Taking Sides: Atheism vs. Christianity

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)
http://mcclungmuseum.utk.edu/specex/ur/ur-xbt.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:18 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.evertrobles.com/e2.su.ur%20ziggurat.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:20 (twenty years ago) link

http://carlos.emory.edu/BOOKSHOP/IMAGES-UR/ur.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:22 (twenty years ago) link

http://urleica.tripod.com/ur-leica.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 23 January 2004 03:22 (twenty years ago) link

!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 23 January 2004 03:26 (twenty years ago) link

Now Jesus existed u cant argue against that history proves it. Therefore hes either of these a lunitic, liar, God,or a prophet. If hes a prophet then he lied making himself not a prophet.

This, by the way, is nonsense. C.S. Lewis, whom I like, was fond of this "proof," and I do love the way Lewis parses it ("we can either dismiss him as a madman or fall at his feet, but let's have no more of this calling him a great teacher" - paraphrased badly, but something along those lines), but it assumes strictly western, modern values: a man who says God sent him - well! either he's telling the truth, or he's crazy, or he's evil! ummm OR he's a Vaisnava who means what he says in a way you don't hear because you don't live the prayerful life he does! OR he's a teacher in a (very strong & great) Buddhist tradition where illogic is used to smash the unhelpful materialistic workings of Mind! Or, or, or, or a bunch of stuff, all equally interesting, pertinent and possible. Bottom line: Jesus could say ALL THE THINGS HE SAID and still not be God, crazy, or evil. OR a prophet. Of course he could.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:00 (twenty years ago) link

haha i wasnt paraphrasing CS lewis on that one thats a standard question u must ask urself about Jesus..... he has to be one of those 4

B. Robinson, Friday, 23 January 2004 04:01 (twenty years ago) link

no, he doesn't have to be one of those four, and your saying so doesn't make it so! he could be any number of other things - you're just not interested in the other possibilities!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:04 (twenty years ago) link

also B. I'd like to point out that you began your argument here with "you atheists say that God doesn't exist because you can't see him," but that's not actually what people were & are saying. What you have there is called a "straw man," i.e., an opponent you made up so you could defeat him.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:07 (twenty years ago) link

No he has to since he claimed to be God.... those r the only choices normal people dont claim to be the almighty creator of the universe so he has to be either a liar, lunitic, or God himself and the reason why i throw in the prophet is becasue some religions regard him as a prophet

B. Robinson, Friday, 23 January 2004 04:10 (twenty years ago) link

Agnostics believe first of all they must see to believe

B. Robinson, Friday, 23 January 2004 04:14 (twenty years ago) link

I left god(s) behind with the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus. I’m actually quite startled that such a lot of people still put their faith in stories and ideas composed thousands of years ago, in a scientifically unenlightened age. The medical parallel would be to refuse modern medicine because “I have faith in the witch doctor.” The trouble with religion is that it’s based on the principle of “don’t ask questions; just have faith” – this is pure intellectual laziness. Yes! be nice to one another, be forgiving and loving… these are all fine philosophies. I, personally, nonetheless, favour the idea of carrying them out of my own accord, and not because it has been commanded of me.

A
List of Biblical Contradictions
.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:47 (twenty years ago) link

I agree with B. I don't understand why athiest try to say that God doesn't exist when they have no proof general theme to back up their reasoning. Back to what B. was saying about how Jesus is proven historically. So he was a man. In the beggining when God created man he created him in his image(Genesis 1:26). So if God created man in his image, if somehow he would come down to earth in some image, man is the way he would look. And when Jesus came, he showed us he was God and God was his and our creator (Acts 3:36). He told us this! All those athiests out there, try reading a gospel in the Bible, if u already have, try to understand who and what Jesus was. I'm not forcing u to believe, I just recommend it. Sorry if i came off really rude. U are in my prayers. Its fascinating how there is always someone praying for you, its becuz they care for u and want to see u in the heavenly kingdom. hope to see ya ther.

J. Sutton, Friday, 23 January 2004 04:52 (twenty years ago) link

nice try

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:53 (twenty years ago) link

Doubts of our conviction
Follow where we go
And when the world's compassion
Ceases still I know
4 your every touch I
Thank U so much
4 your every kiss I...

I wish U love
I wish U heaven
I wish U heaven

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 January 2004 04:59 (twenty years ago) link

Nice try, what else do you need. What can i say that will satisfy you. I dont know what to tell non-believers because most of the time they are ignorant and stubborn, i suggest u wise up and acknowledge your creator, and ask him to show u who He is. I dont approve of smart alic respones.

J. Sutton, Friday, 23 January 2004 05:13 (twenty years ago) link

i don't approve of jackasses who can't master a simple word posting under multiple names. so i guess we have a problem.

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 23 January 2004 05:13 (twenty years ago) link

I dont know what to tell non-believers because most of the time they are ignorant and stubborn

Somewhat hypocritical, methinks.

U are in my prayers. Its fascinating how there is always someone praying for you, its becuz they care for u and want to see u in the heavenly kingdom.

If you really cared for people, should you perhaps not be less condescending and more understanding towards those who don’t believe exactly what you believe (that would be anyone outside the Christian faith)? And prayer is cheap, anyway.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 05:19 (twenty years ago) link

Broadcasting Christian TV, especially the fact that one of our channels can broadcast Jimmy Swaggart with a straight face and having encountered so much hypocrisy in so called religious people has only strengthened my increasingly less tolerant atheism. People create gods not the other way round. I warrant that through the ages there have been some charismatic teachers but their messages of ,'stop hitting each other of the head with that rock', always get clouded by imaginary fathers, policemen, or judges.

