by name but fails to mention his SNP connections and donations.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Monday, 24 October 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

Still, I agree it's progress. I mean it's nearly 20 years since a Scottish MP was last hounded to his death for being gay.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Monday, 24 October 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

I will never forget the hilarity when N4ncy Cl3nch decided she loved Scotland so much she had to move to London to make it as a drag star

boxedjoy, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 07:35 (seven years ago) link

scottish nationalists shouldn't be allowed to leave the country

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Chain them to the stone of Scone.

Anyway, Zac Goldsmith resigned, so by-election.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

BJ is digging in as well. Hah! this could get messy.

calzino, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

Kind of wish Corbyn was visibly trying to hold the Vote Leave crew to account (in the way that Chuka Umunna has been doing, over the last few days).

(Perhaps he is and I have missed it?)

djh, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

No discipline in the ranks. You'd expect it from a busted flush like Goldsmith but for newly appointed Cabinet ministers to be mouthing off this early should be worrying, because they're not going to get any happier over the next few years.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Bush argues that Goldsmith's "personal following" is exaggerated and that the Lib Dems have a real shot:

https://www.facebook.com/stephenkbush/posts/546869208845145

part of me wants to see Labour not stand a candidate to increase the chances of Goldsmith losing, but they probably can't afford to do that when in the middle of an existential crisis

- SOLO - Pink Dolphin, Bubbling Cassina (frog), Indris, Monkeys, Tiger (soref), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Can you imagine if a Labour rebel stood down to fight as an independent in protest at party policy and the Labour Party decided not to put up a candidate to stand against them? The press would murder them.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Richmond had a slight Leave majority during the referendum which may have eroded since June but would still be big enough to offset any gains the Lib Dems might make.

The bigger Goldsmith's personal following the greater the chance of a Lib Dem victory, presuming he splits the vote for whoever the Tory candidate turns out to be. Assuming they field one.

(xpost - are the Tories really not contesting the seat?)

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

The Conservatives said they "disagreed" with Mr Goldsmith's decision but would not field a candidate against him.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I mean it's probably a sensible decision given the size of their majority and the fact that an independent Goldsmith would vote with them most of the time in any case.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure they came to some sort of arrangement with the plank Goldsmith.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

I have a low enough sympathy rating for poor old millionaire's row getting besieged by planes and noise pollution, but for the benefit of Zac Goldsmith and his "personal following" I'd say build another fucking runway while you are it.

calzino, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

I mean this is huge, right? Hard to see how she could get away with leaving the single market now, and equally difficult to see how she'll get away without howls of betrayal from Brexit true believers.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

baldrick-style

mark s, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure Corbyn will find some way not to mention it for the next week or so.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

at least we know our pm isn't daft enough to think brexit is going to do the country any good ...

just craven enough to ride the concomitant wave of xenophobia to an enduring reign at westminster

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

i don't think it's going to be very enduring

mark s, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

I'm extremely interested in how Murdoch and Dacre respond to this. I'm guessing by doubling down on the with-us-or-treasonous betrayal narrative.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

which is i think quite brittle

mark s, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

I doubt they will mention it extensively. If she was saying this in secret speeches this week it would be huge but this was prior to the referendum when she was supposed to be drumming up support for staying. Her position, in public, has always been that she was in favour of staying but will make the best of the democratic decision to leave. She was extremely quiet at the time but differing degrees of nuance in her stated position doesn't seem a huge issue.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

But if she were to proceed with taking the UK out of the single market it would be (virtually) unprecedented for a PM to be pursuing a course of action they'd privately admitted would be hugely damaging to the country? I mean aside from Cameron but his fecklessness is now well-documented.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

That is the nature of having a referendum, though. She doesn't need to believe it, she just needs to do it and Murdoch / the back benches will be happy. She has given very little sign that we won't be going for 'hard Brexit'.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

(I had been assuming she secretly voted Remain all along and had only kept her head down with one eye on Number 10, expecting it to play out in more or less exactly the way it did).

Felix Salmon has just pointed out on Twitter that she has shown a level of honesty and frankness with Goldman Sachs that she has so far refused to show the electorate.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

Boris managed to swerve that Remain article he wrote with that "it was me just ruminating aloud on the EU question" despite having a long rep as being pro EU. The electorate don't seem to care about the legitimate concerns these politicians really have, they are so out of touch:p

calzino, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Not that I am defending her but it's much easier to say 'Brexit will be a trash fire' when you are responsible for campaigning against it than when you are in charge of making it a reality. Her primary job at the moment is maintaining economic confidence during the process - she pretty much has to talk up the exciting opportunities for innovative jam exports rather than admitting everything will be terrible unless she is going to reverse her position that the will of the electorate shouldn't be listened to.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

But the electorate didn't vote for a "hard Brexit", they may have voted to leave the EU but they didn't vote for a PM to walk willingly into an economic disaster with their eyes wide open. They might not care that much about dire warnings right now but they sure as hell will when it happens and the anger is likely to be extreme.

If nothing else the disgruntled Remainers on her own back benches are going to be emboldened and it suggests that, when it comes down to it, she's going to with her Chancellor over David Davies or Liam Fox.

(In any case everyone knew Boris was full of shit from the start).

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

The electorate voted against freedom of movement. They may have believed that this didn't require hard brexit, but it does. The tory electorate voted 2 to 1 to leave. From the point of view of her position astride the UK state and the Tory party May has played a blinder. She's remained unblemished by her remain stance by being so soto voce with it in the run up to the referendum, and so balls out for brexit in its wake. Her only position that would be ethical or honest would be to lay her cards out - leaving the single market will be terrible for the UK, let's do whatever we can not to do it. It would also utterly destroy her politically.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

So once again it comes down to the question of how much of a hit to their wallets Leave voters are prepared to take in exchange for "controls on immigration", and the government would be extremely foolish to overestimate that figure.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

is our only hope that the economy goes so tits up before article 50 is triggered that only a rump of fundamentalist brexicists still want it?

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

that big slab of rock in the canaries could slide into the sea

mark s, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

I had a really unpleasant argument with my mum about Brexit on Saturday. She has recovered from breast cancer in recent years and has a had a tough time, so it left me feeling queasy. But she parrots stuff my stepdad says and he does vote UKIP and is a complete nazi fuckup whose formative years were spent in 50's S Africa.

Another thing was, at the time of the referendum, my partner mentioned to her brother that I was voting Remain and his response was: "I thought he was one of us". Like it rendered me some type of bad element class traitor, and he said it very factually like it was beyond debate she said.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

Clive Lewis, Lisa Nandy and Jonathan Reynolds call for Lab not to stand a candidate against Goldsmith:

http://labourlist.org/2016/10/lewis-nandy-and-reynolds-lets-make-this-a-referendum-on-goldsmith-not-heathrow/

it sames safe to assume that there will be a lot of resistance to this idea within Labour? a stunning Lib Dem victory in Richmond Park is obv not a great precedent the next time there is a by-election in a seat that Labour hold, and you'd think they would want to avoid aiding narratives about resurgent Lib Dems at a time when Lab are at historic lows in the polls and people are questioning if they will ever form a government again.

- SOLO - Pink Dolphin, Bubbling Cassina (frog), Indris, Monkeys, Tiger (soref), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 09:50 (seven years ago) link

Yeah this isn't a good idea unless Corbyn is prepared to enter into a formal pact with Fallon. And that's riddled with problems - lots of Lib Dems won't want to be associated with Corbyn and the Liberals' Euro pitch isn't going to play well at all in the Labour seats that voted Leave.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

I mean you could argue that Labour should favour anything that chips away at the Tory voting majority. They have zero chance of winning the seat anyway.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

i think pragmatic individual arrangements along those lines mightn't be hugely damaging. the Blairites can't really moan because "we must attack the Tories" is their only current mantra. most sensible leftists won't get het up about tactical candidacies, it's not the same as a formal alliance with the Lib Dems at all and it may help to develop areas of common understanding that could come into play in future general elections or moves toward PR.

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

god knows i'm as doctrinaire as anybody when it comes to things that matter i.e. your actual policies, but the tedious bullshit mechanics of politics as a game are unimportant and should be treated as such imo. again, the key problem with a lot of pro politicians of all stripes is that politics as game is literally the only thing they focus their attention on

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

It will smart a bit to people who have been disqualified from voting in the Labour leadership election due to expressing pro-Lib Dem views oh wait those views wouldn't have got you disqualified.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 11:23 (seven years ago) link

the "progressive alliance" idea is interesting because it seems to split the Labour party, but not neatly along pro/anti Corbyn lines - there are Blairites opposed to it, but Jon Lansman also has been critical of the idea and Corbyn and McDonnell seem sceptical (though McDonnell has come out in support of PR?). I get the impression that it's partly an age thing, a lot of younger Corbyn supporters seem more open to the concept (by younger I mean people roughly my age i.e. early 30s, it occurs to me that these are ppl who's impression of the Lib Dems were probably formed in the period where they where a mildy social democratic party, led by Charles Kennedy, opposed to the Iraq war, criticising the Blair govt from the left etc, idk if Corbynites 10 years or so younger whose impression of them was formed by the coalition era are more wary of them?) my gut reaction is that it's a bad idea, but then there dones seem to be a shortage of better ideas

- SOLO - Pink Dolphin, Bubbling Cassina (frog), Indris, Monkeys, Tiger (soref), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Older voters are intensely reminded of the SDP, which doesn't put us in a good mood (if I'm asked who my most hated politician is, I still reflexively think "Dr David Owen" even tho there are many figures objectively more loathsome, with many worse deeds on their charge-sheet).

mark s, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

xp soref

Good point about that narrow generational view of Lib Dems. I fit into the Charles Kennedy era so may be more amenable to them than if i was 20 years older or 10 years younger.

michaellambert, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

this is the tim farron era

conrad, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

The word "progressive" is smug and self-congratulatory and meaningless but it's amazing how quickly people have fallen back into the trap of believing the Lib Dems are somehow half-Labour.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

are Labour even half-Labour etc.

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

I keep forgetting Tim Farron even exists.

michaellambert, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

one of the central characteristics of the tim farron era

conrad, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

self-identified Moderates are my favourite kind of reactionaries

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

it takes a certain kind of hubris/privilege

stopping myself now, feel another pointless rant building up

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Orwell_Fan/status/778549825566564352

conrad, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Hang on, it's satirical, right?

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

xp read some effing Orwell m8

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

Ok thank fuck, that's really well done

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

last one, promise

https://twitter.com/Orwell_Fan/status/763322372191576064

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

That account hits real paydirt whenever Tristram Hunt or whoever decides to approvingly retweet/cosign it.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

Good brand. Don't follow just bcz its RT-ed on my TL often.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

Mis-step by Clive Lewis to call for this "alliance". Lisa Nandy is lost for good I think.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

I do think that Labour should stand aside where they can't win and let LDs take on Cons

A smaller Con majority is good

I agree with Clive Lewis - often

I unfortunately can't like Lisa Nandy because she constantly attacks the Labour leadership

the pinefox, Thursday, 27 October 2016 08:49 (seven years ago) link

Labour should leave this to the wisdom of crowds, like in the nineties. While John Major's government was tottering like a drunk, there were several by-elections where the Lib dem was best placed to leave the tory, and most labour voters in these seats voted tactically for them- this led to some derisory, sometimes deposit losing labour performances, but that didn't matter at all(and obviously labour cleaned up in this period in by-elections where it was competitive). Point is, they got the same results pretty much as a formal agreement, without having to make any commitments. Now, if enough labour voters in Richmond are prepared to hold their nose and vote lib dem to fuck the tories, they'll do that regardless of whether labour fields a candidate. If they can't bring themselves to, because fuck the party of Clegg, Laws and Cable, they won't, and it's best to respect that choice.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 27 October 2016 09:03 (seven years ago) link

I don't see it.

If Labour fielded a candidate now, and I had a vote, I would generally feel obliged to vote Labour, because I am supportive of the Labour leadership.

If Labour decided not to field a candidate, making it clear that they wanted to give the other party a run at the Con -- then I would vote for the other party. Again, in part because I am supportive of the Labour leadership; also because I want the Con government to be damaged.

So from my POV, it would make a big difference whether Labour chose to put up a candidate or not.

the pinefox, Thursday, 27 October 2016 09:29 (seven years ago) link

“It’s warm beer and cold hands,” he said. “It’s the clacking of bowling balls, the peal of church bells; it’s tutting when you see an ice-cream van selling hamburgers; it’s a healthy suspicion of human rights; it’s a Punch and Judy show having a giggle at a domestic incident; it’s a dozen sausage rolls in a tupperware box and a pair of trunks wrapped in a towel; it’s an iPhone, it’s an iPhone charger.

Alan Partridge: UK united by warm beer and healthy suspicion of human rights

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 27 October 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

Silly old fool.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Thursday, 27 October 2016 10:36 (seven years ago) link

... oops, lol, I misread that as Andy Partridge. It's the sort of thing he would say. Apart from the bit about human rights. I hope.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Thursday, 27 October 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

"it’s a healthy suspicion of todd rundgren"

mark s, Thursday, 27 October 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

the country has entered the high-partridge period

ogmor, Thursday, 27 October 2016 11:37 (seven years ago) link

minus the charm

nashwan, Thursday, 27 October 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

The lyrics to Senses Working Overtime are a bit like a good version of that

imago, Thursday, 27 October 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

oh ho
SAUsage ROLLLs

- SOLO - Pink Dolphin, Bubbling Cassina (frog), Indris, Monkeys, Tiger (soref), Thursday, 27 October 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Labour should leave this to the wisdom of crowds, like in the nineties. While John Major's government was tottering like a drunk, there were several by-elections where the Lib dem was best placed to leave the tory, and most labour voters in these seats voted tactically for them- this led to some derisory, sometimes deposit losing labour performances, but that didn't matter at all(and obviously labour cleaned up in this period in by-elections where it was competitive). Point is, they got the same results pretty much as a formal agreement, without having to make any commitments. Now, if enough labour voters in Richmond are prepared to hold their nose and vote lib dem to fuck the tories, they'll do that regardless of whether labour fields a candidate. If they can't bring themselves to, because fuck the party of Clegg, Laws and Cable, they won't, and it's best to respect that choice.

The big difference is that back then John Major was a dead man walking. Labour were miles ahead in the polls for years leading up to 1997. They were hardly going to be damaged by the Lib Dems nicking a 'safe' Tory seat. Now it's difficult to see what is the least bad option. They could put up a candidate, potentially lose their deposit and/or see Goldsmith win with a slightly smaller share of the vote than the combined Lib Dem and Labour vote. Or they could step aside and run the risk of this being reported 'Labour recognise they aren't a credible opposition and have no chance of winning'.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 27 October 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Ukip have done the decent thing to let the unprogressive alliance prosper:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/27/ukip-backs-zac-goldsmith-in-richmond-park-byelection

Alba, Thursday, 27 October 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

aw he's just like his dear old dad

Neil S, Thursday, 27 October 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

centrist human rights violations

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

con-centrist circles of hell

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

Sure, selling weapons to a family dictatorship for genocide in Yemen really fucking enhances our security. All these Labour abstainers are a disgrace as usual, and their mealy mouthed self deception sounds like desperate bullshit from people ensconced in corruption as usual.

calzino, Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

"yes we are selling weapons to an autocratic regime to wage war on civilians in the poorest country in the middle east, but think of how much worse things would be if we weren't"

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

grown-up politicians know that it's important for the national interest that MPs take bribes from murderous dictators on the reg

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

“The coalition is precisely focused on training Saudis to be better able to be in compliance with international humanitarian law so that our interventions, if effective, will create fewer civilian casualties,” he said.

And how is that going? Were they only supposed to bomb the funeral twice, to get the guests and the first wave of people trying to dig them out of the rubble, rather than three times to get the people who were digging the first wave out?

The market for the UK's trash weapons looks a lot smaller without KSA so there is probably no need to bribe anyone these days but I do wonder how much of that al-Yamamah cash is still sloshing about.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

"yes we are selling weapons to an autocratic regime to wage war on civilians in the poorest country in the middle east, but think of how much worse things would be if we weren't"

tbf, we have a long track record of selling them planes you can't fly in desert conditions so there might be something to this.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

well y'know bribes in the broadest sense, probably entirely legal for the most part, grown-up politics shit, legitimate business, the sort of stuff the Labour party was founded to protect

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-37791366

DUP block equal marriage for five years.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

remind us what the D stands for

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

several abortive attempts to craft a response that wasn't hugely sectarian

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

several boat trips, then

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Thursday, 27 October 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

Tony Blair: conviction democrat

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Friday, 28 October 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

lol! IDS reviewing the new KL movie on R4 this morning was pretty much RUSSIANS HUNGRY, BUT NOT STARVING type shit. Even when he is trying to erase his own toxic legacy he doesn't quite know when to stfu

calzino, Friday, 28 October 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/SKinnock/status/792052127887654912

Are Kinnock and Woodcock trying to make themselves look as appalling as possible in a bid to make the rest of the centrists seem better in comparison? It's like kamikaze politics.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 29 October 2016 09:46 (seven years ago) link

nah, they really are neocon scum

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 29 October 2016 09:47 (seven years ago) link

state of the Labour Party

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 29 October 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

Like father, like son.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

hey at least his dad used to pretend to be a socialist

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

Don't forget Boris - "If WE don't sell arms to the Saudis someone else will"

nashwan, Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:28 (seven years ago) link

when the bullshit isn't cutting just admit that we are amoral profiteers of genocide, what the heck.

calzino, Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

^cutting it

calzino, Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

Amoral Profiteers of Genocide = national mission statement iirc

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 29 October 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

and the next Manic Street etc..

Mark G, Saturday, 29 October 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, MSP on in the pub as I read that. Not a good omen.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 29 October 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

Well, if you tolerate that...

Mark G, Saturday, 29 October 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

this has been doing the rounds on twitter but Wetherspoons voice of the people and prominent brexit bellend Tim Martin still isn't happy.

http://app.ft.com/content/219bd3a4-c6ef-30d8-ade2-0b2fe0eafb31

as one person had it:

"He wanted to leave the EU & now he's mad at the EU for losing the benefits of being in the EU."

Fizzles, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

EU drinks manufacturers have apparently just sent UK suppliers new price lists with a 20-30% uplift due to the weak GBP, which I am sure he will take with equally good grace.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Almost makes you wonder how these dorks would feel about the EU if we'd never belonged to it

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

When the new benefits cap kicks in on monday it will be very harsh for a lot of people, but for something like 18000 people in London it will be a disaster. They will either be driven out of their homes or will have to sacrifice food/heating/basic needs for rent, and some probably will try and make that work. So much for Damian Green's no more cuts under TM pledge, he just meant no more additional cuts to the already diabolical timetable of misery to come.

calzino, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

I for one welcome the 21st century Dickens who's going to step up to chronicle this

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

At 10:35 on an early winter's morning, John Lanchester sat down at his study desk, switched on his new Dell computer, opened up the word processing programme that the computer had come with and began

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

I knew Lanchester was the punch line :D

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

I hope none of Labour's London landlord clique will be hypocritical enough to criticise this austerity while social tenants are being evicted from their own properties. Mind you most of them probably wouldn't rent to such lowlife in the first place.

http://landlord-mps.co.uk/

calzino, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

gonna out myself once again as a delusional utopian Trot but the thought of Labour MPs as landlords is pushing my already deep depression down past the GAME OVER line

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Even Meacher had 4 properties in London, but I think he was being more honest than most on that list.

calzino, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

imagine tony and cherie consumed with regret that they didn't hang on to their house in hackney

conrad, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

or the one in downing st

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Wednesday, 2 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

just a tarted up council house with no right to buy option really.

calzino, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/TimesLaw/status/794118330357522433

Parliament approval needed

groovypanda, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

oh this will be fun

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

Crikey. Wonder whether Govt. will take it to the Supreme Court?

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

There will be an appeal hearing early Dec. apparently.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

I suspect most Tory MPs will dutifully fall in line, but there could be enough disgruntled Osbornites out there to whittle away at their majority. The real question is what Labour do now - given the obvious divisions in their voter base I suspect we're in for another almighty clusterfuck.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I think a Bill could easily make it through the commons in the current climate. The Lords, though, no idea.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:20 (seven years ago) link

Oh god this is all going to be about how Labour is totally useless. Somehow. AGAIN. Isn't it

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

I'm not convinced that Corbyn will oppose it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Ditto quisling fucks like Chuka with a massive Remain majority and an eye on the leadership.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

Worst case scenario I can see now is that this leads to a General Election, which the Tories will win at a landslide. Then we are truly fucked.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/evans_edward/status/794118764526714880

groovypanda, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

Oh god this is all going to be about how Labour is totally useless. Somehow. AGAIN. Isn't it

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:21 AM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

a lot of celebratory tweets etc - hard to see anything good coming from this

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:50 (seven years ago) link

I dunno why the pound's gone up, surely it's going to get through all the same (unless it goes to the Lords) as it would be mad for an MP in a Leave area to vote against leaving, and most MPs are in Leave areas.

Then again obv it would also be mad for an MP to vote for the giant unnecessary disaster which is Brexit, and nobody is going to get what they want out of Brexit, so who knows what happens then. So, interesting choices ahead.

(Stating the obvious here but really wondering how "the markets" are seeing it that I'm not. I guess they think that MPs will get a more nuanced choice than the binary slapped in front of the electorate and so will soften the Brexit - does that seem likely?)

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

If it goes to a vote, this parliament is totally going to approve A50; it'd be political suicide not to.

But it's all the stuff that has to happen inbetween that's going to be popcorn-tastic. An actual debate, for one thing — with the SNP foaming, Ken Clarke stirring the pot, and with a delicate dance for the Tories to do to try and not answer questions from SNP/Lab while simultaneously not pissing off their own, larger, Remain faction. MPs won't settle for knowing less than Nissan, and now they have a means to get the answers.

The Tories have collapsed into civil war over way, way less than this in the past. I reckon this bumps the chances of a general election to get a mandate for Brexit a bit. Not to dead cert territory, but it's definitely a lot more real than before.

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

Basically pound is up because suddenly there are more roads open that don't lead straight to ruin

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

Stating the obvious here but really wondering how "the markets" are seeing it that I'm not

Think you're crediting 'the markets' with more insight then they deserve ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

I reckon this bumps the chances of a general election to get a mandate for Brexit a bit. Not to dead cert territory, but it's definitely a lot more real than before.

I think this would be a disaster. We end up with a massive Tory majority. Labour decimated.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

xp Yeah, they're a nervous system, not a brain.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

most MPs are in Leave areas.

Are they?

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

https://ig.ft.com/sites/elections/2016/uk/eu-referendum/

Good breakdown of results here. Most of England is leave

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

And Wales of course ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

Is that by parliamentary constituency though? I don't know, I'm only asking.

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:12 (seven years ago) link

...I have no citations to hand but I remember soon after the vote reading something saying that if the votes had been added up by constituency like a general election it would have been even more strongly on the Leave side. I'll see if I can find it again

can't see anything good coming of a GE even if the above is wrong and even if the fixed term parliaments can be got past; there's nobody else to vote for and not even Scotland will save us from our horrible Tory Little Englander selves any more

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

Is that by parliamentary constituency though? I don't know, I'm only asking.

Sorry, no - it's by local authority.

I'd be shocked if, when broken down to constituencies, there was a significant swing to remain, though.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

The best-case scenario here is a Brexit that will be less ruinously destructive than the one that appears to have been on the table since the Tory conference. I'm not convinced that MPs will approve any package that doesn't include membership of the single market for one thing (certainly not a lot of Tory Remainers). It means they can't just hammer together some kind of 'we're going to get an AMAZING DEAL!' leap-first-think-later Liam Fox hackjob and push it through regardless.

It also presumably has to get through the House of Lords, which is where the real fun starts. But I think the chances of Parliament nixing Brexit altogether are close to zero.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:23 (seven years ago) link

^^^ Yep - totally agree

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

It means they can't just hammer together some kind of 'we're going to get an AMAZING DEAL!' leap-first-think-later Liam Fox hackjob and push it through regardless.

an amazing deal of TITANIC proportions if you don't mind.

mark e, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:25 (seven years ago) link

I think Brexit is really bad
so I want MPs who are against it to vote against it

if their constituencies are pro-Brexit -
1: that could change somewhat - we're always being told about buyers' remorse, etc
2: it wouldn't necessarily mean the MP would be voted out next time. But I admit it could be a huge rallying point for UKIP to attack MPs who have voted vs their constituents - so this could be a way for UKIP to revive or grow
3: still, MP elections are not single-issue -- I don't think someone will necessarily be rejected by the electorate on this one issue.

Utimately I think MPs should vote in the national interest and vote to stay in the EU, and if some of the public doesn't like it, so what, MPs often votes for things that lots of the public don't like. In this particular case the MPs know better, than some of the public.

Not saying all this going to happen. I'm sure what will happen is what people have said above.

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

If normal rules applied a GE would be a disaster. Not sure they do though.

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

In what sense?

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

I mean, I can't see Labour winning over anyone with their Brexit 'stance', whatever that actually is

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

Even if he does choose to try and vote down Brexit, Corbyn lacks the authority to whip his MPs over this issue. There are enough Legitimate Concerners in the Labour MP ranks to make a show of waving Brexit through, I suspect. This is a big dividing line down the middle of the PLP and it's going to blow up.

If normal rules applied a GE would be a disaster. Not sure they do though.

Struggling to think of any scenario in which it won't be a disaster.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

Even if he does choose to try and vote down Brexit, Corbyn lacks the authority to whip his MPs over this issue.

Also need to consider that Corbyn / McDonell actually appear to want brexit ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

I think our democracy is more important than any notional national interest and Parliament should be compelled to follow the will of the people at all times. Also I feel toasty warm from bathing in the funeral inferno of this scumbag colonial micropower

nom de grrrrr (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

Christ fucking help me, I'm nostalgic for John Major now.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

I think our democracy is more important than any notional national interest and Parliament should be compelled to follow the will of the people at all times.

Hope you're stoked for voluntary repatriation and the return of hanging.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately democracy is nothing without transparency and that's been in extremely short supply lately.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

As Thatcherite death-eaters go, he's pretty loveable and I'd take him as PM like a shot. Admittedly my feelings are largely based on his preponderance towards cricket xxp

imago, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Matt, Matt, it's me

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

lol

imago, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

Lots of Remainers love a bit of One Nationism tbf

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

Fucking cricket people.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately democracy is nothing without transparency and that's been in extremely short supply lately.

ftfy

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately democracy is nothing without transparency - wouldn't say that, could really go for a secret ballot about now.

Or rather democracy now* includes other actors absent transparency - when the tabloids have to announce how much their owners could make from the political decisions they're pushing then we'll talk.

*okay, "now"

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

as is often -- perhaps unsurprisingly -- the case with eu-related politics, the best (least-worst) can generally be attained by kicking all kinds of cans down the road

the corb-mconnell version of lexit doesn't actually require Art50 to be triggered in March (in fact it would certainly be better from the lexit-perspective to delay it, especially if they're serious about arguing for continued freedom of migration as a constituent part of lexit).

i have no idea if they recognise this -- tho they can hear as well as anyone the informed technocrats all screaming that they're going to need more time to make the best of the worst -- and i have no idea if they can find a way to whistle and dog their chaotic self-regarding yet self-loathing flock into the right pen, or even work out which the right pen is

what they can do lots of is scatter their opponents' sheep all over the hillside for the next few weeks (someway upthread we did see starmer and corb in step on this for a day or so)

mark s, Thursday, 3 November 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

In what sense?

In a few. The LibDems seem to be making gains that would have been impossible at the last GE, following Brexit. Labour is steadying, but could easily factionalise on a seat-by-seat basis at a GE. Tactical voting would be *massive*.

Probably most not-business-as-usual though are the Tories. The usual rule is that the Tories are always unified going into an election. If this is an election that's a proxy for "shall we leave?" then they will be again — they'll all be Leavers this time. But, if is more likely, all parties accept the will of the people that we're going to leave, then this becomes a referendum on "What does Brexit mean?", and the Tories will absolutely and immediately schism into a pro-business Single-Market-red-line faction (the larger one) and a damn-the-foreigners immigration uber alles nasty one.

John Curtice can probably work out what the result would be in that instance. I can't.

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

I honestly can't see the point of Corbyn if he's going to lean Brexit. I know, I know, I'm a Tory/Blairite/etc etc. But seriously.

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Thursday, 3 November 2016 12:52 (seven years ago) link

The Lib Dem polling hasn't shifted an inch from 8%. The last prediction i saw today had them losing three seats rather than gaining any. That needs to be taken with a pinch of salt but i can't see much of a bounce happening at the moment.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 November 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/UKLabour/status/794148626805051392

Labour will be pressing the case for a Brexit that works for Britain, putting jobs, living standards and the economy first.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

If that turns into a red-line on single market access, I think we'll have pro-business Tories voting for Labour or staying home — cf Republicans and Clinton.

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Labour will be pressing the case for a Brexit that works for Britain, putting jobs, living standards and the economy first.

Stirring stuff ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

be interesting to see what happens to the ukip vote in the event of a GE. this ruling obviously plays right into their hands - meddling political classes scupper the people's brexit etc. i'd imagine their vote would go through the roof - but they're obviously completely dysfunctional as a party atm. if only they hadn't made such a bad fist of things lately

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 3 November 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Farage will be officially leader again within days/weeks.

nashwan, Thursday, 3 November 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

...I have no citations to hand but I remember soon after the vote reading something saying that if the votes had been added up by constituency like a general election it would have been even more strongly on the Leave side. I'll see if I can find it again

I found the article btw, it is here: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisapplegate/why-a-pro-eu-party-could-be-screwed-in-the-next-election?utm_term=.cmy7bKvDV#.konVRDEbq
this page has a bit more about methodology: https://medium.com/@chrishanretty/the-eu-referendum-how-did-westminster-constituencies-vote-283c85cd20e1#.kq728oqgd

admittedly 1. lol buzzfeed/medium.com and 2. as both articles admit there isn't a direct way to map the publicly available referendum vote statistics onto parliamentary constituencies, but I think it's fair to say it's not looking good

xps need to find a way to put "you voted to win back UK parliamentary sovereignty and now you don't like traditional UK parliamentary sovereignty lolwut" in more persuasive terms, though not sure any argument not involving Showing Them Forriners We'll Take Stuff Back Ra Ra Blighty Glorious Empire 1851 Forever can ever persuade a kipper

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

This has been rather overtaken by events but still:
https://www.ft.com/content/e72be378-a0ee-11e6-891e-abe238dee8e2

Pasha Khandaker, president of the Bangladesh Caterers Association, who campaigned heavily for a Leave vote, said he was “very disappointed” by the government’s determination to slash immigration ...
“My organisation supported Brexit for several reasons but the main reason was to bring people from abroad to help our industry to survive.”
...
The official Leave campaign even sent leaflets to Muslim communities arguing that Brexit could allow more incomers from Commonwealth countries to take the place of eastern European migrants.

Vote for anti-immigration scaremongers, be surprised when you end up with anti-immigration scaremongers

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure labour would, in case of a GE, focus on pro or anti. People hate elections, and the complete mess the Tories have made of this could be influential. And regardless of any mind reading of Corbyn, I expect the Labour Party to be firmly pro remain. For the same reason I was - jobs, wages, rights.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

The quote above, "Labour will be pressing the case for a Brexit..." was signed Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Hey, at least we're now going to get a clearer idea of how many Leavers were using 'sovereignty' to mean 'keep johnny foreigner out' ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

“My organisation supported Brexit for several reasons but the main reason was to bring people from abroad to help our industry to survive.”

Just... LOL? I don't know. 2016 has rewired my emotions.

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

X post: Yeah - there's no way I can see Labour trying to reverse Brexit now. Too many MPs whose constituents voted leave for one thing

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Labour (or failing that the SNP) should be hammering at the shaky claim of a "mandate" every time it gets trotted out and every time it gets shakier.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Like the party piece of Cameron at the leader's debate where he claimed that he carried Liam Byrne's "No money left" around with him everywhere, as justification for what had to be done - I thought that Ed M lost a trick by not responding "Well, that makes you look like a psychopath, mate"

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Is there really still a majority who want Brexit or is that now-diminished demographic just louder and more threat-y than Remainers?

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

“My organisation supported Brexit for several reasons but the main reason was to bring people from abroad to help our industry to survive.”

This is obviously naive but completely understandable.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

Everyone who isn't completely naive knows what happens when "control" is taken back. The drums start beating for ever lower net migration numbers, and if those can't be achieved, then any assurances the EU receives about the status of EU citizens already in the country won't mean shit, and the demands will grow for non-EU migrants to leave as well. Unless there's a major political sea-change (and I wouldn't rule that out in the event of an economic disaster) then I don't feel optimistic at all about where this is all heading.

Any Labour MP who enables this bullshit is essentially validating May's approach, however much they try and dress it up otherwise, and they will be as guilty as anyone for whatever happens next.

Matt DC, Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

Sure, but anyone from outside the EU knows that was going to happen either way, with eight years of immigration crackdowns aimed pretty exclusively at non-white communities to back that up. The prospect, however remote, of the 'Australian points based system' that looks at skills and not nationality is an upgrade on what's being offered. I think Johnson and possibly Gove believed it as well.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

Is there really still a majority who want Brexit or is that now-diminished demographic just louder and more threat-y than Remainers?

Fair chance it's minority who still want Leave (just). But it's very geographically distributed (Remain is very focused on big cities). That means under FPTP there's a big majority of seats for it.

stet, Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

So that's yet another thing I have to fix when I get this time machine built then

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Thursday, 3 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

is there any reason to think about any of this til the next election?

ogmor, Thursday, 3 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

The prospect, however remote, of the 'Australian points based system' that looks at skills and not nationality

The storyville doc about Nauru the other night showed the grim other face of Australia's system.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Thursday, 3 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

Definitely but it's still seen as a much more open and welcoming country for skilled and student migrants.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

So how would the debate play out? For this to pass there would surely need to be guarantees on the Government's negotiating position for a soft Brexit. If the government do not give those assurances - and they haven't been coorperative with Parliament so far - then a narrative would come into place to 'reject' leavers in a soft manner, i.e. they are not rejecting the act of leaving, but how the government is going about Leaving.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 3 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

...and the demands will grow for non-EU migrants to leave as well. Unless there's a major political sea-change (and I wouldn't rule that out in the event of an economic disaster) then I don't feel optimistic at all about where this is all heading.

reminded me of a bit from an NYT piece about British EU staff from a few days ago.

Claude Moraes, a Labour Party lawmaker, said that politicians were used to uncertainty but that the referendum result was “a real emotional spasm.”

An immigrant who arrived in Britain from India at age 6, he said the campaign had brought back uncomfortable memories.

“I grew up in the 1970s,” he said. “One of the things people used to say was, ‘They never gave us the chance to vote on you people coming here.’"

He grew up “with that ringing in my ears,” he said. “That vote has now taken place, and it came in the form of an E.U. referendum which was about immigration.”

gyac, Thursday, 3 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/hendopolis/status/794305335158853634/photo/1

Restrained of them not to photoshop gun sights over their faces.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

the Express front page is even more unhinged, if anything.

on a lighter note, Peter Paphides and Huey from Fun Lovin' Criminals have been arguing on twitter:

https://twitter.com/OfficialHuey/status/794176706974257152

soref, Thursday, 3 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

Somewhat surprised to see Charlie Mullins caught up in this, http://www.pimlicoplumbers.com/media/pimlico-on-tv/sky-news/government-defeated-over-triggering-article-50. Go on, my saaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhnnnn!

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

Huey's on Question Time right now.

Mark G, Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

I would just like to add that the NIC EIC Domestic Installer badge Mullins has on his web page and vans does not signify any level of competence to work on electrical installations. It is a quick course qualification that can be attained in weeks. I wouldn't even trust a cunt with that mickey mouse badge to change a ceiling rose tbh.

calzino, Thursday, 3 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

it would be mad for an MP in a Leave area to vote against leaving, and most MPs are in Leave areas.

It's not as simple as that. You could be a Labour MP in a constituency that voted 'leave' by a reasonably narrow margin (say 55/45), but where the majority of Labour voters voted 'remain' (which, if the polls are to be believed, most Labour voters did). If you yourself were inclined towards 'remain' and most of the people that voted for you also wanted to 'remain', it would be idiotic to stand on a 'leave' ticket: vote for me and I will bring to pass what neither I nor my supporters want to happen. Obviously you would lose. If the only reason to go against your instincts and campaign for 'leave' is to try to save your seat, but the act of campaigning for 'leave' guarantees that you would lose your seat anyway, you might as well stick to your principles and try your luck.

The Lib Dem polling hasn't shifted an inch from 8%. The last prediction i saw today had them losing three seats rather than gaining any. That needs to be taken with a pinch of salt but i can't see much of a bounce happening at the moment.

This is exactly why I found that Oxfordshire by-election result the other week so strange. I get the idea of the whole 'protest vote against hard brexit' thing, but if it happens on such a large scale there, you would expect it to happen on a similar scale in at least *some* other places, which would lead to at least *some* kind of improvement in their support, even if it was just a jump from 8% to 11%, but there's no evidence of anything like that.

Struggling to think of any scenario in which it won't be a disaster

Yep. If Labour have any sense they will reject any attempts to call a general election - they're under no obligation to agree to one, it was the Tories that changed the law to bring in 5 year terms, and an election now would be political suicide. Sadly, there seems to be a lack of any sense in just about any part of the Labour party.

Fucking cricket people.

OTM

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 4 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

oh go and found FC Labour :P

imago, Friday, 4 November 2016 00:14 (seven years ago) link

snap elections are up there with referenda in terms of 'devices of dictators'

ogmor, Friday, 4 November 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

Nothing wrong with referenda as long as they're legally binding and really clear about what exactly they're proposing.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 November 2016 00:39 (seven years ago) link

the issue of who gets to set them, on what, and under what circumstances are all pretty important. doing it as a 50%+1 thing is absurd too imo

ogmor, Friday, 4 November 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

I just think that given that we already have a v strong centralised govt that can do more or less as it pleases, the whimsical way they can try to summon up a democratic mandate seems gratuitous

ogmor, Friday, 4 November 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

what's great and amazing about this whole farce is the bright spotlight on what bullshit the UK's parliamentary democracy is - "educated" liberals and ignorant working class stooges interpreting the concept in wildly different, irreconcilable ways mostly as a fig leaf for their own underlying economic/social agendas, no understanding or respect for our alleged invisible constitution. the classless society as close as its been in an eternity to outright class war.

what's depressing as fuck about this whole farce is just how much racism, xenophobia, stupidity and class bigotry are as ingrained in ever across the whole polity. but it's better that this stuff is visible and we can stop pretending we're a noble nation with a proud tradition of tolerance.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 07:26 (seven years ago) link

Yes, the "what don't you thickos understand about *hastily googles* the idea that the residual royal prerogative that rests with the Prime Minister, representing the Crown, allows for the arbitrary withdrawal from international agreements but where those international agreements have been incorporated into British law, conferring rights that are not explicitly dependent on the continued performance of international treaties, there has to either be a motion or a bill in Parliament to review" narrative hasn't shown many people in a particularly positive light.

It'll be interesting to see how any of it shifts if the judgment gets overturned on appeal, which i still think is definitely possible.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 4 November 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

when you have Tory MPs decrying senior judges as enemies of democracy and the provisional wing of the sneering liberal elite then you know that something is fucked at the most fundamental level

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

They'll be having a pop at Charlie Mullins next. Gaw!

Millions of species Faye Dunaway (Tom D.), Friday, 4 November 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

It makes sense when you remember that the default mode of the British Right is basically "WHY can't I do exactly what I want all the time?"

Matt DC, Friday, 4 November 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

I'd prefer the papers with the judges on the cover to the ones with barely-restrained racism towards Gina Miller, though this is obv "would you rather drown in piss or shit?"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:01 (seven years ago) link

when you have politicians and political journalists behaving like a 52% winning vote - on a referendum question that left out every important aspect of the decision it was supposed to inform - is the greatest mandate in political history then you know parliamentary government has ceased to function usefully

and good! because it wasn't functioning usefully anyway, and now we can see it. only those with certain kinds of privilege would be wishing for a blissfully unruffled Cameron/Osborne government with a "successful" referendum result behind them, slashing away until 2020.

and everybody who wants the referendum result to just go away is failing one way or another to address everything that led to it. it probably can be subverted, overturned, diluted. it's not a solid mandate. it's an awful look for people who allegedly buy into our democratic system to want to just say "fuck you" to the entire Leave vote tho.

there's enough awful looks to go round at the moment.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 11:03 (seven years ago) link

but where those international agreements have been incorporated into British law, conferring rights that are not explicitly dependent on the continued performance of international treaties, there has to either be a motion or a bill in Parliament to review

This is where I actually think (after reading some legal blogs) the judgement was wrong, and may indeed be overturned. ECA 1972 incorporates rights granted under EU law into British law, but only *while* those rights apply to the UK in accordance with EU law. If the EU changes or revokes a right, then that right is also changed/revoked under domestic law. Invoking article 50 means that, after 2 years, the UK is no longer subject to EU law, and all rights it grants cease to apply. And so, as per ECA 1972, any rights granted by the EU are no longer incorporated into UK law.

Thus, the act of invoking article 50 by royal prerogative, an act of international rather than domestic law, doesn't, in itself, remove the any rights from UK. It just brings about the circumstances by which those rights no longer apply.

Anyway, I think this is all just delaying the inevitable. At least we've got a clearer picture of who was using 'parliamentary sovereignty' and 'returning control to British courts' as a cover for their racism (if it wasn't clear enough already ...)

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Friday, 4 November 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

everyone otm

NBS, good points about party support within a constituency. A lot of interesting calculations to be made. Not that I'm suggesting focus grouping over principles is the way to go, but that depends on what your principles are there are potentially a lot of variables to keep an eye on...

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

don't really disagree that parliamentary democracy is no longer functioning usefully but the idea that we can just toss it away and improvise* a replacement that's also an improvement -- in a climate where one MP has already been murdered and FB is simmering with calls to murder the woman who took the Art50 case to court -- is, well, a big ask, let's just say (the "we" that's currently the noisiest doesn't include any of us, my guess is, and the we that is us as much as anything defines itself against that noisy "we")

*and improvise more or less from nothing: aside from the SNP (and the usual burble of nitwits who think everything will instantly turn lovely when we switch away from FPTP) literally no one has given a second's discussion to future constitutional arrangements (SNP and the alt-right, I guess I should say)

lol (bleak lol): i just caught myself reaching to quote thomas more in "man for all seasons"

William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!

yesterday was the 482nd anniversary of the first act of supremacy -- which is one of the things more was most agitated about

(ps i despise TMore and "man for all seasons" is a deeply and also prissily boring film)

mark s, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Tory MP Stephen Phillips resigns over Brexit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37872899

calzino, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:37 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately the country voted for Brexit and therefore it should happen (or the country should be allowed to vote on the actual package we end up with). The country voted to leave the EU but made that decision for a variety of different (and often contradictory) reasons that were ignored by a simple yes/no vote. They certainly didn't vote for an economically suicidal Brexit that will see their jobs disappear.

There are only two real options here (and 'no Brexit' is not really one of them) - there'll either be an economic settlement where things are basically the same as they were before, or there will be a complete disaster. Neither of them is appealing and both will involve some kind of structural rise in the Far Right.

The idea that this is all on The Working Class is bullshit fwiw, I've met so many affluent flag-waving shire Tories who are 100% pro-Brexit, and the vote would not have happened without them, but they're erased from the debate altogether.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

oh I don't think we can just cobble together a replacement mark, I've no idea what the positive answers are. positive answers only have a chance of developing when you recognize what's broken tho.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

I've met so many affluent flag-waving shire Tories who are 100% pro-Brexit, and the vote would not have happened without them, but they're erased from the debate altogether.

OTM

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Friday, 4 November 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

There is that awful Brexit Street program on R4 where they interview inarticulate legit concern bigots with Geordie accents. I don't think they have featured any m/c Tory heartlands bigots yet, but usually after two minutes I switch to the world service.

calzino, Friday, 4 November 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

Misread that as 'OperationBacon' ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Friday, 4 November 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

From Operation Bacon: "Article 61 of Magna Carta which has never been repealed, it is our true sovereign law."

Obviously this is crackpot nonsense and only has validity if you write your true name in CAPITALS.

mark s, Friday, 4 November 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

incidentally, googling "Article 61 of Magna Carta" takes you deep into menk territory -- a bit further you meet Daniel Hannan coming the other way, as he argues that the Battle of Hastings 1066 was England's nakba.

mark s, Friday, 4 November 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

Lol

https://twitter.com/DemocratsOnline/status/794521856980099072

All 33 of their followers maybe?

groovypanda, Friday, 4 November 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

Some of the comments on that Beacon post are amazing. Reads like the facebook parody column in Private Eye. I'm struggling to distinguish the windups from the genuine swivel-eyed frothers

Suspect this is not serious:

Why should Parliament have a say in this? We got rid of the EU Parliament in June so now it is time to tell the UK Parliament where it gets off. It is anti-democratic for MPs to expect to have a say in what Britain does. Who do they think they are? We don’t need them and could save a lot of money by getting rid of them. People who say Brexiteers voted to make the UK Parliament sovereign are mad. We just want Nigel Farage to be the sovereign. Get rid of the Queen too. King Nigel the Great.

My personal favourite so far, though:

My tip for protests: Make and bring your own drum

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Friday, 4 November 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

I like how they bang on about "the 52%" which you could with absolutely equal honesty describe as "the 37%"

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

kind of confused by what Operation Bacon mean by "Brexit", it doesn't really define it anywhere I can see on their website

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

gradually everything is melting into the Freemen thread

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

Brexit means Brexit, duh.

Chewshabadoo, Friday, 4 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

People are completely deluded if they think this means Brexit is being blocked in any way. Even if Parliament does vote against Article 50, even if the Lords blocks it, it'll be the fuel for a monstrous betrayal narrative that will force it through eventually anyway.

Blocking it might be counterproductive when the alternative is to let the dire economic consequences become more apparent and wait for public opinion to turn with the hope of voting against it in the future. A second referendum looks more and more likely eventually. As the does the prospect of Britain actually reapplying for EU membership within our lifetimes.

The backlash against this shit, when demographics evolve, will be massive.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 November 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

The genie's out of the bottle now anyway - part of me wants the hard Brexit that fucks up as much as predicted so that people can go "see? This is what you wanted all along". The better part of me knows that this is nihilistic and that lots of people will suffer unnecessarily just so that point can be made.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

I suspect the Freemen stuff derives -- via family tradition , if you like, with all the mutation that may entail -- from proto-political dissent carried over from the UK into the US in the 18th and early 19th century, when the Norman Yoke was a live protesters' meme and, in absence of anything, self-educated artisans really did research themselves back to stuff like Magna Carta to try and fashion a counterculture to that era's equivalent of neoliberalism. Cobbett called it "Old Corruption" or sometimes just "The Thing".

It predates working-class agitation (because it predates the large-scale industrial working class) and locks at a subterranean level back into 17th century puritanism (which also feeds into American politics, of course). There was a lot of self-taught lawyering.

(I was also reading something a couple of days ago -- which I actually wasn't very impressed by, but this point was interesting -- that some of the democratising political triumphs in Britain in the 19th century, particular the repeal of the corn laws, directly preceded and were a partial cause of the Empire becoming a good deal more institutionally rapacious overseas, to counteract the rising costs of the changed political economy. I think it's more complicated than this -- the British navy was a key guarantor of the slave trade in the early 18th century, for example -- but it's true that some of the UK's better institutions, for example universal education and access to healthcafe, evolved out of the needs of Empire as much as they did from from agitation, and right up until the 1950s at cost of the ruled in the rest of the Empire. There's a sense in which what's happening right now is payback for all of that; and that Trump and the Farage falange are degraded descendents of currents in Brit history that were bottom up less than they were top down. A little, anyway.)

mark s, Friday, 4 November 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

As the does the prospect of Britain actually reapplying for EU membership within our lifetimes

Can't see that being a realistic option - surely we'd have to accept the Euro & Schengen (assuming those things still exist, which is not guaranteed of course!)

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Friday, 4 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

The genie's out of the bottle now anyway - part of me wants the hard Brexit that fucks up as much as predicted so that people can go "see? This is what you wanted all along". The better part of me knows that this is nihilistic and that lots of people will suffer unnecessarily just so that point can be made.

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAObAAAAJGM2MjQzYmNiLWY0MGItNDNlMC1iN2ViLTJmZTFjODUyZDk1YQ.png

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 4 November 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

I'm firmly in the 'hard Brexit that fucks up as much as predicted' camp tbh. (my ex is English)

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

lol no hard feelings then

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Teresa May, uniting the nation

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

Xxp jokes obv Banana, wish you all the best

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

People are completely deluded if they think this means Brexit is being blocked in any way.

I don't think anybody thinks this really, except some screaming Leavers who didn't understand it going in and don't understand it coming out. Plus disingenuous tabloids suggesting it blocks Brexit.

But it does offer a chance to do it as close to right as this thing can be done — and opens the door to building in a safety valve of some kind

stet, Friday, 4 November 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

Personally I think there is no "right way" to do this for the UK. It will be damaging in *every* way: economically, socially, humanely. There is no "safety valve". In theory, sure, you could try and bake in some looser regulations for the finance sector to prevent them from moving house. And maybe Juncker et al will throw a bone here and there, but in any case you will lose.

In essence the UK is a kingdom that decided (with a v slim majority, but still) to turn inwards, to shy away from globalization, turn their back on Europe. In a world where bonding up and aligning is even more important than ever. And the cynical truth is it will affect the poor and the mundane the most: sending a parcel overseas will be more expensive. Phoning will be more expensive. Flying to the Costa del fucking Sol will be more expensive. Giving talented people the opportunity to work in England will get harder and more restricted.

UK choosing isolation, choosing looking inward instead of outward, is a disastrous choice. But I fear it's not the UK alone: there will be many nations following this in the not so distant future.

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

(And parliament getting involved prob just means May can make Labour somewhat an accomplice to all this, make the Vote Stay camp partly responsible. And the months and months of bickering and agony and further downfall of the left tbh)

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

("The poor and the mundane" was v poorly phrased, didn't mean to imply the former equal the latter)

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

It would be fun to be actually in favour of Brexit. You would feel that a really big good thing was happening.

Or would you just be constantly worried about people supposedly subverting and diluting it?

I am against Brexit.

the pinefox, Friday, 4 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

The safety valve i mean is a Tusk style one where the deal is presented to the public again and they can can the whole idea.

stet, Friday, 4 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

(ffs ILX is obsessed with that album)

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

Hardly a safety valve but a complete turnover of "the people's wish". I will help you hope for it but I can't see it happening. Xp

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

Lol Tom

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

That's the thing. If it becomes three years of "they'll make us vote again until they get the result they like1!1!1!!!" its fucked. If it becomes "you get to say if you think the Brexit deal is a good one" that could work.

The margin isn't that big, after all. And polls have Remain in the lead. Why are we so scared of these cunts? (By which I mean the hard-right shit-stirrers, not every Leaver)

stet, Friday, 4 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

They own the newspapers.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 4 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

Blocking it might be counterproductive when the alternative is to let the dire economic consequences become more apparent and wait for public opinion to turn with the hope of voting against it in the future. A second referendum looks more and more likely eventually. As the does the prospect of Britain actually reapplying for EU membership within our lifetimes.

doesn't it feel more likely that actually more EU countries will follow us out of the EU and we will have a lovely fascist Europe? cf National Front second place in France, with elections next year, or the Netherlands, where the Eurosceptic party is in the lead with elections soon to come

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Friday, 4 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

or the Netherlands, where the Eurosceptic party the fascist, racist party is in the lead
.

Agree with you tho, said it before: Brexit and its ugly fascist nature is what will happen to many other EU countries.

Trump le Monde (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

Kier Starmer stanning for immigration controls
http://www.politico.eu/article/keir-starmer-britains-last-remaining-hope/

stet, Friday, 4 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Ctrl F "legitimate"

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 November 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

Oh hi, I had an idea earlier..

Mark G, Friday, 4 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

http://www.johnpye.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Backing_Britain_Badge-smaller-2.jpg

Could we get some badges like these, but with "I'm Blocking Brexit" ?

I think that'd be good, thought it through and owt..

Mark G, Friday, 4 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

That Politico article is painful in how much the writers want Starmer as leader.

nashwan, Friday, 4 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

I don't think many countries will be clamouring to leave the EU when they see what happens to the uk post exit.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Saturday, 5 November 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

Depends how that gets spun though. Britain turning into a shit-tip may be a fact but these guys don't gi a fuck about facts

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 5 November 2016 02:32 (seven years ago) link

I've seen a small shift in Denmark. We had a referendum last year on whether or not DK should let the parliament let DK stay in Europol - it's all a bit complex, but basically people are afraid an agreement would include European immigrant politics as well - which was voted down. But the nay-sayers promised that it would be easy to get a special agreement with Europol, which of course has turned out to be untrue. At this point almost every other party is openly accusing the DPP - Danish Peoples Party, the Danish UKIP, basically, though they've refused to have anything to do with UKIP - of deceit and lying. They're definitely playing on the fact that people has seen the chaos after Brexit, and that the same thing could be said to have happened here on a smaller scale.

I voted no in that referendum as well, btw. The whole question was weaselly done to assure everyone that we could still be as uncaring to refugees as we wanted, and I couldn't stand that bullshit. It's all a bit lol to me, much less serious than Brexit.

Frederik B, Saturday, 5 November 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

France would be the one I'd be worried about.

Matt DC, Saturday, 5 November 2016 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Way stronger far right and equally belligerent post-imperial boner.

Matt DC, Saturday, 5 November 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

Le Pen was six points ahead of Sarko in the last public poll I saw but still only had 28% of the vote - which is 28% too much but probably not enough to stop Juppé being the next president. If a handful of the old-guard French industrialists lined up behind her she'd have a chance. I'm still not entirely convinced that any of the large Western European countries could go full fash until fascism serves the interests of capital, which Le Pen doesn't, but that might be naive.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 5 November 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

The bickering US left could learn something from the French socialists in their willingness to vote against le pen, no matter what. Obviously that was a while ago - not sure they have the discipline to do that again - and the centre-right won't return the favour.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 5 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

see capital doesn't even need fascism in power, it just needs it to hold enough gravity to persuade leftists that a vote for the status quo is always a necessary sacrifice

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 5 November 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

That's what people who died fighting the nazis were doing.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 5 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

French standing in Europe gets elevated post-Brexit - they suddenly become even more important partner to Germany - and among the public at large there is an extremely strong pro-European sentiment even among lumpen Le Pennists

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 5 November 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Labour will vote against A.50 if the government doesn't rule out leaving the single market.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 5 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

Or 'guarantee access to', to be more precise.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 5 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

the only obvious position open to them at this point i think

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 5 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

05/11/2016, 23:57
@AaronBastani @paulmasonnews "access" not an issue. Terms of that access are. EU won't discuss those until A50 triggered.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 6 November 2016 00:34 (seven years ago) link

otm

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 6 November 2016 07:51 (seven years ago) link

picture of Judge Jeffreys getting the shit kicked out of him not really an appropriate analogy tbf

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 6 November 2016 09:14 (seven years ago) link

It would be fun to be actually in favour of Brexit. You would feel that a really big good thing was happening.

But no Brexiter will get the Brexit they want or voted for. The bile will just go on and on. Nigel Farage will not enjoy a happy retirement.

mahb, Sunday, 6 November 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

literally every single Brexiter tossing and turning in their beds at night, every last one of them lost to fever dreams that the settlement will never be racist enough, united as a solid body determined to protect the Englishness of their DNA down to the last base

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 6 November 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

It misleads and distorts – either deliberately or out of ignorance.

Observer editorial far too lenient here. This is unquestionably wilful, malevolent.

quis gropes ipsos gropiuses? (ledge), Sunday, 6 November 2016 10:12 (seven years ago) link

As we have seen in this country, the far right doesn't actually need to win power in the conventional sense, it needs to be just powerful enough to frighten 'mainstream' politicians into co-opting its language. Britain's far-right proper has been piss-weak in comparison to France's and remains so, virtually no one is going to go out and vote for the BNP even now, it's the rise of the 'respectable' far right that's fucked us.

I was certainly under the impression that France was even more Eurosceptic than Britain, even if France lacks our moronic island mentality. I think having been under totalitarian control within living memory also plays a part as well, Britain is stupid and complacent about its place in the world precisely because it has been so unusually stable for so long.

Also how the hell have we got to the point where the most left-wing Labour Party in a generation is the party defending free trade against the Tories?

Matt DC, Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

Xp

There's are a couple of related issues at play.

Firstly, almost nobody really understands the finer points of the 'constitution'. Public ignorance is one factor (you pretty much have to have taken law at university to be taught anything about it) and there are as many grey areas as black and white principles. Afaict, a lot of constitutional law experts were surprised by the decision.

Secondly, the law has been shifting away from unchecked executive power and, to some extent, unchecked parliamentary power for a long time, something that has arguably accelerated since 1998. It is probably incorrect to talk about an activist judiciary but the trend towards challenging government decisions does arguably reflect a judiciary that feels more empowered and is willing to test the boundaries in a way more conservative judges might not thirty years ago.

Thirdly, this is not a madness Brexit has wrought. May, Blunkett and Straw all attacked the judiciary for perceived attempts to overstep their power, backed by a baying press. You saw that in the Belmarsh case in 2004 and repeatedly since then. Home Secretaries have used the judiciary as a punching bag and the tabloids as a cudgel when they didn't get their own way. It's tempting to see the reaction as a tantrum on the part of Dacre, etc, but the roots are deeper and more insidious.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

Britain is stupid and complacent about its place in the world precisely because it has been so unusually stable for so long.

This feels very true.

michaellambert, Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

We are due a civil war, yes.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

Never mind me I just came here to laugh @ this:

Tracy King Verified account
‏@tkingdot

Retweet if you would like a Labour leader who opposes Brexit

Thanks.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

We're about six months late for that.

here we are now entertain us (snoball), Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:36 (seven years ago) link

Britain is stupid and complacent about its place in the world precisely because it has been so unusually stable for so long.

This is true though I can't think of any other Western nation where terrorists came within a ba' hair of wiping out a Prime Minister and most of their cabinet - not once but twice. Maybe not twice but the second attack was unique enough.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

An Italian PM has been kidnapped and murdered within living memory

Neil S, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

at least current 2 EU members were still Fascist dictatorships when the UK joined tbf

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

wait, which two? spain and portugal both joined after the UK (and were no longer dictatorships)

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:52 (seven years ago) link

oh sorry, misread: "current" meaning "are members now but weren't then"

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy Corbyn MP ✔ @jeremycorbyn
There must be transparency and accountability on Brexit terms. We won't block Article 50 but will fight for a Brexit that works for Britain
12:01 PM - 6 Nov 2016

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

clown shoes wearers, the lot of them

Is that my hand, manatee? (stevie), Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 November 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

We won't block Article 50 but will fight for a Brexit that works for Britain

How are you going to do that when you've just pissed any leverage you might have had up the wall? I wanted to believe Corbyn was getting better at his job but this sort of naivety and incompetence is difficult to overlook.

Watson has been a cunt about this as well.

Matt DC, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

If they block A50 then I think it likely there will be a General Election, which will be it for Labour as we currently know it.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

Nah, there will need to be an Opposition just because people will always want the chance to vote for one - it won't be the Lib Dems, and the SNP won't be around forever.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Worded badly - I meant the current Corbyn lead Labour. He wouldn't survive, and knows it. Labour would obviously still exist, albeit badly wounded

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

idk, I can see a nightmare scenario where anti-tory votes are split amongst Lib Dems, UKIP and Labour (or maybe even two Labour parties, if it were to split), leading to indefinite Conservative hegemony

soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

There's also the 10+ years of guaranteed Tory majority in the commons to worry about ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

They don't need to block Article 50 - they just need the government to think that they might. Corbyn has just removed that at a stroke, there's minimal chance of wringing any concessions out of the government now because they know that, when push comes to shove Labour won't dare to block it.

Matt DC, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

I've heard it suggested that even of they don't vote against Article 50 they can delay it with amendments and so forth, which will stymie May's preferred timetable, where Britain is out of the EU and past the rockiest and most chaotic period before a 2020 election - but I guess this leads back to the same problem that Against The 80s mentions above, that it will just push the tories to call an early election in which Labour look set to lose dozens of seats.

soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

Labour are under no obligation to agree to an election. To do so would be electoral suicide. Obviously, they will do so.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 6 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

Ha!

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Sunday, 6 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Worded badly - I meant the current Corbyn lead Labour. He wouldn't survive, and knows it. Labour would obviously still exist, albeit badly wounded

― Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Sunday, 6 November 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Its been suggested that he would stay even if Labour lost badly. It is a way to take out a lot of PLP deadwood. I've been so angry with them that this 'approach' does have its attractions.

I think whatever is said when it comes to the actual debate & vote its almost certain to be an individual choice surely? Many Tories and Labour MPs will want assurances written in blood. Others will vote for A50 despite anything because they represent Leave constituencies.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

It is a way to take out a lot of PLP deadwood

How?

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 6 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

In a GE Labour would lose a lot of seats?

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

By losing lots of seats to the Tories et al I assume.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

(xp)

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Are we just defining *all* Labour MPs as dead wood? So ideally all Labour MPs should lose their seats?

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

He might still block it.

He could 'change his mind owing to circumstances'

Mark G, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

If Labour did suffer a big defeat then presumably the PLP would force another leadership contest - I guess Corbyn could run again, but if it's possible to get another left-wing candidate onto the ballot it I'd have thought it quite likely that he chooses that moment to step down? but obv it would depend on the composition of the PLP after an election as to whether that would be possible

soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

Tories or Lib Dems or Greens or cricket fans - many ppl are so desperate to get onto that time machine and burn some Greeks, tolerate right-wing Eastern Euro governments and get into the CETA gravy train.

We'll see how the debate goes - I'm not defining *all* Labour MPs as deadwood but I'd need more than two hands to count the fuckers.

xp

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

list of MPs by order of their majority at the 2015 election. most of Corbyn's supporters seem to be in fairly safe seats afaict, several of his most high profile critics have fairly small majorities (Margaret Greenwood is one exception, w/ majority of just 417 votes)

http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/mps-maj.htm

soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

If the Tories really fuck up UKIP will probably see an increase in support too. Pressure all round, 2017 should be exciting.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

Oh look at what I've just found: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/06/nigel-farage-to-lead-100000-strong-march-on-supreme-court-on-day/

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

Most of the "PLP deadwood" were parachuted into some of the safest Labour seats in the country so that's a pretty moronic viewpoint.

If Soref's theory is correct it suggests that Corbyn doesn't believe that he can win an election under any circumstances but I don't believe that's true. If it is then he must at least be vaguely aware of the possibility of putting his own project back decades.

In any case I'm not sure a snap election could be called without repealing the FTP Act so I suspect it's just another case of JC saying the first thing that comes into his head or capitulating to pressure within his own ranks. Or he just wants Brexit anyway and fuck the consequences.

Matt DC, Sunday, 6 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

I am interested in how Xyzzz thinks the cause of socialism will be advanced by substandard Labour MPs being replaced by a load of Raab/Rees-Mogg replicants in any case. Especially as reselection looks like it's going to happen anyway.

Matt DC, Sunday, 6 November 2016 23:55 (seven years ago) link

oh, I don't think Corbyn believes he can't win an election, or that he's *hoping* for an election wipeout to remove his PLP opponents - just that, in the event of a wipeout I guess he'd prefer to hand over to a left-wing successor rather than stay on himself, given the choice.

I think that if the commons passes a motion of no confidence in the government an election can be called without repealing the FTP Act (after the opposition is given a chance to form a government), so in theory the Conservatives could use their majority to vote no confidence in themselves? would be awkward for them for them from a PR perspective, though.

soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

Am I right in saying that it wouldn't automatically lead to a new election - that first of all they (the Queen?) are supposed to see if anyone else can form a government from the existing set of MPs? It would be hilarious if the Tories voted no confidence in themselves and then some kind of minority Labour-SNP-Lib Dem coalition was able to form a minority government. Obviously this won't happen.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 7 November 2016 07:58 (seven years ago) link

And Sinn Fein, don't forget Sinn Fein (you can forget Sinn Fein).

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 7 November 2016 08:26 (seven years ago) link

Ah yes Sinn Fein. Of course!

As soref says some of the Lab right are in tight-looking seats. Some others may leave after GE if Corbyn stays or someone with the same political persuasion takes over (Owen's challenge was never ever just about competence).

Its hard to predict what will happen in a month never mind a year but for now Corbyn can't possibly win next year - as leader he has to believe he can whatever he might privately believe. The project around Corbyn has yet to mature, and his party have been silent since he won again but as the vote on Yemen showed he is still undermined and some of these people's politics are insane. The public will not be confident Labour are stable enough even if there is a compelling vision in the manifesto. From reading around re-selection looks hard between now and 2020 and certainly impossible between now and next year when we will possibly have one so yes Raab/Ress-Mogg replicants might be all we have for now so as moronic as it sounds I'm thinking around what progress might look like post-GE. A leaner Labour party might be one thing.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 7 November 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

In any case, not holding the government properly to account because you're afraid of what might happen in a general election is piss-weak stuff, it's failing as an opposition on more than one level, on what might be the biggest political call in a generation.

Matt DC, Monday, 7 November 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

I think the point about strains of often localist anti-state sentiment persisting from way back before the reform act is probably true, but it does beg the question about what form it has taken while dormant (or has it been active in some way?), especially as it seems that the british have quite a poor sense of their own political history

ogmor, Monday, 7 November 2016 10:41 (seven years ago) link

Don't know that that's unique to them, in fairness.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 7 November 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

until recently i wd have said it had died out nearly entirely in the UK (except for paisleyism and the DUP, which is a throwback to it, there's a couple of good essays by tom paulin on this)

clearly it survives in the US -- and i suppose my argument wd have been that the US had become the harbour for ppl who thought this way when it was Further West Britain (ie 1660s-1770s), and that it largely migrated away from here (except for isolated cranks like william blake)

of course ukipism does take some of its inspiration from US quasi-libertarian anti-stateism (falange on the gun laws for example)

mark s, Monday, 7 November 2016 10:52 (seven years ago) link

yeah I wonder if the country ideology has been imported back over here from the new world, sounding weirdly familiar, like afro-cuban music being a hit in the congo. I always thought the mass internal migrations since the industrial revolution marked a decisive rupture with earlier radical politics but maybe not. idk if you could argue it got mixed in with anti-urban, arts&crafts-type movements. all this stuff seems very paranoid but you have to balance that against how profoundly-entrenched some of the class power they're against is

ogmor, Monday, 7 November 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

arts&crafts movements was mostly a late 19th C top-down middleclass escape from encroaching industrialisation -- it was well meaning but moneyed, and while it did rescue a handful of working class artisans and their skills, and also set up a next generation of apprentices, this was almost always at cost of genuine in-family transmission of knowledge, and the line was broken again by the 1970s

the project i'm working on (the book abt the birth of the uk rock press from the underground press in the 60s) repeatedly returns to the idea that the underground press was basically "libertarian" (ie very focused on individual rights): definitely there was an upsurge of hippie counterstate attitude then, and there WAS a little bit of an overlap between brown pots and self-made furniture arts-and-crafts tail-enders with brown rice & macrame self-sufficiency, which *may* in turn i suppose link a little into sovereign freemen stuff -- but there's no largescale continuity (and the brown pots thing was very much a quietist retreat from the world)

mark s, Monday, 7 November 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

(Watched an old "Mana Alive" or "Everyman" documentary doing called "Where Have All The Flowers Gone" on the iplayer this week which looked at various hippies ten years on. Although very much of-its-time in its style was really interesting in respect of the routes out of the hippie idealist moment - Vashti Bunyan was living in the country, sourcing antiques to sell to Texans; Felix Dennis was in the first flush the success of his media empire; Jerry Rubin heavily into ca$h and making lots of money in NYC through selling self-realisation techniques or somesuch; a fellow whose name I have forgotten had left his cult-commune and was learning computer programming; Mick Farren was busily being Mick Farren. Vashti aside it was hard to see any trace of the Arts and Crafts in any of them really.)

Tim, Monday, 7 November 2016 12:47 (seven years ago) link

Having said that, most of the remaining hippie 'idealists' (Nigel Weymouth, Joe Boyd, Nick Sand etc) seemed to have been at the V&A (Museum of the decorative arts founded in 1852) over the weekend - so maybe there are still obscure links to arts & crafts.

Dr Drudge (Bob Six), Monday, 7 November 2016 12:52 (seven years ago) link

there's always a mixture of classes when these things come anywhere near critical mass, finding lower common denominators and distrust of elites is a good bet whether its rotten boroughs or straight bananas or duck houses. given that now any (possible) freemen types have common cause with garden city england it makes me wonder

ogmor, Monday, 7 November 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

also interesting to see role of church in these demographics. not sure if the general christian tendency to plump for brexit is just generational, there's prob a anglican/non conformist divide but there's also the giles fraser-style anti-market england of parishes which is self consciously yearning for the past and sits in the middle of this

ogmor, Monday, 7 November 2016 13:07 (seven years ago) link

curious what people here think of this Len McCluskey speech on immigration

http://labourlist.org/2016/11/len-mccluskey-workers-need-safeguards-and-strong-unions-to-make-migration-work/

So we need a new approach. I believe it is time to change the language around this issue and move away from talk of “freedom of movement” on the one hand and “controls” on the other and instead to speak of safeguards.

Safeguards for communities, safeguards for workers, and safeguards for industries needing labour.

At the core of this must be the reassertion of collective bargaining and trade union strength.

My proposal is that any employer wishing to recruit labour abroad can only do so if they are either covered by a proper trade union agreement, or by sectoral collective bargaining.

Put together with trade unions own organising efforts this would change the race-to-the-bottom culture into a rate- for-the- job society.

It would end the fatal attraction of ever cheaper workers for employers, and slash demand for immigrant labour, without the requirement for formal quotas or restrictions.

soref, Monday, 7 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

It sounds good, but will McClusky actually organise those workers?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 7 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Len McCluskey's still alive?

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Monday, 7 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

There's a lot of Legitimate Concerns guff wrapped up there, specifically talking about "people's daily experience" - some of the highest-immigration areas in the country are also the ones that are the most tolerant. The roles of deinustrialisation and (especially) austerity are glossed over and ignored, as is the prospect of the unions as a force for political education. It's capitulating even as it claims to be providing solutions.

Matt DC, Monday, 7 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

Some of it sounds like "we decide who gets the cheap immigrant labour" - so everything will obv be alright.

calzino, Monday, 7 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

also lol since when did the unions have any sway or power

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 7 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

The cuddly band of unions around the world all working together sounds great in theory until you consider that maybe unions in India aren't going to be too happy with their members' jobs all being moved to the UK, any more than the reverse.

Matt DC, Monday, 7 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Some of it sounds like "we decide who gets the cheap immigrant labour"

this is not a position unknown to the trade union movement

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Monday, 7 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

If all workers in Britain suddenly unionised I suppose they could agitate for jobs to go to them not to immigrants, but would this do anything for people who are chronically unemployed already, who are out of work already after years of de-industrialisation, etc?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 7 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

the necessity of unions' role in protecting their members against incursions from wage-undercutting labour has always meant that they aren't the ideal instrument for class solidarity, even if you accept the chronically unemployed as belonging to the same class as skilled or semi-skilled union members - which unionists have almost never believed to be true

all this aside, unionization is one of the few protections working class people have ever had

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Monday, 7 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Agree

Are any of Labour putting forward serious proposals for new job creation + protections for workers (surely the way to solve both poverty and 'legitimate concerns')?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 7 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

"this is not a position unknown to the trade union movement

calzino, Monday, 7 November 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

"this is not a position unknown to the trade union movement"
Yeah, but this one I wouldn't trust much.

calzino, Monday, 7 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

I was once at a company where during the '07 recession they felt empowered enough to effectively have zero hour conditions, in the gaps between big contracts starting and finishing they would just casually say "we haven't got anything for the next month (even though they could have allocated people onto other sites) come back then" to staff who were f/t and not self-employed. One of my colleagues was a member of unite and he said they were a waste of time when he took his grievances to them.

calzino, Tuesday, 8 November 2016 07:41 (seven years ago) link

this fucking scrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/10/nigel-farage-jokes-about-trumps-alleged-sexual-assaults

thank god ukip are in such disarray right now - if they were any better organised, i would actually be fucking terrified at the potential repercussions of the trump result on our politics, particularly given that there will likely be a growing public impatience with the government failing to deliver the glorious brexit that was promised.

corbyn's weak response to the election not much helping my state of mind. now is one of those moments to galvanize the left, but just like after the brexit vote, cometh the hour, cometh the vague mumbles and a bit of shuffling about

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 10 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Farage can really claim credit for the success of a billionaire reality TV star.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

In further 'this fucking guy' news:

@George_Osborne
Came across this anti-Trump protest here in New York last night - can't help wondering how many of them voted ....

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 November 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

Everyone out last night will have voted. D'oh!

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

Perhaps he hasn't heard of the ... the ... electoral college.

the pinefox, Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

@George_Osborne
Came across this anti-Trump protest here in New York last night - can't help wondering how many of them voted ....

Hillary beat Trump %58.8 to %37 in New York. But then, numbers never were Osborne's strong point, were they?

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

i was there. i didn't vote because i'm not allowed, but i have voted against him several times fwiw.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

also clinton won 59% of the vote in NYS, but 82% in manhattan, 75% in kings (bk), etc., etc.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

Jon Cruddas on the splits in Momentum:

Arguably, the real tension lies between traditional Leninist far left politics based around a discernable industrial working class base and the post-operaismo—literally the new “post workerist”—left. The latter was highly influential within the anti-globalisation movement and the post-crash Occupy and student anti-cuts protests. For this group, the working class base of the left is disappearing, thanks to technological change and automation. The new core left project is pushed by the urban, globally orientated, networked and educated youth—rather than any group resembling the proletariat. The class absolutism of the old guard is at odds with the new “autonomists” and their rejection of mainstream left political parties, unions and traditional representative democracy.

For this group, the fashionable talk is of “accelerationism” and even “fully automated luxury communism,” with technology offering new straightforward route maps toward some vaguely defined era of “post capitalism”—captured in the current post-workerist fad: the Universal Basic Income.

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/momentum-crisis-labour-party

soref, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:51 (seven years ago) link

Cruddas, earlier today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYZpZr3Cv7I

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 08:42 (seven years ago) link

Momentum's statement on the US election is all I need to know: http://momentumpress.tumblr.com/post/152969802602/momentum-statement-on-the-us-election

While Corbyn's own statement was weak as long as he keeps on being an enabler for this I'm all for it.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 November 2016 09:23 (seven years ago) link

hmmmm

http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/main/Readmit_expelled_socialists

soref, Friday, 11 November 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

Yes a press release on the Momentum website is truly the moral lead we've all been craving in these dark times.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

I can only assume someone somewhere has asked Corbyn to soft-pedal on all this because it looks more "statesmanlike" or whatever, in the magical fictional world where he might conceivably be PM, but if he can't be relied upon to show moral leadership on an issue of this magnitude then what on earth is the point of him? Plus all this vague guff implying that because Trump also represents a threat to the neoliberal status quo then there must be something good about it if you look hard enough - something that is also I suspect behind his Brexit stance.

Obviously Bernie Sanders now has nothing to lose but the difference between him and Corbyn this week has highlighted how desperately the Labour left needs a better figurehead.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

Think I'm going to let my LP membership lapse. Really raw about politics atm, and I don't regret my membership - I do think Corbyn is a Good Thing. Even with the reduction in price it's still money I could be drinking, and I hate the meetings.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Also, way to go tacking "and all forms of racism" onto every sentence when someone's accusing one of your boys of being an antisemite but not when the US elects an actual fucking fascist.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

There's a kind of optimism I find absolutely infuriating in British politics. The same people saying that 'nothing will change, it won't be that bad' have been saying it about Trump. Let me have my moment of misery, damnit!

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:25 (seven years ago) link

god I've been reading re-admit as read-mit all day

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

I'm nearing the point of agreeing that Corbyn isn't very good but am too hateful of every centrist neolib conclusion that seems to lead to, because in this case, bad player or not, the problem is absolutely the game itself and fuck wanting to play it

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

like, well done realists, you win, let's get a nice telegenic orator in and win some hearts and minds on the road to full socialism in 3016

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Or, some funny bloke that makes up his own words and might actually appear on "Tipping Point" to get his face over to people.

Mark G, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I mean anyone who thinks that another technocratic centrist is the answer right now just has a profound lack of insight or understanding of anything.

It's becoming increasingly obvious that the divide is not between 'electable centre-ground moderates' vs people who are too right/left-wing. It's between politicians people believe will do something for them vs politicians they don't. Remember the 2015 election was basically fought between three dudes competing on how much they were going to take away from people. One of them had to win and the British public forced his exit the first chance they got.

Unfortunately Corbyn is in that camp for too much of the country as well, he's just a terrible communicator when it comes to people who aren't already predisposed to listen. I don't want another glossy neoliberal centrist, I want a competent version of Corbyn, one who isn't going to squander what might be the left's only opportunity in a generation.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

otm

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

He doesn't really 'get' America; his/Milne's analysis of the GOP vote doesn't mention the kind of exurb dweller who swung this, much as the Brexit analysis given by the vast majority of UK politicians doesn't acknowledge the well-off golf-club types who really swung it.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

He is a not very dynamic and driven leader ok a useless fucker - but nevertheless a useless fucker operating in difficult conditions, and as the only trustworthy candidate offering a genuine opposition to austerity he still has my support. Pure selfish self interest here, but when I get completely sick with politics it's the only motivation left to carry on engaging.

Just heard about the local Y Pat centre losing funding and staff. For some severely disabled people it offers just about the only social interaction they get outside of family. The Labour centrists have supported the austerity agenda at every vote, and then carried on with hypocritical smooth-tongued lip service to social inclusion blah blah, so fuck every last one of them cunts forever.

calzino, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

his/Milne's analysis of the GOP vote doesn't mention the kind of exurb dweller who swung this, much as the Brexit analysis given by the vast majority of UK politicians doesn't acknowledge the well-off golf-club types who really swung it

It's because it gets in the way of the convenient 'people who have been failed by the neoliberal consensus' narrative, a narrative that also requires downplaying the white supremacist angle. A lot of the voters you describe, maybe even the majority of Trump voters, would have the neolib consensus back in a heartbeat if they felt they were still the ones benefiting from it.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

This supposed Brexit march seems to be being organised mainly by the Telegraph. If it actually happens there must be a counter-protest.

nashwan, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

I was never someone who deified Corbyn - I don't think very much of him, tbh, be he was a handy tool for moving the party to the left and that was valuable. The long term effects of that are still to be seen. His inability to not say unpopular stuff about foreign policy was deeply unhelpful to me where I live, because lost of the people I was canvassing were forces/ex-forces and lots of them were sympathetic to moving left. But all I got in return was Falklands/Hamas/trident.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Not that he was necessarily wrong about those things, but you don't win elections on foreign policy, but you can lose votes based on it.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

There never seems to be any planned strategy on how to respond to Tory baiting without falling right into their not so cunning traps. Which is one reason I'd dread it it if they called an election right now, although I don't see what will change a few years down the line if Milne is still stealing a wage.

calzino, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

There never seems to be any planned strategy on how to respond to Tory baiting without falling right into their not so cunning traps

This seemed to be more of a Cameron/Osborne thing. I'm not sure May/Hammond are putting much thought into how to undermine Labour other than coming up with her hilarious PMQ zings.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Yes a press release on the Momentum website is truly the moral lead we've all been craving in these dark times.

― Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Let's have a recap from this morning - an article is posted about how Momentum is useless (from the quote, I am not reading the rest of it). I post an excellent on the money response from Momentum that is allied to the current leader of the Labour Party.

Ultimately yes it wasn't a good statement from Corbyn - but again it was never ever about him, but what is around him, and what I am saying -- and what that statement by Momentum shows -- is that this is still good and worth holding onto. But please be an Einstein and tell me who can replace Corbyn that is from the left-wing of the party AND is a better PR maN AND would be allowed on the ballot AND then when he/she does get elected will unify the party on policy on all sides.

Ultimately when push comes to shove Corbyn did the following: 1) voted against the Welfare Bill when most other abstained and 2) in the EU debate talked of 'no upper limit to immigration' (but you know not standing in with Cameron was his biggest crime). I am prepared to give him some leeway against some crappy tweets and statements. The actions and example have mostly been good.

Granted, it probably will not do me any good (the pessimists are always right in the end huh?) but I'd like to see Corbyn stay, and more importantly for Momentum and the activism around it to mature, and hopefully to allow for the space for some progressive politics. Better than screaming that he isn't a good communicator and doesn't love the EU for the billionth time.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

There isn't anyone else, that's the problem, although the reasons for that lie in 20+ years of poor selection policies from Labour, so that when new intellectual direction was desperately needed there was nothing.

Once again the problem isn't that Corbyn doesn't believe in the right things, it's the danger that this might all be snuffed out or pushed back to the margins after the next election if he doesn't get his act together. There isn't necessarily time for it to mature.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

there are at least two problems :

jeremy corbyn isn't good enough ;

there isn't anyone else .

can either be solved ?

how ?

conrad, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

sign caroline lucas in the january transfer window?

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

how indeed

& we always come back to this when this week saw a benefit cap that will lead to not just individuals but families becoming homeless which will surely lead to deaths fairly soon.

it's quite depressing/frustrating to read discussions about waiting until 2020 to weed out the dead wood of the PLP etc. so that we'll be in a better position by 2025 when we're in quite a desperate situation with regard to people's lives and i don't hold the view that we can afford to wait for Corbyn's massive failure. I'm perfectly willing to accept something close to a Blairite at this point.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

Good for you dude, Lib Dems are that way ---->

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

I like Farron a fair bit, in fact.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

A standard Blairite would be very unlikely to win either at this juncture (adopting either the policies that Blair etc actually followed, or the ones the current Labour right claim they would follow now). It would be virtually impossible for them to come up with policies on Europe, welfare, the economy and immigration that would be acceptable to enough of the country.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Sorry, unnecessary. I don't believe a hypothetical Blairite government would row back any of this.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

no need to apologise. i'm just don't have any answers and am fairly desperate for some hope of any kind.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

Even if they were to adopt the Tories' immigration policy wholesale they would still haemorrhage support in West Midlands marginals, or in London, without winning enough votes from disgruntled Tories or UKIPers to compensate. They aren't going to be winning any seats in Scotland for a long time.

The only thing that can save them is a really totemic, transformative and popular policy that the Tories too stupid or ideological to steal. Or for half the electorate to die in a meteor strike.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

> The only thing that can save them is a really totemic, transformative and popular policy that the Tories too stupid or ideological to steal.

a little of column a and a little of column b: assuming we'll be some way down the brexit road by the time an election comes around, is there any way of making that additional £350 per week for the nhs bollocks work at all? that was the one stomachable offer of the whole brexit farrago, even if it was a total fantasy that it would ever happen. they could slash e.g. subsidies to wealthy farmers to part fund it.

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

i'm sure that any actual budget savings from Brexit - hard to imagine they will really exist, but let's play along - will have been handed out as tax cuts before any non-Tory government has a chance of getting near them

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

As it stands the Lib Dems are the only English party prepared to resist a road that will almost certainly lead to ever more punitive and destructive anti-immigration laws.

Obviously this isn't to suggest they've suddenly become socialists or that their Cameron rubber stamp isn't to blame for this whole shitshow, but it is something.

Most Labour MPs and probably a majority of party members voted Remain, but they won't oppose leaving the EU for fear of upsetting anti-migrant voters in the constituencies Labour might lose. The alternative would be to give 48% of the population (at least) something to really vote for. Meanwhile they've pledged to hold the government to account for some vague "Brexit that works for Britain" while refusing to vote against Article 50 and taking the only thing that might have actually done so off the table. It's an utterly fucked and incoherent state of affairs.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

I mean the chances of me voting Lib Dem over Labour are basically nonexistent, but still.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

i still think trying to overturn the result of the referendum is electorally impossible. trying to force some kind of vote, Parliamentary or otherwise, on the single market/free movement feels more sensible, even if still racked with difficulties and dangers.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

Yeah you can't just overturn the referendum result without an unlikely general election victory fought on that explicit platform. But there are other ways that would be in line with the principles of both wings of the party, and would surely win more votes than the current mess. It would also provide a platform that might actually give them a chance (however remote) of actually enacting some anti-austerity policies with the right leadership.

As it stands all that they can do is impotently oppose some horrific and damaging policies while making it all the more likely that they'll actually continue to happen.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

how likely are MPs to get a vote on the negotiating terms, even if the Supreme Court upholds the original decision on Parliament having to trigger A50? seems pretty unlikely to me?

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone really knows. As it stands the government seem to have free reign even if Article 50 does go to a vote. Lib Dems + SNP + a handful of Labour and Tory rebels isn't enough to force any changes.

Cameron could have fixed the whole thing by stipulating that all four parts of the UK had to vote Leave, which probably would have caused its own constitutional crisis but surely not as big a mess as what we have now. Bit late for that now.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

any number of ways Brexit could've been avoided by the way the referendum was set, but perhaps not many ways it could've been set that would've protected Cameron from his bucolic colleagues and the ravages of UKIP

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

can't remember if i've said it on here or elsewhere but the best referendum question would've been "Should we continue to belong to the Single Market and allow free movement of people?" It would've functioned as a referendum on EU membership since a No vote would've meant withdrawal, and we'd have a handy figure for how many fucking racists there are in the country without the figleaf of sovereignty to hide behind

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I mean the referendum would have happened whatever eventually I think, the forces would have just kept building. He was probably banking on a Labour party in a rather more coherent state though.

I'm just exasperated or sickened by virtually everything in politics at the moment which is colouring my posts.

Like, look at an ILX politics thread from 2006 and just imagine trying to explain our global and national political situation to a poster from ten years ago. People would think you were fucking insane.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

I was listening to that hideous man-boy/Redwood clone Rees-Mogg talking up Trump/US trade deals on r4 yesterday and thinking the next decade is going to be so much fucking fun. I'm sure even 15 years ago this fucker would have been derided as an old school tory anachronism, but now they nearly give the BoE gig to the cunt.

calzino, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

Like, look at an ILX politics thread from 2006 and just imagine trying to explain our global and national political situation to a poster from ten years ago. People would think you were fucking insane.

Say no to ID cards! Hahahahaha.

Alba, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Was thinking about the UK politics end of season finale thread earlier today
The Official Newscorp/UK end of season finale/Rebekah Brooks did 9/11 thread

Gotta say, the scriptwriters really upped their game.

Stevie T, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

I know both Corbyn and Starmer have come out saying they wouldn't vote down A50 but iirc in an interview Keir gave the position seemed to be a bit more ambiguous. Reckon it won't be a free pass but yeah Labour are figuring things out etc.

there are at least two problems :

jeremy corbyn isn't good enough ;

there isn't anyone else .

can either be solved ?

how ?

― conrad, Friday, 11 November 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

To me this isn't about any single person. You could still have a Trudeau-like telegenic blah with better communication. Then if you have that person coming out saying they wouldn't use nuclear weapons or that there is 'no upper limit on immigration' you would witness this guy getting squeezed on all sides.

The problems are many: the Labout Party is almost certainly beyond use, the almost dead Liberals/centre that are still vocal enough to divert the left's energies (because the centre is now fucked and this is a question of left and right), the lack of a movement or a culture on the ground, and the many who don't vote at all. Not that I would ever blame them. Its all too fucked up and a lot of my POV is...not so much forget 2020, its more around creating the kinds of change will take time. A left that can fight at all.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

the two problems and two questions were in response to Matt DC - whose words and opinions I appreciate sometimes reflect things I think or feel sometimes make me reflect upon the way I think or feel and of course sometimes do neither - saying that jeremy corbyn isn't good enough and then that the problem is that there isn't anyone else. they're both problems. jeremy corbyn isn't setting the world on fire dynamically reframing narratives seizing imaginations converting the masses. he isn't good enough - that's the first problem. he isn't likely to radically alter his approach his persona his appeal. but he is necessary. there isn't anyone else - that's the second problem. it seems as though the only way at this point that there can ever be anyone else is with someone like jeremy corbyn despite not being good enough hanging around long enough. so jeremy corbyn isn't good enough - this likely cannot be solved. there isn't anyone else - this can possibly be solved. it needs to be solved. someone else is needed. lots of someones else are needed.

conrad, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

Yes I saw you were responding to Matt and I was actually going to reply to his focus on the "There isn't anyone else" thing.

I agree that many are needed.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

FWIW I agree with that - the problem isn't Corbyn himself (although...) it's the political vacuum that propelled him to a position for which he was manifestly unqualified. Why was no one else there?

The same phenomenon has of course propelled Trump to the White House but that's going with the grain of a rabid media rather than against it.

It can't be solved without fundamentally changing the whole system. No vaguely left wing politician who doesn't include electoral reform in their manifesto is going to achieve anything in the long run.

This doesn't change the fact that the biggest threat to Corbynism is Corbyn himself.

Matt DC, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

^ you keep saying everything I want to say better than I could put it

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/12/donald-trump-election-global-wake-up-call-jeremy-corbyn

this seems better than his original statement imo, draws parallels between Trump and the tories/UKIP, goes into the idea that people feel they don't have control over their own destiny

soref, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:36 (seven years ago) link

FWIW I agree with that - the problem isn't Corbyn himself (although...) it's the political vacuum that propelled him to a position for which he was manifestly unqualified. Why was no one else there?

There were others there, just no one else of Corbyn's colours. Once he gained traction in the leadership election the voting rules worked against a close race between C and A.N.Other. Large numbers joined the party to ensure his safe passage, rightly to support their convictions around a rebooted labour movement. However in supporting a leader who is never in a hundred years going to become PM the party has shot itself in the foot as an electoral force. Whether a more centrist leader would have had any more success in keeping the party-as-was afloat we won't know. The conditions for that happening were removed once Corbyn's nomination spurred the groundswell of support. The vacuum was created in that no one else would have had a chance against the two-fingers (we'll vote for what we want even if you say it's a bad idea because we've had enough of being told) . Hence the disaster that was Owen Smith.
One thing is pretty certain : the tories would never have done something similar to themselves. The right will always choose the necessary course of action (to retain power)

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Saturday, 12 November 2016 09:22 (seven years ago) link

i don't really believe in Tory infallibility but there is a key difference, in that centrist Labour has moved so far to the right over the last 25 years as to be no longer credibly part of the left. and the centrists' policies, in power or out, are so disconnected from the needs of the poor and marginalized in the UK that supporting them feels wholly pointless, if not self-sabotaging.

perhaps there's a minority of people in the country who will be permanently impoverished by our political/economic system, and perhaps those people are kidding themselves that they can form an effective alternative candidacy capable of winning power. perhaps the underlying truth is that the Haves and the Kinda Haves are going to just keep ignoring or demonizing the Have Nots until the ocean swallows us up. if that's true then a lot of us at the bottom will continue to kid ourselves that given the right tactics a properly left Labour have a shot, because it eases the pain a little bit.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 09:46 (seven years ago) link

One thing is pretty certain : the tories would never have done something similar to themselves. The right will always choose the necessary course of action (to retain power)

The Tories elected Iain Duncan Smith at a similarly low and directionless point in their political cycle, I wouldn't be so sure about that. They are also pursuing a version of Brexit that their leader and many of their senior figures know full well will be economically suicidal. Whether it's electorally suicidal is a different question, and maybe one they might be more tempted to ask themselves if they felt more threatened by the opposition. I suspect their failure to ask that question is going to come back and hurt them, because the economic mismanagement could be so bad that if Labour does come back (probably under Corbyn's successor) then it's going to happen very quickly because the tide of anger will be so great.

Corbyn won because a) the decision not to oppose the welfare cap crossed a moral line that most of the Labour Party was not prepared to cross, and b) the party took a long look at Liz Kendall, Yvette Cooper and Andy Burnham and realised that they didn't necessarily stand a greater chance with any of them, and if they were going to fail on their own terms then they might as well go with a failure that didn't leave them in paroxysms of self-loathing.

Say whatever you like about Blair and Brown but their whole project was about combining neoliberalism with increases in welfare and public spending. The conditions for that no longer exist. Still, take that second bit away and there's nothing, and no one on the Labour Right has been promising anything like that.

Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

... just some clueless Tristram Hunt guff about "offending the British people's sense of fair play by appearing to oppose the welfare cap".

Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

another scary referendum question would be "Is it better that legitimate claimants suffer if it ensures people cannot cheat the benefits system?"

wonder just how many malicious, self-centred vultures would vote yes on that one

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

i'd like hard-ish answers to this stuff, surely somebody is running the research?

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

I think if there's an ideological school that might come to seriously threaten Momentum while remaining "electable" it's unlikely to come from the Blairite side, and more from some kind of mutation of Blue Labour. A combination of social authoritarianism, industrial strategy and redistributive economic policies could work in Brexit Britain. Whether that 'electability' tell us anything good about the country is another question.

There's also the question of whether, if he were a member of the Tories, Farage or a similar figure would stand a chance of becoming PM. Possibly not, for the same reason with don't have PM Boris Johnson right now. Then again, Trump was able to rinse through, with embarrassing ease, the kinds of Republican electoral processes that were surely designed to prevent someone like him becoming President.

Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

maybe the most political capital could be made by a party credibly offering to create a lot of good jobs - via manufacturing, i suppose, but maybe there are other alternatives. that could be done by politicians from a range of backgrounds, from the centre right to all points left. Trump has certainly made this part of his offer, without the "credibly" bit, obv.

hard to imagine any other way to lastingly improve incomes and equality in the UK that doesn't involve a major restructure of the economic infrastructure

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:20 (seven years ago) link

How do you do that without being shouted down by the press and portrayed as a crazy communist/financially irresponsible? Corbyn is also frustratingly vague on how he'd create jobs - the National Investment Bank idea suggests one path that I genuinely think might work, "people's quantitative easing" is another, but neither are exactly something that is going to resonate with an electorate. It also might take years to come into fruition.

Then again the Tories can get away with doing things that even a right-wing Labour government couldn't, and May could be leading the country in the direction of more economic interventionism. I think the neoliberal consensus is over but voters are still rather attached to the benefits of neoliberalism, even if they no longer feel it in their wallets.

Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Then again the Tories can get away with doing things that even a right-wing Labour government couldn't

Ain't that the truth. Sadly, Paul Dacre is undead so we will never be rid of him.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

you can do any sort of borrowing you want as long as you frame it so that the "serious people" i.e. deficit ideologues go along with it. they all went along with the keynesian response to the financial crisis. i honestly don't think most people give a shit about the deficit unless mercilessly prodded about it by the press and conservative think tanks. as you say matt the austerity consensus has basically fallen apart now - there is room for a massive investment programme if it's sold the right way.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:32 (seven years ago) link

you come up with a programme of things that need investing in the UK and sell it hard? of course the usual voices of capital are going to go after you, but i thought we'd already accepted that one way or another the electorate is crying out for "not the status quo". Brexit could even supply a useful context for arguing the necessity of investing in growth.

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

so basically what Tracer said :)

more fun than an Acclaimed Music poll (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

this - or the next - govt could say alright, we need half a million homes built each year for the next five years, and the govt will do the lion's share of the borrowing, with HAs and local govt doing the building and contracting. this will of course require other infrastructure and services as well. it will require massive borrowing, which we are comfortable with, as loans have never been cheaper. and we are creating assets that will mainly rise in value.

i mean just as an example. this would be a massively popular policy!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

Unless it tanked the prices of people's homes.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

people's homes have already tanked/ are tanking unless you live in London.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

and they will continue to tank unless the economy improves in a meaningful way.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

That's the exact opposite of what seems to be happening at the moment.

"The dire shortage of available housing across the UK is continuing to push prices upwards, regardless of the uncertainty linked to the ongoing discussions surrounding Brexit," RICS chief economist Simon Rubinsohn said.

Price expectations for the coming three months edged up and were positive in all areas bar London, where prices have fallen for the past eight months, mostly in central areas.

The Tories are going to have to be remarkably brave to flood the market with new stock when most of their voters are homeowners who see their wealth as inextricably linked to the value of their property.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

iirc those "Central London" figs are median prices, and misleading as they are capturing zillionaire properties in Zone 1 whose prices have halved (like from 3M to 1.5M etc)

and again, an investment in say Paisley residential property 10 years ago will have seen you taking a bath for the most part.

that said yes of course there's a problem with property, which is what a massive homebuilding scheme would address. and yes it would require courage to propose and vote through. anything substantial would! (and yes the tories are not the ones to do it)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

There are parts of the country where house prices are below their 2007 levels still, though they tend to not be Tory strongholds.

The housing crisis has never just been about reluctance to invest in infrastructure - under Tories or Labour - and seems fairly intractable at this stage. There isn't much alternative to Corbyn proposing a huge programme of house building if it's going to be 'fixed' but idk how popular it will be.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

yes the particulars may be troublesome - this is why i'm an internet typist and not a career politician. ultimately i'm saying people seem like they're ready for big ideas even if they cost money. voters are looking for somebody who can "cut through" and fix shit.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

i don't really believe in Tory infallibility but there is a key difference, in that centrist Labour has moved so far to the right over the last 25 years as to be no longer credibly part of the left. and the centrists' policies, in power or out, are so disconnected from the needs of the poor and marginalized in the UK that supporting them feels wholly pointless, if not self-sabotaging.

Two Tory MPs have resigned, the elected Tory PM was booted out after a year. Labour - and the energy that has come about via the set-up of Momentum - could revitalise the party, ultimately bringing about a vision that is positive and beyond the 'please don't vote for the other lot'. You saw the results of that in the US elections.

Look at this: http://news.sky.com/story/city-bosses-dismay-over-treasury-minister-talks-10653125

Sources who were present at the meeting say Mr Kirby told them that he was unable to offer detailed assurances about the Treasury's work.

He is understood to have made a convoluted joke about Ed Balls' appearance on the light entertainment programme Strictly Come Dancing, before answering two questions and then leaving after little more than ten minutes to attend another engagement.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

If I were Jeremy Corbyn I would be on every TV show, talking to every camera shoved in my face, saying "they don't know what they're doing about Brexit, they don't know how to do it without crashing the economy". Again and again and again until people listen. Make it about their incompetence instead of his, he was pretty good on this a week or three ago and then sort of stopped.

Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

yes

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

there is room for a massive investment programme if it's sold the right way.

should people be pushing harder for a national investment bank, or is there something else?

ogmor, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Nigel Farage @Nigel_Farage
Especially pleased at @realDonaldTrump's very positive reaction to idea that Sir Winston Churchill's bust should be put back in Oval Office.

it'd be funny if it weren't so depressing

soref, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

farage rolling up to trump tower uninvited kinda reminded me of gazza's support mission for raoul moat

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 13 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

Farage wasn't wearing a poppy on the news earlier. Not that any newspaper will bother shitting their pants over it.

Matt DC, Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

If I were Jeremy Corbyn I would be on every TV show, talking to every camera shoved in my face, saying "they don't know what they're doing about Brexit, they don't know how to do it without crashing the economy". Again and again and again until people listen. Make it about their incompetence instead of his, he was pretty good on this a week or three ago and then sort of stopped.

― Matt DC, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:08 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, this. I think.

djh, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Once Micheal Foot was sporting a very smart jacket with a poppy an all, and it was even complemented by the vacuous nazi loving queen mom. But the press did shit their pants over his jacket.

calzino, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

The Telegraph is pinning its colours to the mast:


Theresa May is facing a growing Cabinet backlash over her decision to dismiss Nigel Farage despite him being the only British politician to meet with Donald Trump since his victory.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/13/theresa-may-facing-cabinet-backlash-over-refusal-to-deal-with-ni/

It's difficult to believe this could be the same paper whose Chief Political Editor has such a great sense of perspective.

@christopherhope If you click on the poppy on Google nothing happens. Half-hearted design and an insult to Britain's war dead

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 14 November 2016 08:02 (seven years ago) link

If I were Jeremy Corbyn I would be on every TV show, talking to every camera shoved in my face, saying "they don't know what they're doing about Brexit, they don't know how to do it without crashing the economy". Again and again and again until people listen. Make it about their incompetence instead of his, he was pretty good on this a week or three ago and then sort of stopped.

Spot on. Something is there for the taking (brexit uncertainty, Tory confusion and wobbling) so why is he not going for it? I'm coming to the conclusion it's a long ball game rather than because he doesn't do that kind of politics. But a long ball game is exactly what the country doesn't need right now. The discussion upthread about housing is all otm. Get the cogs turning again.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Monday, 14 November 2016 08:30 (seven years ago) link

Long ball game is a funny expression cos (as eg Matt DC will know) in soccer (where it is also called Route One) it means almost the exact *opposite* of 'playing a long game'!

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 09:13 (seven years ago) link

I watched the Cenotaph event on TV yesterday with Mr Corbyn standing in front of Tony Blair and anxiously hoped he would not do anything deemed 'wrong' or 'disrespectful'. He didn't but I imagine that today's papers still claim that he did.

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 09:17 (seven years ago) link

yes, that he was dancing at the cenotaph.

"Jeremy Corbyn dances his way down Downing Street as he attends ...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/.../jeremy-corbyn-dances-his-way-down-downing-street-...
22 hours ago - JEREMY Corbyn was pictured DANCING outside Downing Street as he ..."

that article has since been removed.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/no-jeremy-corbyn-wasnt-dancing-9252300

i did notice he was at least miming the national anthem yesterday. that old woman stood at the front kept her mouth resolutely shut though.

koogs, Monday, 14 November 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

'you couldn't make it up' can be a misleading phrase but I couldn't have made that up.

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

I mean the desperation to make a bad JC story when JC was acting well -- is here at post-truth fever pitch and shows us what a world of savagery we inhabit.

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 10:39 (seven years ago) link

Yep.

In other news, the Blue Labour conference lineup features Claire Fox and UKIP punchbag Steven Woolfe - and has a keynote speech from Rod Liddle:

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/blue-labour-forging-a-new-politics-tickets-28306180548

Don't all apply for tickets at once.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 14 November 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

None of those people are Labour!

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Lisa Nandy is, and is giving the other keynote, which does not improve my view of her, which is already not good.

I am disgusted that this movement has published something called 'tangled up in blue'.

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

I thought terms like Blue Labour were supposed to be derogatory and highly insulting of someone's integrity, like Red Tory or Rod Liddle.

calzino, Monday, 14 November 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

No, unfortunately, it's a real thing.

Family, faith and flag!

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 14 November 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

I thought it was a term they used themselves but was maybe past its sell-by date and a bit of a joke so I am surprised they are still using it in a serious way as the title of their event, etc

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

have been fantasising about some sort of 'cooperative' party that takes non-arseholes* from as broad a spectrum of uk politics as possible and basically doesn't espouse an explicit ideology aside from the need to not leave anyone behind. in practice this means massive education, mental health, infrastructural reform, but the key would be to not express any sort of political leaning. is this completely pie-in-sky or with the right charisma could it take hold as an 'enough is enough' antidote to the bullshit we've been feasting on? nakhers if you're reading you're free to mock

*this is relative - i'd probably have to get yer peter obornes and so forth in

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

https://party.coop/

the pinefox, Monday, 14 November 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

hm!

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

seems a bit polite and retiring

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

at least you get a return for your money from the Co-op and you can get a bag of kale for 69p. For £25 that I didn't even need to spend at Labour I got nothing but a load of fucking straight in the bin spam mail from Smith + Corbyn.

calzino, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

How could you hope to excise politics from what is a political programme? You're describing a political programme that would be endorsed by the left, and which the political right exists to prevent. The need not to leave anyone behind can't be a non-ideological position when the ruling ideology is devil take the hindmost/fuck the poor.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 14 November 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

I said no explicit ideologies aside from 'don't be a dick', but of course there are plenty of ideologies involved

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

i'd like this party to ideally be quite aggressive/blunt, because fuck getting steamollered by cunts like farage - let's have our own 'tell it like it is'

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

Oborne's Daily Mail piece on Trump was completely incoherent, he has no place anywhere near whatever movement you're describing.

Matt DC, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

shall we draw up a list

- ilx
- clive lewis
- some of the green party
- a few slebs but not russell brand
- idk

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

In a capitalist society you can't truly defeat the right without using deadly force like the Bolshevik/CCP style of anti-rightist campaigns, in which case there would be military coup before that happened in this country!

calzino, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

he's coming home, he's coming - david miliband's coming home

conrad, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

This wouldn't be about defeating the right as simply opposing the shit we're being pitched into*, which I'm sure even a few rightists are opposed to

*I know, I know

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

Anyone who thinks that D-Mili is the answer right now has clearly learned nothing at all from the past week.

Matt DC, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

Prospective slogan: "We Stand Against Hate", prospective ad campaign denouncing farage etc as cunts. Like, not saying they're wrong or that there's a more nuanced approach, but calling them cunts and giving a reason in the small print. Legal minefield you say? It'd receive a LOT of support. Let's call the cunts cunts and see if it takes

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

xp
learned nothing from the last election either!

calzino, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Guys I'm starting the revolution here

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

I don't even know how serious I am

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

[pic of D-Mill with banana]

Finally a Labour leader with electoral credibility.

calzino, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

The Non-Cunts Party

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

Reel England.

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

Let's hit populism with populism tbh

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

Impotent Rage Squad (Prospective slogan: You Call That Taxing?!)

nashwan, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

If I were Jeremy Corbyn I would be on every TV show, talking to every camera shoved in my face, saying "they don't know what they're doing about Brexit, they don't know how to do it without crashing the economy". Again and again and again until people listen. Make it about their incompetence instead of his, he was pretty good on this a week or three ago and then sort of stopped.

He did this at one PMQs, using the quite good line "shambolic Tory Brexit" and then a couple of weeks later made a slightly rubbish Baldrick joke and used the exact same phrase again. Maybe he thought that by repeating it, it would start to stick. Anyway, yes, he seems to have given up since then.

Alba, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Owen Jones was pushing the phrase "chaotic brexit" as an alternative framing to hard/soft brexit, but it doesn't seem to have caught on, sadly

soref, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

runny brexit

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

chaotic brexit
lawful brexit
neutral brexit
true brexit

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

Hold on I've got this

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

big bad brexit

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

any post-brexit braindrain has to be called brexodus

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

up brexit
down brexit
strange brexit
charm brexit
top brexit
bottom brexit

imago, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

Full English BREXIT
Continental BREXIT

koogs, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

Someone catch me up

- Tories useless at what they're supposed to be doing
- Labour useless at what they're supposed to be doing

Have I got that about right?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

^ pretty damning leaked memo

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

Whitehall mandarins conspire to thwart the people's Brexit

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

speaking of which, the gov pushing ahead with HS2 feels deeply unBrexian

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 06:42 (seven years ago) link

Japan must look at us as a real backwater of Europe, they already did this update in the 60's.

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 06:54 (seven years ago) link

30,000 people! Remind me what happened to all those people they had a few years ago?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 08:46 (seven years ago) link

Yep, 80,000 redundancies in the Civil Service according to this piece today:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/rust-belt-middle-class-wiped-out

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

That period of being optimistic about Clive Lewis didn't last long then

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/15/clive-lewis-labour-eu-free-movement-corbyn

lex pretend, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

The bit below the headline is more encouraging.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

Called for the party to reinvent an outward-looking English nationalism for the 21st century

https://media0.giphy.com/media/RHS4uBLwvRNUA/200.gif

nashwan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

The thrust of it appears to be about strengthening union protections rather than opposing free movement per se, but it's overly influenced by that dreadful Len McCluskey piece from the other week.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

However, he said Labour will only be able to win over alienated voters if it can champion English nationalism, as well as promising economic reforms. “Does the Brexit vote lead us down a path of inward-looking, negative English nationalism, which will alienate the Scots, alienate the Irish, alienate the Welsh, or are we going to have an inclusive, civic, outward-looking, open, tolerant version of that? I think it’s there for the left to say, ‘We’ve got a stake in national pride and identity as well’,” Lewis said.

i keep trying to parse this but it's like grabbing a fistful of smoke

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:37 (seven years ago) link

I think we have rules that employees can't undercut pay with foreign workers. It doesn't always work, and should be combined with chain responsibility but it's been championed by the left, not the populist right. The center-left has constantly refused chain responsibility, though, in one of the clearest cases for me of them not working for workers.

