Bloody hell, *I* fancy you!!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OK, males (and perceptive females) of ILE, please explain this behaviour to me:

Dirty Dronerock boy lying stretched out on my bed, complaining about his love life and how girls just don't fancy him.

What's going on?

1) He has forgotten that I am even female, does not actually even consider me as potential partner and is just looking for ego-stroking and reassuring.

2) He is shy and wants me to make the first move by saying something like "HEY!!! you are wonderful, you are mind-bogglingly talented, you are unbelievably brainy, and so pretty that my eyes actually hurt to look at you, bloody hell, *I* fancy you like crazy!" and pouncing on him.

I would have thought that if you were lying in a girl's bed at 7 in the morning having sat up all night talking, it's pretty *obvious* she fancies you like mad. But sometimes boys just crave company and sympathy. I've learned this the hard way, and I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)

*sings* There may be trouble ahead.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

for gods sake just *fuck* him.

thuddd (thuddd), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Alongside thudd's post, mine now seems mean. That wasn’t intended.

This chap obviously likes you but doesn't *like* you. He is probably looking for ego-stroking and reassurance but that doesn't make him bad. Sounds like you are both experiencing similar emotions that are complicated by the fact that your feelings are for him. I would advise to STEER WELL CLEAR. you'll only end up looking like a fool or getting upset.

Perhaps I am too proud though?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Most likey #2, but you don't want to reward such poor pickup skills with action, on to the next dronerockboy!

Mary (Mary), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)

You have a boy you fancy in your bed. Do you:

1. Make a serious pass at him?
2. Get on the Internet and ask some people if they think he might fancy you?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)

The second option. Pounce on him.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with Mary, don't reward that kind of thing. Unless you really really really adore him he sounds just annoying.

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

But it just felt so much like a gender reversal of that scene from Bedazzled...

He: I have such terrible luck with girls!
She: I really don't understand men!
He: Do I scare them off by being too intimidating?
She: So do I! I scare them off by being too honest!
He: But girls *hate* honesty! They like to play games!
She: I hate playing games. Why can't we just be free from social convention?
He: Why is it so difficult to just say "I *LIKE* you!!!"
::silence as possibly potentially meaningful looks are exchanged::
She: Perfect Prescription is over, shall we put on Playing With Fire next?
He: It's so unfair, girls never fancy me!

However, in the movie, he pounced on her and she beat him off with a stick. I've had this scenario end with disasterous results if I actually attempt to pounce. Sigh. I don't fancy him in a threatening scary way, I just want to make beautiful free jazz with him. I just want him to know how groovy I think he is.

Oh, this is the confusing, sickening, fun, wonderful, nailbiting awful part of the crush. Where it's all wonderful potential and no hurt or disappointment of non-reciprocation, or the awkwardness of actually trying to blossom into A Thing. Why can't we just stay this way forever?

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Jazz? Ewww! Euch! Euch!

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, but we had such a wonderful conversation about whether free jazz was evil or good.

He: Free jazz! jazz is innocent!
She: Do not free jazz. Put jazz back in jail, 'tis evil!

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I will listen to jazz FOR NO MAN.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Love DDB's and you have to put up with Free Jazz. It just goes with the territory. Blame J. Spaceman.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

You have a boy you fancy in your bed. Do you:

1. Make a serious pass at him?
2. Get on the Internet and ask some people if they think he might fancy you?

3. Knowing that he reads Freaky Trigger and sometimes lurks on ILM, post thinly veiled dilemmas which make reference to his immense shaggability in the hopes that it will boost his self esteem?

Bear in mind that I'm not entirely sure that the desired end result is us getting it on. The last thing I want right now is a relationship. Maybe I just want to let him know that he's lovely in a way he can't discount. :-)

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Kate, I envy your agony.

Amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)

We can change the FT tagline to "HEY DRONEROCK BOY KATE FANCIES YOU" if that would help!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Send him an email (don't address him personally) and if he doesn't respond favourably, feign shock and pretend it was meant for someone else.

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)

No, that's nowhere NEAR specific enough. I mean, DUH, Kate Fancies DDB, shock horror, no one could have seen that one coming. But if Tanya Headon could maybe say something to the effect ::hrmmm, what shall we call him in thinly veiled land?:: "HILTON BETELGUESE IS A HOTTIE!!!" I think that would make his dirty dronerock day.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Ohhhhhhhhh....him! I'm not sure he's Tanya's type. But I'm not sure anyone is. Still the suggestion has been noted!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm willing to take a punt that Tanya hates dronerock.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, Tanya hates his band. He's so chuffed about this. He loves Tanya, he wants to marry her. No! Don't marry her, have me... (Beautiful South, beGONE!!!)

OK, I'll stop being so obvious.

Oh fuck it, who cares? He's lovely! And if he doesn't realise that I think he's amazing, then he's stupid.

kate, Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-three years ago)

He may know that you think he's amazing but that's not going to change anything, is it?

Lara (Lara), Sunday, 26 January 2003 19:54 (twenty-three years ago)

free jazz roxx no question abt it!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)

You could always say something like "you know what drives me BATS: beautiful dirty dronerock boys who don't know how to make a clear distinction between complaining that girls don't fancy them so that they can get sympathy from their platonic buddy-girls and complaining that girls don't fancy them so that they can test the waters to see if their platonic buddy-girls would be willing to fuck them, instead of just asking them outright."

