Capital Punishment: Should the Death Penalty Still Exist In A 'Civilised Society'?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1756 of them)
No, I agree with that, hstencil, it was more a counter-point to the idea that the death penalty is counter-productive to rehabilitation: it's not meant for the rehabilitable (is that a word?).

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

but at the same time, prisons seem to have entirely given up their rehabilitative functions and focus mainly on the punitive/deterrent aspect.

xpost

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:22 (nineteen years ago) link

It is now (and really that's probably the crux of this disagreement more than anything else; can every criminal/mentally unstable individual be normalized back into mainstream society (where "mainstream" is used in its broadest definition, ie I'm not advocating putting everyone in an Izod shirt and giving them golf lessons, no matter how funny it might be)).

(xpost)
()

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, the concept of prison as rehabilitator is not one that is reflected in the current state of affairs. We might as well send them to hard labor in Siberia for what prison does to people.

xpost Dan, I know, that's why I personally think the death penalty should be halted for now, the system is waaaaaaay too flawed and is not being used in any way I'd approve of persnoally.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:24 (nineteen years ago) link

The idea that everyone can be rehabilitated is not one I agree with.

yep, you only need to look at ILX for this (excuse sarcasm)

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Would you care to elucidate your point?

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:43 (nineteen years ago) link

it was not at a dig at you, just the behaviour/character of certain people on here that despite being told it's not appreciated continue to behave that way. flippant jokey comment, nothing to see here!

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:45 (nineteen years ago) link

death penalty is counter-productive to rehabilitation

This was originally a morbid joke on my part. Unless anybody knows of any upstanding undead citizens, killing criminals is the ultimate expression of our determination of their un-rehabilatibility.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I have no idea where I stand on this one. Tombot's reasoning is sound, but the idea that killing a convicted felon is permissible would take me a long long time to become comfortable with, just based on social/ethical conditioning I suppose, but I'm not even totally convinced of that.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha I wasn't thinking you were insulting me, stevem! I was just wondering what the hell it meant, like I missed something massive in my time off. Now I'm kind of slapping my head.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm all for the death penalty when we have an equitable legal system that guarantees real equal access to counsel, is devoid of racism, and isn't driven by mere bloody-minded bloodthirstiness. Which is to say, it's unlikely I'll ever support it in practice.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Someone in a class of mine yesterday used the phrase "catastrophic catastrophe"!

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link

As opposed to those seredipitous catastrophes?

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Do you all think we can "rehabilitate" that piece of dirt who killed six people - bashing their brains in with aluminum bats so savagely that even dental records were useless in identifying them - over a stolen X-Box video game?

"This is the worst thing that I've ever seen in my career," said Johnson, a 33-year veteran of law enforcement. "The brutal force used against the victims ... it's indescribable."

Rehabilitate my ass. You're goddamn right it's about revenge. I'll be watching for a jury of the people of Florida to do the right thing and fry that guy.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 16:59 (nineteen years ago) link

y'know, statements like the ones the law enforcement officials made about this heinous crime make it more difficult for prosecutors.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

what do you mean?

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

See, you don't understand, that's the fault of American video game society, and not the perpetrator, once removed from society he can be treated...

*moves to Castro's Cuba*

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

*asks ally for some salsa cds*

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

she's only going to see the Manics

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link

the people of Florida to do the right thing

[ asinine one liner not really germane to anything ]

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

He just needed Ritalin, that kid. Ritalin and, uh, Prozac. And, um, VIAGRA. Yes. Then none of this would've happened.

*kills Nicky Wire*

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Wait...yeah, hstence to the j-dog, wtf do you mean about it making things more difficult if the cops say things like that? I would think testamony such as that would help, obviously...?

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

It shows a marked prejudice against X-Box users which any competent attorney can use to his or her client's advantage.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I guess if he could afford an X-box he could afford Johnnie Cochran.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Wasn't there something about how the ringleader of that killing was apparently supposed to have been rearrested already for violating probation, but that the officers in charge of that let it slip by?