Just as an example that not everything he puts forth is crazy right-wing nonsense.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

Referendum among the vast Labour membership on championing English nationalism please.

nashwan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

Lewis often talks like one of them ex-armed forces types that has really drank that queen + country kool-aid. This wasn't my first impression of him but I've gradually decided I don't particularly like the cut of his jib.

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

So in countries that are relatively strongly committed to the EU -- let's say Germany -- how do unions approach the issue of protecting their members?

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

good question but it's possible that they have pretty much the same employment issues as the UK, but their commitment to the EU is a little deeper due to other factors. obviously their manufacturing industries are in better shape too.

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Not to romanticise German industry but they have much stronger unions, formal workplace councils and companies tend to have a better sense of corporate social responsibility - going over and above what is legally necessary to invest in the regions they're based in.

How it works in the gig economy / low-level service work, which would be where a lot of precariously employed Brits would be, idk.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Lewis often talks like one of them ex-armed forces types that has really drank that queen + country kool-aid. This wasn't my first impression of him but I've gradually decided I don't particularly like the cut of his jib.

I agree and fwiw I think he'd be a disaster as leader, especially if he's shunted into the job too quickly. He seems to be linked to the leadership mostly because the paucity of the talent pool on the left.

I do think that "take this grim right-wing phenomenon and shunt some left-wing content into it" is going to be something we hear with depressing regularity from now on though.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

So in countries that are relatively strongly committed to the EU -- let's say Germany -- how do unions approach the issue of protecting their members?

I am not sure what you mean exactly, Mark, but for example we have a minimum wage of 8.84 €.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

a grand £7.64

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

next March it will be a grand amirite etc

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Interlude: Is anyone following the Tory leadership contest with any intensity?

(was looking for first mention of D Cameron on ILX)

nashwan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Oh my god the DJ Martian posts on that thread.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

Being leader of the country is not a casual 9-5 job, it requires total energy and constant dynamic action - international travel, multi-tasking, urgency, constant co-ordination, leadership, decision making etc.
Ken Clarke is too laidback with his jokey-joley-bloke style, this is not an effective working style to lead this country.

― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 6 October 2005 15:00 (eleven years ago)

Because a OneNationTory is nearly the same as NewLabourRenewed
With Brands Alba you need to differentiate ;-)

However your task tonight Alba is come up with a merged brand identity for OneNation Conservatism and New Labour Renewed. This is an assignment for the Liberal Democrats to take the piss out of two conservative moderate staid political parties.

Alba, I expect only the finest conceptual thinking & insight. Can you deliver?

― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:21 (eleven years ago)

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

we did not deliver :(

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

I am very pleased that after 11 years my hotlinked picture of Tony Blair playing table tennis is still present and correct.

Alba, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Don't worry y'all LJ will deliver!

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

alex, i was wondering more about practical approaches for cooperation between the unions in one member state and another, to ensure (for example) that they weren't being coaxed into situations where they undercut one another

but perhaps this is far more a problem in un-unionised industries

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

As opposed to barely unionized countries like the UK.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

No government can resist (the moral pressure)

great to see some love for this early 90s banger

ogmor, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said that Labour would not seek to prevent or delay Brexit, labeling those trying to do so as being "on the side of certain corporate elites".

do these cunts know what 'opposition' means

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

I suppose floating the idea that it could be good if done correctly is designed to make May look worse when it all falls apart.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Simpler than that, McDonnell and Corbyn have never been in favour of the UK being in the EU.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

fuck these brexiting cunts. they've made chumps of us all.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

Just keep repeating the word 'elite' enough, people will start to like you. Also the "it only helps big business" line doesn't quite work when you're simultaneously arguing that Britain needs to remain within the single market, and you don't really know what you think about free movement.

The Lexit argument is just going to look more and more feeble up against front pages like this, which are only going to increase in volume and ferocity post-Brexit.

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/covers/287x361front/2016-11-14.jpg

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Bush linked to that Lewis interview with these comments:

Stephen Bush ‏@stephenkb 2h2 hours ago
Team Corbyn are getting sharper: wheeling out the black guy (& activists' darling) to do the anti-immigration thing

Stephen Bush ‏@stephenkb 2h2 hours ago
And make no mistake, Lewis is not freelancing - this is very much a decision from the top.

if it *has* come from the top, that is interesting/depressing. Lewis wrote this a couple of years ago, there's nothing here that's contradicted by anything in the new interview exactly, but definitely a different emphasis: http://www.clivelewis.org/ukip_and_immigration_policy

soref, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

good tweet-thread here from james butler on the conflicted nature of the choices facing the left: https://twitter.com/piercepenniless/status/798559698421215236

It’s that mixed character which wrongfooted much of British left on Brexit, forced to choose between two bad options: embolden the right or ‘endorse’ a hugely exploitative, unequal Fortress Europe. Two bad options. So much of the left opted for fantasy (“lexit”) or silence

(he doesn't just mean labour, he's talking about further left)

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

so 48% of us deserve no representation at all.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

I repeat 'elite' daily, as in 'the elite-controlled dailies'.

If McD & JC could've just said 'OUR plans work in or out of Europe' and kept on hedging all bets I might've settled for that.

nashwan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Little Timmy Farron is bustin' a gut to represent you.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

imago told us upthread to to go back our constituencies and prepare for government

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

imago told us upthread to to go back our constituencies bedrooms and prepare for government

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

go back to your constituencies and prepare your stocks of bottled water, nonperishable food and weapons

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

so 48% of us deserve no representation at all.

And nearly 63% if you consider non-voters as implicitly accepting the status quo ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

I look forward to the Tories using that one to claim a crushing 75% mandate at the next general election.

Hypothetically, what do people think the route to stopping Brexit would be if Labour was as fired up about it as the SNP?

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Matt DC's suggestion above is def. a good start.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

If the numbers were there Lib Dems would have a much higher polling and Farron would be leading a rally of 200K on Westminster to shows us all how its done. Not seeing any signs of that...and polling I've seen since then shows the country is still divided.

Ultimately I do expect a push for staying in the Economic area - and the EU insists that comes with freedom of movement. So that is the real call that Labour have to make. Assume the quotes are a play for time/not showing your hand too early. You don't have to be a pessimist to see this as a fuck-up but hey we are all bystanders in this shitshow.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

not if we form a party

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

you'll be my Culture Secretary

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

calzino gets Defence

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

Dear Andrew,
Celebrate Labour's greatest achievements and plan for the year ahead with a limited edition 2017 calendar - Labour Through The Ages.

Each month showcases a pivotal moment in Labour's history, inspired by our shared values. The same values that will drive us forward to meet the challenges of 2017.

Donate £9 or more today, help support our upcoming NHS campaign day, and we'll send your calendar in plenty of time for Christmas.

Darcy Sarto (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

which month was the edstone

mark s, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

so 48% of us deserve no representation at all.

I'm really sure there's more than 48% of us now.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

I think relying on numbers arguments is a big dead end. What if a real majority genuinely support a morally abhorrent policy?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

i think someone mentioned it before now, possibly upthread here, but the very least someone should do is to challenge boris or whoever whenever they use the words 'clear mandate' about brexit because 51.9% is really just scraping through.

koogs, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

I agree the mandate claims are dishonest as fuck

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

I think relying on numbers arguments is a big dead end.

Tell it to those who want us to junk the economy and embrace fascism because 52% voted for it. xp

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

And we believe they're wrong, therefore

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Yeah you know I think there is a point here. Its wonderful how RBS and Deutsche Bank have turned it around after a bit of help from the Draghi and friends, plus all the austerity we had to put up with was worth it. And since the referendum the EU have put the boot into fascism! Seen a real, no nonsense attitude to tyrants like Erdogan and Orban.

I am willing to give the EU a 2nd chance on another referendum. All is forgiven!

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

don't brexit til i go home (30 Nov)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

I can't buy into "we need to counter their bad faith arguments with our own bad faith arguments", whether it be nationalism or populism

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

I was just listening on R4 to a single primary school teacher with 2 children from London who is technically homeless and living in emergency accommodation. Brexit aside, London already deserves to be annexed by the North Sea.

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

with your Defence budget, you can make that a reality!

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

i'd just spend it wine

But seriously, didn't Khan didn't Khan run his mayoral campaign on housing?

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

on^ wine

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

scuse the bad typing

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

to a single primary school teacher with 2 children from London who is technically homeless and living in emergency accommodation

ah, a metropolitan elite, according to 7 million comfortably retired house-owning pensioners

(sorry, more bad faith arguments)

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

Even in the milk snatcher years I can't ever recall getting taught by a primary school teacher who is basically living in a homeless shelter with her kids.

calzino, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Ships not going to have missiles anymore

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:49 (seven years ago) link

Which AFAIK in modern navwar terms means basically they'll have no weapons, an exocet could one-shot a ship and that was back in the Falklands

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

Confetti cannons.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 01:02 (seven years ago) link

i don't know what to tell you nv, i'm guessing we're on the same page, but i wasted some minutes yesterday arguing w/some idiot on a friend's fb page who was, with a straight face, arguing that Brexit would be a boon and that it was fine for the govt to play its cards close to its chest and that this was in no way a con only the lamest rube could fall for, and his main argument was, "The majority voted for it." This sense of a majority - the slimmest majority - is key to their argument, it is their fuel, their justification, and I don't think they have that majority anymore, i think some of the lemmings have thought twice about jumping off the cliff. so i think it's worth thinking about.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 07:48 (seven years ago) link

"The Will Of The British People" seems to be the buzz-phrase used by all of these pro-Brexit clowns. It drives me absolutely mad. "The Will Of The British People has given us a clear mandate! You can't frustrate the Will Of The British People or who knows what will happen!"

Pheeel, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 08:35 (seven years ago) link

this post examines the "will of the people" stuff in some detail: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/brexit-is-not-the-will-of-the-british-people/

Neil S, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 08:59 (seven years ago) link

I do think, for this to be truly democratic, the public needs a vote on the actual terms of Brexit once they're agreed - whether that's by a further referendum or an election - as opposed to the vague fantasy version of Brexit we were sold last time.

This is why Corbyn/McDonnell's stance here is so exasperating, but also I suspect why the government is so clueless right now, because they know the actual terms of Brexit will be unpopular. Whether any of this is possible within the current legal framework I have no idea.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

I have a growing feeling that there will be another vote. Is this purely wishful thinking on my part?

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 09:47 (seven years ago) link

I think the only possibility of another (public, if that's what you meant) vote would be as a General Election, and Labour seem to have all but ruled that out now.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 09:51 (seven years ago) link

May has next to no chance of getting a referendum on the terms past the party. It would be seen as a second referendum on the principle of leaving. Labour has next to no chance of forcing the issue from a position of weakness.

I am not even sure how practical it would be to spend two years negotiating terms and then opening it up to a vote. If the public says no, are they meant to go back and try to renegotiate something that's largely beyond their control or scrap the whole idea altogether?

As much as i'd like to think there's overwhelming buyers' remorse, i suspect a lot of people think of it as a done deal and just want to get it settled ASAP. The better prospect for a UK future in Europe might be to leave, take the lumps and try to rejoin when it all falls apart.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 09:54 (seven years ago) link

Looking pretty doubtful there will be much left to rejoin by that point.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

As much as i'd like to think there's overwhelming buyers' remorse, i suspect a lot of people think of it as a done deal and just want to get it settled ASAP. The better prospect for a UK future in Europe might be to leave, take the lumps and try to rejoin when it all falls apart.

Sadly I think this is true, more so now that Labour have conceded. Can't see us rejoining though - all new members have to accept the Euro don't they?

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

Labour is in a much strong position (in numbers terms) than it probably will be after the next election, their only hope would be if a) the leadership were in favour, b) the rest of the party was united on the issue and c) there were enough Tory rebels prepared to vote with Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP. It probably wouldn't be enough to kill of Brexit altogether, but it may be enough to force substantial concessions on free movement and the single market from the government (which May might privately appreciate anyway).

The consequences of being seen to go back on this, in terms of an emerging far right in the mainstream, could be disastrous. But the consequences of blithely pressing ahead with no one holding the government to account are also dangerous.

You're right that it is probably impractical, and that rejoining after the inevitable clusterfuck might be better, albeit not for a lot of those who have to live through it. This might be moot after a few more European elections anyway.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link

I take your point about the tactical value of majorities Stevie but I think the big picture is "no matter how many of you want this, you're wrong" - not really my own take on Brexit per se, but always my take on a lot of human rights issues - majority, shmajority

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:11 (seven years ago) link

The issue is often less about how many people want something but how much they want it. If Brexit was really the single overriding concern for the country then Nigel Farage would have been swept to power even under FPTP, or we would at least have seen a swathe of the North of England turn blue. As it stands, a large swathe of the country that voted Leave also voted Labour, who at the time wouldn't have granted a referendum anyway.

But it doesn't work like that, most voters have other concerns. Even if there was a majority in favour of capital punishment or voluntary repatriation AND a party prepared to run on that ticket it wouldn't necessarily get anywhere because voters wouldn't trust it with anything else. One of the things in favour of parliamentary democracy is, while it keeps things ossified and slow-moving and terminally unsatisfying, it has also kept things relatively stable, until some fuckwit like Cameron comes along to blow a hole in it while trying to save his own skin.

(I think eventually we would have had a pro-Brexit Tory leader anyway, whether it would have been an electable one is another matter).

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

Slightly tangential but i wonder how much Cameron's decision to take the Conservatives out of the mainstream centre-right group in the European parliament and align them with the anti-semitic pariahs of PiS will come back to bite them in the negotiations.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

bite them in the negotiations

ouch!

conrad, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

May has next to no chance of getting a referendum on the terms past the party.

Are you saying there's a majority in favour of Brexit? I got the impression that the Tory anti-Euro mob was just a loud minority. Albeit that Tories not in that category may still not want to be branded Enemies of the State.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

It's a large enough minority to trigger a leadership election and I have little doubt that they would.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:20 (seven years ago) link

It's complicated by the fact that many Tory MPs (and Labour MPs) who are/were pro-remain have constituencies that voted to leave, so they might feel pressurised to vote that way.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:37 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely. 30% of my constituency voted UKIP in 2015 and 65% voted for Brexit. My MP is pro-EU but i am not sure she'd bet a 7,000 majority on it.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:40 (seven years ago) link

We should never have been allowed to vote on this. The public is too un/ill-informed. This is why we have the parliamentary system.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:45 (seven years ago) link

That can be imago's platform

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

stevie appointed to Minister for Brexit

imago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:53 (seven years ago) link

If the public were better informed they could vote for a currency that doesn't work, the toleration of fascism in Eastern Europe and the destruction of Greece.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

Which of those situations do you think would be improved by Britain leaving the EU?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:22 (seven years ago) link

None of them but I wouldn't be enthusiastically voting for this. The only pro-remain arg was that things could get substantially worse.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

oh good, we learned nothing from last week then.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

People learn nothing. They are thick, misinformed oafs and only people up to zone 3 should get to vote on these matters.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Enjoy your brexit then, mate. Enjoy this country, it's what you've made it.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

I dunno, I mean I watched what happened with Greece last autumn and spent the end of the year vaguely toying with the idea of voting Leave. One of Cameron's mistakes was to call the referendum at a time when the EU was the worst possible advert for itself. I came round the other way heavily when I realised that there was no 'could' about it, things definitely were going to get worse for almost everything I care about in the aftermath of a Leave victory, and so far I can see nothing that disproves that. And only a tiny proportion of Leave voters would have given even a passing thought to Greece or Hungary.

There's a lot of delusional stuff coming from Corbyn's team at the moment but the main one is that Trump's victory shows he can win here. I suppose it is theoretically an opportunity for the left but these moments are also an opportunity for the far right, and guess which one has the money, momentum, press and (increasingly) public support. If you could be guaranteed socialism in 20 years, would you accept 10 years of fascism in order to get there?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

lol polls etc but:

almost half of the public (48%) believe the government is doing a bad job at handling Britain’s exit from the European Union, with 37% saying it is doing a good job. Again opinion is divided along familiar lines. Conservatives and older people are most positive (53% and 44% of over 55s respectively think the government is doing a good job) while younger and Labour voters are most critical (60% of 18-34s and 65% of Labour voters think it is doing a bad job).

-- https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3806/Half-say-the-government-is-doing-a-bad-job-at-handling-Britains-exit-from-the-EU.aspx

Unfortunately it goes on to say that everyone still loves T. May and will vote Tory forever so blah. (Also how do even 37% of people think the current shambles is a good job)

I see Corbyn also called it a shambles in PMQs; still seems a good tack but not so great if Labour policy is "this route off a cliff is terrible but of course we don't wish to obstruct the Great British People's desire to go off a cliff so there must be no other route, no slowing down, finding a shallower cliff, putting tiny pixelated umbrellas up, etc"

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

I suppose it is theoretically an opportunity for the left but these moments are also an opportunity for the far right, and guess which one has the money, momentum, press and (increasingly) public support

A key point. Nothing in the last 18 months leads me to believe the Great British Public is moving leftwards.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

You gonna leave Stevie? Which lib paradise are you off to? Canada? or NZ, heard they got rid of zero hour contracts over there.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:10 (seven years ago) link

Your nonsensical posturing is really such a traet, xyzzzz.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

And I'm allowed to vote too!

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

stop it you two, ffs

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

Okay, whatevs.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

This thread has the Dr Morbius it deserves.

the fog of "Wha...?" (stevie), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:45 (seven years ago) link

Jul1o appointed Minister for Culture AND Chancellor

imago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Man-free Cabinet or GTFO

nashwan, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

this post examines the "will of the people" stuff in some detail: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/brexit-is-not-the-will-of-the-british-people/

...

However, in a close analysis, virtually all the polls show that the UK electorate wants to remain in the EU

Polls, how convincing!

quis gropes ipsos gropiuses? (ledge), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

well, as argued above, if the Brexit lot's arguments rest on simple majoritarianism, then it's worth understanding whether there really is a majority, simple or otherwise.

Neil S, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

corbyn pressing "may's brexit shambles" angle hard today

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

her inevitable scripted insults in riposte were unspecific and, in the reading anyway, a little needier and defensive than i'd have imagined

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

More polls, more lols @ the GBP

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

The trouble with Corbyn trying to press the "shambles" line on anything is one of authority. The general public don't think the non-Blairite left have earned the right to judge on this score so it doesn't stick. I don't think it comes naturally to Corbyn himself, either – it feels like he's being fed the line. He's much more at home saying things are evil or unjust, and people take him more seriously when he's on that terrain.

Alba, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

But a lot of them don't care when he's on that terrain, fundamentally a lot of voters - especially swing voters - value competence over empathy. They'd prefer both (which is why May made that opening day speech), but the "shambolic" tag should stick. Or at least it would if Corbyn wasn't essentially shambolic himself, which is the whole problem. If he'd done this from day one he'd probably be in a better position despite the hostility from all angles.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Rutgers prof detained by NYPD and compelled to have psych evaluation based on political statements on campus & on social media. Thread:

https://twitter.com/kevinallred/status/798729156557205504

gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

The shambles is going to stick bcz (a) true anyway and (b) being hammered from several directions, not just Corb: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-16/u-k-s-brexit-policy-chaos-is-unacceptable-italy-s-calenda-says

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

it's the governing party's duty to defend their governing innit tho? So even the shambolic Labour party shouldn't have authority issues when pointing out TM currently doesn't know wtf she is doing imo. I've not seen today's performance but I don't think any great political oratory skills are required to make some of the Brexit Shambles stick to May, so even Corbyn can do some damage at the moment. It sounds like the pressure is getting to her as well.

calzino, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

As I, now somewhat dimly tbh, recall, one of the few times Miliband was able to lay a glove on Cameron/ Osborne was the whole Budget omnishambles business, the pasty tax or whatever the fuck it was. They don't like it up 'em.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

Isn't the problem here what's going to happen if she asks if he has a plan himself? The right is answer is "I'm not in government", but would he leave it there?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

It worked for the Brexit campaign.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Downing St's tone in its responses to...everything lately has been fascinating, this "just GET ON with it" (both as in "we are going to" and "everyone else should") which is a bit like a tough-talking version of keep calm... rhetoric. Because it just indicates blind panic to me.

I agree with NV on democracy - I think a lot of the grasping at straws, both here and re: Clinton's greater popular vote, is unseemly, even if the actual outcome is something I want. Just accept that democracy has failed us this time.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

Wary of polls about *anything* at the moment -- maybe ever again -- but if that Guardian result is accurate ("90% favour staying in single market and 70% want limits on EU immigration") then it really underlines the problem, for both parties and all factions and all tendencies (inc. Tendance Imago). Which is that a significant proportion of the electorate want something which is literally impossible (the "single market" means "no limits on internal EU migration", by definition and by the formally instituted rules of the community).

All parties factions and tendencies are looking to put together their respective coalitions from a parent population which is radically split. And not even spilt in the sense that a football match is split, into teams and supporters facing off against one another, but in the sense of many people being split, and unknowingly spilt, within their own heads: literally wanting an impossible combination of elements. (This very much includes the various different flavours of remainer btw…)

It doesn't actually much surprise me that the major parties have moved towards a more simplified stance. The shock event happened because the existing fault line wasn't taken seriously. So the parties are trying to shift so that the fault-line doesn't run right through the middle of them -- because it is (right now) the one salient issue, which it really wasn't this time last year. It also isn't terribly surprising that the major parties are both temporising like crazy, in the hope that things start to shift by themselves. May and Corbz are both super-cautious politicians, and Corbz also recognises more than most the value of patience. So he's gambling on a stubborn "Here I stand" to buoy his position up when everything else is swept away (I don't buy that he's happy with Art50 proceeding at full jolly pace: his entire career says otherwise, really).

Nor this issue is not going to stay salient the way it is now -- "Events, dear boy, events!" (Serried ranks of super-grim events… )

What the Corbz-machine* currently lacks is *anyone* who knows how to seize on and use urgency. I think this is a general problem: UKIP has collapsed into bickering uselessness in the moment of its apparent victory, and the Tories aren't far off from this. There are younger agitators who are quick on their feet -- some of them cut their teeth in the Occupy events a few years back -- but they're most of them also quite wary of the errors that earlier generations made in a similar situation (by e.g. foax like Dany Cohn-Bendit). Someone who knows how to seize on and use urgency will turn up, of course -- but it may not be anyone anyone wants. (My intution: iy won't be someone adopted and shaped and controlled by the established media, inc.tabloids as they currently exist. The Murdoch empire is not as immoveable or unchallengeable as it once was: he's old; he'll be 90 in 2020.)

*also the Corbz-machine is tiny (leadership office has distinctly less resources allocated than it did in the EdM era, and the opponents within the party are more relentlessly and openly mobilised, despite the many setbacks of the PLP being individually and collectively clueless). Momentum is of course much larger than any other faction, but not at all structured to operate as a party yet (and -- of course** -- itself internally divided).
**sigh

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

"Nor this issue is not going to stay salient the way it is now" s/b "Nor this issue going to stay salient the way it is now"

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

*cough* s/b "Nor is this issue going to stay salient the way it is now"

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

There was a tremor earlier at the idea that maybe maybe Merkel had said that the impossible was possible - as far as I can tell this is just throwing the UK the same bone she threw Cameron?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/16/is-angela-merkel-willing-to-compromise-on-free-movement-eu

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

Great last line too: (Also worth remembering is that Merkel rarely “signals” anything. She says it.)

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

Even if Merkel is compromising here -- which I don't think she in fact is -- it only takes one of the other 26 states involved to veto (see Italy's response further up). We spent a good three-quarters of our time *in* the EU throwing tantrums in order to get the rules specially bent in our direction: we are not going to get this bone except at the vast cost (of being boned), especially if we also insist on it in the shortest possible order. (Not to mention who our chief negotiators actually are currently…)

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

Well the specific bone isn't the one May wants, it's "you have to let them in but you can delay providing them benefits". Which, even if it was in her power to persuade the EU to re-proffer it (as you say, by no means guaranteed) - that was already part of the "Remain" package at the time of the referendum, so it would be hard to imagine that any of the animating engines of Leave would be particularly happy with it.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

I dunno, I mean I watched what happened with Greece last autumn and spent the end of the year vaguely toying with the idea of voting Leave. One of Cameron's mistakes was to call the referendum at a time when the EU was the worst possible advert for itself. I came round the other way heavily when I realised that there was no 'could' about it, things definitely were going to get worse for almost everything I care about in the aftermath of a Leave victory, and so far I can see nothing that disproves that. And only a tiny proportion of Leave voters would have given even a passing thought to Greece or Hungary.

Greece = austerity, which is something we've all been living with for years and everyone must've thought about (The Greeks to an extreme I guess no one else went to). I also reached a similar conclusion that this was going towards a dark place. Since then you just look at the EU standing by while Ergodan does his worst, and the EU not offering any alternative to ongoing austerity (the UK and EU totally parallel on this) you think 'wtf is the EU for really?'. If Remain had won you could still have an economic collapse and the migrants thrown under a bus and I am not convinced the EU would've done anything about it, or offer any counter, or its leaders offer much.

Times we are living in. What last week has taught us, if anything, is the need to organise, resist, take care. This 'we need a 2nd referendum to save us from the thickos' is remain crybaby routine. Tedious.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

*also the Corbz-machine is tiny (leadership office has distinctly less resources allocated than it did in the EdM era, and the opponents within the party are more relentlessly and openly mobilised, despite the many setbacks of the PLP being individually and collectively clueless). Momentum is of course much larger than any other faction, but not at all structured to operate as a party yet (and -- of course** -- itself internally divided).
**sigh

From what I've read its been a struggle to get a handle for Corbz and team to get hold of the party machine even after he was re-elected. The oppposition from the inside has lessened but not been eliminated. And Momentum is trying to organise in a modern rather hierarchical (old-left) way.

Quite a few setbacks, just need signs that this is temporary.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

Austerity in the UK is if anything likely to get worse, not better, post-Brexit, especially as the economy goes southwards. TBH I don't think it's unfair to say that the public is/was too ill-informed, when you consider that the Leave campaign was entirely based on deliberately and systematically spreading misinformation. The public is badly informed about economics as well, which is why the Tories were able to maintain support for austerity even as it damaged the economy and many people's livelihoods. The question is how the left combats that in a way that actually resonates with people, and they are further away from that than ever right now.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/11/labour-has-checkmated-itself-brexit

This is a decent piece on the various legal permutations of what could happen:

Assume that Labour, with the help of the SNP and Liberal Democrats, succeeds in inserting into the Article 50 Bill its “Good Brexit” pre-conditions. How will Labour police their delivery?

To answer this question, we must wind the clock forward to just before March 2019, the moment the government returns to Parliament with a final deal negotiated with our EU partners.

If Labour’s Good Brexit preconditions are delivered, job done. But what about the – I would suggest more likely – situation where they are not? What then?

Logically there are only three possibilities.

First, Labour waves the deal through anyway, having failed to police its objectives.

Second, Labour blocks the deal. We would leave the EU without one. Again, Labour would have failed to deliver its objectives.

A third possibility would arise if Parliament retained a residual right to block the deal without leaving the EU. In demanding that right Parliament would, in effect, be saying: “Unless you the government do what Parliament demands, we will either reject the deal and Remain, or put the deal to the electorate in a Second Referendum.”
The first two don't achieve parliamentary control. Only the third does. And so long as Article 50 is legally revocable – which is likely but will need to be resolved elsewhere – it is a meaningful threat. Indeed, it is the only meaningful threat. Unless Parliament issues it, Labour demands for parliamentary control are mere sound and fury. They signify nothing.

But here’s the problem. McDonnell has explicitly ruled it out. “This means we must not try to re-fight the referendum or push for a second vote," he declared this week.

He’s checkmated himself. And that’s a pity. It’s a pity because it removes any opportunity for Labour to shape the terms upon which we leave the EU. And it’s a pity, because it’s just the wrong course.

Matt DC, Thursday, 17 November 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

Also Britain's austerity is being inflicted by our own elected government and not by the EU, there's little doubt in my mind that a lot of Leave voters are suffering under austerity but the fate of Greece is unlikely to have entered into the concerns of too many of them. A big part of the Leave appeal is basically "fuck people suffering in other countries, our concerns come first".

Matt DC, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

A third possibility would arise if Parliament retained a residual right to block the deal without leaving the EU. In demanding that right Parliament would, in effect, be saying: “Unless you the government do what Parliament demands, we will either reject the deal and Remain, or put the deal to the electorate in a Second Referendum.”

Surely Labour would be slaughtered if they tried this, though? Accused of trying to "frustrate the will of the British people" and so forth, and the debate would become all about Labour's contempt for democracy rather than the terms of whatever deal the Tories have reached. And what incentive do the EU have to agree to Article 50 being reversible once it is triggered and/or subject to another referendum? Wouldn't this would just create more uncertainty and confusion from their point of view?

soref, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

If the deal was "put to the electorate in a Second Referendum", what happens if it's rejected? More negotiations with the EU and then *another* referendum? Is the hope that by then things may have dragged on for long enough and become sufficiently that we can avoid leaving the EU regardless?

soref, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

xp to Matt

yeah sure up to a point but the poll we saw the other day about the numbers who want to end free movement and stay in the single market at the same time tells me that many, many people's reasons for voting (in either direction imo) were not particularly logical or rigorous

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

like that even needs saying over and over again every time there's a vote on something - "guess what? parliamentary democracy not only allows you to vote for stupid reasons, it encourages you and celebrates your freedom to be stupid"

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:17 (seven years ago) link

I think they probably would be slaughtered if they tried that, unless the deal was so obviously terrible for Britain that public opinion was firmly against it. Which might happen considering the fuckwits that May has put in charge of securing it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

Like, Britain is leaving the EU, pretending otherwise is delusional thinking, but there's no consensus on the terms of leaving and Labour should be putting in a position where they can, if not shape them, then at least put enough pressure on the government to produce something that isn't a complete disaster.

Matt DC, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

I'm not even stoked for the madness tbh. A sorry state of affairs.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

I don't really have a sense of what percentage of UK population support leaving the EU (as in, now that the referendum has happened). I mean, presumably more than 52% do, there's presumably a decent number of remainers who think "this is stupid but democracy is important", I'd have to think there are more of them than repentant leavers (though this feels like quite a policy-wonk-ish viewpoint, so it might be less common than I think?). Anyway I have no intuition for the numbers here - I could believe anything from 55% to about 90.

Gravel Puzzleworth, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

I think the checkmating here is that any "pressure" to block A50 is obvious bluff, for the reasons MDC and soref say. What is the point of threatening something you know you can't or won't deliver? (I ask this as the parent of two small boys - I know whereof I speak)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

It feels like the Labour strategy might have been to bow to the Democratic Will Of The People by not coming out against Brexit but against, in due course, May's particular (inevitably terrible) Brexit package. Hence Corbyn's Brexit conditions from a few weeks ago and his constant hammering home that she has no plan.

The trouble with May refusing to tell her plan (bc it doesn't exist) is that it leaves Labour in a holding position where there's nothing to firmly come out against, while still having to pay lip service to the idea of not blocking Brexit bc democracy. Much as I would emotionally like to see an anti-Brexit position strongly articulated, Labour would be absolutely ripped apart by the press if they were to do this (obv the Lib Dems have nothing to lose on this so can say what they want).

I still wonder what May, Johnson etc think their leverage is. It's quite amusing to see literally everything they put to every other country being knocked back amid suppressed laughter. Imagine waking up every morning knowing your entire MO is to fight for a philosophical impossibility like free trade without free movement.

lex pretend, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

oh and in keeping with the worst case scenarios that keep happening I'm now assuming the eventual outcome is that when an immigration-free Brexit isn't delivered, whether because no other country will go for it or because it gets snarled up in the courts or the Tories just fall flat on their faces - as someone who has had problems with deadlines I'm cackling to imagine how Theresa May will feel as the end of March gets ever nearer - anyway yeah, I imagine at that point the scapegoating and full on fascism will be ramped up. God, imagine if Ukip had a remotely adequate leader.

lex pretend, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

We will crush them. You can be Health

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

Seriously though, a counter-cunts movement is surely only a few charismatic leaders away

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

This is why I am not in favour of PR voting rn: instant Tory/UKIP coalition.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

I think, and this goes back to what NV was implying about democracy, is that a lot of ppl on the left have to face up to being outnumbered by rank right-wing bigotry, and cutting it this way or that in terms of electoral system or seat mathematics won't make them go away. Everything they stand for has to be fought. As with America, I've no time for the left self-flagellating anyone who's been standing up for left-wing values, whether safe space students or Bernie bros. If the left must self-flagellate it should be entirely directed at centrist liberals who have compromised at every turn.

lex pretend, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

so the opposition at the moment is basically jeremy corbyn, the islington raider, toothlessly jeering 'you got no plans' from the touchline

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

^Puns (new dept)

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

This is why I am not in favour of PR voting rn: instant Tory/UKIP coalition

I'm not actually convinced that would be worse than the alternative. On current polling a general election now based on the current 650 constituencies would give us Con 390 seats, Lab 174, Lib Dem 7, UKIP 0, Green 1, SNP 56, PC 4 (and 18 in Northern Ireland). Under pure PR (and assuming people vote in exactly the same way, which isn't really a safe assumption) we would get Con 286, Lab 172, Lib Dem 55, UKIP 70, Green 28, PC 4 (and I don't know what would happen to NI). Seeing as the Tories seem to have decided to *become* UKIP since the referendum, I don't see that a (probably unstable) Con-UKIP coalition with 356 seats would be worse than Tories alone with 390 seats. Labour would be just as weak in either scenario, but 28 Greens and 55 Lib Dems (which is never going to happen under first past the post) would at least bolster the opposition and give you a feeling that things *could* actually change at some point.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

I've no time for the left self-flagellating anyone who's been standing up for left-wing values, whether safe space students or Bernie bros. If the left must self-flagellate it should be entirely directed at centrist liberals who have compromised at every turn.

OTM, like that fucking Jonathan Pie video people have been sharing on FB.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

predicting how people would vote in a purely PR system is hard, i don't think you can extrapolate from current votes/polls

what PR would do, more than ever, is reduce the overall level of stupidity within the electoral process. not because people wouldn't still be free to vote based on irrational or unexamined impulses, but because there would be a broader range of viable parties, and therefore a broader range of opinions on offer to the electorate.

the irony of heavily 2-party systems is that they tend to force the 2 big parties closer and closer together, policy-wise, as they wrestle over swing voters. give voters multiple directions to swing ("out of context" thread is thataway") and you remove some of the impetus to "Centrism"

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Agreed

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

Would there be any chance of another PR referendum?

calzino, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

it's an unfortunate setback that we didn't have a proper PR referendum last time

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

these turkeys may be awful, but they're just smart enough not to let people vote for Christmas

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

no more fucking referenda

lex pretend, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

they certainly haven't raised the quality of political debate

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

i feel like this has upset me for over a decade now but it's so easy to bang on about how stupid and uneducated the electorate is and that isn't untrue but HOW DOES THIS COUNTRY NOT TEACH CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS ABOUT HOW IT ALL WORKS THEN?

it is so easy to pass through the entire educational system - at a very high level! - without ever having to know a thing about the political system

lex pretend, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

otm

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

the answer is that ignorance benefits the ruling classes

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

i once had a friend 2 years into a social work/sociology degree ask me what Marxism is so yes

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

NV gets Justice, renamed Executions

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

just so it's clear tho, i refuse to stand on a platform with "charismatic leaders"

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

what about annoying ones

imago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

The lead story in the Times, Telegraph, Metro and Mirror has been blanked out of tomorrow's advance front pages as it can't be reported until after midnight. The fact that it's them, rather than the Mail, Sun, Express, etc suggests it might be something more serious than an Elton John superinjunction or whatever.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

https://s16.postimg.org/grso5v1px/embargo.jpg

lol, maybe not.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

i love tittle tattle

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

If it's what I've heard elsewhere, it's nothing to do with Rooney or politics. Or anybody famous.

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

hope it's not the bold wazza. we've all had our fun laughing at his johning ways

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

if it's what i've just heard on Today then it's about as "meh" as it could be

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 November 2016 06:51 (seven years ago) link

thicko journalists sure get excitable about cryogenics

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 November 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that seems to be it. It's a total non-story.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 18 November 2016 09:08 (seven years ago) link

working on a Crexit angle

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 18 November 2016 09:17 (seven years ago) link

It's a landmark case and reasonably front-page worthy but not especially exciting when you consider what's happening right now and what it could have been.

Matt DC, Friday, 18 November 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

what could be more future-proof than ice

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 18 November 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

It's barely a landmark case, tbh, it's the first to have cryonics as an element but the legal issue was a fairly straightforward disagreement on medical treatments between parents - which they ended up agreeing on in the end. It's good to see the FT hasn't been distracted from the real business of the day.

https://s18.postimg.org/e8dph2155/Untitled.png

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 18 November 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

Jail the scamp.

nashwan, Friday, 18 November 2016 10:59 (seven years ago) link

scumbag

conrad, Friday, 18 November 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

send him back to france

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Friday, 18 November 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

Senile delinquent.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 18 November 2016 11:50 (seven years ago) link

what could be more future-proof than ice

a+

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 18 November 2016 11:58 (seven years ago) link

Lol! I could just imagine all the goodwill in the last dayz UK dystopia towards revived frozen dead people returning to society, the taxpayers alliance would be like "send these benefit scrounging necros back to oblivion" just as an opening gambit.

calzino, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

http://labourlist.org/2016/11/abbott-labour-adopting-an-anti-immigration-stance-would-only-alienate-supporters/

Reading the odd bit from Labour left around concessions on immigration (so much for Libs conceding). This by Diane is good as a statement although her argument is around polls rather than actual principle - you are not convincing racists on this issue but there are many others who can go one way or another on this.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

That's good from Abbott. Sadly there seems to be virtually no chance of Labour coming to a unified line on immigration - the party is such a mess of principled stands, dog-whistlers, focus group lamers and cowardly fucks that someone would break it within seconds.

Matt DC, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

Sadly there seems to be virtually no chance of Labour coming to a unified line on immigration anything ever

fixed.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

I just read that Independent link and why does Northern Ireland not get a say?

Matt DC, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

well the scottish and welsh governments lodged applications to intervene in the case. not sure the nordies did, especially because half of the power sharing executive are unionists

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

trying not to be too parochially petty but i would absolutely love it if the scottish government was given a veto over article 50 and prevented brexit

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

i mean i would love it mainly because im into being an eu citizen and the economy of the place my retired parents live not going tits up but i would also enjoy the schaudenfraude of subverting the democratic will of the english and welsh

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

It's more likely that Sturgeon would use it as a bargaining chip in any independence talks. If Scotland does indeed get a veto it might come down to a straight choice between Brexit and Scottish independence, I can see a lot of British nationalists fucking fuming at the very idea.

Meanwhile...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/19/extreme-surveillance-becomes-uk-law-with-barely-a-whimper

Matt DC, Saturday, 19 November 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

I just read that Independent link and why does Northern Ireland not get a say?

Belfast High Court rejected a N Irish challenge to Brexit - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-37796836 - but it's going to the UK Supreme Court and in light of recent decisions that must stand a good chance of being overturned?

lex pretend, Saturday, 19 November 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxtmKYKXgAEmAcr.jpg

Matt DC, Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

this was the plan all along tho as any fule (except bojo??) kno

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/UZC6joC.jpg

conrad, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

austerity is back hashtag baby

xyzzzz__, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Taxing the employment benefits of middle income earners doesn't seem like the kind of thing tory voters will like. If they still have a 14 point lead after doing that I will either despair or take some comfort that the polls must be all bullshit, again.

calzino, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

Cyber physical systems.

stet, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Chuka Umunna and Bob Geldof /siren gif

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

branson is like the anti-trump lol

imago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

not that i fully endorse him

imago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

lol

@realDonaldTrump
Many people would like to see @Nigel_Farage represent Great Britain as their Ambassador to the United States. He would do a great job!

soref, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:37 (seven years ago) link

We're all going to hell.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:41 (seven years ago) link

We're all going to hell! (corrected)

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 06:55 (seven years ago) link

the guardian article I posted has now omitted the second i they'd added throughout that turned "milburn" into "miliburn"

conrad, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 07:36 (seven years ago) link

didn't farage already say he didn't want that job (as if anyone would give it to him)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 07:37 (seven years ago) link

'I do not want what I can not have'

Mark G, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 09:57 (seven years ago) link

farage is the most influential british politician of the 21st century, he's not going to be satisfied with a mere ambassadorship

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

if only there was some kind of cadre of professional diplomats available to the nation that meant we didn't have to rely on the likes of Nigel

Neil S, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

I would like to believe though that there's some sector of his support that would see him as tarnished by hanging around with Trump - the fault lines don't line up exactly.

Which would be useful if UKIP ever felt the need (by which I mean opportunity) to return as a political force - at the moment their ghost is doing most of their work for them.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/800997290915807232

groovypanda, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

a few of my in-laws are ukip-supporting leave voters and they've been uncharacteristically muted on social media about nigel's recent adventures - maybe i should politely ask them for their thoguhts over xmas dinner

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:49 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it would've been best if Farage had actually won the RIGGED South Thanet seat - wouldn't be hearing about him quite so much.

nashwan, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/2zU7ya5.jpg

conrad, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-must-stop-being-obsessed-with-diversity-says-stephen-kinnock_uk_58342344e4b09025ba335e02?4ajlwhfr&

Kinnock sounding pretty ukippy here - weird that he's literally, explicitly saying what Bernie Sanders was being attacked for supposedly saying yesterday (but didn't really afaict)

soref, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

I mean

“What we need to see in the progressive Left in the country is an end to this identity politics. We need to be talking far more about commonality rather than what differentiates from each other - let’s talk about what unites us.

“Every group is actually struggling with the same problems of social mobility, the same problems of disempowerment, the same problems of feeling that they are being left behind. It doesn’t matter what the color of your skin is or what your background is. What matters is that you’re poor and you’re disadvantaged and we’ve got to be there to help and engage with every single one of you - not just those who seem to have been taken priority over others.”

soref, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Technotwat.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Labour Must Stop ‘Obsessing’ About Diversity, Says White, Middle Class, Cis-Het Oxbridge Graduate

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

Here's an idea, they could pledge to actually do something that would unambiguously benefit millions of working class people or... they could keep trying to sound more racist. Which is the biggest vote-winner?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

The Labour MP said the party needed to stop practicing “identity politics” and “understand the role of the state is to manage immigration”.

His Remain campaigning must've been interesting.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

“We’ve been obsessing about diversity,” he added.

“The huge mistake we’ve made, we have played the game of identity politics and identified groups, whether it is by ethnicity or sexuality or whatever you might want to call it, rather than say, ‘we stand up for everyone in this country and that includes you, the white working class’.”

I thought the problem was they spent so long obsessing over Tory voters that the white working class (possibly rightly) thought they didn't give a shit about them?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

remember when the Labour party was founded to stand up for everyone in this country? i miss those days

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

Some truths that need to start getting self-evident:

1. What's left of the working class and the trade union movement can't support alone the weight of a party popular enough to hold workable power. If it ever could.
2. Labour has always been a collab between working class and middle class members/voters, because of 1.
3. If the Labour Party has any point at all it's to increase economic equality and to attempt to make the machinery of Capitalism work for the good of all citizens, by whatever means seem most effective.
4. YOU HAVE TO SELL THAT TO ENOUGH PEOPLE HONESTLY - Not sneak piddling redistributions of wealth through by stealth
5. A decent system of PR wd be an improvement on First Past the Post but only if the Party itself can stop centralizing power and restore proper democracy to the regions

― Westwood Ho (Noodle Vague), Monday, June 8, 2009 11:57 AM (seven years ago)

Matt DC, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

nothing if not consistent

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

i guess the only thing i think differently now is that it's not so much working + middle class as that swathes of people who consider themselves middle class are basically proles irl and should be appealed to with the same offer as the working class and the below working class. don't actually call them proles tho because some of them get really funny about it.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

For real that was a great post (which is the reason I found it so quickly), I still quote it nearly word for word if I need to resort to that argument in the pub.

Point 5 still stands as well, any even vaguely centre-left party that doesn't put electoral reform at the heart of its policy agenda is basically dead in the water. Then again most of Europe is just as fucked as we are so maybe it's just a more novel way of letting the fascists in.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

Has Brexit actually helped working people? Bear with me:

- Brexit slump does not materialize
- However, it is still anticipated on the horizon
- Therefore, Chancellor announces (x) of new spending, reversing years of Tory austerity (he says 187b but I don't believe that's all actually new)
- New spending creates jobs and demand in the conomy

Without Brexit, and the fears over its economic impact, would that new spending have been announced? We would still have Osbornomics and the race to surplus, right? Just playing devil's advocate here.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:27 (seven years ago) link

We would still have Osborne. And Cameron. In celebratory mood.

Mark G, Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:10 (seven years ago) link

True.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:11 (seven years ago) link

I mean, things would arguably be much much worse - that's what I'm saying.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:18 (seven years ago) link

Virtually nothing I saw yesterday suggested that Hammond is interested in reversing austerity, certainly not in reversing welfare cuts. He just hasn't doubled down like Osborne would have. There might be some new infrastructure projects, but Osborne was a late convert to that form of stimulus anyway.

We'd still have Cameron and Osborne merrily slashing away at the welfare state, but on the other hand we wouldn't have a gigantic clusterfuck with no obvious solution that is putting off most new investment in the country. It would be shit either way (especially for the unemployed and those on low incomes) but the pedal towards blue-collar Toryism after the last election suggested that they were aiming for a particular voter group anyway, and that's the group that might benefit under your optimistic scenario.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

The whole point of yesterday's speech was to show how dire the public finances are about to get, potentially laying the ground for even more austerity but mostly in order to start chipping away at support for leaving the Single Market. None of which comes over in today's particularly detached-from-reality Mail front page (which also neglects to mention the murder of an elected representative by a Nazi terrorist).

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:55 (seven years ago) link

... in fact it can't find space for it until PAGE FUCKING THIRTY

stet, Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

They obviously don't consider him an Enemy of the People.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

Shocked at the lack of COBRA meetings over these people.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

We would still have Osborne. And Cameron. In celebratory mood.

I'm not so sure about that, Cameron was obviously desperate to get out at the first opportunity and I think Osborne's star was in decline - could be wrong about the latter, so difficult to recall life before the Living Death we're going thru now.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:27 (seven years ago) link

True but I was meaning right now..

Mark G, Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:28 (seven years ago) link

So was I. Obviously?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

there will always be something positive to draw from any scenario with Gideon getting fucked over, but alas still tories running the show and no end to austerity in sight.

calzino, Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

john mcdonnell on today today in his new usual softly-spoken hang-dog disappointed tones characterising the spending announcement as not new and still representing a cut in line with the previous

conrad, Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Without Brexit Farage would still be UKIP leader...Corbyn would still be...Corbyn.

nashwan, Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

corbyns gonna corbyn

conrad, Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

Well, trade is on the meatrack..

Mark G, Thursday, 24 November 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

Any short term benefits for poorer people from Brexit have already been wiped out by rising prices I imagine. I'm seeing basic groceries go up already and in an era of no wage rises this is gonna be brutal on a lot of people and liable to get much worse over the next 12 months I think. I could pay zero tax and still be barely a step above making ends meet

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 November 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

there will always be something positive to draw from any scenario with Gideon getting fucked over, but alas still tories running the show and no end to austerity in sight.

Also ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/24/george-osborne-made-more-than-300000-in-a-month-from-speeches

Alba, Thursday, 24 November 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn's now starting to trot out glib unsupported lines about immigrants undercutting wages which basically means there's no hope for anything any more.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 November 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Cameron making a similar amount from talking about Brexit, which, really.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 24 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Where is the moral leadership right now? Is there a single politician prepared to stand up and say "stop the madness"?

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

nope :(

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

here it comes, moral leadershipping all over the place:
http://www.newstatesman.com/sites/default/files/styles/nodeimage/public/blogs_2016/11/2016_47-blair-web.jpg?itok=hiULN-Fx

mark s, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

Christ almighty

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Super-unflattering photo, almost surprisingly so!

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

I think that's his "man of the people let's get down to real talk" look isn't it?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

He looks strangely like Martin Amis there

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

That's a waxwork, surely?

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

http://www.zak-ove.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/whitemagic.jpg

^^^*this* is a waxwork, by zak ove, called "white magic"

mark s, Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/307483-nigel-farage-moving-to-the-us-report

later, suckers

, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

“I think they enjoy each other’s company, and they absolutely had an opportunity to talk about freedom and winning and what this all means for the world,” she said.

Oh to be a mosquito on the wall of that meeting and give both of those fuckers malaria.

stevie, Thursday, 24 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

In a couple of weeks virtually your entire browsing and online purchase history will be made available to multiple government departments and no one gives a shit.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

does anyone have a link to how MPs voted on this?

I see they're going to ban a lot of online porn by holding it to BBFC standards - no female ejaculation, watersports &c., good synergy there

ogmor, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:13 (seven years ago) link

Incidentally I don't think there is a single previous example of a politician going directly from the Home Office to Number 10. There are a lot of thwarted schemes that she's going to push straight through.

Apparently Labour didn't see this as worth opposing at all?

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

there is a recurring theme. I spent a lot of the last year googling Labour MP's voting/abstaining history and basically fuck about 80% of the party - they might as well not exist.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:22 (seven years ago) link

This is so obviously a policy that's going to be massively unpopular if only they could be arsed to make an issue out of it.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

^^ same could be said about brexit and its consequences tbf

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

Is the public generally against 'spying bills'? Previous ones seem to have been derailed by the Lords rather than overwhelming public pressure iirc.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 25 November 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

To modern eyes, there's no logic behind the rules, bar what appears to be a ban on female pleasure – facial ejaculation is allowed as long as it's male ejaculate, but face-sitting and female ejaculation are both banned. Fisting is banned, double penetration is fine. Not only will the BBFC enforce a block on sites which don't – or can't – age-verify users, it will also be checking to make sure our porn complies with illogical notions of "acceptable" sex, based on obscenity laws so old they might as well compel porn stars to wear powdered wigs.

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/non-conventional-sex-the-government-wants-to-block-perfectly-legal-porn-digital-economy-bill

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

Brexit is completely different, enough of the population is still heavily in favour despite everything. The proportion of people who want HM Revenue and Customs or the DWP leafing through their browsing and purchase history will be minuscule.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:32 (seven years ago) link

From what I can tell this isn't a case of individual MPs choosing to abstain or not bother, the party actively supported it.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

nothing to hide! nothing to hide!

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

I think the proportion of people assuming that it won't be their browsing history they'll be leafing through - it'll be suspected terrorists, 'welfare cheats', etc - is fairly high though. xxp

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 25 November 2016 12:37 (seven years ago) link

nice, now they can even snoop on your grocery orders.

“This is all about national security, this is about dealing with crime whether it's child abuse, whether it’s trafficking, whether it's drug dealing, whether it’s the sort of criminality that we want to deal with in our society."

presumably they will be looking for subscribers to Child-abusers Times or the Drug Dealer's Digest.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

if they're really blocking all porn without age-verification that's huge. are they going to ban tumblr?

ogmor, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

It's unworkable. The only question is whether they'll realise that before they pass the law. It simply can't be done.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 25 November 2016 12:43 (seven years ago) link

On the plus side this is the death knell for the Daily Mail's sidebar of shame.

nashwan, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

The censorship regime has led to bizarre understandings between the producers and regulators, Barnett said. One is the “four-finger rule”, which limits the number of digits that can be inserted into an orifice for sexual stimulation.

http://www.nestle.com.au/kitkat/PublishingImages/kit-kat-four-finger.jpg

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Friday, 25 November 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

and all decadent sins
will reap discipline

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

If you're on any kind of benefits the DWP can now see (some of) what you're spending your money on. If you're self-employed or a small business owner HMRC will be able to see who you're working with and what you're buying and could increase your tax bill based on this data.

Right there is a policy that will affect people right across the political spectrum and could provoke enough outrage if framed right. But Labour has never really given a shit about privacy, especially when they were in government, and most voters wouldn't be prepared to listen to Corbyn even if May proposed to feed a quarter of the population into a meat grinder.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Christ better not buy any fancy brand Parmesan or booze, the benefits gestapo will be calling round to disapprove and sanction.

I never heard Mary Whitehouse's take on the four-finger rule, but she might have approved.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

A friend likes sourly to point out that if the police are allowed to see something, it's only one bent copper away from a private investigator working for the tabloids. Which is a pretty potent way of generating specific fishing expeditions to threaten to name and shame* and thus hound or shut up critics. The actual real crime side of it, meanwhile, is going to be a blizzard of false positives, as these broad trawls always are.

*Caveat: the selfie/tumblr generation may turn out to be less shameable on this front.

mark s, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

It's such an ideal wedge issue for labour- likely to piss off whole swathes of people who wouldn't normally be receptive to them, strongly personally associated with the prime minister- we shouldn't be surprised that they've completely pissed it up the wall. Either Corbyn doesn't care/understand, or he's basically given up and has surrendered on this to the strong authoritarian streak in the PLP.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 25 November 2016 12:52 (seven years ago) link

what are the greens saying

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

Shortly after the Autumn Statement was delivered, with much of the country still under floodwater, Caroline Lucas MP asked Philip Hammond how he can justify a statement which didn't mention climate change even once.

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

fair

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

LOL

OCT
2016 Wednesday 5TH posted by Morning Star in Britain
by Solomon Hughes in the security zone
HARROW MP Bob Blackman revealed the Tories’ worst nightmare at a conference fringe — Jeremy Corbyn seizing their internet search history.
Mr Blackman told delegates about the need to stop the Labour leader getting hold of their Google cache and supermarket shopping records in a standing-room-only meeting in the “Think Tent.”
The marquee has been erected outside the conference building but in the secure zone by the Institute of Economic Affairs, the Taxpayers Alliance and the Free Enterprise Group — a trio on the Tory right.
Mr Blackman revealed libertarians’ fears over regulation and security to a gathering of around 150 delegates on Monday.
He said: “Just imagine how much data Google has on you as an individual that they could actually sell and utilise in the long term on your lifestyle habits.
“At least you know on a computer you are choosing to put that information in.“But when you go to a supermarket do you realise that everything you are buying is being monitored, particularly if you’ve got rewards cards.
“So there is a real challenge in terms of personal freedom versus the monitoring that is done and the potential abuse of that information.
“If we had a totalitarian government with — god help us — Jeremy Corbyn involved, just imagine what use that data could be put to.”

nashwan, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

xps
this time it feels so far beyond just the police being able to see stuff. The list of agencies is p247 onwards here:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2016-2017/0066/17066.pdf
The possibilities for bentness seem endless (also, resentful stalking of ex-wives etc).
(I haven't read through the bill to see the safeguards, but I might try later. It seems terrible, just terrible.)

woof, Friday, 25 November 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Caroline Lucas voted against the bill fwiw.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

Police probably historically and more practically bendable than other agencies, but yes

mark s, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

obviously Lucas voted against the bill. she votes on the right side of all the bills. can we pls have more politicians like her? is that too much to ask?

imago, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:06 (seven years ago) link

David Davis voted against it as well!

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

we've come reasonably close to having compulsory ID cards a few times, I honestly think that the GBP doesn't give much of a flying one about this kind of issue, and there might even be a slim majority in favour of turning the country into a giant Panopticon

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

I mean, this is a classic bleeding heart liberal concern

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

how they voted on Investigatory Powers Bill many xps
http://simonbjohnson.github.io/MPs_vote_data_retention/

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

also think the "if you've got nothing to hide" line of thinking fits precisely with the mood of the country

lex pretend, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

David Davis used to be good on stuff like this, tbf. In the past it was also a classic old-school English-home-a-castle Tory concern, but they've largely died off as a breed.

mark s, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

(Not that Davis comes from that wing, exactly -- he's more a libertarian constitutionalistI think)

mark s, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Peter Bone's keeping the tradition alive, though.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

tbh if Teresa May introduced a "Police Powers to Torture Islam-looking People At Will Just in Case" bill tomorrow it would garner a terrifying amount of PLP and GBP support

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

Tories with Tor browsers. They'll get their kids to set it up over Xmas.

nashwan, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

anyway, if this leads to an "Ilxors, what's on your browsing history?" thread it can only be a good and disturbing thing

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

come to think of it, the gov could've avoided the need for this bill amongst ILXors by just starting an ILM write-in poll for favourite porn and terrorism sites

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

Even Theresa May doesn't want to read 500 pained and earnest posts about why there aren't more metal jihadi sites in the list.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 November 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

or why http://www.swimming.org/asa/ should be allowed as a water sports site

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

I find the idea of a perplexed and horrified food standards agency employee going through my browsing history hilarious and, if I'm honest, a turn-on

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

what keywords do I have to start using to make this happen

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

sudden influx of Cheltenham-based visitors to the "Who vs Kinks" thread

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

Well, Pete Townshend is mentioned in there, so fair dos.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

I laugh now but obviously when I'm on the front of the Daily Mail next to a blurred screenshot of AnimalCollectiveTeens.com I'm gonna see things differently

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

i thought most brexiteers were firmly anti human rights legislation, so wouldn't imagine anyone that way inclined to come out against this, especially if they're convinced that it's only targetted at the other people, different people, bad people. all feeds on that same brexity paranoia and suspicion anyway

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Friday, 25 November 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

The fact that only two of the Lib Dems voted no is further reason why they would, as a party, benefit from being taken outside and shot.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Wait hang on, that's the DRIP act from two years ago. So in fact they have largely felt this benefit.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, one man's* war on experts continues

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/treasury-watchdog-dismisses-michael-goves-claim-it-missed-a-200m-a-week-brexit-dividend-a7438811.html

*with his two friends

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

Feeling a bit dirty for liking Blair's suggested replacement of 'Left v Right' with 'Open v Closed'.

nashwan, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

The voting on the bill back in March:
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-15/division/333DA9DF-9521-4EF3-9241-AE62E3DFEC54/InvestigatoryPowersBill?outputType=Party

Almost complete absention from Labour & SNP, which combined could have overturned it. Also an apology from me to the Lib Dems - all 8 of them on the right side.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

oops sorry for the wrong voting link.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

I find navigating through the parliament.uk an absolute mare, what is the clicking route towards the ayes and noes. I have never directly got there through the actual site, always from google results - hence the error.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

I honestly think that the GBP doesn't give much of a flying one about this kind of issue, and there might even be a slim majority in favour of turning the country into a giant Panopticon

Yup - bits of the government have gone out of the way to avoid things that seem like ID cards (ie giant ID databases) & I've looked through the testing on the alternatives. A lot of users are either 'but you already have a giant ID database, why don't you just use that?' or 'You're the government, you _should_ have a giant ID database'.

(have to be a bit vague, sorry)

woof, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

xp
is the Public Whip/They Work for You not better for digging in that stuff?

woof, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

yes, they are definitely more user friendly for voting data, jesus that parliament site is literally 50 massive PDF links per page.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

xp The latter wasn't all that helpful, a lot of discussion but couldn't really find the votes - going to Hansard and searching for Divisions (if you know the date you're looking for) was pretty painless.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

You could actually pass on that info without being so smugly superior AF, but no doubt you are busy shitting Cuban cigars right now:p

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

Er, sorry if I'm coming across like that - I was just trying to be helpful, I don't mean to imply I have any mystical knowledge here. I spent a while trying to find it via other means and then stumbled into it (definitely _not_ by searching on Hansard, it was a link off the main parliament site but when I tried to retrace my steps it was just a brick wall).

I mean, if anyone has the right to act superior, it's not the guy who noted loudly that there were two Lib Dem 'No' votes on the earlier bill, but didn't spot that there were 57 Lib Dem votes total rather than, say, 8.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

I wasn't being totally serious btw. I'm just not very good at this humour malarkey.

calzino, Friday, 25 November 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

xps Agree with what ppl are saying about mood of the country. The argument against the snooping bill feels very very uphill

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 25 November 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

I mean like 'there ought to be this barrier between the individual and the state' 'what even for PAEDOS AND TERRORISTS' 'yes'

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 25 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy you have failed us on Brexit but for Gods sake man FIDEL CASTRO HAS JUST DIED PAY A FUCKING HEARTFELT TRIBUTE ALREADY!

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 26 November 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

Keep up - he's already getting trashed by Michael Deacon and Stephen Pollard for his statement.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 26 November 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

Trump showing Corbyn how this should be done:

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Fidel Castro is dead!

say what you want about Trump, but difficult to imagine anyone taking issue with that

soref, Saturday, 26 November 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

Keep up - he's already getting trashed by Michael Deacon and Stephen Pollard for his statement.

― Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 26 November 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I have been a reading a piece abotu Cuban prisons so forgive.

His statement wasn't posted on his twitter when I checked earlier

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 26 November 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

Get you a Labour leader you can rely on:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/jeremy-corbyn-hails-fidel-castro-as-a-champion-of-social-justice-a7440696.html

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 26 November 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

There is probably a limited amount you can hold against Corbyn for his statement when Justin Trudeau and Michael D are saying the same thing but, damn it, they're going to have a good go.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 26 November 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

wtf:

Philip Collins Verified account
‏@PCollinsTimes

For those saying Cuba=New Labour, I might add that Blair too improved health & literacy and, amazingly, did so without any political murders

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 26 November 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

no political murders under Blair's watch, it's official

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 26 November 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/malaiseforever/status/802517729697759232

The responsible left weighs in.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 26 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

Is that what we're calling Nick Cohen these days?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Saturday, 26 November 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

correct term: "the Soi-Decents"

mark s, Saturday, 26 November 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

We call him a drunken slob, if spotted in the Islington farmer's market!

jane burkini (suzy), Saturday, 26 November 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

Thursday
Just occasionally, select committee proceedings give you an insight into how the rest of the world sees us. During a recent session of the public accounts committee – at which the Department of Health civil servant Chris Wormald made headlines for saying the NHS was planning on making patients show theirs passports to access treatment – one gem slipped under the radar. During a question about reciprocal healthcare arrangements for foreign pensioners, the chair, Meg Hillier, asked Wormald if he had any comparative figures for Spain. “Yes,” he said promptly. “At our last count there are 62 Spanish … ” “Not 62,000?” interrupted the Conservative Richard Bacon. “62 Spanish pensioners,” said Hillier. “You’re kidding me.” “62 Spanish pensioners live in the UK and about 70,000 British pensioners live in Spain,” replied the bewildered Wormald, who couldn’t see what the fuss was about. “62?” Hillier repeated incredulously. “We are not the retirement place of choice,” Wormald explained.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Saturday, 26 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

that's rough

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 27 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

surprised it's that many

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 27 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

The thing is who the hell is doing the Cuba=New Labour thing? Love to read that illusion being spun out.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 27 November 2016 08:54 (seven years ago) link

This is great, seriously, Abbott has really stepped in: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/26/labour-will-not-win-a-general-election-as-ukip-lite-says-diane-abbott

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 27 November 2016 10:33 (seven years ago) link

There is probably a limited amount you can hold against Corbyn for his statement when Justin Trudeau and Michael D are saying the same thing but, damn it, they're going to have a good go.

― Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 26 November 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Trudeau is losing his lib cool:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/27/justin-trudeau-ridiculed-over-praise-of-remarkable-fidel-castro

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 27 November 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

michael d rumours i hear from my innergov gay contacts are choice

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Sunday, 27 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

how did this guy become one of the most prominent political broadcasters in the UK?

Jeremy Vine ‏@theJeremyVine
Is the phrase "tyranny of the majority" a John Major original? I have never heard a politician say anything like it

soref, Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if there's any connection between the general incomprehension with which the public respond to the idea that referendums are potentially undemocratic and the fact that the ppl whose job it is to makes these issues comprehensible are all "Alexis de WHOville????" on twitter?

soref, Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

he got the job after shooting the previous sheriff iirc

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 27 November 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

May's been quoted as saying her 'faith in God will guide our path out of Europe'. Hopefully not the same God who was advising Blair on Iraq!

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Monday, 28 November 2016 09:39 (seven years ago) link

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n23/frederick-wilmot-smith/who-speaks-for-the-

I have to read the 1st half of this piece again around the complicated legal args on Brexit case at the Supreme Court (even then I don't think I'll understand as I'm no expert see) - take away is the government can very much win the appeal.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 28 November 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

Noodle Vague, is this an Eric Clapton reference I am not getting?

the pinefox, Monday, 28 November 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

no, it's a reference to his finest hour:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7JX8D1Kb88

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 28 November 2016 09:59 (seven years ago) link

There is, then, no possible way of defending the minority ... from the tyranny of the majority, but by giving the former a negative on the latter

- Bob Marley

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Monday, 28 November 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Good one NV ! I had forgotten that. It is funny and remarkable.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 November 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Eddit Hitler In. No kisses.

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/6B25/production/_92692472_mediaitem92692468.jpg

nashwan, Monday, 28 November 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

http://i2.liverpoolecho.co.uk/incoming/article11203249.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/JS59801345.jpg

the new leader may seek to exploit Eurosceptic fears that May will not be able to deliver a clean break from the EU that reduces immigration and cuts ties with the single market.

At the same time, there may be an opportunity to woo pro-Brexit Labour supporters in the north of England who were unhappy with their party’s campaign to remain.

Nuttall, a former university history lecturer from Bootle in Merseyside, has been seen as the senior Ukip figure most likely to be able to connect with this vote.

The MEP has strong rightwing views on crime, is open to a referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for child killers, and opposes abortion.

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

I think this was a bad choice by UKIP - I can't see him expanding support beyond people who already vote UKIP. Which is good, of course. Plus the guy already has 'nut' in his name, which shouldn't matter, but I bet tabloids are already writing puns they'll be looking for a story to fit to.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

He is horrible, also probably the smuggest politician since Salmond in his pomp, though at least you could argue Salmond had stuff to be smug about.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, in case anyone hadn't realized it before, this is UKIP very much going after Labour voters the Tories don't think they can get to, cosy little arrangement there.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

is open to a referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for child killers

tbh in this political climate a pro-nonce-hanging platform is probably a surefire votewinner :(

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

also otm tbf

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

5k fps for an execution nbd

ogmor, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

loves his executions

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

tbf the punishment for rape of any kind should be 'let the victim decide' and if the victim's learning-impaired or a minor then 'let the victim's family decide' imo in a perfect world, with necessary limits on torture &c

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

"you can walk free, but legally required to wear I AM A RAPIST shirt in public forever"

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

"on pain of death"

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

http://talkradio.co.uk/

nashwan, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

tbf the punishment for rape of any kind should be 'let the victim decide'

this is a bad idea. Altho perhaps not much worse than the current system of 'let the rapist decide' so idk

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

nashwan is Minister for Naysaying

Bananaman Begins is Secretary of Trenchant

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

fair

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

tbf the punishment for rape of any kind should be 'let the victim decide' and if the victim's learning-impaired or a minor then 'let the victim's family decide' imo in a perfect world, with necessary limits on torture &c

turning criminal justice into a sideshow def a great idea, would back 100%

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

The advantage of the legal system is that it allows an 'external' resolution for issues. Otherwise you get endless recriminations that endanger society. It's not so important from that standpoint what or how the decision is - it ends the violent state of a crime, and that's it's value. We should, of course, try to make those decisions as just as possible - but moving backwards is, I think, a terrible idea, and weakens social structure. The victim can now be blamed for the punishment, which will happen. Recriminations will multiply and unsettle communities. I'm very pro penal reform, but I'm not in favour of undermining the structure of justice itself.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

Victim will also be liable to outside pressure innit.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

Even more than at present.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

Which is good, of course. Plus the guy already has 'nut' in his name, which shouldn't matter, but I bet tabloids are already writing puns they'll be looking for a story to fit to.

kind of hope the tabloids don't give him some kind of "nut" based nick-name, as it risks distracting from what should be his official title, i.e. "bad bootle ukip meff":

https://twitter.com/paulnuttallukip/status/558416166004469760

soref, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

his official title is paul nuttalls of the ukips

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

also, I said 'in a perfect world' of course I'm not dismantling the justice system here lol

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Don't know much about him apart from the Stewart Lee thing and the bad meff thing but imo ukip is still too rooted in nineteenth hole snobbery to unite behind a leader from Bootle

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

In a perfect world there wouldn't be rapes tho

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

upgraded to Minister for Checkmate

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

you can deliver all my checkmates

I'll even let you do it in a Palace shirt

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

I believe in being gracious in crushing victory

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

Like my mentor Alan Pardew lol

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

his official title is paul nuttalls of the ukips

this is the problem - imo "bad bootle ukip meff" is much funnier than "paul nuttalls of the ukips", especially because it's totally self-inflicted and a reminder that he chose to highlight this comment that hardly anyone would have noticed otherwise - but other people feel differently, and I'm worried that the split could mean that neither catches on

soref, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

just like to point out that our reserves just beat palace's reserves. carry on

imago, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

I can't see him expanding support beyond people who already vote UKIP

I don't think these are safe times to be making any predictions

Ireland's Industry (that is what we are) (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 28 November 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Farage will be back within six months.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 November 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

Like a bad tuppence

stevie, Monday, 28 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

Well at least it's not a fucking Euro eh?

Matt DC, Monday, 28 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

I don't think these are safe times to be making any predictions

Ha, that's true - I've been wrong about almost everything political for the past 18 months, so certainly not a strong claim.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Monday, 28 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

I think he will do quite well and more against Labour than Con and it is therefore bad news.

I suppose the only silver lining conceivable would be eg: in fighting Labour, he takes UKIP 'to the left' in a certain way and thus moves their Overton window.

Speculative at best, I know, esp given his views cited above.

the pinefox, Monday, 28 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/6B25/production/_92692472_mediaitem92692468.jpg

The Angerous Brothers

Mark G, Monday, 28 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

the line between the cartoon grotesque exaggeration of political satire and actual photographs of real scumbag players has always been not that far off, but...

calzino, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 00:14 (seven years ago) link

Talking of satire
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/28/uk-unlikely-to-stay-in-single-market-tory-document-suggests?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Is this
A. Rank incompetence
B. Pushing Chatham house rules to their limit to undermine the leave lobby
C. Part of a thick it / black mirror hybrid script
D. Having your job and eating it too?

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 06:20 (seven years ago) link

the line between the cartoon grotesque exaggeration of political satire and actual photographs of real scumbag players has always been not that far off, but...

He literally looks like a character from Viz.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

the line between the cartoon grotesque exaggeration of political satire and actual photographs of real scumbag players has always been not that far off, but...

if dudes who looked like either of these dudes arrived as the new manager of the shop where you worked or a new co-worker in your office you would have to consider your options or just move on right away

stevie, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:01 (seven years ago) link

he takes UKIP 'to the left'

I very much doubt this.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

In a more Strasserite direction maybe, not really useful to decribe it as 'left'.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:23 (seven years ago) link

If Labour can't find a way to beat this guy then they should deselect every single sitting MP and just start again.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:39 (seven years ago) link

>>> he takes UKIP 'to the left' in a certain way <<<

The idea was qualified twice over.

If he is challenging Labour in working-class seats etc, then I imagine that there will be ideological / rhetorical elements different from what we know from UKIP, and more stuff to appeal to trad Labour voters -- eg he will sound more pro-NHS. Perhaps he will stress eg that these are 'our public services' and we must stop other people from using them, while not saying we should privatize them.

I have seen him on TV before and to be honest I thought he sounded reasonable by UKIP standards. I wasn't aware of his anti-abortion policy.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:45 (seven years ago) link

I don't see why Matt DC thinks he should be so beatable -- I would think him harder to beat than Farage, in those 'Labour heartland' targets.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

"he will sound more pro-NHS" -- in the past he has explicitly argued that the nhs be wound up, tho he seems to be deleting tweets that state this

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

xpost

he will sound more pro-NHS

The Labour Party are already attacking Nuttall for giving a speech in favour of more Privatisation within the NHS.

Darcy Sarto (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

He's very much from the right wing headbanger wing of UKIP.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

Yep - and he's openly religious (Catholic) too

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:54 (seven years ago) link

plus there's the "bad bootle ukip meff" effect

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

FWIW I think he's a good choice by UKIP. A 'strong man' leader, who will pick up plenty of northern Labour voters. Worrying.

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:57 (seven years ago) link

The Tories will be delighted.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

What is the other wing of UKIP?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

I'm not saying he'll be easy to beat, but if the political establishment is really that vulnerable to a bald pro-privatisation neo-fascist, or can't find a way to defend itself against one, then we urgently need to get a new political establishment.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

There's not many of them left now, the Diane James/Douglas Carswell "see, we're not right wing headbangers, we're quite nice and middle class" wing.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

there's a good piece here by alex harrowell on the social-political make-up of UKIP: http://www.harrowell.org.uk/blog/2014/05/23/not-two-ukips-three-ukips/

it's two years old and, well, A LOT'S HAPPENED SINCE THEN, but i doubt this basic make-up has shifted much except in proportion (bonus early flag for the quality of stephen bush's work)

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

Daily Record today had "As Nuttall as a Fruitcake" today. Come on, thy can do better than that! (I know, it's the Record)

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

If Labour can't find a way to beat this guy then they should deselect every single sitting MP and just start again.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:39 AM (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ftfy

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Nuttall's evident schtick is 'right wing' -- I think it's 'bluff Northern working class' -- perhaps covering up the extent of the right-wing interior.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:26 (seven years ago) link

"fake bluff Northern working class" as lapped up by metropolitan centrists to sneer at or panic about

the bootle meff incident demonstrates his cage is fairly easily rattled -- it was his response that turned it into a thing -- and that (not terribly surprisingly) actual real northerners see thru the shtick reasonably effectively

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:33 (seven years ago) link

I don't know what this Bootle meff thing is ! :O

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:44 (seven years ago) link

pvmic

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

UKIP was only able to win one seat at the last election, when they were leaded by the infinitely more media-friendly Farage and the party had a concrete goal in mind. With that goal now essentially achieved, they only have two real options - one is to maintain the pressure on the govt to actually see Brexit through, after which they might as well cease to exist. The other is to just transform into an explicit anti-immigration party, if they haven't already/

They got a substantial share of the vote in the North of England but weren't able to win any seats from a pro-European Labour Party run by the Jewish (and therefore dog-whistle un-British) Ed Miliband. If they win multiple Northern seats next time round then one of two things will have happened - either Corbyn's leadership will have been so disastrous that he has effectively opened the door to the Far Right, or anti-immigration hysteria will have reached such a peak that we are essentially seeing the rise of fascism in this country. Or both at the same time.

It strikes me that UKIP presents more of a danger to Labour in Midlands marginals, where it could eat into enough of their vote to deliver even more seats to the Tories. But a lot of Brexiters will swing behind the Tories anyway unless something big happens in the next four years.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

sorry PF i was going to link but ppl had talked abt it in thread so i assumed everyone was up to speed: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/ukip-mep-paul-nuttall-brands-8505324

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

They came 2nd in about 40% of their constituencies (120!) last year - though as Matt says that's hopefully a high-water mark.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I thought the UKIP vote was huge in 2015 - about as many as the SNP & LDs combined - and the Brexit success only adds to the sense of critical mass, and the prospect of clear results and change will be tempting while the rest of the political landscape remains fractured and confused

ogmor, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

how do you confront it electorally tho? more talk about people's legitimate concerns? a new cuddly "right-wing-economics-with-a-welcoming-pat-on-the-head-for-immigrants" coalition/party?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

most of the counter proposals are basically "we must cling harder to the status quo" which y'know, maybe, arguably, maybe, possibly, led us to this mess in the first place

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:21 (seven years ago) link

"the Brexit success only adds to the sense of critical mass"

momentum*-in-the-narrative is an argument that media makes re increased coverage, not an argument voters ever actually make -- in reality, the success in turning brexit into the default position of both the major parties undermines ukip's vote-share, unless (as matt notes) it can refashion itself into a purely xenophobic party

meanwhile in the world of actual real economics and labour patterns: "UK farmers warn of Brexit-triggered labour crisis":
https://www.ft.com/content/7ceb876c-b58d-11e6-961e-a1acd97f622d

*not that momentum

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

what arguments do voters make? people don't like to feel they've thrown their vote away so the fact that UKIP got so many votes as parliamentary outsiders is pretty astonishing. the successes aren't decisive or established enough to appease people yet (especially given that there was no one clear thing people were even voting for). I'll believe the disquiet is on the verge of dissipating & standard two party politics is to be resumed when the headlines change

ogmor, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

i guess "adds to the sense of critical mass" may translate into something like "a rush and a push and the land is ours"

i agree that (for some), the increased uncertainty post-vote is very likely encouraging a feeling of "just one more rush & push and no more bengalis in platforms [insert disliked aspect of modern life]"

but -- within that same voting collective -- every step towards local shutdown (nissan in sunderland, fruit rotting in the fields of the garden of england [see link above], stresses on tourism in conrwall and wales) is pulling the collective in several directions

i don't think we're ever going to return to standard two-party politics, or (in the medium term) a sense of easy-reach calm

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

But even supposing the Labour Party decided to pander to the anti-immigration crowd, they can't out pander them. They will always offer more restrictions than the LP do - if the LP promise to cut immigration the right will promise to eliminate it it. If the LP promises to eliminate immigration they will promise to eradicate the asylum system etc. 'What is morally unconscionable is always electorally unfeasible' or something like that.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

who'd have guessed that a wealthy rock star would be a Tory?

Neil S, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

I'm choosing to believe that she isn't and that she's just trotting out that moronic victory-for-feminism line.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't seem that likely, bearing in mind she was an adult all throughout the Thatcher era.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

doesn't really belong on the brexit thread

take it here: theresa may: is her project subtly machiavellian or merely cunning, baldrick-style?

mark s, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

LOL Kate Bush, she's not perfect after all, ILX.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

Aw, that saddens me. Especially with a kid with special needs - it would be terrible to leave such cases to the private sector.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

*shrug* I still love Ezra Pound's poetry, I think I can get thru this

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

She's from Bexleyheath, even the urban foxes are tory round there

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

2015 was a tough year for this A Lloyd Webber fan, never want to go through that kind of internal conflict again :p

calzino, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

im shocked that a middle-class english musician who makes progressive rock could be a conservative.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

have your barf bags at the ready:

https://twitter.com/ProgressOnline/status/803684565621600256

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

Now I don't normally advocate shooting people in the face but

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

First comment is mint tho

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Hah, that's a friend of mine (er, unless twitter is being tricky - Brevor Tastard?)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

Haha I was just coming to post that Progress tweet. Special circle of Hell just for those cunts.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

Reading that tweet on my desktop computer and seeing down the side bar the little info bit for Progress's twitter account and just thinking to myself "what in the name of fuck is wrong with you bastarts?":

Progress, Labour's new mainstream, is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical&progressive politics

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

John McTernan otm, somehow

https://twitter.com/johnmcternan/status/803711188257247232

quite a few of the hardcore progress/blarite types seem uncomfortable with the anti-immigration/blue labour rhetoric, the other day I saw Spencer Livermore of all people, praising Diane Abbott for an article defending free movement. Abbott really is doing god's work by standing firm on this issue against the vast majority of the PLP (and quite a few of the people on team Corbyn afaict?)

soref, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

The word progressive is completely fucking meaningless at this stage, although I could imagine that tweet coming from Eric Clapton.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

Its like someone looked at the UKIP leadership results and the guff spouted about how UKIP could fuck Labour and believed every word of it, then had a full day and drafted the tweet about 15 times before posting it.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

and had zero idea of what "assimilation" has historically meant in this discussion

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

it turns out that Kinnock had lots of bad opinions at this event:

ProgressOnline ‏@ProgressOnline
.@SKinnock 2008 changed everything ... Labour must take responsbility for the drift that lead to the rise in authoritarianism.

ProgressOnline ‏@ProgressOnline
.@SKinnock Nobody on the doorstep listens to me when I say, 'think about the economic benefits of immigration'

ProgressOnline ‏@ProgressOnline
.@SKinnock Labour has to reassure the British people that we understand and respect their desire for control over immigration.

ProgressOnline ‏@ProgressOnline
.@SKinnock We must recalibrate our approach on immigration and talk, as patriots, about what unites us, not what divides us.

soref, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

hard to believe that a privileged white middle class kid grew up with shitty political opinions

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

The Telegraph recently described him as "the red prince" in an article about him allegedly trying to conceal the tuition fees of the private school his daughters attend. I don't why he bothers, it isn't like he has a reputation to protect and is plainly another waste of a private education like Smith was. But "the red prince" lol wtf

calzino, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:16 (seven years ago) link

I mean actual poshos like Clement Atlee and Tony Benn have made decent socialists but that's because they actually bothered to interrogate their background and their position in life. Nothing I've seen of Kinnock Jr suggests that he's in the Labour Party for any other reason than accident of birth and I don't believe he's done the slightest self-reflection for all the pretence of doing so.

The only way the Labour Party is going to offset the rise of right-wing authoritarianism is by offering something that is indisputably more attractive and there isn't any sign that they know how to do so.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 09:41 (seven years ago) link

At this stage I'm fully expecting to see some Labour pamphlet outlining The Progressive Case For Eugenics.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

Idly googling whether anyone has put out the case against the modern identity politics, and it turns out the MP for Aberavon has in fact had some views last week on how it's a distraction because everybody is suffering under the Tories.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 09:51 (seven years ago) link

Please stop being otm Matt as it's quite depressing.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock was in conversation with Margaret Hodge last week at the LSE on the subject of "the new minority: white working class politics in an era of immigration and inequality". I was tempted to see if my old university pass still worked so i could go in and set off the sprinkler system.

It would be interesting to know whether his views have been influenced by, or overlap with, those of his wife's government but idk if anyone has the insight into domestic Danish politics we would need on that point.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:05 (seven years ago) link

wait so there's an actual real assimilation/borg/borgen joke waiting to be made here?

mark s, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

Big lols will accrue to whoever can land that one right.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:34 (seven years ago) link

Sorry but I just watched Carl Dreyer's "Ordet" last night, so the name Borgen does not signify big lols to me.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

At this stage I'm fully expecting to see some Labour pamphlet outlining The Progressive Case For Eugenics.

For some reason I can't shake an image forming in my head of a sort of alt-right nazi version of Dave Angel-Eco Warrior. "We all like a good time, but here's one thing that aint no laughing matter- white genocide. I bet you've never thought about these liddle things called haplogroups..."

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 10:38 (seven years ago) link

I'd be interested to know how Kinnock conceives a specifically white working class culture in terms beyond "distrust or hatred of non-white people"

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 11:49 (seven years ago) link

nah, let me second guess him - it's about concerns re: community spirit, job insecurity, access to healthcare and education. and what Kinnock would like to do is not to tell people that the excesses of market capitalism and 35 years of UK governments rolling back the welfare state are not the main causes of those problems, but immigration is. either because he believes that, or because he believes in market capitalism and rolling back the welfare state and thinks immigration is an easier lie to sell to a gullible electorate.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

(b)

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

hey, he's either a moron or evil, I'm comfortable either way

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

“I think we need to make it very clear that the difference between ourselves and Ukip is that Ukip and the hard right of the Tories are nationalists and isolationists,” he said.

Whenever you're ready to start making that clear Kinnock please knock yourself out.

nashwan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

kinnock def putting clear water between labour and ukip/tories with statements like 'we must recalibrate our approach on immigration and talk, as patriots, about what unites us, not what divides us', good job buddy

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:08 (seven years ago) link

http://metro.co.uk/2016/11/30/zac-goldsmith-hit-by-his-own-car-on-his-way-to-hustings-6292357/
zac^^^ trawling for the brian harvey vote here

mark s, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

Sorry but I just watched Carl Dreyer's "Ordet" last night, so the name Borgen does not signify big lols to me.

Ordet is great! That is all.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

https://www.crowdpac.co.uk/campaigns/558/labour-first

surely no wiser use of a crowd-funded 40k!

lex pretend, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

They definitely need the money, judging by that hideous photograph.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

i wonder how much it would cost to build a rocket capable of firing Stephen Kinnock into the sun

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

i think one now calls it solar assimilation

Rae Kwoniff (NickB), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

Denmark has dealt with populists in charge of immigration policy since 2001, so it's quite possible that Kinnock is being influenced by his wife. He's not really echoing Danish talking points, though, it differs when anti-immigration policy has been practice for 15 years. The debate becomes much more technical, less about standpoints.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

we've all been there, partners making us go all racist

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8ZIeHam4vvw/hqdefault.jpg

mark s, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

I blame the parents.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

Combat 1 of 8, can we do something with that?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

not the first time a great man has been laid low by a dane pouring poison in his ear iirc

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

*applause*

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

Is that a reference to darraghmac and Fred?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

just looked at that Labour First fundraiser thing and saw this:

Recent donations

Get Behind Your Democratically Elected Leader
1 minute ago
£1.00

now I'm worried that they might actually nickel and dime their way to the 40k via pass agg joke donations

soref, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

It isn't like the PLP need any more encouragement to "put Labour first", they have been already doing it for years. Even to put some childish "obscenely bald Kinnocks" type offensive joke donation I wouldn't give these lowlife a penny.

calzino, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

Name withheld to prevent being purged by the loons £10.00
3 minutes ago

calzino, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2331400/thumbs/o-STEPHEN-KINNOCK-570.jpg?4

The Red Prince (aged 14)

calzino, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRYjY8zv5wAZnhkRIB2tvAW6JaETuqdks5jkKSFc0tntzL4qulw
Kinnock, who is all but certain to be elected Labour MP for Aberavon in South Wales, was cast in the 2007 film after he made a speech at a film festival. The director thought he looked like a “youngbald Tom Hanks”, according to Danish newspaper Politiken.

calzino, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

apologies for the cheap baldist shaming, no actually fuck this slaphead tory twat!*

*disclaimer I'm actually receding myself.

calzino, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

It's a pity that SK has proved so bad.

But it might be a bit of a pity to take it out on Neil Kinnock, who has said some things I have not liked, but whose party I also voted for long ago. Relative to today the prime Kinnock was a left social democrat like many of us. His policy platform in 1987 and 1992 was miles to the left, if that is the right word, of British governments since (though maybe Labour 1997 manifesto did actually share a lot with it, and / or with John Smith era c.1994, though the differences were more talked up).

the pinefox, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:22 (seven years ago) link

i wonder how much it would cost to build a rocket capable of firing Stephen Kinnock into the sun

https://www.rocketbuilder.com/

just under £50 mil by my reckoning for a launch next winter

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

this is also worth reading: http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/the-candidate-by-alex-nunns.html

(in fact avps is always worth reading, as a northern midlands left-labour activist who's also a sociologist, and a very long way outside the westminster bubble)

mark s, Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:39 (seven years ago) link

yeah I like that blog v much

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:44 (seven years ago) link

don't want to jinx this but

Kevin Schofield ‏@PolhomeEditor 26m26 minutes ago
Lib Dems getting increasingly confident they may just have done it in Richmond Park. Tories quite gloomy. We'll find out soon enough.

soref, Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

to turn the thread tartan for a second:

after following polls in about 5 or 6 general elections and referendums in the last 4 years or so i'm a little wary of taking polling at face value...

however, some yougov stuff from yesterday seems bigish. was posted here on twitter: https://twitter.com/britainelects

support for independence has shrunk to 38% and opposition is at 49% - regression to the historical mean seems to be happening, and the effect of brexit, which some (including me) hoped would precipitate a move towards independence has either had a negligible or contrary influence.

and then this:

Scottish parl' voting intention (regional):
SNP: 39% (-6)
CON: 24% (+4)
LAB: 14% (-1)
GRN: 11% (+2)
LDEM: 6% (-)
UKIP: 4% (+2)
(via YouGov)

snp honeymoon is definitely over, labour is now a lib dem-like non-entity third party

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Unionists voting for the Unionist party

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

I had a lib dem doorknocker tell me that if I didn't vote LD the SNP would get in. Ha.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

my favourite door knocker was a labour one in 2010. i was living in glasgow central, and it was obvious that Anas Sarwar was going to walk away with it (which he did, by 10,000 roughly). was the most lackluster spiel possible, i told him i wasnt a fan of labour, but assented with him that they werent as bad as the tories and he seemed content.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

lol zac

stet, Friday, 2 December 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

up to nine! resurgence!!! hail tim

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Friday, 2 December 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

LOL @ this total loser

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:02 (seven years ago) link

losing a 23,000 majority to the lib dems lolololololololol

lex pretend, Friday, 2 December 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

The man who couldn't win the mayoralty on a platform of populist racism and xenophobia in 2016, and couldn't win Richmond on a platform of opposing Heathrow expansion. A comedy trombone fart of a politician.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

voters in 'not electing a total cunt' shocker

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

Give her time

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

uneasy abt the "wheel out geldof" precedent this sets (obv the victory was achieved despite this but not everyone will spot this)

mark s, Friday, 2 December 2016 10:12 (seven years ago) link

Was geldof wheeled out? lol

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:14 (seven years ago) link

And Zac still lost? Even funnier.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

Obviously the Dems wheeled out Geldof, Tom

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Exactly my point.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

Oh ok lol

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

It's just a pity for Zac that Eddie Izzard was busy in court that week.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

Someone make a gif of Zac's look at 0:12 in this Guardian clip. Priceless.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 2 December 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

Fuck the Tories and Goldsmith for assuming they could get away with stage managing a phoney 'resignation on a matter of principle'.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 2 December 2016 10:53 (seven years ago) link

why the fuck would the Lib Dems wheel out noted Tory shitheel Bob Geldof?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 2 December 2016 11:27 (seven years ago) link

never mind, I think that one answers itself on reflection

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 2 December 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

Labour should leave this to the wisdom of crowds, like in the nineties. While John Major's government was tottering like a drunk, there were several by-elections where the Lib dem was best placed to leave the tory, and most labour voters in these seats voted tactically for them- this led to some derisory, sometimes deposit losing labour performances, but that didn't matter at all(and obviously labour cleaned up in this period in by-elections where it was competitive). Point is, they got the same results pretty much as a formal agreement, without having to make any commitments. Now, if enough labour voters in Richmond are prepared to hold their nose and vote lib dem to fuck the tories, they'll do that regardless of whether labour fields a candidate. If they can't bring themselves to, because fuck the party of Clegg, Laws and Cable, they won't, and it's best to respect that choice.

― more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:03 AM (one month ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bananaman otm

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 2 December 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

Good to see Howling Laud Hope standing between the two more ridiculous candidates - shows he doesn't consider himself above them.

nashwan, Friday, 2 December 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you can really draw any conclusions from a place like Richmond which really is a unique constituency in so many ways but I'm going to draw one anyway.

Zac Goldsmith is really fucking stupid.

Matt DC, Friday, 2 December 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

this Stephen Bush article is very good imo:

So where does that leave the left and its immigration problem? It might help if the party stopped talking about those ‘very real concerns’ and started to listen to them, and I mean really listen. If someone who lives somewhere untouched by Eastern European immigration but with a sizeable second generation Pakistani community says the area has been ‘swamped’ by immigration, the appropriate response probably is not to reduce the ability of Poles and Latvians to move to London. If the ‘problem’ is children speaking Lithuanian at the school gate, the solution probably is not a higher minimum wage.

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2016/12/02/not-enough/

soref, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

you can hear it here, starting at 1:59

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX4NmRqeHPs

soref, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

oops

soref, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

The sun is up, the sky is blue
It's beautiful, unlike the EU

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Awes!

Mark G, Friday, 2 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

kill me

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

If someone who lives somewhere untouched by Eastern European immigration but with a sizeable second generation Pakistani community says the area has been ‘swamped’ by immigration, the appropriate response probably is not to reduce the ability of Poles and Latvians to move to London. If the ‘problem’ is children speaking Lithuanian at the school gate, the solution probably is not a higher minimum wage.

my solution wd involve guns

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

apparently it was all an unfortunate misunderstanding, but that just proves Kinnock's point, or something:

I was therefore profoundly shocked when people suggested that when I said we should stand for one group: the “British people” I meant standing for only white people. That would simply never even cross my mind as a definition of the British people, which I have always seen for what it is: as a patchwork of different lives, experiences, cultures and ethnicities that are inextricably, compellingly and beautifully interwoven.

The strength of the reaction to my comments is a stark illustration of the gaping hole at the heart of this debate, which is the lack of a shared language. So, I said one thing, and some people heard something completely different. But despite the furore, I do not for a moment regret making the argument, because it is a conversation that we in the Labour party so clearly need to have.

https://labourlist.org/2016/12/kinnock-how-to-build-an-inclusive-patriotic-and-confident-view-of-britishness/

soref, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

espousing patriotism is a quick way of dividing british ppl

ogmor, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

Also, for the right wing and 'centrists', 'real' (when attached to 'people' or 'concerns') is dogwhistle for 'white'. Nobody outside of a vogue ball should be able to invoke realness.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 2 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Kinnock doesn't see colour

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 2 December 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Labour got fewer votes in Richmond than it has local members. Massive tactical voting clearly, but has that ever happened before?

Matt DC, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

would be v interested to learn how much of the tactical voting was pre-organised rather than spontaneous

lex pretend, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

2016 in summary.

Bad:

Brexit
Trump
Syria
Yemen
Bowie, Prince, Leonard Cohen, Castro meet their makers

Bad to come: Fascist Prez to be elected in Austria, Renzi to get fucked with a potential run on Italian banks/Eurozone/one for the road

Good:

Zac got fucked over and over.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

Zac's double humiliation was not bad at all, but there is still a mayor in London who loves "affordable housing" and could do without a triumphant Farron.

calzino, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Zac should go and chain himself to a jumbo jet to continue this campaign

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

The comments sparked an angry response from Sadiq Khan who described them as “out of touch” and “just plain wrong.”

The Mayor told the Standard: “One of our biggest strengths as a city is our diversity, with Londoners from different backgrounds living side by side.

"So whether these out of touch comments were designed to shock or not, anyone who thinks abolishing affordable housing altogether, supporting ‘buy-to-leave’ empty properties, and building on Hyde Park is the answer to London’s housing crisis doesn’t understand the first thing about our great city.

“I was elected as Mayor because of my commitment to tackle the housing crisis. I know – and most Londoners agree – that this means building more new and affordable homes for Londoners to rent and buy, and protecting our public square and parks.

"I’ll listen to any ideas people have about tackling the housing crisis, but in this case Mr Schumacher is just plain wrong.”

he's serious

conrad, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Them "free-riding council tenants" comments by Patrik Schumacher were just beyond the pale, he probably doesn't realise that even if "affordable housing" was abolished it wouldn't make fa difference to most w/c people.

calzino, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

This dumbass probably has no idea how people qualify for council housing.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

don't think sadiq khan has a magic wand to wave but his rhetoric is often the most wishy-washy myopic apologist bullshit still not a surprise to see him play the big man when unambiguous scumbags say their unambiguously scumbag stuff

conrad, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

and by playing the big man yes it's with lukewarm boosterism of "affordable" housing

go get em sadiq

conrad, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

The high-life existence of the starchitect is not a world to encourage one to have socialist leanings, especially as the nature of the business is often aggressively pro-gentrification. But was going say at least he is shooting straight, unlike some people.

calzino, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

good fun comments Conrad!

btw a letter in current LRB replying to Owen Hatherley says: Brutalism was the reactionary tool of an architecture profession in league with the concrete and cement industries !!

the pinefox, Saturday, 3 December 2016 08:37 (seven years ago) link

That would simply never even cross my mind as a definition of the British people, which I have always seen for what it is: as a patchwork of different lives, experiences, cultures and ethnicities that are inextricably, compellingly and beautifully interwoven.

ya there is a word for this and it is multiculturalism

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Kinnock: Christianity is a load of horseshit

Also Stephen Kinnock: Hey look, it would simply never cross my mind to deny that Jesus Christ is the son of God who died on the cross to redeem the sins of all mankind so that all who believe in him should have eternal life. This misunderstanding indicates the lack of a shared language

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/09/peak-kinnock/comment-page-5/
Short but totally otm about vulgar Labour centrists and their massive charity incomes.

"When you toss in Stephen’s salary and expenses, the Stephen Kinnock household are bringing in just shy of a cool half a million pounds a year from public service and charity work."

calzino, Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Boris on Andrew Marr, what an embarrassment this bumbling mumbling fuck is the Foreign Secretary. Bit of George III manspreading at the end of the show, with an obscenely long tie draped over his crotch, calling Keir Starmer, Keir Schtarmer.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 4 December 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

Argh, see also calling KS 'a lawyer'. Boris, you twat, he's a QC and was head of the DPP and comes from a background where none of his family members are chatterati.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 4 December 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

I don't know how BJ can concentrate on his standard long winded obfuscation at every awkward question with an oversized comedy tie like that, worn in that fashion. I thought KS looked like he could have easily won the debate if it had been a bit more orderly (i.e taser BJ every time he goes on a long winded monologue ).

calzino, Sunday, 4 December 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

He gets away with murder, Boris, to think John Prescott used to get crucified for being ponderous, rambling and incoherent, but ghastly prole vs. lovable Etonian rogue, only one winner there.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 4 December 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

Made the mistake of watching the Sunday Politics after that. Andrew Neil, Helen Lewis, Tom Newton Dunn, Toby Young... why oh why is the BBC so left wing and biased? I can only assume Toby Young was joking when he said the danger of the Richmond by-election result for Labour was that the Lib Dems might begin to be seen as the official opposition... with 9 MPs.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 4 December 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

TD, what do you think is Helen Lewis's political position?
I think she thinks she is on 'the left' but to most of us she does not seem to be.
But appearing beside Toby Young would make most people seem to be on the left.

the pinefox, Sunday, 4 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Soft left. Someone who'd accept a paycheque from the Daily Mail is not exactly left-wing though.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 4 December 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

I'd hope any writers at the NS who consider themselves left wing would have massive objections to their publication blowing smoke up the arse of the Blair cadaver.

calzino, Sunday, 4 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

she blocked me on twitter for i think, disagreeing with a tweet. something of minor significance afair.

xpost

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Sunday, 4 December 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

New Wasteman amirite

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Sunday, 4 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

TD, what do you think is Helen Lewis's political position?

My point is token wet leftie and three right wing arseholes, that's the BBC idea of political balance.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 4 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

I don't think she is much of a lefty.

the pinefox, Sunday, 4 December 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

Probably not, but what passes for left in the British media.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

https://medium.com/@lauracatrionamurray/momentum-vs-inertia-e525c8f9e217#.k10k6lzdj

Momentum being strangled by Trots rn.

Very depressing.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

Imposing a dictatorship from the left is desirable.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

this is maybe getting into insider baseball stuff that should be somewhere other than the general UK politics thread, but I tend to think that the trots (or the AWL at least) are actually right on the problems with OMOV

But the idea of not having a decision-making conference and instead having “decisions” made through online votes is pseudo-democratic and manipulative. Unlike real-world general meetings and delegate conferences, it allows for no real deliberation, challenges, amendments, persuasion or democratic control; it puts power in the hands of a bureaucracy that sets the questions and of the capitalist media. It makes it impossible for members to decide what they want to propose and what they will vote on, rather than just being able to click “yes” or “no” online to choices formulated by the office – or by a convoluted system of procedures that will, at the end of the day, come down to control or domination by the office.

Such systems have been used to undermine both democracy and political radicalism in left-wing parties such as the Brazilian PT and Podemos.

https://theclarionmag.wordpress.com/2016/11/02/momentumqa/

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

there's some truth in it but it's a bad faith argument, most of yer actual Trots are against the process because they measure comrades' worth in sheer number of hours spent arguing in meetings, which is a great way to exclude swathes of people from engaging with you, and more or less the same system that makes the main political parties so unrepresentative and hopeless now

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

Imposing a dictatorship from the left is desirable.

― harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 5 December 2016 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

In particular circumstances only :-)

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

like it shdn't be beyond the minds of our best and brightest political thinkers to integrate modern media technologies and democratic debate. sitting everybody in the same room to argue it out consistently results in other forms of unsubtle manipulation. and people with shitloads of other things going on in their lives -childcare for a start - shouldn't be excluded from the decision-making process just because they can't attend enough meetings.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

i was reasonably impressed with the level of democracy in podemos when i saw my uncle, who is a member, mucking about on his account on the laptop over breakfast one morning in the summer.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

he suggested a measure which then would show as an option for people to vote on among other suggestions. and voted on a couple things both to do with the national direction and his local branch.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

are you sure he wasn't being manipulated by the capitalist media while he was doing it?

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

yes but more rt.com than the economist

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

I think Momnetum Kids is a great idea but others also want to engage and don't have as much time. Also I think that far-at-first engagement could turn into more ppl turning up and being more active over time. Mnay people will want to see the thing working and convinced it will make a difference first.

this is maybe getting into insider baseball stuff that should be somewhere other than the general UK politics thread

yeah idk, the reason I put it here is bcz Momentum's decline could hasten the end for Corbyn. The organisation is big and tied to him for the forseeable. xps

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

far-at-first engagement could turn into more ppl turning up and being more active over time. Mnay people will want to see the thing working and convinced it will make a difference first.

yeah, i've heard Party people advocate a real "show us you mean it! get out there and knock on front doors and when you've done that long enough maybe we'll take you seriously" approach to newbies and not only is that alienating and privilege-y but it means you tend to end up accepting a particular type of personality which has up sides and down sides

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

supposedly Lansman's proposal for how the conference would operate is that everything would be based on the MxV website, the conference would choose 9 from the top 18 most popular resolutions on MxV (without a chance to amend them afaict?) then an online OMOV ballot to choose 3 of the 9 resolutions to become Momentum policy. looking at the current most popular proposals on MxV, which are mostly pretty vague, I'm not really convinced that this is a viable way of turning Momentum into a truly democratic organisation.

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

no that's also fair. somewhere in the middle of the death-by-committee crew and the change.org massive there ought to be a viable way of extending democratic participation whilst remaining functional.

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

NV - the word for that kind of attitude is rockism.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah, totally, but the worst kind - in a realm where that thinking has real, shitty consequences

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

a Party run by the sort of brass-necked bastards who'll knock on your door uninvited on a Sunday morning for a chat about local elections is the last thing anybody needs

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Arron Banks has been arguing with Mary Beard on twitter over which of them knows the most about Roman history

https://twitter.com/Arron_banks/status/805837627589066752

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

LOOOOOL

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

oh wow, wish i could follow the whole conversation but i can't be bothered picking thru Twitter - there's your "experts vs interested amateurs dudes who think their opinion is valid about everything" argument right there

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

the highlight is when Banks reveals that his extensive study of Roman history = he learned about it at school, and is then unable to remember the names any of the writers he was taught about who back his view and not Beard's

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

lol!
"I studied roman history extensively - you don't have a monopoly on history !"

calzino, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

ha, I looked up his wikipedia page to remind myself exactly how he made his money, and it's already been amended:

Arron Fraser Andrew Banks (born 22 March 1966), also known as Aaron Banks is a British businessman and political donor. He is the co-founder (with Richard Tice) of the Leave.EU campaign.[2] A former Conservative Party donor, he came to prominence in October 2014 when he donated £1 million to the UK Independence Party[3] and has since donated in total £6 million to a variety of anti-European Union campaigns,[4] such as the cross-party Grassroots Out. Banks is an expert on Roman History and certainly knows more than anyone else, that's for certain.

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

This profile was hilar:

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/10/arron-banks-man-who-bought-brexit

In 2001 he married again, this time to Ekaterina Paderina, known as Katya, a Russian from Yekaterinburg whom he met while attending a Britney Spears concert at the O2 Arena in London as the guest of an insurance
firm. Katya came to Britain in the 1990s to study marketing at Portsmouth University. She overstayed her visa but married Eric Butler, a merchant seaman who, at 54, was more than twice her age. The marriage ended within months, prompting officials to investigate whether it was a sham.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

Sadly I did not meet Katya. She advertises herself on the website Model Mayhem as an aspiring actor: “I am fun and friendly with an extensive, glamorous wardrobe and a large house which could be used for location shoots. I will not do nudes.” And I had been repeatedly told how feisty she is, a description Banks cheerily confirms.

He recalls an occasion when they were guests in a corporate box at the Emirates Stadium when Arsenal played CSKA Moscow. Katya started cheering the Russians; the crowd below barracked her. She tried to climb out of the box to confront them, whereupon the stewards hauled her back and took her away for 30 minutes to cool off.

At one point the couple separated for a year. “We’re both quite eclectic, high-energy people and probably needed a break,” he says. “I was sent to the dog kennel for a period of time . . . In the end, we got bored of the divorce and legal bills and decided to give it a miss. You get so angry with the lawyer that it actually brings you together.”

This kind of thing.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

I read that "Momentum is being strangled by Trots" article that xyzzzz posted and it is very bad imo, especially this part:

Firstly, the AWL — a group with such extreme Trotskyist politics that they are almost a caricature of themselves — and their fellow travellers. Subtle support for imperialist wars, uncritical support for Israel and fanatical support for the European Union are amongst their policies.

it's probably unfair to visit the sins of the father on the children, but the author of the article is the daughter of Stop the War Coalition chair and top Stalinist Andrew Murray, so I do kind of wonder if some of the hostility to trots in general/the AWL in particular is actually an example of the left sectarianism that she complains about.

soref, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

Thanks for the comments soref and others - its interesting because she is insisting on the outcome/what are we working for.

It'll be interesting what the reaction to all of this might be in the coming days..

xyzzzz__, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

i remembering and then laughing at this michael gove tweet about the turner prize.

https://twitter.com/michaelgove/status/805901298319167488

feels like "the tragic emptiness of now" needs to be a post-brexit thread title.

Fizzles, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:48 (seven years ago) link

ban cameras on phones and bring back Christmas it's the only thing for it.

Fizzles, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:50 (seven years ago) link

there is something very empty and lacking in humanity about Gove, like he is some kind of insentient mollusc impersonating a human.

calzino, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:56 (seven years ago) link

gove obviously thinking of all of jmw turner's happy, sunny pictures there. and how he was critically praised at the time.

here's one for you mr gove:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Burning_of_the_Houses_of_Lords_and_Commons

koogs, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:58 (seven years ago) link

One for the diaries.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

I called all this Momentum shit a year ago:

A lot of Corbyn's supporter base seems to be a coalition of younger, more idealistic voters and bitter old giffers with a score to settle from 20+ years ago. There's a whole spectrum in between but these two broad blocs are already very apparent. They don't necessarily want the same things and that tension will become more visible over time. I know which lot I trust more. The younger group is only going to grow in number, while the other group is only going to shrink. They also have no particular attachment to Labour in and of itself and could easily take their votes elsewhere if an option presented itself.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:26 PM (eleven months ago)

Momentum cannot be allowed to become a coalition of the same useless old Trots applying the same tactics that have failed time and time again for decades. Particularly at this unique point in history, where new ideas, new thinking and new vision are essential. These fuckers should be purged from Momentum immediately, it's too important for that.

I also believe (quite strongly actually) that Momentum is a force for change within the Labour Party, and therefore for Labour members (new or old*), or it is nothing. If it just becomes a far left ragbag or effectively a political party in itself then it loses all focus and becomes pointless.

*But probably not New.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Watching Pannick in action is amazing. I want a brain like that

stet, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/dec/07/man-held-over-online-threats-to-article-50-campaigner-gina-miller

very bad people!

I support Gina Miller. I admire her courage in standing up for what's right against all this abuse and danger.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/dec/07/man-held-over-online-threats-to-article-50-campaigner-gina-miller

very bad people!

In another world, the pinefox is US president-elect.

Alba, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

… and ilx is Twitter.

Alba, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

"I don't understand how this big red button works"

Cosmic Slop, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

I think he'd be more perplexed at the nuclear football being the wrong shape.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

This story about Althea Efunshile being rejected as a ch4 board member by the culture secretary is absolutely incredible.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

incredible but vmic

woke cop, boo! (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

just got confused and tried to "like" NV's comment.

Fizzles, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

I cannot find out what is meant by 'vmic'.

the pinefox, Thursday, 8 December 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

"Very much in character"

:)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 8 December 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

vmic - agreed in both instances :)

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 8 December 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

"just got confused and tried to "like" NV's comment."

i've done this an accidentally flag posted people, i think.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 8 December 2016 04:15 (seven years ago) link

Garage and will self on question time tonight

koogs, Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

Farage, obv. Happily Nigel hasn't made it into my autocorrect yet.

koogs, Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

UKIP Garage is a sadly overlooked microgenre.

do you play to win or are you just a bad loser? (snoball), Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

Used that as a pub quiz team name a few years back, idiot quiz guy fucked up reading it out, so will never know what lols it would have brought

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

It was even worse than Koogs implies - it was Farage, + Mensch, + a Con MP.