Douglas (Douglas), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Might that not be a bit subtle?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 January 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

the luxury of having such ..problems

Vic (Vic), Sunday, 26 January 2003 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy

That's always the problem, isn't it?

Jen (nstop), Sunday, 26 January 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all. All you have to do is buy him a pint of his favourite beer and then touch his willy and he's yours.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 26 January 2003 22:39 (twenty-three years ago)

just put my hands on your ass, it's that easy!

Radisson Mars (tracerhand), Sunday, 26 January 2003 23:10 (twenty-three years ago)

It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:19 (twenty-three years ago)

If it were me...I would think it's probably not worth the trouble. He just sounds like one of those types who just wants someone to make a fuss over them and feel sorry for them, and wouldn't be able to handle someone dealing with them directly and honestly (what would he have left to whine over?).

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)

what nicole said.

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

What di said.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)

That's because men conveniently classify some women as non-women.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:03 (twenty-three years ago)

...but of course there are no women classifying men as non-men.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:07 (twenty-three years ago)

God jot, paranoid much? What didja want Melissa to say, "That's because people conveniently classify some members of their respective opposite genders as not part of that respective opposite gender."?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I'm just tired of men-are-like-this rhetorics. It's so goddamn dull.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Women classifying some men as non-men shocker. [Warning! Barbara Ellen penned article] (it make me so sad that this woman has a career)

N.B. I am not sympathising with jot eff pe's weird hyperdefensive post - it just reminded me of reading this drivel today.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-b-but an overwhelming majority of males *does* share some similiar behaviour patterns, as does the overwhelimg majority of females. Why is it "dull" to point that out?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:26 (twenty-three years ago)

...but of course there are no women classifying men as non-men.

I didn't deny this.

I just hate that men always say "Oh, it's so easy for you girls, you can get laid/find a guy any time."

It's not true. The reason guys say this is because they conveniently exclude a large portion of the female population when they think of "women".

I think women are more honest about having standards, whereas guys seem to like to perpetuate the myth that they'll fuck just about anything.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-b-but an overwhelming majority of males *does* share some similiar behaviour patterns, as does the overwhelimg majority of females. Why is it "dull" to point that out?

If they do, it's dull because it's a cliche.

If they don't, it's dull because it's sexism.

(Grrr... this would be so much easier if I knew the English word for Schubladendenker.)

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 01:42 (twenty-three years ago)

"schubladendenker" = a gigantic urge to classify people as part of a certain group, ignoring any other sorts of traits they might have and thus effectively disowning them as an individual (can't think of a single English word fer that, either.)

I hardly think that what Melissa said was a cliche; pointing out a general weakness that is present in many men or women (more due to social conditioning than due to their gender itself) might alert some of 'em to this weakness and give them the possibility to work on it, so it's useful even if it is dull. Sure, we are all individuals, and what Melissa said doesn't apply to *all* men, but she's hardly putting us all in one schublade (so to speak) by pointing out a weakness that many men might have. There's a difference between saying "men tend to..." and saying "ALL MEN tend to...", you know.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There's a difference between saying "men tend to..." and saying "ALL MEN tend to...", you know.

OK, my mistake. Saying "MOST MEN I KNOW OR HEARD OF tend to etc." every time would be really fucking PC but let's try to think it, please. At least once in a while. Thank you.

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 02:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, any man who says this: "It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all. All you have to do is buy him a pint of his favourite beer and then touch his willy and he's yours."

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

that comment must have been joking! i mean if a man says that and MEANS it then it reflects badly on him as caring only about alcohol and sex right? so no self-respecting man would say it seriously. i do know what you mean about that general stereotype being harmful, but i doubt that nick believes it.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, any man who says this...

...it's still not what "men always say", for christ's s... oh wait, I'm getting into a loop here.

(Don't argue, kids, you're both wrong.)

jot eff pe, Monday, 27 January 2003 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)

>I just hate that men always say "Oh, it's so easy for you girls, you can get laid/find a guy any time."
It's not true. The reason guys say this is because they conveniently exclude a large portion of the female population when they think of "women".
I think women are more honest about having standards, whereas guys seem to like to perpetuate the myth that they'll fuck just about anything.


Melissa, I think that most any woman can get laid most any time. Just go into any bar. I am not saying that she would necessarily want to have sex with any of the men there, but it is highly likely that at least some of the men would be more than willing to have sex with her. (After all, why are there so few male prostitutes who serve women? There just isn't that much of a market when it comes to women wanting to get their rocks off. And yes, there are male escort services, but those tend to cater toward women who actually want an escort/companion for some stated reason - sex may be involved, but it's usually after attending some function where he poses as her date.) BUT there is a big difference between someone finding a sexual partner for a one-night stand or for a fuck-friend and finding someone you want to spend your life with.

For either gender, the search for a mate can be a long and tedious and frustrating and lonely process. It is not easier for one gender or the other, I don't imagine, to find someone with whom they are compatible in things other than sexual interests.

I do believe that men can be sexually manipulated easier than women, but that is a generalization and varies depending on age/sex drive at a given time. (I've seen some older women do some really stupid shit because of their sex drive.)

