This is the thread where we discuss the Bryan Singer Superman fillum

I'm not looking forward to Kevin Spacey smarming his way through Lex.

Last I had heard they were going to get Evangeline Lilly from LOST to play Lois...that would've been good...sad emotion tears go here now.

Fuck a Superman.

Oh, and word is they're going to use stock footage of Marlon Brando as Jor-L!
http://www.supermanhomepage.com/images/characters/jor-el/i-doomed.jpg

On the other hand, neither can Kate Bosworth. She'll just look emaciated and shiver, like one of those chihuahuas.

The supporting actors are okay, but the casting for Superman and LL seems very poor.

Hugh Laurie sucks with an American accent
Instead of Hugh Laurie they should get Lee Evans.

*SPOILER*

Nah, it's Perry White's son's kid.

I wanted Lex to be sexy and dangerous. I've been watching too much Smallville. Which, while it sucks, has a fantastic Lex.

Lex Luthor *IS* a Daddy!

Postmodernity anyone?

What is the point of this movie? Look at the sheer insane expense--they built an entire farm and grew crops! This movie has already been made! What is going on? Is this par for the course in hollywood?

The boy wants to see it in IMAX 3D.

Heh, nice touch.

The ad on myspace: what the hell is all that stuff jutting out of the background behind Kevin Spacey?

as is the title sequence.

and they will both be the SUPER-JAM in IMAX 3D.

Jeeezus, BRANDO digitally resurrected for a cameo? He's having a shitty posthumous career. Too bad he doesn't have a scene with Eva Marie Saint, right?

http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/5747_15079_1.jpg

My Question:
Dear General ZOD,

I find myself wondering what your opinion is on gay marriages and abortion. I am sure that you will have the solution that Planet Houston has been searching for. You seem to come from a "Sexually liberated" planet, as demonstrated by your devotion to your sadistic, wild eyed girlfriend and furry, "monkey man" sidekick. Us on Planet Houston can only wonder what happens in the glorious bedroom of General ZOD, but since you never seem to have time to take off your pajamas, it must be exhausting. I await your superior advice on this confusing subject...

Zod's Response: What I do not understand is why matters such as marriage of any sexes would concern a slave who should be doing nothing but kneeling in tribute to me! It appears as though you will soon discover my opinion on abortion, however, for I have just decided to abort your life! DIE AS YOU DESERVE TO!

Mind you I have no interest in this film.

(Even when he is not a man but an alium).

No Halle Berry bootycure.

I liked the movie.

Well okay, the middle section could've used some editing, but otherwise, totally worthy sequel to Donner's original two.

Totally different types of superheroes from totally different publishing houses? That might have something to do with it. I mean I like the X-Men and think Superman (generally-haven't seen the new film) is totally retarded. If you go into it thinking Superman is retarded you're going to have a problem, I think. Granted I have no idea what he thinks of previous Superman films.

Bosworth is one of the worst alltime castings, ever. She's terrible and terrible for the role. Her kid is also dismal. The plot is miserable, a total Hollywood moneygrab with ZERO creativity. Parker Posey is okay, Spacey is fine. The fake Christopher Reeve is passable. The Daily Planet riffing is gawdawful and absymally tired.

The opening title sequence is the bomb, because that music will never cease to be awesome. It's the only thing they got right.

oh wait, not for another week. Damn.

seriously, this film sucks. I wanted to like it, but in the face of both Spidermans and Batman Begins, this is unbelievably bad. ZERO dramatic tension in the script, zero chemistry between any of the actors. there is no soul to this one. Yes, some of the action scenes are well done, but any movie above $200M has the CGI firepower to do that. A by-the-book disaster.

I'm just over giving comic movies a pass because they blew a load on CGI. Anyone with a budget can do killer action scenes now, and the ground that Spidey/Batman plowed leaves a huge trench for Superman to fill. The storyline isn't compelling at all. The only suprise is the XXXXXXXX and that was so fumbled I can barely take it. Really, I want to root for this film but just can't in any way.

hahaha. oh, if only her later years are as entertaining.

I think that Superman and Lois only ever did IT once, in the Fortress of Solitude, in Superman II, after he asked his mom to take away his powers so that he could be normal and get beat up in truck stops like anyone else.
Also, the Smallville conceit is that the superpowers didn't really develop until puberty (something about accumulation of solar energy), so Krypto-fetus would be safe for human uterus.

