simon reynolds reviews 679's grime comp 'run the road' for the observer

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Various Artists: Run The Road

5 stars Simon Reynolds on a collection which proves that grime is US hip hop's true heir
Simon Reynolds
Sunday November 14, 2004

The Observer
Various Artists
Run The Road (679)
£13.99

Grime is our hip hop, the final coming of a Brit rap that's not merely a pale reflection of the original. To American ears reared on 'the real thing', grime sounds disconcertingly wrong - the halting, blurting MC cadences don't flow, the gap-toothed grooves seem half-finished and defective.

But if grime doesn't have a hope in hell with America's hip hop heartland, right now it's got the edge over 'the real thing'. The records sound cheap'n'nasty next to US rap's glossy productions, but grime's way with rhythm and sound is far more jaggedly futuristic. More crucially, grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that's de rigueur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don't yet have because it's also so much more within reach.

As a sound, grime is still very much an underdog, and so its fantasies of triumph and living large are much more precarious and affecting. There's a definite ceiling to how much money can be made on the underground scene. Selling 500 singles is a result, shifting a thousand is a wild success; nobody in grime, not even Dizzee Rascal, has really mapped out a crossover career path yet.

You can hear all this in the music, in those pinched, scrawny voices - the sound of energy squeezing itself through the tiniest gap and grabbing for a chance that no doubt will prove to be a mirage. All of the guys (plus occasional gal) on Run the Road already feel like legends in their own minds. Standout track 'Chosen One' by Riko & Target distils that sense of destiny and destination. Over sampled soundtrack strings, Riko imagines himself as a star on satellite TV, then offers counsel that applies equally to other aspiring MCs and to street soldiers dealing with adversity: 'Stay calm/ Don't switch/ Use composure, blood/Use your head to battle through, cos you are the chosen one.'

American rappers, once they've made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms. From grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they're really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow. Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach, but, though outnumbered 20 to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on 'Unorthodox Daughter', promises to 'put you in Bupa' and warns, 'soundboy, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'.

Possibly the best grime collection yet, Run the Road is also touted as the genre's first major label compilation. Actually, a Warners sub-label released one - Crews Control - in 2002. But its contents were more like proto-grime, the beats mostly two-step and UK garage, and the vibe far more playful and genial, courtesy of now almost forgotten crews like Heartless and Genius. Their brand of boisterous bonhomie and quirky humour is in short supply here. One exception: Lady Sovereign's 'Cha Ching', on which the squeaky-voiced 'white midget' announces, 'It's Ms Sovereign, the titchy t'ing/ Me nah have 50 rings/ But I've got 50 things/ To say/ In a cheeky kind of way/OK?'

If grime ever does makes it, collectively, these past three years of the genre's emergence will be regarded as the golden age. Make no mistake, the MCs on this compilation - Kano, D Double E, Riko, Sovereign, Dizzee, Wiley - are our equivalents of Rakim, Chuck D, Ice Cube, Nas, Jay-Z. To twist slightly the words of another rapper from that American pantheon, Notorious BIG: if you (still) don't know, get to know.

Burn it: 'Chosen One'; 'Cha-Ching'

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

by the way, i know he doesnt like hip hop but at least get the biggie quote right at the end if youre gonna go on about how grime is the 'real uk hip hop' or whatever.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

TWIST SLIGHTLY

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

(cough)

so who's got 679's new grime comp - run the road?

piscesboy, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

"To twist slightly the words of another rapper from that American pantheon, Notorious BIG: if you (still) don't know, get to know."

ok, i didnt read the first part of this sentence properly.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

With Reynolds continually referencing UK hip hop as being "our" in his think-piece review, isn't there any irony somewhere as I'm sure Reynolds' is American - is he not?

Also, as with every other musical sub-genre that has sprung up in the last 15 years, how is it that Reynolds seems to be the first journo to attempt to capture the first wind of something and champion, whether it good or bad, or not even a genre to start with???

Personally, I think grime is a more tokenist brand than anything before it. Really!... you can go back to many points in UK hip-hop and brand it "grime" (what of Shut Up & Dance, London Posse, Hijack, Cash Crew, etc..etc).

I like to be ahead of the commerical game and strike early in a genre's birth, but, c'mon, grime? Is that the best "you" can do?

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Reynolds lives in the US with his American wife but is British by birth and lived in the UK until the mid-90s, I believe.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

er no simon reynolds is from hertfordshire but lives in new york

reynolds maybe the first journalist to use brand it "grime" (and i dont think he is) but that doesnt mean he invented the term! genre names have a life outside of the press, a style of music doesnt need to be validated by an artcile to give it official recognition. the term "grime" came from within the scene and people using it now outside the scene (eg us, journos etc) are doing so because the people making the music and involved started off calling it that. i remember when people moved from garage to "grimey garage", and from then on it just got truncated. its not the best "you" could do, because "you" didnt do it.

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

whoops xpost

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

in five posts this thread has become the single worst most inll-informed thread on ilm and that really is saying something quite spectacular.

by the way, i know he doesnt like hip hop

sheer idiocy - read some of the man's work rather than spouting nonsense that you read on the internet. he's actually quite a big fan.

isn't there any irony somewhere as I'm sure Reynolds' is American

no he's not. he's english.

Personally, I think grime is a more tokenist brand than anything before it. Really!... you can go back to many points in UK hip-hop and brand it "grime" (what of Shut Up & Dance, London Posse, Hijack, Cash Crew, etc..etc).

ummm... this is quite mental. it's an important and fertile scene in london and no shut up and dance cannot be labelled as grime. the name has been pretty much accepted and it's a very specific brand of mc-led urban music (not quite hip-hop, not quite garage, not dancehall but with roots in all the above).


stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

god i hate this board

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

SUAD made a few proto-grime tracks (No Doubt) tho, heh heh

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Was "Snot Rap" grime?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The Ragga Twins - proto-grime then?

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i think SUAD can be quite easily linked to grime.

hardcore - SUAD/ragga twins -> jungle -> grime

most grime artists claim jungle and UKG as equal parents to the scene/music.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - what i meant was that i dont think reynolds likes UK rap. london posse might be anomalies in the UKHH pantheon but their first album was as original as anything grime has made for it's time.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

well it helps to say what you mean in the first place, if indeed you did mean that.

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

the SUAD link's simpler than that, 'No Doubt' sounds much like '183 Trek'

it was listening to Gunshot's 'Apocalypse Bass' that actually got me thinking 'woah this could almost be now' but perhaps i was just hearing what i wanted to hear (i haven't heard THAT much grime after all)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

yes yes yes, of course old hardcore and jungle and ukg are *LINKED* with grime (this is not news) they just can't be referred to *AS* it. please accaept that i am correct. i know it goes against the grain here, but just this once humour me... it's nearly xmas, after all

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

you and your crazy 'spherical world' theories

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread = "Why Dissensus Is Necessary" part 379.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i feel really bad about saying this, and a bit ashamed, and maybe im just out of the loop or something, but am i the only one slightly underwhelmed by run the road?! i love listening to certain grime tracks, and pirate shows, and even sidewinder cds that ive got copies of, but something about RTR just doesnt seem as exciting as the other stuff ive heard and all the hype would have me believe. i cant be the only one who doesnt love every single thing about grime unreservedly!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Titchy don't think that just because we don't start ten threads about this or that piece of grime which underwhelms us that we're not underwhelmed by any grime tracks or artists. But what's the point of talking incessantly about stuff that isn't so interesting? If I don't like a grime track I pretty much stop listening to it rather than start a crusade about it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone remember Speed Garage, progressive house, artcore, ragga-jungle, 2-step, etc... Grime just doesn't have the staying power to convince itself that it's a worthy genre unto its own!