I was so glad that minor Europa League highlights were on the other side.

the pinefox, Friday, 9 December 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

also, THIS WEEK finished with a car-crash live appearance from 'Peter' Doherty talking to Neil, Portillo and Liz Kendall about 'bust-ups'.

the pinefox, Friday, 9 December 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

Garage and will self on question time tonight

― koogs, Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:03 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

really enjoyed rolling this sentence around in my head while pretending to forget that will self is a person

loudmouth darraghmac ween (darraghmac), Friday, 9 December 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

An interesting perspective on why QT has gone so fash recently, from someone who's been on a couple of times:

https://mobile.twitter.com/MxJackMonroe/status/806721058539769856

Sehr Kornisch (Branwell with an N), Friday, 9 December 2016 08:28 (seven years ago) link

Makes depressing sense

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 08:30 (seven years ago) link

It's so gross - my friend's nephew is at cadet school and the faculty there tell the kids that Britain First is toxic and if they catch them so much as Liking or sharing one BF item, there will be hell to pay.

QT is made by Mentorn and should really be taken back in-house if the BBC wants their impartiality standards taken seriously.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 9 December 2016 08:43 (seven years ago) link

QT is a joke and probably always has been afaic, the kind of sports politics that belongs to a stupider era. but as long as there are people who regard it as a significant part of the political scene I think you're right suzy

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 09:12 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's enough to say it's always been a joke -- this programme goes back c.40 years to Robin Day etc etc and has often hosted interesting discussions, has introduced viewers to political ideas, has sometimes featured interesting speakers and good people.

If it's true that it's going this badly downhill (as last 2 weeks suggest) that is more bad news about present that has to be registered.

If Jack Monroe's suspicions / construals of evidence are accurate then that is seriously disturbing, scary. Someone needs to start campaigning about this now, hard as it will be.

the pinefox, Friday, 9 December 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

'more bad news about present' = OUR present

the pinefox, Friday, 9 December 2016 10:14 (seven years ago) link

This year has just been an ongoing miserable realisation that the media and political bulwarks that have been constructed to prevent even moderate post-war style social democracy are like fifty times stronger than those in place against the far right.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

holy shit

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 9 December 2016 10:26 (seven years ago) link

They're just reflecting what they think are the real concerns of proles. A la Stephen Kinnock.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 10:31 (seven years ago) link

'Populism'. That must mean it's popular.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 10:32 (seven years ago) link

the degradation of the quality of the bbc's news and current affairs editorial has been happening over many years -- the forced resignation of alastair milne (seumas's dad!) in 1986 was 30 years ago

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

degradation of quality might be long term but a fascist being in control of QT audience seems like a new development.

the pinefox, Friday, 9 December 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link

There's something oddly reassuring about the first comment there.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 11:04 (seven years ago) link

I didn't know Seumas Milne was the son of Alasdair Milne! It's like Hugh Greene and Graham Greene all over again (a bit). This exciting news caused me to look at A Milne's Wiki page:

Milne was strongly critical of later BBC Director-General John Birt whom he called "blue skies Birt". Birt's thesis on television's so-called 'Bias Against Understanding' Milne described as "balls, actually", and said "[Birt is] the most graceless man I have ever known. Ghastly man".[13]

In October 2004, stories were published implying that he had suggested that alleged dumbing down of the BBC was partly the consequence of the corporation's growing number of female executives: "Too many dumb, dumb, dumb cookery and gardening shows . . . I have nothing against women. I've worked with them all my life. It just seems to me that the television service has largely been run by women for the last four to five years and they don't seem to have done a great job of work."[14][15] Milne later clarified his position: “What I actually said was that the three people who had run the television service for the past four or five years had not, it seemed to me, done a marvellous job. I would have said the same if they had been mice or men. They happened to be women and then I was stitched up by The Times.”

Darcy Sarto (Ward Fowler), Friday, 9 December 2016 11:18 (seven years ago) link

kickstarter for the beeb to be run by mice for the next ten years

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 11:19 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlP7l8vkNOk

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 December 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

There's something oddly reassuring about the first comment there.

― Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 11:04 (seventeen minutes ago) Permalink

Agree. Spam Therapy feels like it's something that could blow up big in 2017

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 9 December 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Uber but for spam. No, hear me out... you see a comment piece, CiF or somewhere, about the refugee crisis, or a proposed burqa ban, and feed the url into an app, which then drowns the article comments thread with strangely comforting enthusiastic plugs for non-prescription medicines or obscure exercise techniques, completely swamping the head-measuring race-hate that would otherwise dominate

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 9 December 2016 11:32 (seven years ago) link

er, perhaps not cool to use the word 'drowns' while referencing the refugee crisis in passing. Pls substitute 'deluges', thx

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 9 December 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

Just imagine reading some hateful Melanie Phillips anti-Muslim screed and then scrolling down to read 'Do you have problem sustaining errection?' It would make you feel so much better.

Except given that article would probably be in the Spectator it might actually be quite well-targeted.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 11:42 (seven years ago) link

Addressed directly to Joshua Rozenberg.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

@George_Osborne
The disintegration of the Labour Party is not good for democracy. Oppositions are meant to try to win by-elections, not slip from 2nd to 4th
8:41 AM - 9 Dec 2016

A tragic blow for democracy in Sleaford & North Hykeham as the Tories hold with a whopping 0.2% swing.

nashwan, Friday, 9 December 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Osborne relishes that rare moment such a colossal failure can find something to gloat over

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

it's almost as if the Tories are deliberately trying to spin the same message over and over

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

And the BBC and the rest of the British media.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

The fact that the Lib Dems were the main beneficiaries of the Labour slump in Sleaford suggests that it's Brexit that's fucked Labour, although I'm sure Corbyn isn't helping.

This is interesting meanwhile, visualisation of the Tory seats most vulnerable to pro-Remain tactical voting. Mostly in SW London.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyqqrV7XAAAkTAl.jpg:large

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

doesn't have to be just about Remain and Labour's stance on it, could be a simple return to anti-government tactical voting "Party X Can't Win Here" has been the standard Lib Dem tagline for years and years, it's their only raisin dettra innit?

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

Except Labour were in (fairly distant) second a year ago and it's only casting themselves as the party of the 48% that's allowed the LibDems to start repairing their comprehensively trashed reputation.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

genius move, guaranteed to bring lulz by the bucketload

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

Tim Farron still not ruling out a hook-up with the Tories so a re-trashing is always on the cards. But yes, Brexit has put Labour in Zugzwang unless the May bus fails to take a corner.

haha BoJo is btw definitely plotting a pulling Churchill currently: being forced to resign because he "TOLD THE TRUTH" abt the Sauds. A Half-Churchill, anyway (Full-Churchill would mean going to the Remain Camp, which wd put the cat among the pigeons of his support base at the increasingly dotty/pernicious Telegraph).

I feel I need to add cooking someone's goose to this smorgasbord of metaphors, tho whose goose is up for grabs. Last Chance Saloon!

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

dammit now you've given me a foie gras craving

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

'passports' noticeably missing in the text of that article, because how would that even work? Obviously it doesn't stop the EU nicking the City's business. I'm curious as to whether being an EU citizen in some sense would protect your rights if they're stripped away - I suspect that would be seen as an affront to "British Justice".

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

"We will mail you your passport declaring you a citizen of the EU, but unfortunately when it crosses the UK border there is someone whose job it is to stamp 'NOWHERE' over that"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

seems like it'd be the worst of both worst which i guess means it's almost guaranteed to happen

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

sort of imagining it ending up a bit like albania and china (was it china?) back in the day, where you weren't alllowed to enter the former if you'd had your passport stamped by the latter

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

Sleaford means nothing. Turn out was about half since the General.

idk what "start repairing LIB Dem rep" means - they gained 5%

xyzzzz__, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

There certainly is no remorse, no substantial shift in position - country is divided, that's the only conclusion from Richmond or Sleaford.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Richmond's a bit different - it regularly elected a Lib Dem MP until Goldsmith came along. He was a) able to cast himself as more liberal than your average Tory and b) ran at least partly on a platform of opposition to Heathrow expansion. Both of those went down the toilet this year, so it's reversion to the mean to an extent, but let's not pretend that the biggest issue in UK politics right now didn't come into it in some form or another.

Sleaford was a Leave consistency anyway so the Lib Dems were never going to pick up massive votes, but the fact they did so at Labour's expense suggests something is happening, even if it can't and won't be applied to the rest of the country.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

In Sleaford the shifts are way too small, especially since half the constituency stayed at home.

Not sure as to long-term effects. Brexit hasn't actually happened yet, but it will do in some form so the Lib Dem position will mean little.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

what's happening = during bye-elections in Leave constituencies where Labour has little historical presence (eg Sleaford, which it hasn't won for decades, possibly ever), LDs will pick up some if not all would-be Remain votes from Lab

lab currently seems locked into the brexit equivalent of the fatal harman welfare abstention: the numbers this will piss off for good are smaller though

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

This is Lab in Sleaford:

97 - 34.3%, 01 - 32%, 05 - 26.5%, 10 - 16.9%, 15 - 17.3%, 16 - 10.3%.

From this timeline there is a slump but that's not really to do with anything in the last six months.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile i'm reading a very jon savage article abt pop mags in the 60s… this paragraph made me laugh then feel sad: "Pop was not only yoked to a generational assertion of power (“Ringo for PM”) but the global re-branding of a static, class-bound country in terms of novelty, speed and creativity. Britain became Pop Island and the bombsite-ridden capital a youth mecca.”

i feel we're currently exactly at the apogee of that cycle, possibly as a direct consequence of that generational assertion of power :( :( :( >:(

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

rainy fascist knife-crime pop island

mark s, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Read this piece a few days ago on some of these areas that voted Leave. Its quite good and tells you its going to take a generation to even begin to repair what's very broken. xps

xyzzzz__, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

21st Century Fox is buying Sky plc. We can have our own Fox News just in time for the worldwide revival of fascism! Huzzah!

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

As I was waiting for the homepage to load, all they showed was a pic of KRM and until the accompanying text appeared, I was thinking 'Dead? Pleeeesase?'

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

seems like labour is now snookered by brexit in the same way that the constitutional question has sidelined scottish labour.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2016-12-09/Best%20Prime%20Minister%204-5%20Dec-01.png

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 9 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

'lab currently seems locked into the brexit equivalent of the fatal harman welfare abstention'

quite distinctive statement from Mark S (haven't seen anyone else make this particular comparison) and perhaps quite convincing

as in, I suppose, I, personally, am not very interested in voting for someone who says 'we accept Brexit, so let's make the best of it' just as (I suppose) some leftists refused to vote for the compromisers re: that particular bill (which I don't claim to understand)

I suppose JC's big stance then was: stand up for what's right, don't abstain and don't compromise

which to some of us doesn't seem to be what Labour are doing now re Brexit

though I think I understand how to some of them, they might feel they are acting in a principled way even if the implicit outcome is bad.

the pinefox, Saturday, 10 December 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link

I was just watching this Stewart Lee on Youtube thing where he disclosed that he was featured in this teenage poetry magazine that also had a teenage Micheal Gove poem in it with some screed about how life isn't fair, and one day he will show all these posh alpha male rugby brutes that bully him - what he is really made of for once and for all etc.

calzino, Saturday, 10 December 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

Karen Bradley really seems a piece of work. I'm not architecturally competent to know whether her objections raised here are spurious or serious, but coming on the back of that odious and corrupt-looking decision not to appoint Althea Efunshile to the C4 board, also taken against serious professional advice, it looks like a great time for this sort intereference on behalf of the monocultural home counties made-up nostalgia-land we've been constructing for ourselves over the past decade or so.

Fizzles, Saturday, 10 December 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

Xxp pinefox, yeah thats otm about JC. His big thing, the thing that makes him worthwhile despite all the risks and disadvantages, is that he won't lead by focus group, won't triangulate himself to death like a miliband, he'll do what's right, sure as kilimajaro rises like olympus above the serengeti. If he's seen to be vacillating now, it throws away his main, perhaps only political asset.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 10 December 2016 09:33 (seven years ago) link

the harman compromise arose bcz the then-leadership (which was as temporary as it was ineffective) couldn't see its way out of the trap the tories had set for it (oppose the bill and this side of yr coalition deserts you, support and that side deserts you): they couldn't handwave it down the road, they were forced to choose (and in fact chose the worst option, the one you could kinda sorta spin to SPADs and certain in-bubble commentators as subtle tactics, but which instantly fell apart in the context of the wider party (and scottish labour and etc)

article 50 poses exactly an exactly equivalent dilemma -- and you can sorta kinda spin the corbyn line as a tactic that pays mind to the ultra-pissed-off tranche described (and i think inflated) in the pseudonymous medium essay xyzzzzz linked to, tho (1) by being such a non-move move it sure doesn't animate or attract that tranche in any way (2) every engaged (which is to say angry) remainer will see it as a spineless betrayal and an irrelevance

i somewhat agree with xyzzzzz that the remainers are not reliably flocking back to a redeemed LD: that any such flow (per richmond) is purely local-tactical

(the verhofstadt move, meanwhile, is a very effective tactical kite that gets all in among the brexit coalition: it doesn't actually even have to be doable -- brexit is after all solidly positioned beyond the realms of the practically doable in terms of its dreams and beliefs and urges -- bcz all it has to do is stand as a symbol of a version of the deal that can be withdrawn-as-threat, causing said deal to be being seen to fail in the eyes of a significant chunk of brexiteerdom

(in other words, if we don't get these kinds of passports, half of brexitland will be actively disgusted with the other half: and ditto if we do) (it's not an arithmetical half-and-half)

mark s, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

kind of strikes me that May's refusal to elucidate a Brexit plan is tremendously effective at trapping Labour in the short term: regardless of Sensible Moderates' insistence that Corbyn is secretly a fervent Brexiteer, I can't see a politically successful way for him to come out firing against article 50 - look at how the High Court judges were treated. But there's nothing for Labour to oppose until there's a specific plan, so you get this ludicrous stasis where no one appears to have any plan or position. May's rhetoric gives the impression she is sticking to her principles, and she's effectively denying Corbyn the chance to do the same.

Where this surely falls down for May is that her rhetoric is completely delusional and this has to become very clear very soon? Surely, surely there is no way for her to stick to her current guns and sail through her self-imposed Article 50 deadline with even a workable deal?

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

(I also have no faith that Corbyn's tactics have ever been to oppose a specific May plan, nor that if she's forced to reveal her strategy he'll actually seize the opportunity to come out all guns blazing. I really hate everyone involved in UK politics again.)

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

(I've been reading a lot about the idea of city states returning and freeing themselves from the social reactionaries of their rural surrounds and I wish this was a workable thing.)

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

best piece on a potential Labour strategy I've yet read -

http://novaramedia.com/2016/12/06/debating-immigration-a-labour-strategy-for-ukip-votes/

Where this falls down for me is that I believe a much larger proportion of the great British electorate is straight-up racist than would be the case for this to work

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

rainy fascist knife-crime zugzwang pop island

mark s, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

Also I feel in both UK and US electorates the most important question shouldn't be about winning over this or that demographic of existing voters but what to do about the much vaster numbers of non-voters

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

(Is there any good recent reading on the non-voters?)

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

i had a similar conversation the other night re: the logistic issues blamed on immigration not being caused by immigration. felt like the guy i was talking to agreed with a lot of the points i made, but you're right, an unknown but probably large part of the problem is "shy racists".

on the other hand, i find it hard to believe that the country is more racist now than it was 30 years ago, so it seems to me that racism isn't that big a voting priority for - excuse me - moderate racists if you focus your campaign in other areas. the same way that UKIP were never going to be a parliamentary force without the referendum - not enough people gave enough of a shit about the EU to vote them seats in a general election.

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

weird bad-shoop tale that acts as symbol of everything currently wrong with tepid centralism:

"the big polly toynbee guardian headshot Q: was someone standing in front of her when took it, or did they photoshop a shadow on her face?"
(via https://twitter.com/tristandross/status/806556543437176835)

"i've fucking cracked it lol. they've photoshopped polly toynbee's head..... onto her own body????"
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzF53y8XcAEI-lS.jpg:large

mark s, Saturday, 10 December 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

pollymorphous perversity

banfred bann (wins), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

"it's in my contract that i'm always seen wearing this butt-ugly red jacket whatever i actually happen to be wearing"

mark s, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

i find it hard to believe that the country is more racist now than it was 30 years ago

more terrorism 30 years ago too, and yet... (I agree basically)

nashwan, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

PT seems a centrist compared to Mr Corbyn or Paul Mason but is not really centrist compared to the UK government or incoming US government or many of the people she has campaigned against (eg as a feminist) for c.45 years. Compared to them she is a leftist.

I wouldn't really call her a leftist but I would still call her a progressive, and a social democrat which is essentially what I am also.

Just kicking words around. Don't know about the photos.

the pinefox, Saturday, 10 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

(Is there any good recent reading on the non-voters?)

Was under the impression that large numbers of this grouping turned out to, er, vote Brexit. Don't know if there are any stats on that, Lord Ashcroft probably has them.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Saturday, 10 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

i find it hard to believe that the country is more racist now than it was 30 years ago

ehhhh racism has evolved a lot and the kind of racism people can't even recognise let alone admit in themselves is a harder thing to combat in some ways

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

yeah having thought about it there's a lot of truth in this - the kind of dog whistles and coded language that have taken over mainstream racist discourse probably help to blur people's view of their own prejudices

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

it's amazing how the idea of racism, or the word racism, has been so entrenched as shameful and immoral, yet only the most absolute egregious and violent acts of racism are seen as such

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

and that's without getting into the qualifications and hierarchies inherent in so many people's perceptions of other races - if you think of some as "the good ones" that gives you free rein to treat the others like subhumans; the way it intersects with class prejudices too. bigotry and the doublethink involved in it is weirdly complex

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

it's amazing how the idea of racism, or the word racism, has been so entrenched as shameful and immoral, yet only the most absolute egregious and violent acts of racism are seen as such

― lex pretend, Saturday, December 10, 2016 8:00 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So otm. And it's getting even worse: Calling someone or something racist today, because it is, is perceived a worse offense than the act of racism itself (at least here in Holland but sure it's happening all over Western Europe). From our 'blackface' Santa to racist trolling online: people will defend someone saying or doing something racist simply by countering "but you can't call me racist! We're the Netherlands, we can't be racist therefor we aren't!"

I don't want to live on this planet any more.

Le Bateau Ivre, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

calling someone racist is often framed as an act of racism in and of itself

and from the NYT

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzL503wWIAAa0jJ.jpg

calling someone racist is now exactly the same level of hate as THREATENING TO SET SOMEONE ON FUCKING FIRE FOR BEING A MUSLIM

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

the thing is the absolute refusal to admit the prevalence of racism is as strong, maybe stronger, among "liberals" and "centrists" and "moderates" and most crucially the mainstream media

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

Same here just today, reputed Dutch papers writing a woman was convicted for "speaking up to a woman wearing a headscarf" (literal translation), when in reality said white Dutch woman tried to pull the headscarf of this woman's head violently at a bus stop.

"Both sides" bullshit a la NYT makes me feel so helpless.

Le Bateau Ivre, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

the liberal/centrist types are far more dangerous than a gaggle of thicko scruffs with Britain First banners. And they are currently like a dog with a bone with this projected "concern" agenda they are using for their own racist policies. They all have the same insipid script for equality/social justice etc while actively assisting in the destruction of the welfare state and disseminating racism. They are the fucking worst.

calzino, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

^^^^^

except "agenda" gives them too much credit for thinking it through to an end game; it's about other people's Legitimate Concerns, it's about Mail journalists are just doing their jobs, it's about well we have to hear both sides, it's even about in giving fascists the biggest platforms possible we're actually helping to expose them!!!

lex pretend, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

calzino as otm as it's possible for someone to be... apart from lex

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

v much otm. this lrb article (don't think its paywalled) about the starvation of councils makes me think fascism is inevitable.

left wing councils deprived of money by central control.
people attack councils.
left wing dies in trad heartland.
right wing is voted in or no one votes at all (not unreasonably)

i guess you rely on incompetence and general broke-ness of ukip.

i mean i know this has already happened to a degree but it just looks like this country is totally fucked.

Fizzles, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

The BBC and right wing media constantly aids and abets them by running news about councils or NHS trusts "running out of money" like as if it is mismanagement is to blame rather than cuts to funding.

calzino, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:49 (seven years ago) link

"political debate" comprises a kremlinology of manners: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/11/theresa-may-trousers-row-angry-text-exchange-nicky-morgan

upon such court gossip turn our fortunes

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 11 December 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

Ther-ouser May

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Sunday, 11 December 2016 10:35 (seven years ago) link

I could care less how much TM spends on a pair of trousers but OMG brown leather with black everything else? *writes penalty notice on behalf of Fashion Police*

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 11 December 2016 10:41 (seven years ago) link

I can't really imagine any clothes those incredibly ugly trousers would pair well with

lex pretend, Sunday, 11 December 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

i'm going to weather the torrent of hate here and posit that all types of leather trousers are unacceptable

mark s, Sunday, 11 December 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbZVlKKd7I8

mark s, Sunday, 11 December 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

AGREED

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Sunday, 11 December 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

1983: "maggie maggie maggie! out out out!"
2017: "may may may! it's turned into a paste!"

mark s, Sunday, 11 December 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

http://www.harrowell.org.uk/blog/2016/12/11/the-turn-to-neo-edwardian-politics/

this is good

mark s, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/dec/12/uk-halve-international-student-visa-tougher-rules

I have banged on about this enough for several lifetimes but the two tier system seems to inevitably point to a fair few British universities going out of business over the next couple of years and half the British students in the country having their institutions branded unfit for genuine international students - or at least, not places the 'best and brightest' would ever want to set foot.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 12 December 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

what good are universities though? how do they enrich our society, and why would we need all the revenue they bring into the country?

I mean obviously I don't believe the above, I can't even conceive of any reason other than self-defeating racism and xenophobia that would support it.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 10:43 (seven years ago) link

I can't think of anything more miserably 2016 than the government choosing to eviscerate our higher education sector in order to further mollify racists, none of whom will be remotely satisfied anyway.

Matt DC, Monday, 12 December 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link

Jesus Christ why are they so horrible??

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 12 December 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

as difficult as it may be to have some racist xenophobes understand and accept the ways in which their points of view are actually self-defeating

it seems equally difficult to have some e.g. new labour types understand and accept the ways in which they seek to further mollify racists will never remotely satisfied them

where do we start?

conrad, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:14 (seven years ago) link

a bit hesitant to go here for various reasons but the third-rail word for mollifcation is appeasement

mark s, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:15 (seven years ago) link

the problem is racists/xenophobes don't want to be challenged on their racism/xenophobia, they want it to be flattered

and politicos therefore think they can win these people's votes by flattering them rather than challenging them

I often wonder what kind of world we'd be living in if Gordon Brown had had the courage to say, "Actually, yes, Gillian Duffy is a racist, and we're all a bit racist, and we need to work to overcome our prejudices for the sake of the country"

This is a not-terrible piece of writing, I think. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/12/devolve-issue-of-immigration-communities

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

"PM: Gillian Duffy IS a racist" ('is' in red) would have been the front page of every tabloid, with a 4-page rebuttal by her in the Sun.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

when you've incrementally accommodated what are now referred to as "legitimate concerns" to the point that it can be suggested that to even question the legitimacy of these "concerns" is something offensive comparable to the offensiveness of the very thinly-veiled violence that "legitimate concerns" often imply

I dunno what else you call it

xposts

conrad, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:28 (seven years ago) link

"PM: Gillian Duffy IS a racist" ('is' in red) would have been the front page of every tabloid, with a 4-page rebuttal by her in the Sun.

I know, and Brown would've lost the 2010 election. So glad he equivocated instead and Cameron didn't get in. Oh hang on.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

I mean at some point we'll have to grasp the nettle that the only way past this is to incur the wrath of the tabloids. Cowardice in the face of racism and xenophobia will only end in self-defeat.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

I don't know how we make it work but "Oh hello racist person, you are not a racist, please vote for me" doesn't really seem to be leading us in a good direction either does it?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

Oh I'm not saying he shouldn't have, I'm just suggesting this is almost certainly the picture in his head which caused his recantation - whether growing naturally or placed there by advisors, none of us know.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

gillian duffy wouldn't have been a good hill to die on because I don't think she said anything substantial enough for someone to challenge her on it. we don't know enough about her beliefs to say anything useful about them

ogmor, Monday, 12 December 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

what good are universities though? how do they enrich our society, and why would we need all the revenue they bring into the country?

I mean obviously I don't believe the above, I can't even conceive of any reason other than self-defeating racism and xenophobia that would support it.

― Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, December 12, 2016 10:43 AM (fifty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I can't think of anything more miserably 2016 than the government choosing to eviscerate our higher education sector in order to further mollify racists, none of whom will be remotely satisfied anyway.

― Matt DC, Monday, December 12, 2016 10:46 AM (forty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Amputating large parts of the university sector is a policy goal in itself, quite apart from any consideration of immigration numbers. The recent HE bill contains provisions for what is euphemistically termed 'market exit'.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:37 (seven years ago) link

But why? Why exit a market we were actually quite successful at?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:50 (seven years ago) link

That's fair, Ogmor. But saying that foreigners are to blame for a problem they aren't to blame for is a fallacy worth interrogating, I think, if we're to get out of this blind alley.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

Like, the only way this country becomes less of a shithole probably involves hurting a few racists' feelings?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

I think there are arguments that there are too many HE places available and that the quality of degrees is too variable, but I don't suppose these are the arguments that really interest this government, any more than they interested Blair's

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Monday, 12 December 2016 11:55 (seven years ago) link

Or, you know, the people clamouring that "immigrants" don't get study visas.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

literally never heard anybody fretting over foreign students other than May and her pals

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Monday, 12 December 2016 12:16 (seven years ago) link

labour have been too quiet on the actual causes behind stretched local services, inadequate housing etc. so it's difficult for them to point to them when immigration is mentioned

I'm wary of the impulse to take race out of the immigration debate to make things neater, but I do think you can dismiss all the main arguments about the damaging effects of immigration purely with numbers and history and it's maddening that no one ever seems to even try

ogmor, Monday, 12 December 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

That's less taking it out and more leaving it the only thing in, though.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 December 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

there does seem to have been a post-brexit referendum shift where Labour MPs like Stephen Kinnock and Jonathan Reynolds are now openly saying that even if you can disprove that immigration has a negative impact on wages and public services etc with stats, that the party should still commit to reduce immigration because of "cultural cohesion".

soref, Monday, 12 December 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

when people suggest to these anti-free movement Labour MPs that they make a positive case for immigration with statistics it seems like they normally don't dispute the evidence but insist that when they speak to people on the doorstep they've learned that quoting statistics at people makes no difference on this issue, which just seems like this dead-end political nihilism

soref, Monday, 12 December 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

government flagship free childcare policy mandates 30 free hours but funding amounts to less than minimum wage meaning that child care facilities are obliged to make a loss and the government is essentially paying less than minimum wage? apparently only two labour mps were in the commons when an amendment was laid in october neither chose to trigger a debate?

conrad, Monday, 12 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

You need them but stats alone won't convince those who've 'had enough of experts'.

nashwan, Monday, 12 December 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link

We need more apprenticeships! No! Not like that! Ones that pay better than regular jobs! Mostly I just want trades to be considered to be as important as fancy degrees!

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

(Which the right can never deliver)

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

re: Duffy - of course Brown could've knocked up a speech a day or so later after incident, made the argument as to why Duffy was wrong (iirc she was a public sector worker with a pension and owned her own home), something nuanced delivered powerfully but it couldn't because of the calibre of politician on *all sides* is so poor (Obama is the technocrat that would've pulled this off). That and the disconnect between Labour and the people you'd think they'd be closer to was something so broken - that incident provided an ample demonstration of what was evident (and from what soref is saying Brexit has accelerated the divide whereby you have idiots like Kinnock trotting along with a bare cupboard of ideas on how to connect and gain trust back). They pander to racists on one side, haven't done a thing anyway to alleviate the suffering in many deprived areas, and are then wined and dined by whoever at the other end.

A lot of things can be said about people that voted Brexit - they were racists, ill-informed. Many simply rolled the dice and didn't care for *expert* advice, and actually there is something to be said for that.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 12 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

What?

the pinefox, Monday, 12 December 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

There are a lot of 'Oh, fuck it' voters and I've met people in couples where one spouse voted in and the other voted out so they'd cancel out.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 12 December 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

the hokey-cokey approach to a successful relationship

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

i imagine the answer to that will be a fairly straightforward "immigrants and POC". maybe some left over for the LGBT community too.

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

Many simply rolled the dice and didn't care for *expert* advice, and actually there is something to be said for that.

what is to be said for this?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

A lot of experts are definitely not on the side of the oppressed or the poor

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

And the people behind Brexit are?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

recognition that a lot of expert bodies and institutions of authority have been - still are! - built on systemic prejudices, I imagine

xp

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

And the people behind Brexit are?

― Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:12 PM (four seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

brexit (and abandonment of expertise entirely) might have been the wrong answer, but that doesn't mean the question or the suspicion was unfounded

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

yep

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

so the people who voted brexit had legitimate concerns, we are saying?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

not to get all adam curtis but feels like the determined erosion of strands of professionalism through the eighties turned on "experts" genrally and then politicians themselves they thought they could control it but they couldn't

conrad, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

many brexit voters were unscrupulous employers or racists. many others had legitimate concerns about being exploited and deprived of infrastructure, which they aimed at the EU. these concerns are yet to be addressed

Dave Plaintive rapper with classical training (imago), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

less to do with expertise per se -- and the widespread fake "expertise" that xyzzz was snarking at -- but the uk's general collapse into a low-trust society, really at all levels

expertise only has traction if people who don't know about a thing works continue to trust that people who say they do in fact do (by definition they're not in a position to check)

have to say my levels of belief in people knowing what they're doing has taken quite a knock this year

xp what conrad said, but there's more to the collapse than that i think

mark s, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

A lot of the elements that aren't to do with outright or insidious racism have their roots in the democratic deficit in huge parts of the country and a general feeling of powerlessness. In that context, offer people a big red button that says CHANGE SOMETHING and they're going to press it, especially if people are telling them it's basically going to be fine.

Ironically as well as being an act of rebellion against the state it is also a huge gesture of faith in the ability of the state to be able to bail them out if things do get much worse (and things can always get worse). But what happens if this time the government can't actually do that?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

i don't think anybody in this thread is saying "fuck experts, better to just go with your gut, or chance" stevie. but a healthy suspicion of authority figures is pretty much inevitable to the extent that your socioeconomic background puts you at their mercy, and the extent to which they fail to communicate with you, either thru ignorance or deliberate disregard. if you grow up learning that teachers, social workers, the police, politicians, do not appear to have your best interests at heart, you'd be unusually naive to continue to blithely believe everything they say. tv commentators, economists, scientists - they just represent a more ethereal form of the authority figures people already know and hate.

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

^^^^^

also context of financial crisis in which all economic experts were proven pretty useless

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

academia, the media, politics etc etc being historically skewed against people who aren't straight white men from middle or upper class backgrounds doesn't need explaining at this point, right?

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

if you grow up learning that teachers, social workers, the police, politicians, do not appear to have your best interests at heart, you'd be unusually naive to continue to blithely believe everything they say. tv commentators, economists, scientists - they just represent a more ethereal form of the authority figures people already know and hate.

right right yes i know this but they voted for the political movement fronted by boris johnson and michael gove

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

against a campaign backed by David Cameron and most of the former Blair government - there was no obvious "these are the good guys" as far as the public faces of the campaigns went

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

they voted for the political movement fronted by boris johnson and michael gove

There was no 'political movement', they voted to leave the EU, most of them couldn't give a fuck who was advocating it.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

if nothing else i'm sure the only people who voted for brexit because of michael gove were his immediate family

lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

i would think intimacy with Gove would make you less likely to vote for him

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

that is fair enough (and lol yes lex, no doubt)

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

noodle pls don't use "give" and "intimacy" in same sentence so close to teatime

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

gove

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

i'd just finished my teatime ramen as it happens

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

give gove intimacy

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

i'd hit it

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

With a shovel.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

there it is

Our Sweet Fredrest (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

ramen goes in... ramen comes out...

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

In any case, not all 'experts' are viewed in the same way:

https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/ipsos-mori-veracity-index-2016-charts.pdf

Clearly doctors, teachers and scientists are overwhelmingly trusted by the public. Politicians, journalists, bankers and business leader are right down the bottom, as are union leaders. Strikes me that the difference is between professions that people view as essentially self-interested and those that they don't.

Economists are somewhere in the middle because a) economist disagree with each other all the time anyway and b) economics is difficult for people to understand and often counter-intuitive in any case, which is why Cameron and Osborne were able to get away with austerity for so long.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

when did we get rid of all the engineers

conrad, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Thatcher.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/EricPickles/status/808663244206436352

Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

Literally the worst tweet ever made by anyone for so many reasons.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

aw

soref, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:26 (seven years ago) link

love the fact that he is wearing a badge that says "Rt Hon Sir Eric Pickles, Member of Parliament", and she is wearing a badge that says "Ms Harriette Cheese, Cub Scout" that is a good tweet imo

soref, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:31 (seven years ago) link

George Osborne has told MPs that they share some responsibility for the terrible events happening in Syria.
The ex-chancellor said the unfolding tragedy in Aleppo had not "come out of a vacuum" but was due to "a vacuum of Western and British leadership".
Parliament had helped enable a "terrorist state" to emerge by voting against military intervention against the Assad regime in 2013, he said.

Utter cretin.

nashwan, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

xp (I'm pretty sure that there's an 'e' on the end of Harriette on her name badge?)

soref, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

wasn't sure whether to post this here or on the "things that have to be Tim & Eric skits" thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY-FhQFnl1w

It is a song familiar to anyone who has wandered into a pub at this time of year. Now, however, one of the most famous Christmas tunes has been worked by a group of Labour MPs as part of a campaign on workers’ rights.

Siobhain McDonagh has led a group of MPs in a new version of Do They Know It’s Christmas?, the band aid classic first recorded by Band Aid.

The Mitcham and Morden MP brought together a group including Dan Jarvis, Mary Creagh and shadow education secretary Angela Rayner to sing the seasonal classic in order to raise awareness of the way some companies have used the introduction of the national living wage to cut overall pay, as well as pensions and other benefits.

soref, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

https://opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/tim-holmes/is-question-time-s-audience-producer-really-fascist

Interesting, balanced piece on whether the QT producer is a fascist.

I don't buy the line at the end of the piece describing QT as in any way useful - the awful format is probably the thing that makes it susceptible to abuse in this way.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Is the QT format effectively 'patented' to BBC? Have there never been attempts by ITV or Channel 4 to replicate it?

nashwan, Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/15/labour-plans-jeremy-corbyn-relaunch-as-a-leftwing-populist

"There’s a great deal of analytical work going on behind the scenes.”

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

Wasn't this his deal from the get-go, and they're just hopeful that the zeitgeist has come closer to embracing it?

Daniel_Rf, Friday, 16 December 2016 10:30 (seven years ago) link

yvette cooper AND len mccluskey with the "progressive case to end freedom of movement" shit today! aren't we lucky.

lex pretend, Friday, 16 December 2016 10:52 (seven years ago) link

brb just going to relaunch myself as a thirtysomething guy disappointed by life who makes occasional snarky comments on message boards

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 16 December 2016 11:48 (seven years ago) link

time 2 make the progressive argument for a rigid caste system

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 16 December 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

burn philip davies mp

lex pretend, Friday, 16 December 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

majority of 500 in 2005, majority of 10,000 in 2010 after a decade of absolutely cuntery in this vein

lex pretend, Friday, 16 December 2016 12:06 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that was a good article on QT !

the pinefox, Friday, 16 December 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38355373

Mr Javid's proposals would mean every new recruit in the public sector, including councillors, school governors and civil servants would be expected to commit to the oath, which may have to be read out loud before starting the role.

This could extend to those working in the NHS and the BBC.

0_o

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 18 December 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Dame Louise said some sections of society did not accept British values such as tolerance.

could really do with some quotation marks around "British values" and/or "tolerance" here

soref, Sunday, 18 December 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

missing "fair play", we love that

Transform All Suffering Into Poo (Colonel Poo), Sunday, 18 December 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

Friend of mine pointed out that what this does is take basic moral principles that almost everyone has in common (in theory at least if not in fact, including here) and label them 'British'

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 18 December 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

they've been doing it for the past few years

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97976/prevent-strategy-review.pdf

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/11/prevent-strategy-uk-counter-radicalisation-widened-despite-criticism-concerns

the "British values" tag has got nothing to do with preventing radicalization and functions as a racist dog whistle basically

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

no specific mention of it in that bbc article, but gay rights seems to get claimed as a "British value" in a lot of this stuff, which seems a stretch. (I mean, it's a wonderful thing that Britain in 2016 is better on this issue than most of the rest of the world but the idea that support for gay rights is some inherent part of "British values" requires a short memory at the very least)

soref, Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

If you called it 'liberal values' test, the right would freak out.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

yeah, they can't use "human rights" either for same reason. "British values" is a really sick attempt at eliding hundreds of years of British/English state abuses of human rights tho

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

"British values" involve respect for the rule of law btw so prior to 1967 they included the criminalization of homosexuality

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

i have been thoroughly trained on how to spot junior terrorists and how to dob them in to MI5 so you can all sleep soundly

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

xp 1980 if you happened to live in Scotland, 1982 in Northern Ireland

soref, Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

But if we can make these people pledge that women deserve equal pay and treatment, religion has no place in legislation, race and sexual orientation are no indicators of someone's worth etc I'd quite like to make people sign it. As it is, it's just another attempt to solidify 'Britishness' as white male conservatism.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Sunday, 18 December 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

had "xmas" with my mum and stepdad this weekend as we're with my in-laws for the day itself this year. all was fine till i got cornered and received the annual political lecture this morning (just glad my partner managed to evade it tbh) which was like a greatest hits of daily mail covers from a man who believes brexit and trump and this 'populist' movement are putting power back into the hands of the people. tried not to engage because every time i have the last 26 years has been a mistake but snapped slightly when he said he was doing it for our kid, and it was a waste of time. we can talk about the damage of our "liberal bubble" all you like, but i don't see how you penetrate the world of people so ensnared by obvious fictions they're too invested in. i'm feeling deflated and dismayed right now, it feels a lot like boxing day usually does.

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

feeling this post

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the ghost of Xmas near-future - if you have Brexit relatives it will fucking suck this year

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Monday, 19 December 2016 07:30 (seven years ago) link

yeah at this point i've had enough of even trying to deal with social reactionaries. happily cutting them out of my lives.

lex pretend, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

Wasn't this his deal from the get-go, and they're just hopeful that the zeitgeist has come closer to embracing it?

Barnstorming populism is probably the least bad option available to Corbyn at this stage but I'm just not sure he'll be able to personally pull it off. He's just really bad on TV for one thing.

Faintly astonished that anyone could look at the way Corbyn approached his first year in charge and conclude that he was basically a populist all along though.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Who is not bad on TV?

nashwan, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

At some point in history Vote Labour posters changed from having this very overt 'Labour will help YOU!' aimed at specific groups to a much vaguer please everyone benefit-of-the-country message. I think they could do worse than try the former approach, especially in the age of non-directional Keep Calm nostalgia.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

"very overt 'Labour will help YOU!' aimed at specific groups" is kind of what Stephen Kinnock was suggesting the other week (and Blue Labour types generally have been suggesting for a while), but only with the specific group in this case being "white working class ppl"

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

I kinda meant in ways other than "we'll be more racist if that's what you really want". Basically it'll be interesting to see what actual policies they hitch this new populist bandwagon to.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

I guess that the 'vague please everyone benefit-of-the-country' was an attempt to counter the fact that pre-Blair, loony-left council era Labour were seen as being too in thrall to "interest groups" (as in ethnic minorities, feminists, gay lib ppl, guardianista do-gooders with supposedly esoteric concerns), and that trade unionism had declined to the point that it was seen as another interest group rather than representing a broad enough swathe of the electorate to enable Labour to win elections by appealing to it? like at one point a 'Labour will help YOU!' message aimed at unionised industrial workers covered enough people that it could simultaneously a "benefit-of-the-country" message rather than an appeal to an "interest group"?

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

thinking about it, isn't "very overt 'Labour will help YOU!' aimed at specific groups" specifically what David Axelrod criticised Ed Miliband era Labour for when he was brought on board to help with the election campaign? (I think he characterised it as "vote Labour and get a free microwave" or something) like, Labour had this checklist of particular interest groups to appeal to with transnational promises of what they would do for them, whereas the Conservatives had this narrative about how they were taking tough decisions in the national interest, and the latter proved more compelling to a lot of people, even some of the people who were getting screwed over as a result of those "tough decisions"

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

once they reached "Labour basically agrees with the Tories about how the economy should be run and for whose benefit" there probably weren't a lot of specific messages left in the tank that anybody was excited for

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

RW media going proper gonzo at the strikes, isn't it? Though maybe the "RW" is redundant.

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

I think that there is merit to the Blue Labour argument that says Labour has a serious problem wrt white, employed working or lower middle class voters whose position is "Labour only cares about immigrants, minorities, benefit scroungers, snobby guardianista liberals, militant trade unionists etc, it doesn't care about ppl like me" as that group is big enough that Labour needs its support to win elections. but obviously the answer isn't for Labour to go "ok then, screw anyone who isn't part of this white, employed working or lower middle class group", which seems to be the only answer Blue Lab has to the problem.

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

sort of agree that Corbyn is absolutely not the person to win over those voters, even if all the alternatives in the last two leadership elections were far worse

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

The idea of 'the people we need to appeal to' seems to have changed since c.1995 and Blair.

Then, it was, say: 'afflent, aspirational, optimistic people who need to be convinced that Labour won't take their money away and will make society better' (to some extent, it did).

Now, it seems to be: 'poorer, angry, distrustful people who have been convinced that leaving the EU is the most important issue'.

Both groups must have coexisted extensively, and still do, but it does seem as though the 'political narrative' has gone from the need to placate the one, to the need to placate the other.

Something about the extent of this shift feels a bit phoney to me. I feel sure that there are still tons of the first group of people.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 December 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

It is really curious to realize how far the idea of 'immigration' just wasn't an electoral issue immediately prior to Blair's first victory, compared to what it is now.

That is one of the biggest changes in the political landscape in 20 years.

I'm not sure how far this is down to actual increased immigration (cf Blair supposedly presiding over lots of East Europeans coming to UK), how far just to media discourse, scapegoating, disproportionate focus on the issue, etc.

Back then (c.20 years ago) there was talk of 'crime', 'the NHS', 'education' ... those were the main issues. There were Eurosceptics but there was no serious talk of the UK leaving European union. There was the possibility of Scottish devolution, maybe, but only if enough Scots would vote for it. There was Northern Ireland to focus the mind a little.

'Immigration' in its current discursive form wasn't really a factor.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Then, it was, say: 'afflent, aspirational, optimistic people who need to be convinced that Labour won't take their money away and will make society better' (to some extent, it did).

Now, it seems to be: 'poorer, angry, distrustful people who have been convinced that leaving the EU is the most important issue'.

in the current moment it seems to be 'poorer, angry, distrustful people who need to be convinced that Labour won't take their money away and give it to immigrants, benefit scroungers etc' (i.e. even poorer ppl for the most part). The idea that immigrants and/or BAME ppl get preferential treatment over working class white ppl is so widespread, wish this could be acknowledged when they're having these arguments over whether saying that racism was a factor in the brexit vote makes you a liberal elitist who has contempt for ordinary ppl or whatever.

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

like, it seems to me that there are a huge number of ppl who are not hate filled bnp thug types and don't think of themselves as racist, but absolutely buy into this "non-white ppl are privileged over white ppl" idea. Kinnock brought this up in his terrible identity politics speech, with the "may ppl feel that" caveat, but if a politician brings this up without explicitly saying it's not true then they're basically endorsing the idea, surely?

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

"The huge mistake we’ve made, we have played the game of identity politics and identified groups, whether it is by ethnicity or sexuality or whatever you might want to call it, rather than say, ‘we stand up for everyone in this country and that includes you, the white working class’....It doesn’t matter what the color of your skin is or what your background is. What matters is that you’re poor and you’re disadvantaged and we’ve got to be there to help and engage with every single one of you - not just those who seem to have been taken priority over others.

he really should never be allowed to forget this, despite his efforts to weasel out of it and say that he was misunderstood

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

pinefox, the shift came in 2004 when Poland joined the EU then other eastern countries joined. French, German, Italian people didn't want to live in the UK in sufficient numbers to change the cultural make-up of the country. Eastern Europeans did.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

RW media going proper gonzo at the strikes, isn't it? Though maybe the "RW" is redundant.

― There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:36 (two hours ago) Permalink

Funny you should say that but I almost posted earlier on about the BBC's ongoing campaign to destroy what's left of the unions in this country. People Cunts are seriously talking about a 'conspiracy to bring down the government', if only.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

my stepdad was on this tip yday, along with raving about populism and trump's secretary of state appointment and admitting "I'm to the right of Genghis Khan"

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

last week 5 Live had a panel discussion/phone-in about "should people be allowed to strike"

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

String 'em up. The BBC, Sky etc are going hammer and tongs on whether public service workers should people be allowed to strike.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Like a fucking postie going on strike is going to kill someone.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

But but but Christmas cards might turn up late ;_;

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

many xposts I thought this report from September highlighted the issue as best as any could. Particularly quotes like "The thing is," he says, nodding up the street towards the African men who are still fiddling with their phones, "in their houses they get given microwaves and ovens and sofas and everything. I mean I had to take a loan to get that stuff." He shakes his head. "They get supermarket vouchers too - we don't get that. But lots more people round here have to go to food banks now."

It encapsulates everything people like Kinnock have alluded to (without providing adequate solutions to). Envy from 'born-heres' of people who seem to have been given things instead of working for them, regardless of whether they're even able to work for them, getting them sooner despite 'deserving' them less.

nashwan, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

Jed: yes, that was a significant development with continuing consequences - perhaps especially for attitudes to the EU - but I'm not sure that it's _the_ shift. That shift I was getting at seems longer and deeper.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

The kind of sub-humans that would begrudge someone having food and the means to cook it are expressing valid opinions according to the beeb on trash like brexit st.

calzino, Monday, 19 December 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

Weetabix workers have also voted to strike in the new year.

The Breakfast of Discontent.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

The kind of sub-humans that would begrudge someone having food and the means to cook it are expressing valid opinions according to the beeb on trash like brexit st.

How do you convince them they're wrong? This task is seemingly beyond anyone.

nashwan, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Let's not get carried away, I'm sure there's not that many people who would 'begrudge someone having food and the means to cook it'.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

xp idk, but the Kinnock idea that can you recognise the 'legitimacy' of their opinion and then design a system suitably onerous enough that ppl will accept that it's "fair", rather than just increasing the resentment is a dead end

soref, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

Strikes me that this lurch to the far right is at least partly propelled by a nostalgia for social democracy, coupled with a fatalism about it ever coming back. When I say 'social democracy' I don't believe that many of these people would even relate to the term, and a lot of them might be explicitly hostile to socialism, and most of the language that Corbyn uses. But the poor availability of both social housing and the kind of manual work that a less laissez-faire state might have been able to provide has almost certainly fuelled this.

The toxic picture of everyone *except* Wayne the landscape gardener and people who look and sound like him living a life of luxury off the state is one that Cameron and Osbourne explicitly encouraged in order to secure public support for austerity. Forces they were unable to control and that ended up destroying their careers. A significant number of the Labour MPs who complain that the leadership doesn't understand working class communities also carry on supporting austerity and don't seem to see the contradiction at all.

This should present an opportunity for left-wing populism that will only work if it's coupled with policies that are so attractive that they trump immigration concerns - this is where Kinnock and friends have nothing at all. But the electorate also has to actually believe that you are capable of delivering it, and this is where it falls down for Corbyn.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

How you sell this vision to the kind of chattering classes idiots who think that things were basically peachy from 1997 up until the Iraq War, and whose votes you also need, is another problem entirely.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Some people, like me, think things were never uniformly 'peachy' but that some things were better, in some ways, at that time, and the direction of travel was better, in some ways, than now.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

You're quite a long way from the sort of people I'm talking about, I mean the Centre Will Rise Again crew, who think that Labour's travails prove that 97-03 (or even 97-07) was the best of all possible worlds. The direction of intended travel might have been better under Blair, but they were also creating the conditions that led directly to this state of affairs - and you can't separate one from the other.

Matt DC, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

It's almost like they're not living in the real world or in touch with ordinary people. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

Yes, it's a good argument that Blair must have created some of the conditions for what is happening now - and thus, I suppose, undermined he legacy had wanted to leave.[*] But exactly how that works, how much is down to Blair and how much other things, would be very complicated to try seriously to work out.

For instance, if 'austerity' is partly blamed for Brexit, Blair cannot really be said to have presided over it. Maybe the claim is that his non-regulation of the City caused it?

[* Blair legacy a problematic idea in the first place, I realize]

I do have sympathy with the view that eg: 1997-2003 was the best UK political period since, say, 1979, as it is hard to point to a better one. The Tom Crewe LRB article on austerity and local government is a good reminder of how much damage Con governments have done since 2010, and how that issue has been occluded by the new problem of Brexit. I suppose by implication that again reminds me that whatever the problems, many things were better before Cameron took office.

The more I think about this, the more I don't blame Tony Blair, and do think he oversaw a lot of good things, as well as bad things. Getting into thinking this on a messageboard is probably opening Pandora's box or reaping the whirlwind.

But, though I may have some esteem or nostalgia for the period of c.17-18 years ago, I don't think I am terribly sympathetic to the current 'centrists' whoever they are exactly.

the pinefox, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Let's not get carried away, I'm sure there's not that many people who would 'begrudge someone having food and the means to cook it'.

You would think there are not many people with such opinions, but the BBC didn't have any trouble locating them for that wretched Brexit St program where people were complaining in the same fashion as the quote in Nashwan's post about asylum seekers having basic household amenities and food vouchers.

calzino, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

Is Liz Truss the the thickest person who's ever held a high ranking post? Got to be up there.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 02:47 (seven years ago) link

Chris Grayling seems like a remarkably unintelligent man, it's not been a good few years for Lord Chancellors. (Gove's tenure as Lord Chancellor seems to have gained fairly positive reviews from legal types? afaict he spent most of his time unpicking the more egregiously stupid reforms put in place by Grayling)

soref, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 03:13 (seven years ago) link

ian duncan smith gotta be up near the top of the dum-dum politicians league table too

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 11:34 (seven years ago) link

Priti Patel ftw

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

a friend of mine was subjected to a visit from priti patel at her workplace just after patel became secretary of state for international development. during a discussion on the effect of brexit on science funding, my friend realised that patel didn't seem to know that jo johnson was the minister of state for universities and science. if you can't keep your own fucking colleagues straight in your head i dunno that there'd be any extra room for all the stuff your job requires you to know and learn either...

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

I am surprised no one properly goes after Farage when he's barrelling in trying to score points off an attack before any information is confirmed. this goes with the time he got stuck in traffic and blamed it on immigrants. he's given you proof he doesn't know what he's talking about, why wouldn't you hammer him with these examples every time he opens his mouth?

ogmor, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

because no-one who has a positive view of him and his politics gives a fuck about whether he's 'correct' or not

as entertaining as that shellacking that farage got from james o'brien on lbc a couple of years back was, it had no impact at all on his standing with his supporters

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

I think ppl *do* hit with this kind of stuff, but he's able to transmute it into "the political elite sneering at me, just like they sneer at YOU, ordinary ppl of Great Britain", and that plays well with enough voters that he's able to thrive

soref, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

the man managed to persuade the uk to leave the eu armed only with fag, a pint and a transparent bag full of shit labelled as 'facts' so i think asking him to be held to account now is a little optimistic

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:25 (seven years ago) link

5live broadcast Farage's response earlier, of course they maintained the famous bbc impartiality by not deriding any right wing demagogues.

calzino, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

just keep it simple, pose the question - can you trust someone who offers firm conclusions based on no evidence

the trick ofc is not that farage is credible really so much as he is persistent and sort of engaging. any opposition has to be similarly relentless. suspect constant media noise is a stronger influence on voters than their own material circumstances

ogmor, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

can you trust someone who offers firm conclusions based on no evidence

do the conclusions fit your prejudices? then yes, you can.

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

who are you speaking for

ogmor, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

my ukip-supporting straw man. his name is steve

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

I think socratic bullying can still be effective with some of people who listen to farage, especially the brexit voters who are more sceptical of him

he's useful as an embodiment of bad thinking, you don't need to put any emotional or moral weight into it, you can just show this ridiculous confirmation bias for what it is, and make people more aware of how it distorts things

ogmor, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

can you trust someone who offers firm conclusions based on no evidence

You can do better than that, you can make him President of the United States and the most powerful individual in the world.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

the trick ofc is not that farage is credible really so much as he is persistent and sort of engaging. any opposition has to be similarly relentless. suspect constant media noise is a stronger influence on voters than their own material circumstances

This is sort of what I was getting at with the left-wing populism thing upthread - when Nashwan asked 'who is not bad on TV?', the answer is 'Farage'. (Well, he is terrible on TV in all the obvious ways but he's also very good at playing the medium to his advantage). Labour needs to be prepared and able to beat these people at their own game - McDonnell and Abbott are pretty good at this, but Corbyn seems to disappear from mass media for weeks on end at times.

Gove's tenure as Lord Chancellor seems to have gained fairly positive reviews from legal types? afaict he spent most of his time unpicking the more egregiously stupid reforms put in place by Grayling

Call me old-fashioned but I think at least some legal background should be a prerequisite for that job, but Gove wasn't bad in that job. Certainly in comparison to education where he was one of the worst ministers I can remember in to be put in charge of a crucial department. But as Lord Chancellor he was a bulwark against the Home Office being able to do exactly what it wanted so it's no surprise that May put someone fairly weak in the role in his place. But we're back to Machiavelli vs Baldrick again here.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

I guess on one hand I have always been more at ease with the idea that lots of politics is, in some sense at least, irrational, but on the other the idea that we've suddenly moved from a rational to post-rational world, and/or that rational arguments now have no chance of swaying anyone is not v compelling to me

ogmor, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38383216

She added: "It's important that we understand the wider meaning of the referendum result and respond accordingly. It wasn't just a vote to leave the EU, but to change the way the country works and the people for whom it works forever."

glumdalclitch, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

i hear dogs barking off in the distance

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

A Country That Everyone Works For

nashwan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

how can you make a referendum where half the people vote one thing and the other half another thing to a vote "to change the way the country works forever"? that does not sound as if that woman cares about democracy.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

People! Vote Yes! (We'll fill in the question later)

Mark G, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

look it's the distortion, stupid! she doesn't want to do it but she has no choice

conrad, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

no, the british people had no choice. they never voted may. she should hold new elections asap.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

what don't you understand about she has no choice

conrad, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

of course she has a choice. she can resign. she does not have to do what she does.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

finally some fresh insight

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

no, the british people had no choice. they never voted may. she should hold new elections asap.

― it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:55 AM (thirty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

a) britain is a parliamentary democracy, we don't vote for our pm

b) may would win a snap election, possibly (probably tbh) increasing tory representation in parliament

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

how can you make a referendum where half the people vote one thing and the other half another thing to a vote "to change the way the country works forever"? that does not sound as if that woman cares about democracy.

Also worth remembering that she was in favour of staying in the EU. Supposedly.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

But would people still vote for brexit today? If there would be an election the parties could position themselves if they want to go on with brexit or if they are against or if they want to have a new referendum. And if the tories would win, so what? That would give the government a stronger legitimation, something which can't be so bad, no? From outside the UK really looks like a big mess right now, i know the eu does not look healthy at the moment but do british people really think isolationism is a path leading to a bright feature? I understand that you are allergic to advice from outside but the thing is i really do not get how such a civilised country which i love btw can trap itself into such a catch-22.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

If there would be an election the parties could position themselves if they want to go on with brexit or if they are against or if they want to have a new referendum.

The Lib Dems might but nobody else would.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

So, forget that idea.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

Election can't be called without either a vote in Parliament with 2/3 support or the majority party declaring a vote of no confidence in itself. It says here.

The Tories should've been forced to have a proper leadership election though. If no-one else stands against May they can vote SOMEONE ELSE until there is someone else.

nashwan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

You have a funny system there. For a simple mundane election you need a 2/3 support in parliament but for leaving the eu you just need 50.0001% of votes. Am i the only one who finds that a little disproportionate?

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

Blame David Cameron for both of those.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

david cameron didn't want to do them but he had to

conrad, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

tbh im in favor of the fixed-term parliaments act

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

I'm probably not because it only encourages more PMs who don't even have to contest for it within their own party. But May making it to 2020 unchallenged would be something.

nashwan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

I like the spectre of a tactical snap election. Dramatic.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 08:35 (seven years ago) link

Alex everyone here thinks this stuff is stupid but I can think of a couple of countries in Europe who would vote to leave the EU if given the chance.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 11:02 (seven years ago) link

rumours that Jamie Reed will resign this afternoon?

https://twitter.com/BBC_Cumbria/status/811559918914457600

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

Becuase he actually put 'Red Leader, Rebel Alliance' in his Twitter bio.

nashwan, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

confirmed apparently. good riddance: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/21/corbyn-critic-jamie-reed-quits-labour-mp-byelection-copeland?CMP=share_btn_tw

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

if they could all resign themselves away this would make Momentum's job a lot easier

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Jamie Reed, the MP for Copeland in west Cumbria since 2005, told the Guardian he was resigning because he believed he could achieve more for his community in his new job, working for the nuclear processing site Sellafield

nice

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully at the reactor core.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

tbf he probably would be achieving just as much for his community doing anything other than being a PLP drone.

calzino, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully someone will be selected who isn't the type to quit for a corporate job.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

was looking to see if Copeland CLP endorsed Corbyn or Smith in the leadership election, but they didn't declare either way.

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

This is set up for Ed Balls to return, surely?

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

three months ago: https://twitter.com/jreedmp/status/779632809854038016

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

Oh god I forgot the Balls conspiracy

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

Balls will be on the lookout for a safe seat with strong connections to the ballroom dancing industry.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

If Labour lose this by-election there's going to be a fucking meltdown.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

So there's going to be a fucking meltdown then.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

in retrospect, Labour agreeing not to stand in Richmond might have worked out well for them in short term at least, if it had meant that the Lib Dems would step aside for this by-election?

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

these are results from the last election: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copeland_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s

a situation where a significant number of people who voted Labour in 2015 but who also voted Remain in the referendum switch to the Lib Dems and allow the tories to take the seat seems feasible? I guess a lot depends on how well UKIP do, and if they take more votes from Lab or the Conservatives?

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Copeland vote in the EU ref:

Remain 14,419
Leave: 23,528

I wonder what % of ppl who voted Labour in 2015 also voted Remain in 2016?

soref, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

I wonder what % of ppl who voted Labour in 2015 also voted Remain in 2016?

65% apparently: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/how-britain-voted/

a situation where a significant number of people who voted Labour in 2015 but who also voted Remain in the referendum switch to the Lib Dems and allow the tories to take the seat seems feasible? I guess a lot depends on how well UKIP do, and if they take more votes from Lab or the Conservatives?

I don't think UKIP will be taking votes from anyone, I think they'll be losing them to the Tories.

65% apparently

sorry, I meant specifically in Copeland. presumably lower than 65%, but still split enough to cause Labour problems if brexit is the defining issue of the by-election

soref, Friday, 23 December 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

I guess that in both the Witney and Richmond by-elections there was also a swing from the Conservatives to the Lib Dems, (obv a swing from Lab to the Lib Dems in Richmond as well, but that can possibly be attributed to tactical voting), so it could be that Remain voters in Copeland who voted for the tories in 2015 cld defect to the Lib Dems in this by-election, and that maybe tory voters are more willing to shift to the Lib Dems than Labour voters? (you'd think so, after 5 years of coalition government, but who knows)

soref, Friday, 23 December 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

UK ambassador to EU quits amid Brexit row

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/07/labour-must-introduce-fair-immigration-system

1) Pretty sure the referendum wasn't just about immigration.
2) Fuck you Guardian newspapers for giving these cunts the oxygen of publicity.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Sunday, 8 January 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

The party is at an existential fork in the road. It must have the courage to introduce a managed migration programme.

what's the other fork guys?

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 January 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

it's not so much Kinnock's racism as the desperate urgency he brings to it that really raises the eyebrows

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:00 (seven years ago) link

But people are worried about more than pressures on jobs, wages and housing: they are anxious about culture, identity and the rate of change of communities.

Kinnock OTM this is not UKIP-lite. His sentiments are EXACTLY the same as theirs.

Many of the areas that voted Leave on 23 June have little or no EU immigration, so it is clear that concerns are not limited to the areas that have experienced large and rapid inward migration flows. it only takes a few nijabs and a high street sklep to expose british nationalist fragility on a hysterical scale.

nashwan, Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:22 (seven years ago) link

They are nationwide, strongly held and generally immune to arguments based on abstract economic data.

Pretty adequate definition of bigotry there.

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:26 (seven years ago) link

his analysis of "there are lots of white Brits who freak the fuck out at any visual marker of difference" doesn't really lead to a controlled immigration policy so much as it leads to forced assimilation and/or expulsion of non-whites.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

I wish my neighbourhood had a high street sklep!

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:42 (seven years ago) link

there's loads by my, i totally approve i just don't like most of the stuff they stock that much

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 January 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

someone doesn't like sugary fruit drinks

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Sunday, 8 January 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

yes, i'm sailing straight for diabetes city

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Sunday, 8 January 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

My mum's grandmother was Polish and owned diners, so I grew up on a few of Granny Lena's recipes: sauerkraut, gołabki, bigos and baked cheesecake (her version as made by my mum contained raisins and had a shortcrust base). All of these are great, especially this time of winter. In central London, there are very few outlets for Turkish or Polish food ;-((

Back to the matter at hand: Labour are a bit flummoxed because half of their voters want unfettered free movement (or at least the same privileges we enjoy now) and the other half are trying to blame the lack of quality jobs on immigrants.

I do wonder whether Corbyn's stock line about immigrants keeping the NHS going is counterproductive, when bursaries for nurses etc have been revoked and many underemployed young working class people would love to work in the NHS but can't afford training because of the new rules.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 8 January 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Back to the matter at hand: Labour are a bit flummoxed because half of their voters want unfettered free movement (or at least the same privileges we enjoy now) and the other half are trying to blame the lack of quality jobs on immigrants.

Labour voters who voted Remain = 63%
Labour voters who voted Leave = 37%

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 8 January 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

I for one took suzy's comment as a precise figure, and would be as outraged at her mendacity if it was 50.1-49.9

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 8 January 2017 14:33 (seven years ago) link

The leave/remain vote split in Labour isn't the same as the immigration controls split due to all the PLP appeasers. Wasn't that obvious?

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 8 January 2017 16:04 (seven years ago) link

I too am concerned about the rate of change in our communities

ogmor, Sunday, 8 January 2017 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Sorry, rant.

My spouse is an immigrant (or will be if we are ever granted a spousal visa) and I've had to stop watching all TV / radio news & current events programmes as the lack of anyone willing to stand up for immigrants makes me completely despair. The worst is people like Stephen Kinnock with their "reasonable concerns" line of argument. People have harder lives due to austerity policies and the country generally being in decline, then the media tells them that this is due to immigration, so all they are really doing is saying "some people are blaming the thing they have been told to blame" - saying this is "genuine" means that this anti-immigrant feeling is actually representative of some vast underlying truth visible only to the masses and ignored by "the establishment." But anyone with a brain can see that the areas with more immigration are less anti-immigrant and that the hysteria comes from the establishment itself, the Conservative party and the majority of the media, surely Kinnock knows this. So what is he doing with this line? Just trying to position himself alongside public opinion in order to get into power and fuck the forrins? Just fuck him.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Sunday, 8 January 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

he's mostly doing that, he's also probably quite stupid, he may have a few niggling legitimate concerns in his own personal armoury. you've touched on the biggest issue here - this is not about "immigration", it's about whiteness and perceived deviations from whiteness. no racist is truly gonna be happy at a "just don't let any more in" policy.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 January 2017 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Listening to peoples legitimate concerns hasn't helped so we have 2 listen 2 ppls illegitimate concerns now

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Sunday, 8 January 2017 17:07 (seven years ago) link

only y/day I was thinking that Labour wasn't saying v much lately and it was frustrating; now I am wishing for some more days when they don't say anything

I find the idea of income thresholds particularly horrible for some reason, not only does it seem to disadvantage people with skilled but not well-paid vocations (e.g. nurses but also language teachers and other jobs which benefit from native speakers) but is this really a panacea to all the "foreigners are undercutting our proud native workers" talk, or will it just turn into "foreigners earn too much, look at them all earning more than I do" / added disenfranchised rage for those who earn under the threshold to count as "useful enough to import" in their own country?

also Camaraderie otm although re the establishment itself, the Conservative party and the majority of the media -- too bad the most anti-immigrant sections of the media have managed to paint themselves somehow as Not The Mainstream Media, Not The Establishment: anyone voting Brexit or hating immigrants is automatically Real England (even if billionaires, Londoners, sons of immigrants) and anyone else is the hated Metropolitan Elite, Enemies of the People, etc

a passing spacecadet, Sunday, 8 January 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

RIP my local Polski sklep and its raspberry jaffa cakes, tho the one I really miss was the one I remember visiting with my mum in Swindon in the 80s, before imported prepackaged Polish food was available here; it was m/l someone's front room and you would bring your own bowl or thermos which they would ladle home-made bigos into

a passing spacecadet, Sunday, 8 January 2017 18:28 (seven years ago) link

I find it curious that even after a friend and fellow politician has been murdered by one of the more unstable legitimate concern noggins out there, that Kinnock seems still so unquestionably invested and comfortable with this flimflam. But then again he is a Kinnock, and probably an even bigger cunt than his dad was.

calzino, Sunday, 8 January 2017 18:32 (seven years ago) link

I get that the Milibands and Hilary Benn have impossible examples to live up to in their fathers, but imagine being a Kinnock and still being so much worse than your dad.

Matt DC, Sunday, 8 January 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Kinnock and Dan Hodges head-to-head for the title of ultimate Labour failson

soref, Sunday, 8 January 2017 21:36 (seven years ago) link

I guess unsuccessful parliamentary candidate, Stronger In chairman and sometime cannabis smoker Will Staw should also be considered

soref, Sunday, 8 January 2017 21:38 (seven years ago) link

sometime drug dealer, rather

n 1997 aged 17, he was caught trying to sell £10 of cannabis after a friend was paid £2,000 by the Daily Mirror to introduce him to an undercover reporter posing as an acquaintance.

soref, Sunday, 8 January 2017 21:40 (seven years ago) link

No way is anyone worse than Jack "Rendition" Straw.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 8 January 2017 22:24 (seven years ago) link

I worked for that undercover reporter once, on something else, she was horrible

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 9 January 2017 08:38 (seven years ago) link

I remember when that story broke and they couldn't say whose son it was, and my then-gf's mum being like, "You've got the internet, find out for us"

It's called, "giving a shit". (stevie), Monday, 9 January 2017 08:56 (seven years ago) link

couldn't cut it as a drug dealer or an mp, maybe uncle Gordon will have a hedge fund manager position for him or something.

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.eu/article/revealed-jeremy-corbyn-labour-plan-to-copy-donald-trump-playbook/

Unfortunately stage one of this appears to be "did you know the money from privatised railways all goes to foreigners?", which isn't quite what I was talking about upthread.

Matt DC, Monday, 9 January 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

That was a Momentum video wasn't it? :-)

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 11:30 (seven years ago) link

As I have said here before: whatever his flaws, I don't think Neil Kinnock is, historically, a very bad Labour figure. He came from the Labour left and his party's manifestos in 1987 and 1992 are arguably to the left of Corbyn's platform now (indeed they are very interesting reading). The Campbell diaries record Kinnock privately lambasting him and Blair for their tabloid politics.

Stephen Kinnock might be a bad Labour figure though.

Will Straw is indeed a poor case - failing at everything and blaming others.

Didn't Euan Blair get involved in something political?

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 12:51 (seven years ago) link

The ridiculous thing about Stephen Kinnock is that his wife is the former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt - so his anti-immigrant bullshit is especially hypocritical.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Monday, 9 January 2017 13:08 (seven years ago) link

More like par for the course.

nashwan, Monday, 9 January 2017 13:16 (seven years ago) link

is stephen kinnock's wife very wealthy and white

conrad, Monday, 9 January 2017 14:15 (seven years ago) link

They met while studying at the College of Europe in Bruxelles, so could hardly be more globalist. She ran a quite anti-immigration government, btw, though it was still a huge improvement on the right. She kept the harsh measures they'd instituted in place, spoke all the time about how necessary it was, and about Danishness and legitimate concerns. But they didn't constantly change things up and create uncertainty, which was what happened before, and happens right now. It's slightly weird if he is copying his wife, though, as her government is widely seen as an enormous failure, and it was the first government not to be reelected since the seventies.

Frederik B, Monday, 9 January 2017 14:30 (seven years ago) link

It's slightly weird if he is copying his wife, though, as her government is widely seen as an enormous failure

perhaps he should consider tempering her failed strategy with something more surefire e.g. blairism

conrad, Monday, 9 January 2017 14:37 (seven years ago) link

He may not even believe this stuff, he's just following the focus group like a good party member.

Matt DC, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:01 (seven years ago) link

It's slightly weird if he is copying his wife, though, as her government is widely seen as an enormous failure

His father is widely seen as an enormous failure so water off a duck's back.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 9 January 2017 15:20 (seven years ago) link

I don't see him as an enormous failure, but as a slightly ambiguous figure from a particular period of history; who stood for better things than most politicians do now. (Perhaps because he 'failed' to stop the landscape shifting to the Right.)

The ambiguity, for me, is that he was somewhat 'proto-New-Labour', became distrusted by the Left, bu the NUM, etc. But it's all relative.

No Labour leader ever defeated Thatcher in a GE.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:28 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Kinnock was really further to the political Right than Wilson or Callaghan - perhaps he was to their Left, if such things can be judged - and we don't knock them now as people knock him. Is that because they were in government and hence 'successful' as he wasn't?

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:31 (seven years ago) link

No other Labour leader ever lost to John Major in a GE either, after making a complete arse of himself a la Ally McLeod in '78.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 9 January 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock Sr (or at least his speechwriters) did have some small modicum of success by proxy though, his "Why am I the first Kinnock in a thousand generations..." speech got completely plagiarised by Joe Biden in '08. I better be careful here or The Pinefox will be giving me double detention :p

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:34 (seven years ago) link

If you're talking about his 'infamous Sheffield rally' I think it's rather a red herring and, at least, not a good basis to judge the totality of a career that lasted decades.

I voted Labour against Major in 1992. I supported Kinnock and I couldn't say then that the result was his fault; can't say it now either.

If you condemn every Labour leader that loses an election then you'll probably have to do the same with the current one. It's true that winning elections is part of their job, but we should also consider what they stand for.

I don't defend Stephen Kinnock, but I'm doubtful about the amount of 'visiting the sins of the son on the father' that goes on every time he surfaces.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

Martin McGuinness has just resigned so, if there are any pigeons left, there's another cat on the loose.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 9 January 2017 15:39 (seven years ago) link

Will he be back?

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Calling for fresh elections.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 9 January 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

for me kinnock sr is indicted by his reaction to and attempted actions against corbyn and as paving a croslandite way for new labour the worst of which seemed to prompt no particular (other than perhaps positive) reaction or action on his part

conrad, Monday, 9 January 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

As I said -- he reacted against Campbell and Blair in private, as Campbell has revealed.

I accept that that is not a substantive political gesture and I agree that he wanted to put Labour on 'the path to electability' etc.

I haven't liked what he has said about Corbyn but to some extent I would separate his recent form from whatever he did c. 30-odd years ago, when he was central to public life.

He was probably quite anti-JC then too but, again, if you look at his old manifestos (whoever wrote them) they are arguably left of what JC stands on now.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 16:13 (seven years ago) link

ok he might not have predicted or understood the direction or destination of new labour but as the immediately previous living labour leader it is yes very weak to react in private

that said I'd have preferred that he react in private against corbyn - I wouldn't have heard about it until it was revealed at some remove

yes I'd separate his recent form from whatever he did c. 30-odd years ago

to say well done for pissing all over whatever good effect you may have had in the past mate

conrad, Monday, 9 January 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Martin McGuinness has just resigned so, if there are any pigeons left, there's another cat on the loose.

― Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, January 9, 2017 7:39 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Will he be back?

― the pinefox, Monday, January 9, 2017 7:47 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

although this resignation is clearly, i would guess, based on pressuring arlene foster to resign as first minister there are rumblings that he isn't in the best of health and that there is an internal power-struggle within sinn fein to replace him as the leader in stormont.

seems like an incredibly fraught time for the northern ireland assembly. this weird power-sharing impasse governance which people have tolerated from a "better than certain all too recent alternatives" point of view was bound to run into some hurdles, but seems in real trouble.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 9 January 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock Snr never liked Ed M either did he? Always comes across as a nasty piece of work. In terms of the manifesto the difference with Corbyn is that he would attempt to actually do some of the things he talks about. Read a piece about Labour of the time battling with 'loony left' councils like Lambeth and my impression is Kinnock wouldn't move a finger.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:26 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock Snr was maybe the most high-profile Labour figure to back Ed M, was quoted to the effect of "we've got our party back" after he was elected leader. idk if he's changed his view since then.

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:30 (seven years ago) link

back him during the 2010 leadership election, that is

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Probably turn erm, red if you mentioned £3.

Well I base this on some interview after Ed lost -- guess it was a tough night. xp

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:32 (seven years ago) link

him throwing a little sideswipe at Abbott as an aside here is pretty funny with hindsight:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Uf7Xz5UD8

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:35 (seven years ago) link

Pretty strong support for Ed M -- I daresay they are personally friendly also.

I have always liked Ed M. But that statement from NK is, in a way, an example of NK's famous windbaggery -- he goes on and on with a load of rather abstract words that sound authoritative but turn out with hindsight to have had little to do with Ed M's capacity to get elected -- though perhaps it would be fairer to look at them in other terms, just as praise for Ed M's personal qualities, which I also admire.

The swipe at Abbott is not very nice and he's not very sensitive about the gender and racial implications of it (dismissing her left only white males in the field). But having said that, I don't admire Abbott either.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

Genuine question: which Labour politician is currently worth supporting?

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:55 (seven years ago) link

"In terms of the manifesto the difference with Corbyn is that he would attempt to actually do some of the things he talks about."

well, NK never got the chance, and realistically, JC won't either.

If JC did have the chance, I am sure he would try to do good things.

If NK had had the chance, in the conditions of the time, he would have done many good things too. The whole ideological spectrum was different then and all kinds of things would have been possible that seem impossible now -- he would have rolled back loads more of the trade union restrictions for instance; would not have started NHS privatization but strengthened the NHS; etc. It's not so much that NK was very progressive, though he was on the Left by most measures, but that what seemed thinkable and realistic then - basic social democracy? - no longer is.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:57 (seven years ago) link

In other words, what was 'normal' or even 'obligatory' aspiration to NK as a Labour (left) man was way-out utopian for us.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I don't agree with that. Here is the piece on Kinnock I was talking about: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/08/labour-lambeth-brixton-rate-capping-thatcher-budgets-corbyn/

Diane Abbott has been easily one of the most impressive politicians anywhere for the last few months - she is pretty much alone in arguing against these controls on immigration.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:02 (seven years ago) link

My feeling about JC, and of course I may be wrong, is that he's all about (often genuine, laudable) political positioning, but has so far not demonstrated any ability to either get things done or make concrete plans on what he actually wants to do.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:03 (seven years ago) link

still think that the best case scenario for Labour is Corbyn standing down before the next election and being replaced by someone else from the left of the party (Clive Lewis, Rebecca Long-Bailey, Abbott) - obv the right will fight tooth and nail to keep this from happening, though.

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:07 (seven years ago) link

CAAL: I think my answer would be -- whichever one is standing against the Con party, UKIP or other right-wing opponent, at any given time.

It could also be worth supporting others like Greens in such scenarios - I am a 'progressive alliance' etc supporter.

I don't see how one would give a more specific answer as we don't generally get the opportunity to 'support', eg vote for, one Labour MP or another -- we have to react to the ones in front of us in a given election scenario.

soref: I think I tend to agree, but I wouldn't vote for Abbott as leader. Lewis or Long Bailey, yes, absolutely.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link

If Lewis could get on a ballot (which may be doubted), he would have a very good chance of winning leadership among the large, broadly left / pro-Corbyn membership.

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

The last thing Labour needs is a new leadership election unless its a very watered down passing down the baton but it will never be that - not sure how anyone has the stomach for another contest after the summer.

Lewis has little experience.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

He also has a habit of shooting his mouth off/relishing the fight a bit too much/dropping some dodgy queen-and-country squaddie soundbytes as well. But unless the rules are changed then there's little-to-no chance of the next leader being from the left of the party - especially if Corbyn leads Labour to electoral disaster. It's probably not going to be Dan Jarvis or Hilary Benn either, so it's a case of whoever can position themselves as the unity candidate, which right now is looking like being Keir Starmer or whichever backbencher has kept their mouth shut for the past 18 months.

Corbyn is only going to stand down before the election if his health suffers or if there's a similar unity candidate who he trusts enough and seems like a shoo-in to win. He's stuck it out for this long though so and presumably it can't get much more intolerable for him than it has been up to now.

Matt DC, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:42 (seven years ago) link

"dodgy queen-and-country squaddie soundbytes"

sounds electable! :D

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

soothsayer time: corny lasts till the next general election where he will get a pasting and resign

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 9 January 2017 19:55 (seven years ago) link

dynamite stuff

conrad, Monday, 9 January 2017 20:48 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Lewis would be any improvement on Corbyn and Abbott would be my automatic choice to replace him (so not going to happen etc). I was listening to a profile of David Davis last week, another ex-military nutter. But I was thinking he may be a Tory twat but he possesses more conviction than say, at least 80% of the PLP and probably most of the current shower of cabinet ministers in government.

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 20:49 (seven years ago) link

"conviction" being a kind of nebulous quality that isn't set in (ed)stone, but basically what most of these fuckers severely lack.

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 20:55 (seven years ago) link

as far as concrete plans from Corbyn or the Labour party are concerned - when was the last time an opposition held clear policies before a general election was called. i'm not approving of this game-playing bullshit but Corbyn appears to be playing the game as it is now played.

Cameron certainly avoided making policy statements prior to 2010. I don't remember much about the losers that opposed Blair bar the odd choice IDS one-liner like "quiet man". I don't remember Labour '97 being policy-heavy, beyond "the Tories are corrupt".

I want Labour to start staking out some political ground and developing a clear identity as soon as possible, but Corbyn so far not doing this isn't a mark of his inability as a politician, it's more like a mark of adhering too closely to the existing orthodoxy.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Monday, 9 January 2017 21:53 (seven years ago) link

having some doubts about this Corbyn 2.0 tbh

In a town that has experienced high rates of change in terms of migration, he will use his strongest language yet on the subject.

“Labour is not wedded to freedom of movement for EU citizens as a point of principle. But nor can we afford to lose full access to the European single market on which so many British businesses and jobs depend. Changes to the way migration rules operate from the EU will be part of the negotiations,” he will say.

“Labour supports fair rules and reasonably managed migration as part of the post-Brexit relationship with the EU.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/09/jeremy-corbyn-uk-is-better-off-out-of-eu-with-managed-migration

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 22:11 (seven years ago) link

but Corbyn so far not doing this

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/politics/jeremy-corbyns-ten-key-policies/
http://www.jeremyforlabour.com/policies

Does this kind of thing not qualify? If not then what?

nashwan, Monday, 9 January 2017 22:14 (seven years ago) link

god that corbyn quote. and this is left-labour's hero

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 9 January 2017 22:15 (seven years ago) link

How can a man who is supposed to be a conviction politician be so sickeningly wishy-washy?

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Monday, 9 January 2017 22:22 (seven years ago) link

He has always had reservations about the EU and it's not completely implausible that the conviction about managed migration is genuine but it seems like a serious mistake given how much of his support is based on not pandering to the legit concerns crew. There is little point in an unpopular populist,

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 9 January 2017 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Was just posting that Guardian piece.

Eastern Europeans will queue for things even when they don't know what the queue is for, just in case, ffs. The idea that common decency is a British trait is both ludicrously xenophobic and rather oversells the British.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 9 January 2017 22:34 (seven years ago) link

the idea that eastern europeans don't know how to queue is uh

difficult listening hour, Monday, 9 January 2017 22:36 (seven years ago) link

say what you like about the man, at least he sticks to his guns of being 7/10 on the EU

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 9 January 2017 22:57 (seven years ago) link

“The insurgent has breathed extraordinary life into the Labour leadership race,” it read. “The party must harness the energy he has unleashed.”

I can recall a lot of that "harnessing energy" bullshit-speak at the time from Burnham, or was it the Graun first? I can't remember.

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 22:59 (seven years ago) link

" a piece from Alistair Darling endorsing the ‘realist’ Liz Kendall for leader (rather unrealistically)"

lol! 2015 seems like such a distant country.

calzino, Monday, 9 January 2017 23:05 (seven years ago) link

The migration line that Corbyn is pushing sounds like a capitulation to the fucking Kinnocks of this world. That goes against what Momentum say (Freedom of Movement is a must, no capitulation), and there will be a pretty clear reckoning soon enough - and Momentum themselves aren't much of anything rn so its a big test for them.

It will be interesting to see Diane Abbott's take on this.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 9 January 2017 23:07 (seven years ago) link

I'm trying to imagine how I'd reacted in summer 2015 if you told me that all four of the then Labour leadership contenders would be on the record as not supporting freedom of movement 18 months later

soref, Monday, 9 January 2017 23:09 (seven years ago) link

we'll just take the six counties back while ye discuss the real issues there folks huh

loudmouth darraghmac ween (darraghmac), Monday, 9 January 2017 23:28 (seven years ago) link

The migration line that Corbyn is pushing sounds like a capitulation to the fucking Kinnocks of this world.

the stephen kinnocks of this world, your liz kendalls, your hilary benns

http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PA-20886269.jpg

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 9 January 2017 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Big Townsend fan.

What migration policy (with EU countries for instance) do you want Corbyn and Labour to propose?

the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 23:58 (seven years ago) link

FUCK'S SAKE CORBYN

lex pretend, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 08:41 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/steve_hawkes/status/818735712006766592

Sun Pol Ed there.

stet, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 08:54 (seven years ago) link

what's he done now :(

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 09:11 (seven years ago) link

Seems to have preemptively partly rolled back on the capped migration speech he was supposedly going to give this afternoon aiui.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 09:45 (seven years ago) link

the speech that was too legitimate to be made

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 09:52 (seven years ago) link

I thought that freedom of movement was something that came with the EU. As the PLP all seems to accept that the UK will leave the EU (Owen Smith was one of the last to resist this!), it doesn't seem surprising that they're now looking toward a different migration policy in relation to EU countries.

JC says he wants a 'managed' migration policy. Knowing JC as we do, I would imagine that his policy would seek maximum fairness especially towards people who are poor or vulnerable. I don't think that such people have much to fear from a JC government (which I am afraid will not come to pass), as against the current government.

People who might have something to fear from a JC government, judging from today's R4 interview, are the very rich, as JC says he wants a maximum income. I don't know what the figure would be but this could be the most controversial policy (as in eg: most vilified by tabloids and media Right) JC has proposed since 2015. One potential result that comes to mind: the billionaires leave the Premier League.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 09:59 (seven years ago) link

Freedom of movement isn't just about being part of the EU, it's about having access to the single market - which almost the entire PLP is still committed to. The idea that managed migration can be combined with single market access is, potentially, a fantasy. May seems to be moving towards clarifying that managed migration is more important than the single market, Labour needs to stake out a position on whether that is also true for them. The Kinnock line Corbyn seems to have potentially been referencing doesn't do much more than muddy the water on what might, in the end, come down to a straight yes / no.

It'll be interesting to see, if the UK does leave the single market, whether there will still be privileged access for European citizens over other (predominantly less white) countries and how that would be justified.

I'd expect a salary cap to mean executive pay being linked to a multiple of the average or lowest paid company salary, if a proposal was actually put forward, rather than a hard number.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

That's a helpful clarification, for me, ShariVari, on both issues. I like the 'salary cap as multiple' policy as (in theory) people could still pay themselves a lot if they dragged everyone else up with them!

Farage / UKIP line pre-referendum was that we should leave the EU so we could give better access for eg people from India.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Xxp pinefox, yeah thats otm about JC. His big thing, the thing that makes him worthwhile despite all the risks and disadvantages, is that he won't lead by focus group, won't triangulate himself to death like a miliband, he'll do what's right, sure as kilimajaro rises like olympus above the serengeti. If he's seen to be vacillating now, it throws away his main, perhaps only political asset.

― Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, December 10, 2016 9:33 AM (one month ago)

I suspected this to be wrong at the time but I was kind of holding back until Corbyn did something that proved it.

He's dressing up broadly leftist or at least anti-establishment policies to appeal directly to racists. This is fascist-enabling bullshit that also, as a bonus, treats the working class as stupid.

The left has effectively now given up entirely on freedom of movement without a fight. The big chunk of the country that doesn't believe this bullshit is effectively unrepresented in British politics. As with last time, I don't think I could in any good conscience give my vote to a Labour party peddling this crap.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:32 (seven years ago) link

prominent MPs prepared to make an unequivocal pro-immigrant, pro-freedom of movement case:

Diane Abbott
Caroline Lucas
David Lammy

any more?

lex pretend, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

The migration issue may be very important but the media are leading with the salary cap issue -- which is being presented, from the little I've seen, as though it's a flat figure, rather than ShariVari's better suggestion.

BBC's Norman Smith excitedly / incredulously says JC's team had no idea he would say this and it is unprecedented for a Labour leader.

I think getting the 'top salary as multiple of lowest salary' idea into circulation would be basically a good thing.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:55 (seven years ago) link

I suspect it's likely that Corbyn really does believe all that unsubstantiated Lexit guff about immigration suppressing wages. Fast-forward five years to when Corbyn is gone and Brexit is widely seen as a disaster and what moral high-ground does Labour have? It becomes incredibly easy for an embattled May government to just retort "well you supported this at the time".

I suspect a salary cap is entirely unworkable and a worse option than proper progressive taxation in any case.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

Maybe in 'the post-truth era' (or just in politics) it doesn't really matter what anyone 'really said at the time' especially if it's 5 long years earlier.

After all eg Cameron & Osborne weren't blamed for supporting the Labour policies that they later claimed had made austerity necessary. And things have only got more unhinged since then.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

Maybe, but Brexit is a lot more prominent than the vague 'share in the proceeds of growth' line that the Etonians were trotting out ~ 10 years ago.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:11 (seven years ago) link

It may turn into one of those things, like the Iraq War, that just hangs over individual MPs for the rest of their careers.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

I suspected this to be wrong at the time but I was kind of holding back until Corbyn did something that proved it.

Wait, am I wrong? Surely not. I was pointing out that Corbyn's main asset was being seen as a man of principle, who won't pander to bigotry, and if he throws that away, he's fucked. Sounds like he's thrown it away, and he's fucked.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:17 (seven years ago) link

If Brexit is _widely_ seen as a disaster (rather than seen as a disaster by you and me), does it follow in your scenario that the UK government will be under pressure to reapply to the EU?

Feels unlikely (but so have other things, to me).

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

's gonna be so ugly watching white leftist friends twist themselves into knots to defend the new racism

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:23 (seven years ago) link

Salary cap is more like left populism.

Shame it doesn't matter...

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:29 (seven years ago) link

If Brexit is _widely_ seen as a disaster (rather than seen as a disaster by you and me), does it follow in your scenario that the UK government will be under pressure to reapply to the EU?

I mean seen as a disaster by people who voted for it and are suffering under the ongoing economic decline/disappointed that the magical sunlit uplands haven't materialised. Those are the people who will dictate the future of the country's relationship with Europe (and immigrants, and the Labour Party). Labour needs proper clear blue water between themselves and the government on this issue, and they don't seem to have it.

Corbyn's entire approach to Brexit has been... well he's fucked it completely really.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:34 (seven years ago) link

there's space for a much more progressive redistribution of wealth via taxation but I'm not sure that those kind of policies aren't ultimately more ameliorative than structurally progressive

some form of stakeholding with teeth feels more like a modern leftist programme to me - if we can't seize control of the means of production and distribution we can at least aim to force them to submit to far more democratic/community-focused control - not all at once, maybe, but as a medium-term goal. businesses need to be compelled to meet the needs of the whole community, not just the profit-taking minority

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

prominent MPs prepared to make an unequivocal pro-immigrant, pro-freedom of movement case:

Diane Abbott
Caroline Lucas
David Lammy

any more?

― lex pretend, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:46 AM (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

idk if she counts as "prominent", but this article Chi Onwurah wrote back in October was good

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/06/labour-freedom-movement-eenophobia-working-class-values

I don't know if she's made any more interventions on this issue over the last few months.

I'm curious to what Abbott would do if the Labour leadership did clearly come out against FoM, but it looks like the fudge is going to continue with Corbyn doing interviews where he plays down what is being briefed, I guess she will also continue making the case for Fom and immigration and there will be confusion over exactly what Labour's position is?

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 11:41 (seven years ago) link

When is Corbyn making the speech? Maybe still time to change its contents entirely, talk about bringing back wooden toys.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

An Owen Jones of England writes Name your demographic group: 18- to 25-year-olds, black and minority ethnic Britons, Londoners, Scots – all decisively report a desire to reduce immigration.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 12:53 (seven years ago) link

on anti-immigration views among BME voters

https://twitter.com/judeinlondon/status/746625153858142208

lex pretend, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

so disheartened by these useless fucks

wins, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

might have known that little whey-faced shit Jones would be a legitimate concernist when push comes to shove. I'm finding Corbyn + McDonnell's latest compromises to populist dross harder to take. I'm seriously thinking of getting shut of my membership, I didn't join for some kind of neo-Blairism with slight leftist concessions.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

on anti-immigration views among BME voters

https://twitter.com/judeinlondon/status/746625153858142208

― lex pretend, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:32 PM (fourteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this runnymede report on BME attitudes to immigration (from Dec 2015) is interesting, seems to broadly concur with the above analysis:

http://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/Race%20and%20Immigration%20Report%20v2.pdf

Third is that there are indeed concerns about the benefits system, and many Black and minority ethnic people do refer to pressures on public services. Here there is perhaps more variation among different BME groups who are after all becoming much more diverse than they were even a decade ago. Many BME people too are concerned about the ‘fairness’ of the welfare system, although some also interpret this to mean that it is often unfair that they have to consistently ‘prove’ they are (equally) British or that their children have equal entitlement to public services and benefits.

Another more general way to put this is that while BME people may often appear to hold similar opinions and attitudes on immigration to those of the white British majority, their experiences often mean that their reasons for holding those opinions differ. So, for example, there are concerns about the fairness of benefits for new migrants, but this is often framed by older migrants in terms of the unfairness of newer European migrants getting access to benefits that older Caribbean, African or Asian migrants didn’t receive. There needs to be a much clearer positive affirmation that naturalised British citizens are equal to British-born citizens, not just in terms of rights but in terms of contributing to a national identity and to public debate, and interms of access to benefits as well.

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 13:52 (seven years ago) link

those Congolesa Rice tweets are excellent

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 13:57 (seven years ago) link

so good, that is the first person I have followed on twitter now. I'm getting there very slowly.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 14:06 (seven years ago) link

I think i've probably mentioned in the past that an "Australia-style points-based system of immigration" has been sold as a tough crackdown to white Brits but sounds pretty good to settled migrants in the UK whose family and friends overseas are being forced to migrate to Australia rather than the UK, for study or work, by a British immigration system that is perceived as being massively stacked against them in a way Australia's isn't. Trusting racist politicians to bring in more equitable rules for non-white migrants under any circumstances is obvs very naive though.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 14:12 (seven years ago) link

Guardian main story: Corbyn backs maximum wage.

Comments below are hidden till clicked on, except the top GUARDIAN PICK which they've highlighted.

It says:

"Corbyn in a nutshell. Everytime you think he's exhausted the bounds of ridiculousness he exceeds himself in turning a real and pressing issue into a farce."

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:21 (seven years ago) link

In fact almost every commenter below the article savagely attacks the idea.

The Guardian Pick comment in full:

"Corbyn in a nutshell. Everytime you think he's exhausted the bounds of ridiculousness he exceeds himself in turning a real and pressing issue into a farce.

We can all agree the market fails in the ludicrous rewards it provides for some jobs, while others struggle. That's why you advocate a progressive tax system - by all means argue for greater taxes on wealth, income, inheritance, property, windows, stupid cocktails, red trousers, whatever. But it's economics GCSE that maximum wages don't work - set it extremely high and it's completely pointless, set it at a level it would actually have an effect and you run into all sorts of problems about incentives, departure, competition.

For God's sake. Enough. Get us a proper left-wing party back, not this ludicrous farce."

I don't know whether JC's policy idea is good or not but I find it somewhat unfortunate that the G has picked out just one comment and it is this highly polemical one.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:25 (seven years ago) link

I did Economics GCE, we possibly decided having everyone on the same wage was a dis-incentive but a maximum wage?no.

Mark G, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:36 (seven years ago) link

not sure why suggest something abstract like a maximum wage when you could just propose taxes that have the same effect, and would seem to frame the matter in a way that has a lot more public appeal.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:40 (seven years ago) link

conventional wisdom is that you must never mention taxes I guess

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 15:57 (seven years ago) link

The thinking would be that basing income inequality countermeasures around tax risks more people feeling they're losing out and/or that highest 'earners' are most adept at avoiding tax whereas salary caps (or better yet pay ratios) could be seen to be a more direct approach.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:01 (seven years ago) link

he's rolled back on it now anyway, it seems.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:13 (seven years ago) link

Don't Let's Be Beastly to the Chairmans

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:19 (seven years ago) link

it's an idea that is trump-level in its economic sophistication

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Congolesa Rice has just ripped Jones to bits, and totally discredited the so-called data he was paraphrasing about BME voters in that bullshit Graun piece. I've never liked him so it was some fun reading.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:48 (seven years ago) link

or at least his analysis of the data was either incompetent or dishonest.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully there's a Scottish Congolesa Rice out there.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:56 (seven years ago) link

I have just been reminded that this song & video mention and show Neil Kinnock.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_QSMTtUQYY

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

wonder if Neil is the only Labour leader to have appeared on a picture disc?

http://images.eil.com/large_image/XXX-45902.jpg

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 17:14 (seven years ago) link

I own that disc soref!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

I must admit, the extent of 'acting' that NK is doing even on that picture feels somehow dangerously excessive, kind of 'postmodern politics' -- I mean even today, I can't imagine Theresa May doing that. Though I suppose I have quite often seen Barack Obama (a great actor and comic) do such things and can almost imagine Sadiq Khan getting involved in fictions in such a way.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 17:48 (seven years ago) link

It strikes me that a maximum wage isn't actually going to benefit workers or the public purse in any serious material way. I can see it benefiting shareholders quite a lot though.

It's a bit like Ed Miliband's fuel price freeze, it's one of those policies that people on the street say is a great idea in the abstract but no one trusts them to be able to deliver it in any case. And that was a lot more workable than this is.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 18:38 (seven years ago) link

corbyn's barmy maximum wage brain fart catching hell on the one show

conrad, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:06 (seven years ago) link

Conrad are you against the maximum wage policy, or, for that matter, the 'top salary as multiple of lowest salary' policy?

I quite like the second one, at least, but what do I know - do not have GCSE Economics.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

I just turned on THE ONE SHOW to find out more but of course had just missed it

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:13 (seven years ago) link

it's an idea that is trump-level in its economic sophistication

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Trump won #thanksForPlaying

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't know about workability - its politics. But he doesn't appear to have followed it through - the populism needs bullshit, chutzpah with some bits of truth in there.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:21 (seven years ago) link

Is this Milne's attempt at a cacophony type strategy? Like keep changing the message but maintain the noise or something.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:25 (seven years ago) link

I doubt it, but I like the idea that there's a strategy.

If it is, he didn't clear it with Owen Jones first !! :O

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:36 (seven years ago) link

I think it's fair to say it wouldn't be a good strategy, if it were one (which I'm sure it isn't).

Jones keeps saying that repetition is the thing (he keeps ... repeating it) and sounds like he knows what he's talking about (though exactly what his credentials are for assessing campaign / electoral strategics, I'm not sure).

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

After 18 months of basically avoiding TV is he now going on every programme that will have him?

It sounds like they've basically given him license to say what he wants, which might not be a winning strategy but stoked for the madness.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:45 (seven years ago) link

this is hardcorbyn

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

pf a maximum wage as messaging seems designed to avoid saying - as someone else said - "tax". I like tax. let them "earn" whatever they like and take it from them in tax. as a message it seems duff and prompts e.g. the question "well how much?" and drives directly to the perverse feeling among some people who will never earn more than e.g. £25,000pa that they cannot risk jeopardising their future cash when they manage to realise an e.g. twentyfold increase in their salary and also the idea that these people "earn" money by "working" "hard". the multiplier thing is a better message one which suggests - as you said - the job creators having to drag the proles up with them. I hope there's a strategy too.

conrad, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

"Labour is not wedded to freedom of movement for EU citizens as a point of principle, but I don’t want that to be misinterpreted, nor do we rule it out."

- leftist firebrand Jeremy Corbyn

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Conrad yes I agree I prefer the multiplier thing!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:17 (seven years ago) link

I think people have been saying for quite a long time, JC should go on TV more and get messages across directly. They also say, he is likely to come across as friendly and calmly droll (etc) on TV in a way at odds with the perceptions promoted by his enemies.

I broadly agree with this. Visibility a good thing on balance.

Not saying any of it will win GE (never have done) but I would like him to maximise whatever particular degree of success he can have.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:22 (seven years ago) link

this seems otm

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/01/jeremy-corbyns-immigration-policy-isnt-muddle-it-mess

Labour’s line on immigration is actually very clear. Corbyn is saying that the Labour party doesn’t particularly care about the right of EU citizens to move freely within the EU area but is prepared to accept it if that’s the cost of a good standard of access to the single market.

What the leadership is trying to do is at once appeal to people who want immigration to go down without taking the economic hit that a hard Brexit – the only way to avoid the free movement of people – would represent.

Labour’s halfway-house position on immigration in particular and Brexit in general risks leaving them as the party of nobody, the middle-of-the-road option. And we know what happens to people in the middle of the road: they get run down.

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:26 (seven years ago) link

The last bit is very stupid. Halfway house in the middle of the road.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

Maybe he can live on a traffic island.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:32 (seven years ago) link

there was no room on the verges

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:34 (seven years ago) link

up near the Ainley Top Junction on the M62 is a house smack in between two motorway lanes, not a Halfway House but a good one if you are an Eddie Stobart truck spotter.

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:47 (seven years ago) link

I don't necessarily agree that JC should be on TV more. He doesn't always come across as friendly and droll to me, it usually seems to involve people asking him sometimes non-hostile questions and him wittering and refusing (or being unable) to engage. His TV performance after the brexit vote is a good example.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 20:49 (seven years ago) link

He's better than May on TV but then he's been on TV more than her seemingly. I don't remember quite how much TV Cameron did before 2010 and he may even have been technically "good" (tho not as good as Clegg) but it certainly nosedived in his last four years as PM.

nashwan, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:01 (seven years ago) link

jc has styled out his maximum wage as a 20x cap on any company w a govt contract. not bad tbh

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I like Corbyn, but he is generally not good on tv imo. the friendly and droll thing comes across when he's chatting informally with broadly sympathetic/like-minded ppl, but this is not really much help and is probably true of most ppl anyway.

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:15 (seven years ago) link

not a great start to 2017 for the Corbyn project, all things considered

https://twitter.com/GreenJamieS/status/818929930243145728

soref, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:37 (seven years ago) link

hard to find takes on the momentum debacle that are not totally tendentious.

what i understand is that all people who were purged from the labour party will be expelled, as will all current members who haven't joined labour yet if they don't before a certain time. which seems to be a bit of a night of the long knives (or icepicks) for the trots.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:08 (seven years ago) link

The bureaucrats always win, they can't conceive a politics they don't own. Counterpoint: they're the only people who care enough to run the world

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:16 (seven years ago) link

in our defence ya ye werent fucked yerselves to do anything right

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link

ok correct me if I'm wrong OMOV has won? but the motions will be presented in a top down way from party brass?

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:30 (seven years ago) link

It's funny Darragh cos I've never thought of you as a CONVICTION bureaucrat

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:37 (seven years ago) link

They did a bad job today, but the first line of the top story on BBC News right now is something I've been waiting for for a long time:

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he stands by his view that immigration to the UK from the EU is not too high.

Even if that's going to be read by the legitimate concern crew as Another Barmy Corbyn Stance, I'm glad he said it.

stet, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:39 (seven years ago) link

only if the conviction leads to the death penalty obv xp

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:46 (seven years ago) link

but what if arbiters of execution start piling up the corpses of class enemies next to the pedos, eh? Sorry just recounting a dream I had last night :p

calzino, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 22:59 (seven years ago) link

from which angle tho, i mean each side prob sees tother as class enemy, and only our lot like executing people in a sustainable way (you guys have a nice line in the revolutionary splurge but again, the inability to put a good robust system in place usually leads to it fizzling out innit)

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 23:06 (seven years ago) link

how dare you impugn Fizzles' revolutionary conviction

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 23:58 (seven years ago) link

i knew you would tbh

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 00:00 (seven years ago) link

i have rarely denied my own corniness is all i can say

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 00:03 (seven years ago) link

but the first line of the top story on BBC News right now is something I've been waiting for for a long time:

But should it be top story ahead of NHS crisis and pressure on Tories? Oh shit I'm agreeing with Owen again...

nashwan, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 00:22 (seven years ago) link

Smith, Jones or David?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 00:30 (seven years ago) link

Paul Mason celebrates JC's stance on immigration:
https://twitter.com/paulmasonnews/status/818974009589112832

(Just heard him on the radio debating with JOHN HARRIS)

the pinefox, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 09:04 (seven years ago) link

Thumbs up emoji at the end is a great punchline.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

osamathumbsup.jpg

Neil S, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 10:51 (seven years ago) link

I noticed even Javid + Farron are weighing in on the Millwall gentrification scheme, but Khan seems very quiet.

calzino, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 11:28 (seven years ago) link

I think Mason has recently written that post-Brexit UK should have restricted / managed immigration, coupled with total openness and generosity to refugees.

I imagine that JC's proposed policy may be similar to that?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 11:32 (seven years ago) link

good migrants and bad migrants, I like it, it's catchy

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:24 (seven years ago) link

I fear JC tumbling into "British jobs for British workers" if not more careful but meanwhile the PM has just branded the British Red Cross...irresponsible

nashwan, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

the Red Cross is an international organization like the EU, FIFA and the Catholic Church, and as such has no place in British life

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Mars, Inc. That's another one.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:59 (seven years ago) link

helps u work, work and work some more

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 15:49 (seven years ago) link

I think Mason has recently written that post-Brexit UK should have restricted / managed immigration, coupled with total openness and generosity to refugees.

I imagine that JC's proposed policy may be similar to that?

― the pinefox, Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:32 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

trying to imagine how small the infinitisemal portion of the electorate who care about restricting immigration - except for for refugees - is

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

also tbqfh british immigration is already very controlled if you exclude the freedom of movement that exists in the eu. e.g. i can't live in britain because I'm married to a canadian and the process of getting my wife residency would be too onerous (i have to move to britain and get a higher than average paid job before i can apply to sponsor her).

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 21:59 (seven years ago) link

yeah i have a friend who's had to give up his business and take on a paid job just to begin the process to allow his non-British wife to live here

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 22:03 (seven years ago) link

if you exclude the freedom of movement that exists in the eu

There's the rub.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 22:08 (seven years ago) link

Of course, once we start keep the Europeans out we will be able to loosen the rules for our chums on the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere - errr, except the Muslim ones... and Africans, of course... Indians are fine as long as they are not Muslims and are brain surgeons, nuclear physicists etc.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 11 January 2017 22:11 (seven years ago) link

And don't mind getting the passport out for a trip to the continent.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 11 January 2017 23:14 (seven years ago) link

The shadow defence secretary, Nia Griffith, was said by sources to be “absolutely furious” on Wednesday night after a spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn appeared to question the recent decision to send British troops to Estonia.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/11/labour-in-turmoil-as-corbyn-briefing-clashes-with-defence-position

("a spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn" = Seumus Milne, yes?

this seems bad? but is apparently a deliberate strategy?

Senior Labour officials are said to have become more relaxed about message discipline and now favour a “let Corbyn be Corbyn” strategy, in which the leader will be free to speak his mind – even if it results in negative publicity. After the Labour leader was criticised for not being visible over Christmas, his team have reached a stage where they believe bad publicity is better than no publicity.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-copy-donald-trump-labour-leader-new-strategy-aggressive-populist-poll-ratings-a7517351.html

the theory is supposedly that voters don't follow the policy details all that closely and the important thing is the general broad message that is being communicated, which seems correct, but surely the message that's coming across is less "Corbyn is a populist who is taking on vested interests" and more "Corbyn is incompetent, Labour are a mess who can't agree on anything and aren't fit to govern"?

soref, Thursday, 12 January 2017 07:16 (seven years ago) link

Nothing is true, grasshopper, and everything is permitted

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 12 January 2017 09:44 (seven years ago) link

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/12/diane-abbotts-late-phone-call-forced-jeremy-corbyn-make-migration/

thank god for diane abbott

lex pretend, Thursday, 12 January 2017 11:51 (seven years ago) link

'Britain Does Not Have Too Many Migrants. Britain Has Too Many Bigots'
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/john-wight/the-lefts-capitulation-to_b_13981888.html

nashwan, Thursday, 12 January 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

^^^ let's have referendum on this, losing side gtfo

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 January 2017 13:30 (seven years ago) link

Either we don't have too many bigots or the bigot majority are happy with the current bigot levels so... where should we gtfo to?

brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Thursday, 12 January 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

Ayrshire.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 12 January 2017 13:50 (seven years ago) link

... oops, that's where the bigots should go.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 12 January 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

was thinking of a taking sides: bigots vs immigrants vote, jeez

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 January 2017 14:03 (seven years ago) link

Agreed (on both parts)

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 13 January 2017 00:20 (seven years ago) link

Are we allowed to admit that Paul Mason is terrible now?

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 08:51 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2CTdp4XgAASAAF.jpg

Treating lower-income migrant workers as if they were just a source of cheap labour for employers is just mirroring the right. Starting from a base argument that immigration is a problem just feeds the far-right narrative even it intends to do the absolute opposite.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 08:53 (seven years ago) link

the problem with old school Marxists is that the racism and homophobia always leaks out eventually

but otoh fuck giving succour to capitalist running dogs

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 08:54 (seven years ago) link

I'm glad he can distinguish between socialism and trade unionism tho. necessary as the unions are they've been forces of reaction for 95 percent of their existence.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 08:55 (seven years ago) link

proud tradition of fighting for lower pay for women and immigrants

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 08:55 (seven years ago) link

That sort of thing is not absent from the history of the trade unions, but it's outweighed by the contribution union struggles have made to fight pay inequality and discrimination in the workplace. '95 percent of their existence' is lunatic hyperbole.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 13 January 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

You're fake news, Noodle Vague.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 13 January 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, 'you can come in if you're a high earner' isn't mirroring, but exactly mimicking the right.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 13 January 2017 10:18 (seven years ago) link

there's yer tristram hunt away to pursue his idea of patriotism as director of the v&a

conrad, Friday, 13 January 2017 10:19 (seven years ago) link

lunatic hyperbole is my life. and you're not wrong, but let's not look too rosy at the differential-clinging bastards

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 10:21 (seven years ago) link

I was about to say that Tristram was going somewhere where he couldn't possibly do too much damage but then immediately saw a link to him calling for the reintroduction of museum entry fees.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 10:34 (seven years ago) link

Hunt's off https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/13/tristram-hunt-to-quit-as-mp-to-become-va-director. Wrong one unfortunately as it looks like a nasty by-election for labour.

