My First Strip Club Experience*

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I went to a strip club the other day and afterwards thought to myself, "could humanity sink any lower?"
-The three "Upscale" places I had gone to shared the same decor: a theme restaurant meets and Indian casino.
-The carpet in 2 of the places were puke worthy.
-The DJs sounded like Morning Zoo outcasts. I was half expecting fart sound effects.
-Who made patform high heels the offical shoes of strippers? I can not imagine an uglier, more uncomfortable pair of footwear anywhere else on the planet. And about a 1/3 of the women had the tags still attached to their shoes. (Huh?)
-I feel very sorry for the girls who work there. They had to rub themselves against some of most vile, ugliest creeps I've ever encountered. Seriously, these guys were giving off major serial killer vibes. And for what? so the girl could get a $10 tip? urgh!
-One would think that in theory a beatiful woman gyrating against a pole would be one of the sexiest thing that a straight man can ever see. And while these girls for the most part were up to par in the looks department, their 'preformances' were about as erotic as burnt toast.

While it wasn't as nightmarish like I thought it would be (in fact, I was pretty amused through the whole thing), I still felt vile and icky afterwards. The situation was so pathetic that it was nearly laugh out loud funny at first then later crying-in-the-shower depressing. My friend oftered to buy me a lapdance just before we left. I told him Would rather suck the buckshot out of a rifle.

(*actually I lied, I've been to a Strip Club once for a bachelor party, but i read Sylvia Plath the whole time there so I don't count it.)

Lurker L MrLurkerstein, Saturday, 22 April 2006 20:52 (twenty years ago)

Mmm, yeah baby, burnt toast. Burn it. Burn it hotter, baby.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 22 April 2006 20:57 (twenty years ago)

Maybe you just don't like girls?

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 22 April 2006 20:59 (twenty years ago)

i don't get all rockist about strip bars except for the fake tiddays, which are always a major turn-off (and always just ubiquitous).

a regal trolley (aaron a), Saturday, 22 April 2006 21:01 (twenty years ago)

Are you the same faggot who didn't liek when teh chick got all raw with you?

Jimmy Mod: My theme is DEATH (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Saturday, 22 April 2006 21:06 (twenty years ago)

i never understood strup clubs -
if i see naked women i want to fuck them or masturbate.
if i cant do both - whats the point?
plus, i dont think it will turn me on to watch them with 20 more men, drooling all over.yaaaach...

cerf, Saturday, 22 April 2006 21:09 (twenty years ago)

men that dont love stripclubs - C or D or psycho or prudeish or just plain weird and prone to creepy tendencies?

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 22 April 2006 21:12 (twenty years ago)

I've been to a Strip Club once for a bachelor party, but i read Sylvia Plath the whole time there

who makes this stuff up?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:26 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, my very limited experience is that strip clubs are indeed pretty lame and/or depressing and/or creepy. (Those three adjectives would be arranged along a spectrum of how "classy" the place is.)

And that's even given that 1/3 of my "limited experience" took place in a Canadian strip club where everything was remarkably clean and the strippers were strangely polite and wholesome-looking.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:36 (twenty years ago)

What kind of shoes would you like to see the strippers in instead?

Abbott (Abbott), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:39 (twenty years ago)

plimsols?

This cunted circus never ends... (papa november), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:41 (twenty years ago)

http://www.railibro.rai.it/images/articoli/plath7_b.jpg

pablo (Pablo A), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:41 (twenty years ago)

I don't think most men actually find strip-clubs to be a turn-on or enjoyable in and of themselves. It's more something you do with the boys - fun by proxy. Like 'we're supposed to get loaded and pay girls with fake boobs to jiggle them for us, it's what men do.'

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:44 (twenty years ago)

I love that asterisk, it makes me think somebody involved was on steroids.

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:47 (twenty years ago)

isnt there an "indie" stripclub in portland where all the girls dance to like MIA and postal service?

phil-two (phil-two), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:50 (twenty years ago)

do you mean mary's?

http://www.marysclub.com/outsidehorizontal.jpg

even cathy berberian's nose (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:03 (twenty years ago)

i dont know. ive never been to portland. i just read about it in some magazine

phil-two (phil-two), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:06 (twenty years ago)

I've never been into the peelers much, myself. I don't think that makes me weird.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:26 (twenty years ago)

Although there's this one place here that has the greatest "fliers" I've ever seen:

ihttp://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v622/dysign/ilx/?action=view¤t=BabyDolls.jpg

plus they gave me pot!

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)

I've been to a Strip Club once for a bachelor party, but i read Sylvia Plath the whole time there

Do your parents know you're gay?

van igloo (van smack), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:33 (twenty years ago)

oops, here we go:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v622/dysign/ilx/BabyDolls.jpg

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:38 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I'm the same 'faggot' who didn't like raw chicks however I do like girls. It's funny out of the 15 some odd dancers we saw than night I think there was only 3 that was noticeably fake. I would rather see strippers look comfortable in their choice of footwear than not. I would like to see a girl come out barefoot, wearing sneakers or anything else for that matter. And how does my Sylvia Plath story make me gay?

Lurker L MrLurkerstein, Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:45 (twenty years ago)

if you have to ask,

pablo (Pablo A), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:47 (twenty years ago)

http://cache.gawker.com/images/2006/04/lorenkreiss.jpg

FAG

Jimmy Mod is a super idol of The MARS SPIRIT (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Sunday, 23 April 2006 00:48 (twenty years ago)

the first time i went to a strip club, i got paid to go. our alt-weekly was doing one of those "sex issues", so a whole group of us went to a stip club and wrote it from various perspectives: straight male, gay male, straight female (we were lacking for a lesbian). and yes, i know, that's the most alt-weeklyish thing in the world. but we got our admission, drinks and tips expensed. i was too shy to tip at first. which made me feel bad, because then you feel like if you're not tipping you shouldn't even be watching. but then it seems rude to not watch someone who's dancing naked for you. so anyway i overcame my shyness and distributed some tips. i found the whole thing pretty odd, as i have my handful of subsequent strip-club sojourns. one of my friends said it was basically a pantomime of courtship at its most traditional: the men bring the money, the women shake their tits and asses, everybody smiles nervously.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 23 April 2006 02:05 (twenty years ago)

That Sylvia Plath thing just takes the cake, doesn't it?

Lurker, you sound like someone who is so desperate to show his Sensitive New Age Man credentials to the world that he's completely forgotten how to have fun. There's a tendency among the young & overeducated to wilfully overlook the fact that a) many women like sex too (SHOCKA) and b) not everyone who does sex work is abused, drug-addled, or self-hating.

You still haven't hung out with that "closet slut", have you???

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 02:09 (twenty years ago)

No, he's terrified of her, remember?

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 02:12 (twenty years ago)

Oh, right.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 02:15 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and:

one of my friends said it was basically a pantomime of courtship at its most traditional: the men bring the money, the women shake their tits and asses, everybody smiles nervously.

O T F M!!!

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 02:17 (twenty years ago)

"Sensitive New Age Man"? Tantrum, you have given me way too much credit. The Sylvia Plath thing happened because I was bored and I had a copy of Ariel in my booksack so I figured, "why not?" Trust me, it was not to impress anyone.

Back in my hometown, I actually knew a handful of dancers who did like sex and who were not crazy or a junky. However I had never seen them preform and I think that there is the key. I saw them as people seperate from their jobs and I never paid what they did for a living any mind. But now having actually seen what they do, I can't help coming out thinking that their profession is highly degrading. In a job where one is reduced to a pair of tits, an ass, and a g-string, it's kinda hard to believe that a girl could be perfectly normal to do it time after time. Andf I know it sounds fucked up and woman hating but it's my opinion and although I wish I could think otherwise, it's what i believe.

It's also kinda funny that Gypsy Mothra brought the connection between strip clubs and the nature of courtship to light beacuse (and perhaps it's just me) everyone there seemed to be into the role playing. And I thought that was tragic for 2 reasons: a) In theory, anyone should attract the gender of their choice. But strip clubs are living proof that it's not so and there are people who will exploit a guy's loneliness and desperation for a money and b)and that there are people on this planet so delusional that will buy into a fantasy no matter how transparent, how fleeting just because they are waving a couple bucks around.

I can not see how that is in anyway 'fun'.

Lurker L MrLurkerstein, Sunday, 23 April 2006 03:21 (twenty years ago)

FAG

Jimmy Mod is a super idol of The MARS SPIRIT (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Sunday, 23 April 2006 03:37 (twenty years ago)

not gay JM, just a potential serial killer. but hey, what's a man to do in a world full of people who are so evil as to exploit a guy's loneliness and desperation for money?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 23 April 2006 03:54 (twenty years ago)

Hey, I've been to Mary's in Portland! It was actually my first proper stripclub experience. Here's the story I recounted to a list devoted to the Smurfs and Misery-solo:

Speaking of stripclubs and Morrissey...I was cleaning out my mailbox
and came across an old message I sent to a friend. Here's an excerpt
about going to a strip club in Portland, OR during the tour last
summer...(names deleted to protect the guilty)
================
So, here's the story...after the fantastic show in Portland (the best
on the tour so far) I ended up with hanging out at the bar (with my
head on the bar) of MOrrissey's hotel. I don't stalk Morrissey at his
hotels, but I'm in the rental car with others who do.
xxx's cousin who lives in Portland is drinking with us, and since
he's Irish, he wants to take us to more nightclubs in Portland to
drink. bbbb and I beg off, preferring to sleep in the car. But
somehow we are persuaded to go to a club nearby that is playing loud,
horrible techno. Fortunately, for some reason we don't go in. I don't
know why, but we go to a place called Mary's Club, which is across the
street.

The strains of the Verve's Bittersweet Symphony usher us inside. Hmmm,
surprisingly good music for a strip club. But they are progressive in
Portland. For example, they allow full nudity in clubs that serve
alcohol. This club is no exception. After I commented about the
music, the owner of the club (presumably Mary) proudly informed me that
the dancers get to choose their own music. They do so by picking
selections from the wall-mounted jukebox to the left of the small
rectangular stage.

I half-expected to see Gary Day in the joint because he's been spotted
at titty bars before. Instead, we encounter bbb and --- at a table
in the second row away from the stage. The first row is a bar right up
in front of the stage. It is reserved for the serious tippers who gaze
up dumbly at the undulating dancers.

This is actually the first time I've ever been in a strip club, I mean
one that caters to straight men. It's not as sad and sleazy as I
thought it would be. There's the smoke, but it's not too bad. The
drinks are watered down, but the dancers are pretty and not scary like
the pornlets I'm used to.