Sure, it might throw up some classics within the next year (as every sub-genre does) but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up; especially when you still hear the influence that trip hop, 'Ardkore, breakbeat or early drum'n'bass in tracks even today!

Grime is a cast-off to any urban form before it but, ultimately, it will wither on this never-ending, name-brand vine.

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone remember Speed Garage, progressive house, artcore, ragga-jungle, 2-step, etc... Grime just doesn't have the staying power to convince itself that it's a worthy genre unto its own!

Oh yes it does.

Sure, it might throw up some classics within the next year (as every sub-genre does) but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up

Oh yes it is.

Grime is a cast-off to any urban form before it but, ultimately, it will wither on this never-ending, name-brand vine.

Oh no it won't.

Have you heard the recent Dizzee record? Have you ears?

Jay Kid (Jay K), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

"but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up"

who gives a shit? stop reading mags and blogs! stop confusing discussion of the music wit hthe music itself!

oh no, its a really short lived genre! that immediately invalidates it! i want it to do, real soon! things that drag on are often (thoughb not always)...a drag! i can fully guarantee (although i have been saying this for a couple of yeasr now) that in 6 months/1 year/3 years time i will be into something else, and although just cos i am into it doesnt signify whether its relevant, what i am saying is dont get so hung up on how long it is going to be around., that isnt a relevant criticism in my mind.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Herbalizer12, what musical style "brands" are legitimate in your book?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 25 November 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

oops "i want it to do" above, obviously doesnt make sense. it should read "i want it to die", although thats a little too strong. what i mean is, i think that it should last past its sell by date, and if that sell by date, like freshly squeezed orange juice or salad in a bag, isnt very far off, then that is no bad thing. like food products, music that is intense, fresh, flavoursome but that wont stay good very long is no bad thing. in fatc i sort of prefer it (thats not to say that jazz, house etc, the jams and preserves of music arent good as well!)

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 25 November 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Grime is a cuture or a movement more than a sound now. And it's birth and rise has been documented in print for the last three years, it's only recently that 'grime' has begun to find it's home in more mainstream press. But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future.

Chantelle Fiddy, Sunday, 28 November 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

"Make no mistake, the MCs on this compilation - Kano, D Double E, Riko, Sovereign, Dizzee, Wiley - are our equivalents of Rakim, Chuck D, Ice Cube, Nas, Jay-Z."

I'm English and never have I pissed my pants as much as reading this junk.

Like UKG and drum and bass before it, a few names from the 'grime' scene (inverted commas because those at the peak of it don't want to claim that as a badge) will go on to more traditional and mainstream friendly things and then the rest with wither away before the next new 'urban' thing comes up.

It's all so tiresome.

Hip-hop changed the world - grime won't even change London.

Link, Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It already has changed London. We're living it.

Chantelle Fiddy, Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Hip-hop changed the world - grime won't even change London.

Apart from the fact that this isn't actually true, why the fuck should it matter whether grime 'changes the world'? Jesus what a hoary old rockist chestnut. Grime is important to the people who make it, the people who listen to it, all these people living it. That's why it's amazing, not whether the creaky old mainstream rock press picks up on it and sends it stratospheric.

The Lex (The Lex), Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i cant be the only one who doesnt love every single thing about grime unreservedly

Who are these people who love every single thing about grime unreservedly? They don't post here, as far as I can tell. We do have our fair share of irritating devil's advocate types without any semblance of a point , though...

adam... (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 November 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

changing the world = rockist
changing the game = rappist

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Sunday, 28 November 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

change of heart -- lauperist.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 28 November 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

ian christe is so OTM.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"Grime is a cuture or a movement more than a sound now. And it's birth and rise has been documented in print for the last three years, it's only recently that 'grime' has begun to find it's home in more mainstream press. But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future."

nice neither here nor there pacifist PR there......

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"Like UKG and drum and bass before it, a few names from the 'grime' scene (inverted commas because those at the peak of it don't want to claim that as a badge)..."

if youre talking about dizzee, well thats just lame on his part. he just wants to go hip hop anyway and appeal to the hip hop masses so let him. or maybe he just has a diff view of what genres constitute his music.

"....will go on to more traditional and mainstream friendly things and then the rest with wither away before the next new 'urban' thing comes up."

thats silly. drum n bass DID change the world, or the world's concept of rhythm, you can STILL hear its rhythms in millions of other genres and songs. on outkasts last album, andre3000 was THAT recently trying to do something in a D&B rhythm (it was a shit remake of my favourite things but never mind).

and it doesnt matter if grime does or doesnt change the world, whatever that might entail.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

the thing is though, that grime has yet to yield a serious 'grime' hit single in the way jungle had original nuttah or even incredible early on in it's development. why is this?

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

becoz Forward got pushed back

Paul (scifisoul), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

nice to see reynolds admit its hip-hop at last... if i could be bothered i'd dig up that blog post where he said something like "it's NOT hip-hop--END OF STORY, PERIOD, FULL STOP"

bugged out, Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"It already has changed London. We're living it. "

Changed London? Get off the crack, biditch! Other than a tiny part of some way out area of London (that's probably more accurately Essex), it ain't shit. It's no 'sound of the streets'.

Some people will do anything to jump on a fad. Tsk.

The Game, Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

well, as far as the its hip hop thing, id say grime on record, for the most part = hip hop. on pirate radio and at raves, no.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

fwd riddim isnt going to sell shit in my honest opinion. i hate the way the industry works - records get delayed over and over until theyre ooooooooooooold news.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Amen

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah why do think "Pow" will chart really well? i cant see any reason for it to. It might have scraped the top 20 if it had beenm released when there was hype about it, but there isnt even a marketable figure to promote behind it either. (eg its Lethal Bizzles tune, so why are there 20 people mcing on it?!)

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future."

i dont like this sort of 'bow down to the big wig establishment' type of thinking. just cos the OMM cover it, why does that make it more important than if B&S, touch, echoes, or RWD cover it? i mean, the mainstream will likely get up on grime then forget about it, just like they always do. just cos theres a lot of hype about it now, theyre all over it, but well see if theyre still into it when the hype dies. jus cos reynolds (no dis to him as a great dance critic at all) is writing about it for a broadsheet, doesnt mean the scene is validated, or rather it doesnt mean grime persons should feel theyre being validated. that type of thinking fucks underground scenes up when they start looking outside for approval.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but whos looking for approval here? reynolds is writing about grime, and 679 want exposure for thier release, but i think you are projecting motives onto the actual producers and mcs, ie the memebrs of the scene here. Like, wiley seemed to want approval for a bit, or at least some sort of wider recognition, but now he is back on the radio and talking about doign raves and stuff again. People within in the scene want success but that is totally different to approval from the print media etc. if reynolds and the observer want to write about grime, thats fine, but it doesnt mean that the "grime scene" has come to some consensus and agreed "ok lets really push for mainstream approval via the channels of.....the Observer!".

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, no thats not what i meant. i just meant the general attitude that pervades underground music, where people think 'it must be big if the mainstream is on it' or whatever. or rather, where they are more respectful of that sort of coverage than other mags. like when i read shystie was overjoyed at being in the independent, cos there was a time when she would have just been happy to be in rwd.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)

am i the only one who thinks pow reminds them of 21 seconds, in that each MC has only a short space to rap in, and theres about a zillion rappers?!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

well being honest, if peopel want to be featured more in national newspapers more than free magazines in record shops, its not that difficult to understand, i mean even the independent, one of the lowest circulation papers sells about 250000 copies, thats loads more than rwd, nme or nearly any other uk monthly mag. its just about exposure.

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)

the 'anonymous' person indignantly dismissing chantelle fiddy's claims about the grime scene/game - bit of a cowardly obnoxious arse aren't you? why not try backing up your comments properly?