Re: the whole movie

the five-yr-old inside me figured out the problem with this movie not long after the great opening sequence.
SUPERMAN WENT ON A MISSION TO OUTERSPACE AND YOU DIDN'T MAKE THE MOVIE ABOUT THAT???

And is it just me, or was everything about Lois Lane just wrong? A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who can't spell "catastrophic," has to get her fiance to butter up her boss, and has a tantrum when she can't cover the story she wants? Lame. Also the "mommy should I stay in the car?" "NO OF COURSE NOT COME INTO THE MYSTERIOUS SHIP WITH ME" was pretty, um, hilarious.

The best thing about the whole movie was the Spider-Man 3 trailer.

The spelling thing is a throwback to Margot Kidder's Lois, who was a poor speller (in times of stress, like when she was trapped under the elevator of the Eiffel Tower in Supes II, she welled spell words out loud). I know plenty of reporters/writers/journalists who can't spell. It's almost a common trait.

I didn't really fault her for wanting to cover the blackouts (esp. since it was actually an EMP, not just a blackout), she was just so damn whiney about it when she was told to cover Superman instead. I mean, it wasn't like she built her CAREER on him or anything. Also I really would have preferred it if Lois was truly "over" Superman instead of being a sulky vindictive bitch about it.

THIS MOVIE DID NOT SUCK

SLOCK1 OTM THROUGHOUT

THANK YOU

you want the next xmen flick to be about starjammers, don't you?

DON'T YOU?!

Kate Bosworth needs to be shoved in front of a moving vehicle before they start filming the next one though. Recast!

Yes, she was less terrible than I would have thought.

Where is it written that all superhero movies must be 30-45 minutes too long? Nothing happened, the last hour was just shite writing - okay, we've got the crystals and Superman's coming back and then Kevin Spacey is going to put one in the water and then uh....

One more shot of Superman in Sisyphus-pose lifting something heavy, please! Maybe a third 'oh, gee that Kryptonite sure kicks Superman's ass, maybe he's dead!' scene.

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Opportunity missed: when he gives the kid his Brando speech, kiddo should have been wearing Batman jammies.

i watched 2 1/2 minutes of larry king live yesterday (more than enough, thank you) and there was a moment when larry complemented spacey on his "understated performance" and spacey looked sort of flabbergasted and said, "really? i thought you could see my mugging from outer space" and larry--clearly not used to being contradicted on such a fine point--sort of stumbled around saying "oh, but such a fine performance" while spacey and singer shot glances at each other that clearly translated to "can you believe this idiot?"

also: larry asks singer "what do you think about the whole 'superman is gay' thing?" singer: "he's not." larry: "yes, but what do you THINK about it?"

it's amazing that larry keeps this up day after day and still somehow manages to pull the most high-profile guests of pretty much anyone.

anyway, the movie was pretty good, i was moved in spots, but that was partly because parts of the score (not the john williams parts) resembled copland's score to "the heiress." also because the basic lois/superman setup is touching, although i'm not sure where it was supposed to be by the end. she clearly still loves him, she bore his child--has he simply exiled himself from romance?

The first half of the movie is really good (basically up until they decided to faff about spending all of their time with Luthor's nonsensical, visually-unappealling plot and Lois meandering around aimlessly)! But anyway the plane crash! The shootout! Brandon Routh and whoever played Jimmy Olsen are awesomely, awesomely casted; Routh is terrific. And I think this is the first time Marsden has been even remotely sympathetic in a film, ever.

But the second half :(

THERE IS NOT EVEN A SUPERVILLIAN MONOLOGUE! How do any of you enjoy the villiains in this movie :(

Parker Posey was terrible, I agree; she was completely outdone by the dude with no lines and the tattoo on the back of his head.

It's like the first half of the movie is from a completely different movie than the second half.

I am now wishing they had made the Superman in Space movie after all, Huk OTM upthread.

The strange concept that seems to exist in Hollywood that all comic books are liked by the same people (you know, "comic book fans") and can all receive the same treatment is going to wear itself out eventually. The treatment you give the X-Men or Spiderman is not the same treatment that will work with Superman. He's a completely different entity. That is probably why I enjoyed the first half sooooooooo much more, it had all the makings of turning into a totally fun, awesome Superman movie and instead turned into a Bryan Singer film.