Dan Worsley, Friday, 13 January 2017 10:36 (seven years ago) link

“I am disappointed to see a talented MP like Tristram step down. His departure will be keenly felt by parliament and by the Labour party"

scumbag recognize scumbag

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Sean__Clare/status/819847809780383744

soref, Friday, 13 January 2017 11:17 (seven years ago) link

Normally with these guys I assume that they joined Labour because they were never posh or connected enough to form a decent career in the Conservative Party but Hunt was pretty much landed gentry so god knows what his deal was.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 11:54 (seven years ago) link

his dad was a Labour councillor, god knows where he got it from tho

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

further digging suggests there might have been Quakerism in the family, always a hotbed of leftiness that

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 12:00 (seven years ago) link

conviction and principles presumably bred out of the family line before they reached Tristram

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 12:00 (seven years ago) link

Don't get me wrong I'd also take running the V&A over another three years in a constituency that the Tories are about to make disappear. He should never have been representing the people of Stoke in the first place.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 12:59 (seven years ago) link

as someone who crossed a picket line to teach his class on socialism he's a confusing bundle of tendencies all round

Don't get me wrong I'd also take running the V&A over another three years in a constituency that the Tories are about to make disappear. He should never have been representing the people of Stoke in the first place.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 13 January 2017 13:07 (seven years ago) link

I like how the most obviously Tory types in Labour are invariably described as "talented", in Tristam's case he inherited most of his talent.

calzino, Friday, 13 January 2017 13:25 (seven years ago) link

Lovely looking bit of Stoke, perhaps even on a wet Wednesday night.

https://www.europcar.com/location/united-kingdom/stoke-on-trent/stoke-on-trent

nashwan, Friday, 13 January 2017 13:45 (seven years ago) link

i grew up 20-odd miles from Stoke and have been there maybe half a dozen times in my entire life. not in any hurry to visit again.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

@paulmasonnews 18s19 seconds ago
I was just on @BBCWorldatOne about @TristramHuntMP - good MP for Stoke, bad decision.

https://m.popkey.co/f0e5c0/eLE7K.gif

nashwan, Friday, 13 January 2017 14:15 (seven years ago) link

well, they both agree on the urgent need to cut immigration

soref, Friday, 13 January 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

trentham gardens are lovely but not sure they represented t hunt's powerbase

ogmor, Friday, 13 January 2017 14:22 (seven years ago) link

OK, Mason's finally flipped.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 13 January 2017 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Although that was his follow up to "Nothing signifies the ideological death of neoliberal Labour better than its gilded youth heading to plush jobs out of politics." so shrug.

nashwan, Friday, 13 January 2017 14:50 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure than running the V&A pays less than being the Economics Editor of Channel 4 but whatever.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 15:13 (seven years ago) link

does channel 4 have an economics editor these days?

conrad, Friday, 13 January 2017 15:36 (seven years ago) link

The Labour MP for West Bromwich East, Tom Watson, has criticised Mr Hunt for crossing the picket line in his blog.
He said he would rather Mr Hunt "resign his post as a lecturer than cross a picket line of striking lecturers, in order to deliver a history module on Marx, Engels and the making of Marxism".
"The preposterous irony of Tristram's action will amuse many, but Labour is too near a general election to write a new episode of The Thick of It," he wrote.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 15:45 (seven years ago) link

tom watson is an enigma he's obviously a raging egomaniac but what is he wants?

conrad, Friday, 13 January 2017 15:51 (seven years ago) link

I don't agree that Paul Mason is terrible.

I think he's a brilliant man whose writing and thought are very stimulating.

I don't know the rights or wrongs of his latest thoughts on immigration - a topic whose complexities I don't really understand very well, whatever positions are being taken.

But I won't stop thinking that Mason is a great figure and thinker.

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Though Hunt is a different matter, I don't really understand the general contempt for him either.

I don't know if he's a good local MP, and I wasn't very keen on the positions he took (Blairite if you like) in the 2015 Labour debates. I don't necessarily agree with various things he's said.

But he's not simply a negligible person - he's written several substantial books for major presses, presumably based on his own research and thought. It's more than most of the thousands of people knocking and mocking him online will ever do.

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 16:40 (seven years ago) link

It's true, Jeffrey Archer has written far more novels than I ever could.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 13 January 2017 16:42 (seven years ago) link

But those are probably very bad novels.

Are Hunt's books bad? They look substantial and seem quite well respected. I admit I am only judging from a distance.

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/177720/ten-cities-that-made-an-empire/

He's written 4 books - slightly fewer than I thought. But still far more than most people. And not vanity publishing.

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Even if his books were great, they would not make him a good MP.

I am only saying that he seems to have some substance as a reader, researcher and writer.

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

In general he's very good at pinpointing parallels with broader historical and economic trends, pretty good as a polemicist and dissolves into vague technobabble when providing solutions. I'd also say that his transition from journalistic observer to gleeful combative participant has not reflected well on him. I admired him quite a lot a year or so ago, a little less upon reading his book, and these days I find him embarrassing more often than not.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Sorry that's Mason not Hunt. I'm sure Hunt is an excellent historian but he's been a generally poor MP. I'm not sure how he's regarded in Stoke (generally not well is my guess) - I don't especially agree with people like Stella Creasey but by all accounts they are very good constituency MPs, something that doesn't seem to have particularly interested Tristram.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:03 (seven years ago) link

It's just a bit difficult to think of anyone in a constituency with less than 50% turnout and who quits one of the party's unsafest seats halfway through their term as a good MP (not that there aren't bad MPs in super safe seats).

nashwan, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

It used to be a safe seat though, right? As a voter, when you're faced with a parachuted-in party hack with no connection to your town and minimal awareness of its problems, it must be difficult to view that as anything more than a contemptuous Westminster decision. Like you're seen as a safe place to plonk fast-tracked future ministers and not much more than that.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:16 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/05/20-seats-lowest-turnout-show-labour-voters-drifting-ukip-or-not-voting-all

It is even worse elsewhere. In Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour has shed 14,000 votes since 1997. Would-be Labour leader Tristram Hunt is Britain’s least popular MP: a derisory 19 per cent of constituents voted for him. Stoke-on-Trent Central was the sole seat in Britain where the majority of the electorate did not vote.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:17 (seven years ago) link

I'm guessing Ten Cities that Made an Empire isn't a top seller in the Stoke Waterstones then.

calzino, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

DC -- I agree -- he may be an OK popular historian and know a lot, and still not be a good MP.

I would imagine that he has done the MP's job as well as he could ie: surgeries, casework, etc -- surely he couldn't simply evade that?

I don't think I share the view re: people being 'parachuted in' - I mean, I don't know where my MP comes from - Bournemouth? Somewhere outside London I believe. Where she's from doesn't really matter to me. She stood for Labour and was selected and elected and now she seems to do her best for us.

DC, I can sympathise with the view of Mason you describe. I think he is very talented and knowledgeable, a Renaissance man (musician, novelist, etc). It is possible that he has overreached. It seems somewhat true that in becoming combative participant, he has taken a risk and perhaps lost some of his authority. I generally find his political prognoses wildly optimistic.

But I still respect him greatly as a multi-talented, sparky intellectual who I believe is truly and unapologetically on the Left.

But unlike you, I have not read his last week, only flicked through it very briefly.

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

lol calzino

wins, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:27 (seven years ago) link

... My MP is from Swindon.

I see that she worked politically in local councils here for 6 years before becoming my MP so perhaps that is what you are saying should happen - they should 'do their time locally' before they are allowed to stand for Parliament in a place?

the pinefox, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

I don't think I share the view re: people being 'parachuted in' - I mean, I don't know where my MP comes from - Bournemouth? Somewhere outside London I believe. Where she's from doesn't really matter to me. She stood for Labour and was selected and elected and now she seems to do her best for us.

London is full of people who weren't born in London, Stoke less so, and that's just how they like it.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:34 (seven years ago) link

the people of Stoke would do well to defer to their betters, people who have written far more books than they have, and get out their and blindly support the next anthropoid-looking figure that rocks up to the constituency wearing a Labour rosette

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:45 (seven years ago) link

Maybe I should wait till my "The Ten Greatest Shits I've Ever Had" book is published to diss him though:p

calzino, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:47 (seven years ago) link

lol

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:49 (seven years ago) link

I don't care whether Tristram is a good historian or not. There have been many gaffes, doesn't seem very intelligent, seems totally out of place in the party - someone in my Twitter timeline compared him to Zac Goldsmith and there is a lot to that.

Been going through this report on the latest round in the Government's attempt to dismantle the NHS and instead of making a noise about that he has been quietly moving for this job back in London. So pathetic - just terrible selection in the first place.

The only positive is that at least these cunts seem to be de-selecting themselves. Many more resignations are needed, on the downside.

Those tweets by Mason are pretty terrible - I think it shows the severe limitations in Democratic socialism and I agree with NV up above that while Unions can put up a fight for conditions and rights they have a reactionary streak those tweets by Mason give expression too. Only the rich can come in = 'basic trade unionism'!

And despite Diane's late phone call it looks like she is fighting a lone battle. We really need more MPs like her in the PLP at the mo so the replacements to people like Jamie Reed and Tristram can be another beginning.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:51 (seven years ago) link

hoping for the by-election Labour can parachute in a proper socialist and man of the people such as the eleventh Earl of Trouser Press

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

This was the shenanigans around Hunt's selection process.

Hunt entered parliament in 2010, having being selected for the safe seat Stoke-on-Trent Central by the Labour national executive committee (NEC) – not by the local constituency Labour party (CLP). The NEC had taken over the process and imposed three non-local candidates (Hunt was London-based and was born in Cambridge, and his father, a Cambridge university fellow, was made a Baron by Tony Blair in 2000). The local Labour party, which had expected local candidates to be put forward, demanded a new shortlist, but this was ignored and Hunt won the ballot. In protest, the former CLP secretary changed his name to ‘Gary Labour Candidate Born in Stoke-on-Trent Elsby’ and ran as an independent, subsequently receiving legal threats from the Labour party because he used red on his rosettes.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 13 January 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Maybe Dan Snow can be persuaded to stand?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Niall Ferguson has written a bunch of history books

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 17:57 (seven years ago) link

I think if there is a local, dutiful candidate - well maybe its just me but they won't cut and run on their constituents. Hunt is acting like pure careerist vermin, he knew he would have no opportunity to get into the Shadow Cabinet (no 'promotion') so he left.

Say what you like about MPs like Corbyn and McDonnell. They were shut out from the wider PLP for a long time but they know the value of public service and what it means to be an MP.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 13 January 2017 18:03 (seven years ago) link

Honestly I think that shipping some Momentum hack up from London would be equally disastrous but that quote is one of many reasons why all this pearl-clutching from Blairites rings hollow. Corbyn is useless but Labour spent years obliviously hacking away at their future electoral chances without the slightest thought about about how these things might be perceived by people on the ground.

That's fine though, I'm sure a good dose of Legitimate Concerns will offset years of being treated as voting fodder, then Sensible Labour will be back to halt the rise of fascism in its tracks.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

Momentum bending to operate within the traditional bureaucratic party structures was probably the death of it tbh, taking a hammering from some UKIP nazi at Stoke will be the funeral. back to proper business, leave politics to the professionals.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

There is a fight around whether Momentum do operate around Party structures or not - saw a couple of things suggesting they wouldn't be.

A 'Momentum hack' from Stoke (perhaps the only Momentum hack in the area) would be a lot better than Tristram.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 13 January 2017 18:48 (seven years ago) link

In the art world some people are welcoming this appointment:

I could easily handle a few more exhibitions about Ruskin’s theory of architecture and a few less about Pink Floyd. I had to apologise to Guardian readers who came to a Masterclass event at the V&A recently because psychedelic music was being played loudly right next to the Renaissance galleries, making it hard for us to analyse the art. In their desperation to get a big Botticelli exhibition on last year, the museum’s curators of proper art had to load it with Dolce & Gabbana dresses and Warhols. So if Hunt brings a more sombre tone to this great museum and gives its unrivalled collections of European and global art the attention stolen from them by Kylie, then good.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 13 January 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

's funny i thought Sewell was dead

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 18:56 (seven years ago) link

To be fair Tristram has spent most of the last year banging on about how the party is seen as a remote metropolitan elite. I'm crediting him with enough self awareness that at some point it must have occurred even to him that he was part of the problem. So shuffling off the stage now is probably not the worst move he could make, unless it just hands the seat to UKIP.

The ideal candidate to replace him would be someone who is neither a Corbynite nor a Blairite, but a diligent and hard-working local party figure who knows Stoke well, is aware of all the local issues, and is already fairly prominent within the city. Those are the MPs who tend to hold onto their seats even in tough times.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 19:12 (seven years ago) link

My mum is involved in her local Labour party, and the infighting and dirty tricks she has told me about are nothing short of astonishing.

I saw an article today saying that the left in the US should learn from the Tea Party handbook and organise in a similar fashion, which sounds a bit like Momentum, and a lot like the last thing anyone needs right now. It isn't like DT was the Tea Party's choice either.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Friday, 13 January 2017 22:46 (seven years ago) link

Luke Akehurst looks like a misanthropic potato

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 22:58 (seven years ago) link

and that is being generous.

calzino, Friday, 13 January 2017 23:06 (seven years ago) link

i was holding out an olive branch

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 23:08 (seven years ago) link

admittedly in order to beat the fucker senseless with it

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 23:09 (seven years ago) link

aw no look at all the violence and hatred on the left, my bad

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 23:09 (seven years ago) link

we need to reconcile with these people, get back to Blair's glorious legacy of winning elections and making wealthy people wealthier

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 13 January 2017 23:10 (seven years ago) link

this is an interesting take on Tristram Hunt from someone who used to work for him

http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/goodbye-to-tristram.html

(it's pretty balanced and avoids invective, which arguably makes some of the criticisms it delivers feel more cutting, if anything)

soref, Saturday, 14 January 2017 00:46 (seven years ago) link

That's pretty much what I would have expected, he comes across as well meaning but largely mediocre and visionless and unused to finding things difficult or any real checks on his mediocrity. The latter is probably why he seemed so frustrated over the last couple of years.

Matt DC, Saturday, 14 January 2017 11:10 (seven years ago) link

I feel like this sort of thing could really fuck the Brexiters' dreams of a Britannia unchained:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/14/netherlands-will-block-eu-deal-with-uk-without-tax-avoidance-measures?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Like, it's open season on pretty much every aspect of UK trade policy now.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 14 January 2017 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure than running the V&A pays less than being the Economics Editor of Channel 4 but whatever.

― Matt DC, Friday, 13 January 2017 15:13 (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I seriously doubt that. The V&A position role pays £300,000.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Sunday, 15 January 2017 01:46 (seven years ago) link

here is hammond speaking directly about wanting to become dubai/singapore: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/15/philip-hammond-suggests-uk-outside-single-market-could-become-tax-haven?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 15 January 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Oh wow, I'm sure I saw some document that said the position was paying about £130k six or seven years ago. That's an insane level of wage inflation, especially to get a dude who's clearly fucking desperate to get out of his current job.

Matt DC, Sunday, 15 January 2017 10:23 (seven years ago) link

J Harris proposes Universal Basic Income.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/13/jeremy-corbyn-big-radical-ideas

He suggests: 'To go with the grain of Brexit, moreover, the income could be contingent on British citizenship and the taking of decently funded English lessons.'

He concludes with a cheap jibe at Corbyn's appearance.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 10:41 (seven years ago) link

fashion advice from John Harris, the indignity

soref, Sunday, 15 January 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

demands for decent standards of English from John Harris, the indignity

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

"You know, my education didn’t come from school, which I hated, it came from reading NME." - Mark Fisher.

Not if you read it in 1995.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:41 (seven years ago) link

Read this critique on UBI earlier in the week as it happens..

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:48 (seven years ago) link

>>> demands for decent standards of English from John Harris, the indignity

Yes. This is fair. He is quite a bad writer.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:54 (seven years ago) link

>>> fashion advice from John Harris, the indignity

This is fair too. Who does JH think he is, talking about anyone's appearance?

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

Worzel Gummidge by the looks of things.

Matt DC, Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

TS: Gummidge vs. Lenin

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

Harris's own appearance, which is terrible, is irrelevant, as he is not a politician hoping to gain support and win an election. I think he has a point about Corbyn's cap. I think it probably is a vote loser, although perhaps a lot of the people who especially dislike the cap and its associations would not vote for him anyway.

dubmill, Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

Fun fact, you can't get British citizenship without being able to speak English unless you are over 65 or mentally impaired so any attempt to impose a language barrier to basic rights could only target people who have already been British for at least five years. Realistically, you couldn't pass the Life In The UK test without having at least reasonable English, which pushes it back to about thirteen years. Harris' brave stance on a handful of Asian pensioners who came here decades ago will have been noted, though.

The cap has polled well, apparently, not that it means much.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:17 (seven years ago) link

Someone obviously got to Corbyn with basic fashion advice ("Jez, you're a 'winter' now!") and I like the Breton fisherman's cap - what the fuck is he calling it a 'Lenin hat' for? No star embroidery and it's not green.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

As you say, it's not a 'Lenin hat' as such, but is it not a type of hat that a fair number of older socialists seem to favour?

dubmill, Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

I think he has a point about Corbyn's cap. I think it probably is a vote loser,

Uh, right.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:25 (seven years ago) link

Like everyone knows what an old socialist looks like.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

this is why Corby is so terrible, Blair would've focused the fuck out of that hat until he could be sure how it played with swing voters in key marginals - that's politics

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Well it's obviously enough of a stereotype for Harris to vaguely recognise it.

dubmill, Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

Now here's a guy who could give Corbyn a few tips on how to win over the British public:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/18/16/27B3429400000578-3044865-image-m-84_1429372366296.jpg

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

No caps but salary caps.

Matt DC, Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:36 (seven years ago) link

If Corbyn wore a striped Breton top, the metropolitan elite would go into meltdown.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 15 January 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

I do think that Corbyn's appearance is a factor in why he's so popular with the Labour membership, they recognise him as "one of us" - every CLP in the country has at least half a dozen Corbyn doppelgangers amongst its membership

soref, Sunday, 15 January 2017 13:28 (seven years ago) link

can't quite get over this look:

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/139/590x/jeremy-corbyn-red-socks-sandals-608678.jpg

soref, Sunday, 15 January 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

I don't mind if JC, on his own judgment, does stop wearing his cap, or wear a different hat, or whatever he sees fit to do.

I just don't like the horrible undergraduate-zine-sarcastic whine of Harris, specifically, ordering him to do it, and undermining what gravitas there was in his already characteristically sneering article by abruptly and irrelevantly ending it on that note.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:15 (seven years ago) link

Paul Mason's latest blog.

https://medium.com/mosquito-ridge/pissing-on-the-ritz-b9a320ef3405#.ujwruts5z

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:15 (seven years ago) link

Harris is not the worst political commentator. But he mars all his good ideas and reportage with his dreadful weary sneering tone.

It strikes me that he makes an instructive contrast with Aditya Chakrabortty
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/adityachakrabortty

who so consistently says bold, intelligent and good things, probably from a better base of empirical and theoretical knowledge than Harris, and never resorts to cheap abuse or weary fake superiority.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:43 (seven years ago) link

pissing on putin on the ritz

nashwan, Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:48 (seven years ago) link

The whole thing is a mess but this seems incredibly fanciful to me:

Let’s get the process stuff out of the way. Buzzfeed was right to release the private intelligence document containing damaging allegations against Trump. In UK terms it was clearly in the public interest to reveal the contents. Any state regulated broadcaster in the UK would have

UK defamation law requires (iirc) journalists to make reasonable efforts to verify the facts before publishing anything potentially defamatory if they want to rely on a public interest defence. Buzzfeed made it clear that thy couldn't verify the facts, which was why a whole range of other US outlets (and possibly even British ones) didn't print it back in October. With this in mind, I can't see the BBC or anyone else publishing an unverified, defamatory set of allegations against a British politician without running a massive risk of a libel action.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:49 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that makes sense.

Do you think the rest of Mason's article equally flawed?

As always, I enjoy his gung-ho commitment even if it seems wildly over-optimistic and over-dramatic.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Yes, it skips from concluding that the document is real (which nobody disputes) to assuming that the raw intel allegations form part of a solid CIA dossier on whether Trump has been compromised, which Obama is mysteriously hiding from the American people and allied states.

This doesn't seem to even make sense:

The clever thing to have done would be to get Trump into the White House and just let him screw up globalisation and the international order with no reference to the Kremlin and no pissing parties in the Moscow Ritz Carlton. Hence the buyers’ remorse.

The clever thing to do would to not get caught?

Anyway, I appear to have gone to school with Aditya Chakrabortty (though I don't recall him) and would agree he's excellent. He's one of the Guardian's best assets.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 15 January 2017 15:04 (seven years ago) link

Cosign ^

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 15 January 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Yes I think I agree too!

Inc with 'clever thing to do would to not get caught' I think.
(Not sure I understand the complexities of this issue really)

And I do find Chakrabortty really consistent and principled.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Is that real?

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 22:50 (seven years ago) link

Yes, he just did a fawning interview with him for The Times.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 15 January 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link

It's disgusting.

It's naive to be surprised and disgusted by something Gove does.

But still - I don't think I ever envisaged Gove doing that.

I still tend to think there is a difference between the appalling Cons and even UKIP people of the UK, and the maniac in Trump Tower. I think: Gove is so absurd and bad, but he did used to talk to reasonable people on NEWSNIGHT REVIEW.

But then I see this kind of thing and these distinctions, for what they were worth, seem to disappear.

It is disgusting.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 23:01 (seven years ago) link

Gove has long been an enthusiast for the idea that the west is involved in some kind of existential struggle with Islamic extremism, so he has common ground with Trump on that score. (Ken Clarke was correct when he said that Gove would probably start wars with three countries simultaneously if he ever became PM). I think he likes Trump for the same reasons someone like Steve Hilton does, this reckless, think-the-unthinkable desire to dramatically reshape the world and damn the consequences.

Gove also wrote this article arguing that Trump is the modern-day Andrew Jackson, this seems to be a good thing in his view: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/how-hothead-old-hickory-harnessed-his-nations-anger-to-become-president-sktsd2036

soref, Sunday, 15 January 2017 23:23 (seven years ago) link

I wish I had pf's naïveté. I really do.

This is the way the world ends

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Monday, 16 January 2017 00:32 (seven years ago) link

I'm consoling myself with the belief that the backlash against all this shit, when it occurs, is likely to be huge, decisive and hopefully lasting. The other half of me thinks this is just the way things are going to be from now on.

Matt DC, Monday, 16 January 2017 15:55 (seven years ago) link

Don't worry Matt, I'm sure when the backlash against Trumpism kicks in people will still find a way to blame the whole thing on the pc brigade and globalist leftist hedge funds

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 16 January 2017 17:35 (seven years ago) link

I still tend to think there is a difference between the appalling Cons and even UKIP people of the UK, and the maniac in Trump Tower.
this is completely and utterly wrong. tory gov in the uk prioritizes controlling eu immigration and opting out of the echr over membership in the single market and economic prosperity. this is extremist nationalism, and it's going to win elections in the uk.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/uk-regions/scotland/news/82428/kezia-dugdale-defies-jeremy-corbyn-call-immigration-be

Ms Dugdale said her party was exploring the system which operates in Canada, where Quebec has a certain level of autonomy when it comes to controlling its borders.

She said that showed it could be possible for different parts of the UK to decide immigration policies "that meets their particular needs".

how exactly does this work in Quebec? Is the idea that immigrants who come to live in the rest of the UK would be able to travel between England/Wales/NI and Scotland but wouldn't be able to work or claim benefits there?

soref, Monday, 16 January 2017 18:10 (seven years ago) link

Kezia Dugdale, or as she know to people in Scotland, Kezia Who?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:12 (seven years ago) link

The Labour What?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

as far as i know the autonomy that quebec has is basically that it has its own certificate that you must receive before applying to immigrate there. it's points based and speaking french is a plus. essentially it has a slightly more restrictive immigration policy than canada writ large.

it's also somewhat toothless in that you can immigrate to another part of canada and just move to quebec afterwards.

not sure how as an example it would be relevant to scotland where we would be better off with a less restrictive immigration system than the uk one

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:16 (seven years ago) link

not sure how as an example it would be relevant to scotland where we would be better off with a less restrictive immigration system than the uk one

^^^^

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

altho i think kez is suggesting it could be used that way, though again id imagine the uk gov would have something to say about it - again what would stop the immigrant to scotland moving down south

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

also her new act of union patter seems like the stupidest least politically astute policy. nats are not going to be satisfied with further devolution within union, yoons don't want further devolution. who is the policy supposed to appeal to?

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:20 (seven years ago) link

Rangers fans People who have switched from Labour to Tory

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

ha, devising policies that are unappealing to ppl on both sides of various divides seems to be the modern day Labour party's specialty, both in Scotland and the rest of the UK

soref, Monday, 16 January 2017 18:29 (seven years ago) link

love me a sectarian headcount

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:33 (seven years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-s-and-putin-s-plan-to-dissolve-the-eu-and-nato

Most people in this country, certainly most members of the political class and especially its expression in Washington, don't realize what Donald Trump is trying to do in Europe and Russia. Back in December I explained that Trump has a plan to break up the European Union. Trump and his key advisor Steve Bannon (former Breitbart chief) believe they can promise an advantageous trade agreement with the United Kingdom, thus strengthening the UK's position in its negotiations over exiting the EU. With such a deal in place with the UK, they believe they can slice apart the EU by offering the same model deal to individual EU states. Steve Bannon discussed all of this at length with Business Week's Josh Green and Josh and I discussed it in great detail in this episode of my podcast from mid-December.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 16 January 2017 19:48 (seven years ago) link

ah an advantageous trade agreement with the states - which currently accounts for 15% of uk trade - will really strengthen britain's position in negotiations with the eu. my sides are splitting. josh marshall is a fucking clown

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 20:17 (seven years ago) link

I think the appropriate fucking clowns in this instance are bannon and trump

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 16 January 2017 20:21 (seven years ago) link

jim, the last paragraph of that article says

My own view is that Trump and Bannon greatly overestimate America's relative economic power in the world. Their view appears to be that no European country will feel it is able to be locked out of trade with a US-UK trade pact. An America eager to break up the EU seems more likely to inject new life into the union. However that may be, Trump and Bannon clearly want to create a nativist world order based on the US, Russia and states that want to align with them. The EU and NATO are only obstacles to that goal.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 16 January 2017 20:42 (seven years ago) link

this is extremist nationalism, and it's going to win elections in the uk.

a million times this.

It's called, "giving a shit". (stevie), Monday, 16 January 2017 20:50 (seven years ago) link

jim, the last paragraph of that article says

My own view is that Trump and Bannon greatly overestimate America's relative economic power in the world. Their view appears to be that no European country will feel it is able to be locked out of trade with a US-UK trade pact. An America eager to break up the EU seems more likely to inject new life into the union. However that may be, Trump and Bannon clearly want to create a nativist world order based on the US, Russia and states that want to align with them. The EU and NATO are only obstacles to that goal.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, January 16, 2017 12:42 PM (twenty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ok lol i didn't read the article

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 January 2017 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I am likely just listening to too many paranoids, but can someone who is more familiar with our convoluted mediaeval government process, please explain me what this is?

A private members' bill has been moved up for a second reading on the exact Friday that the judgement is due on Gina Miller's Brexit case. BBC says not to worry too much about it; Bremain twitter is already coming up with bizarre theories that it's being some kind of ruse to push it through without objection under the radar on a busy news day, then later spring out and go "look, A50 was approved by parliament, off we go".

Is that possible? (I'm not even asking if it's likely, because nothing seems unlikely any more with this lot.)

The bill:
https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/withdrawalfromtheeuropeanunionarticle50.html

The BBC:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-parliaments-38173167

I can't tell if this is legit or another tin-hat with that blog name, but:
https://thegreatbritishmoronathon.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/article-50-private-members-bill-tabled/

Is this something we should be worried about?

Sehr Kornisch (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 08:40 (seven years ago) link

I think the short answer is no. All it would take would be for one Lib Dem or SNP or pro-Remain Labour MP to say "object". This is the kind of stunt you'd expect from Peter Bone and it would only really work (as it did with the expenses thing a few years ago) if everyone was in on it.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 09:03 (seven years ago) link

Thanks, SV.

(I'm mostly just worried because there's going to be such an eruption about the court case that it's a classic "day to bury bad news / do something nefarious because the person due to shout 'object' failed to turn up" situation.)

Sehr Kornisch (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 09:11 (seven years ago) link

Um that BBC article is from Dec 1st 2016 and refers to the bill being on the agenda for Dec 16th 2016?

JimD, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

May has made it official - the UK will not seek membership of the Single Market.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

what recourse do we have to 'these maniacs have to be stopped'

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:30 (seven years ago) link

MPs and peers to get a vote on the final Brexit deal, May says

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:30 (seven years ago) link

aha

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

that isn't so reassuring mind

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

that was an unintentional xp answer :) (doubt it will change things tbh) xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain, Brighter Future, Global Britain.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

@PeteWishart She now seems to be issuing threats to the EU - 'Don't do what's in your interest our I'll ruin the UK even further'.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:34 (seven years ago) link

Global Britain wtf?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:34 (seven years ago) link

How does Labour respond now, given that Corbyn has a) emphasised the importance of remaining within the single market and b) said that Labour won't vote against Brexit?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

Parliament must reject the deal by 51.8% no less

nashwan, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

It's "They need us more than we need them" more or less ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:36 (seven years ago) link

MPs and peers to get a vote on the final Brexit deal, May says

She already announced this during the Supreme Court hearing, didn't she? And what will happen if MPs/Lords don't like the deal? Won't it be slightly too late by then?

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

if it helps guys I like to think of how much the ghosts of the hundreds of millions of victims of the British Empire will be enjoying this

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:43 (seven years ago) link

@DPJHodges
One other narrative May's killing off. The idea she's out off her depth. This is a heavyweight speech from a serious politician.

Imagine being this credulous.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

Is he still alive?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:45 (seven years ago) link

if it helps guys I like to think of how much the ghosts of the hundreds of millions of victims of the British Empire will be enjoying this

I am going to defer judgement until i'm absolutely sure she's not going to recolonise Trinidad as part of the Global Britain initiative.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Hodges is like one of those England pundits who continually big up the opposition in the hope of downplaying the shitness of their own team

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:47 (seven years ago) link

The GBP is rising against the USD just based on the clarity of the decision (rather than the wisdom).

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:47 (seven years ago) link

dahahan hahahahannan

conrad, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

Unhappily EFTA after.

nashwan, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

good luck "britain"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:03 (seven years ago) link

finally, at last, britain will take its place on the world stage

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

> The GBP is rising against the USD just based on the clarity of the decision (rather than the wisdom).

up 2 pence since 9am to 1.23. don't spend it all at once.

koogs, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Farmers have “legitimate and important concerns” about Brexit.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/17/business-theresa-may-brexit-speech-uk-eu

Alba, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:11 (seven years ago) link

Annoyed at the statement "some said leaving the SM was inevitable once May started talking about freedom of movement etc" (or something like that) on the BBC. No, some said it was inevitable before that! It was obviously going to be a consequence of the vote. Meh, maybe they can use it as an excuse for another vote - I doubt it. No doubt, though, there were plenty of people who voted leave but failed to understand it would mean leaving the single market. Which is someone's fault - I'm sure the media will tell us who.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:27 (seven years ago) link

She obviously thinks this isn't in Britain's interests but is too cowardly and/or too electorally weak to go against it. This is a complete disaster and a total failure of leadership.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:30 (seven years ago) link

I genuinely think she believes immigration is the no.1 priority and any other political, social or economic considerations should take a back seat. This isn't a failure of leadership, it's the leadership of someone who has deliberately taken a catastrophic course of action.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:37 (seven years ago) link

Her dodging the questions about the impact on Britain is the sort of thing a decent opposition should be driving massive wedges through.

Starting to agree with the Twitter wisdom that this is ultimately a narrow self-interested political calculation for her: If she doesn't go all-in for Brexit and cut as many ties as possible, the remaining immigration will be blamed on her, and immigration is the evil That Must Be Stopped.

If she does go all-in, what has she got to lose? The diffuse economic effects will not be blamed on her, or the glorious Brexit idea, but instead on a heady brew of Remainers, the Media, Enemies of the People, et al.

That calculation ignores the livid 48+%, and any collapse of the UK, though.

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:39 (seven years ago) link

No doubt, though, there were plenty of people who voted leave but failed to understand it would mean leaving the single market.

i'd be interested to know how many people voted leave but failed to understand it would mean leaving the single market vs those legitimate concerners who voted leave and didn't then (and still don't now) understand what the single market is and how it relates to the uk

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:41 (seven years ago) link

It's probably true that the public cares about it greatly: but that's what leaders are for (I know that sounds horrible un-socialist, but it is what it is).

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:41 (seven years ago) link

Farmers have “legitimate and important concerns” about Brexit.

tbf those concerns are more likely to be anti-Brexit than pro. Unfortunate choice of words perhaps? Not the same "legitimate concerns".

Transform All Suffering Into Poo (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:44 (seven years ago) link

The owners of farms will be anti-brexit - the workers who see none of the benefit (at least explicitly) won't be.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Confusing.

nashwan, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:49 (seven years ago) link

It's time to do to legitimate concerns what Trump does with "Fake News"; if everyone has legitimate concerns, no-one does

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:49 (seven years ago) link

We're going to end up with a tariff-based economic system with key strategic companies/industries propped up with sweeteners and central government subsidies. Is this really what the Conservatives wanted to end up with 35 or so years after Thatcher?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Also had Corbyn, who has presumably had weeks to prepare for today, said anything in response yet?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

xp

not the Thatcherites/Libertarians/Friedmanites, but they're not running the show any more, and the racist Little Englander wing that never went away is in charge as long as Theresa May thinks she needs them

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:12 (seven years ago) link

"Theresa May has made clear that she is determined to use Brexit to turn Britain into a bargain basement tax haven on the shores of Europe. She makes out this is a negotiating threat to the 27 EU countries but it's actually a threat to the British people's jobs, services and living standards.

“We welcome that the Prime Minister has listened to the case we've been making about the need for full tariff free access to the single market but are deeply concerned about her reckless approach to achieving it.

“This speech should have been given in Parliament where MPs could ask her questions on behalf of their constituents. She talks about Brexit restoring parliamentary sovereignty but, once again, she is determined to avoid real scrutiny of her plans."

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:13 (seven years ago) link

(xp to matt)

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:13 (seven years ago) link

lol matt dc angling for a gig at the new wasteman or something

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:50 (seven years ago) link

Wait what?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-news-uk-will-leave-eu-regardless-of-parliament-vote-theresa-may-a7531656.html

This can't be true, right? That's effectively forcing Parliament to wave the deal through no matter how bad it is.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:08 (seven years ago) link

I mean I'm guessing that's a heavy spin put on that "source" quote, but who even knows any more.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:10 (seven years ago) link

tbf those concerns are more likely to be anti-Brexit than pro. Unfortunate choice of words perhaps? Not the same "legitimate concerns".

Yeah, that was why I quoted them: thought it was funny to see the cliche turned against Brexit.

Alba, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:10 (seven years ago) link

That's effectively forcing Parliament to wave the deal through no matter how bad it is.

I think this was always the case, in truth. I can't see how anyone (the government or the EU) could be forced back to the negotiating table by Parliament. The choice would potentially be to back the deal on the table or reject it, with rejection meaning leaving with no deal rather than staying.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:16 (seven years ago) link

of course, the only vote that matters is if there's a vote on triggering A50. once triggered I would assume there are no backsies.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:24 (seven years ago) link

Or rejection meaning another vote. So much hangs or revocability of a50 xp

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:25 (seven years ago) link

So what Labour does or says basically doesn't matter for anything other than their electoral positioning in 2020? ie there's no way they could make single market membership a red line in terms of their support, even if they were minded to? Unless there's a vote on Article 50, and I've completely lost track of what's happening there.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:32 (seven years ago) link

We're waiting on Supreme Court there still.

Tim Farron is getting roasted on Twitter by leavers. Who couldn't give a shit about Corbyn. Is this going to give them legitimacy as opposition? I'm started to wonder what form the mechanism to sunset Labour will take.

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

So what Labour does or says basically doesn't matter for anything other than their electoral positioning in 2020? ie there's no way they could make single market membership a red line in terms of their support, even if they were minded to? Unless there's a vote on Article 50, and I've completely lost track of what's happening there.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 17:00 (seven years ago) link

good contribution from me there i know, cheers

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 17:02 (seven years ago) link

@paulmasonnews

(10/10) Brits: get ready to Rise Like Lions - if May loses on the final Brexit terms in the Commons she must go. End of.

#theresistance

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

"I am equally clear that no deal for Britain is better than a bad deal for Britain."

...

nashwan, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

Tbh I don't think at this point in time it would be very sane for any political party to nail itself to the cross of resisting Brexit. Let the story play itself thru, draw attention to the Tories' failings in UK terms, come back much later when (if) the tide of opinion swells back in a more decisive direction

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:05 (seven years ago) link

Don't expect people not to laugh if you ask them to Rise Like Lions for a set of trade agreements

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:06 (seven years ago) link

Don't think the LDs have much to lose though, do they?

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:15 (seven years ago) link

Well yeah, that's a perennial given

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn’s speech prompted charges he was “pandering to racism”. This betrays a profound misunderstanding of what drives opposition to free movement among progressive, left-minded people in the communities where Labour is rooted. Free movement does not just suppress wage growth at the low end. It says to people with strong cultural traditions, a strong sense of place and community (sometimes all they have left from the industrial era) that “your past does not matter”. It promotes the ideal worker as a rootless person with no attachment to place or community, and with limited political rights; whose citizenship resides in their ability to work alone. In case you haven’t noticed, shouting, “Don’t be racist!” at the Labour voters who backed Brexit, isn’t working. That’s because most of them are not racist.

lex pretend, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:28 (seven years ago) link

everyone goes ukip in the end then

lex pretend, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:28 (seven years ago) link

paul mason is a total cunt.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 19:08 (seven years ago) link

glasgow is a very white and culturally homogenous city where the majority of people you speak to speak in a glasgow accent, have left-wing politics, have ties to the city spanning generations, and feel particularly connected to a sense of glaswegian identity - quite often eclipsing any sense of scottish or british identity. 2/3 of the city's voters voted remain.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 19:12 (seven years ago) link

The Lib Dems are the party with a major grievance to exploit and a fairly clear playing field to do so, but their voter base is not Labour's and in any case their brand may be so trashed post-coalition that it'll make no difference.

Suspect that UKIP are the big losers from today, in pure electoral terms if nothing else.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

glasgow is a very white and culturally homogenous city where the majority of people you speak to speak in a glasgow accent, have left-wing politics, have ties to the city spanning generations, and feel particularly connected to a sense of glaswegian identity - quite often eclipsing any sense of scottish or british identity. 2/3 of the city's voters voted remain.

Only some working class people matter though.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 19:33 (seven years ago) link

The owners of farms will be anti-brexit - the workers who see none of the benefit (at least explicitly) won't be.

makes sense, but does not explain the giant Leave banners on every field pre-referendum

unless they just wanted to put up their right-wing union flag look-how-big-my-field-is bragging banners as they do before every election without thinking anyone might dare to take their subsidies away

The choice would potentially be to back the deal on the table or reject it, with rejection meaning leaving with no deal rather than staying.

accept the deal which will probably be 99% equivalent to no deal, or leave with no deal. hurrah

Only some working class people matter though.

only retired baby boomers matter, whinging in their mortgage-paid-off 3-spare-bedroom houses about being "left behind" by "metropolitan elites". who will matter once the baby boomers die out? dunno but I expect they will have Legitimate Concerns while having enough spare cash or not having enough grasp of cause and effect to hold Tories/Brexiters to account for austerity multiplied by a crashing pound

sorry I don't have anything insightful to say but fuck this country and its government tbh

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:15 (seven years ago) link

This is on Brexit & NI

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:19 (seven years ago) link

Paul Mason can't even link his tweets - state of the man

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:21 (seven years ago) link

some futurist

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:27 (seven years ago) link

pm-2020

nxd, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Not even sure there is a way out but could Parliament force the government to take a more reasonable positon before Article 50 is triggered? I saw something like no white paper will be produced but really MPs need to force them on this. Parliament need to scrutinise the Government's postion in detail. Someone needs to come up with a set of checks and balances - nothing like this will happen but y'know.

Also could Scotland force the Government's hand? I just find there are weaknesses in May's position, a lot of pre-negotiation talk bluster on a slim majority, and the outcomes of a hard-Brexit are potentially suicidal for the Conservatives (whatever the state of the Labour Party) and the country.

Also, by going on about hard Brexit and the government we do forget the EU is on the other side - talking about 'fuck it we'll become a tax heaven' or whatever is just childish. They've forgotten to be technocrats.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:36 (seven years ago) link

of course after my little Brexit breakdown up there I concede Stephen Bush has a point: https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/821433144415031298

on NI, opinion pollsters LucidTalk had a PDF out recently which included the stat that 8% of Unionists (!) would "consider" Irish reunification in the event of Brexit. not sure about methodology or reliability or anything (the PDF is a little less than professionally presented) so mainly presenting for lols tbh

and this was an interestingish article in the Belfast Telegraph:
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/news-analysis/northern-ireland-election-could-become-rerun-of-the-eu-referendum-35369244.html

suspect anecdotal Arlene-deserting DUP voters are as illusory as the Lifelong Republican But Not Trump voters turned out to be, but there are interesting times in NI politics ahead either way I fear

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link

Worst case is 10+ years of struggle, after the previous 10 years of struggle, meaning a whole generation will hit its mid-30s to 40s without ever experiencing what a British economy that wasn’t fatally wounded by government mismanagement looked like.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 23:48 (seven years ago) link

The days of boom and bust looking pretty good rn tbh

stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 23:58 (seven years ago) link

our side should hold a quick eirexit poll and simply swap out any of ours looking to leave with anyone up north looking to stay

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 00:21 (seven years ago) link

According to the relevant EU regulations once A50 is triggered (by the UK informing the EU of its desire to leave) the UK will leave the EU in two years. The only way this could be stopped or the timeline lengthened would be if the EU states unanimously voted to extend the process.

AlanSmithee, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 09:26 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHFp3-qE_T8

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 10:16 (seven years ago) link

But you see we don't listen to experts any more

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 10:31 (seven years ago) link

Remind me again why the UK doesn't pursue membership in EFTA?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Oxford professor, what does she know?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Tracer, because you have to allow dirty foreigners into your country to be an EFTA member and everyone knows that goes against the people's number one priority.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

We are not Switzerland, look at all the pink on this map from 1923.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:08 (seven years ago) link

Presumably there's nothing to stop the UK applying for single market membership later down the line? ie after the almost inevitable economic clusterfuck, once peak Brexit hubris is over and voter sentiment has changed?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

by which point presumably we'll have a piss-weak case for joining back up

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

And we'll have pissed everyone off even more by having tried to become a dingy cut-price tax haven in the meantime.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:17 (seven years ago) link

stoked for the madness

How To: Make the perfect summer jorts (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:19 (seven years ago) link

Also could Scotland force the Government's hand? I just find there are weaknesses in May's position, a lot of pre-negotiation talk bluster on a slim majority, and the outcomes of a hard-Brexit are potentially suicidal for the Conservatives (whatever the state of the Labour Party) and the country.

her position is still entirely weak have-cake-and-eat-it shit but I can't see how she gets around either the Scotland or Ireland question. She says she's committed to the open Irish border but this is completely incompatible with hard Brexit.

It's sad that Parliament will actually have a say on how this shitshow will unfold but no one thinks it'll make a bit of difference

lex pretend, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Labour has to come up with its own “red lines” on Brexit, and promise that they will not vote through any Brexit Act that does not meet them. That’s a de facto “we’ll vote no” because there’s no way May is going to deliver on anything non-awful.

this is bang on but I feel this weird dread that Labour will do nothing of the sort

lex pretend, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

"it seems absolutely incredible to me that in the 21st century member states of the EU should be seriously contemplating the reintroduction of tariffs or whatever to administer punishment to the UK"

Boris Johnson, who went on to accuse them of wanting to "administer punishment beatings" "in the manner of some world war two movie"

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

Was he then heard to mumble something about 'one World Cup'?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:10 (seven years ago) link

She says she's committed to the open Irish border but this is completely incompatible with hard Brexit.

There was some talk about strengthening Irish immigration at ports & airports, but it turns out that most of that talk was from the NI secretary James Brokenshire* and not so much from Ireland.

*still can't believe this is an actual name, much less the name of the SSNI

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:14 (seven years ago) link

It seems absolutely incredible to me that in the 21st century my gym should be seriously contemplating not letting me use their equipment or whatever to administer punishment to me for cancelling my membership.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:17 (seven years ago) link

The best case scenario is that she's setting out an unachievable stall so that the compromises, when they inevitably occur, don't seem so bad. But she'll be slaughtered from the right whatever happens.

Trying to think what the landscape is going to look like in ten years. By that stage they're likely to be trudging through a lame-duck final term that will make Major/Brown look like Blair in 97.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

Nuttall is standing in Stoke.

nashwan, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

There was some talk about strengthening Irish immigration at ports & airports, but it turns out that most of that talk was from the NI secretary James Brokenshire* and not so much from Ireland.

I think the only workable thing would be:

Keep the border open
Maintain a free-movement position for Irish citizens
Impose stronger border checks for travel between NI and the rest of the UK
Make life next to impossible for EU citizens who are in NI 'illicitly'

In theory, if you're Czech you might technically be able to travel from Leitrim to Fermanagh but any benefit from doing so other than no longer being in Leitrim would vanish.

The last point is going to, surely, be essential to any post-immigration Brexit position. EU migrants, including those already here, will need work permits / documented leave to remain and then have to show that documentation every time they want to access employment, housing, the NHS, public services, etc.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:26 (seven years ago) link

in further irony brokenshire was security and immigration previously and looks like a photofit of a benelux eu commissioner

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d8/James_Brokenshire_2015.jpg/220px-James_Brokenshire_2015.jpg

conrad, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

otm.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

The last point is going to, surely, be essential to any post-immigration Brexit position. EU migrants, including those already here, will need work permits / documented leave to remain and then have to show that documentation every time they want to access employment, housing, the NHS, public services, etc.

The miserable thing about that is it means *everybody* has to show documentation when they want those things. And passports ain't free.

stet, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

I mean that's not the only miserable thing about it, but y'know

stet, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

A national ID card would probably sail through these days. The quaint objections to Labour authoritarianism that killed it off last time seem a hundred years ago.

Landlords, doctors, etc are already being asked to act as immigration enforcement agents with non-EU migrants. I think most English-accented white people will be generally ok but can definitely see a reluctance on the part of the private sector to employ / rent to anyone else without a huge amount of scrutiny given that they'll be the ones facing the risk of reprisals for non-compliance.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:25 (seven years ago) link

Impose stronger border checks for travel between NI and the rest of the UK

They'd love that in Norn Iron.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I don't know what %age of people in e.g. Easterhouse have passports. A huge number of them can't afford the bus fair into Glasgow centre.

X posts.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

it's fine, i'm sure the government wouldn't want to cut the most marginalised people in society out of access to healthcarem, voting etc and so will find a simple, affordable way around any potential issues

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 13:50 (seven years ago) link

On Theresa May's Brexit plan:
Good for Britain: 55%
Bad for Britain: 19%
(via YouGov)

Perceptions on who needs who more:
UK needs EU more: 19%
EU needs UK more: 34%
Need each other equally: 28%
(via YouGov)

YouGov is obviously terrible but these results are still O_o

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 19 January 2017 08:16 (seven years ago) link

i can't even.. what?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 19 January 2017 08:22 (seven years ago) link

With a fawning media, lack of effective opposition and a general "just get on with it" attitude even among some Remainers that's not especially surprising.

Today's Guardian was suggested that Labour MPs in Remain constituencies - including close Corbyn loyalists - are planning on defying the Whip if it goes to a vote. Certainly got the sense that one of the quotes came from Diane Abbott.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 08:59 (seven years ago) link

Not Kate Hoey.

brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Thursday, 19 January 2017 09:04 (seven years ago) link

the wiff waff blitz spirit has done wonders for national morale bring on the world war 2 movie punishment beatings

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:25 (seven years ago) link

even taking that poll with the requisite amount of yougov-related skepticism, the idea that support for brexit might not have just remained steady but actually increased despite the government's panicked flailing since the referendum is... troubling

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:39 (seven years ago) link

Nearly all the papers have spent the entire time since the referendum telling people how right they were and how fantastic Brexit is going to be; insisting that the plunging pound is just proof that everything's going to plan. There are very few credible voices pointing out the looming disaster, and those that are get very short shrift from the majority of the media.

Life inside the Brexit bubble is pretty good rn I think. No wonder they're delighted when the PM gives a big speech describing a very tasty cake and telling them how delicious it will be.

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm genuinely worried just how toxic the "of course Brexit was a good idea and it would have worked if only those Europeans hadn't PUNISHED US" backlash will be; especially if there's someone there to capitalise on it. Conflicts have started on much less.

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

i was just typing something to that effect about the reality-warping brexiteers will have to perform once the real slide into the shit begins and what the side-effects of that might be

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

brb gonna build an air-raid shelter and stock it with weapons and non-perishable goods

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

Re: The Sun reprising the Kinnock lightbulb front page, has no one reminded them that it ushered in a disastrous Major administration that they spent five years shitting on?

Basically, don't every expect them to admit they were wrong, even in the face of disaster.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:07 (seven years ago) link

it's the sun wot wons it wen it's won and not the sun wot don't wons it wen it's not won

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

it's fairly predictable but also disturbing, the extent to which the tories are comparing this to a war. it says a lot about the world that you can wage a recession in the same way as a war, like an economic war, in the same way a politician might traditionally have galvanised a country by violent conflict.

as stet says, you kind of feel the pain and anger that's going to be left around europe, especially if the eu were to break up, is exactly the right kind of climate for war. plus you look at this dire, lame duck tory party who have a mandate by default, and it's hard to see a line they wouldn't cross to stop being undercut from the right.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

That Sun page was a troll; their actual was much more staid. Which makes sense -- no way do they want to tell their readers that Europe is laughing at them

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

those terrifying yougov numbers seem like an extension of anti-elite, anti-expert feeling to me. This is something I've noticed about Theresa May's few speeches since becoming PM - she never calls on expert or statistical evidence, rarely if ever cites numbers, but she absolutely nails what a specific mindset wants to hear emotionally. I mean to us it sounds like jingoistic waffle and have-cake-eat-it nonsense but it's not our emotional buttons she wants to press.

I am not very far into this but it feels related! https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/19/crisis-of-statistics-big-data-democracy

(The irony is ofc that statistics have absolutely been used to manipulate the public discourse by elites for years, so the suspicion is not actually unfounded - it's just gone to the other extreme)

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:29 (seven years ago) link

*gulp*

There could be a one in three chance that Brexit negotiations will end with no deal between the UK and the European Union, resulting in "serious economic disruption and a degree of legal chaos", the author of Article 50 has warned.

Lord Kerr also suggested that leaving the EU could result in a "decade of delay and disruption" for Britain, which would damage investment, economic growth and employment.

The former diplomat, who negotiated European deals for both Margaret Thatcher and John Major, made the comments as he considered a number of possible outcomes for the UK following the vote to leave in 2016

Lord Kerr, who has served as UK ambassador to both the EU and the US, warned if no agreement was reached on the terms of Brexit, and no extension to the talks was agreed, the UK would have to leave the EU anyway.

Reports have suggested the UK could be presented with a "divorce bill" by the European Commission which could be as much as £50 billion to £60 billion.

Going on to outline some of the possible outcomes from Brexit, Lord Kerr said there was about a 25 per cent probability the UK will leave Europe in 2019 with an agreed Article 50 financial settlement , a "substantive framework" setting out future relationships and a "degree of progress on the trade negotiations Mrs May says she want".

There is about the same chance the UK will leave in 2019 but with only a "thin framework and not much progress made on trade", he said.

He also warned that talks with the dozens of nations the EU has trade agreements with would not be able to take place until the Brexit process has been completed, telling the audience: "We can expect, I'm afraid, a decade of delay and disruption with investment, economic growth and employment lower than they would have been."

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:31 (seven years ago) link

lex otm re: may's conspicuous and alarming lack of evidence every time she talks about brexit

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:35 (seven years ago) link

you know with all the focus on the uk having to negotiate its new trading relationship with the eu it hadn't really dawned on me that of course it will also need to negotiate replacements for all trade deals it currently has with everywhere else via its eu membership

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:49 (seven years ago) link

This is something I've noticed about Theresa May's few speeches since becoming PM - she never calls on expert or statistical evidence, rarely if ever cites numbers, but she absolutely nails what a specific mindset wants to hear emotionally

It's because she doesn't actually believe in a hard Brexit and is only pursuing it out of fear. Any statistical evidence she were to quote would undermine her direction. I don't think much of the public is in the mood to listen to it right now, but it would come back to haunt her in the future.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:49 (seven years ago) link

and anyone who's been paying attention knows it, so we're in the bizarre and terrifying position of listening to a leader outline a suicidal plan for brexit while knowing that she can't possibly believe anything she's saying

i mean what the fuck

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

How do we stop this lemming-like madness? Like, seriously?

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

It's like the UK always had this self-destruct button wired in, and only Cameron was fool and coward enough to punch it.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

1) cameron presses self-destruct button to shore up conversative votes from those who might otherwise vote ukip
2) may disingenously cheerleads for destruction in order to stay in power
3) ???
4) profit

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

seriously wondering about my chances of emigrating to canada, maybe i should message jim in vancouver for advice

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:34 (seven years ago) link

this thread would be better if it was just immigration tips

ogmor, Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

The only real hope was for a parliamentary vote on Article 50 and for Labour to unite with other parties and Tory rebels in voting against it, forcing May to come back with better proposals. But there's next to no chance of that happening, especially with the Stoke by-election bearing down on Labour.

I'm kind of 80% 'hope that May sees sense once negotiations actually begin' and 20% 'hope that is actually fucks up so that everyone concerned is swept from power forever', but a lot of people will need to suffer for the latter one to take place, sadly.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

1) cameron presses self-destruct button to shore up conversative votes from those who might otherwise vote ukip

Less to do with vote-chasing I'd have thought more to do with keeping Tory hawks off his back from a time when there seemed more dissent within the ranks and perhaps also appeasing certain business and media magnates likely to do very well out of post-referendum economic effects (e.g. Murdoch buying Sky costing him less now than it likely would've had Remain won).

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:07 (seven years ago) link

This is the template email response from my Labour MP when I asked them to vote against triggering Article 50

Thank you for contacting me regarding the process for triggering Article 50. I am a democrat. The people have spoken, and they’ve said we are leaving the European Union.

The Brexit process will be based on two phases, the first being withdrawal, under article 50, the second end-state, under article 218. Withdrawal determines the details of the divorce; end-state determines our future relationship with the EU, as a non-EU country.

The article 218 phase is where the big questions such as access to the single market and reforms to freedom of movement will be decided.

The idea of a second referendum on completion of the article 50 phase is therefore deeply misguided, because the withdrawal is a relatively minor piece of the Brexit puzzle. The success or failure of Brexit will depend on the terms of the article 218 package, not on the details of what is agreed under article 50.

That's why I will not veto or seek to stall the triggering of article 50.

In Parliament, the Opposition have repeatedly emphasised that they will not frustrate or delay the Article 50 process and the motion tabled on the 7th December simply restates a pre-exiting Government timetable to start Brexit negotiations by the end of March 2017.

The British people will rightly wonder what on earth is going on when the public debate is all about end-state issues such as our trading relationship with the EU and dealing with free movement, but those issues are not actually covered by the withdrawal package upon which MPs would be voting.

David Cameron blundered complacently into this referendum in an attempt to tackle an internal spat within the Tory Party. It is the duty of the Opposition to hold the Government to account. We must be there for the British people when the tough times come, as they surely will.

The government is at the eye of the Brexit storm, and rightly so. They have sailed the ship into choppy waters, without a map, compass or any sense of direction. Our job now is to be a responsible and constructive opposition.

We must hold this government’s feet relentlessly to the fire, scrutinise its every move, and ensure that Theresa May works in the national interest, as opposed to the tactical party management manoeuvres that have so far defined her approach.

But none of this will be possible if the story of Brexit becomes that of politicians playing Westminster games, and attempting to subvert the will of the British people.

On Brexit we should be holding the government to account, not to ransom.

AlanSmithee, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

mmm, reassuring

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link

bar the tedious rhetoric in there I still think the basic point is right: the way the game works now, no political good can come out of trying to overturn or ignore the referendum result.

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:19 (seven years ago) link

the uk deserves to be punished for prioritising immigration over everything else

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:30 (seven years ago) link

People in a few years (ha) will be asking what the point of the Labour Party is given they didn't even oppose Brexit. It'll be a political nightmare down the line if they vote for Article 50. True, it'll be a political nightmare now if they do oppose it, but they aren't going to win the next election anyway.

AlanSmithee, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Only just realised Westmonster is Aaron Banks new thing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38650596

Not mentioned in the Guardian article where he met Mary Beard.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

bar the tedious rhetoric in there I still think the basic point is right: the way the game works now, no political good can come out of trying to overturn or ignore the referendum result.

It shouldn't be about ignoring the result, it should be about pressuring the government to pursue a less obviously damaging form of Brexit. As it stands Labour is barely even holding the government to account.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Alan Smithee - just out of interest, do you live in a Remain or a Leave constituency? "I am a democrat" doesn't make a great deal of sense if it's the former.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:52 (seven years ago) link

after I've finished my daily survival tasks i.e. fighting someone to the death over a single tin of EU-aid stewed beef in a near dystopian foodbank, stripping bark off trees etc - I hope I can still get internet access to see the ensuing bonfire of the Tories though. At least that will be fun.

calzino, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:55 (seven years ago) link

It shouldn't be about ignoring the result, it should be about pressuring the government to pursue a less obviously damaging form of Brexit.

sure, but that's what that MP's letter said they intended to do - true or not

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:56 (seven years ago) link

xp trouble is, every time there's a disaster in British politics, I think "this time the Tories are finished!" and yet, like the Cockroaches of Cockroach Britain they are they just keep on coming back.

Neil S, Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:56 (seven years ago) link

I honestly have no idea how the Tories' haven't cratered their own "trustworthy with the economy" reputation. Do people think that part of their brand identity is completely divorced from their actual actions?

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:12 (seven years ago) link

it isn't exactly "trustworthy with the economy" though is it it's more "willing to be cutthroat when it comes to the 'undeserving'" where undeserving is poor if you're rich and immigrant or other if you're poor

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:17 (seven years ago) link

not sure either party is immune from accusations of economic mismanagement (though New Labour were arguably a bit unlucky on that front), but the Tories have certainly had more opportunities to give fucking it up a go

Neil S, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:19 (seven years ago) link

Strongly leave, MattDC. They campaigned to remain.

AlanSmithee, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:29 (seven years ago) link

I'm genuinely worried just how toxic the "of course Brexit was a good idea and it would have worked if only those Europeans hadn't PUNISHED US" backlash will be; especially if there's someone there to capitalise on it. Conflicts have started on much less.

― stet, Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:00 AM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

May's speech the other day also made ominous noises about ppl in this country not rallying behind the government as it tries to negotiate Brexit ("Every stray word and every hyped up media report is going to make it harder for us to get the right deal for Britain"), so I imagine there'll also be plenty of blame to go round for unpatriotic UK pols and press who suggest that things are going badly

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:29 (seven years ago) link

didn't she also talk about the need to keep their cards close to their chest on the negotiations so as not to give the eu an advantage? so yeah we've all gotta shut the fuck up and trust they're playing 5d chess on our behalf and everything will be cool, i guess

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:32 (seven years ago) link

Yes, keep on insanely banging the patriotic drum when, not so long ago, 45% of one part of the UK voted not to be part of the UK.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:35 (seven years ago) link

and just barely less than 50% of the nation voted to stay in the eu

good times

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:39 (seven years ago) link

People in a few years (ha) will be asking what the point of the Labour Party is given they didn't even oppose Brexit. It'll be a political nightmare down the line if they vote for Article 50.

this is the Tories' Iraq war

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:43 (seven years ago) link

It's a three-line Corbyn whip, so now they can all vote it for then blame him

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:55 (seven years ago) link

xp idk, if they vote against Article 50 it just makes it easier for the Tories to blame Brexit's inevitable failure on Labour being divisive and pessimistic and stopping us getting the awesome deal we *would* have negotiated if we'd all stood together, but Labour hate democracy + Britain too much. there don't seem to be any good options, but voting for Article 50 is maybe the least worst?

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:56 (seven years ago) link

They've taken their only bargaining chip off the table, they obviously think it would be disastrous for Britain to leave the Single Market but they're going to do fuck all about it except make some stern tutting noises from the other side of the house.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:59 (seven years ago) link

deckchairs, titanic etc

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:00 (seven years ago) link

YouGov "Was it right or wrong to vote to leave EU?"
Current LAB voters
Right 16%
Wrong 75%
DK 14%

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:04 (seven years ago) link

I guess the thing is we needed a Labour party with a leader strong enough to have made a convincing argument against Brexit before the vote, and with the courage of its convictions to stick with that argument after the vote. Corbin has never been that leader. The Labour party has never been that party. They have failed as an opposition to the biggest threat in recent years.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:18 (seven years ago) link

I mean if the Labour Party cannot convincingly argue against what will be a catastrophic decision that will greatly (further) impoverish its heartlands voters as well as the rest of the country, then what use is it as an opposition?

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

It isn't. It's either incompetent or tory-lite. No point in it.

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:22 (seven years ago) link

A leader with the prevalent criticisms Corbyn had from the start (both within and outside his party) was never going to wield that sort of power.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:23 (seven years ago) link

He's not a leader. That's the crux of it.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

And it's not the criticisms he's had. He's not a leader. He is not looking to lead. He is not up to the job.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

If a better one can be found I'm sure they will emerge...eventually. But how they'd then contest a GE in 2020 with the promise of actually reversing four years of a process set to take 10+ I'd love to feel surer about.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:38 (seven years ago) link

Tim Farron seems to be the only leader right now with a decent, sane argument out there right now. And yeah, he has nothing to lose blah blah, the Lib Dems are awful, blah blah. But when the other two leaders are playing chicken with almost inevitable financial collapse (not to mention, you know, the end of the European project, the rise of fascism, the spectre of war, etc etc, stuff you might have expected Corbyn to at least thing not a good idea) he seems like the only sane adult at the table.

David Lammy has argued well throughout. He's my MP, he seems a good politician.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

as much as we love to handwring about Labour, I'm not sure anything anyone in the party would have said in the run-up to Brexit would have been decisive. The party has been languishing in the polls for years, the last election was a disaster and the polls consistently show that they're not trusted on the economy even when the Tories are driving it off a cliff edge. Corbyn was never going to be a deciding factor in Brexit, especially with the media's attitude to him, and neither was any other putative Labour leader.

Oh look in the time it's taken me to type this Dan Jarvis has popped up blathering about Legitimate Concerns, doesn't he know that phrase is a joke now

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

Farron has also said he would be prepared to go into coalition with the Tories again, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. Brexit will be largely settled by 2020 but I suspect he'd throw his European principles out of the window in a flash for a shot at sitting on the other side of the house again.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

as much as we love to handwring about Labour, I'm not sure anything anyone in the party would have said in the run-up to Brexit would have been decisive. The party has been languishing in the polls for years, the last election was a disaster and the polls consistently show that they're not trusted on the economy even when the Tories are driving it off a cliff edge. Corbyn was never going to be a deciding factor in Brexit, especially with the media's attitude to him, and neither was any other putative Labour leader.

But he didn't really try, Alex, at least not in a competent or convincing way. I can't believe that someone who could have cooked up a strong argument against Brexit wouldn't have had more impact than Corbyn did. Brett won by such a slim margin, it could have swung things.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:52 (seven years ago) link

I mean, the party is languishing in the polls in part because it doesn't have a leader who can inspire support (and Corbyn is decisively not that leader - he's incompetent, or worse). A certain amount of Labour voters voted Brexit because the party and leadership did not argue well enough that it was in their best interests to Remain. These things don't just happen.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

very few of the vocal Remainers were really "convincing". I didn't hear any passionate pro-EU polemics from anyone. Which was a huge flaw in the Remain campaign overall but not specific to Corbyn and not an explanation of why he seems to bear the brunt of centrists' fury or is blamed any more than Cameron for the referendum result

A certain amount of Labour voters voted Brexit because the party and leadership did not argue well enough that it was in their best interests to Remain

Labour has been, and mostly continues to be, absolutely terrible at countering the myths - especially on immigration - that made voters want to Leave. Corbyn has been one of the few exceptions until last week.

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:59 (seven years ago) link

How about the myth that Labour supporters in droves voted Brexit?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:02 (seven years ago) link

I'd literally crawl through a corridor of vomit and needles to get away from voting for Farron or any LibDem scum candidate ever. Regardless of whatever current grasping desperation they are employing on disgruntled Remainers.

calzino, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:07 (seven years ago) link

you don't like corbyn do you Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I did, two years ago, but his performance has dismayed me and led us to this impasse, so no. Is that not allowed on this thread, conrad?

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:19 (seven years ago) link

why he seems to bear the brunt of centrists' fury or is blamed any more than Cameron for the referendum result

Cameron quit as PM after losing Brexit, which is I guess why people's fury is now trained on the man who still has the job of leading the opposition.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:21 (seven years ago) link

Really not sure why people itt have the idea that UK could ever stay in the single market after leaving the EU. What is this fantasy based on? Why would the EU agree to it?

pandemic, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:23 (seven years ago) link

reminder that however underwhelming Corbyn is, it could always be worse:
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/82513/excl-dan-jarvis-labour-must-get-tough-immigration

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:26 (seven years ago) link

not trying to police you Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions you are of course free to like and to dislike whomever on this thread and on other threads e.g. at the moment you like tim farron on this thread

nothing personal - I have met a few people who don't like corbyn because they don't like corbyn and they seem to concentrate on not liking corbyn and it becomes kind of a frenzy and perhaps every one of them is acting out their genuine frustration and sadness and desire for a better politics and a better world but all they end up saying is I don't like corbyn

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:29 (seven years ago) link

xp
and see every other dire candidate the PLP put forward, and even flaky types from the left like Clive Lewis.

calzino, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

thank you for not policing me then conrad. you are a good socialist.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

and you know i "like" tim farrow inasmuch as he is voicing some kind of opposition to Brexit, which is what I would have liked Labour to do.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:31 (seven years ago) link

me, I'm a moderate

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:31 (seven years ago) link

Can you seriously imagine how badly Liz Kendall or Andy Burnham or Owen Smith would have been at negotiating the last few months? Corbyn is useless but he's only in the position he is because there's no one good out there.

Honestly I think Labour would be fucked whatever in the current climate, but having said I would have expected Corbyn to at least show more moral leadership than he has of late, especially on free movement, and if he can't do that then what is the point of him?

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:33 (seven years ago) link

I'm starting to dislike Corbyn. It feels like history's trapdoor is open and we have a well-meaning dullard waving us through rather than inspiring a counterforce. But as Matt says, who could?

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:34 (seven years ago) link

I just can't quite believe that Corbyn is the best there is, though again, beyond Lammy, I've not seen anyone who's impressed me.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Oh wait, Caroline Lucas

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Diane Abbott

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:37 (seven years ago) link

I like Abbott a lot.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:39 (seven years ago) link

I mean I've read countless leftists castigating Hilary Clinton for running despite supposedly knowing she wasn't the best candidate to beat an outright fascist, but that logic is never really applied to Corbyn with the far right escalating over here. If Labour lose Stoke to UKIP that may become more acute though.

I think they will hold more seats than people expect them to in 2020, but making virtually no gains. It's what happens after that that matters, and whether Corbyn can at least lay some positive ground-work in some way before then.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Abbott is a figure of absolute loathing amongst the white working class. She'd be even more unpopular than Corbyn. But maybe if she owned it and spoke dynamically she'd win around some of the racist misogynists?

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:42 (seven years ago) link

What is the point of 'some kind of opposition to Brexit' if not an all out pledge to abandon it if elected?

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:42 (seven years ago) link

abbott is definitely despised by the white working and middle and upper class

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm aware Abbott is loathed by many and also why. Fuck em.

and you know i "like" tim farrow inasmuch as he is voicing some kind of opposition to Brexit, which is what I would have liked Labour to do.

btw by this do you mean you want any Labout leader to be explicitly anti-Brexit? ie, explicitly ignoring the referendum result? Because much as I'd like that to happen I can't see a way to do it politically.

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:44 (seven years ago) link

david lammy mp is the labour mp saying let's ignore it isn't he?

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:45 (seven years ago) link

I don't see how obeying the referendum result isn't a disaster for Labour, and I would have more respect for a party that was honest about what a disaster Brexit will inevitably be - it would put clear water between them and the Tories.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Labour could stand on the premise of forcing another referendum for a chance to reject may's brexit deal.
They could quite easily form a pro-brexit coalition with lib-dems,snp,PC, Greens

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Lammy wants another referendum and then maybe another one. Let's get one on Trident too and a dozen other things too.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:48 (seven years ago) link

I'm sympathetic to that argument but I assume electability isn't something you're concerned with in that case?

xps

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:48 (seven years ago) link

Lammy's always struck me as being somewhat of a dimwit tbh.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:49 (seven years ago) link

I don't like Diane Abbott either, just to lay my cards on the table.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:49 (seven years ago) link

I like Abbott, voted for her in 2010, wld vote her again now if given the chance. she's definitely much better on TV than Corbyn, I think she would do better than him in appealing to "apolitical" people/ ppl who are not dyed-in-the-wool beardy guardian reading lefties (which is most ppl, obv) even taking into account her status as a hate figure for racists and misogynists, chances of her becoming leader probably zero though, she seems even less popular in the PLP than Corbyn

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:50 (seven years ago) link

We're gonna need a bigger table.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

Lammy went on to become the first black Briton to study at Harvard University when he won a place to study an LL.M. at Harvard Law School.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

only 52% of voters voted for leave. They weren't voting for hard brexit. Hard brexit and leaving the single market was not what was asked.

So why shouldnt pro-euro parties join up?

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

I have to say im no fan of abbott either

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

tho i do end up defending her all the time against racists who claim they arent

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:52 (seven years ago) link

They would be asking people to vote for them on the basis of ignoring a democratic vote, it's a bit Catch-22

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:52 (seven years ago) link

I'm sympathetic to that argument but I assume electability isn't something you're concerned with in that case?

I don't know if this is aimed at me, but I'm not convinced that Brexit is or shall be a very "electable" stance for much longer

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:53 (seven years ago) link

oh and i meant anti-brexit coalition way upthread obviously

Cosmic Slop, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:54 (seven years ago) link

Electability as a concept has been given a bit of a kicking over the last few months, just saying like.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:54 (seven years ago) link

I think Abbott would actually make an impact in terms of not being "an average politician"/someone different who will actaully shake things up or whatever, which is what a lot of Corbyn's supporters said he would do, but hasn't afaict? I get the impression that a lot of ppl don't really see Corbyn as radically different to previous Labour leaders, just more useless and with some eccentric positions they don't like.

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:55 (seven years ago) link

I don't know if this is aimed at me, but I'm not convinced that Brexit is or shall be a very "electable" stance for much longer

This is the thing, but it's too much to ask the Labour Party to focus on fighting the next election rather than the last.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:56 (seven years ago) link

I don't know if this is aimed at me, but I'm not convinced that Brexit is or shall be a very "electable" stance for much longer

you're a lot more optimistic about how much racism/jingoism/nativism/plain stupidity is out there then. I mean, look at the Times/Mail headlines. We usually look at it from the perspective of "these evil tabloids brainwashing the masses" but those sentiments obviously also strike a pre-existing chord.

lex pretend, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:57 (seven years ago) link

They're not going to be very tolerant of an economic collapse either.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:59 (seven years ago) link

That depends on how it will be spun. Stick-in-mud Remainers and Trump will be blamed before Tories (even if May herself doesn't last longer than Cameron).

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:01 (seven years ago) link

I don't know if this was already linked to on this thread, but re: Abbott, this interview with her published in the NS last week is very good: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/01/having-last-laugh

soref, Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:02 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you're wrong in your pessimism Alex, but *only 52% of those who voted actually went for Brexit, and who knows how many of them still feel that way, polls (which didn't do a great job of testing a nation's temperature throughout 2016) notwithstanding. And I do believe that its the malign papers that are driving this - the nation might have a tendency to nativism, etc, but I also think it can be encouraged in the opposite direction. I don't know ho to overcome those tabloids, but I think it's important to try, or to at least not just resign in the face of the Murdoch/Dacre machine.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:03 (seven years ago) link

I also kind of find endless pessimism in the face of this situation to be defeatist and self-perpetuating in of itself. I don't think we'll find a solution to it without believing that there's a solution to be found.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:04 (seven years ago) link

You could hardly get a more boilerplate run-of-the-mill politician than Theresa May. so much for novelty.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

Her biggest fans e.g. Dacre see her as Classic Conservative and that'll more than do them for a few years.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

She is a woman, I'll give her that. Corbyn fails there again.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Stick-in-mud Remainers don't have any actual power right now though, so I don't know how that could be the case. Unless you count the stick-in-mud remainders relocating their businesses to the continent.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:17 (seven years ago) link

First task, get shot of that wanker.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:33 (seven years ago) link

Jesus @ this discussion today. Stevie can you have a look at this thread: how to find a good therapist

Can you find yourself a good therapist please? I mean we all have our problems but surely no one keeps going back to the same nonsense each and every single time. Brexit is terrible, yes, but its happening.

The button is going to be pushed - and Europe is falling apart in any case - and now the fight is in the how it happens.

There are conflicting reports on what Corbyn/Labour are going to do - there was a impose vs suggestion. Its a coms issue as much as his enemies gladly muddying the waters. From what I can tell this is playing the long game badly. Its awful if that turns out to be Labour's position but after an hour or two my twitter TL has calmed down.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 19 January 2017 19:57 (seven years ago) link

If it's a comms issue the wtf is Milne doing?

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

LOL those two links are ined up perfectly.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:09 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'm out of this thread, guys. Keep being a cunt, xyzzzz.

Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:25 (seven years ago) link

Fucking Glover in the Mail and that Bertram in the Telegraph getting ready to heap blame for failure on Remainers for not accepting and moving on.

I get that people are tired of the whole thing now and still looking for an out seems like denial rather than pragmatism but at the same time, if the vote went the other way we really still would be hearing about it from the losers. Just like you still hear from Yes voters in Scotland.

Losing doesn't mean you shut up now and forever more; it never has. You just make your case better.

Perhaps Remainers should start talking about how and when we'll rejoin the EU, chastened and without our special exemptions.

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:32 (seven years ago) link

I totally agree - remake the case. But fantasies of side-stepping the referendum are empty fantasies, let them go

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:42 (seven years ago) link

loooool

leader of tory surrey county council on ch4 news the now - they're having a referendum to raise council tax by 15%. philip hammond mp jeremy hunt mp chris grayling mp crispin blunt mp have their constituencies in surrey. need to raise council tax says this bloke need to plug gap in adult social care and children's services he says we've made hundreds of millions of pounds of savings since 2010 and we're on track to meet targets for 2020 but we must plug the gap. cathy newman asks what do they tell you from central government there's no money he says do you believe them she says he says central government always manages to find money for things aren't you glad someone's standing up and telling the truth he says telling it how it really is again she says do you believe there's no money and he says I think we should look at foreign aid

I'm a big believer in foreign aid

I've done a lot of work with the rotary club (I believe he said)

but we have to ask

what outcomes are we getting for that money

shouldn't we think about whether we need to spend it here instead

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:46 (seven years ago) link

Honestly I think there's nothing the Tories would like better than to redistribute cash from Rwanda to Surrey but if he thinks they aren't deliberately squeezing local government then he profoundly misunderstands his own party. Or at least the Cameron-Osborne version of it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:55 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure he'd settle for redistributing cash from areas with Labour councils.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:58 (seven years ago) link

Though I'm sure that's already happening.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:58 (seven years ago) link

sure it's not british politics, but i think british commentariat connoisseurs will get the most pleasure out of this - https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/822102387389251584

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:12 (seven years ago) link

bar the tedious rhetoric in there I still think the basic point is right: the way the game works now, no political good can come out of trying to overturn or ignore the referendum result.

nationwide agreed but my area voted strongly Remain and I will be fucking disgusted if when its MPs make not even the smallest sound against this full-on hard Brexit

Remain-voting areas have fewer seats per voter so not enough to overturn any results but please make some show of representing your constituents

1) cameron presses self-destruct button to shore up conversative votes from those who might otherwise vote ukip
2) may disingenously cheerleads for destruction in order to stay in power
3) ???
4) profit

working out nicely for DCam and no doubt will for May as well - destroy country, make millions in the currency of your choice on the after-dinner circuit to stash into off-shore bank accounts

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:19 (seven years ago) link

blaming social progress is the terrifying rung that lurks below blaming foreigners, and it'll be really thrilling when the new right in the uk resort to it properly

illbient microtonal poetry Surbiton (imago), Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:20 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'm out of this thread, guys. Keep being a cunt, xyzzzz.

― Dysphagia Nutrition Solutions (stevie), Thursday, 19 January 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bye Stevie, get well soon.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Hodges a desperate sad little batshit orc as always.

nashwan, Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:23 (seven years ago) link

The button is going to be pushed - and Europe is falling apart in any case - and now the fight is in the how it happens.

Yes to the first and the last but i doubt europe is going to fall apart. Europe has to change and will. And after that it will probably be a bit smaller but it will be stronger. Going back to nationalism and isolationism and protectionism is definitely not the right answer to tackle the global challenges. That is the way into disaster and i mean world-wide disaster. Who cares about the uk shutting itself off from the world but if all countries are going into this direction we are all in big trouble. The next world war could be the last.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:35 (seven years ago) link

"I'm sure he'd settle for redistributing cash from areas with Labour councils."

My local council is a just about a Labour controlled one (just 1 seat short of a majority) and is facing an £80 million deficit in it's funding over the next 3 years, as the 8th lowest funded and 2nd most skint in terms of reserve funds - even after factoring in LA incompetence + waste we still have obv really got an extra shittier austerity deal than many others. Without checking I'd safely say there will be no Oxfordshire/Surrey boroughs below us on the underfunded list.

calzino, Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:41 (seven years ago) link

The aim of Brexit talks will be to show that the consequences will be severe for any country looking to drop out of the club, they aren't going to concede shit to May, let alone Liam Fox or Boris Johnson.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 January 2017 21:42 (seven years ago) link

it's going to have to be michael gove

conrad, Thursday, 19 January 2017 22:39 (seven years ago) link

Ha!

Heavy Doors (jed_), Thursday, 19 January 2017 23:54 (seven years ago) link

Lives torn apart and assets lost: this is what a Labour privatisation would mean

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/19/lives-torn-apart-assets-labour-privatisation-north-london-haringey

aditya good and angry again on "zombie blairism" in local gov (shame the guardian made him look like he thinks edmonton where he grew up is a borough)

conrad, Friday, 20 January 2017 08:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm all for London being fenced off from the rest of the country tbh

Rock Wokeman (Noodle Vague), Friday, 20 January 2017 09:12 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/HeIXW3p.jpg

conrad, Friday, 20 January 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

Farage's face always looks so odd when he's trying to do "sombre"

http://i.imgur.com/XeJi5aH.png?1

soref, Friday, 20 January 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

reminds me of those photos of football mascots observing the minute's silence

soref, Friday, 20 January 2017 11:53 (seven years ago) link

looks like kermit the frog doing sad/confounded

conrad, Friday, 20 January 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

these cunts

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 20 January 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

for some people politics is a call to serve, for others not so fucking much

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 20 January 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

the man's just setting an example to the feckless unemployed, give him a break

In the Ways of John Scales (Noodle Vague), Friday, 20 January 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

Blackrock is the second largest shareholder in my company so I feel a bit better to have fucked them over with our disastrous price collapse this week.

Good to know he won't be allowed to lobby the government - not that anyone in the cabinet is likely to be returning his calls anyway at the moment.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 20 January 2017 17:47 (seven years ago) link

rare to see a sneering public-school cunt offered employment at an investment bank

i don't watch lamestream porn (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 20 January 2017 17:54 (seven years ago) link

I hope he still has time for his chair on the Northern Powerhouse Partnership - I don't know what we'd do without all the great work he does in this capacity.

calzino, Friday, 20 January 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile paisley jr lauds mcguinness as he stands down after a distinguished political career in which he established power sharing in the north

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Friday, 20 January 2017 18:28 (seven years ago) link

His old da and McGuinness got on like a tricolor on fire after all.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 20 January 2017 18:34 (seven years ago) link

McGuinness looked at death's door when i saw him on the news last week

In the Ways of John Scales (Noodle Vague), Friday, 20 January 2017 19:00 (seven years ago) link

I was briefly thinking he was brown bread the other day when I switched on R4 half way through a report on him and it sounded like it was referring to him as an ex-person rather than an ex-minister.

calzino, Friday, 20 January 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

he looks horrendous. amyloidosis, which he has, sounds fairly scary

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 20 January 2017 19:41 (seven years ago) link

the first european "politician" trump has talked to was farage. you can imagine what kind of idea of europe he gave to trump. farage for me was always an irresponsible git who just wanted to show that he isn't the loser he actually is. does this make any sense? as soon as his "project" materialised he fucked off. his false smile says it all. what i don't understand is that a majority in the uk follows this pied piper. together with the us election it reminds me very much of the 30th january 1933, the "machtergreifung" of hitler. maybe each people has to make the same mistake once. just let's hope that it won't have the same consequences as in 1933. i think it is about time to prey. and i do not not believe in god.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Friday, 20 January 2017 23:56 (seven years ago) link

sp: pray

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Friday, 20 January 2017 23:58 (seven years ago) link

37% of eligible voters voted to leave the eu.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 21 January 2017 00:02 (seven years ago) link

what i don't understand is that a majority in the uk follows this pied piper

stood for parliament 7 times and failed each time

lex pretend, Saturday, 21 January 2017 00:03 (seven years ago) link

but in the end this bastard succeeded.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Saturday, 21 January 2017 00:21 (seven years ago) link

37% of eligible voters voted to leave the eu.

way more than the 26% trump got tbf, donald has much to learn

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 21 January 2017 02:15 (seven years ago) link

Farage was important in the moment but pushing at an open door. The vision May is setting out has always been the preferred one of the majority of people in the Conservative party outside of Parliament and the majority of people who own and operate the newspapers. Tories have been struggling to put a lid on this since Thatcher was turfed out. The number of people convinced by UKIP to vote leave could conceivably have swung it but I think they were probably a small proportion of the overall leave vote vs the number who were either convinced years ago and just looking for an opportunity or brought over the line by the press coverage.

Trump's next door neighbour is an Italian fascist with links to far right parties all over Europe. That may explain why Le Pen was in Trump Tower but there was no meeting announced. Might also partly explain why Farage has been hanging around there so much.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 21 January 2017 07:55 (seven years ago) link

Who is the neighbour?

jane burkini (suzy), Saturday, 21 January 2017 07:59 (seven years ago) link

A guy called Guido Lombardi.

http://www.politico.eu/article/trumps-ambassador-europe-far-right-news-lombardi/

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 21 January 2017 08:04 (seven years ago) link

but in the end this bastard succeeded.

How about sharing out the credit, alex? For instance, there's Gisela Stuart, Labour MP and the only UK MP originally from, er, Germany.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Saturday, 21 January 2017 08:36 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn did his bit too

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Saturday, 21 January 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Corbyn made much difference either way really.

Alex - I just don't think you understand the landscape over here particularly well. The British public wasn't exactly clamouring for a referendum when Cameron called it, things could have carried on as they were for years without the demands getting audibly louder. Even now the country remains deeply divided on the issue and is likely to become more so.

Where the clamour really did exist was in the Conservative Party itself. As Sharivari says this has been a Tory faultline since 1990 at least. It crippled some leaders (Major) and kept other would-be leaders out at a time when they were miles behind Labour (Kenneth Clarke). Before he won an unexpected majority last year, Cameron was convinced, probably with good reason, that his party was about to commit regicide over the issue, which is why he pledged the referendum despite believing defeat would be disastrous for the country. He effectively traded the UK's future for another 12 months in office.

The majority of the country does not "follow" Farage. Not even close. As Lex says he's failed on multiple attempts to get into Parliament. UKIP has one MP, a defector for the Tories. It has never elected an entirely new MP to Parliament.

However, it's been extremely useful as a pressure group for the segments of the press that have been anti-EU for decades. Murdoch, Dacre etc purposefully built up Farage not because they wanted him in power, but because they knew it would drag the Tories to the right on the issue. In that, they succeeded. Once Article 50 has been triggered they may well fade away altogether, except as an explicit anti-immigration party. Those have historically not fared very well in the UK, certainly not when you compare them to several European countries, but we're in exceptional times here.

The person who doesn't get enough blame for Brexit is Osbourne. In trying to "shoot Labour's fox" and close off avenues of attack from Miliband and Balls, he hammered home the fiction that the country doesn't have any money. He ran down public services and eviscerated the welfare system. And he, with Cameron, allowed the fiction to develop that EU migrants were getting everything from the state while hard-up Britons were having everything taken from them - because he knew the Labour were vulnerable on the issue. Eventually his twatty political game-playing destroyed his political career, but neither he nor Cameron will suffer in the slightest for it.

Matt DC, Saturday, 21 January 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

I just don't think you understand the landscape over here particularly well.

You are absolutely right there, Matt. That's why I am following this thread which I find quite instructive. But somehow I still fail to get why such a small majority is enough for a hard Brexit. That Cameron is responsible for calling the referendum is obvious. But the result is in the responsability of the English people, you cannot blame Cameron for it. Maybe direct democracy has to be learnt, in Switzerland it seems to work quite well but they are used to referedums there.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Saturday, 21 January 2017 16:12 (seven years ago) link

The button is going to be pushed - and Europe is falling apart in any case - and now the fight is in the how it happens.

Yes to the first and the last but i doubt europe is going to fall apart. Europe has to change and will. And after that it will probably be a bit smaller but it will be stronger. Going back to nationalism and isolationism and protectionism is definitely not the right answer to tackle the global challenges. That is the way into disaster and i mean world-wide disaster. Who cares about the uk shutting itself off from the world but if all countries are going into this direction we are all in big trouble. The next world war could be the last.

― it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Thursday, January 19, 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/21/marine-le-pen-leads-gathering-of-eu-far-right-leaders-in-koblenz

In Holland, France and Germany - and Italy with the populist five star - you are seeing revolts against austerity. Things are fragile that only one or two of those results going against the current order could deal another blow to them, put more pressure on the Euro and lead to another banking/lending crisis.

Since Brexit there has been no desire to change - or to offer an alternative, more positive, vision of how things could be.

And then there is the ongoing migrant crisis (cause by war or environmental decay (and the reports on the Earth's temperature mean something major could happen in our generation)). All that is going to put pressure in everything, including the European project. Not seeing anything to counter that, only heads-in-the-sand stuff.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 21 January 2017 16:53 (seven years ago) link

Both Copeland and Stoke by elections take place on the 23rd: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/20/jeremy-corbyn-labour-copeland-byelection-gillian-troughton

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 21 January 2017 16:54 (seven years ago) link

of Feb

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 21 January 2017 16:55 (seven years ago) link

"But somehow I still fail to get why such a small majority is enough for a hard Brexit."

It isn't, morally or rationally. It's just what some people are able to achieve politically. The government does not feel under much threat of being voted out and it doesn't fear any pro-EU electoral force.

"But the result is in the responsability of the English people, you cannot blame Cameron for it."

I do - like Matt DC I think - blame Cameron primarily, for calling it.
There was, as DC says, no great clamour for a referendum. It was all a fiction.
DC is quite right about the wickedness of Cameron's calculation - 12 months of his own career for trashing the UK's future.
And he is right about how Cameron and Osborne both escape to a life of ease, having ruined everything for the country.
It is a scandal.

In terms of the population's responsibility for the result, the people who voted Leave are responsible. The people who voted Remain are not.

the pinefox, Sunday, 22 January 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

But the result is in the responsability of the English people

Well, this is true. And the Welsh.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 22 January 2017 14:18 (seven years ago) link

"I find that when I shoot a few Borises and Michaels I feel a whole lot better."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-cameron-shooting-birds-boris-johnson-michael-gove-brexit-eu-referendum-davos-a7540311.html

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 22 January 2017 20:55 (seven years ago) link

ahahahahaha what larks eh

i find that when i take a shit in the toilet I've named 'david cameron' the existential dread i've been living in since the result of the eu referendum briefly recedes

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 22 January 2017 21:23 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/23/theresa-may-donald-trump-us-uk-immigration

But now it is emerging that May’s policy to keep Britain open to the “brightest and best” will be shaped by any early post-Brexit trade deals that the UK is able to negotiate. And it is quickly becoming apparent that those deals are more likely to be done with countries such as America, Australia, Canada or New Zealand, rather than India or China.

However, the danger is that immigration policy for businesspeople and the most highly skilled becomes based on the old “kith and kin” white Commonwealth of Australia, Canada and New Zealand by default, if not by design.

"If not by design".

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 08:28 (seven years ago) link

My great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandmother was Scottish so p sure I'm good

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 08:55 (seven years ago) link

Supreme court: Gov can't trigger A50 without parliament approval

Eine Kleine Nakh Musik (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

Parliament in a few weeks: *gives approval*

lex pretend, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:44 (seven years ago) link

:(

Scotland doesn't need to be consulted, it seems

bye bye Scotland

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

xpost yeah not sure why all the breathless anticipation about this as everyone has signalled they will not oppose A50

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:47 (seven years ago) link

There might be a large-scale Labour revolt anyway (especially from those in Remain constituencies) but with only a handful of disgruntled Tories it'll clearly pass.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

Where are the global free trade Tory capitalists when you need them is what I want to know

My MP was a Remain campaigner in a 75% Remain constituency, voted for the Brexit timetable last month and has said she'll vote to trigger A50

lex pretend, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

If the PLP hadn't been so fucking clueless last summer, they'd a) have a good chance of toppling Corbyn over this, and b) be in a position to inherit less of a dead husk of a party

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

(I blame the PLP more than Corbyn for the dead-huskness)

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:59 (seven years ago) link

what would that party stand for? free trade and legitimate concerns? bracket Corbyn out of the equation and where is the cadre of non-Trots offering voters a new deal?

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:06 (seven years ago) link

I'm not even arguing that Corbyn isn't there to be toppled, just repeating the same obviousness one more time: they're tactically clueless because they're ideologically empty

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:23 (seven years ago) link

:(

Scotland doesn't need to be consulted, it seems

bye bye Scotland

This must be especially painful for you with your Scottish ancestry.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:26 (seven years ago) link

will we have to police that border too

ogmor, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

It is as if a deep-friend phantom limb were making a painful separation from my pasty white body

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:34 (seven years ago) link

deep fried obv

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:34 (seven years ago) link

a munchy box of painful emotions

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:37 (seven years ago) link

"Labour respects the result of the referendum and the will of the British people and will not frustrate the process for invoking article 50.

However, Labour will seek to amend the article 50 bill to prevent the Conservatives using Brexit to turn Britain into a bargain basement tax haven off the coast of Europe.

Labour will seek to build in the principles of full, tariff-free access to the single market and maintenance of workers’ rights and social and environmental protections.

Labour is demanding a plan from the government to ensure it is accountable to parliament throughout the negotiations and a meaningful vote to ensure the final deal is given parliamentary approval."

This is Corbyn's spokesperson rather than Corbyn himself but it really is just toothless, empty brand positioning. If they actually believed in holding the government accountable they'd vote against it. It's amazing how they just repeat the mistakes of their predecessors. You just expect better.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

"Labour is demanding a plan from the government"

strong stuff

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

i'd be fascinated to hear what leverage they think they have to force the government to produce a plan, given that they've conceded that they'll allow article 50 to go ahead

this 'bargain basement tax haven' stuff is really dire: clunkily-phrased and guaranteed to appeal to no-one but diehard tax policy wonks. fucking tragic that it seems to be the best they can do to paint a picture of post-brexit britain

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

what would that party stand for? free trade and legitimate concerns? bracket Corbyn out of the equation and where is the cadre of non-Trots offering voters a new deal?

Oh absolutely, it wouldn't be worth a toss, Corbyn going would not improve matters. Just marvelling at the circular firing squad.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:05 (seven years ago) link

If labour has already conceded on not stopping the government's trigger of article 50, how on earth is it going to have any leverage for its amendments?

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:08 (seven years ago) link

our existing major parties are (ought to be) fractured beyond repair. I still think at some point there will be a major restructuring, but it seems likely that the consequences of Brexit (and I still maintain Brexit is not the only game in town, and am still amused by the wailing and gnashing of teeth from nice people who have just not been that fazed by 40 years of Thatcherism and Post-Thatcherism, cheers guys, nice to have your concern and solidarity along the way) will have to become starker and more horrible before the parties realign.

and in terms of party realignment/betrayal of the electorate as a whole, the free trade Tories seem to me more culpable in many ways, their party is in power after all, and their silence right now is outright cowardice.

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:27 (seven years ago) link

hey d00d we can trade with the whole world

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

"cheers guys, nice to have your concern and solidarity along the way"

I get the feeling a lot of seemingly good folk who wouldn't openly admit to be pro-austerity would happily take further austerity if it meant this unwholesome Brexit thing could be somehow made to disappear.

calzino, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:44 (seven years ago) link

my sarcastic point entirely, a lot of Remainers' core interests aren't really aligned with mine

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately I don't really believe that May and Hammond have abandoned austerity even if they aren't going for it as gleefully as Osbourne did. They may have put a break on new cuts but the previous ones are still going ahead and that brake can be removed at any time.

Some of the stuff that was coming out re: an industrial strategy the other day was not inherently terrible and went a bit beyond the usual platitudes, but I have zero faith in their following through on it.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

the notion of an industrial strategy is fundamentally counter-Thatcherite, I'm not even sure there are many Tories who think in those terms any more, a lot of Statist business types are closer to a Blairite position than anything

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

That's true, but the current direction of travel also strikes me as counter-Thatcherite, I'm just not sure the extent to which many Tories have noticed amidst all the shock and awe of Brexit. The Thatcherites will bite back eventually.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

no doubt. their silence right now is as cynical and corrosive as the PLP's.

crawling in (sic) (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 15:21 (seven years ago) link

no doubt. their silence right now is as cynical and corrosive as the PLP's.

Owen's put his hand up

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 16:06 (seven years ago) link

http://uk.businessinsider.com/khan-dismisses-corbyn-claim-ministers-erode-workers-rights-brexit-2017-1

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has repeatedly claimed that the government plans to turn Britain into a "bargain basement economy" with "low wages and worse conditions."

However Khan today dismissed the claims, saying that he had seen "no evidence" that ministers wanted to erode rights and suggested that they should be given "credit" for committing to protect them.


@CCHQPress

PM: Jeremy Corbyn should listen to Sadiq Khan, who has paid credit to the Govts plan on workers rights t#PMQs

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

what is Khan's motive for saying this? is it an attempt to disassociate himself from Corbyn (and Labour more generally if it continues to follow a Corbynite direction) and present himself as a centrist, increase his chances of being re-elected even if Labour sees its vote share collapse over the next few years?

soref, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Probably. I assume that 'maintaining the confidence' of business is another factor.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:00 (seven years ago) link

that's what I like about Khan --> absolutely nothing.

calzino, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:38 (seven years ago) link

You'll love this then:

Sadiq: roof garden justifies lack of affordable homes at E&C

brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:41 (seven years ago) link

Reminds me of going past a development under construction in Brixton last week and seeing the notice promising X number of homes "a third of which will be staffordable". So fucking offensive, what does it even mean.

nashwan, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

ha, ignore that s

nashwan, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

does anyone know any good reading material on non-voters (both here and in the US, and I guess across Europe)? I keep thinking about the tightness of the percentages in these elections from hell and the vast bloc of people who abstained

lex pretend, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

what about them?

ogmor, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:09 (seven years ago) link

taffordable? I still don't get it.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

i think the sign said gtf to Stafford if you want affordable housing

calzino, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:12 (seven years ago) link

wales imo

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:14 (seven years ago) link

discount for employees of the development owners perhaps

nashwan, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:17 (seven years ago) link

The metric for 'affordable' housing is so broken as to be effectively meaningless in London. 80% of a £2500 per month market rate would mean you'd need to earn £60k a year after tax to be spending the UK average proportion of your wages on rent iirc.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

what about them?

― ogmor, Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:09 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

their motivations, their political engagement/lack of, their reasons for not voting, their alienation from the process, everything

lex pretend, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

there doesn't actually seem to be much obvious reading material around which is why I asked

lex pretend, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Turnout for the Brexit ref. was much higher than for any recent General Election, I believe.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:25 (seven years ago) link

I recently read a think-tank type piece that basically said that with credit costs and (some) incomes being what they are, you could pretty much flood the London market with new housing without causing much more than 2% reduction in prices. So building new social housing is pretty much the only solution to the problem and no one is proposing it.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:26 (seven years ago) link

lowest voting turnout in the uk is amongst the poor and ethnic minorities and would skew disproportionately labour/left, everything is as you'd expect and based on pragmatism/cynicism/realism etc.

at the risk of sounding contrarian, voting seems like it needs a lot more explanation as a behaviour

ogmor, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Turnout for the Brexit ref. was much higher than for any recent General Election, I believe.

Yeah this left me feeling that higher turnouts for GEs wouldn't really offer different outcomes under FPTP (but then FPTP seems a huge deterrent to non-voters).

nashwan, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

It skewed towards Brexit, among the poorest in the white community.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:34 (seven years ago) link

ppl who didn't vote in previous GEs were less interested in getting out of the EU than voters iirc

ogmor, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:39 (seven years ago) link

Don't know, haven't seen any figures on that.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:42 (seven years ago) link

I can imagine a lot of 'young people' who hadn't voted in the GE voted to stay in.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Nigel Farage @Nigel_Farage

If Parliament makes an attempt to stop Brexit, the very gentle English will revolt in the most extraordinary way.

the replies to this are pretty much what you would expect

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/824289997326909441

soref, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:24 (seven years ago) link

and the welsh, scots and norn irish, what will they do nigel

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Need a Gentle England thread.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:27 (seven years ago) link

(xp) I imagine the Welsh will do whatever they're told to do.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

So building new social housing is pretty much the only solution to the problem and no one is proposing it.

Some of the councils are, at least. Southwark has been banging on about it for ages

stet, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

From what I follow Lab councils may want more housing built but they are in a battle to clear out estates, redevelop and kick out current residents. No wonder there is a % of people who don't care for voting - if you are screwed what does it matter?

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 18:28 (seven years ago) link

As I understand it we are getting a Brexit white paper now? The amendments to a Brexit bill are key - got to enforce freedom of movement. I think in some ways not saying very much of anything - which is probably pure fumbling about - is ok for now. Its the vote that matters.

But I agree (with NV) that the parties are fractured - almost certainly beyond repair. Labour could be fucked over this; the Tories will be fucked if and when any consequences of a harsh braxit manifest themselves (if a soft Brexit is enforced it could save the Tories). The industrial strategy is all hot air as well.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 25 January 2017 18:35 (seven years ago) link

May's speech to Trump will say:

“So as we rediscover our confidence together – as you renew your nation just as we renew ours – we have the opportunity, indeed the responsibility, to renew the special relationship for this new age. We have the opportunity to lead, together, again.”

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 26 January 2017 08:26 (seven years ago) link

But but Global Britain. A truly Global Britain.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 26 January 2017 09:01 (seven years ago) link

lol @ everyone who on the basis of no evidence at all and having obviously never paid any attention to Theresa May before now, somehow thought she'd take a ~moral stance~ in her dealings with Trump

lex pretend, Thursday, 26 January 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

Sucking up to Trump was inevitable but the theme of "national renewal" applied approvingly to his programme is probably slightly closer to flirting with actual fascism than she normally aims for.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 26 January 2017 09:10 (seven years ago) link

Maybe to seal the deal we can offer up our air bases for extraordinary rendition once again

Benylin Ascent (NickB), Thursday, 26 January 2017 09:21 (seven years ago) link

she obv is using the same speech-writing software that Thatcher/Blair used for US diplomacy. it re-hashes the worst bluster of old Lloyd George/Churchill speeches and the rest of the world cringes in unison.

calzino, Thursday, 26 January 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

Was about to say, some say 'flirting with fascism', the British media says 'Churchillian' or 'Thatcher-like", and the GBP lap it up.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 26 January 2017 10:24 (seven years ago) link

i for one welcome the advent of our renewed nation, henceforth known as 'airstrip one'

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 26 January 2017 11:19 (seven years ago) link

Wee Britain

nashwan, Thursday, 26 January 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Labour has selected a Stoke candidate who tweeted a terrible poem calling Brexit a "pile of shit" and called Corbyn an "IRA-supporting friend of Hamas".

It's becoming very apparent that the party might just be too stupid to survive.

Matt DC, Thursday, 26 January 2017 14:31 (seven years ago) link

waht

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 26 January 2017 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Like the candidate in Copeland seemed to be a reasonably sensible choice for the seat but this is just mental for a seat with a high proportion of Leave voters and the fucking UKIP leader running.

Matt DC, Thursday, 26 January 2017 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Just to play dev's ad I assume that they were solely focused on a local candidate over anything else this time and even a pro-Leave candidate for Labour isn't going to convince them to switch any existing allegiance. Just try and get a turnout over 40% for fuxake.

nashwan, Thursday, 26 January 2017 15:55 (seven years ago) link

@EllieJPrice 17mins ago

Lab MP tells me: Lab whips ringing Lab MPs telling them to vote for art50 while also telling them they themselves intend to vote against it.

Matt DC, Thursday, 26 January 2017 15:59 (seven years ago) link

lol perfect :(

Headphone Jack (seandalai), Thursday, 26 January 2017 16:07 (seven years ago) link

There was lots of doom and gloom before that Oldham West by-election and they absolutely pissed it. That Snell seems like a total dud but he is a local dud and should benefit from some blind regionalism and the Not Tristam Hunt feelgood winds that will be sweeping through the potteries :P

calzino, Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:27 (seven years ago) link

can't believe they found a Blairite Remainer

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:34 (seven years ago) link

nor indeed a remaining blairite

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

there's fucking 200 of them

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

It is said that Clive Lewis may vote against Brexit.

If he does not, he might not get re-elected as an MP.

the pinefox, Thursday, 26 January 2017 18:12 (seven years ago) link

Labour Leave made an £18,500 donation to UKIP during the referendum:

http://heatst.com/world/labour-brexit-group-made-18500-referendum-donation-to-ukip/

(would normally be dubious of any claims made by Heatstreet, but they include a link to the relevant page of the electoral commission's website http://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/English/Donations/C0245093)

soref, Thursday, 26 January 2017 20:43 (seven years ago) link

related:

https://politicalscrapbook.net/2017/01/labour-leave-try-and-boost-ukips-chances-in-stoke-with-a-voodoo-poll/

Political Scrapbook earlier highlighted that the Labour Leave campaign, which lobbies to leave the EU, is funded by right-wing Tory donors including supporters of Taxpayers’ Alliance.

Despite being ignored by most of Labour, it is still intent on creating mischief.

This morning The Sun and the Express triumphantly tout a poll by Labour Leave that shows UKIP 10 points ahead in Stoke, where Tristram Hunt’s resignation has triggered a by-election.

soref, Thursday, 26 January 2017 20:50 (seven years ago) link

Another front bench resignation just now. Clive Lewis staying put but showing his lack of experience again today.

The Brexit Bill to be voted on (May publishes then smartly goes off to America as Labour chews this one over, a 'good move' unless Trump humiliates her). Its basically giving the PM the space to do what she wants so I see room for the amendments that Corbyn (and Labour) have been mentioning Despite this piece arguing against oppositon to A50 (coupled with JCs visit to a pollster as described by Stephen Bush in the NS) Corbyn and that left-wing cadre are: 1) good at NOT listening to wider opinion and 2) often good at making the case for thinking whatever way they do think (Abbott has been excellent on immigration these past two months).

In some ways it isn't about the numbers (in Parliament or out there) so much as being on the right-side when Brexit goes wrong and oposing/resisting.

Having said all that I'm not even sure as to what the shape of those amendments might be, how you could enforce a soft-Brexit approach.

That, coupled with the choices at both of these by-elections, and its an incredibly bleak day even by the usual standards. xp

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

After all that here are the planned amendments:

Labour later tabled seven planned amendments to the bill, one of which would guarantee a “meaningful vote in parliament” on any final deal. Another amendment would be to guarantee the protection of workers’ rights and securing “full tariff- and impediment-free access” to the EU’s single market.

The other five amendments are: to ensure the Brexit secretary, David Davis, reports on progress to the Commons at least every two months; guaranteeing the rights of foreign EU nationals living in the UK; obliging regular consultation with the devolved governments; require regular impact assessments on the effects of leaving the single market; and to oblige the government to keep all existing EU tax avoidance and evasion measures.

Some are good but I'm not sure what a "meaningful vote in parliament" means.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2017 20:59 (seven years ago) link

This morning The Sun and the Express triumphantly tout a poll by Labour Leave that shows UKIP 10 points ahead in Stoke

Are The Sun finally directly endorsing UKIP?

nashwan, Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:03 (seven years ago) link

i know theres loads of blairites nv

im just surprised

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:30 (seven years ago) link

This makes some sense:

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/01/why-has-jeremy-corbyn-committed-labour-voting-article-50

for two thirds of voters, their vote in the referendum is now more important than their chosen political party

Which suggests that the Tories are potentially in trouble in places as well.

Meanwhile two Labour whips, Thangam Debbonaire and Jeff Smith, have both come out and say they will defy their own whip. Strikes me that Corbyn is shortly going to find himself in the position where his allies are voting against him and he has to rely on a lot of his Labour opponents to prevent complete humiliation.

Matt DC, Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:36 (seven years ago) link

if a fella called debonnaire is instrumental in helping you out of your misery is it suicide by fop

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:42 (seven years ago) link

What exactly is Jeremy "defied whip 428 times" Corbyn going to do to the quite possibly large amount of his MPs who will not vote the way he tells them?

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:47 (seven years ago) link

not too sure if youre being casual but debonnaire is female btw

nxd, Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:48 (seven years ago) link

ah well another mediocre pun goes wasting

trilby mouth (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 January 2017 22:54 (seven years ago) link

May's groveling is extraordinary.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 26 January 2017 23:21 (seven years ago) link

Which has been the standard position for Brit PM's "special relationship" possibly since the post The Treaty of Versailles days, and definitely since Thatcher.

calzino, Thursday, 26 January 2017 23:30 (seven years ago) link

She has even more reason to grovel than usual though.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 26 January 2017 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Global Britain, and all that.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 26 January 2017 23:37 (seven years ago) link

I am deep in that excellent Adam Tooze book The Deluge at the moment, and the dying days of Euro neo-imperialism is fresh on my mind and I was actually agreeing with TH's post even if it din't sound like it.

calzino, Friday, 27 January 2017 01:10 (seven years ago) link

balls deep in a tooze

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 27 January 2017 08:27 (seven years ago) link

Feel like Thatcher was a more dominant personality than Reagan so that strikes me as very different to this obviously insincere and/or craven bout of sycophancy.

