The camera thread.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (276 of them)

Yep, Ilford was revived by some of the former managers when it was about to fold completely.

milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 01:34 (sixteen years ago) link

B&W 35mm is actually cheaper today than it was two years ago for some reason. Both Ilford and Kodak products are very reasonable ~$3.75US per roll.

milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

That's good to know. I doubt I'll ever be keen enough to set up a proper darkroom again, but I'm still nostalgic for big white boxes stamped ILFORD and the smell of ripe fix.

stet, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 01:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't been in a darkroom since I was a physics undergrad doing x-ray crystallography; I can still smell those chemicals though.

I think I'd trust Ilford to do a better job of developing their own B&W film than I would Boots/Snappy Snaps/Jessops but that's not based on any first-hand experience; those Ilford mailers are about £11 online.

I need to find a manual for the FTb online as I've sort of forgotten how to use it; I know there's a little switch to lock the mirror up but last night I seemed to invoke step-down metering with it (the match-needle went dead and the viewfinder image went darker with each aperture ring click) which I can't recall doing before...

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 08:59 (sixteen years ago) link

three new toys that arrived today:
Kodak Retinette 1A - guess-focus, clean lens and shutter that sounds right-on - a whopping $9
Polaroid SX-70 Sonar - unmodified, and the re-manufactured SX-70 film (Polaroid Blend) is $2/shot plus shipping, so I doubt I'll be using it much
another SX-70 Sonar, but modified to use the current 600 film

I've got an old Agfa Click and an Isola coming from the Netherlands.

milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

The last darkroom I was in was above the archway at 60 Pleasance, Edinburgh, about 10 years ago now; its list of rules included "Do not have sex in the darkroom - we have had complaints." I'd love to have space for my own.

I also still have: fixer-stained jeans somewhere at the back of my wardrobe.

Forest Pines Mk2, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes! I've ruined a pair or two like that.

Our college darkroom was crazy for discovering exotic activities

stet, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

eight months pass...

Cor, has this thread really been dormant for so long?

Anyhoo, me & the missus have taken the plunge into medium format:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3033/2579050056_919ca4e2a9.jpg

Since that picture was taken we've replaced the plain prism finder with a metered one and added a Polaroid back. Anxiously awaiting the results of running some (expired*) Provia 400F and Astia 100F through it. The Polaroids have been variable in quality (using 690, which requires a bit of exposure compensation - it's all I could find on a quick lunch-hour trawl round Soho). This stuff is crazy cheap on eBay now - we paid £26 for the ME prism; they used to retail for about 20-25 times that.

* - part of a set of 41 rolls of expired 120/135 slide film we got on Freecycle; and if that didn't get us back into shooting film, acquiring the below - also for nothing - a week or so later definitely did:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2297/2374962333_04fef02c44.jpg

(The 430EZ Speedlite didn't work terribly well with my EOS 300D and now has a new home; I have a 420EX flash now, another eBay bargain).

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:40 (fifteen years ago) link

I was only talking about getting into medium format with some flickr pals last week. I love the - well I'm not sure of the word, but maybe 'depth' is the right one? - that you get. Quite apart from the fact that the cameras look cool.

Looking forward to seeing your results.

Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Sitting in a friend's garden on Sunday, I took the prism off and was kinda amazed at the clarity and three-dimensionality of the image coming through the focusing screen. You can see why waist-level finders are so popular with these cameras. Surely we can find one of those for a fiver?! But then we're back to guessing the exposure...

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Love my old Bronica SQ-A, haven't used it in some time except for a few slides since I don't have darkroom access or a scanner. But oh how I miss 6x6.

I prefer the waist-level finder and guessing exposure - with color neg or B&W, you've got plenty of leeway. Or you can pick up an incident light meter cheap ($25-100), meter a patch of light that's similar to whatever you're shooting (assuming you can't meter directly at your subject).

milo z, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I <3 medium format

I just bought one of these

http://www.leicagallery.com/images/gr1.gif

czn, Thursday, 3 July 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Hey, I've got a major problem. The aperture on my lens (on a Pentax K1000) doesn't seem to be moving. When the lens is out of the camera it's normal, but when it's in, it stays wide open the whole time. My light meter is working fine though, which is kind of wierd, I guess.

How worried should I be?

mehlt, Thursday, 3 July 2008 15:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Hey, I've got a major problem. The aperture on my lens (on a Pentax K1000) doesn't seem to be moving. When the lens is out of the camera it's normal, but when it's in, it stays wide open the whole time.

Do you mean: even when you change the aperture setting the iris doesn't move? That's normal (certainly on most SLRs including my Pentax ME) - the iris doesn't actually stop down until you take the picture, so that you have maximum brightness in the viewfinder. If it didn't work like this, then your viewfinder would be too dark to see very much when you're stopped all the way to f22. This is why lots of SLRs have a "depth of field preview" control, to override this behaviour.

Forest Pines Mk2, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Ed: oof, very nice. Even if they wouldn't work on my F801!

