however i think this can work as long as the jeans don't sit to high on the waist.
what do you think?
most of my shirts are kind of long to un-tuck without looking like a schlep or a hippie.
this is w/r/t men.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)
on the other hand, people wearing really really long shirts un-tucked into their pants look silly too, i think.
i have a hard time finding shirts of the right length. like a *really* hard time. i think that's cause i've gotten kind of thick.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aja (aja), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― dan (dan), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
scissors: very very bad idea.
well fitting jeans? like sort of snug? hm.
i'm hopeless.
(of COURSE i'd use a belt. i never go out without a belt. ever.)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)
Excusse me, I'm really worried about my Religion homework, and I actually need some scissors
― Aja (aja), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)
uhh, no. When was this?
― Aja (aja), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)
i have one black shirt that fits well un-tucked but i don't really like wearing black shirts. (fascist iconography aside.)
i used to be like amateurist but i developed some kind of metal allergy and now all belts really irritate me and my pants fall down all the time!
sounds like some kind of porn comedy
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)
i am having MAJOR belt issues lately! i used to be like amateurist but i developed some kind of metal allergy and now all belts really irritate me and my pants fall down all the time! -- s1ocki (slytus...), September 25th, 2004 1:20 PM.
use suspenders, or a rope
― Aja (aja), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)
amateur!st - most dept. stores have a tailor that will properly measure you for your shirt size for free.
― joseph pot (STINKOR™), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― dan (dan), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― joseph pot (STINKOR™), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)
i think i have a good basic fashion sense but i can never, ever find the right clothes. mostly because i have no money at all and am forced to shop at goodwill or the cheaper chain stores.
i think i might just wear a sweater today. though even my sweater is kind of wrong.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aja (aja), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― antexit (antexit), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― joseph pot (STINKOR™), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
im not entirely crazy about tucked in stuff but if it looks good on someone, i am all for it. i just happen to see a lot of collegiate douchebags sporting this style, hence my aversion.
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
tuck it in without shame.
― todd swiss (eliti), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)
which one of you has good taste?
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― dan (dan), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)
!!!
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)
The idea of spending money to get a dress shirt tailored specifically so you can leave it untucked ... well, that's completely asinine. The things are long because they're MEANT to be tucked in.
(Of course, I assume we're talking about a button-down type dress shirt, not all shirts with collars like polo/golf shirts and the like)
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)
pics of my cock and sandal combo on the way. I'm so red right now.
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.brooksbrothers.com/Images/Catalog/ProductImages/220Q.jpg
and taking it to a tailor to have it SHORTENED?? spending extra money, and ruining a nice shirt, to enable yourself to look like an indie douchebag complete slob and leave the thing untucked??
I don't get people.
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― todd swiss (eliti), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
xp2
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
trousers are classic.
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.liberty.edu/Media/images/%5B2925%5Ddresscode5.jpg
Vs.
http://www.central-heights.isd.tenet.edu/BPA/WSD/new%20hightower2.png
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Far, far too common in my childhood
(visiting naturist campsites for my summer holidays)
― caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)
should i watch pleasantville now?
― candour floss (mwah), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
http://gallerysink.com/marksink/Images/Andy/Andy_24.jpg
I highly recommend this book-
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3829020295/qid=1096146339/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/104-0122541-1555178?v=glance&s=books
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― candour floss (mwah), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― adam. (nordicskilla), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
xp
i'll leave it to your imagination.
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)
without the coat, then definitely lose the tie. And yeah, uncuffing the sleeves is a good gesture if you still feel too dressy.
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― candour floss (mwah), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Reed Moore (diamond), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― sandy mc, Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― La Monte (La Monte), Saturday, 25 September 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
some collared shirts can look good untucked and some of them look better tucked in. if you really really like a shirt but its too big DO get it tailored [it is not as expensive as people think!] being a cheap-ass will only make you look as such.
the key ingredient to pulling off a shirt is not the shirt itself, its how you wear it with pants. pleated front pants will make you look like either a fratboy douchebag and/or pudgy. make sure your pants are not too baggy and long. [believe it or not, i can tell if a dude is a mama's boy and so on by the way they wear their pants]
make sure to wear a belt and see that the seam of your shirt runs straight down through the belt buckle and zipper/fly of your pants. non-scrawny-indie-rocker-cum-drug-addict dudes take note: this will make you appear slimmer, as you'll be creating one long line. for those in the military, you will be familiar with this rule already.
