Radical Feminism: Discuss

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (269 of them)
Do any other women here get made uncomfortable when they see a porn mag laying about? I suppose it would depend on the situation somewhat, in any case.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 07:43 (twenty years ago) link

Ed, are you sure that gender inequality is insignificant in the Western world? I think there have been a lot of institutional advances, but they haven't been entirely reflected in social attitudes.

In some cases, in fact, they've worsened social attitudes. I can only really speak for the UK educational system, but there's a big problem there with the fact that girls tend to do better than boys in Key Stage SATs, GCSEs, and A-Levels (although at University there's, I believe, a reversal). There are scads of measures in place to increase boys' attainment, but meanwhile many working-class young men aren't getting the best jobs they potentially could have because women are often better qualified. Which leads to more resentment, and more disenfranchisement of working-class males, and that's surely counter-productive.

cis (cis), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:11 (twenty years ago) link

composing post on this one, broadly along the lines that we have the structures of equality, people have to know to use them and that problems such as the education attainment one are societal problems rather than gender based ones and should be solved as such. The key point being that we should help people on the basis of need and not too much worry if we are helping more girls, or boys or whatever.

I've got some stuff to do today but I will get back to this point later.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:17 (twenty years ago) link

Well maybe that's because men and women finally do have equal opportunity and women are just better and smarter.

(x-post)

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:26 (twenty years ago) link


Ed, this is a really old argument. What do you mean "restrict groups by gender"?
I don't even know what you are *talking about*? Who? What? And I'm not being sarcastic. Give some concrete context for me to respond to! (It won't be tonite, its after midnite going to bed, but later)
Orbit (cstarrcstarr@yahoo.com), September 2nd, 2003.

I’ll give an example of ‘restrict groups by gender’ (though I don’t know if it’s the sort of thing Ed was talking about).
This weekend I’m going to Ladyfest Manchester and one of the workshops I’d really like to go to, in fact the only one I really want to go to is a drumming workshop which I’m banned from because I’m not a girl!
I’m semi-furious, I pay exactly the same as everyone who can go.


I think they want to keep out men cause they think they might make it intimidating for the women, but I’m easily intimidated too.
I can kind of see where they’re coming from but I wanna go!
*throws rattle*.

Practically, what should I do? Is there anything I can do?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:37 (twenty years ago) link

I see their point, male ladyfest attendees are a notoriously rough bunch

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:39 (twenty years ago) link

Have you not learned anything from sitcoms, mei?

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:41 (twenty years ago) link


I do disagree with you statement that experiences across gender are common. They are not. You never got your first period, You never had a perv grab your tits. You never had to wonder was that guy looking at your chest or at you. Experiences are different, When I walk into a room and there is a porn mag on the table it affects me differently from how it affects you because I am female and have grown up in a sexist society. I could go on for pages, but the experience of growing up a boy is very different from growing up a girl, This is old territory, its been covered a million times, and no one disputes it any more. I am not trying to be dismissive, and after I've had some sleep I could post a reading list or something and we could pick up the conversation later if you are interested.
-- Orbit (cstarrcstar...), September 2nd, 2003.


I think experiences are broadly common though there are differences.
I never got my first period but I did have a first wet dream; I never had a ‘perv’ grab my tits but I did have a (female) ‘perv’ grab my bottom; I never wondered was a guy looking at my chest (which would be part of me) but I’ve wondered was someone looking at my puppy fat.

When I walk into a room and see a porn mag on a table it effect me different to how it effects you because we are different PEOPLE, not because we are different sexes/genders. I’m interested in porn mags than most men I know. I know several women who really do like porn.

How do you know the experience of growing up a boy is so different to your own experience? When did YOU grow up a boy?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:42 (twenty years ago) link

I see their point, male ladyfest attendees are a notoriously rough bunch

-- Andrew Thames (cleanbridge...), September 2nd, 2003.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


GRRRRR!!!
Anyway, I’m only going so I can cure me some Lesbians!



Have you not learned anything from sitcoms, mei?

-- oops (don'temailmenicelad...), September 2nd, 2003.

What, you mean I should dress up as a woman and sneak in?
Hmmm. That might help me with the lesbians too...

(Humour Alert – I AM JOKING)

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:47 (twenty years ago) link

typo:

Meant to say I'm LESS interested in porn mags than most men.