Matt DC, Friday, 27 January 2017 09:28 (seven years ago) link

xp

that post gave me a triggering image of the former Shadow Chancellor and amateur ballroom dancer, thnx

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2017 09:30 (seven years ago) link

and at this point I'm frightened enough to welcome anybody's efforts to calm down that psychopath, even May's

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2017 09:42 (seven years ago) link

May says she and Trump want to put the interests of ordinary people first, the people who feel the odds are stacked against them. She and Trump both feel that these people deserve a fairer deal.

i thought i hated david cameron.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 27 January 2017 18:52 (seven years ago) link

left coalition party now

Check the BNM Pitchfork track review, it says Weezer too (imago), Friday, 27 January 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

a promising statement emanates from labour

https://www.facebook.com/labourclivelewis/posts/1256644634412341

lex pretend, Friday, 27 January 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

The more closely May is associated with Trump the better.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 27 January 2017 19:06 (seven years ago) link

Clive Lewis would make quite a good drag queen.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Friday, 27 January 2017 19:21 (seven years ago) link

he's got the eyelashes

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link

It would be great if went for a photo op with those fossilised dragoon in full drag!

calzino, Friday, 27 January 2017 19:29 (seven years ago) link

Solid work under the circumstances from Clive Lewis, but I'm pissing myself laughing that according to the comments, the first version of the paragraph

IF THE GOVT DOES NOT ACCEPT THESE AMENDMENTS, I WILL VOTE AGAINST TRIGGERING ARTICLE 50 AT THE THIRD AND FINAL VOTE.

had a 'NOT' before the first 'VOTE'.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 27 January 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Interesting report from the Stoke selection meeting, if you like that kind of thing
http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/inside-stoke-centrals-selection-meeting.html

stet, Saturday, 28 January 2017 00:14 (seven years ago) link

comforting if true

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 28 January 2017 07:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah in the wake of the trump news i just noticed that headline sitting below it all like "hey i'm also horrifying news"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 28 January 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link

British Values - always be closing

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 28 January 2017 15:09 (seven years ago) link

Wasn't Turkey the example brexiteers always used when trying to scare people about immigration from potential EU countries?

koogs, Saturday, 28 January 2017 16:43 (seven years ago) link

yes

Odysseus, Saturday, 28 January 2017 16:48 (seven years ago) link

the "Turkish problem" has been sorted now, any Turks who wanted to come here have been purged or killed.

calzino, Saturday, 28 January 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38788388

"populist gestures" different from "the will of the people" apparently

lex pretend, Monday, 30 January 2017 09:22 (seven years ago) link

chuka umunna:

"But they need to understand, just as they will put America first, we will put British values first."

ffs

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 30 January 2017 09:25 (seven years ago) link

nice that the government are rejecting the petition out of hand without the debate it guarantees, too

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 30 January 2017 09:26 (seven years ago) link

Obviously these concerns are not bigoted legitimate enough.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 30 January 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

We should wait until we see how many signatures the "let him in" petition gets

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 January 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

The more votes this gets, the worse they will look - also for those like me, resident but with no referendum or election vote, it's important to sign.

I would love to see every Remain voter, EU and non-EU resident (all of whom pay taxes) sign this.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 30 January 2017 10:21 (seven years ago) link

chuka umunna:

"But they need to understand, just as they will put America first, we will put British values first."

ffs

In terms of how Britain should respond to "America First", this speech Tom Watson made on Saturday seems to have been overshadowed somewhat, which is a shame considering how bad it is

In a controversial speech, Mr Watson said the UK could experience a “Brexit bounce” when it leaves the EU and questioned the prevailing belief that free trade was always a good thing.

As politicians and the media rush to condemn Mr Trump, Mr Watson suggested people should “keep an open mind” about the new President’s policies.

Speaking at the Co-operative Party Economic Conference in London, Mr Watson said: “If Trump says ‘buy American’, our rational response is ‘buy British’.

“Yet to say ‘buy British’ these days risks sneering derision from much of Britain’s commentariat and chattering classes, few of whom have been on a factory floor lately. When did you last hear Theresa May say it?”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tom-watson-buy-british-brexit-donald-trump-labour-a7550661.html

soref, Monday, 30 January 2017 11:35 (seven years ago) link

Not many factories ergo not many factory floors, Tommy boy.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 30 January 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

the message is clear: uk citizens have a duty to support plucky british startups like bae systems by buying our own jet airliners and missile arrays

the greg evigan school of improvised explosive devices (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 30 January 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

as a true blue Brummie Tom was clearly thinking about British-owned mega-giants like Jaguar and Cadbury's

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 January 2017 15:20 (seven years ago) link

so trump's likely ambassador to the eu thinks the european union is equivalent to the soviet union? that's, um, troubling

bayland rippenkroeger, stunt artiste (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 30 January 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

I suppose he means the european union will perish like the soviet union did. Which sadly is quite possible.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Monday, 30 January 2017 19:44 (seven years ago) link

That's not what he means.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Monday, 30 January 2017 19:47 (seven years ago) link

He would like to help the european union to go down the water toilet of history. That's what he says.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Monday, 30 January 2017 20:02 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson is the slimiest cunt.

Matt DC, Monday, 30 January 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

What he says is "well I had, in a previous career, a diplomatic post where I helped to bring down the Soviet Union so maybe there's another union that needs a little taming"

Heavy Doors (jed_), Monday, 30 January 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

What does Chuka Umunna, a child of (at least one) immigrant representing a solidly Remain constituency, expect to gain from this shit? Does he really expect a load of racists to rally to his cause in two years time?

Matt DC, Monday, 30 January 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

...yes?

bayland rippenkroeger, stunt artiste (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 30 January 2017 20:12 (seven years ago) link

Is that surprising? The big cities have the most people and were the strongest remain, so even if everyone had signed evenly across the country the graph would look like that, no?

I did like that heat map that showed signatures from across the entire country, though.

stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:51 (seven years ago) link

Parliamentary constituencies are roughly level though (hence why some of them are enormous) - I'd rather see it by % on both axes, agreed.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

this map shows you the % of the population of each parliamentary constituency who have signed the petition, there does seem to be a definite correlation between remain voting areas even factoring in differences in population

http://petitionmap.unboxedconsulting.com/?petition=171928

soref, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure plenty of people who voted Brexit find Trump repulsive too.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

xp e.g. 8.85% in Corbyn's Islington North vs 1.01 % in Hartlepool

soref, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

tbf there's prob something to Stephen Bush's tweets y/day (https://twitter.com/stephenkb/status/826167402056601601) which said m/l that Remain-leaning areas are just more likely to sign gov.uk petitions in general

(I can't define exactly why, but it seems plausible: lol chattering classes media types; Leave voters skew older and perhaps less web-savvy, tho obv plenty of Leave voters on twitter and news site comments sections; less disengaged from govt processes, even slightly modernised ones like web petitions; less wary of putting their name on a govt list?)

but, still not looking good for my hope that Trump will tap into Leave voters' anti-Americanism and they'll think "we've got to be with the US or with Europe, maybe Europe is a better idea after all"

admittedly there were already plenty of signs that was never going to happen; people either delighted by any amount of right-wing nuttery or still convinced that we're still a globe-spanning empire that needs no alliances

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:21 (seven years ago) link

"How long before the Yanks want back in?"

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:25 (seven years ago) link

Leave voters skew older

Still grateful for GIs bringing over chocolate, chewing gum and nylons during the War.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:41 (seven years ago) link

The 'revenge' petition demanding that Trump be allowed to molest the Queen or whatever is approaching 100K signatures. Ooh that'll show us.

nashwan, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

if that was certainly going to be the outcome I'd be tempted to sign it myself (◣∀◢)ψ

calzino, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:51 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure plenty of people who voted Brexit find Trump repulsive too.

― Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:59 AM (forty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there do seem to be a lot of ppl who backed Brexit and who have dubious views on immigration + multiculturalism etc who also are appalled at Trump, and will specifically mention his racism as a reason for their disapproval. idk if this is a variation on the "I can't be racist because racist means violent skinheads with swastika tats and no-one else" way of thinking, that a grotesque ranting American leader fits their idea of what a "proper" racist looks and sound like

soref, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Trump's concerns are not legitimate you see

stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:00 (seven years ago) link

Parliamentary constituencies are roughly level though (hence why some of them are enormous) - I'd rather see it by % on both axes, agreed.

― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, January 31, 2017 5:58 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm. they are ~60-80k give or take. but yeah, it should be %.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

most a lot of the Brexiteers I know are pretty pro-Trump pro-gentle racism tbh

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

Here's the other petition, suitably illiterate...

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/178844

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

This morning I talked to a Brexit voter who'd signed and forwarded the petition to her entire family of Brexit voters, and only one refused to sign because 'the election was over'. I'd be pushing back on the idea that 'remain areas' are solely occupied by Remain voters.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Russia Today talking this petition up. Who'd've thought it?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure their 1000 viewers will appreciate that.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Always a good time trawling thru what petitions people start.

Close all retail on boxing day, retail isn't needed on boxing day! - 145,384 signatures
Give status to Police Dogs and Horses as 'Police Officers'- 125,530 signatures

nashwan, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

Those are good.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 14:02 (seven years ago) link

I don't know it's hard enough getting human polices to observe people's human rights without trying to break that concept down for an Alsatian

Onanisi Paizuri (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Labour shadow Brexit minister (?) M. Pennycook says:

He will vote for Brexit because not doing so would be 'a gift to the Far Right'.

I see this point, and add that Brexit, which he will vote for, is also a gift to the Far Right.

He also says that if anyone votes against Brexit, there will be riots in the streets and a breakdown of social order.

It is a bit as though he is trying to give people ideas.

I think these predictions could be accurate, up to a point, but only because Farage ('the gentle people will revolt') et al have created the massive pro-Brexit attitude and the idea that this is the most important thing in the world.

c. 3 years ago, the idea of rioting about the EU, pro or anti, would not have occurred or made sense to anyone. The all-consuming anger is synthetic, something that has been pulled together and constructed relatively recently (though the anti-EU poison in general is much older).

the pinefox, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 14:07 (seven years ago) link

There is something strange about a politician openly saying 'I'm not going to do this thing, because if I do, people will protest about it'.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 14:16 (seven years ago) link

Not an ideal lay-out for it but I put the resources list for refugees and migrants that daniel trilling crowd-sourced and storified into a slightly more readable format, to be used and shared (I'll transfer it onto its own page when I have a moment)

http://dubdobdee.co.uk/2017/01/31/resource-list-for-refugees-migrants-asylum-seekers-and-more/

mark s, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 15:26 (seven years ago) link

Emma Hutchinson @ITVEmmaH

Clive Lewis tells me if Gvt doesn't accept Lab amndmnts to Brexit Bill then he can't support next week & will leave Shadow Cab @itvanglia

if I understand correctly the chances of the Labour amendments being accepted are slim to nil, yes? so I guess Lewis is resigning.

soref, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:40 (seven years ago) link

resign as MP and run as a Green candidate imo

I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 19:04 (seven years ago) link

The chances of Corbyn being able to fill even a skeleton Shadow Cabinet look pretty slim right now.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 19:24 (seven years ago) link

LOL the Green Party - probably suits that fool.

I'd want Labour to vote against an un-amended bill - which may carry weight once Brexit reality hits, but the Tory 'rebels' are accepting this (w/a White Paper another LOL) which means the numbers aren't there. Of course that won't appease the usual crowd who will run to the Lib Dems/Greens at the first opportunity.

LOL at this court case so we could have an anaemic debate on a garbage bill. Lenin was right.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Apparently Cameron actively tried to get Dacre sacked - knew he was naive but wow

nashwan, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 23:37 (seven years ago) link

You have to hand it to them - the Conservatives have been determined that this entire process be doomed to its worst possible incarnation and they have played an absolute blinder

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 23:40 (seven years ago) link

I think Clive Lewis is one of the best MPs.

Though I appreciated a comment I saw online this week: CL had said that we neglected Leave voters while Cool Britannia was going on. The commenter said 'he seems to have more against people who might once have bought a Supergrass CD than against crypto-fascists'.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 12:36 (seven years ago) link

its a thin line tbh

Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 12:42 (seven years ago) link

damnit beaten to the punch

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Elitist cunts

https://yougov.co.uk/profileslite#/Supergrass/demographics

Alba, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

top regions northern scotland? is there a hithertofore-hidden hardcore of teuchter supergrass fans?

bayland rippenkroeger, stunt artiste (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:12 (seven years ago) link

NICHE INTERESTS
- SPORTS
- SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- CULTURE & THE ARTS
- 2003 IRAQ WAR
- STEPEHN KING

soref, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

also inriguing that Supergrass fans are 15% more likely than the average person to say that ham sandwiches are one of their favourite foods

soref, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Disappointed to see this Gazlighting from our elected representatives.

nashwan, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

This is remarkable.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

wonder if CL was at this Norwich gig? Maybe it was what cemented his future sympathy with forgotten Leave voters.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/norfolk/content/articles/2005/06/01/music_review_supergrass_20050601_feature.shtml

"Supergrass are still coiffuring their trademark sideburns and despite a solid performance in Norwich, reviewer Simon Clough wonders if the band are in danger of getting trapped in a time warp."

"Even so, they were once the epitome of youthful exuberance, so their getting on a bit begs the question: Have Supergrass lost their meaning in today’s music world?"

the pinefox, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

Back to my question then of Supergrass’ relevance in today’s scene. Well, there was a time a band called Status Quo were bold, brash and brimming with the youthful confidence.

Time warp trap

If they're not careful, Supergrass might well become caricatures of themselves too.

They're already looking slightly Quo-esque (turns out Mick Quinn's new look is actually Rick Parfitt's old look) and it’s their refusal to progress that will spell their downfall.

Supergrass are not so much pushing the envelope as climbing inside, sealing and posting it to their selves of five years ago.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Omg.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Imagine being so antediluvian that you are alienated by Supergrass.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3lvansXAAQjBZo.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Who's Ted though?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

MPs overwhelmingly back Brexit bill

2017, how bad could it be? (snoball), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 20:19 (seven years ago) link

worms armageddon kamikaze gif might have been more appropriate lol

I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 20:29 (seven years ago) link

apparently diane abbott didn't vote because she was ill?

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 20:50 (seven years ago) link

What the hell's with the abstaining LDs?

stet, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 21:59 (seven years ago) link

weak

Cat Smith MP
2 hrs ·

The Labour Party is a fiercely internationalist party and a pro-European party. It is because of these beliefs that I campaigned to stay in the EU, and these beliefs will never change. There is no doubt that the EU is our major trading partner and that the single market and customs union have benefited UK businesses and our economy for many years. I recognise more widely the benefits of collaborative working across the EU in fields of research, medicine, technology, education, arts and farming. I also recognise the role that the EU plays in tackling common threats, such as climate change and serious organised crime.

But we failed to persuade. We lost the referendum. Despite the best efforts of a small yet dedicated group of Remain campaigners here in Lancaster and Fleetwood – we lost. Our council areas of Wyre and Lancaster both voted leave, my constituency voted leave and the country voted to leave. Yes, the result was close. Yes, there were lies and half-truths—none worse than the false promise of an extra £350 million a week for the NHS. Yes, technically the referendum is not legally binding. But the result was not technical; it was deeply political, and politically the notion that the referendum was merely a consultation exercise to inform Parliament holds no water. When I was urging people to vote in the referendum and to vote to remain, I told them that their vote really mattered and that a decision was going to be made. I was not inviting them to express a view.

To those of you who are upset with the result of the referendum, take from this experience the lesson that yes it's important to turn up and vote - although I've been contacted by constituents who didn't even do that! - but it's also important to stand up and speak up too. Elections and referendums are decided by those who turn up - so turn up and turn out fellow citizens who share your views. Don't be just a keyboard warrior signing yet another e-petition on worthy things.

Although I campaigned for remain I am, above all, a democrat. Had the outcome been to remain, I would have expected the result to be honoured, and that cuts both ways. A decision was made on 23 June last year to leave the EU. I wish the result had gone the other way - I campaigned passionately for that - but as a democrat I have to accept the result. It follows that the Prime Minister should not be blocked from starting the article 50 negotiations, which is why I voted for the EU Bill at this week's second reading.

But I will not be giving her a blank cheque on what the UK out of the EU looks like and I will be supporting amendments next week which ensure EU citizens here in the UK are protected, as are our workers rights and the environmental protections as well as trade and sectors like higher education which is so important in my constituency. I will vigorously oppose any threat to rip up existing economic and social protections, including slashing corporate taxes and public spending. Living standards and public services must not be used as a bargaining chip in Brexit negotiations. Tonight represents the beginning of a negotiation, not the end, and I will be standing up for the best interests of my constituents and the country every step of the way.

Odysseus, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:06 (seven years ago) link

most of that seems to be word for word taken from the speech Starmer gave in parliament yesterday, are all the Labour MPs who voted fir the bill sending that round with their respective constituencies subbed in for Lancaster and Fleetwood?

soref, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:15 (seven years ago) link

lol

Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:16 (seven years ago) link

(I agree with most of it, though, fwiw)

soref, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:17 (seven years ago) link

tbf if you're going to make a rote token nod to "democracy" it might as well be as rote and token as you can make it

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:17 (seven years ago) link

I will be standing up for the best interests of my constituents and the country every step of the way riiiiiiight after this

Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:19 (seven years ago) link

i think "look, you lost, suck it up beardos" would've done a job

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:20 (seven years ago) link

Dame Margaret Beckett, the former Labour Foreign Secretary, says she will vote for the Bill, but adds: “I still fear that its consequences, both for our economy and our society, are potentially catastrophic.”

soref, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Wtf?

Heavy Doors (jed_), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:30 (seven years ago) link

fuckin' principles, how do they work

bayland rippenkroeger, stunt artiste (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:38 (seven years ago) link

if anythings shes democratised that a little too well for me gary

Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2017 23:06 (seven years ago) link

http://images.gr-assets.com/books/1436853065l/238367.jpg

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 1 February 2017 23:56 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately no matter who's in charge you can always rely on the Labour Party to roll over and basically do what the Tories want in the end.

Matt DC, Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:31 (seven years ago) link

They are chasing after ~polling results~ like some YouGov is some crystal ball into voter opinion.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChukaUmunna/status/826787973622538240

This poll is basically asking "would you prefer unicorns, or BEING TOTALLY FUX0Red" under which conditions, of course 51% of people are going to pick unicorns.

I keep seeing these terrible results from YouGov being bandied about by MPs and the press. I didn't know anyone who even used YouGov! So I joined, and I've been encouraging people to join and try to move the percentages. But the problem is, often the options are: Centre right option; Hard Right option; How far can we push the Overton Window into outright fascism option; Don't Know.

Of course they keep getting Centre Right responses when there's not even a Centre Left option, let alone anything beyond.

If there had been an option that was neither "Unicorns" or "You're fucked" but "If we can't get a better deal than the one we have, it would be more sensible stick with the deal we have" - but Labour never seem to consider adding new options, just continuing to slavishly follow ~opinion polls~ without even questioning how they are produced.

Umunna is particularly mendacious at the moment. I honestly think he believes he is "being pragmatic" and "fighting for the best deal"; that's a charitable interpretation. I don't know what else the child of two immigrants, living in an 85% Remain area is hoping to accomplish with this. He's already alienating his voter base. It's not bad enough that he voted the way he did after trying to represent himself to his constituents that he was going to represent us. He then had the audacity to go and publicly lie and release some statement saying "none of my constituents contacted me about this" only to be greeted by a hail of screengrabs of emails and tweets and letters from constituents that had been bombarding him for weeks.

It's just such a bizarre and self-defeating option to pursue. Anyway, in the next Tory Gerrymandering, this constituency is being carved up between Dulwich and Tooting, both of whom rebelled so I'm hoping we get shot of this mendacious twit.

Following Polls which are shaped by design to return misleading results just seems so deeply deeply wrong-headed.

Sehr Kornisch (Branwell with an N), Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:02 (seven years ago) link

Have we not DONE this argument 10 million fucking times over the last 15 years? It is honestly like banging your head against a brick wall. These fucking principle-free fucks bleating constantly about needing to debate people's right to exist. And what wonderful timing too, to choose the week of global pro-migrant protests not to push that argument politically but to double down on fucking Legitimate Concerns

may they all burn

lex pretend, Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:03 (seven years ago) link

xp!

lex pretend, Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

Cooper told the Guardian: “I wasn’t in the Home Office, or any of the key departments..."

Get tae fuck.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:06 (seven years ago) link

I briefly joined YouGov last year and found similar things Branwell - just really reductive options. I know a poll can only hold so much nuance but it was barely the level of a Sporcle personality quiz. And you'd think an official govt polling site might contain some...information? facts? to enable people to make up their minds rather than going with kneejerk feeling

lex pretend, Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:07 (seven years ago) link

Why would you need facts, when you can just endlessly regurgitate opinions? (New ILX board description, TBH.)

It's depressing, but when my MP not just ignores - but actively denies - contact from his own constituents in favour of this rubbish heap, what can you do but shovel at the rubbish heap?

Sehr Kornisch (Branwell with an N), Thursday, 2 February 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

is the yvette cooper interview that bad? i mean i normally can't stand her but if many people are actually anti-immigration, as they clearly are, then maybe it would have been a good idea to try to make more effort in actually facilitating integration or educating people?

i'm not sure she says anything in that piece that suggests she wants to cut immigration. that didn't feel like "legitimate concerns" to me, more like suggesting we need to do something about people's concerns, no matter how wrong or misinformed they may be.

perhaps i'm being too kind to her but in terms of what to do in this country, it does seem like there needs to be some attempt to walk people back on immigration, given that the alternative would mean their views just harden or get worse. it's probably way too late, but she does kind of hint at some good arguments about how the tories might scapegoat immigrants to avoid getting blamed for quality of life themselves, without explicitly saying that.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:06 (seven years ago) link

There's another leadership contest in the offing, I assume.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

Once Nuttall's safely in the Commons.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

And you'd think an official govt polling site

yougov isn't officially anything other than a polling company founded and run by a bunch of tories

conrad, Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:19 (seven years ago) link

I probably should have cancelled my direct debit and wanged my card in the bin by now. But it is the potential to piss on the chips of unreconstructed tories like Yvette Cooper that keep me going as a member.

calzino, Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

I agree with LG - I didn't see anything in the article regarding 'legitimate concerns', and it seems self-defeating to argue that the Great British Public do actually have all of the facts in their possession. Where would we go from there except Noodle Vague's bloodiest fantasies?

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

Noodle Vague's bloodiest fantasies is certainly a strong candidate for screen name.

Alba, Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:54 (seven years ago) link

Airport potboiler, gold embossed letters.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 February 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

bring on the NV bloody assizes IMO

Neil S, Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

The obvious issue with the Yvette Cooper thing is she implicitly states the Treasury and DWP aren't "key departments", given she held senior cabinet positions in both while Labour were in power. (Note lack of argument over Housing ministry.)

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:07 (seven years ago) link

at least at last an almost prominent politician is almost saying see that debate we always said we were having and which was so necessary well we weren't actually having it

conrad, Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

tbh I would execute enemies of the people as bloodlessly as possible

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:38 (seven years ago) link

That's what the guillotine's for.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:30 (seven years ago) link

vote noodle vague for exsanguinator-general

for sale: steve bannon waifu pillow (heavily soiled) (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

No need for bloodshed. I'd build a gulag archipelago in the Shetlands and leave them on starvation rations, any survivors would re-sentenced as having taken more from the state than they were entitled to.

calzino, Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely world class piss-taking by the Government in today's White Paper:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3qgluEWIAADpRt.jpg

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:54 (seven years ago) link

cantbagree with nvs politics but i support his methods in a broad sense

Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:59 (seven years ago) link

I get an e-mail from Yougov about once a fortnight inviting me to take part in a survey. Most of the time I ignore it. Whenever I do click on the link it almost never asks me political questions, just endless brand recognition things about pizza delivery companies I've never heard of / cafes I never go to / train companies I haven't travelled with.

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

Coopers not calling for a debate, she wants one side of the debate to acquiesce to the other. UKIP/Tories/NF types aren't calling for or interested in a conversation about immigration.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:16 (seven years ago) link

yes, absolutely. There isn't a debate, it is just desperately trying to sate right wing voters.

calzino, Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Labour can't even build support for immigration within its own party let alone the country. There isn't going to be a debate because they're too terrified to say anything positive about it in any case. It's just sending out a batsignal for the 8 millionth time.

Did Diane Abbott pull a sickie last night by the way?

Matt DC, Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:32 (seven years ago) link

Yes.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 2 February 2017 14:54 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Law_and_policy/status/827192883069452288

Allegedly

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 2 February 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

There's a picture of Diane Abbott out on the piss the night of the 1st, and video of her speaking earlier in the day on the 2nd.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Thursday, 2 February 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

But I came here just now to mention Corbyn's "choose to be gay, choose to be lesbian" gaffe.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Thursday, 2 February 2017 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Get rid of him. I hate him now

I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile in Stoke the patriotic pissing contest hots up.
https://twitter.com/MalcCarter/status/827131239190634497

nashwan, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:04 (seven years ago) link

But I came here just now to mention Corbyn's "choose to be gay, choose to be lesbian" gaffe.

― Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Thursday, 2 February 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Apparently is more games from the press: https://twitter.com/AllyFogg/status/827198603835772928

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:07 (seven years ago) link

I love him. JC for President

I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:09 (seven years ago) link

Not suggesting it's any more than mis-speaking from Corbyn but you shouldn't be failing at language when you're the leader of the party. And I'm on his side.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn seems to have a good record on these issues so without seeing the video I am willing to cut him some slack.

Yvette Cooper has been full of shit so I am not willing to cut her slack on whatever it is she has to say on immigration today. Corbyn not being Yvette Cooper or Dan Jarvis is - amazingly enough - a viable argument for keeping him on. Not that I'd shed a tear if he doesn't last.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

May fluffs lines like crazy in every speech she gives but as usual people just can't help but look the other way.

nashwan, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:19 (seven years ago) link

but you shouldn't be failing at language when you're the leader of the party

May, Cameron etc. do this all the time.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:27 (seven years ago) link

They already had the job. He wants the job.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:29 (seven years ago) link

p sure he doesn't actually even really want the job he currently has

mark s, Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Xyzzy and mark clearly otm god help us

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 2 February 2017 20:22 (seven years ago) link

it turns out that Will Straw almost became notable for a fifth thing (as well as being a drug dealer/posing for a photo with some blacked-up morris dancers/failing to be elected as a Labour MP/masterminding the Stronger In campaign):

But despite its popularity with a generation of young males, it appears not everyone was a fan of Eurotrash.

In fact, former home secretary Jack Straw was apparently so appalled when he walked in on his son watching the show that he secretly lobbied for it to be axed from the airwaves.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4186192/Jack-Straw-tried-Eurotrash-axed-Channel-4.html

soref, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:19 (seven years ago) link

Been enjoying David Allen Green's scathing comments on the White Paper. https://twitter.com/Law_and_policy

Labour: "Of course we will vote for Brexit whatever happens, but there should be a white paper to assure us that the Brexit we are all voting for anyway is good for hard-working British people."
Tories: "Hm. If we must. You vote yes first, then we'll arrange some sort of white paper."
Labour: "Yes yes, what could go wrong?"
(gives white paper task to the work experience kid with instructions to say nothing informative, scrape together some charts and who cares what they say cz surely nobody will check, editorialise a little if you like about how marvellous leaving will be because even though we already had sovereignty and will gain nothing and stand to lose a lot some people had ~the feels~)

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 3 February 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

Global Britain though.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 3 February 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

i thought the idea that we'd have brexit in name only had kind of disappeared with the hardline rhetoric of recent weeks, but that seems to suggest otherwise.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 3 February 2017 11:37 (seven years ago) link

tho if you're going to fudge on things, why the determination to leave the customs union?

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 3 February 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

I suspect the strategy, if one could be said to exist, is to be as vocally pro-Brexit as possible while working behind the scenes to ensure as little as possible actually changes. Which strikes me as a surefire way of ensuring you piss literally everyone off, including/especially the people you are supposed to be negotiating with.

Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 10:55 (seven years ago) link

I had assumed that was the strategy, but I assumed that more in the aftermath of the referendum. In recent weeks and months it seemed to me like they were going to actually cut all ties and consequences be hanged. I mean, that's why people have been talking about the dangers of a hard brexit, right? But if that article is true, and you're right, then they have successfully duped a lot of people. The entire media narrative has been about an actual hard brexit, not a postured one. Like that article is the first time I've seen the return of ideas like transitional agreements, or the notion of Brexit in name only.

I mean it'd be a lot less worrying if that was the case, apart from the risk of getting undercut by the right, I'm just not convinced it is.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Saturday, 4 February 2017 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Part of my problem with the Labour...strategy?...is that it's going to completely destroy them in Scotland. And, of course, that was already a problem after the independence referendum, but people have been working hard trying to reverse that, and this ruins that. Scottish labour can't claim to speak for working people in Scotland while labour votes against their wishes.

Of course, that may be a calculated risk - but the fact that Scots (and, indeed, others) are always the sacrifice is part of the SNPs case.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:42 (seven years ago) link

Doubt Scotland has crossed Corbyn's mind at all tbh, he seems completely oblivious to its existence.

Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Interesting, good even, to see Crabb dismissing the prospects of immigration reduction (crucially by pointing out both the unfeasibility and undesirability). Pile it on.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/03/brexiters-face-rude-awakening-on-immigration-warns-ex-minister

nashwan, Saturday, 4 February 2017 16:00 (seven years ago) link

(xp) losing the one remaining seat in Scotland vs. potentially dozens in the Midlands and Northern England = no-brainer

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Saturday, 4 February 2017 16:15 (seven years ago) link

I know! And that's why no one will vote labour in Scotland.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 4 February 2017 16:21 (seven years ago) link

It's not the only reason in fairness.

Matt DC, Saturday, 4 February 2017 16:26 (seven years ago) link

I don't actually believe that calculation but everybody involved in politics seems to, so, hey ho.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Saturday, 4 February 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/lisa-nandy-labour-should-be-a-party-of-patriotism-not-placards_uk_5895fdf6e4b0a1dcbd029a2a

this is totally Nandy positioning herself as a potential replacement for Corbyn if Labour loses the upcoming by-elections, right?

(I was also thinking that Owen Jones coming out and explicitly saying that he would "struggle" to vote for Corbyn in a leadership election might be another sign of a possible Clive Lewis leadership bid?)

soref, Sunday, 5 February 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

this seems a pretty awkward attempt to consolidate "I am a liberal on immigration" with "people are right to blame immigration and immigrants for problems in their communities"

The Wigan MP, tipped by some as a future unity candidate who could succeed Corbyn, said that defending EU ‘freedom of movement’ was a good example of how out of touch Labour had become nationally.

“I am very liberal in my outlook around immigration….But I feel very, very angry - like many of my constituents - that the system of free movement has allowed us to ignore the skills and aspirations of young people in towns like mine.”

“If you look at opportunities for young people in towns like mine….it’s allowed a skilled and mobile population across Europe to gain advantage at the expense of the rest of us.

soref, Sunday, 5 February 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

the fucking Labour party was formed in the teeth of accusations of lack of patriotism precisely because it was formed by people who believed in the rights of all human beings to economic and social justice. socialism is internationalist or it's nothing. Labour MPs risked public violence in protesting against the blind jingo-driven slaughter of World War I. stand up and take a bow Lisa Nandy, what a model of integrity you are.

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 10:48 (seven years ago) link

Definitely some sort of Thermidorian Reaction being lined up if Nuttall wins Stoke.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 11:09 (seven years ago) link

Just watch yer jaw, Jezza.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 11:09 (seven years ago) link

“If you look at opportunities for young people in towns like mine….it’s allowed a skilled and mobile population across Europe to gain advantage at the expense of the rest of us.

wenn der Bauer nicht schwimmen kann ist die Badehose schuld

massaman gai, Sunday, 5 February 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

Surely if the Europeans are 'skilled' then that is an 'advantage' that they have merited and should be able to use?

And if we have 'freedom of movement' then weren't the 'young people in towns like mine' also potentially just as 'mobile' as the other Europeans, ie: if they were 'skilled' enough then they could go and work in Poland or Zaragoza?

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:10 (seven years ago) link

You wouldn't be earning very much if you went to Poland. Also you'd be living in Poland. Though, admittedly, if you come here from Poland you might be living in Greenock.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

Poland was very cheap last time I was there. You wouldn't need to earn much.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:16 (seven years ago) link

Just read more of Nandy's interview. Dreadful.

--
“Most people’s view that I meet in Wigan is that we just need to get on with it and decide what comes next: ‘We had that debate so why are you still having it?’

“What matters to people in their everyday lives…we’ve moved quite far away from that in the last few years on the Left."
--

Well, quite a big fuss was made about Parliament needing to be able to debate Brexit and not just leave it to the executive. That's what the story of Gina Miller, the two court cases, the Mail attacks on 'enemies of the people' etc were about. That's why you're still having that debate.

She says 'on the Left' but no statement in her interview makes her sound like she is on the Left.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:17 (seven years ago) link

It's amazing how Labour MPs all default to same vague guff whichever end of the party they're ostensibly from. Maybe they're just shellshocked from being berated by frothing racists on a weekly basis, but there's always an issue of employment or housing or healthcare in there that is virtually never actually framed as such. Labour can't win on immigration, it can win by promising to improve the social housing stock, invest in healthcare, use a more activist state to create jobs - especially manual work. That's assuming that anyone believes them capable of delivering on that, which is admittedly a huge assumption.

Matt DC, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:22 (seven years ago) link

Nandy's comments make me think: 'Local people' trying to get away from 'freedom of movement' and 'immigrants' seem to be saying 'we are not really as good at our jobs as those other people so we can only prosper by banning them from competing with us'.

Like if English football clubs were bad in European competition so they banned themselves from competing in Europe and thus stopped failing at it.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:26 (seven years ago) link

And if we have 'freedom of movement' then weren't the 'young people in towns like mine' also potentially just as 'mobile' as the other Europeans, ie: if they were 'skilled' enough then they could go and work in Poland or Zaragoza?

Didn't know Norman Tebbit posted on ILX

Transform All Suffering Into Poo (Colonel Poo), Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:26 (seven years ago) link

“If you look at opportunities for young people in towns like mine….it’s allowed a skilled and mobile population across Europe to gain advantage at the expense of the rest of us.

No attempt to give local young people any of those skills or mobility then? What a fucking tool.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Yes. Perhaps it is bad that people should have to go far looking for a job.

I think my point was: being 'mobile' is not an unfair advantage that continental workers have over Britons. Within the EU as it has been, we have had the same right to be 'mobile' as them. We can't blame 'them' if they are (no doubt with difficulty, effort, struggle etc) using this right and we are not.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

You're on a very slippery slope when you start implying that the problem with the poor is that they're insufficiently driven.

There are fewer jobs in much of the rest of Europe than there are even here, that's kind of the whole issue.

Matt DC, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

Lots of jobs in the UK and Germany. It's the lack of range and the conditions (zero hours etc.) that need addressing here. Not sure 'opportunities' is supposed to mean now.

nashwan, Sunday, 5 February 2017 13:57 (seven years ago) link

“If you look at opportunities for young people in towns like mine….it’s allowed a skilled and mobile population across Europe to gain advantage at the expense of the rest of us.

No attempt to give local young people any of those skills or mobility then? What a fucking tool.

― Camaraderie at Arms Length, Sunday, February 5, 2017 1:36 PM (twenty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

to be fair, she does also talk about that immediatley before that bit I quoted, but she's still coming at it from the angle that it's immigration that has allowed the govt to get away with failing to give opportunities to young people in Wigan, that immigration should be blamed rather than the tories

She highlighted the Government’s decision to axe the bursary for nursing degrees, a move that this week led to a sharp drop in the number of people applying for the course.

“There was a week in the EU referendum when there was a Labour politician who went onto the TV and said you are more likely to be treated by a migrant in the NHS than queuing behind one.

“And somebody said to me in Wigan: ‘Why should I be grateful that we can attract people to come here and work in hospitals, when you’ve just abolished the nursing bursary and I have not got a hope of getting a job in that hospital now? So thanks very much’.

“If you look at opportunities for young people in towns like mine….it’s allowed a skilled and mobile population across Europe to gain advantage at the expense of the rest of us.

soref, Sunday, 5 February 2017 14:08 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I think these are good points.

I still think Nandy seems to be scapegoating foreigners who are probably just trying to get by.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 14:11 (seven years ago) link

there are a lot of things that make relocating to poland (and other parts of eastern europe, presumably) difficult, especially long term. I know a couple who have had to move back to the UK after working in poland for a few years because there was no way they could get a decent pension there doing what they were. I'm not sure how freedom of movement/brain drain has impacted the inequality across europe but it's certainly still a big problem

ogmor, Sunday, 5 February 2017 14:34 (seven years ago) link

Nursing is a bit of a red herring. The number of training places is capped by the government and courses are heavily over subscribed. Candidates losing out on the opportunity to train are, by and large, are doing so to other, possibly more privileged, British and Irish young people. The crisis in numbers is less about a finite number of opportunities for people being trained than it is about retention. Two years of experience in the NHS translate to a much higher salary in the private sector, or in the Gulf or Australia. Hypothetically you could argue that if EU nurses were not available then the government would be forced to bump up the salaries of British nurses by 50% but I wouldn't bet on it.

Nandy presumably knows as well as anyone that opportunities come through training, investment in education, a diversified economy and a level playing field for kids of all backgrounds. When she starts articulating how she plans to deliver that, I'll welcome her jockeying for the leadership.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 5 February 2017 14:48 (seven years ago) link

In the wide-ranging interview she also says:

“There is a real need for Labour to articulate emotions and values. And if we forget to do that then it finds only one outlet and that is the populist right or the radical left. And I think both of those things are a dead end for this country and for the world."

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 14:59 (seven years ago) link

You just get this sense that Labour has been stuck in the shellshocked post-election stage for nearly two years now. They aren't anywhere near close to articulating a clear direction let alone an electoral strategy.

Matt DC, Sunday, 5 February 2017 15:04 (seven years ago) link

LN goes on and on about the 'we need to realise politics is emotional' line which is as worn-out as 'let's have a debate about immigration'. Ditto 'the left needs to embrace patriotism' -- something the Labour Party has claimed to do every year for the last 25 years.

I just read OJ's Standard interview saying he would find it hard to vote for JC now.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 15:07 (seven years ago) link

tbf i find it hard to read OJ now

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:18 (seven years ago) link

Patriotism? What for? The UK? England?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:25 (seven years ago) link

Let's try to define Britishness yet again and fail yet again.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:25 (seven years ago) link

Of course, as discussed upthread they've given up on Scotland, this is all about England and whatever weird brand of patriotism English people claim to have.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:27 (seven years ago) link

it's just a simple feeling that England is a better country than everywhere else in the world and foreigners are bitter jealous cheats trying to rip us off from everything we rightfully acquired through our guts, intelligence and humility

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

Still not sure if that's about England or the UK Greater England tho tbh.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:32 (seven years ago) link

oh it's England, obv we have a few lads in the wider islands who consider themselves English tho

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:35 (seven years ago) link

football commentators with thick Ulster accents who refer to the England team as "we" etc

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

I have never cared much for Owen Jones at all, ever. I do feel bad that he has been afflicted with the same man-boy condition as Rees-Mogg, but fuck the whey faced little cunt tbh.

calzino, Sunday, 5 February 2017 17:38 (seven years ago) link

Why do people dislike Owen Jones?

I find him a bit irritating as a persona, but has he had any particularly bad ideas?

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Owen Jones' twitter feed is full of people (including OJ) saying they won't go on a march because the SWP will be on it.

I would not want to go into the minefield of offering a defence of the SWP, about which people evidently have very strong feelings, but if you're on the political left and you avoid demos with an SWP presence, surely you will soon not be going to any demos. Which might be convenient.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:23 (seven years ago) link

Your second post partly answers the first for me

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:25 (seven years ago) link

The SWP are pretty reprehensible, but so insignificant that refusing to be seen near them in public is only feeding the Judaean Popular Front mentality that hobbles the left in the UK

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:29 (seven years ago) link

Suspect the idea is that if you say things like you won't go on a march because the SWP will be there, normal right wing people will respect you more

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Leads to this thing of always talking about how you don't like the SWP, Hamas, Stalin, etc

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:39 (seven years ago) link

imo plays into the idea that Stalin and Hamas are always just around the corner, ready to pounce as soon as any left idea or policy comes into play

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:39 (seven years ago) link

N. Vague: I think I agree.

Even if you think the SWP are beyond the pale -- if you are trying to build an 'anti-Trump movement' or something as OJ seems personally to be trying to do, then to be making divisions within it when it's less than a week old, does not feel encouraging. It's curiously like the recent Momentum debacle (don't know the details), except OJ's movement is more centrist / liberal / mainstream I would think. He talks about how glad he is that Boris Johnson's sister is involved - perhaps he is keen to build bridges in that direction.

Cardamon: OJ might have good motives for his relation to the SWP - but more broadly, yes, I do think he wants to reach out to people to the Right of him.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 18:42 (seven years ago) link

The motive is that SWP excused a senior member's sexual misconduct and made his accuser's life a misery. Owen Jones is just doing the unprecedented thing of acting on women's complaints. A great many women do not see what gain there is to be had in letting a bunch of rape apologists march alongside them to denounce a known sexual predator.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

i understand the background suzy and i understand why individuals might want to protest the SWP and refuse to engage with their members. it's hard to see how it would be possible to organize protests on the left that weren't attended by SWP members/apologists tho. and Jones hasn't taken this stance on the Labour party which as far as i'm aware has never taken steps to censure the likes of Simon Danczuk.

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link

X-Post:

Yes. As I said, many people think the SWP are beyond the pale because of this. I am aware that a crime or crimes of that kind is the reason, though don't know lots of details. As I said, it is an issue that people who know about it take very seriously and is very sensitive.

However, I think in general it will be difficult for people to hold demos and only allow some people to join in.

^
so, similar to what N.V. just said. (Can't really comment on the Labour / SWP comparison)

Beyond that, my general point was -- I find OJ a bit irritating, but I am not really aware of any specific views of his that are bad.

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:27 (seven years ago) link

you're right tho suzy, it's a mess, i don't have an honest solution and i agree the SWP's internal politics should be held up to the spotlight. maybe protest them too while people are marching?

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:30 (seven years ago) link

SWP will always turn up for rallies and marches; they own their own presses, hence the poster glut. The issue as I understand it is that they are welcome to attend but it would be inappropriate for them to lead or act as a main sponsor of an event.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Fuck the SWP obviously, but that's always been the case. Don't exactly go on many marches these days but, when I do, I try to make sure I'm not caught in the middle of a crowd of arseholes waving Star of David = Swastika flags or whatever.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:36 (seven years ago) link

xp

i agree completely with that, but the shifty fuckers do hide behind a bunch of campaign groups and not all of those groups are simple fronts as i understand it

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 February 2017 19:40 (seven years ago) link

Yeah the issue isn't that the SWP will be attending the protest (they turn up to everything as has been noted), it's that they actually organised this one. Refusing to attend is not only an ideologically consistent statement it's also a laudable one.

Matt DC, Sunday, 5 February 2017 20:23 (seven years ago) link

and there are those who are ~diplomatically~ suggesting others on the left put this aside when it's events like this one where the swp have played only a small role. v disingenuous to act like they don't know the swp's remaining ten old men and a few dozen naive undergrads don't still try to monopolise every leftist movement they can get in any way involved with

Hours later, Ukip mega-donor Arron Banks also appeared to have had Creme Eggs thrown at him - which he then ate.

as exemplary expressions of englishness goes it's not quite at the level of the queen mum standing up to nazi bombers during wwii but it's at least at the level of bobby charlton in 1966

for sale: steve bannon waifu pillow (heavily soiled) (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 6 February 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

scenes in parliament rn

Well, it all just kicked off. pic.twitter.com/wHYVJdlMja

— Ben (@Jamin2g) February 6, 2017

stet, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 10:43 (seven years ago) link

(tweet embeds c/d?)

stet, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 10:43 (seven years ago) link

omg stet YES C, VERY C!

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

gamechanger

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 10:55 (seven years ago) link

Is there any way of turning the sound on if you play the clip in zing? I can't find one.

Tim, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:01 (seven years ago) link

Mr Deputy Speaker seems like a total arse-hoyle, but I guess this isn't the point of this historic twitter embed:p

calzino, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:03 (seven years ago) link

Is your ringer on silent? Switching it back on turned the sound on for me xp

wins, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:05 (seven years ago) link

Ah yes, that works. Weird that looking at the footage via twitter doesn't require the ringer to be on but looking at it embedded in zing does. Thanks wins (and Stet of course).

On the matter in hand, it's hard to tell who's in the wrong from that clip - the speaker is on about someone taking advantage of something...

Tim, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:08 (seven years ago) link

lol salmond going HAM

(tweet embeds super-classic)

for sale: steve bannon waifu pillow (heavily soiled) (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:10 (seven years ago) link

Loving tweet embeds but if we can linkify them for people with images off, in the way we do with Youtube embeds, that might be better. Not keen on having any kind of images onscreen at work.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

As usual, the SNP providing the only effective opposition in the Commons.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

agree w matt, it should work same as images/YT embeds

still, ace in any case!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

That looked feisty and I was on the side of the SNP and against the Yorkshire geezer.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

Hoyle's accent is conspicuously Lancastrian but this is maybe the kind of subtle difference that only a northerner would pick up

sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

Fair article.

This:

--
By a solid majority of 61% to 33% its 2015 voters backed Remain at the referendum. However, the 33% of Labour-Leave voters are disproportionately the traditional working class Labour voters that the party is struggling to keep hold of. 70% of Labour Remainers are middle class, drawn mostly from the professional classes. Labour Leavers are 60% working class, mostly those working in routine occupations or surviving on benefits. Labour Remainers tend to be graduates, Labour leavers tend to have few or no qualifications.

If we break down these two Labour tribes by their current voting intention Labour's problem becomes even clearer. Amongst 2015 Labour voters who backed Remain, 60% have remained loyal to Labour and would vote for them tomorrow. When it comes to Leave voters who backed them in the last general election, only 45% would vote for the party now.
--

- shows in effect that the Labour Leave people are holding Labour to ransom by, as it were, threatening to go to UKIP, while Labour Remain people are loyal and therefore are not taken account of. We are treated as though we have 'nowhere else to go', as they used to say about Labour voters in another context.

It is not quite true that we have nowhere else to go, though, as lots could go Green or Lib Dem, never mind the nationalist parties. But this polling does not seem to show that as a likely big prospect.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

(... actually the contrast drawn by the article and thence by me is perhaps too strong: 45 vs 60 % is not such a huge gap. Perhaps the bigger issue is that ONLY 60% of Labour Remain people would vote for Labour tomorrow.)

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 13:16 (seven years ago) link

It also suggests that Labour have to vote against Article 50 if they don't get their amendments through. They need to frame it as enforcing a soft Brexit for the good of the country, but it's probably too late for that.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 13:23 (seven years ago) link

"here are our amendments. oh and we'll vote in favour regardless"

"ta"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

The most likely outcome is probably Corbyn forcing it through (as he arguably has to) and then either stepping aside or getting challenged from 'the left' before the end of the year - allowing whoever comes in a measure of distance.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 14:04 (seven years ago) link

ATM there seems to be a lot of grouping people into "leavers" and "remainers" as if this is some kind of fixed identity which supersedes everything else.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

We must draw the line at branding.

Alba, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Temporary tattoos, maybe.

Alba, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 15:18 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CljWr9aWkAA4FrU.jpg

conrad, Tuesday, 7 February 2017 15:30 (seven years ago) link

Dabitties

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 15:43 (seven years ago) link

It also suggests that Labour have to vote against Article 50 if they don't get their amendments through. They need to frame it as enforcing a soft Brexit for the good of the country, but it's probably too late for that.

Good point. I don't think it's too late as the process is still unfolding. However I doubt the lab leadership can see the wood for the trees on this issue.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 16:17 (seven years ago) link

ATM there seems to be a lot of grouping people into "leavers" and "remainers" as if this is some kind of fixed identity which supersedes everything else.

― Camaraderie at Arms Length, Tuesday, February 7, 2017 6:05 AM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

welcome to scotland!

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 7 February 2017 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Hi,

The news this morning is all "Corby is under pressure to discipline MP's who vote against the three line whip to back the Brexit bill"

From whom?

Mark G, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 08:02 (seven years ago) link

I get why Parliament "has to" wave through Brexit even tho I think it's spineless, but I don't understand why pro-Remain MPs on either side seem resigned to waving through Theresa May's hard Brexit.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 08:35 (seven years ago) link

Mark G: I suppose, under pressure from other MPs who think, I have done what I was told, so others who don't should be punished for it?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 09:20 (seven years ago) link

The most likely outcome is probably Corbyn forcing it through (as he arguably has to) and then either stepping aside or getting challenged from 'the left' before the end of the year - allowing whoever comes in a measure of distance.

Reports going round that he's named a date of departure to his closest circle.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

via Simple Politics on Twitter
PM: "What we get from Labour are alternative facts. What they need is an alternative leader."

When even the enemy call for more challenging opposition (albeit to deflect from their own poor PMQs performances)

nashwan, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

Running down Labour leaders instead of answering any questions at PMQs has been Tory policy since time immemorial, ramped up even more post-Linton Crosby, sorry, Sir Linton Crosby.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

tbf tho, getting Gordon Brown to answer a direct question at PMQs was like pulling teeth. Fuck PMQs.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

sure but usually more in the 'you're shit and you know you are' vein rather than 'get a good leader and then you might beat us' concern-trolling with that tacit admission of their own shitness

nashwan, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

Having said all that it looks like Corbyn, or his team, might have uncovered something interesting re this Surrey County Council malarkey.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

It's not often he gets a direct hit that dominates the news cycle, wrongfoots the government and makes people sit up and take notice but he's done it this time.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 16:33 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure it will get swatted aside as some kind of bogus news and quickly forgotten about. Looking after their own is what the Tories do anyway isn't it.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 16:53 (seven years ago) link

no doubt somewhere on the internet there will be threads of how Tara Palmer-Tomkinson was offed to get something else on news headlines

Odysseus, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:04 (seven years ago) link

"Britain has a proud history of welcoming refugees. At a time when Donald Trump is banning refugees from America, it would be shameful if the UK followed suit by closing down this route to sanctuary for unaccompanied children just months after it was opened."

"During the Kindertransport, Sir Nicky Winton rescued 669 children from Nazi persecution virtually single-handedly. I was one of those lucky ones. It would be a terrible betrayal of his legacy if as a country we were unable to do more than this to help a new generation of child refugees.

"I urge the prime minister to show leadership by continuing and building on this programme, not shutting the door to some of the most vulnerable refugee children."

Still, Truly Global Britain though.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

they was changing the face of our culture too quickly

Dick Hole Son (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:25 (seven years ago) link

Those 200 12 year olds took my job, my home, my wife, my life.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

these countries should look after their own, what has the middle east got to do with us?

Dick Hole Son (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:29 (seven years ago) link

But 12 of them looked 200!

How did we go from an Immigration minister called Brokenshire to one called Goodwill...

nashwan, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:31 (seven years ago) link

That Surrey leak ought to be doing some damage, but it will be mainly dead celeb getting all the clicks.

calzino, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:35 (seven years ago) link

Will have to find a way to prolong the story beyond the week of national mourning for Tara Palmer-Tomkinson.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:38 (seven years ago) link

c.lew resigns

conrad, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

if there is another leadership election, could Lewis get the requisite number of nominations from Lab MPs to be on the ballot? I guess there could be some MPs who might nominate him on the basis that, even though he wouldn't have been their first choice, they know any candidate from the right or lol soft-left would likely lose to Corbyn?

soref, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 20:13 (seven years ago) link

(xp) There goes the Surrey County Council story.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 21:06 (seven years ago) link

It was probably already going to get buried by the Ketchup debate, which is already two places above it on BBC's most popular stories.

calzino, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 21:14 (seven years ago) link

re: Surrey, it won't be the last story of its kind.

Labour should've pressed for its amendments - but for Lewis to resign is a shit show. If he does get his hands in the leadership I think the right-wing could easily push him out. There are Umunna-levels of idiocy to exploit.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link

clive lewis must think we have short memories

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/15/clive-lewis-labour-eu-free-movement-corbyn

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:23 (seven years ago) link

the fact that just him resigning has caused a flurry of speculation about corbyn's leadership shows how dire labour's situation is right now

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:23 (seven years ago) link

There is always speculation (rumours he would set a date for departure earlier in the day, which sounds unforunded). I expect more speculation if he loses either or both by-elections. Obviosuly hoping he'll stay but any movement should not be depedant on any one person.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:28 (seven years ago) link

honestly looking at labour's situation and not to be a sad sack defeatist but there is absolutely no chance that any course of action from here on out doesn't end in total disaster

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:35 (seven years ago) link

This is nice, on the march to communism folks: https://twitter.com/EdmundGriffiths/status/829437871480328193

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:41 (seven years ago) link

If I was a Blairite pound shop Machiavelli I'd probably want Lewis in the race to split the left vote.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 23:11 (seven years ago) link

Obviously six identikit Blairites would all run at once ruining my brilliant plan at a stroke but hey.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 23:12 (seven years ago) link

Don't you keep eliminating the candidates with the least votes one by one until someone has got a majority? So it wouldn't matter if the vote was split?

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 8 February 2017 23:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Lewis's resignation has anything to do with the leadership. Pundits say that kind of thing because it's their genre.

He did not think it was right to vote for Brexit, without the amendments. Also, his constituency is anti-Brexit so he may have been pragmatic in voting for what would be popular there. In any case he had already promised that he would not vote for Brexit without the amendments. He has stood by his word and refused to vote for it. His resignation from shadow cabinet is presumably a direct result of that.

When I saw him spouting pro-Brexit stuff a week or two ago I was doubtful but I now think it may have been tactical.

I like him. I think he is one of the best MPs.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 23:59 (seven years ago) link

"one of the best MPs" is faint praise indeed

lex pretend, Thursday, 9 February 2017 07:37 (seven years ago) link

faint praise being exactly what Lewis deserves I guess

lex pretend, Thursday, 9 February 2017 07:38 (seven years ago) link

so good to see "what is the point of Jeremy Corbyn" developing separately but in parallel to "what is the point of the Labour Party"

lex pretend, Thursday, 9 February 2017 09:16 (seven years ago) link

The Guardian clearly building for a 3rd leadership challenge. Owen Jones and Clive Lewis really are two dumb dipshits

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 9 February 2017 09:27 (seven years ago) link

What have they said to give you that impression?

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 February 2017 09:53 (seven years ago) link

Oh good, no amendments (not even the one about the rights of EU citizens in the UK, or the one saying "maybe we shouldn't fuck up the Good Friday Agreement"). Thanks guys.

Thanks both Oxford MPs voting it through too. Guess Andrew Smith's seat is safe enough that it doesn't matter to him that 70% of his constituents voted Remain. Guess Nicola Blackwood didn't notice during her time as Chair of the Science & Technology Committee (despite being a home-schooled Christian music grad) and also representing a constituency where a significant % of voters work in research & higher education that science, research & higher ed are really dependent on EU funding, collaboration, students & workers.

Grr.

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

There seems to be a lot of naivety about what replacing Corbyn would mean. As much as journalists on the soft left would like to believe that his problems are his presentation, 'baggage', ways of working, etc, the tone of the coverage and framing of debate will remain more or less the same unless Lewis, Nandy, Starmer, etc, explicitly disavow any broadly leftist platform. The question is probably whether they would be any better placed to lead a mass movement capable of driving a socialist (or socialist lite) agenda in the face of that opposition.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I agree, the same vile media will attack almost any Labour leader, in a similar way -- it would be daft to think it would stop because JC stops. They would be attacking Yvette Cooper if she were Labour leader now.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38917436

'I made it up yesterday.com'

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

Did he actually say it was "fake news"? Fucking hell, JC.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:33 (seven years ago) link

That's a legitimately contemptible move

lex pretend, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:34 (seven years ago) link

The BBC interviewer introduced the phrase - JC was just going along with his terms.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

What got me about May's risposte was not the "labour u need a new leader lol" bit (Cameron did that, too), but trying to ride the zeitgeist via "alternative facts", which only became A Thing because the US administration she's so confident we should all be pals with introduced it with a straight face. Much more egregious than JC's fake news imo.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 9 February 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

yeah that was a lame retort considering what had just been revealed, it must have been a toe curling moment even for the Tories.

calzino, Thursday, 9 February 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

this seems a little worrying

In unprecedented move, the Conservatives will grant a half-day debate to the Democratic Unionist Party just a week before elections to the devolved assembly in Stormont on 2 March, the New Statesman has learnt. No equivalent to the half-day debate, which will take up the entirety of the Thursday afternoon session, is being given to the other Irish parties, who will also be competitors in the elections.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/devolution/2017/02/conservatives-criticised-unprecedented-intervention-northern-irish

soref, Thursday, 9 February 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

There's clearly some sort of horrible deal afoot here in return for their support last night.

stet, Thursday, 9 February 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

this has being going on for some time as well: http://www.irishnews.com/news/2016/10/14/news/ni-conservatives-disquiet-over-dup-love-in-to-be-raised-with-party-hq-736030/

soref, Thursday, 9 February 2017 12:50 (seven years ago) link

"I fully understand the pragmatic political realities but I'm genuinely concerned that the nature of the DUP's political aspirations, and its views on social issues in particular, are not fully understood within Conservative Party headquarters."

lmao

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 9 February 2017 14:52 (seven years ago) link

Poor naive Tories, not understanding what the up stand for.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Thursday, 9 February 2017 14:57 (seven years ago) link

Obviously six identikit Blairites would all run at once ruining my brilliant plan at a stroke but hey.

They are 6 for a pound last time I checked on Bury market

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Thursday, 9 February 2017 15:45 (seven years ago) link

Here's the "fake news" interview in full. Starts at about 5 mins in if you want to judge for yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElVNHaDmrLo

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 9 February 2017 16:08 (seven years ago) link

I don't like Corbyn but that's a very mild use of the term. He's pretty much just repeating what the interviewer said back to him.

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 9 February 2017 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Torygraph: Now Corbyn is copying Trump *chortle*

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 February 2017 16:45 (seven years ago) link

His media skills remain very low. It might have been an unassuming use of 'fake news' but in the context of him throwing the comment back at the beeb like a weak fish slap it just comes across as Tory-chortle fodder now. Like watching oliver hardy step into a seemingly shallow puddle only to disappear up to his neck.

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:40 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile you can always count on a Tory MP to fight for 'impartiality' over the need to condemn an actively criminal abusive President.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38923451

nashwan, Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:42 (seven years ago) link

You're thinking of Dawn French xpost

Heavy Doors (jed_), Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:53 (seven years ago) link

To the qn from above Lewis' actions on this do nothing and to frame it as a concious act is pathetic. The numbers were not there to overturn anything, the Tories were disciplined in the end. That includes Anna Soubry - interviewed by OJ, who seemed to be the new Kenneth Clarke, the latest in the 'nice Tory' bollocks people indulge in now and then except that she voted to trigger A50. Its just embarrassing.

Corbyn has found it increasingly difficult to articulate his positions more widely although I read his tweet as a bigger fight than whether we are in the fucking EU. Anyone who knows what the EU is also knows they won't safeguard rights and conditions or anything. Freedom of movement is an economic need; thousands died last year at Europe's borders. The referendum result is sad, as is Corbyn inability to mount a position. Don't see why he should go because he isn't much of a Westminster operator, especially with the scum he has attempted to work with. Needless to say Labour couldn't afford to indulge in a 2nd leadership, and a 3rd? Well it won't end its woes. Although its hard to see what will.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:05 (seven years ago) link

I suspect he'll go voluntarily if Nuttall wins Stoke - not right away but not long after.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:10 (seven years ago) link

idk, the candidate Labour chose is a cunt. Not sure he should finally go because of that.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:14 (seven years ago) link

It's a John Barnes post Inverness Caley v. Celtic situation, like, OK, this is the end.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:17 (seven years ago) link

Lol! Barnesy seemed to think Celtic were a good little stepping stone for his meteoric rise to Real Madrid. I think Corbyn always knew he had hell on with this job!

I don't think Nuttall has a prayer tbh, I feel like he is a rank outsider whose chances are getting way too talked up.

calzino, Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:30 (seven years ago) link

I fucking hope so.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:33 (seven years ago) link

I've a fiver on The Incredible Flying Brick although that is a v insensitive name to Angela Eagle

nashwan, Thursday, 9 February 2017 21:46 (seven years ago) link

"If you can't laugh, what can you do?" "Take up politics, perhaps?"

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 9 February 2017 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Fucking hell

"I arrived in Sleaford on Sunday 4th Dec, and quickly toured the public meeting places. As usual I was greeted with:
“great to see you, it wouldn’t be a real by-election if you weren’t here.”
Monday was fun, my old friend Nigel Farage held a public meeting in the local Legionnaires Club, I was there and ended up on stage when he stated that there was another party leader in attendance."

https://www.loonyparty.com/

Not just painfully unfunny, actually mates with Nigel Farage.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 9 February 2017 22:26 (seven years ago) link

kerrazy guy! One of my local "eccentrics" is a sad old bigot as well, he used to have a bath fixed to the top of his car and would turn up in pubs wearing pyjamas and wellington boots. But basically a staid old nasty bigoted twat underneath all the wacky get-up.

calzino, Thursday, 9 February 2017 22:56 (seven years ago) link

They often are.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 February 2017 22:58 (seven years ago) link

does any other country have comedy parties and candidates? (i don't mean protest candidates who use a comical gimmick, i think that's a reasonable honourable tradition plus i believe hangus was a two-term mayor of hartlepool and did quite a good job: i mean ftang ftang biscuit barrel garbage)

mark s, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:09 (seven years ago) link

three-term in fact, blimey, good for him

mark s, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:09 (seven years ago) link

Like Jon Ganrr you mean? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3n_Gnarr

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:15 (seven years ago) link

Its Gnarr but I won't bother with the accent.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:15 (seven years ago) link

We had a singer-comedian called Jacob Haugaard, who campaigned for more wind on the bicycling lanes, rearming an old frigate, stuff like that. As every politician gets some sort of funding support post-election depending on the number of votes they get, he would always throw a massive party right after an election. But surprisingly, he got elected to parliament in 1994, after which he didn't really think it was that funny anymore. Now, there's a painting of him hanging in parliament, supposedly as a warning against populism :)

Also, Bebe Grillo in Italy. Though that's not funny.

Frederik B, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:21 (seven years ago) link

tbh i find the mrloony party way more annoying than any of these guys -- who all seem to be borderline protest candidates, even if the protest takes the form of clowning (grillo's five star is a full-on populist protest party)

hangus by contrast ran to get publicity for hartlepool fc, which to be fair was his actual job as he was its professional mascot, got up as a monkey -- then when he won he put the monkeysuit away and got down to the serious business of being mayor

mark s, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Didn't a puppet turkey run for the Irish presidential election in the 90s?

Matt DC, Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:40 (seven years ago) link

wow i genuinely didn't believe i could feel more patronizing contempt for Owen Smith, good effort

Dick Hole Son (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 9 February 2017 23:46 (seven years ago) link

Mcaleese xp

Betsy DeVos Ayes (darraghmac), Friday, 10 February 2017 00:17 (seven years ago) link

That'd be Dustin the Turkey who was also Ireland's representative in the Eurovision Song Contest when they decided they didn't want to be good at it and qualify any more, aye?

xposts to Matt

ailsa, Friday, 10 February 2017 01:20 (seven years ago) link

"idk, the candidate Labour chose is a cunt. Not sure he should finally go because of that"

The choice of Stoke candidate is just one piece of moronic self harm among many. But if Corbyn's stance on Brexit is also alienating the people who initially flocked to Labour because of him *and* he is simultaneously unable to prevent a crypto-fascist from winning what was formerly a safe Labour seat then people are in dreamland if they think this ends in anything other than complete disaster.

And yes I know that most of the problems are not of his own making, and that many of the alternatives are worse, but if "Corbyn" continues to be one of the main answers to the question "why don't you vote Labour" then this situation is just untenable. He means well on some issues but has completely fucked it on others, but he doesn't have enough of the answers either. And even if he did he isn't trusted to deliver them.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 07:42 (seven years ago) link

It's incredibly bad luck that Corbyn came along just in time for the defining political issue to be Brexit, not only because it would have boxed any Labour leader into a corner or that he was particularly unsuited to promoting the EU but because it threw a wrench into what was always going to be a long-term project of building up a grassroots social movement (and surely the momentum has been completely lost there now). Corbyn had the opportunity to tie the latter into the former by fighting for freedom of movement, EU nationals' rights, a soft Brexit that wouldn't hurt working people so much, and he fucked it.

in other words he's not just failed by the standards of centrist cunts who bang on about electability but he's failed by his own standards, the reasons the people disillusioned by Sensible Labour supported him in the first place.

I mean it's not as if there's a single member of the PLP who strikes me as a useful replacement though so have a leadership contest, don't have a leadership contest, whatever. Maybe people will have to get used to the idea that channels of resistance have to be extra-parliamentary now.

lex pretend, Friday, 10 February 2017 08:27 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn and Momentum were a brief flicker in the pulse of what a lot of us assumed was already a dead party. it'd be nice if the initial energy and enthusiasm built up behind Corbyn can be channelled somewhere new and not left to slowly dissipate but I don't have much hope right now. engaging with our parliamentary democracy is probably the most discouraging thing that can happen to people who have some naïve desire to make this country a better place to live.

Dick Hole Son (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 February 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

It's not really bad luck, it's part of the same thing - the collapse of a political consensus and the decline of the institutions that supported them. Corbyn was propelled to where he is a result of a political vacuum the Labour Party created for itself, and it's a real tragedy for the country that it didn't propel someone less inept at dealing with the situation. Now he's gone and created his own vacuum, his approach to Article 50 has been a complete failure on almost every level - strategic, tactical, political, economic and moral.

I doubt a straight up left-winger would get past the PLP next time round but I have enough faith in the wider membership rejecting a Legitimate Concerner. Just.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 09:40 (seven years ago) link

I have enough faith in the wider membership rejecting a Legitimate Concerner.

I definitely don't

lex pretend, Friday, 10 February 2017 09:53 (seven years ago) link

The choice will probably be between a centre-right legit-concerner and a centre-left legit-concerner so it's likely to be moot. The boat has already sailed - the course for Brexit has been determined already and there seems very little Labour could have done to stop it or could do to reverse it.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 10 February 2017 09:59 (seven years ago) link

xp if there's no straight up left-winger on the ballot next time around, then I guess the most likely choice would be between a "soft left" candidate spouting progressive-patriotism/Legitimate Concerns rhetoric (e.g. Lisa Nandy) and a Blairite, who might actually have a better stance on brexit and immigration (if it's Stella Creasy or David Lammy or someone)

soref, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:01 (seven years ago) link

or it could be someone who's bad on all the issues like Dan Jarvis or Stephen Kinnock

soref, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:02 (seven years ago) link

Think we'll have all four tbh.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:04 (seven years ago) link

The boat has already sailed - the course for Brexit has been determined already and there seems very little Labour could have done to stop it or could do to reverse it.

This is true but he's positioned Labour on the wrong side of the argument to make much political capital out of the inevitable fuckups. OTOH people have short memories so who knows.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn and Momentum were a brief flicker in the pulse of what a lot of us assumed was already a dead party. it'd be nice if the initial energy and enthusiasm built up behind Corbyn can be channelled somewhere new and not left to slowly dissipate but I don't have much hope right now. engaging with our parliamentary democracy is probably the most discouraging thing that can happen to people who have some naïve desire to make this country a better place to live.

this seems otm. I think it has really just highlighted how divided the left is, after this goes to shit lots of the momentum crowd &c. will leave the party and not come back. if anyone thinks there's any chance there will be a party/leader that the left could unite behind in sufficient numbers to come close to beating the tories in the forseeable future I'd love to see your working.

ogmor, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

afaict the best hope the left have of retaining the Labour leadership after Corbyn departs is if what Progress have dubbed the "McDonnell amendment"* passes, lowering the % of the PLP a candidate would need to get backing from the on the ballot in a leadership election. for this to happen the left would need to get its people elected as delegates for Labour conference, would need to get more involved in local Labour party branches, which is part of why the current mood of fatalism amongst momentum types is worrying, I get the feeling that a lot of ppl have more or less given up?

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/01/01/stop-the-mcdonnell-amendment/

*(dubbed the "McDonnell amendment" in an attempt to damage its chances, because they know McDonnell is a divisive figure, apparently)

soref, Friday, 10 February 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

if there are glimmers of a future I would see them in local community actions, creating projects and infrastructure as an alternative/replacement to what we've no longer got. whether that can be agglomerated into broader, more direct political action I dunno. I'm trying not to let February pessimism colour that picture.

Dick Hole Son (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 February 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

I don't think most people on the left or anywhere else are ready to stand for office (or set up local infrastructure for that matter), so if that's the only alternative to giving up then it does seem hopeless. taken me a while to realise ppl follow politics for the drama rather than to any end, there was always this misleading suggestion of citizenship attached to it

ogmor, Friday, 10 February 2017 12:07 (seven years ago) link

local community actions, creating projects and infrastructure as an alternative/replacement to what we've no longer got.

Just feels like a dangerous idea in itself to me. Not long until "what we've no longer got" includes the nhs, no level of local community action is going to replace that, so disengaging and going down a "well maybe we'll just be able to look after ourselves instead" route can't be the answer.

JimD, Friday, 10 February 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

Yeah honestly that just sounds like Big Society 2.0 to me.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

We wouldn't be where we are now without the right having pressured and pressured the Tory leadership (both externally and from within) until it eventually buckled. The left has to be prepared to do that to Labour, which requires organisation, but it also requires building broad coalitions, focusing on things that matter to ordinary people, and applying that pressure from outside the party as well as within it.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 February 2017 13:00 (seven years ago) link

not really suggesting amateur hospitals, am thinking of mental health projects, housing collectives, community engagement schemes, a lot of grass roots stuff that's already been happening for a long time - this is where people's energies go when they'd rather not play committee-men to shore up the egos of career Parliamentarians for the rest of eternity

excitable Question Time guest (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 February 2017 13:30 (seven years ago) link

NV otm - and forget the NHS, that's going the way of the dodo rn. The cost of Brexit will mean an ever smaller public sector. It doesn't mean we couldn't get it back at some point. It has to be fought for again.

And yes I know that most of the problems are not of his own making, and that many of the alternatives are worse, but if "Corbyn" continues to be one of the main answers to the question "why don't you vote Labour" then this situation is just untenable.

Is it? I mean yougov or whatever might indicate this among groups or whatever (although its fkn yougov anyway) - but isn't the lack of confidence much of the PLP have shown him also to blame, as the 2nd leadership challenge?

So if many Tories left and created UKIP, and that was what did a lot of the work (the external pressure, combined with events) I can see the creation of Momentum as planting a seed on something new, interesting. It might not look good right now but its better than hoping parliament lifts a finger.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 11 February 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

this is good:
https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/anthony-barnett/daily-mail-takes-power-0

mark s, Saturday, 11 February 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Jon Stone ‏@joncstone 23h23 hours ago

Daily Mail political editor James Slack is taking over as Theresa May’s official spokesperson. His predecessor is going to work for Boris

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 11 February 2017 14:07 (seven years ago) link

need some kind of wall around London to keep them all in, Tom

a wall! a wall! you know the people want it

excitable Question Time guest (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 12 February 2017 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Racism for the proles, cuddly multiculturalism for the nice metropolitan elite. It's such a brilliantly obvious way out of a complex and challenging situation that I can't believe Tom didn't think of it before!

Matt DC, Sunday, 12 February 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

unbelievable

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 12 February 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

"Well these polls are contradictory!"

"Are they though? ARE THEY?"

http://newscrusher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/homer-points.jpg

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 12 February 2017 13:38 (seven years ago) link

Tom there's this little thing called the Treaties of Westphalia

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 12 February 2017 13:39 (seven years ago) link

Sonos hikes UK prices by 25% due to Brexit

Any chance of a discount if you voted Remain?

nashwan, Monday, 13 February 2017 10:32 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/CliveWoodward/status/831084829181624320

I am reminded Dan Jarvis follows the Justice For Marine A twitter account.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 13 February 2017 11:48 (seven years ago) link

I'd imagine DJ would feel that any thuggish murderer that takes the queen's shilling can murder who the hell they want to.

calzino, Monday, 13 February 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

What do you make of this Phil Shiner malarkey btw, the Charlton forum p much wants him executed

I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Monday, 13 February 2017 12:17 (seven years ago) link

Sorry 4 Twitter but TORY FRAGILITY

Tim Loughton ‏@timloughton 15h15 hours ago
Just had a great night at the BAFTAS apart from the usual predictable drivel from Ken Loach in his own La La Land

Tim Loughton ‏@timloughton 3h3 hours ago
So when Ken Loach uses a BAFTA platform to lambast Govt for stuff that is nothing to do with his film it's fine but when I dare to criticise what he said, certainly not his right to say it nor his film making skills, the left go bonkers & launch a whole load of alternative facts about my parentage. Says a lot about where the real threat to free speech lies in our country

nashwan, Monday, 13 February 2017 13:04 (seven years ago) link

xp

Seeing as he had previously done some good work it probably isn't as cut + dried a case as the "string him up" brigade think. But gl to anyone trying that opinion on a football message-board.

calzino, Monday, 13 February 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Marine A

Aqua Marine A

What are these strange enchantments that start whenever you're near?

Marine A

Aqua Marina A

Why can't you whisper the words that my heart is longing to hear

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 13 February 2017 15:26 (seven years ago) link

Ukip leader admits claim that he lost close friends at Hillsborough was false

Nuttall is utter, complete scum.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 14:46 (seven years ago) link

I know appalling demagogues seem to winning everywhere these days, but I get the feeling this clown might even be a bit too appalling even for most bigoted people of Stoke.

calzino, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Maybe Snell's sexist tweets will win some Kippers back to him.

I've been expecting Tories to win the seat since it was vacated - surprised they don't seem to be considered part of the race given closeness between them and UKIP at last GE.

nashwan, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 15:18 (seven years ago) link

the 50/1 suggests the Tories haven't a prayer, but yeah, there was only 30-odd votes between them + UKIP them last time.

calzino, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

world's worst human being Arron Banks weighs in on Hillsborough, some highlights:

Arron Banks ‏@Arron_banks

I'm sick to death of hearing about it. It was a disaster and that's it, not some sort of cultural happening

Arron Banks ‏@Arron_banks

No milking a tragedy forever is sick

Arron Banks‏@Arron_banks

if a policemen opens a gate trying to help and makes a bad decision it's an accident. As for a cover up it was the 80's.

soref, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 21:16 (seven years ago) link

I blame Calvin Harris.

Alba, Tuesday, 14 February 2017 23:19 (seven years ago) link

Calvin Harris isn't even acceptable to the over-80s

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 14 February 2017 23:27 (seven years ago) link

As for a cover up - this is the North, we do what we like.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 February 2017 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Here's one I hope you will enjoy.

"And what of those people who do want to reduce immigration? In some circles, it’s become standard to dismiss “legitimate concerns” as nothing more than veiled bigotry. However, many of the problems frequently blamed on migration are very real."

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/14/leave-voters-london-voted-remain-eu?CMP=fb_gu

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 08:22 (seven years ago) link

the *legitimate* "legitimate concerns" backlash doesn't begin here

conrad, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 08:46 (seven years ago) link

That looks moronic in isolation but I broadly agree with the article.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:47 (seven years ago) link

And what of those people who do want to reduce immigration? In some circles, it’s become standard to dismiss “legitimate concerns” as nothing more than veiled bigotry. However, many of the problems frequently blamed on migration are very real. Public services genuinely are overstretched. Housing supply really is insufficient, and rent in some areas is unaffordable. People truly have seen their wages stagnate or fall and their terms of employment become more insecure. Training for UK workers in industries such as construction actually is inferior.

It’s one thing to argue that real solutions to these issues don’t involve limiting freedom of movement, it’s another to suggest that they don’t need solving at all. The rightwing media has pumped out a steady supply of misinformation blaming all this on immigration for decades, while painting Brexit as the solution to all these ills. If the left failed to effectively counter that, is it fair to attack voters for the opinions they now hold?

The last Labour government failed to protect the material interests of many working people in a changing economy. When the Tories took over following the financial crash, it was inevitable they’d take the situation from bad to worse. Given the rapid expansion of EU immigration in the same period, it’s hardly surprising that a simple narrative emerged to fill the vacuum. Illiberal elites might have taken the opportunity to push their own toxic agenda, but it’s the failure of the liberal left that made that possible.

Instead of learning from this failure, many privileged remainers are simply doubling down on their ignorance. If you write off more than half of the population and wish further hardship on regions that are already struggling, why should those people listen to a word you say?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:48 (seven years ago) link

The article gives 3 sources for the view it attacks:

1. a single tweet by an obscure person
2. 'tongue-in-cheek' internet campaigns by some people
3. private 'chats' with unnamed persons

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:50 (seven years ago) link

Obviously most Labour politicians no longer appear to be especially interested in countering that, if anything they're happy to reinforce it. But the smugness and stupidity of publications like the New European really is intolerable.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

It's not heavily sourced but the editor of Politics.co.uk is not exactly an obscure person in London media circles. And you only need to follow or stumble across enough chattering classes media workers on social media, or other Remainers who are not especially prone to self-questioning to know that the mindset is pretty widespread.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:55 (seven years ago) link

There's an enormous overlap between people who think like this and New Labour/recent Lib Dem converts who lambast Corbyn without any understanding of the factors and failures that led to his rise.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Finding articles like that just worthless.

nashwan, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

idk, think there's a desperate need for a left-wing response to brexit that isn't either "brexit voters in Wales and northern England dislike immigration, so lets be anti-immigration" or "brexit voters in Wales and northern England dislike immigration, so lets write them off as backwards losers and double down on some Economist worldview where everyone in Hartlepool just moves down south to get jobs in big cities"

soref, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 11:42 (seven years ago) link

You forgot the backward losers in the Midlands btw.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Wednesday, 15 February 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

Writing people off is stupid and partly why we're where were are but it's so frustrating to see voters' racism explained away from the other side as created by tabloids and right-wing politicians. They may have exploited it and fomented it but why is it so difficult to just admit that Britain was full of bigots anyway, whether low-key or high-key? And that this isn't changing because outright explicit hatred gets dismissed as "other" in various ways (just a twitter troll, just mentally ill, just a working class person on public transport, nothing to do with us!) and low-key racism gets dismissed as non-existent. Repeat as necessary and with tweaks for misogyny, homophobia etc.

I don't really know what you "do" about that - or about them, the social reactionaries, call them by what they are instead of euphemistically and idiotically talking about London v the north or working class v liberal elite or whatever binaries get trotted out. Social reactionaries are the poison here and they're not limited to a particular class or location.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Ultimately it's foolish to pretend that 35% of the country all voted Leave for the same reasons and, while frothing racists, impressionable morons and quiet bigots account for a chunk of that, it clearly isn't all of them. A lot of racists voted Remain as well but those people don't really exist in the simplistic debate that the country has been having over the last few months.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

If most of the country thinks like this then why weren't they voting in their droves for a Tory party that campaigned heavily on immigration from 1997 to 2005?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

that's when electoral turnout fell off a cliff, right?

lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

I mean, it's fair to say there were a lot of other reasons the Tories weren't appealing to the electorate then

lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

If most of the country thinks like this then why weren't they voting in their droves for a Tory party that campaigned heavily on immigration from 1997 to 2005?

I kind of think that most of the country *does* think like this (or at least a whole lot of it), but even if ppl are wrong to blame their problems of immigration it doesn't necessarily mean that those problems don't exist or should be ignored.

soref, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/14/jeremy-corbyn-labour-leader-populist-centrist

^
broadly somewhat sympathetic to this but odd that it uncritically uses the word 'populism' as a good thing that we want

By definition we all want our party to be ... _Popular_, but 'populist' should not really be an unambiguous term of praise / desirable goal.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

If the left failed to effectively counter that, is it fair to attack voters for the opinions they now hold?

we can be more nuanced about who/what is responsible for views beyond the people espousing them but long-ingrained proclivities towards xenophobia & awful whitebread little england imperial nostalgia is def a big part of why the left struggled to combatthe right wing media's immigration scapegoating, so it's obviously a important thing to look at, and if we're being more nuanced about the relationship between people and ideas then there's no need to be so concerned about possible alienated victims in a discussion of chauvinism etc.

the underlying fear of being an out of touch rootless unreal cosmopolitan which you can sense in so many of these Let's Take The Volk Seriously columns is dangerous nonsense and needs to be untangled asap

ogmor, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

It may be true that much of the country thinks along those lines but in varying degrees and they attach different levels of priority to it, and they prioritise other issues over immigration that are wiped out when you give them a simplistic Leave/Remain binary. Even if you can't wipe out social reactionaries then you have to work towards a situation where bigotry doesn't dictate their voting intentions (even if it does, which I doubt). Strikes me that people are more likely to vote for less reactionary parties in moments of economic growth or national optimism OR when the party is able to communicate better policies on housing, employment, health, education etc that trump immigration in voters' minds. That last bit is where Labour has collapsed over the past decade or so and it's the only front they're even going to win on.

Also worth noting that New Labour came to power at a time when cultural jingoism was extremely fashionable including/especially within the London media class and they definitely benefited from that on the way up.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

FWIW -- in response to Ogmor -- this article takes the opposite tack and says don't apologise for being a cosmopolitan.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/metropolitan-liberal-elite-donald-trump-brexit-stand-up-for-ourselves-and-ideas-a7559891.html

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure these two articles are even at odds - there's a world of difference between making the case for what you believe and writing off everyone who disagrees with you as stupid or ignorant.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

the only reason housing and social services are stretched is because the tories gutted local councils and artificially drove up the price of houses. it's got nothing to do with immigration.

the only reason housing and social services are stretched is because the tories gutted local councils and artificially drove up the price of houses. it's got nothing to do with immigration.

the only reason housing and social services are stretched is because the tories gutted local councils and artificially drove up the price of houses. it's got nothing to do with immigration.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Once again people make the mistake of conflating left-wing or even left-leaning with liberal. Swathes of the "liberal elite" are just not interested in redistribution of wealth, reduction in inequality, or even hostile to it. You saw it in the cries of betrayal when the Coalition formed, and you see it again in the handwringers with short memories flocking to the Lib Dems again.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

following DC's post about left-liberal -- an x-post following the Guardian thing earlier:

--
The idea that 'the Left has failed to combat this line from the Right' looks plausible in theory but is misleading because 'the Left' in the UK (let alone anywhere else) does not have the power, finance, etc of the Right.

If Right here means eg: Murdoch, Sun, Mail, + most of the Con party, + UKIP -- clearly that has power.

To most of us, Left means something like eg ... Paul Mason, Owen Jones, Rebecca Long-Bailey.

Clearly there is no equivalence between these two forces - the first is always going to take 'national public opinion' etc with it.

If you expand 'Left' to mean 'New Labour and Lib Dems' it's a different story - though many people would deny that that can be called 'Left', whereas we can all agree that the Right above is Right.

That's also to say: Right here is far-Right, but Left, in any prominent form, is only very moderately centre-Left. So that's another imbalance.

Even if you take New Labour et al as Left, the media support for that position is still mainly Guardian, Mirror. The media battalions are not there. The one exception to that, I suppose, is that Sun / Mail etc did grudingly support Blair for a while.

But the general point is that it is false to posit equivalence of Right vs Left in terms of capacity to get a message across and persuade people over a long period of time.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

btw from Independent article:

--
Politicians, we are told, are out of touch. Broadsheet commentators should have spent more time in Scunthorpe and Nuneaton if they wanted to understand what “ordinary” people want. Maybe we should get out there and start listening?

No. We need to start saying difficult things. It’s time for progressives to stop being in a muddle about “elitism”, to stop being petrified of being branded a snob if we stand up for what we believe is important, true and good in our society. It’s time to defend the positive elite values of rigorous expertise, difficult ideas, judicious government and well-resourced journalistic scrutiny.
--

I quite like the chutzpah of being the only person to say 'No' to the idea of listening.

John Harris would presumably not agree.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

Well worth clicking

http://whybrexitisgreat.co.uk/

Odysseus, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:38 (seven years ago) link

again, it would be nice to think that there is a third way between "broadsheet commentators already know everything they need to about Nuneaton + just need to shout louder" and "John Harris"

soref, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 12:41 (seven years ago) link

lol Odysseus

ultros ultros-ghali, Wednesday, 15 February 2017 14:18 (seven years ago) link

a lot of this is about good old-fashioned class resentment I think and therefore there are clever and sensible people across the full divide who get it and then there are dicks with 500 words to rattle out before lunch

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 15 February 2017 14:19 (seven years ago) link

"So what’s going to happen? These days, it feels like the worst-case scenario always prevails. If that happens this time, too, Brexit will mean that England, shorn of Scotland, Northern Ireland and maybe even Wales, contracts into a small, isolated, one-party state governed by schoolteacherly Conservatives who persist in wild-eyed delusions about their country’s special grandeur."

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/opinion/theresa-mays-empire-of-the-mind.html

Heavy Doors (jed_), Thursday, 16 February 2017 00:59 (seven years ago) link

I don't currently see the rationale for Wales leaving the UK.

the pinefox, Thursday, 16 February 2017 09:50 (seven years ago) link

we're in the post-rationale era tbf

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 February 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

Wales is going nowhere. Pick the bones out of that one.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

hyperbole from the failing nytimes. sad!

conrad, Thursday, 16 February 2017 10:28 (seven years ago) link

I believe the author moves in merdeyeux's elite london philosophy circles, hyperbole like sam kriss but more of a sweetie

ogmor, Thursday, 16 February 2017 10:33 (seven years ago) link

It read like a succession of T0m Whym4n tics minus the jaunty Twitter Marxism so I was entirely unsurprised to see his name at the bottom.

Matt DC, Thursday, 16 February 2017 10:51 (seven years ago) link

Hyperbole vice theory bros probably most consistently otm class of pundit over last couple years tbf

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 16 February 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

I mean they're not clearing a very high bar in that regard but something about their tireless cultivation of their online personas makes them phenomenally irritating Twitter presences.

Matt DC, Thursday, 16 February 2017 11:09 (seven years ago) link

sounds like someone has a cruuuush

ogmor, Thursday, 16 February 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

This particular worst-case-scenario has been haunting me a little, whatever the likelihood
https://twitter.com/J_amesp/status/829243010739232769

nashwan, Thursday, 16 February 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

no real problem with twitter vice theory bros except they are a bit young. If u don't remember Play School first hand then gtf frankly

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 16 February 2017 12:07 (seven years ago) link

today we'll be looking through the SMARM window

mark s, Thursday, 16 February 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

these people who only know baroness floella benjamin as a lib dem life peer

conrad, Thursday, 16 February 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

This particular worst-case-scenario has been haunting me a little, whatever the likelihood
https://twitter.com/J_amesp/status/829243010739232769

― nashwan, donderdag 16 februari 2017 11:14 (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It reads like a monologue from a Godspeed You! Black Emperor album.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 16 February 2017 15:12 (seven years ago) link

"the export market is toast… but spread with COMEDY MARMALADES"

mark s, Thursday, 16 February 2017 15:13 (seven years ago) link

With no access to the EU butter mountain either <----- showing my age.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

A+

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 16 February 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

So if you live in Stoke and get a text from Labour it's probably from...UKIP?
http://www.itv.com/news/2017-02-16/stoke-on-trent-text-messages-warn-vote-labour-or-go-to-hell/

nashwan, Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:12 (seven years ago) link

This particular worst-case-scenario has been haunting me a little, whatever the likelihood
https://twitter.com/J_amesp/status/829243010739232769

― nashwan, Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 AM (ten hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the loss of northern ireland is basically unthinkable given the demographics, you've got a strong, consistent majority of people who will never want unification with Ireland under any circumstances.

Wales consistently polls below 20% support for independence.

Scotland is basically a "maybe" at this point, but if there is a second referendum, and it fails then the Scottish National movement is dead.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:43 (seven years ago) link

aye wait til it hits is the point

conrad, Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:45 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah also northern ireland independence is basically unthinkable too*, the statelet is not sustainable on its own.

*of course https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Army_Council">some loyalist nutbars did consider it at the height of the troubles

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:46 (seven years ago) link

remind me never to attempt to use formatting ever again because i am dumb

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Not to mention we don't want NI

Betsy DeVos Ayes (darraghmac), Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Indeed not as it's expensive and full of coat-trailers, but doesn't the GFA say you'll have no choice if NI should ever vote to join you? (icbw and probably always loopholes, esp when the British govt is dismantling much of the legal basis the GFA is built on)

but yeah, I'd say there's a non-aligned chunk of NI that doesn't even vote at the moment because NI politics is all us and them, and a lot of that chunk currently finds the status quo convenient but may slowly change its mind if things go to shit, and maybe even some softer unionists will rethink, but as long as the DUP is #1 nothing big or sensible is going to happen

looking forward to the election to see if the ash scandal has dented the DUP notably, or just the wider sense that there's any point in voting at all

all other worst case scenarios sadly too convincing sounding. yaaay let's do this thing in the stupidest, most self-destructive way possible, and brook no dissent

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:14 (seven years ago) link

iirc there is a free stater veto over irish unification in the GFA

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:17 (seven years ago) link

anecdata re: Scottish independence - I know a couple of fervent No voters (middle class managerial types living in England motivated mostly by Sensible Economics) who in the immediate aftermath of Brexit switched without hesitation to Yes in the event of another referendum and have stayed there since

lex pretend, Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:21 (seven years ago) link

personally my breath is bated for a putative independent Scotland's citizenship criteria. a parent who was born there please and thank u

lex pretend, Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Beats my sister's failed attempt at discovering some recent Irish ancestry which only managed to uncover a great uncle who played for Hibs, sadly not sufficient criterion for an EU passport.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:26 (seven years ago) link

quite fancy tracing my irish roots but am too lazy. not for eu reasons tho - I'm eligible for italian citizenship anyway - but to find my ancestral donegal village and drink the pint of harp in the pub there

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:03 (seven years ago) link

I can get an Irish passport tomorrow if I wanted one, but it wouldn't have any practical use for me. At the moment my name is so shit with my Eire based family that I will probably never go back there. They don't like that I won't go pay tribute to my dying dad, who I haven't had fuck all to do with for nearly 30 years now.

calzino, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:17 (seven years ago) link

ooh what does it require, my mum's mum was born and raised in rutherglen

mark s, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:21 (seven years ago) link

That'll dae, ye're in, big yin.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:22 (seven years ago) link

... repeat after me

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:22 (seven years ago) link

You could already get a game for Scotland with that background... no, seriously, you could get a game for Scotland, you'll have seen Grant Hanley play?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:24 (seven years ago) link

Jordan Rhodes as well

calzino, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:26 (seven years ago) link

He got a Scotland cap because he spent 18 months in the school system.

calzino, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Grant Hanley is Scottish through and through though. More's the pity.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:29 (seven years ago) link

2017!

mark s, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:31 (seven years ago) link

Lex I think that view is reasonably widespread among Scottish people living in England (I mean certainly in my experience) but a lot depends on whether Scotland would be able to retain EU membership or rejoin easily and that's a minefield. Before a Yes vote was a leap of faith and now if becomes a vote for a status quo of sorts. But if the most likely outcome is an independent Scotland outside the EU then No would surely win again?

Blair, a politician with nothing to lose now appears to be launching his own anti-Brexit campaign. And the text of his speech wasn't terrible until this:

“There is, in some parts of the country, a genuine concern about numbers from Europe – real pressures on services and wages. But for many people, the core of the immigration question – and one which I fully accept is a substantial issue – is immigration from non-European countries especially when from different cultures in which assimilation and potential security threats can be an issue.

Wait I thought it was supposed to be about pressure on jobs and wages and services and now it turns out it was about Muslims all along?

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 07:51 (seven years ago) link

I doubt Sturgeon would push for a referendum if retaining EU membership wasn't in the cards.

the last few times Blair returned from the dead with a grand plan to save politics it blew over in a day so hopefully that'll happen again. God he really has no idea how loathed he is, does he.

lex pretend, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:48 (seven years ago) link

It's more than that, it's an attempt to reframe the debate into something that's actually worse. It's stupid, hypocritical, mendacious, dangerous, fascist-enabling bullshit from a guy who hung out with Gaddafi, tried to knight Assad and has done more to destabilise the Middle East than anyone who wasn't an actual dictator or terrorist.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:56 (seven years ago) link

on Scotland and EU membership in the event of secession: there are significant obstacles to this because of the precedent it would set for other EU countries, in particular Spain and its relationship with Catalonia, and to a lesser extent France and Italy. Sturgeon is likely to campaign for independence with a vision of Brexit > Scottish independence > smooth Scottish re-accession to the EU- but just because she is promoting that line doesn't mean it would play out that way. The uncertainty might therefore be an obstacle to an independence vote, much as the hand-waving about various aspects of independent Scotland did for it last time round.

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Sturgeon had any choice once Leave won, to hold back further would have put her under a lot of pressure from her own party.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:32 (seven years ago) link

that's the problem for the SNP: they had to make a commitment to campaign for another referendum after the Brexit vote, but there's no certainty there would be a yes vote if one were held, and in the event of a "no" it's unlikely there could be another one for at least a generation.

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

at least now uk voted to leave the eu spain could pretend that scotland separating from the uk partly in order to stay in the eu is different to the idea of catalonia leaving spain just in order to be separate

conrad, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

Go back a bit (just catching up), I suspect that Corbyn's views on Scotland are a) The SNP look like a decent candidate for coalition, no need to piss them off and b) If they break away, then it'd be nice to have a left-leaning country next door to retire to.

in the event of a "no" it's unlikely there could be another one for at least a generation.

This is, in fairness, not the first time I've heard this.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

*Going

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

the last few times Blair returned from the dead with a grand plan to save politics it blew over in a day so hopefully that'll happen again. God he really has no idea how loathed he is, does he.

― lex pretend, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:48 (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Geldof in a boat swearing at some fishermen pales beside this. These people are just blissfully unaware of what anyone else thinks of them and why anyone could possibly object to them. It reminds me of those people in the Guardian who, in a feature about the housing crisis, were going on about selling their 4 bedroom house in London, at a 60% profit, in order to move to an eight bedroom listed building in the Cotswolds, with live-in au pair, that's near a good state school.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 17 February 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

when Blair mounts his pulpit I don't think he's speaking to the rabble who hate him

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Friday, 17 February 2017 12:15 (seven years ago) link

needs to drop some major zingers on UKIP to make this remotely worthwhile

nashwan, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

And the text of his speech wasn't terrible until this:

the Spectator has published a transcript of what I think is the speech as delivered, and it looks like this part has been rewritten a bit, but it looks like the same basic argument - he's seems to be saying that the "EU migrants put pressure on jobs and services" position is inaccurate, but implicitly endorsing Fararge and Trump's scaremongering about muslim immigrants, while arguing that leaving the EU will not actually affect the latter?

Immigration is the issue. Net immigration into the UK was roughly 335,000 in the year to June 2016. But just over half was from outside the EU. I know, in some parts of the country, there is a real concern about numbers from Europe and the pressures placed on services and wages.

However of the EU immigrants, the PM has recently admitted we would want to keep the majority, including those with a confirmed job offer and students. This leaves around 80,000 who come looking for work without a job. Of these 80,000, a third comes to London, mostly ending up working in the food processing and hospitality sectors. It is highly unlikely that they’re ‘taking’ the jobs of British born people in other parts of the country. The practical impact of Brexit on immigration is on analysis less than 12 per cent of the immigration total. And for many people, the core immigration question – and one which I fully accept is a substantial issue -is immigration from non-European countries, especially when from different cultures in which assimilation and potential security threats can be an issue.

Yet this impacted the Brexit decision. It was Donald Trump who said without the refugees from Syria, ‘you probably wouldn’t have a Brexit.’ It is no coincidence that the infamous immigration poster of Leave was a picture of Mr Farage in front of a line of Syrian people. Thus, we have moved, in few months, from a debate about what sort of Brexit, involving a balanced consideration of all the different possibilities; to the primacy of one consideration – namely controlling immigration – without any real discussion as to why and when Brexit doesn’t affect the immigration people most care about.

soref, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

it's a pity because the first bit is a more elegant, lucid refutation of the "jobs and services" argument than pretty much any made by a prominent contemporary UK politician over the last few years (honorable exceptions such as Diane Abbott aside)

soref, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

Blair's conviction Islamophobia sits weirdly with his decision to destabilize Iraq tbh

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Friday, 17 February 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Moss ‏@StephenMossGdn 3h3 hours ago

Blair should come out and start that new pro-EU Macron-style party now. Would decimate the Tories in the south

YouGov ‏@YouGov 2h2 hours ago

Tony Blair had a net favourability rating of -60 (14% favourable, 74% unfavourable) on our most recent survey (Nov) https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/12/05/despite-article-50-controversy-senior-judges-viewe/

Never change, Guardian writers.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 17 February 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

I wish he would fuck off back to doing PR for genocidal dictators because I've seen enough of his concerned face posturing, it doesn't help when media outlets like the beeb and the NS keep giving him the front page.

calzino, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

His concerned, happy and angry faces are all the same, thanking you Botox.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 17 February 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

This is distracting from Nuttall's lies and incompetence so conveniently.

nashwan, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Nuttall reappeared didn't he? I was getting very worried

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Walked past a news screen where the banner had, below "Blair's Speech", "Nick Clegg: I agree with every word"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.eu/article/david-cameron-courted-for-top-nato-post/

Oh Christ. I mean, sweet Jesus...

I mean, could you even imagine?

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:34 (seven years ago) link

not with a bang but with a simper

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:35 (seven years ago) link

Flipping a coin to decide whether Putin should invade Estonia.

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

Who better than a man keen on sticking to the outcomes of highly questionable referendums to sort out Crimea, though?

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:48 (seven years ago) link

Lol, Cameron is not going to get that NATO job, Jeremy Corbyn has more chance of being offered it. And if I'may reading between the lines of that downing st 'no comment', not even May will back him.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 18 February 2017 10:16 (seven years ago) link

I don't know. If Anders Fogh Rasmussen could do it, any idiot can.

Frederik B, Saturday, 18 February 2017 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Any idiot but maybe not a lazy slapdash superficial idiot like Cameron.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 February 2017 12:40 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure they're not going to give the job to a guy who already destroyed one country through sheer carelessness, no. Fun to imagine though.

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 13:23 (seven years ago) link

U.K. cabinet ministers and a foreign statesman are “courting” David Cameron to raise his hand to be the next secretary general of NATO, according to people familiar with the situation.

The story is 'friends of man think he be good at job'.

nashwan, Saturday, 18 February 2017 14:46 (seven years ago) link

If anyone was still wondering why the Tories are such a long shot in Stoke it's because their candidate looks like a GCSE student being helped with his homework and he can't spell Brexit.

https://mobile.twitter.com/byelection/status/833737178664562688

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 20 February 2017 21:59 (seven years ago) link

is this new? (the union flag aspect)

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/662257548515504129/rp23Mx-x_200x200.jpg

koogs, Monday, 20 February 2017 22:56 (seven years ago) link

I think they've been using that for a few years now?

soref, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:15 (seven years ago) link

it is in the shape of a one-legged hedgehog, to project dynamism

calzino, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:19 (seven years ago) link

it has. it was green in 2006, back when they wanted to take votes from the greens. has been union flag coloured since at least 2010 when ukip have been more of a threat. (according to daily mirror, i won't link to it)

koogs, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:25 (seven years ago) link

It was green because it a tree, now I don't know what it looks like, a vomiting union jack brain.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 20 February 2017 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, union jack tree makes no sense. Also can't see a flag used like that without thinking of the nasty kind of nationalism. Do other countries have this problem?

koogs, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 02:23 (seven years ago) link

South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, Tristan da Cunha, Pitcairn Islands, Montserrat, British Indian Ocean Territory, Anguilla, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Niue, Turks and Caicos, Bermuda, Fiji, Tuvalu, Ascension Island, St Helena, Cook Islands, Falkland Islands, British Antarctic Territory, Hawaii(!), Australia, and after some discussion New Zealand.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 07:28 (seven years ago) link

Also can't see a flag used like that without thinking of the nasty kind of nationalism.

you should probably start asking yourself a few questions when your logo can be ripped off by the BNP this easily

https://cdn8.qutee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1154132638cp1_1-300x180.png https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2011/5/12/1305223563976/The-new-British-National--007.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=b77e3dfb4d10201d6b50274b695b9fcb

Any stylistic similarity with the rough shading displayed in the Conservatives' green and blue tree symbol is entirely "unintentional", a BNP spokesman insisted.

soref, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:25 (seven years ago) link

Note that that quote's from 2011, when the Tory tree was still green, and BNP was just nicking the scratchcard aesthetic - clearly someone in Tory office thought "Hey that looks pretty good..."

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

Definite Norwegian flag vibe to the Tory one.

Tim, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Icelandic more than Norgie, but yeah.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 21 February 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

Haha you're right, minus points for me on Nordic flag knowledge.

Tim, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/hillsborough-investigators-say-paul-nuttall-12635738

Nuttall apparently gave a witness statement to police investigating the Hillsborough disaster yesterday. Hypothetically, if it did come out that he wasn't present at the stadium on the day, and he'd lied to the police about it, he'd have committed a criminal offence, yes?

soref, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 14:56 (seven years ago) link

For the first time the UKIP leader publically criticised UKIP donor Mr Banks for tweets he wrote last week in which he said he was “sick to death” of hearing about the tragedy and accused campaigners of “milking it.”

Although the flustered Bootle native appeared to initially back the comments, before he was corrected by the radio host.

Mr Nuttall said: “I condone what he said,” before asked by Mr Campbell if he meant “condemn?”

Mr Nuttall added: “Yes, sorry, I condemn what he said.”

conrad, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 15:02 (seven years ago) link

I support Paul Nuttall's campaign to run in every by-election until he's elected.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

electrocuted?

conrad, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 15:08 (seven years ago) link


In contrast, the Stoke market has been all over the place and it is easy to envisage plenty of volatility in the closing stages. Favouritism has switched three times between Labour and UKIP but, while they remain the market leaders at 1.64 and 3.50 respectively, we have just witnessed a massive move for the Tories, in from 130.00 to just 9.00.

There has been a bit of money for Tory-boy (50's to 8/1), unsurprisingly Nutall has drifted out and Labour are Odds on now. I wish I'd had a nibble at that 50/1 they were quoting last week now.

calzino, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

...or even 129/1 on Betfair.

calzino, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 17:54 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, tories are dark horses in stoke I think, if Nuttall's clowning has harmed him at all (far from certain), it's going to result in would be kippers either staying home or voting tory, not switching votes to labour. Labour is just not going to win kippers back on a large scale, I would suggest it stops fantasizing along these lines.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 21 February 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

we live in a world where stupidity equals authenticity - let the dice fall where they may

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 21 February 2017 18:03 (seven years ago) link

What is Tony trying to tell us in the photo accompanying this article?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/22/tony-blair-accuses-tories-agreeing-20million-payments-guantanamo/

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 22 February 2017 14:18 (seven years ago) link

1+1=3

For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (wtev), Wednesday, 22 February 2017 16:18 (seven years ago) link

taking fat donations from the son of Oswald who wants to game the free press is pretty grubby, but I wouldn't expect any better from Watson or Labour.

calzino, Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

It looks like I agree with The Sun on Mosley - I hate it when that happens.

calzino, Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

It looks like there has been an astonishing drop in the number of international students according to the new ONS data. China has fallen as well, which had propped up all the other countries we've been alienating over the last few years.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:39 (seven years ago) link

presumably empty rooms in student castles and nidos will be made available to uk-born homeless people

conrad, Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

I appreciate those John Harris clips where he talks to locals but the Stoke one is particularly depressing.

nashwan, Thursday, 23 February 2017 13:22 (seven years ago) link

By-election too depressing to bump tbh. UKIP still can't get its leader elected though hurrah

stet, Friday, 24 February 2017 19:52 (seven years ago) link

What u all make of this:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/24/stoke-copeland-labour-remain-richmond-copeland-ukip

Specifically the bit about implications of Snell being a Remainer?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 24 February 2017 22:17 (seven years ago) link

They didn't lose in Cumbria for being insufficiently Remainy but god bless the Graun and all who sail on her

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 February 2017 22:22 (seven years ago) link

It is John Curtice though, he's more reliable than most.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Friday, 24 February 2017 23:01 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy Corbyn: Theresa May's attempt to divide the UK over Brexit shows she does not love her country

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/jeremy-corbyn/news/83604/jeremy-corbyn-theresa-mays-attempt

this "progressive patriotism" idea that the left should try to convince voters that Labour are the *real* patriots/that the Tories and UKIP are insufficiently patriotic - it just seems a self evidently terrible concept on every level? "questioning your opponents loyalty to the country" is not a battleground that Labour is ever going to win on, even without someone like Corbyn as leader.

soref, Friday, 24 February 2017 23:58 (seven years ago) link

Frank Field was just on the R4 money program talking about a yellow card system rather than instant benefits sanctions and targeting them at the "scallywags" rather than the more worthy [sic] "I, Daniel Bells".

calzino, Saturday, 25 February 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

When slimeballs like Field are using a Loach film character as an archetype of deserving poor to pit or compare against the undeserving poor it almost makes me glad Labour are completely fucked tbh

calzino, Saturday, 25 February 2017 12:38 (seven years ago) link

Might do well to replace 'country' with 'society' in a lot of this otherwise meaningless talk, if only to see how the jingoists react to it.

nashwan, Saturday, 25 February 2017 15:51 (seven years ago) link

this "progressive patriotism" idea that the left should try to convince voters that Labour are the *real* patriots/that the Tories and UKIP are insufficiently patriotic - it just seems a self evidently terrible concept on every level? "questioning your opponents loyalty to the country" is not a battleground that Labour is ever going to win on, even without someone like Corbyn as leader

More on nationalism:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/sadiq-khan-sparks-huge-row-by-likening-sottish-nationalism-to-racism-a3475926.html

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Sunday, 26 February 2017 12:10 (seven years ago) link

Lots of very predictable "who does this London Muslim cunt think he is?" replies on Facebook.

Matt DC, Sunday, 26 February 2017 13:12 (seven years ago) link

Ellie on Corbyn is good https://medium.com/@MissEllieMae/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-corbyn-aafe32418dcf#.gcdd7zkhm

lex pretend, Monday, 27 February 2017 08:33 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile this, casually tweeted out by someone on the 2005 Tory campaign, seems...important

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5oS8zCWMAA609r.jpg

lex pretend, Monday, 27 February 2017 08:36 (seven years ago) link

don't want a fire, don't play with matches, cunt.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 February 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

That E-M blog post is excellent and pretty much mirrors my thoughts at this stage, especially the part about how lackadaisical Corbyn seems a lot of the time, but honestly I'm not sure there's any way forward that involves him being at the helm at this stage. I'm guessing he'll hang on until conference season and resign shortly after that, but who even knows any more.

Matt DC, Monday, 27 February 2017 11:01 (seven years ago) link

even the fully automated luxury communo-corbynista mob clustered round novara are evidently teeth-grittedly frustrated at self-inflected obstacles now, cheery-optimism-of-the-will faces notwithstanding

mark s, Monday, 27 February 2017 11:09 (seven years ago) link

Thus, the only way someone else could take the leadership is if Corbyn was to step down and endorse him or her. The people who have Corbyn’s ear don’t seem to want this to happen — in fact some of them seem to be living in an alternate reality where everything is going according to plan

this was the impression I had been getting from the outside, depressing to see someone who has some level of direct contact with these people concur.

I'm becoming more convinced that the most likely outcome of all this is a scenario where Corbyn limps on/ leads Labour into a 2020 general election/ the party suffers its worst result since the 1930s/ in the aftermath there is a split on the left between those who want Corbyn to step down and die-hards think he can remain as leader/ when he inevitably goes there is no clear successor from the left to unite behind, all the possible candidates will be tainted either by association with this crushing defeat, or by being seen as "traitors" if they have tried to get Corbyn to resign (or both)/ a rightwing candidate wins the leadership and it's back to Blairite business as usual (with the long term issues causing the parties decline continuing)

soref, Monday, 27 February 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

there is also part of me that thinks- if Corbyn did by some twist of fate actually end up becoming prime minister, can you imagine how bad he's be at it? all of the embarrassing incompetence of the last 18 months but x 100000

soref, Monday, 27 February 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Embarrassing incompetence? The Prime Minister??!

nashwan, Monday, 27 February 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

3 of JC's erstwhile media / online supporters - O'Hagan, Jones, Mason - have all now indicated that they don't think he should lead Labour into 2020 GE.

That seems a relevant straw in the wind, though I can imagine it possible that an in-house team around JC also takes a different view.

The idea of JC stepping down before 2020 and letting new generation come through is not really a new one. I think for Jones and perhaps even Mason it was always part of the plan.

the pinefox, Monday, 27 February 2017 12:10 (seven years ago) link

Out of all these scenarios how much worse or better would a split in labour be? Trying to paper over the cracks doesn't seem to be any good in short nor long term regardless.

The Perks of Being a Wall St R (darraghmac), Monday, 27 February 2017 12:14 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/OwenSmith_MP/status/836182026709577728

Matt DC, Monday, 27 February 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

xxp I don't see how it makes a difference, the country is miles off being prepared to elect a left of centre gov, this is all deckchairs on the titanic

ogmor, Monday, 27 February 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

“I do my best to reach out to people,” Corbyn said, before criticising reporting of his party and leadership: “Clearly persuading our wonderful media in Britain to report what we say on policy will be a big achievement and that we’re working on.”