Except there's one dancer whom I did not like. She wouldn't dance to
Morrissey/Smiffs even though I'd tip $20 for it. She knew who they
were (one of the dancers claimed ignorance), but she said the only
SMiths song they had was a cover of How Soon Is Now by Snake River
Conspiracy. It is a foul cover by a vile band. Anyway, she already
played a SRC song, so she refused to play another. That's okay because
I thought she looked like a skank. She looked like a biker
chick with her tattoos. She also had blonde hair but a shaved pussy,
which makes me think she's another repulsive blonde-in-a-bottle type.
Big turn off. But ----- was attracted to her. The dancer had large,
firm boobs. She was a chunky girl, so the big boobs looked believable
on her frame. But when she hung upside-down on the pole, I noticed
that her firm breasts were too firm -- they didn't move naturally.
That's a damn good boob job! But ----- didn't like hearing that. She
protested that maybe this girl was 18 so she could have naturally firm
and high breasts and all. I said, no, if they're that big (and
natural) there's no way they'd stay up like that. I've seen more tits
than a dairy farmer, so I ought to know! ------ further argued that
her own sizable breasts don't move. I disagreed and told her that I've
seen her breasts move (and due to gravity hers are also a lot lower
than the trollope's on stage). She seemed shocked that I'd scoped out
her breasts and said she felt cheap and used. Well, I retorted, would
you feel better about it if I had paid you for the privilege? She said
that was a low blow. Well, of course I look! Don't try to tell me you
don't look, either!

I tipped one dancer for playing Joy Division's Love Will Tear Us Apart
and also for "keepin' it real" because she didn't alter her lovely
breasts with horrible plastic surgery. But she didn't dance to the
Smiths cover.

Since we were heckling every dancer to dance to Morrissey or the
Smiffs, one of the patrons at the bar in front of the stage asked me if
I had been to the Morrissey show that night. Of course! He pointed
out a pretty, slim woman wearing the black tour "wifebeater" shirt with
"Morrissey" in olde English script standing in the back. SHe had a
cascade of gorgeous, brown corkscrew curls. She was his co-worker at a
posh restaurant called Pastis (sp?) where Morrissey had dinner that
night. The unfortunate girl asked for the night off to go see
Morrissey. But if she had worked that night, she could've served him
his meal! I asked the guy what Morrissey ate. He said Morrissey had
angel hair pasta with basil and tomatoes. Sounds right.

When a seat in front of the stage became available, this lovely fan
grabbed it and spent the rest of the evening gazing up at all the
dancers. I thought it was odd that she should stare at the women on
stage when she seemed to be way better-looking than them.

The guy who told me about his co-worker was kind of odd in that he
seemed too good-looking to be here, too. I thought he looked so pretty
that he was gay. But he was one of the most ardent admirers of the
dancers and tipped copiously. Later on, I saw him hugging on the
pretty lesbian Mozfan co-worker of his. They were kind of swaying in a
slow dance. I could tell that he was in love with her. But she had
eyes only for the strippers. Seeing her gaze longingly at the peelers
on the stage while she was being hugged by this man was too poignant a
scene for the end of the night. It was such the illustration of "I
Want the One I Can't Have." I thought of the lyrics "Sad-veiled bride,
please be happy. Handsome groom, give her room. Loud, loutish lover,
treat her kindly, though she needs you more than she loves you..."

We stayed until closing... Then I drove to the airport because I had an
early morning flight to Salt Lake City.

Oh yeah, I met Maf (Matthew), the subject of Momus's patron-pop Stars
Forever song, in Portland that night. He seemed charmingly flustered
when I told him that reading MOmus's online tourdiary entry about
illegal sexual practices in Salt Lake City tempted me to engage in the
outlawed practices while in SLC. When I saw him again in Santa
Barbara, he asked if I had found oral sex in SLC. That is another
story for later...

Melinda Mess-injure (Melinda Mess-injure), Sunday, 23 April 2006 05:00 (twenty years ago)

The Sylvia Plath thing happened because I was bored and I had a copy of Ariel in my booksack so I figured, "why not?" Trust me, it was not to impress anyone.

So a) why'd you tell us? and b) if you had to tell us, why not just say you read "a book", and c) wtf is a booksack?

JimD (JimD), Sunday, 23 April 2006 05:18 (twenty years ago)

a bookbag.

even cathy berberian's nose (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 23 April 2006 05:23 (twenty years ago)

A potential serial killer?!?! Yeah, I think there's a lot of uglyness and evil in the world and I don't care much for Strip Joints but what makes you think I'm going to kill people? You're a fool and a madman for that assertion.

And as for the Sylvia Plath nonsense a) it's funny story b) the detail makes it funnier (i.e. getting into a fistfight while listening to the Cocteau Twins) and c) a sack of books.

Oh and another thing about Strip Clubs: The freaking music! I've never expected to hear a note of Kid Rock ever again!

Lurker 'Lurky' MrLurkerstein, Sunday, 23 April 2006 07:06 (twenty years ago)

And that's even given that 1/3 of my "limited experience" took place in a Canadian strip club where everything was remarkably clean and the strippers were strangely polite and wholesome-looking.

the only strip clubs i've ever been to were in edmonton, canada, when myself and a photographer and PR got stranded there after our flight to LA on 9/11 got diverted due to the closed american airspace. it was a weird time to be stranded thousands of miles from your loved ones with no idea when you'll be able to go home again, so our heads were all a little fucked up to begin with, but it was a weird night.

we went to one place that our waiter had reccommended, but when we got there, the owner told us that as they do lapdances there they couldn't legally serve teh booze, and the PR - a girl whose idea the whole strip club trawl had been - said we weren't nearly drunk enough yet, so we went to this abysmal place called the pink pussycat, which was like a huge aircraft hangar with chairs and a stage, where disinterested boobless, pubeless, buttless girls cavorted while drunks cheered em on. there was one dancer who didn't dance to Kid Rock, but to some insane penumatic R'n'B track, who was *awesome, and the photog and I got to chat to her later and she gave us autographed posters of her (nekkid, natch) mostly because the photog (6' 4") had dispatched a punter who was hassling her.
we then went on to the original place, chez pierre (i think), an old skool darkened room where the stones had appara once visited. as i'd already raised PC objections to our trip, i was bought the first lapdance - a bump and grind from a mostly naked eastern euorpean girl who whispered filth in my ear while putting her hands all over me. i was at first kind of disturbed by it, then found it insanely erotic for a minute or so, and then everything seemed grubby again when i realised this was only happening because the PR had put her credit card behind the bar. the proprietor later told us that the soundtrack for the dancing was one of a series of mixtapes he'd made for the club from his favourite tunes, each edited to a strict two and a half minutes to maximise profit from the dances. mostly they were cool rock tunes, though i had the misfortune to receive my dance to the lilting tones of chris de burgh's lady in red.
i dunno. i was pretty skeeved out by the whole thing, and wouldn't wanna do it again. but its not like i object to it.

i am not a nugget (stevie), Sunday, 23 April 2006 10:14 (twenty years ago)

I have never stepped foot in a strip club. It's kind of weird -- it's the kind of thing you think I'd have done at some point, but I never have.

phil d. (Phil D.), Sunday, 23 April 2006 12:25 (twenty years ago)

not gay JM, just a potential serial killer.

This is a really, really shitty and destructive thing to say.

but hey, what's a man to do in a world full of people who are so evil as to exploit a guy's loneliness and desperation for money?

I think you're inadvertently betraying your sociocultural roots here, S. Clover. However foregrounded the haha-"ironic" dimension may be in NYC, Portland, et al., in most cases strip clubs are very much about "exploiting guys' loneliness and desperation for money" (not to mention women's desperation-for-money). I mean, dude, try talking to an actual real-life stripper, or failing that, at least reading some articles -- this one maybe, though there was a terrific one I saw a while back that really nailed the mutual-exploitation angle, but can't find now...

But, you know, I wouldn't want to interfere with your turning McLurkerstein into the straw man you clearly need him to be! Do continue calling people names when they don't say their shibboleths in the proper order, instead of engaging with them as human beings; it's a truly noble, admirable trait, and definitely makes the world a better place.

lurker #2421, Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:17 (twenty years ago)

poor exploited guys! pity them!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:33 (twenty years ago)

I felt lucky to have a Yale degree to fall back on, because despite the financial problems I had to deal with after quitting so suddenly, I didn't have it in me to dance for one more day.

I guess its not so tough for strippers seeing as how they generally have Yale degrees to "fall back on" too.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:36 (twenty years ago)

i also love that the original poster claims to hate strip cubs yet talks about "the three 'Upscale' places' he had gone to. dude, if you don't like it, why do you keep going?

just another exploited guy trapped in the life, i guess.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:40 (twenty years ago)

That's right, man! We shouldn't even TALK about that angle (because, y'know, it definitely has no bearing on anything in the situation)! And the strippers who do write about it (and who do, in fact, "pity them") should be censured! Sterling Clover knows best!

xpost Ah, the privileged disapproving of the privileged. Good show!

lurker #2421, Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:40 (twenty years ago)

And we certainly can't have this:

CODY: You know, I think a lot of people assumed going into stripping that I would start to think of men as, you know, chauvinist pigs who wanted to objectify women. But in fact, I developed a lot of sympathy for men after stripping, because when they are in the club, when they are in that situation, they're kind of powerless, and they're there because they are looking for companionship and they're looking for intimacy. And it was up to us to provide that.

HAMMER: So you kind of felt sorry for them?

CODY: Yes, a little bit.

HAMMER: You weren't just there to take their money and their dollar bills.

CODY: No.

HAMMER: You were actually providing a service of putting a smile on their face?

CODY: Exactly. Which made it all the easier to be condescending.

(P.S. I don't find this point of view, or interview, to be entirely unproblematic...not to mention that it's a CNN interview, and all that that entails...but I'm a hell of a lot more inclined to defer to a stripper's judgment on whether it's appropriate for mutual exploitation to be a part of the dialogue about stripping than I am to defer to Sterling Clover's judgment about said topic.)

lurker #2421, Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:47 (twenty years ago)

consolidated's 'no answer for a dancer' to thread (or not)

i am not a nugget (stevie), Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:51 (twenty years ago)

That "ha, ha strippers don't listen to Morrissey" story is one of the most patronizing things I've ever read on ILX.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:53 (twenty years ago)

Clearly I need to try harder.

