R.E.M. "Around The Sun" - the verdict

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So, album's leaked now. What's your verdict? I'm only on song 2, sounds like more of the same so far. Hookless, Reveal pt. II.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Fucking hell, Q-Tip IS on the fucking third track!

I thought that was a silly rumor.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Track 3 starts like Mariah Carey's cover of "Without You". The piano that is, Stipe has yet to deliver a dolphin squeek. Hook is missing. I think. What's wrong with HOOKS, R.E.M. guys? "Bad Day" and "Imitation of Life" were great - they had HOOOOKS!

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

No, no it isn't a rumor. Alas no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, that's what I said. Regardless, my favorite track so far. Doesn't say much though. Oh, except the single.

And it's track FOUR that starts like Mariah.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

FINALLY something remotely non-ballady. Track 7, Wanderlust. Still not hooky enough.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah fucking bring Q-Tip back on.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Stanley, I didn't really NEED an excuse to not listen to a new REM album, but you are giving me one anyway.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 September 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

You're more than welcome, Scotty.

Stanley Brody, Sunday, 19 September 2004 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

the single is pretty weak....is Q-Tip rapping? Radio Song II?

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Sunday, 19 September 2004 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a pretty bad record, and I really like REM anyway. Stipes voice has gone totally, he sounds just plain BORED on most of the songs which seems to exacerbate the whole lack-of-hooks problem.

The Q-Tip bit is basically him rapping over a slowish 80s soft rock thing - it took me completely by surprise as the song actually seems to end just before it, and then starts up again. Its not very good but not as awful as KRS-1 on Radio Song.

Electron Blue is nice though. And the first half is quite pretty in a way which may grow on me hugely. Second half mostly just plain clumsy and tedious.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 19 September 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

who's got this on slsk?

Josh Love (screamapillar), Sunday, 19 September 2004 22:28 (twenty-one years ago)

wtf rem wtf

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 19 September 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I’ve managed to hear about half of it and actually think it’s quite all right. The instrumentation is scaled back considerably. The songs are tighter. The singing, less lazy. The lyrics less over thought. The new drummer adds a little more bounce. The Q-Tip bit is pretty subtle, and the production is really clean. I’m liking the last song right now. But again, I've only managed to hear about 35 minutes of it. There's still another 20 or so that could drag it down.

danh (danh), Monday, 20 September 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the most depressing thing about this whole affir is that here we have an ILM new album thread with...14 replies in total, compared to, say 167 or whatever 2 days after the JAXX opus last year.

it's all rather sad, and i was soooo hoping it wouldn't go this way.

news that they would be headlining next year's lancs. cricket ground gigs was front page news in manchester's local paper mindyou.

come back monster-era all is forgiven.

piscesboy, Monday, 20 September 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

come back monster-era all is forgiven.

I never thought I'd agree with such a sentiment, but here I am.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 20 September 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

REM are doing adult contemporary much better than Sting is doing it.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 September 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

yes but adult contempo plus Twista > adult contempo plus Q-Tip

Al (sitcom), Monday, 20 September 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"The most depressing thing about this whole affir is that here we have an ILM new album thread with...14 replies in total"

But most posters here, for whatever reasons, are very un-optimistic about an album that they have not heard yet.

It's not so depressing. I mean, it's their thirteenth album. I like REM, but I can't say that I'm super excited about it either. I certainly don't want a "return to Monster days," though. To me, that was their worst period (though not all that bad). Up and Reveal are, I think, better than Monster and New Adventures.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Would Out of Time and Automatic for the People be considered Adult Contemporary? Just curious as to what the criteria are.

danh (danh), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Blasphemy, New Adventures is the only exciting record they've put out since Automatic. Note that I'm not saying "the best," it's uneven as hell. But it's undeniably exciting, and it takes some risks, and it's not afraid to sound a bit shaggy (as opposed to Monster, which was supposed to be hard-edged but ended up plodding).

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

This album should've been titled Autopilot For The People.

This is the first R.E.M. album that I've ever not liked at all. Reveal, as boring as it is, had some decent songs on it. I could respect Reveal. They're just phoning it in now.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I like 'em, but I don't see how "The Wake Up Bomb" (5:07), "Undertow" (5:08), "E-Bow the Letter" (5:22), "Leave" (7:17), etc. ("Low Desert?") could not be considered the most "plodding" batch of REM songs ever. (Have not heard new LP.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)

they sure ain't the dullest

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a real love for New Adventures in Hi-Fi but I seem like I'm in the minority....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Part of the problem is that I don't understand what they wanted from this album. I get Reveal - they were going for a summery, light, lush record, but ended up with something that was mostly lifeless and overbearing, production-wise. There are some worthwhile songs, but it's a failed experiment for the most part.

This record just doesn't work. "Electron Blue" is halfway interesting and is by far the best song on the record, but if it were on Up (much less one of the classic albums), it'd just sound like filler. "Leaving New York" and "The Boy In The Well" aren't terrible, but are just too sappy and overwrought. "Leaving New York" in particular sounds like something that they'd play in a 'dramatic episode' of Friends or something. "The Outsiders" at least sounds like they were trying, though it's not very successful - it's too drab and plodding. Q Tip isn't totally cringe-inducing, but the 'now we are playing a hip hop beat' that starts just before he comes in definitely is. Sorry, nice try. Respect to Q Tip for being brave enough to rap on an REM album, though. Jay-Z and Ludacris probably didn't return their calls.

(It does make me wish that they just went all the way and hired out Lil Jon to do some kind of perverse crunk song - "Skeet In The Place Where You Live!")

Most of the songs just plod along, daring the listener to care. They aren't catchy, but they aren't devoid of melody. They are theoretically pop songs, but it's just a lot of numbness.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

"Leaving New York" elicited the same thought process in me as "Imitation of Life." "Ooh, nice pre-chorus buildup, it's going to be awesome when the chorus kicks in. (10 seconds later) Hm... Oh well, after the second time, I guess. (40 seconds later) Wait... shit, that WAS the chorus."

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I think "Imitation Of Life" has one of the better choruses of their late period - 'that's sugar cane, that tasted good...'