i say these things because i love you all and im shallo and there's nothing i enjoy more in the world than staring at neatly dressed boys. clearly this thread wouldnt exist if you werent trying to care about your appearance.
this dude always dresses well:
http://magnetmagazine.com/photos/spoon50.jpg
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.tonynelsonphoto.com/live/images/spoon3527.jpg
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 September 2004 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 25 September 2004 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Saturday, 25 September 2004 22:48 (twenty-one years ago)
On the fucking money
― Michael Philip Philip Philip Annoyman (Ferg), Saturday, 25 September 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― jones (actual), Saturday, 25 September 2004 23:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 25 September 2004 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 26 September 2004 00:06 (twenty-one years ago)
because he lives/lived in France. These things are serious over there. I have this big-time stereotype/theory that I actually do kind of believe in, that French people can't dress cool and American people can't dress chic.
― You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Sunday, 26 September 2004 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 26 September 2004 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:22 (twenty-one years ago)
huh?
― jimmy crackhorn (don maynard), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― {Sand in the [vaseline} on the lens] (x Jeremy), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
xx-post
― jimmy crackhorn (don maynard), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)
http://images.jambase.com/bands/drivebytruckers/kayceman_bonnaroo03/scary1.jpg
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:55 (twenty-one years ago)
no, not necessarily dress shirts. i save dress shirts for dress pants. just collared shirts, like the one's you'd get at the gap or wherever, only i got most of mine at goodwill.
i resolved this dillemma tonight by sidestepping it: i rocked the cursed chris martin look: jeans, black t-shirt, and cord blazer.
but this issue will surely come up again.
p.s. c0zen mentioned up above that you can rock the tucked-in look if you are slim/built. unfortunately i am neither. i have a belly that if i let myself go just a bit more would be spilling all over the place. but if i wear a nice shirt you wouldn't really notice it. actually i think you'd notice it less if i had the shirt tucked in.
maria: yes, seam should always match belt buckle. and pleats? who do you think i am? i never wear pleats.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)
this would be a great bumper sticker.
― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)
or get a girlfriend, same difference
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)
i hope i didn't just offend someone!
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)
so true. come hang out by wrigley field and we can point at the dudes rocking this look.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)
what are people thinking?
― todd swiss (eliti), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― todd swiss (eliti), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 30 September 2004 07:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dickerson Pike (Dickerson Pike), Thursday, 30 September 2004 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Thursday, 30 September 2004 09:27 (twenty-one years ago)
As far as I am concerned you shouldn't tuck any type of shirt into jeans.
Formal trousers however are a whole different fish kettle, then tuck away, but no t-shirts or polo shirts.
The semi formal/casual trouser is where I think the confusion lies.
― Davel (Davel), Thursday, 30 September 2004 09:43 (twenty-one years ago)
here's my suggestion: save up your pennies. go to a nice department store. buy five shirts that fit you properly that are of a good quality. take good care of them. use them only for work, take them off as soon as you come home, hang them on wooden hangers, wear undershirts, etc. do not buy any other shirts.when these shirts wear out on you, use the saved money to buy new ones.buying a quality garment that fits you that you wear every day is infinitely better than buying a bunch of cheap shitty garments that don't fit you. you'll look and feel better in a quality shirt... especially if it FITS.
― Catty (Catty), Thursday, 30 September 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
No wire hangers!
― dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 30 September 2004 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
There's that word again. I assume you mean vest?
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 30 September 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Loose Translation: Sexy Dancer (sexyDancer), Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Davel (Davel), Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm just tryin' to let it breathe, dawg.
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 30 September 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Thursday, 30 September 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 30 September 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)
ALWAYS WEAR A FUCKING BELT IF YOU TUCK IN THE SHIRT.