Dan (Did I Mention I Went To Harvard?) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 23 April 2006 16:37 (twenty years ago)

I like porn but dislike strip clubs - I think C.S. Lewis's food analogy in Mere Christianity is apt, though I find his overall take on sex relations as problematic as one would expect, given that he was at that point working almost entirely from theory rather than experience. Here's the key line (the set-up, about an imaginary planet, I don't have to hand):

"There is nothing to be ashamed of in enjoying your food: there would be everything to be ashamed of if half the world made food the main interest of their lives and spent their time looking at pictures of food and dribbling and smacking their lips."

With porn, it's like "sure: visual stimulus for masturbatory purposes, makes sense to me!"; with stripclubs, it's more like "here's a whole bizarre roleplaying universe where one gets to feign a sort of Bizarro-world courtship (with little or none of the fun, subtle intricacies that make courtship both delightful and daunting/scary) and roleplay in a way that doesn't seem especially rewarding or worthwhile." Obviously, others' mileage varies on this question, and as a married guy I can only really imagine being at a point where I was like "if I do not see a Live Nude Girl I am gonna die of starvation here pretty quick."

I am very puzzled by how reactionary people get over men claiming they don't enjoy strip clubs; "don't go to them then!" seems like an oblique way of saying "let's not discuss this matter, some people enjoy them, THAT'S ALL!" which resembles the odious "discussing music DESTROYS THE MAGIC" folderol

though finally, yes, the Plath line is priceless, I'd assumed it was a joke - the lighting's much better at the bus stop, if you're so bored in a strip club that you'd rather read you oughta go home and read

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 23 April 2006 16:46 (twenty years ago)

So I asked a friend once, what's the appeal, especially considering that you're basically having a sexual experience IN PUBLIC, surrounded by all your male friends. Which was pretty much counter to his whole idea of masculinity, so I was perplexed. And he said that it's not even a sexual experience, that when you go with a group it sort of disarms the sexuality and it becomes about the fact that you've now seen X many more women's breasts, out of all the women in the world. Because, he said, men walk around every day trying not to be caught looking, and wondering what women look like sans clothing, and at strip clubs you actually get to find out and relax yr...discretion vigilance and just flat out stare.

I still can't decide whether I think that's utter bullshit or a quite reasonable take on the idea.

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Because, he said, men walk around every day trying not to be caught looking, and wondering what women look like sans clothing, and at strip clubs you actually get to find out and relax yr...discretion vigilance and just flat out stare.

There's definitely some truth there. Your friend is also right in that any sexual arousal gets dialed down a lot, especially if you're with a group.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)

Or a dirty, dirty stripper.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:26 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, how dare they try to make a living?

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:27 (twenty years ago)

My we're defensive!

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:29 (twenty years ago)

I am very puzzled by how reactionary people get over men claiming they don't enjoy strip clubs; "don't go to them then!" seems like an oblique way of saying "let's not discuss this matter, some people enjoy them, THAT'S ALL!" which resembles the odious "discussing music DESTROYS THE MAGIC" folderol

I think the problem is that disgust or casual disinterest of the "I read a book the whole time I was there" variety are the most socially acceptable responses to strip clubs, so conversations about them start to seem a little like roleplaying themselves (even if those are people's genuine feelings).

Fwiw I've never been to one, so I'm saved from having to offer up an opinion about them.

31g (31g), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:36 (twenty years ago)

My we're defensive!

Nah, not really, I just think it's funny that the knives come out on both sides whenever we have one of these threads.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:43 (twenty years ago)

fwiw - all the girls i know that went into stripping were not doing it "to make a living".

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:46 (twenty years ago)

Really? I've known two women who both went into stripping for essentially the same reason - they just weren't making enough money at normal jobs. Both were educated & intelligent people (and there is a difference, I'm sure you know what I mean), but neither of them had been able to get into their chosen fields, and they were both sick to death of working in food service. So off they went.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:57 (twenty years ago)

i think talking about stripping and strip clubs is a losing proposition, because they're not just one thing. they are, in part, sad and (sometimes but not always) skeevy, but they're not only sad and skeevy, they're a lot more complicated than that, and no generalization about either patrons or dancers is going to capture the odd mix of motives, desires and roleplaying. that article by the yale grad basically acknowledges all that -- she enjoyed doing it for a while, there were things she found fascinating and rewarding, and then after a while she didn't enjoy it. that's hardly a wholehearted indictment. there's a lot of ugliness that goes on around strippers and stripclubs, for sure, but that doesn't mean that's all that's there, and it's hard to condemn the institution of stripclubs without that condemnation spilling over to their employees and customers in a way that seems both meanspirited and hypocritical.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 23 April 2006 18:05 (twenty years ago)

strip clubs are a weird thing for sure. first time I went to one (in Minneapolis) was actually a great experience, though not because of the club: I was dragged (against my will! oh OK maybe not) by four very cool and amazingly attractive female coworkers, which led to a lot of dirty looks from the other male patrons. the women at my table critiqued the dancers ("she doesn't know how to dance in heels"; "she must have just gotten her tits done last week") and I mostly squirmed. all of the dancers seemed to be surgically enhanced, not a turn-on for me. the nadir was when a couple frat dudes went up onstage for their birthday "gifts," which consisted of having a row of dancers box the dudes' faces with their surg-enh breasts while the dudes sat on their hands. it was pretty fucking ugly. and the only attractive woman in the place who wasn't sitting at my table was the waitress, who had a black bob and was mousy-cute (rowr).

I've had a better time with peep-show booths like the Lusty Lady in Seattle, where the protocol is very straightforward. and the one place I went to in Portland with some friends after a Hold Steady show was kind of great; the dancer looked at me appreciatively when I drunkenly mimed the Magnetic Fields' "Reno Dakota," which was playing as she finished up. the number she had just finished dancing to was Neu!'s "Hallogallo."

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Sunday, 23 April 2006 18:32 (twenty years ago)

actually the most memorable thing about that first night happened afterward. the five of us went down the street to Sex World, a toy/whatnot shop. as we were putting quarters in a mechanical-claw prize-grab machine (the shortest girl in the group "won" some anal beads), this semi-retarded guy grabbed the ass of one of the women, prompting the other three to chase him down the block, screaming bloody murder. I felt like a moron for not thinking to do anything myself. in the car afterward the four of them began swapping stories about times when boyfriends had defended their honor by using intimidation in various ways, while I sat in the back seat trying to be invisible. finally someone asked, "Michaelangelo, have you ever anything like that?" I started to stammer out that I'd never been in a situation where I'd had to when another of them said, "Aw, leave the kid alone." (I was 22.)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Sunday, 23 April 2006 18:37 (twenty years ago)

it becomes about the fact that you've now seen X many more women's breasts, out of all the women in the world. Because, he said, men walk around every day trying not to be caught looking, and wondering what women look like sans clothing, and at strip clubs you actually get to find out and relax yr...discretion vigilance and just flat out stare.

while i do believe this is the case for a lot of people, and it does sound pretty harmless put that way, i don't know if it really is just as simple as curiosity being satisfied. especially if it's a habitual thing. isn't this just a diplomatic way of saying that these guys secretly wish they had power over women and are glad of a place where they can "comfortably" exert it? that's a little squicky i think.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 23 April 2006 18:40 (twenty years ago)

the super-weird thing about strip clubs - as a man - is that EVERY woman you see for the next 20 minutes or so afterwards you just can't understand why they have clothes on

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 23 April 2006 18:50 (twenty years ago)

isn't this just a diplomatic way of saying that these guys secretly wish they had power over women and are glad of a place where they can "comfortably" exert it? that's a little squicky i think.

squickier than first-person shooter videogames? or pornography, for that matter? i mean, we have lots of ways to sublimate urges.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 23 April 2006 19:21 (twenty years ago)

first person shooter games are a little creepy sometimes yeah, but they are not reality whereas strippers are people, not just entertainment. why would you even draw that comparison? pornography is too broad a term to be judged in that way. some is creepy, some is fine. books can be creepy too. i was just saying that that particular rationale makes me a little uncomfortable because i sense an ugly subtext in it.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 23 April 2006 19:37 (twenty years ago)

why would you even draw that comparison?

ok, then paintball tournaments, where you do actually shoot at people. i'm just saying that fantasy roleplaying has a place, even if it's not a fantasy you share or role you relish. stripclubs are big commercial rpg's, in a way.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:01 (twenty years ago)

isn't this just a diplomatic way of saying that these guys secretly wish they had power over women and are glad of a place where they can "comfortably" exert it?

What's the difference between wanting to have "power over women" and wanting to participate in a sexual (or sexually-charged) experience in which the usual complicated interpersonal negotiations that take place between two people are -- thanks to commerce! -- bypassed, allowing the sexual element to be foregrounded and, essentially, the sole object of discourse?

I mean, I'm sure for some people strip clubs are about the power of getting a woman to do your bidding for $$$ (even though that power relationship is very double-edged at best, as many strippers have pointed out in their writings). But strip clubs, prostitution, pornography -- I'd wager that all of them have, as a large part of their appeal, the desire to have a sexual experience that's solely about sex qua sex. To actually not have to worry about the human being; to enjoy another person as, yes, an object (or, to use a slightly less loaded term, as a means to an end).

[I think this seems more immediately creepy in the case of strippers, because unlike pornography, it happens in person, and (wild tangent alert) unlike prostitution, we don't "code" strippers as inherently dissipated -- and I don't think it's unfair to guess that the average stripper in the U.S., at least, is probably of a higher socioeconomic background than the average prostitute (though I may be wrong). So you're basically, y'know, ogling the girl you might otherwise know from class, or from the house three doors down, or whatever, and putting $5 bills in her G-string.]

I don't know -- on the one hand, I can understand how the human desire for "no-strings-attached" sexual experiences can seem creepy and depressing: it often feels depressing to me, and even though I don't think it's a uniquely male impulse, I'm still willing to acknowledge that women are far more likely to be on the receiving end of its uglier aspects.

On the other hand, I don't know that sexuality is really something that can be expected to follow the laws of mutual respect and whatnot. I suspect we're better off embracing that wilfulness, and acknowledging that there is an amoral, self-centered aspect to sexuality -- and trying to suppress or legislate that aspect out of existence will, I think, just make it stronger.

lurker #2421, Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:13 (twenty years ago)

i guess it's just a little weird to know (as a person with boobs) that it's such a common fantasy for boobs to be some kind of guilt free public property. but i suppose that it's only because i've been brought up to feel that they're mine alone. for sharing like, on special occaisions only. haha. omg.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:21 (twenty years ago)

lurker, first part of the quote i was responding to said "And he said that it's not even a sexual experience"

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)

according to pretty much everybody I've known in the therapeutic professions - across the spectrum, from psychoanalysts to touchy-feely MFCC's - a bunch of guys going to a strip club are essentially sharing a homosexual experience in a public space where it's safe for them to do so. Suck one cock, one wants to say, but baby steps, baby steps

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 23 April 2006 22:14 (twenty years ago)

A friend of mine who did tabletop dancing for a while said it doesnt make as much money as some people think. She just did it for kicks and curiosity and something different, I guess. And she has a degree and had good IT job, she just wanted a radical change.