Forest Pines Mk2, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 09:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Ha! I saw some old film compacts recently (Nikon?) that had analogue display dials in the top-plate - only they were for aperture/shutter speed settings, I think.

Michael Jones, Monday, 21 July 2008 09:02 (fifteen years ago) link

nikon, yes

mmmmmm dials

czn, Monday, 21 July 2008 11:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, that was it! Smashing. Anyway, there are a couple in a display case in the Camera Cafe in Bloomsbury if you're interested. Not to mention multiples of every Leica M body...

Michael Jones, Monday, 21 July 2008 11:22 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

droooooool
http://craigmod.com/journal/gf1-fieldtest/

cozwn, Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:27 (fourteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Hi,

who can recommend me a camera in the $200-350 range? I already spend enough of my time fetishizing analogue by making 16mm films so I want to keep this simple and get a digital camera. Cannot afford to go higher on price but want something that isn't just a total point n' click and maybe with half-decent low light capability?

Thanks!

admrl, Friday, 2 April 2010 18:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I've been eyeing this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Digital-Optical-Stabilized/dp/B002LITT42

Spencer Chow, Friday, 2 April 2010 18:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Thanks! Pleasingly retro looking

admrl, Friday, 2 April 2010 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

there's discussion here too

Compact camera recommendations

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Saturday, 3 April 2010 01:17 (fourteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Any thoughts on the Nikon D3100 and/or what would you buy around the £300 mark?

And will I regret going for an 18-55 lens rather than an 18-105?

djh, Sunday, 6 January 2013 12:34 (eleven years ago) link

And will I regret going for an 18-55 lens rather than an 18-105?
--djh

Depends on the type of photos you want to take?

I prefer prime lenses so don't really know!

suare, Sunday, 6 January 2013 14:30 (eleven years ago) link

aperture range on both?

乒乓, Sunday, 6 January 2013 14:40 (eleven years ago) link

Is there an option of a kit with one or the other, or are you buying the lens separately?

I had the 18-55mm with my D40x and it was fine, but rarely use it after i got the 35mm f1.8 prime - very good lens (bar a little barrel distortion) and remains my default.

michaellambert, Sunday, 6 January 2013 17:24 (eleven years ago) link

The smaller lens was a Nikon AF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR.

Not really sure *what* I want to take photos of, really ...

djh, Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:09 (eleven years ago) link

it might be a default camera snob position but I think a prime is always the best bet.

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:19 (eleven years ago) link

(Excuse the naivety) Prime?

djh, Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:35 (eleven years ago) link

fixed focal length, not a zoom basically

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:38 (eleven years ago) link

(usually) faster and with better glass.

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:38 (eleven years ago) link

I'd say I value the wider aperture of a prime over the ability to zoom in on things - if I use my 18-70 it tends to be wide open for landscape stuff, very occasionally.

michaellambert, Sunday, 6 January 2013 18:44 (eleven years ago) link

I'd go with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G lens with the small Nikon DSLR bodies.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 6 January 2013 22:07 (eleven years ago) link

Thanks all.

djh, Monday, 7 January 2013 16:30 (eleven years ago) link

five years pass...

Close to pulling the trigger on a Fuji x100f
Walmart has it for a 200 discount somehow

calstars, Thursday, 2 August 2018 23:33 (five years ago) link

Woop out of stock

calstars, Friday, 3 August 2018 01:27 (five years ago) link

It’s a great camera tbh and if you can get a deal it’s a fun carry. I’m not 100% on where they are in the update cycle tho so buyer beware

YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 3 August 2018 01:49 (five years ago) link

I want that large sensor for low light shenanigans

calstars, Friday, 3 August 2018 01:55 (five years ago) link

True. Also a little light rigging makes the onboard flash v pleasant

YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 3 August 2018 01:58 (five years ago) link

Also looking at the new XF10 and the Ricoh GR ii. ... just can’t justify that $1.3k price for the x100F.

calstars, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 02:02 (five years ago) link

I bought my X100 (original model) used about 6 years ago - the sensor on these handles light and colour so beautifully. It's got its quirks but I have never felt like leaving it behind.

an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Tuesday, 7 August 2018 02:45 (five years ago) link

pre ordered the xf 10

calstars, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 03:39 (five years ago) link

Can’t wait to use an image sensor 10x the size of what’s in my phone

calstars, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 03:40 (five years ago) link

had my original X100 for about 5/6 years. love it. might jump on the next model after the X100F

||||||||, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 08:23 (five years ago) link

the x100 series are maybe my favourite cameras ever

Rogan Twort's highly portable product (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 7 August 2018 08:40 (five years ago) link

Those of you that have the x100 - what is it about that camera that you really enjoy, or that’s unique? The new XF has the same sensor but is only $500...

calstars, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 14:32 (five years ago) link

it takes great pictures, with minimal fiddling required. great low light performance, great JPEGs, and - even though it’s not required - it has the settings/features that let you fiddle if you want to

||||||||, Tuesday, 7 August 2018 14:35 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.