Yeah, but they were going for that, "Oh look how complicated we are!" and failed to make it engaging.

I'D FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE AMNESIA THING.

SUPERMAN RETURNS JUST DROPPED ABOUT 500 LEAGUES IN MY ESTIMATION

I liked this movie a lot more before that big fucking plot hole was pointed out.

Now I realize that I should have argued that it's more understandable if you haven't seen the others because they had so much ridiculous crap.

I know! And I hadn't even really thought about it until now since it has been a while since I've seen Superman II.

i honestly don't remember, i thought the film was a bit incoherent on such points and left evidence of script revisions.

Superman Meets Brainiac
a treatment by Huk-L

CHAPTER ONE: THE SEARCH FOR KRYPTON!
Following the events of Superman II, astronomer Milton Fine (WINK WINK) discovers radio waves emanating from deep space in what appears to be KRYPTONIAN. Superman, feeling more alone in the universe than ever before (thanks to Phantom Zone villains dust-up and the Rho-Kryp-nolisation of Lois) sets out to discover if there might be more survivors.
After some seemingly random encounters with Space Princesses and Vartox, Superman arrives in the asteroid field created by the decimation of Krypton. Weakened by the massive Kryptonite radiation, he drifts, nearly comatose, through the cosmos.
CHAPTER TWO: THE BOTTLE CITY!
Then, his SUPER-HEARING picks up a faint trace of KRYPTONIAN radio signals. Following them, he discovers BRANIAC, who has captured the former Kryptonian capital city of Kandor and reduced it in size and placed it in a bottle.
After a shocking battle with Braniac and his SPACE MONKEY WITH KRYPTONITE VISION (WINK WINK), Superman is shrunk and confined to Kandor. Though Jor-El's crystals have given Superman knowledge of Kryptonian language and culture, he persecuted for his EARTHLINESS by the Kandorians, who, in light of being CITYNAPPED AND SHRUNK, have become understandably xenophobic. He is held as a political prisoner.
CHAPTER THREE: SUPER STIR CRAZY
After Superman and several FREEDOM-LOVING prisoners outwit the corrupt prison officials in a bizarre rodeo hoodwink (featuring the digitally manipulated ghost of Richard Pryor, WINK WINK), Superman rallies the Kandorians to rise up against Braniac!
CHAPTER FOUR: TINY TITANS TRIUMPHANT!
Superman leads an army of miniaturized Super Soldiers against Braniac. SPACEMONKEY kills a bunch of them, but eventually they win. However, in the battle, the shrink-ray-reversal-device is destroyed. The tiny Kandorians set up to create New Krypton on a baseball discovered floating through space, which is not only proportionally the size of a decent planet, but is ONE OF THE BASEBALLS YOUNG SUPERMAN THREW INTO SPACE AS A KID. They ask Superman to stay and be their leader. He declines and they build him a tiny spaceship to go back to Earth.
THE END

Then, in SUPERMANT RETURNS, Superman gets to all the things he did in the current movie, only first he has to go get unshrunk by Prof. Ray Palmer, WINK WiNK.

If I was to make a Superman flick, I'd make the villain Mr. Mxyzptlk and go for a wacky comedy feel. Remember how much you laughed when you first saw the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man rampaging through Manhattan? That's the vibe. Luthor can come in for a bit to be truly evil and menacing, just to raise the stakes enough for a big finale. Super can't muscle his way out, so plays them against each other and wins because he's gooder and nicer than the mean bullies, smiles and winks at the screen, then flies away. THE END

Never happen, of course.

Also can we all just agree that the half hour that came AFTER the climax was completely unnecessary and overly drawn out and made me wanna tell Superman to get on the elf boat already and sail off? The whole hospital boo hoo thing was really unnecessary and bizarrely long.

oh wow, i forgot about that dude. they could have basically made "little man" and "superman returns" rolled into one.

OTM x infinity. It was just stupid.

some of the stuff in this film shaded toward slight parody (affectionate parody) just enough to make it interesting, without undercutting the drama. i wish they could have done that a bit more. but then i'd be expecting the richard donner film i suppose.

i liked the bird/plane line, corny though it was.