However after some months she left, because according to her, while the job is ok, the girls are fine and most of the crowd are, her and a lot of the other girls had major problems with stalkers. We're talking, seriously messed up men who assume they have made freinds with the dancers and try to follow them after work/find out where they live. The girls had to have a bouncer with them after work and shit. Fuck that for a job!

Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 23 April 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)

That homosexual experience thing sounds like bullshit. If a guy goes to a strip club with a bunch of girls or a mixed crowd, what then? A bisexual experience?

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 23 April 2006 22:59 (twenty years ago)

Kim, I think you're partly right about that weird edge, except that you're making a big jump when you say that it's about "control over women" -- and there's something really critical and complicated about that jump, something that's probably important in terms of strip clubs. Basically you're interpreting wanting to see women naked as wanting to have power/control over them: your breasts (for instance) are yours, and so someone who wants to stare at them wants to take power and control from you. But that's exactly what's complicated about the desire to look at people sexually -- maybe the person doesn't want control! Maybe someone wants to look at the breasts, but wants it to happen in some way that doesn't have to involve subjecting the woman to anything. I mean, the preference would be that it was just freely offered somehow! But the main acceptable way you're "freely offered" that kind of experience is when you've established an actual relationship with someone, which is a whole other thing with whole other risks and responsibilities.

Stripping in general seems to want to work around that. Notice the type of personality strippers are supposed to have: they're supposed to come out like they want to show you something; they're supposed to seem powerful, almost domineering, almost predatory. Why? Not because it's sexy, I don't think! But rather because a stripper who seemed too shy or reluctant -- a stripper who seemed like she was really giving up something -- would make men feel like they were oppressing her and hurting her. And that's deeply unsexy. Hence that reverse power dynamic, where the strippers begin to seem in charge, as if they're subjecting the patrons to something -- it's surely more comfortable that way.

The same could probably said for voyeuristic fantasies and peeping toms and so on: I really think their idea might be that they want to look at someone sexually, but from some hidden place where it "doesn't matter," where the woman doesn't even know she's being observed. The desire would be to somehow gaze without consequences -- without intimacy, responsibility, or anything. And it seems like it's hard for plenty of men to fully understand why that gazing would seem invasive or threatening or an issue of power and control, because men have pretty much zero experience of anyone just wanting some removed sexual gratification from their bodies.

Anyway so yeah, I think there are lots of complications in that little jump to power-and-control there.

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:01 (twenty years ago)

yeah.

Kim (Kim), Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:12 (twenty years ago)

according to pretty much everybody I've known in the therapeutic professions - across the spectrum, from psychoanalysts to touchy-feely MFCC's - a bunch of guys going to a strip club are essentially sharing a homosexual experience in a public space where it's safe for them to do so. Suck one cock, one wants to say, but baby steps, baby steps

I have to say that this really does not jibe with any strip club experience I've ever had (in fact, the one time I went to a strip club with gay men was maybe the most irritating visit I've ever had to a strip club; there's nothing that ruins the entire vibe quite like someone you've brought with you loudly judging you for having the nerve to like looking at breasts and vaginas). Also, particularly in the context of bachelor parties, that entire scenario seems to completely miss the two major reasons guys have bachelor parties:

1) Culturally, it's the last socially-acceptable time they get to be "wild" in some way, shape or form with the opposite sex.

2) Culturally, it's the last time it's socially-acceptable to hang out with the guys without responsibilities requiring you to check in with your spouse.

There is a gigantic difference between, say, that one friend who always wants to wrestle (you know you have one) and going out to a strip club with your friends; there's no contact, there's very little fantasy-swapping (mostly because you're all looking at the same thing) and, most importantly, there's not even a remote possibility of someone cumming. Saying that going to a strip club with your friends is merely a way to act out sublimated homosexual desire is about as credible as saying that going to a strip club by yourself is pathetic and creepy; you're so busying decoding the behavior to find the hidden, actual meaning that you're kind of missing the fact that straight guys like to look at naked women.

Dan (Occam's Razor Pwns U) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)

(I mean, yes some guys go to strip clubs in groups because the like watching their friends watching breasts and vaginas and some guys who go to strip clubs by themselves are socially retarded nightmares but taking the stance that ALL guys who fit either profile strikes me as being Exercise 1 in the Big Book Of How To Be A Presumptuous Douchebag.)

Dan (So Don't Do That) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:34 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco in OTM shocker!

men have pretty much zero experience of anyone just wanting some removed sexual gratification from their bodies.

This is so key, and I think one of the things that (speaking very generally here) women find most difficult to relate to in men's experience -- in other words, the idea that men want to be found beautiful and wanted for their bodies.

(I say "difficult to relate to" because, for many women, that kind of being-wanted is the bane of their daily existence, no?)

xpost Dan Perry also OTM, the tendency to "queer" (I don't use that word pejoratively) male-male interactions seems deeply suspect to me, kind of a cross between "HAHA U R FAG" and wishful thinking (depending on who's talking)

lurker #2421, Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:57 (twenty years ago)

Ha, that reminds me: in the process of not generalizing and picking out specific groups of stripclubgoers, I actually feel like the "normal" guys I know who like strip clubs are also actually guys who treat dealing with women as kind of a team sport -- i.e. dudes who are used to a regular routine of "let's ALL go out into the world seeking CHICKS," even as one of their main forms of socializing with one another.

That's a whole other issue of people who have separate modes of like (a) work, (b) "going out," meaning buddies and drunkenness and chick-searching, and I guess (c) dating/relationships.

nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 23 April 2006 23:59 (twenty years ago)

Dan, the issue is: a bunch of guys choosing to become sexually excited with one another. None of them have any hope of actually scoring with the women involved. They're pretty much masturbating in one another's company, only without actually touching themselves: it's a roomful of guys enjoying the collective hard-on.

As I say, this isn't my theory, but what I understand to be the general therapeutic take on groups of men going to strip clubs; that said, makes perfect sense to me. This isn't a "THESE GUYS ARE GAY!" deal as lurker implies; it's much sadder than that - lots of men (say, oh, 100% of them) wonder what it would be like to have sex with men, but most of them are too flipped out by the potential consequences to their daily lives if they actually took those questions into in vivo situations i.e. having sex with men. Sharing a sexual experience - which is what going to a strip club is, pretty plainly I'd say: a group of men experiencing sexual arousal about/within the same object - without having to actually "do something gay" allows straight men to dip their toe into the water without getting wet.

Admittedly I'm radical on this question: I'd also argue, strongly, that MMF threesomes are about the males experiencing one another's sexuality through the medium of the woman involved. (NB the woman in this scenario is having an entirely different experience.)

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:07 (twenty years ago)

I'd say there's approximately a light-year's worth of experiential difference between going to a strip club with your friends and having sex with some of your friends, but I tend to make distinctions between things that are dissimilar.

Dan (Your Mileage May Vary) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:15 (twenty years ago)

(Like I said before, there are definitely groups where you can see the dynamic you're describing in play but I don't think you can sensibly ascribe that to every group of guys in a strip club.)

Dan (I Want To Make A Joke Here But It Would Piss Everyone Off) Perry (Dan Perry, Monday, 24 April 2006 00:21 (twenty years ago)

is it assumed that men go to strip clubs to get turned on, and not for the bad-boy entertainment value? i mean, i think a lot of guys see strippers with a level of remove, where they're something "naughty" but not necessarily arousing.

even cathy berberian's nose (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:24 (twenty years ago)

(i'm talking about men in groups, fwiw, not men who go alone.)

even cathy berberian's nose (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:25 (twenty years ago)

I've only been in a strip club outside the ritualized experience of being on a bachelor party excursion twice. The first time was with friends from home after we'd all graduated from high school; the main impetus behind the visit wasn't so much to be turned in each others' presence as much as it was to hang out in a context forbidden to us when we were in high school; we were adults and we could do adult things, which included LOOKING AT BOOBIES WOW BONUS! The second time was when I was working as a contractor in DC, primarily to bond with some of the other contractors as part of playing office politics where the side-effect was that, instead of happening over golf or martinis, said work-bonding involved LOOKING AT BOOBIES WOW BONUS!

I'm not going to flat-out lie and say there's nothing sexual about going to a strip club; that would be silly. I will say that there is nothing inherently sexual about the people you are sharing the strip club experience with, at least not for me.

Dan (A More Sincere "Your Mileage May Vary" Goes Here) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:35 (twenty years ago)

Just for the record, I didn't feel exploited. But there are those who do buy into the roleplaying and the fantasy wholesale and those are the people I feel sorry for. For some of these people, the whole strip club scene is the only way they have any control over the outcomes of their interactions, sexually. (but without the stigma of prostitution and rape.) They become the stalkers that Trayce referred to.

Now I have nothing against the concept of strip clubs. I see nothing wrong with the idea of guy paying a chick to see their tits. I mean everyone from time to time wonders what that hot boy/girl looks like beneath his/her clothes and usually guilt free. (Well, not me but that's a whole different bag of neurosis.) And if that's all that went on in these places (stripping), then I would be cool. But when I see girls grinding on men's laps, then I think the barriers between roleplaying and reality become blurred. And that is what worries me.

Lurker 'Lurky' MrLurkerstein, Monday, 24 April 2006 00:42 (twenty years ago)

And am I wrong in saying that the excitement produced by strip club sis based on spectacle rather than sexual arousal which makes the point of sharing a collective hard on moot?

Now if we were talking about a couple of guys sitting around watching porn, well...

Lurker 'Lurky' MrLurkerstein, Monday, 24 April 2006 00:54 (twenty years ago)

well, 'spectacle' of sexually arousing things. and uh, also, sometimes aforementioned lapdances.

(one should add here to nabisco's point that the $$$ is a sort of necessary component of the thing -- its a way of guys feeling that the power balance is more equalized. if guys just paid a flat cover (even one that was large enough to make up for the amount tipped) then the whole thing would probably feel very different.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 24 April 2006 00:57 (twenty years ago)

(i'm talking about men in groups, fwiw, not men who go alone.)

because there are always gonna be other men at the strip club, a man going alone to a strip club isn't really going alone: he knows he'll be with a group of men

unless it's a totally lame strip club I guess, or he's there way early in the morning

(and for sure, no question, going to a strip club isn't the same as boning the guys in the strip club. I'm just saying that there's a pretty strong case to be made that the two exist on a continuum, and that that continuum is "enjoying sexual experiences with other men.")

