Attack Of The Clones

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well,at least it's better than TPM vs. yea action,fx,nat pertmamm

a-33, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

an predictions for episode 3.

a-33, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But but but...it's not out yet?

jel --, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I had the chance to see it last Sunday and I thought... nah.

N., Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Um - I reckon in episode 3 everyone except Obi-Wan and Yoda dies and Anakin Skywalker becomes Darth Vader. I know it sounds crazy but...

Pete, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

B-b-but Pete that can't be!!! Anakin is the HERO after all!

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bronchitis can tip anyone into the Dark Side though.

Pete, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The civil war must have cost alot...The clone troopers have much better outfits than the storm troopers. I don't feel so bad about storm troopers getting killed now, I always assumed they were conscripts not clones.

jel --, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh Jel, HATH NOT A CLONE EYES?

Got my tickets for Thursday and await it patiently.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This has really snuck up on me. I'm way more excited about seeing Spiderman, or at least I was until I saw the Jango Fett trailer with him firing the missile out of his backpack! I've been waiting 20 years for a missile to come out of a Fett backpack.

JOnnie, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

you wait 20 years for a missile to come out of a Fett backpack and then two come at once.

MarkH, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't have a ticket! Should I have got one? Oh damn! I guess I shall have to wait a week or so :(

jel --, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

wouldn't you be more excited about this if it was called ATTACK OF THE CREEPS ?

fritz, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The phantom creeps?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

man! what a movie! i felt like a kid again.

chaki, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The last 5th of the movie almost made up for the excruciating previous 4/5. Every single scene with Anakin and Padme made me want to gnaw my wrists open and bleed to death right there in the theatre so I wouldn't have to endure any more of their truly atrocious acting. Hayden Christiansen HAS to have fucked George Lucas--no one, not even Lucas, could ever think in a million years that HC can act at ALL. JESUS. He SUCKS. N Portman is pretty bad too, totally unattractive and the entitled-JAP thing she's got going on grates.

Christopher Lee is cool, but I don't think his character is developed enough, or at all. Yoda, Mace Windu both rocked. Jango Fett is a fruit as is his wee clone.

If it had been any other movie I would have left after like 3 minutes of HC+NP. Even Jar Jar was better than them.

adam, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Jango Fett is a fruit

Raspberry?

My theory about the way Lucas directs his actors is that if you're handy enough to handle minimal direction, you'll find your own spin on things to bring the character more to life (thus the various subtleties Liam Neeson brought to his part, say, or how Harrison Ford steps up in the original Star Wars so easily). I'm guessing Christensen needs more active direction than Lucas normally applies (ever since the first trailers I've had my doubts about the performance), so I'm coming in with that frame of mind.

Six hours to go! I've heard that neither a Two Towers nor new Star Trek trailer is attached to the copy at the theater I'm going to, which puzzles me greatly. Apparently I'll get the Matrix teaser, the new James Bond, Minority Report, couple of others.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

more active direction = several years of acting training or a swift kick in the ass, judging from the trailer i saw

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Both. :-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Did anybody else think that the action sequences seemed tailor made for video game translation?

Honda, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Did anybody else think that the action sequences seemed tailor made for video game translation?

No kidding. I read a review of Spiderman (or was it on ILE? I don't even know anymore) that commented on how Spiderman's action scenes were logical, like you could tell what was going on, and that most modern action movies are visual nonsense. I was thinking about that while watching AotC. George Lucas falls into a lot of MOR-action traps like video-game sequences (dodge the cutter blade, slice the droid, A A B up down repeat) but they have some context to them that makes them more pleasant to watch than, say, The One. Plus, Star Wars- related video games are fun more often than not--has anybody played Jedi Outcast yet? It looks really really badass.

adam, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, having seen it -- very very good indeed, in fact I think a serious rival for Empire near the top of the heap. Yes, it lacks the original film's beautiful self-contained simplicities, but it outdoes Jedi's flawed ending easily (the Luke/Vader/Palpatine sequence aside) and builds on the background details of Phantom Menace for greater impact. Like Empire, things go wrong here...but threaten to get much worse.

My biggest concern was Christensen, so I was keeping a very careful eye and ear on him throughout (whereas I knew Ewan would do a fine job straight up, and did). There are one or two sequences I would rewrite if I had the chance (I was seriously thinking the fireside romance side would have Anakin admitting all the overheated prose was his clumsy attempt at expressing himself, which would have a little more human), but you know, he did a pretty damn good job. Importantly, I think, scenes that in the various trailers seemed forced or halting actually made much more sense in the finished film, in terms of explaining his reactions. No, no Oscars, but no raspberries either...if anything, he helped make Darth Vader that much more of a human character in retrospect. Let's see if he can really shine in III with more experience under his belt.

The hints of the 'future' throughout were at times amusing, at times creepy and chilling. The obvious homage to Blade Runner throughout the Coruscant sequence worked well, the machinations of Palpatine perversely elegant up to the concluding moments. What happened to C3P0 in the final battle sequence was an amusing touch, and Yoda, well...it's clear what he can do now. :-) It ended on just the right note of hesistancy (and credit to John Williams, the main love theme sounds perfect as a balance of romance and mourning). I approve, I do. :-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

has any intentional 'joke' in a star wars film ever been funny ever?

ethan, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Let the Wookie win.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

isn't it the director's job to get people that he can direct, at least partly? i.e. blaming one of the actors' bad acting on his not being able to get with the director's thing seems a little odd (given the usual auteur approach that is).

Josh, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

THE ACTING IS IN THE STYLE OF THE ORIGINAL STAR WARS FILMS SO IT MAKES SENSE.

chaki, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hurrah he has maintained consistent levels of shite acting - wot an auteur!

Andrew L, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

N o, Star Wars is not supposed to be funny

What do you think of George Lucas's justification for crappo acting and dialogue? Kind of interesting, I thought.

N., Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Fits in with the general tone of the movies, they *are* serials writ large. The article doesn't get into why that "No!" scene was really amusing, namely because initially it seems like he's having a wet dream (or else Padme's underneath the covers enjoying herself).