I understand what you mean, though - the production is so cluttered that it almost blurs together. Their songs keep getting more droney and less dynamic. That's a big problem for them.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Right, but "that sugar cane, that tasted good..." part ends on a hanging (dominant?) chord that's normally used to heighten expectation; a sense that the melody is going to go somewhere, except it doesn't. See "Bittersweet Me" for the same thing done right - the pre-chorus ends on the same hanging chord, then the real chorus ("I couldn't taste it") kicks in.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i enjoyed reading about them in the trouser press guide to alternative records

amateur!!st, Monday, 20 September 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

(X-post) You're right. The chorus ends on the dominant chord and then there's a "deceptive cadence" where it goes to the vi chord for the return of the verse. That melisma that ends the chorus over the dominant chord is gorgeous, though. The melody EXHAUSTS ITSELF with that long melisma before the tension is resolved. (And, of course, the tension never does resolve with that deceptive cadence).

"'Leaving New York' in particular sounds like something that they'd play in a 'dramatic episode' of Friends or something."

Exactly! That's why it's so great! I mean, it is that, but it's that DONE WELL.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i think REM's just found themselves absolutely stuck in a weird middle ground - they don't want to revert back to the looser, more ramshackle sound of their early days or the anthemics of their middle period for fear of sounding like an oldies nostalgia act, but at the same time they're afraid to fully embrace cutting edge, modern-day sounds for fear of making total asses of themselves.

as a band, i think they've evolved too much over the course of their career to ever do the former (this isn't like some post-punk heroes emerging after a decade-long hiatus just to prove they can play the exact same songs just as well as ever)...however, i really love to see them do the latter, certainly not in the "Lil Jon remix" sense, cuz they would look like asses, but just the idea of Stipe singing over Prefuse 73 beats or something would at least be tenfold improvement on the noxious tastefulness of Around the Sun.

Josh Love (screamapillar), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

tastefulness has a bad rep

amateur!!st, Monday, 20 September 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Josh Love 100% OTM

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

the great beyond is one of their best choruses of recent years.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah normally i think "tasteful" is WAAAAY overused as a diss on ILM (see: Cee-Lo's latest wtf) but in this case I can't think of a more applicable term.

Josh Love (screamapillar), Monday, 20 September 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

no, i see what you mean. dave marsh made the same criticism of them back in 1993 IIRC

amateur!!st, Monday, 20 September 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Though I know exactly what "tasteful" as an insult means and use it all the time, I'm wondering whose taste this actually is. But then I realized - I know. It's this guy.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

That review gives the author plenty of opportunities to misspell "acoustic."

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"They don't want to revert back to the looser, more ramshackle sound of their early days or the anthemics of their middle period for fear of sounding like an oldies nostalgia act, but at the same time they're afraid to fully embrace cutting edge, modern-day sounds for fear of making total asses of themselves."

I really doubt that they're consciously calculating their style. I'm sure they just collect instruments and equipment that interests them and play around, trying to write songs.

And they're good at it and that's why I like 'em!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think that R.E.M. were trying to make anything particularly cynical with this record, but I have no doubt that their anxieties about the relative failure of their last three albums shaped the music of this record. I think that they had a lot of pressure to create something commercial, both from the label and within the band. I think that they are reticent to be 'experimental' now, but also feel a sense of "well, let's just do what we do," lowering their own expectations for their output and yielding a lot of "so what" songs.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, you're romanticizing the process a bit. Lately, most songs start as Buck's complete instrumental demos that he mails to Stipe to put vocal melodies over. Then in comes Mills to flesh out the arrangements.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

is it just me or does "Leaving New York" sound remarkably similar to "Losing My Religion"?

frankE (frankE), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

It's just you. It's in a major key, for chrissakes, and twice as slow.

"Bang and Blame" sounded awfully like "Losing my Religion" (Em-Am).

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Joseph, I don't know how your description of their songwriting process negates what I said about it.

Matthew, I hope what you say is not true. Their albums have been hugely successful in Europe. I'm sure they've brought in a lot of money.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

And, of course, even so, trying to write a hit record does not automatically equate with bad (hence "Leaving New York").

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

It's just you.

i hear the same strum pattern then and a lot of the same inflections in stipe's voice in it.

frankE (frankE), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I am finally ready to admit that REM are not a very good band.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

There a melodic similarity in the way the choruses start. ("Leaving New York never easy" similar to "That's me in the corner.")

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder if there was a clause in their contract that would've required them to give back a shit load of money if they didn't deliver. Cuz I can hear no reason for them to stay together.

I always remember Peter Buck saying that his band was capable of making an album as good as Astral Weeks. Each passing release proves him more and more wrong...

frankE (frankE), Monday, 20 September 2004 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

So basically this is their boring return to roots "All That You Can't Leave Behind" but prolly missing a song as good as Beautiful Day?

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 20 September 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

(X-post) They made a number of albums that were in league with Astral Weeks when they first started.

One of the keys to making an album like that, of course, is the lyrics. And Michael Stipe hasn't been delivering something like that. Doesn't mean I don't like what he does.

(Not x-post): It's a "return to roots" album? How so?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 September 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

After hearing tracks off the new album I'm convinced that they are creatively beat and running on fumes. They sound tired, they *look* tired. They need to make proper mistakes.

mzui, Monday, 20 September 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

They made a number of albums that were in league with Astral Weeks when they first started.

Buck never thought so. I don't really either.

frankE (frankE), Monday, 20 September 2004 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

and i like them (ie. the earlier stuff) a lot, too.

frankE (frankE), Monday, 20 September 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess you're right. They should aim that high.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Matthew, I hope what you say is not true. Their albums have been hugely successful in Europe. I'm sure they've brought in a lot of money.

Well, whenever they talk about it, they seem very proud of their European success (and they should be, really), but it's always brought up in a defensive way in the US press - "yeah, but "The Great Beyond" is our biggest hit ever in...England, Reveal is huge...in Italy!" I don't think people in America take that stuff very seriously, because we're all used to "but we're big in Germany!" jokes. America is ultimately the big important market to crack, especially for American bands.

I don't hear much of any similarity between "Leaving NY" and "Losing My Religion."

