Lens help

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (58 of them)

I think for now I'm a non-L primes kinda guy.

They had a 1DX for sale with only 1 actuation, how is that possible? They must reset just before boxing.

MaresNest, Friday, 21 June 2013 08:31 (eleven years ago) link

two years pass...

What's the current consensus on a Canon walkaround lens? Is it still the 17-55? Or is the Tamron 24-70 the way to go?

arbiter of sorrow (aldo), Monday, 6 July 2015 11:35 (nine years ago) link

what do u shoot

How Butch, I mean (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:55 (nine years ago) link

i mean a true walkaround lens is the pancake 40 in terms of size

How Butch, I mean (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:56 (nine years ago) link

Do you have a crop-sensor Canon? So you mean the Ef-s 17-55/2.8? Not sure 2.8 is really necessary in an everyday zoom - that is a great lens and I've hired it in the past, but if you're never going to go full frame, I would recommend the 15-85 instead. Slower but smaller, lighter, cheaper and the image quality is excellent. Nice to have that extra reach too.

Don't know the Tamron.

Michael Jones, Saturday, 11 July 2015 10:32 (nine years ago) link

I was wrong about price. The 17-55/2.8 has come down by quite a bit since I last looked. Now about the same as the 15-85/3.5-5.6. Just comes down to speed vs reach.

Michael Jones, Sunday, 12 July 2015 12:17 (nine years ago) link

I just bought the 40mm on a whim. I'm full frame now so it's theoretically good for walking around, haven't taken anything other than test shots with it yet but I'm going to use it this week.

MaresNest, Sunday, 12 July 2015 12:40 (nine years ago) link

if you're near London, Aperture have a (Mint-) 17-55mm for £370 at the moment.

http://www.apertureuk.com/Canon_EOS.html

MaresNest, Sunday, 12 July 2015 12:43 (nine years ago) link

Shooting is mainly architecture and portraits (or what would have been disparagingly called 'holiday photos' at one point) I guess. I have a 10-24 and a 70-300 that I usually also carry in the bag so it's really something that I can leave in when I'm away and will be good for 70+% of shots.

I threw the Tamron in because at one point there was talk as far as I can tell through limited digging that the Canon 24-70 was the business but is out of my price range and the Tamron is the affordable equivalent.

And arse, I only left London this morning.

arbiter of sorrow (aldo), Sunday, 12 July 2015 13:51 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.