Okay, that's my piece.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't want to fuck up a potentially wonderful friendship with an amazing guy

Oh, Kate, get over it. Pounce on the boy. If he's an amazing guy but somehow not interested in you, he'll brush you off and it won't destroy the friendship. Worst case scenario, you have a few awkward weeks and then get over it. (Well, OK, the worst case scenario probably involves a white picket fence and the pitterpatter of little feet, but you see what I mean.)

Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:30 (twenty-three years ago)

[Warning! Barbara Ellen penned article] (it make me so sad that this woman has a career)

Gah, that was horrible. I mean, god forbid a man actually care about his appearance! That instantly makes him a gurl.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:31 (twenty-three years ago)

No, an 'almost man' or PROBABLY GAY.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:40 (twenty-three years ago)

And you just know she'll have a column bitching about men not making an effort to look nice a few months down the line.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Nah, I think she's consistent in her liking of rough men. I mean each to his own, but please don't attempt to make social commentary out of it unless you have the wit to do so. Well, it gets her money but God the Observer commissioning editors are clueless.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)

It's like she's trying to go for Burchill-stylee hyperbole but can't quite pull it off. Her nme writing was like this too, except for her story on the Manics in Bangkok but that was only really because even a twit couldn't mess up a story like Richey going mad in Bangkok.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 02:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, Tanya hates his band. He's so chuffed about this. He loves Tanya, he wants to marry her. No! Don't marry her, have me...

In the past I've told such guys that they're deliberately setting themselves up for failure by swooning over the girls who don't care about them. Sadly, this has never resulted said guy coming to his senses and coming to appreciate my loyal affection, so I don't recommend it.
:^p

j.lu (j.lu), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I wonder why ILE is so Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus lately...

Mary (Mary), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:16 (twenty-three years ago)

heh, TS: betty vs veronica

geeta (geeta), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I wonder why ILE is so Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus lately...

It is a bit odd.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:19 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.newbie.net/SmileyFAQ/files/marvin-plugged.jpg
Marvin finds ILE.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 27 January 2003 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I wonder why ILE is so Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus lately...

because our fragile psyches are being ingrained by gary zukov and oprah winfrey!

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 27 January 2003 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course this is a Mars/Venus thread, because it's impossible for either sex to have sympathy for the other when surely all of us who are heterosexual have been having this conversation with people we like since the time we were 14: every fucking cell in my body is screaming at me to say GOOD GOD DO YOU REALIZE HOW FUCKING MUCH GUYS GO THROUGH THIS THIS IS OUR MONTHLY VISITOR but I'm just reminding myself of the obvious bias of being male myself and assuming women have to do it just as often. Anyway you could say "bloody hell, I fancy you" but if I'm really gonna take it on faith that it works the same way for women you'll just get this massively insulting "oh you're sweet" which basically means "no no I meant actual men don't like me, not insects like you who obviously fawn over me because how could you not?"

This thread hurts me in my heart, and Mel please keep in mind that your saying it's difficult for you to get action has as much to do with you not considering some people worthy as it has to do with men doing that. That's the point, not that it's hard to find someone who'd be willing to get on you but that it can be difficult to find a situation where you actually both appeal to one another. I used to hate hearing women complain about not getting any until I just started mentally adjusting the words coming out of their mouths to what they really meant: not "I wish I could get laid" but "I wish I could meet a person I actually liked and who liked me too so we could have a relationship that would actually be satisfying to me (and as of press time that person is not you)." I would be a lot more open to listening to guys make this complaint, since there's often provable evidence that they've been trying, really hard, relaxing whatever standards or expectations they may once have had, and they're still finding it impossible -- only as it happens these tend not to be the kind of guys I really want to hear about this sort of thing from.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:05 (twenty-three years ago)

kiss him you fool!

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:11 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread hurts me in my heart, and Mel please keep in mind that your saying it's difficult for you to get action has as much to do with you not considering some people worthy as it has to do with men doing that.

That's my point though, I feel like I've admitted that. I just wish men would admit it too.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Mel, I think men's point with this is that our standards will still drop way lower than women's will when we are really looking to get some. (This is not entirely true but is definitely still true in its own way.)

Actually a great and defining moment of my younger life was when I decided I was not going to listen sympathetically to such complaints anymore: I was sitting with this very drunk girl I rather liked and she was having a weepy mini-breakdown about guys not liking her because some guy she liked had been going after whatever girl he liked -- and I made that classic "bloody hell" counterargument and got the "that's sweet" and I realized: this is ridiculous and a waste of your time, and next time you see one of these coming on you are not going to stick around in the hopes of ingratiating yourself by being supportive, unless this person is an actual friend you are going to be minimally sympathetic and then move on with your life, not sit around being the empathy machine and then later having to complain yourself about all these girls who find you so comforting not actually liking you. I can't tell you how much better my life has been since that moment.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, possibly that doesn't sound flattering about me but really, it was a good thing.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I have been on both sides of this situation and being on the "gee I wish someone liked meeeee" side is intoxicating, if utterly rotten and wrong. I did something similar to nabisco on more than one occasion, simply said "This is nutters. I like you and you're fucking tormenting me."

However I've had more conversations with girls where the complaint is more "Why aren't I interested in anyone?!" rather than the other way 'round. I'm not sure which is more abject.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I meant to write:

From the other side, I did something similar to nabisco on more than one occasion, simply saying "This is nutters. I like you and you're fucking tormenting me."

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Amateurist it looks like you're saying you said that to me!!!