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

rah! booked tix for tomorrow. i LIKE the crap acting bits in star wars. mark hamill in ep iv is excruciating "But i was going to go to the tashi station etc" "i care" etc. and the crap dialog is just part of the magic. the exchanges between leia and tarkin, and vader and kenobi are full of clumsy clumsy lines, but they're just SUPER thank you very much. it reminds me of dr who dialog, of course. today's challenge: "i could play all day in my green cathedral"

Alan Trewartha, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

TRACER HAND TO THREAD

Josh, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

my chum just sent me details of the Star Wars Holiday Special that he saw last week (yes, the infammous and rarely seen holiday special for all you doubters).He described it thus "It is absolutely unbelievable. I mean literally unbelievable". Has anyone else seen it? I get a viewing when he comes down to London in June - I can't wait.

Jonnie, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Christmas Special is indeed awesome. I know it's available somewhere online because that's how I saw it, but you'd need a cable or dsl line to view it.

Nicole, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yay Christmas Special! I remember watching it during original broadcast when I was a wee one. Dear lord, is it tragically bad. The animation sequence and introduction of Boba Fett, however, roolz.

Two words: Wookie porn.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mark Hamill should have kept wearing makeup though. He looked really fab and glam in the holiday special, like a bowie groupie in space.

Nicole, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

http://www.stomptokyo.com/sings/swholiday/images/luke1.jpg

Here's a good page for more info -- and plenty of screenshots!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

* blinks as if seeing the sun for the first time in years *

yes, ah. good acting = good, bad acting = bad. the first three eps are bearable (if they are) only because fisher and ford brought sparks of need and confusion and humor to bear. remember how psyched you were when you realized han solo was in the next scene? "campy acting" is fun sometimes i guess but there's no need to seek out star wars for this. there's plenty of it elsewhere. anyway, the article linked above is HUH-LARIOUS - he says "it's about telling a story, not about special effects." so don't go for the special effects, either.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I saw it the other day. How many cliches could the pack into one film? how much appalling acting? (well I guess that anikin guy really is Mark Hamill's spiritual heir) I liked Yoda, and um, I laughed a bit. Natalie Portman was not a draw card for me, I just wished a grand piano would drop on her most of the time, though I did have fun watching her tacky costumes.

Overall I found it more funny than painful so I am not going to whinge about spending money to see it. Besides it was hilarious watching the shortland st actors in there. Is there no escape?

Menelaus Darcy, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Let it be said that my friend ML, who adored the original movies and found TPM a grave disappointment, was thrilled with the new one and is already excited about the next (and last) one in three years' time. Rawk. :-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Awesome. Although I had my doubts, when I saw the trailer first. 1/ This Christansen guy looked like a terrible actor 2/ The CGI looked really cluttered and it was way too showy, too much stuff going on 3/ Ewen McGregor is still acting AS Alec McGuiness and this makes him sound like those newscasters in South Park who talk with a semi- British accent. But watching "AOTC" brought back to me what I dig about Star Wars in the first place. Cancel out no. 1, Christiansen isnt a bad actor, you really get the sense his arrogance will get the best of him and he isnt able to handle the burden of The Force cos he's a whiny, petulant shit. If anyones the weak link, it's Natalie Portman, she's a dullard, a blank page. Cancel no. 2 as well, despite the huge battle scene at the end (where Lucas lays it on a bit thick) theres plenty of jaw dropping moments like the clone factory. It's cool to join the dots and get to the nitty gritty of the story. But even besides that, theres some great set-pieces like the chase through the Blade Runner-ish city and when Bobba Fett's dad sets off depth charges as Anakin chases him through an asteroid belt. The fighting scenes are intense and visceral and you get the gist of what that little snot Yoda is capable of. Samuel L's Mace Windu has definitely established himself firmly in the pantheon of Star Wars badasses too. I loved it and cant wait for the next episode.

michael bourke, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Gonna see it tomorrow! hooray! I shall report then!

jel --, Saturday, 18 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

just saw it. yoda saved that movie's ass. some of that acting was beyond horrible. the entire audience laughed nonstop through the "tender fireplace wuv scene" - i don't blame them; i was laughing as well. hayden christensen suXor!! but the screenplay is also to be blamed - some of the cheeseball lines that anakin had to deliver sounded like failed pickup lines george lucas might have used when he was in college. in terms of recent overly hyped movies, spiderman was much better: if you have a choice or only want to spend to see one of the two, go check out spider-man instead, sez i.

taking sides: spider-man vs attack of the clones

alternate question: if we switched the lead roles of the two movies (tobey maguire/kirsten dunst for star wars, hayden christensen/natalie portman for spider-man) would they have been better or worse?

anyway: go yoda!! i hope he wins the oscar one of these days - in the future only computer-generated puppets will win academy awards.

geeta, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

so just like the past then?

mark "the s stands for satire" s, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I thought it was great!

Fave bits/thoughts:

i) The advertising, clubs and diner. I was pleased to see this attention to detail, as I have often wondered about the things other than the war and politics.
ii) The C-3PO/ battle droid.
iii) Yoda!
iv) Anakin being well on his way to the darkside
v) Dying in unfortunate ways runs in the Fett family. Mace Windu better watch his back in episode 3.
vi) Ewan was quite good!
vii) Natalie Portman, cool outfits! The kids in the cinema were getting bored at all the love stuff.
viii) The Jedi ain't really that good at seeing the future or sensing the darkside.

Can't wait to see it again!

jel --, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh and Darth Tyranus/Count Dooku has a hella cool light-sabre.

jel --, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hella lotta fun. Mechanical as hell, of course, and so saturated with CGI that it now looks almost totally animated with a few 'real' people walking in front of the cartoon backdrops. Like it was 'Mary Poppins 2450' or some damn thing.
And Courausant (sp?) I wish they would make up their minds how they want it to look. High up it looks all 'Metropolis', lines of pod-car traffic beading their way past immense spires; furthur on down it's a bit 'Fifth Element', impossible amount of cartoony criss-crossing traffic and on the ground it's like a more stagey version of 'Blade Runner', though I think it looks closer to the Martian streets in 'Total Recall' or even 'A.I'.
'Clones' actually makes 'Menace' now look even worse; suffocatingly unexciting and slow. The script and acting was also marginally better than Episode 1 - though it's only on a par with the original trilogy, so at least it's consistant. I think some people forget how clanging the acting was in Star Wars. Carrie Fisher completely unable to get a grip on her charecter. One minute she's all clipped tones and priggish, "Lord Vader, only you could be so boauld", a few scenes later she's gone all Brooklyn broad, shouting "INTO THE GARBAGE SHUTE, FLYBOYYY!"