I'm not saying I don't like pornography at all, but the realy artificial stuff I've seen in mags, with it's participants obviously not enjoying it, isn't a big turn on.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:50 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I don't think women have the monopoly on being made uncomfortable by porn.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 08:58 (twenty years ago) link

Cis - maybe 'working-class males' are just idiots. That's certainly the case where I live. I wouldn't care if they were 'disenfranchised' out of existence. About 'resenting women', they haven't even gotten over their racial resentments yet, give 'em a bit of time to catch up, they're a bit slow on the uptake. (What I mean is, if ppl are worried about 'not causing resentment' it turns into a race to the bottom)

dave q, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 09:00 (twenty years ago) link

I have an interesting admission to make - I assumed mei was female (sorry mei!). I don't know why I did this, but I think it is an interesting assumption for me to have made and says.. well, something, I'm not sure what.

To respond to the porn question, I'm not at all uncomfortable about porn personally, except when it appears unwanted around say, the parents or at work or something, but hell, I have been known to look at porn and enjoy it! FWIW.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 09:14 (twenty years ago) link

Feminism has a part to play where gender inequality is significant, but in western societies we are past that stage in our development.

ed do you think legislating against racial and gender inequality actually works or something?

In striving foe equality why restrict your group to 50% of the population, smells like sexism to me

who is doing that? when women say WE WANT EQUALITY, why is it often read into as "we want equality but not for men"? if men feel oppressed, shouldn't they organise their own shit, like women have had to? most feminists want equality for men and women, thats what equality means!

also, if you think class oppression is more crucial in western society than racial or gender oppression, i can only think you have your head in the sand. NB class oppression IS important but i think your prioritizing of some oppressions against others is very monofocussed.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:36 (twenty years ago) link

trayce i originally assumed mei was female too. mei i can understand why the drumming workshop is female-only. when women are learning to play an instrument, some of them feel like a male presence might be a hindrance, because (unfortunately) some men harass women musicians in subtle and not-so-subtle deterring ways, especially when they are just starting out. furthermore, women have lesser visibility as musicians (so some may feel lacking in the whole female role-model aspect of musiciandom which some men could take for granted) and so a female-only space for learning to drum might be empowering for them. of course - tim mentioned the oppression that goes on between women, so it might not be ideal, but seeing as the Ladyfest is a feminist thing you would hope that that issue would be dealt with if it even arose.

although i was taught the open chords from a male, i can definitely attest to the comfort of having no men around when i learned to play guitar. i felt less judged. there are still a lot of assumptions about women playing instruments which circulate, to this very day when i go to the rock shop and ask for a guitar string the male staff ALWAYS assume i mean an acoustic string...

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:48 (twenty years ago) link

I think that I must simply be misled. From every course I have taken or book on feminism I have read, I have gathered that radical feminism has absolutely nothing to do with "radical" behaviour whatsoever. Instead, it has always been my understanding that radical feminism simply suggests a radical perspective on gender relations, i.e. the idea that there is no essential male or essential female. I've always taken this to therefore imply the fallacy of essentialism across the board. Hence, radical feminism opens the discussion to issues of identity creation...

Maybe I didn't read this thread correctly...

cybele (cybele), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 12:33 (twenty years ago) link

that sounds like what i understand as cultural feminism. i understand radical feminism to be concerned with a transferral of value from the "male" side of the patriarchal binaries to the "female" side.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 12:40 (twenty years ago) link

orbit is so sexist!!

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 12:53 (twenty years ago) link

I take it as a sort of weird compliment that you thought I was a girl!

But I'm not and I've not hidden it, I thought I mentioned it up above somewhere and if not it's definitely on another thread from the last few days and I've said it before on ILM/ILE.

I think I probably fit the male stereotype less than most men.

The reasons that TLML gives for me being barred from the drumming workshop are exactly those I imagined, and they are really understandable, which is why I'm not really angry at being barred. I can totally see their point of view.

But many men, including me feel harassed by male musicians while learning or practising. I can play the drums a bit already (and guitar, bass etc) but I've never been taught by anyone. That's partially because I'd be intimidating.
I also find it very hard to go into a music shop and try out an instrument or ask for advice, I get the feeling the ppl in there would be looking down their nose ar me. I hate the thought of picking up a guitar and them listening to what I was playing - eeek!
Most ppl just play some rubbish metal riff to try and impress and that is totally not me.