I absolutely love "I'm not interested in anyone" as a complaint, though I don't think I'd be rude enough to really stress this to anyone in person and expect any sympathy. The thing is it's really counterproductive, as I've learned that saying this too often can just make you more appealing.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh Nabisco, like you don't remember...

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:45 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't know that this is necessarily a heterosexual men/mars, women/venus thing. think two girls sitting on a bed, talking, one girl saying, "why doesn't so-and-so [stupid dumm guy totally unworthy of her attention] like me", and other girl thinking, "oh christ, why don't YOU like ME!!! here i am!! over here!!"

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:51 (twenty-three years ago)

(Ha, Di, I only said "heterosexual" because if it's two girls or two guys doing it neither one can blame the ENTIRE OTHER SEX for being awful like that. Whereas with heterosexuals it turns into "why do guys always do that" versus "what the hell are you talking about girls are the masters of that shit.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyway how could anyone resist this:

http://pluto.imagemagician.com/images/nabisco/drinking-nabisco.jpg

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 07:59 (twenty-three years ago)

empty boxes with X in the top left corner are awfully tough to say no to

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 27 January 2003 08:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Threads like these pretty well underline the importance of taking breaks from ILx from time to time.

(Incidentally, general note to "potential partners": our name is not Gordon Lightfoot. We cannot read your mind. We prefer to be told specifically, either physically or verbally, that it's OK to take things further. Just so that we don't get accused of rape or something like that. You know?).

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 08:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Funny you should say that, MC, this was my first new thread after a week's "break".

I'm actually finding this thread enlightening. It's good when you start a thread on the personal and it ends up sparking debate about the Endless Questions.

On the personal, well... I think Douglas has been the most OTM. ;-)

Without getting too personal, it's that rush when you've known someone 24 hours, you have that intense discussion-talk-mind-meld experience of "Oh my god this person is *exactly* like me in every way!" It makes me do silly things like post overly personal threads to ILX. If you feel like a freak your whole life, it's kind of overwhelming to meet a person who shares your experiences, and you don't know to handle it. If I met someone in a bar who was *exactly* like me, I'd fuck them in a heartbeat, they'd be amazing in bed. But I'd *never* date them, or maybe even not be friends with them, cause they'd remind me of my own freakhood. And destroy the sense of uniqueness which at least gives me a reason to go on living.

With regards to "Hilton" - the exchange took place amid a flurry of other personal revelations. We had been talking about our exes, we'd been talking about our social inadequacies, our problems with bandmates, problems of trying to shut up and fit in in the music industry, then back to moaning about the opposite sex. Ten minutes later he told me about some awful groupie girl who tried to rape him. So I wasn't about to pounce for the fear that's what I'd be perceived as.

Tom always says about crushes, that you idealise in the other person what you most wish you had yourself. I can look at Hilton and go "My god, you're a fucking misunderstood genius. You are brilliant, you are *SO* creative, you are talented, you are beautiful, yes, you may be neurotic and insecure and totally crazy and your bipolar moods and your drinking wreck your life and personality, and your dedication to your work destroys your relationships, and you may be beautifully bitter and can't keep your mouth shut but *I* could love you for that honesty and that bitterness and that talent."

Which is something I really need to spend a lot more time telling myself.

As to whether it's easier for men or women to "get laid", the answer is this: it is far, FAR easier for women to Get Laid. I spent the summer proving this. However, it is far, FAR harder to get laid by someone you would actually *want* to sleep with.

It's also easy for men to get laid. Pick up a guitar or laptop and get on a stage. End of story.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 09:57 (twenty-three years ago)

It would be nice if someone said that to me, but I find that these are the qualities which make potential Others run away from me. Too intense blah blah too much hard work etc. I cannot deny it. They can admire but never enter (and I don't just mean sexually either) you. Plus, as I said to you last week, I myself aren't ready for it yet. This doesn't mean I will never be ready.

The whole thing just reminds me of the mess I got into - god, it's getting on for a year ago now - friendship which I foolishly allowed to escalate into extremely active passion without bothering to check whether there was actually any love or real common ground in existence. I have to be very careful not to do that again, because the pain after it ended just made my existing pain far, far worse.

Yeah, Kate, I know this is nothing to do with anything. I am frustrated too but in different ways. Pay no mind...

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 10:17 (twenty-three years ago)

'Pick up a guitar or laptop and get on a stage'

Howcum chicks who like gtr players usually have no idea what a 'hairbrush' is?

dave q, Monday, 27 January 2003 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Because they fancy guitar players who have NO IDEA WHAT A HAIRBRUSH IS.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it a brush for yr hair?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 27 January 2003 10:47 (twenty-three years ago)

My answer to this is broadly on the "it's a mug's game" developing consensus. Asking for advice generally != flirting and when it is it's really passive-agressive flirting and should be avoided. It's only a step away from "My wife doesn't understand me" after all.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 10:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Basically, we're all fakes and phonies and almost all interraction between the sexes is based on lies, misunderstandings and selfishness?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:13 (twenty-three years ago)

michel houellebecq to thread.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 11:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's put it this way: I wish I'd followed my own advice above many years ago when my own Adorable Indie Chick gave me the overdrive version of Dirty Dronerock Boy's complaint, viz. "oh God it's been almost TWO YEARS and I can't stand it any more and there's this horrible sleazy guy I know who's been hitting on me all the time, but the next time he breathes his rancid foul innuendos at me I'm probably going to have to say yes to him because nobody else fancies me at all and I'm just so desperate at this point for any kind of sexual connection with anyone that I've lowered my standards as far as they'll go."