'Attack of the Clones' is a cinematic turd. A quick inspection of it and you can tell what films Lucas has been studying for inspiration. Gladiator, Titanic(witness Lucas and pals discussing the boat movie's success in awed tones on the Episode 1 documentary 'The Beginning'), and was the (pretty rubbish) droid factory sequence really inspired by 'Chicken Run'? Looked like it.

Still, bloody great fun. Ace battles and space ships and lots of really great noises.
Christopher Lee as Count Dracula, sorry Count Duckula, sorry Count Dooku was cool. Tone darker. Yoda... was it David Fincher who said that the series was having to be carried by a muppet? Well, Yopda's no muppet now. I still can't figure out just how they made that scene work. Ewan's hair an improvement (that bit where he was hanging onto the little flying droid though was just daft). Father and son Fett were (properly) wicked. Fat cafe owner creature was brilliant, one of the truly great CG aliens that have a real presence and life, like Watoo and, now, Yoda. Oh, and Portman's spray-on outfits as well. I liked.

DavidM, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i really enjoyed attack of the clones, but i am not sure it is because my expectations were fatalistically low or because it was great. i really despised phantom menace more each time i saw it but this one wasn't terrible, i found myself only smirking a few times mostly near the beginning when hayden the canadian tried to act tortured but i'd say the last 2/3rds are mostly excellent. maybe hayden will play one of the ents in 'the two towers'? he certainly was wooden enough, christopher lee playing saruman with a light sabre yay. the yoda scene was fantastic.

keith, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Like it was 'Mary Poppins 2450'

i am PSYCHED!!

geeta, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I found the lovey dovey stuff a bit hackneyed, but not completely awful.

but I don't know, I mean I REALLY liked The Phantom Menace but in some non specific way this one hasn't done it for me in the same way.

DV, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Removing Jar Jar from most of the movie improved things by about 800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% , as far as I can tell.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But how do you *feel*, Dan?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What I really want to know is Darth Tyranus plotting against the Emperor, coz like he told the truth to Obi Kwon, or did he just think that he wouldn't believe him anyway? I think that will be a central storyline in episode 3.

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think it's a case of Palpatine cleverly creating/manipulating the opposition through the leadership of Dooku -- in otherwards, folks like the Trade Federation think they're working against Palpatine, but in fact that lets him consolidate his own power and create his own new army for use. Call it the Star Wars COINTELPRO -- and it fits a pattern given later happenings (ie, feeding the Rebellion false info re: Endor and nearly succeeded in crushing them all). But I wouldn't be surprised if Tyrannus decided to make his own play for things later...and given that Anakin already has a score to settle with him, that makes the reason for the two to clash even stronger.

Why YES I'm obsessed. Now leave me alone. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I sort of agree with Ned. It seems pretty obvious to me that the Sith Lords are manipulating both the Republic and the Seperatists as part of a bid to consolidate power and get rid of the Jedi Knights in one (drawn out and meticulously-planned) fell swoop. There's a remarkably twisted bonus in that no matter which side the Jedi support, they're ultimately supporting the Dark Side. A large chunk of the next movie will likely involve the implosion of the Jedi Knights and how the remainder secreted themselves on inhospitable remote planets across the galaxy. The thing I really want to know is this: will Mace Windu die or end up going over to the Dark Side?

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He's got to be going down -- doesn't strike me as the temptable type. As for the ultimate fate of the Jedi, I'm not counting any Expanded Universe stuff here where it seems like half the Jedi hid away in dark caves or things like that -- to quote Obi Wan's line in the original, "Now the Jedi are all but extinct," and I'll take that to mean that at the time he meant himself, Yoda, and not much else. Episode II killed off a slew of them and more are on the way...

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree that it's more likely he's going to take a dirtnap, but how cool would it be if he was tempted into slotting himself into the emerging Empire by becoming a self-appointed watchdog so intent on seeking out corruption amongst the politicians within the emerging Empire that he becomes less and less cognizant (or caring) of the evils being visited on other portions of the galaxy?

Another thing that I thought was great about the movie was how the good characters are shown busily doing things to shoot themselves in the foot. Jar Jar and Padme do some wildly inexcusable stuff here, particularly given that we know what the eventual outcome will be. I really like the theme running through this prequel trilogy of good people making precisely the wrong choices and the eventual nastiness that can lead to (although a large portion of me can't help but wonder how the majority of the galaxy's life was different under the Senate as opposed to the Empire).

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, apparently the Republic wasn't going around blowing up planets, see (on a smaller level, consider Owen and Beru getting torched in the original film). Though one might wonder what an ambitious chancellor would have done if they had the plans to the Death Star in place of a scheming Palpatine (and let me just say that the Death Star 'cameo' in the film was a brilliant touch). Much of the semi-revision going on regarding the true nature of good and evil in the Empire (see the Weekly Standard thread Nabisco started up) argues that from a broad point of view there doesn't seem to have been much in the way of hurt or harm on the part of the Empire if you weren't part of the Rebellion. But then you see how Lando tells folks in Cloud City how the Empire has taken over -- and there's no indication at all that Bespin has had anything to do with the Rebellion -- and bedlam breaks out as people split ASAP, so clearly the idea of direct Imperial control doesn't sound like a good one. Of course, that doesn't explain all the celebrating crowds you see there at the end of Jedi, or rather why there were still crowds in the city to begin with. ;-)

Yes, the theme of incorrect choices causing further problems is a fine one, and clearly the last film will just hit the nail on the head squarely on that front (and arguably Luke faces that problem too -- his running off to fall into Vader's trap in Empire, then nearly giving into the Emperor's wishes in Jedi).

