What is worse: reading someone's diary, or cheating on a current partner with an ex?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Cos I did the first today, and I know now that my girlfriend did the second last week.

I could probably forgive her in the circumstances, but it's difficult to bring up the subject obviously. What do you do?

Is this the last proper logged-out thread?

Logged Out Forever, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

Neither; getting caught is worse.

The Original Jimmy Mod: Waiting for the return of the Lohan's titties (The Famo, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:55 (twenty years ago)

Caught doing what?

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

I mean, which one?

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

Call her out.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

The latter is worse.

You don't have to mention it. You don't *have* to do anything. But just the fact that you know about it *is* going to change your relationship.

xpost: caught doing either!

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

The latter, diaries are meant to be read.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

i don't easily forgive cheaters. i'd kick her to the curb.

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

HATE FUCK! HATE FUCK! REVENGE REVENGE REVENGE!

The Original Jimmy Mod: Waiting for the return of the Lohan's titties (The Famo, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

woah fuck. the latter. by far.

did you read the diary because you had an inkling she'd done it? because ... ach, fuck. like dan says: call her out.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

If she gets mad that you read her diary, remind her that she cheated on you and is teetering very close to the Untrustworthy Whore tarpit. Besides, if she didn't want any chance of anyone finding out what she'd done, she wouldn't have written it down in the first place.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, I'll wait a bit to see if she confesses I think. It'd be easier if the diary weren't in a foreign (to me) language so I had to use a dictionary to translate. Maybe that's why she felt cool leaving the diary lying around. But 'sex' is 'sex' in this language too, I happen to know.

xposts

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

If you have to broach the subject of her cheating, do it by asking why she's been acting strangely all week, or something like that.

beanz (beanz), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

dude. ditch her. sooner rather than later.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

She hasn't been acting all strange this week. Or if she has, I wouldn't know because, of course, I WAS OUT OF TOWN.

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

If it was me, I'd try to guilt-trip her by saying stuff like "I was talking to ___ at work, and he said his girlfriend slept with her ex behind his back! She sounds like *such* a nasty tart to even think about doing something like that!!"

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

"did you shag your ex?"

"er, no. no, honest."

"well why did you write about it in your diary?"

"you read my diary? how dare you?"

"how dare you shag your ex!"

this is watertight, i think.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

Definitely the latter. I mean, both are breaches of trust but on the continuum cheating is worse right?

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

maybe she hasn't been acting strange, but you can telltale heart-her into thinking she has

gear (gear), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

xxxpost ah, didn't know that. Been on the phone to her at all? Do you know the ex by the way?

beanz (beanz), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

I was wondering what Logged Out was getting up to lately...

Cheating is definitely worse. But still, reading a diary is a broach of trust. But nine times out of ten when someone leaves their diary easy enough to be read, it's kind of like they want to get caught.

Dunno. Sounds pretty horrible, though.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

Well, Forest Pines, I can do it much more subtly than that because it so happens that next week I am going to be sleeping over (very platonically) at one of my ex's house, so the subject of trust etc will have to be discussed anyway.

xpost & beans: no but he is around and she is still friends with him, as I am still friends with my ex.

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

if she gets mad that you read her diary, just tell her that your last relationship fucked you up, got hurt majorly, find it tough to trust

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

i dunno which is worse though.. i mean, she's shagged her ex before she met you, so this is nothing new. but you never read her diary before you met her!!!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

maybe she hasn't been acting strange, but you can telltale heart-her into thinking she has

Gear OTM. "Are you OK? You've not seemed yourself since I got back."

I'm surprised noone yet has mentioned that Arab Strap song about reading your girlfriend's diary and finding all about the secret sex life you really didn't want to know about. I think it's called "Love Detective", although I could be wrong.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

If she gets mad that you read her diary, dump her immediately.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

LOF if you're still friends with your ex maybe you should try and get some action with her!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

I'm surprised noone yet has mentioned that Arab Strap song about reading your girlfriend's diary and finding all about the secret sex life you really didn't want to know about. I think it's called "Love Detective",

haha i think that maybe because arab strap are shite!!!! ;)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)

ken!!

er xpost

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)

Yr sure you translated it properly?

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

get your own back yo!

(by 'back' i mean ass)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

"I had a very strange conversation with (ex) yesterday, is he alright?"

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

Ooh, I've found the mumbles lyrics:

We slept in this morning and she had to get ready in a hurry - no time for her usual attention to detail - and she ran out the door, slamming it behind her, leaving her keys swinging and jangling. I stayed in bed until I heard the downstairs door shut, then peeked through the blinds and as soon as she was out of sight, I went for the keys. She never tried to make a secret of the box or the fact it was locked or even where she kept it. But as I said at the time - "If you've nothing to hide, why hide it?"

It's one of those wee red cashbox things and she keeps it in a drawer by the bed, under some pictures and books. Every key she has is on the same keyring - it took me a while to find the right one. I don't know, I suppose I've had my doubts for a while. There's been hushed phone-calls virtually every night, her friends stop talking when I come in the room and they look at each other, and I don't know, it's just a feeling. Anyway, I eventually found the right key and it fitted perfectly in. I put the box on top of the bed and opened it up...

There were these pictures of friends and ex's, letters, postcards, doodles, nothing bad - and then I found some sort of sex diary and I went to the latest entry. It explicity detailed a recent adventure up the park with a boy she said she had forgotten about...

And it got worse as it went on. The dates never made sense, there were people I had never even heard of. Eventually I had to stop reading it because I started to feel sick. So I put everything back the way I found it, shut the drawer and phoned you. See, I don't know what to do. I keep having fantasies about leaving her dictaphone under the pillow or following her when she goes to work. I've been lying about where I'm going, just in case I can bump into her.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

without knowing the circumstances, it sounds like you want to forgive her, and if you can consider forgiving her transgression, she should probably forgive yours if she wants to. be honest and upfront, and hope she can do the same. the relationship is already over if you are both sneaking around behind each others' backs and suspicious. the cheating and your reading of her diary seem both like symptoms of some greater issue between you. good luck.

carly (carly), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

you should post the diary entry here so that we can all translate it to make sure it's correct

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

I had this happen to me in high school!
SHE: You read my fucking letters! [slaps my face]
ME: You're God-damned right I did, I knew something was up!
[hour of very uncomfortable silence]

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

'Lyrics' is stretching it a bit.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

SHE FUCKED SOMEONE ELSE,END IT.

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

Haha the translation issue a good point! What if she was reminiscing about sex with her ex and you missed the past tense? Or she was maybe saying "I miss Logged Out Forever; the sex I'm having now is so much better than when I was with Guillaume"?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

(x-posts) that is a great song. an oft-forgotten classic by ver strap. obviously the creepy thing is that aidan sounds like he's slightly excited by it ...

... sorry, this isn't helpful.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

Haha the translation issue a good point! What if she was reminiscing about sex with her ex and you missed the past tense? Or she was maybe saying "I miss Logged Out Forever; the sex I'm having now is so much better than when I was with Guillaume"?

or "I wish my current boyfriend and my ex would have hott manlove, it wd b k-awesome"

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

Robert Guillaume...with a little Auberjonois on the side.

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

"ay, santa madre de dios! necesito un lysol douche para mi vadge"

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

Or what if she made the whole thing up, and wrote it in her diary on purpose because she suspected you might read it while she was away?

(I can imagine mitigating circumstances for shagging an ex, I can't imagine any for reading a diary)

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

If I were in your position, LO, I'd simply dump her and I wouldn't even bother to explain to her just why.

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of society's derangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

you should post the diary entry here so that we can all translate it to make sure it's correct

First line, in Swedish, below. Don't think I got this one wrong. Other stuff which followed (which I'm not going to post) is more complicated & so I'm not too sure of the whole situation.

"Hade sex med [name of ex] nu i eftermiddags."

Your other advice, Ken, is useful.

Or what if she made the whole thing up, and wrote it in her diary on purpose because she suspected you might read it while she was away?

I already considered this!

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

maybe she is writing a 'belle de jour' style made-up diary to make you both millions of pounds. maybe she anticipated you reading it, and will use the episode for material -- including this thread.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

(I can imagine mitigating circumstances for shagging an ex, I can't imagine any for reading a diary)

See, I would say it was the other way around.

I'd probably dump someone who read my diary. But I'd DEFINITELY dump someone who cheated on me.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

tell her you met an ex the other week, and she was really into you, and, yes, you were a little tempted, but when you thought about how it would ruin everything, well, it just wasn't worth it you know! but its really cool, that they want to be friends again, then ask current partner, if she has any objections, because obviously you wouldnt meet her again, if current partner wasnt comfortable with it

dioufy (gareth), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

that would be ridiculously soap-opera.

xxpost

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

you still haven't answered the question of why you read/translated her diary ?

have her ex beaten to a bloody pulp

Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

sure, blame the ex.
try tangoing on your own. it's shit.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

(I can imagine mitigating circumstances for shagging an ex, I can't imagine any for reading a diary)

Does being a selfish unfaithful dirtbag really qualify as a mitigating circumstance?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

"Hade sex med [name of ex] nu i eftermiddags."

withought knowing any swedish, that sure does look like "had sex with [name of ex] something something afternoon."

stckhlm cnd (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

you still haven't answered the question of why you read/translated her diary ?

It was just lying around, she was at work, and I was too tempted by the thought that there might be nice things written about me inside. I got what I deserved, I suppose.

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

teh ghost OTMFM

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Well, I tried a translation site, substituting a name in, and I got...

Translation of: Hade sex med garu-g nu

The word Hade sex med garu-g nu is not in the dictionary!

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

withought

or any english, apparently! gawd, i can't type lately.

stckhlm cnd (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

I'd probably dump someone who read my diary. But I'd DEFINITELY dump someone who cheated on me.

I can imagine forgiving the latter if it was eg a one-off, drunken thing and he was regretful, honest etc. Reading a diary is kind of more...deliberate (obv this does not apply to all cases of cheating).

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

(I can imagine mitigating circumstances for shagging an ex, I can't imagine any for reading a diary)

-- The Lex (alex.macpherso...), August 31st, 2005.

lex, i read your diary all the time.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

withought knowing any swedish, that sure does look like "had sex with [name of ex] something something afternoon."