The bird/plane line was kind of funny.

http://www.chrisreevehomepage.com/images/superman2/supII-zod.jpg

YEAH THAT'S RIGHT

http://www.x-entertainment.com/pics/su6.jpg

-- gear (speed.to.roa...), July 10th, 2006.

otm, they started it off portraying it as a fairytale thing, then they started molding it into GRASSBEAST VS HOTEL PEOPLES WATCH OUT THEY CUT THE POWER THEY CAN'T CUT THE POWER THEY'RE AMINALSES MAN!

Fucking A, Ally. I'm waiting for the release of ACTOR: THE MOVIE starring Meryl Streep, Rob Deniro, and Kevin Spacey.

1. Routh practically perfect in the main role. I was astonished at how well he came out of this, I went in expecting something ok and he was decidedly better than that - a real feel for the Clark/Supes split and some very elegant physicality to the flying/landing/lifting impossibly heavy stuff.

2. Supporting cast also OTM. Spacey was mean as fuck and I know he was just doing his thesp thing, but I thought it was fine. Cannot understand the Posey flack here, she was spot on and tremendously costumed throughout. Even Bosworth cut the mustard.

3. Given the length I almost wished it was longer - not a dull moment, compared to the repeated yawnfest I got in POTC2. There was probably too little of Luthor's plot and I really wondered how they'd resolve the "huge landmass off the coast" issue, so when they did in the most obvious way possible I was delighted.

4. The whole thing looked *gorgeous* - impeccable FX work and the cinematography was stunning at times - particularly liked the repeated framing to make Superman appear tiny in relation to his surroundings. These new Genesis cameras be da bomb.

5. The big set pieces were SO good. The plane/shuttle crash, the yacht rescue and the final Atlas lift - fuckin' A all round. And like a chump, when Superman fell back to earth after his final endeavour and started to glow on re-entry I felt strangely choked up. Wish there had been more of young Supes, but oh well.

Bottom line, it was huge fun and I'd watch it again tomorrow.

I decided last night that I will never watch another Bryan Singer film.

btw, the imax screen revealed all sorts of flaws in the image (i was so bored, i had time to think abt the mise en scene!) - everything seemed so dark and grubby, right from that utterly lame bit at the start, w/ luthor swindling the old woman out of her money (like a rejected scene from an Addams Family sequel)

apart from bryan singer who is obv useless i also blame alex ross, the major inspiration for lots of the images in this flick

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9aB-9kYaBw

I posted this in ilovecomics already, but it needs a bigger audience. Stay for the end.

terrible movie

Just saw this. I refused to see it when it came out because to me the original Superman movies are what the Star Wars movies seem to be to everyone else, and I couldn't stand them ruining it.
But, it was pretty awesome in the first half, I loved all the references to previous films and the plane crash etc. Then right after they did the crowbarred-in 'flying Lois over USA' scene it went completely downhill.
The Lex-continent should have been amazing but no-one really batted an eyelid.
Kate Bosworth pretty much made this film 10000 times worse, she looked like a 9-year-old playing dress-ups (reminded me of Jodie Foster in Bugsy).
Superman looked and sounded the part but got hardly any lines or character or anything. :(

I don't think I liked this so much in the cinema, but last night I liked it a lot. There are loads of things I like about it including

• Superman's colourful costume
• Superman's attractiveness
• the grace and dignity of Superman's movement, flight etc
• the wit and references just mentioned above
• the villains did more for me this time around - in fact Spacey and Posey almost made me think of Merritt and Gonson, not as direct parallels but just in the atmosphere of American old-world camp
• the whole world of Metropolis, and that great section which always seems in fact to be the best section of a superhero film, where they quickly establish how many crimes the hero is fighting and how famous he has become (here by TV screens and reports from around the world - I loved the equivalent bit in Spider-Man too)

I still can't believe they made a Superman movie about babymama drama.

And when he finds out the kid's his, he says "kid shit's gonna be tough" WHILE HE'S SLEEPING and then FLIES AWAY. "I'll be around." CREDITS ROLL.

Super-Federline! Doo doo-doo DOOOO!

woops, I mean he says "kid, shit's gonna be tough" while the kid's sleeping

"Kate Bosworth is going to be the worst Lois Lane ever."

