i'm a bit insulted. i can't formulate a general objection to them, and i grow tired of those who insist on doing so. but i just don't have particularly warm feelings about anything i've seen by them, and i have pretty negative feelings about some of their films, like 'man who wasn't there.' none of their films sticks in my mind as an experience i want to linger over or return to.
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, 10 May 2010 10:32 (fourteen years ago) link
are you the same darragh mac who writes for senses of cinema?
nope.
the 'ur a little bit mad' was me just being confused btw, sorry if it came over a little strong.
― Black IP's (darraghmac), Monday, 10 May 2010 10:33 (fourteen years ago) link
amateurist i share your discontent w/ most of the coens' stuff but 'srs man' is every bit as good as this thread would suggest
― nakhchivan, Monday, 10 May 2010 10:54 (fourteen years ago) link
amateurist i share your discontent w/ most of the coens' stuff
YOU'RE BOTH CRAZY
ok i'll stop
― Black IP's (darraghmac), Monday, 10 May 2010 10:56 (fourteen years ago) link
amateurist fwiw i really loved this one and hated the man who wasn't there so... i say go for it
― sir gaga (s1ocki), Monday, 10 May 2010 12:44 (fourteen years ago) link
― by another name (amateurist), Monday, May 10, 2010 11:32 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
i'd say 1) this is fairly atypical, 2) i don't like "man who wasn't there" (or any of their films from the 2000s really) but liked this, 3) imo this and "lebowski" are their best films. idk you might not like it, but im sure you'll watch much worse films in any given year.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Monday, 10 May 2010 12:49 (fourteen years ago) link
the man who wasn't there is probably one of their worst movies. they def. have stinkers in their catalog.
this movie, tho, is amazing
― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 May 2010 15:42 (fourteen years ago) link
so, what's everyone's problem with the man who wasn't there? curious because I've seen it but honestly don't remember much about it.
my reaction at the time was, "yeah, it was alright."
― original bgm, Monday, 10 May 2010 16:04 (fourteen years ago) link
terrible cast, pointless plot, half-assed screenplay, an homage that adds nothing to its sources, empty
― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 May 2010 16:05 (fourteen years ago) link
I liked this movie a lot but generally I agree with amateurist re the Coens.
― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 May 2010 16:06 (fourteen years ago) link
i like everything they have done, to varying degrees – with the exception of big liebowski, which i kind of just feel is just silly and aimless, and oh brother! where art thou, which never really connected with me.
― ampersand (remy bean), Monday, 10 May 2010 16:56 (fourteen years ago) link
man who wasn't there was super boring iirc
― dmr, Monday, 10 May 2010 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link
I think I liked it enough when I watched it, but can't for the life of me remember ANYTHING about it.
― dan selzer, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:04 (fourteen years ago) link
the movie that wasn't there iirc
― sir gaga (s1ocki), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:05 (fourteen years ago) link
The Movie That Wasn't There
― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link
lol
man, who wasn't there?
― max, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link
Basically the two Minnesota-set Coen movies are, imo, their best. Except maybe No Country.
― will live out his days in gloomy batchelorhood (Eric H.), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link
I liked The Man Who Wasn't There, but I'm a big fan of the source material. It's definitely better than the Hudsucker Proxy or the Big Lebowski.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link
this movie was kind of like a cohen brothers's' napoleon dynamite
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link
sorry I have no idea what I meant by that I just wanted to type it
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:12 (fourteen years ago) link
this movie wasn't bad by any means but I felt like it wasn't doing anything new/I really never felt a connection to it for whatever reason
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link
I liked The Man Who Wasn't There, but I'm a big fan of the source material
I am too, but this movie didn't even come close to the moody intensity oc the best Cain screen adaptations imho. cast, as I said, was terrible.
It's definitely better than the Hudsucker Proxy or the Big Lebowski.
totally disagree on both counts but I tend to be the lone Hudsucker stan around here
― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link
nah man i like it
definitely better than TMWWT
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:40 (fourteen years ago) link
"cast, as I said, was terrible"
I liked the cast generally. Sco-Jo was miscast though.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link
I love Hudsucker, actually.
― Mordy, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link
The Man Who Wasn't There had a terrible cast? I'm not crazy about the flick (it's def. better than, say, Lady Killers), but the cast looks pretty good on paper to me ... I need to watch it again, though, wasn't sure whether the ending was brilliant or terrrrrrible.
― tylerw, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:42 (fourteen years ago) link
Totally forgot about the Lady Killers. That movie is total garbage.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link
the Clooney/Zeta Jones divorce lawyer one is also really bad. Not a fan of Burn After Reading either
― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link
Also Intolerable Cruelty, sigh. Lot of lame Coen bros movies.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link
I am a fan of Burn After Reading just for J K Simmons scenes. Those are so good they almost redeem the rest of it.
the weirdest thing to me about A Serious Man was how under the radar it seemed - distro was totally shitty, was gone from the theaters in a couple weeks, never saw much press for it, etc.
― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link
intolerable cruelty and burn after reading are both hella enjoyable
― goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link
Burn After Reading's pretty easily my favorite since Lebowski if not Fargo
― da croupier, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link
Loved Serious Man (finally saw it a couple weeks ago). Was refreshing not to have a bunch of big name actors in it after the overload of Burn After Reading.I am a fan of Burn After Reading just for J K Simmons scenesYes -- I lol just thinking about them ...
― tylerw, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link
I am a fan of Burn After Reading just for J K Simmons scenes.
Also, the David Rasche scenes - though I may be getting those mixed up with "In the Loop".
― o. nate, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:55 (fourteen years ago) link
I watched A Serious Man last week and it mainly left me cold. If I'd have grown up with this sort of Jewish culture I may have loved it, though. Some good moments (loved the tenure guy leaning on the door each time, Sy Ableman in general) but found it kind of unsatisfying.
― Not the real Village People, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link
No he's the one who Simmons is talking to.
He's not funny in In The Loop at all.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link
"If I'd have grown up with this sort of Jewish culture I may have loved it, though."
Yeah I def think this helps.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link
i grew up a lutheran in a small dutch calvinist town in iowa and i thought it was one of the most brilliant things they've ever done.
i do live in the twin cities tho. i was just in SLP this past weekend!
― goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link
I thought he was good in "In The Loop" - though maybe I imagined it. Seeing him in anything usually brings a smile to my face - probably because of watching "Sledge Hammer!" too much in my formative years. Sort of like my reaction to Bruce Campbell.
― o. nate, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:00 (fourteen years ago) link
I didn't think any of the Americans in In The Loop were funny so maybe it's me.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link
creepy aide had some decent lols imo
― rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Monday, 10 May 2010 20:03 (fourteen years ago) link
oh god, when i made my post upthread i forgot that the following shitty coen brothers movies exist
burn after readingintolerable crueltyladykillers
― ampersand (remy bean), Monday, 10 May 2010 20:12 (fourteen years ago) link
"creepy aide had some decent lols imo"
The racquetball guy? He had a moment or two.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2010 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link
Ladykillers is the only one I thought was truly shitty.
― tylerw, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link
Intolerable Cruelty was brutally bad.
― no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Monday, 10 May 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah it was pretty bad, but maybe Clooney was OK in it? I don't know, I don't remember it all that well.
― tylerw, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah I almost walked out on that one (xpost)
the weirdest thing to me about A Serious Man was how under the radar it seemed
wasn't it nominated for Best Picture though?!
― dmr, Monday, 10 May 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link