The dictionary kind of indicates that "nu i eftermiddags" means "now this afternoon".

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

i can't imagine being able to forgive somebody that cheated on me.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

Does being a selfish unfaithful dirtbag really qualify as a mitigating circumstance?

no, but I would venture that not everyone who cheats is a selfish unfaithful dirtbag.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

nrq that's not a diary that's a blog (I like to pretend)

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

I don't really want to dump her I have to admit.

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

well, you're probably gonna get hurt again.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

perhaps you could insinuate that you've found out about this some other way? but without telling her, because "that's not the issue here".

Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

If I had written incriminating things in a dairy and left it where my partner could find and read it, I might be pissed off that he/she'd read it but I wouldn't exactly have a leg to stand on if they were pissed off in turn about what they'd read. Shouldn't have read something vs shouldn't have DONE something? No contest.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

It really isn't that difficult to break up with someone BEFORE you sleep with someone else, or to end your current relationship ASAP if you manage to get things in the wrong order. If you're in a monogamous relationship and you are unhappy/unsatisfied enough that when an opportunity comes up to sleep with someone else, you take it, your relationship is over. You can try to start over afterwards but you kind of don't have any moral ground to stand on with the other person as far as fidelity and trust are concerned and you shouldn't be too shocked if the other person wants nothing to do with you once the dirty laundry is aired.

I would venture that not everyone who cheats is a selfish unfaithful dirtbag.

This is what people like to tell themselves to make themselves feel better in the face of the any guilty feelings thrown at them by their conscience. As far as I'm concerned, if you are in a monogamous relationship and you willingly sleep with someone else, you are culpable. Drugs and alcohol only excuse so much and if you're doing enough of that type of shit that you're making such egregiously bad errors in judgement, you've got an entirely different set of problems that your SO should be deeply concerned about.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)

another thread with a not so dissimilar theme. may be helpful dunno

generic relationship advice question

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

i'm 100% with Perry-san.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

there can be mitigating circumstances, but come on, reading a diary is never going to be as bad.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

have sex with her diary

Dr. Glen Y. Abreu (dr g), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

it's the only way to be sure.

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

perhaps it would be helpful to look at this situation NOT in black/white right/wrong better/worse terms. The relationship for whatever combination of reasons is clearly a little bit dysfunctional - there is deception and lack of trust - so you should either end it or have a very good long talk.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

Archel OTM. The fact that she is an order of magnitude more in the wrong than you are doesn't change the fact that you are also in the wrong.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

Talk is nothing without action.

You can talk to/with your partner til you're in the face, but if they're not willing to change their actions (and yeah, sleeping with an ex is kind of a big one!) there's no point to it.

Luminiferous Aether (kate), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

i would agree with Ghost-Dan

gear (gear), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

I am very firmly of the "diaries are written to be read" school of thought. I am also very firmly of the "having sex with an ex while in a committed relationship is a serious motherfucking act of betrayal" school of thought, drunk or not.

Dan Perry OTM throughout, as ever.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

I'd just be very careful about accusing anyone when all you've got it something translated using a dictionary - we've all seen how badly literal translation can be.

And then, if you confronted her and were wrong, you would not only have read her diary behind her back, but falsely accused her of cheating on someone - how would that make you look?

I'm more for shades of grey than Dan's black or white views on trust and cheating in relationships; it would be stupid to throw away a happy, fulfilling relationship just cos of a drunken mistake surely?

, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

sure, blame the ex.
try tangoing on your own. it's shit.

yeah LOF if you were betting in bed she wouldn't have gone sleeping around with ex's innit.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

BETTER in bed, not betting.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

a drunken mistake surely

I'm not sure how drunk she would've been in the eftermiddags.

LOF, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

what if it's all conditional tense or some shit and you don't know the verb endings? 'i fucked/i used to fuck/i would fuck' feel me?

N_RQ, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

Betting in bed?

How does that work?

"Red or black..."

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

'I'll wager there won't be a wetspot tonight'

xxxpost

, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

If I had written incriminating things in a dairy and left it where my partner could find and read it, I might be pissed off that he/she'd read it

In this case, "don't go out with a milkman/milkmaid" is urgent and key.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

Reading a diary is not stealing money or lying about important things. It is READING A DIARY. Shagging an ex is not a "drunken mistake". It is shagging an ex.

LOF, you need to ask your girlfriend exactly what it means. If she gets all upset about you reading her diary, then, sorry, but fuck it, that's a big wrong priority right there. You need to talk and seriously.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

Talk is nothing without action.
You can talk to/with your partner til you're in the face, but if they're not willing to change their actions (and yeah, sleeping with an ex is kind of a big one!) there's no point to it.

You can't really change a betrayal, though, you can't undo what's been done. So to progress in the relationship IF that's what you want requires forgiveness from the cheatee as well as action on the cheater's part.

That said, I wouldn't even be having the talk. You cheat you get dumped.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

many x-posts

everybody makes mistakes. everybody fucks up. cheating isn't the end of the world; these things can be worked out. (and i say this as one who has never cheated on a partner in his life.)

say, for sake of argument, that this happened and your partner is now racked with guilt; she wishes with all her heart she hadn't done it. if you didn't know, you wouldn't be hurt. you might never have found out, and your relationship might have been able to continue blissfully.

obviously, though, you do know - so for both your sake and hers, you need to be totally blunt about it. yes, you read her diary. you can't undo that, though. and you sure as hell can't sweep this under the carpet.

talk to her. it is the only way. perhaps you won't be able to continue after this. but what doesn't kill you makes you stronger :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

whatever.
"oh, i was drunk" is the WORST EXCUSE EVER.
i've been drunk before, it doesn't literally turn one into a blind moron with no memory whatsoever of the last (x) years.
what they're really saying is "i was drunk, i thought that'd help me get away with it. easy excuse to fall back on, aii?"

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

I would venture that not everyone who cheats is a selfish unfaithful dirtbag.

This is what people like to tell themselves to make themselves feel better in the face of the any guilty feelings thrown at them by their conscience. As far as I'm concerned, if you are in a monogamous relationship and you willingly sleep with someone else, you are culpable.

Dan you obv. haven't watched Mission: Impossible 2. This girl thief lady fell in love with this spy dude but then she has to go under cover and shag her ex to gain her ex's trust so that the spy dude can uncover the digital camera pictures of this deadly virus so that stop them before the evil ex infects everybody with the virus then charge the world £££££ for the antivirus. that's quite a ligitimate reason!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

There's a gigantic presumption that this was a drunken mistake going on here. Also, while it is certainly possible to forgive someone for cheating on you and continue being in a relationship, I think it's naive to the point of idiocy to pretend that cheating on your monogamous partner isn't a gigantic reset button on your relationship that destroys the lion's share of the trust you've built up and changes the way the cheatee looks at the cheater forever.

If you're cavalier enough about your monogamous relationship that cheating isn't a big deal, you should not be in that monogamous relationship as that kind of completely defeats the purpose of the "monogamous" bit.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

Okay yeah, if the gf has to have sex with other people as part of her job or to save the world, that's a different issue.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

LOF tell your ex you were drunk when you read her diary

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

you could tell her, "you were talking in your sleep, you said some things...it aroused my suspicions!"

gear (gear), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

everybody makes mistakes. everybody fucks up. cheating isn't the end of the world; these things can be worked out. (and i say this as one who has never cheated on a partner in his life.)

say, for sake of argument, that this happened and your partner is now racked with guilt; she wishes with all her heart she hadn't done it. if you didn't know, you wouldn't be hurt. you might never have found out, and your relationship might have been able to continue blissfully.

otm.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

I have always believed that those who read the diary of another person without permission are BEGGING for trouble because sod's law dictates there will either be unflattering descriptions of the eavesdropper or recollections of sexual infidelities against the eavesdropper.

Take the hit from her for letting curiosity get the better of you, but end the relationship.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

Hm. Dan OTM. I have cheated in the past. That doesn't mean I would accept it from a partner and I wouldn't make any excuses for myself - it's a sign that the relationship is dead, as far as I'm concerned. But everyone is different.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

I disagree that diaries are written to be read. I keep a fairly detailed diary of pretty much everything I do, but there's no way I want anyone that I know to read it. I keep it because my memory is shit and I'd like to remember stuff in years to come. Maybe I could handle the idea of someone reading it in a century, when no one I know is still alive, but if anyone I know were to read it now I'd be genuinely mortified. I'm not writing for an audience and I have made it clear to anyone that knows what my diaries look like to never look in them.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

If you're cavalier enough about your monogamous relationship that cheating isn't a big deal, you should not be in that monogamous relationship as that kind of completely defeats the purpose of the "monogamous" bit.

absolutely true. but we don't know it isn't a big deal. a lot, i guess, depends on what else is in the diary. if it says: "hahah, i care not a jot for logged-out's feelings", then this girl needs teh dumping. but if it says: "oh god i've ruined the best thing in my life" ... well, like i say, everybody makes mistakes.

sex is animalistic; the capacity to forgive is one of the things that makes us human.

[pauses]

i can't believe i wrote that. that's quite sickeningly twee.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)

say, for sake of argument, that this happened and your partner is now racked with guilt; she wishes with all her heart she hadn't done it. if you didn't know, you wouldn't be hurt. you might never have found out, and your relationship might have been able to continue blissfully.

if you didn't read the diary, then by the uncertainty principle: she has both cheated and not cheated on you.

so yeah, perhaps it's you that put the final ball in the net that ends the relationship but she sure set up an open goal to shoot.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

Suzy OTM. Reading someone else's diary without their permission is the action of a fool.

RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

But surely, Ken, only very paranoid quantum physicists go around thinking: "right now, my partner has both cheated and not cheated on me".

(I have dated one - well, a quantum physics student - but he wasn't a particularly paranoid one)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

although if she's preggers now you'd know to ask for a DNA test. so it's not all dumb

xpost

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

Ok, Logged Out got it right by using a dictionary. "hade sex med (name) nu i eftermiddags" DOES mean "had sex with (name) now this afternoon". It's only forgivable if the ex is swedish as all swedes are irresistible. If he was british, dump her.