Other than a tiny part of some way out area of London (that's probably more accurately Essex), it ain't shit. It's no 'sound of the streets'.

you think these MCs are coming from Essex? what makes you think that? don't you read the bios? or is it all untrue?

i think things have changed a little. there's a stronger confidence in London MCs since the rise of Dizzee and co., and with that a stronger style...in turn making a stronger artform, image and indeed product. the in roads people like Diz, Wiley, Dynamite, Kano, Lady Sov and the like have been making in the last few years seems largely thanks to the recognition grime has got (in critical circles at least) for being undeniably a powerful and exciting musical movement. whether it makes the same impact rave music or hip hop did doesn't seem that important now tho, because some in roads are being made and that may be enough.

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Sunday, 28 November 2004 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)

has anyone heard the fwd riddim with spragga benz (sp?) (and only him)freestyling on it? I liked most of that; it was fun.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 28 November 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"B&S, touch, echoes, or RWD"

Because the first three sell around 7,000 copies between them a month (and that's on a very very good month). (RWD doesn't really count as any form of critical barometer/exposure indicator as it's an openly payola publication and is thus no more valid than a press release.)

Pikmin, Sunday, 28 November 2004 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

is that true about RWD being a payola mag? i had no idea. but then, thats *all* mags to a degree.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Monday, 29 November 2004 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, the magazine (being free) is openly based on people paying to fill content. I would have thought the writing standard would have alerted people to that!

Pikmin, Monday, 29 November 2004 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Changed London? Get off the crack, biditch! Other than a tiny part of some way out area of London (that's probably more accurately Essex), it ain't shit. It's no 'sound of the streets'.

Some people will do anything to jump on a fad. Tsk.

-- The Game (gamestar...), November 28th, 2004.

Wake up. Grime is huge in London. Grime MCs are street hero's in their ends'. and Chantelle was living this "fad" before you knew what the word grime meant.

martin (martin), Monday, 29 November 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the game means hes from hampstead and his mum has never heard of crazy titch.

l...., Monday, 29 November 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Wake up. Grime is huge in London.

It's bigger in Essex.

Fried Marlboro Sunday Tea, Monday, 29 November 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)

In grime terms Essex follows whatever London does.

martin (martin), Monday, 29 November 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

No I think you'll find London follows whatever Essex does.

Fried Marlboro Sunday Tea, Monday, 29 November 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"Wake up. Grime is huge in London. Grime MCs are street hero's in their ends'. and Chantelle was living this "fad" before you knew what the word grime meant."

i cant stop thinking of the method man lyric "every rap critic, they talk about it while we live it." things are clearly different in UKG land! ;)

essex was home of suburban base. im waiting for someone or a label romford and ilford to make their name in grime like SU did. i think slimzee is from south woodford, if that sort of counts...

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Monday, 29 November 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

No I think you'll find London follows whatever Essex does.

-- Fried Marlboro Sunday Tea (f...), November 29th, 2004.

i'm not sure what city you're living in...

martin (martin), Monday, 29 November 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i work in romford. grime caught on early in essex because thats where the clubs were. romford and ilford hosted a lot of early events so essex does have a part in the story, but the only reason for that is that the areas that birthed it, bow, stratford, forest gate, plaistow, east ham, leytonstone, chingford, walthamstow, etc
are fairly close to the essex borders.

there's plenty of mcs from ilford, essex is chaing demographically. its still racist but theres more and more black people in ilford, dagenhnam, romford etc which obviously is changing those areas. blah etc

l., Monday, 29 November 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

mr blungblung: nice to see you and i are living in the same city...

martin (martin), Monday, 29 November 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Changed London? Get off the crack, biditch! Other than a tiny part of some way out area of London (that's probably more accurately Essex), it ain't shit. It's no 'sound of the streets'.

jesus christ people are so fucking rude here it's unbelievable sometimes - and that's coming from me (as many of you know my school careers advisor was right on the nose when he strongly urged me not to join the diplomatic service).
so, first of all nice to see you posting on this thread chantelle, and above all talking a lot of sense. martin, luka; as ever, props for same.
now, down to business... i'd be really interested to know where exactly titchy and that other obnoxious tit who posted the above remark actually live - gonna enlighten us, ladies?
my bet is that it's quite likely not where this stuff happens and can be heard blasting out of every other car window.
although this is probably going to have hordes of internet lunatics descending on me in paroxysms of carmodyesque fury, claiming that i'm a nazi or some other shit, it's pretty important when you're talking in terms of the "value" (ugh!), relevance or impact of a pretty localized movement, to at least have seen it in action - gone to a few shops, listened to pirates, had a few evenings out experiencing how things work,finding out who is listening to the music/making it, generally boning up - otherwise you're going to make a knob of yourself.
so what we've all learnt here is:
1) grime is not a massive global scene (does it need to be to be relevant to it's producers and core audience? no. is this in any way indicative of its "worth" or "quality". er... no.)
2) that it's not ramraiding the charts like 2step did (now i know this is important to the popist flock, but it really shouldn't be to anyone with even the most basic critical faculties and a pinch of common sense)
3) that it's not all unequivocally brilliant (for god's sake, what genre can you say that for?)
3) that a piece in the OMM isn't the high point in grime's life (really, i consider all the pieces i've written for newspapers to be the best thing to have ever happened to the artists/genres covered - and if you believe that, well...)
4) that some people with far too much time on there hands still choose not to employ it by actually *reading* a piece before trying to tear it and its writer down and that they're more likely to do this if the writer happens to be well-known/doing their thing for a high-profile publication.
5) that simon reynolds is, in fact, not american
6) that certain sections of a board called i love music really do have something against people who are involved with and care about music (personally i reckon this place should be renamed i love moaning, or i love talking bollocks).
bloody hell, i'm glad i stopped by.

stelfox, Monday, 29 November 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

it's pretty important when you're talking in terms of the "value" (ugh!), relevance or impact of a pretty localized movement, to at least have seen it in action - gone to a few shops, listened to pirates, had a few evenings out experiencing how things work,finding out who is listening to the music/making it, generally boning up

this, btw (before anyone calls me a reactionary elistist gatekeeper or hurls some other daft buzzword at me), does not mean that those who can't do this, for whatever reason, can't still enjoy it, find something in it that touches them or, conversely, even dislike it; i'm simply saying that it's impossible to deconstruct something in terms of its impact when you don't actually know what that impact is.

stelfox, Monday, 29 November 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

In other words...

Essex

Fried Marlboro Sunday Tea, Monday, 29 November 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i live in hackney, not that it matters. do i have to give a street name as well?

as far as the popism thing, it doesnt bother me that dizzee or whoever sells a lot or not - i was merely making a point that its a little strange grime has yet to have that massive crossover 'arrival' hit. but i suppose you could count i luv u (top 20) or stand up tall (top ten).

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Monday, 29 November 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, i didnt even say that, dont know why im trying to explain that one.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Monday, 29 November 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I reside somewhere in the midst of the big ol' area that is Hackney. Where the kids bump Lil Woosie, Wacko & Skip and Lil Wayne. It's trill.

Apologies for any hostility - I just once had the misfortune of having to edit a certain poster's words. It wasn't pleasant - her words were shit.

The Game, Monday, 29 November 2004 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

oooooooooooooooh@that jibe about a certain poster.

i live in well street, hackney. they used to play dizzee's BIDC album in the street sometimes.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Back in the days you could also leave your front door open.