Trumped up Jezza :/ sorta OTM but still

nashwan, Monday, 27 February 2017 13:08 (seven years ago) link

This is McDonnell's blog post:

http://labourbriefing.squarespace.com/home/2017/2/26/the-soft-coup-is-under-way

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 27 February 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

buried in that mcdonnell post is an implicit admission that hiring s.milne away from the guardian was a blunder (and would have been even if milne were actually any good at the job he's been hired to do, which he really isn''t) -- at the paper he had tenure and significant command of a platform

half-minded to argue that the guardian's seamless editorial hostility to JC is as much as anything enacted in revenge for how SM had been in meetings for the last however many years (not that i know anything about this: it's possible that he's a charming sweetheart that one and all love… but i somehow doubt it)

mark s, Monday, 27 February 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Going full-on apocalypse over Copeland: http://publicpolicypast.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/what-is-meaning-of-copeland-and-stoke.html

stet, Monday, 27 February 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

"thumping marmalisation" -- actually quite like this phrase, but i'm afraid it belongs in a children's book (possibly a very good one)

i: i don't think the plotters are in fact imaginary or even -- given blair's and mandelson's recent interventions -- particularly secret (though they have now realised they can't win the argument via the party's democratic procedures, hence, well, plotting…)
ii: "bargain basement tax haven" actually seems a pretty good four-word description of the "let's model ourselves on singapore" project (tho yes, more work maybe needs doing on explaining to C2DE why this will be so catastrophic for them)

a better class of gloom can be found here, maybe (from two labour members who both actually campaigned in stoke)
https://gapingsilence.wordpress.com/2017/02/26/trust-i-can-rely-on
http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/labour-and-insecurity.html

mark s, Monday, 27 February 2017 16:49 (seven years ago) link

They had a phenomenally good night, not only taking Copeland for the first time since the 1930s (above), but blunting the United Kingdom Independence Party's challenge in Stoke too.

What a pathetic 'not only but also'.

nashwan, Monday, 27 February 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

All democrats - all citizens who believe in a viable multi-party system, and in good governance - should listen. Heed the warning, before it's too late.

helps when those multi-parties have actual policy differences to distinguish them i'd've thought

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 February 2017 16:56 (seven years ago) link

"good governance" reeks of lol centrism

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 February 2017 16:57 (seven years ago) link

The argument now is whether Labour's abysmal poll ratings (and they have slipped markedly since 2015) are down to a broader lack of interest in social democratic ideas (including in solidly working-class seats) or whether it's down to Corbyn personally and his inability to communicate them in an appealing way. Everyone who cares should be hoping it's the latter.

Obviously in-fighting, Brexit etc don't help either, that goes without saying.

Matt DC, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:12 (seven years ago) link

I think that having an overwhelming majority of your own MPs publicly declare you not up to the job is something that almost no party leader would be able to recover from, even if they were some kind of Blair/Reagan level great communicator, which Corbyn definitely is not. If he leads the party into the next election then every sitting Labour MP who voted no confidence in him is going to be repeatedly asked how they can sqaure that with saying that people should vote him in as PM, and I've never heard any of them give a convincing answer to this question.

soref, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

A powerful right-leaning section of the media is either a distinct third significant factor or key agent behind both left-wing antipathy among the public and the perception of Corbyn as deadweight.

nashwan, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

the Ellie Mae O'Hagan piece that lex posted summarizes the problems pretty correctly to me. and the problem is i don't think the party can turn around 20+ years of "managed decline" in the space of half an electoral cycle even if the most charismatic politician in the world were in charge.

most of the PLP and their fans don't want to change things, and most of the traditional Labour supporters have more or less given up hope that things can be changed. so the party carries on like a horribly run football club, without a consistent line or direction, blowing in the wind in the name of "electability", a word that still means nothing without a set of long-term beliefs and aims behind it.

the wealth gap is getting wider, real terms poverty is deepening, i can't believe there isn't a sizeable voter base for social democratic ideas that are clearly articulated and defended in the face of the generally pitiful criticism of our allegedly terrifying right-wing media. but how is a party gonna make enough people believe in those ideas until it looks like it believe in them itself?

bottom line, there'll be a split eventually, we should try not to let the SDP wing have the name, if only for branding's sake.

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 February 2017 17:25 (seven years ago) link

Despite all the heat and light generated by his candidacy and election, Corbyn had little discernible effect on labour's polling, as borne out in by- and local election results, until June 2016. The no-confidence vote followed by bitter three month leadership campaign sunk both him and the party. Destroyed the party in order to save it, you might say.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 February 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

First time I encountered the word "governance" was when Harold Wilson published this and literally all reviewers responded LOLWUT NO SUCH WORD

Apparently it is not a stirring read (tho I know no one who can confirm this by actually having ploughed through it). Wilson of course looks like a mitey titan of the left these days, but this was the year he resigned, when the bloom was entirely off him (thanks, in part, to secret plotting; also to his awareness of early-stages alzheimer's, tho no one else knew abt this for several years)

mark s, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:29 (seven years ago) link

The argument now is whether Labour's abysmal poll ratings (and they have slipped markedly since 2015) are down to a broader lack of interest in social democratic ideas (including in solidly working-class seats) or whether it's down to Corbyn personally and his inability to communicate them in an appealing way.

a good argument at last

Everyone who cares should be hoping it's the latter.

ok fingers crossed

conrad, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:29 (seven years ago) link

A powerful right-leaning section of the media is either a distinct third significant factor or key agent behind both left-wing antipathy among the public and the perception of Corbyn as deadweight.

I mean I think he *is* deadweight but I've been paying attention, which is more than can be said for the sizeable chunk of the population that is better informed about whether or not he wears a tie than they are about, say, cuts to mental health services.

Part of the whole reason we are in this mess as a country/planet is that there are much stronger bulwarks in place against even a marginal shift to the left than there are against a slide into fascism. And as that tweet that Lex posted proves, politicians, publicists and policy-makers have been incredibly cavalier about ramping up anti-immigration rhetoric, thinking they can put it back in the bottle afterwards, but if Ed Miliband suggests a freeze on energy prices then he's an extremist.

Corbyn had little discernible effect on labour's polling, as borne out in by- and local election results, until June 2016. The no-confidence vote followed by bitter three month leadership campaign sunk both him and the party. Destroyed the party in order to save it, you might say

Is that actually true? The polls flattered Miliband into thinking he might be PM right up until the last election, and they haven't been in the lead since. They have collapsed after last year and yeah I definitely blame the right of the party for that. More generally I don't see much reason to vote for a party where both wings would rather destroy (or seriously damage) the institution than relinquish control over it.

Matt DC, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Also being overlooked is the party in power always polling highly in accordance with low unemployment. Is that ever not the case?

At least I assume the perception of low unemployment is widely held - inconvenient tho it may be for all those who think there are too many immigrants. Maybe the loudness of the latter has obscured the former. Plus I haven't looked at any regional stats which doubtless vary wildly.

nashwan, Monday, 27 February 2017 17:47 (seven years ago) link

unemployment is such a misleading figure in the land of zero hour contracts and wages so low the government has to top them up, but i think we can blame Labour for this misleading as much as anybody else

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 February 2017 17:51 (seven years ago) link

Mr Memory‏@AmIRightSir

Gerald Kaufman is the 24th sitting Labour MP to have died since April 2000; in the same period 1 Con, 1 LibDem, 1 UUP and 1 Ind MP have died

soref, Monday, 27 February 2017 21:05 (seven years ago) link

it's putin's world we just live in it

mark s, Monday, 27 February 2017 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Get Louise Mensch on to it, pronto.

Labour had twice as many MPs over 70 than the Tories at the last election (16).

I assume the Tories are happier to move to the Lords.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 27 February 2017 21:11 (seven years ago) link

This switching from DLA to PIP process is a complete shitshow. My partner went to some ATOS type assessment and was turned down at the first stage despite having advanced MS. I mean it isn't like you can fake having the serious myelin damage related lesions all over your brain and spine that show up on an mri scan, and it isn't like MS is a fucking benign condition that just makes one walk a wee bit slow - Richard Pryor called it More Shit for a good reason. There is probably a good chance she will be awarded it on appeal as has been happening. But way to fucking being vindictive towards disabled people at a cost, you absolute cunts.

calzino, Monday, 27 February 2017 22:24 (seven years ago) link

That sounds grim, sorry calzino.

Labour Lords just helped govt defeat Hain amendment to keep UK in single market post-exit. See when everyone asks the (valid) "well if not Corbyn then who??" question I'm at this point ready to take any fucker, anyone at all, who will start voting against this suicide.

stet, Monday, 27 February 2017 22:49 (seven years ago) link

That's awful cal, I really hope she gets her appeal.

Utter, utter cunts.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Monday, 27 February 2017 22:50 (seven years ago) link

That's just horrible.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 27 February 2017 23:29 (seven years ago) link

There is probably a good chance she will be awarded it on appeal as has been happening.

Pretty much everyone gets it on appeal, the whole process is pure fucking evil though, fuck these cunts for all time.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 00:37 (seven years ago) link

For shame, best wishes to you and partner calzino

Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 02:06 (seven years ago) link

seem to deal with somebody every month now on a PIP appeal, every one of them has been won afaik

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 06:48 (seven years ago) link

Someone with advanced MS should never have to see a 'medical professional' other than their own doctor to arrange benefits.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/28/not-really-disabled-man-benefits-appeals-process#comments

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 08:54 (seven years ago) link

Pretty much everyone gets it on appeal, the whole process is pure fucking evil though, fuck these cunts for all time.

Yeah, the point of making blanket rejections on the first go-round is the expectation that a certain percentage won't appeal, and the hope that a percentage of those will kill themselves.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

Aaron Banks has just confirmed he is standing against Douglas Carswell at the next election, which is utterly batshit on multiple levels.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 11:33 (seven years ago) link

at this point ready to take any fucker, anyone at all, who will start voting against this suicide.

With a handful of obvious exceptions, the only people who are really prepared to do this are those with nothing to lose, either because they're in heavily Remain constituencies or because their political careers effectively ended 10-20 years ago. Everyone else is just so... cowed right now.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 11:35 (seven years ago) link

Aaron Banks has just confirmed he is standing against Douglas Carswell at the next election

can't believe a Nazi coalition is turning against itself

mock you like a Turrican (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 13:43 (seven years ago) link

Big Stop The Silence poster van driving about London today proclaiming "we didn't vote for this". Sponsor badges were too small to see who is behind it though

stet, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 15:02 (seven years ago) link

https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/how-labour-can-win-over-ukip-voters

"The conclusion for the embattled Labour leadership should be clear: side with the people, and against multi-millionaire bosses exploiting the vast majority of British citizens who are struggling just to get by. Tell British voters that it is you who will help them take back control – not from the EU, not from migrants, but from their bosses" (my itals)

(based on a YouGov poll that showed UKIP voters "way out in front as the most boss-hating group in Britain": I saw DanH respond to this on twitter when he first encountered the poll so I'm glad he's written it up)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

The slogan 'take back control' was a piece of political genius.

Hate this opinion so much. It's only 'genius' if it wins and it won narrowly in extraordinary circumstances. Oh Trump and his genius in not campaigning to win the popular vote etc.

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 16:24 (seven years ago) link

I like that piece by Dan Hancox but its strange anyone placed any kind of bet on the 'populist' remake of Corbyn's. Saying things in a somewhat louder, more present, brash way isn't his style. JC says enough 'un-sayable' things from time to time. What it does need is other cabinet ministers to show up as well. Abbott and McDonnell do but what about the many others from this fabled 2015 intake Ellie Mae O'Hagan talks about in her piece (isn't it so courageous of her not to call for Corbyn's sacking? Applauding here), whose chosen one is meant to be taking over in time for the 2020 bashing.

I really want Corbyn to stay and contest 2020 though. But I am very stubborn and like people who really stick around no matter what.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:10 (seven years ago) link

I really dislike "bargain-basement" btw. I know what it means but its so timid. Totally his style though

Could've said May is trying to turn Britain into Zimbawe, but that is project-fear, when nothing has happened since May got elected beyond the minor technocratic dramas around the mere triggering of Art 50.

There is plenty to work with. This government is killing people! But again to hammer that message is nakedly antagonistic.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:18 (seven years ago) link

>>> By forensically targeting aspirational middle class voters – "eight people sipping wine in Kettering", as Peter Mandelson's former assistant Derek Draper put it – 13 years of New Labour in power devastated its historic base. <<<

surprised Mark S has not added this to his 'latte-sipping / hummus-eating' meme.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:58 (seven years ago) link

metropolitanelite.xls

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:01 (seven years ago) link

pardon me if this was already posted

https://twitter.com/SBienkowski/status/836172114004692996/photo/1

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 01:55 (seven years ago) link

I have a lot of time for DH but "we're on your side against your bosses" makes it so easy for Labour to be painted as not to be trusted with the economy. And when you consider how precarity and insecurity play into people's voting decisions... it doesn't look like a vote-winner to me. Not without some considerable finessing at least.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

Are people not even allowed to pick a side in the class war nowadays?

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:16 (seven years ago) link

Asked about Ukip’s future as Britain begins to leave the EU, Farage said: “We are the turkeys that have voted for Christmas."

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/01/nigel-farage-carswell-stopping-ukip-becoming-radical-anti-immigration-party

the pinefox, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

makes it so easy for Labour to be painted as not to be trusted with the economy

whether you're painted as economically trustworthy has nothing to do with reality though. it's a branding problem (reinforced by the media), not a policy one. the Tories driving the economy off a Brexit cliff edge and still being perceived as more economically trustworthy is surely evidence of this.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:36 (seven years ago) link

it's so infuriating to have this ongoing internal Labour battle/collapse when all the ingredients were there for something similar to happen to the Tories and the fuckers just sailed through it unscathed with no strife

lex pretend, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

It doesn't matter whether it has anything to do with reality! It doesn't even matter whether it's the right course of action, or whether it will shore up the vote in certain areas (it probably will). It just feels like a naive approach to take given how it will almost certainly be countered.

Unfortunately there is an element of show-don't-tell about this. Enough voters still blame Labour for the financial crisis and that won't change until the Tories have their own on their hands and (crucially) people are feeling that in their pocket. They can't really press that narrative until it happens (and a lot of people will suffer when it does), but yes it's completely fucking infuriating that Labour have failed again and again to put themselves on the right side of that argument since June.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

post-2008 labour is going to be painted as "not trusted on the economy" for the foreseeable, however they twist and turn -- that ship is sailed (on a long voyage, distant date of return not yet known: it will never return sporting a blair-coloured cargo-cult flag blah blah)

re precarity and insecurity etc: this is a fair point -- it's all too easy to to advise "advance to full class-war setting" from our relatively comfortable metropolitan ivory munching platforms and sipping balconies. nevertheless, if the status quo does still include a significant number of people knowingly voting against their interests out of uneasy fear, then it is an unstable status quo (and someone is going to pick up those votes when they turn in desperation). this is not a situation i enjoy being in -- i'm a peaceable fellow who's no longer even built for running away, let along any other kind of "street" activity -- but if it turns into a choice, "war on the bosses" is where the left should be, and not "war on migrants" or "war on scroungers" or whatever. what's more -- and this is dan's point -- 'war on the bosses" would change the numbers in unexpected ways

blimey listen to me, i'll be itemising heads fit only to go on poles in a post or two

mark s, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:48 (seven years ago) link

There is the kernel of something in there when you consider the extent to which people like Philip Green and Mike Ashley are held up as modern-day folk demons, and maybe this is what Ed Miliband was hamfistedly aiming for with "predatory capitalism" and you can see how that turned out.

It's one thing to tell people you're on their side, and even have them believe you, but they also have to trust that you're capable of delivering what you say without making things worse, and that's where Labour's real problems have been for years.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:05 (seven years ago) link

feel like labour could brush up on the classic STAR technique for job interviews. Situation, Task, Action, Result. for the last couple of years they've been somewhere between S and T.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

the electorate voting out labour (just about) after a crash caused by an out of control finance sector is a good example of the emotive weight of narrative and blame i.e. branding, and how suspicious most of the country remains of labour/the left & how quick they are to run back to the tories; really none of the standard left wing tropes have resonated for 40+ years without being backed up with quite authoritarian lines on, broadly, 'security'. & yet there is always the pull to overstate the inevitability of the current political situation and I'm aware that a competent new labour successor to blair could well have beaten cameron and we'd be living in the brexitless 00s centrist stasis so many people are now pining for.

I do wonder though what might happen if there was a truly disastrous split in the labour party with both weakened parties losing further ground to the greens & lib dems, and you had the tories getting 3x the number of seats of anyone else. this seems like perhaps the most sure-fire way to change the political landscape in a way that might actually have a long-term effect on the tory vote, though to what end I don't know.

ogmor, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

I'm aware that a competent new labour successor to blair could well have beaten cameron

incompetent succession p much integral to the entire nu-lab project

mark s, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

yeah Blair had PPI'd his own party before he took the job

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:59 (seven years ago) link

y'know, I meant PFI'd but either way works

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

the takeaway of everyone's gloom is that labour has to get better at convincing ppl it can be good at something again (=believes in something and can deliver it)

which goal can it reach quickest, most effectively? (i agree i and ii both are a massive ask, tho i consider i much further out of reach)

i: managerial economic competence for the good of all
ii: pile of bloody bosses' skulls
iii: other (plz specify)

mark s, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

Brentry

The Perks of Being a Wall St R (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

The Sarah Champion paper just given at LSE this morning: she's asking for an economic equality bill to stop budgets favouring men (86 per cent of austerity's cuts and tax rises have fallen on women). Good optics to make a fake feminist PM look bad?

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:34 (seven years ago) link

There is the kernel of something in there when you consider the extent to which people like Philip Green and Mike Ashley are held up as modern-day folk demons, and maybe this is what Ed Miliband was hamfistedly aiming for with "predatory capitalism" and you can see how that turned out.

It's one thing to tell people you're on their side, and even have them believe you, but they also have to trust that you're capable of delivering what you say without making things worse, and that's where Labour's real problems have been for years.

― Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 11:05 (eleven hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh, Geeen is already redeemed.

PARDONED!
As he (belatedly) does the right thing by BHS pensioners The Mail hereby revokes the title Sir Shifty. Well done Sir Phil!

http://en.kiosko.net/uk/np/daily_mail.html

Heavy Doors (jed_), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 23:01 (seven years ago) link

It is a good job the Mail put in that exclamation marK in the heading, possibly to signify he is a bit of a raffish/maverick/zany character - because otherwise I might have mistaken the thieving cunt for a criminal type that would literally rob your fucking wallet if you were dying on the pavement!

calzino, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 23:25 (seven years ago) link

... and then get shirty and outraged if anyone objected to him rifling the pockets of a corpse.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 23:40 (seven years ago) link

I see it was 'a deal' and that 'most' of the money has been (or is to be) paid back..

Mark G, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 23:55 (seven years ago) link

Yes, without him even having to sign a caution for the missing money. None of this falling off yachts anymore, the story just blows over within a year.

calzino, Thursday, 2 March 2017 00:05 (seven years ago) link

I meant by normal people, not the Daily Mail. People fucking hate Philip Green (although they hate Ashley more).

Matt DC, Thursday, 2 March 2017 08:27 (seven years ago) link

i do basically think there's a *lot* of energy ready to be unleashed here, and not just at green and similar high-profile figures

mark s, Thursday, 2 March 2017 08:52 (seven years ago) link

Left always overstating potential of green energy n'est pas

The Perks of Being a Wall St R (darraghmac), Thursday, 2 March 2017 11:30 (seven years ago) link

This government is killing people! But again to hammer that message is nakedly antagonistic.

Dunno if the issue is a lack of hammering tbh, ppl are well aware of it I think. It's just that loads of people are fine with it.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 2 March 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

cheekily lifted from comments on DHancox FB thread, in counterpoint response to the piece linked above: "Having read your piece, and while I completely agree with you on the reading of the polls, I wouldn't think that boss-hating could form a solid base for a left-wing populism. Without looking at any polls, I find it very hard to imagine a time when people didn't hate their bosses. It's why class based mobilisation is quite hard to achieve too. People don't think of it as "money in their pockets", to put it cynically. There's a lot to talk about here, especially on how to interpret the success of Podemos, Syriza etc, but eat the rich has never been much of a rallying cry (however much it might be my favourite one)."

(i think this is wrong though: the locus of fury at issue isn't The Rich per se, it's more like your incompetent bullying line-manager and the ppl above him -- sometimes her -- who appointed him/her and back him/her against you)

mark s, Thursday, 2 March 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

In addition to that point, Ukip voters are full of shit and completely incoherent politically. Basing a whole political strategy on some of them responding favourably to (one or two) vaguely leftish ideas does not look wise.

I mean, I'd like to see such policies pushed by labour, but not to reel in kippers who are supposedly really socialists, if only they could see.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 2 March 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

i believe the point is that all proles are really socialists if only they could see

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 2 March 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

and, y'know, sometimes i concur but the world makes it v hard to be optimistic and cuddly sometimes

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 2 March 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

think the dynamic is the other way round (xp to bananaman)

i) as you say, BB, we should be doing this anyway!!
(1st clue: the word "labour" in the phrase "labour party")
(2nd clue: there's a *lot* of free-floating anger out there, someone else will certainly hoover it up if we merely daintily sidestep it) (tbh one good side-effect of brexit is that it has brought anger back onto the metropolitan munching menu) (angry blairites twit-listing the good things blair/brown did are in fact making the loud leftish noises blair/brown as a matter of policy delined to make even as they were doing these often not-bad things) (obviously the horse has long bolted bcz blair/brown also left the stable door open…)

ii) given this poll, there appears to be more anti-boss anger among ukip voters than any other voting group, incoherent as it indeed is -- so playing to it as a strategy has the BONUS of overriding or tending to nullify the angers in that (incoherent) sector pulling them elsewhere, plus of course (more urgent) "speaking to the left behind" etc etc, plusplusplus starting to articulate the now decade-long unhappiness at recently emergent types of employment (biggest employer in stoke = not the potteries but bet365 etc), not to mention all the zero-hour contract garbage disguising actual functional unemployment

(caveat: it's a poll, all polls are probably garbage, surprising results like this may be wrong) (tho this isn't actually a surprising result of course)

our cat among their pigeons for a change, in other words

mark s, Thursday, 2 March 2017 13:26 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2017/03/world-after-brexit

Packed with question-begging this but is the first "Britain can handle Brexit" piece that feels like it has real thought behind it compared to all the unicorns

stet, Thursday, 2 March 2017 21:47 (seven years ago) link

Good luck NI! The 1st preference votes have been added up but the STV magic has yet to happen.

DUP on 28.1% share of 1st preference votes (down from 29.2% in 2016), SF on 27.9% (up from 24.0%).

Suspect that will get shaken up by the vote transfers but this brief moment is exciting...

http://sluggerotoole.com/2017/03/03/ae17-live-blog-the-count/

(also I'm realising I don't really understand STV quotas)

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 3 March 2017 16:05 (seven years ago) link

xp Brendan Simms is excellent, I can recommend this book to anyone interested in Longue durée approach to European history: https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/56563/europe/

Neil S, Friday, 3 March 2017 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Heaven forbid it should be >4th story on the BBC website.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 3 March 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

Live coverage here at least: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/ni2017 -- expect it'll move up as it gets closer to result time tomorrow.

stet, Friday, 3 March 2017 18:21 (seven years ago) link

Our Queen

xyzzzz__, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:06 (seven years ago) link

BEST CHILD EVER

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Friday, 3 March 2017 20:08 (seven years ago) link

Crying. That's amazing.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:51 (seven years ago) link

adorable, but I don't believe it wasn't planned.

calzino, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:57 (seven years ago) link

Oh its a stitch-up.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:58 (seven years ago) link

That's pre-planned, you mean

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 3 March 2017 20:58 (seven years ago) link

ffs everyone

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 3 March 2017 20:59 (seven years ago) link

don't post that shit unless it's farage being literally run through with a broadsword

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 3 March 2017 21:01 (seven years ago) link

i saw the conversation on the Tweet, sure it might be pre-planned, but how does it work to Farage's advantage?

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Friday, 3 March 2017 21:02 (seven years ago) link

admittedly if the kid had said "my mum says you're a specious cunt" it would've been better but

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Friday, 3 March 2017 21:02 (seven years ago) link

I want to believe damnit

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 March 2017 21:03 (seven years ago) link

Just a bit of fun Louie.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 3 March 2017 21:12 (seven years ago) link

ni election results looking interesting (full results not clear till tomorrow afternoon)

mark s, Friday, 3 March 2017 21:51 (seven years ago) link

248. Posted by dodger on 8 minutes ago

The papes have out bred the unionists, no surprise there given the policies of their lords and masters in Rome.
The obscenity that is religion just disgusts me.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Friday, 3 March 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link

DUP: 28
Sinn Féin: 27
SDLP: 12
UUP: 10 (leader has resigned)
Alliance: 8
Greens: 2
People Before Profit: 1
Traditional Unionist Voice: 1
Independent unionist: 1

40 unionists, 39 nationalist/republicans, 11 unaffiliated

mark s, Saturday, 4 March 2017 10:03 (seven years ago) link

The good news here (apart from the general hilarity of the situation) is that the DUP no longer singlehandedly have the 30 votes required for a "Petition of Concern", a veto which was supposed to stop one side imposing legislation on the other side, but because the DUP had enough MLAs to trigger it without even asking the UUP they were using it for anything and everything, including stopping enquiries into their own misconduct

we still don't know if they'll actually manage to form a govt - this should have sent a message to the DUP but if Arlene Foster refuses to stand down SF may continue to refuse to form an assembly, and then what?

either way, with the DUP veto-less or with temporary direct rule from Westminster, there's a chance to get the gay marriage bill through in NI, so that's good, but for the bigger picture, it's hard to say

currently quite pleased with the result, though also wondering: now we've seen that the nationalist vote can be mobilised and potentially topple the unionists, can the 35% who didn't vote or the unknown % whose vote was Anyone But The DUP be mobilised to vote for e.g. Alliance or some other nominally non-aligned party in future?

a passing spacecadet, Saturday, 4 March 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

Do the DUP *have to* be part of whatever power-sharing government can be formed? Is it theoretically possible you could have SF + SDLP + Alliance + UUP?

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 4 March 2017 20:35 (seven years ago) link

Questioning RT more.

nashwan, Monday, 6 March 2017 12:45 (seven years ago) link

@LiamFoxMP
"The United Kingdom, is one of the few countries in the European Union that does not need to bury its 20th century history" #scc16
8:39 AM - 4 Mar 2016

https://media.giphy.com/media/l3q2K5jinAlChoCLS/giphy.gif

nashwan, Monday, 6 March 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

Still marvelling at Nuttall's "it's not like I was CAUGHT sexually abusing children" defence from the other day.

nashwan, Monday, 6 March 2017 13:08 (seven years ago) link

a diabolical imperial historical listicle

Neil S, Monday, 6 March 2017 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Lol! Liam has read plenty of history, but just Tristam Hunt's books unfortunately!

calzino, Monday, 6 March 2017 14:54 (seven years ago) link

who could forget this classic?

http://www.the42.ie/bloody-sunday-1920-1767626-Nov2014/

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Monday, 6 March 2017 15:06 (seven years ago) link

agree with Liam tho, nothing to bury here

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Monday, 6 March 2017 15:08 (seven years ago) link

No twas left in the street to encourager les autres alright

The Perks of Being a Wall St R (darraghmac), Monday, 6 March 2017 15:10 (seven years ago) link

“If a police barracks is burned or if the barracks already occupied is not suitable, then the best house in the locality is to be commandeered, the occupants thrown into the gutter. Let them die there – the more the merrier. Should the order (“Hands Up”) not be immediately obeyed, shoot and shoot with effect. If the persons approaching (a patrol) carry their hands in their pockets, or are in any way suspicious-looking, shoot them down. You may make mistakes occasionally and innocent persons may be shot, but that cannot be helped, and you are bound to get the right parties some time. The more you shoot, the better I will like you, and I assure you no policeman will get into trouble for shooting any man.”

Lt. Col. Smyth, June 1920

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Monday, 6 March 2017 15:15 (seven years ago) link

BritEmp crimes I learnt about while still at school:

1: Boer Concentration Camps
2: Black & Tans
3: Amritsar
4: Gas-bombing of villages in (whats now) Iraq
5: Partition of India (generally presented as unavoidable, the fault of the quarrelsome native etc)
6: Mau Mau counterstrike (much underplayed, but def. "the colonials also committed atrocities")

BritEmp crimes I did NOT learn about while at school:

7: THE BENGAL FAMINE, which -- with several millions dead -- is def.comparable with the *major* 20th C crimes of others; the exact numbers are contested but the scale is not)

(There were several other largescale famines in India under British rule, but all in the 19th century I think)

mark s, Monday, 6 March 2017 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Let's not mention the slave trade and getting half of China hooked on opium, while we're at it.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Monday, 6 March 2017 17:37 (seven years ago) link

the disgraced DrLF did specify 20th century

mark s, Monday, 6 March 2017 17:39 (seven years ago) link

We turned over a new leaf once that old bag, Victoria, was in her grave.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Monday, 6 March 2017 17:42 (seven years ago) link

we didn't learn about any imperial atrocities at my school, just a lot of industrial revolution and inter-war stuff. I expect LF knows most people's ideas of those things are pretty foggy & so feels able to get away with it.

otoh I always found this bit of BJ incredible:

“From these rooms, 178 nations of the world we either conquered or invaded,” he said, to the loudest cheer of the day.

“But those days are over,” he said. Silence. They were not expecting that.

What we have now, apparently, is ‘soft power.’

“Up the creeks and inlets of every continent on earth there go the gentle kindly gunboats of British soft power captained by Jeremy Clarkson - a prophet more honoured abroad, alas, than in his own country,” he purred. “Or JK Rowling, who is worshipped by young people in some Asian countries as a kind of divinity.”

ogmor, Monday, 6 March 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

Fox probably sincerely considers that stuff, at worst, unfortunate collateral damage vastly outweighed by the freedom and prosperity the British empire distributed. And BJ will be the same. That's why they're so dangerous/evil.

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Monday, 6 March 2017 19:13 (seven years ago) link

and because sub/consciously there are millions of reasonable Brits who agree with them

Sacked Italian Greyhound (Noodle Vague), Monday, 6 March 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

One of my standout history teachers from high school was a Marxist type dude giving us a very pro-Mao version of CCP history, longer on the march than the genocidal campaigns + famines etc. He was totally full of shit but I quite liked him and he was the first person I can remember mentioning Brit concentration camps, though he was definitely going off curriculum.

Some of these BritEmp apologists would probably use that LePen line for the purpose of excusing modern atrocities when he described the Nazi death facilities as "the details of history".

calzino, Monday, 6 March 2017 19:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm averse to the religious & moral tone of a lot of the arguments made about the empire, not much use as history, although I understand the urge to teach a corrective morality tale to children. could do with a lot more high profile Big History about the empire though

ogmor, Monday, 6 March 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

this person thinks Labour needs 'heads on sticks'

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/03/labour-should-ditch-kinder-gentler-politics-it-needs-heads-sticks

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 March 2017 14:50 (seven years ago) link

shd be poles

mark s, Tuesday, 7 March 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

Taking all the jobs these days...

Matt DC, Tuesday, 7 March 2017 16:33 (seven years ago) link

if Innocent Smoothies made paramilitaries

barry snappleton (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 7 March 2017 17:38 (seven years ago) link

Who's yerwan says we're not a real country

The Perks of Being a Wall St R (darraghmac), Tuesday, 7 March 2017 19:59 (seven years ago) link

A lot of 'policing' around the area I work has already gone to a private security force kitted out to look extremely similar to police / community support officers. There is very little actual crime but plenty of homeless people to harass.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 7 March 2017 20:10 (seven years ago) link

I'd hate to think one of these private high-vis thug security ops might piss off the wrong person one day and end up in casualty, that would be tragic.

calzino, Tuesday, 7 March 2017 21:02 (seven years ago) link

Nice to see every paper going in on Hammond re Budget. Get ready for that whopping 1% drop in the polls.

nashwan, Thursday, 9 March 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

between the business rate hike and the changes in tax, it really feels like independent businesses are going to be fucked. can we expect a wave of pret/byron etc across every street, or just boarded up windows?

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 9 March 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

I guess the assumption is that they feel so unthreatened by Labour that they don't even care about pissing off their core voter base.

I wouldn't bet against the press trying to take Hammond down though with the aim of replacing him with a Brexit Chancellor. He's been very obviously keeping his head down for months, you couldn't go a day without hearing Osbourne pipe up about something or other.

Matt DC, Thursday, 9 March 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

there's been beef in hackney over the last two-three years abt particular types of independent business getting favourable deals from the council, to shift the look of a street etc etc, while others (often long-standing -- and useful! -- shops, like DIY/home-dec or motor-parts emporia) feel the pinch and move elsewhere (=essexwards i assume: cockney flight)

i'm not a huge stan for hackney council (ftb living here since 1983) but rather a hippie or a hipster caff than ANOTHER property agents or betting shop -- and while the proposed "fashion hub" is p hard to separate from the general trajectory towards gentrification, it (a) will provide better-than-McDs jobs for locals (bcz prospects) and (b) is actually not entirely alien to the area (which was still all ragtrade sweatshops when I first moved here: of course they've gone, factories converted to bijou flats mostly)

anyway, i assume the cash for this (problematic!) kind of planning is going to be drying up! maybe no to more betting shops -- this wave seems to have slowed -- but yes to more property pimps and development speculators (meaning more unaffordable/empty housing)?

mark s, Thursday, 9 March 2017 12:47 (seven years ago) link

home-dec sonned after hackmey beef

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 9 March 2017 16:20 (seven years ago) link

between the business rate hike and the changes in tax, it really feels like independent businesses are going to be fucked. can we expect a wave of pret/byron etc across every street, or just boarded up windows?

Boarded up windows with hundreds of newly self employed window cleaners standing beside them crying into their buckets.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 March 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

tax deductible buckets i'll have you know.

mark e, Thursday, 9 March 2017 19:12 (seven years ago) link

It's pronounced Bouquets

Odysseus, Thursday, 9 March 2017 21:13 (seven years ago) link

https://mobile.twitter.com/NaomiOhReally/status/840288994596397060/photo/1

Theresa May’s decision to give up her favourite crisps for Lent may not have been headline news. I suspect, however, that it’s at least as important as anything else we’ve discovered in the past ten days. Because it goes to the heart of the beliefs that guide, and the background that has shaped, our prime minister.

The principle of Lenten sacrifice, of giving up something cherished to recall the 40 days Jesus spent in the wilderness, is a discipline observed by many Christians. But it is particularly a feature of Catholic practice. And Theresa May is, I believe, Britain’s first Catholic prime minister.

If it's that easy to be Catholic maybe I can married in church after all.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 10 March 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

Are C of E clergymen in the habit of having Catholic daughters?

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Friday, 10 March 2017 20:09 (seven years ago) link

can you imagine being such an out of touch twat that you reach for angl-catholicism as a relevant contemporary political reference

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 10 March 2017 20:12 (seven years ago) link

it's not the 19th century, gove you insufferable cock, as much as you would like it to be

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 10 March 2017 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Giving up crisps? Pah! I'm just popping down into the cellar wi' hairshirt and going to kneel on some gravel for 6 hours. Catholic my arse!

calzino, Friday, 10 March 2017 20:23 (seven years ago) link

I have a friend whose adoptive parents are very wealthy devout catholics, who you could easily mistake for Tory voter types. He says they think she is a fucking disgrace and a terrible pm. Possibly the amount of volunteer work they do in foodbanks has influenced the way they feel.

calzino, Friday, 10 March 2017 20:28 (seven years ago) link

there are some Blue Labour types on twitter who seem very focused on Catholicism and the "Catholic vote", a few months ago they were predicting that Paul Nuttall's supposed appeal to Catholics was going to help UKIP displace Labour in the north of England

soref, Friday, 10 March 2017 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I think the "Catholic vote" is likely a very diverse and probably rapidly shrinking phantom demographic that is way out of reach from the type of useless fuckwit that can't even make a fist of consolidating the relatively piss easier populist bigotry vote - which could be a different description of the Catholic vote I know. But there are actually practising Catholics who are deeply moral in their own fucked up way, there are some I can think of who if anyone could court their votes it would be Corbyn more so than anyone representing cruel austerity or right wing bigotry. Because he is more like Jesus innit?

calzino, Friday, 10 March 2017 22:39 (seven years ago) link

All the Catholics I know are Labour to the core.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Friday, 10 March 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link

Anglo-Catholic is v specifically not Catholic

snappy baritone (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:02 (seven years ago) link

That said let's not skip an opportunity to moan about T Blair

snappy baritone (Noodle Vague), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:04 (seven years ago) link

The Catholic vote is extremely important in Scotland and is one of the reasons that Labour had hegemony there and now has lost it - Catholics used to vote Labour en masse, and have switched quite heavily to the SNP, with the majority of Catholics now supporting independence. This contrasts pretty starkly with the late 70s and the first referendum around devolution for Scotland where the majority of Catholics rejected devolution due to sectarianism (they feared the rule of the Scottish protestant majority).

English catholics are a mystery to me.

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:08 (seven years ago) link

Other than the ones of Irish descent

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:08 (seven years ago) link

Jim otm

Odysseus, Friday, 10 March 2017 23:11 (seven years ago) link

It's going to be really interesting to see if Labour loses the catholic vote at a local level with the councils in Coatbridge and Hamilton. They have always ran it.

Odysseus, Friday, 10 March 2017 23:13 (seven years ago) link

Strange quasi overlap with the IRA thread, ironically

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:20 (seven years ago) link

not so strange, the bonds of the union are stirring

mark s, Friday, 10 March 2017 23:23 (seven years ago) link

True but i only bumped tother one because it happened to strike me that loyalists were all twisted nutters which tbh isn't a thought that come to me whilst in deep contemplation of current political currents or anything

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:25 (seven years ago) link

the bonds of yr subconscious are also stirring perhaps

mark s, Friday, 10 March 2017 23:27 (seven years ago) link

English catholics are a mystery to me.

There's not many of them tbh.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:29 (seven years ago) link

Steps were taken

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:31 (seven years ago) link

I think their electoral clout is negligible, outside of Liverpool and Manchester. Guessing there a bit though.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:33 (seven years ago) link

tbf tom we dont have much clout outside of a few places in Scotland

Odysseus, Friday, 10 March 2017 23:40 (seven years ago) link

There's a line in one of the Father Brown stories -- The Hammer of God -- in which Brown, the Roman priest, asks a vicar if he can look inside the church. "'I hear it's one of the oldest in England. We take some interest, you know,' he added with a comical grimace 'in old English churches.'"

I don't suppose I spotted it the first time or the second, but the joke he's making -- which the vicar also misses -- is that ALL old English churches (which is probably most of them, at least outside cities) were once Roman churches, and that's why "we" (= the Catholic church) take this interest. Chesterton was of course a Catholic -- albeit a rather weird one -- and was mainly mildly teasing his readers here (it's not really relevant to the story, at least not very) but the deep point is there, and it's a bit dizzying when you remember it. All this was once ours; we haven't forgotten.

One of the fascinating (and to be honest unsettling) things about modern Tories -- who still claim to venerate Burke -- is that they really have forgotten a lot of things that they claimed to be the ones who took care NOT to forget. This is after all kind of the whole point of Burke: "Don't fuck too much with the ways things have grown to be, everyone will suffer if you do." Now things that the conservatives of two generations ago -- even a handful of the Thatcher intake young-turned-leathery-grandees -- would have fought like tigers to, well, conserve, are just being allowed to dissolve, as if they were never there.

mark s, Saturday, 11 March 2017 00:23 (seven years ago) link

All this was once ours; we haven't forgotten

this is what i think whenever I'm in an old scottish cathedral

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 11 March 2017 00:27 (seven years ago) link

Everytime I watch father brown (which i love) I keep thinking it must be set in Carfin because I cannot imagine a village in England where EVERYONE is a catholic.

Odysseus, Saturday, 11 March 2017 00:29 (seven years ago) link

In the stories -- which I love too much to be able to watch the TV versions -- most of the people he meets aren't catholic, though one nearly always is (which is why he's there at all, to give last rights or confession).

mark s, Saturday, 11 March 2017 00:31 (seven years ago) link

I'd like to read the books. Im amazed my mum doesn't like the show or read the books

Odysseus, Saturday, 11 March 2017 00:38 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/05/why-do-we-get-it-wrong-about-working-class-voters

I knew Rob Yates in the early 90s,when he was a music writer -- I remember him being wry abt the romanticised portrait the middle-class writers at Melody Maker tended to paint of inchoate working class youth (i think the tenor of their Happy Mondays fandom being the actual talking point then). "They admire what I ran from!" is a fair summary of how he felt about it, I think.

Anyway he's basically making the same argument here: that the guilty metropolitian romanticisation of the left-behind is a reinforcement of the problem. He quotes a couple of people I haven't any time for -- Jess Phillips, Rob fkn Ford -- though interestingly deploys them to say more helpful things than either of them usually do.* He describes John Lanchester as "a handsome writer and no fool", which is not the ilx line haha, but does it in order to point out that JL said a silly thing. I think this tactic actually shapes the whole piece: he may feel he can't say "my fellow music writer john harris aka WURZEL is a near-r4cist knob, hire me instead, I'm from one of these places, I have a feel for the ones who stayed as well as the ones who fled"

I wish he had said something more like that (as someone needs to): the piece is much too mild-mannered and hummed and hurred and measured. But the point that it's a strategically ghastly place to draw the line (esp.for labour) is correct.

*ie even Ford's "no reason why you couldn’t have a Blair mark II" -- yes there are reasons Rob -- is there to support the idea of "a leadership of common purpose across the classes". I *think* Yates's argument -- I'm guessing at it bcz he doesn't quite make it out loud, but the last paragraph implies -- is that this leadership will in fact largely have to come people from the various left-behind places, able to articulate the complexity and turn it into a rhetorical weapon.

mark s, Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:15 (seven years ago) link

(in other words, if it's not clear, to inflect the things that are actually pretty good about cosmopolitanism and interest in cultures outside your own, without doing it through the vast comfortable self-regarding complacency of the pollytoynbiat)

mark s, Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

When I left the school in the 1980s, seven or so of the 250-strong yearly intake went on to university; now it’s about 110, in line with a general shift in deprived parts of the country. Higher education as an option has gone from being unusual and uncelebrated to routine – in the space of a generation.

just one point amongst a stack i would like to make if it wasn't a lazy blue saturday - the experience, purpose and value of Higher Education was v different back in the 80s than it is today. i'm probably similar in a lot of respects to Mr Yates and my feelings about my class background or the necessity of "escaping" it are quite divergent from his i think

snappy baritone (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

also yeah i think we can do with out missionaries coming to save us, that was v Blairite thinking. maybe turn things on their head and talk to the lower middle class about how really they're as proletarian as the rest of us regardless of what they like to eat and watch on TV

snappy baritone (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

Will they like that? No, they will not.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

it might be instructive for them to learn where their real interests lie

snappy baritone (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

re HE yates is saying "things have changed, we shd understand that better" -- but yes, he only contributes a bit of anecdotal vox pop to this understanding, and it needs a lot more than that

mark s, Saturday, 11 March 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

he may feel he can't say "my fellow music writer john harris aka WURZEL is a near-r4cist knob, hire me instead, I'm from one of these places, I have a feel for the ones who stayed as well as the ones who fled"

Interesting, though I don't know how serious you're being about the "hire me instead" thing – he's been a section editor at the Observer for donkeys years and rarely writes himself, so I imagine this piece was just him really wanting to get something off his chest.

Alba, Sunday, 12 March 2017 20:22 (seven years ago) link

When I left school, after sixth form, I went into Computing, as IT was called back then. You could not do that now.

Mark G, Sunday, 12 March 2017 22:07 (seven years ago) link

i didn't know that alba -- i was surprised to see his name after all these years, wonderered where he'd been keeping himself (which section? i should pitch to him maybe)

so substitute "pay attention to me instead" for "hire me instead"

mark s, Monday, 13 March 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

I think a lot of middle-class MM/NME guys were frankly astounded to find themselves in a setting with scallies where they weren't getting their lunch money stolen or their belongings 'taxed' and it showed.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Monday, 13 March 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

curious about how you came to adopt 'scallies' as yr preferred term suzy, I thought it was a NW thing

ogmor, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:07 (seven years ago) link

Possibly by having Happy Mondays in my mind's eye when pondering the question?

syzygy stardust (suzy), Monday, 13 March 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

can't argue with that. I'm not sure if the fact I barely hear it any more is indicative of it falling of favour, my spending more of my time w/ people who grew up outside the NW or just no one having the need or possibly inclination to use it. but back in the 90s it was scallies as far as the eye could see

ogmor, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:18 (seven years ago) link

there was a good thread on the manchester reddit (i know) about the decline of scally culture, the changing faces of yates clientele etc. TOWIE was blamed as the main culprit behind a major style shift

ogmor, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

If I were pressed I'd also suggest that the NW sunbed massive/footballers' male grooming thing predates TOWIEism by at least a decade.

'Scallies' probably the least-worst way to refer to ducky-divey young guys who are slightly intimidating to people who have to wear cheap suits to work.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Monday, 13 March 2017 11:33 (seven years ago) link

unconvinced these various caricatures help counter harrisism tbh

mark s, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

some guy on twitter talking about Paul Nuttall:

mark cönwáy‏ @1markconway

@fossy49 @BBCNews He's a scally. They're all scallies. I've no idea where we'll end up. Thank God Theresa is a real grown-up.

soref, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

bad bootle ukip meff

^^^i am prepared to accept this caricature :D

mark s, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:46 (seven years ago) link

it seems significant that when "chavs" became a thing in the 2000s that the chav stereotype was dim/slow-witted, which was never the case with scallies as far as I remember, scally sterotype = weasely, cunning little bastards

soref, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:47 (seven years ago) link

Before we actually start comparing them to Raptors, Nicola Sturgeon has announced a second Indyref.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:49 (seven years ago) link

Or has announced that she intends to:

She says she will ask the Scottish parliament to vote in favour of this next week.
She says the details of the referendum, including the timing, must be for Scotland to decide.

She says it should take place when the options are clearer than they are now, but while it is still possible for Scotland to stay in.

She says she expects the outcome to be clearer by next autumn. So that would be the earliest date.

She says it should take place between the autumn of 2018 and the spring of 2019.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

They'd lose again if they held it tomorrow so obviously betting on Brexit turning out to be a colossal fuck-up.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Monday, 13 March 2017 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Safest bet in the world, la

stet, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

re: scally - the origins of the towie look are def older but I don't think it really took off til around that point. i'm not totally convinced by that anyway, it seems like more of an adult look whereas we only ever used scallies to refer to teenagers. some ppl I know are v firm on never using the word & would judge you for it, & it doesn't trip off the tongue anymore, it just reminds me of being 13, which feels a long way away

ogmor, Monday, 13 March 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

counterpoint: brookside's SIZZLER (brookside is where i first heard the word "scally")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu_681EK8Pc

mark s, Monday, 13 March 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

The upshot of that timescale is that May could be gone before Brexit actually occurs.

Matt DC, Monday, 13 March 2017 12:51 (seven years ago) link

in comedy marmalades news: https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/841653201044721664

mark s, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 21:38 (seven years ago) link

re: Catholoc discussion above - odd coincidence (of sorts) I finished Tabucchi's Pereira Declares. Really great book about a catholic man (editor of a culture section of a newspaper no less) who is eventually dragged into the politics of Salazar's Portugal (book is set in '38) and the Spanish Civil War. That sense of deep morality (his favourite fiction is French Catholic writers like Mauriac, and then Pessoa of course, although his politics were more fucked so this seems odd), a sense of right and wrong mixed with a sense of passivity. Unless things really get in your face.

I should read those Father Brown stories sometime.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 22:52 (seven years ago) link

Share memories with ogmor about 'scallies' and think ogmor OTM although hem hem possibly best not me getting back on to that topic here

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 01:23 (seven years ago) link

Etymologically speaking though it's interesting that scally connects to 'scally wag' (i.e. something you might call your own lovable, cheeky children, softening the derogative) whereas 'chav' connects to the Romany word for 'boy' or 'child' IIRC (i.e. brings in the idea of the demonic other more so than the earlier term). And it was 'chav' that made it from playground to mainstream press usage

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 01:24 (seven years ago) link

the JUSTICE FOR MARINE A dipshits in my extended family are already wetting themselves with joy on facebook over this sentencing downgrade

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

just a lil' shooting of an injured enemy combatant followed by a verbal acknowledgement a war crime has been committed let's be cool abt it

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Brexit Secretary David Davis says Government has not done an economic assessment of the impact of not reaching a deal with the EU on Brexit

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 10:53 (seven years ago) link

brexiteers in 'being entirely unprepared' shocker

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 10:56 (seven years ago) link

They could've done an assessment that said it would be bad. People would not like that.

Or they could've done an assessment that said it would be OK or even good. People would not like that.

nashwan, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

I didn't realise that Neal Ascherson had come out in support of Marine A

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/26/author-admits-shot-two-injured-soldiers-bid-help-jailed-marine/

soref, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:22 (seven years ago) link

Marine A

Aqua-Marine A

Why won't you say, that you'll always slay

Prisoners disarmed

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

Fuck that guy

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

I didn't realise that Neal Ascherson had come out in support of Marine A

best defence for a war crime? more war crimes apparently

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:42 (seven years ago) link

OUR BRAVE BOYS ARE NEVER WRONG *clutches union jack*

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

ascherson is a great writer (also a scot nat rather than a union-jack clutcher) but seems to me he's belatedly working through his own war guilt issues here

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:46 (seven years ago) link

very likely, aye, and he got what he wanted anyway with the downgrade of the sentence. not at all sure that 'i've committed a war crime too' is a helpful addition to the conversation tho

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

U-turn on the NICs and Corbyn can't even manage to formulate a question? FOR FUCK'S SAKE

stet, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

It's probably the first he's heard of it to be fair.

If the press can force a U-turn when there's virtually zero threat from the opposition then it suggests that personal tax rises of any kind are politically nearly impossible right now, and as a country that means we're even more in the shit.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:30 (seven years ago) link

It's also the second budget to unravel in two years, and yet their supposed economic competence is still taken as read by so many.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/NNomjDJ.png

Odysseus, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Labour under Corbyn caught in the same Tory trap his predecessors were, of course, even if JC and JMc wish to exit it in the other direction: the issue of raising taxes. Miliband said no way, which hobbled him. Corbyn wants to say YES WAY -- but that makes it hard to make proper hay of Hammond's difficulties here.

Think it was the Machiavelli-Baldrick thread where I said a strong leader is one that can rhetorically fuse (and thus defuse) these kinds of contradictions so that people stop seeing them (or stop caring): it's very evidently something Corbyn can't or won't do. (He may, with a residual Bennian romanticisation of the democratic nature of the working people's movement, actually consider it a dishonest skill -- I'm not a Benn stan, but i don't think this is an error he would ever have made if he'd been allowed within sniff of a leadership role… )

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn wants to say YES WAY -- but that makes it hard to make proper hay of Hammond's difficulties here.

My feel is that if you're own position is clear and bold enough, it hardly matters what it actually is, you can make a lot of hay with your opponent's difficulties and equivocation. Maybe this will occur to someone in the labour party by about the year 4545.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:19 (seven years ago) link

your lol

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

Have to say I'm not that convinced that "effective performances" at PMQs are all that important any more: the audience it once spoke to has dwindled, and the commentariat, when it isn't so straightforwardly partisan it can't be swayed, has far more of an eye on other measures of success (especially polls, which retain a quasi-scientific aura that entirely gets the guard of the scientifically illiterate gang who mainly make up the commentariat).

Michael Rosen on twitter just now: "PMQs isn't 'debate'. It's a knob-wrestling match now serving the purpose of keeping press in work doing theatre criticism on it"

This^^^ threatens to turn it into "Corbyn wins by not participating in this stupid game!" vs "It's his job to participate and he does it badly!", neither of which get us much further. And theatre is a needed skill in politics. But Rosen is entirely correct that the game is now both stacked and rebarbatively stupid. The big threat currently isn't that the table can't be overturned, it's that the people overturning it are shrieking predatory monsters.

Sturgeon''s intervention was also excellent table-turning, mind you -- she of course has access to an entire political machinery that isn't Westminster-centred.

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

It's dickwaving that no one pays attention to really but it does contribute to the steady subliminal drip-drip of wider sentiment and that has had an effect on Corbyn's own wider perception. Obviously the media is near-blanket hostile but that can no longer be used an excuse - "he'd be doing better if people who disagreed with him weren't constantly trying to undermine him" doesn't hold water in politics where everyone is constantly trying to undermine everyone. And on the rare occasions where he DOES get a direct hit at PMQs people pay attention - cf the case with that Surrey council - because it gets the TV news 20-second clip. Corbyn's main problem here is no that PMQs doesn't matter, but he also thinks it doesn't matter and can't be arsed to go through it.

It wouldn't really matter that he's largely ineffective at PMQs if he hadn't also been completely ineffective in opposing the government on the biggest call in a generation, which people really do care about and where he might have had some impact.

Obviously Corbyn probably agrees with the NI rise in private, but the line of attack here is "the Chancellor clearly thought this was the right think to do, so a) did the PM tell him to row back, and if so did she know about it in advance. If not, do they just not communicate on something as big as the Budget, lol incompetence. Or b) see how easily the Chancellor is bullied into a U-turn". And it should be repeated again and again. Corbyn has largely failed in making it about their incompetence, not his, partly because his own incompetence and lack of authority is so easily thrown back in his face.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:17 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn is routinely praised for PMQ performance - but I guess this depends who you follow (e.g. I see no praise for May, perhaps it as common in the right quarters). It's not something I'd do myself as I agree with the general negative judgements of PMQs and don't watch them.

nashwan, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't use words like 'knob wrestling' or 'dick waving' partly because I don't like them in general, also because the dominant participant in this case, at the moment, is a woman, so even the perhaps otherwise valid point that these debates are often about men performing their masculinity isn't valid.

That note on idiom doesn't mean I disagree with any of the substantial arguments above.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 15:41 (seven years ago) link

I like Sturgeon's intervention, despite not wanting Scottish independence.

It is as though she is responding to a slow motion car crash by crashing another car into it. And the people who very deliberately crashed the first cars furiously say 'What on _Earth_ do you think you're doing, crashing that _car_??'

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 15:42 (seven years ago) link

PMQs is like Newsnight; it doesn't matter because it has a huge audience but because all the politicians and journalists watch, and it sets their agenda, which it turns feeds the national agenda. If you can't cut through there, you don't get your 20s clip on the 10.

stet, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Running away from the wreckage surely?

(May is also very bad at PMQs and not good at being put under pressure generally, so it's also a missed opportunity to make her look worse)

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn is routinely praised for PMQ performance - but I guess this depends who you follow

Are you following Seumas Milne perhaps? Now the government and the opposition are hopeless at PMQs can we just call the whole thing off?

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:16 (seven years ago) link

it sets their agenda, which it turns feeds the national agenda

i am no longer convinced this is true re PMQ: it continues to a pretext for punditry but i don't believe anyone could transform the situation from its platform -- which possibly you could once upon a time

what i'm getting at is that in days gone by it was a simultaenous test of two things -- mastery of the detail of your brief and your project, and mastery of the arts of parliamenary banter

but that partly depended on a preponderance of journalists -- even partisan ones -- who were able to get their heads round the first and judge the content, setting it against judgments about the effective theatre

i don't think such a preponderance now exists: there's a handful, peter oborne, stephen bush, but they're fairly marginal, newsnight doesn't have any (tempted to say the satanic reign of paxman saw them off, as i am quite anti-paxman, but it was more to do with editorial decisions probably)

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:18 (seven years ago) link

I mean the collapse of a singular national agenda is partly to blame for all the bullshit raining down on us right now to my mind, so that PMQs has a smaller impact on what's left of it would naturally follow I guess

stet, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:24 (seven years ago) link

as significant: the collapse in a layer of trusted (and trustable) expertise

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:26 (seven years ago) link

>>> Running away from the wreckage surely? <<<

yes, I agree, the metaphor which feels compelling to me in one way, seems wrong in others -- you could say that she is pressing the ejector seat rather than crashing the car.

But there is something about what she has done which is: responding to a crisis by creating ANOTHER crisis -- and she is almost literally the ONLY person who could do this (the Lords, or NI Assembly for instance, evidently can't) -- and I have found this temporarily liberating, because the ONE slow-motion car crash crisis that we follow every day had seemed (and indeed is) so inescapable -- when the NEW Scottish crisis pushes it sideways or diagonally in some way, that is some relief.

Put yet another way, Sturgeon seems to be the ONLY person who has any capacity for leverage over the Brexit people, ie can do anything that actually scares or bothers them; and I cannot help admiring her for this.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Yes I feel the same way!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure she does have much leverage in the commonly understood way, and that leverage is perhaps not the point - her aim is not to overturn Brexit, it's to secure independence - and the government would be torn apart from within if it were seen to be offering her too much ground (maybe any ground).

Where she might have leverage is over the date of the referendum - she can perhaps get May to agree to the referendum as long as she promises not to hold it at a crucial stage in the Brexit negotiations.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:09 (seven years ago) link

i think as well there's leverage at a symbolic level: brexiteers enjoying the thought that soon things will all be back as they were in the golden times confronted with something which absolutely doesn't belong anywhere in those golden times, viz a uk w/o scotland -- as in, "you have no grasp of what you're going to get"

the threat of it screws w/ppl's warm nostalgia fore the comfortably familiar -- and actually helps dramatise what a radical step is being taken

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Also quite a lot of satisfaction in the (fair few) Brexiteers who were all "this will make Scottish independence even LESS likely!!" and "there will be no second referendum" becoming all spluttery. Tiny taste of what's to come when the negotiations begin.

stet, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:33 (seven years ago) link

come home to somebody on PM gently making the case for war crimes being OK. this is the really scary shit, the steady retreat of civilization.

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:37 (seven years ago) link

the metaphor which feels compelling to me in one way, seems wrong in others -- you could say that she is pressing the ejector seat rather than crashing the car.

It could be both: she is pressing the ejector seat so that she flies clear of the wreckage while allowing her car to crash into the existing crash

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that is a good way to put it, too.

I am essentially in agreement with Mark S's post above. And stet's though I did not know that people thought this would make Scottish independence less likely; I would have thought the opposite.

Mark S says

"ppl's warm nostalgia fore the comfortably familiar"

-- I am surprised, does anyone actually see the Brexit future that way?

For me, of course, it's the opposite: UK in the EU is what I am already nostalgic for.

It could possibly be that some people who are older than me do have that nostalgia for a pre-EU UK but it seems hard to believe they have really kept that nostalgia going for 40-50 years and are not remotely nostalgic (as I am) for anything since.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

does anyone actually see the Brexit future that way?

I think there was a fair bit of nonsensical thinking along the lines of 'let's turn the clock back to before we joined the EU' - both from people who didn't experience the UK in the 60s and the 70s and, this is more bizarre, people who did and who are largely the same people who never stop going on about how terrible Britain was in the 70s.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:57 (seven years ago) link

Ditto, people who say, let's go back to when the Commonwealth was our main trading bloc and we put Commonwealth citizens first, but who did nothing but moan about Commonwealth immigration at the time.

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:59 (seven years ago) link

i think "take back control" makes no sense as a successful slogan if there wasn't a "back" people felt warm towards

when exactly it existed is a different thing (let alone if) -- there was a poll i saw people responding to that suggested people felt it was 30 years ago that they felt on top of their lives (which as one respondent said means they were basically saying "let's get back to the year the happy mondays released "squirrel and g-man etc" -- viz really really not a time that overlapped well the imagined past that is somehow being conjured)

but memory is strange like this: i can remember times i myself enjoyed very clear and what i enjoyed about them, and then when i try and map them onto public events find i must be several years out somewhere (but not able to work out where)

so i don't think it's impossible that largish numbers of people are saying "let's get back to the times when i was in control of my life and all will be well" and then associating that with quite another time (probably an earlier one) when the various dynamics that gathered to put that life out of control had not yet visibly started and assuming the good things will come again and the bad things that knocked them off course will not begin gathering

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:00 (seven years ago) link

to be fair most people who moan about the terribleness of the 70s are not complaining about the lack of workers' rights or ready access to Polish lager

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

TomD: That is interesting and curious.

It strikes me as oddly parallel, though, with what you might think a somewhat more rational idea: ie: Nostalgia for the UK before Thatcher! (In line with the standard leftist line that she ruined everything)

In effect, the time before Thatcher is the time before the EU!

Mark S: there seems to be a surprising conflation between 'a good time for me personally' and 'a better time for society and politics' there. Even those of us, for our sins, very interested in politics probably wouldn't often conflate the two.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:05 (seven years ago) link

The 70s in this country certainly didn't look like a barrel of laughs but these guys are actually nostalgic for the 50s and 60s and those really *are* viewed as a golden age of sorts so maybe what people are nostalgic for is the social-democratic consensus. Obviously not in the Tory party.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:08 (seven years ago) link

The 'take back control' point is a good one, it's a bit like Make America Great Again, er, when was that exactly?

Return of the Flustered Bootle Native (Tom D.), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:09 (seven years ago) link

Mark S: there seems to be a surprising conflation between 'a good time for me personally' and 'a better time for society and politics' there. Even those of us, for our sins, very interested in politics probably wouldn't often conflate the two.

― the pinefox

Yes but you must allow that this is a very guilty board

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:10 (seven years ago) link

i'm too sleepy to put this clearly i think but no, i wasn't saying people are conflating "a good time for me personally" with "a good time for society" -- i was saying that people in this time of crisis remember "a good time for me personally" (and that afterwards things went wrong) and feel that in order to return to this good time personally, the clock will have to be reset years previously, in order that the things which caused the good personal time to go bad to even *start* happening

i think people think like this precs=isely bcz they know NOT to conflate their own good times with societies as a whole

i also said, which did not help my clarity, that people often somewhat misalign the timing of their good time with what they think of as the precise time it happened in public terms, but this is a different phenomenon

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure how much "a good time for me personally" comes into it - this seems to be more common among the centre-"left" who really blatantly just want it to be the '90s again - but the industry of nostalgia for the '50s and '60s (and before) aimed squarely at people way too young to have been there has been going on for some time. So on the one hand you have the aesthetics of colonialism, of '40s fashion, of village fêtes and twee cupcakes and GBBO, creating this illusion of a golden age, but crucially on the other you don't have an education system in which Britain faces up to the atrocities it committed worldwide in the name of maintaining that golden age.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:26 (seven years ago) link

I mean, there are probably many different forms of nostalgiae working in parallel, I guess

lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

if there'd been no "good times for me personally" (where "me" is this person we're trying to imagine and explain) then there'd be no real investment in the past at ANY point, as opposed to the possiblities of the future, say -- weaponised nostlagia is a consequence of things shifting (personally)* from "seeming to get better, give or take" to "seeming to get worse"

it's because things were once OK for person X (say at time B) and then began to go awry (at time C) that person X is looking back beyond time B to time A, when the forces that came together to make C bad for them hadn't (so they think) at all started

the Bs and the Cs are probably all over the place -- which is one reason that A needs to be more or less at the start of our shared memory time

*i'm not ruling out a depersonalised (which is to say public and politicised) sense of better and worse in operation also, but i don't think that's primarily in operation in this instance

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:36 (seven years ago) link

i literally cannot write to save my life today -- you can blame either rachel maddow or the scary bumblebee that got into my bedroom at sun up

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 18:37 (seven years ago) link

PMQs is like Newsnight; it doesn't matter because it has a huge audience but because all the politicians and journalists watch, and it sets their agenda, which it turns feeds the national agenda. If you can't cut through there, you don't get your 20s clip on the 10.

Nostalgia for those days.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/global/2017/mar/15/second-tory-reveals-police-investigated-him-over-spending-allegations

i was just about to say "£70,000 seems cheap to buy a close election" but it sounds like somebody in the CPS was way ahead of me

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 07:21 (seven years ago) link

"Politics is not a game" is becoming the go-to line for when their own game-playing gets called out.

Matt DC, Thursday, 16 March 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

Meaningless hardly covers it.

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 March 2017 10:19 (seven years ago) link

There should be a tougher penalty than this, the seat should be invalidated and put out to by-election.

Matt DC, Thursday, 16 March 2017 10:31 (seven years ago) link

they may yet be

"Given the range of technical errors made by a number of political parties and campaign groups, there also needs to be a review of how the Electoral Commission's processes and requirements could be clarified or improved."

"Your honour, given that other people have broken the law in the past I think we should change the law."

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 10:36 (seven years ago) link

This first surfaced a while ago, thought it had been forgotten about, as I'm sure the Tories had, but looks like the Old Bill might have been working on it all along.

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 March 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

No wonder the police were complaining about being dangerously underfunded the other week.

nashwan, Thursday, 16 March 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

re: nostalgia and taking back control

happiness depends not on your circumstances but how your circumstances compare with your expectations. I think perhaps the biggest driver of the lingering crisis of national identity lies in how the way the country feels about its future has changed. to look back now on the 60s is to have it backwards. this isn't the future people expected, no one saw it coming, it doesn't even have an architect. to the extent that looking at things in terms of these very general underlying sentiments makes any sense - poignant pause - the EU has been a scapegoat at times, onto which all the unease and uncertainty people have felt with the future over the last 40 years has been projected. the future of the EU was always deliberately and necessarily vague, I think ppl underestimated how unappealing those features were to the british public

it's not a coincidence that ppl like me & the rest of lefty ilx who would feel more unease at reverting to the past also have no real positive sense of national identity or a national future. there is something to the point about being a citizen of nowhere, it also makes it v difficult for the left to sell anything as part of any coherent vision at a national level

ogmor, Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

couple of interesting things in this (interview with bill rodgers, the member of the gang of four who no one can ever remember)

http://www.newstatesman.com/2016/01/bill-rodgers-it-s-very-difficult-very-painful-leave

not the we-were-right-it-was-painful stuff (you were wrong, i'm glad it was painful, at least for you, bill) but his comments on what the party was always like -- just constant internal arguments since the 1950s, as bad then as now, and (implied) a succession of solutions which, as means to unite successfully, just didn't take (there was a backlash against wilson as against blair)

but also -- against this -- his apparent ultimate belief in the lasting resilience of the party

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

ogmor otm in the post above btw

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

I ask myself when the Blairites modernized the constitution - abolition of Clause 4 etc - did they leave anything that resembles a set of core beliefs? a broad coalition of interests is one thing, but without core aims and beliefs what do get? Electability?

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

I don't buy vague comparators to the status quo as aims or beliefs btw - "fairer", gtfo

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

The Labour Party is a democratic socialist Party. (This is either untrue or a lot of members, including the majority of the PLP, don't belong here.) It
believes that by the strength of our common
endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone (meaningless rhetorical platitude),
so as to create for each of us the means to realise
our true potential (meaningless ontological platitude) and for all of us a community in
which power, wealth and opportunity are in the
hands of the many not the few (many/few is sufficiently vague but I struggle to think of many recent policies that aim in this direction) ; where the rights we
enjoy reflect the duties we owe (meaningless authoritarian platitude) and where we live
together freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and
respect. (KUMBAYA)

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:39 (seven years ago) link

there are no politics in the Labour Party's Aims and Values, good work everybody

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:40 (seven years ago) link

clause four: "To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service"

there's a bit of fluffle here -- "most equitable… possible", "best obtainable" -- but on the whole it's admirably direct, and i LOOOOVE the phrase "workers by hand or by brain" (and also think it was politically important, insisting on a sense of equality that 's badly gotten away from us)

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

adopted 1918, 99 years ago

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

yeah exactly. I'd forgotten/didn't know that Clause 4 was rewritten rather than scrapped, but the comparison between the 2 tells you everything about the party from the death of Smith on. it also says to me that people like Rodgers were never honest adherents of the party's core aims - they were the entryists all along

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 13:52 (seven years ago) link

Fabians innit (but they were there from the start): party was always an uneasy coalition (background as much in Methodism as Marxism blah blah)

lol this i did NOT know till just now: "The Fabian Society was named [“]in honour of the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus (nicknamed "Cunctator", meaning the "Delayer"). His Fabian strategy sought gradual victory against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal through persistence, harassment, and wearing the enemy down by attrition rather than head-on battles"

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:06 (seven years ago) link

that bit I did know

I guess I'm being unfair to the old-school Fabians in that as far as I remember most of them were not opposed to the nationalized industries staying nationalized, at least pre-1979, so they could argue they did have a relationship to the original Clause 4.

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:10 (seven years ago) link

second punic war was a topic of great interest to me as a child so was familiar with him but always assumed they'd got their name from elsewhere, that's curious, kind of a great way to troll the revolutionary left

ogmor, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:11 (seven years ago) link

something something "rivulets of blood"

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:13 (seven years ago) link

main SDP planks were europe, arguments over how the leader was selected (not just over union involvement, tho they thought this was too great), and distrust of tony benn

(haha this makes them sound much more justified than they were)

privatisation was not something they were actively pushing or against -- in the sense that being pro it wasn't why anyone split w/labour i wouldn't say

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:22 (seven years ago) link

no, that would be how I remember it - but I feel like the SDP rapidly ditched any interest in socialism, democratic or otherwise

and as I say, the old Clause 4, even the current version, essentially state "this is a party for people who believe in a socialist economy". love it or leave it imo

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:28 (seven years ago) link

Rdogers talks abt leaving entirely in terms of pain -- meaning the sundering of friendships and professional relationships as much as anything -- but another aspect of party-quitting and floorcrossing which people don't talk much about is political and moral disorientation. You've been surrounded for many years with people you sometimes agree with and sometimes quarrel with, and you use the fact that you compromise with them sometimes or refuse as a kind of moral compass. These are people you know, well, so you know what it means to agree with them, and to disagree.

Once you quit the rooms they're in and enter new ones -- at least once you're past a certain age -- you find you don't have access to that collective moral compass you had learned to trust (even when you disagreed with most of your fellows). I think people -- even really strong-minded people -- who walk away because "the party has left them" or whatever are often afterwards much more bewildered and manipulable than they admit (or recognise).

Not applying any of this understanding to Dr David Owen, mind you. He's an egomaniac arsehole who I loathe unreasonably more than any other politician to this day.

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:45 (seven years ago) link

i LOOOOVE the phrase "workers by hand or by brain" (and also think it was politically important, insisting on a sense of equality that 's badly gotten away from us)

Ralph Miliband had a thing or two to say about this (condensed version - "lol u crazy, workers by brain have never identified with workers by hand") and that's more of a problem now than it ever has been.

Matt DC, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:48 (seven years ago) link

He was right, it was a romantic reach and possibly delusion -- but tossing the phrase aside addressed nothing.

(Mentioning Ralph M reliably reminds me of the moment in Miliband of Brothers where Ed bobs up to say "I'm a cyberpunk!" -- which somehow also has relevance here, AT LEAST TO ME)

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link

always think of "workers by brain" as a pacifying shout out by the Webbs to their more genteel brothers and sisters in the nascent party

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 14:57 (seven years ago) link

maybe that's what the webbs were thinking; to me it's an acknowledgment that intelligence isn't just a middle class attribute and that literacy used well is a political weapon

except expressed in a way that reminds me of little schoolkids in crocodile, hand in hand and pals 4evah

mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

WTF George Osbourne named as the new editor of the Evening Standard?

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:25 (seven years ago) link

total wtf

conrad, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:26 (seven years ago) link

in practice i'm unsure what this means -- does he stay on as MP? given journalistic background (none?) is he figurehead or hands-on? -- but further grist to my feeling he was always less damaged than cam by brexit

(doesn't strike me as particularly helpful news for may)

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:28 (seven years ago) link

these fuckin people

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:30 (seven years ago) link

jesus

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:30 (seven years ago) link

ok he's staying on as mp for tatton

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:33 (seven years ago) link

He claims he'll continue as an MP but if I were Theresa May I'd basically force him to make a choice between continuing as an MP and editing the Standard. He'll use it to undermine her government on a daily basis and for her it would be a good way of getting rid of a potentially troublesome leadership challenger.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:34 (seven years ago) link

it'd be better for lolz if she doesn't manage to make him resign.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

Interesting, a leftward turn at the sub-standard

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

"In 1993, Osborne intended to pursue a career in journalism. He was shortlisted for but failed to gain a place on The Times trainee scheme; Osborne also applied to The Economist, where he was interviewed and rejected by Gideon Rachman.[11] In the end he had to settle for freelance work on the Peterborough diary column of The Daily Telegraph"

^^^Wikip's current acid commentary on his background in journalism

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

fair play to nineties Telegraph for having that level of regional coverage tho- probably all been cut now

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

He'll use it to undermine her government on a daily basis and for her it would be a good way of getting rid of a potentially troublesome leadership challenger.

Under current conditions, why would he need to challenge May? He's been promoted above her.

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:42 (seven years ago) link

Now just waiting for Gove to be officially editor of The Times.

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

unless there's already parliamentary rules against something like this, i'm not sure TM *can* require him to resign as an MP -- how would that work, esp.if he fought back?

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:47 (seven years ago) link

A sitting MP as editor of a major newspaper wtf wtf wtf

stet, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:51 (seven years ago) link

she'd withdraw the whip, effectively booting him out the party, thinking being the shame would do it then xp

stet, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

thinking being the shame would do it then

good luck with that

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:54 (seven years ago) link

lol i think that wd be to misjudge the psychology of the man

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 11:54 (seven years ago) link

adding: he'd have the perfect platform to wage war on her via a "fight for his rights" (or some such piffle)

lol it's like lord stansgate all over again

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

I would love to be a fly on the wall of the Standard office right now.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

"What am I? Fucked bacon?!"

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article7567532.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Theresa-May.jpg

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

May giving a foretaste of her contempt for parliament by having a shit on the front bench

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

Standfirst of Buzzfeed's story: One Standard insider said: “No one can believe it. I feel like I’ve been shot.”

https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/former-chancellor-george-osborne-will-be-the-editor-of-the?utm_term=.rhnGxpGKG#.heaQ25QeQ

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

if you've held one of the great offices of state i think you should be compelled afterwards to retire to your farm or be shot up to you

conrad, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:03 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/gordonrayner/status/842703932564606976

"Email to Standard staff explains that Osborne will edit the paper in the morning, then head over to the Commons in the afternoon. REALLY???"

Fizzles, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:04 (seven years ago) link

if you've held one of the great offices of state i think you should be compelled afterwards to retire to your farm or be shot up to you

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 12:07 (seven years ago) link

4 days a month at Blackrock, plus the McCain institute gig...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_-8SS1LS_c

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:10 (seven years ago) link

lol at all a million "[politician x] to become editor of [_______]" response tweets, not one of them funny

also lol david allen green pedantically explaining that MPs have often been editors before now and citing the spectator in evidence

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

This is more the GGO's thing I think

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoGofvVhKTo

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

the way david allen green he says "this is the sound of the constitution working" one more time there's an egregious political steamrollering of generally accepted interpretations of how legislature/executive/judiciary works and people are up in arms would try the patience of a saint.

Fizzles, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:17 (seven years ago) link

i actually still think DLG is quite useful as someone explaining complex issues of law and its procedures clearly, but his grasp of how politics impinges on this and manipulates it is pitiful

(haha i snarked abt this on twitter two days ago and he retweeted me saying "quite" and then must have reread my tweet and realised i was being snarky, bcz he deleted his)

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

Jack-off C**t more like lol

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 17 March 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

Kind of intrigued by what his game is here, I mean there's clearly more going on then "I fancy editing a newspaper" and I don't think he's really required to make Labour look like a shambles right now. Chipping away at May's authority and/or casting himself as the leader of Tory Remain/Return has to be in his thinking here.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

lol at all a million "[politician x] to become editor of [_______]" response tweets, not one of them funny

This amused me:

@Ed_Miliband 30m30 minutes ago

Breaking: I will shortly be announced as editor of Heat magazine....

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:26 (seven years ago) link

Fair enough, me too -- but it's funny bcz "bless him, he's still game" plus "if only he'd been this salt two years ago". The actual choice of title is kinda random.

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

Thought it just about worth noting that Liz Kendall implied UKIP are far-right on This Week and Andrew Neil not only indignantly questioned her on it but appeared to deny there was no far-right political movement in the UK at all. The Express is pearl-clutchingly incredulous at her suggestion and commends Neil for the "SLAP DOWN". Don't like it up 'em.

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 13:40 (seven years ago) link

"In 1993, Osborne intended to pursue a career in journalism. He was shortlisted for but failed to gain a place on The Times trainee scheme

yes, the person who did get the place Osborne applied for was Carole Cadwalladr, I remember her writing a piece in the Observer about it.

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 17 March 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

if you've held one of the great offices of state i think you should be compelled afterwards to retire to your farm or be shot up to you

― conrad, Friday, March 17, 2017 8:03 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 17 March 2017 14:26 (seven years ago) link

Nashwan I watched that too (I almost always do), thought the same thing.

Also: I know it shouldn't be news that Portillo is unpleasant, but (given his media rehabilitation, etc) I am sometimes surprised by it -- his behaviour last night a prime example, I hope you'll agree.

the pinefox, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:03 (seven years ago) link

Kind of intrigued by what his game is here, I mean there's clearly more going on then "I fancy editing a newspaper" and I don't think he's really required to make Labour look like a shambles right now. Chipping away at May's authority and/or casting himself as the leader of Tory Remain/Return has to be in his thinking here.

― Matt DC, Friday, March 17, 2017 12:23 PM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this - or at least the idea that obviously he has an ulterior political motive - is why I'm just, idk, flabbergasted that a sitting MP is allowed to edit a newspaper

lex pretend, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:23 (seven years ago) link

the period we're living through is "oligarchs vs norms who will win?"

also, you know, the crack-up of the union is going to spew out a LOT of residual stuff from how politics was in the 18th (and 17th) century

i don't believe there's laws or rules against it per se -- conflict of interest yes, but that is going to become a battle of interpretations before a committee if osborne digs his heels in, while the sanction of his constituents against an absentee mp is voting the bum out at the next election

if he has his eye on a way back to PM-ship (maybe via the mayorship when that becomes free), i don't think GO has much to lose tbh -- this is yet another flaming car driven into the pile of wreckage from another angle

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:40 (seven years ago) link

upside: we could still end with heads on poles

downside: wrong heads

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:40 (seven years ago) link

suspect there will be pushback from murdoch, rothermere and the barclays

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:42 (seven years ago) link

I would be happy to cheer on Parliament passing an entirely cynical "Fuck George Osborne March 2017" bill proclaiming that you can't edit a paper and sit as an MP.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

I am glad that one person has taken up my flaming car metaphor.

the pinefox, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

There is no way that TM would seek to stop GO being an MP.

The point about GO trying to be Mayor is an angle though. I hadn't thought of it. It fits with the ES. But I think he is too unpopular among many Londoners and I don't see that changing fast enough (or ever) for this to work.

the pinefox, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

the problem is we don't make flaming cars in britain any more

conrad, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

he looked coked out of his mind when he was on the bbc news earlier talking about this

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 March 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

a+ work conrad

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 March 2017 15:49 (seven years ago) link

Didn't know the owner of the ES looks like Ant & Dec & the bearded version of Action Man merged into one.

http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/pc/Evgeny+Lebedev+wdMmiW4Se9Xm.jpg

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:58 (seven years ago) link

http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/pc/Evgeny+Lebedev+wdMmiW4Se9Xm.jpg

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 15:58 (seven years ago) link

the period we're living through is "oligarchs vs norms who will win?"

s/b "oligarchs vs norms WHICH will win?" as i meant political/social/moral norms not the kinds of norms momus wd sneer at

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 16:00 (seven years ago) link

xp Evgeny "Two Beards" Lebedev © Private Eye

Neil S, Friday, 17 March 2017 16:01 (seven years ago) link

perennial private eye favourite evgeny 'two beards' lebedev

https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/03/02/10/lebedevcr0.jpg

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 March 2017 16:02 (seven years ago) link

'two beards' jinx

not even my mate ross king sniffed out this hot gossip (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 March 2017 16:02 (seven years ago) link

(2 beards)²

Neil S, Friday, 17 March 2017 16:03 (seven years ago) link

He's Elton's beard now.

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 16:04 (seven years ago) link

An extremely well-respected critic for one of his papers gave yer Rocket Man a panning, and he went running to Lebedev to insist the writer be fired. Lebedev fired the writer. CUNT.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Friday, 17 March 2017 16:35 (seven years ago) link

thinking abt this a bit more:

i: i think lebedev is going to get creamed for the decision, by the various mouthpieces of his rival oligarchs: also the FT and the guardian (which already ran a p funny take-down by marina hyde)
ii: however i think we are so far into wtf mode in every respect that this may not deter him in the short run
iii: in the long run it's really hard to see how the standard sustains the issues that arise (quite apart from anything else, it has respected city journalists read by the city on a daily basis -- they don't want compromised fluffwork from a blackrock shill) (it will not be taken seriously by these readers if they imagine into is being massaged) (reputation once lost v hard to regain)
iv: have also read (eg stephen bush) saying it's problematic for GO's return to front-bench politics -- unless he seriously reigns in/steps on the ES's role in political gossip he makes it quite hard to maintain or develop alliances w/other sitting MPs, very much needed to become leader or anyway regain heft
v: not sure this latter will deter GO, who may be in go-for-broke damage-may and imagine he can later magic into existence what's later needed -- also i'm not sure we are in enough of an era where normal assumptions apply
vi: tho i have said for a while i don't think GO was as damaged by brexit as cam, i have never considered him a mightily adept pol
vii: entirely unrelatedly, coke and crystal meth are a hell of a drug combo

mark s, Friday, 17 March 2017 17:12 (seven years ago) link

Although he was not reappointed as Chancellor after May became PM, there is no particular evidence, that I have seen, that GO is strongly motivated by a desire to do anything to Theresa May.

He is a Conservative and one of his first loyalties will be to the Conservative Party, of which she is currently leader.

Beyond that, he is extremely rich and well connected and perhaps he actually doesn't care much about May or UK politics anymore.

the pinefox, Friday, 17 March 2017 17:32 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/AdamBienkov/status/842713111484383233

soref, Friday, 17 March 2017 19:06 (seven years ago) link

hello darkness my old friend

nxd, Friday, 17 March 2017 20:01 (seven years ago) link

There's also the question of how long the Standard realistically has left as something read by a mostly decreasing number of bored commuters, bored LT staff and cabbies. If it makes it to the next GE and/or outlasts May's Premiership Lebedev and the six jobbed hard hatted bellend with barely any journo experience he just had to have might settle for that. Or this is just my hapless wishful thinking as usual (if online only by that point perhaps it simply merges with Leb's other organ to form The Indepentard).

nashwan, Friday, 17 March 2017 20:01 (seven years ago) link

He is a Conservative and one of his first loyalties will be to the Conservative Party, of which she is currently leader.

The Conservative Party has shown an astonishing ability to turn in on I gettself over the last 25 years at least. Europe has obscured a huge faultine running through the party between metropolitan libertarians and rural social conservatives, as well as another between toffs and social climbers. Both latter quadrants are in the ascendancy right now and Osborne is on the wrong side of both divides.

There is no way he spent over a decade as Cameron's right hand man without coveting the top job and he was seen as the heir apparent until IDS deliberately derailed his budget a year ago. He isn't going to be remotely interested in party unity at a time where there's no real threat from the opposition. He's like Blair, doing everything to put his guys back in charge. Unlike Blair he still has the opportunity to put his career back on track.

Basically there is no reason in the world to assume that Osborne will put loyalty towards a the 'wrong' part of the Conservative Party over his own ambitions.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 March 2017 20:09 (seven years ago) link

May called Osbourne in to sack him, isn't that fairly unusual? Usually ministers are called in to be hired and those that aren't kept on are told by phone. She clearly called him in in order to humiliate him and It worked since he left by the back door.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Friday, 17 March 2017 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Although he was not reappointed as Chancellor after May became PM, there is no particular evidence, that I have seen, that GO is strongly motivated by a desire to do anything to Theresa May.

RONG

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 March 2017 00:36 (seven years ago) link

What's the evidence, that you have seen?

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 10:43 (seven years ago) link

1: "fiercely loyal to the party = fiercely loyal to the leader" is not remotely the story of the tory party since at least the 70s
2: this by itself doesn't mean everyone is plotting against everyone (or that everyone wants to be leader): obviously it's factional
3: does osborne? i don't know, maybe not
4: is he now a cheerful may footsoldier? i don't know, maybe (for now, as long as she's riding high) (which may not be that long)
5: is he basically retiring from politics to roll around in a big pile of his money ? of course not
6: reason one -- he's staying on as MP even though he has other (probably less tiresome) jobs
7: reason two -- he's about to be editor of a major newspaper, a role that (a) is going to be political every single day, and (b) will mean balancing various competing interests every other day (he can't just roll into a support-may-every-time groove, no such groove will exist)
8: besides the govt is full of other ppl who can't not rankle (hammond and bojo esp.)
9: perhaps pinefox is correct and GO is just a sweet loyal soldier all down the line; HERE'S THE THING, THAT IS *NOT* HOW MAY WILL SEE IT -- she sees someone she just sacked (and chose to publicly humiliate, whatever words were actually said in number 10) setting up a sniper's nest in full view of all… it becomes a thing she can't not have a wary eye on, in a way that just isn't the case with a journeyman journalist as editor (that's just business as usual -- this is not, bcz at any moment, as far as she's concerned" the sweet loyal soldier may seize his chance)
10: … and she will be thinking like this bcz (a) look what she just did to cam, why wouldn't his lieutenants be thinking payback? and (b) "fiercely loyal to the party = fiercely loyal to the leader" is not remotely the story of the tory party since at least the 70s and she knows it better than anyone

tl;dr: TM cannot afford to assume GO will be loyal; that unease will inflame his ambition WHETHER HE CURRENTLY SEES THIS OR NOT

(obviously the likelihood is that he crashes out of the job in just a few months bcz it's hard and he's an idiot)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Assuming GO is basically the front-person. Editor in name only - defeinitely not in action. If he tries to actually do stuff yes that could sink the paper - which isn't a bad outcome.

There was a v tedious hour on my twitter TL of "this country is a banana republic". Weird notion, because there is plenty of corruption in British public life. Granted its not so naked, but its there when MPs who are landlords vote down things that would cost them, i.e. on requirements to make their housing fit for living in, and so on.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

>>> is he basically retiring from politics to roll around in a big pile of his money ?

I think perhaps he is!

Yes he has said he will continue as MP, but perhaps he will change his mind.

I think his own £££ and high-rolling lifestyle with international bankers probably means more to him now than what goes on in the Commons.

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

>>> (a) look what she just did to cam

What did she do?

There is only one answer: she did not campaign very hard for Remain in 2016, and this might have been a small contributing factor to his losing the referendum and hence leaving as PM.

Otherwise she has not done anything to him.

It is not as though he wanted a job in her cabinet and she refused him it. He had already quit frontline politics for good.

For that matter, it is not really very clear to me that GO would have wanted a job in her cabinet. Quite likely he didn't want to go on being Chancellor through Brexit; though perhaps he would have liked another big job like FCO (but that's also hard during Brexit). In fact I can't really see that the anti-Brexit GO would have wanted to be in TM's government at all.

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

Was surprised by Marina Hyde's crystal meth swipe at GO. Not that I don't think it's true, I've no idea one way or the other, more that a major broadsheet would broach it. Presumably lawyers are all over it to ensure there's no comeback from GO.

Dan Worsley, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Yes he has said he will continue as MP, but perhaps he will change his mind.

Or maybe have his mind changed for him. I wouldn't imagine that the news has gone down well in his constituency. The person who stood against him for Labour at the last election is a friend of mine who told me that GO didn't even bother showing up to the hustings, so he was already treating his constituents with contempt even before he took the Standard job (I know, I know, 18,000+ majority, rich area etc but it still looks bad I think).

Grandpont Genie, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:23 (seven years ago) link

to xyzzzz: this is a play for lebedev for a place on the oligarch grown-ups table i think (owning the independent didn't get him that bcz lol the independent)

saying "GO is the front-person" assumes lebedev knows what he's doing and can play the murdoch role: he can't -- GO is being brought in as a stunt editor, yes, but a stunt editor with moves

of course the dep ed will do all the thankless gruntwork -- but it will be the gruntwork that comes *after* GO rushes in of a morning and says "hold the front page, we have to run with this" (and the dep ed sez "is that wise sir" and lebedev sez "do as you're told")

journalists are upset professionally bcz it's their profession being turned into a silly plaything -- some know perfectly well this happened long ago but plenty feel they are doing good work in the wreckage and this makes a mockery (some actually even are)

to dan: MH commented on twitter that this piece had taken a very long time to lawyer -- she doesn't actually say "all the while snorting crystal meth", it's used as a figure of speech indicating absurdity ("it's like man of substance ON ACID" doesn't actually mean he took acid; lawyers presumably felt something similar with this)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

In fact I can't really see that the anti-Brexit GO would have wanted to be in TM's government at all.

Don't have the figures to hand, but most of May's cabinet was anti-Brexit surely? I assume the Telegraph is close to the Tory Party, could be wrong, anyway here's what they've been saying/printing ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/17/theresa-may-allies-accuse-george-osborne-plotting-undermine/

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

PF: i suspect he will in fact shortly move out of politics to roll around in his money -- but i don't believe that, in the discussions he had with lebedev this ES job, either of them assumed anything like this, quite the opposite

the problem with treating editor of a paper as a sinecure is that every day an edition comes out with your imprimatur on it WHETHER OR NOT YOU'VE ACTUALLY SEEN IT -- if he actually ends up doing this job at all* then he will be being political every single day he is doing it, whether he intends this or not

*(and not failing to turn up on the first day or every after that, as an editor did at city limits in the mid-80s!) (the fellow i like to assume is pixie lott's dad, tho he is not in fact)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

mark s yes, guess that's how it played out. Even if he was minded to sue I'm sure GO wouldn't be daft enough to do so, giving lawyers a free pass to shine a spotlight into his extra curricular activities.

Dan Worsley, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Pixie Lott surely not related to Tim Lott ?!

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:38 (seven years ago) link

I don't think so, no. Her father is called Stephen.

Grandpont Genie, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:40 (seven years ago) link

all this has suddenly reminded me of harold wilson's deputy leader george brown in the 60s -- who is the cause of the phrase "tired and emotional" entering the language as code for blotto, bcz he was found faced down in the gutter outside no.11 incapably drunk, and the paper that reported it said "tired and emotional" (he'd have sued, he was litigious) and private eye picked the phrase up and wielded it with some hilarity (and presumably still do)

he was kicked upstairs into the house of lords and became BARON GEORGE-BROWN, which it turned out did not reduced the public tendency to laugh at him

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

apparently she is not but i prefer to believe this is all a cover

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

There are sooooo many George Brown stories, a terrible man for the booze.

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Who said about the Labour leadership contest between Wilson and Brown? "Some choice, a crook or a drunk".

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:54 (seven years ago) link

crosland (inevitably)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 13:58 (seven years ago) link

dick double-crosland to call him by his correct name

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 14:03 (seven years ago) link

wait no that was dick crossman, crosland is anthony crosland

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 14:10 (seven years ago) link

all this is making me want to read Sampson's Anatomy of Britain again. I seem to recall some journo referring to Gordon Brown as George Brown by accident in the early nineties and Gordon making some joke about not drinking as much as him!

Grandpont Genie, Saturday, 18 March 2017 14:30 (seven years ago) link

yes i just went down the rabbithole of a 1986 hitchens (c) essay on an anthony howerd biog of dick (double) crossman in googlebooks (with half the pages missing) (haha even tho i actually own this book w/no pages missing if i just get up off of the sofa)

line that made me laugh bitterly: "labourism's seemingly endless corps of ambitious phoneys" (written in 1986 abt the 50s and 60s)

(hitchens could still write then, and was still angrily on the left)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 14:44 (seven years ago) link

Evgeny Lebedev ‏Verified account
@mrevgenylebedev

Frankly @George_Osborne will provide more effective opposition to the Government than the current Labour Party

https://twitter.com/mrevgenylebedev/status/843074709692530689

^^^lebedev's view of his hire (to get back to the earlier discussion)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 14:58 (seven years ago) link

That is a good piece of non-anonymous evidence.

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Osborne has made similar concern-troll remarks about Labour since the referendum (as have countless supposedly centrist journalists of course) - is this genuine frustration? The idea that it makes the Tories look like they're not truly earning their benefits victories and popularity?

nashwan, Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:13 (seven years ago) link

I have heard a few other tories making that "we need proper opposition to hold us to account" line in the Corbyn era. yeah like Ed Milli pushed them so hard with his Austerity-lite and made life so difficult for them.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:25 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's necessarily an admission that they'd been killed keeping up with the millis either now

The night before all about day (darraghmac), Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:27 (seven years ago) link

need to get back to the days of savagely agreeing with and carrying out their economic policies

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:30 (seven years ago) link

well exactly, according to the polls he was pushing them all they way, but in terms of offering alternative policies he was a fail.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:31 (seven years ago) link

After Blair left it's probably possible that they're pissed off to have to come back and run the shop themselves

The night before all about day (darraghmac), Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:32 (seven years ago) link

i know right

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 March 2017 15:38 (seven years ago) link

I feel a twinge of embarrassment that I voted for Ed Milli these days, what an absolute worthless mediocrity to break my voting duck with :(

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 16:42 (seven years ago) link

idly wondering if there's ever been an opposition party in the parliamentary model that opposed govt policy as a matter of formal principle: oposed everything (bcz it was their formal job to oppose) as opposed to picking and choosing what you oppose and what you support

(corbz of course supports art50, which is a big deal for metropolitan labour voters)

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 16:52 (seven years ago) link

Well allegedly Labour are supposed to be ideologically different to the Tories, so maybe some disagreements would be inevitable (NHS,Welfare State, Social Housing for starters).

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 16:57 (seven years ago) link

tories didn't oppose any of those during 60s and early 70s

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:01 (seven years ago) link

and it was both of the them that put up lots of terribly conceived social housing, but the welfare state + the NHS seem to be more in peril in recent times than ever before.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

right-to-buy was a corrosively effective move on thatcher's part -- arguably her single most damaging policy

welfare state and NHS (along with education for all) were both outfalls of empire bismarckianism really: the argument that this vast national project needed a smart and healthy heartland, finally established just at the point the empire started coming to bits

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:14 (seven years ago) link

they were fought for and established by the left but approved right across society

the other corrosive legacy is that we never really confronted our role in empire when it vanished, just kinda forgot abt it and never spoke of it

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:16 (seven years ago) link

Last point is key as we come to find that those countries we think as being our friends (read trading partners) may be a bit more arms length than May expects. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/brexit/2017/03/why-brexiteers-need-update-their-reading-colonial-history

Dan Worsley, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:22 (seven years ago) link

Did the French deal with their empire legacy any better than the British? I'm guessing they are just as bad.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

exits from Algeria and Vietnam were horrible but then they still have an EU to trade with

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:33 (seven years ago) link

exit from india was also horrible but worst impact very much not on brits

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:38 (seven years ago) link

yeah i don't think the French equalled the carnage we caused but their empire was considerably smaller

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:39 (seven years ago) link

also possibly the american intervention in vietnam kinda took the spotlight off

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:44 (seven years ago) link

I can still recall seeing a map that showed the peak British Empire in an infant school classroom in the 70's, very vague memory but I definitely saw one. But I suppose this was only 10-15 years after the Kenyan atrocities.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

http://static.newworldencyclopedia.org/thumb/2/28/British_Empire_1897.jpg/788px-British_Empire_1897.jpg

1897 was empire at greatest extent iirc

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

ruddy shame how canada and nigeria never really got the hang of cricket

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:51 (seven years ago) link

said to be a third of earth's landmass tho quite a lot of that must have been big empty islands in what's now nunavut

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:52 (seven years ago) link

would love to roam baffin island during waterbird breeding season tbh

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:54 (seven years ago) link

in zoot suit and panama hat, ordering my native underlings about with my cases

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

it's quite cold dude

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 17:57 (seven years ago) link

The scale on that map doesn't look quite right somehow.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cyCg6QtW9_c/TT1vvDgqUwI/AAAAAAAABGQ/3zMLJX1rYo0/s400/uk_india_extract.png

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:06 (seven years ago) link

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Mercator.jpg

blame him^^^ not me

mark s, Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

Making the Colonies and Dominions appear smaller than they are and the hulking Russian Empire seem bigger at that point in history would probably make sense.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

I like Ed Miliband a lot.

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:26 (seven years ago) link

I don't mind him personally, but I just certainly wouldn't vote for the cunt or any of his type ever again though. And every time they play footage of his election campaign it is toe-curlingly bad, he was only up against Cameron with his sleeves rolled up ffs!

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Well, who can beat Cameron, or May, or anyone else, at the moment? If anyone has any good ideas we could do with them.

the pinefox, Saturday, 18 March 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

I like Ed Miliband a lot.

his twitter groove at the moment is brilliant.

mark e, Saturday, 18 March 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Well, who can beat Cameron, or May, or anyone else, at the moment? If anyone has any good ideas we could do with them.

As someone with a kid with autism and a partner with MS I'm more concerned with the politics of self-preservation at the moment, like beating them at any cost doesn't mean anything to me at all. I appreciate you have your own vantage point and concerns, but these are mine.

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

But trying to reason with a poster who thinks the BBC gets a hard time and thinks Tristam Hunt deserves respect. Why fucking bother?

calzino, Saturday, 18 March 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

Well, who can beat Cameron

pinefox van winkle lol

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 18 March 2017 21:25 (seven years ago) link

Tim Farron accuses Theresa May of having same 'aggressive nationalistic' agenda as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 19 March 2017 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Has he failed to rule out a coalition with them as well?

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Sunday, 19 March 2017 14:13 (seven years ago) link

Beat me to the punch there.

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Sunday, 19 March 2017 14:15 (seven years ago) link

i was wondering whether he realised this is the USP for a lot of her supporters

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 19 March 2017 14:16 (seven years ago) link

anyone know of any good UK politics podcasts?

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 20 March 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

http://podcast.novaramedia.com/

^^^from the "aftermath of occupy" perspective -- and more engagé than cool and q

mark s, Monday, 20 March 2017 11:18 (seven years ago) link

oops, more energetically engagé than cool and quizzical surveys of the political scene -- i actually find both their main commentators (aaron bastani and james butler) a bit bumptious on-screen and prefer to read than watch or listen, but that's as much to do with my age and tastes i think

mark s, Monday, 20 March 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/PFmHoHi.png

Untie the bUnion = a pun (kind of) on "Unite the Union", I guess? is "Foot problems" supposed to be some sort of reference to Michael Foot? Confusing.

soref, Monday, 20 March 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

You don't untie bunions either afaik

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Monday, 20 March 2017 11:49 (seven years ago) link

generally a sign of a bad political cartoon is little labels on parts of it explaining the allegory by saying "the national debt" or "latvia's refusal to sign the bilateral treaty in 1837" or whatever

in this one the labels make NOTHING clearer (tho i am glad to learn the doctor's sleeve is anti-corbyn i guess)

mark s, Monday, 20 March 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

inept political cartoons are some of my favourite things in the world

Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Monday, 20 March 2017 12:15 (seven years ago) link

Where'should that one from? Stone cold classic. Actually, it'seems probably a pis stake from some left twitter dude browse isn'the it

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 20 March 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Thank u auto correct

Thank you for your service, wasteman (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 20 March 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

I saw it posted (multiple times) by some odd twitter account belonging to a self-described "English Nationalist", I think he's on the level (or else very committed to not breaking character). it looks like it's a re-purposing of this cartoon, which is still not funny but at least comprehensible:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lowres.cartoonstock.com/fashion-foot-podiatrists-foot_specialists-consultants-foot_doctors-gshn156_low.jpg

(lol at taking the time to crop out the cartoonist's signature. poor Genevieve.)

soref, Monday, 20 March 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

"That's not what a Thai foot massage means."

Best possible. :(

nashwan, Monday, 20 March 2017 14:09 (seven years ago) link

podiaTRICKS amirite

mark s, Monday, 20 March 2017 16:39 (seven years ago) link

thanks for reccomendation mark, will check that out

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

is the New Statesman podcast with Stephen Bush and Helen Lewis any good? Bush's writing always seems very insightful/interesting, generally not as impressed by what I've seen from Lewis.

soref, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

to be honest i have avoided watching it in case my confidence in SB evaporates: i too have a low opinion of HL

mark s, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

What's britilx view of mcguinness

The night before all about day (darraghmac), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

Very clever man.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

mixed

it's hardy out there for a Vardy (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

There is a horrible anecdote going around from the son of the founder of NI Mencap (a music editor of 30+ years' standing) that McGuinness said some very cruel, fairly eugenecist things about his learning-disabled brother, to his father's face. :-((

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

i'd say he has a few skeletons in the closet alright.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

for a "Marxist" I'm sure he had some unenlightened views on quite a few things

it's hardy out there for a Vardy (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:25 (seven years ago) link

not sure the provos were marxists (tho maybe he said he was, i don't know)

the marxist orgs were the OIRA (the "stickies") and the INLA

mark s, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

nah I was confusing/assuming, thanks for clarification

it's hardy out there for a Vardy (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

re deems' question: serious peace negotiations never need to be conducted between friends or, well, nice people

any end to war that isn't total defeat for one side means hostile murderous arseholes sitting down together at the peace table… and some arseholes turn out to be good at getting others to do the same

(which is obviously very easy to say from where i'm sitting: i know the person suzy's referring to, we used to work together, and, well, the price of peace being a general forgiveness you have no personal control over must be very hard to swallow)

mark s, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:49 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, it must be - classic case of one person's centrality being left out of the history written by the victors.

Also noticing a lot of peace process bros omitting Mo Mowlam.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

who do you mean by peace process bros? northern irish politicians? it seems reasonable enough, not to take away from mo mowlam, that while they wait to bury martin mcguinness his legacy, good or bad, might dominate the news, putting aside the general awkwardness some, on the republican side or otherwise, might feel about the roles of representatives of the british state.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 13:24 (seven years ago) link

I could imagine when he formed his unlikely "chuckle brothers" friendship with Ian Paisley that the great benefits (to mankind of course) of the eugenics movement would have been one of the subjects that they were both in complete agreement on.

calzino, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

This is relatively minor in the grand scheme of things but annoying:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39343971

May is going to announce that laptops and devices larger than phones are being cabin-banned from flights going via the Middle East - probably including the major transport hubs of Doha, Dubai and Abu Dhabi. It pretty much rules out working on any business flights to the Middle East or almost any going to Australia unless you're connecting in Singapore.

The only reason it's being done is the US is doing it. The only reason the US is doing it is to fuck over Emirates, Qatar and Etihad. It's protectionism - the US airlines can't compete on service or price but the government can inconvenience passengers of other services on their behalf.

The UK following that lead, despite BA having its main transfer hub in Qatar - is bizarre. I can't see how they could possibly justify excluding Qatar but including the other main regional hubs.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 15:43 (seven years ago) link

kindles (etc)? they are bigger than 'phones.

koogs, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

What's britilx view of mcguinness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fyCMffCj5c

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 21:16 (seven years ago) link

not sure the provos were marxists (tho maybe he said he was, i don't know)

the marxist orgs were the OIRA (the "stickies") and the INLA

― mark s, Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:31 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

when the adams, mcguinness et al crew got control of the army council the provos went very intentionally into branding themselves as national liberation strugglers in the left-wing tradition. quote from sinn fein policy paper of 1979:

"with James Connolly we believe that the present system of society is based upon the robbery of the working class and that capitalist property cannot exist without the plundering of labour; we desire to see capitalism abolished and a democratic system of common or public ownership erected in its stead. This democratic system, which is called socialism, will, we believe, come as a result of the continuous increase of power to the working class. Only by this means can we secure the abolition of destitution and all the misery, crime and immorality which flow from that unnecessary evil."

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 21:50 (seven years ago) link

That is remarkable from Partridge.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 21 March 2017 23:25 (seven years ago) link

"...looks like a clown without makeup" is one of the best put downs I've ever heard.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Wednesday, 22 March 2017 00:16 (seven years ago) link

Freedland on Goodhart.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/22/the-road-to-somewhere-david-goodhart-populist-revolt-future-politics

The division of people into 'Anywheres' and 'Somewheres' is embarrassingly inane. Even Freedland gets at some of what's wrong with it.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

a twat writing some bullshit about some bullshit a twat wrote

conrad, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 10:28 (seven years ago) link

A terrible thing to say about ILB.

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Wednesday, 22 March 2017 10:37 (seven years ago) link

shooting at house of commons?

conrad, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link

man attacked policeman and was shot apparently

conrad, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Reports of a car mowing down several people at Westminster Bridge

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Another thread for this I think?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Shooting outside Portcullis House/Houses of Parliament

Matt DC, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 15:00 (seven years ago) link

the fucking nick of galloway

http://www.westmonster.com/george-galloway-enters-mother-of-all-by-elections-in-manchester-gorton/

(writing a by-election diary for arron banks' website)

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 22 March 2017 19:45 (seven years ago) link

love this:

https://twitter.com/GallowayExposed/status/839181831467597824

(Mac Giolla was a marxist wasn't he? so the calling the Stalin-loving Galloway a "Trotskyist" presumably a calculated insult.)

soref, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7mNjZiV4AAD6Fd.jpg

mark s, Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:24 (seven years ago) link

idea for novel where dystopian future government interns swathes of political opponents on the pretence that they're participating in a reality show

it's hardy out there for a Vardy (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

fantastic

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

feel the words "novel" and "future" and "pretence" could be tidily swapped out there

mark s, Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:42 (seven years ago) link

Ben Elton's probably written it.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking of a good novel tho

it's hardy out there for a Vardy (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 23 March 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

idea for novel in which every detail of our current predicament has already appeared in a ben elton novel, along with how to escape said predicament, but no one read will ever the ben elton novel bcz by ben elton

mark s, Thursday, 23 March 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

the elton paradox

physicist and christian lambert dolphin (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 23 March 2017 14:01 (seven years ago) link

by robert ludlum

physicist and christian lambert dolphin (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 23 March 2017 14:01 (seven years ago) link

ukip back down to 0 MPs courtesy shortly-floorcross carswell

mark s, Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

Anothere Clacton byelection?

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

"Difficult test for Corbyn" lol

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:20 (seven years ago) link

he's going to sit as an independent rather than rejoin the tories, so I guess that means no byelection?

soref, Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

There wouldn't need to be one even if he rejoined the Tories.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

no, but he might feel obligated based on the fact that he chose one last time he switched parties, I guess?

soref, Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

last time he was disobliging a political party by affecting its voting tactics in the house; this time no one of such consequence is affected

mark s, Saturday, 25 March 2017 12:39 (seven years ago) link

it's kind of bizarre to think that UKIP got 12.7% of the vote in a general election less than two years ago and now have zero MPs

soref, Saturday, 25 March 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

If they could have less than zero MPs that would be even better.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Saturday, 25 March 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, they're over-represented in the European Parliament... oops.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Saturday, 25 March 2017 13:49 (seven years ago) link

They're over-represented in Westminster

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Saturday, 25 March 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

just checking i'm not going mad: the government thinks people shouldn't have the means to communicate privately with one another, and it's being reported like it's no big deal?

millwallreptile (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 March 2017 06:00 (seven years ago) link

It is bad.

One of the bad things is that BBC journalists, in interviews, are urging government politicians toward these positions, even when the politicians start off sounding more cautious and moderate.

the pinefox, Monday, 27 March 2017 07:38 (seven years ago) link

I think the impact was probably lessened by Rudd clearly not knowing what she was talking about / having not thought it through.

However, the presumption against privacy in this country at the moment probably means they could allow the Post Office to steam open all your mail to check if you were corresponding with Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi without causing too much fuss.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 27 March 2017 07:47 (seven years ago) link

The Telegraph is currently railing against Wordpress in an article titled "Apps that let extremists plot in secret".

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 27 March 2017 08:01 (seven years ago) link

"presumption against privacy" is exactly the phrase I was looking for to describe the current mental landscape

millwallreptile (Noodle Vague), Monday, 27 March 2017 08:06 (seven years ago) link

Can't imagine what British newspapers might have against secure encryption of private communications lol

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 March 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

just checking i'm not going mad: the government thinks people shouldn't have the means to communicate privately with one another, and it's being reported like it's no big deal?