Swedish Interpreter, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

omg leave your diary open on a desk and write things like "hade offer for sex nu i eftermidtags, but jag refused because jag älskar [her name]"

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

could somebody please explain to me exactly how diaries are written to be read?

i would wither instantly if anyone read my diary, which is why i do NOT have a diary online. it's private. i write private things in there so i don't say/do them. sometimes things need to be expelled from the brain but not acted on and that's what diaries are for. not to be read, at least not mine.

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

(suzy and RickyT are very OTM re: NEVER READ THE DIARY YOU FOOL)

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

If you hadn't read the diary you wouldn't have known. The lesson is: never ask, never tell.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

and "jag jävla älskar vitlök räkor!" just to show off your vocabulary

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

See no evil hear no evil? Bollocks. Intentions mean nothing in situations like this.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

could somebody please explain to me exactly how diaries are written to be read?
i would wither instantly if anyone read my diary, which is why i do NOT have a diary online. it's private. i write private things in there so i don't say/do them. sometimes things need to be expelled from the brain but not acted on and that's what diaries are for. not to be read, at least not mine.

you really ought to write it with an invisible pen!

my diary is written to be read. by me.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

If you hadn't read the diary you wouldn't have known. The lesson is: never ask, never tell.

unless you catch some swedish STD. or if she comes home with lipstick on her collar. uh oh

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Cheating is an exciting part of a loving relationship. Moaning isn't.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

This is what people like to tell themselves to make themselves feel better in the face of the any guilty feelings thrown at them by their conscience. As far as I'm concerned, if you are in a monogamous relationship and you willingly sleep with someone else, you are culpable. Drugs and alcohol only excuse so much and if you're doing enough of that type of shit that you're making such egregiously bad errors in judgement, you've got an entirely different set of problems that your SO should be deeply concerned about.

Dan hundreds of thousands of marriages/relationships make the difficult climb back from adultery/infidelity - it's a huge red flag that the relationship's in trouble but it's usually just that: a warning sign. Naturally: 1) the person who cheated chose the cowardly, easy way of saying "something's gotta change and 2) the betrayed party is right to say "hey fuck you" for as long as it takes 'em to get the feeling out but your scorched-earth take on the question doesn't really allow relationships to be complex, mutable, or dynamic

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

or if she said she had to work so you went to the show alone
They turned down the lights and turned the projector on
And just as the news of the world started to begin
you saw my darlin' and your best friend walk in
Though you was sittin' there they didn't see
And so they sat right down in front of you
When she kissed his lips you almost died
And in the middle of the color cartoon you started to cry.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

xx post

Oh no that came out wrong...

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Dan hundreds of thousands of marriages/relationships make the difficult climb back from adultery/infidelity - it's a huge red flag that the relationship's in trouble but it's usually just that: a warning sign. Naturally: 1) the person who cheated chose the cowardly, easy way of saying "something's gotta change and 2) the betrayed party is right to say "hey fuck you" for as long as it takes 'em to get the feeling out but your scorched-earth take on the question doesn't really allow relationships to be complex, mutable, or dynamic

I agree with this. I still think anyone who thinks reading a diary is worse than fucking an ex has seriously fucked-up priorities.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)

emailing to [email protected]

xpost i'd rather my gf read my diary than to fuck an ex.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)

my diary is hilarious, for one!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

my diary is hilarious, for one!

I can confirm this as I have been secretly reading ken's diary for months now

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

and what if one partner cheats, then repents and keeps the whole mess a secret for years and years in a long-term relationship? I know the therapeutic take is that this buried conflict will ultimately poison any relationship but it that true all the time?

(I recognize the universal truth in dan's point but can also appreciate the case-to-case variation that Banana underscores.)

m coleman (lovebug starski), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

Banana OTM.

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

x post

Mrs Vague is only to aware of my apparently fucked-up views on the joys of monogamy, ken. Course that doesn't mean I don't practise it.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

M. Coleman asks a good question.

What if:

--Your relationship went through a bad spot about a year ago, but has been fantastic since.
--You stupidly read your partner's e-mail (again, looking for good things!) and found out they cheated on you multiple times during this period, despite their insistances to the contrary.
--Your relationship is one of the best things in your life and you don't want to lose it over what might be old & buried transgressions.

lgdt, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

Then you keep quiet and come to terms with it or you walk away. Your choice.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)

what if...

1. you have been keeping a diary for ages
2. one day, while bored you went to your ex to have sex with her
3. she told you stuff that your gf told her about what's in your diary
4. now you know that you know your gf has been reading your diary, do you confront her? would you tell her that you've been boning your ex???!!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

A) OK cheating on someone isn't really cool. It is not necessarily the end of days but it's really not ok. Also I mean I dunno if that's a bad translation but her grammar is awful if that translation is accurate.
B) OK reading someone else's diary isn't really cool. It is not as uncool as cheating on someone but it's pretty non-ok, especially if it involves all the extra effort of translation etc. I mean how long did this take and at any point did it occur to you this was kind of bonkers?
C) The combination of cheating partner + snooping partner is really, really bad and you both should consider just not being together anymore, or you need to SERIOUSLY FREAKING TALK (fuck this oneupsmanship "Who has the right to say what" nonsense cos this is not going to solve your problem) and possibly go to couples therapy or something, cos neither of you are in a good place with the other, based on the information presented here. Even if you both feel really, really bad about all this.
D) While I do not believe this would be the case here, I have not been above writing really insulting and insane (though not necessarily untrue) shit in my journals about bfs when I had inklings they were snooping my turf. I mean, you got beef, just ask your gf, don't snoop around cos then, yeah, it puts you in that oneupmanship game, don't it?

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

Ally OTM 100%.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

Also, LOF is a lot better bringing up the subject himself and admitting his "wrong-doing" in this pretty wrong situation, because if she finds out on her own (and chances are, in my experience, she will, no one is ever as clever as they think putting things back just so et al), it will either result in a fight anyway or worse, she'll start doing the same kind of thing right back at you and you'll just have this vicious cycle of outright suspicion. If you just own up to doing it one time and call her on what she wrote, you're more likely to at least be able to eventually discuss this and she'll be more likely to believe that, yes, this was a one time transgression and no, you are not regularly checking up on her.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

you should see if you can get hold of her ex's diary. i think that would give you a full picture of what's going on.

if you think going to his house to read his diary is a little suspecious, why not get your ex to seduce his ex and then get her to take digital photos of his diary for your reading pleasure!

if you find out it was him who made the move to lure your gf back into his den, then beat the crap out of him (or get your ex to 'discover' his affair with your gf and chop off his rod)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

If someone read my diary, I wouldn't care. It only goes up 'til April and mainly lists my musical purchases. I would be more upset and hurt by the latter in the thread title.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

I'd say the worst is reading your girlfriend's diary while sleeping with an ex... for everyone concerned, really.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

...Especially if you and the ex are laughing at the bits you're reading out loud.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)

Reading out loud?

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)

remind me to never actually be friends with ken c, because if I needed relationship advice and his comments here were what he actually said to me, I would probably not benefit from it and/or whack him in the head with his own head

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)

I hate x-posts.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)

RUFUS GO BACK TO CHUCK FORGET KATHY

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)

I would probably not benefit from it and/or whack him in the head with his own head

DOES NOT COMPUTE

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

He's well hung?

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)

Or recently castrated?

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

basically haikunym is going to take out one of my ribs and make me auto fellate.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

1. everytime you have sex with her again your going to wonder if she is thinking of her ex.

2. or your going to imagine her being violated in the hallway of a run down loft apartment ala Diane Lane in Unfaithful.

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

and then read my diary and find out all the relationship advices i've been giving to people
xpost

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

Castration doesn't usually involve removal of the, er, head.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

What if she wrote it as a trap, as bait for a sneaky boyfriend?

How does THAT red herring taste?

At work, we suspected our web guy was reading our e-mail so we started communicating about quitting and going to work for a competitor. Guess who started asking about our future plans and how much it paid? CAUGHT!

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

I read my sister's boyfriend's diary. Actually I just skipped to the part where he met her. It was sweet.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

before it all turned sour after that?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

(kiddin' n1j011)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

I was at school with a boy who said he'd auto fellated himself by accident after tripping over in the kitchen and falling against the fridge whilst naked.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

Repeatedly?!

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

I don't get how the fridge would aid him that.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

it only took one stroke

xpost

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

I guess it was only accidental on the first insertion. But once he'd found out he could do it...

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

as in, one head movement.. well perhaps he actually had a stroke and somehow that made his head spasm.

(i only read about this in his diary and the translation may not have been perfect.. maybe The Strokes helped him)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

xpost

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

Oh wait! Don't do anything yet Logged Out, not until you've read the context it was written in. For instance, if it goes: "förut idag så somnade jag på soffan ( herregud, nätterna med Logged Out är så heta!) och jag vaknade mitt i en mardröm. Jag drömde att jag HADE SEX MED (NAME OF EX) NU I EFTERMIDDAGS. Vilken jävla tur att det bara var en dröm!" (which means "earlier today i fell asleep on the couch (OMG,the nights with Logged Out are so hot!) and I woke up in the middle of a nightmare. I dreamt I HAD SEX WITH (NAME OF EX) NOW THIS AFTERNOON.Thank fuck it was only a dream!" then kiss her and buy her some flowers.

Swedish Interpreter, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

sure, but a cheater turns you into a snoop even though you know the results will be disasterous.

LOF, you should just break up with her and not mention the cheating at all. say youre breaking up with her because youre looking for someone more umm sexually competent or someone smarter or that you are bored with her or anything that you know will fuck with her self esteem.

important - say it in an apologetic voice like 'im sincerely sorry you werent good enough for me'. thats how you win.

sunny successor (he hates my guts, we had a fight) (katharine), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)

xpost but don't say anything like sov gott, dröm sött.. cos that might rouse her suspecions

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

i should have xposted to ally, i guess.

sunny successor (he hates my guts, we had a fight) (katharine), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

at least this thread has given me a new name to use!

