1) There is nothing especially wrong with rhyming about all the neat shit you have and all the hot women you've fucked. What's stupid is saying "oh that's all these MCs talk about nowadays, their chains and their cars and their hos" when the motherfuckin' Sugarhill Gang spent almost the entirety of the first widely-regarded rap hit rhyming about how they had Lincoln Continentals and Cadillacs and had larger penises than Superman. The next time someone says "man what the hell is up with all the corny money-flashing videos, I miss Rakim" I give you my full permission to hit him in the eye. Not hard enough to keep him from watching the video to "Follow the Leader" afterwards, though (as an audio-visual-eye-jammie educational value package). See also: Slick Rick.
2) Fine, so MC Madlyrixx the Underground Space-Rap Assassin is living out of his Subaru Brat and eating reduced-price hot dogs from the "slightly irregular" items bin at Safeway, and it sucks that he isn't hugely recognized and can't afford to buy Steve McQueen's Porsche from Le Mans. But MCs who tailor their shit to a specific underground niche or spit things that the general public can't relate to all that much (average inner-city hip-hop fan in not being intimately familiar with sci-fi anime and skateboarding shocker!) probably realize they aren't going to reach the same people 50 Cent is reaching and are actually not really that torn up about it.
3) BUT. It is pretty ass when you're an MC that raps about how good he is at being an MC and does it better than many other MCs yet isn't all that wealthy and doesn't have videos and rocks 3 year-old FUBU hoody sweats that smell like small-club Newport miasma. Holy fucking shit, get this -- many underground MCs who don't cater specifically to the braniac robot Pharoahe Monch/Allan Ginsberg crossover demographic actually want to get paid and drive awesome Italian sports cars and be seen with super-fine ladies just like those mainstream rap stars you dislike!
4) I have no idea what "underground" means anymore. I joked in City Pages that it might as well apply to any MC who never sold crack (that's the media's problem, not the MCs) but when you have the Chapelle Show guest star/Jay-Z backup/Rahzel-says-Twix-are-tasty Roots, new-funk underground/wants-to-produce-Ludacris RJD2 and ultra-nerd-possibly-hip-hop but maybe something else Anticon all draped under the same "undie" banner something is kind of weird here.
5) If Bill O'Reilly hates you, you must be doing something right.
6) Ass-shaker party rap and abstract jazzbo future beats can coexist in the same record collection. So can gangsta and conscious. For years I've been the kind of person who could love both the Velvet Underground and Van Halen; why I couldn't feel the same way about hip-hop until recently I don't know.
7) No, I have not sold all my indie-rap CDs and 12"s. I'm just gradually liking the mainstream stuff on the same level now.
8) I have said in a few public forums that Jay-Z is not a good MC or things to that effect. As penance, I have been punching myself in the groin repeatedly until I pass out.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)
c'mon people is this really necessary? This is the only place I see people spending this much time debating "pop" hiphop as opposed to "conscious/undie/backpacker" bla bla
most people i know happily switch between Black star and Jay-Z and this ongoing agonizing or dispragement of one or the other is getting really tired.
can this topic be dropped now please, or at least discussed in a more interesting way
― H (Heruy), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post - ok i know that but see above
― H (Heruy), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
Not hatin' on Jay-Z, I got the Blueprint 2.0 and it's great though for a double CD that's a hell of a lot of filler, but it least it doesn't have all the lame-o skits that the Li'l Kim album has (runs to hide from trife
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)
(I will still defend El-P to the death, though. That bit on the Weathermen Conspiracy mix CD where he rhymes over the "Gossip Folks" beat = OH DEAR LORD)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 June 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― autovac (autovac), Friday, 20 June 2003 05:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 20 June 2003 06:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 20 June 2003 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)
is "afro puffs" by lady of rage considered canonic? everything else on this cheapie threefer compilation i did actually hear of art least once
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― alext (alext), Friday, 20 June 2003 09:59 (twenty-two years ago)
-- Nate Patrin (natepatrin550...), June 20th, 2003.
That Dobby character from Harry Potter has inspired masochists all around the world.
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 20 June 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 20 June 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)
(does trife REALLY like the skits on the lil' kim album?)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 20 June 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, Nate something you touched on - how boring is 'undie' when it's all "I'm doper than you" "I keep it real" "I educate the youth" the upteenth time around. I'd rather hear someone rapping about plasma screen TVs.
― scott m (mcd), Friday, 20 June 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Friday, 20 June 2003 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Neudonym, Friday, 20 June 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 20 June 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Neudonym, Friday, 20 June 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 June 2003 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)
IT DAMN WELL SHOULD BE.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 20 June 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Neudonym, Friday, 20 June 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 June 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)
So... whatcha sayin'?