The Game, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

grime is maybe not as popular in hackney as everywhere else in east london (waltham forest, newham, tower hamlets) presumably becuase none of the talent came out of that borough, for whatever reason. dunno if anyone wants to specualte about why that is.

it is pretty massive in the rest of east london, and south loves it up too. the idea that grimes popularity is a myth cooked up by chantelle fiddy is pretty crazy.

l..., Tuesday, 30 November 2004 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)

well you can still leave your front door open (its a nice thing to do when feeling optimistic about the safety of your community). you just cant count on everything being in its right place if you do.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

luka, you're right, grime isn't as big in my 'hood as it is in, say, bow or waltham forest but it's still pretty obviously important. you can hear it played way more than most other stuff, with the possible exception of ragga (and we're not just talking about my living room here). so, as far as i'm concerned, these guys either pay no attention to what's going on around them or should get out of the house a bit more. i've heard some myopic crap on this board before, but for someone to say that a whole musical movement doesn't matter because it doesn't happen to impact *them* is ludicrous. also it appears that the recurring theme on this thread is for people to bitch about people whose job it is to write about music (simon initially, then chantelle). i think it's larely a waste of time discussing music here.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

why take the comments of logged out non-entities so seriously? do the no-good nicks really run this school? oh ILM Elementary, I WILL HAVE YOU BACK AGAIN

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

ive never said it doesnt matter. not once. at its best, grime is amazing. i just have some reservations about it. im finding that i hold similar feeling about it as i do about uk hip hop - a lot of wack MCing with a lot of awkward transplants of american themes and content slung through british mouths, which i just dont care for. sure the accents are british, but if i recited a load of sub-sub-jay-z lyrics through a cockney tongue, it wouldnt necessarily make it any more accurately reflective of life over here (a thorny issue in itself). im not saying all grime suffers from this - wiley, to name one, doesnt suffer from these pitfalls. when grime just sounds like a variant of hip hop or a messy morass of all that falls under the cringy flag of 'urban' music, i have no interest in it to be honest. its why id rather hear my tape of d double rhyming over fast and furious UK-sounding rhythms like he was doing on rinse on sunday night rather than most of his proper tracks.

obviously not all of it is like that, but reynolds claim that grime as a whole has none of the problems UKHH has is a little overexagerated. as for the whole real heir to hip hop thing, wasnt he saying that about jungle and drum n bass a while back?

i only made one comment about reynolds, i love his book. people are quite sensitive about grime i find - sure, this is I Love Music, but there's nothing wrong with discussing things you might not like so much. it doesnt have to be a hippieish love in.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

sure, this is I Love Music, but there's nothing wrong with discussing things you might not like so much. it doesnt have to be a hippieish love in

i don't think there's any danger of that, just like i don't think there's any chance of it becoming i love manners, too.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)

ive seen threads with far ruder comments than this one.

mr m. carlin for one, is a regular champion of I Lack Manners (not that i am necessarily much better of course).

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

oi! amazon.co.uk says that this is not released until january 24. how did any of you people manage to hear it? 515k?

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

no. some of us are legitimately sent records, then we write about them.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, are you? what a special person you must be. i happen to enjoy the same privilege, but warner (679's distributor in my country) just seems to be sleeping on this. also, i wondered why reynolds reviewed it this early, with a price indication and everything.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont mind sending it via gmail to people. fuck this elitist industry shit.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

It was initially supposed to be released this week but distribution/xmas racking politricks arose, hence why some stores will get it now while HMV/Virgin won't until January...
As for the rest of this thread, I'll be back with my two pence worth when I muster the ability.

chantelle Fiddy, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost)

yes, fuck this musicians making a living out of their music shit.

Marcello "I Have Manners For Those Who Deserve Them" Carlin, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

fuck this elitist industry shit

hahahaha! i refer you to the above post where i say:

"before anyone calls me a reactionary elistist gatekeeper or hurls some other daft buzzword at me"

there's something to be said for the predictability of this place.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

is ilm officially hating on file sharing now?

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

It was initially supposed to be released this week but distribution/xmas racking politricks arose, hence why some stores will get it now while HMV/Virgin won't until January...

Thank you for a courteous and satisfying answer.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

People being paid for the work that they do! That's so elitist.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i take that as a yes. dr. dre, lars ulrich, ilm. great company.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Better company than you, loser.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

yay - let's all nick stuff off people who can't really afford it!

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

let the abuse begin!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't believe my own eyes. i think we should call the riaa and make them sponsor the forum. and there's no need for calling each other names. unless you can't come up with anything else.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

"there's something to be said for the predictability of this place."

theres also something to be said for sounding so self aggrandising and pleased with yourself in your ivory tower made from record mailers surrounded by promo cds and 12"s!

i love this place!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

theres also something to be said for sounding so self aggrandising and pleased with yourself in your ivory tower made from record mailers surrounded by promo cds and 12"s!

very well put.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

well, i just think it sucks to pretend you care one way or another anything if you're not prepared to invest something in it - especially when its music and specifically an important record that people *should buy*. i say this regardless of the amount of people i know who were involved in this one way or another. the simple fact is that the people who put this out deserve and those who contributed to it deserve some props and as the music industry only really gauges success acknowledges success in terms of units shifted, for them to get this recognition it's necessary for you to buy it. promos are entirely different - you're not leeching, you are contributing, if you actually use them properly. anyway, you fucking idiots were the ones who where mewling on about grime not having heralded a big mainstream hit. how could it if no one were to fucking shell out fot it?

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

erm ... before you get all worked up and start calling people "fucking idiots" and stuff, maybe i should clarify that i am a newspaper music critic myself, and i wanted to hear the album out of curiosity and anxiousness to convey the merry news to the people. i have troubles getting the album at all, and that's why i asked if anybody knew where to hear it. there's a few songs on it that i haven't heard as of yet.

ANYWAY: let's chill. and i still think that you should lose the "i am a music critic and therefore worth much more than you pirates" stance. maybe that's not what you meant to say, but it came out like that.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i know you are and, as i said re promos, that's a different story.

and anyway titchy, the reason i presumed you weren't from london/england was that it took you nearly three weeks to find the piece that started this thread. why?

anyway, i'm off to my ivory tower (in dalston)

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Dave, do you compensate the artists whose tracks you use on those mp3 mixes you make (btw the last one was very good)?

I think everyone (okay well certainly me) would buy grime stuff if it was AVAILABLE for a reasonable price. I'm sorry the cheapest I've seen any of the Lord of the Decks or Mic stuff is 15 pounds which once you calculate in shipping is an insane amount to pay for any record. . . even if mp3s didn't exist I wouldn't be buying them. I would be getting tapes from friends or failing that NOT HEARING IT OR PERHAPS EVEN ABOUT IT at all. So the idea that by downloading this stuff I am taking money from somebody is silly--THEY WOULDN'T BE GETTING MY MONEY WAY! What being able to download the mp3 ensures though is that when something like Run The Road gets released in the states (and I hope it does) that I am ten times more likely to buy having either a) heard it and liked it or b) heard other stuff like it and liked it. Considering that a huge % of Mr. Rascal's sales (and they were pretty respectable in these parts) have come from people like me who either heard the mp3 of "I Luv U" or were turned onto him by the attendant buzz from the mp3 of "I Luv U", grime seems like one of the worst genres to get pissing about mp3 trading about. Cuz most people aren't looking at grime CDs and going "shit I'm not gonna buy this, cuz I can just download it", we are looking are grime mp3s and going "damn I hope they release something I can actually find."

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

It's turning into handbags at dawn! *Journo's trying to get hold of album, head in the direction of Sainted PR*

chantelle Fiddy, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i have some money waiting for these grime dudes (and everyone else i've acquired music by without purchasing actual CD in shops) if they want to pop round and collect it (please do!)