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think that this album is anything like All That You Can't Leave Behind, except for in a "way below average lyrics" sense. All That You Can't Leave Behind is a finely tuned machine created for total commercial domination. It was an album meant to put asses in seats in stadiums, and it worked. Almost anything on that record could have been a big chart hit. This is just not the case for Around The Sun - "Leaving NY" is the only thing that is obviously a single (well, "The Boy In The Well" has a decent chorus, but the rest of it is pretty plodding and not particularly radio friendly), the rest of the album just hums along aimlessly. It sounds as though it was designed to be played in the background.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

**I have a real love for New Adventures in Hi-Fi but I seem like I'm in the minority.... **

For some reason I picked this one off the shelves for the first time in 5 yrs recently - what an album! I must've not taken notice at the time, because this is a revelation. A fair bit of postpunk stuff going on there - Wire (obv) and Joy Div (that track with the rumbling drums that sound like Atrocity Exhibition - what's it called). But that's not really why I like it so much - it's the choruses and melodies. HUGE!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes! We've converted another one. Seriously, this album is ripe for mass re-examination.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I love Hi-FI too. Parts of this new album remind me of Hi Fi, but with all of the catchiness and interesting stuff taken out.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I like New Adventures more than any of the other Warner Brothers albums, I think. I just appreciate the range and diversity within the album - the way no two tracks really sound anything like each other and yet they all manage to be these big stadium-friendly creations. Shame so few of them were ever played live.

The one with the rumbling drums would be Undertow - right?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

My problem with the Boy In The Well is the same problem I have with the rest of the album - the backing sounds tossed-off while the vocal melodies sound incredibly laboured, like Stipe is trying to force something out of largely prosaic backing and failing.

Aftermath is the one that strikes me as a potential single, and I quite like the Final Straw and Electron Blue as well. Everything else, meh.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

They played "Undertow," "Binky The Doormat," "Departure," and "Wake Up Bomb" very frequently on the Monster tour, and "Electrolite," "So Fast So Numb," "E-Bow The Letter," "Wake Up Bomb," "Low Desert," "New Test Leper," and "How The West Was Won And Where It Got Us" have all been played a lot on the tours for Up and In Time.

I'm okay with "Aftermath." That's one of the better songs, for sure.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)

That's it Matt - Undertow!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

(Okay, what I meant is that they never played Be Mine when I really wanted them to)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually saw the one show where they played "Be Mine." It was at the Tibetan Freedom Concert in DC. Thom Yorke sang lead.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a real love for New Adventures in Hi-Fi but I seem like I'm in the minority.

I have a real love for New Adventures in Hi-Fi but I seem like I'm in the minority.

I love Hi-FI too.

This really is their best album since leaving IRS and may even be better than most of the ones previous. It's certainly the one that has gotten the most play in my house over that time. I don't see how anything other than "e-bow" could be called plodding -- and even that accusation falls apart on closer inspection. long != plodding. but i think it's the first time since he went for clarity over mud that stipe's lyrics worked consistently entirely across an album. i also wonder what bill berry's contribution was here.

frankE (frankE), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

The thing with Hi Fi is that it's just so listenable - it's not constructed like an album, but more like a mix cd, which is a major bonus. Most other R.E.M. albums are cohesive to a fault, and seem somewhat monochromatic, whereas Hi Fi is like a best-of record of entirely new songs.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I've listened to the new one a couple of times now and it has the same problem the last few have had. There is a decent ten-song record in there but there is too much dead weight. A couple of songs near the end sound like Up rehashes. One sounds like a rewrite of Parakeet, a song I never liked in the first place. If they could edit themselves at all, they would have a decent 40 minute record that top me sounds like the record the Go-Betweens would have made right after 16 Lovers Lane if they didn’t split for a while (Nowhere near as emotionally relevant however). I do like the sparseness of the record, however. It all sounds very pleasant, but yeah, I’d have liked some more emotional punch to it.

danh (danh), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

There's just as much stylistic variety on any of REM's other Warner Brothers albums as there is on New Adventures.

Joseph, you were calling Monster plodding. I don't see how it's more plodding than New Adventures. Seems less so to me (and yes, that is partly a matter of length).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone else seen the video for 'Leaving New York'? It's so 'Lost In Translation' it should open with a shot of Michael Stipe's bum in a pair of tight pants.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 25 September 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Nice to see all the Hi-Fi love. I really haven't listened to them at all in years but that one grows in my estimation.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 25 September 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I leant New Adventures... to someone ages and never got it back. Periodically I tell myself I should buy it again - I remember really liking it.

Rasputin Kitten (Nick Southall), Saturday, 25 September 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Your identity is once again mutating.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 25 September 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Another thing that makes Hi-Fi great - and more diverse-sounding than just about any record they did before or after - is that they banged it out during a tour. It's basically a somewhat sweetened live album, with half the songs done during soundchecks. They will never be able to repeat such casual approach as a trio.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 25 September 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone else seen the video for 'Leaving New York'? It's so 'Lost In Translation' it should open with a shot of Michael Stipe's bum in a pair of tight pants.

What is the best way to poke out one's mind's eye?

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Saturday, 25 September 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

A prenatal lobotomy.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 25 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"They will never be able to repeat such casual approach as a trio."

Why is that?

Good to see all the Up and Reveal love coming from myself.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 25 September 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Later that day...

I was just listening to Reveal. I have no idea why someone would say that there is ANY qualitative difference between this album and that alleged masterpiece, Automatic for the People.

R.E.M. obviously became a muzak group on Out of Time. Monster was an ill-focused attempt at becoming a four piece rock band again (but still a good album). New Adventures in Hi-Fi was the transition album (back to muzak land!).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 26 September 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Pitchferk review a couple of days ago (album given a 5.2) focused a lot on lyrics. Criticisms about the lyrics being banal. I still haven't heard the new album, but Michael Stipe's lyrics for a long time have been character sketches. The first person characters in the songs are often (always?) not him. You can't criticize sentiments expressed by characters in the songs as though they were Stipe's own poetic sentiments.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with that. If you're going to criticize the lyrics, that method isn't really a good one.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

just listening to it, for a second time only.
huh, i had the fear it'd be as faceless and dumb as the frikken 'reveal' (worst evah rem-alb in my book still, no competition). well the new one sounds slightly more decent ...whether by a narrow or not-so-narrow margin, i'm yet undecided.
"final straw" does remind me a bit of "let me in", however...

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

New Adventures in Hi-Fi was the transition album (back to muzak land!).

have you ever actually listened to this album?

