Your ideal length of a film

As long as it takes.

(ie, not voting)

otm

of course Daisies has a plot wtf

While that's the correct answer, I still voted 70-90 minutes 'cause I miss terse little films.

Daisies reminded me of Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure, but I couldn't really tell you what the plot to that one is either (the having to give a history report or they won't become rock messiahs is more of a bogus formality than actual plot device)

is daisies the one about the two czech chicks? tbh i haven't seen it in nine years. not exactly overflowing with plot iirc but who can say.

Sherlock Jr is perfect at around 40 minutes, Berlin Alexanderplatz is great at 13+ hours.

BA is a tv series

yeah, we know

Yeah, one is blonde (Bill) and the other is brunette (Ted). They have a food fight, which I remembered reading was controversial because they wasted perfectly good food? Was it Czech or Polish, though?

It's Czech. I am both bemused and amused at the Bill & Ted comparison.

if a film is good, it doesn't really matter to me how long it is.

+1 for whoever sd 80 min is the perfect length for a movie

Yeah, I might have actually sat through an 80-minute Gone With the Wind.

70-80 is a sweet spot

My concentration at home is totally shot, thanks to the internet. At least I'm FORCED to watch the damn thing in the theatre (which makes me resent the bloated running times).

in a theater i don't mind any length, really but if i'm watching at home, I get antsy for anything over 90 minutes, so I voted 90-110

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, March 9, 2010 8:02 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark

i cosign this 100%

when i get a movie from netflix and it's like 130 mins i'm always like *grooooaaan*

years of smoking have made it p much impossible for me to watch a 120+ movie in the theater

at least long films in the olde days had entr'actes in the middle so you could break for the day or whatever

90-110, always kinda pissed if I see it's over 2h on the DVD case/movie listing, even if it's something i can't wait to see.

long movies at home > long movies in the theater

can take it at your own pace / don't miss key scenes in the inevitable bathroom breaks / watch the rest tomorrow / etc.

That would be easier if I didn't get the itch to go on ILM, check email, Facebook, etc every ten minutes.

i can usually stash the computer for the length of the film -- i pretty much can never not fall asleep tho

ILM, check email, Facebook

I have no problem doing this + watching the movie at the same time

but I am part of generation ADD

I don't mind long movies so much at home because I can always pause them and take a break to go do something else if I want to, but hate getting stuck at the theater with a long movie.

pausing/resuming movies after more than a few minutes kind of gets me out of movie mode.. loss of momentum etc..

I do like skipping past credits and trailers. It offends me when I have to sit through'em in the theatre.

trailers are the work of satan; i like a good ol' opening credits scene, though. gotta go for The Full Effect

As long as it takes.

(ie, not voting)

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 March 2010 18:13 (3 hours ago) Bookmark

hey, there's the >150 option.

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

ADD

http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/3251/josemourinho6.jpg

(my vote for 130-150 btw)

that screenshot from satantango is great, i thought i could never get tired of narcoleptic long takes of desolate hungarian plains but jancso managed it in 'the round up' (95 mins)

the relation between runtime and boredom isn't always obvious

what the actual blazing fuck, 25 of you savages

NAME ME 10 ALL-TIME MOVIES OTHER THAN LIKE VIDEODROME THAT FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY

110 mins pls

1. Killer of Sheep

2. Bicycle Thief (93 minutes total, but who watches credits?)

er Thieves

splits shd have been

>80
80-100
100-120
120-140
140<

imo

but then 80-100 wdve got like 60 votes so maybe not

haha milo please continue

3. Paths of Glory

dammit, Strangelove clocks in at 94

4. Lots of Chaplin/Marx Bros

5. Love & Death

and several other Allens

6. Wild Strawberries

7. Persona

but you're still wrong :D

I probably would have voted 90-110, but definitely would have voted 80-100.

would have voted 100-120 but can perfectly understand a vote for 80-100 - the number of A++ movies that fall between 90 and 100 minutes is frankly huge

One of Fantastic Mr Fos's many virtues was its 80 minute length. More, please!

*Fox

Pickpocket, L'argent, Mouchette, Lancelot du lac, Los olvidados, Viridiana, L'atalante, Umberto D., Sullivan's Travels, Palm Beach Story, 39 Steps, Cabinet of Dr. Calgari, Lift to the Scaffold, Pickup on South Street, Show Me Love, Lady From Shanghai, Battleship Potemkin all purty good

ok there is no doubting there are classics in the 70-90 range, but what I am saying is that there are enormously more in higher ranges

however, i guess the question is 'how long would you most often like a film to be' so all 25 of you just like films to be shorter maybe

There's some perfect 3-hour films but they're just gonna sit in my stack at home getting resented for weeks before i get to them. i checked out Petrified Forest last week - that little "82 minutes" on the back cover makes my face look like i'm about to tap some ass.

Novels should be within 50 pages/however many words that is of The Great Gatsby, btw.