This is the one time I actually came out with the "bloody hell I fancy you" response. And, naturally, got the "that's sweet." It was a bad moment for everyone.

Playing bass on stage, incidentally, never did me a whit of good. Drums either. I think it must be a guitar thing.

Douglas (Douglas), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Thinking about it - the 'nobody fancies me' ploy IS usually designed to elicit 'hey some people do' or even 'well I think you're fanciable' but in a non-aggressive way. The sought-for response is usually 'don't be stupid I bet loads of people fancy you'. That's what makes it so dangerous!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Aye, so saying "I'd gladly fuck you right now" is liklely to scare the beheebijeebies outta them.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)

It is a ploy for attention. I'm happy to give attention to someone that I think is groovy. I guess I just don't know whether the attention wanted is "Hush up, you're amazing" (which is basically how I responded) or "OK, you want dirty dronerock sex? let's go!" Either of which answer I was probably pretty happy to provide.

He had to listen to me complaining about how Pliny spent most of the night chatting up Some Other Girl, so you know what? He probably didn't actually know or care if *he* stood a chance or if I was going to go "fuck off, weirdo, I like *Pliny*!" What we wanted was some mutual ego stroking, and both of us got it. Both with regard to each others' attractiveness and each others' talent. Happiness all around.

I'm writing happy, gooey bubblegum popsongs about him, and that's what I need out of a boy right now. I could see this turning into an awful, torturous Channel 6 situation, cause, well, I just look at him and *know* where it would go if I tried to persue anything more. I'm aware of that, I'm not going there. (At least that's what I'm saying to myself right now.) Just because you're aware of bad patterns doesn't mean that you can stop them.

But anyway. I should concentrate on my job, and concentrate on my music and concentrate on trying to repair my relationships with my friends that I've alienated and estranged during my self obsessed misery with being useless and unemployed for so long.

They're playing Brown Sugar downstairs and that's how I feel right now. Yeah! yeah! yeah! WOO!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe your new job will divert your attention from the charms of Dronerock (?) boy?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:26 (twenty-three years ago)

NOthing will ever divert me from the charms of DDB's.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 14:27 (twenty-three years ago)

You are lost to us Kate, lost.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Do Dronerock Boys have to be dirty?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

At this juncture may I ask what traits 'Dronerock' refers to? I have been posting 'blind', so to speak.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I cannot somehow imagine a Clean Dronerock Boy grooving to the Telescopes/whoever in spats, plus fours and Victorian gentleman's waistcoat complete with watch chain.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 14:56 (twenty-three years ago)

"Dronerock" = Kate likes it.

"Dirty" = if you have to ask etc.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Ride always looked quite well-scrubbed I thought.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Slowdive were always immaculately turned out.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 14:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Personally, I'm mostly into the dirty hair dronerock look, not so much dirty bodies. Minds fine too.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)

This guy's DIRTY??

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:02 (twenty-three years ago)

lara, you need educating. dirty = dirty mind/ lusty/ rampant/ horny

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Why Martian you're incorrigibubble.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Haha when I phoned RickyT before about REAL ALE (not that I am feeling very well and should probably not be drinking real ale but boy it is lovely) he was listening to Ride! But I think he has had a bath today BAD LUCK!

Anyway blimey the last time I had a boy in my room was... actually I think the last time I had a boy in my room might have been RickyT in an entirely platonic way might I remind you cor blimey, I must start picking up boys and taking them home.

Who was the last boy in YOUR ROOM ilx0rs?!

("schubladendenker" is a grebt word)

I think I am feverish again!

Sarah (starry), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Who was the last boy in YOUR ROOM ilx0rs?!

Me (oh ha ha).

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:07 (twenty-three years ago)

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME AN ACUTE DEFINITION OF DRONEROCK!

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Hello Starry Sarah. Back at the helm?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

NB I mean I was the last boy in my room not Sarah's.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Sarah was the last girl in my room though, checking her eBay. Isabel refuses to visit because it's too squalid.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Bah yes although I've just been told to put my hand over my mouth whilst coughing - do they not KNOW I'm busy posting on the interweb? Hmph. I wish I hadn't come in today but I can't afford not to :(

Dronerock is music with guitars wot sounds the same for several minutes. Then stops. New track. Does the same again. I think.

Sarah (starry), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:10 (twenty-three years ago)

And what has it got to do with lice?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Darling don't you go and brush that hair
do you think its going to make him change?
Im just boy with new brushed hair,
and its a pretty good hair brush.

damm you SM out out of my head

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Dronerock = stuff kate likes = girls and boys (who sound like girls) with guitars that go WHOOOOOSH and words that go swoon and rhythms that go chugachug.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:19 (twenty-three years ago)

In my day dronerock male band members were obliged by law to don the stripey French fisherman's T-shirt.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I like clean boys with dirty minds.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Apparently.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to have one of those! Back when I was 18 and skinny and loved Ride!