Yep. In fact it's being reported like we are all ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE if this gives us pause in any way. Hooray.

iirc the government also thinks that any software written in the UK should not allow its users to encrypt any data without giving the government/other governments/hackers a back door, but assures us that the technology sector is very important to our post-Brexit economy. Because people (or big companies with data security obligations) will def be just as interested in buying a UK-made app (or big-company-data cloud storage platform) which lets GCHQ read their messages and 4channers put their credit card details on pastebin as the equivalent software made somewhere without a mandatory govt backdoor.

But it's all fine because people with extreme views and credit card numbers shall not threaten our drinking tea out of red, white and blue cups. Also, look everyone, over there, a new pound coin, how shiny.

a passing spacecadet, Monday, 27 March 2017 09:40 (seven years ago) link

We are our own worst enemy.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Monday, 27 March 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

looking forward to those new pound coins tbf. Who's going to be on them, Cecil Rhodes?

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 March 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

Who's going to be on them

The queen, m8.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 March 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

The Guardian is making noises about it, in fairness, as apparently is David Davis.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 27 March 2017 10:50 (seven years ago) link

DD has been a consistent critic of government snooping.

calzino, Monday, 27 March 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

must have something to hide

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 March 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

he does have that look of a cold blooded murderer tbf!

calzino, Monday, 27 March 2017 11:16 (seven years ago) link

just seen the new pound coin the usual rose leek thistle clover shite on it

conrad, Monday, 27 March 2017 13:28 (seven years ago) link

technically a binding contract </freeman-on-the-land>

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 27 March 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

thistle

best not mint too many of those ones eh

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 27 March 2017 13:40 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/28/diane-abbott-calls-on-left-to-back-free-movement-as-workers-right

^ A politican says stuff and I am not feeling like scratching my eyes out!

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 09:55 (seven years ago) link

it really is a shame she's the most hated politician in the country

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:02 (seven years ago) link

Not sure how you work that one out.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

y tho. I get that sending her kid to private school was nagl, but that aside all the criticism I hear boils down to "she's boisterous and sometimes steps in it", which afaict made Boris one of the most popular pols in the country?

I know racism and sexism inevitably plays a part in this but is there other stuff as well?

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:07 (seven years ago) link

No its mostly racism and sexism.

But mostly racism.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

I'm not a big fan of her either tbh.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:09 (seven years ago) link

She wasn't that much on my radar either way but her statements this year on immigration have been excellent. Whether Corbyn goes or not she must be in a senior position in any future Labour shadow cab.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

Tom, why? Asking not as some sort of raving Abbot fan (tho she's certainly the person I most often see putting views I agree with across in the right manner), I'd just like to know what the leftist case is against her.

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Never come across any convincing criticism of her that wouldn't apply to hundreds of other MPs.

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

I wasn't that keen, thought she was a bit of a self-promoter, and yes, a sort of Boris Johnson of the left, but she's certainly stepped up to the plate since Corbyn has become leader (better than Corbyn has, lol). Got a lot of time for her now. I calculate composotion of disdain for her at 80% racism 15% sexism 3% objections over personality issues, 2% what we might call 'legitimate' political disagreement.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:19 (seven years ago) link

Her politics are fine and always have been. But, you know, I would have said the same about Corbyn. She's never impressed me much personally though. Sending her son to private school was typical middle class Labour Party hypocrisy. Spending years as a left wing punchbag for (her good friend) Portillo and Andrew Neil was irritating but got her face on the telly, which seemed to be good enough for her.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:21 (seven years ago) link

particularly since the brexit vote, there have been so many occasions where she has seemed like the lone parliamentary voice of - if not sanity, then, say, basic human decency - on the subjects of immigration and racism, when the Labour left/soft-left/right have all been pretty useless. idk if that is something she will get more recognition for in retrospect, but a lot of her interventions it feels like if she weren't there to be saying this then NO-ONE of comparable prominence would be saying this.

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:25 (seven years ago) link

From what I've heard, her son didn't get into Stoke Newington School despite living in the catchment (it has always been seriously oversubscribed because it's a great school) and was genuinely worried about getting jumped into gangs at the school where he was offered a place (hence DA's coded reference to 'black mums going above and beyond' so she wouldn't denigrate the LA). Her child was the one who asked to be sent to City of London (which has large numbers of boys on bursaries). I cannot say I've ever heard a single POC in her constituency slag her off for his choice - it's mostly liberal white men who already hate her for being insufficiently attentive to whatever their needs are this week.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:31 (seven years ago) link

This is a bit of a left-twitter joke explained but its hilarious: https://anomiegeographie.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/the-jolyoncene/

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:33 (seven years ago) link

Beyond that I love this observation:

A decade ago, Alastair Campbell stalked Labour HQ behind the scenes, while Jeremy Corbyn spoke on a platform at the end of a march down Whitehall against Labour foreign policy in Iraq. At a protest on 25th March 2017, their positions were almost reversed, as Campbell took to the stage to oppose Brexit. British centrists have had to ‘go activist’ to defend their inheritance.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:37 (seven years ago) link

xxp even aside from the ppl who really hate her and rant about her on twitter etc, there does seem a more widespread tendency for ppl to treat her as a joke, or obviously second rate, which I think is unjustified. (which is not to critisise anyone here who's not a fan, but she definitely gets treated differently to other politicians). I do wonder what would have happened if she had stood for the Lab leadership in 2015 rather than Corbyn - if she'd been elected I think she'd have made a better fist of being leader, not sure how she'd have overcome the ‘’most hated politician in the country‘’ factor (also, even more hated than Corbyn in the PLP). I think she would have been able to present herself as a truly 'different' type of party leader, which I'm not sure is really something that Corbyn has done to most of the country, despite all the talk.

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

like, I don't think most voters see Corbyn as radically different from the average out of touch politician, they just see him as an average out of touch politician but more incompetent and useless

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:39 (seven years ago) link

Half of what I say is meaningless
But I say it just to reach you Jolyon

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

there does seem a more widespread tendency for ppl to treat her as a joke, or obviously second rate, which I think is unjustified.

Yeah I think the years as the Daily Politics' jolly comedy leftist have not helped here.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

The sympathetic profile of Abbott that I read (in the New Statesman I think? Might even have been linked to here...) portrayed her sending her kid to private school as something she agonised about for a long time (yes I am aware that she would say that) and ended up doing as her "one concession" to her private life vs her work in politics. It's obviously not great but I think as far as blemishes go 99% of Westminster must have worse in their records.

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Most of rage against Corbyn from right wing media (o hai tautology) is less about labour's poor polling, which they don't give a fuck about, and more about how a left wing leadership of the opposition means voices like Abbott's cannot be marginalized so easy.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

This Week is so unwatchably bad. but was it quite as bad when she was on it? maybe this is my memory playing tricks, but seem to remember slightly less screen time devoted to broadsheet columnists gooning around in stupid costumes in the 2000s incarnation of the show. (I blame twitter for this hateful capering, tbh)

'Baader-Meinhof effect''thing is otm re:Jolyons

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:49 (seven years ago) link

I used to think Abbott was a bit clumsy in presentation of policy even tho I've always broadly agreed with her. she's fully deserving of respect now for the reasons listed above, and the best of it is that I think she's gained this respect by just continuing to be honestly herself.

schools are a v tough issue. I don't think I could've sent my children to a private school but i'll happily accept that other people may have reasons where they feel they have to

millwallreptile (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

DA is extremely smart and admirably resilient, and a good example i think of a politician knowing how to bide their time, until events suddenly and unexpectedly turn their way -- her TV slot legitimating andrew neil was frustrating bcz it looked like a pol who'd always risked being treated as a novelty and a pet (inc.by her own party) willingly letting themselves be turned into a pre-shelved* he-said-she-said cartoon for the crappy purposes of a very bad kind of telly, but in retrospect it maybe wasn't the worst place to be sat when the time came and the moment called?

corbz by contrast also bided his time -- stepping up to the plate when the time came, a move i would not have credited a few months before and respect him for -- but is maddeningly diffident abt the powerplays he currently has a (surely one-time only) chance to unleash: i recognise that this scepticism abt power is built into his brand of politics (socialism-is-people's-democracy bennism)**, but if the PLP hasn't actually defeated him it has certainly harried him to a standstill, and this is partly his fault***

*(DA's long game of course offers succour to my portillo's-VERY-long-game theory)
**(i remain a benn-sceptic: a poshboy westminster insider playing at -- for him -- near-lifelong easy-option dissidence, justifying his cincinnatian quietism by handwaving the unreadiness of the masses to shift towards action) (the bennite failure to address the issue of europe except via head-in-the-sand refusenik stubbornness as a species of refusal to address the problems of the aftermath of empire: benn was a pedant about the UK's constitutional exceptionalism, but this exceptionalism hardwon via the blood and labour of the non-UK labouring classes, first as slaves, then as subjects of the empress, by which i mean the subjects-without-the-vote)****
***if benn was cincinattus, corbz seems to be fabius***** cunctator, committing to a win by waiting out his opponents
****i don't deny this stuff is hard to think through properly -- hence so many leftists either thinking it through badly and glibly, or not thinking it through at all
*****irony alert, but his approach to the Art50 vote is an EXACT mirror of harman's to the workfare vote

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

"Lol where did all the Jolyons come from?" jaunty left-wing Twitter is hugely annoying at the best of times but that link Xyzzz posted is a lot more than that and I think he undersells it if anything.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

(post structure^^^ reminds me that i invented the tweet-storm here on ilx, long years b4 twitter even existed :D)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

the jolyon thing appears to run into a wall the moment we recall that corbz is (a) called jeremy, (b) has a brother called piers

(cf also jarvis "common people" cocker: this isn't a posh-people tic, it's a teachers-have-children tic)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:14 (seven years ago) link

class ressentiment's rarely a good look but sometimes yr kneejerk defense mechanisms lie deep

millwallreptile (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:16 (seven years ago) link

haha as soon as i posted "teachers-have-children" as a semi-defence i started thinking of the teachers' kids at the various schools i attended: almost invariably irritating spoiled arseholes

of course from a certain angle this genre also includes me

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:20 (seven years ago) link

being christened James as the son of an upper working class Dad with aspirations for his kids who bought me a fecking briefcase when I started secondary school I learned a fair bit about the micro-distinctions of class and the cruelties they entail

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:37 (seven years ago) link

lesson 1: find the kid one notch posher than you and try make him the scapegoat

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

I am speaking from near-complete ignorance, as I was paying more attention to another country's politics for most of her career, but I'd be surprised if a black female leftist could rise far in the Labour party, particularly starting in 1987, without some leverage on the level of "I'm on TV a lot".

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

all this opprobrium towards teachers' kids and easy-option dissident poshboys is most upsetting

the regular-bloke line on DA is that she is an anti-white racist fwiw, and that is unfortunately not going to change

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:49 (seven years ago) link

i was lucky namewise: i arrived the year all the many marks sprang up like skeletons from the hydra's teeth (in one maths class there were five of us)

(i have never worked out who the kylie-esque celebrity patient zero was who encouraged all our parents admiringly to unleash the markspasm -- before the 60s it was quite a rare name)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy is a common-ish name, no? I sorta heard of Jo Maugham before but I didn't know it was short for Joylon?

I have much to learn about the UK before it breaks up

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy is not uncommon but still connotes a level of poshness in England I think

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

not that connotation is fair or rational but

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

Lolyon

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

Right, I suppose if I don't hear enough people being called [insert name here] = posh. So Joylon, Gideon. On and on. xp

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

being christened James as the son of an upper working class Dad with aspirations for his kids who bought me a fecking briefcase when I started secondary school I learned a fair bit about the micro-distinctions of class and the cruelties they entail

See you, Jimmy. Is James hoity toity?

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

kids at school seemed to think so, a bit

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

tho of course at secondary school you mostly get called by yr surname or variant thereof

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:03 (seven years ago) link

the briefcase was the killer, what were they thinking? me and my brother still commiserate with each other about this

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:03 (seven years ago) link

James not posh where I come from, despite all those kings.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:06 (seven years ago) link

for me jolyon invariably brings this (annoying but harmless) fellow to mind:
http://en.tintin.com/images/tintin/persos/lampion/C2042D1_en.jpg

(in OG Hergéian French ^^^he's called SÉRAPHIN LAMPION, which i can't begin to parse classwise -- meanwhile the only other travelling sales in fiction that i can recall is dorothy sayers' MONTAGUE EGG)

IMO most of this kind of material stems from dubious generalisation out of reasonably accurate first-hand empirics

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:07 (seven years ago) link

xp

my dad once told me that the scottishness of mine and my brother's names was deliberate, but he never really elaborated

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

i think nowadays having parents give you a briefcase to take to school is grounds for legal emancipation

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

To return to Diane Abbott on This Week, her Oxbridge chumminess w/ Portillo was nauseating enough but worse was she was never sharp enough to get the better of Portillo and Neil, who, week after week, ran rings round her. Two against one was unfair, of course, but her choice to pick up the appearance fees.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

tho of course at secondary school you mostly get called by yr surname or variant thereof

imo this is v antiquated now, and therefore posh. when i was at high school the fact that at my friend's high school they called each other by their surnames (along with the fact that the rugby team were socially at the top of the pecking order) was the damning evidence that despite both being comps, his school was way posher than ours and basically a private school

ogmor, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:13 (seven years ago) link

but yes > most of this kind of material stems from dubious generalisation out of reasonably accurate first-hand empirics < is definitely true, suspect a lot of this stuff is v localised

ogmor, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:14 (seven years ago) link

"Lol where did all the Jolyons come from?" jaunty left-wing Twitter is hugely annoying at the best of times but that link Xyzzz posted is a lot more than that and I think he undersells it if anything.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah its a good short piece around technocrats trying to do something like activism. The weird thing is actually those two poles seem to talk to each other in Greece under the Syriza banner, until it all fell to pieces. The name is a side-issue but it will probably dominate and overwhelm any of the serious point its trying to make.

Jo Maugham has already replied "the left can make fun of my name but I'll go ahead and change things/be the opposition" or some such. Twitter far-left mirrors his tweets with @dril posts, and in the meantime the world keeps falling apart.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

The Mark thing is absolutely mums with a Richard Burton crush c. Cleopatra who did not want to go with Richard as a name choice.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm v antiquated tbf ogmor :)

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

week after week

have to look a bit askance at someone who was watching week after week -- very first question come my revolution will be about thursday-night TV viewing, anyone admitting to the BBC's politics output will have their head on a pole so fast their eyes will still be widening

xp cleopatra came out when i was 3 so this seems implausible to the point of being uncanny

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:20 (seven years ago) link

Abbott's choice to take an unprecedented opportunity to be a regular visible presence in the media as someone like her - wouldn't fault that for a second (also bearing in mind she was replaced by another old white geezer).

Following Diane Abbott's departure from the show, Neil would joke that her leadership bid and later appointment as Shadow Minister for Public Health were part of her "insatiable lust for power".

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

On the rare occasions now that she makes an appearance on the show, Neil introduces her by saying "And back by absolutely no public demand whatsoever..."

Typical Beeb bias

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

Duncan Smith did not specify what “red tape” he wanted to abolish, but the Telegraph published a panel citing the EU working time directive as a law it would like to abolish, as well as regulations relating to bananas and to the great crested newt.

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

have to look a bit askance at someone who was watching week after week

This from the guy who watches The Good Old Days every week :-o Week after week was a slight exaggeration and it was more watchable with DA on it as opposed to Alan Johnson, who really was kicked about like old fitba' by Portillo and Neil.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

i remember arguing when galloway went on big brother that the idea behind the idea -- that modern politics very much needs to know how to work the seam of popular slebhood -- was by no means a bad one: the gorgeous one is and always was a degraded wasteman cockfarmer obviously, and his specific working of said seam developed not necessarily to his advantage, as they say…

but look where we are now, bigger-picturewise

the question has become: which formerly indispensible institutions and/or estates can you now and in the near future effectively end-run?

xp the good old days is on a FRIDAY tapping_head_wisely.gif

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:39 (seven years ago) link

Mark's long post with lots of *** notes above reminds me of Robin Carmody.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:40 (seven years ago) link

\o/ \o/ \o/

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:41 (seven years ago) link

In it, also: Mark S says that Corbyn

"is maddeningly diffident abt the powerplays he currently has a (surely one-time only) chance to unleash"

What are these "powerplays"?

Why doesn't JC or anyone else know about them?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:41 (seven years ago) link

powerplay one: don't leave the meeting until AoB is completed

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:43 (seven years ago) link

the Telegraph published a panel citing the EU working time directive as a law it would like to abolish, as well as regulations relating to bananas and to the great crested newt.

it's always fucking banana regulation with these cunts, like we've been living under the yoke of oppressive banana-regulation for so long that it was worth tipping the entire country into chaos to bring back our beloved british bendy bananas WHICH AREN'T FUCKING GROWN HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE

and the right-wing press suddenly claiming an interest in newts after decades of lolling at ken livingstone for the same thing is fucking infuriating

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

I agree that JC is diffident but on the whole I don't see what power he has.

If he does have powers that he could use for good then it would be good for someone to tell him about them.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

seem to recall from many years back in Private Eye that there might be some post-colonial economic shenanigans behind where EU bananas are sourced

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

and the right-wing press suddenly claiming an interest in newts after decades of lolling at ken livingstone for the same thing is fucking infuriating

I should've added that rest assured this passage from the Guardian's politics feed was swiftly followed up by one about KL bemoaning his McCarthyist victimhood.

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

re: oxbridge chumminess, being the only black British student from a state school in Cambridge at the time (after being repeatedly told to give up on that idea) makes me think of this as a survival strategy more than anything

Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

roughly this time last year JC was riding momentum's maximum, well, momentum -- in terms of massively (unprecedentedly) rising membership and a huge wash of money for the party

if he'd been defter (and less diffident) re intra-party manoeuvre (something i suspect he rather despises) he could have done significantly more to establish the first as a genuine new bloc in the party, and to ringfence some of the second for his own leadership office (which is now deliberately underfunded and understaffed, despite his being the reason much of the money arrived)

both of these would have led to public -- and possibly nasty -- fights, and would certainly have been portrayed as ugly and disgraceful powerplays, so there was a downside (but i think the downside of sidestepping them, perhaps bcz too just too trusting and nice, is now limiting him much more seriously, basically bcz materially)

they were powers he had access to -- if only via timing -- which he has essentially given away: the PLP is not a tactically adept body! but it is now in a strategically very powerful position, unfortunately

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:06 (seven years ago) link

tho of course at secondary school you mostly get called by yr surname or variant thereof

imo this is v antiquated now, and therefore posh. when i was at high school the fact that at my friend's high school they called each other by their surnames (along with the fact that the rugby team were socially at the top of the pecking order) was the damning evidence that despite both being comps, his school was way posher than ours and basically a private school

― ogmor, Tuesday, March 28, 2017 1:13 PM (fifty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sorry to go off topic, but I need a second opinion on whether this is correct

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

I have just read this.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/26/comic-relief-centre-politics-hard-questions

Critique of charity is OK, but not convinced by analogies between it and 'the centre'.

She also doesn't seem to remember that Comic Relief started in the Thatcher years; it isn't really a Blair-era phenomenon at all.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Bananas as a mark of the European Jackboot is of course an invention of one B. Johnson from his time as Brussels correspondent for .. the Telegraph.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:30 (seven years ago) link

comedy relief type projects reached a critical mass with live aid = geldof-bonoism, which is i think arguably a precursor to blairism (ie it's a counter-thatcher quasi-multicult phenom that blair felt comfortable straddling and deploying)

(the precursor = the secret policeman's ball, etc, was reasonably richly politicised, at least in its satirical targets, viz "secret policeman are bad"… )

post the geldof-bono move, big-scale charity stunt events were consciously depoliticised, to ensure widest possible support and money-gathering: this depoliticisation of, well, politics is generally considered a neoliberal phenom, hence, roughly, "blairite") (thatcherism wasn't a politics of depoliticisation, quite the opposite in fact)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:39 (seven years ago) link

mark s otm. Progresso delenda est essentially, and it's a great shame that Corbyn hasn't used the, ha, momentum of his leadership victories- especially the second, after which there could be no doubt how things stood- to drive these fuckin snakes into the sea. Instead, he's gone back to trying to work with the PLP, which has lead to all sorts of uninspiring vacillations, without reining in the traitors one jot.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:42 (seven years ago) link

this has always been the premise of Comic Relief: that you could talk about dire hardship one minute and have a joke the next, and the juxtaposition would be not just got-away-with-it inoffensive but deliberate and unifying: in our laughter, we show our shared humanity, and that’s what we’re going to use to mend this

Reminds me of THAT'S LIFE also

nashwan, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:43 (seven years ago) link

Red Nose Day was banned at my Catholic school. I can remember the headmaster saying "Cardinal Hulme has been collecting money for the African famine for far longer than these [spits] trendy comedians". So some wag put a red nose on the crucifix in the chapel and there was uproar.

calzino, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:45 (seven years ago) link

I understand the idea that charity looks proleptic of Blairism, but these particular cases (inc Live Aid) predated Blairism by such a long time, comparatively -- that it's not very reasonable to conflate them.

Bono now seems associated with Geldof and charity but he was only really a bit player for Live Aid and Band Aid, albeit one who 'seized his moment' both times - not an organizer at all, I don't think.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:45 (seven years ago) link

Didn't even turn up for Band Aid on TOTP, Paul Weller had to mime his bit.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

i agree conflation is confusing in terms of actual dates and actual history (and thus seemingly easily confuted): but i think the line can nevertheless be fairly clearly drawn (in fact it goes right through the middle of RATTLE AND HUM, a record i dislike more than you i believe

bono not only swiftly got on board, he elected himself chiefest among ambassadors of this approach to the actually powerful: and U2 were very much a vector for the depoliticisation of *irish* politics, a move with some good side-effects that blair can also somewhat take a bow for (until such time as the re-politicisation of same takes a dark turn, which it still well might)

as i said on FB, i recoil more from her ineptly opportunistic deployment of "hygge" than this conflation

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:53 (seven years ago) link

soref in the interests of science i asked my little brother, a sixth former who has grown up in different parts of the country to me, and he agreed, though not v strongly, said the only ppl he knew who did this had gone to relatively posher schools n.b. neither of us know many public school folk

ogmor, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:59 (seven years ago) link

authento-brag ^

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

*** RATTLE AND HUM, a record i dislike more than you i believe ***

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:06 (seven years ago) link

it is the source of ALL EVIL, forwards and indeed backwards in time

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

fwiw i was disappointed when i got my my middle-of-the-road scottish high school and neither teachers nor pupils used surnames like i'd been conditioned to expect by years of exposure to fictional schools

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:22 (seven years ago) link

if anything the general cultural move has been towards massive over-use of first names (by e.g. marketing bots that i haven't been properly introduced to, whose wheedling assumed familiarity i deplore)

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:27 (seven years ago) link

used to be you could kick a surname in the street

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:28 (seven years ago) link

AGREE WITH MARK S

the pinefox, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:29 (seven years ago) link

Or S, as he prefers.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Marky, as I call him.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:59 (seven years ago) link

as I've said before on ilx any superficial signifiers of authenticity in my life only serve to highlight how irredeemably culturally middle class/offhandedly noble my inner essence is

just surnames is an abomination, i can't hear it as anything but ironically respectful. full names are good and underused though

ogmor, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15:15 (seven years ago) link

*shudder*

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15:24 (seven years ago) link

for years i was only ever called by my surname at the various schools i went to.
i really grew to hate it, hence the complete lack of its use when i started my life online.

mark e, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 16:48 (seven years ago) link

bumped into a guy from school a couple of years back who couldn't remember my first name, so comprehensive was the use of surnames only in school

bomb diggy diggy diggy bomb diggy bomb (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 16:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah i think the only way surname-use indicates a posh school is if it's followed by Major or Minor

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 16:57 (seven years ago) link

surnames-only was what the catholic and private schools did "round our way"

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 17:03 (seven years ago) link

it pretty much surnames or surname-based-sobriquets only for male pupils at my school, iirc correctly using first names marked you out as posh and was considered soft and effete, it's really thrown me that there were places where the opposite was apparently the case

soref, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 17:07 (seven years ago) link

i know 30-something definitely not posh blokes who still only ever call each other by surname

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 17:08 (seven years ago) link

surnames only is very common on construction industry sites, or if not even just reducing everybody to "that cunt" over there, or sometimes you become "that fucker"!

calzino, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

weird I've def always though surname-only was a particularly private school thing

lex pretend, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 18:01 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile back at the semiotic monopole:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8A0agMW0AIfdwD.jpg

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 18:44 (seven years ago) link

aka @cursedimages_2 knows what time it is

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Is he standing on the Edstone?

Dan Worsley, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 18:47 (seven years ago) link

the Edstone winked out of existence the moment paul nuttall became ukip leader

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

currently orbiting Jupiter iirc

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 19:05 (seven years ago) link

*record scratch*
*freeze frame*
yup, that's me -- you're probably wondering how you all ended up in this situation

http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/lhc-sim.jpg

mark s, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 19:13 (seven years ago) link

The sympathetic profile of Abbott that I read (in the New Statesman I think? Might even have been linked to here...) portrayed her sending her kid to private school as something she agonised about for a long time (yes I am aware that she would say that) and ended up doing as her "one concession" to her private life vs her work in politics. It's obviously not great but I think as far as blemishes go 99% of Westminster must have worse in their records.

― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 11:44

The "Mao did more good than bad" thing bothered me quite a lot more.

Haven't read this yet but I haven't seen this posted. Thread was tough to load.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/28/opinion/why-brexit-is-best-for-britain-the-left-wing-case.html?_r=0

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:20 (seven years ago) link

alan johnson.... otm?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:43 (seven years ago) link

Nothing more middle classy than not being able to use surnames in a matey way maybe imo idk depends on surname

virginity simple (darraghmac), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:51 (seven years ago) link

xp. he quotes streeck, who I'm not very keen on.

good review in the lrb of streeck's "how will capitalism end", https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n01/adam-tooze/a-general-logic-of-crisis

gimp in wankouver (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:55 (seven years ago) link

I was always lucky that surname(y) is the dictionary definition for scruffy and old fashioned, but most people I worked with didn't know that!

calzino, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Most of the fiscal rules Johnson talks about don't apply to the UK given it has never been part of the Euro, but that's to be expected from the guy who celebrated his elevation to Shadow Chancellor by going "guess I'd better learn some economics lolz!!!"

There are several things about the EU that are both stupid and repellant but the situation in Greece is not going to be improved because of Brexit. The entire Lexit argument is fine in theory but requires an alternative reality where you don't consider the position of the left in this country, the current party in power or what they likely to do with this new 'control'. Hint - it isn't social democracy or Keynesian stimulus. But let's fast forward two years to when these guys are suddenly surprised they've opened the door to mass deportations or the destruction of any remaining workers rights in this country.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 07:08 (seven years ago) link

It's a different Alan Johnson http://fathomjournal.org/author/alan-johnson/

AlanSmithee, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 07:13 (seven years ago) link

bwahahahaha really??

that makes more sense..

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 07:18 (seven years ago) link

I think the phrase "left-wing case" should have alerted you to the fact that it wasn't the lovable Hull West MP

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:08 (seven years ago) link

Alan Johnson MP has been very happy to assume Man of the People credentials when it suits him and has never been the most ideologically consistent of former ministers so it did sort of make sense. That'll teach me to glance below the line occasionally.

The article is still delusional mind.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:21 (seven years ago) link

it comes down to the version of left politics that is just about taking principled stands and pragmatism be damned because you know you're pissing in the wind anyway I guess

oh good he's gone now i can take this off (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:30 (seven years ago) link

the left in Europe is playing by someone else's rule book in a rigged game.

Almost like... Brexit

carry on with the whole "once Britain leaves Europe, we'll have a wonderful opportunity to do things British governments and particularly Tory governments have never been interested in doing which other major EU players already do" though

so, today's the big day, eh?

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:34 (seven years ago) link

I believe the ceremony involves the British Ambassador going to Tusk's office, kicking him in the nuts, and dropping a salver of Ferrero Rocher on him as he writhes on the floor

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:35 (seven years ago) link

Start stockpiling Ferrero Rocher now.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:44 (seven years ago) link

we are really spoiling us

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:52 (seven years ago) link

alan "not the minister" johnson also an enthusiastic progwessive-eustonian supporter of the iraq war

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 08:53 (seven years ago) link

eek

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 09:03 (seven years ago) link

needs rechristening as the hardman left

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 09:06 (seven years ago) link

*Clicks on ILX Brexit talk*

*turns to my @dril bible*

wint‏ @dril 2 Mar 2014

ive never heard of this "europe" but it sounds like a big bunch of shit to me

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

People say Gulags/"working the fields" are bad, but think again please: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/28/landlord-fergus-wilson-said-coloured-people-leave-curry-smell

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fergus_and_Judith_Wilson

Fergus and Judith Wilson are both former maths teachers.

Having both failed to gain O levels in being human beings and treating other people decently they moved in to the buy to let market with the aim of providing affordable decent housing for all. An aim they appear to be singularly failing at.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

nice

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/94a0dee1dd5fc6c90c7fca029e1a4e0b5300b992/0_95_2821_1692/master/2821.jpg?w=620&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=f1185a2dcff52b4982c56cc1140d6f1a

has anyone who's not a total sack of shit ever worn the fabric fergus wilson's jacket is made from? it's indelibly linked in my mind with the worst kind of little-englander dipshit

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

he looks a bit like paul hollywood after a couple of decades of poor decisions

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:18 (seven years ago) link

Like moving to Channel 4?

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

re: lexit, I agree it's a terrible strategy for the UK right now and pretty much everything that's bad about the EU will become worse.

That being said, I did get very frustrated at the amount of British leftists who embrace the EU uncritically, like it's all about good will between nations, fighting xenophobia, etc. Particularly galling is the argument that it prevents Europe from falling into war, like we're all bloodthirsty savages and only a formal body can prevent us from succumbing to tribalist warfare. Especially when it's boiled down to "well, Germany hasn't started a war yet, so the EU's doing its job", like Germany wouldn't have very strong cultural, historical and pragmatic reasons not to do that, EU or no EU. Also just mostly oblivious to the Eurozone crisis and how it plays out - people occasionally know a bit about Greece, but that tends to be it. As an EU national living in the UK I had a very hard time summoning the kind of enthusiasm that ppl around me were showing, even though again I agree the decision to leave was catastrophic.

not people itt of course

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

the reaction of some people who seemed quiescent or complacent through years of post-Thatcherism rankles as well: this is the point where you decide to get all righteously indignant? cheers, excuse my shrugs.

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I've heard a lot of ppl say "hey the good thing about this is that now the left and conservative free market City types have something we can push for together" and yeah I'm not so sure that's so great.

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:48 (seven years ago) link

got a text from a friend at the anti-Brexit march on Saturday saying it was the most bourgeois march he'd ever encountered

as pathetic and stupid and profoundly depressing as Brexit is, there's also something uniquely unedifying about the Jolyons and co choosing this as their hobbyhorse for action

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:48 (seven years ago) link

or, like, Toynbee being all "hey we're on George Osborne's side now"

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:49 (seven years ago) link

strenghtens the "London political elites all the same" narrative, if nothing else

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:53 (seven years ago) link

xp and not xp

exactly. eventually you have to form coalitions of interest but these people have never been my natural allies.

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:53 (seven years ago) link

got a text from a friend at the anti-Brexit march on Saturday saying it was the most bourgeois march he'd ever encountered

Spanish woman I work with thought it was great, but she's a bit hippy dippy, hello trees, hello flowers.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

"better together" was always a rubbish slogan but its hidden deep ghastly truth is that together the intolerable crappiness evident on all sides was kinda cancelled out, or at least kept relatively constrained

"united i'll keep the worst of me locked away from public view" -- this is civics, i guess… or anyway was

(xp -- also coalition politics of course)

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

Lets bring back hanging for rogue landlords now we are free of Europe.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:16 (seven years ago) link

Neither Jolyon nor Moscow

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Especially when it's boiled down to "well, Germany hasn't started a war yet, so the EU's doing its job", like Germany wouldn't have very strong cultural, historical and pragmatic reasons not to do that, EU or no EU.

This sentence doesn't make a lot of sense? The reasons why there is a EU, and why the road to it started in 1945, are those same reasons. And obviously the two different effects of those reasons are wobbling in different ways 70 years later.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:25 (seven years ago) link

As an EU national living in the UK I had a very hard time summoning the kind of enthusiasm that ppl around me were showing

Entirely the opposite here - I was already largely pro-EU, largely through paying attention to "But the government have their hands tied by the ECHR", and the UK are more than putting in the work to keep it the more attractive option.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:27 (seven years ago) link

The narrative that the EU is there to protect the peace -- which was iffy anyway by 1960 -- has totally fallen apart given the way it holds a gun to countries that step out of line.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:40 (seven years ago) link

1957..

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:41 (seven years ago) link

the reaction of some people who seemed quiescent or complacent through years of post-Thatcherism rankles as well: this is the point where you decide to get all righteously indignant? cheers, excuse my shrugs.

White British person talking there.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Andrew, yeah, peace lead to the EU, the EU didn't lead to peace. Obviously an enterprise like the EU couldn't have been conceived in a time of warfare between European nations, but I don't think it follows that the EU is the only defense against a return to that. It's not like the European nations that aren't in the EU are constantly plotting to take over their neighbours, innit.

I lived in Portugal previous to moving to the UK, so I saw the uglier sides of EU economic policy firsthand. It's difficult to reconcile that with the idealised vision a lot of UK leftists have.

Really I tend to think the main problem with the European Union has always come down to lack of communication - from my experience it just means radically different things to people in Portugal, Germany, the UK, the Czech Republic...and of course it would, different countries different contexts. But there seems to be very little awareness of what it means outside one's country.

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

Sorry that was unnecessarily pissy but given the particularly harsh politics of immigration this has ushered in (or magnified), indignation is too mild a response if anything.

Like I agree with you in principle. The ongoing destruction of the welfare state is worse than Brexit, or at least it would be if the two weren't exacerbating one another, but it doesn't have that sudden cathartic cut-off point and it has been mostly done by stealth. It's the difference between death by a thousands cuts and a sudden guillotine dropping, and I can see why one seems more traumatic than the other.

Obviously the technocrats who are only now understanding what it is to be at the sharp end of a big political defeat are terrible.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:51 (seven years ago) link

and I guess it's the technocrats and the holiday home in Francers that I'm really pissy with - the Toynbees. but you're right, it's good to be reminded regularly of the ugly race politics that this is accelerating and legitimizing.

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

obvious point to make -- obscured in the lexit argts whether from the bennite english-exceptionalist perspective or not-the-minister pseudo-left bien-pensant croissant-munchant virtue-signalling -- is that the EU is a big baggy cluster of clashing opposites running uneasily along yet attempting, in its maddening secretive sluggish way, to attempt to set out technocratic solutions for genuine problems

but "technocratic" very often = "don't bother us with yr democratic wishes, we are EXPERTS, you are mere PUNTERS"

for example greece-as-longterm-problem = how to fold economically straitened (and currently unfruitful) outlier regions into the whole w/o simply establishing a permanent unaddressed funding transfer* between member states (from successfully well off to intrinsically poor)

such transfers are currently not really allowed by the EU, but happen anyway bcz they need to happen (everywhere when i say EU I may well mean ECB or some such, look it's fiddly and this is ilx, i'm not on trial)

(EU said we will give you "a fvckton of mostly german money if you abide by our requirements abt transforming yr region into one that makes money rather than just sucks in eurotransfers 4EVAH", greece said "we will take all this money but frankly fvck yr so-called rules, also give us much more money", germany said "hang on we have voted NOT to give any more money", eu said "OK here IS a lot more money, tho much less than you asked for or needed lol, btw our rules are now even more punishingly stringent and arguably counterproductive", greece said "fvck you fvck you fvck you fvck you fvck you wait we have nowhere else to go for such money ok then fvck you but we accept ps fvck you")

(viz there is both an element of unresolveable conflict AND an element of managed undemocratic solution here, some of the latter according with EU regulations norms and practices, some of it frankly bending them) (bending is good! but also risky and tricky, and generally the most counter-democratic of all)

the problem elements don't at all go away if the top-down technocratic management bits are simply stripped out or shut down: of course bcz this is my foolish politics i wd HOPE that the widening of democratic institutions will be able eventually to tackle these problems, but we need first of all to be honest abt what the problems ARE

(this^^^ is btw why all poshkid chatter of gulags and stalinstalgia etc is so ludicously lolsome: bcz here's what the revolutionary socialist states were bad at -- being even slightly honest w/themselves abt the problems they faced) (surprise surprise: democracy is how you air and explore probems)**

at the moment the uk europhiles are not being honest w/themselves abt the realities of europe-as-top-down-structure -- but the brexiteers are more deluded still

(the lexiteers are mostly choosing to sit on the margins saying "our turn next", which is fine if yr a tiny splinter group far from any hope of power, but is like super-sucky if yr actually a party in official opposition, sorry corbz) (i remain a benn-sceptic)

**the underlying issue of how to achieve honesty is minimally adequate media, which in the uk especially we seem a long way away from

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:14 (seven years ago) link

apologies maostalgia is funnier than stalinstalgia, my post = fail

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

Glasnostalgia
A feeling of longing for a time when America had a single, well-defined enemy and Reagan was president.

damn u urban dictionary

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:26 (seven years ago) link

In other news The Daily Trollegraph is Andy Coulson's new PR client.

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:31 (seven years ago) link

a fox in every henhouse

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

Experts setting out technocratic solutions would be fine - if they worked.

Annoyingly they only work to the extent it keeps the show (precariously..) on the road..

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

Ah I'm not suggesting it's the only defense, but it's both a totem and a canary in the coal mine. And yeah it uses trade as the glue (and as carrot, and as stick), with the liberal effects that come with it - I'd rather if comity between nations sprang forth naturally from the breast of all myself.

And fair point it does vary per site, the Irish story of my generation (rafts of my friends happy to declare themselves Europeans first) is no doubt affected by considerable EU investment in our youth.

Not sure if Julio's actually clear what a gun is..

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:36 (seven years ago) link

problem we* actually have to solve (by defn *can't* be solved technocratically) is that expertise** and honest communication*** currently go together like water and phosphorus

*i don't mean ilx (except i kind of actually do)
**when burnham wrote "the managerial revolution" (1941) he wrote it as an ex-trot with stalin etc admiringly in mind
***communication being a two-way thing obviously

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:45 (seven years ago) link

People are avoidably suffering and dying in Greece and other austerity-battered countries and that's the fault of the EU and its response to the crisis, but comparing it to a war still feels facetious and stupid.

Obviously the EU has been hugely imperfect and the cuddly band of nations thing feels ludicrous given what's actually happening, but 50+ years of peace is an enormous achievement given the history of the continent. Whether that peace is/was likely to hold given the current approach to keeping the band together is another thing entirely.

I suspect the technocrats are right about Brexit and it isn't going to be metropolitan hummus drinkers who suffer.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

Also lol why would you hire a PR adviser who managed to destroy one of the oldest newspapers in the country through generating bad PR? If this is a technocracy then bits of it have very little regard for technical ability.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:53 (seven years ago) link

It's a PR move by a different PR firm hired by Coulson's own PR firm to make the Osborne thing look better.

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'll agree that the gun to the head metaphor is gilding the lilly a bit - nations always have the option to, haha, pull a brexit, and the reason this never gains traction in the Eurozone crisis countries is we know that would spell economic disaster much worse than what has already happened.

Would still be very hesitant to identity the EU as responsible for 50+ years of peace; surely this is down to factors that, again, tie into the creation of the EU but would still be present otherwise - namely the cold war/eastern bloc and the various wirtschaftswunder in different Western European nations. There was no longer any geopolitical reason for conflict after WWII and afaict there still isn't - even if the worst comes to pass and we arrive at some insane far-right dystopia surely this would result in European nations marching hand in hand to defeat infidels in the Middle East long before they'd turn on each other?

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

It's not like the European nations that aren't in the EU are constantly plotting to take over their neighbours, innit.

uh, subs check this

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:04 (seven years ago) link

mass media's woes in respect of the technics issue fit somewhat into their own path-determined bubble -- but in some ways is advance guard of wider problems

given the mass deskilling that desk-top publishing (and wapping) enabled, several layers of expertise were lost to the industry, in which were embedded all manner of tacit wisdom abt how newspapers interacted w/their readership -- grizzled old subs who'd worked their way up from paste-pot boy etc and knew how to edit on the stone, now replaced by glib young college grads w/new wave haircuts and tony parsons shoes, who had a DEGREE in MEDIA and cd quote DICK HEBDIGE and liked KIND OF BLUE and blah blah

everything swiftly went to the (isle of) dogs -- telegraph is basically now the barclay twins' crap fanzine

(sorry i am right now puzzling thru the good and bad effects of 60s and 70s countercultural media: still unwilling entirely to pull a "god this was all a horrible waste of time wasn't it?" as have quite a lot emotionally invested in it, plus a kickstarter fund i am not quite ready to embezzle** for the Greater Revolutionary Good)

**j/k contributors the CORE OF THE NEST EGG is RING FENCED

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:05 (seven years ago) link

that's de-skilling rather than desk-illing OR IS IT 😫

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:06 (seven years ago) link

xxxp That's an interesting speculation about endgame of European/western hypernationalism being a revival of the Crusades, if you like, rather than internecine war among the rich countries.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:07 (seven years ago) link

RIP

https://www.speakerscorner.co.uk/media/image/Des-Lynam-P.jpg

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:10 (seven years ago) link

wait don't we blame wogan?

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

just checking in, have ukip disbanded yet

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link

Arguably a lesson of the times is that anything good is going to be a cluster of clashing opposites held in check by a more solid construction.

No wait, that's a pie isn't it? Mmm, chaos pie.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

xp no but Douglas Carswell was on TV just now talking about reaching out to the 48%

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:19 (seven years ago) link

Jolyon and the Jing Jang Jong

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:19 (seven years ago) link

xp lol fuckin oddball

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

if anyone can unite the 48% it's political pinball douglas carswell

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:22 (seven years ago) link

tbf he's reigning uk champ of this facial expression

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

he does have an unfair advantage tho by dint of having a face that seems partially melted on one side

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

no but Douglas Carswell was on TV just now talking about reaching out to the 48%

To what purpose? Other than 'keeping Douglas Carswell in a job'?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

He's not a single-issue politician: keeping him on TV is also close to his heart.

(It was a subtitled big screen in office building atrium as I was passing)

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:41 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'll agree that the gun to the head metaphor is gilding the lilly a bit - nations always have the option to, haha, pull a brexit, and the reason this never gains traction in the Eurozone crisis countries is we know that would spell economic disaster much worse than what has already happened.

The EU will make sure the UK isn't getting a nice deal out of this otherwise several countries would take this option.

Whether I know what a gun is (and you know I'm a peaceful person and never held the thing!) what happened to Greece was different to Art 50 - they had to take the only deal on offer as they wanted to stay in the EU - or to try to work wiht the EU.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

in centuries to come, fancy paintings of this historic moment will be, er, painted:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8FZvMcXkAAzW5U.jpg

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:03 (seven years ago) link

*just moments later, tusk petulantly knocks union jack stands over and shrieks w/frustrated super-villain rage*

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Just uploaded from my crates:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg3kenARW0c

mike t-diva, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:06 (seven years ago) link

The A50 letter suggests the government are planning to use security expertise and intelligence access as the main intimidation tactic selling point in post-Brexit deal-cobbling.

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

From a reporter on Twitter:

Labour's Kelvin Hopkins tells Theresa May he is celebrating Article 50 as it will "make possible the socialist future" he has always wanted.

I do not get these lexiteers at all. Is he delusional? Whatever the future, Labour's chance of handing Britain an socialist future are zero iirc.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:31 (seven years ago) link

actual letter printed in ransom-note graphics (like trump's to merkel), hence the secrecy re the delivery

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:33 (seven years ago) link

tbh given johnny rotten's thumbs up they shd have projected it in this form on dover cliffs

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:38 (seven years ago) link

exiting the eu allows uk to pursue socialism glabally

conrad, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:39 (seven years ago) link

lal

conrad, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:39 (seven years ago) link

gunter glieben glauten glaben

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:40 (seven years ago) link

ich möchte glauben

conrad, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Labour's Kelvin Hopkins tells Theresa May he is celebrating Article 50 as it will "make possible the socialist future" he has always wanted.

I do not get these lexiteers at all. Is he delusional? Whatever the future, Labour's chance of handing Britain an socialist future are zero iirc.

Christ. Arguably more deluded than the 'Empire 2.0' lot on the other side of the floor ...

Steve Reich In The Afternoon (Against The 80s), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:17 (seven years ago) link

i get that it's delusional, particularly now, and that this isn't the way to go about fixing things, but (t'other) alan johnson's critiques of europe in the linked article wayyy up there sound entirely accurate to me. the eu is locking generations of europeans into misery and hardship as a structural feature of the system.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Thornberry the only Labour frontbencher joining in the lolz there.

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:24 (seven years ago) link

and it's THOSE 'values' theresa may has in mind in that video, imo

xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:24 (seven years ago) link

A friend has made this... thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aotgKFPBqrA

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 18:30 (seven years ago) link

even if the worst comes to pass and we arrive at some insane far-right dystopia surely this would result in European nations marching hand in hand to defeat infidels in the Middle East long before they'd turn on each other?

Absolutely. I mean there were a few friendly scuffles between European countries during the Crusades of course, but nothing major.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 18:46 (seven years ago) link

The Guardian has an article on leave voters in my current place of residence, which contains possibly one of the dumbest quotes I've ever read:

Joy proudly tells of how his family goes back all the way to Hastings in the 11th century. “The concept of being governed by an unelected body would have been absolutely abhorrent to anyone in those days.

Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:31 (seven years ago) link

surely satire

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:34 (seven years ago) link

lol what the shit

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:35 (seven years ago) link

this is the kind of thing you'd be looking for if you were graun journo talking to leave dafties, mustve been manna from heaven for the journo

gimp in wankouver (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:38 (seven years ago) link

isn't it the dim echo of a norman yoke argument? it was a fairly commonplace belief in the 18th and 19th century that society before the arrival of william the bastard (in the late 11th century) was free and lovely and democratic if you were of yeoman anglo-saxon stock

(it's a confused belief: dan snow off of the telly recently taught me that the normans ended anglo-saxon slavery when they invaded)

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

oh joy

a Brazilian professional footballer (wins), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

what did the normans ever do for us

gimp in wankouver (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:40 (seven years ago) link

^^^they did this

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:40 (seven years ago) link

isn't it the dim echo of a norman yoke argument? it was a fairly commonplace belief in the 18th and 19th century that society before the arrival of william the bastard (in the late 11th century) was free and lovely and democratic if you were of yeoman anglo-saxon stock

seems unlikely, his surname is Joy, which assuming that's the family he traces back to the 11th century, comes from French, so he'd be a Norman.

Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:43 (seven years ago) link

All reminds me I just bought The Wake and am soon to read it, seems a relevant work for these times

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:46 (seven years ago) link

on that Dan Snow BoH program when it kept showing the two historians jauntily talking up their chances of victory from a William/Harold tactical POV - it wasn't good.

calzino, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:47 (seven years ago) link

lol he's covering his tracks! like when the prison guards dress as prisoners as the liberating army arrives over the hill

anyway, some of the mythological detritus of 18th and 19th century radical activism has ended up in anti-EU rhetoric, esp.as you find it in towns with a lot of old history (and lots of crankish self-taught amateur historians)

xp there were three historians! harald hardrada had one too

mark s, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 19:50 (seven years ago) link

his surname is Joy

Week is just full of them.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn confirms that Labour would vote in parliament against a Brexit deal if it does not meet the party’s six tests. But he says he does not want the UK to leave without a deal, and insists it would be in everyone’s interests to continue the talks.

You can smell the skin of that banana from here.

nashwan, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Oh ffs, not bananas again.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 21:51 (seven years ago) link

The Guardian has an article on leave voters in my current place of residence, which contains possibly one of the dumbest quotes I've ever read:

Shoulda stayed in Walthamstow. Or gone to Specsavers.

Warren's Treat (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 29 March 2017 23:33 (seven years ago) link

The bloke in the top photo in that article is so rooted in the 70s that he's wearing a Superstars t shirt.

koogs, Thursday, 30 March 2017 03:09 (seven years ago) link

xp idg the Specsavers ref, but I do need a new pair of glasses actually. I wouldn't go to Specsavers for them though, I've done that before and they were shite.

Can't afford Walthamstow any more which is why we had to move somewhere cheaper.

Colonel Poo, Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:58 (seven years ago) link

hastings residents possibly keen to revive their once thriving smuggling industry

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:12 (seven years ago) link

One in the eye for Remoaners etc

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:15 (seven years ago) link

the words "great repeal bill" contain the essence of everything horrendous and terrifying about theresa may.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:23 (seven years ago) link

it's about time they pulled their fingers out and brought back the Corn Laws, I'm sick of these foreigners coming over here with their cheap corn

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:31 (seven years ago) link

Yes, this Bill seems and sounds awful.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:31 (seven years ago) link

just adding the word "great" to it, like to make it similar to the great war or the great british bakeoff, everyone join in, the great repeal bill is here, it won't be easy but we'll all muddle through in the end! we always do!

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:33 (seven years ago) link

anything in history called 'the great' is invariably shit. the great war, the great depression, the grest fire of london, all rubbish. not to mention great britain.

xp ha yep

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:34 (seven years ago) link

the tories are their own brand of innocent smoothie.

https://hat4uk.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/workie211015.png

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:38 (seven years ago) link

a kinder, cuddlier iron fist which which to crush the poor

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

emmy the great

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

grebt repeal bill

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:43 (seven years ago) link

"Hey everyone! It's Workie, the workplace pensions mascot!"
"Workers are disposable cogs in our glorious neo-liberal economy!"
"YAY WORKIE!"

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:44 (seven years ago) link

the words "great repeal bill" contain the essence of everything horrendous and terrifying about theresa may.

OTM. What's Disraeli saying about it?

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

workie the workplace pensions mascot says: 'lol you'll never be able to retire you fucking peon, you'll die alone in the poorhouse and be fed to the dogs'

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:49 (seven years ago) link

retiring makes workie sad!

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:55 (seven years ago) link

I think the fact that it sounds like Great Reform Bill is one of the things I hate about it.

I very much agree with the hatred for the name Great Repeal Bill, expressed here.

And probably its content and effect, too.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Question: people were talking recently about a blog about 'Jolyons' -- I did not see the link -- can someone post it?

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

Holy hell at Workie.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 March 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

Millwall Britain sounds like a keeper.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 March 2017 10:50 (seven years ago) link

internal govt report into public's reaction to Workie:

On whether people liked Workie, the report said "perceptions of Workie are polarising".

Only 34 per cent of those surveyed liked Workie while 35 per cent disliked him. The remaining 27 per cent were "neither".

The report noted 25 per cent of those spoken to were in the "strongly dislike" category.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/furry-workie-monster-85m-year-9420645

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:03 (seven years ago) link

"Workie creates a sense of empathy among viewers by being non-threatening and an odd ball that is being ignored.

"Many respondents said they feel sorry for Workie."

One business, however, suggested Workie should "get stroppy" if workers ignored him in advertising.

strongly agree that they should go with this "Workie's mad as hell and he's not going to take this anymore" angle

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:06 (seven years ago) link

Workie's been around what 18 months and some people are only just noticing. Questions will be asked on whether the big lad is really up to the task.

nashwan, Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:17 (seven years ago) link

i did see him when he launched but just came to mind itt

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:21 (seven years ago) link

I've been quietly thinking "what a terrible campaign" since it started but the big lad's too affable to really want to get the boot into him

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

Workie's been around what 18 months and some people are only just noticing

next phase of the workie rollout is higher-profile: you awake to find workie at the end of your bed in the middle of the night. as you scramble to understand what's going on, workie yells 'WHEN YOU PAY IN, YOUR BOSS PAYS IN TOO' then leaps through your bedroom window and vanishes into the darkness

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:27 (seven years ago) link

you open the boot of your car to find workie squashed inside. as you reel back in shock, workie shrieks '7.5 MILLION EMPLOYEES HAVE NOW BEEN AUTOMATICALLY ENROLLED AND ARE SAVING INTO A WORKPLACE PENSION' before disappearing over the garden wall with a sleek, catlike grace

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:31 (seven years ago) link

you raise the lid of the toilet to find workie's wide-eyed face staring up at you from the bowl. 'DON'T IGNORE THE WORKPLACE PENSION, GET TO KNOW THE BENEFITS' he bellows, before reaching up to the handle and flushing himself away

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Thanks Bananaman.

I understand that the name is unusual but not sure it's fair to tar people's politics with it. This was probably said above.

tbh I ultimately think if these people are getting involved and doing what they can, it's all to the good.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:37 (seven years ago) link

I think it came out of Corbyn bros on twitter getting annoyed at 'Corbyn only appeals to posh Islingtonites' talk coming from, well, barristers called Jolyon.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

I think people who want the Labour party to abandon socialism and ignore the working class would be better off not getting involved or doing what they can.

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

I thought they wanted Labour to ignore socialism and pander to the working class by sounding really racist?

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 March 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Or is that a different lot? I get all these knobs mixed up these days.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 March 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

iirc Joylon G advocates a "pander to the working class by sounding really racist" policy, Joylon M is more of a "Corbyn has betrayed the left by not standing up for liberal values" type.

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Ken Livingstone has claimed there was at one point “real collaboration” between the Nazis and Jews, ahead of a hearing on whether he has brought the Labour party into disrepute.

at this point I can't see how Labour expelling Livingstone would be anything other than a boon to Corbyn, if they don't get rid of him this time it's surely only a matter of time until he says something else objectionable and this whole mess starts all over again?

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

though if they expell him I guess he might step up the offensive comments, and Corbyn would still be damaged by association, especially if Corbyn is unwilling to clearly distance himself from Livingstone (which I imagine he almost certainly would be)?

soref, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

I am pretty sure that Jolyon M, whatever else he does, has not said anything racist or appealed to racism.

He is hostile to Corbyn, but I can't tell if that is for 'policy reasons' or just 'electability / effectiveness reasons'. I think the latter is understandable but don't really agree with the former.

I am a bit dubious about people who are not politicians (eg: JM) saying 'politician X is pathetically ineffective' as we don't really know how hard it is or what one should really do to be more effective. And JM has not been elected to anything.

He is anti-Brexit, anti-May, anti-BJ, anti-Gove, anti-UKIP, anti-Farage, and I agree with these positions and think it is good to make as much common cause as possible with people who hold them.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Literally the only reason we are talking about this guy is because he's called Jolyon.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

DC: true, but he was a speaker at the rally the other day - it's true that he has moved into the political sphere somewhat and is trying to have influence.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:00 (seven years ago) link

Mordy - other than a group of particularly vociferous Labour partisans most people probably don't hate him, it's just that hardly anyone thinks he's particularly competent, and being able to project a veneer of competence, even when you're leading the country off a cliff, is basically the only thing that matters any more.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:01 (seven years ago) link

surprising number of people seem to buy into the moronic soap opera narrative that the media pretends is politics

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

The divide is between people who base so much of their politics over Brexit and people who do not.

He is anti-Brexit, anti-May, anti-BJ, anti-Gove, anti-UKIP, anti-Farage, and I agree with these positions and think it is good to make as much common cause as possible with people who hold them.

― the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 13:37 (one hour ago) Permalink

If you stop this at Anti-Brexit that is actually enough for Jo Maugham (all of the other in the anti- list above are either pro-Brexit or carrying it out) (and his name is NOT the sole reason why we are talking about him, its just something to colour the picture). That Joylon tweeted (yesterday iirc) urging people to register to vote in the local elections and to vote for candidates that are anti-Brexit - so you could end up voting with a pro-austerity Tory (or who held other awful views) who was friendly to Europe!

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:08 (seven years ago) link

I don't think that, in practice, someone who wants to vote against Brexit is likely to vote for a Con candidate. Very few Cons are openly friendly to Europe now.

I can see that if applied, this idea could produce a surge of Lib Dem votes.

Possibly part of the idea, then, would be for this to put pressure on Labour to be more anti-Brexit, like the Lib Dems.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:15 (seven years ago) link

It's true that it's a pity that Brexit distorts and occludes so many other political issues now. In fact this is one of the many bad things about it. It's a massive distraction.

But it's not surprising that it is influencing people's political thinking a lot, because it conditions so many other issues.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:21 (seven years ago) link

I only said Tory as an example (no doubt Joylon loves Kenneth Clarke even though he "closed hospitals for breakfast").

Lib Dems supported austerity in a coalition government but you know that's ok they are making the right noises on Europe.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:24 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't want to vote for them. But if it was a practical choice between voting Con and voting LD, I might vote LD.

That's normal for any 'progressive coalition' perspective, as in Jeremy Gilbert. I agree with Gilbert's ideas on that issue.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:28 (seven years ago) link

I should revisit what Gilbert says on it. Have a lot of time for him.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:31 (seven years ago) link

we've had 20 years of no choice but Con or LD

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:38 (seven years ago) link

SMDH at the idea that electing anti-Brexit local councillors is going to change anything at the moment.

Matt DC, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:41 (seven years ago) link

It's the new craze that's taking the nation by storm

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:43 (seven years ago) link

No, it's not going to change much. But it's still good to vote in local elections.

The bigger problem is that local councils' job has been made almost impossible by 'austerity' policy, as far as I can tell. Which makes you wonder who would want to be a councillor.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

people with a long-standing need to be photographed pointing at street furniture

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:46 (seven years ago) link

town halls up and down the country full of people who spent their adolescence practicing their 'grave disapproval' face in the mirror in preparation for photo duty on pg 17 of their local newspaper

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:50 (seven years ago) link

likes to wear outsized gold chains, hates rap music

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 16:01 (seven years ago) link

deep-seated desire to serve the community thru the medium of corrupt property development

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 16:07 (seven years ago) link

people with no real friends

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 16:08 (seven years ago) link

people researching an upcoming Ben Elton sitcom

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

people who really enjoy closing nurseries, old people's homes

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 16:11 (seven years ago) link

Which makes you wonder who would want to be a councillor.

This estimable thread illustrates, if not fully explains: Local councillors

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 March 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

It does !

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 March 2017 17:39 (seven years ago) link

pothole inspection fetishists

Choco Blavatsky (seandalai), Thursday, 30 March 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

Great lost Fall title.

Dan Worsley, Thursday, 30 March 2017 21:42 (seven years ago) link

people with a long-standing need to be photographed pointing at street furniture

― Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:46 (six hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I wanted to be able to click a "like" button then.

djh, Thursday, 30 March 2017 22:40 (seven years ago) link

if we go to war with spain it's really gonna fuck up my summer holiday plans :(

tony orlandoni, cheese engineer (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 31 March 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

surprised the Remain vote was so overwhelming there, always assume sunshine expats are the lowest of the low, politically

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Friday, 31 March 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

like I could imagine them all voting to leave the EU without thinking for 2 seconds of where that might lead. suppose that's more likely among the Costa del Retirement crew maybe.

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Friday, 31 March 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

They typically go to Spain to shop iirc.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 31 March 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

“an implacable, marmoreal and rock-like resistance”

for goodness sake, STFU BJ.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Noodle Vague and ShariVari, you guys seen that Guardian video thing about British pensioners in Spain? I have to assume the journalist intentionally went after the most loathsome people he could find, aside from the main interviewee and some of the younger people, but it was still pretty blood-boiling...

Daniel_Rf, Friday, 31 March 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

totally offtopic but..

It seems remiss that Nazi Germany never occupied Gibraltar considering how strategically important it was to Britain in WW2. Sorry I'll stfu now and nip over to wiki.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:01 (seven years ago) link

probably would've fucked off Franco I guess

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Friday, 31 March 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

haven't seen that vid Daniel, will hate-watch over the weekend

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Friday, 31 March 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

Per Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltar#Modern_history

During World War II, Gibraltar's civilian population was evacuated (mainly to London, but also to parts of Morocco, Madeira and Jamaica) and the Rock was strengthened as a fortress. The naval base and the ships based there played a key role in the provisioning and supply of the island of Malta during its long siege. As well as frequent short runs (known as 'Club Runs') towards Malta to fly off aircraft reinforcements (initially Hurricanes but later, notably from the USN aircraft carrier Wasp, Spitfires), the critical Operation Pedestal convoy was run from Gibraltar in August 1942. This resupplied the island at a critical time in the face of concentrated air attacks from German and Italian forces. Spanish dictator Francisco Franco's reluctance to allow the German Army onto Spanish soil frustrated a German plan to capture the Rock, codenamed Operation Felix.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:07 (seven years ago) link

I'd forgotten that Franco was one of them type of entente buddies that magically disappears when it's their round!

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:15 (seven years ago) link

“an implacable, marmoreal and rock-like resistance”

for goodness sake, STFU BJ.

― calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 13:35 (four hours ago) Permalink

BJ or LJ?

xyzzzz__, Friday, 31 March 2017 18:33 (seven years ago) link

I'd have used 'petrous' rather than 'rock-like', or perhaps 'Saxonian' if you want the classical pun. BJ is an amateur

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 31 March 2017 18:42 (seven years ago) link

or perhaps 'Saxonian' if you want the classical pun

explain this to me lj

-_- (jim in vancouver), Friday, 31 March 2017 18:43 (seven years ago) link

something to do with the New wave of British heavy metal band, maybe!

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 18:47 (seven years ago) link

haha

-_- (jim in vancouver), Friday, 31 March 2017 18:48 (seven years ago) link

'saxum' = Latin for 'rock'

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 31 March 2017 18:50 (seven years ago) link

I can respect a learned application of obscure language or whatever, but Boris does it in a very wooden try-hard manner and lacks flair in my unqualified opinion. But as a recent infamous ILX troll showed, even 7-8 years of higher education at a venerated institute such as Goldsmiths won't polish some turds.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:06 (seven years ago) link

oh now I'm curious

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 31 March 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

the latest White Dorke sock I meant.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:20 (seven years ago) link

hahaha that surely isn't him?

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 31 March 2017 19:21 (seven years ago) link

I might have mis-read some ILX history, but I thought he was unmasked on the ask raccoon thread.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:23 (seven years ago) link

and I'm sure they both had a penchant for Slick Rick. But apologies if I'm wrong and slandering someone here.

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:25 (seven years ago) link

oh shit you might be right

was the new guy def RT? seemed to be slightly different, idk

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Friday, 31 March 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

This could be one for the ILX Department of Forensic Sockiology Investigations. Without the search facility working it is very hard to process all the various strands of this case!

calzino, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

was the new guy def RT? seemed to be slightly different, idk

No doubt whatsoever.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Friday, 31 March 2017 23:13 (seven years ago) link

gibraltar vote is hugely remain less bcz they shop in spain than that a significant proportion *work* there (they're not a retiree community), which requires daily freedom of movement

mark s, Saturday, 1 April 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

Wight Dorke seemed to be just another trash DiS hipster with cool opinions at the time, if this is true his descent into full batshit reactionism is almost heartening

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Saturday, 1 April 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

tbf with bitter, stalkery trolls the personal politics are an irrelevance, i doubt he is your actual EDL simp

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 1 April 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

Joey Ayoub 🌹‏Verified account @joeyayoub Mar 31

The breakup of the UK should be decided by a random Indian or Pakistani official

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:04 (seven years ago) link

LOL @ hopeless Spiked guy being all Hard(man) Brexit on that terrible programme w/ Nicky Campbell.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

... talking of posh trolls.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

Oh fuck, they've dredged up Obergruppenfuhrer Mark Littlewood.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:10 (seven years ago) link

https://s30.postimg.org/9i3nf7f41/IMG_0072.jpg

https://s11.postimg.org/rxaithkwj/IMG_0071.jpg

Looking forward to the proposed reintroduction of the £1 note, smallpox and Myra Hindley.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:13 (seven years ago) link

Time to bring back these bad boys...

http://www.mirfieldmemories.co.uk/images/coins/five_pound_note1944.jpg

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:19 (seven years ago) link

nobody but a liar or somebody who was mentally ill would describe a passport colour as a source of humiliation

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:22 (seven years ago) link

https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/register/flags-and-heraldry.htm

Title
Flags and Heraldry All-Party Parliamentary Group

Purpose
To promote the flying of the Union Flag and flags associated with the UK, British territories, dependencies, the Commonwealth, heraldry, British symbols and related issues.

lol Tom Watson is one of the vice-chairs. also, a guy from the SNP, which seems a little...odd?

soref, Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:22 (seven years ago) link

is Heffer calling for Great British Scientists to drop the use of SI measurements btw?

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:23 (seven years ago) link

these people are so abject

a Brazilian professional footballer (wins), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:32 (seven years ago) link

there's something to be said for having enough money that you can wear a lot of tweed, sit in the pub all day and just make up any old shite that comes into your head without having to understand what the world outside the snug looks like

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 April 2017 09:34 (seven years ago) link

No, you see we're the ones that are completely out of touch with the real concerns of normal, decent people.

ultros ultros-ghali, Sunday, 2 April 2017 10:32 (seven years ago) link

Simon Heffer is not normal.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Sunday, 2 April 2017 11:05 (seven years ago) link

> nobody but a liar or somebody who was mentally ill would describe a passport colour as a source of humiliation

Colour-blind too. Who sees an EU passport and thinks "pink"?

koogs, Sunday, 2 April 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

Gonna get a pink cover made up to put the blue one inside.

nashwan, Sunday, 2 April 2017 12:30 (seven years ago) link

Koogs is correct. The passport is red.

the pinefox, Sunday, 2 April 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Another Banks interview interesting and frustrating and depressing in equal measures
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/02/arron-banks-interview-brexit-ukip-far-right-trump-putin-russia

nashwan, Sunday, 2 April 2017 14:33 (seven years ago) link

it is PUCE

http://www.macmillandictionary.com/external/slideshow/full/Puce_full.png

mark s, Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:16 (seven years ago) link

burgundy iirc

a Brazilian professional footballer (wins), Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:20 (seven years ago) link

(apologies for the #ACTUALLY there, but in my mum and dad's little 60s notebook of "hilarious and/or alarming things our small children have said" there was documentation of tiny me correcting a startled and/or disgusted guest about the colour of of a balloon -- "no the balloon is NOT purple, mrs wiggins, it is PUCE" -- so just assume i cannot help myself faced with this colour, and feel justified solidarity with mrs wiggins re the ghastly nature of the s children)

(burgundy is the colour of a PASSPORT TO PIMLICO, i'll stop now)

mark s, Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:24 (seven years ago) link

I used to read that this was puce - which is a different colour again, more like 'shocking pink' perhaps:

http://gingkopress.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/product_images/blast-1/c01.jpg

the pinefox, Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:26 (seven years ago) link

to be honest yes that is closer to puce as i understood it aged 4: the slab of colour i linked above is puce as understood by macmillan dictionary

mark s, Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:30 (seven years ago) link

also even in the early 60s not many balloons were burgundy (outside pimlico)

mark s, Sunday, 2 April 2017 15:30 (seven years ago) link

The BLAST colour is fuschia.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Sunday, 2 April 2017 16:17 (seven years ago) link

Brain's Navy is far weaker than it was during the Falklands war but could still "cripple" Spain, military experts have said.

Rear-Adml Chris Parry, a former director of operational capability at the Ministry of Defence, has called on the Government to "appropriately" invest in Britain's military capacity if it wants to "talk big" over Gibraltar.

It came as a former Tory leader suggested that Theresa May would go to war with Spain to defend the sovereignty of the peninsular just as Margaret Thatcher did with the Falklands.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 April 2017 16:46 (seven years ago) link

Well hard Brexit.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 April 2017 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Oh for fuck's sake

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 2 April 2017 17:33 (seven years ago) link

Gibraltar voted remain because they could see this stuff was likely. (As well as working in Spain - the folks I met in Gibraltar were horribly right wing, on average, but that doesn't mean their interests align with the agenda of the Tories.)

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Sunday, 2 April 2017 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Just imagine May attempting to go to war with an EU nation and NATO member at the same time as crucial Brexit negotiations.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

it's so patently fucking ridiculous that i'd right it off as dementia on Howard's part and tasteless journalism on the other side

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

however it might give us an accurate measure of how deeply this country's fucked if we could get a headcount on people who sincerely agree with him

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:19 (seven years ago) link

British passports are burgundy, with the coat of arms of the United Kingdom emblazoned in the centre of the front cover.

||||||||, Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

burgundy is of course a french invention. a pressing priority for the uk government must be to spin up puppy farms across the country, providing the british bulldog skin which will cover all post-brexit passports

jobs for all in the vast and roiling puppy-leather tanneries of theresa may's britain

stanley weebeard (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:24 (seven years ago) link

At least we have our dignity as a nation back:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/liam-fox-meets-philippine-president-rodrigo-duterte?CMP=twt_gu

idk whether this is worse than May loudly condemning a fictional ban on Easter eggs while glad-handing the Saudis but thankfully there is no need to choose.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 12:20 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/apr/04/disabled-students-future-independence-payments-cut-benefits

The restrictions on PIP payments and the stress of the new assessment, and length of the appeals procedure is effectively making it impossible for many disabled people to pursue degree courses. I'm not familiar with it, but this must be a breach of the EU Human Rights act - not that it seems to be a big deal in the current ghastly climate.

Last month – five months after placing an appeal – Boulle had her PIP rejection overturned at tribunal. But the gruelling process has taken its toll: her condition is exacerbated by stress and she’s been collapsing from additional pain, whilst she’s also had to begin treatment for panic attacks. Several weeks after winning her appeal, Boulle still hasn’t received her backdated benefits.

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

still don't know anybody who hasn't had to appeal to get their PIP

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

My partners niece is a young adult with Down's Syndrome and I think she might have got it at the first attempt, her mother says her money is actually slightly more than the DLA was.

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

I saw a local guy with mental health problems and possibly an autism spectrum type recently, saying they had stopped his money and he was getting rid of his dog, because he can't afford to keep it anymore. He looks like he is physically/mentally deteriorating. It is brutal the way some people are being treated.

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 12:38 (seven years ago) link

Still, what a disgrace about the National Trust and the Easter Egg Hunt, eh?

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 13:25 (seven years ago) link

Well anything that evokes the 1940's (or is it the 1840's?) should be ring-fenced or encouraged (child poverty etc) by this fucking Tory Vicar's daughter.

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Got stopped by a key103 journo in Manchester today collecting vox pops from joe public on "the big story of the day". This turned out to be the national trust rebranding their egg hunt with Easter now omitted. I mumbled some stuff about not being religious, c of e country blah blah. Had granddaughter with me so threw in my anti chocolate easter takeover rant. Then refused to go through it all again for the microphone due to inarticulate. Probably says more about me than the state of the nation. But sharing is caring.

wtev, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

Lol Tom d got here while I was slow typing.

wtev, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 13:48 (seven years ago) link

http://img.kiosko.net/2017/04/04/uk/sun.750.jpg

the editorial inside apparently refers to the spanish people as "donkey rogerers"

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Moyes pic deliberately cropped to make him look like Gibraltar

Django Chutney (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

Lol. Sweet 15 quid deal to... Spain! tho.

idk whether this is worse than May loudly condemning a fictional ban on Easter eggs

This nonsense has reached your shores v quick. We've been dealing with this FAKE NEWS for several years now. Politicians crying wolf (even or prime minister) about a ban that does not exist in the real world.

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 14:50 (seven years ago) link

The word Easter is featured quite prominently on the NT website Egg Hunt thing, btw.

https://easter.cadbury.co.uk/find-an-egg-hunt/?utm_source=nt&utm_medium=mainsite&utm_content=article1&utm_campaign=easter2016

ailsa, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:08 (seven years ago) link

not like the right-wing press and the CoE to make things up

Neil S, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

hey not all eggs need to conform
https://twitter.com/bnmrsl/status/849224131623124992

nxd, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:12 (seven years ago) link

What sincere Christian believer would not want the language and imagery of Christ's resurrection to be plastered all over the aggressive marketing of chocolate crap to kids by a Kraft Foods subsidiary.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

Any easter egg that isn't packaged in a reproduction of Grunewald's Isenheim Altarpiece is dead to me

(also fuck Nat Trust 4 tacky shilling)

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:40 (seven years ago) link

If you turn that Help For Heroes egg around there's a big picture of a mosque on the back.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:45 (seven years ago) link

no doubt it's halal chocolate too

Neil S, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:46 (seven years ago) link

lol @ thumbs up from wounded silhouette

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:46 (seven years ago) link

OsamaThumbsUp.jpg

Neil S, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Enjoying this rumour and any other which jabs into the Safe Pair Of Hands image:

Civil servants and former special advisers believe that May’s swift response is due to her longstanding antipathy to Helen Ghosh, the National Trust's director-general, with whom she clashed when Ghosh was permanent secretary at the Home Office and May was Home Secretary.

-- http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/04/why-did-theresa-may-scramble-comment-national-trust-easter-egg-row

Would like to know TM's view on the "information" board her pals in the DUP insisted the Trust up at the Giant's Causeway, saying never mind all that geology stuff on the other boards bcz it is an equally valid viewpoint argued by many people that God put the pretty hexagons there 6000 years ago

a passing spacecadet, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 18:32 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/itvnews/status/849312890477846529

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

I thought even most of the PLP (at least for the moment) had stopped directly asking him to step aside, so he's quite right to let rip.

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Ken Livingstone suspended from Labour for another year... but not expelled.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 4 April 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Didn't expect any contrition from the idiot, but please at least stop talking: "No-one should be suspended for telling the truth."

calzino, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 20:03 (seven years ago) link

Fucking Gibraltar, fucking eggs

Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

what if gibraltar modarn day?

barbary apes hav ipad

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

the implications as outlined at the bottom of the piece are frightening - victims of hate crime will no longer report to the police, so basically we're giving nazi thugs a free pass to do their worst

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

but so long as it gets the home office numbers down, who gives a shit amirite?

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 10:20 (seven years ago) link

Would've thought that there are already a lot of unreported crimes because of this as a prospect, contemptible as it is either way.

nashwan, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 10:32 (seven years ago) link

maybe give p**i bashers some free nectar points if a victim is found to have irregular immigration status

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 11:00 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy Newmark‏ @Jeremy_Newmark

I understand Shadow AG Chakrabarti believes Ken's post NCC remarks & lack of contrition are possible grounds for new investigation

now pretty much just resigned to everything the Labour party does being a complete farce tbh

soref, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Its all a farce. This is David Runciman, expert in Politics, expressing a wish to wind the clock back to 2010

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 20:30 (seven years ago) link

One thing I don't like about that article is, it seems to repeat the wisdom that George Osborne speaks for 'liberal Britain'.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:15 (seven years ago) link

the strange rebirth of etc

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:21 (seven years ago) link

runciman isn't generally a fool but that's a very odd piece: i didn't think "going back to 2010", i thought "going back to 1981 and the LIMEHOUSE DECLARATION" (i actually looked up his wikipedia to see if he was a whiskered old SDP trooper, but he's much too young, he was only born in 1967) (it's possible that earlier generations of runcimans were SDP enthusiasts, of course)

the osborne/hunt paragraph is i think is primarily a clever flourish that fails to come off: he's identifying "liberal britain" with remain and then saying this tendence has no obvious leaders on left or right (which is true), and demonstrating the claim by noting that two of the leading pretenders -- osborne and hunt -- have quit the game entirely (which is also true, but i think the rhetorical balance is more bullshit than insight)

basically the piece is arguing that labour should dissolve itself for the good of country, constitution and everything else -- which is just magical thinking, since labour is not going to dissolve itself

mark s, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:36 (seven years ago) link

not so much "pretenders" as "kings-over-the-water" (and he's dispelling the fantasy, except he's then replacing it with a bigger and more bizarre fantasy)

mark s, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:38 (seven years ago) link

weren't you talking about private-schoolers trying to be spokespeople of the left? runciman's good but he and i share the unsecret unmeek unshame

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:40 (seven years ago) link

well, i don't think runciman IS presenting himself as a spokesman for the left here, he's trying to imagine a space in which the sensible centre can once again lead us to the sunny uplands of something or other

mark s, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 21:45 (seven years ago) link

(one of the maddening things abt the SDP in its pomp was that it was PURE CATNIP to political scientists and psephologists -- i guess bcz of the chance to watch an Historical Political Realignment in real time -- so as well as observing and predicting they all became uncritical drooling fans and members and excitedly announced labour's demise every week for six years, until David Steel finally did the decent thing and stabbed David Owen viciously in the back… a sustained realignment has continued to remain elusive, blairism notwithstanding)

mark s, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 22:00 (seven years ago) link

Osborne hasn't really left the game, really..

It seems utterly ludicrous to say to someone "well just leave" in almost any situation, but especially here when what that someone has NOT been doing for the past two years is shifting one little from the leader's seat -- and Corbyn is all tenacity and staying put. Runciman sounds utterly clueless here.

A feature of UK and Euro politics in the last 5-10 years are those little parties that shift the ground. They don't gain outright power (in Europe bcz so much politics is done by coalition and other parties won't work with them) but they don't need to, as centre ground parties adopt some of their policies and much of the rhetoric already. UKIP are a very successful pressure group.

So in that sense I don't see why these centrist parties shouldn't just keep plugging away -- they may produce policians that could get more votes, if not seats -- and they should try and shift the conversation and policy their way. The instability of the current climate seems permanent so there should be all sorts of openings.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 22:39 (seven years ago) link

'Sensible Labour' twitter journalists/commentators scrambling to condemn free school meals is quite something.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 6 April 2017 08:32 (seven years ago) link

well, i don't think runciman IS presenting himself as a spokesman for the left here, he's trying to imagine a space in which the sensible centre can once again lead us to the sunny uplands of something or other

The Sensible Centre represented by George Osborne and Ruth Davidson. Nice.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:00 (seven years ago) link

xp you have to remember that these people love means testing more than a smile on the face of their new-born children

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:18 (seven years ago) link

Kind of curious how long Steve Bell will keep bashing us over the heads with his rapier wit about how people are being awfully mean to Ken Livingstone.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:26 (seven years ago) link

it's probably some kind of conspiracy

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:36 (seven years ago) link

Mike Buchanan, chair of the The Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference, representing leading private schools, said the proposals on fees would hurt "hard working, dual income families who are working very hard".

Is this sort of McNultyesque sentence construction accepatable at private schools or what?

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:48 (seven years ago) link

evidence if we even needed it that "hard-working" as an adjective is more dogwhistle than descriptor

mark s, Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

John Gray will criticise pretty much any political position but this contains some truth even if I don't agree with all of it (the bits about Scotland seem particularly spurious):

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/04/liberal-britain-has-nothing-say

Matt DC, Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

I agree with Tom D -- it is a bad sign (in a forest of bad signs) that 'progressive liberal' now includes George Osborne who spent several years being one of the major hate figures of every progressive person in the UK. And Davidson I think not much better.

the pinefox, Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

much as I instinctively distrust and dislike Gray he is often otm when describing what's wrong with things

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:41 (seven years ago) link

part of the problem with progressive liberalism is the vacuousness of that concept "progressive". this is why I bang on about New Labour people not being allies of socialism, because they are and always were more naturally allies of the likes of Osborne. nebulous labels bring nebulous politics, the broader you spread your coalition the more enemies you end up trying to pal up with

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:44 (seven years ago) link

more hunt-fluffing i see

(from gray, not anyone here)

mark s, Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

James Meek's essay on Cadburys in the new LRB is typically brilliant on the complications of supposedly left parties signing up to apparently prog-lib enterprises
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n08/james-meek/somerdale-to-skarbimierz

Stevie T, Thursday, 6 April 2017 10:56 (seven years ago) link

They're just bourgeois people who want gay people and POC to be just happy enough not to complain about them.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Thursday, 6 April 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Mark Reckless has defected (refected?) to the Tories.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 6 April 2017 12:11 (seven years ago) link

Feckless

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 6 April 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

A former winner of the World Nominative Determinism Challenge Cup, currently held by Robby Mook

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 6 April 2017 12:26 (seven years ago) link

somewhere in a stormont corridor, a forgotten james brokenshire weeps

mark s, Thursday, 6 April 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link

Michael Fabricant was robbed.

Matt DC, Thursday, 6 April 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

James BrokeNCYDE

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Thursday, 6 April 2017 15:34 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-39504338

there's plenty of dickery on either side of the term-time holidays debate but lol at Lady Hale telling it like it is with her measured use of the phrase "obedient parents"

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 16:12 (seven years ago) link

I've had 2 absentee days this week due to early morning meltdowns, where I couldn't in good conscience send him onto the transport in a violent mood and scaring the bejesus out of everyone else on there. The school is 20 odd miles away and to be quite honest, what they provide isn't worth the long journey on public transport anyway - the home schooling my partner used to do was better. When the arsey letters from them about attendance arrive - I just launch them straight in the bin.

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 16:31 (seven years ago) link

when some twat from the Department of Ed says "even a few days missed school can affect a child's results" i think to myself "maybe you should sort out your terrible fucking system then"

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 16:34 (seven years ago) link

do they seriously think our kids don't tell us about the week at the end of every term when they watch DVDs all day while the teachers are finishing their marking?

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 16:36 (seven years ago) link

word

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 April 2017 17:08 (seven years ago) link

p sure there were considerably greater number of days i spent at school where i learned nothing (especially post primary school) than there were days were i learned something. also whenever this subject comes up i keep hearing a teaching representative state that all the evidence shows that even a days missed schooling can have a detrimental effect on a pupil's achievement but they never seem to cite these studies.

pandemic, Thursday, 6 April 2017 17:40 (seven years ago) link

how about the fact that you make us do YOUR job at on OUR time (i.e. homework) means we get to do a little of OUR JOB (i.e. raising our kids) on YOUR time? thx

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 April 2017 18:22 (seven years ago) link

Feel as though everyone who might want to take their kids out of school for a bit gets painted as if going to disneyland whereas in fact cf. calzino's post

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:22 (seven years ago) link

For the sake of balance though parents like that do exist and imagine you had to teach their kids, or getting death threats at parent's evening because you've tried to stop their kid bullying other kids etc etc etc

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:28 (seven years ago) link

as i say, dickery on both sides, some parents give zero fucks about their kids's educations. but the police state response to that is ugly as.

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:40 (seven years ago) link

I had a recent arsey phone-call from the school when we took him to an autism friendly Romeo + Juliet showing at the Playhouse. It had already been discussed with his form teacher who regarded it as an educational excursion and said no probs. But for some reason it automatically sets in motion some mechanism where some arsehole has to phone me up and read me the riot act. Excellent use of resources in this austerity era of course.

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:50 (seven years ago) link

I'll desist from any more of this, it should be on another thread - but just wanted to get it out!

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

i think there was a "what the fuck's up with the education system?" thread years back but couldn't be arsed to look for it

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:00 (seven years ago) link

No need to desist, I'm getting an education here as a non-parent and it's all very relevant imo

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:20 (seven years ago) link

Did youse all have good attendance records? Maybe ask in the posited separate thread if it gets goin

virginity simple (darraghmac), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:41 (seven years ago) link

skived a *lot* between 13 and 17. social services etc. wd be interested in a thread.

Fizzles, Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:44 (seven years ago) link

Same except not sent as opposed to skived and uh well rural irish social services lol

virginity simple (darraghmac), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:45 (seven years ago) link

cd xpost with the work ethic thread as well tbh.

Fizzles, Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Nothing degenerate I could do as a teenager could outshine my mum who got caught breaking into a bakery in Kilbrew at the age of 12 and ended up in care. But I did have a dedicated social worker and would leave school most days straight after morning registration and we had sourced the 67 pence for 10 Berkley Superkings so we could look cool instead of learning!

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:07 (seven years ago) link

i've previously owned to up to being compelled to carry a briefcase so

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link

My older brother had one when he went to high school as well, but weirdly he pressured my mum for it himself. But he actually found a briefcase clique amongst his generation!

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:29 (seven years ago) link

I didn't personally skive whole days very often but I was the go-to guy for excuse notes because I could imitate adults handwriting.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:30 (seven years ago) link

with my most mild-mannered latin teacher i'd sometimes watch a session of cricket rather than attend class

an uptempo Pop/Hip Hop mentality (imago), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:32 (seven years ago) link

lol!

calzino, Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:34 (seven years ago) link

(xp) Ditto

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:35 (seven years ago) link

... not really.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:35 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson is backing Trump's air strikes.

The government has said it approves but won't participate.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 7 April 2017 09:32 (seven years ago) link

do they seriously think our kids don't tell us about the week at the end of every term when they watch DVDs all day while the teachers are finishing their marking?

― Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 17:36 Bookmark

never will i forget the (thirtysomething, fairly grumpy) physics teacher who brought in a home-taped vhs of ren & stimpy episodes

r|t|c, Friday, 7 April 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

good man

my ex used to tell a top story about being bollocked by one of her more confused teachers because she told her she couldn't turn a video over to watch the other side

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Friday, 7 April 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

don't really know where to put this but kind of exasperated over lefty friends who are so far onto Putin's dick you'd think he was running the soviet union

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 8 April 2017 07:01 (seven years ago) link

You mean because he's not 'the west'?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 8 April 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

(As in, you mean people favouring him without thinking just because he's cast as the opposite to 'the west')

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 8 April 2017 15:54 (seven years ago) link

yeah exactly but also kneejerk fondness for the USSR i suspect

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 8 April 2017 16:13 (seven years ago) link

Yeah it's a distinct problem, sort of artefact from the 90s I guess

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 8 April 2017 18:50 (seven years ago) link

I could have sworn I heard Salmond saying "the teutonic plates are shifting" on Marr earlier. It probably wouldn't be the most hilarious misspeak, but that would be almost a Tony Soprano A- standard malapropism there.

calzino, Sunday, 9 April 2017 14:42 (seven years ago) link

Many years ago, I joined a FB group called something like "a GrOuP FoR PeOplE WhO LiKe SlAyEr, NickElback, NirVana aNd LiMp BizKit", and as a result got added by a girl from South Africa. It was kind of cool seeing her life - she studied journalism, has become a published journo over there, does a lot of good work for social justice and against islamophobia (she's muslim). Anyway at one point I started seeing RT links shared on her wall a lot, and she posted some declaration by Putin going "we will always fight for the rights of the Palestinian people" with her commenting "this is why we love him".

It bummed me out more than the other times I've seen RT news/Putin boosterism amongst clueless leftists because a) she's an actual journalist and b) she seems to have her heart in the right place, while a lot of the other people I've come across kinda just wanna go "WAKE UP SHEEPLE" regardless of the actual issues.

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 10 April 2017 10:34 (seven years ago) link

I guess 'Russia' just has a certain counter-cultural cache or something - due to the old Cold War binary scheme?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 10 April 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

I think "enemy of my enemy" is part of it and Cold War nostalgia/skepticism might play a part for some people too, but I also think Russian media has been very smart and savvy the past decade or so - RT, especially, jumps on any cause that could make the West look bad (many of which are leftist*), they had those billboards in London with pictures of Bush and Blair leading the war in Iraq and a "this is what happens when you only hear one side" tagline. They've placed themselves as the opposition to the "mainstream media" as well. A lot of the people they manage to recruit with this stuff I think are way too young to have much of a stake in Cold War era stuff, they've grown up with the USA as the one hegemonic world power.

Of course at the same time they're also incentivating the far right across Europe, but somehow that cognitive dissonance doesn't bother people.

* some friends who work for an anti-detention organisation got a call from RT; they told them to fuck off

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 10 April 2017 16:09 (seven years ago) link

RT has roughly the same viewing figures as Welsh-language local news shows iirc. Russia probably picked up a fair bit of support from sections of the left during the Iraq war but I honestly don't think I have met anyone who was 'pro-Putin', other than my extensive network of old Russian ladies, in years. That includes all the Russia geeks I know. idk, maybe my dad likes him.

The key thing is that hardly anyone on either side is particularly interested in Russia other as a canvas to project their own imagination on. It is easy for the left and right to dismiss most reporting as inadequate / biased, almost nobody learns Russian at school, it's still kind of a pain to visit, relatively few people do a it of business there, etc, so you can just make it up according to your ingrained biases.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 10 April 2017 16:23 (seven years ago) link

It's not really about viewing figures though surely, it's about shareable content. The people I know who try to convince me of Putin's greatness (mostly online, though it has happened irl too) don't tell me to watch a TV channel, they show me a video they saw on facebook.

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 10 April 2017 16:27 (seven years ago) link

I honestly don't think I have met anyone who was 'pro-Putin'

Was in a bar in Edinburgh last night when a fight broke out - well, one guy took a swing at another guy and broke his glasses - the aggressor standing up and saying to the other guy, "Right, ya Putin bastard, ootside noo!" before being bundled out.

― Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 2 January 2017 14:31 (three months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Monday, 10 April 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Xp, most of RT's shareable content is just repackaged reports from other news organisations around the world. It is also pretty light on overt Putin boosting these days.

Sputnik is much more aggressive but has very limited reach.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 10 April 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

I like this case for universal welfare provisions, and against means-testing.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2017/04/08/aaron-bastani/free-school-meals-for-all/

the pinefox, Tuesday, 11 April 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

'Favourite' bit of that was his little 'I don't know enough about French politics to comment although I am sick of people calling Le Pen racist' remark which sums up the mindset of these libertarian cunts as well as anything.

nashwan, Saturday, 15 April 2017 17:44 (seven years ago) link

The policy announcements from Labour this past week have been good recently - just need to diligently keep plugging away.

Looking a bit over in France and Melanchon there seem to be ideas that could be bought over here (and they seem to have been bought over from the Latin American left). I'd like to see this mapped.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 16 April 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

diligently plugging away is wholly insufficient

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 14:04 (seven years ago) link

The election is scheduled for 2020. Pace yourself.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 16 April 2017 14:17 (seven years ago) link

what are you advocating 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨

conrad, Sunday, 16 April 2017 14:43 (seven years ago) link

Corbz could double up with a hologram, it seems to be working well for Melenchon!

calzino, Sunday, 16 April 2017 15:04 (seven years ago) link

More hats.

nashwan, Sunday, 16 April 2017 15:06 (seven years ago) link

Now 47, Hilton has lost none of his restless, bouncy energy, and talks flat-out for our whole journey. I want to know what a nice, green liberal is doing promoting Trump on Fox, but my questions seem to strike him as typical of the left’s lamentably lumpen way of looking at the world. I’ve got Fox News all wrong, he says. “It’s the only place where there is actual political debate going on in America.” When I ask if he didn’t wince to see veteran Fox presenter Bill O’Reilly mocking the hairstyle of congresswoman Maxine Waters (he called it a “James Brown wig”), a suppressed smile dances round his mouth. “I just think people make jokes, say things, you know.” What Trump said about grabbing women by the pussy “was disgusting, yes. But let’s be honest, it’s not just Donald Trump that treats women with disrespect and sexualises them.”

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 16 April 2017 15:39 (seven years ago) link

things may perhaps happen between now and 2020. merely diligently plugging away gives the government a free hand.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Lots of the bad stuff that has already happened wasn't voted against by about 80% of the PLP you know, caek.

calzino, Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:00 (seven years ago) link

yes and that's one of the many reasons why plugging away is definitely not good enough?!

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:02 (seven years ago) link

ok 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 so you suggest it would be better if labour were, like, a lot better or something - got ya

conrad, Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:03 (seven years ago) link

if the choice is between praising "diligently plugging away" and being terrified by the idea that that's the best we've got to expect between now and 2020 then i'm on team terrified.

i don't have the answer, but then i'm not leader of the opposition.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:07 (seven years ago) link

“It’s the only place where there is actual political debate going on in America.”

If anything this is the lumpen olde view. If we're post-truth we're post debate.

nashwan, Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:31 (seven years ago) link

team terrified you should get some t-shirts made up

dissenting members of the plp could wear them

probably get on the telly in the papers

then we'll see some improvement

conrad, Sunday, 16 April 2017 16:45 (seven years ago) link

i'm on team terrified

https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1485048/jeremy-corbyn-john-mcdonnell.jpg?w=736

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 16 April 2017 17:15 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/rcDfZTB.jpg

conrad, Sunday, 16 April 2017 17:24 (seven years ago) link

too bad the only are "i think the plp are great" and "i think corbyn is great and plugging away is fine because ... governments are only actually allowed to implement policy in election years"?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 19:00 (seven years ago) link

*options

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 16 April 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

There is a third option:

Russian Telegraph‏Verified account @RT_1917 2h

Hundreds of #Bolshevik supporters gather at Finland station in #Petrograd as train with @VLenin_1917 expected to arrive in 1 hour #1917LIVE

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:43 (seven years ago) link

A vast swathe of the PLP just want to go toe to toe with the Tories on austerity and populist bigotry, others not of that stripe lack experience. I don't see a lot of options tbh.

calzino, Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Think you might mean stand shoulder to shoulder.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:48 (seven years ago) link

yes, sorry Andrew.

calzino, Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:49 (seven years ago) link

but pitting the same policies against each other in an election is sort of going toe to toe.

calzino, Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:50 (seven years ago) link

i read it as that, these dinks think they can compete on some nebulous PR stance even when their policies are a Rizla apart

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 16 April 2017 20:55 (seven years ago) link

May is apparently making an important statement outside Downing Street at 11:15 but nobody knows what it's about.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:02 (seven years ago) link

She's pregnant.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:18 (seven years ago) link

The election is scheduled for 2020. Pace yourself.

― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 16 April 2017 14:17 (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You don't say?

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:21 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if the increased likelihood of Corbyn going before 2020 is worrying her a bit. A lot of things can and will go wrong between now and 2020 so from her point of view there's never going to be a better time.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:27 (seven years ago) link

Either that or the Queen's dead.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:28 (seven years ago) link

Would Labour agree to an election?

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:30 (seven years ago) link

Either that or the Queen's dead.

let's hope so eh

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:31 (seven years ago) link

as long as we get a bank holiday i'm good, in fact personally i think we should mourn her for a month

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:37 (seven years ago) link

My well-placed sources seem to know nothing at all about what it could be. It's not just journalists who are in the dark.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

if she's taking over the role of the doctor from peter capaldi i'll be v disappointed

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

she's not resigning is she? i'm seeing speculation to that effect.

xpost may is notoriously strict about leaking etc - the entire civil service was called to a special meeting after trump got elected to tell us not to insult the donald on the twitter

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

xp

still better than that other cunt

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

NI direct rule seems to be in the running.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:42 (seven years ago) link

that scares me in itself

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:42 (seven years ago) link

civilian junta led by Arron Banks to be handed power immediately

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:44 (seven years ago) link

second Kendrick Lamar album to drop

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:45 (seven years ago) link

theresa may delighted to reveal wenger has signed a new 20-year deal

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:45 (seven years ago) link

that kid off Britain's Got Talent exposed as a cheat

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

George VI's death was announced at 1115. Just leaving that there.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:47 (seven years ago) link

Yes please to 20 year #wengerIn deal

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:48 (seven years ago) link

if the queen had 24 hour webcam surveillance this kind of rumour couldn't get started

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:50 (seven years ago) link

Dean Gaffney was caught spying in North Korea and is about to be liquidated by anti-aircraft weapons on live tv.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

Dean Gaffney is the new Doctor Who

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

Apparently the PM doesn't announce royal deaths so it probably isn't that.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

she might be the hype man tho

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:52 (seven years ago) link

Buckingham Palace takes care of all royals' announcements.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:52 (seven years ago) link

i think the reigning monarch dying is unusual enough that protocol might be changed

on the other hand, maybe the Trump golden showers tape has leaked

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:53 (seven years ago) link

poor choice of wording there

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:54 (seven years ago) link

rip murdoch, national holiday declared, brexit cancelled

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:54 (seven years ago) link

People reading the tea leaves have noted that the lectern doesn't have the government insignia on it and the last time that happened was when Cameron called the 2015 election. It's entirely possible they just forgot to glue it on, though.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

may steps to the podium, unzips her human suit, reveals true reptilian form and announces the uk is formally under the dominion of the reptoid empire

then she eats a live baby

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

kuenssberg sez election 8 june

sktsh, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

can they call a date before they go thru whatever the parliamentary rigmarole is?

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

because frankly if you can choose to ignore your own legislation, win an election (?) then lock yourself back in for 5 years, fuck that

btw before we start making a 2017 general election a rerun of the Brexit referendum would be monumentally fucking stupid for Labour kthx

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:02 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn for P-oh ffs

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:04 (seven years ago) link

Wonder if we'll get a response from him before bedtime

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

she's at the lectern early

election 8 june

ffs

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

unprecedented economic growth, HUGE confidence, country coming together but westminster is not, labour wants to grind economy to a standstill bla bla bla

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

Currently making a case for a dictatorship.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:08 (seven years ago) link

Other parties are endangering our economic security.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:09 (seven years ago) link

does parliament have to vote on this?

she's made it a second referendum, that speaks volumes

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:09 (seven years ago) link

Erdogan has the right idea, it seems.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:09 (seven years ago) link

ok that answers the vote thing

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

because frankly if you can choose to ignore your own legislation, win an election (?) then lock yourself back in for 5 years, fuck that

yeah this was my first thought, does the fixed 5 year term still apply from this year???

lex pretend, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

if the tories win obv, hollow lol

lex pretend, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

"Decision will be all about leadership -- it's me or Corbyn"

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

PLP will tear itself apart, it makes no sense to stand on a non-Brexit manifesto and every Blairite will be demanding that's what happens

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

This is an appalling statement. Erdogan comparison isn't far off the mark.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

ah well, this big unsightly boil needed a good lancing

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:12 (seven years ago) link

Sweepie on turnout? Low 30s?

michaellambert, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:12 (seven years ago) link

presumably every Tory candidate that stands will have to believe in her version of Brexit or they'd be massive hypocrites

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

what happens if the commons doesn't vote to support the motion? unlikely i know but still

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

if he loses the election will Corbyn go?

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Then they're going against The Will Of The People and must be destroyed.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Genuinely surprised she slanders Labour/opposition like this. Really odd because her party's already the biggest. Erdo indeed. Trump will prob congratulate her in a min smdh

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

All made out to be enemies of democracy if they don't support it, despite May's ludicrous statement.

michaellambert, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

Would Labour agree to an election?

They've said they will in the past. Funny how NOW IS NOT THE TIME for the turmoil and uncertainty of a Scottish Referendum but it is for the peace and tranquillity of a General Election.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure how unlikely a no vote is - all opposition parties should weigh up the tactical value of voting no

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:16 (seven years ago) link

#votenoforthelulz begins here

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

MR JOHNSON YOU LOOKING FORWARD TO AN ELECTION

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Nice shout-out to the "unelected House of Lords" too.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Projected Tory maj of 112 http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:19 (seven years ago) link

Tory government threatening the Lords, Labour party torn apart on Europe, welcome to Bizarro Election

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:20 (seven years ago) link

Who can trust polls anymore? Not that I'm not going into this one with a complete feeling of dread and defeatism.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:21 (seven years ago) link

pollsters cranking up for their important role in telling people that resistance is futile

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

Top stories on BBC website:

May to seek snap election on June 8
Trump congratulates Erdogan on poll win
'We will react with nuclear strike'
Redknapp named new Birmingham manager

Not a good day, when all is said and done.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

If anything the polls have been consistent in underestimating the right wing vote so that majority looks a little slim.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:23 (seven years ago) link

xp

i can see a real silver lining there

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:23 (seven years ago) link

Is a LibDem surge def off the cards?

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:24 (seven years ago) link

oh god any awful thing feels possible but yes

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:25 (seven years ago) link

I can see them coming back, definitely. There's enough croissant-munching, latte-sipping wankers out there who would vote for them again.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:26 (seven years ago) link

A lot of hacked-off Teachers/NHS staff might go LibDem.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:27 (seven years ago) link

They're the only explicitly anti-Brexit English party so they could nick a few seats off the Tories here and there.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:28 (seven years ago) link

TM's statement was disgusting.

I don't think she believed most of it herself.

I understand why she wants an election and big majority, but the reasons she gave to justify it were totally bogus.

Worse, as people here have indicated, they were anti-democratic. She accused opposition parties of sometimes ... opposing, and taking different views from the government. She called this 'playing games', not doing what opposition parties are supposed to do.

It was utterly disgusting and I must say kudos to the people above who have compared it to Erdogan.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

(Okay the Greens are as well but that's not going to happen)

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

croissants are good

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

Has someone done the legwork of finding all the Tory remain seats at risk to LDs? I can def see that being a thing

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:30 (seven years ago) link

btw we are always told that the opposition does NOT oppose, that it is a shambles, that it has waved through Brexit, etc. None of us believe that Labour will affect Brexit. And clearly the LDs can't.

So this makes it plainer how deeply bogus it for TM to say 'sadly, I must call an election because the opposition are threatening to derail Brexit'. She knows that no one is capable of derailing anything and that this has often been remarked on.

She is a dreadful public speaker, incredibly insincere and desperately false.

Her statement was one of the vilest I have seen in UK politics for some time.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:32 (seven years ago) link

Gordon Brown will be thinking "If only I'd called a snap election, I wouldn't have ended up erm.. totally loaded!"

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:33 (seven years ago) link

'people aren't getting 100% behind this thing that i personally opposed! it's disgraceful!'

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:35 (seven years ago) link

Not quite, the people, that's you and me, are getting behind it, Our Leader says so:

"The country is coming together but Westminster is not."

This isn't Erdogan, this is Trump.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:39 (seven years ago) link

you're right, i forgot that i've become a fanatical brexit supporter recently

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

go brexit *fist pump*

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/early-general-election-may-2017-theresa-may-article-50-brexit-negotiations-labour-polls-a7639246.html

^^explicit denial there'd be an early GE less than a month ago -- wonder what caused the change of mind?

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:43 (seven years ago) link

Maybe some Brexit induced disaster is looming.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

Heady mix of reality arriving from EU pulling agencies etc and making soft Tories rebellious, plus rumbling election fraud tale, plus slamming huge poll margin, I think

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

Jezza reliable as ever:

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn says: "I welcome the Prime Minister's decision to give the British people the chance to vote for a government that will put the interests of the majority first."

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

wow, teresa must be recoiling hard from that zinger

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:52 (seven years ago) link

if only he was a stand-up comedian

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:53 (seven years ago) link

if only parliamentary democracy was a game of Have I Got News For oh never mind

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

"Our opponents believe that because the Government's majority is so small, our resolve will weaken and that they can force us to change course.

"They are wrong.

"That is why I will immediately prove them right"

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

The Tories got 37% of the votes in the last election, I see. That statement is pretty scary, watching as an outsider.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link

holy shit

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:06 (seven years ago) link

hope somebody gives May a good grilling on her obviously longstanding and passionate commitment to Brexit

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:06 (seven years ago) link

I'm looking at the 2015 electoral map and wondering if there are that many seats that Labour can lose. The Midlands looks shaky, maybe some in London to the Lib Dems but otherwise?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:07 (seven years ago) link

Just think, all this instability because people were made scared of Red Ed and his weird way of eating a bacon roll.

michaellambert, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:08 (seven years ago) link

is it just me or have the tories been cynically changing the voting system as it suits them, to whatever seems most likely to keep them in power, justifying it with whatever explanations are readily to hand, and then discarding those justifications when they no longer serve their narrow electoral interests ?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:10 (seven years ago) link

all this instability because david cameron is a fucking idiot

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:11 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, thay too.

michaellambert, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:11 (seven years ago) link

all this instability because Tories gonna Tory

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

really gotta get my arse in gear and emigrate to canada / new zealand asap

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

Tracer: yes.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:16 (seven years ago) link

so many delighted pundits on the Beeb right now

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:19 (seven years ago) link

oh good, Stephen Kinnock's on

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:23 (seven years ago) link

really gotta get my arse in gear and emigrate to canada / new zealand asap

new zealand is run by tories too, but a decent option if you can't pull off a canada emigration

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

managed to go 3 minutes without calling for mass deportations, good call on May being a fascist, tragic use of "Brextremists"

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:25 (seven years ago) link

refused to back Corbyn, talked about voting for Labour being a vote for strong opposition, obviously intends to run an atomized campaign

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:27 (seven years ago) link

so if labour wins, does that mean a super-soft brexit?

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:28 (seven years ago) link

runny brexit

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:29 (seven years ago) link

bristolstoolchartbrexit.jpg

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:29 (seven years ago) link

diarrhoexit

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:31 (seven years ago) link

if Labour wins they give it 3 months then call a general election because the Tories are undermining their Brexit strategy and off we go

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:33 (seven years ago) link

Trotskyite Permanent Referendum

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:34 (seven years ago) link

deeply arrogant to say "westminster can't get its shit together so you all need to get off your arses". if she can't lead, why's she doing the job?

even from here this is obviously about exploiting labour's crap polling.

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:37 (seven years ago) link

looking forward to finding out the exact depth of scumbaggery that runs this nation tbh

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

far be it from me to suggest that the Lib Dems are receiving a hugely disproportionate amount of coverage on the Beeb this morning but

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

new zealand is run by tories too, but a decent option if you can't pull off a canada emigration

starting to think that signing up for a one-way trip to mars might be the way to go tbqh

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:44 (seven years ago) link

t/s: living in a post-brexit united kingdom vs dying on the arid red soil of mars

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

The Graun will probably run some piece on someone emigrating to some Liberal utopia, making a killing with 2nd home, employing an extra domestic with the proceeds .. ad nauseam.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:47 (seven years ago) link

it's hard out there for a middle class liberal

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:53 (seven years ago) link

Jeremy Gilbert:

--
Well everyone else is already sticking their oar in so here we go...

Firstly assessing May's motivations, Richard Seymour sums it up nicely

"A snap general election is a very logical move to harvest the fruits of Brexit before they go rotten, get a supermajority before it all starts to go sour, and hammer Corbynism. It also, of course, sees off right-of-Tory rivals. The electoral consolidation of the Right behind a hard-right Conservative leadership and the fragmentation of the Left (and a certain fingers-in-ears bluff optimism from some quarters) has been the major tendency since Brexit last year. May is striking at a prime moment. If you interpret everything she is doing in terms, not of what is good for British capitalism, but in terms of what is good for the political position of the Conservative Party and the composition of parliamentary politics, it makes perfect sense."

And as I just remarked to Cedric, "May would be stupid not to do it - The Tories can’t believe their luck that Brexit has dampened down the support for UKIP and that Labour still can’t get it’s shit together. Plus everyone knows the economy is going to tank again some time soon."

So how could we respond? As Alan Finlayson remarks

"The only route to a rational politics now is an electoral alliance of those opposed to a cliff-edge hard Brexit. The chances of this happening are zero. Remain is now, for many, an identity politics; Labour always thinks it is a lone top dog - and half its members will want it to lose; libs will not turn down a chance to stiff the Left. "

Which pretty much sums up the situation.

I would also add that the recent political developments (Brexit) have demonstrated that the right-wing press can still still basically deliver whatever results it wants to when it is united behind a particular agenda, and it has not been as unequivocally united behind the Tory leadership since 1992 as it is now, so May is right to go for it when she has that chance, and we will never get anywhere until we work out a strategy for challenging their hold over the imaginations and information-flow of a key strategic section of the electorate.

So what is to be done? Yes we have to get out and campaign, and do everything suggested by Holly:

"1) Organise the largest mass canvassing campaign the UK has ever seen, including bussing London activists to other parts of the country every weekend until the GE
2) Organise a huge demo for our vision of a People's Brexit which explicitly lays out Labour's programme to protect jobs, migrants and human rights.
3) Announce a migrant impact fund for working class areas where services are most affected by immigration
4) Make a deal with the SNP to go into some kind of coalition in return for INDYREF2"

But realistically all this has to be done with our eyes on a horizon well past the next election. Realistically, a Tory landslide is simply the logical expression of the current balance of forces in British society, not because the left is especially weak by historic standards (it is weak compared to times when it has been strong, but that's not saying much in the long-term), but because the coalition which it could potentially lead is desperately fragmented. It is a specific problem that much of the left and its leadership thinks that even trying to lead that coalition would constitute some kind of sell-out, and we will have to campaign to try to change that mentality if we are ever to improve our position (see my recent blog post on the concept of relations of forces for more on all this).