Vilken jävla tur att det bara var en dröm!onym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:07 (twenty years ago)

Dan hundreds of thousands of marriages/relationships make the difficult climb back from adultery/infidelity - it's a huge red flag that the relationship's in trouble but it's usually just that: a warning sign. Naturally: 1) the person who cheated chose the cowardly, easy way of saying "something's gotta change and 2) the betrayed party is right to say "hey fuck you" for as long as it takes 'em to get the feeling out but your scorched-earth take on the question doesn't really allow relationships to be complex, mutable, or dynamic

You know, "your relationship as you know it is over" is not the exact same thing as "break up; it will never work out". I also take issue with the "it's just a warning sign" mindset precisely because of the word "just"; it trivializes the magnitude of the transgression. It is a transgression that can be overcome, but much like any massively positive event is going to impact your relationship in a way that will turn it into something it wasn't before (see: moving in together, having kids, getting married), a massively negative event will etc etc etc. I would think that that is a blatantly obvious point to make!

Ally is 100% OTM. As per usual.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

Furthermore, in this situation you HAVE to know that what you've done is wrong and hurtful. If you pad that understanding/knowledge with "Oh, this is just a warning sign of blah blah blah" platitudes to make yourself feel better, where is the impetus to FIX the things that are contributing to your behavior (whether they be communication issues, intimacy issues, or plain old grow-up-and-stop-trying-to-fuck-everything issues) going to come from?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

haha! forgot n1joli posted here. faced.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

Both infidelity and snooping are bad, but there are so many other variables. Did you read the diary because the relationship is souring in general? Is there enough good stuff to outweigh the bad? Some relationships suck WITHOUT infidelity and snooping. Focus less on those particulars and more on their context. Yes they could be death-blows, but maybe not. If you stay together you will probably never "resolve" your feelings about these trespasses. Just put them in a lock-box, as Al Gore would say.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

I disagree with all the knee-jerk "end it" stuff here. People take actions, make mistakes, etc. However, that does not mean that she wants to end the relationship or that the sex (if she had it) means something specific. This is not something any of us can speculate on. Logged out may have an inkling, but it would be wrong for even him to jump to conclusions.

I say that if you like the way the relationship is going and that she treats you well and is happy, well that's something too. Sex with an ex is not necessarily this transcendental sign that "YOUR LIFE IS OVER AS YOU KNOW IT" (exaggerated to make a point).

Also, I think that reading the diary is bad, but her leaving it out is just as bad.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)

Generally cheating is a "warning sign" that shows up after about 17,639 (approx) other warning signs happen. I mean there are those people who like just cheat no matter what in the relationship, just like there are those people who are always going to snoop no matter what in the relationship, but generally both of those events are signs that a whole lot of other warning signs have been totally and utterly ignored, or at the very least not addressed appropriately, so the idea that cheating is "just a warning sign" is kind of silly. It is symptomatic of greater problems but it's knd of beyond warning-sign-that-something-is-wrong-with-the-relationship...So like, yeah, Dan OTM, veritable love fest.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

of course, there is that cutie who works in the bakery, you know, the one that looks at you shyly when she thinks you're not looking? you could always make a move on her instead

dioufy (gareth), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)

yeah, and then you'd be ROSS from FRIENDS.

great plan.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

sterling you watch friends?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

not since forever.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)

but i mean, back in '95 everyone was doing it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

i wasn't.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)

TS: reading someone's diary, cheating on a current partner with an ex, or admitting to watching 'Friends'

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

The last deserving stoning, obv.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

or at least a gramscian analysis rooted in anti-authoritarian gobbledygook

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

Selections From the Rachel Notebook

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

LOF, you know you'll do what you wanna do in the end, regardless of what everyone here thinks or says.

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

dude ned, i think The Rachel Papers are just about as unforgivable as friends.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/coverv/74/209474.jpg

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

(Can I just point out that while I'm being held up as the poster child of "CHEATING IS UNNACCEPTABLE; DUMP HER NOW", what I actually said was "Confront her on this; if she is self-involved enough to be mad that you didn't trust her enough not to read her diary even though there appears to be a concrete reason to not to trust her in the shape of her cheating, get out" and that this second statement doesn't actually preclude or disallow the possibility of reconciliation?)

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Dan, noted. You are not the poster child, even though I was referring to this:

"your relationship as you know it is over"

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Why are you bothering, seriously dude? xpost

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

And that last point is excellent. Although I'm not convinced that he should even bring it up.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

I should note that I'd probably just walk out of the house and never talk to the person again.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

The thing is what I said, USUALLY people don't cheat OR snoop in a relationship where there aren't already problems. That has to be addressed. Whether or not he chooses to bring up the cheating is up to him (though as I said I find it hard to believe she's not going to figure it out eventually) but they've gotta figure out what the deeper problem is here and figure out a way to talk about THAT and work on THAT. If that involves owning up to snooping and cheating well that's what it is.

This is of course assuming they are not the strawmen I already presented, the person who cheats no matter what and the person who is suspicious and snoops no matter what.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

And that last point is excellent. Although I'm not convinced that he should even bring it up.

Well, I would, but I like to go for the thermonuclear option when I argue (this is also why I try to avoid arguing at all costs).

Why are you bothering, seriously dude?

Work avoidance, duh!

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

Not-bringing-it-up doesn't tend do anyone any favors. If you're capable of just, y'know, forgetting about b/c haha anything my partner doesn't tell me didn't really happen than you're no more "in" the relationship than the cheating partner.

I'll wait a bit to see if she confesses I think

She won't. Not in the context of staying in the relationship, anyway.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

but I like to go for the thermonuclear option when I argue

Yes! While some people are Passive-Aggressive, I find that in arguments I am Aggressive-EXPLOSIVE.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

Also, I do agree that cheating is often, and probably mostly catastrophic - but not necessarily.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Spencer, Dan, LET'S TAKE THIS SHIT OUTSIDE, NOW.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

i think if you're looking for a way out of your relationship, then this is it.. her cheating on you gives you the best excuse in the world

if you want to salvage it, then you need to talk to her about it, and perhaps figure out the problem. but then again perhaps she could have talked about the problem to start with (if there was a problem) before going shagging her ex's, but who knows. personally i don't think i want to go out with anybody like that, but hey love is weird etc.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

Furthermore, in this situation you HAVE to know that what you've done is wrong and hurtful. If you pad that understanding/knowledge with "Oh, this is just a warning sign of blah blah blah" platitudes to make yourself feel better, where is the impetus to FIX the things that are contributing to your behavior (whether they be communication issues, intimacy issues, or plain old grow-up-and-stop-trying-to-fuck-everything issues) going to come from?


Sure Dan - I don't know if I'm really making my position clear. I say "just" a warning sign to steer the ship away from the rather juvenile position "oh, once they've cheated it's over, you'll never be able to have sex without thinking of the other person" etc etc stuff that's come up here. Because

1) if the person who's cheated is genuinely sorry and passionately wants to attend to the broken relationship, and
2) the wounded party is genuinely willing do do the hard work that accompanies this (which! will often end up being really painful for the wounded party, who may have to face how he/she helped make the relationship a place where one party felt like cheating), and
3) everybody agrees not to be high-school drama queens about it,

then the whole situation can be addressed like any other serious adult situation. Anybody who says "once somebody's cheated on me, I can never get over it" is essentially saying "I'm proud to be an emotional cripple." Strong relationships can get over much worse things than cheating: the death of a child, catastrophic financial losses, etc! This doesn't minimize what a wretched thing it is for a person to cheat on his/her partner; FFS, man, I've made a neat living writing songs about how destructive infidelity can be. But to fix it, you have to do a little cutting the problem down to size. That's all I'm saying.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

Anybody who says "once somebody's cheated on me, I can never get over it" is essentially saying "I'm proud to be an emotional cripple."

I think this makes sense if the cheater is remorseful about straying from the boundaries of the relationship. It doesn't make sense if the cheater is remorseful about getting caught. Either way, you won't be able to figure out which way the cheater is going to turn unless you confront her/him (which has been my main thesis this entire thread; see for example my first post).

Personally, I think "cutting the problem down to size" makes it easier to ignore. Also relationships are strong in different ways; some can be completely impervious to financial difficulty but completely defenseless against losing a child, etc etc etc, so I'm not sure that I buy into the romantic notion of the "universally-strong, bulletproof relationship" that you are advancing. (One real-life example that is leaping to mind are a couple of personal friends who were compatible in every conceivable way... until they had a child. Now they're getting divorced because the stress of parenthood generated a whole bunch of issues in their relationship that not a single one of their friends saw coming.)

I don't think I'm saying anything particularly shocking or different from the people who are disagreeing with my tone (as they certainly aren't disagreeing with my content).

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

I think anybody who says that is essentially saying "everything is about me".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

(anybody who says: "once somebody's cheated on me, I can never get over it")

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

yeah Dan we largely agree here, my only point is/was that to think in absolutes in cases like these (as, perhaps, in most areas in life) is usually not constructive or helpful. The person who's been wronged needs to ask himself: "What do I want?" and be practical from that standpoint. Much popular thinking about these issues seems grounded in cosmic sense of Justice etc which really aren't helpful when what's really involved are two people (or, haha, three) trying to heal a wound.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

I am maybe the least absolutist person on the planet! I hedge on almost EVERYTHING!

The Ghost of See What I Did There? (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)

I am maybe the least absolutist person on the planet!

Absolutely!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

LOF's reaction doesn't seem to be one of a heartbroken, betrayed guy, so maybe the relationship isn't especially meaningful anyway? meaning maybe this is a good time to get out. but then again, maybe he's a wreck!

gear (gear), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

I hedge on almost EVERYTHING!

*was about to invoke the Cure, then remembered "Push"*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

And "Mint Car" and "Return" and "A Thousand Hours" and "The Caterpillar (Shiver Mix)" and "So What" and "It's Not You" and sometimes "Us Or Them" and "Strange Attraction" and "Club America".

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

It happened to me. I'm not particularly paranoid by nature, but I've been hurt in the past and if this something's up I get suspicious. She'd been acting weird and distant, I knew she was emailing someone, I read the emails. I didn't feel good about it but I knew something was amiss. As it turned out, there was nothing going on between her and the recipient, but she obviously felt the need to be confessional and I learnt about the "love of her life" and it wasn't me. After that I never felt the same way about her again and we split up a while later. But I don't feel guilty because I know I'd never have read it if everything had been OK. Frankly, nothing nice can come of reading someone's diaries, but if things are wrong it's a way of confirming it. On the other hand, if there's nothing wrong then feeling the need to read someone's diaries should be a sign that you need to take a long good look at your own insecurities.

