― luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 04:06 (twenty years ago) link
― django (django), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 04:15 (twenty years ago) link
― luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 04:17 (twenty years ago) link
― kayT (kaytee), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 05:57 (twenty years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 05:58 (twenty years ago) link
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 06:00 (twenty years ago) link
But threads that are nothing but interesting deep discussions are just as dull as those that are just banter. (Neither are as dull as the ILM list threads, though.) Give me some ebb and flow and I am happy.
― Chris P (Chris P), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 06:23 (twenty years ago) link
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 06:49 (twenty years ago) link
I found the in-jokes and special ILX lingo slightly daunting to begin with, but I just lurked for a week or so to get the gist of it all before diving in. And I'm very glad I did :)
― C J (C J), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 06:57 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:08 (twenty years ago) link
I don't think it's the palliness that people object to, but rather the endless allusions to things that happen offboard at meetups, FAPs, etc. - this makes you feel very left out and out of the loop and unpopular if you weren't at said events.
Or maybe that's just me.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:15 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:16 (twenty years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:18 (twenty years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:19 (twenty years ago) link
x-post: this is getting too pally now. I will go away for a while ;)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:20 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:21 (twenty years ago) link
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:22 (twenty years ago) link
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:23 (twenty years ago) link
― chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:23 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:26 (twenty years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:27 (twenty years ago) link
ILM is easier for me when I don't feel like revealing too much of myself or getting into things too deep because there is a focus, and a topic to remind me not to get too personal. (Not that this works, but relatively, it seems to work.)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:28 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:30 (twenty years ago) link
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:34 (twenty years ago) link
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:35 (twenty years ago) link
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:35 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:38 (twenty years ago) link
(unless you're talking about someone besides me, then I hate you)
Aw, you know it's you ... No, wait, alt.fan.geri-halliwell? I don't even know you.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 08:58 (twenty years ago) link
As for the FAP's and such, I'm obviously unable to attend them since I don't live in the UK or the US (or New Zealand or Australia). But that's okay; I don't come here to chat with friends I'd meet anyhow outside the InterWeb. I come here because you folks are genuinely fun to talk with, and even though your threads sometime are dull and injokey and cliquesque, more often they are funny and intelligent and a pleasure to participate in. If that wouldn't be the case, you wouldn't see me here.
[SOPPY MUSIC]
[CURTAIN]
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 09:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 10:35 (twenty years ago) link
I wonder if the thread's author should have a moral right to be able to say "um, can we get back on topic please" when things start to disintegrate? Just a thought out loud, not a suggestion.
― Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 10:49 (twenty years ago) link
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 10:50 (twenty years ago) link
Of course they should. And people do, I'm pretty sure.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 10:54 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:01 (twenty years ago) link
― mast ace (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:05 (twenty years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:07 (twenty years ago) link
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:10 (twenty years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link
― Larcole (Nicole), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:30 (twenty years ago) link
I've never met another Ilxor, haven't been on AIM in months, and that never bothers me.
Like I said upthread: someone, somewhere, is always bitching about ILX. Either it's too pally/in-jokey/chat-roomy/twee/nice/cliquish, or it's too hostile/unsafe/argumentative/overrun-by-new-people. You can't have it both ways. You can't fix both problems. All you can do, apparently, is keep swinging back and forth between the two. The complaining is probably part of the cycle, which means we're about to be overrun with personal attacks, stalkerish behavior, and a few people leaving the boards or threatening to -- or maybe we have, cause I'm not caught up yet.
― Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:44 (twenty years ago) link
― NA. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:53 (twenty years ago) link
Josh, if the reason you left Usenet was because it became too pally, I have to wonder at how you're defining the word "pally".
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:54 (twenty years ago) link
Yeah you can, in theory. It doesn't have to be either of things. In practice, maybe you're right that those are the two traps it can fall into.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:57 (twenty years ago) link
i read and post on the "earnest" threads bcz the chances of finding somewhere else in the world where i get my ideas this stretched or challenged = v.slim indeed
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:59 (twenty years ago) link
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:01 (twenty years ago) link
My take on it is that the serious threads are often less about exchanging ideas and much more about scoring points off of each other in a genteel, academic manner and if I'm going to be involved in a point-scoring contest, it's much more entertaining to me to involve dick jokes.
Conversely, I really like the way people are treated when they post personal problems to the board. The outpouring of well wishes and sympathy usually staggers me, even given that many of us have met each other.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:06 (twenty years ago) link
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:12 (twenty years ago) link