The biggest danger we face right now is that after the defeat in June we face a replay of the mid-80s (see the podcast that Holly, Huw, Gabriel and I have been posting about for a detailed discussion of that history and its lessons): instead of accepting that Labour simply cannot deliver what it wants to without engaging in the imaginative attempt to lead a broad coalition of political and social forces, which must challenge the press explicitly at some point, among many other things, the party convinces itself YET AGAIN that there is some magical position that it can aspire to whereby the press will allow it win on a moderately social-democratic agenda because it has a respectable and likeable-appearing leader. No doubt being led by Sir Keir Stamer on a soft-left Millibandish agenda and seeing our poll share back up in the 30s will seem a very reasssuring prospect this September, after the bloodbath which we're probably about to face. But it will only lead us to the same place that Kinnock and Milliband did. Can we come up with a strategically radical alternative response to the defeat? Can we start to build it now and make our campaigning during the election campaign a preparation for that instead of just short-term damage limitation. Let's see.
--

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

@milton_book1

To bottomless perdition, there to dwell

https://twitter.com/milton_book1/status/854301108658855936

milton joins BG on mars

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

it's hard out there for a middle-class liberal on the airless ochre desert in the shadow of olympus mons

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

the other benefit for May is that this pushes the post-Brexit electoral reckoning out to 2022

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

who cares what some bloke off The Vampire Diaries thinks?

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:58 (seven years ago) link

May: 'Parliamentary dissent must be steamrollered'
Commentariat: 'omg can you imagine Corbyn in a TV debate rofl!'

Not that i expected much better but idk what these people think they're for any more.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:59 (seven years ago) link

themselves

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 11:59 (seven years ago) link

Alex Pareene's "You Cretins Are Going To Get Thousands Of People Killed" as relevant to the UK media as the US

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

Who's with me on team terrified now?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

just trying to enjoy the temperature of the water in the saucepan we're floating in before it starts boiling itself dry

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

the terror is never the Tory government, it's the thought of living amongst the people that enable it, which is an ever-present tbh

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:17 (seven years ago) link

Announce a migrant impact fund for working class areas where services are most affected by immigration

FFS - another one blaming the immigration factor over the austerity factor

nashwan, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

i assume Gilbert sees the migrant impact fund as partly a placebo, partly a short-term fix because austerity can't be overturned in a day tbf to the lad

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:21 (seven years ago) link

Is there even time to schedule televised leader debates for this one?

nashwan, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:22 (seven years ago) link

what if the Queen dies on Jun 7th?

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

can you have a placebo for a disease which doesn't exist tho

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

yeah i don't think "hey we're ameliorating all those very real problems caused by immigrants" is the best way to go

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:25 (seven years ago) link

the terror is never the Tory government, it's the thought of living amongst the people that enable it, which is an ever-present tbh

leave-voting tories in your office, on the bus, in front of you in a queue, behind you in a queue, at your family get-togethers

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:25 (seven years ago) link

on a lighter note, this article about what will happen when the queen dies is good fun https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/16/what-happens-when-queen-elizabeth-dies-london-bridge

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:33 (seven years ago) link

Nice of you to try cheer us all up.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link

It's almost like Steve Vai is playing a solo, except the solo is Britain

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

50 posts about Steve Vai

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

Banks v Carswell cuntbowl confirmed

Meanwhile Nuttall furiously filters his advanced Search on Zoopla

nashwan, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

pfft, if only the government was capable of steve vai's level of proficiency

this seems more appropriate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb9dg1R1oPA

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:39 (seven years ago) link

"Not long afterwards, Dawson injected the king with 750mg of morphine and a gram of cocaine – enough to kill him twice over – in order to ease the monarch’s suffering, and to have him expire in time for the printing presses of the Times, which rolled at midnight."

They knew how to get the fuckers to die punctually back in the day. I don't they'll give Brenda that same sort of nudge over the line!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:42 (seven years ago) link

the nhs is fucked for real now, isn't it?

along with students, migrants, haha actually hang on ALL OF US

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:43 (seven years ago) link

Well tbf, all the disabled people they are killing should take some strain off the NHS.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

50 posts about Steve Vai

He's no Allan Holdsworth.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:45 (seven years ago) link

business will be booming in the vast soylent green factories of theresa may's britain

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

Where's our Kendrick? JME, you ready to step up?

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:46 (seven years ago) link

yes, we need a homegrown cover of 'cups' now more than anything

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

Actually we already have the Kendrick we deserve: Kate Tempest

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

We have the Kendrick Mark Lamar we deserve!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:50 (seven years ago) link

i'm trying to think of positives

1) corbyn and milne gone in six weeks (soz but let's be a bit real here)

2) following on from this, labour back in power in 2022, rather than 2025

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

3) PROFIT

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

Dawson injected the king with 750mg of morphine and a gram of cocaine – enough to kill him twice over – in order to ease the monarch’s suffering

the government should offer a similar speedball of mercy to anyone who can't be arsed hanging around to watch the uk implode, i'd be tempted

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

A lot of people who think 'Get rid of Corbyn' is the obvious solution are going to get a very rude awakening fairly shortly.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

corbyn and milne gone in six weeks (soz but let's be a bit real here)

finally, the advent of the owen smith-led labour party we've all been clamouring for

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

there is no obvious solution

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:59 (seven years ago) link

A lot of people who think 'Get rid of Corbyn' is the obvious solution are going to get a very rude awakening fairly shortly.

there's going to need to be a queue for rude awakenings all over the place tbf.

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:59 (seven years ago) link

it's not the solution but surely it's a necessary precondition? that said i thought ol' wooly-jumper had finally been doing a good job over the past few weeks :(

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:01 (seven years ago) link

has corbyn actually said he will step down if labour loses?

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link

seriously, who does the labour party have in its ranks who is a) popular and/or b) not a craven corporate low-cal tory

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link

and could lead the party and win votes

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link

c) hasn't said the LC words

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:03 (seven years ago) link

i am rudely awoken by the discovery that diligence has turned out to be insufficient

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:04 (seven years ago) link

d) isn't hamstrung by their position on Brexit.

Corbyn has made a bad situation worse but he wouldn't be there in the first place were it not for the litany of fuck-ups that led to him. I have a feeling he actually won't do quite as badly as is being predicted (ie the complete and utter annihilation of the party) but there's no clear route back to power for anyone that might succeed him unless there's a profound change in the way the country thinks and behaves.

If he loses and refuses to step down then any challenge is bound to include another left-winger. I wouldn't bet on him winning again in any scenario.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:04 (seven years ago) link

also i just read* that -- in the case of a snap early election like this -- the next fixed-term election will happen in 2021 not 2022

*courtesy david allen green bcz i haven't yet got round to the mass muting that the next six weeks urgently demands

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn does not wear woolly jumpers very much in public.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:06 (seven years ago) link

c) hasn't said the LC words

'la cucaracha'?

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:06 (seven years ago) link

Unless you were referring to me, Tracer?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:06 (seven years ago) link

haha you're always doing a good job, pinefox :)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

The other thing here is that virtually no one has developed detailed policies on anything at all, which would favour the incumbent almost regardless of the situation.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

"the next fixed-term election will happen in 2021 not 2022"

That is quite reassuring if true, maybe when many of the Local Authority's (going into the financial "jaws of death" over the next 2 years) don't even have the budget to empty the bins anymore - the backlash will start here!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:12 (seven years ago) link

What's the fucking point of the fixed-term parliaments act and the two-thirds majority rule if the opposition won't say no to an election for fear of being told they look scared of the electorate? I mean, there could scarcely be a more blatant "election being called for political expediency" than this one.

Alba, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if they have even pondered opposing it?

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

may was saying a couple of weeks ago that it's not fair to ask scotland to vote on a brexit vote that doesn't exist yet.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link

I strongly endorse Alba's great post.

It is another aspect of the cynical vileness of TM's intervention.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

It is nice to see Alba taking a strong stance despite his professional need for calm and neutrality.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

What's the fucking point of the fixed-term parliaments act and the two-thirds majority rule if the opposition won't say no to an election for fear of being told they look scared of the electorate?

The point is really to keep coalitions together. The opposition would be expected to oppose it if the junior coalition partner did as well

stet, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

in the indie piece i just linked from last month, labour was quoted as saying it would be "very hard" for them to block an election if called (but the reasoning isn't given)

the fixed-term act was always a bit of a stunt and was never going to stop this kind of stuff: it's just too powerful a weapon for the PM to wield

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:24 (seven years ago) link

If they tried to block it and failed it they would get absolutely rinsed for it.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:28 (seven years ago) link

pinefox where did you get that jeremy gilbert bit from? can't see it on his twitter

ogmor, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

tbh i quite like that corbz is all "yeah, let's go for it"

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:33 (seven years ago) link

Why would he not be?

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Why would he not be singing that line from "In the air tonight" right now?

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

i imagine he is, i know i am

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

i know this is lunacy but there is a timeline in which jean-luc mélanchon and jeremy corbyn are leading their countries by the second week of june

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

best birthday ever dude

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:38 (seven years ago) link

🙌

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:40 (seven years ago) link

anything is possible, well apart from that!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:42 (seven years ago) link

"What's the fucking point of the fixed-term parliaments act and the two-thirds majority rule"

The fixed term parliament act was itself an piece of political expediency, designed for a specific set of circumstances that lasted until the last general election. Its was always going to be circumvented or binned by the first majority government that found it inconvenient.

frankiemachine, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:44 (seven years ago) link

The Manchester Gorton by-election is going ahead on May 4th.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

Before Easter I spent a few days walking in Wales with my husband, thought about this long and hard and came to the decision that to provide for that stability and certainty, this was the way to do it.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Blame Wales, whydontcha!

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:54 (seven years ago) link

it could be construed as a burgeoning messiah complex in the works, or maybe just absolute twaddle!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 13:55 (seven years ago) link

" I stared up at the sky, and a glowing effigy of Mick Hucknell looked down and said ... "

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:01 (seven years ago) link

"on the fourth day, we stopped to break our fast at a greggs in swansea, and it was then i decided to call an election"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:21 (seven years ago) link

Lol wait whut

virginity simple (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:21 (seven years ago) link

(We had declined the Patisserie Valerie, for obvious reasons...)

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:22 (seven years ago) link

.. in quotes..

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:22 (seven years ago) link

"as i bit into the grey sausage meat, flakes of pastry falling onto my lap, i was filled with a profound sense of what britain stood for and what it could be."

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:23 (seven years ago) link

'gazing across the blasted hellscape of contemporary wales i thought i wish all of the uk looked like this'

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:28 (seven years ago) link

looks like it's time to initiate my Project Uzbekistan a few years early

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:34 (seven years ago) link

or at the very least make a timely judgement on when to withdraw from reading anything about politics for the next 3 months

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:35 (seven years ago) link

Channel 4 now saying that May has ruled out any televised leadership debates.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:45 (seven years ago) link

handy

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:45 (seven years ago) link

doesn't everybody who's not UKIP and the tories have a duty to band together now and stop this? are the parties really going yo go it alone and treat this like just another election?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:47 (seven years ago) link

The SNP are not going to band together with anyone. Third biggest party in parliament.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:54 (seven years ago) link

there's a strong doubt whether openly forming a broad coalition would be effective - it's not just the parties, but many of their voters - Tory Lib Dems, unionist Labour, who would be turned off by potential deals to be made. better maybe to encourage a tactical voting infrastructure and try to cobble together a coalition after the results are in. unlikely to make much difference.

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:55 (seven years ago) link

if Sturgeon or Corbyn have got any sense they won't countenance a coalition before the vote

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:56 (seven years ago) link

didn't the tories weaponise the prospect of a Labour/SNP in the last election? Like voters don't like it cos erm.. it's a bad thing apparently.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:57 (seven years ago) link

exackly

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:58 (seven years ago) link

yes. i am grasping at straws.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:03 (seven years ago) link

in this country the idea of a coalition is in itself something to be feared - imagine a political party co-operating with another one rather than defiling the country for 20 years at a time.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:05 (seven years ago) link

i think it would be nice for the forces of non-evil to collaborate, just don't call it a coalition, yet

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:06 (seven years ago) link

Channel 4 now saying that May has ruled out any televised leadership debates.

Idgi, is this her call? If she doesn't want to, let the others do it then right? Not that it will matter. Not that anything matters.

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:12 (seven years ago) link

The Lib Dems may well have the light of "the official opposition party" burning in their eyes.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:16 (seven years ago) link

oh good

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Is there even enough time for constituency parties to run a proper selection process?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:21 (seven years ago) link

The SNP are intent on the annihilation of the Labour Party in Scotland, something they have made very clear, so unlikely to want to enter into any association with them. They've already said the election in Scotland is between them and the Tories.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:32 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Bush@stephenkb

On the Labour leadership point: if the result is as bad as polls suggest, I wouldn't be shocked if it's Yvette Cooper by acclamation in PLP.

I guess this kind of scenario might stop Corbyn from standing down after a general election defeat? don't know what his chances would be if he stood in another leadership contest though.

soref, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Theresa May says: "No Jeremy Corbyn on the television OK thx bye"

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:35 (seven years ago) link

btw, what's the betting for this elec being the lowest turnout ever?

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:36 (seven years ago) link

that gorton bye-election will get a low turnout, if it's still happening

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:38 (seven years ago) link

Is that it now, the end of opposition politics for good?

wtev, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:38 (seven years ago) link

Turnout over 50% would be good...under the circumstances...

nashwan, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:41 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it can, surely, as it would require electing an MP to a Parliament that's already been dissolved?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Is that it now, the end of opposition politics for good?

i doubt it. no reason to think the madness of the last year or two will lead to stability, even for the right.

xpost

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:42 (seven years ago) link

is rebecca long-bailey still seen as the designated corb-successor? i guess post-defeat might be the time to step aside for whoever it is -- tho only if there's a chance of a corb-successor being on the ballot at all (if there's even a ballot)

(seem to recall a stephen bush in feb abt why it's highly unlikely to clive lewis: no way for him to get to the vote threshold within the PLP)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:43 (seven years ago) link

Rebecca Long-Bailey has even less chance of getting on the ballot than Lewis though, surely? along with pretty much anyone from the left of the party, unless the left gets enough delegates at the party conference to be able to change the process

soref, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

then corbs will stay and may win

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:50 (seven years ago) link

corbs

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Dr Corbius

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

dr. corbius

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

blast xp

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

haha

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:59 (seven years ago) link

also i just read* that -- in the case of a snap early election like this -- the next fixed-term election will happen in 2021 not 2022

*courtesy david allen green bcz i haven't yet got round to the mass muting that the next six weeks urgently demands

Just been trying to verify this. What is the reason it would be 2021 not 2022!

wtev, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 16:03 (seven years ago) link

If Corbyn was reinvented as Dr Corbius he would be unstoppable, it would be like that Simpsons episode where Homer changes his name to Max Power!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 16:05 (seven years ago) link

? not ! Sorry in pub

wtev, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 16:06 (seven years ago) link

checked back and david allen green* has changed his mind abt this: apparently "4 years only applies if early GE takes place before first Thursday in May" acc. s.1(4) of the fixed term act

*still haven't muted him, where is my head

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 16:07 (seven years ago) link

The next election will take place six months to a year after the Scottish referendum.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 16:25 (seven years ago) link

https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/anthony-barnet/why-is-she-frit

I'm convinced.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:02 (seven years ago) link

definitely an element of frit, yes

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:10 (seven years ago) link

That essay is good in giving no shrift to the BS reasons given by TM -- and in finding other reasons.

It is shameful if the media accept her own version of what is happening and why.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:11 (seven years ago) link

more importantly it grasps the importance of the question i asked upthread and thus validates my profound political acuity

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Which question? The one in the Baldrick thread?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:35 (seven years ago) link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/early-general-election-may-2017-theresa-may-article-50-brexit-negotiations-labour-polls-a7639246.html

^^explicit denial there'd be an early GE less than a month ago -- wonder what caused the change of mind?

― mark s, Tuesday, April 18, 2017 11:43 AM (six hours ago)

^^^nope this one a little up this page (tho that thread is doubtless also full of good questions from me)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Which question? The one in the Baldrick thread?

Had to think for a moment what thread this was referring to.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

in line with that, Deutsche Bank forex dude apparently says this:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9su_Z9XYAA8zt0.jpg

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

(quite a good case for starting a new thread dedicated to british politics imo)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

STRUCTURALLY BEARISH

the pinefox, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

bear say hi to me

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:03 (seven years ago) link

BTW, when does Osborne take up his Heevnin Stannit job?

Cause, he doesn't like May much, right?

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:05 (seven years ago) link

So yes that makes her biggest problem to be the EU itself and what they do - which shows, as she can't even name them when listing her reasoning.

But maybe also the expenses scandal was part of it. If it is the case that several MPs could be jailed for it then this would impact her small majority. I wonder how it will play in those seats affected. It will not matter if the projected polls are right but this will reflect badly and may cast a shadow on the campaign.

I don't think she would have called a GE - we've had elections in 2015, 2016 and now 2017 (Scotland had their ref in 2014) (and this GE will follow one month on from the local elections). It might explain her reluctance of debates. A debate is a big show, its sheer fatigue to have these time after time.

So I wonder if, by instructing Labour to reject this proposal of an election outright and forcing the government to hold a vote of no-confidence in itself it would just heighten that sense of May as a shameful political operator.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:06 (seven years ago) link

osborne starts at the ES in may apparently (sez wikipedia)

MAKE 8 JUNE THE LAST OF MAY

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:08 (seven years ago) link

(Scotland had their ref in 2014)

... and elections to the Scottish Parliament in 2016. In Northern Ireland they've just had an election, less than a year after another election - quicker than Charlton Athletic go through managers.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:10 (seven years ago) link

labour would be daft to support an election. well apart from the PLP as surely Corbyn won't be able to continue after a pasting in a GE?

-_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

I don't agree w/that.

Corbyn's statement in minimising a mention on Brexit was the right tone. The reaction of 'oh where's Brexit in this?' is just what you'd expect. Brexit IS politics for a section of people (are 'team terrified' voting Lib Dem?). There is coherence between the tone of the statement and the policy announcements last week.

Corbyn shouldn't resign (fkn hilarious posts upthread). Instead the Labour MPs who made it their business to malign and not work with this leadership and who backed Owen Smith are the ones who should pack up and form their Progress Party and fight for their politics (whatever the fuck that is?) The game has changed and what I said yesterday about learning the lessons of Melanchon etc. stands - its clear that kind of politics is in play. Its there in Spain, Portugal, and was there in Greece, and is now showing itself France. This GE has been called because of Tory fuck-ups. No reason to think they won't stop. A left-wing party with a base has to keep positioning themselves as an alternative that people might vote for at some point. I don't see this election as the 'end of oppostion' or any kind of apocalypse as long as a left-Labour is acitve.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:20 (seven years ago) link

Right on time:

Michael Crick‏Verified account @MichaelLCrick 22m22 minutes ago

BREAKING: The CPS have told Channel 4 News tonight that they are considering charges against more than 30 individuals. #electionexpenses

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:21 (seven years ago) link

i like, i like

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:23 (seven years ago) link

LOL @ Richard Seymour though, from the piece quote upthread:

So what is to be done? Yes we have to get out and campaign, and do everything suggested by Holly:

"1) Organise the largest mass canvassing campaign the UK has ever seen, including bussing London activists to other parts of the country every weekend until the GE
2) Organise a huge demo for our vision of a People's Brexit which explicitly lays out Labour's programme to protect jobs, migrants and human rights.
3) Announce a migrant impact fund for working class areas where services are most affected by immigration
4) Make a deal with the SNP to go into some kind of coalition in return for INDYREF2"

no 1 was the thing that meant over-spend in the last GE.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:26 (seven years ago) link

do we know the timetable for the election expenses investigations? do they carry on straight away, or do they get postponed till after june?

i haven't really been following it bcz the bar to nullify the individual seats was obviously going to be too high -- the party might get fine but the MP is only kicked out if it's proved beyond doubt they were directly knowingly involved in the fraud (which is quite unlikely in terms of the practical organisation of an election -- they have quite enough on their plate campaigning)

but now that issue is irrelevant -- they're all stepping down anyway (for the election) and the bar for making the fraud a local campaigning issue is very much lower than the legal bar

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:30 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/mar/23/conservative-election-scandal-victory-2015-expenses

Well I read this at the time and thought it was a real ticking time-bomb. I knew of it but that piece set some timelines.

If the candidate is standing again and is being charged with fraud then I think its relevant in those marginal seats. The effect could ripple through to the rest of the campaign.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:34 (seven years ago) link

iirc I have to re-read and can't do rn.

The timing isn't good for May.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:36 (seven years ago) link

do we know which constituencies are affected?

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Just received another one of those spam Labour emails from Dr Corbius. As a voter in Scotland, I thought this paragraph was extraordinarily badly judged:

Labour will be offering the country an effective alternative to a government that has failed to rebuild the economy, delivered falling living standards and and handed the SNP a fresh grievance in its campaign for a second independence referendum.

Bernie Lugg (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:40 (seven years ago) link

labour in 'bad judgment' shocker

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:41 (seven years ago) link

labour love to alienate their former scottish voters

-_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:43 (seven years ago) link

They're finished in Scotland, I think the Tories and Lib Dems have more chance of winning seats from the SNP.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

I imagine the SNP feel the same.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

oh, definitely

-_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 18:47 (seven years ago) link

The policy announcements from Labour this past week have been good recently - just need to diligently keep plugging away.

The election is scheduled for 2020. Pace yourself.

...

fkn hilarious posts upthread

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:28 (seven years ago) link

lol

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:35 (seven years ago) link

'scheduled'

voting lib dem, cake?

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:35 (seven years ago) link

no, labour.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:36 (seven years ago) link

good boy.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:37 (seven years ago) link

or do i have to think corbyn is doing a good job diligently plugging away to be allowed to vote for them?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:37 (seven years ago) link

Don't think, please.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:38 (seven years ago) link

at this point there really is no reason to not vote Green (plus I live in a safe Labour area)

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

this post sponsored by irking jools

imago, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

will they be able to agree on the contents of the suicide note in time?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:47 (seven years ago) link

You're doing better than this cunt, cake. Well done.

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/85170/labour-mp-john-woodcock-i-cant-vote-jeremy-corbyn

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:49 (seven years ago) link

asked and answered

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:51 (seven years ago) link

But you know its Corbyn that must make way when the suicide the Tories are carrying out occurs. Bring David Mill back from exile he'll sort it out.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:52 (seven years ago) link

Kinnock pulled a similar stunt this morning, talked about how he'd fight for his constituents, refused to say a positive word about Corbyn. fuck these cunts into the sun

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

tbf you can see how Corbyn's relentless harrassment and abuse of the Blairites started this

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

On R4 earlier it was sounding like a party political broadcast at times, with a lot of mindless parroting going on. At least that anti-establishment figure Dimbleby actually criticised the content and tone of May's speech.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

Today's UK politics posts have been far too comprehensible.

I think I prefer when it's impenetrable in this thread, it means things are not as horrible.

The Jams Manager (1992, Brickster) (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:21 (seven years ago) link

YEWTREE

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:25 (seven years ago) link

lool!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Is it really nearly 2 years since the Ed-Stone? Corbyn might like dynamism or whatever, but thus far he hasn't been party to anything as comically risible as that beauty. He is totally in my good books right now, after pledging to put up Carer's Allowance by a tenner a week. That'll pay for an extra Stella multipack at least! [joeks]

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:40 (seven years ago) link

like lack

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:41 (seven years ago) link

"The tablet was unveiled on 3 May 2015, in a car park in the marginal constituency of Hastings and Rye"

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:42 (seven years ago) link

Stop it! That wasn't even close Jim!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:53 (seven years ago) link

no, wearing silly clothes is exactly the same as making a racist 2001 monolith

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 20:56 (seven years ago) link

There must someone somewhere who is STILL drinking from that Controls on Immigration mug!!

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:04 (seven years ago) link

a majority of the uk public is still drinking from the controls on immigration mug iirc

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:07 (seven years ago) link

You guys are just trying to make me feel better

The Jams Manager (1992, Brickster) (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:08 (seven years ago) link

Well, "We're all sinners" (Tim Farron, Liberal/Brexit saviour) xp

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:09 (seven years ago) link

just had a sudden flashback to the sinner/winner guy on Oxford Street

Mozart's Musical Dubstep Dice Game (snoball), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:11 (seven years ago) link

http://www.alembic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/stanleyboard.jpg

^^^ed shd have gone with this for the stone, landslide material

mark s, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Try living with the shinners

virginity simple (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Well now I'm confused was it this rock or the bacon sandwich that destroyed the guy

The Jams Manager (1992, Brickster) (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:27 (seven years ago) link

it was a banana that destroyed his brother, just to add some US clarity!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:28 (seven years ago) link

I remember him!

He went up to my g/f and in a doleful voice, intoned "Are you suffering from too much marital love?"

'Chance would be a fine thing!' I thought to myself...

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:29 (seven years ago) link

That was art MarkS's pic

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:30 (seven years ago) link

Wrt! As in with regard to! Damn spelling korrector!

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:31 (seven years ago) link

"BASIC PROCESSED FOOD SUSTENANCE FROM FOODBANKS HASN'T YET STOPPED PROLES FROM COPULATING"

He got debunked in this era!

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 21:54 (seven years ago) link

Houses of Parliament needs an expensive re-wire, might as well burn it down at this point.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:03 (seven years ago) link

xp the kubrick crazy stare

soref, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:04 (seven years ago) link

https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/9226/production/_95641473_mediaitem95641472.jpg

― -_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:46 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Stop it! That wasn't even close Jim!

― calzino, Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:53 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

no, wearing silly clothes is exactly the same as making a racist 2001 monolith

― Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:56 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it was more of an ed eating bacon sandwich thing to be fair.

-_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:05 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9uiXfXW0AMrkO7.jpg:large

mark e, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:09 (seven years ago) link

ooops sorry SV ..

mark e, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:10 (seven years ago) link

it's a shock, i thought the Daily Mail would be supporting her

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:10 (seven years ago) link

my first impression when i saw the cover ..

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/b0/c4/73/b0c473c6aca8e81403e0213954f68432.jpg

mark e, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:11 (seven years ago) link

The Mail really aren't doing any favours for her there. But one person's psychotic Mosley-clone might be what the electorate wants. I really don't know anymore.

calzino, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link

Hello EU I'm ready to negotiate XO

wtev, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 01:22 (seven years ago) link

Every other party leader should be hammering her for ducking the TV debates at this point. It's not like I even like them that much but May is clearly the one with the least to gain and the most to lose from them. Plus I think she'd be shit.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

She'd be terrible. Cameron ducked them last time. Brown stupidly agreed to do them.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link

wouldn't put a lot of faith in either corbs or farron winning a televised debate - they'd tske more hits than they'd deliver imo - but nicola sturgeon would make mincemeat of her right now

jay kay huysmans (NickB), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

aha.

Mark G, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:50 (seven years ago) link

Labour could have played this so much better by making their support for an election conditional on certain criteria for fairness being met, perhaps in conjunction with other parties. First, we want a reasonable time to make our case, not the rushed snap election that suits a government living by the polls and terrified of a long lead time. Secondly, we want tv debates. And so on. No fairness, no election.

frankiemachine, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:53 (seven years ago) link

The nuances of voting for a local representative who will be active within a constituency, and who will effectively cast their vote for their party leader to be Prime Minister..

Will be replaced for the forthcoming election

It will be basically a referendum with two people's names on it, and the question "Who's Best?"

We haven't time to have TV debates, choose candidates, all that. Also, Britain's Got Talent has just started, and we don't have the airtime for anything else.

Mark G, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

The SNP are abstaining in this vote, I believe. So is anyone actually voting against this election?

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

Is Corbin really as Aethelred as all that?

Mark G, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:56 (seven years ago) link

Why on earth would the SNP vote against it? They must be rubbing their knees in glee at the idea.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

It will be basically a referendum with two people's names on it, and the question "Who's Best?"

Honestly I think this is how a lot of people vote in General Elections, they don't vote with the local candidate in mind and a lot don't even consider policies that much, they treat it like a Presidential election. It's one reason why Corbyn could drop 10 hugely popular policies and still lose.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 10:58 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn would be fine in a debate imo.

May would struggle under any kind of combative presenter / audience questioning even without opposition there. She has an inherent reluctance to explain policy beyond soundbites at the best of times. Given how much of Brexit policy is TBD or has problematic consequences, she'd be appalling. She's enormously fortunate nobody with access seems interested in asking difficult questions.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:01 (seven years ago) link

TBD I understood momentarily as "The Best Deal" which represents the entirety of brexit policy detail

conrad, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:11 (seven years ago) link

Opposition support for a snap election should have been on the condition that it was achieved through May calling and winning a vote of no confidence in her government - not an unfair interpretation of yesterday's speech

michaellambert, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I think Corbyn would do well in a TV debate as well, and I suspect May knows that.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

god forbid our unelected pm should have to defend her positions against other leaders, heaven forfend

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:13 (seven years ago) link

*DRUDGE SIREN* Osborne stepping down as MP

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:36 (seven years ago) link

Nick Clegg coming back. Or attempting to.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

a scoop for the evening standard I see

lex pretend, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:42 (seven years ago) link

osborne stepping down to spend more time with his coke habit his other job

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

Bins not emptied for 3 weeks in LibDem Sutton mentioned on PMQ. I'm still convinced it will be un-emptied bins that will create more of an austerity backlash rather than more pertinent matters like A+E closures/Social care-fail/education-fail/disenfranchised disabled etc

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:45 (seven years ago) link

Four levels of frit at work here:

i: the panic switch from no early election to election now, courtesy the EU requirements (as explored in the anthony barnett piece linked by the pf)
ii: the election fraud investigations
iii: may's unwillingness -- inability -- to field confrontation or surprise
iv: just six weeks

TM is a brittle figure and history will not judge her well, but so far her tendency to lunge towards quite risky decisions has paid off -- partly because the corb-machine to date only has one speed, slow-and-steady. Which made sense in terms of refashioning the party and the left (this was always going to take time and the nu-lab strategy of placing all policy eggs bar war in the electoral basket is very much a reason why we are where we are); and also suits JC's own schoolmasterly temperament. And arguably -- in the longer haul -- would have paid dividends just in terms of the electorate being fkn SICK of electioneering at this horrible high level and beginning to be drawn to something/someone more measured… "Our opponents will bit by bit fall completely to pieces, we will gradually be seen to be there to take charge and reconstruct what has been broken." (Bcz I am old and tired these days I am drawn myself to this pitch; but I am also far too long in the tooth to believe that MY WAVE OF POLITICS is here at last; it never has been and never will be)

Unconvinced the corb-machine can be rammed into the high gear needed for a six-week campaign, to batter at these layers of frit. JC personally dislikes nastiness and has set his face against it; he dislikes "politics" in the sense of the opportunistic deployment of the quick-fire jab (many of his followers are fine with it obviously but -- bcz not "led" -- merely create a self-cancelling bubble-buzz of venom and contempt). He distrusts "deftness" -- it's a slimy professional pol quality that fits in with everything nu-labour stood for (and against all they lost).

And -- as ever in recent years -- there are nearly no labour-friendly mainstream media platforms now. The Mirror, that's kind of it. Undercutting mainstream media platforms by means of social media etc is the work of years not weeks. It's happening (and will continue to): print media is dying as we watch -- some of the headlines today are a symptom of that tbh. But there are no secret invisible levels. And no adults left to appeal to, who'll step in and fingerwag the wrong uns back into their box.

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:46 (seven years ago) link

I agree Theresa May would be shit in a TV debate but it's not as if that would matter. The TV debates led to Cleggmania which lasted approx three hours iirc.

Amidst all the tedium of Labour infighting and centrist bleating the most depressing thing is how Teflon the Tories/May seem to be. Regardless of who the opposition is she's deeply unimpressive if not actually horrifying on every level. But the electorate basically seem OK with her and the direction she's taking the country in. I'm not sure you can blame the media for being useless at this point, she's the prime minister that Rainy Fascism Island wants and deserves.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:48 (seven years ago) link

apparently jeremy corbyn is goading theresa may about tv debates

conrad, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

The TV debates led to Cleggmania which lasted approx three hours iirc.

alternatively, were it not for a brief burst of cleggmania we might have ended up with a straight tory majority instead of coalition which could well have been worse for the country

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:57 (seven years ago) link

Is there really much difference between the ConDem coalition and untrammelled Tories though? It didn't make much difference for a lot of disabled people.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

The word 'cleggmania' gives me simultaneous giggles and goosebumps

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

alternatively, were it not for a brief burst of cleggmania we might have ended up with a straight tory majority instead of coalition which could well have been worse for the country

iirc the Lib Dems actually did substantially worse than anyone expected and didn't so much win a place in the coalition with a good performance as back into it despite a bad performance thanks to sheer fluky mathematical luck

lex pretend, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure May is particularly well liked outside of the core Conservative party and Thatcher nostalgists - but rather thought 'competent' and 'safe', something even centrist journalists have been willing to buy into.

The BBC and others uncritically parroting the line that a clear majority (which, realistically, only the Tories can deliver) means a stronger hand in Brexit negotiations is also hugely important. It's a softer position than 'crush all saboteurs' for sure - but still positions her being given uncontested power as objectively in the national interest. It all adds up to 'you don't have to like her but you need her'.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:08 (seven years ago) link

it's almost as if centrist pundits and lols are naturally small c conservatives

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:14 (seven years ago) link

pols, not lols, but well played stupid spell checker

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:15 (seven years ago) link

The BBC WS just played a truncated snippet of Corbyn making pertinent points about a lot of people being poorer, followed by a longer snippet of uninterrupted platitudinous waffle from May. I know it gets boring continually pointing out how impartial and shit the BBC are. I probably need to switch to R3 and Classic FM for my sanity.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:16 (seven years ago) link

didn't so much win a place in the coalition with a good performance as back into it despite a bad performance thanks to sheer fluky mathematical luck

ok but bear in mind that the visionary leader who allowed them into the coalition was one cameron, now little remembered: "cleggmania" only needed to have impressed him, a man whose depth of judgment has been laid open to all, for all time

the seeds of cleggmania -- cleggmania-without-clegg if you will -- have been present in UK politics (among the commentariat) since AT LEAST the limehouse declaration (1981): have probably been there ever since the labour party first emerged, as a fusion of incompatible class elements

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

Venn diagram of centrist pundits, people sending their kids to private school and people who think that 'well, actually, these days £70k isn't a lot of money...' would be something to see.

The BBC had Tim Montgomerie from Conservative Home and Dan Hodges in discussion earlier - covering all points of the spectrum from 'i am a Conservative who will be voting for the Conservatives' to 'i am a "liberal" who will be voting for the Conservatives'.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

Lol 'Cleggmania' happened because the majority of people, who generally don't care enough about party politics to know who the leader of the LibDems actually is, suddenly noticed him for the first time and he did well in that first debate. Then they got to know him better and he became reviled.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link

calzino's "it's all about the bins" used to be a staple of solid old-school left municipal politics -- the successful thatcher war on which is unavoidably also part of why we are where we are; the effective demolition (bcz defunding) of local politics (inc.the abolition of the GLC, a startlingly irresponsible and anti-democratic move) undermined this staple

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:25 (seven years ago) link

Hardly surprising. Rubbish on the streets makes it impossible to pretend that everything is okay.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:26 (seven years ago) link

things that need doing:

i: rebuild local politics
ii: refashion balance between london and rest of country re size, resources, attention
iii: supply moon on stick

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link

yes, bins is super-basic but it's still also mainly only the radar of columnists in local papers currently

(and they largely still seem to blame it on EU bureaucrats, at least if the shropshire star is any guide)

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:30 (seven years ago) link

I live in a particularly Brexity part of the country but local failings - including the increase in Council Tax to compensate for central government shortfalls - still get blamed on the provision of translations at the GP's, too many 'spongers', the EU etc.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:34 (seven years ago) link

Last year one of the local rags ran a story about a woman who was pissed off at getting a threatening letter from the council about cutting her garden and hedges. To a backdrop of the local parks division having a backlog of work themselves, with lots of overgrown areas in public parks and grass verges on estates at knee length. These are the real important issues and no doubt many people, illogically will blame foreigners rather austerity. It becomes quite depressing through repetition.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:40 (seven years ago) link

argument isn't hard to fashion tho: look what EU did to greece -- much in news for many months -- hence "actually it's austerity" p quickly reverts to "blame the EU"

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:49 (seven years ago) link

I'm wondering about the extent to which the economy will be an explicit issue in this election. Perhaps by proxy (how could Brexit not be) but it might be the thing that everyone tries not to mention because they know they're vulnerable on it. Whereas obviously the main reason Labour won't win is because they aren't trusted with it, and lots of people are ignoring the obvious economic cliff that we're about to go over.

Ian Dunt, who I usually try not to agree with on principle, made the point that this election is a referendum on Corbyn dressed up as a referendum on her Brexit plans, and it will be clearly trumpeted as the latter when she wins. Obviously she wouldn't be doing this if the Tories felt even the slightest bit threatened by Labour.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

@joehullait

George Osborne's announcement, issued to his own newspaper, missed the deadline for the print edition

https://twitter.com/joehullait/status/854662884697276419

probably fake news but fuck it i'm not checking

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:00 (seven years ago) link

I know it gets boring continually pointing out how impartial and shit the BBC are

There is this, and there's the whole "how much more Farage can we show?", but at the same time, journalists are lazy/under pressure and will take "someone who makes good telly" whenever offered to them on a plate. Labour needs a PR machine that understands that and delivers, not one that is hostile to the whole fucking idea of the media.

stet, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link

sure i've said this before, but yoinking milne out of the guardian editorial office and onto the corb-machine first-response squad was probably the single biggest mistake JC's made

(i was intrigued by it at first, on the grounds that SM had grown up right at the heart of the upper middle-class commentariat -- posh school, dad ran BBC etc -- so surely despite his politics he knew everyone, knew how the game worked blah blah*: this was exactly wrong, turns out insofar as everyone knew SM they disliked him and were only too happy to fuck him up)

*viz like eg paul foot, who was GREAT on tv and good at getting his writing into just the places it had traction

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

Don't fuck with the middle class's bins.

I never quite understand why labour out unpopular things in their manifesto - just avoid the issue like the Tories do. You don't have to put 50p income tax in, you just do it once elected.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

Even the Tories couldn't get away with a previously-unannounced NI rise so could you imagine what would happen if Labour tried it?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:18 (seven years ago) link

They'd be slated by the media?

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

and if you target your tax rises properly most people don't give a fuck by the time the next election rolls around

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:31 (seven years ago) link

xp IIRC the problem was less that it was unannounced, than that it directly contradicted a manifesto pledge?

Tim, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

sadly when it comes down to it, most of nu-lab's success w/media in the late 90s/early 00s was basically down to blair working out a personal devil's pact with murdoch himself, a ploy both unrepeatable and corrosive

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

in some respects the Tories are always more vulnerable to that pressure than a Labour gov which would be in power despite it

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

ie what mark just said

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

fwiw Labour's smallest majorities nationwide

Chester (0.2% over Con)
Ealing Central & Acton (0.5 Con)
Ynys Mon (0.7 PC)
Brentford & Isleworth (0.8 Con)
Halifax (1 Con)
Wirral West (1 Con)
Cambridge (1.2 LD)
Ilford North (1.2 Con)
Newcastle under Lyme (1.5 Con)
Barrow & Furness (1.8 Con)
Wolverhampton SW (2 Con)
Hampstead & Kilburn (2.1 Con)
Enfield North (2.4 Con)
Hove (2.4 Con)
Dewsbury (2.7 Con)
Lancaster & Fleetwood (3 Con)
Derbyshire NE (3.9 Con)
Harrow West (4.7 Con)
Bridgend (4.9 Con)

and about 27 others under 10%

Tories have just over 70 seats with less than 10% majority

nashwan, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 14:21 (seven years ago) link

the prospect of trying to help solidify someone like e.g. wes streeting mp of ilford north

conrad, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 15:03 (seven years ago) link

Labour NEC has agreed all sitting MPs will be reselected automatically, so no opportunity to get rid of Gisela Stuart, John Woodcock, etc.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 16:54 (seven years ago) link

MPs are going to be hurting for cash like fuck here. More than a few constituencies and MPs personally still paying off 2015, especially those who had central funding pulled.

Really think Corbyn should have negotiated a later election here. Even if he lost it would have been worth it to have May voting no confidence in her own government.

stet, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:08 (seven years ago) link

Later date arguments otm

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:09 (seven years ago) link

Really think Corbyn should have negotiated a later election here

How would that have worked?

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

this is kind of intricate deft parliamentary manoeuvre i fear JC et al have no feel for at all (and tend ideologically to despise as obscurantist and inauthentic gamesmanship)

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:22 (seven years ago) link

thx for the Queen's funeral plans piece, caek. “Don’t go overboard. She’s a very old woman who had to go some time.”

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

My local council has closed its dogshit bins due to funding cuts, so all the regular rubbish bins are now overflowing with dogshit. Feel like this is now set to be my stock footage memory of THE BREXIT YEARS, just as rubbish bags in the streets is used as lazy pophistory shorthand for the winter of discontent etc.

Stevie T, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Maybe frits will become more commonplace in the brexit years as well!

Frit
A fried shit
That dog shit has been lying in the sun for so long it has become a frit

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 17:37 (seven years ago) link

niche i know, but i do like this (but then i would !) :

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9ybn_VXsAEZMUj.jpg

mark e, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 18:31 (seven years ago) link

/Really think Corbyn should have negotiated a later election here/

How would that have worked?

Vote no today (Labour has the votes alone to stop it), and say the timing is political games to suit the PM and we need a fair election, parties were expecting 2020 especially after her assurances etc. Name a date, start trading.

Makes May look weak, if it's political games she started them, and leaves her two unpalatable options: no confidence vote in her own govt, or giving way to Corbyn.

stet, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

The NEC are such fkn shit.

otoh Alan Johnson and a few others seem to be fucking off so it is another day of pluses and minuses @ Lab.

sure i've said this before, but yoinking milne out of the guardian editorial office and onto the corb-machine first-response squad was probably the single biggest mistake JC's made

Is the frustration around Milne that he is ineffective? Sorry yes I don't have a good handle on PR/communications (hence my screaming @ this thread half the time). I get that maybe much of Corbyn's team might be not that good (he has certainly been understaffed) but w/SM it comes with a name and his journalism.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

Problem with that is: hadn't Corbyn already indicated that he would accept a snap election being called? So he'd be going back on his own word just like her.

Xpost

Alba, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:16 (seven years ago) link

even I think Seamus is a cunt but largely he's an excuse to cuddle down on liberalism

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

Why a cunt?

Alba, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:18 (seven years ago) link

everyone's a cunt

imago, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:20 (seven years ago) link

posho pro-putin former stalinist who will write apologia for any murderous figure or group as long as they are against the west. pollyannaish and dogmatic anti-imperialist, and evidently dogshit at PR if corbyn walking from own goal to own goal is anything to go by

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:20 (seven years ago) link

I live in a particularly Brexity part of the country but local failings - including the increase in Council Tax to compensate for central government shortfalls - still get blamed on the provision of translations at the GP's, too many 'spongers', the EU etc.

― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Last year one of the local rags ran a story about a woman who was pissed off at getting a threatening letter from the council about cutting her garden and hedges. To a backdrop of the local parks division having a backlog of work themselves, with lots of overgrown areas in public parks and grass verges on estates at knee length. These are the real important issues and no doubt many people, illogically will blame foreigners rather austerity. It becomes quite depressing through repetition.

― calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

argument isn't hard to fashion tho: look what EU did to greece -- much in news for many months -- hence "actually it's austerity" p quickly reverts to "blame the EU"

― mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well the EU is rightly responsible about what was and is happening in Greece. With cuts a lot of the time the Tories have been able to deflect underfunding by saying that its the councils who are failing as well, despite having their grant coming in from Central Govt. I wonder how long that could possibly last. A lot of the failings are not very visible as yet, not enough for people to have joined it up to lay the blame at the door of this govt.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:20 (seven years ago) link

thanks Jim that was a clear explication

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link

Voting against the election would have been another thing to effectively hammer Corbyn with imo: TM could just say this guy doesn't even trust you, the electorate and the beeb would aid and abet her by playing it in a loop for the entire news cycle.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:25 (seven years ago) link

re: SMs Stalinism and how that operates in his career is one thing sure. Just checking that is what's fuelling the anger around his imcompetence at his current role.

I mean no one says Campbell is a war criminal whenever he comes up these days. Not that he is much of a feature, or I don't see it so much.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:25 (seven years ago) link

Andy Burnham has stood down. I can see something in this GE lark..

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:29 (seven years ago) link

as was pointed out elsewhere on my FB it did seem odd that a trot would appoint a tankie as generally they fight as much with each other.

I expect the 'left' will splinter again if Corbyn stands down and they cant get enough MP support for another suitable candidate.

Odysseus, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:34 (seven years ago) link

Jim Dowd Labour MP for Lewisham West & Penge has told Skynews he is standing down

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:35 (seven years ago) link

I don't like sharing a surname with that fucker, good riddance.

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:38 (seven years ago) link

campbell was good at his actual job and (albeit slightly difft job) so was mandy: JC needs a legendary operator, not a simpatico ideologue w/a sullen bunker mentality and no professional imagination (or grasp of how the internet works)

someone you feel is excitedly leaping into action right now, not re-battening down the hatches for the slow and steady five-year haul

also: turns out they needed milne inside the guardian tent arguing their case in editorial meetings, he was a high-up there with traction

(tbf i don't have any evideince that ppl actively dislike him, he may be lovely in person -- but i think he was doing much better work as a commissioning editor than as a writer)

burnham was already due to go, wasn't he? he's campaigning to be mayor of manchester (tho i like to think it was my munching-and-sipping thread did him in, him and his "posh coffee")

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if Scots Labour will put up many of their former MP's to refight their old seats? I hope they do as that could be quite funny watching them get their arses kicked again.

Odysseus, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

Oh yes AB was going for Mayor of Manchester but that died down so forgot it was on.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:48 (seven years ago) link

Voting against the election would have been another thing to effectively hammer Corbyn with imo: TM could just say this guy doesn't even trust you, the electorate and the beeb would aid and abet her by playing it in a loop for the entire news cycle.

Only if terribly played. He's saying he welcomes the election, but not as part of a political game. Appeals to fair play go down well usually.

Xp to Alba: yes, probably another misstep. Should have welcomed an election "at the right time for the right reasons" or whatever that trope is

stet, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:52 (seven years ago) link

odd that a trot would appoint a tankie as generally they fight

not really, politics is full of strange bedfellows, and seemingly ideologically conflicted teams can be highly effective (it's helpful when you're out-thinking the foe to have ppl in-house who think *like* the foe) (which is what i thought SM's strength wd be, but i now doubt this)

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

the "foe" in this^^^ post being the print media

mark s, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 20:00 (seven years ago) link

best thing about SM is people calling him the thin controller

||||||||, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 20:06 (seven years ago) link

I recall reading somewhere TGM - probably an ironic title tho!

calzino, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking I reserve "cunt" for people who I know to be personally obnoxious, but then I thought about it some more and realised I'd be fine with using the word for many of the key Tory ministers of the last few years without really knowing what they're like in person, so I guess it's just that I give the benefit of the doubt to people on the left.

Alba, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Would Corbyn actually be able to persuade enough of his own party to vote against the GE given his in-party opponents are probably looking forward to it as the new best opportunity to get rid of him? Nice idea though.

nashwan, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 21:09 (seven years ago) link

I'll come back and we can do this properly but for thickos everywhere: centrists are Tories in disguise and would rather have a Tory gov than any version of leftness. Them's the rules of the game, pick your side, cheers

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 21:25 (seven years ago) link

It's not voting against the GE, I don't think he can do that, it's voting to have it in October or something -- by which time the elections in europe will be over and the EU will be stirring the shit mightily

stet, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Bob Marshall-Andrews has defected from Labour to the Lib Dems

This is him campaigning in 2001:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/may/21/election2001.politicalcolumnists


"What they do for us in the war, then?" asked the man, and Mr Marshall-Andrews told him about the Indian and West Indian regiments. "While we're at it, what did you do?"

"I'm too young."

"Well, you don't look it. And under no circumstances are you allowed to vote for me. You will not vote for me!"

Alba, Thursday, 20 April 2017 05:38 (seven years ago) link

Metro letters lolz n trollz this morning

'being a labour voter but also one who voted to leave the EU I'm now caught between a rock and a hard place'

'isn't Mrs May worried that Labour may be inspired by recent US conspiracies, which may have occurred, to strike a deal with the Russians, whose hackers may achieve an election result that may surprise her! A whole lot of 'mays, in that sentence. And the campaign will take place during May. Coincidence!'

wtev, Thursday, 20 April 2017 05:38 (seven years ago) link

enjoyed an impartial BBC description of Mélenchon as a "hard left firebrand" this morning, stay classy you scumbags

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 05:56 (seven years ago) link

Hard left firebrand is a bad thing?

Alba, Thursday, 20 April 2017 06:05 (seven years ago) link

I just heard Karen Bradley referring to the danger of a "Coalition of Chaos", much the same rhetoric as last time.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 06:15 (seven years ago) link

hey i'm sure nazis complain about BBC bias too so they must be doing something right eh?

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 06:16 (seven years ago) link

I've been uncharacteristically shocked and appalled by the simpering and pandering tone of bbc coverage.

Ye should all move imo.

virginity simple (darraghmac), Thursday, 20 April 2017 07:32 (seven years ago) link

it is saying something when many are making Dimbleby sound like an angry young man

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 07:58 (seven years ago) link

would move at the first opportunity d

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:21 (seven years ago) link

Nowhere left to move to, it's basically all gone to shit.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:38 (seven years ago) link

FPing anyone who says 'Canada'.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:38 (seven years ago) link

any future move i make will be based on climate and culture, politics is fucked af

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:41 (seven years ago) link

I'd settle for a remote cave in Wales or some Monk's order that permits booze atm.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:43 (seven years ago) link

So in the last few days Farron has made a forced admission that being gay isn't a sin and hasn't ruled out another ConDem coalition. But he's against brexit so obv they are a "nice" party.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 08:59 (seven years ago) link

lol like May called this election cos she's dying to go into coalition with those wankers

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:00 (seven years ago) link

pity the poor folk of West Hull having to manage without hard left firebrand Alan Johnson to represent them

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:02 (seven years ago) link

Cliché, but New Zealand still looks appealing: tory government yes, but one that is obliged to at least pretend to care about climate change, a constitutional limit on how racist public discourse can become, decent but not brutal weather, lack of poisonous spiders, feels cool to be up and about and doing stuff while rest of the world is asleep. Unfortunately you have to be superman to legally emigrate there. And he'd be marked down for only having superpowers under a yellow sun.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

Why doesn't Farron rule a coalition out? It's fucking obvious there's going to be a Tory landslide and it could be worth 10 or so seats to the LDs. It doesn't make any sense at all, even before you take Brexit into consideration.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

NZ no good, need to be as far away as possible from Englishes and their descendants

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:09 (seven years ago) link

No jobs in Spain but they've had a fascist government in living memory so they're unlikely to go that way in the near future I guess.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:10 (seven years ago) link

Spain would be good, Uzbekistan would be better

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:11 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9qf8HYXkAIYlM1.jpg

This is fucking batshit fwiw.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:12 (seven years ago) link

yeah, for all the years my dad moaned on about the EU i used to tell him nobody really gave a shit or UKIP would win elections

sigh

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:13 (seven years ago) link

tell mi more about how the media only reflects publick concerns lol

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:17 (seven years ago) link

NZ no good, need to be as far away as possible from Englishes and their descendants

― Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:09 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, as many older Kiwis would chummily point out, 'there aren't that many pure bred anglo descendants these days tho m8!'- before adding a little too hastily, 'and that's a good thing!!' in response to your darkening countenance.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:20 (seven years ago) link

NZ announced imposed the strongest restrictions on immigration in years yesterday - possibly in anticipation of the ILX influx.

Canada and Australia remain viable if you have a useful skill. UAE is ok if you can wear a suit in super-humid 44 degree weather.

Ireland is superficially attractive, particularly for me, but it's expensive and has a tough job market.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:24 (seven years ago) link

could get a job as a pintman

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:25 (seven years ago) link

any openings for a sideman

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:27 (seven years ago) link

anyway once a day between now and June 8th i have to feebly say "it's not over yet guys" and smile wanly

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:27 (seven years ago) link

best to try and build some internal utopia in your own imagination if you can't afford the plane tickets. I'd imagine everywhere where there is people will become disappointing eventually.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:33 (seven years ago) link

"abundance of poisonous spiders" is the dealmaker

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:35 (seven years ago) link

xp Alright Boethius

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:36 (seven years ago) link

nah, I'm more Diogenes!

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

No jobs in Spain but they've had a fascist government in living memory so they're unlikely to go that way in the near future I guess.

― Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:10 (twenty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Party_(Spain)

imago, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:40 (seven years ago) link

the only acceptable answer is 'scotland' and you all know it

imago, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

Politics and scenery much superior, weather and mass market lager less so

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:42 (seven years ago) link

Scottish politics will be equally miserable post-independence. Don't believe that Scandinavia shit at all.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:43 (seven years ago) link

a few interesting craft breweries in scotland now tbf

imago, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:44 (seven years ago) link

xp politics are better now. After independence, sure, SNP to do a heel turn and become an entrenched permanent tartan tory establishment.

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

nb scottish ppl pls don't read that

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:49 (seven years ago) link

No jobs in Spain but they've had a fascist government in living memory so they're unlikely to go that way in the near future I guess.

I'm not sufficiently well-informed about Spain, but "oh, twere better in Salazar's days" is a majority position amongst older Portuguese.

We had that TV event where you choose the greatest person of your nation that was a fad all over the place some time ago, and the fucking senior citizens got Salazar to win it (the leader of the communist resistance against his regime came in second). Bitter lols.

(The German version made Hitler and his chums ineligible from the get-go to prevent potential embarassment)

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:50 (seven years ago) link

I have a quite wealthy electrical contractor in my family who kept threatening to move to Canada for years, it never happened - he bought a farmhouse in Beverley instead. I never asked him if they turned him down for citizenship or the lure of Beverley was too much to resist.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:53 (seven years ago) link

re: bins and Greece, it's always depressing for me to remember that the things the Eurozone crisis countries resent the EU for are things the UK government gleefully does to its own people without any need of coercion

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:55 (seven years ago) link

p good speech by corbs this morning

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

corbs

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Ireland is superficially attractive, particularly for me, but it's expensive and has a tough job market.

if i could get a job in ireland (and i guess i should form a band of friends and pitch them gov.ie) it does seem p attractive. good quality of life, short enough commutes in dublin relative to london, on a personal level still have family and close friends living there. i just wonder would i hate it after a month and wonder why i bothered.

i would love to live in spain or portugal but my work is a bit tied to english, i'm trying to change that a bit.

xpost

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

i've decided to run with "corbs"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

some of the stuff he said this morning feels like it's been unsaid in british politics for the entirety of the tories' latest reign.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:01 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn needs to say something like 'drinking urine is weird and fucked up', just to see Dan Hodges, George Eton et al uploading youtubes of them drinking pints of their own piss. "Mmmmmm!"

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:02 (seven years ago) link

find it a bit sad/sad lol that both labour and the lib dems are proudly announcing that 2,500 people have joined their party since the election was announced. like... doesn't exactly feel like some seismic yes we can numbers.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:03 (seven years ago) link

not least considering about 250k people used digital register to vote on the day of may's announcement

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:04 (seven years ago) link

Q: [From ITV’s Libby Wiener] Your poll ratings suggest people do not believe you. And you attack the elite. But aren’t you just part of an Islington elite.

: /

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:05 (seven years ago) link

I'm part of the Islington elite and I can assure you Corbyn is not one of us.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:06 (seven years ago) link

Never once seen him in the Coronet on Holloway Road.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:06 (seven years ago) link

tbf anybody joining the Labour party is taking a punt as to whether they'll be allowed to stay and vote for owt

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:09 (seven years ago) link

The thing is, these cunts in the media all live in London (of course) and so know exactly what Islington is really like, though of course many of them probably avoid it because it's too downmarket and full of immigrants, non-white and working class types.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link

what even is the islington elite? he has some money but i don't recall journalists grilling osborne or cameron about going to eton.

imagine what kind of rodent would go all-in on the idea that holding liberal views or wanting a society which doesn't torture those in need makes you an elitist.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:11 (seven years ago) link

Good speech.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:12 (seven years ago) link

IT IS NOT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:12 (seven years ago) link

i don't recall journalists grilling osborne or cameron about going to eton.

Politics of envy dontchaknow

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

ONE PEOPLE, ONE WILL, ONE DIRECTION

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

Good speech.

really good imo. haven't felt anything even akin to enthusiasm for him much but it had some fight to it at least.

xpost NO COALITION OF THE LOSERS

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:13 (seven years ago) link

BRITAIN'S GOT BREXIT

NOW HERE'S ANT AND DEC IN UNION JACK WAISTCOATS GIVING AN IMMIGRANT A GOOD SHOEING

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Feel like Islington elite was no problem for anyone in the days of Blair and Brown, then "North London intellectual" became an antisemitic dogwhistle pejorative in the Miliband era. The only reason it's used against Corbyn is because it's his constituency and it's a good stick to beat him with by the "they don't understand working class communities but btw we still support austerity" kru.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

yeah islington is vaguely known as being posh. it's unfortunate corbyn isn't representing an area people don't actually have a shorthand for.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

tho it would be hilarious if he was mp for shoreditch and dalston.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:15 (seven years ago) link

it's weird - the angel islington is the second cheapest property on the monopoly board

conrad, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson is MP for West Bromwich East, just sayin

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

Right Honorable Member for Hummus & Chardonnay.

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link

the English electorate will never trust a politician who looks like he might have read a book

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:18 (seven years ago) link

corbyn: "i will not rest until a bacon roll costs 12 quid in every cafe in the north"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:20 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn's standard response that half of Islington is in poverty and being squeezed by policies designed to benefit the leafier bits with £2m houses is correct. It's a microcosm of almost everything that is wrong with the country.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

btw i saw some Tory politician or other on tv yesterday telling the Scots they should stay in the Union because free trade and free movement are awesome then i hurt myself laughing

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:23 (seven years ago) link

the inequality in london is truly insane. the whole city is morally perverse. like the rents and house prices in given areas combined with the visible and growing numbers of addicted, homeless and mentally ill people.

xpost

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:25 (seven years ago) link

it's weird - the angel islington is the second cheapest property on the monopoly board

Monopoly can't keep up with gentrification.

Corbyn's standard response that half of Islington is in poverty and being squeezed by policies designed to benefit the leafier bits with £2m houses is correct. It's a microcosm of almost everything that is wrong with the country.

Yup. Talking to some people you'd think Hackney is nothing but hipster cafes as far as the eye can see but if you take a look at the childhood poverty rates...

xpost Ronan totally otm

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:29 (seven years ago) link

I can recall many years ago in The Graun, Francis Wheen wrote a really good in defence of "Champagne Socialists" piece. God, it was probably 20 years ago. But reminding people that posho oddballs like Stafford Cripps or whoever did a lot of good work.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:31 (seven years ago) link

Most of the Atlee cabinet could be derided the same way as Corbyn, although I'm not sure if there is a snappy way of putting this to the electorate.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

maybe if Ant and Dec did it

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:45 (seven years ago) link

lol!

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:47 (seven years ago) link

Faisal just exhausted his scarequota for the year

Faisal Islam‏Verified account @faisalislam 1h1 hour ago
Corbyn says Labour Government will "take on cosy cartels hoarding wealth for themselves" he will "take on" a system "rigged" for "elites"

nashwan, Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:12 (seven years ago) link

Corbs "says"...it was really communicated more via war dance

nashwan, Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:15 (seven years ago) link

Carswell stepping down, voting Tory. Bottler.

nashwan, Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:17 (seven years ago) link

Jokip

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:18 (seven years ago) link

That's...a bad thing? But Banks can't win right. He can't

imago, Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:24 (seven years ago) link

To what extent are the new Tory candidates being selected on their stance on Brexit? What happens if the expected landslide brings in a significant proportion of pro-EU MPs, or are they just going to be blocked by the selection process?

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:26 (seven years ago) link

Arron Banks, the multimillionaire insurance broker who was planning to stand against Douglas Carswell in Clacton, is now considering whether to scrap his candidacy in the wake of his the former UKIP MP’s withdrawal. Banks told the Guardian:

Twenty four hours after launching my campaign, the new sheriff in town has run the old sheriff out. He’s a coward, he’s too chicken. He didn’t want to fight me because he knew he would lose.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

the sheriff of racistham

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

I thought those types adhered to the "mano el mano" warrior code.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 12:00 (seven years ago) link

lol

imago, Thursday, 20 April 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

To what extent are the new Tory candidates being selected on their stance on Brexit? What happens if the expected landslide brings in a significant proportion of pro-EU MPs, or are they just going to be blocked by the selection process?

Per the Mail, they're being told they need to formally sign a pledge for hard Brexit. The idea is that it will be the core of May's manifesto and all candidates will need to agree to abide by it. Of course, they can't stop anyone from disobeying that after the election, short of withdrawing the whip.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 12:05 (seven years ago) link

is may even going to publish a manifesto? i assume it'll just be a small piece of paper with "i shall do what is best" written on it.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Thursday, 20 April 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

Four point pledge:

- end freedom of movement
- leave the single market
- leave the ECJ
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

people who feel £70,000 is not a lot of money these days god bless them

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Indeed.

At some point, if your logic is "i'm paying £30k a year to rent a flat, £3k in transport and £8k in childcare which doesn't leave me with much money" and your answer is not "maybe we should fix the housing crisis, nationalise the railways and stop cutting early-learning education" idk what to suggest other than trying to do it on a third of that.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:11 (seven years ago) link

Maybe one of them should start a "gosh, I'm only 3 grand away from my overdraft after hols" fundraiser.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:25 (seven years ago) link

I meant to share a link to the Graun there, not showing up on my phone tho

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:28 (seven years ago) link

I'm lucky, it never shows up on my phone.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:36 (seven years ago) link

To what extent are the new Tory candidates being selected on their stance on Brexit? What happens if the expected landslide brings in a significant proportion of pro-EU MPs, or are they just going to be blocked by the selection process?

This seems to imply that potential tory MPs have some sort of moral red-lines concerning the EU or basically anything else - which seems a bit optimistic judging from the last year at least.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Thursday, 20 April 2017 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Cliché, but New Zealand still looks appealing: tory government yes, but one that is obliged to at least pretend to care about climate change, a constitutional limit on how racist public discourse can become, decent but not brutal weather, lack of poisonous spiders, feels cool to be up and about and doing stuff while rest of the world is asleep. Unfortunately you have to be superman to legally emigrate there. And he'd be marked down for only having superpowers under a yellow sun.

Superman or rich naturally.

wtev, Thursday, 20 April 2017 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Superman. Or rich.
Fckn fone

wtev, Thursday, 20 April 2017 15:29 (seven years ago) link

imagine what kind of rodent would go all-in on the idea that holding liberal views or wanting a society which doesn't torture those in need makes you an elitist.

Yeah not claiming any sort of perfection for myself here but man, these people ^ I suppose they feel like they've got something to lose if he gets in

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 20 April 2017 15:36 (seven years ago) link

Or is it that they see him as a traitor?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 20 April 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

ok so the corb-machine -- as presumably steered by SMilne -- actually had a p good first day i think

historical notes re the anti-islington sneer:
this started life many years ago as a weapon aimed at margaret hodge and the "people's republic of islington", as a borough out-kenning ken's GLC in terms of "loony left" positions -- this mainly meaning stuff making life maybe more welcoming for non-white and/or LGBTQetc citizens (mostly well meant if perhaps a bit gestural, tho some of the support centres and etc probably actually genuinely helpful, i don't know, i never lived in islington)

^^^the banning of "baa baa black sheep" was first heard (at least by me) in ref islington, also tiresome joeks abt black lesbians w/one leg hoho fuckoff

(hodge long ago swerved blairwards of course: and lots of stuff has since emerged abt child abuse on her watch…)

then later in the run-up to the iraq war, there was for a while a pundit blitz on "things overheard at islington dinnerparties", these things basically being the anti-war sentiments of the well heeled, as reported (or made up) by the ex-left likes of n.cohen, then fed thru a wannabe-hitchens mincer to seem foolishly and/or contemptibly hypocritical, anti-liberal etc etc

so it's not new

(codedly anti-semitic?: well, hodge is jewish, but then so is cohen, at least adoptively and performatively, so i'd say that element was *not* always being implied -- but i think the "out of touch elites" aspect was certainly present back in the early 80s, as a rhetorical weapon against well meaning top-down anti-racism, gestural or substantive)

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:41 (seven years ago) link

(actually when i say "started life", it may well go back before the early 80s: that's when i first moved to london and noticed it)

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Jon Snow article from 2000 about the decline of 'Hampstead liberals', after Jack Straw used the phrase to describe opponents of his draconian judicial policies:

https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2000/jan/13/features11.g2

soref, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

lol jack straw was hodge's deputy leader at islington

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:52 (seven years ago) link

was gonna say, Henry Root always used Hampstead for the same purpose as Islington is now used

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Mark the GRANITA episode / period, c.1990s is also part of the story ie: a period when it was actually seemingly OK for a Labour MP to live in Islington -- it was mocked, but they also succeeded (a bit like the Cons and Notting Hill I suppose)

the pinefox, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

not to get lost in these absurd weeds, but i think the hampstead and the islington varieties were subtly different!

however i am just off out so my reasoning here (or subsequent disavowal of this startling claim) will have to wait

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 17:59 (seven years ago) link

http://c7.alamy.com/comp/G4ACDT/tony-benn-and-jack-straw-G4ACDT.jpg

Tony Benn and Jack Straw, 1981

stock photo keywords: 4/5/81, 600th, anniversary, anthony, attending, awb1, benn, blackheath, commemorate, day, jack, london, may, mp, mr, news, pa, peasants, photo, politics, rally, revolt, son, straw, wedgwood, william

^^^posted mainly for the keywords, now i am running for a bus

mark s, Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

nah you might be right mark - Hampstead as chattering class woolly liberals, Islington as yer actual loony lefties?

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:06 (seven years ago) link

Islington morphed into Hampstead during the New Labour years.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:11 (seven years ago) link

... or so I thought, not sure how Corbyn fits into that, anyway how anyone can think of him as belonging to any sort of elite is beyond me.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

is that a young Will Straw on Jack's shoulders? (born 1980, so looks about the right age)

soref, Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:14 (seven years ago) link

oh, I didn't notice 'son' and 'William' in the keywords, so answer is yes, presumably

soref, Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

Side note: Hodge's ex-husband and Straw's ex-wife got married and were family friends of mine.

But yes, it started out as code for 'incompetent, didactic hard left control freakery' and morphed into 'cappuccino-sipping middle class' as the area gentrified in the 90s. Corbyn managed to largely avoid being tainted by the negative associations Hodge always had - probably partly because he was never responsible for running the council and partly because he is not a ghastly human being.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:43 (seven years ago) link

A lot of the heat the area got is probably because so many liberal journalists/editors (Rusbridger, Dowden, etc) lived there too.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:46 (seven years ago) link

Who all hate Corbyn.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

well tbf the establishment is working out pretty well for them

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:52 (seven years ago) link

I hope that Mark S, if no one else, will be entertained to hear that I was at that rally on Blackheath which was addressed by Tony Benn.

I was a few years older than the baby.

the pinefox, Thursday, 20 April 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link

http://images.archant.co.uk/polopoly_fs/1.4975679.1492091221!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_630/image.jpg

Islington 30 years ago, when it was more famous for Joe Orton than political elites.

calzino, Thursday, 20 April 2017 21:39 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/7ckBafw.jpg

Alba, Friday, 21 April 2017 05:15 (seven years ago) link

Yes. I have never forgotten the slogan, though I don't think I have the badge.

the pinefox, Friday, 21 April 2017 08:07 (seven years ago) link

OMG Tim Farron. I know in order for the Tories to do badly the Lib Dems have to do well but, call me an old sentimentalist, but I would still love them to be completely annihilated.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Friday, 21 April 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

'Let's finish the job' ya cause in 1381 they didn't manage to kill every last foreigner in London

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 21 April 2017 16:03 (seven years ago) link

(lol joeks, I'm not really 'well actually'-ing the peasants revolt)

why labour 'foot problems' since 2015? (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 21 April 2017 16:04 (seven years ago) link

What's going on with Farron then?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 21 April 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

(I want to say I think he's being 'Corbyned' in the famous video where he can't give an answer but ...)

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 21 April 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

What's going on is I just saw a clip of him attempting to rouse the Lib Dem troops for the battle ahead, what a state.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Friday, 21 April 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Read a defense of his gay sin thing and the (lib dem) blogger who wrote it started it with 'Let's get something clear first of all, I'm a fucking liberal, people can have whatever religious beliefs they want ...' but then did go on to say he has been strongly involved in LGBT initiatives

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 21 April 2017 17:38 (seven years ago) link

defending homophobia, that's a win

no fucker in the world is a bigot because of their religion

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Friday, 21 April 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

great coalition opportunities there folks

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 April 2017 17:55 (seven years ago) link

What have we learnt after a couple of days:

- Corbyn gives good speech
- Corbyn is good with kids
- Corbyn is getting his arse kicked on the 8th June

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 April 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

Can we burn the countryside down and send its population out to sea?

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 April 2017 17:57 (seven years ago) link

extend Scottish nationalism to Beachy Head

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Friday, 21 April 2017 18:16 (seven years ago) link

feel the comparison to paintings by magritte needs work

mark s, Saturday, 22 April 2017 13:17 (seven years ago) link

it does tbh

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 22 April 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link

magritte thatcher

||||||||, Saturday, 22 April 2017 13:21 (seven years ago) link

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 50% (+4)
LAB: 25% (-)
LDEM: 11% (-)
UKIP: 7% (-2)

(via ComRes)

Tories hit 50. who are all these fucking people?!

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 22 April 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

morons and scum

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 22 April 2017 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Probably people who like brexit? i.e. nv otm

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 22 April 2017 21:26 (seven years ago) link

Morons and Scum -- I agree. Well said.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 00:27 (seven years ago) link

There is a poll this morning suggesting an 18 point swing to the Conservatives in Scotland.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Sunday, 23 April 2017 07:33 (seven years ago) link

i guess Team Brexit can grasp the concept of tactical voting too

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 07:50 (seven years ago) link

that said, it's still the combination of hysterical, willfully naive, navel-gazing, smug sub-Canary bollocks littering my Facebook that's most likely to drive me off social media for the duration. Alan Moore thinks you shouldn't vote Tory, fuck me, i bet that's shook 'em

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 07:54 (seven years ago) link

Corbs's Britain's Got Bank Holidays promise is distressingly weak too, surely somebody saw that'll generate more lulz than votes

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 07:57 (seven years ago) link

I think it's quite good. It feels concrete, easy to communicate. When the pub finally opens (I hate Sundays. Oh, and Old Firm game too, ugh) I bet people are talking about it. It's nothing huge, but I imagine it will be popular, and provides a pretext to talk about working conditions lie holidays and productivity etc.

Will people like it as much as UKIP's 'burkha ban'? I hope so, but my cynical side doubts it.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Sunday, 23 April 2017 08:15 (seven years ago) link

Wee emo blog entry : feeling shiter about how British politics is headed than anything in this fucked world, chin up to all the decent Britons itt.

-_- (jim in vancouver), Sunday, 23 April 2017 08:17 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'd just started getting politically active again, for the first time since the Iraq War, when last year knocked the stuffing out of me again. Very pessimistic.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Sunday, 23 April 2017 08:19 (seven years ago) link

I am going out campaigning for Labour in an hour!

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 08:39 (seven years ago) link

Good luck!

Nuttall interviews / editorial making it clear he is taking the inevitable step to reposition UKIP as the political wing of the EDL now that their main reason to exist is moot.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Sunday, 23 April 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

Caught a little bit of Corbyn on the Andrew Marr Show, so relaxed I almost expected him to finish the interview by saying, "If you don't mind, Andrew, I'd like to finish with a little song..."

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 April 2017 10:54 (seven years ago) link

this bizarre national sentiment seems to be a mix of "hooray we've fucked the country" and "well since the country is fucked we prob need the tories in charge"

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Sunday, 23 April 2017 10:59 (seven years ago) link

"we need to be fucked harder" oh wait

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Damien Lewis/Tim Farron nausea-time double on Marr next week. Will be giving that a wide berth.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

HE WAS GOOD AS HENRY VIII

mark s, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:18 (seven years ago) link

This is an interesting twitter thread discussion on the Scottish poll nos.

https://twitter.com/AnndraADunn/status/855930664067244032

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

Despite my Stalinism coming through earlier the poll numbers are as much a reflection on what a rag the Labour Party has been since Corbyn took over. Not saying he would've won but May would not have called an election if they were unified to such an extent that he would be able to push policies he is advocating if he were ever to win.

Pasok etc.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:38 (seven years ago) link

one of the small grim nuggets of amusement from a Labour thrashing at the polls will be that by sheer weight of numbers there'll be a lot of Blairites losing seats

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

Morons and Scum -- I agree. Well said.

― the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I am going out campaigning for Labour in an hour!

― the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Can you let us know how this turns out. Thanks.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

lol

briscall stool chart (wins), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:49 (seven years ago) link

one of the small grim nuggets of amusement from a Labour thrashing at the polls will be that by sheer weight of numbers there'll be a lot of Blairites losing seats

― Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Wes Streeting will be sweeping the floor at a McD's 4evah post-June 8th.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Most people are out, or are very good at remaining very quiet and not answering the door to canvassers.

Some people who answer say they are too busy to talk.

Some people who talk for a moment say they have not made up their minds.

One person grandiloquently said he had been Labour all his life but would never vote for Corbyn who has destroyed the chance of social justice for the working class in this country.

One person was enthusiastic for our MP.

One person might vote LD.

One person will vote Labour but said 'Corbyn is the problem - as I'm sure you're hearing'.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Radio 4: Tony Blair says he feels like getting back into politics.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:56 (seven years ago) link

Tough crowd xp

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:57 (seven years ago) link

I'd love to believe in this deux ex machina fantasy I've been seeing of massive numbers of momentum kids suddenly registering to vote but I can't bring myself to

briscall stool chart (wins), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

(xxp) Remain wing of the Conservative Party could do with a spokesman tbf.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Ken Clarke can't live forever.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 April 2017 12:59 (seven years ago) link

One person grandiloquently said he had been Labour all his life but would never vote for Corbyn who has destroyed the chance of social justice for the working class in this country.

You challenged this?

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Tom Watson is a diifcult man to reason with.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:08 (seven years ago) link

That's a good one Tom D !!

No - it wasn't my job to challenge people's views today, just to collect them. And this particular household was really being canvassed by a colleague; I was just observing.

I did find it an odd thing to say. If you are seriously interested in social justice for the working class in this country then you would at least notice that JC believes in these things, more passionately than most MPs, even if he won't manage to deliver them.

I did wonder if there was a time when electoral activity shifted from actively campaigning and debating to just deferentially gathering information. I feel as though there was a time in the past when you would actually get debate on the doorstep.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:09 (seven years ago) link

Relatively speaking, I think Ken Clarke is more of a decent human being than Blair, and he has better taste in music.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:25 (seven years ago) link

neither of those things are high bars tbf

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:27 (seven years ago) link

he actually likes music music is a better way of putting it, unlike the "eclectic" likes of Kendall who love every thing from Dire Straits to Public Enemy!

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:32 (seven years ago) link

I've never quit reconciled myself with the big clunking fist reaching over to turn up that Arctic Monkeys CD.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

nah can we stop this relative stuff - Ken Clarke closed a bunch of hospitals as health sec, don't care if he liked jazz.

Can say a lot of shit about Blair but that government put a lot of cash in Hospitals.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:37 (seven years ago) link

also both Dire Straits and Public Enemy are really good, so can't really fault Kendall for that.

there was that weird thing about 10 years ago when all these journalists were suggesting that Cameron was only pretending to like the Smiths and the Killers to look cool, when that's *exactly* what music I'd expect someone of his age and background to be into - it seemed like it hit a little too close to home for some of them? looking forward to our first PM who was a teenage Slipknot fan

soref, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:43 (seven years ago) link

"also both Dire Straits and Public Enemy are really good, so can't really fault Kendall for that."

which is irrelevant, am more talking about the grasping desperation of Blairites pretending to like stuff, like the example of Broon trying to get down with the kids above!

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 13:47 (seven years ago) link

People (well, people who like them) associate the Smiths with outsiderdom, Northerness, lgbtq themes, and assume all this is incompatible with being a tory. This ignores that a very common position amongst conservatives is that the left is rubbish at politics but good at art.

Morrissey-Brexit-Was-Beautiful might actually disgust me more than David Cameron these days, in terms of opinions held. Though thankfully unlike Cameron he's never been put in a position where his views have actual consequences.

Daniel_Rf, Sunday, 23 April 2017 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Though thankfully unlike Cameron he's never been put in a position where his views have actual consequences.

Yet. We never thought Trump would be president. Prime Minister Morrissey can no longer be ruled out.

Alba, Sunday, 23 April 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

Hasn't that Arctic Monkeys story been debunked. IIRC he was asked about them and said something non-committal along the lines that they'd get you up in the morning or something similar. Next day it was Broon's a massive Arctic Monkeys fan and has all their albums.

Dan Worsley, Sunday, 23 April 2017 15:37 (seven years ago) link

xp

It would be the Vichy Britain under uber-fuhrer Mosley our ancestors missed out on.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

Asked if he really liked the band, the Chancellor responded: 'You've got to laugh, because actually I was asked did I prefer Arctic Monkeys to James Blunt (of 'You're Beautiful' fame), and I think I said I'd prefer Coldplay. But I made a joke that Arctic Monkeys would certainly wake you up in the morning. So, I mean, I've heard Arctic Monkeys and they're very loud.'

Pressed on his favourite track, the Chancellor could only say: 'Well, I mean, I have got them. But they are very loud.'

Brown does own an iPod - his wife bought it for him - but it is said to contain largely speeches, including Bob Geldof's famous four-letter tirade at Live Aid, and classical music.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 16:10 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/23/tony-blair-vote-tory-or-lib-dem-where-they-are-open-minded-on-brexit

article suggests that TB is violating Labour rules by potentially endorsing rival parties.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 April 2017 16:16 (seven years ago) link

i say support terrorists where they are open-minded on killing Blair

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 April 2017 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Exactly what I was driving at earlier, this piece of shit is worse than any Tory.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 16:24 (seven years ago) link

Get Darling and Mandy out telling people to vote Conservative as well. After all, they did such a good job for Leave the electorate won't have forgotten them yet.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 16:53 (seven years ago) link

The Arctic Monkey debut really fell prey to the loudness war, it's true.

Frederik B, Sunday, 23 April 2017 17:03 (seven years ago) link

Assange panicking over being turned over to US in exchange for a fast-track trade deal.

nashwan, Sunday, 23 April 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

Blair is doing his own version of what I see a lot of otherwise well-meaning liberals posting on social media, that they'll vote for whichever candidate says they'll "stop Brexit". I've posted before that the ongoing destruction of the welfare state is worse than Brexit, and what these people are doing is falling into May's trap of making this a single-issue election. If it's allowed to become Brexit referendum mark two then it will allow her policies on other things to become dangerously under-scrutinised - because when she wins she'll take it as carte blanche to do whatever the fuck she wants.

Matt DC, Sunday, 23 April 2017 20:33 (seven years ago) link

In some ways the process of Brexit will drain public finances which will facilitate the destruction of Welfare and NHS and so on except people aren't even attempting to link these issues.

This is where that "Joylon" critique really comes to life - for some people this is their badge. Really fucked.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:04 (seven years ago) link

There was a documentary on R4 on homelessness last year that featured a couple of "metropolitan elite" types that ended up homeless. One of them a single parent teacher who was living in hellish temp accommodation with her young daughter. Another was a former wealthy type from the banking system who had mental health problems and ended up a rough sleeper. This should be one of Labour's lines of attack. Do you really want to live in a country where a redundancy or a spell of illness could be a fast track route onto the streets. But sadly most of the PLP seem to be stuck in the old "benefit scroungers" rhetoric used in the Blair era, it's the only way to get elected apparently.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:06 (seven years ago) link

In some ways the process of Brexit will drain public finances which will facilitate the destruction of Welfare and NHS and so on except people aren't even attempting to link these issues.

Yeah this is what I meant upthread about the two things exacerbating and feeding into one another. Austerity (or more to the point the narrative that there was no alternative to austerity and no end in sight) helped create the conditions for Brexit, which is why Osborne should be getting more blame than he actually is.

Matt DC, Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Calzino - I do think we are now living in a country where one set of precarious workers are unable to empathise with another, but we've had decades of divide-and-rule rhetoric largely aimed at keeping unions down so it's not surprising.

Matt DC, Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:13 (seven years ago) link

If all the PLP were on message about why the Welfare State and the NHS minus creeping privatisation are very good things, maybe they would seem a lot stronger + the full spectrum of precarious people (possibly even some of the 70k club could end up on their arses post-brexit, Weimar stylee) might listen. Probably naive of me, but just a thought.

calzino, Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:36 (seven years ago) link

I'm surprised even with everything else going on that we have a defence minister who casually states that there are circumstances where the UK would use nuclear weapons as a first strike. And yet Corbyn is the 'security risk'.

AlanSmithee, Monday, 24 April 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

Both things - Brexit + austerity / neo-Thatcherism etc - are terrible. They are linked and feed into each other, including re the idea that 'Brexit is the way to finish what Maggie started', etc. People should be against both.

DC is right, though -- May's 'Brexit mandate' will also be taken as a mandate to do terrible things that are not specifically linked to Brexit. That's a good observation about a terrible situation.

On that, a bad sign about Blair's interview yesterday was that while questioning Brexit, he specifically said several times that TM had good policies and he agreed with her about a lot of things.

It's good to oppose Brexit and oppose TM's dire Con policies. But it's not good to oppose Brexit and support them.

the pinefox, Monday, 24 April 2017 09:07 (seven years ago) link

AlanSmithee -- we have a normative situation in which the people who will casually say that they would incinerate millions are sensible, and people who have qualms about that idea are suspect.

the pinefox, Monday, 24 April 2017 09:09 (seven years ago) link

That Farage article upthread is serious stuff - though it says he is part of a 'libertarian' movement which I don't really think is the case; might as well say authoritarian.

the pinefox, Monday, 24 April 2017 09:37 (seven years ago) link

Libertarian in the US sense of wanting to do away with all government restrictions on big business? He doesn't crow much about it but if he ever got anywhere near power I'd expect that's what he would do.

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 24 April 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

Most if not all libertarians skew authoritarian re people not like them tho eh

nashwan, Monday, 24 April 2017 11:07 (seven years ago) link

I don't know, I don't think a lot of these types want a heavy police state - tho traditionally going back to at least Nozick maintenance of civil order is the one role that Libertarians are willing to concede to the state - they would rather exclude/expel, internally or otherwise, those they perceive to be threats or burdens

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 April 2017 11:18 (seven years ago) link

see for example Trump's Wall or the anti-refugee rhetoric of right wing Europols - the Other is to be kept at bay, not to be managed or assimilated

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 April 2017 11:21 (seven years ago) link

seriously don't think it's worth trying to parse farage *or* trump in terms of some underlying "philosophy", as if they were disciples of oakeshott or nozick or whoever

trump is an ill-informed bigot with a lifetime's quiver of dealmaking noises and moves -- he'll say whatever he thinks works to work the room, often fashioned directly out of the last thing he heard

farage is a conman, beginning and end

mark s, Monday, 24 April 2017 11:38 (seven years ago) link

I guess I was thinking more of the ventriloquists than their dummies, fair point

Brexterminate all the brutes (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 April 2017 11:39 (seven years ago) link

Zac G has returned to the Tories to run for Richmond Park again, be pretty sweet to see him beaten again.

calzino, Monday, 24 April 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

conversely, a triumphant comeback would be almost too much to take.

calzino, Monday, 24 April 2017 12:03 (seven years ago) link

Not sure what he thinks is different now than when he last lost. Maybe he'll make it all about the bins.

nashwan, Monday, 24 April 2017 12:09 (seven years ago) link

RP is a 70% Remain constituency, so he is probably going to get crushed.

calzino, Monday, 24 April 2017 12:12 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39698976

Anyone else find this little report of the UKIP 'policies' alarmingly generous and apologetic for them - supportive even? It refers to their ideas as 'right wing' not 'far right', calls them 'extensions of the party's popular stance' and saying 'Its integration agenda was quickly labelled by some as offensive, even Islamophobic' - too scared to even write 'some as racist'?! - feels dismissive. The piece then directly asserts them as 'radical': The Tories have stomped on UKIP turf, so the party's trying to break new ground. If it's more radical as a consequence? So be it. The question is whether it will be enough.

nashwan, Monday, 24 April 2017 20:02 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, this is appalling.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:43 (seven years ago) link

trying to out-tory the tories worked so well for the last time.

calzino, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:47 (seven years ago) link

he always seems very clever and impressive does Starmer, but also seems a complete dick.

calzino, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:48 (seven years ago) link

The New Statesman is still promoting this fawning guff as well:

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/june2017/2017/04/labour-s-best-general-election-bet-keir-starmer

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 11:50 (seven years ago) link

the new statesman's most popular article

Received wisdom states that Jeremy Corbyn’s position in the Labour party is guaranteed, at least for the next six weeks, until the general election on 8 June. However, this belief is in large part down to polls conducted earlier this year among the Labour membership, which showed continued support for him.

In light of the changing political landscape, and the looming General Election, these polls should be revisited. It is clear they offer enough cause for hope to Labour moderates who might be willing to take the risk of removing Corbyn before the country makes this decision for them.

conrad, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:02 (seven years ago) link

Brextermination too good for them

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:32 (seven years ago) link

Do the rules not suggest you can't challenge the leader twice within a year?

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:48 (seven years ago) link

rules are unimportant when the integrity of the SDP is at stake

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:51 (seven years ago) link

tbf that's grossly unfair to the SDP who were way to the left of the likes of Watson and Kinnock

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

tom watson mp appeared in a documentary film about his favourite book the ragged trousered philanthropists

conrad, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:54 (seven years ago) link

he should read it some day

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:58 (seven years ago) link

my favourite bit is when Owen tells his fellow workers that socialism isn't really appropriate to the modern world and they should all vote for minor incremental changes that tinker at the very edge of the capitalist system in the hope that it allows a few more children to become middle class when they grow up. then he shoots an immigrant iirc.

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:14 (seven years ago) link

No that's Camus

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link

well the Labour party does know a fair bit about absurdity

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:35 (seven years ago) link

https://medium.com/@Orwell_Fan/fear-and-voting-in-leechwood-south-23e26e4d43a0

This is more like it.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 16:25 (seven years ago) link

That's a seat wide open for a plucky independent if ever I saw one.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 16:44 (seven years ago) link

Karen has applied to stand in Bury!

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 25 April 2017 16:50 (seven years ago) link

What a shitshow today was, and Ronnie O'Sullivan about to be knocked out from the World Championship too!

Really nice person I follow has applied to be Lab MP in Lewisham West and Penge: https://medium.com/@Tom_Gann/the-new-type-of-mp-labour-needs-d6e0498f0d07

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:14 (seven years ago) link

That Hedges article is a minor masterpiece

Neil S, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:18 (seven years ago) link

julio i thought you despised really nice people

mark s, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:19 (seven years ago) link

LOL come on Jeremy Corbyn is really nice and I think he is great!

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:24 (seven years ago) link

nah, the corb-machine needs more dick moves, i hear all politics is mostly dick moves

mark s, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:39 (seven years ago) link

thats what the likes of Starmer is for, seemingly. He has credibility.

calzino, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:43 (seven years ago) link

good dick moves >> stupid dick moves imo

mark s, Tuesday, 25 April 2017 21:44 (seven years ago) link

It would be good to be MP for Penge.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 07:39 (seven years ago) link

Roy Hattersley yesterday seemed to say that Labour should revolt vs JC, before the election.

In any case he said Labour would one day return from JC to its true Labour values.

RH fought one election as part of the leadership. Labour won 229 seats, to the Cons' 376.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 07:41 (seven years ago) link

Aw, Tom Gann hasn't been selected for interview by Penge. I think he has stood as a candidate before, and would have been good, but is vocally critical of the PLP.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 08:03 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I like Tom Gann and a lot of what he says is OTM but he's been very heavily critical in a very combative way which strikes me as naive behaviour for someone planning to run again. Maybe he felt like he had nothing to lose, I dunno.

Lewisham West used to be my constituency and the runners appear to be exactly the collection of former NEC-members, barristers and charity workers you'd expect, but then you get this guy:

Ibrahim Dogus

The entrepreneur and co-chair of SME4Labour is perhaps best-known for his role in the popular British Kebab Awards, which is attended by activists from across the party. He is also the founder director of the Centre for Turkey Studies.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 09:17 (seven years ago) link

*gives up comedy, goes on panel show*

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

"Keir Dullea, gone tomorrow" was Noel Coward's famously cutting remark about one of the hottest young actors of the 1960s.

Bernie Lugg (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 09:42 (seven years ago) link

never realised the whole snivelling toad queue of 'questions' that happens on the last day of pmqs before an election. is it always like this?

Sir Gerald Howarth, a Conservative who is standing down, says he came into the Commons in 1983, when the country had a strong woman leader, and he leaves as another one is restoring British sovereignty. He appeals to Howarth to protect the armed forces guarding “this sceptred isle”.


Sir Eric Pickles, the Conservative, asks May about anti-semitism, and if she shares his disgust at the selection of David Ward, a former MP accuses of anti-semitism, as a Lib Dem candidate. (See 10.35am.)

May pays tribute to the work Pickles had done tackling anti-semitism. She says people will be disappointed to see the Lib Dems adopt a candidate with a questionable record on anti-semitism.

Ben Howlett, a Conservative, asks if May agrees that his voters should give him a renewed mandate to improve traffic around Bath.

May agrees. A vote for any other party is a vote for wrecking the economy.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 11:56 (seven years ago) link

Ed Laslett‏ @EdLaslett 33m33 minutes ago
More
Great question from @ben4bath, it's him or the coalition of chaos. There really is only one choice for Bath. #PMQs

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 12:00 (seven years ago) link

The depressing thing is that this shit is definitely going to work.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 12:01 (seven years ago) link

yeah the guardian min-by-min person said something about there being proof that repeating the same message over and over can be ineffective - i thought this was a p core part of the SIR lynton crosby approach. may is deadeningly good at it too. with cameron or whatever there was always the chance he might try to change the message or come up with his own soundbyte - the idea of bludgeoning the public to death and killing discourse via a few dull soundbytes is prob a dream come true for may.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 12:06 (seven years ago) link

Sir Eric Pickles, the Conservative, asks May about anti-semitism, and if she shares his disgust at the selection of David Ward, a former MP accuses of anti-semitism, as a Lib Dem candidate. (See 10.35am.)

May pays tribute to the work Pickles had done tackling anti-semitism. She says people will be disappointed to see the Lib Dems adopt a candidate with a questionable record on anti-semitism.

Ex-MP David Ward has been sacked as a Lib Dem general election candidate, party leader Tim Farron says.

Mr Ward, who planned to stand in Bradford East - the seat he lost in the last election - caused controversy in 2013 when he accused "the Jews" of atrocities against Palestinians.

His party membership is suspended and an independent panel will investigate him fully after the election.

Mr Farron said he believes in "open, tolerant and united" politics.

Mark G, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Shudder to think of the state of Bath's bins.

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 14:02 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/857216148689096704

On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 14:02 (seven years ago) link

Howlett has one of the most punchable Tory Boy faces in the Commons. But he's not quite at the level of Corby MP Tom Pursglove.

http://www.toshlist.org/img/photos/mp/mp-pursglovet.jpg

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn should clarify if his position is based on broadcasters refusing to empty chair May (essential spectacle).

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 14:10 (seven years ago) link

The UK should just blow itself up.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/26/theresa-may-popular-voters-leader-since-late-1970s/

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 17:23 (seven years ago) link

i don't understand why anybody wouldn't want to be part of the United Kingdom, it's full of wonderful people

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/june2017/2017/04/jeremy-corbyn-has-attracted-socialism-fans-not-labour-voters

Where to even start with this condescending shit?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:06 (seven years ago) link

- Impossible contemptuous and condescending in the way that virtually every New Statesman article seems to be these days.
- I totally accept that delusional Corbynite cultists exist and they're among the most annoying people on the internet but for every one there are two who desperately want to preserve the welfare state and saw Corbyn as the only available option given the rhetoric coming from his rivals. A lot of the latter group would have voted LibDem before 2010, so bleating about them not being Labour enough is missing the point.
- This is the part where I caveat this by saying that Corbyn has been a disaster who has bungled/squandered the opportunity of a generation and the likely election result will only confirm this.
- So what happens then, assuming he resigns. Do the Allisons of this world think that all these people can be shamed into electing a nice, "sensible" "moderate" who will do what the focus groups tell them, even if that includes dismantling Labour's legacy, and ensure they lose by a smaller margin next time?
- These people need to be won over, not sneered at! The only way this is going to happen is by putting forward candidates who people trust NOT to proceed with welfare cuts if they get elected. Otherwise they're going to cling to Corbyn like a life-raft, or go for whoever is most like Corbyn next time round, even if they're useless.
- The alternative is that Labour gerrymander the process to keep them off the ballot, and they don't seem alert to the dangers that might be inherent in a Momentum Party or similar siphoning off votes from the other side.
- It's amazing how he can bang on for maybe 10,000 words without mentioning the elephant in the room - the financial crisis and the complete collapse of all the apparent certainties that sustained New Labour, and the failure of subsequent leaderships to really get to grips with that.
- Stop pretending that *any* Labour victory is going to be good for the poor, when it's obvious that there are several prominent figures within the Labour Party who continue supporting austerity.
- Brexit would have fucked them anyway.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:23 (seven years ago) link

when I started reading that (which, why) I was like, oh, another lazy tossed-off blog based on a quick 20-minute scroll through social media and my horror as it dawned on me that it was meant to be a Serious Long Read

lex pretend, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:47 (seven years ago) link

Seriously! The entire attitude is precisely why you end up with unelectable lefties running your precious party in the first place.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

why do we think corbyn will resign?

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:50 (seven years ago) link

I don't. He will hang on until he can guarantee the threshold for nominations is lower. Party conference?

Odysseus, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:54 (seven years ago) link

if he doesn't have enough MPs who will accept places in his shadow cabinet after the election he may resign

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:56 (seven years ago) link

Didn't he already double up on some of those jobs?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

that NS piece barely contains a sentence that isn't stupid, untrue or meaningless. takes some doing, that.

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:00 (seven years ago) link

i think at this stage the greater likelihood is splitting the party than seizing it -- with the election lost and the next one five years off, the rationale for not splitting is certainly less than it was

re ns: stephen bush is still worth reading, nearly no one else

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

If Corbyn doesn't resign after a massive defeat them fuck him. But he's very likely to be challenged by another left-winger in that scenario.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

he will force the challenge i suspect, and force the split

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

otherwise the momentum wing of the party basically loses all purchase

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:18 (seven years ago) link

I also wouldn't bet against the unions abandoning him either. Even the most loyal ones know that their interests are better served by virtually any version of Labour in power than under the Tories. And they're unlikely to accept a situation from which there's no apparent way back.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link

O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast!

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:34 (seven years ago) link

if the election is lost, a momentum party is a plausible consequence, but it emerges at its strongest out of a situation where the PLP is gerrymandering or generally manoeuvring against the membership's (and the jilted would-be membership's) wishes

older labour voters are deserting to the tories -- they'll never come back-- but corbyn is currently winning the election vote with under 40s (this alone won't save him in the election but it makes a new party considerably more doable, especially one formed under the kinds of in-party stupidity and unfairness we've seen corbyn first stood… )

corbyn staying on brings that situation about -- him stepping down much less so

on the other hand, i do keep saying he has little strategic nous

mark s, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:37 (seven years ago) link

Why are Labour voting pensioners going Tory? TM hasn't committed to the triple lock. Right wing Tory think-tanks have recent history of saying "optimum time to ditch 'em - high numbers will be dead by the next election". The BBC seems have an endless stream of northern WMC pensioners with "not voting for that fooker!" type answers, followed up by "this is the sound of the political landscape changing forever".

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 19:55 (seven years ago) link

Blair promised them (and gave them) nothing but electability. Corbyn doesn't appear to be able to promise them that. 1945 was a very long time ago and at best they were children.

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:03 (seven years ago) link

the Atlee government was the anomaly, not the acme, of the Labour party

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

That explains why they're not voting Labour. It doesn't explain why they're voting Tory.

(Short answer might be 'Brexit')

Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:10 (seven years ago) link

a lot of (older) people believe in the process of voting (for one of the proper parties) whether they've really got any belief in what any of those parties really stand for, is part of my guess

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:13 (seven years ago) link

The BBC lets you say fooker?

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:13 (seven years ago) link

xp plus loving the whipcrack of strong government, and we do love our strong governments, coalitions and yearly elections are for effete continentals. plus of course the Brexit demographic skews older.

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

xp
No only Scottish Rangers fans can smuggle swearing onto the Beeb, was figuratively speaking Tombot.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:21 (seven years ago) link

Yeah the c-word too. Not Celtic either.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:24 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking maybe some pensioners might have muddled hand-me-down or direct memories of Crippsian post-war austerity, and think it is the the right way to do things and associate it with recovery rather than the decay that the current austerity is causing.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 20:54 (seven years ago) link

I can remember having conversations about Blair and New Labour with my partner's dad (rip) who was born in the late 20's. He used to always say "you've got to give them a chance". I seriously think he was that attached to the "Labour brand" that he would probably vote Corbyn if he was still breathing.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 21:16 (seven years ago) link

Lib Dems not standing in Brighton Pavilion in order to boost Lucas. Greens not standing in Brighton Kemptown (nor Ealing & Southall) in order to boost Labour.
https://twitter.com/joncstone/status/857348826818064384

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:35 (seven years ago) link

oops make that Ealing Central & Acton

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:36 (seven years ago) link

If Corbyn doesn't resign after a massive defeat them fuck him. But he's very likely to be challenged by another left-winger in that scenario.

― Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Why should Corbyn resign after a massive defeat? The PLP haven't backed him at all, they should resign from their seats instead.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:46 (seven years ago) link

Why should Corbyn resign after a massive defeat?

― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:46 PM (seventeen seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

because he's basically hamstringing the party's chance of competing in an election by being the leader

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:47 (seven years ago) link

while having policies not hugely different to ed miliband

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:47 (seven years ago) link

while having policies not hugely different to ed miliband

that is total bulshit, jim.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:49 (seven years ago) link

The only residual EdStone type shit is coming from the "credible" wing of the party.

calzino, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:51 (seven years ago) link

well the manifesto should be interesting (in purely academic terms). being written by Corbyn's main policy bod Andrew Fisher.

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link

I guess it depends to an extends on the composition of the post-election PLP, but if surely Corbyn stands down shortly after the general election then the most likely result is a leadership election where the choice is between several Lab-right candidates without even an Owen Smith style 'soft-left' option? (or even the PLP bypassing a leadership election altogether and electing someone by acclamation?)

soref, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:56 (seven years ago) link

to an *extent*

soref, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:58 (seven years ago) link

while having policies not hugely different to ed miliband

― -_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Making sure every school child is fed without going through the means-testing rigmarole in a push for universal benefits is an example of delicate changes in emphasis from the Milliband years.

Also, not wanting to blow-up the world.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 23:02 (seven years ago) link

the barracking of corbyn from the press though stems much less from the policies that he floats than from his past associations (as substantial or insubstantial as these are), through decades of being backbench bennite rebel labour mp, with the Provos, SWP, Hamas.

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 23:26 (seven years ago) link

he's painted as loony left on the basis of his past, not his policies.

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 23:27 (seven years ago) link

this might be a shame, it might be a real indictment of our political system, it might show our overton window is located very far to the right, but it's an ingrained and inexorable element of corbyn as politician that will follow him as long as he aspires to lead

-_- (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 26 April 2017 23:28 (seven years ago) link

Boris just called Corbyn a MUGGLE I demand Trial by Combat.

nashwan, Wednesday, 26 April 2017 23:48 (seven years ago) link

He WHAT?

Thornberry had Labour's response which was basically 'back in your box, you giant numpty'.

syzygy stardust (suzy), Thursday, 27 April 2017 06:39 (seven years ago) link

he called him a Mugwump according to the BBC, it would be a compliment in the Algonquian language in which it means "great chief"!

calzino, Thursday, 27 April 2017 07:11 (seven years ago) link

Jim - you said it - "from the press". In the doorstep do people know who the hell the SWP are? Its a non-issue.

Where the kind of left politics has made it onto public conciousness would be his anti-nuclear stance and really mostly his anti-EU stance that came in via the Brexit vote. Now here he could lay out a coherent set of oppositions via a set of speeches while acknowleding that it has bought some good, he could forcefully open up debate. But its not something that he is able to do. There are valid criticisms of the guy.

There are failings but I think people would be more favourable if there was any question that the party genuinely backed him. I haven't seen many reports of this but it wouldn't surprise me on bit if Lab backbench MPs encouraged/lobbied May to hold this election just so they could get rid of him and keep up this charade.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 27 April 2017 07:12 (seven years ago) link

I think a lot of those backbench MPs are worried they'll lose their seats and would quite happily have held on for another leadership challenge next year. Rachel Reeves seems to be the name circulating at the moment, suggesting they haven't learned anything at all.

Press attacks on Corbyn seem much less about past ties - which i think relatively few people care about - and more that he will raise taxes and trash the economy. There is occasionally a grudging respect for the consistency of his principles though a clear message that he is not a serious politician and doesn't understand economics, diplomacy, the threat of terrorism, etc, etc - putting the country at huge risk. The fact that his policies tend to be quite popular in the abstract has to be countered with the consistent line that 'socialism sounds nice in principle but doesn't work'.

I don't think that wound fundamentally change if you replaced Corbyn with anyone else of 'the left'. Miliband was himself repeatedly attacked not just from the right but the centre as being dangerously and irresponsibly left-wing.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 27 April 2017 07:37 (seven years ago) link

Boris seems to be floating the idea that the UK will join in with the next round of Trump's air strikes if they've invited.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 27 April 2017 07:43 (seven years ago) link

I keep thinking about the headline of that NS piece implying that Labour should not be a party that appeals to socialists

Brown was attacked for being dangerously left-wing too. The Blair years really did pave the path for socially liberal types to completely detach themselves from the economics of inequality.

lex pretend, Thursday, 27 April 2017 07:51 (seven years ago) link

Miliband was also and more effectively attacked for not looking like a leader or potential PM: in fact there's an entirely plausible theory that this factor on its own was enough to cost Labour the election.

I thought Miliband should have stood down in time to give a successor a chance to bed in before an election. The electorate's perception of him wasn't fair, but it was consistent enough over a long period of time to suggest that it wasn't going to change.

Unfortunately Miliband looks like a Hollywood casting director's idea of a successful British politician compared to Corbyn.

frankiemachine, Thursday, 27 April 2017 08:25 (seven years ago) link

which leads to the question, not how does a left party compete in this environment, but why bother? let's just kill ourselves and get it over with

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 08:56 (seven years ago) link

Several of Corbyn's policies wouldn't be out of place in a Miliband manifesto and some of them could have even been in Blair's without many people batting an eyelid, but there are more than enough points of difference as well. It's a reasonably moderate social democratic policy platform (that's also in and of itself very popular) but he's been painted as a dangerous radical. Being timid while looking radical is probably the wrong way round. Unfortunately he's just not capable of countering this, although he's been doing well enough at campaigning. Opening up debate in and of itself isn't enough, and I wonder whether the "why should he resign?" crew would take Labour never winning an election again in exchange for being sufficiently left-wing.

The PLP haven't backed him at all, they should resign from their seats instead.

Pretty sure most of them won't have any choice.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n08/david-runciman/short-cuts

Runciman in the LRB is interesting on this - Tony Benn's concerns that a left-wing leadership with no authority would be worse than a right-wing leadership that had to be able to work with the left. It's becoming very apparent that you need a coalition of both in order to stand a chance - the right knows how to do the down and dirty things that actually win elections, and knows how to appeal to the wider electorate. But you need the left to keep them accountable and remind the party what it's actually for. That coalition held throughout the early Blair era because for every one thing he was doing they didn't approve of, there were another two or three they were very happy with. But it frayed from 2001 onwards, was on life support throughout the Miliband era and collapsed completely when the right failed to oppose the welfare cap.

Any Labour leader who can't find a way to repair that isn't going to do shit.

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 08:59 (seven years ago) link

I wonder whether the "why should he resign?" crew would take Labour never winning an election again in exchange for being sufficiently left-wing

yeah, basically, for a value of "sufficiently left-wing" equal to or greater than "actively working to promote greater economic equality and a strong, well-funded welfare state"

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:03 (seven years ago) link

because without those things the Labour party is functionally useless to me and why would I care whether it could win an election or not?

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:04 (seven years ago) link

Do you think that makes it functionally useless to other people?

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

I mean people who aren't smug media liberals or investment bankers.

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:05 (seven years ago) link

also, reducing inequality and poverty should not be the furthest extent of the party's ambitions, it should be its starting point and bare minimum reason to exist

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:06 (seven years ago) link

I dunno Matt, what is the point of a Labour government that doesn't want to try to manage the economic base of the country?

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:07 (seven years ago) link

unless we're back at the politics of "not the most heinous bastards in the bunch" in which case, again, probably better off just not thinking about politics

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:08 (seven years ago) link

probably better off just not thinking about politics

I'm trying.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:09 (seven years ago) link

Blairite apologists are still trumpeting Brown's accelerated privatization of the NHS and the demonstrably failed Sure Start programme as their notable achievements ffs

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:10 (seven years ago) link

Agreed that the Labour party doesn't serve any purpose in and of itself if it doesn't do the bare minimum for what it's supposed to represent. Still hoping against hope that there's a middle ground between PLP takeover and happy fringe party status tho.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:10 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure there is one in theory, but what we have right now is so venal, destructive, stupid, vindictive, divisive and racist that I would take virtually anything that stopped it right now. And no the party of Tony Blair and David Miliband is not going to be able to do that, but it also has to be something that isn't completely fucking ineffectual in the face of such an onslaught.

A neoliberal wonk is unlikely to win next time round but it has to be someone that isn't going to preside over another clusterfuck. A left-wing or even centre-left leader with some charisma and strategic thought could actually succeed.

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:14 (seven years ago) link

(And yes I totally blame New Labour for opening the door to our current toxic immigration policy, which is why I don't trust them to row back from it)

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:15 (seven years ago) link

"actively working to promote greater economic equality and a strong, well-funded welfare state"

This is the bare minimum for me as well fwiw, and no one who can't convince of their ability to do this is going to stand a chance with the membership. But Corbyn is making it less, not more likely.

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:24 (seven years ago) link

obv I will go and vote against the Tories which in my constituency means a vote for left-wing firebrand Diana Johnson, and I'd encourage everybody right now to vote for whoever is most likely to beat the Tory in their constituency. but that doesn't mean going forward I'm happy for anything to happen to the Labour party as long as they're electable.

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:27 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I'd cosign that really. But "electable" doesn't have to mean "a slightly pinker version of every Tory policy", which is what a lot of the PLP seem to think it should be right now.

Matt DC, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:32 (seven years ago) link

I have to think they're just not very bright, or not very interested in economics, most of them. which is gob-smacking if you think about it, like centrist politics has become a branch of social work or charity work. but if they're confused about big technical terms like neoliberalism, maybe some could spell out to them that the Labour party wasn't really set up to let businesses just do whatever the hell they like while the government mops up their mess with inadequate benefits and inadequate social services and inadequate education and etc

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:53 (seven years ago) link

shall we do an election thread? "n'er cast a clout til May be out: brelection 2017?"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:58 (seven years ago) link

^^^

mark s, Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:59 (seven years ago) link

a+

calzino, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:01 (seven years ago) link

I was gonna go with No Brexit: Hell is Other Voters

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:04 (seven years ago) link

or "I'm Talkin' Fear" tbh

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:06 (seven years ago) link

should maybe combine the former imo

calzino, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:07 (seven years ago) link

"n'er cast a clout til May be out: Hell is Other Voters

calzino, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:07 (seven years ago) link

tidy work there

mark s, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

Miliband managed to appear moderate despite having policies that were well to the left of Blair/Brown. The right-wing press did their worst to make the Red Ed tag stick but the only people who bought it were other convinced right wingers.

It wasn't the electorate's impression of where he was on the left/right spectrum that did for him, it was the belief that this gawky nerd might be a nice enough bloke but wasn't the sort you'd want to put in charge of anything.

frankiemachine, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:21 (seven years ago) link

why not move to the nice new thread?

mark s, Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:25 (seven years ago) link

I would argue it's not the politician that's on trial in those situations

Brexectile dysfunction (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 27 April 2017 10:26 (seven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.