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. It was mostly a rock record like Monster, but "How the West Was Won etc.," "New Test Leper," etc. were the "transition back to muzak" tracks.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a strange thing to say, since "How The West Was Won" is one of the weirder songs that they've ever recorded. It's not a rocker, sure, but it's not a very normal song.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

It's also one of their best album-openers, methinks.

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I love that piano solo in the middle. It's easily one of the best things Mike Mills has ever done.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

xposts

"new test leper" and "how the west was won" would not work as backgroud music. they both have a hell of a lot more lyrical and musical substance to them than what would usually be pigeonholed as muzak.

while, i can totally hear "leaving new york" in my dentist's office. i can totally hear most of reveal and up while waiting in line at my bank i don't think any of new adventures would work in similar settings.

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

btw, i love the bass in "new test leper".

frankE (frankE), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I hear you guys. I'm using the Meltzer, Aesthetics of Rock definition of muzak: rock and roll moving into studio production, hi-fi listening pleasure music. It was a long time ago, but he was calling things like Blonde on Blonde muzak. And surely Beach Boys/Van Dyke Parks, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand the point of using outdated reference points like that.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think it's outdated. I see their first five albums as rock and roll records, more or less. I see a transition to "muzak" occurring after this. Out of Time is, I think, their first full-fledged "muzak" album in the Meltzerian sense. Automatic for the People is also muzak. As I said above, Monster seemed like an attempt to make a rock and roll record again. Whether or not New Adventures was a transition (I DO hear it more as a rock record like Monster), their first two post-Bill Berry albums feel like muzak again to me.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I do think "New Test Leper," "How the West Was Won," and "Electrolite" can easily work as music for banks, btw.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"How the West Was Won" as music for banks --HAHA!

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Wells Fargo!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

That'd be a pretty cool bank.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyhoo, from Around The Sun I'd rather lose (at least) "I Wanted To Be Wrong" and "Make It All Okay". Which wouldn't make it all okay but...

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

When I was in high school, I worked at a supermarket where actual instrumental Muzak versions of R.E.M. songs were played regularly. Off the top of my head, I remember "Man On The Moon," "Everybody Hurts," "The Sidewinder Sleeps Tonight," "Shiny Happy People," "Pop Song 89," "Stand," "So. Central Rain," "Don't Go Back To Rockville," and "Can't Get There From Here" being played quite frequently.

If the tracklisting of Around The Sun were up to me, it'd be:

01 Leaving New York
02 Electron Blue
03 Animal
04 I Wanted To Be Wrong
05 The Boy In The Well
06 Aftermath
07 Wanderlust
08 Final Straw
09 Ascent Of Man
10 Around The Sun

It still wouldn't be that great of an album, but it'd be easier to take for sure.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 7 October 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I have never really like REM. And now, I'm just glad that I don't have
to do any catch-up. 'Up' almost worked. If they had cut 'Up' by a third, and added one more catchy tune it would have been a great album. Oh well...maybe Stipe should buy a toupee.

The TAO that can be Posted is not the TAO! (The Tao that can be Posted is), Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw REM play last weekend, and they were very good. Which makes me repeat my constant recommendation: no more overdubbing, godddamnit! Just write the songs, head to the studio, and record live. Stipe can record as many takes as he likes, but the other guys should just keep it raw. Or call in some new producer, like Dave Fridmann, to add some life.

Fridmann, Mick Harvey... hell, get Lindsey Buckingham to produce! That would kill the overdub rule, but I bet the results would sound great.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 8 October 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I agree that they need a new producer. The guy who did the last three records is just not right for them. I don't know about David Fridmann - his signature sound is all wrong for R.E.M.

I'd recommend that they work with the Spoon guys. Their production style is really minimal, and emphasizes clarity of composition and well-recorded, prominent percussion. That's exactly what they need.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Friday, 8 October 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

New Adventures i bought on considerable special, as though REM, going under the radar with the cover etc. were testing their fans, and so too many CDs were manufactured and so many were dumped in NZ

then i bought Up and Reveal under similarly situations -- 3 months after release -- discount table -- priced to go

it makes me think that REM with their contract from at least Up but possibly back further are allowed to dictate distribution. The Clash forcing their record prices down led me to buy Sandanista! for an inflation adjusted US$0.5 and LOndon Calling had also been sold at a Clash adjusted price.

to me, they recognise they're rich enough and so relese their music and just avoid taking a loss, or maybe run albums at a loss, as vanity projects (!) -- artistic cruise control -- especially if the album is leaked as here

i think they'd be happy for expenses to be covered and then at that point just give away their music -- and i don't think they give it away or not depending on their own aesthetic feelings about their work, or guess that it's "good" or "bad" -- maybe they have to produce one good album in five (a bit like the Luis Buunel setup)

whatever, i don't think they care about the norms of the corporate rock machine anymore having delivered $$$$$$ with Monster and Automatic, aren't obliged to meet target sales levels etc -- radiohead can spout "no corporate logos" and support Napster for one album and then "get difficult" but they haven't made enough money yet whereas REM seem to be the real deal with slow insidious strategies of ideas dissemination, as if this is the "contractual obligation two singles" album in the scheme -- i'm just guessing (and don't for a moment think radiohead are in the same league any way anyway)

(i have not bought the new album for another two-three months for obvious reasons so _have_ _not_ _heard_ _it_ -- i don't have access to the "leaks" -- this is all just speculation)

certainly MOR music will get picked up by many more radio stations, keeping REM brand as reminder to all the "rites of passage"-based occasional fans they can rely on for occasional pickup -- "Wake Up Bomb" was perfectly produced and a great song but too negative sounding for mass airplay (as predicted in the songs title) -- i assume they would wish all their songs to be wake up bombs and operate on that basis (but obv. mostly avoiding the deliberate "fallout" of that song) -- REM as careerists impress me and so i hope they can produce such a "bomb" that can be dropped on their potentially u2 sized äudience elegantly (unlike their peers u2)

george gosset (gegoss), Friday, 8 October 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

How is "Leaving New York" doing on the U.S. charts? It seems to be getting far more alt-rock and "authentic rock" radio station airplay than anything from the last four albums or so where I live.