First line in the thread says it all.

"daddy why don't you live with mommy?"

"well son, after I hit it astronomers found my home planet so KAPOW I went off and kinda forgot to tell her I'd be gone for five years and when I came back she had a new man so I was sad but then she didn't know my real name so I kinda stalked her for a bit in a disguise and then you both got kidnapped so I had to step up and then told me you were mine and I was like O RLY? but like, I need to float around in space impressing movie critics with my dignity and grace and looking at Earth and shit. And that James Marsden guy is pretty nice. You'll understand when you're older and you stand for truth, justice and the American way."

I don't think anyone's mentioned SIR RICHARD BRANSON for a while. Watching the aeroplane scene last night I thought the pilot seemed like him, then dimly remembered a story of him ... buying himself a part in the picture? And indeed Branson it was. I guess this particular double-take must already have been discussed above.

I really don't know why they did have the babymama drama in this movie, it was so unnecessary and overly soapy.

they aren't doing a follow up to this, are they?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_(film_series)#Future

Warner Bros. is currently planning to reboot the film series. With the financial and critical success of The Dark Knight, Warners said of the reboot Superman film, "We're going to try to go dark to the extent that the character allows it."[57] Legendary Pictures president Thomas Tull said "Superman needs a powerful antagonist, a worthy opponent".[58] Tull also wants to evoke Superman as an "angry God".[59]

i probably wouldn't throw a "bad idea jeans" line at that if not for the fact that Brandon Routh is still attached to star in the reboot AFAIK

xp: If the projectionist "goes dark" enough they don't need to actually make a movie.

I really don't know why they did have the babymama drama in this movie, it was so unnecessary and overly soapy

I just can't believe how many reviewers were so fascinated by a man in tights that they could ignore the implication that Superman(!) has a lower moral code than your average guest on Maury.

Routh was fine, though hardly great. Problem was the film around him: script, direction, tone, cast, etc. "Reboot go dark" seems like a moron's response to The Dark Knight's success, but the character's durable, and I don't see how they could do any worse than Singer.

hey, the sexiest moment in any of the Superman movies is when he goes bad in Superman III and flicks peanuts into mirror.

Routh was charming enough in Zack & Miri Make A Porno that I am not against him being allowed to work again.

x-post Bad Superman was so awesome I'm tempted to forgive everything else about the movie

this movie was so bad

Marlon Brando's zombie had more lines than Kal Penn, nuff said

hey, the sexiest moment in any of the Superman movies is when he goes bad in Superman III and flicks peanuts into mirror.

― Alfred

Everybody hates S3, but horny, evil Superman was the single best thing about the first run of Superman flicks. That and Xanadu Krypton.

parker posey was so bad in this

well, I admit a fondness for Nuclear Man's power to scratch Supes with long coke-snorter fingernails and give him the flue.

xp yes and kevin spacey

parker posey was so bad in this

― omar little

It's true. I cringed every time she was on screen. Felt awful cuz I like her, but damn, she was unbearable. In her defense, Bosworth and Spacey were every bit as bad. Not that it helps. Did like Langella as Perry White.

the sexiest moment in any of the Superman movies is when he goes bad in Superman III and flicks peanuts into mirror.

No way, Zod was much hotter than Superman.

Well, if they're doing more of them they need to sort out exactly what's happening in the 'current' Superman world. What's up with the Kryptonite - in the first one if it was in a box near him it made him weak as a baby. Now a whole continent of Kryptonite doesn't affect him til he tries to use his powers and he can still fly around etc unless he has it stabbed into him. Also why didn't he lock the back door of his crystal palace if it was so bad for Luthor to nick the crystals.

Pretty sure Lois had cottoned on to the Clark/Superman thing at least once per film, although my memory is failing and I think he managed to cunningly trick her each time. Clark needs to actually do some stuff as Clark that should include making ludicrous excuses for rushing off and ripping his shirt off.

All superhero films are 'going dark', they should resist it with Superman.

Pretty sure Lois had cottoned on to the Clark/Superman thing at least once per film, although my memory is failing and I think he managed to cunningly trick her each time.