― still bevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 30 September 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
this thread is confusing
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― todd swiss (eliti), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Plus, 3/4 of my height rests in my legs, and when I tuck it makes me look like I have no torso, as though my shoulders flow seemlessly into my hips.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 30 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
yep, i do this too, but if it's done incorrecly it looks assinine.
i never tuck polos or t-shirts and tucking any shirt into jeans is always a risky proposition, but it depends on the particular outfit. i disagree with the always wear a belt comment and tucking in general depends on the cut of the shirt. if it's a long sleeve button down, chances are it belongs tucked. unless it doesn't.
― tricky disco (disco stu), Thursday, 30 September 2004 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― chimera (once alison, now james), Thursday, 30 September 2004 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 30 September 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 30 September 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― tricky disco (disco stu), Thursday, 30 September 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)
now when he went to another wedding last month he went very neatly dressed with his shirt tucked + tie, not thinking over 1 minute to leave it untucked. he is 29 now.
ps. we didn't break off 'cos of this. ;-)
― erik, Saturday, 2 October 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
When I tuck, I still regularly get slovenly oafs going - ooh no, mustn't tuck.
With T-shirts, I like to shove in one side tight and leave the other looser. Maybe asymmetry is passé now, I don't know, but I still like it.
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 2 October 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 2 October 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm: convinced.
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 2 October 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 2 October 2004 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)
Next question: Where in the UK do I get cool belts? I have a really hard time finding belts that fit, mostly I need to make holes deep into the material, 'cos I'm all small-waisted like.
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 18 October 2004 13:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Monday, 18 October 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Loose Translation: Sexy Dancer (sexyDancer), Monday, 18 October 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― B.A.R.M.S. E.N.D.O.R.S.E.S. T.U.C.K.I.N.G. (Barima), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 10:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate/thank you friendly cloud (papa november), Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Ordinary guys--read FAT guys with beer bellies--are going to start untucking en masse. "Hey, look, it's the style, and it makes me look thinner!" Except that it doesn't. Hipsters and movie stars will not want to wear the look after it's fully exported to the 4,000 calorie per day crowd and they'll move on to something else that only looks good on 6'2"-165 lbs.-18 year olds.
Of course, everything looks good on them!
― Th9in, Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
The reason I go to goodwill is to find expensive shirts for nothing. Aquascutum, Polo, Brooks, made-to-order. Find a better goodwill, obv.
― Th9in, Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Fitted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfitted
but I agree with your second statement
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, but if you don't tuck a shirt that's too big for you, you look much worse than if you're wearing a blouse. You get that whole "big fat guy" thing happening.
― sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)
-- ryan (augustuscaesar2...), March 24th, 2005 11:01 AM.
otm
― amon (eman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)
UNTUCK. THAT MOTHERFUCKING SHIT.
OR I WILL.
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)
i think my solution to this problem, once i have a little more cash, is to wear suits all the time. you can't knock a suit.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:09 (twenty-one years ago)
*sorry, i'm sensitive to tracer hand having outed me as heteronormative yesterday.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)
I usually don't tuck in my shirts. Unless I have to work.
― What we want? Sex with T.V. stars! What you want? Ian Riese-Moraine! (Eastern Ma, Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 March 2005 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― amon (eman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 March 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leon Bluth (Ex Leon), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Silky Sensor (sexyDancer), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)
I've decided this looks best when the contrast between jeans and shirt is profound -- ultra-ratty jeans, basically, paired with an obviously-classy and maybe even somewhat silky shirt. (NB ultra-ratty does not = Diesel-bleach disasters.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
-- kyle (akmonda...), March 24th, 2005 10:07 AM. (akmonday)
In a coincidental turn of events, I just ran into Mr. and Mrs. (Anthony) Kyle Monday downtown and they gave me the thumbs-up on the untuck. They both looked ravishing as usual.
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM. $20 Levis are what you're looking for. And a $150 shirt that no one will ever know that you didn't pay $150 for.
― sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
what kind of shoes does Seinfeld have again? they're like white tennis shoes iirc.
― amon (eman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 24 March 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Yes, I rock! Except add an inch and drop 30 pounds of course. My metabolism's through the roof. I can eat a whole pizza and lose a pound twelve hours later.
― What we want? Sex with T.V. stars! What you want? Ian Riese-Moraine! (Eastern Ma, Thursday, 24 March 2005 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)
case closed
― ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 25 March 2005 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)