I like your vision of Mace there...I think the question of who the Jedi are actually serving and for what purpose is going to be a key theme of the final film, if not the key theme.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Death Star cameo was EXCELLENT, I agree. The point about the Empire blowing up planets is a good one, but I do think it's worth pointing out that that level of brutality was introduced at the beginning of that trilogy and hadn't been endemic in the galaxy before then. Also, I thought the issue with an Imperial presence in Cloud City has more to do with Lando's operation was somewhat illicit in the Empire's eyes rather than a particular political statement. I mean, didn't Vader say something along the lines of, "Thanks for giving us the rebels, but since you helped them, we've decided to screw you royally. Resistance is futile!" when he took over? There was an active threat in the Empire's presence rather than a passive one. Also, don't forget that Owen and Beru were killed as part of an investigation into a Rebellion plot. It wasn't like they stole some food from the neighbors and the torching of their deaths were standard Imperial justice. Luke is pretty sheltered, but the degree of shock he exhibits even when seeing the demolished Jawa ship tells me that, for most people, this level of Imperial ruthlessness is not a fact of everyday life.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mace will be killed by Boba Fett. Revenge for his father. I agree about the position of the jedi's, damned if they do, damned if they don't. Though, I think that Dooku may try to eventually u-surp Palpatine...which could have something to do with Anakin's eventual arrival at the darkside (he maybe 'saves' palpatine?).

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, Palpatine wants Luke to take 'your father's place at my side!' So conceivably something similar could happen in III...though I'd have to wonder about how readily Anakin could square that with knowing Dooku was already working for Palpatine to begin with. But as you say, 'saving' Palpatine may be the answer.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The situation I see in the Star Wars trilogy is one of you can get away with most things as long as you are not helping the rebellion. The Hutts and the bounty hounters and the smugglers...if anything the universe has become more lawless.

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's just something Anakin said about trusting two or three politicians. He respects Palpatine. And Dooku chopped off his hand.

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think it's pretty clear that Anakin is going to kill Dooku and is going to hold up Palpatine as the wise person that everyone should be made to listen to.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(Yikes. Passive tense: classic or dud?)

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I can't believe that episode 3 will end on a total downer, it's not the Lucas way. So, Bail Oragana will have a significant role to play in III...ending with the formation of the rebel alliance and perhaps a minor victory for them?

Has anyone noticed the fatalism that haunts Yoda? I think he already knows what is going to happen, I mean he is the most powerful jedi on the light side after all. The future cannot be changed. And after all the prophecy is for one who will restore balance to the force, which at the time of Clones is stacked in the favour of the lightside.

Oh and how will R2 D2 and C3PO get programmed (though, I have a sneaky suspicion that R2 and Obe Kwon do recogonise each other in Star Wars but 3PO has def had his memory wiped).

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Forget that, I think this is the more interesting change when you think about it.

UNCLE OWEN (meeting the Jawas and buying C3PO, thinking to self): "That's odd, we had a translator droid that looked a lot like this one and even talked the same all those years ago. Who knew? Anyway, R2 units..."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Though when it comes to the whole droid memory dump thing, Lucas is perfectly covered by the bit in the original film where Owen tells Luke to take the droids into town and get their memory erased -- implying it's a common enough practice, etc. Ta-da. And keep in mind so far Obi-Wan barely worked with R2 and hasn't directly talked with 3PO yet at all (never met in the first film, didn't seem to meet in this one beyond being in the arena at the end).

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think that, just to spite jel, the end of Episode III will feature Anakin playing kickball with Padme's severed head.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Arrrgghh! No way! :( You're a very bad man Dan Perry! (I'm beginning to think that my Star Wars theories may be a bit mental...though, R2 could never have his memory erased, he's too cool for that! :)

jel --, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Has anyone noticed the fatalism that haunts Yoda? I think he already knows what is going to happen, I mean he is the most powerful jedi on the light side after all. The future cannot be changed. And after all the prophecy is for one who will restore balance to the force, which at the time of Clones is stacked in the favour of the lightside.

I was thinking this initially, but while "order" and "democracy" are in ascendancy, Yoda and Mace have a conversation stating that their Jedi powers are waning because of the growing power of the Dark Side.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it should've been yoda and ma$e

geeta, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When it comes to severed heads, it was noted after the film among my crew that if Peter Jackson had directed Episode II, Boba would have picked up Jango's helmet...and then his head would have fallen out of it.

Padme ain't gonna die none in the film, I'm guessing. Remember that in Jedi Leia remembers her mom from a young age, and Portman has said that she'll be pregnant in the next film rather than already a young mother.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Was that her birth mother or an adopted mother, though? I was under the impression that Padme died in childbirth. (This could be a completely mistaken impression.)

Joei and I said the exact same thing about Jango Fett's head, BTW. :) And I now see how the 'NSync cameo could have worked without being forced and painful (hopefully, they would have been made up as those blue aliens with the twin aardvark snouts sprouting out of their forheads).

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sounds about right. ;-) Luke to Leia in the revelation scene in Jedi: "Tell me about your mother...your real mother," ie as opposed to adoptive mom. Leia says she was beautiful, kind but sad, which sounds about right given where things are going. Luke says he has no memory of his mom, etc.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"where things are going" = yoda enables sting to have sex for hours on end?

mark s, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Perv.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

DAMN YOU MARK S FOR GIVING ME A MENTAL IMAGE OF STING-ON-YODA ACTION.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yoda likes the handle of Sting's light saber.

I still have not seen this yet, might do on Wednesday but it's not something I've been dying to see. Maybe if there were more Yoda porn I would be more interested.

Nicole, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yoda porn I can face. Sting porn is the END OF THE WORLD.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The new films have destroyed the Star Wars mystique by revealing everything that was better left imagined.

In the first 3 movies the Jedi were a mysterious lost knighthood with mystic powers, but now we know that they were actually thirty nerds with carny haircuts who sit around in a circle stroking their chins on The Planet of Traffic and do the odd David Blaine trick in bars.

Darth Vader was this ominous force of darkness - but he turns out to be a whiny, horny bedwetter with a rat tail. He looks like he should be selling sno-cones. He's a puppy.

It was a real mistake to make a prequel series like this - the end is a foregone conclusion so Lucas has tried to jazz it up with an utterly uncompelling convoluted plot about political intrigue. Does anyone really care about these trade federations and backroom machinations? The Lord of The Rings film was able to convey a complex history with factionalism and twisted loyalties while keeping the action urgent and exciting. Clone Wars plot was too contorted, too obsessed with explication - it never gets rolling on its own. It never feels like a story that needs to be told.