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

they're not mp3 mixes, really, that makes it sound like *i've downloaded everything! they're made with 7"s that i've paid for! one of the reasons i make those ragga mash-ups is to make the music available to people without sharing whole tracks (and thanks there's a new one coming with better, newer tracks on it coming soon). for american journalists, it will be coming out in the states in february apparently and you should be able to get copies.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:54 (twenty-one years ago)

run the road, that is.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

£15 for a cd and a dvd is pretty good i think. lord of the mic is worth getting. kano is pretty incredible on it. run the road, that looks good but if i could only get one thing i'd get lord of the mics=.

....., Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

dearest dave aka fellow 'fucking idiot', i was on the continent when the OMM review came out so i didnt read it until a little while later, when i found out it was online. sorry for not flying back in time to especially buy the OMM. hope thats ok with you.

and everyone moaning that we shouldnt download or fileshare grime, well then we shouldnt have traded tapes of pirates shows during jungle's reign and definitely shouldnt do that either now then should we? we should have waited for an official box set of pirate sessions! the sharing, and illegal taping is part of what makes it so exciting and its how people get to hear and know about the music. i cant afford to shell out 65 quid each week for ten white labels down uptown records in the west end. i do plan on buying RTR when it comes out on vinyl though. and as far as grime having a big mainstream hit, we meant singles-wise, not albums.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

"for american journalists, it will be coming out in the states in february apparently and you should be able to get copies."

Woo hoo!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

"they're not mp3 mixes, really, that makes it sound like *i've downloaded everything! they're made with 7"s that i've paid for! one of the reasons i make those ragga mash-ups is to make the music available to people without sharing whole tracks"

I'm pretty sure that you are required to pay licensing and royalty fees on tracks that you include in mixes, Dave (whether you've paid cash money for them or NOT)! But perhaps my BMI/ASCAP understanding is a little light in this regard.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

"£15 for a cd and a dvd is pretty good i think."

£15+£5S/H (that's almost $40!?!?--I've never spent that amount of money on a non-boxed set CD) is an insane price.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

for americans in general, i meant - not being elitist here, oh no...

and everyone moaning that we shouldnt download or fileshare grime, well then we shouldnt have traded tapes of pirates shows during jungle's reign and definitely shouldnt do that either now then should we

different thing entirely.

and yeah the mixes aint strictly legal, but fuck it, as i said, it's a nice way of sharing music without giving away whole tracks.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)

$40 is absolutely fuck all to spend on music!

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

hey dave where can i hear your ragga mash-up things?

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"$40 is absolutely fuck all to spend on music!"

Hahaha this is an unbridgeable gap.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

what's $40? £1.63?

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

or maybe a gap between someone who makes a fair amount of money and someone who doesn't? just guessing here ...

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

what's $40? £1.63?

now that's cruel, steve!

Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

£15 for a cd and a dvd is pretty good i think.

no it bloody isn't, especially as I'd have no intention of ever watching the DVD.

honestly, some people and their healthy bank accounts.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Or the difference between living in Switzerland and Argentina.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm doing a new one stevem - i'll gmail it when it's finished

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

the dvd is by far the best bit. i get about £150 a week. im not a music journalist. i'm a carpark attendant. i don't spend £15 every week, i pay it when something exciting comes out. its a lot to spend for something if youre getting it cos you think its going to impress youre mates, its not much for something exciting.

...., Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

£15+£5S/H (that's almost $40!?!?--I've never spent that amount of money on a non-boxed set CD) is an insane price.

technically speaking, they do come in sort of a box, too.

stelfox, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha technically almost every CD comes in sort of a box, Dave.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Worst thread ever. I hope Reynolds doesn't drop by to read this crap.

md, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)


yea its a pretty lame thread. I thought the original article was good.
Cool to see stelfox posting again, too bad it took attacks on Reynolds to make it happen though.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

yup, this thread is pretty craptastic.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

no one's attacked reynolds. quite the contrary in my case, actually.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

it hasnt been that bad - there have been some good points brought up. its just too bad that nobody discussed them in a calm and rational manner.

DVD (dickvandyke), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)

no one's attacked reynolds. quite the contrary in my case, actually.

i refer you back the the first five or so posts. it hasn't got any better.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)

WE NEED NAMES

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i retracted those early posts.

if people have something worthy and important to say about the review, then let's hear it.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)

no one's attacked reynolds. quite the contrary in my case, actually.

Someone said he was American!!! (x-post)

3underscore (___), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, people are quite able to defend themselves if they see fit. i just think this thread is, on the whole, all about people being wilfully contrary for the sake of it and not knowing what the hell they're on about.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

stelfox OTM. This thread is quite bamboozling to read, to be quite honest.

3underscore (___), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)

au contraire, folks, this thread has very distinctly exposed the superiority of certain members of the music press. spotlighting such bad karma can never be a bad thing.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

what's perhaps more interesting is reading the uncut review on Mr Reynolds website...

chantelle Fiddy, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

what, because i said that people should buy records where possible? get off your high horse. this is not superiority, it is plain common sense, especially when major-label subsidiaries actually come under a lot more pressure to perform than cottage-industry indies.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah well, stelfox, it may be that i'm OTT here. but i just got a whiff of bad air from this whole thread.

Jay Kid (Jay K), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

okay, here's the full uncut review/post from the site of sir reynolds.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Did a review the other week for the Observer of the Run the Road comp, this here's the director's cut which conveys more of the flavour of the record:

Various Artists
Run the Road
679 Recordings
* * * * *

Grime is our hip hop, the final coming of a Britrap that’s not merely a pale reflection of the original. Instead it’s a wonky, hall-of-mirrors reflection. To American ears reared on “the real thing”, grime sounds disconcertingly not-right--the halting, blurting MC cadences don’t flow, the gap-toothed, asymmetric grooves seem half-finished and defective. Something of grime’s skewiff quality is captured in the title of this compilation. “Road” is grime-speak for “street”. On “Destruction VIP,” one of the killer tracks here, Kano proclaims “from lamp post to lamp post/We run the road”. The intent is gangsta menace, an assertion of territorial might, but perhaps even to English ears, the quaint phrasing makes the boast fall a little short. American rap fans would most likely crack up on hearing the line. No wonder Grime’s modest fanbase in the United States consists almost entirely of white Anglophile hipsters.

If Grime doesn’t have a hope in hell with American’s hip hop heartland, it can console itself with the knowledge that right now it’s got the edge over “the real thing”. The records sound cheap’n’nasty next to US rap’s glossy production values, but Grime’s way with rhythm and sound is far more jaggedly futuristic. More crucially, Grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that’s de rigeur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don’t yet have because it’s also so much more plausible, within reach. The path is well-trodden--not just selling millions of records, but diversifying into movies, starting their own clothing lines, bringing their neighbourhood crew up with them once they’ve made it.

As a sound, Grime is still very much an underdog, and so its fantasies of triumph and living large are much more precarious, and affecting. There’s a definite ceiling to how much money can be made on the underground scene. Selling 500 singles is a good result, shifting a thousand is a wild success, and even hawking your white labels direct to London’s specialist stores with a huge mark-up won’t generate that much cash. At the same time, nobody in Grime, not even Dizzee, has really mapped out a crossover career path yet. Indeed, making that transition from pirate radio to Top of the Pops is risky. Take So Solid Crew, who got to #1 with “21 Seconds” a few years back. Their second album flopped and their rep on the street (or should I say "road"?) is now non-existent.

You can hear all this in the music, in those pinched, scrawny voices--the sound of energy squeezing itself through the tiniest aperture of opportunity and grabbing for a chance that most likely will prove to be a mirage. All of the guys (plus occasional gal) on Run The Road already feel like legends in their own minds. Standout track “Chosen One” by Riko & Target distils that sense of destiny and destination. Over majestic sampled movie-soundtrack strings
Riko imagines himself as a star on satellite TV, then offers counsel that applies equally to other aspiring MCs and to everyday street soldiers dealing with adversity: “Stay calm/Don’t switch/Use composure, blood/Use your head to battle through, ca’ you are the chosen one.”