It seems like maybe it's their time again. They were old news for a while and now maybe they can be in style again.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)

All I hear about the album is bad buzz.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha yeah, 2 stars on AMG. Yikes.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

What I've heard of the album is OK. I like the single. It can't be as bad as 'Reveal', surely?

They're still, like, the greatest.

Ally C (Ally C), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Compared to whom?

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

It is so so much better than Reveal. So much better. They still can't self edit though. They really haven't since Bill Berry became uninterested.

danh (danh), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Or before: New Adventures in Hi-Fi.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Thats when he became uninterested.

danh (danh), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

The Berry-being-crucial-element thing is patently obvious.
They've managed maybe three up-to-Berry-era-par songs by my count since he split. They were my favorite band before that...

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Daysleeper
2. The Great Beyond
3. Imitation of Life
IMO, in case you're wondering

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

DUDE WHY YOU NO LIKE UP AND REVEAL AS GOOD MUZAK ALBUMZ?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

They're not up to snuff dude. I mean they're ok...

Oh, and people need to stop saying "At My Most Beautiful" "sounds like Brian Wilson". It doesn't. It sounds like a pile of shit. Fuck that song.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Compared to Out of Time and Automatic, which you also refer to as Muzak, they ain't so good. Not even close to other musak albums you cite such as Blond on Blond and Brian Wilson things.

danh (danh), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

OTM

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad you said they're OK, Aarnon! I still don't really see how they differ so much, qualitatively, from Out of Time and Automatic for the People!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

songwriting

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a grain of truth in what you guys are saying. There are certainly more whopperz on Out of Time and (especially) Automatic for the People. I like whopperz! But the lack of whopperism on the last two albums doesn't mean that there isn't just about as much enjoyable musical material on there.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

As someone upthread put it, they're like dish washing music. Or housecleaning music. Not "Oh I love this!" music. There is nothing to latch on to.

I blame it on Michael Stipe singing lullabies. There are a few great moments on the new one where his voice takes on some drama and it hearkens back to something they once had. A fly by the seat of your pants aggressive kind of thing. But it's there very intermittantly these days. Musically, I like Reveal and Up just fine. Vocally, all I can say is they're kind of pretty.

danh (danh), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

If their music is going to work as muzak, they've got to go whole hog. Someone upthread, I think, commented on how generic the new album cover is. For a muzak album, that's a good thing!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I like the cover, but then, I like the photographer, so.

danh (danh), Friday, 8 October 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Looks like a Postal Service album. (And now we have our answer for why they're getting more airplay on this one!)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 8 October 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

radiohead can spout "no corporate logos" and support Napster for one album and then "get difficult" but they haven't made enough money

uh, i'm pretty sure Capitol/EMI's made a fuck load of money off of their world wide radiohead deal.

They've managed maybe three up-to-Berry-era-par songs by my count since he split.

OTM, though the key word there is maybe

frankE (frankE), Friday, 8 October 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I really like 95% of "Up," and some of "Reveal." But listening to this new one has been like pulling teeth, if pulling teeth were boring. Maybe something will click later on. Really, who gets Bill Riefin to play drums and then chooses to wimp out (even further)?

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 8 October 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael Stipe fronting a Hootie cover band!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 8 October 2004 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

why not document deterioration ? honest call-in from REM, from where they're at ? (or document facets of american society)

if they can define a new "intelligent" ambient or MOR music by using MOR/am heuristics in surprising ways, they're still open to a much wider audience

i say : get the fans back (like you had them in '95 with the "whoppers" Monster, Automatic & Out Time) and once you have them listening to you at the 50,000 festival gig, do something really weird/ interesting/ punk, like i-dunno, howabout Stipe singing in falsetto like Barry Gibb ? and singing new non-abstract styled odd stories -- straightforward vocal stuff that aggresively addresses the audience using simple repetetive words and mantras -- "Paperback Writer" type songs (in falsetto) ?

really, stipe's word association is still much more aesthetically pleasing than most rap, but i think the audience would like less whining and sarcasm -- the audience does not trust Stipe, trust he earned but now needs to reclaim -- as for the "can't be bothered" tone, leave that to under-achievers sonic youth

i wish they would dominate world pop again and i wish the world had gone with REM rather than u2.

george gosset (gegoss), Saturday, 9 October 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

REM were never meant for the world. It was a long joke.

Ally C (Ally C), Saturday, 9 October 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

That's true. Every moment they spent as Rock Superstars had a weird cognitive dissonance about it. It's not that they didn't want to be this big - it's more like they feel the fame obligates them to be VERY NICE to all these NICE FOLKS who buy their records - a reaction real "rock stars" very rarely have.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 9 October 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I've finally heard it. Funny, I was the most optimistic one on this thread and I was still a little cynical about this thing. Turns out that it's a massively great record after all, full of whoppers. There's some stylistic continuity from the last two albums, yes, but it has a stronger overall scope than any album since Automatic for the People. Seemingly, their best album yet and I must say that I find the reactions on this thread (by a lot of people who are fans of one degree or another) to be utterly baffling.

Is anyone with me on this???

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)

No.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

"Leaving New York" is the first song since the '80s that has almost made me want to become an R.E.M. fan again...

Here's a live review I posted on the Springsteen thread:
http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/pscholtes/2004/10/12

Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 19 October 2004 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, you are so bizarro.

I've come to really like some of the songs - "Electron Blue," "The Boy In The Well," "Wanderlust," "Aftermath," "Around The Sun" - but I can't fathom anyone seriously thinking that this is the band's best work. You've heard Green and Document and Fables Of The Reconstruction, right?

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"I Wanted to Be Wrong" doesn't make your list? "Leaving New York," "Make It All Okay," "Final Straw," "High Speed Train," "The Ascent of Man": none of these make your list? If you're not big on Up and Reveal, I can see not liking "The Outsiders" or "Worst Joke Ever" (I do!), but that's only two songs on the album!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I forgot to mention "I Wanted To Be Wrong." That's a very good one.

"Ascent Of Man" is just okay. I don't hate "Leaving NY" or "Final Straw," but I don't enjoy them.

I don't like "Make It All OK," "The Outsiders," "High Speed Train," or "Worst Joke Ever" at all. If they weren't on the album, I wouldn't feel so icky about it.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The only song that I really love on the record is "Electron Blue."