It's just a piece of garbage.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The new series is inherently less compelling than the original series because the heroes are no longer underdogs. They represent the ruling class, the status quo. The bad guys we're supposed to be booing in the new picture are a rebel alliance, just like the one we were supposed to cheer for in the first series. The logic of the films (and ironically enough the entire American mythos)is empire = bad, rebel = good. It's impossible to completely reverse that and expect people to relate to it in the same way.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Um, the "rebels" in the new trilogy are arch-conservative trade despots who want to destroy the existing Republic and power-mad fascists who want to destroy the existing Republic. Why would we even consider linking them to the rebels in the old series?

Dan "Self-Contradictory" Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But in the interests of TRUTH fritz isn't it interesting to demythologise the allure of the mystical rebels, as represented by the Jedi?

It said in the paper that George Lucas has definitely dropped the idea of making episodes 7-9 and the the next one will be his last Star Wars. This is a bit of a shame. I liked the idea of dragging out an ancient Mark Hammill and Harrison Ford in a kind of 'Grumpy Old Men' like reprise. Maybe someone else will make it.

I don't know why I'm getting drawn into this.

N., Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Urgent and Key Question: Did Negri & Hardt title their unlikely best- selling tome "Empire" to play on associations with the Galactic Empire?

alext, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Um, maybe because the "rebels" in the old trilogy were arch- conservatives bent on destroying the existing system?

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But in the interests of TRUTH fritz isn't it interesting to demythologise the allure of the mystical rebels, as represented by the Jedi?

If it wasn't so terribly boring, yes, it might have been interesting. This is my point, N. - I think Lucas did try to demythologize the series and it didn't work.

Fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The rebels in the original trilogy were a conglomeration of liberals (Leia)/anarchists(Han)/libertarians(... Luke doesn't really fit in here; myabe Yoda? Or possibly Lando?) unless you're defining "conservative" as "people who want to go back to the old way".

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Vader is humanized, the force is gentic not individual, the universe is ruled not by a mystic battle between good and evil but by the mundane forces of history as we all know it here on earth: trade routes, arms races, manouvering politicians. What is there to care about in these stories now that everything fantastic has been reduced?

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

CGI and cool light-sabre battles!

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dan makes an important point.

N., Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

you're defining "conservative" as "people who want to go back to the old way".

That's how I'm defining it. How else would you? This is the big problem with the new series: no-one's goals or ideologies are defined - OK there's some really nebulous & boring stuff about "trade", but its basically meaningless. The first trilogy worked better because all we needed to know was that they were trying to get rid of the bad guys - the guys who blew up planets, burned uncles and tortured princesses. That's all we needed to know. In the new ones, there's all this crap about alliances and treaties and blah blah blah. It's like reading the paper.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(Serious answer: Rather than detracting from the overall mythos, grounding it in such mundane, easy-to-understand terms crystallizes the story for me in terms of how easily I could imagine it as coherent story that I can visualize happening. It magnifies the point that myths are created out of the actions of real people.)

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is the big problem with the new series: no-one's goals or ideologies are defined

Palpatine's are. Control of the whole society and destruction of the Jedi.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In related news, I saw Natalie Portman on David Letterman the other day and she was SO LOVELY.

N., Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Fritz: This is the big problem with the new series: no-one's goals or ideologies are defined

Ned: Palpatine's are. Control of the whole society and destruction of the Jedi.


But our heroes aren't aware of this, so there's no conflict - just confusion. And we are aware of this - we even know to what degree Palpatine will succeed - so there's no dramatic tension.
It's like reading footnotes. maybe this trilogy is to the original what the Silmarillion is to LOTR - fascinating to die-hard fans but snooze-inducing in casual fans.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I enjoyed it shockah! I have loads of plot and continuity questions, but I have a horrible feeling Ned could answer them all. And NP was gorgeous throughout.

Jeff W, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

fritz has spoiled parts 1-3 for me by being right (possibly) (i haven't yet seen them) (i heart jar jar binks tho)

mark s, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

there's no dramatic tension

Without trying to sound too much like Joseph Campbell, sometimes it's not what you're telling but how you're telling it. When it came to the Greek tragedies, for instance, everyone already knew the story -- question was how to tell it.

In this case, I find the confusion to be part of the attraction of the story. We do know what's going to happen to an extent -- they don't, and that makes their fate all the more distressing. Also, like I muttered, it seems clear that the Jedi as an organization suffered to a large extent from hubris and are about to get cosmic payback.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

haha my GRATE THEORY abt the Silmarillion proceeds apace

(clue tolkien = heidegger w/o hobbits => BUT WHERE ARE THE HOBBITS??)

mark "the s stands for WAKE UP NOW YOU BASTARDS" s, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Their goals and positions are ill-defined?

Jedi Council: Restore balance to The Force. Are currently attempting to achieve this by mistakenly helping the people who are pushing The Force out of balance in the first place.

Dooku: Allied with Palpatine. May have secondary goal to grab power, but so far is playing out as second-in- command in a startlingly-elegant manipulation.

Trade Federation: They are making a purely selfish power play in the interests of revenge and profit. Initially they attempted to use internal corruption in the Republic to achieve this (EpI) but didn't realize how tangential they were to their allies' plans. They've now rededicated themselves towards exacting vengeance upon the people who have wronged them (Amidala and Palpatine) and seizing power (financing their robotics supplier to build up their army and develop a world-destroying weapon).

Anakin: Wants to make everyone do the right thing. Current problem areas lie in that this is an inherently fascist view and the allegedly benevolent person he wants to support is actually an evil power-crazed bastard. Also, he's a tempestuous brat with a deadly weapon.

Padme Amidala: Believes in the Republic and in executing her duty to her people as their chosen representative. She either doesn't recognize the level of corruption running through the current system or (more likely) is being manouvered out of the way so that her opposition on key matters can be neutralized. (See Jar Jar in EpII, her stand-in in EpI.) She is also torn by the forbidden love she feels for a little boy who stands on the brink of toppling in the wrong direction. She gives in to this love, partly out of fear of death and partly because she seems to think that she can help moderate Anakin's increasingly erratic emotional outbursts.