Gelogt, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

Fidelity is so Precious and Desirable and Magical, why do are you having these problems in the first place?

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 22:29 (twenty years ago)

i think that any suggestion whereby you tell her that you know about her infidelity through means other than you reading her diary are a super bad idea. theres enough deceit here already. dont be too big to admit that you did wrong.

i also think that if the maxim that you shouldnt read diaries because you might find out something unpleasant holds true, then the same goes for "dont write what you dont want people to know", unless you literally lock up your diary. just telling people "dont read it" is never sufficient*. but then people always have wildly differing views of diary-sanctity.

i also think it would be worth examining a bit closer your reasons for reading the diary in the first place. you just wanted to "read nice things" about yourself? hmmmm....i think that this may not be the whole story, and if it is then you have to think about the relationship in a new light. no trust from you, a breach of trust from her, what are you left with. well, what you are left with might be, after all that, worth continuing with. but i dont think its worth continuing with if all parties arent clear about the new parameters of the relationship.

* see "czech dream" advertising campaign: "dont buy", "dont spend", "dont come" etc)

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)


What a convoluted story. If your live-in partner has a diary in a locked case that she doesn't want you to read, there are trust issues there to begin with. Some people are really bad at reading signals, eh?

The Popish Plot (dymaxia), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:30 (twenty years ago)


Reading someone's diary is a control issue. Unless you have some openly negotiated the nature of your relationship, you are not automatically entitled to everything your girlfriend owns, as if she is your property. It's a control thing.

Also, I love how people take these stories at face value. We don't know what really went on here. We don't even know if it's a real "relationship". Why on earth do people bring their relationship problems to a board instead of directly communicating with their partner, like normal people do.

The Popish Plot (dymaxia), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah. Normal people.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

you mean, like, people writing about their feelings and insecurities in a diary instead of telling their partners?

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)


What is the degree of the relationship here?

Men are not automatically entitled to know everything and own everything about their partner until trust is established. The OP has been quite sketchy on this account, and is merely trolling with a fiction in order to "intimidate" his victim, who was never in a relationship with him (he's too ugly and vindictive and downright abusive).

Spare me the Scientology (or are you people from some crazy Christian church?) morality play. Your little game is getting tiresome.

You Christian fascist males luvvvv to fantasize that your unwilling S&M victims have "insecurities", don't you?

Take your non-consensual S&M play elsewhere. ILX is for adults who see through this shit.

The Popish Plot (dymaxia), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v317/TheRealEdwin/crack_pipe.jpg

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 August 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)

Goodness! What a lot of advice to wade through.
I'm afraid all this chatter is going to confuse rather than clarify things for you.
The important question is this—Do you love this girl?
Or do you just love your hopeful idea of her, of what she could be if only she'd stop this or that?


Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 1 September 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

Actually these days ILX is pretty much non-consensual S&M play 24/7.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)

You love it you slag.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 September 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

http://centerclick.org:81/previews/archive/simpsons/p.cat_lady.mov.jpg

O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 1 September 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)

But is it true that ILX is a hive of Scientologists?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 1 September 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

only about 50% percent of us are Scientologists. the other 50% percent are just bigots intolerant of OUR religion.

huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 1 September 2005 01:11 (twenty years ago)

my advanced Scientologist typing skills did "50% percent" on purpose, thank you very much.

huell howser (chaki), Thursday, 1 September 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)

But what none of you have suggested is this: Read the ex's diary so you can figure out what exactly his intentions are! That would be the Scientological thing to do.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 1 September 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

er--the things that people write in diaries aren't always true! they can be outbursts of anger or flights of fancy. would you look at your partner's daydreams if you could? what makes you think you can interpret what you read in the correct context? People work through things in their diaries and you don't necessarily know the conclusions that they have reached. Geez why don't you bug her therapist's office too???!!

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 1 September 2005 02:20 (twenty years ago)

Allyzay & DJPerry are OTM throughout. Not that this hasn't been pointed out before . . .

So, if you're not going to take their advice LOF, you should totally hire CHEATERS (www.cheaters.com) & get on & have a confrontation with your gf while she's caught red-handed!! After the show ends, you can post a profile on their "no cheaters" online personals.

Just a thought, of course.

kelsey (kelstarry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)

Jerry Springer!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 1 September 2005 03:36 (twenty years ago)

Just dont do what my ex did, when he read my diary and then in anger tried to strangle me. Whee, that was fun. Maybe I deserved it who knows. He had his own secrets as well though - no ones flawless. Never forget that. Cast the first stone etc etc.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 1 September 2005 05:25 (twenty years ago)

hade strangled [name] nu i eftermidtag...

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 1 September 2005 08:49 (twenty years ago)

KELSEY OTM

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 11:16 (twenty years ago)

Haha my wife is addicted to Cheaters. The one where the host got stabbed was fun (he's fine, AFAIK, I wouldn't think it was funny otherwise...) but I'm very bored of it now. I just go on the computer while it's on.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 1 September 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

The one where the guy was paying an Amazon to spank him in a hotel room was PRICELESS!

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:14 (twenty years ago)

That might get me interested again! The ones we get here are repeats though, I saw a lot of the recent ones shown in the UK a couple of years ago when I was staying in Lakewood (CA).

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

Hey, there is too much advice here, but thanks.

Context: I've only been going out with this girl for a couple of months, but it is fun, and I like her, and I like having sex with her. I'm not terribly angry at her for doing this, because I could kind of imagine doing the same thing myself (I hope I wouldn't, I mean, but it is possible) and it not meaning anything. I'm a bit hurt and suspicious that she still wants to be with the ex though.
So I don't want to dump her to punish her or anything, but I might want to dump her so I don't feel like a mug. But I'm a bit worried that being afraid of feeling like a mug might make me a mug anyway.

Things are made worse by the fact that she is still very friendly with her ex (and other exes in fact). She has dinner with them and stuff, and hangs around in the same places. I've tolerated this so far, partly cos I'm quite friendly with some of my exes.

I didn't find the diary and think "I must translate this!" I opened it up at the most recent page, whose first line was the one I quoted above, and I thought "Can that really mean what it very much looks like it means?" And it did, so then I translated more.

I will probably wait a while and see if she confesses. Maybe I won't be able to act normal with her, or it'll mess up the sex, and then I'll have to talk about it or something. But I think I'm gonna keep quiet for now.

LOF, Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)

i don't think that's a good idea. but - as someone wise upthread says - you can only do what you think is right.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

you should totally hire CHEATERS (www.cheaters.com) & get on & have a confrontation with your gf while she's caught red-handed!! After the show ends, you can post a profile on their "no cheaters" online personals.

I was going to suggest this! The one I liked was the boyfriend dumping over a port-a-potty on the dude who was doing his girlfriend.

O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)

Did you ever see the ep of Cheaters where this totally TOnya Harding-ish chick was cheating on her weasily Geek Squad (TM) boyfriend with this guy who looked like an extra from the Come On Eileen video? I mean, it's the only Cheaters I've ever seen, but holy hell. I mean, in what circumstances did these three people meet?

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 1 September 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

No, that sounds great though. The dude who go the port a potty dumped on him was wearing a Fugazi t-shirt, and he started crying after the incident. The girl was kind of Tonya Harding-ish though, perhaps this is a Cheaters meme. I should try watching it again.

O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 1 September 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

It was like watching what if Britney Spears, the Verizon Guy, and the lead Dexy's dude (but only in Come On Eileen mode) beat the crap out of each other, with fists. It was kind of mesmerizing, even without the sound on, in a bar, without even drinking anything.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 1 September 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

It was only with the follow-up posts that I realized Kelsey hadn't made this show up.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 September 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)

Seriously, every time we stumble across Cheaters, we have to watch it.

The one where the host got stabbed was INSANE.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

four years pass...

don't read someone's diary if you're not prepared to deal with what you find there : (

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)

i got in a big fight with an ex once after i had read letters he had written and received to/from past girlfriends, and then he read my diary and read about me reading said letters

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)

i did the former once, didn't find out anything of any particular interest (and certainly nothing relevant to me), but i felt squicky afterwards regardless. no desire to ever do it again. got nothing to say about the latter.

lorax & order (electricsound), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)

In third grade I wrote that I had a "maybe girlfriend," and then I read in my brother's diary that I had a "maybe girlfriend," so I've never really trusted anyone since.

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)

reading the diary is worse

лампа (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)

cheating is worse

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:17 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, it's shitty, so serves me right
xpost

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:18 (sixteen years ago)

both are shitty - for a long time i kept a diary in code, so that even if someone found it and tried to read it it would be meaningless

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:21 (sixteen years ago)

rot-13

lorax & order (electricsound), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:21 (sixteen years ago)

actually it was a simple letter-substitution code that this guy i had a major crush on in high school "made up" that i later learned was mostly taken from the Mormon Deseret alphabet

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)

I read my sister's diary a long time ago...I was losing her, and we weren't talking, and I wanted to make sure she was okay. I wish I could go back and not read it. I should have trusted her.

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:24 (sixteen years ago)

cheating is worse

no its not - fuking sum1 isnt necessarily a big deal - tyrna get your hands on someones secret self is a way bigger violation not just a betrayal but an invasion

лампа (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:28 (sixteen years ago)

I got in the habit of expressing myself in the most oblique ways as I knew my parents read my journal.

existential eggs (Abbott), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:38 (sixteen years ago)

I used to put macguffins in journals to teach nosy mother a lesson after she read a three-way note where myself and friend A were advising friend B what to do in a 'family planning' situation. She'd struggle under the weight of her knowledge, trying not to mention the fake incident and then finally exploding with I READ WHAT YOU DID, to which the only sane teenaged answer is one of those baleful looks followed by 'are you finished yelling yet? Because PSYCH!' She either stopped reading or stopped believing but definitely stopped yelling.