This was so much more tolerable before he busted her out with his super sperm

sorry to keep bringing it up, but I can't believe that made it past the rough draft

also, if the idea is that they knocked boots while they were a couple in II, and that he gave her the amnesia kiss without realizing his boys were floating up Lo's Lane ("your diaphragm is no match for me!" POW!), why does the kid have super-strength? If he didn't have powers, how could his sperm? The alternative explanation is that he nailed her as Superman, without ever giving away his true identity.

Srsly, fuck whoever had the superbaby idea, and fuck the umpteen producers, exec and crewmembers who never said "HOLD UP WTF."

If he didn't have powers, how could his sperm?

Wait, why would the flashy thing take away his sperm's powers just because it took away his? I'm not taking that premise as a given!

i just assume whatever magically made his powers disappear must have triggered the same molecular reaction in his jizz and omg fuck these slash producers for even making this conversation possible.

NEWSFLASH

THIS MOVIE DID NOT SUCK

SLOCK1 OTM THROUGHOUT

THANK YOU

― David R. (popshots75`)

^^^^^^^^

you people are unbelievable. someone took a poo in ur eye, you'd be all on DID NOT SUCK SLOCK1 OTM THROUGHOUT

bryan singer has made exactly one good movie imo and this is not it

it's weird they're thinking of rebooting this since it this basically WAS a reboot.

150 minutes of good reasons for a re-reboot

cannot believe how bad this was! Finally saw it on TV the other day and was... um... supremely disappointed

(yawn)

dig this film

it's weird they're thinking of rebooting this since it this basically WAS a reboot.

― akm, Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:16 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ this is ALSO the problem with comics in 2009 imho.

soooo...

pedo?

This is not remotely a defense of anything he might have done re assault, but the guy who's suing him was 17 at the time of the alleged attack

I read 15

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/x-men-director-bryan-singer-accused-sexually-abusing-15-year-old-boy-article-1.1759389

Variety says 17

Oh later in the article they mention there were earlier incidents. Weird, but yeah, never mind.

http://www.avclub.com/article/x-men-director-bryan-singer-accused-drugging-and-s-203560

*Shudder*

Whether or not the specific allegations are true, this whole thing touches on the worst of the late 90s: first-wave dot-com semi-hucksters living in Suge Knight's former house. This story and how it relates to this story...

(Or not hucksters per se, but...)

the resemblance of the story in the lawsuit to right-wing evangelicals' fantasies about Hollywood as a homosexual den of iniquity makes me really want to be able dismiss it, but i know better than to dismiss allegations of sexual abuse because they sound far-fetched to my narrow mind.

i wonder when USC will have to change the name of their film-studies program: http://cinema.usc.edu/criticalstudies/

The first thing I thought of when I read that was Corey Feldman's allegations from a few years ago that he and Corey Haim had been the victims of a Hollywood pedophile ring in the 1980s.

I guess the next series of X-Men prequels won't be called X-Boys anymore now.

(Or a Superboy prequel, since this is the Superman thread)

do you think power players in Hollywood have sex with teen boys and girls? Yes, I think they might.

I guess the next series of X-Men prequels won't be called X-Boys anymore now.

― StanM, Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:03 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

(Or a Superboy prequel, since this is the Superman thread)

― StanM, Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:12 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Good work StanM, accusations of rape are exactly the kind of topic begging for inane and unfunny punning.

Actually presumed that ws a prospective title, seemed more likely than an attempted joke

Dr Morbius, equating sex w teens to rape, this thread has it all

Sorry Stevie - I suggest you killfile me because that's how I post, unfortunately. Howto: KILLFILE 2.0

I wondered when the next celeb shakedown scandal allowing for displays of sanctimonious dickery wd pop up

I had a hunch this revival would not be about Superman.

what made you say that

j0rdan calling out nick denton ON gawker was pretty awesome

More lawsuits scheduled for today...

There a link to said j0rdan calling out?

http://defamer.gawker.com/the-great-big-bryan-singer-sex-party-mailbag-1564764188

Oh right. Thanks Alfred

damn.

AWWWWWWWWWWWW!

Too soon? http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-xmen-film-features-bryan-singer-traveling-back,36103/

http://www.vulture.com/2014/09/michael-egan-bryan-singer-lawsuit.html?mid=facebook_vulture