This is what I walked away from the movie with, without reading any fan-fiction or indulging in any more discussion of the film than you've seen on this board.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And anyway, to pick up on Nizad's point, the dramatic tension is supposed to arise from the way that the "good guys" (ie, the Jedis and the Republic) fail to achieve their goals. Yes, we all know what's going to happen, but we don't really know how it went down. Your point could be extended to say that most semibiographical or historical movies aren't worth watching because hey, we already know what's going to happen. (BAD METAPHOR ALERT!) It's like saying you know everything that happened at the Battle of Antietem because you read a chapter in in a book about the American Civil War and turning down a chance to go back in time to see it solely on that basis.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dan, all that is in there I trust. I didn't get about half of what you saw in it, but maybe I'm not the attentive viewer this film demands.

It's the film's priorities that are so frustrating. It's Fan Facts, not storytelling. We learn all about the origin of Boba Fett - a minor character from the earlier films just because he's a character from the earlier films. But we don't learn anything about the relationship that is key to this film - Annakin & Padme. They haven't seen each other in years, she's ten yrs older than him, they have different philosophies - why do they fall in love? because he falls off a giant-assed gopher in a meadow? A third of the audience was laughing during the awkward fireside romance scene - it just wasn't handled well in the movie. And it's like that throughout the film. The obscure details are obsessed over while the big narrative points are left unattended, incomplete.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Best observation about the romance I've read is that it's less a story of love and more one of obsession...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's like saying you know everything that happened at the Battle of Antietem because you read a chapter in in a book about the American Civil War and turning down a chance to go back in time to see it solely on that basis.

Let's face it - we know more or less what's going to happen in almost every film and that doesn't make them good or bad. Filling in the background of Star Wars could have worked - this version just doesn't. It doesn't transcend its relationship to the earlier films - it's for fans not a general audience. I think Lucas's mistake was that everyone was enough of a fan that he didn't have to worry about keeping the storyline interesting.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anakin is using his darkside powers to seduce Padme!

jel --, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The relationship is fundamentally unhealthy, largely because Anakin is operating on obsession and Padme is operating on a desire to mother/nuture/heal. You could see it as a vicious retelling of Romeo and Juliet.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

what a mentalist bitch!!

mark s, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a giant-assed gopher in a meadow

Capybaras!

http://www.rictus.com/viz/photos/nature/capybaras.jpg

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

c'mon Dan, you could describe anything as a vicious retelling of Romeo and Juliet. That's meaningless. Forbidden love is about as basic a plot device as you can get. The fact that Lucas couldn't make it the least bit believable or meaningful is a tribute to what a lame- ass story-teller he is now.

fritz, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't think that's meaningless at all. Obvious, yes. Meaningless, no.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't know, I could easily see somebody in Anakin's position as believably obsessed over someone or something -- the idea of the Jedi is normally to train them when very young, to avoid the problems of 'attachments,' as the movie states, both in terms of family and other people. Lucas has said that the Jedi aren't supposed to be celibate, but need to steer clear of anything like a deep relationship or marriage (which makes the end of the film interesting to me -- is the marriage there meant to be a secret?).

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm certain it was. If it wasn't, Obi-Wan and Jar Jar would have bee there.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Saw the film on Monday, timed my urinations for every love scene. Thought the film was decent, but I'm very confused. I haven't seen the older films for a number of years, so I plan on watching them all and then going to see AOC again.

Chris, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

GIANT ARSE COWS!

Alan T, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OK, I think I've figured out the central thing that kills the new series for me, and why I see these films as a betrayal of every kid who grew up with them. While the first films were all about free will and the individual's ability to change the universe, the new ones are all about predestiny and fate. No one has any responsibility, because everything is just unwinding as it must. The heroes and villians aren't all that much different than the droid and clone armies (why should we care about either of these forces? they are literally soulless) - just doing their jobs, just following orders. It's not simply that we know what will happen - it's that the characters themselves seem helpless and tossed about by something bigger than themselves that they cannot fight. It's all foreshadowing and no story. The movies end up business-like and passionless. I'll shut up about it now.

fritz, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does anyone really care about these trade federations and backroom machinations?

…the universe is ruled not by a mystic battle between good and evil but by the mundane forces of history as we all know it here on earth: trade routes, arms races, manouvering politicians

It's like reading the paper

While the first films were all about free will and the individual's ability to change the universe, the new ones are all about predestiny and fate.

Not arguing with anything fritz says here, but these are the very things that have most pleased me most about Eps. I and II. All this trade stuff is great (ha ha I am a boring eurocrat!). Also an "unhappy ending is guaranteed" is far more interesting to me than the "happy ending is guaranteed" aspect of IV & VI.

Jeff W, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah, I agree with Jeff (unsurprisingly). All of the things Fritz is holding up as the fatal flaws of the new triliogy are the things which have been interesting me the most (Jar Jar and "Padme + Anakin TROO WUV" aside).

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's very troo, it is. It might be a bit of a stretch, and I'm obviously reading it through my own experience, but arguably the original trilogy is the kids' story and the the newer one the grown up sequence. What is interesting is how all the stuff Fritz has problems with suggests greater depths and developments for IV through VI without taking away from the self-contained flow of those films on their own. Indeed, the original film could still very easily stand alone without a problem.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Now you're making feel like a dope. I like the kiddie version, you like the adult version. I don't like the parts of the story that suggest greater depth, etc. Sorry, but this story is just not being told well. I feel no tension, no character development, no sense of wonder, no humour, no emotion - only a filmmaker and badly cast actors going through the motions. Beyond that, I see it as an almost complete reversal of the ideals espoused in the earlier pictures. You don't see it that way. That's cool. But I'm not arguing for it to be dumbed down at all.

fritz, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I apologize, Fritz, I can see how my thoughts came across poorly. I agree that if you're not feeling the connection then there's no real point in caring about the further developments. For me, I think there are some prime moments in the new film which rank up there with the originals in terms of epically-themed emotional impact. I immediately sensed Lucas meant to show Anakin's destruction of the Tusken Raiders in a negative light, for all that the audience cheered when he went into bad-ass mode. That turned out to be the case with the confrontation/confession scene back at the homestead with Padme, a scene which went a long way towards my accepting Christensen's abilities -- the excerpted part in the trailer seemed like complete petulance, in context it was the sign of somebody who knows his particular stature but feels unable to act on it, who in turn has been further torn up by his inability to save his mother and then how his anger was channelled into destruction. It's a portrait of someone starting to slide into an abyss, a balance Luke has to fight with later on.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As for the kids/adults comparison in general, what I was more trying to get it was to ask myself if my nine-year-old self, who had already imbibed SW thoroughly and was primed for Empire, would be able to follow the specific twists and turns of the larger plot structure in AOTC. Does anyone know/have any kids that age who really got into it thoroughly?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not to worry, Ned. Everyone I saw it with hated it so I'm glad to hear what people did like about it.

