why must every moderately successful store in the UK be immediately turned into a chain?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (559 of them)

speaking of which, FUCKING WETHERSPOONS

david guest was stood outside the regal the other night. CELEB FACT

tissp, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the french and italians have a very different relationship with and approach to food,

This is basically it I think. The chain store mentality is just as strong in France as in the UK for everything except food. Paris still has about 50 farmers' markets because people are actually willing to spend their precious time patronising them (and paying their higher prices).

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

david guest was stood outside the regal the other night. CELEB FACT

on holloway rd??

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

and a wee supermarket on every other street

RJG, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

david gest, or a david guest i've not heard of? if the former, lol cheekbones. (tracer, tissp be talking about cambridge)

i actually go to 'spoons' occasionally, normally when the group i'm with winds up there. it's cheap, vast, impersonal, and overcrowded.

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

and a wee supermarket on every other street

The fact remains that 90 percent of food in the UK is supplied by five supermarket chains (or something like that), whereas in France the supermarkets have nowhere near that stranglehold.

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yes

RJG, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Glasgow has lots of nice places to eat.

mono?

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

if supermarkets supplied 90% of the food in france, no one would have anything to argue about

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

carrefour 4tw

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. that place does great croissants but the bread is bad, and this place has the best lamb west of pau, whereas this place etc etc etc etc til your head splits open

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, sorry tracer i am talking about cambridge. and it was david gest, sorry. i didn't realise he spelt his name all funny style. he was fucking TINY

tissp, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

e leclerc was up and running before supermarkets in the uk btw.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

nationmaster is great!

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/foo_tea_con-food-tea-consumption

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Is the issue that the French and Italians are, generally speaking, more protectionist and precious about their cultural heritage than the British?

(And with that, clusterfuck fans, it becomes a race issue as well as a class issue, oh joy)

Matt DC, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

France and Italy are a lot less "integrated" in terms of their immigrant communities, put it that way.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm having roast beef for dinner

DG, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Plus the English "protecting" their culture of food is a bit like American Samoa protecting their culture of football, let's be honest.
lol xp

Dom Passantino, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Is the issue that the French and Italians are, generally speaking, more protectionist and precious about their cultural heritage than the British?

time for a french farmer to weigh in.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

that's why this thread is not about "the good old days" vs today's bad bad world

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

american samoa are my spiritual bros, it's not every day you let 31 in

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Zelda, to a certain extent the crowds at a hypermarket Flunch would proove you a little wrong. However you are mainly right, france and especially italy have a culture of eating out that is very diferent from that in the UK. Walk round Turin on a sunday evening and every pizzeria and trattoria will be bursting with family groups, a fair number of whom will go and sit at the same table week inweek out or atleast on a monthly basis. There is an attitude of a local restaurant being an extensions of the home. It is certainly somewhere where the tenure of restaurant property is more ownership than leasing.

On the UK side, I think that the culture of leverage is pretty strong, i.e. mortgaging your business to extend your business. The banks of other European nations have been less gung ho about this.

Ed, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Weather's nicer there innit?

Mark G, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Well we have a similar pub culture in the UK that places like Italy generally lack and that hasn't stopped the majority of them becoming owned by massive impersonal PubCos. I suppose you can pinpoint the moment that started to Thatcher forcing the breweries to sell off pubs, though.

Matt DC, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

firkin' chain pubs, hate the lot of 'em. :D

the smoking ban hasn't helped. sometimes a chain pub gained a musty individuality through the atmosphere created by its clientele. i don't smoke myself, but i'm really pissed-off about the ban.

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't smoke myself, but i'm really pissed-off about the ban

Oh fuck off you're not, you bandwagon jumper.

Mark C, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I sort of agree with Tracer to some extent. Obviously the preponderance of chains is an economic factor and the US does of course have thousands of them, but in California at least most people I know tend to shop and eat at independent businesses or community-minded local chains. I think in Britain perhaps this kind of behaviour is seen as a little precious and bourgeois but that's sort of how Britain is, sometimes.

admrl, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Walk round Turin on a sunday evening and every pizzeria and trattoria will be bursting with family groups, a fair number of whom will go and sit at the same table week inweek out or atleast on a monthly basis

and the vast majority of these families will be a snapshot of urban upper middle class, much like the clientele you mainly see sitting outside restaurants in any major european city.

it's the people you don't see eating at these restaurants that may well be shopping/eating in chain supermarkets/restaurants. they're generally the majority.

darraghmac, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

"if you can eat this peperami we'll know you're not a class traitor"

"ok"

menacing guard waves peperami under nose of detainee

"ugh.. no. NO!"

* bang *

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently carrefour is the second largest hypermarket chain in the world second only to walmart

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh fuck off you're not, you bandwagon jumper.

The majority of my friends are smokers, and I side with them and their right to choose. No way am I a bandwagon-jumper. I genuinely prefer bars with a musty old-man smoky vibe.

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Of course you do. "Right to choose"? What right to choose?

Mark C, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

you mean the right to choose what

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

darraghmac takes the arg one step further: european people who eat at restaurants are upper middle class!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Choose whether to smoke or not when they're out enjoying themselves!

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

um, i meant uppity middle class, possibly

darraghmac, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

they can choose whether to smoke or not outside

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

has the thread question been answered yet?

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

well i'm pretty sure Tracer knows why

gff, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Also with regards to "cheap food" and "chain restaurants" being one and the same, I am a graduate student with negative income. I can't even really afford Starbuck's!

admrl, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Mark - lay off, just because you're really passionate about the anti-smoking ban it doesn't mean all non-smokers share your views. (I'm saying this in an affectionate, small nudge way, BTW.)

Personally, I prefer the small shops. For reasons of quality and middle class guilt. That said, I've just done a shop at Lewisham Tesco. My boyfriend is in hospital and, like, Grimly, I haven't got a spare second right now, let alone waiting for a carrot until I can get to the market on Saturday. (Fuck waiting a carrot?) The danger is a homogonised chain of supply, suppliers prices being forced down and being stuck with standardised apples.

The other issue: when I was really poor a few years back, small shops were a God send. I could buy small amounts from loose produce, three apples, one fish fillet etc. Supermarkets only really work as the cheapest option if you're bulk buying - so if you're feeding a family on a budget, then yes, supermarkets are cheaper. If you're an elderly person living alone/ a freelance journalist who hasn't been paid in three months, shop small and local.

and i'm not going to look down on some harassed mum taking her kids in for a child-/family-friendly meal, because -- hey! -- preferring the food from the wee bistro round the corner doesn't make me some superior life-form.
No, I think it's great. Means I can have a nice meal in wee bistro without screaming sprogs smearing food on each other! That said, if I had kids I'd probably take them - just because they'll have staff who can provid crayons and the other diners will know what they've let themselves in for.

Anna, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:37 (sixteen years ago) link

this question was answered after 1 minute- if you do something well, and are making money at it(presumably), why wouldn't you want to expand?

darraghmac, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

You can buy 3 apples and one fish in Tesco.

Also, some of us have children who behave in restaurants, whether it's a pizza hut coz it's next to the cinema or a nice wee bistro.

xp

onimo, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Darragh - because the appeal of some businesses and therefore their main USP is that they're unique?

Matt DC, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

wee-bistros were the reason maddie went missing

ken c, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Maddy would still be with her parents if they'd taken her to McDonalds.

Matt DC, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh I'd never take my kids for tapas, it's hard enough to get them to choose one thing.

onimo, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

and the vast majority of these families will be a snapshot of urban upper middle class, much like the clientele you mainly see sitting outside restaurants in any major european city.

Not in my experience.

Ed, Monday, 5 November 2007 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.