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Friday, 20 June 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't care about that whole indie/undie/whatever stuff, but I don't know where to start with mainstream stuff. I guess Method Man's first album should be on my list.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 21 June 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 21 June 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 21 June 2003 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 21 June 2003 02:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:13 (twenty-two years ago)
'Whut thee Album' and 'Muddy Waters' are worth the 13 or whatever dollars. Course, are those really pop?
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)
now answer my question abt afro puffs, yo
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 21 June 2003 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 21 June 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 21 June 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― cybele (cybele), Saturday, 21 June 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 21 June 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 21 June 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Saturday, 21 June 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd say that, IMHO: Deltron > Wu-Tang > El-P > J5 > Ja Rule > Ca$h Money > Talib Kweli. The bling-bling stuff isn't horrible by default, it's just really played out. Same thing with the "I'm a great MC, I don't rap about flossin" stuff, ok fine we get it. But what I really can't stand is the "save the kids" rap (i.e. Nas' "I Can", one of the worst mainstream rap songs I've heard in a long time). That why the indie-rap of Deltron appeals to me, because the guy's rapping about post-apocalyptic society, and I'm a sucker for that kind of weird shit.
― Brian the Snorf, Saturday, 21 June 2003 23:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 22 June 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 22 June 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)
(still ain't entirely right, but c'mon)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 June 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Josh (Josh), Sunday, 22 June 2003 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Sunday, 22 June 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Sunday, 22 June 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 22 June 2003 02:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 22 June 2003 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Brian the Snorf, Monday, 23 June 2003 22:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Monday, 23 June 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Twee rap...mmmm.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
if you havent heard cadence of raw produce, i suggest you try him out. the best of what 'conscience' rap has to offer right now. none of that bullshit nas (hardly clever), talib (somehow thinks that rapping about conscience rap makes it conscience rap), or dead prez shit (these guys are boneheads).
cadence - cadence poisons the minds of children
http://www.daybydayent.com/content/releases/cadence_cadence_poisons.shtml
as far as wu-tang, the best stuff coming from them is killarmy. all three lps were great, if you like that kind of gritty sound. also, the solo releases from two of the killarmy members - pr terrorist n 9th prince - were both solid.
def jux. i havent heard anything really solid from def jux since stepfather factory. i think a better substitute is birthwrite records out of chicago.
if nothing else, check out that cadence. shit, im sure it's on slsk.
put your fagdars up!
― faggotry (faggotry), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
I hope El-P didn't pick out those videos himself because knowing he was into Cat Power would ruin me.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 01:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)
There were some really bad bands/videos on that show. The garage-rockers on the beach was the worst.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)
the new mf doom as viktor vaughan 12"
and
s.a smash - smashy trashy
that's about it. oh, and if you are feeling indie guilt for digging on some mainstream MTV/TRL bullshit, be a dear and fuck off with telling other people the way things need to be now that you are over your undie elitism. some people actually remember why they originally turned that shit off to begin with - most hiphop is wack in 2003 for the same reason it was in 1995...
― jason m. (jason m), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― jason m. (jason m), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
that, and pennsylvania dutch crafts
― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Actually it's one of those Analog Brothers/Bobby Digital/Scaramanga alter ego things. The face behind the name? You guessed it:
http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/elp1.jpg
― Nate Patrin will never get sick of that picture (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)
el p
ps: it's "little johnny", not "little jimmy" you fuckin dick.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)
comment on the "tigers in a spotlight"- an El-P review by scott seward. *because of the nature of what i do for a living i do notnormally respond to negative reviews- i accept good and bad and that is the nature of music criticism and life gig.
with that said i'll go onto my point: why do we all have to suffer through reading pot shots by critics (who i'd guess come from aworld of indie rock and experimental electronic criticism) at any hip hop that is "experimental" or seen as heady (and made by whiteguys) yet these same characteristics don't seem to evoke the same criticisms when applied to rock or electronic music reviewed bythe same writers (see seward's various and mostly rock/electro reviews of the past)? in his review of el-p's new record "fantasticdamage" seward slams el for making rap too smart and hard to decipher (i guess that what he means as he references using athesaurus in regards to this stuff) and to even get down to that point we have to navigate our way through the pretentious territoryof snide, wordy, and less-than-simple-plain-english-striving-to-be-clever prose. i thought it was intentional on the writer's part to makehis point but after perusing other articles he has written this is standard style for him. strong point of hypocrisy on his part- seems hemust feel that music writers are allowed to be complicated and wordy and that rap writers (yes, mcs are writers) are not- they mustbe simple and dumbed down (he also states he hates positive sentiment, and loves juvenile and others rappers like this (see paststories)- who are high on homophobia, misogynistic thoughts and low on mental pondering/stretching). what a sad and repressiveceiling he puts up for rap artists of all backgrounds. shame, shame! he claims this type of out-there hip hop is boring. would thiswriter, back in the day, have slapped the snooze label on afrika bambaataa? public enemy? freestyle fellowship? even herbiehancock? they all slipped some crazy shit up into the mix and were considered highly experimental (and at the time had their shareof haters too). thank god for all of them and any other artists in any form of music who keep things moving. he says el-p's lyrics arewack but, as becomes par for the entire article, he never references anything from the actual album to accompany his judgments,he's more inclined to wank on and on with his own attempts at rhyming.
