Battlestar Galactica Revival

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (775 of them)
I was wondering if they were going to go for four or five. Katee seems pretty set on doing the Bionic Woman, did she actually get the role?

kingfish, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

I think I'm in favor of this. I hope they make it really slamming knowing it's the end.

Jordan, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

what jordan said

sean gramophone, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

definitely better to have one more season than to drag it out.

latebloomer, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

an ex eastenders (UK soap) actress is playing the lead in the BIonic Woman

i was looking for 2 more seasons, but i read somewhere that Ron Moore had got the go ahead to do fewer self-contained eps and concentrate on the continuing story. so i guess that makes sense to do just 1 more series

Alan, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

i'm actually more interested upon hearing this, but the last half of S3 blew so, so badly that it better be awesome upfront or i'm done with it.

BATTAGS, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

I can't get too mad about it. Don't play out your premise farther than it can go. (Yeah, I'm the guy that wanted all of season 3 on Nu-Caprica under the toaster's thumb. So?)

Oilyrags, Friday, 11 May 2007 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

oh man

rrrobyn, Saturday, 12 May 2007 07:21 (nineteen years ago)

i'm glad it was you, ned, who breaks this news to me. i am angered! but will not blame the messenger. maybe i will swear at you a bit. it is not your fault. oh, tv world, wtf.

okay okay, i see how it makes sense for just one more season. and how last season wasn't fabulous relative to other seasons but whatever! it was still good tv.

:( battlestar

rrrobyn, Saturday, 12 May 2007 07:26 (nineteen years ago)

not so quick

http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=2&id=41457

Contrary to comments by Edward James Olmos (Adm. Adama) at the Saturn Awards on May10, no end has been announced for the award-winning show. Battlestar Galactica is preparing to film its fourth season, one that will include 22 episodes, rather than the previously announced 13.

"For those of you who have been paying attention over the years, this is not the first time Eddie has made an announcement about the possibility of the show's end," chuckled Eick. "I promise you that when [executiuve producer] Ron [Moore] and I make a decision about Galactica's future, we'll let you know."

Alan, Saturday, 12 May 2007 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

sweet.

ned, eff off with yr rumours. if terrastock7 is all a lie i may not be able to forgive you btw.
;)

rrrobyn, Saturday, 12 May 2007 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

If those mothercuddlers "Cousin Oliver" us, Rrobyn, I'm blaming you.

Oilyrags, Saturday, 12 May 2007 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

Elvis Telecom is the source for T7! I am inclined to highly trust that. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 12 May 2007 23:39 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Well then:

Sci Fi Channel sent us the press release confirming the show is ending....

"This show was always meant to have a beginning, a middle and finally, an end. Over the course of the last year, the story and the characters have been moving strongly toward that end and we've decided to listen to those internal voices and conclude the show on our own terms," Eick and Moore said in the statement. "And while we know our fans will be saddened to know the end is coming, they should brace themselves for a wild ride getting there –- we're going out with a bang."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 June 2007 00:34 (nineteen years ago)

confirmation. muy triste.

Drooone, Friday, 1 June 2007 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

So when are they going to Hollywood and riding motorcycles??

Spencer Chow, Friday, 1 June 2007 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

But that was a ripoff of Chips, so the equivalent would have to feature Apollo doing his David Caruso.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 June 2007 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

battle of the battlestar threads

rrrobyn, Friday, 1 June 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

this is good news

Jordan, Friday, 1 June 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

i am a bit sad abt this news but not super sad - i would've liked 2 more seasons
xpost yeah yeah

rrrobyn, Friday, 1 June 2007 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

pika-chuuuu :-(

Alan, Friday, 1 June 2007 18:41 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe they realized that they can't sustain the dramatic tensions over more than one season, considering the last season finale.

Mordechai Shinefield, Friday, 1 June 2007 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

its good to have limits

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 June 2007 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

s4 is gonna rule dudes

blueski, Friday, 1 June 2007 22:50 (nineteen years ago)

I like that they are doing this with both BSG and Lost. Nobody wants to watch shows as they descend into X-Files/Alias nonsense.

schwantz, Friday, 1 June 2007 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

yeah open-ended shows are always tarnished by their latter-day suckage.

(Sopranos also wise to do this)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:05 (nineteen years ago)

more shows should do this. it was so sad see the x-files become a lame parody of itself.

latebloomer, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

Especially ones with BIG SECRETS (Lost, Alias, X-Files) or Gilligan's Island syndrome (BSG, Lost).

schwantz, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

x-post

schwantz, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

Counter-example, however - Star Trek Voyager - weak-ass, tacked-on, convoluted ending due to waning ratings.

schwantz, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

that one sucked from the beginning

latebloomer, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

Indeed it did. However, I think you may mean Star Trek: Enterprise, which was even worse (but actually was cut short at four years instead of going the seven allotted to TNG, DS9 and even the foetid Voyager.)

Oilyrags, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

Enterprise was downright blasphemous in its suckitude

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

at least it was attempting something different. voyager was just bland.

latebloomer, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

predship

cutty, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

gornship

Oilyrags, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

"predship"

ouch! lol

latebloomer, Friday, 1 June 2007 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

I just meant the bit where Voyager finally makes it home. Maybe it wasn't due to bad ratings, but it jut felt wrong (and managed to work in some lame time-travel angle too). I like the idea of the writers at least having some idea of where a show is going, rather than just figuring it out as they go (see - or rather DON'T SEE - : the last few seasons of 24).

schwantz, Saturday, 2 June 2007 00:47 (nineteen years ago)

omg i just watched the episode where there's the virus, and then sharon puts the wire in her wrist and then they build and ship and name it after the president and and omg

cutty, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

bit of a tearjerker that one

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

I vaguely remember the wrist thing.

Drooone, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

just watched season one and first ep of season two

occasionally think bits are stupid (getting away from baddies easily, usually) or the typical having difficulty not thinking about "earth" stuff appearing in "alien" culture but do manage to forget about it, mostly. a couple of devices that I think, were they described to me, I might have thought "that will be bad and annoying" I have been able to almost not mind. wonder about the weird, shakey, zooming camerawork and lens flare in completely CGI scenes. the bit at the start, where they have the drums over bits from the ep you're about to watch, is annoying, too. on the whole, I think it's really pretty good

RJG, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

not thinking about "earth" stuff appearing in "alien" culture

waht this is not an alien culture

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:31 (nineteen years ago)

but they have earthly stuff plus check out my inverted commas

RJG, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

bit of a tearjerker that one

totally!

also rjg, stick with it, it only gets better

cutty, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

what do you mean - that they all look like humans? that they have names similar to ancient earth cultures? that they developed telephones? I don't get it... I mean its made rather sledgehammer-obvious that the colonies' cultures are precursors/contemporaries of earth's.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

like why wouldn't you expect them to develop pants and whiskey and poker chips and have dogs for pets

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

precursors?

cutty, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

(and actually while I really enjoy it I'm not sure I would say it gets better - the miniseries has yet to be topped imho)

yeah precursors like they had their thing going and then a colony got lost and left for earth - are you sure you're watching this show?

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

in old battlestar there was the line "some say life here began out there"

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:39 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.