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 06:12 (sixteen years ago)

There are so many wrong opinions on this thread. If you leave your diary lying around, you want to the other to read is a bunch of crap. No, it's not. If you would like to read it, ASK before you open the diary. S/he'll probably say no. You can't interpret the diary correctly anyway. People write *stupid shit* in it. They can do a no holds barred approach cause they assume that noone's reading it. It's a way of trying to imagine how something could be for example and then see how they like it. Also, immediately kicking someone to the curb after adultry is just sad. You want to throw a relationship away because someone made a mistake? I would be extremely saddened and angry if I found out my husband fooled around, but I would hope we could work it out. You have to know why s/he fooled around. Maybe something is wrong with the relationship, so you have to find out the cause. Maybe it can be solved.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 07:49 (sixteen years ago)

xp - lamp - i've had my diary read and i've been cheated on, and the cheating hurt the worst. but that's just me.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 08:14 (sixteen years ago)

if one suspects a cheating mate, not out of paranoia but because of some soild clues, how does one go about finding the truth? in other words, is snooping ever justified??

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 08:58 (sixteen years ago)

well, it's not easy, but the best way is just to have a talk with them.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:05 (sixteen years ago)

well, i think most people will deny unless some sort of "proof" is shown (this was my experience).

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:08 (sixteen years ago)

do you mean, are you justified in reading your partner's diary or private correspondence if you have evidence to believe they are cheating? Justified or not - and it really doesn't matter, because individual feelings and beliefs are stronger than hypothetical ethics - don't do it.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:08 (sixteen years ago)

did anyone find out what happened with LOF in the end?

tomofthenest, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:11 (sixteen years ago)

http://theozzone.com/images/Records/tv_tributes/arrested_development/recurring_gene_parmesan_c.jpg

power, corruption & plies (dyao), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:11 (sixteen years ago)

^^ better idea, rent an animal costume and follow your partner through the streets

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:12 (sixteen years ago)

so, sarahel, do you just stew in your suspicions?

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:13 (sixteen years ago)

I liked how bathetic the LOF saga turned out in the end - everybody got all moralistic and upright, and then in the end LOF was just like "she may have cheated on me but I like fucking her so hey! s'all good"

power, corruption & plies (dyao), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:13 (sixteen years ago)

It is never justified to read someone's diary. Even if you know "for sure" the person cheated. You are reading his/her thoughts and could find other things that should be kept secret.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:15 (sixteen years ago)

kind of a lose-lose for the one cheated upon

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:17 (sixteen years ago)

i discovered a bf was cheating by accidentally walking in on him with another woman, though i had suspected something was going on between the two of them. The best course of action, as someone suggested upthread, is to discuss it with your partner. You don't necessarily have to accuse him/her of the act, maybe talk about the signs/symptoms.

it's a tough question - would you rather risk being a fool or being a sociopath (to put the options in their least favorable characterizations)?

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:19 (sixteen years ago)

wtf cheating is next level worse.

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:22 (sixteen years ago)

that sounds reasonable if you think people will be upfront about cheating, my experience tells me that it is not the case in a majority of situations
xpost

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:24 (sixteen years ago)

I've had (and thrown away) the password to my gf's e-mail before; I figure let sleeping dogs lie. she gives me my privacy too.

power, corruption & plies (dyao), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:25 (sixteen years ago)

gerneral snooping/fishing expeditions are never justified

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:26 (sixteen years ago)

when i was the one doing the cheating, i thoroughly denied it, even when asked point blank (i was 20 years old at the time). i ended up dumping the guy i was cheating on not long afterwards because it made me feel totally despicable.

the idiot/sociopath question remains though.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:30 (sixteen years ago)

i got nothing tbh

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:33 (sixteen years ago)

nothing, as in you read the person's diary but there was no evidence?

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:34 (sixteen years ago)

oh no, i got evedence

nothing wrt is it worth it/is it justified/are you better off etc....

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

evidence

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

other evidence or evidence from reading the diary?

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:38 (sixteen years ago)

suspicions based on circumstantial evidence confirmed by diary

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:39 (sixteen years ago)

is this someone you want to stay in a relationship with, or would you be better off breaking up?

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:40 (sixteen years ago)

this happened ages ago, but i was thinking about her today for some reason and what happened. i chose not to break it off but things were never the same, and it ended

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:42 (sixteen years ago)

hah! and i'd almost forgotten the walking-in-on-them incident. he was either spanking her with a hairbrush or a fencing foil, but i can't remember anymore.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:44 (sixteen years ago)

poll

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:46 (sixteen years ago)

Thing is that the partner can be cool with an affair

Oh damn that sounds wickedly weird;

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:46 (sixteen years ago)

it's okay nathalie, we've seen plenty of movies.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:48 (sixteen years ago)

Oh I could never be. But y'know it's wrong to assume that adultry is always frowned upon.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:50 (sixteen years ago)

Personally I could never fuck around. It has crossed my mind (in previous relationship) but even the mere thought felt filthy.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)

xxp - i think i witnessed the fencing foil actually. he told me later about the first incident where her eyes "lit up" at the prospect of being spanked with the hairbrush, and that's how the affair began.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)

Snooping I wouldn't mind (both sides). I can understand what compels someone: insecurity, paranoia and simply love. You don't want to lose the other. I can totally forgive that. Totally. If you don't want anyone to know your thoughts, I say keep'em in your "brane"

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:53 (sixteen years ago)

but even the mere thought felt filthy.

definitely, i agree. it's something i could never do again.

robert polltard (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)

Don't keep a diary unless you're prepared for someone to read it some day.

Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:44 (sixteen years ago)

It's OK to read someone's diary... AFTER THEY'RE DEAD.

...and the wizard blew his horn (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:45 (sixteen years ago)

what if you were the one who killed them?

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:45 (sixteen years ago)

There may be some legal complications with that.

...and the wizard blew his horn (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)

What is worse, reading someone's diary or murder?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:50 (sixteen years ago)

TS: killing someone because it's only okay to read their diary after they're dead vs. not flushing the toilet

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:51 (sixteen years ago)

3. Top ten diary killers on Pitchfork

...and the wizard blew his horn (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:54 (sixteen years ago)

people who don't flush their dead spouse's diary down the toilet during the night are disgusting savages imo

power, corruption & plies (dyao), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 11:03 (sixteen years ago)

My ex read my diary once and also cheated on my with my best friend. I felt more violated upon finding out about the diary thing tbh but both are pretty bad.

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 14:19 (sixteen years ago)

No, best friend thing is worse because they haven't had to read your diary to know what you think about your relationship.

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 14:25 (sixteen years ago)

um, I don't think ENBB needs advice on what to feel more violated about!

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 14:26 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah!

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

don't people usually read other people's diaries to find out if they're cheating on them?

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:13 (sixteen years ago)

I think the cheating is worse but that's partly because my own diary is pretty boring, it's mainly just a lot of neurosis that anyone close to me is probably unfortunate enough to know well anyway.

Maria, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

don't people usually read other people's diaries to find out if they're cheating on them?

Yeah, I mean, is there a case for, at some point, not banging your head against the wall with paranoia and suspicion and just finding out what's what?

If only Mrs. Larry Craig had read her husband's diary...

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

I'd be so flattered if someone read my diary. About ten years ago, reading my sister's diary, I discovered that she'd read my diary, stopping to remark on her mild horror at my sexual encounter with a trick.

Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I mean, is there a case for, at some point, not banging your head against the wall with paranoia and suspicion and just finding out what's what?

Hmmmm, no. If you're in that situation just ask the person.

I my case my ex read mine because I'd left it lying around and he thought it was a book of fiction writing. In any even I was not cheating nor did he suspect that I was.

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

I've never been a cheater and certainly don't plan on it, but I'd imagine that if I were I certainly wouldn't write my activities down in a book somewhere in the house I share with my partner!

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

Diarising always struck me as an unhealthy degree of narcissism.

Alex Quebec (WmC), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, but a lot of things that're really important to people strike me exactly the same way. I try to rein myself in about that stuff b/c being my own biggest hobby makes me so unhappy in the long run, but I'm sure I do it too.

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)

Obsessive interest in one's diet and/or physical condition, for instance.

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)

what is worse, diary nazis or cheating nazis?

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

Funnily enough, I always found that actually keeping a diary helped me to be less narcissistic - i.e. having a place to talk about ME ME ME MY THOUGHTS MY PROBLEMS all the time whenever I wanted, and working them out there, makes me less likely to bring them up in inappropriate places.

...and the wizard blew his horn (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

i didn't know this many people wrote diaries!

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

i try every now and again. pretty boring imo.

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:13 (sixteen years ago)

the one and only diary i kept with any regularity (couple entries a month, sporadically, for my freshman year of college) has, i was horrified to discover, found a place on the bookshelf of the 'library' of a lodge i used to work at in NH

i got a drunken voicemail like 2-3 years after graduating from some old friends, wherein they read some particularly awful, emo passages.

butt sound insanity (gbx), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

"i am listening to harry connick, jr, and LOVING it"

butt sound insanity (gbx), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

now if you will excuse me, i am going to go suicide

butt sound insanity (gbx), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)

Oh I have no problem with diary keeping, I've made more that a few aborted attempts at keeping one myself, I just really struggle with "interesting" things to say about myself.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)

harry connock, huh. ouch dude.

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)

i am listening to harry connick jr. and loving it.

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

no one should be ashamed to listen to harry!

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)

OMG Evanston....

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

Btw this diary incident was when I was around 21 and I haven't kept a paper one since then even though I think it can be really therapeutic.

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

A password-protected Word doc is a good place if you want to write something that will remain unread, even if you end up on a desert island.

I like keeping a journal. I assume someone will read it at some point.

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)

OMG Evanston....

What about it?