The t-shirt, that is. My mind gets dirtier as I get older. And unwahsed hair makes me feel icky these days. Thopugh I did once go three years without washing it. But that was university.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Dirty Dronerock Stuff

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Cute definition of dronerock -- "Aw, look like the sweet little thing use those guitar pedals."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

my plastic lady here's a glitter roll
straight from my heart thu thy soul
yeah I don't care about dirty hair
all praise due queen and yogi bear
so get back in the boat yeah

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

"Cue wild crowd scenes; the collection of Stooges; weaving spots; amp noise; an introduction finally finding its way round to the opening bars of "Penetration" and then there's this creature onstage, his skin is dirty, hair greased, body bound in black leotard, fishnet-tights, Chelsea boots and cock-belt, he's skittering round the stage each muscle coke-glass now not smack-gristle."
MELODY MAKER, LONDON 1978

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

no those lyrics do not qualify for dronerock, they need to be more in the way of the following:

"agamemnon august haze
golden hair zovirax raise
purple cathedrals condone
bloodied scarlet travail zone."

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

or, for a more contemporary lyrical viewpoint, consult the wisdom on this thread.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 27 January 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks, Marcello. Just obsessing on the dirty hair aspect of this thread. Remember when I visited Paris for that one week last year? Dirty haired boys everywhere. But maybe they just had dis-sheveled clean hair? Don't know. I'm always mussing my bf's hair to make it sloppier.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)

That Spiritualized thing is possibly the funniest thing I have ever read.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 January 2003 16:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Dronerock = Kate Likes It. See "playing one chord/on riff for an hour putting different effects on it." Talked about this loads with Hilton because he has written the perfect dronerock song.

Dirty Dronerock Boy = "I am far too busy thinking about free jazz and tonal modality and the future of modern art to be concerned with the care and cleanlines of my hair" There's a thread around here somewhere entitled "Dirty Dronerock Boys: Shag and Destroy" which will explain everything.

The DDB in question is obviously FAR too busy contemplating radio edits of his epic free jazz arkestra adventures to bother returning text messages. No wonder he never gets laid. :-(

Suzy wants her computer back or else I would expound for hours on the DDB.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Wait. You stayed up all night talking about ...Pliny?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 16:48 (twenty-three years ago)

if *only*
IF ONLY
*IF ONLY*
it were always true that just because
a grrl stays up talking til 7 a.m. it
meant she fancied you.

often, very definitely not always.

i say again - if only.


piscesboy, Monday, 27 January 2003 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)

No, we didn't talk all night about Pliny. We talked about Spacemen3 and Dronerock and Dolmens and Time Team and Neurochemistry and the KLF and other dirty dronesubjects. I'd been moaning about Pliny cause Pliny had been doing sound at the club where I DJ'd. So I moaned about Pliny and he moaned about his Ex and that's how the whole "boys/girls don't fancy me" moan started from.

It doesn't fucking matter anyway, I got a song out of it. Even if I went out to go shopping and sign off the dole and forgot the entire melody and nearly forgot the entire song but then I remembered it's in 6/8 which made the chorus come back.

And tomorrow I will fancy someone else, probably the Ex whose band I will see tomorrow night, and I will moan about him tomorrow. At least I *know* Pliny doesn't do sound at that club...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

We should perhaps make clear to N. that this is just someone with a strange name, not actually the Roman statesman transported through time to do sound at London indie gigs, Bill&Ted stylee.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 27 January 2003 19:07 (twenty-three years ago)

BTW, "Pliny" is not his real name. Neither is "Hilton Betelguese". Just so's you know!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)

(His real name is "Gibbon.")

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)

but is hilton betelgeuse like his real name?

Maria (Maria), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:40 (twenty-three years ago)

His real name (well, real like "Kate St.Claire" is my *real* name) is much, much wackier. ;-)

No points for guessing, neither. I'll just have the moderator change it. Unless that's you, Hilton, posting under an assumed name!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

dronerock is so 90s

g (graysonlane), Monday, 27 January 2003 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks Andrew for clearing that up. The original Pliny was a terrible bore as I recall. I hope his dronerock incarnation is more entertaining.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't even know if Pliny is dronerock! I mean, he gave me a flyer for an alt.country night, so who knows what he's into! I don't actually know a bloody thing about him other than that he is a soundman. I mean, he could be married and own only 12 CD's for all I know. It really is that random a crush.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, he could be married and own only 12 CD's for all I know.

Kate's secret crush is Tony Blair.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Fuck his library books off the nightstand, Kate! Actually..., but really, here's what I was going to say:

It's so easy for a woman to pull a man though, any woman at all.Oh, that's it, I was just going to quote this. But I think this is super wrong, mostly because "woman" here are defined as "fucking hot woman." I hung around with some DUDE'S DUDES on Saturday night and they were talking about how UN-HOT their buddy's new girlfriend is, and I thought she was adorable! One of the other guys said, "Well, but she's so much cooler than his last girlfriend--she was psychotic." The other guy pipes up: "Yeah, but dude, that last chick may have been psychotic, but man, she was soooo much hotter." The fact that these dudes were saying that in front of a fine lady such as myself makes it obv. that I am one of those women that is not considered a REAL CHICK because I am not 'fuckin' fine'. Wow, I'm off the subject.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I bet if the Roman Pliny were around today he'd be into alt.country.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Mandee, I bet if you'd taken off your shirt that the conversation would have stopped dead.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:21 (twenty-three years ago)

His real name (well, real like "Kate St.Claire" is my *real* name) is much, much wackier. ;-)

...now i really want to know!