fritz, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was three when I saw Star Wars originally so was surely more interested in the smell of the theater and the texture of my seat cushion than whatever was on the screen. It was re-released a year or so later so I saw it again, with my dad. I made him promise to tell me when Darth Vader killed Obi Wan Kenobi so I could turn away and not see it (reality/fiction divide not really entrenched yet). I knew it was coming because I'd read my best friend's Star Wars comic book and had a horrific mental image of Luke screaming "Bennnnn!!!!!" with gaping anguished mouth and face. I don't think he actually does this in the movie. Of course my father has no idea when this part comes and doesn't really care so I am exposed to scarring scene of Obi Wan dying at Vader's hands. For that I hated my father for days.

By the time the Empire Strikes back came around I'd pretty much forgotten about Star Wars, until my parents sprung the news on me during some sort of birthday party (maybe for my comic- reading best friend?) that there was ANOTHER movie that continued the story! This was unbelievably great news, obv, and as I remember it we went to the theater that day, only to find that all shows were sold out. But eventually I saw it and it was SO GREAT. I was Luke, obv, and Han Solo was my comic-reading friend. Seeing us up there on the screen doing these heroic things was just beyond cool!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Watching your enemies carbon-freeze your best friend and sell him to ruthless criminals, then whining about it to your twin sister as the bloody stump that was your right hand throbs painfully: Classic or Dud?

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Luke doesn't see the freezing part, silly boy. He just sees Han floating by at a distance and probably doesn't even know what the damn thing is. "Why are there four people floating along a coffee table without legs and a carving in it? Mine is not to question why...hey, that guy's shooting at me!"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But Ned I saw it, and I was Luke, so Luke saw it!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mystic.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I loved the crap costumes and the love story was ho-larious. When they are escaping to Naboo as refugees, perhaps they might be a little less conspicuous if she were not wearing a GIANT TIARA on her head.

Other indications that Padme is a bit backwards in the fashion department (or else just passive aggressive) are that she runs around her hippie planet in backless, low-cut chiffon dresses and black leather bustiers even as she's telling Anakin to back off. She seems to get a bit of a makeover on Tatuoine, but still has not apparently heard of a bra.

The love scenes were so ridiculous they were entertaining. After Anakin confesses that he's just genocided an entire tribe, Padme's just like, whatever, poor Anakin had a hard day.

Too, I liked the public transportation and neon advertising on the Planet of Traffic. Yoda was obv. great. Kenobi is dead cool: "You do not want to sell me death sticks."
"I do not want to sell you death sticks."
"You want to go home and re-think your life."
"I want to go home and re-think my life."

felicity, Thursday, 23 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I saw Ep 1 on opening day, and I waited a week for this? I liked Episode 1 in an underdog-ish kind of way, but this really was a terrific movie. Hayden Christensen's hideous acting was my only problem; even Lucas' dopey humor served as flavor (as it should be) and was kept in the background. Many, many positives including complicated but very sensical (to me) storyline, fantastic FX and music, the strongest attention to detail and subtlety in a Star Wars movie yet, clever allusions to the other films, and finally! a glimpse of why Yoda is the head of the Jedi. I'd see it again in a heartbeat (and I may since many of my friends enjoyed it).

Vinnie, Thursday, 23 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And another thing...

At the Lars', when r2 plays back the message from Kenobi, I really wanted dialogue to follow like anakin saying "Who is he, he's gorgeous". message, what message? etc i think the trigger was 3p0's "He says he has a message from one Obi Wan Kenobi" or something equivalent and I fell about.

Alan T, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I saw The Emperor near Angel tube station yesterday.

Jonnie, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

is he still co-running the Almeida? (just up the street from Angel tube)

Alan T, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still don't know about this. It was entertaining enough, but it lacked a certain something. I wasn't really expecting a lot to begin with so I wasn't disappointed.

Nicole, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i meant the FULLY-OPERATIONAL Almeida.

Alan T, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

JAR JAR MUST STAY!!

binks = punk, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

mark s = Nigel A (FT) and I claim my €5.

Jeff W, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

someone said that the last fifth made up for all that went before it, maybe, but only just, it was like watching an episode of the Sullivans or soimething, bloody hell, b-movie acting or what????

chris, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I finally got to see AotC at the certain DC theater in which I wanted to see it.

I agree with whoever it was who said that this film cribbed heavily from Gladiator--not just the sequence in the arena, but the spectacle of Anakin ranting about Obi-Wan supposedly holding him back reminded me of the previous film's portrayal of Commodus as a whiny Gen-X stereotype. And the Jedi fight scenes were Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon with light sabers.

(I suppose Joseph Campbell and other Star Wars mystics have already noted the Oedipus motif in Luke eventually having to battle his father?)

There's supposedly a bootleg edit of The Phantom Menace that heavily cuts out Jar Jar and otherwise tightens up that film. I'd like to see an edit of AotC that reduces to a minimum the relationship scenes between Padme and Anakin. Okay, their love is forbidden by Jedi code and their offspring are presumably foreordained as part of the "bring balance to the Force" prophesy. But I think those sequences would have been improved if Britney Spears and a random boy band member had been playing the roles. Is there any chance that the direction of the third film could be taken out of Lucas' hands, on the grounds that an influential cultural legacy is at risk?

I'm not that zealous a Star Wars fan, but I expect to see the third film when it comes out. However, if TPM and AotC is what Lucas can do with millions of dollars, state-of-the-art special effects, and presumably any writers and actors he wants, it's probably for the best if he doesn't make episodes 7-9.

j.lu, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is there any chance that the direction of the third film could be taken out of Lucas' hands, on the grounds that an influential cultural legacy is at risk?