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

my dad burned all of his journals a few years ago, which bums me out - hed kept them since he was 18, prob 35 of them or so.

he is a weird private man, so im not exactly shocked

fred phelps loves it in the poopchute googlerank outreach project (jjjusten), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

both are perfectly acceptable in my book

homosexual II, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

A password-protected Word doc is a good place if you want to write something that will remain unread, even if you end up on a desert island.

http://www.rixler.com/word_password_recovery.htm

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

http://mediakey.dk/~cc/crack-or-recover-read-only-password-protected-word-document/comment-page-1/

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.crackpassword.com/products/prs/integpack/office/

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

etc etc

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

oh to answer the initial thread question cheating is about a billion times worse

fred phelps loves it in the poopchute googlerank outreach project (jjjusten), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

If they're that desperate to break the password and read it, then fair game to them.

ps cheating is much worse than diary reading

krakow, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

Both are pretty jerky, though.

The ever dapper nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

i read an exboyfriends letters to his exgirlfriend once. he got REAL PISSED. i was 19 at the time, though - i would never do that now.

homosexual II, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)

Apparently HI DERE has done some research into hacking into Word doc diaries.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, it's called "type 'crack passwords on word documents' into a Google search"

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

I agree that both can be bad and damaging things to do, but cheating in a relationship seems like quite a different level of wrongness to diary reading, even considering the wider implications of breaching trust and privacy of the latter act.

krakow, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

I think the implications of breaching trust when cheating on someone are much much much worse than the implications of breaching trust when reading someone's diary!

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

Defensive? It was just funny how quickly you threw up several different options!

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

haha but that was my whole point! ("if you think a password on a Word document is going to protect you, you should really think again")

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

Agreed, I don't think I would have trusted that option.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

This is obviously much more secure:

http://images.barnesandnoble.com/images/33850000/33854834.JPG

It even has the key handily attached to it with a ribbon for easy access!

krakow, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

one of the main GIS results for "silly diary":

http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/faq/images/geoduck.jpg

otm, I write all of my most private thoughts on geoducks which I then release into the wild

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

OK, OK, so much for the secure doc. Back to the drawing board.

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

if yr partner is going to the lengths to download some shit to hack your diary, then the solution is gtfo that relationship.

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

I think the implications of breaching trust when cheating on someone are much much much worse than the implications of breaching trust when reading someone's diary!

how - u sleep w/sum1 the dmg is to the relationship but reading sum1's diary dmgs the relationship & their privacy - sleeping around is pretty natural it happens alla time basic and so what u break up the relationship is done any dmg is in the past. sum1 invades yr privacy they no all that shit abt u to the end of time u cant get it back even if u break up~~

also i mean cmon most of the time u fuk around its just selfish no intent to wound but fukken tossing their office tryna hack word docs - thats dastardly

k::sigh::way1 (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

A little like happening to see an e-mail window open vs. figuring out a password.

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

uh not sure how many people would buy this excuse: "sleeping around is pretty natural it happens alla time"

iatee, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

"I used to put macguffins in journals to teach nosy mother a lesson"

There was an episode of Leave it to Beaver where the beav wrote some fabulist stuff about dealing crack and murdering hobos down by canal (or some such 1960s TV equivalent) and June & Ward were hemming and hawing the whole episode after they snooped, and I thought it would be an awesome trick to do, but never did, but you did it, so kudos to you!

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

how - u sleep w/sum1 the dmg is to the relationship but reading sum1's diary dmgs the relationship & their privacy - sleeping around is pretty natural it happens alla time basic and so what u break up the relationship is done any dmg is in the past. sum1 invades yr privacy they no all that shit abt u to the end of time u cant get it back even if u break up~~

also i mean cmon most of the time u fuk around its just selfish no intent to wound but fukken tossing their office tryna hack word docs - thats dastardly

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

so congrats, I guess

The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

considering u mod ilm it *is* a real accomplishment

k::sigh::way1 (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

not loving lamp's ?new? textile postings

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

so what u break up the relationship is done any dmg is in the past

a+

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

102 dmg points to relationship

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

how - u sleep w/sum1 the dmg is to the relationship but reading sum1's diary dmgs the relationship & their privacy - sleeping around is pretty natural it happens alla time basic and so what u break up the relationship is done any dmg is in the past. sum1 invades yr privacy they no all that shit abt u to the end of time u cant get it back even if u break up~~

also i mean cmon most of the time u fuk around its just selfish no intent to wound but fukken tossing their office tryna hack word docs - thats dastardly

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.

― The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, October 7, 2009 1:13 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

loooooooooooooooooool

mark cl, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

mostly b/c it took me 2 attempts to read the post past "sum1's diary dmgs"

mark cl, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

murda is pretty natural it happens alla time basic and so what u killem the deed is done any dmg is in the past. sum1 invades yr privacy they no all that shit abt u to the end of time u cant get it back less u killem.

That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

Okay now you sound like the little woodland creatures in the Mossflower books.

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

tbh i agree with lamp--i wd be a lot sadder if sum1 invaded my privacy. if sum1 sleeps around u can just dump em~~

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

sum1 invaded my sleep privacy.

The ever dapper nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

aint ez 2 fill that cankle sized hole in ilx

Alex Quebec (WmC), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ ilm dbags who spend all day ejaculating slimy verbiage on pitchfork threads whining abt how i lvl - fuk u

k::sigh::way1 (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

particularly if u disagree

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

ur not ice cram u realze

omar little, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

idk you don't get stds from someone invading your privacy

tlönic irrigation (c sharp major), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

surely channeling cankles

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

lamp seems like ur in a bad mood--did sum1 dmg u?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

dammit the REDWALL books laurel (staples of my youth!)

kell surprise (country matters), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

sleepin w/sum1 = y u braek hart?
invadin yr privacy = y u so nozy?

That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

The abbreviation LVL may represent:

* the ISO 4217 code for Latvian lats, the currency of Latvia
* Level
* LVL (band), an industrial/electronic band from New York
* Laval, Quebec, a city in Quebec, Canada
* Laminated veneer lumber
* Low velocity layer, a term in seismic refraction statics determination

mookieproof, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

i think lamp was talkin abt makin money in latvia

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

usin abbrv8ns 4 intrnt?!?? omg ur so cankles

/dumb

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

you guys are really making a lot out of this

dan m, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

What, you have something better to do?

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

u sleep w/sum1 the dmg is to the relationship
http://sum1.onreact.com/bilder//2007/05/nu-project-matt-blum-bald-woman.jpg

velko, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

i 4 1 m gld 4 sum1 lik lmp 2 lvl w/ me

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

http://inside224a.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/text_message.jpg

omar little, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

never understood keeping a diary - seems kinda pathological/neurotic. also what's the point of writing something down if you don't want anyone to ever read it.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

like, the whole point of writing is communication - so it strikes me as sorta nuts to intend to only have a dialogue with yourself. do people who keep diaries really go back and read entries from years ago and whatno?

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

is the whole point of writing really communication?

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

is that the *whole* point? i would never keep one but people say it helps them think baout stuff. whatever works.

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

xp

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

what is communication

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

it's the only way you can speak for yourself after you die. aside from ghosting.

your regulatory body is a wonderland (m bison), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

I ain't fraid of no ghost.

The ever dapper nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

seems totally narcissistic to obsess about WHAT WILL PEOPLE THINK OF ME after your dead? not to mention totally irrational. who gives a shit.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

alive-me cares a lot! ppl need to know who i was crushing on and what band logos i thought were tight when i was 14, it explains my adult life in a way the movie about my life never could.

your regulatory body is a wonderland (m bison), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

that was about 5% serious. 50% serious answer: perhaps a shining legacy will provide a shining example for shiny future offspring.

your regulatory body is a wonderland (m bison), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

and that legacy would be lovingly detailed by me

your regulatory body is a wonderland (m bison), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

Actually if you're not in the breeding racket, it's perfectly reasonable to think about what else you'll leave behind (and with so many writers on ILX ,why is this even an issue, I've no idea).

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

what, so yr precocious niece can find it in the attic some day and be struck by yr brilliance? no thanks.

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

my ex (the one whose letters i read) actually made copies of letters he wrote people to preserve them for posterity, so that a future editor or biographer could more easily compile and publish his complete correspendence.

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

95% serious, i think diary keeping at a certain point growing up provides a forum for personal introspection that allows you to articulate an identity distinct from your parents. but beyond a certain age and outside nautical contexts, super secret journals don't do it for me personally

your regulatory body is a wonderland (m bison), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

xpost I was talking about those of us with a record of publication :/ but memoirs as time capsules are always cool.

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

the illusion that someone out there in the future might give a shit is a substitution for the illusion that someone out there in the present might give a shit

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

the breeding racket

ooh can we rename the parenting board/threads plz

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

the illusion that someone out there in the future might give a shit is a substitution for the illusion that someone out there in the present might give a shit

^^^this

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

xp - it's a comforting thought for those who know no one at present gives a shit, it's kinda like believing in god.

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

sry suzy, that was as general comment- i realise it looked like it was addressed to your post but it wasn't :)

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)

my ex used to grab my phone and read my texts

she also frequently searched my chatlogs & email archives for her own name if i happened to leave my gmail open on my computer

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

would be mortified by the thought of a young hip relative getting an emo missive from my teenage diaries.

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

it's a comforting thought for those who know no one at present gives a shit, it's kinda like believing in god.

― Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, October 7, 2009 7:34 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

otmfm

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

i agree! placebos work!

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)

I keep a journal, though I write in it much less frequently than I used to. I think diaries/journals can be useful for when you just need to work through some thoughts, either emotional or intellectual, and give yourself some clarity and perspective. One reason I don't journal as much anymore is because I don't often find myself in these situations anymore, or else I have other outlets. Lots of stuff I post on ILX, for instance, would've originally gone in a notebook. The main reason I still do keep a journal, though, is because I enjoy writing for its own sake, and there's something satisfying about sitting down and just seeing where your thoughts take you.

That said, I do like going back and reading what I've written in the past. Maybe that's narcissistic, but I like reconnecting with my past self every once in a while, for the same reason I like going to school reunions.

katherine helmand province (jaymc), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

journaling or whatever you like to call it certainly has a place in some ppl's mental health and / or creative processes! i'm not in the practice of it myself (due to a total lack of privacy as a kid -- my dad would regularly grab my personal notebooks thoughtlessly if he needed a piece of paper or something) but i don't see the need to shit all over the idea of keeping a diary.

and yeah, it can be valuable supplement to memory! i don't understand these challops.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

sorry not trying to be challopsy

diaries strike me as antiquated is all - like things that were useful as historical documents pre-printing press, electronic media, etc.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

next thing you'll be saying it we need an electronic device that would replace books. let's give it a catchy name like "incinerate"

omar little, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

this is all about what kind of person you are--self regarding interior people are going to get diary keeping, non-reflective types (i count myself as one of these) really arent

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

next thing you'll be saying it we need an electronic device that would replace books. let's give it a catchy name like "incinerate"

haha I'm cool in principle with one media replacing another, but I tend to be one of those who bemoans what gets lost in the switchover (ie, records that never got released on CD, books that won't get transferred to electronic devices, etc.)

