quite honestly I have been super happy for pretty much my entire life reading pulpy genre-bound science fiction and fantasy and the idea of reading most "literary" novels makes me want to scream
That too.
― GamalielRatsey, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:10 (thirteen years ago) link
'pretty much my entire life reading pulpy genre-bound science fiction and fantasy and the idea of reading most "literary" novels makes me want to scream'
They've kind of converged though, right? If you pick at random a page from a Bolano and a Warhammer novel, someone uninitiated might have a hard time picking out which was the "literary" one.
Also, is realism as much a constraint today as it was say a few decades ago? Would Gibson need to set Neuromancer in a fantastic setting if he wrote it today?
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:17 (thirteen years ago) link
If you pick at random a page from a Bolano and a Warhammer novel, someone uninitiated might have a hard time picking out which was the "literary" one.
really now
― emotional radiohead whatever (Jordan), Friday, 9 July 2010 17:18 (thirteen years ago) link
thread keeps giving
― thomp, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:19 (thirteen years ago) link
Would Gibson need to set Neuromancer in a fantastic setting if he wrote it today?
speaks more to the failings of the imaginations of modern sci-fi writers than anything else (Gibson himself has already conceded the fact, no longer feels writing about the future is "necessary" etc. But he's been shit for like 25 years now anyway so who cares)
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link
We don't have a Rolling Contemporary Literary Fiction thread, do we? Would people be interested in that? I would. If anyone else would too, I'll start one on ILB.
― ksh, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link
I think Gibson's gotten better at writing, but his novels have gotten worse, if that makes any sense. But if it's a collective failure of imagination, that failure stretches back pretty far then -- which great genre works cannot be re-written as realist novels today?
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:25 (thirteen years ago) link
not that I think accurate prognostication is what makes sci-fi interesting (it isn't), and it's a given and well-worn truism that all science fiction is actually about the present anyway - but to me one of the most enduringly fascinating things about science fiction is this creation of other worlds, whether they're in the future or on other planets or other dimensions or whatever. These "what if?" scenarios that are fired by speculation and imagination seem so much more engaging to me, they encourage the reader to shift perspectives and see things, real world things, in a new light. Sci-fi writers like Lethem or Gibson essentially abandoning this tool altogether in favor of realism just seems like a weak capitulation. Their books suffer for it.
xp
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 17:26 (thirteen years ago) link
Boom: Rolling Contemporary Literary Fiction
― ksh, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:27 (thirteen years ago) link
I used to love that Ben Marcus book pictured up above when I was in college, and I recently tried to re-read it and decided it was bullshit
― homosexual II, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:38 (thirteen years ago) link
I'd agree that Lethem suffers for it, in that he's more adept at pure invention in the fantasy realm, versus say, places he happened to have lived in, but Gibson's schtick was always more pastiche, when the source realism could be rendered in just as perspective-shifting and exotic a fashion as necessary.
But even Lethem with some effort could translate a lot of his genre stuff no-problem. The fact that some characters are kangaroos in Gun With Occasional Music isn't particularly crucial. Michael Jordan shoes could be reformulated as a story about Moneyball-type statistics-based changes affecting basketball. Amnesia Moon could be morphed into a more Oliver Sacksian story.
There might be some stories that are just pure philosophical thought experiments that have no easy analog in realism, but even then, I feel a writer with enough will and skill could make it happen.
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:40 (thirteen years ago) link
I disagree that Gibson's fiction has gotten worse. Pattern Recognition is one of his best novels. None of his books hold up very well plotwise and never have; all of them have been pretty contrived. It was one of the lesser contrived ones. But I do think the Difference Engine was his most interesting book. No idea how much of it he wrote.
― akm, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link
Someone give me a compelling writing prompt and I'll go and save literature
― homosexual II, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link
there once was a message board,
― ksh, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Pride and Prejudice and Bearotaurs?
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:50 (thirteen years ago) link
Provincial academic sees a cat being run over which prompts a sudden realisation that his life is empty, that results in him staying exactly where he is and gradually watching his life is unravelled, that's before a mysterious stranger turns up on his door with an unusual proposition...
Then aliens land in massive shiny spaceships and blast them all to shit.
― GamalielRatsey, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:51 (thirteen years ago) link
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, July 9, 2010 1:26 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is just nuts to me, assuming im reading you right
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:52 (thirteen years ago) link
Anyway, Bolano Warhammer isn't enough inspiration for you? xpost
― GamalielRatsey, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:53 (thirteen years ago) link
These "what if?" scenarios that are fired by speculation and imagination seem so much more engaging to me, they encourage the reader to shift perspectives and see things, real world things, in a new light.
this is what all books do, or are supposed to do, and if woolf or carver or... whoever were trashing here arent doing that to you im inclined to think its your fault
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:57 (thirteen years ago) link
but i also have a pet peeve with people who are demanding toward their books/music/art i.e. "why isnt this thing doing what i want it to do"
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link
nah I like Woolf and Carver - the people I'm explicitly trashing are sci-fi writers who transition to more conventional realist novels and as a consequence have their work suffer for it
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:00 (thirteen years ago) link
harry potter and the sea
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:01 (thirteen years ago) link
oh well i dunno. motherless brooklyn is my favorite lethem book and its his most 'realist' isnt it? no flying kids or anything.