In which case, the fault would appear to not solely be the murderers', strange to say.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:36 (nineteen years ago) link

if we sent them to hard labor in siberia then they would see more than half an hour of daylight per day which would be coddling them, especially if they had just come from pelican bay.

i hate to joke about this stuff, but has anyone seen a picture of the cells there? its almost as bad as a studio apartment in manhattan.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:37 (nineteen years ago) link

again, Ned the people of Florida to do the right thing

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Everybody to come from street.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

pelican bay = place of Evil

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link

you guys ever hear of an impartial jury? Kind of impossible to guarantee one with so much pre-trial publicity. They might as well get Dubya to say these jerks deserve the DP, a la Nixon on Manson.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link

but wouldn't that make it harder on the defense, not the prosecution?

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:41 (nineteen years ago) link

unless you think the prosecution could claim police persecution. (that rhymed!)

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Seeing sunlight isn't necessarily a joyful thing: see also Tent City.

xpost Impartiality is virtually impossible to begin with on any high profile case; the only answer to that is to shut down the press completely on reporting crime--whether or not the cop said a damn thing, people still could read the story and see for themselves that it is an absolutely horrific case, so I don't see how the cop per se is causing a problem for the prosecution.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost - no, because statements like that can let the defense claim the defendents didn't get a fair trial. Ask Bugliosi what he thought of Nixon.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

or rather, the defense could claim police persecution, thus making it harder on the prosecution.

my brain is addled from too much cream of broccoli soup.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost

hstencil: ok, that's kind of what i was thinking. got ya.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link

They'll get lots of DP's as lifers though, no?

xxx-post

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link

gross.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost

Yeah.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Now on a more civilized note:

If you kill someone with a baseball bat, does it really make the crime any more heinous if you also smash the teeth into tiny pieces? I mean presumably the people were long dead by the time they got finished with all the teeth, right? Sure, it indicates some kind of insane rage, but is it really a more heinous crime that your regular run-of-the-mill death-by-bludgeoning?

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:57 (nineteen years ago) link

In as much as it makes Rico work harder at Fisher & Sons, I think it should receive more punishment.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:59 (nineteen years ago) link

OK it is a sign of how sick our society is that reading "If you kill someone with a baseball bat" immediately summoned up the phrase "Peanut Butter Jelly Time" in my head.

Anyway I think there are two ways to look at why that's an indicator of it being "different": the insane rage part. It indicates, I suppose, either the person is completely insane and mentally ill (well, I guess you'd have to be but hopefully you know what I mean), which I guess would actually make them ineligible for the death penalty. Or it implies they just really get off on torture and abuse and death, which is really heinous. Run-of-the-mill bludgeoning/shooting/etc you still have that possibility of like heat-of-the-moment or OMG that was actually a one time thing, I think, in some people's minds...

Of course the whole dynamic is fucked because I think getting off on bashing in people's teeth with baseball bats IS a sign of being completely mentally ill so the whole "mental illness" conundrum is a false one.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:02 (nineteen years ago) link

And again the question of rehabilitation, how the fuck can you expect to rehabilitate somebody who commits such a crime? Absurd. Throw away the key, dude.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:07 (nineteen years ago) link

The teeth smashing could also be a sign of a cold blooded desire to see the victim is difficultly identified, though abviously not in the X-Box case.

TOMBOT, aren't you being a little defeatist?

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link

how the fuck can you expect to rehabilitate somebody who commits such a crime?

it happens, sometimes.

|a|m|t|r|s|t| (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't believe in the death penalty (except in extreme circumstances, such as perhaps treason during wartime), but I also think that the mental illness defense should only be allowed for people who are obviously and permanently in a state of complete disconnect from reality - ie., to the point of not being able to function in everyday society. Clearly, I think these defendants should not qualify for it. There's something "Catch 22"-esque about the logic that says that the more horrific the crime, the greater the evidence of mental instability, and thus the less the culpability of the perpetrators.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link

o. nate OTM. OTOH I don't think mental illness absolves people from crimes.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:12 (nineteen years ago) link

everybody should read Helter Skelter.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think "absolves" is the right word either. But at the same time, it seems wrong for society to punish a mentally ill person for doing something that they can't even understand is wrong.

xpost

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link

and Will, the autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy, but that's for another thread.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.