American rappers, once they’ve made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms. From Grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When Grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they’re really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow. Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach. “Cock Back,” one of 2004’s biggest grime anthems, is a Terror Danjah riddim constructed from the click and crunch of small arms being cocked. Over this bloodcurdling beat, D Double E spits couplets like “Think you’re a big boy ‘cos you go gym?/Bullets will cave your whole face in.” Outnumbered twenty to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on “Unorthodox Daughter”, promises to “put you in Bupa” and warns “soundboy I can have your guts for garters/turn this place into a lyrical slaughter”.

Possibly the best grime collection yet, Run The Road is also touted as the genre’s first major label compilation. Actually, a Warners sub-label released one in 2002, Crews Control. But its contents were more like proto-grime, the beats mostly 2step and UK garage, and the vibe far more playful and genial, courtesy of now almost forgotten crews like Heartless and Genius. Their brand of boisterous bonhomie and quirky humour is in short supply on Run The Road. One exception: Lady Sovereign’s “Cha Ching”, on which the squeaky-voiced “white midget” announces “It’s Ms Sovereign, the titchy t’ing/Me nah have fifty rings/but I’ve got fifty things/To say/In a cheeky kind of way/Okay?” Bruza sounds comic, injecting the Cockney into “Cock Back” with his lurching, Arthur Mullard-like delivery and lines like “you’ll be left in ruins for your wrong-doings”. But content-wise, he’s “brutal and British”, reeling off the usual list of inventively gory acts of revenge. Run The Road’s brand of laughter is mostly the gloating, vindictive kind. Hence the eerie digital cackle, like an evil, leering cyber-goblin, used by Terror Danjah as a motif on all his productions (on this comp, “Cock Back” and Shystie’s “One Wish”). Compared to even a few years ago, Grime seems like it has less scope for goofing about now. There’s a deadly seriousness in the air, possibly influenced by the sense that there’s more at stake--a real chance of making it, now the majors are cautiously sniffing around and signing up MCs like Kano.

If Grime ever does makes it, collectively--achieving the sort of dominance that American rap enjoys--these last three years of the genre’s emergence will be looked back on as the golden age, the old skool. Make no mistake, the MCs on this compilation-- Kano, D Double E, Riko, Sovereign, Dizzee, Wiley--are our equivalents to Rakim, Chuck D, Ice Cube, Nas, Jay-Z. To twist slightly the words of another rapper from that American pantheon, Notorious BIG: if you (still) don’t know, get to know.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now did I really write "these last three years of the genre's emergence"? Wrong. Here's something I wrote and posted on the website back in April 2001, actually tucked away as a coda to an Unfaves of 2000 item on breakbeat garage. After slagging off Stanton Warriors et al, a late surge of incoming pirate data causes an unexpected spike in optimism:

"That said, the last batch of pirate tapes I got, showed signs of a new twist in this breakstep (or whatever they're calling it) direction: not so much jungle-slowed-down, and more like a post-rave, drum'n'bass influenced form of English rap. On these spring 2001 pirate tapes, there's hardly any R&B diva tunes, and every other track features very Lunndunn-sounding MCs or ragga-flavored vocals, over caustic acid-riffs and techsteppy sounds, like some latterday Dillinja production. Unlike with techstep or recent d&b, there's very little distorto-blare in the production, there's this typically 2step clipped, costive feel, an almost prim and dainty quality to the aggression-- a weird combo of nasty and neat-freak. Lyrically, the vibe seems to be similarly pinched in spirit, a harsh, bleak worldview shaped subconsciously by the crumbling infrastructural reality beneath New Labour's fake grin; UKG seems to be already transforming itself from boom-time music to recession blues. The Englishness of the vocals reminds me of 3 Wizemen and that perpetual false-dawn for UK rap. Lots of killer tunes I can't identify, but one in particular stood out that I could: "Know We" by Pay As U Go Kartel. As I say, quite mean-minded and loveless music but sonically very exciting-- a new twist if not quite paradigm shift from the hardcore continuum."

Yes, that shrill, off-key noise you can hear is the sound of someone blowing their own trumpet...

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha for a moment i thought you'd added that last line titchy.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

bad air

i'm making no apologies.
1) people should be at least vaguely polite to one another, especially relatively new posters
2) know what you're on about before trying to rip people or their work to bits
3) buy records when you can - it's a nice thing to do, they're good to own and the people that make them get paid, too!

thanks kids - any wonder i don't come here too often.

also it's considered better to post links to people's blogs, rather than posting wholesale entries on messageboards.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

that's obviously "especially *to* relatively new posters"

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)

if people buy not download RTR then there might be other comps like it by loads of different labels, which means the artists in this genre might start to make a decent living out of their art...

martin (martin), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Martin do you know if Run the Road is being released in Australia? If it is I'll do all in my power to get some editorial for it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

thank you martin.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The mixtapes are about creating a buzz not making money, i'm pretty sure Aftershock for example realise they're gonna make fuck all on the £6 pound Bossman cd, why do you think so many are given away free on radio, at raves, Soundclick etc. I think it's a bit arrogant to take on this crusade for the benefit of the artist. Besides, I personally think most UK artist would be chuffed that some random dude in Australia or somewhere is listeneing to their tune by downloading it for free.

kjkjhjkhjkdsf, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)

scg are you calling me a random dude?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)

(co-opt it Daft Punk -style!)

though I see em listed on Independance, Rhythm Division (and even Juno occasionally)
I've held off on the DVDs too - too many great 12"s to budget between already
but I'd love to see+hear some of my heroes in action

and although the info is here, spread over the grime threads
can anyone recap which of the DVDs are best
and which ones may not be available now ? ta in advance

Paul (scifisoul), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, I don't know about Australian distribution I'm afraid...

martin (martin), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha no sorry! Australia was just the first example that popped into my head. Plus I just realised Martin and Stelfox are probably referring to major label comps, so ignore my comment. But yeah. "Happy Dayz", what a tune!

kjhhhjk, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

to be honest, i dont think posters on this thread are really the ones to worry about not buying it. i think the real demographic to preach that bit of info to would be teenagers. of course, im still waiting for the official download census of 2004 results to come in so......

i think stelfox should have a daily list of rules of things people should do like the three point path to ILM redemption up above. or maybe a daily email of some sort of things we could all improve on. im now starting to see a message board programme like Would Like To Meet on BBC2 called Would Like to Post. dave could be one of the panel of experts.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

4) use less sarcasm

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i really like lord of the mics, paul, but luka owns more of these things than me so will be able to give better info.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Would Like to Post

sorry but that did make me titter

it's too bad every thread with the words 'grime' or 'reynolds' in them ends up like this tho

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

haha. i rest my case.

The old fart formerly known as Jay Kid, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)

pretty much spot-on steve. i just think it's a bit dud to talk about how elitist it is to say people should buy an album, immediately assuming that everyone involved in the production of said record will be quite happy to give it to you for nothing like it's your inalienable right when one of the people responsible for compiling it is posting on the same thread. i'd see it as a bit of a kick in the teeth, personally.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)

"it's too bad every thread with the words 'grime' or 'reynolds' in them ends up like this tho"

people are reacting to all the hype (perhaps more than to the music), thats all.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

dave i think everyone agrees that everyone involved in the production should be rewarded and you're completely right of course.

i don't even know what i am doing here to be honest - i never buy or listen to grime, i only hear a couple of tracks every few months. i suppose like many i am interested in the ideas and concepts floating around such a thing, rather than the actual results (e.g. the lyrics reynolds quotes seem, to me, and isolated from their correct context, dull and unoriginal - but of course with the exciting beats, hooks etc. they constitute an inspiring 'action' and a feeling greater than the sum of the parts. this is what i enjoy about aggressive hip-hop and it's what grime trades on as well as US rap, jungle and dancehall often, based on what i know and have heard). so my apathy is not really the fault of the genre itself but my own condition as shaped by a wide variety of external factors (a certain disillusionment that infiltrates but doesn't quite eradicate my interest and passion for what is or can be pop). not that this is important or anything but i feel like i ought to explain my own behaviour if not just presence on threads with topics and outcomes such as this.