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

COME HOME TO R.E.M.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Right now, when I listen to the album, I pretty much toggle between "Electron Blue" and "The Ascent of Man" and back. "High Speed Train" is pretty weak (the verse and the chorus are the same vocal line!) up to the Middle Eastern solo, which redeems it.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Christgau reviewed it for Blender and he seemed to like it (though he only gave 3 stars).

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

he seemed to like it more than the last two but less than anything before those.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh high speed train and ascent of man make this records for me. Along witht the last song. Actually the only really bad one is Worst Joke Ever. the rest are pretty good to blah. Final Straw being pretty blah. Make it all OK however is a great great glam ballad that sounds like an homage in the same way their Beach Boys rips do.

danh (danh), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, what does this mean? it has a stronger overall scope than any album since Automatic for the People

Specifically, speak to how it has a stonger overall scope than New Adventures in Hi-Fi, k? tnx. bye.

frankE (frankE), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. I think that the songwriting is stronger than it has been on any album since then. I think that the songs, on the whole, are more STYLISTICALLY DEFINED and less generic than on any album since then.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

pffffffffffffffffft. see my comments above.

frankE (frankE), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 01:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I remember your comments, Frank. New Adventures in Hi-Fi is a good album. I think ALL of their albums are good. But, yes, I do think the songs are stronger on this one (on the whole) and that the album is considerably more stylistically diverse and compelling as an album programme.

So there.

Re. album sequencing: Notable that Reveal and Around the Sun have both been shorter than New Adventures and Up. Did they really pull off a compelling longer album length programme that well on New Adventures and Up? (I actually think Up pulls it off a little better!)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)

A couple of reviewers whose opinions on the album share some commonality to the ones I'm expressing here:

http://www.flakmag.com/music/remats.html
http://www.indielondon.co.uk/music/cd_REM_around_sun.html

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
Was this album another big success in Europe? Number one all over the place?

I wonder what the critical reaction was to it over there. Not in England, but in the rest of Europe. Was over there in November and heard "Leaving New York" twice on the radio and I just thought, "Yeah, REM makes sense over here."

It's also interesting that Geir Hongro likes this album.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, I love REM, from "Wolves, Lower," all the way through "Electrolite." I'm sorry, but Around the Sun sucks.

wendell gee, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

around the sun and reveal are both available used like super cheap at my local record store, but i can't bring myself to buy reveal again, even for 2.99, much less buy around the sun for 5 something.

i probably will, even though i'm discovering where tim's tastes and mine diverge. i think i might agree with tim more if i knew r.e.m. were self-consciously pursuing lounge as a new pop perversion. i'm not convinced that they are.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Apart from "The Outsiders," how is this album any more "lounge" than any of the stuff they've been doing since Automatic for the People (with the exception of "the rock and roll record")?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

the rock and roll records you mean

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

No, I'm talking about Monster. New Adventures was part Monster Part Two and part Return to Muzak Land.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

We had a discussion of this matter upthread!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Also: Monster has "Tongue."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i've been reading the thread backward - i thought reveal was a complete and utter lounge record, and not an engaging one at that. i think thati was done in by their reappearance on unplugged in '01. i still have it's cringeworthiness on tape somewhere.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

It took me a while, but I came around to liking a majority of Around The Sun. If I wasn't invested in REM for most of my life, I probably wouldn't have put the time in, so I can't blame people. It's not their best work, but "Around The Sun," "Electron Blue," "I Wanted To Be Wrong," and "Ascent Of Man" are wonderful songs, and most of the others are at least good. I expect more from them, but it's not as bad as people make it out to be. I would go so far as counting "Electron Blue" among my favorite REM songs ever.

I really love about half of Reveal. "I've Been High," "Imitation of Life," and "The Lifting" in particular.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yay!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see much lounge in Around The Sun. About half of the record is them in default folk-rock mode, and the keyboard songs are actually more like some weird notion of adult contemporary. I usually describe "Electron Blue" as being like Peter Cetera in a sci fi movie. I kinda like them like that, I really wish that the whole record was more like that song and "Ascent of Man."

One thing I really like about post-Berry R.E.M. is how the lyrics are so often about being enthusiastic and hopeful for the future. There's this warm, open-hearted optimism that I find very rare in other music. It's always been there in Stipe, but now he's really embraced it. So many of the songs are like kind advice from a good friend.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

They made a pretty big mistake by not releasing the song "Around The Sun" as the first single. That would've been a smart move.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, it's like "Man On The Moon" part III.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"Electron Blue" kind of bombed as a single, it seems.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)

that's what you get for trying to bite icehouse's style

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

WHO KNOWS MIGHTA BEEN HUGE IN EUROPA

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, "Electron Blue" is a lovely song but maybe not a very good choice for a single.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 02:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I would have voted for "Aftermath."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Aftermath was single number 2, no?

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"Aftermath" was the second single. It actually was a pretty decent hit on adult album alternative radio in the US. "Leaving New York" was a total dud. They didn't even bother to service "Electron Blue" in America.

I think that if they wanted to, they might be able to revive this record a bit if they pushed "Around The Sun" or "I Wanted To Be Wrong" and pushed it on another tv promo tour and played a series of small theatre shows in America. They need to stop playing such large places - when the tickets move slowly, it makes them seem like big has-beens. If they play small rooms and become a hot ticket, it's so much better for their reputation.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Around the Turd"

57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
If this album had come in some sort of fantastic, colorful packaging, would the critical reaction to it have been totally different, praising it to the skies?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)

I don't know, maybe but not too much. The packaging did kinda suck (certainly slick in a way that doesn't seem right for the band), and if it was better, it certainly would've made some people give it a better chance, but even still, there's an adult-contemporary/AAA-ness to a lot of the songs that would've turned a lot of people off no matter what.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

I heard the album before I saw the package and it didn't make it any better.

Brett Hickman (Bhickman), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

SORRY, I'M STILL ASLEEP

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

What if they also wore different clothes?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

Shitty packaging sure didn't hurt Out Of Time

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

in fact boring-ass artwork and dumb clothes have kind of being a reliable constant

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

like my typos

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

I like Michael Stipe's stage clothes. Not the white suit so much. But when he's got the stripe and the black outfit, he looks fantastic.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

Fables of the Reconstruction: Best REM art and worst album.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)

Murmur: Best REM art and best album. Well, definitely best art, anyway. Love that kudzu photo esp now that I live in the South and see it all over.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

My favorite R.E.M. album covers are for Automatic For The People, Monster and New Adventures In Hi-Fi. The rest are all okay, but those are pretty great and memorable.