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:05 (twenty years ago)

I think there's a massively superfluous "with other men" in that continuum; are you making the same argument for women who go to male strip shows?

Honestly, I think you've got a much more cogent/coherent argument if you're talking about pro wrestling.

Dan (Now THAT'S Some Subtext) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:10 (twenty years ago)

dan, you're obviously just in homosexual denial. let go. the more you protest, the more obvious that you're afraid of your inner gay.

("and for sure, no question, going to a nice eatery isn't the same as being a cannibal and consuming the guys in the eatery. i'm just saying that there's a pretty strong case to be made that the two exist on a continuum, and tha continuum is 'enjoying gastronomical experiences with other men.'")

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:13 (twenty years ago)

Honestly, I think you've got a much more cogent/coherent argument if you're talking about pro wrestling.

I was gonna get around to that next! And then boxing, which happens to be my favorite sport.

No need to get snarky Sterling - I'm not accusing Dan of fearing his inner what-have-you, just advancing - offering, really - the possibility that a group of people sharing an essentially sexual experience are at some level enjoying that experience with one another. I would say, though, that if you go to a diner where cannibals are known to eat human flesh and say "oh yeah but I just ordered the grilled cheese," it's fair to say "yeah but surely you had some interest in cannibalism - you could've made yrself a grilled cheese at home"

though again, I'm not inventing this shit whole-cloth: this is what most of the psych theory I was taught in my schooling had to say about the whole phenomenon, and I hardly think it's such a difficult idea to digest: guys jackin' off together = somehow guys enjoying a gay experience, no? How is a group of guys enjoying their erections together all that different?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:28 (twenty years ago)

you broek analogy. :-(

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:29 (twenty years ago)

(and yes, I'd say women enjoying strip shows together are also affirming their collective sexuality via shared sexual experience, with the notable caveat that women's sexuality is quite different from men's sexuality - though I welcome the predictable onslaught of defensive "ahh come off it, they're just havin' a good time" popism-applied-to-behavioral-analysis responses)

xpost sorry Sterl I rather liked your volley there!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:31 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I think it's silly to start talking about the experience as homoerotic, rather than just starting with the homosocial side of it. Especially since that homosocial side of it is pretty complicated, and not even in any kind of subtextual or psychological level -- it's like right there at-face weird. I mean, one of the many reasons strippers don't really appeal to me is that there's a plain awkwardness to doing that stuff socially, in terms of how you react, how into it you seem, and so on. It's a little like the awkwardness of watching a movie with your mom and coming across a graphic sex scene, except that in that case you have the option to just pretend like nothing strange is happening, whereas in a strip club you'd actually have to, like, engage. So in order to go to strip clubs with your buddies, you'd have to have a certain comfort that the sexuality of the group was pretty consistent -- like a confidence that you were normal, or a lack of self-consciousness about the possibility of being "different." And that's another thing that's built into strip-club norms, this idea that it's just a basic guy thing that all guys share: we all understand what the expected normative guy behavior is in a situation like that.

That's another of the many things that makes stripping not totally appeal to me -- that when exposed to it I feel a total social pressure to conform to a specific notion of what being a guy means. Bring a stripper into the mix and the only real option is to act like, well, a fratboy (sorry to generalize but that's the best shorthand) -- anything else would leave you looking and feeling inappropriate. (Looking and feeling weird, geeky, gay, prudish, creepy, asexual, like a big pussy, or whatever else.) Which is fine if you already subscribe to that code of behavior, but if you don't it can really chafe to suddenly be in a situation where that kind of thing is really being imposed on you.

E.g. the last time I saw strippers, at a friend's bachelor party, there were people having creepy reactions on either end of the spectrum -- one dude who went scary misogynistic and made a super-creepy joke about raping a stripper, one dude who was totally shyly uncomfortable about the whole thing and stayed out of the room -- and between that you could feel some kind of pressure leading everyone to approach things the same way, kind of settling by pressure and instigating one another to act the way guys are "supposed" to. And it's weird to think that I honestly don't know how many of the guys there are naturally like that, and how many of them just started acting like that because everyone else was starting to, and nobody wanted to be abnormal.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:33 (twenty years ago)

(And again, I should be open about my radical position on this: stadium full of men cheering on sweaty groups of men on a field who push strenuously against one another in an attempt to drive a ball across an agreed-upon barrier? to say nothing of the vocabulary that's grown up around descriptions of said events: "he got real good penetration there," etc.? ritualized no-loss-of-face gay experience imo. I don't mean gay pejoratively in any sense there, ffs. When I said "suck one cock" upthread, I meant it - I think American culture would be a lot better off if more guys felt comfortable satisfying their curiosity on that front instead of becoming predatory businessmen, sports fans who use the first person plural to describe their relationships to their teams, etc)

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:37 (twenty years ago)

Hey, McLurk, I wasn't trying to be snarky way upthread. I was generally curious what kind of shoes you think the women should wear, or more generally, how you think the experience could be improved for men and employees alike.

I've been to strip clubs a couple of times. I'm a girl for those of you not up on the latest Abbott news.

The first time I went was with a bunch of friends who had moved out of Boise and were visiting. They heard about this thing called 'Art Night' at a Boise strip joint called Erotic City (sadly, no Prince on the PA). Boise outlawed public nudity unless it was a model posing for an artist, so you'd pay to get into Erotic City and they'd give you a little dollar store pad of paper and pencil, ostensibly to draw the 'models,' who were of course just nudie body-makeup stripper girls in the obligatory lucite stilettos. FWIW, my friends were three gay guys and a very anxious Mormon girl, their buddy, who obviously didn't want to be there.

I was pretty damn curious what it would be like since really the only thing I had seen to know of the experience was 'Bufallo 66' which was way too stylized to be anything like real (Yes? No, obviously.) And yeah, it was skeezy and the girls all talked to me especially like 'finally, someone to sound off on.' It was a very peculiar circumstance: the boys gave me some money to get a dance (back then I was happy to play the mascot who would do things for laffs) and the stripper, a pretty cute girl who looked like a better-fed Faruiza Balk, told me first off to put my tip in my mouth. Then she basically tongued it out of my mouth, a very awkward surprise that I can't imagine was really scintillating even for the voyeurs. She then did the usual routine, windmilling her calves around in an unnatural manner and, while basically venting to me because I was one of the girls. "God, it's been the worst fucking night. Four girls didn't show up, so and so at that table is being a real creep and not tipping, etc." She was doing extra-special stuff, breathing on my neck and things none of the dudes got, and also just sharing her frustrations at the sort of phoniness of it all, neither of which she would do with guys. I found it odd: I mean, I knew the extra visuals were for some kind of mass show, which was really awkward, basically turning me into some sort of male-turn-on accomplice, but I got none of the pretense, no forced flirting or anything, I just got to play the talk therapist.

My cumulative strip club experience has lead me to conclude it's just one of the most forced and awkward situations possible. It's not really healthy in Boise either, the laws are complicated and backward but basically it means bars get 21+ age strippers, "juice bars" let 18+ strip, and the juice bars are always next door to the world's seediest bars from which the biggest old creeps come to give these 'barely legal' women a much harder time than if they were working at a place with an actual bar (with which comes bouncers, security, etc.). So it's fucked on that level. And I agree, it's totally not just cliche but depressing, the uniform and persona the girls adopt (shaved beaver, body makeup, forced idiocy). But sometimes the girls transcend it, I mean they're gloriously athletic and lithe and flexible and beautiful for all that, it's the context and the stifled screams of sexual tension everywhere that fucks it all up.

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:38 (twenty years ago)

xpost reminiscence

Ha, my one "abnormal" response that night was that the least "good" of the strippers that night just somehow seemed really nice -- like she seemed really cool -- and so I had this inappropriate desire to, like, talk to her. Which was submerged for the evening, obviously, but I do remember talking to my other friends months later and having them all be like "yeah, she seemed really nice! I wish she could have just hung out for a while!"

This is probably another reason that strippers are not traditionally meant to seem personable. (Ha, it's like they have to do everything in their power to not seem too much like actual people, because that would be creepy.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:41 (twenty years ago)

is it assumed that men go to strip clubs to get turned on, and not for the bad-boy entertainment value? i mean, i think a lot of guys see strippers with a level of remove, where they're something "naughty" but not necessarily arousing.

Ragingly OTM. I'm sure most men involved get turned on if they get a lapdance (it's generally hard to keep your remove when there are boobs in your face), but just watching the stage or whatever isn't exactly hard-on city.

milo z (mlp), Monday, 24 April 2006 01:45 (twenty years ago)

Lurker L MrLurkerstein, you sound about as much fun as a headcold.

But when I see girls grinding on men's laps, then I think the barriers between roleplaying and reality become blurred. And that is what worries me.
The reality is, these guys paid for a girl to grind in their lap. They know that. They get to see that skin, up close; get that hair in their face; get the visual from their own eyes' actual perspective instead of from a camera lens. They may not get to act on it right then, but they get to take it with them. Maybe you don't have any need to feed your erotic imagination, what the fuck if others do?

The first time I went to a strip club, it was for lunch, with my (female) boss and a customer of ours. We had wanted to treat him to a spa day for his birthday, which he vetoed and suggested this instead. Once there, we had some excellent fried chicken w/fixin's. Then on a lark, he bought us each lapdances so he could enjoy our discomfort. My boss shrieked through most of it, waving her Nordstroms card at the dancer, saying "take it, take it, just stop!" I had a great time though - we talked about shaving vs. waxing, where she'd got her outfit (at the mall), and laughing at my seriously freaked out boss. The customer was cracking up the whole time. He took me out to a shooting range a month or so later, so I could get over my girly hoplophobia, but that's another story.

