define "convincing"... other film styles are just as artifice-laden as his, they're just what you're used to.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293113/
^^ really beautiful!! shot on dv, if i remember right, making the 'silent movie' stylization even more present, obvious and knowing, but the seamlessness of it renders it transparent, yeah
― goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Beer legs!
― kate78, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link
"convincing" meaning he could've done a better job of emulating the older production styles he's obviously striving to reproduce. I don't mind fakery, just make it good fakery. it seemed half-assed, like seeing a cheap commercial that tries to look like the 50s by shooting video in b&w. maybe the lack of total committment is supposed to provide some intentional brechtian distance, but it would be a lot more impressive if the film actually convinced me it was shot in the 1920s. why not go all out and actually use a hand cranked camera?
or maybe this was just the wrong place to start.
― Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link
He does used hand cranked cameras all the time, I thought.
But I think "being inspired by" and "trying to reproduce faithfully" are two entirely different things.
― Casuistry, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:07 (fifteen years ago) link
Apparently I missed my brief chance to see My Winnipeg here. Dammit.
― Casuistry, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link