I love Stipe's taste in suits, but I could do without the make-up.



Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

Packaging does tend to color the music and the starkness of this cover does tend to permeate the songs, so maybe. It'd be nice to see some of the single covers but I could imagine a much stronger impression for Around the Sun (the song) and some of the other standouts with bright colorful packaging.

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

"Shitty packaging sure didn't hurt Out Of Time"

But every situation is different. Somehow, people bought that color scheme and those graphics as a representation of that music. I don't think they bought the sort of Postal Service modernism as a representation of the music on Around the Sun.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Yellow and gold = Out of Time. also the artwork is very much of the time. it's hard to look at and not think early 90's PC liberal optimism.

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

But no one buys music cuz the packaging is ugly. If that were the case, then Neil Young would be Scrawl or something.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Er, no one buys music because of its cover art, I meant.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Do you really think that cover art doesn't have any affect on how people think of the music on an album and, ultimately, on an album's sales?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

No doubt cover art does affect our response to the music, but I suspect it's macro. For example, Neil Young's shitty cover art signifies his 100% devotion to sloppy brilliant music.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

People buy Yes albums for reasons other than the covers? Pshaw.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

I think the Around the Sun cover art plays into the perception of the album as loungy. It's not really that loungy.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)

Or I should say that it's kind of loungy, but they could have had a better branding of their lounginess.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

four months pass...
I wonder the extent to which this album would have been received VERY differently if they had merely left off one song (and replaced it w/ something else, obviously): "THE OUTSIDERS."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

But no one buys music cuz the packaging is ugly. If that were the case, then Neil Young would be Scrawl or something.

Wait. What?

I keep making my self by imagining "The Outsiders" with a spoken intro where someone says "Hey. I can't find nuttin on tha radio" to which Q-Tip replies, "Uh. Yo, turn to dat station." Cause that would totally fucking rule.

martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)

That should be "making myself laugh"

martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Probably not that differently, Tim.

Interestingly, it seems like a lot of the hardcore Murmurs.com type REM fans really love "The Outsiders."

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

What are the other tracks on the album that are objectionable to people who like albums like New Adventures in Hi-Fi, but hate this one?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

The songs I cannot bring myself to enjoy at all are "Make It All Okay" and "Worst Joke Ever." Everything else is either good or at least so-so. Well, I'm not crazy about "High Speed Train" either, but that was better live.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

Well, you're someone who actually kind of likes the album, though. What about other people who like an album like New Adventures but hate this one? Which songs other than "The Outsiders" are objectionable?

I think there are songs on New Adventures that are worse than either "Make It All Okay" or "Worst Joke Ever."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)

Nothing they've done is worse than Worse Joke Ever.

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)

Just sounds like something that could have been on Up to me.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

That song is a tuneless dirge, ruined by the thoughtless bleating spewed on top. It's the most unlistenable thing they've done. But again, I like the record so my opinion doesn't really apply. (But yes, it sounds like Parakeet, their second worst)

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

"Electron Blue" and "The Outsiders" are that record's only interesting songs to me.

Chris O., Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

It's not my favorite song on the album, but I certainly like it more than tuneless dirges like "Leave" and "Low Desert."

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

listening to this now for the first time in months. probably for the last time ever.

Hookless, Reveal pt. II.

otm. so bland. perfectly inoffensive AAA smooth pop. and, since they all go nowhere, the songs are at least a minute too long.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)

ya know, i read an interview a long time ago where stipe (i think) was talking about how each member of the band kept the others in check. he specifically cited berry's urging to change the lyric to "disturbance at the heron house" (from "hang your freedom fighters" to "hang your freedom higher", if i remember correctly) cuz the original was too heavy handed. i dunno if he was the only one doing this, but man, someone needs to take these guys and tell them how much they absolutely suck now.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

god, this album is so easy to ignore.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

Is it the instrumentation/arrangements you don't like? I don't get talking about the songs on this album being hookless and going on too long while praising New Adventures in Hi-Fi!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

Nothing they've done is worse than Worst Joke Ever.

100% OTM

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

he specifically cited berry's urging to change the lyric to "disturbance at the heron house" (from "hang your freedom fighters" to "hang your freedom higher", if i remember correctly) cuz the original was too heavy handed.

"Welcome to the Occupation," actually.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

Tim should join R.E.M. He's got more charm and personality than Berry's replacement.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

Thank you, Alfred.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i knew that was coming. "leave" is 7 minutes long and i fucking love it. maybe it was the circumstances of recording hi-fi that made it different, maybe it was berry's prescence, i dunno, but this is so damn flat in comparison. not the only thing, but a huge part of my problem with around the sun is stipe's delivery. he doesn't seem to feel or even cares about the stories he's singing. plus buck's few guitar efforts are so perfunctory. like, oh, i need a 5 note solo, shrug, here ya go. that shit started with monster. dunno how hi-fi avoided it.

"Welcome to the Occupation," actually.
right, thanks!

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

im a big fan of new adventures and while there is nothing overtly objectionable on Around the Sun there isn't exactly anything inspiring, either as a pop music fan or as a long time REM fan. New Adventures had like 7 songs which were compelling and exciting enough for me to want to listen to again, and because they are spaced throughout the album, it encouraged multiple listens.

There have been less compelling songs with each succesive album, and thus less reasons to give each album a shot, despite the interesting sonic pallete they've grown into.

Since Bill Berry left they have usually had one "Classic REM" sounding song per album, (Daysleeper and Imitation of Life), as if to say "hey we might sound different but we're still the REM you know and love", but on my few listenings of Around the Sun I can't find one song that sounds like "REM", or even that has a great hook that gives me any sort of feeling. it just seems so uninviting.

I think it might be because Michael Stipe makes his melodies uneccesarily complicated, or at least unnatural sounding. Its like they aren't songs anymore, but notes that his voice plays.

but maybe its just because i don't want to put in the effort, because being an REM fan just doesn't seem that urgent. but pop music shouldn't take effort.

brontosaur, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

I really think "I Wanted to Be Wrong" is classic R.E.M.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)

Anyway, the thing about Stipe not being connected to the songs is interesting. I find him ... funnier and more bizarre here and maybe there's a sort of inhuman aspect to it. He dresses like an alien onstage.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

And there's a COLD aesthetic here that goes with this, right? The album cover, making muzak records again ...