seward goes on to liken el's beats to clanking chains and buzzing noises that he doesn't see as "soundscapes" like his other writercohorts "deathlessly" do (a hint of being a hater based on bring-down-the-critical-darling sentiment?) he again gives no actualreferences which can be essential in music reviews. it's fine to not like any part of the record- it's a complicated and involved recordand certainly shares all the acclaim it's gotten with criticisms- but the smarmy manner that this is written and his contradicting viewsmake it lose credibility. he hacks away at the production sounds and techniques saying he could do it himself (the "i could do this"argument is the weakest of all in the history of all art criticism!!- come on, my grandmother says that in regards to everythingcontained in the whitney and moma combined!) but in a past review of the ohm: early gurus of electronic music, he praises thismusic (of a different genre) with much favor despite the fact that according to our writer it's "frog snippets and train whistles" but it'sok for brainy academics like john cage- just not for hip hop dumb dumbs i guess. again in the paragraph that this is brought up in weare to wade through his own endless attempts at spitting lyrics on the page. our super-down gully penner than goes on to sum upel-p's (and his now defunct seminal hip hop group company flow's) fan base as scandinavian ding dongs- ridiculous. companyflow/el-p had and still does have a very large fan base all over the world and especially in nyc with concerts and record cases alikefilled with and by true heads of all ethnicities, head-knodding to every cut. would mr. seward step to dj premiere and lump him intothis? check out premiere's underground series where he showcased company flow. ask chuck d if he's rocking a toe-head mullet withco-flow on the headphones- yes another fan. i guess bobbitto garcia holds no cred for him either? you can definitely not like what el,co-flow, and defjux do but get the facts correct on who is buying this stuff and making this music. he slams def jux but interestinglydidn't mention the harlem duo cannibal ox who practically took over hip hop last year or well-liked boston mc mr. lif- both reveredby true heads worldwide. interestingly he only mentioned the white guys on the label and made trite "little dj shadow" references inthe midst of jackoff-verbage like "vomitory voluminousness". during his praise of non-phixion he didn't mention that non-phixion areon el's record or that ill bill was on the company flow ep last year (did he even know this?).
a line by breakdown of this article's inconsistencies/lack of knowledge and information and depth would be very possible but themain point to be made is that the review is non-specific. it's so mucked up with flowery wording and stabs at over-the-top lyricismby the author himself, that it almost doesn't seem like a review of someone else's music at times and more like our writer's own hiphop 101 lyric notebook. sounds to me like there is a good deal of projection and one too many el-p praise articles got to him so itwas time to lash out- standard fare but at the very least pepper it with facts and actual points as if the record was truly listened to. allmusic can be criticized to be certain- including this album- but it seems best if the writer had some knowledge of the genre andhistory of the artist he is delving into, the ability to be clear and a more exacting style so that readers can have some clarity aboutthis product out there that they could potentially drop loot on- instead they are likely to simply get caught up in a murky swamp ofliterary flexing and the obvious rubble of chips falling off mr. seward's shoulders.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― faggotry (faggotry), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)
Now I am really regretting the whole crotch-punching line. It was supposed to be violence-funny, not smut-funny.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't get into rooms with guys who say "undie rap" unironically.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)
I will never like Limp Bizkit because the Undertaker used "Rollin'" as his entrance theme and I do not like the particular professional wrestling stylings of that particular individual.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 01:09 (twenty-two years ago)
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST MICCIO HELLO "NUTMEG"! "BOMBS OVER BAGHDAD"! "STAN"! "COUNTRY GRAMMAR" EVEN! ARGH ARGH ARGH PUT AWAY THAT TELLTALE PAPER BAG WITH THE WAVY LINES EMANATING FROM THE TOP PLEASE
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 02:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 June 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 03:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 June 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)
1) divine styler - purple delicious saplings of vulnerable soprano ninjas2) through 14) all tracks from jay-z - the blueprint15) amg - bitch betta have my money 200116) picture of eminem
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 June 2003 04:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 26 June 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 26 June 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 26 June 2003 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 26 June 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 26 June 2003 06:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Thursday, 26 June 2003 06:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 26 June 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)