Jaq (Jaq), Monday, 24 April 2006 02:35 (twenty years ago)

i actually, um, kind of like strip clubs. i've been to them in groups, with my girlfriend, by myself, with my uncle/boss. the night is always a little strange, but appealingly so most of the time. the only time i went to a full nude club in the states was weird because of the no alcohol, so i left pretty fast. my reason for going is basically to see women other than my girlfriend naked. i think it is in some ways a sexual experience, depending on who you go with, or if you 'connect' on any measurable level with a stripper in some way other than on a watch-smile-tip type transaction basis.

my uncle used to produce porn films, so growing up i knew a lot of strippers and porn stars, and some of them were totally normal well adjusted people, and some of them were total headcases-- a lot like you find in the real world. they mostly weren't very well educated, but then again, neither are most people. having known them sort of informed some of my earliest sexual fantasies, in a way that is much more personal than the way most people are introduced to/interact with porn... so maybe i find it easier than some people to deal with how i feel about strippers and porn or something.

my first time at a club was kind of bizarre though. my uncle took me while on a business trip in florida, his ex-girlfriend was a featured dancer in town to dance at a club in miami. he did a lot a lot a lot of blow and he probably gave away $30,000 in tips that night, which got us a lot attention of course. he instructed me to 'choose a girl' and i was a little bit scared that maybe he meant 'choose a girl to bring back to the hotel with you tonight' at first, so i was hesitant for a while. then as i got drunk, i was bored watching him and 'his' five girls all drinking dom and laughing and whatever, so i walked around and kind of tried to figure out who it might be nice to talk to AND to look at/get lapdances from. eventually i picked a girl that awkwardly looked kind of like the stripper version of my girlfriend. she came to the table and in the course of the conversation i discovered that we liked a lot of the same books. she was really into kafka. so we had this conversation about writing and books that was occasionally peppered with lapdances, which by this point became incredibly sexy because i knew that she was gorgeous and smart. eventually she offered to come back to my hotel room (no issue of payment was discussed, but i assume that she meant to be paid), but i had to sadly tell her that as much as i'd love to, and as drunk as i am and really really really really would love to, that i'd feel weird going home and facing my girlfriend. when i got back to the hotel i watched the matrix reloaded, which sucked, and i seriously kind of wished i had brought her back, to be honest. since then, my girlfriend has actually told me that she doesn't have a huge problem with the idea of me sleeping with a prostitute as long as i was safe about it, but that she'd be bothered if i had slept with that stripper because of the kafka thing and the potential for there to be a realer more true connection there.

btw, the sylvia plath thing is totally lame. were you doing that to be ironic or what?

firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 24 April 2006 03:50 (twenty years ago)

Well, feeding one's erotic imagination is cool only as long as one has some sort of sexual outlet. Like I said, if one does not then, I feel, it only leads to frustration and in extreme cases, delusions and psychosis.

I didn't do the Sylvia Plath thing to be cute or clever, but now I wish I had. I don't know if that would have made me SuperCool or an Ultratwat.

I was simply bored. In fact, I spent about a third of the time during my recent Strip Club adventure reading the club's rule on the table ("AT NO TIME may a dancer ask a patron to buy her a drink...") or watching the Family Guy on the television above the bar. I guess I find Strip Clubs to be too boring/disturbing to be fun.

Perhaps I should have done a couple of lines before i went.

Lurker 'Lurky' MrLurkerstein, Monday, 24 April 2006 04:32 (twenty years ago)

Well, feeding one's erotic imagination is cool only as long as one has some sort of sexual outlet. Like I said, if one does not then, I feel, it only leads to frustration and in extreme cases, delusions and psychosis.

you're talking about people with no hands, or what?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 04:46 (twenty years ago)

firstworldman is secretly Andrei Kirilenko

milo z (mlp), Monday, 24 April 2006 04:48 (twenty years ago)

this has turned into a really good thread.

I have tended to view strip clubs as arenas of the kind of gendered power-play Kim describes upthread, but I find a lot of the (presumably) dudes' responses here genuinely enlightening. I'll admit that feeling sympathy for the potential loneliness of male strip club goers is generally the furthest thing from my mind but this comment:

I think one of the things that (speaking very generally here) women find most difficult to relate to in men's experience -- in other words, the idea that men want to be found beautiful and wanted for their bodies.

(I say "difficult to relate to" because, for many women, that kind of being-wanted is the bane of their daily existence, no?

strikes me as really insightful, not least because it makes sense for me of an exchange I had with a (more or less straight) male friend years ago. he sort of incoherently commented that he'd love to be a girl for a day or two in order to dress and fix himself up to elicit random male appreciation. I was utterly befuddled and responded, "but that's the worst part about being a girl." which now that I write it out doesn't seem directly on-topic, except that I think it maybe has something to do with my kneejerk hostility to strip clubs and the evident reality that noncreepy men (and probably many women) don't have the same kind of problem with them. any way. keep saying smart things, people in this thread!

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 05:17 (twenty years ago)

the one time i went to a strip club was for my brother's bacheolor party. he fell asleep. after getting titties jiggled in his face of course.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 24 April 2006 05:26 (twenty years ago)

earlier that same night he drunkenly punched me in the balls for the hell of it. i was being a whiny bitch though, so i can't blame him and our friends for thinking it was funny.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 24 April 2006 05:28 (twenty years ago)

firstworldman is secretly Andrei Kirilenko

for a second i confused andrei kirilenko with andrei rublev and i was very confused.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 24 April 2006 05:55 (twenty years ago)

the one time i went to a strip club was for my brother's bacheolor party.

my little brother threw up in the bathroom at the strip club at my bachelor party. we were all ready to leave and then it was like, uh, where's your brother? we got him out ok. he's a good kid.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 06:19 (twenty years ago)

horsehoe you know the robyn hitchcock song, right? "sometimes i wish i was a pretty girl.."

the male-female perception gap is one reason i love hanging out with women. just that sense of getting a different view of the same reality. and i'm often surprised how naive women sound to me when they talk about men, so i can only imagine how naive men tend to sound talking about women. but then at the same time there are a lot of relationships of one kind or another -- parents, siblings, friends, mates, lovers -- that leap those obstacles, so we know they're leapable. we're a kind of interesting species.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 06:33 (twenty years ago)

I've been to a strip club once; I had mentioned to a friend that I'd never been, so he suggested we check one out. His first question to was was "beauty or the full Monty?" -- the liquor and vice laws in Baltimore combined with who owned what clubs meant that you could see rough-looking completely naked women at a BYOB joint in the city, or lovely g-string-clad women in a Baltimore County strip mall where beer could be bought. This didn't strike me as a difficult decision. The women really were quite lovely, some could dance very well, and botched boob jobs were not in evidence -- my friend said that they would have been on the Block. He also pointed out that the strippers always talked to patrons at tables where there was a women. He had once dated a ballet dancer and brought her there (she had asked), and the strippers fawned over her when they found out who she was. Anyway, I had a nice time, the audience wasn't overly sleezy, I didn't have gay sex, and have never been to a strip bar since.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Monday, 24 April 2006 07:17 (twenty years ago)

Way past time to address it but still;

(And again, I should be open about my radical position on this: stadium full of men cheering on sweaty groups of men on a field who push strenuously against one another in an attempt to drive a ball across an agreed-upon barrier? to say nothing of the vocabulary that's grown up around descriptions of said events: "he got real good penetration there," etc.? ritualized no-loss-of-face gay experience imo. I don't mean gay pejoratively in any sense there, ffs. When I said "suck one cock" upthread, I meant it - I think American culture would be a lot better off if more guys felt comfortable satisfying their curiosity on that front instead of becoming predatory businessmen, sports fans who use the first person plural to describe their relationships to their teams, etc)

I think you are compressing a gigantic spectrum of attitudes, behaviors and desires into a tiny box called "gay" here, or at least that's the way you are presenting your argument; it does not de facto follow that looking at naked women with other men implies a sublimated desire to be with those men, which is precisely what your argument is implying. It does imply that men like looking at naked women, regardless of whether they are together or in groups, but for your hypothesis to be valid the lapdances would be happening in full view of all the patrons, not in a private room away from prying eyes.

(This does say something very interesting about bachelor parties, though!)

Dan (Find One (1) More Focused Tree To Bark Up) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 April 2006 13:47 (twenty years ago)

Well I think there's some severe cognitive dissonance in most women concerning the idea of being found sexually attractive: on the one hand it can be inconvenient, invasive, even degrading, but then on the other hand most women in some way revel in it, court it, expect it, even demand it, or base some bit of their self-worth on it. There's a constant push and pull surrounding that, and some nuanced distinctions being made about the way they want men to be (or not to be) physically attracted to them. And I think the upshot is that women are mostly trying to harness that sexual attention and redirect it into something slightly different.

E.g., one aspect of this that fascinates me is that there's a whole fashion-derived and largely woman-enforced notion of what it means for women to look attractive, and it doesn't match up very well at all with what men find visually attractive. (Even what men find visually attractive in a non-sexual way!) Its point is not necessarily to attract men on that level. But there's a component of it that really is meant to attract male attention -- only it seems calibrated, somehow, to attract a certain kind of attention, to somehow cut through that cognitive dissonance and establish the way men are supposed to be sexually attracted.

Being skinny is a good (weird) example of this. I mean, I get the sense that being a bit un-skinny is more viscerally sexually attractive to men in general -- not necessarily obese, I guess, but definitely not "skinny." And this may seem to read too deep into subtext, but being skinny seems like an attempt to modify the male attraction, to kind of ensure that it's directed at the head and not the body -- to seem more like an animal and less like a pillow. More importantly, there's a whole code there where certain things (like being skinny) get assigned a social value, totally apart from what's actually attractive to men. And that, too, modifies the male attraction, because now what the woman's offering isn't something the man just wants, but something that's acknowledged to be valuable, outside the realm of sex. (I.e. "they don't just want to fuck me -- they're attracted to public, social value here.") In that sense we kind of have a system of like physical attraction as distinct from social attraction, and of course it's mostly women who police one another about sticking to the latter.

I can't remember where I was going with this, except that yeah, of course lots of (all?) men have some desire to be wanted for their bodies -- we never get this at all! We may be less likely to mind the thought that someone just wants to fuck us and doesn't otherwise care who we are -- it'd be refreshing! Yuk yuk, etc. And it seems a bit baffling when women say that it's a bad experience, because we all see the levels on which women really are harnessing and courting and using that kind of attention, and we know that most of them seem to on certain levels enjoy doing that -- so yeah, it can seem baffling and/or hypocritical for women to claim that it's all bad.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:26 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I should correct that: I should say we see the ways that some women actively make use of that kind of attention. Possibly just a limited class of women, but one that gets (haha) disproportionate attention. (A class kinda considered by at least a few women to be the strikebreakers and picket-line-crossers and rule-flaunters and cheaters of how women should behave!)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:37 (twenty years ago)

But there's a component of it that really is meant to attract male attention -- only it seems calibrated, somehow, to attract a certain kind of attention, to somehow cut through that cognitive dissonance and establish the way men are supposed to be sexually attracted.