Monster and New Adventures are WARM records.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

i wouldn't call New Adventures warm. its got some warm songs on there but i'd say the overall impression of that album is cold. not as cold as around the sun though.

brontosaur, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

Granted, I hate Worst Joke Ever, but beyond that, Around the Sun has more hooks than anything since HiFi. The melodies are trending towards lazy if anything, but I count 9 songs with easy hooks, no problem.

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

Agreed.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

well, they must not be good hooks, or else everyone wouldn't bemoan the lack of them.

or maybe everybody really just wants their REM with lots of upfront rockin' guitar, but are just too "open-minded" to admit it. i think most people were quite happy with Bad Day and maybe it just primed the audience for the wrong sort of thing.

brontosaur, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)

I really think "I Wanted to Be Wrong" is classic R.E.M.

I agree with this statement. I'd say the same of the title track as well.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

I maintain that the two biggest problems with R.E.M. on the last couple records is that they are too eager to go crazy with overdubs and end up making decent songs sound flat and drab, and the drums on every album since Berry left sound stiff and are mixed waaaaaay too low. They need more backbeat and better percussion. It's amazing how much better the songs from Around The Sun sound when they are played live.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 23:52 (twenty years ago)

I don't know if it's too many overdubs, necessarily. Out of Time and Automatic for the People are just as dense.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

But there's a great drummer and songwriter with whom the band had real chemistry, Tim!

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 10 November 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

I agree that the Around the Sun production is a little lifeless, though (although I think this works with the inhuman muzak thing ... OK, I'll stop).

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 10 November 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)

We've gone down that road before a little - the idea that they miss Bill Berry's songwriting input. I don't know. I don't know as that people have made a convincing case for this by identifying the stuff that Bill was responsible for (and, obviously, I think they have written good stuff since he left).

Anyway, the point was not about the material on Around the Sun (which some seem to like and some do not) so much as the production and the idea that it could have come out more lively somehow.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 10 November 2005 00:27 (twenty years ago)

I think they are okay without Berry The Songwriter (Mills, Stipe, and Buck are all gifted songwriters, that's not the problem as far as I'm concerned), but are still not over the loss of Berry The Drummer. I think they tried to dodge the issue of drumming as much as they could on Up, and opted to make percussion part of an overall "lushness" on Reveal, but they couldn't hide it on Around The Sun. My feeling is that since there is no one in the trio who seems to REALLY CARE about drumming, they just think of the percussion on the albums as being a purely functional thing.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 10 November 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

I keep checking back with this album and the results are the same: I love "The Ascent Of Man," "High Speed Train," tolerate "Electron Blue" and about 80% of "The Boy In The Well" (the chorus annoys me)... That's it. No amount of repeated listening makes me like anything else.

That said, I'm looking forward to the next one. I'll never learn.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 10 November 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

i listened to most of this album again last night, and this time i sort of skipped around and mixed it in with older REM, so it wouldn't all sound quite so same-y, and "ascent of man" seemed like a grower and "electron blue" was a little peppier and better than i remember it.

and i noticed that it really doesn't sound too crazy different from older mellower REM songs, just more lifeless. i think whoever said Stipe's vocal delivery is the problem might be OTM.

like,"i wanted to be wrong" while the verses sure as hell sound like "classic REM", the song as a whole seems flat and drab, which seems like a fairly new phenomenon for REM.

although, i don't hear how "around the sun" sounds like anything REM has done pre-UP, but maybe i'm just being dense.

speaking of UP, it has songs which i think are superb )"why not smile") and pretty damn good ("at my most beautiful") which would fit on this album and are way better than anything on this album, so its not like the lack of Bill Berry is the problem.

anyways, i really want to like this album, maybe i'll try it on headphones..

brontosaur, Thursday, 10 November 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

I used to be a hardcore REM-maniac, which waned little-by-little from the release of Monster, but this is the first of their albums I haven't bought. Is there anything on here actually worth bothering with, a single song to download?

From what I've heard (acccidental exposure at Borders during the time of release), I thought "The Outsiders" and "Electron Blue" sounded like the most vaguely non-boring tracks. The Q-Tip bit, it's not terrible, it's just not particularly interesting.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Sunday, 13 November 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

five months pass...
Revive!

Around the Sun is a step forward because it is a move away from the Up/Reveal aesthetic. Post-Bill Berry, R.E.M. bought into a vision of alt-rock albums as bland modernist sonic hodgepodges a la Radiohead - a sort of treatment of alt-rock in its recorded form as electronica, but lacking whatever modernist appeal was actually going on in techno during these years.

They are so talented that they transcend this aesthetic context a lot on Up and Reveal with really strong compositional materials (especially, I think, on Reveal, on which Michael Stipe moved away from the longer narratives on New Adventures in Hi-Fi and Up and the songs tightened up as pop structures). But the aesthetic context of those albums - that bland alt-rock electronica - is important and I believe that people's opinions on these two albums hedge a lotl on their feelings about that genre.

Around the Sun is bland, too; it's basically a blander version of Automatic for the People. But I think R.E.M. are a really good muzak group and muzak is an area where they can excel, whereas they seemed more like dabblers in the whole *treatment of alt-rock as sonic hodgepodge electronica* thing.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 17:58 (twenty years ago)

Who knows what they'll do next, though? I'm not sure I buy into Matthew Perpetua's vision of them doing a more stripped down rock album with the guy from Spoon producing or something, though. Didn't they already sort of fail at attempting to acclimate themselves to current alt-rock styles with Monster and with Up/Reveal? It seems to me that Matthew wants them to act like an indie rock band instead of acting like ... whatever they were acting like on Monster or what I outlined above about what I think they were doing on Up/Reveal. But R.E.M. could lead instead of follow and muzak is an area where they can lead. Yes, it would be nice if they found a way of doing it that is less bland than Around the Sun.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 18:11 (twenty years ago)

Hi, Tim.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 18:24 (twenty years ago)

: D

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 18:40 (twenty years ago)

please, not this again.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Wednesday, 3 May 2006 19:02 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.