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

i am a pretty interior/reflective person but just wouldn't be able to get into this, partly due to lack of privacy as a kid like elmo said. but i can definitely see the value. you can even make one on your electronic device!

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

given the choice, I'd rather read diaries completely unintended for public consumption than the modern equivalents which seem geared to it.
(e.g. kurt cobain's diary vs. courtney's blog)

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

just to be clear I only brought up the pre-printing press/electronic media angle insofar as that pertains to diaries as HISTORICAL documents. Like, it might be useful for someone in, say, the Roman Empire to keep a diary, because shit didn't last forever back then and not everybody could write/preserve their thoughts and it was hard to tell what would last through the ages and what wouldn't. So preserving something for posterity made sense. But now every little teeny tiny thing is fucking documented and catalogued and preserved, removing that particular rationale for keeping a diary. I don't care about digital vs. analog media or whatever, that's not the point.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, i really feel old when i see what younger people will publish online. i'll feel slightly embarrassed about stuff i wrote in a private journal as a teenager, and that's for an audience of one.

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

But now every little teeny tiny thing is fucking documented and catalogued and preserved, removing that particular rationale for keeping a diary.

who is doing this for the particulars of your life if you don't do it? this argt is dumb. it's not like the romans knew what they didn't have. fuck, no ipod! better write about these gallic wars going on or w/e.

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

my ex used to grab my phone and read my texts

she also frequently searched my chatlogs & email archives for her own name if i happened to leave my gmail open on my computer

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, October 7, 2009 2:36 PM (48 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this would make me go apoplectic

butt sound insanity (gbx), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)

fuck, no ipod! better write about these gallic wars going on or w/e.

lololol

my point was that now we don't need to glean what's going on in history from the particulars of anyone's life, since current events are pretty well documented in all their minutiae at this point.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

your ex is an ex for good reason.

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

the particulars of most people's lives don't really matter when it comes to posterity, hate to break it to ya

x-post

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)

they don't? i remember when the lewinsky scandal was trailing off, and the starr report included all these emails btw clinton and That Woman, and they included all this cultural minutiae about movies and songs and The Gap and other 90s ephemera. there was a historians roundtable on pbs and someone said 'man, we'd kill to know this kind of stuff about lincoln now'

this is a long winded way of saying, the "particulars of most people's lives" does matter to posterity! it IS posterity, isn't it?

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

the president and blowjob-giver /= most people

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

that is to say, the key phrase in your quote is "ABOUT LINCOLN"

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

blowjob-giver /= most people

i know, it's tragic

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

what a disaster for blowjobs

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

but knowing things about the particulars of ordinary people's lives at that time gives us a context in which to understand people like Lincoln, surely?

tlönic irrigation (c sharp major), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

honestly, my ex copied his letters for posterity because he fancied himself a clever guy and thought he'd be a celebrated writer someday

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

but knowing things about the particulars of ordinary people's lives at that time gives us a context in which to understand people like Lincoln, surely?

do you really think in this particular day and age that diaries are going to be the sole source of this kind of crucial historical information gtfo

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

the point is that you as diary keeper don't know what it is that will be important or noteworthy to future readers, if it is. we'd love 'daily life' stuff about all past eras, and that's exactly what we don't have and has to be reconstructed by conjecture. this idea that people don't need to document themselves because... why? blogs? lots of media? whereas they did before, doesn't make sense -- people in the past didn't self-document out of some lack of other media or a desperate wish to broadcast themselves into the future. they just did it, like people now do it. i mean, the two aren't even related really.

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

people in the past didn't self-document out of some lack of other media or a desperate wish to broadcast themselves into the future

oh I think you're wrong about this

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

this would make me go apoplectic

― butt sound insanity (gbx), Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:30 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark

it did

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

I'm just sayin, you keep a diary nowadays don't pretend like you're doing it for posterity or for subsequent generations. You're doing it for yourself. What that says about you, hey I dunno...

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

if you want to come up with reasons to dislike people, okay, but that seems like a dumb one to me

goole, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't say I disliked anybody, just that I don't understand the point of keeping a diary in this day and age

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

cuz really what do I care how other people spend their time by themselves. do whatever you like!

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

I feel like in the past, keeping a journal has kept me from letting my anxieties and neuroses explode onto everyone around me, because it's like somebody's listening to my concerns (but it turns out that person is me!). So I definitely see the practice of writing as a useful release, rather than the importance of the record itself. I think one of the reasons I've stopped is that the internet is full of places for me to go on at whatever length I feel like, but I've never reached the same level of candidness because there's always the possibility that somewhere out there, somebody's reading it.

Maria, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

but I've never reached the same level of candidness because there's always the possibility that somewhere out there, somebody's reading it.

smart woman!

Althus (sarahel), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

i just don't get the "in this day and age" thing - in the past, sure, there were bureaucratic diary-keepers recording for later generations in their posts and people who thought they were going to be celebrated writers someday, but there were also a bunch of people who just wrote diaries for themselves, like people just write diaries for themselves now.

and the stuff that's useful to us from those bureaucratic diaries often isn't what they were intentionally recording "for posterity" -- a friend of mine's been using 9th-12th century diaries to get climate change information.

i like the idea of keeping a diary but i'm incapable of doing it-- every time i try i get bored halfway through an entry, or forget to write again, or find myself unbearable and give up.

tlönic irrigation (c sharp major), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

and the stuff that's useful to us from those bureaucratic diaries often isn't what they were intentionally recording "for posterity

my "in this day and age" point is that this stuff you refer to is now widely available and recorded in other, non-diary formats.

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:19 (sixteen years ago)

and my point is that just as they couldn't predict what posterity would want to find out from their diaries, we can't predict what use current diaries might have to our own posterity.

tlönic irrigation (c sharp major), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

while that's true, but I have a hard time believing anyone's private diaries contain unique, crucial information that will be totally unavailable from other diligently archived and exhaustively comprehensive sources

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

well, depends how postmodern you want to be about your question i guess. maybe sometimes the individual non-expert opinion will be wanted.

Maria, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

9th-12th century diaries to get climate change information

zoiks, this is awesome (though I'm a little curious about the form said diaries took and where they're from, given the obsession in Europe at that time to turn any pieces of paper/vellum into more painstakingly illuminated copies of the Bible, with anything else clearly being a terrible waste. I'd much rather read a millennium-old diary, obv.)

ein fisch schwimmt im wasser · fisch im wasser durstig (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)

maybe sometimes the individual non-expert opinion will be wanted.

don't worry, there's plenty of those too. there's this thing called the internet...

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

If I thought someone mistrusted me enough they would consider reading my letters/diaries/email (and you can kind of tell when things get to that point) you can bet your bippy I'd put maguffins in there, as Suzy mentioned. Call me malicious or whatever, I dont care really. Who's to say thats not what happened to the original logged out OP? I mean who would write something as bland and straightforward as "had sex with [blah] this afternoon" in a diary anyway? Yeesh, its not minutes from a meeting.

Meh maybe thats just me though.

ceci n'est pas une pipecock (Trayce), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe could be a GTD enthusiast?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)

Haha.

ceci n'est pas une pipecock (Trayce), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

I'm just sayin, you keep a diary nowadays don't pretend like you're doing it for posterity or for subsequent generations. You're doing it for yourself. What that says about you, hey I dunno...

Mormon church it's a freaking commandment to keep a diary SO your posterity can read it. Mainly read your testimony that the church is true and awesome! So it's this bittersweet lol looking back at journals of mine from age 15 where I was first getting held underwater by depression, and five pages of suicidal moaning ends with "but at least I know the church is true and that Joseph Smith was a prophet of god!"

existential eggs (Abbott), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

If I ever do a diary now it's in the form of a wordless comic about my day. Happens maybe 3x a year.

existential eggs (Abbott), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

not quite a diary, but the chris ware sketchbooks are a lot more interesting than the acme novelty stuff that eventually comes out of them.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

It is a very, very weird feeling, feeling you have to cover up parts of your inner life so as not to shock your future great-great0grandchildren.

existential eggs (Abbott), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

I used to keep an oldschool diary, but in actual fact, amusingly, it *did* get me into trouble (but the guy was already snoooping through all my shit and being an asswipe and I wasnt cheating on him.. UNTIL all that started happening and pissed me off, but long story). Then I sort of began to write journalistic nonfiction instead - observational stuff, notes for short stories, trying to hone my craft (or kid myself I was).; Then I got a livejournal and then it all got kind of boring to bother with.

ceci n'est pas une pipecock (Trayce), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)

. So to the Privy Seal, where I signed a deadly number of pardons, which do trouble me to get nothing by. Home by water, and there was much pleased to see that my little room is likely to come to be finished soon. I fell a-reading Fuller’s History of Abbys, and my wife in Great Cyrus till twelve at night, and so to bed.

Squash weather (Eazy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

Trayce, it totally worked - and my mom also learned what is 'unreliable narrator' - but I also pointed out that she probably didn't want me digging through HER stuff. School had already toughened me: sometimes the posse of evil roach-clip loser girls in my jr. high would lift a journal or some other work in progress and I'd be like 'oh I was waiting for the staged performance whoops I forgot none of you can actually read, were you stealing my shit to learn?'

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

I wish I'd thought to do it earlier in my life where it may have at least had some entertainment value!

ceci n'est pas une pipecock (Trayce), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

lolz Abbott you are the bestest.

things I have learned about the Mormon Church today: the Deseret Alphabet, diary-keeping requirements

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

Yes, Abbott rocks!

edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:45 (sixteen years ago)

:O

:D

existential eggs (Abbott), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 22:53 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.