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:01 (thirteen years ago) link
harry potter is sci fi right
Never particularly happy with that 'this is what all books are supposed to do' argument tbh. Novels can do what they damn well please - it's the freedom of what can happen between the pages that fascinates me, the enjoyment to be had in reading, rather than any real world relevance (<---ugh).
There's no doubt that the seeing things anew thing has happened with some of the best things I've read, but equally it's not a thing with an awful lot of other stuff that I like. I'll settle for 'it made me laugh' quite a lot of the time. Or spaceships.
― GamalielRatsey, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:01 (thirteen years ago) link
"world-building" happens in p much all fiction although theres a specific kind of world-building that gets done in spec fic that i can see finding more compelling than "literary realism"
but im just like "..." over warhammer 2666K
― Lamp, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link
lethem's a hack there I posted it
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link
I dunno if I would call it realist - it's a pretty obvious noir homage, more than anything. Probably the last decent thing he did imho
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:03 (thirteen years ago) link
the last sci fi book I read was the first book of the new sun when I was a teen, I saw an old dude reading it in a diner a month ago and kind of nodded at him but he was reading and didn't see me
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:03 (thirteen years ago) link
book of the new sun is terrible, there i posted it
― Lamp, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link
Never particularly happy with that 'this is what all books are supposed to do' argument tbh.
I hope this isn't how I'm coming across - I pretty directly disputed this above somewhere iirc
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link
Wolfe is great there I said it. altho I wouldn't recommend everything of his (the amnesiac greco-roman soldier stuff got kinda tiresome)
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:05 (thirteen years ago) link
ok fine but "books are supposed to shift perspective and help you see things in a different light" isnt a very precise restriction is it? i mean its vague enough to be sort of meaningless which i guess is my point. having aliens and shit in your book doesnt make it better at shifting perspective than have a particularly acute way of talking about emotions or something
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:05 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah I kind of skipped around it but there are still some cool scenes I remember like when people were sitting at a dinner table in a forest and tripping out on some sci fi fantasy drug and eating that dude's gf
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:05 (thirteen years ago) link
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, July 9, 2010 2:03 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
noir isnt realist!? but those guys are all hemingway stans!
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:06 (thirteen years ago) link
postman always rings twice is one of my fav books I think
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link
Anyone who thinks Gibson has ben shit for 25 years has not read Pattern Recognition
― "Don't forget to bring a juggalo towel!" (HI DERE), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:09 (thirteen years ago) link
I flipped through a Star Wars novel that appeared to be 90% concerned with architectural and political considerations on building a large public-works project like the Death Star, and was thinking did they dig up an old novel about the Panama Canal and just search/replace on proper names?
re: motherless brooklyn -- is this the one with the guy with asperger superpowers? that seemed like a book that is ambiguous as to its being set in the real world or not.
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:11 (thirteen years ago) link
anyway i sort of thought we had established that shakeys real problem with books isnt books its that hes too lazy to seek out books he wants to read
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:12 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah it was that
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:13 (thirteen years ago) link
no noir is not realist
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:13 (thirteen years ago) link
xposts "books are supposed to shift perspective and help you see things in a different light" isnt a very precise restriction is it
No, no, not at all, it's a fine achievement when it's done (no matter how its achieved), I just wouldn't personally use it as a blanket for everything that I've liked. The Hollow Man by John Dickson Carr (to take an example), doesn't really make me look at the world in a new way, but when I'm reading it, I'm like 'Yeah! This is great!'
― GamalielRatsey, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:14 (thirteen years ago) link
hes too lazy to seek out books he wants to read
dude I'm reading 4 different books right now (Horace satires, Process Church of the Final Judgment bio, Disch short story collection, Riddley Walker) so um fuck you
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:15 (thirteen years ago) link
also not exactly helpful to blow up my very specific criticism of a couple of sci-fi writers into a LAW OF FICTION WRITING but thx for the strawmanning well done
but shakey how many of those books have aliens in them?
― Lamp, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:16 (thirteen years ago) link
SORRY FOR MISUNDERSTANDING YOU I BASICALLY ASSUMED YOU WERE CONTINUING YOUR DUMB CRITIQUE OF ALL LITERARY FICTION NOT JUST WILLIAM GIBSON MY BAD DOGG
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:16 (thirteen years ago) link
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_c_L6wtZ6XJA/Sut19E2jMcI/AAAAAAAABHo/OqgCQgHQzaQ/s400/Signs_alien.jpg
― ksh, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:17 (thirteen years ago) link
like I said a few posts back my dumb literary critique boils down to = modern realist novels, I hate them
― Master of the Manly Ballad (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 July 2010 18:18 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah
― max, Friday, 9 July 2010 18:19 (thirteen years ago) link
*shrugs*