Yes yes yes and thank you. This seems like the obvious difference between "stylish" and "sexy", the stylish version being designed to single out only those men whose taste would be in line with that style and/or whatever demographic considerations it represents, so that the dresser's sexuality/attraction is only being displayed/offered to sort of a chosen group. I think this works in little ways for everyone (see every mention of "stripey shirts" on ILX EVAH) but w/r/t Nabisco's point, the more a dress style diverges from what "men" consider "attractive", the more true the rule will be.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:45 (twenty years ago)

Also, there's an interesting status system involved. Ie, the more nuanced and referential a style's approach to portraying sexuality, the more "civilized" or "sophisticated" it's perceived to be. So something clearly revealing and/or obviously sexy can be alternately seen as holding LOTS of appeal, or LACKING appeal for being obvious. And everyone has sort of overall preferences but can still be surprised by a stealth attack of appeal when one least expects.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:50 (twenty years ago)

xpost

Well not to go too much into clothes as the only example of this, but that distinction gets harder to sort out when we're talking about women deliberately showing skin, looking sexy, etc. -- that's trying to pull of something really complicated with male attention! (It may be that in situations like nightclubs, male attention is suddenly at enough of an actual premium that women will bend further and further toward whatever it takes to get it.)

(Oh how banal: it is all about supply and demand, heterosexual people as consumers of the opposite sex, advertisers of their own product, always with the branding!)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:53 (twenty years ago)

your entire post is totally right, nabisco. I didn't mean, in my response to my friend, that I didn't ever want male attention; it obviously does inform many womens' sense of self-worth. it's just that in the moment of receiving that attention, I usually feel a lot more ambivalent about it than my friend's comment seemed to suggest he would feel were he in that situation. for the reasons you suggest. and the premium on skinniness seems to work in part to manage that ambivalence, yeah.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)

not that I'm representative of all women on this front, obviously! god this stuff is hard to talk about sensibly.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:55 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, tiresome, and the language of commodities is just depressing. But I think I'm also coming at the idea from a place of wanting to LIMIT male attention, or the expression of it, without limiting my options/message/whatev an unacceptable amount (ie, veiling, for instance) so aim's a little different, here. (XXP)

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 24 April 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)

to what extent is all of that (style, sexual display, etc.) directed at men, and to what extent is it directed at other women? not in the sense of trying to be sexually attractive to women, but in the sense that women pay a hell of a lot more attention to how other women present themselves than men do. so it seems to me there's this whole level of female display that is largely appreciated by and even intended for other women. (i've had lots of experiences of leaving a party or something with a female companion and the woman will go into detailed analysis of what other women were wearing, and the most i can muster is, "yeah, that was a nice shirt.")

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:00 (twenty years ago)

it's definitely true that the language of female clothing style is generally one that other women are a lot more fluent in than men. but, like nabisco said, I think it's still in part directed at men; you might rely on your female friends to compliment you on your superior style, but you suspect that discriminating men (ones whose attention would therefore be pleasing) will pick up on it, too.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:06 (twenty years ago)

and men do respond to it, in practice.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)

I'm uncomfortable with how my comments to this thread assume a heterosexual matrix, but I'm not sure how to fix it.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:11 (twenty years ago)

well these are all heterosexual dynamics we're talking about. gay and lesbian dynamics would be different discussions.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:20 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, gypsy, that's what I mean about women constructing the whole thing! I think I've talked about this before, on threads about body image and fashion and such -- there would always be this floating idea that it was men responsible for these visual burdens on women, and while in some ways that's true, the everyday footwork seems to be done exclusively by women.

I wonder how long it would take the average man to become ambivalent about getting that kind of attention. I really can't tell whether it'd be days or decades.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:21 (twenty years ago)

that's what I mean about women constructing the whole thing!

mph! i don't think that's entirely true. like most men are not going to say, wow that A-line cut is totally perfect for your silhouette, but style plays into which women they notice. i've totally seen dudes on ILX fixate on details like the shape of the glasses a woman wears, etc.

I'm not touching the skinniness thing, because it's too fraught, but I don't think men are innocent in the whole placing a premium on that, either. but this discussion gets depressing quickly, so whatever.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:34 (twenty years ago)

i've seen the theory proffered that skinniness is actually a gay aesthetic being foisted on women -- and hence on straight men -- by gay designers of both sexes, who gravitate toward a more broad-shouldered, flat-chested body type. but that may well be bollocks.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:38 (twenty years ago)

Ha, horseshoe, I didn't say it was entirely a female construction -- I mean, I'm calling that kind of thing "social," which is kind of neither men nor women -- but the point was that a lot of the actual day-to-day police work gets done by women. (A fact understood quite clearly by Sir Mix-a-Lot and immortalized in his landmark "Baby Got Back" -- "oh my god, Becky, look at her butt ... they only talk to her because she looks like a total prostitute.")

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:47 (twenty years ago)

I wonder how long it would take the average man to become ambivalent about getting that kind of attention.

Haha, ask any pretty straight boy who ever worked as a photographer's assistant/design house/etc or was sent to run errands in Chelsea. A friend of mine once had to run around picking up stuff for his boss, one of the items being his boss's really tiny, fancy dog in a stupid fancy bag, and then carry it with him for the rest of his trips, giving all the wrong signifiers. He was a little shaken up about it the next time I saw him!

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:51 (twenty years ago)

That's not nearly the same -- it's sexual attention from the sex you're not interested in!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)

Oh hmm, that's true.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 24 April 2006 16:56 (twenty years ago)

I mean, for a sense of where male fantasy seems to wander on this one, just look to one of those Axe commercials where male product-users are mobbed, physically assaulted, and comedy-raped by piles of attractive women. It seems like a pretty basic male fantasy for there to be something you could do -- body spray, cool car, anything -- that would make strange women just want to fuck you. (Especially given how much we cast sex as something guys are scheming and begging for, something only we enjoy that we have to trick or bargain other people into doing us the favor of joining in on!)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:03 (twenty years ago)

but, what about the episode of Buffy where Xander casts a love spell and all the women in Sunnydale fall in love with him and it's awful? totally admissible evidence!

(those Axe commercials are so gross.)

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

there was a column somewhat relevant to this thread in (no really) the nyt style section.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:08 (twenty years ago)

No, they fall in love with Xander and want his attention and shit -- that's totally different from just wanting to fuck him!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)

Or am I misremembering that episode?

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:10 (twenty years ago)

the way women behave in axe commercials is exactly the way 1,000,000,000 commercials portray their loyal customers behaving when they get near the Vaunted Product, i.e. so overcome with their compulsion for the product that they behave in ways most people would describe as literally insane. the product marketers of the world wish their consumers to have the same relationship to their product that men fantasize women would have with their cocks

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Anyway the point is that duh obviously it's not so great, in like countless ways, exaggerated by who it comes from and when it comes along and what it replaces and a MILLION other things -- but the end thing is that guys nearly never get a shred of it, and so of course we're going to fantasize about idealized situations to revel in it. That doesn't mean it's great, just that it's foreign and therefore exciting.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)

Ha xpost that's why I'm branding my cock as luxurious but edgy, like a Range Rover, or a Ketel One and Red Bull.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)

but, as Giles points out (it's possible I recently rewatched this episode, shut up), they don't really love him. they just seem to want to own him, which has sexual connotations. Jenny Calendar all feels him up and asks him if he's been working out at some point! and it's the really physically threatening nature of their attraction which ends up being the "evil" of the episode. they basically almost tear him apart. which is maybe interestingly analogous to the negative part of women's ambivalence about male attention, the threat part of sexuality.

ahem. or I'm a huge geek.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)

sorry. i hope I didn't kill the thread with my Buffy dork-out.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:15 (twenty years ago)

Dude nothing on ILX has ever been killed by Buffy dork-out, only enhanced. Anyway that episode is a poor example, since the attention was concentrated for single-episode lesson-learning -- in a real-world switch he could probably get by a little longer before the vague leers spooked him.

I like Tracer's phrasing, though, because it suggests another way of framing this male fantasy: "we are impersonally excited by and drawn to YOUR bodies, so why can't you openly do the same for us?" As if we're actually burdened by the attraction/need and would like that to go both ways.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:20 (twenty years ago)

Anyway that episode is a poor example, since the attention was concentrated for single-episode lesson-learning -- in a real-world switch he could probably get by a little longer before the vague leers spooked him.

heh. what I dig about you is how you don't dismiss my totally rigorous Buffy-episode example out of hand.

"we are impersonally excited by and drawn to YOUR bodies, so why can't you openly do the same for us?" As if we're actually burdened by the attraction/need and would like that to go both ways.

the times when I've been in mixed company and women have openly expressed impersonal attraction to, ahem, the male form, it seems to make the dudes present kind of uncomfortable. but maybe that's insecurity, because the women aren't talking about them?

horsehoe (horseshoe), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:27 (twenty years ago)

Well maybe that plus it's just rare and unexpected. Which is something to note about the male fantasy here, right: it would be disconcerting if it actually happened, just because it's not supposed to -- the same way it'd be disconcerting if you actually found yourself in some kind of Penthouse letter situation. Ha: the last time a strange woman approached me acting all lascivious and guy-like, I felt pretty sure it was part of a plan to rob me. Which is maybe similar to the downside for women, but not quite the same.

Anyway I feel like despite all this talk it's not really anywhere near that black/white for men/women, so maybe the whole conversation is a bit aimless. Plenty of guys managed to turn heads, and plenty of women don't, and in the end I'm not convinced the experience of the hetero sexes in this arena is nearly as different as it starts to seem when we've spent a while picking it apart.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Maybe insecurity, but just from my perspective, it was probably more of it being the kind of thing men never experience, so we don't really know how to respond to that when it does happen. Like in my case, some years ago, when having my ass randomly grabbed by an attractive lady.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 24 April 2006 18:26 (twenty years ago)

yeah Dan I mean the whole thing's elsewhere now but I sorta thought everybody already understood bachelor parties to be a safe space for men to feel intimate with one another, ditto stripclubs

evidently not, but as I say, it's not an opinion I pulled out of my ass (block that metaphor) - I first heard the take from an MFCC with 30+ years' experience who was one of the most respected (and non-radical) voices in the entire Californian therapeutic community - and it's not a "tiny box called 'gay'" - it's an enormous box called "sexuality," which for every man includes heteroerotic & homoerotic urges, but these latter ones are generally frowned upon by society. I'd still argue that the experiencing of sexual feelings in a public space around a shared object (I use the word "object" a little pointedly here) is a largely homoerotic experience, but it's not like I wanna go to war about it with you - you say tomato, I say penis, 'sall good

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 24 April 2006 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Is there any reason an MFCC's opinion about this would be any more or less valid than yours or mine? I mean, it doesn't really seem like the sort of thing that's at all testable.