I think maybe the confusion isn't helped by my name. I'm Welsh and my name is Meirion (which is in my email adress) but no one can say that properly, including me, so everyone just calls me Mei.

TLML - you should go in and straight away say:
"I'd like a single 52 please. Steel core with brass/nickel. Round wound, bullet end."
See what they say then. They probably won't even know what all of that means.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:10 (twenty years ago) link

Not having an academic base in this stufff I've never heard of cultural feminism and I would have just assumed that radical feminism meant what those two words juxtaposed would normally mena, that is, an extreme/strong/ form of feminism.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:12 (twenty years ago) link

the term "radical feminism" should be reclaimed, it sure as hell shouldn't be associated with people like andrea dworkin.

"I'd like a single 52 please. Steel core with brass/nickel. Round wound, bullet end."

haha i should probably find out what all that means before i test it out!

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:20 (twenty years ago) link

Dworkin only 'says' what guys really 'think', although she's not as OK with it obviously. That's only the guys that actually 'think' tho, which isn't many so not to worry. Also, straight guys of course. Do gay guys see other guy's asses as being chambers of dirt and death that they want to immolate themselves in by possessing and destroying? I'm starting to think book censorship is a good idea because then I wouldn't have read Dworkin and Dennis Cooper at the age of 11

dave q, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

Heh, I was going to say Andrea Dworkin's not all bad and that her style (and some ideas???) inIntercourse reminded me a lot of dave q.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:52 (twenty years ago) link

Rumbled! Once you read 'Intercourse' and 'Rock and the Pop Narcotic' you need never read anything I write ever again

dave q, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:55 (twenty years ago) link

Anything you can recommend by Dworkin that I could read that's only say a couple of hundred pages long and which would tell me more than just the fact she has a really, really silly surname?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:56 (twenty years ago) link

in what way is she not that bad???

H (Heruy), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

Uh...she's not Catherine MacKinnon?

Jesse Fuchs (Jesse Fuchs), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

I ask because someone with some fairly extrem views quoted her to me a few weeks ago and I've been curios since.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:02 (twenty years ago) link

OK, Let's start with last things first.

No where have I said , nor do I believe that I have inferred, that I believe feminists desire to see women gain equality at the expense of men. The very word equality precludes this. Femenism grates against my humanism not because it wants to overtake men, but because its perspective on society seems no longer relevant, if it ever was. It seems far better to fight for the equality of humanity and human rights as a collective whole, than fighting for the rights of one group at a time.

The problems facing society today are largely not of gender but of class and economics. The barriers facing middle class women in western society are no greater than those facing men, this is a very general statement, but broadly it's true and the middle classes and up have the best access to the mechanisms designed to rectify any imbalances. I don't really see many problems here. OK so there are inequalities but over time these are ironing themselves, out, there will never be 50:50 parity in all areas of life but broadly this will be the case (I'm talking about maybe 60% of care workers being men whilst 60% of teachers being women, that sort of thing). There's some tidying to do, a bit more paternity leave here, a bit more support for working mothers there.

I'll get onto the cultural points in a bit.

As we cast down the social spectrum the problems faced aren't really gender specific, its shit weather you're male, female, black or white society needs to solve the socio -economic problems. Socio-Economic oppression encompasses all others. its not being mono-focused at all. If you look at where racial and sexual inequality is at its worst it is at the bottom. Solving socio-economic problems is going to go a long way to alleviating the situation of the most oppressed women in society.

One of the oft cited examples is of academic achievement. In the UK girls do better than boys at the age of 16 but then boys do better at 18 and at university. However, if one looks at the statistics, one sees that although this is true the difference in achievement between kids of different socio-economic backgrounds is far greater than any gender differences. How well you do in society comes down to money and that's a much bigger inequality than anything brought on by gender or race.

Aside from this we have the whole problem of gender in culture.

The biggest problem being that, after a little improvement in the 80s and early 90s comodification and objectification of women is now worse than ever. What's more it's extending to men in both similar and different ways. Now far be it from me to say that the male form is exploited in the same way or as mercilessly as the female form but it is there and its growing. Its not just about sex and bodies, some people are willing to allow access to every minute aspect of there life just to gain the faint hope of fame and fortune. The lure for women (and for men) is economic (and to a certain extent narcissistic), the rewards can be high if you're lucky. If you're unlucky the price can be high.

However these problems are again best tackled from a humanist rather than feminist stand point. Concentration on the objectification of women leaves out the fact that the objectification of men is growing quietly in the background. Much better to fight the base comodification of human existence, and experience from a position of unity.

