atheism vs. agnosticism

[T]he sacred orgasm is your Divine Right. Your beautiful bodies were designed for this in order to attract evolving souls into your plane, third dimensional planet Earth. The reptilian-based tyrants have kept you from this knowledge. They have imprisoned you in guilt and shame; you are ashamed of your bodies which are works of art.

They think after God, starting from the death of God without caring about what might mean the death of God, it's "existence", if it still exists; the tranquil atheist doesn't care about this kind of questions.

Deleuze explains it's less caring about a static negation or a fight against God than a dynamic method emerging on a positive proposition aiming at building after the fight.

OTM

This guy embodies surreal silliness.

Touche Daniel !

THe self is never an illusion eh, your gestures are all original! Immortality beckons!

To cite CS Lewis again: "Doubts are the ants in the pants of Faith".

As I said, I liked the bits about the development of the Christ 'myth' and I think they are pretty strong - the medieval insistance on Christ having a virgin birth is a good example of how changing social attitudes affect these characters. I didn't want to post on your thread either, like how you don't want to step on a fresh snowfall - it's very cool.

I left that out, because it was boring (altho I talked about elsewhere on that board: it's about copyright), but nice calling me on it: you read carefully.
the argument to explain these 'mentionnings' : copysts. A text lacked a little bit of text? they add it! tacitus doesn'T mention jesus: now, that's not very nice of him isn'it? let's correct tacitus then! let's correct flavius joseph by adding a sentense about jésus. no copyright then... not very honest one might say, but as I said they were in performative logic of truth building.

Since Dan denies that any person could be intrinsically good or evil, how does his attributed emotion of "hate" make sense?

Not on external grounds. And Steve's blog doesn’t regard it's use of schizophrenia as being confused with MPD.

Well alright then.

(these are the slowest animated gifs ever)

Woah, somebody doesn't understand spacial relations. That inverter be fucked up, man.

This is rather simplistic, but it doesn't have congruent reasoning. I am so confused.

In most cases, the rejection of the Creator does not result from logical conclusions. The average atheist, if he or she is honest, will cite an emotional motivation for lack of faith in God.

The late Isaac Asimov once wrote: “Emotionally I am an atheist. I don’t have the evidence to prove that God doesn’t exist, but I so strongly suspect that he doesn’t that I don’t want to waste my time.” Now that Mr. Asimov is dead, I suspect he wishes he would have invested time into proving the existence of God.

Most people who do not think God exists betray their stance by arguing with Him. If God is not real, there is no need to be hostile toward Him or toward anyone who believes in Him.

HAHA - letter to the editor troll

A CORNUCOPIA OF THEOLOGICAL DELIGHTS