31g (31g), Monday, 24 April 2006 20:22 (twenty years ago)

hmm. id say, as i think someone did above, that going to a strip club with the guys (if it has anything to do with these issues) is more about proving your NOT gay (ie, it's homosocial) than finding a way to be secretly gay with each other. that's what i find uncomfortable about it, personally. you have to pretend exaggerated interest in naked women, for the sake of some homosocial solidarity. it's very ritualistic i think.

hetero men are "gay" together when there are no women present, like sports, etc. a woman present enforces the heterosexual norms.

ryan (ryan), Monday, 24 April 2006 20:24 (twenty years ago)

to clarify, going to a strip club with other dudes is sort of tense in that way (to me)--it's enforced heterosexuality. playing sports, on the other hand, provides the sort of relaxed atmosphere to experience those feelings for other men that Thomas is getting at so bluntly.

ryan (ryan), Monday, 24 April 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, that's what I was saying upthread, a little buried in long paragraphs: it's weird because you're led to playact a set of expected guy behaviors.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 24 April 2006 21:03 (twenty years ago)

I'm glad there was a distinction drawn between titty bars (beer and g-strings) and strip clubs (creepy alcohol-free full nudity) somewhere on this thread. I've been to both. Going to strip clubs with guys is about two steps away from watching pornos together, and three from masturbating each other while watching pornos together.

Titty bars are breasts-as-decorations. That isn't gay. It's objectification of women.

josh in sf (stfu kthx), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:28 (twenty years ago)

this thread is kinda depressing. in my overly idealistic mind i just think its sad that people go to such ridiculous lengths to avoid talking about what they want or fantasize about. and listening to each other.

awesome is as awesome does (lucylurex), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:09 (twenty years ago)

Could you offer some examples of what you mean?

(I thought this was a good thread, and from what I can tell many other people here did too -- so, um...)

lurker #2421, Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:13 (twenty years ago)

"You say tomato, I say penis"

Tracey (Recipe for disaster) Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:15 (twenty years ago)

This thread is the funniest thing I have read in weeks. The Onion, on its best day, could never come up with a bachelor party featuring Hipster McMorrissey, lord of the touchy feely sensitive men, thumbing through his dog-eared copy of Sylvia Plath and lamenting the plight of humanity whilst the strippers cavort around him. I am still giggling about this.

I have only been to strip clubs in connection with bachelor parties, but none of my experiences made me reach for the Sylvia Plath. Are the strippers only talking to you because you have money? Of course. Are lapdances weird? Yup. But in my mind strippers are not greatly different from the aggressive bartenders and waitresses at legitmate establishments who will flirt with you for a bigger tip.

It comes down to this, if you don't like strip clubs, don't go. If it's a bachelor party, tell your friend the groom that you'll catch up with him before and/or after the stripper part of the evening. I'm not sure who you think you might be impressing with the smug world weariness.

Ash (ashbyman), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:24 (twenty years ago)

Is there any reason an MFCC's opinion about this would be any more or less valid than yours or mine? I mean, it doesn't really seem like the sort of thing that's at all testable.

Yes; they have extensive education & experience in human behavior and its meanings. I know I'm kinda outta step in advocating (or at least subscribing to) this kind of orthodoxy, but yes: the opinion of a person whose schooling & career involves the description and explanation of human behavior carries a lot more weight for me than the opinion of somebody who's just sorta comin' up with stuff on the fly. Similarly, I would rather have somebody who went to Julliard explain Mozart to me than somebody who never studied music.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:01 (twenty years ago)

there's a pretty obvious disproof of this theory tho, which is fairly empirical. if strip clubs are about repressed homosexuality then one would imagine that they increase in proportion to the homosocial taboo. but actually, as far as i know, countries that are more libertine about homosexuality are also more libertine about strip clubs -- i.e., there are more, they are more accepted and discussed socially, etc. which lends itself to the obvious interpretation that in more sexually repressed countries guys who like dick can't be so open about it and guys who like titties can be open about it, but can't be so casual about just going out to see some titties.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:12 (twenty years ago)

sterl I think there'd be a few more stats 'n' variables to work in there. But I mean...I dunno, I don't wanna spend a lot more time & energy on the question, the discussion went elsewhere...but, anyhow, it's not "repressed homosexuality" that I mean - that's a gross oversimplication of what I'm talking about. I'm not saying "guys at strip clubs are actually gay." (Though I did suggest they should and still maintain it might benefit them if they did suck one dick.) I'm saying that strip clubs are a space in which straight men can share their sexuality with one another in a group setting. That going to one is less about seeing boobies than seeing-boobies-with-other-guys, and that a man involving other men in his arousal is at some level enjoying a homosexual experience. Which I frankly think is terrific, though I wish it didn't usually take place in an ugly & misogynistic environment.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:23 (twenty years ago)

but the confusion is between "sharing sexuality" which can also mean "demonstrating masculinity" and "sharing SEX" which is something entirely different. i think there's a sort of latent homophobia in that actually, a "dude, that's sort of... gay" behind every experience.

also where's the evidence that there's much more about "seeing boobies with other guys" than "seeing boobies" going on?

also to what degree is it that the "other guys" (to the extent this is a group expedition) make it feel more comfortable to see the boobies rather than vice versa, a sort of safety in numbers game?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:30 (twenty years ago)

sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, eh Sterling?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:52 (twenty years ago)

and sometimes a cigar is my dick in yr. mouth.

Sterling (I'm so so sorry) Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 01:59 (twenty years ago)

Do you still snip the tip before lighting it on fire in that situation?

Dan (Ow) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 02:47 (twenty years ago)

O the slashfic visions.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 03:08 (twenty years ago)

just another mohel-meets-sterl story.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 03:55 (twenty years ago)

hey lurker i was referring to a couple of astute things that nabisco said, one regarding men's desire to watch strippers...

The desire would be to somehow gaze without consequences -- without intimacy, responsibility, or anything. And it seems like it's hard for plenty of men to fully understand why that gazing would seem invasive or threatening or an issue of power and control, because men have pretty much zero experience of anyone just wanting some removed sexual gratification from their bodies.

...and the other about women's attitude to being the object of the male gaze.

Well I think there's some severe cognitive dissonance in most women concerning the idea of being found sexually attractive: on the one hand it can be inconvenient, invasive, even degrading, but then on the other hand most women in some way revel in it, court it, expect it, even demand it, or base some bit of their self-worth on it. There's a constant push and pull surrounding that, and some nuanced distinctions being made about the way they want men to be (or not to be) physically attracted to them. And I think the upshot is that women are mostly trying to harness that sexual attention and redirect it into something slightly different.

i didn't mean that anyone on the thread was having trouble getting their point across.

awesome is as awesome does (lucylurex), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 22:00 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure who you think you might be impressing with the smug world weariness.

That's right, all behavior is based in attempting to impress others. That's the only way to interpret what happened in that story.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 22:08 (twenty years ago)

but actually, as far as i know, countries that are more libertine about homosexuality are also more libertine about strip clubs -- i.e., there are more, they are more accepted and discussed socially, etc.

hey on a tangent i'd like to ask sterl what he means by this - do you mean liberal in a legislative sense or in a social? i ask because the nz government has legalised prostitution, which i think is more pertinent to your example than homosexuality (and nz has civil unions as well), but i don't think either strip clubs or homosexuality are exactly socially accepted.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 22:15 (twenty years ago)

i meant in a social, though the whole thing is sort of vague and handwavey in that its a huge generalization that doesn't take into account places i know less about, e.g. new zeland (tho since i meant social then yr. points tend to go with it rather than against it).

one aspect is even i think that gay culture as such (i.e. expressly gay things) has a large camp and sexually libertine element (that isn't the same as the simple fact of homosexuality, but is sort of homosexuality and then) that extends to strip clubs (if partially as camp/fetish objects) etc.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 00:54 (twenty years ago)

whats the deal the humans body is a beautifull thing? a tit never killied no one

animal, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 00:59 (twenty years ago)

i ment killed

animal, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 01:00 (twenty years ago)

what if its a tit bazooka?

awesome is as awesome does (lucylurex), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:15 (twenty years ago)

nice pare of bazookas yo lol

animal, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:20 (twenty years ago)

it could be quite dangerous to be hit on the head by a falling lovely pair of coconuts.

estela (estela), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:23 (twenty years ago)

they have wiplash lawyers they need striplash lawyers

animal, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:25 (twenty years ago)

man, me & sterling go to all that trouble to wrap the thread up all roffly and people just fuck up our timing

ingrates

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 22:06 (twenty years ago)

pantomime of courtship at its most traditional: the men bring the money, the women shake their tits and asses

This does not really bring to mind "courtship at its most traditional"!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 22:32 (twenty years ago)

when i was 18 i went to my first strip club...the fuzzy grape in webster, ma. the stripper took my nordiques hat and stuck it in her snatch. it smelled like pussy for two weeks...i loved every mother fuckin minute of it.

slow jamz and white guy indie acoustic shit (Chris V), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 22:47 (twenty years ago)

I knew that was poops before I even read the name.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 23:27 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

wow, I went to a strip club last night for the first time (in Toronto, so wholesome and polite, as above) and we ended up at the House of Lancaster/Paradise but we were actually looking for this place:

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v622/dysign/ilx/?action=view¤t=BabyDolls.jpg

plus they gave me pot!

― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, April 23, 2006 12:28 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

We couldn't find the place though, we drove up and down Ossington. :(

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Saturday, 7 March 2009 16:04 (seventeen years ago)

i'd be shocked if that place were still open!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 7 March 2009 17:18 (seventeen years ago)

i had some friends that went on a sunday morning/afternoon (after a night of partying) and said it was both amazing a horrifying.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 7 March 2009 17:19 (seventeen years ago)

we found it listed under La Mirage and Baby Doll Club when we were googling trying to find places.. but Paradise ended up pretty fun. Four girls in a nudie bar is still a bit of a novelty I guess, everyone seemed to like us (but no lap dances.. too shy)

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Saturday, 7 March 2009 17:33 (seventeen years ago)

ha ha - so what inspired the ladies night out?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 7 March 2009 17:47 (seventeen years ago)

One co-worker broke up with her girlfriend this week and needed to go out and stare at some fresh boobies I think! Just one of those suggestions that turned into a "yeah, let's do it!"

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Saturday, 7 March 2009 18:22 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.