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

all that said i am now very keen to hear the comp and probably even hand over good money for a lousy old CD!

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, "thanks kids". can you believe this guy ...

Jay-Kid (Jay-Kid), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

people are reacting to all the hype (perhaps more than to the music), thats all.

All the hype? A thread, about an album review, in a Music Magazine free inside a UK broadsheet. For something to be hyped it clearly getting a lot lower threshold than when I was a kid.

3underscore (___), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

can you believe this guy

wanting people to show each other a bit of common courtesy and thinking they should have the faintest idea about things before they try to have a pop at them - i ask you! the cheek of it.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"All the hype? A thread, about an album review, in a Music Magazine free inside a UK broadsheet. For something to be hyped it clearly getting a lot lower threshold than when I was a kid."

clearly you either dont live in london or dont read the music press.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

oh stop arguing with everything everyone says, please.

stelfox, Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

hello pot.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 1 December 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I just wanna know if I can start saying Jay-Z is "our" rapper when talking to British posters.

also, do people really agree with this?

More crucially, grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that's de rigueur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don't yet have because it's also so much more within reach.

Is Reynolds' saying that "grime" is hungry but "hip-hop" is not?

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

it's a theme also brought up in this paragraph

American rappers, once they've made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms. From grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they're really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow. Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach, but, though outnumbered 20 to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on 'Unorthodox Daughter', promises to 'put you in Bupa' and warns, 'soundboy, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 2 December 2004 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, that's what he's saying. And as an American who finds himself listening to early '90s rap provided on "GTA: San Andreas" for PS2 and thinking, "Damn, that stuff is so much better than current hip-hop," I tend to agree with Reynolds.

Mr Deeds (Mr Deeds), Thursday, 2 December 2004 06:56 (twenty-one years ago)

clearly you either dont live in london or dont read the music press.

I don't live in London, I do read the music press, and have promoted artists outside of London, Tinchy. I was just pointing as to what the actual topic this thread was about before it got dragged off line. And all in all, it isn't that much hype. Not as much hype as Tesco trying to get me to buy a fucking snow patrol album every time I turn on TV, or the amount of wanking-over and peddling about bono and his lads releasing another mediocre album. So? The press are getting a little excited about something that *isn't* major label pushed, and is resulting in people getting contracts and getting signed. Why the fuck aren't they allowed to get a bit excited about this, even if it dies in flames????

3underscore (___), Thursday, 2 December 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont have the power to stop people getting excited about this, even if i wanted to stop them (which i dont). my point was just that a lot of people, especially those within the media, are going to react to the hype. of course its not on the level of snow patrol - i wouldnt call that hype anyway, thats advertising - but it is still there - you can FEEL it. its no bad thing - i hope RTR sells a million and we get more comps, like we got a decade ago with jungle.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

"also, do people really agree with this?

More crucially, grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that's de rigueur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don't yet have because it's also so much more within reach.

Is Reynolds' saying that "grime" is hungry but "hip-hop" is not? "

yeah, hip hop has lots its hunger. its bloated and fat, with nothing to prove. the south is still incredibly hungry though, just as much as grime artists, possibly more so.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Someone used the phrase 'politricks'? Lord help us all.

Pikmin, Thursday, 2 December 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

No pleasing some people...
Of all the DVD's out there I'd recommend Lord of The Decks 2 as well and Practice Hours. Risky Roadz looks set to be a must-have as well. As for the south, the crunk ethos and style is on a par with grime, totally agree. For me hip hop lost it's hunger a while ago. Like Nas was saying on Channel U last night, this decade so far has been one of the worst for hip hop in terms of originality and creativity.

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-but surely what makes crunk so good is the way it's SO bloated and fat, and revels in that. That's what I hear in it anyway.

I don't like this hip-hop vs grime trope which seems to be developing. I definitely agree that grime sounds 'hungrier' and more desperate, but this does not necessarily make it superior.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

We all want grime to sell a million copies... and then we can bitch about how it's not hungry anymore.

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Like Nas was saying on Channel U last night, this decade so far has been one of the worst for hip hop in terms of originality and creativity.

he said that on Popworld as well, but i thought he was just talking about himself hyuck hyuck (seriously tho, hip-hop is still creative and exciting but it's not a kid (80s) or teenager (90s) anymore so freshness lost in that respect sure but it's all grown up now - those are the terms i think of it in)

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the energy in crunk I find attractive, and it's that same energy I get from grime. I don't think it's about which one is superior, to me it's about what it's saying. They'll be great hip hop tunes and wack ones, same with grime. The hip hop v grime arguement will no doubt continue and become more prevalent because not only is so much of it about the MC but elements of the media want to coin grime the real UK hip hop.

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm I get what you're saying re energy but to me it's totally different energy - über-hedonistic, decadent, wild energy vs hungry, desperate, sharp energy. I like 'em both though so it's all good.

Re grime vs hip-hop, I suppose the minor backlash to "Stand Up Tall" ("oh no! Dizzee's sold out and gone hip-hop!") was a bit of an alert.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

but people said that when he did Fix Up, Look Sharp too

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't see how anyone could say stand up tall was a hip hop record; fix up, i can understand but not that. and lex do you really think crunk sounds bloated? put it against anything else not from the dirty from the past couple of years and, to me, it sounds quite the opposite: stripped down and bleak, like rusting metal and peeling chrome might sound. these sonic characteristics make me appreciate it in the same way i do grime, which i really can't do with any other kind of hip hop (or even dancehall). incidentally, it's also pretty hungry-sounding - if you listen to a good lump of it in one hit, it's really easy to pick out a running theme, too: appetites, be it for booze, violence or booty.

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Crunk sounds massive to me; mainly cos of the vocals, actually, which make even the sparsest production sound maximalist and rowdy (and the vocals are so deliberately dominant as well). (and I don't see how the overall sound is particularly stripped down compared to Missy or Twista or Trina or Snoop.) And appetites, yes, but appetites for more booze'n'booty rather than coming from a position of not having any of it.

listening to Crunk Juice it really is the vocals which I think make me think like this.


The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't see how anyone could say stand up tall was a hip hop record

it's taken on the image rather than the sound perhaps. the video is VERY hip-hop. but they're a combined package to some people.

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

lex, it's not more minimal per se it's just a lot less frilly, a lot more crunches and wallops and less intricacy than there is in anything by tim, jerkins, the neptunes etc.

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I put Crunk Juice on after you posted the first time and I definitely see what you mean. but the key difference for me really is the vocal styles. (to generalise) Lil Jon sounds like he's shouting at strippers, most grime MCs sound like they're holed up in some dank recording studio.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

stand up tall isnt hip hop. forget the video, its way too fast for regular hip hop.

as for crunk being bloated, i dont get how anyone thinks that, crunk is the freshest thing hip hop has thrown up from the US in ages.

xpost - cant believe nas was on channel u!!!

as for this:

"American rappers, once they've made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms."

showtime was very much in that mould. its not like grime doesnt talk about bitches and haters. it does them in abundance. and half the time, it sounds OTT and forced. they could at least do it with some more conviction. much as i like cock back, they sound a bit ridiculous and cartoonish.