Maria (Maria), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Fuck his library books off the nightstand

I am going to try this the next time this happens to me, for sure.

felicity (felicity), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Mandee, I bet if you'd taken off your shirt that the conversation would have stopped dead
Dead is right.

Mandee, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:28 (twenty-three years ago)

My lips are sealed.

(Then again, he's actually the sort of nutter that would probably get off on knowing that his friends and other random girls were discussing his shaggability on an internet board. And I mean that in the nicest possible way.)

But no. Private lives should stay private because until I see evidence of otherwise, he's not here to defend himself and even if *I* choose to advertise my patheticness, he hasn't made that choice.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:29 (twenty-three years ago)

My lips are sealed.

Choice of soundtrack -- Go-Gos or Fun Boy Three?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Then again, he's actually the sort of nutter that would probably get off on knowing that his friends and other random girls were discussing his shaggability on an internet board.

Nutter? Surely we would all love this(?) Oh no! Kate thinks I'm a nutter.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, he would LOVE knowing that random girls were discussing his shaggability on the internet. As would most men.

What he would not love would be the world knowing that he was lying in my bed moaning for most of Saturday night and Sunday morning. That's the sort of thing that can ruin a boy's reputation. ;-)

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Would most women not love this too?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Women would love moaning in bed with Kate? Dude! Dip me in honey and throw me to the lesbians!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 21:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe it is easier for women to get laid. But is that sex going to be any good?

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Who cares? IT'S SEX!!!!

(the male attitude in a nutshell)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Only in fantasy though, Dan?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

By which I don't mean scented candles 'good' wanking. I mean in the day to day flickering imagination / superficial consideration of wants . When it comes to it many sexual encounters would be (and often are) quite bad really?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Taking sides: bad sex vs no sex?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Well that might be a hard decision, but I'd take 'little sex but all good' vs 'lots of sex but lots of it bad'

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean 'over' not 'vs.'.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:32 (twenty-three years ago)

"Lots of bad sex" = you have the steepest learning curve on the planet. Practice doesn't make "perfect", but it ought to make better than "bad".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:34 (twenty-three years ago)

It's not all about PRACTICE!! I meant about the interpersonal stuff involved. Am I just a big girl?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Bad sex is awful while you're having it, but it's still "sex" that you can brag about at the bar and it'll make you feel that much more experienced and worldly.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)

And no, that has nothing to do with having to *lurve* them. I just meant the awkwardness. That might have something to do with practice but more importantly it's just a psychological unfitness for a zipless fuck.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually N. you're a very willowy girl. But yeah.

"zipless fuck" = buttonfly jeans?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Depends why you want sex. If you want sex to assuage a low self esteem and reassure yourself of your own worth/attractiveness, well, even bad sex serves its purpose. Hell, that's been most of the reason that I've had sex most of the time.

What other reason is there to have sex? Cause it feels good? Most of the time, a decent wank is just as good. The only reason to have sex with someone else is to see your own validity reflected in their eyes. I'll be your mirror, reflect what you are, in case you don't know.

Yeah, I'm aware of how sick and fucked up that is. It sure explains a lot of my attitudes, doesn't it? Maybe things would feel different if I was in love. But that's even scarier than being in bed with a near stranger...

So what is bad sex, under those conditions?

Anyway...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 22:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I really feel like I have a clear thing I am failing to communicate here. Once again, it's not to with 'emotions getting in the way' or anything. To give a silly but concrete example, I mean the worrying about whether she'd be OK with just saying 'goodbye' afterwards. I guess I could only cope with it if it was some seedy contacts mag way where it was all understood. Even then..

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:45 (twenty-three years ago)

N., do you have a magic willy that the ladies can't leave alone?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)

God, yes (no the post doesn't end there) I see how it might look like I was implying that. No no - I just meant who knows, she *might* really like me. Do I have to be so self-effacing as to preclude that possibility? Gosh, that must be how some people with low self-esteem say they are so promiscuous, isn't it? Like, 'Well s/he couldn't possibly like me as a person so it's OK to fuck off in the morning".

Anyway yeah. The other less flattering take is that I wouldn't really care about their feelings, it's just that I wouldn't want myself moaned about as another man who just fucked and went.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

(Dude, I was joking. You've made a bunch of valid points which are really the main reason why I didn't have casual sex.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

You're MARRIED - isn't that reason enough? Wait till Joei hears about this. Were your vows a *joke* to you?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)

What you do in practice and the philosophy you adhere to are two separate things. I thought that was evident from what you were saying?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Remind me what I was saying?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I gave you no window for that joke! There's a difference between "didn't" and "don't", you know...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:05 (twenty-three years ago)

My interpretation of your posts was that this is what you thought about things rather than what you go about doing on a regular Saturday night. I may have been deceived.

And what Dan said.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Thankfully Dan, I misread.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Lara - I don't *do* these thing on a Saturday night but my reasons for not doing so are real and experienced and not hypothetical. Of course if I am already seeing someone then it's quite different. I WAS ONLY JOKING ABOUT DAN SLEEPING AROUND.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Erm, can we go back to talking about how beautiful Hilton is, please?

Which is exactly what I was doing on Saturday night, thank you...

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:10 (twenty-three years ago)

How are we supposed to do that?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

So you would actually *like* to do these things but you are reluctant due to bad experiences?