A mock petition has been circulating for some time that urges him to hand the reins over to Peter Jackson. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

and you know what? Padme is gonna survive episode 3!

jel --, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Finally did see it. I have hard time coming to grips with it, or rather a sort of elusive problem in the film. I thought the acting was okay, Christensen is actually pretty convincing as a spoiled brat although a bit too heavy on the "Obi Wan is disrespecting me" side. Probably the movie is filled with too many tacked-on explanations in re. Anakin's future downfall. The weakest point for me is the death of his mother, which felt just forced and rushed. Although a friend said his subsequent killing of the Tusken Raiders was the turning point in the relationship, I paraphrase: "after he told her, she obviously wanted to fuck him". Oh boy.

-1-

Omar, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Otherwise a lot of enjoyable and even beautiful moments: Boba picking up his father's helmet, the wicked sound of those depth charges, Corcusant in general. Though I wasn't too crazy about Yoda in ass- kicking mode, always liked to think he was above that sort of thing. Also like the suggestion of Yoda being a little nihilist who can't be bothered about changing things, this would indeed explain the Jedi's disturbing blindness in re. dark forces.

Hey, France - Uruguay is starting.

-2-

Omar, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Now can I complain about Lucas being heniously stereotypical in his portrayal of librarians? It's the last acceptable prejuidice, people. ;-)

Nicole, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ah, I should have guessed! But you see, I like the idea that Jedi librarians determine the arrangement of the universe. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, it's another little old lady with a bun in her hair who thinks she knows everything and couldn't possibly wrong, and is seriously unhelpful with Obi-Wan. The only thing Lucas left out was her shhh-ing him. That has been the cliche for at least 100 years in film and television, so I'm not exactly surprised that Lucas isn't any different.

Nicole, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Of course my complaint is very silly as I mentioned in the other AOTC thread, but it's still annoying.

Nicole, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, it's another little old lady with a bun in her hair who thinks she knows everything and couldn't possibly wrong[...]

Nicole, stop describing Ned.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That's why I was so hesitant to bring it up before Dan -- we know how sensitive Ned is.

Nicole, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just give him a cup of warm milk; he'll be fine.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is the kind of ridiculous abuse from people who I count as my 'friends' that leads me to conclude I must become an antisocial superhero who lurks in darkness. From now on call me Mange.

This past week I have told countless people to put away their drink, turn off their damn cell phones, to try and put things away correctly and in general stop acting like STUPID GODDAMN FUCKUPS when it comes to studying for finals. Right now I'm on the side of the stereotypes, woo-hoo! ;-)

But Nicole does have a point. She is, after all, friendly, helpful and cool, and not a stereotype. :-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two weeks pass...
good lord this was the worst movie I've seen in a long time.

I kept wanting to heckle the screen but the theater we were in was deathly quiet and almost empty. the only time the audience really seemed to react was once c3po showed up, and the people I was with admitted that his jokes seemed more corny and forced than normal.

I'm not opposed to the whole serialistic space opera writ large project, but he's just doing it really fucking badly. his writing for characters in the high end of society is an enormous weakness - senators, jedi, royalty, etc., and they did most of the talking in this one.

Josh, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To be honest, I'm sorta surprised you saw it, Josh! Didn't strike me as being an interest of yours at all.

Caught it again last week on the local digital theater, to see if the image quality is all it's meant to be (and indeed, it is). Also had fun catching some of the small touches and mistakes people had mentioned -- Jango Fett's helmet being dented a bit when he runs into his ship, the Coke can by Christensen's feet at the end of the lakeside/balcony sequence, Liam Neeson's voice after Anakin starts killing the sandpeople.

That said, where I was absolutely impassioned enough to see Fellowship something like seven times during its theatrical run, I'll probably only see it once more in theaters with a friend who has been waiting to catch it herself.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

'only see it once more' -- 'it' being AOTC of course. Darn pronouns!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it was a staying-informed thing, ned. I would've waited to see it on video but I thought the big screen and sound etc were important. (this is why I'll see lotr eventually too, only I probably screwed up in not catching that in the theater)

Josh, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it was a staying-informed thing, ned

Hmm...I dunno, that's the kind of thing that seems a lot easier to do with music, say (quick download, three minutes listening, can do at home). But I admire yer dedication. :-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I liked it. It made me think.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it was OK. but anakin has zoomed effortlessly into my punchable list at no. 2, just after the king of punchable himself, spidey!

katie, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Spidey is about as punchable as a cute kitten! Anyway, the most punchable person in that movie was his roommate.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dan speaks the truth! Spidey's room mate could have been Anakin's long lost brother.

jel --, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, Anakin was horrid. But like Perry I like Spidey - very endearing.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

like the pinefox, it made me think, ned. partly because it showed so much potential. unfortunately that made it come off as much worse than most badly done movies. but it did get a special pass because it's star wars. I don't make myself go out to see the pokemon movie, even though I should. ;)

Josh, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Just the one Pokemon movie, Josh? ;-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

mark s sez not 3 yes? so maybe 2.

Josh, Wednesday, 26 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
If you watch four years after release at home on a Saturday morning, not remotely excremental. Even the Frankie & Annette in Space romantic scenes take on an Ed Wood-with-a-budget fascination.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Okay I think the world is ending because I am AGREEING with Morbius about the artistic worth of a movie. Or at least more agreeing than violently disagreeing.

Dan (Wow) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:17 (twenty years ago)

its better than Matrix: Revolutions

latebloomer aka rembrandt, the fifth ninja turtle (latebloomer), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:19 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure about artistic worth, but the arena battle near the end -- at least half of it -- is, like, Super Harryhausen.

Putting slangy dialogue in McGregor's mouth when he's doing a Guinness impression, tho, aiiiiieeeeeee! Esp when he stops in at Mel's Diner.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:56 (twenty years ago)

Heh, I was using "artistic worth" as imprecise shorthand for "positive qualities".

Dan (King Handwave) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:06 (twenty years ago)

that diner scene, omg

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)

does anyone else in Canada "talk" like Hayden C?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:22 (twenty years ago)

I do prefer Hayden with that weird rat's-tail than Hayden with the Leif Garret frightperm.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 20:21 (twenty years ago)

we all talk like that

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 20:23 (twenty years ago)

sixteen years pass...

Count Dookie shoulda done better

Gymnopédie Pablo (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 7 June 2022 18:05 (four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.