Men and women aren't all that different and the male and female experience in modern society is not all that different. To answer Orbits, point above, it's just as hard growing up a boy as it is growing up a girl,soem experiences may differ, but are they all that different?

(((((((a little point to answer

I've got no problems with women only classes etc. In fact I've even taught some myself (Axing, (Chopping Wood)). It can be highly valuable to learn something in the absence of people who think they know what they are doing (but more often than not, don't).)))))))

I do apologise for the rambling and incoherent nature of this post. i had it all sorted out in my head as i was walking round london this morning but I was on my way to buy a new notebook so I neglected to write any of it down.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:17 (twenty years ago) link

It seems far better to fight for the equality of humanity and human rights as a collective whole, than fighting for the rights of one group at a time.

i disagree with this. i think it is important for politics to be micro and incremental, rather than overaching and universalist. also, specificities provide relevance for people, and meaning, and context, and something peple can relate to

i have no idea why you are suggesting that women and men face very little difference in the workplace, it makes me wonder if you have ever worked in the real world, the institutional sexism that keeps many professions overwhelmingly male is plain to see, especially if you work for a company and look who gets hired for what.

i dont agree with fighting the whole battle at once, politics is incremental and different people need to improved different aspects. fragmentation of politics neednt be a bad thing

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:30 (twenty years ago) link

I'm very much enjoying this thread, and learning a lot too.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:41 (twenty years ago) link

I don't believe I am arguing against incremental improvements but I am arguing that the lot of women as a whole would be vastly improved by improving the lot of those worst off in society.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:43 (twenty years ago) link

In terms of oppression, hardship, etc., I'd rather be a middle-class woman than a working-class male. But I'd rather be an upper-class twit than either.

Jesse Fuchs (Jesse Fuchs), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 14:47 (twenty years ago) link

Because we want to!
Because we want to!
(Spice Girls, dunno when)

I can't believe no one picked up on this... this piece o' post-feminist sloganeering actually comes from Billie Piper.

I would love it if I had more time right now, because then I could contribute something good to this thread, but as things are I'll just point out that Andrea Dworkin is incredibly, stupidly myopic and is only saved from her otherwise irredeemable bintishness by not being Catherine MacKinnon, and that emphasising difference and victimhood is a dead-end way to ultimately self-defeating self-ghettoisation.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 15:01 (twenty years ago) link

I've been quickly scanning through this thread (quite a long & intense read here) and I suppose I identify more with Trayce's way of thinking than anything else, even though I didn't have any brothers (or any sisters, come to think of it) and had a heavily femicentric upbringing (most of my relatives were and are women). I did, however, get to have the lovely opportunity to spend all but about four years of my life in a very heavily machismo-oriented location, and after years of being openly teased (mercilessly) by my male classmates in grade school I pretty much learned how to have an iron constitution with regards to relations with the opposite sex. (It's only been really recently when I've actually become friends or friendly with males that I've eased up on this.) But you know what? As I've grown older I've found that people in general can be utter & complete bastards and morons or angels and great examples of humanity. Females struggle because we ALL struggle. It's pointless to list how we've been mistreated in the past because if we do that, then we need to give equal time to Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, Chinese-Americans, Latinos of all backgrounds, Native Americans, African-Americans, Japanese-Americans, gays & lesbians, etc., etc., etc. Point being, most EVERYONE has been mistreated in the past. Life is inherently unfair. This is purely fact. The key is to make sure that you alone get as much of the fair bits as you can and not focus as much on what you may or may not be getting because of who you were born as. Trayce totally hit the nail on the head with her proclamation of "I refuse to be a fucking victim," because that is the way I operate in life too, no matter what happens to me or in my life.

I love my sisters and want to stick by them, but I also love my brothers too and also want to stick by them. I am a humanist. I want fairness for ALL and victimhood for NONE.

Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

But she's so funny! "He is not possessed even though he rolls over dead and useless afterward, shrunk into oblivion" A laff riot.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 15:25 (twenty years ago) link

I feel the same as Trayce and Deanna, and I only I wish I could have put it so well.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

radical feminism =radical, Latin for root. Change is not possible within the existing system. To achieve a more just society that takes the lived experience of different race/class/gender in mind, society must be completely TRANSFORMED. Root change. Revolution.

cultural feminism: can be utopian or liberal (in the classic sense, change within the existing social system is possible). if only you change our culture so that things are not constructed in such a violent, male-centered, war-culture way then all people would be liberated from chains that bind them. If government culture were changed to emphasize consensus decisionmaking rather than power and hierarchy; if single mothers were given social support instead of being branded sluts and welfare queens etc. A change in the culture, in how we look at things, construct things, think of things.