Are you curious or wanting?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

"Cause it feels good? Most of the time, a decent wank is just as good"

uh, no.

g (graysonlane), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I so should have written 'wanton'.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

See how an ill-crafted joke can just boomerang back on you, N.?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Say "Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I stayed in a hilton in phoenix...it was OK, nice pool.

there's one by the motorway in glasgow but I've never been inside. there's one at the end of byre's road...earlier this month, as the last resort, we went in there for a drink and it was very expensive and they had on tori amos the whole time. it was nice, though.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know, Lara.

[...thinks...]

IT'S NOT A BINARY QUESTION.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:16 (twenty-three years ago)

"Are you curious and wanting?"

Is that better?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:17 (twenty-three years ago)

111000?

001100?

010101?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"Tag Team, back again/WHOOMP THERE IT IS!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you curvaceous and wanton?

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:19 (twenty-three years ago)

That would be.. bewildering and wrong.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Dammit, if you don't get back on topic NOW, I am going to google like the wind until I find pictures of Hilton!

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Is the topic Hilton-worship or having an unrequited crush on someone oblivious and self-pitying?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Both.

And why have I only found ONE photo of him on the internet, and that one is totally shite and you can barely see him for psychedelic stuff?

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.ushandicapable.org/Hilton-1G_small.gifhttp://www.vialattea.net/hubble/1996/9604.jpg
[I am not doing this to annoy anyone]

RJG (RJG), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

RJG is my hero.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 27 January 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes! yes!!! Thank you, Jazz Butcher, for dropping the secret of his real name. I mean, his birth name, rather. Heh.

kate, Monday, 27 January 2003 23:41 (twenty-three years ago)

It's also easy for men to get laid. Pick up a guitar or laptop and get on a stage. End of story.

OK, so I just got back from my first tour. What went wrong?

Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

What is wrong with you people? Hilton also tried to claim that he never got groupies. (apart from the scary one who tried to rape him, obviously.)

Or rather, what am I doing right? I couldn't get laid in a meat market if I wasn't in a band. But when we're on tour, I have to beat off boys with sticks. I wouldn't stay in a band otherwise!

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess I have to start playing the kind of music that would land me an article in Guitar Player. Then the sex would be flowing my way. (Though it probably would be female groupies, anyways. Bah.)

Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 01:20 (twenty-three years ago)

"Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank you, Luna. That's what I needed, really. :-)

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I do what I can

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 02:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I give up googling. I've just accepted the fact that Hilton's band is the only band in the world without a website, and that there are no pictures of him anywhere on the web. :-(

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"Yes, Kate, Hilton is beautiful and talented and wonderful and you are brilliant and perceptive for appreciating his beauty and his talent and his wonder."

"And Hilton is a total dick for not noticing how much you fancy him, and not appreciating your loyal affection."

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

why don't you draw a pic kate?

That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure how much loyal affection you can show for a man you've known 48 hours. IF, in the remotest chance that there was any actual mutual lust going on, considering the circumstances, I think either of us is exhonerated for not pouncing/appreciating/whatever.

I'm trying to have perspective here, but it's hard when you're bored and manic and can't sleep. I've blown this whole thing way out of proportion. Why? Because it's fun.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

What's the best approach? To only complain about no-one fancying you to people you don't find attractive, or complain about no-one fancying you to people you do find attractive. In the hope that they say "Bloody hell, *I* fancy you!!!". Both these options could narrow down how many people you could have this conversation with, but would make life simpler when it came to luv. I think.

fractal (fractal), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)

You know, I was going to say that I only complain about not getting laid to people that I wouldn't mind sleeping with, but then I realise that I often complain to other women, and to men that I think of as women. In fact I'm more likely to complain to someone I wouldn't sleep with. If there's someone I'm interested in, I find it's much better to represent myself as "Wow, I'm so well adjusted and fun to be around I bet you only wish you were half as glamourous and exciting as me, but if you hang around with me, you might be able to capture some of the glamour and excitement by association..." Which actually works in a way that moaning about not getting laid doesn't.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to go really monosylabbic(sp) and speak in really simple sentences like a not very bright person. When approached by someone I really fancy. I really should do something about changing this method. It rarely works. :)

fractal (fractal), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 03:40 (twenty-three years ago)

I am curvaceous and wanton.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whatever.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I usually get brainsuck and cannot speak at all. Which is why it's all the more amazing that I was able to carry on an actual intelligent (for 7am) and articulate conversation with Hilton for so long. While staring in his big brown eyes and thinking "god, you're fucking gorgeous."

OK, last post about Hilton and now I will make an attempt to control my mania and not get this way about some boy. Even though I REMEMBERED THE SONG!!! I REMEMBERED THE SONG!!! I'm so proud. I wrote a song about him yesterday morning, but then in all the excitement about my job, forgot to write it down. And when I went to play it in the evening, it was wiped from my memory. But I woke up with it stuck in my head this morning. Complete. Arranged. Middle 8 and everything. Beautiful! Just like him!

ENOUGH! Slap me if you catch me perving on Hilton. This is to stop.

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)

But I woke up with it stuck in my head this morning. Complete. Arranged. Middle 8 and everything.

I originally read this as "Middle 8 Mile", so I thought Kate had started doing rap!

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:33 (twenty-three years ago)

No way man, avante guarde bubblegum free jazz, dude. HAR HAR HAR!!! Captain Groovy and his Bubblegum Army are coming to take me away...

kate, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:36 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.