"From grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they're really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow."

people used to say this about hip hop - that the boasts and brags were to cover up insecurity. i dont know why its more forgivable here. in a way its worse, cos theyre just apeing american MCs, albeit in a sort of slightly 'british' way.

"Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach, but, though outnumbered 20 to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on 'Unorthodox Daughter', promises to 'put you in Bupa' and warns, 'soundboy, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'."

hip hop always had female MCs to give the guys what they deserved too - salt n pepa, mc lyte, latifah, etc etc. most female mcs now might just be fantasies for men, but they still do stick it to the men most of the time, albeit mainly or only in the sexual arena.

the grime vs hip hop debate is a bit redundant - hip hop still has a lot of good stuff happening. its shot most of its wad, but stuff like the dirty south still makes it exciting. and when theres MCs like Trife from theodore unit still emerging, it proves theres still life in it. nas' new album also shows rappers still have some balls and arent complete parodies. lets not get carried away with grime's alleged superiority over hip hop, its still in its infancy.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, the grime vs US hip hop grandstanding is not much better than insular brit-hip hop heads claiming how much better UKHH is than US hip hop in the last few years (yes these people do exist). its overstating things, especially as so many grime MCS are so reliant on gangsta hip hop ideologies and concerns from the last ten years or so.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"its way too fast for regular hip hop"

it uses one of the oldest hip-hop breaks in the book, fule.

Back in the '80s, hip-hop was faster than it is now.

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"its way too fast for regular hip hop"

it uses one of the oldest hip-hop breaks in the book, fule."

are you referring to stand up tall or fix up look sharp?

hip hop was ocassionally faster in the 80s, and there were lots of fast records being made, but it kinda lost that around 1994.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost, i do like the idea of grime as punk going against hip hop as prog. not sure if its that simple though.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I should clarify that I like crunk because I find it bloated, it's like total over-indulgence to my ears.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Stand Up Tall is a good pop song

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

its sort of like a hardcore/rave type beat to my ears.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

yes titchy but you're playing this too literal. and i think videos CAN be important. as i said, the song may not necess. be hip-hop but the video is.


, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'

this reads like a terrible rhyme! unless it's deliberate

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Surely not hard and pounding enough?

xpost

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"are you referring to stand up tall or fix up look sharp?"

whoops!

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

re: "guts, garters, and lyrical slaughters"

yeah it sounds a bit naff. same as the rhyme 'from lampost to lampost, we run the road'. sounds like a road traffic control announcement. maybe the met will co-opt it for ads.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not a terrible rhyme when you listen to it. looks infinitely worse than it sounds. for the record that's one of my favourite tracks on the comp. she's just so incredibly ballsy and she spits like she's got a *real* beef with someone. it's the most aggressive bit of mic work i've heard in ages (it actually rivals vybz kartel on fa*got correction, his answer to assassin's eediat ting on the stepz rhythm - and he sounds like he's ready to *kill* someone!)

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"From lampost to lampost, we run the road" is a great line, a quintessentially grime boast. So much of the best grime has contained within itself an awareness of the inherent ridiculousness of using prissy English vocabulary and accents to make gangsta-style threats and boasts, but it goes ahead and does it anyway, which I love. Most of my favourite grime MCs do this to some extent, and it's a huge part of Showtime's appeal certainly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually like the line "I'll have your guts for garters", but I can definitely see where rhyming it with "Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter" would strike some people as a bit meh. I really like the line "from lampost to lampost, we run the road", it just sounds so perfectly London. It's a grime line, one you couldn't imagine an American rapper saying, but working beautifully in the context it's used in.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

'stand up tall' is a gd mid-way point between pop and grime as in pirate proper grime.

'and half the time, it sounds OTT and forced. they could at least do it with some more conviction. much as i like cock back, they sound a bit ridiculous and cartoonish.'

er yeah well its cartoonish - what with songs titled like 'pow!' (god I can't actually remember 'cock back', I'm not sure I've heard it grr!). I actually like that (in the two versions I've heard) they don't overuse the 'pow!' shout out tho'. I find the whole 'I'll break your jaw' 'I'll crack your skull' type talk far funnier than 'happy talk' or 'pies'. Would an album full of 'itchy and scratchy' type cartoonish violence with grime-pop beats be too much to ask? huh?

martin make us a comp!

x-posts

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Presumably she said "slarta" though, yeah? As in Slarta John? xpost

I'm momentarily forgetting, what's the song with Crazy Titch and I think JME and Lethal B's "ARGH! LETHAL B's GOT A GUN!" Maybe my favourite grime track of the year (at least on some days), but definitely the best for cartoonish violence.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"martin make us a comp!"

HE DID! That's what this thread is about!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I know alex - I mean a comp of other grime tunes with 'cartoonish violence' theme (reply to tinchy's post - sort of...making a bad late night joke).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter" isn't supposed to rhyme - the next line is something along the lines of "Think I'm an orthodox daughter?/Think I'm an orthodox daughter?"

Jason J, Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

""From lampost to lampost, we run the road" is a great line, a quintessentially grime boast. So much of the best grime has contained within itself an awareness of the inherent ridiculousness of using prissy English vocabulary and accents to make gangsta-style threats and boasts, but it goes ahead and does it anyway, which I love. Most of my favourite grime MCs do this to some extent, and it's a huge part of Showtime's appeal certainly."

yeah i love wileys pies, and dizzee saying 'i havent got the foggiest' but when its meant to sound hard or rude, its almost lightweight. maybe the delivery isnt confident enough but i dont hear the smirk you refer to. i dont know - it just sounds, as reynolds says, too quaint. i never really paid it any attention anyway, until the review. and its just a single line, it goes fine in the song.

the line i did have a small prob with was the one in mic fight about (im going from memory here) 'its just london living, money guns, weed cars and women'. that was a bit lame.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Friday, 3 December 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

four weeks pass...
i should probably preface by saying that reynolds is great before his fans shoot me down, but on his new blog entry, he does admit he has never been a hip hop fan, much less a british hip hop fan, as such, something which came across to me quite clearly in his energy flash book. just thought that might be of interest regarding the earlier (and some later) comments in this thread. i dont think hes even a soul/funk fan either, from some of the other things hes written - i think he has a love/hate relationship with it, which also came across in his energy flash book, as he seems to go to lengths to relate rave and dance to previous eras in rock, but not so much with soul or funk. this is probably just because thats the musical background he came from.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 2 January 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

five months pass...
Find threads from I Love Music, subject contains 'grime'.

72 results found:

DAEREST V1CE MAGAZINE!!!!! (ex machina), Friday, 17 June 2005 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
even we have to admit this compilation isnt that great

vicemagazine, Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

nine months pass...
even we have to admit this compilation isnt that great

-- vicemagazine (vicelan...), October 19th, 2005.


AHAHAHAHA..

Aditya (dan138zig), Monday, 31 July 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

Grime sucks.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)

Mime sucks.

alext (alext), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)

Grindie changed everything.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

he moved away because he saw the way things in this once glorious country were heading. if it wasnt for the erosion of traditional english culture, we might still be able to boast one of its true exponents (mr reynolds, in case you were unsure) right here where he belongs.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:07 (eighteen years ago)

i am pretty sure i saw bruza on the 73 in stokey the other week. he seemed to have a sweetboy jheri perm thing going on. it were odd.

r|t|c, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:28 (eighteen years ago)

Grindie changed everything.
-- Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:51 (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

^^^true

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:29 (eighteen years ago)

This thread = "Why Dissensus Is Necessary" part 379.
-- Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (3 years ago) Bookmark Link

4-5-1

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if nu-look nme will be employing dissensus contributrs.

that would certainly bump its sales.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.