In terms of RG, mei, the separatist argument has been done to death, and there are several different takes on it. You can see the usenet type arguments by googling for Riot Grrrl chapters and discussion boards on the web. I really don't want to get into it here, it's just boring for me in a been, there, done that a million times kinda way, and no i'm not being elitist i'm just being honest and no i am not trying to put anyone down.

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 15:54 (twenty years ago) link

Deanna, you ROCK.

cis (cis), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 16:01 (twenty years ago) link

No oppression is ended until ALL of it is!

p pot, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 17:12 (twenty years ago) link

Although I agree with Dee and Trayce on an individual level, I agree with gareth in that universals and essentialism should be avoided at all costs. One of my favourite theory-type books has always been "The Practice of Everyday Life" by Michael De Certeau. I like the idea of working against hegemonic systems by using smaller tactics, thus avoiding the creation of a replacement hegemony.

cybele (cybele), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 17:12 (twenty years ago) link

In ancient tymes the English word for woman was "wif-man" and the word for man was "waepna-man"—i.e. women wove cloth and t-shirts and California Raisins beach blankets, and men carried weapons. If a woman picked up a weapon, though, hey presto her category suddenly became "waepna-man", and vice-versa!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 18:44 (twenty years ago) link

My favorite feminist theory book is Dorothy Smith: The Everyday World As Problematic.
Second favorite: everything bell hooks ever wrote.

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 18:53 (twenty years ago) link

'radical' is latin for 'ROOT'!? there's sexism embedded in the language right there cobber!

bruce q, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 18:55 (twenty years ago) link

Separate classes: my ex-wife used to teach some, and organised lots. Her favourite examples of why it was needed were a woman who was doing self-defence, and the instructor suggested she might like to pay for lessons in a different way (and was she going to let him put his hands on her after that?) and, my 'favourite', a woman who lived on a barge and went to a class on canal navigation (don't ask me, I wouldn't have thought you could get lost on them) and at the start of the first lesson the instructor said "What's the problem, love? Couldn't you get a man to do it for you?" in what he apparently thought were reasonable tones.

Ed, your position that women really don't have it much worse than men is completely mental. Men suffer from the normative nature of sexual roles, but women's suffering and oppression is still there. Look at any serious study of violence within relationships, look at any study on rape, on murder in the home, and it is unmistakeable that feminism has many battles still to fight and win. The fact that poverty is a bad thing does not mean that women don't have plenty of extra ground to gain.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:03 (twenty years ago) link

I thought Ed's point was that the disparity between the classes was greater than the disparity between the sexes.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:56 (twenty years ago) link

I don't see how you can measure them, I don't see the use in doing so, and in any case I can't see that class disparity making rape and 'domestic violence' negligible in any case.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:20 (twenty years ago) link

this is starting to remind of that suffering thread. who has a 'right' to suffer, who suffers more. people only really know their own experiences and you can't blame them for working to improve their lot and those in similar situations that they can relate to. complaining because they aren't working to improve YOUR life or the lives of people YOU personally think have it worse-off is so silly. besides,someone would just chime in and criticize them on their priveleged guilt in trying to help people 'beneath' them or people they know nothing about. i swear, you can't win on these boards!

saying you're more interested in issue a than issue b is one thing, but denying that issue b even exists and that issue a is the only one anyone should care is so arrogant and naive.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:41 (twenty years ago) link

I really don't want to get into it here, it's just boring for me in a been, there, done that a million times kinda way, and no i'm not being elitist i'm just being honest and no i am not trying to put anyone down.

-- Orbit (cstarrcstar...), September 2nd, 2003.

So what should I do in this particular case?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

The disparity classes thing depends on where you live. I don't think nz is quite so class structured as the uk for eg. More concious of differences of gender and race here - though often those are essentially economic and maybe therefore = class.

Liek to add my support for the idea that feminism is not about gaining equality for women by standing on the heads of other groups that are discriminated against. It's just saying this is one issue I can identify and wish to address.

isadora (isadora), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:11 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.