Ed (dali), Friday, 23 January 2004 07:03 (twenty years ago) link

I think Karl Marx had it about right when he said that "religion is the opium of the people"... and boy, are the people hooked.

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 07:27 (twenty years ago) link

This is where I admit (slightly drunkenly) that this bit:

Do u see the wind. No u cant but u can feel the wind

...actually made me think more of Ween interpreting Prince than Prince. Thank you and good night.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 January 2004 07:30 (twenty years ago) link

What do we do with other things that we have no proof of? God is not alone in this. There can be no proof of the existence of phlogiston [A hypothetical substance formerly thought to be a volatile constituent of all combustible substances, released as flame in combustion.] Just like God, there is literature available on phlogiston, but we don't take that fact as proof that phlogiston exists. The thing is, we can explain combustion well enough without phlogiston. It is unnecessary for our understanding of combustion. So, what do we do about phlogiston? We don't believe in it or have a belief system about it not existing. We simply leave it out. That is not agnosticism, as it does not involve maybeism at all (love that neologism, by the way).

In the case of phlogiston, the reason we have no proof is that non-existence is undetectable. I'd say this is equivalent to God, but I know that isn't an easy statement for a lot of people.

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 08:24 (twenty years ago) link

Exactly so. The burden of proof lies by default on those who wish to show the existence of a thing or a characteristic of a thing. It has always seemed so clear to me that I often feel as if everyone's playing a practical joke on me. "Oh yeah, we've arbitrarily decided to believe in the existence of this Guy that we've never seen and of whom there is absolutely no evidence! Haha!"

Dan I., Friday, 23 January 2004 08:58 (twenty years ago) link

btw, that thing about not seeing the wind but feeling it is hokum. You can see the wind by looking at a field of corn, watch it sway. And feeling the wind on your face is nothing like feeling something intangible inside. Feeling the wind on your face can be measured in temperature change, wind speed and so on.

Sorry, that one was bugging me.

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 09:08 (twenty years ago) link

According to northern English folklore, pigs can see the wind. But then, according to northern English folklore, saying the word "pig" is extremely unlucky, especially if you're about to go to sea.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

I think I'm becoming more of a pantheist these days.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:52 (twenty years ago) link

Does that mean you worship cookware?

(boom! boom!)

(serious answer: yeah, me too.)

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:57 (twenty years ago) link

I think trying to justify belief/disbelief in God on rationalist, scientific grounds is the wrong approach. Religion is neither a science nor a pseudo-science.

Jonathan Z., Friday, 23 January 2004 12:14 (twenty years ago) link

Well, yes. I've always thought that if you're genuinely religious that you shouldn't need to look for proof of the truth of the Bible (or your religion of choice): your belief should be strong enough.

Lots of people don't seem to get this, though. Cf: creationism.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 23 January 2004 12:21 (twenty years ago) link

No he has to [be one of the four things I named] since he claimed to be God

No, only according to your very narrow understanding of things. Jesus never outright said "I am God"; what he said was, "no man comes to the father except by me," "there are many rooms in my father's house, if it were not so I would have told you," etc. A perfectly sane non-prophet might in total sincerity say "no man comes to the father except by me" and mean any number of things! nor did Jesus say "I am the only son of God" - the authors of the gospels did that one. Every claim Christ made for divinity could be made by a perfectly sound worshipper of God who understood worship in the ecstatic tradition. You understand worship in a tradition that's roughly eighty years old, and Christ's version of worship would probaly give you the creeps real bad, since it doesn't involve "feelings" and whatnot but actual ecstatic dissolution of the self.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 12:27 (twenty years ago) link

short version: I know you think the "he has to be one of these four things" is really clever, but unless you're myopic, it's transparently false

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

U guys havent read the Bible i take it becuase Jesus siad he was God he proved it in miracles said he was the messiah called himself the Son of God and was almost stoned because the Jews took it as him putting himself equal to God. U can find contridictions in the Bible in a lot of places. But if u dont read the whole thing u dont know why God sent the HEbrews to kill everyone u just assume its just well another contridiction. I challenge u to read the Bible thats what CS LEwis did he tried to prove it wrong and became a Christian in the process

B. Robinson, Friday, 23 January 2004 12:57 (twenty years ago) link

What about the SHEbrews?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:02 (twenty years ago) link

Some quotes associated with atheism…

Religion glorifies the dogma of despotic, mythical gods. Atheism ennobles the interests of a free and progressive mankind. Religion is superstition. Atheism is sanity. Religion is medieval. Atheism is modern.
~E. Haldeman-Julius

The idea of God implies the abdication of human reason and justice; it is the most decisive negation of human liberty, and necessarily ends in the enslavement of mankind, both in theory and practice.
~Emma Goldman

What religion a man shall have is a historical accident, quite as much as what language he shall speak.
~George Santayana

With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
~Steven Weinberg

Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.
~Thomas Jefferson

If we assume that there is no God, it follows that morality is even more important than if there is a Deity. If God exists, his unlimited power can certainly redress imbalances in the scale of human justice. But if there is no God, then it is up to man to be as moral as he can.
~Steve Allen

Is God something that exists 'out there', beyond, and independent of us? Or is God merely the product of an inherited human perception, the manifestation of an evolutionary adaptation, a coping mechanism that emerged in our species in order to enable us to survive our unique and otherwise debilitating awareness of death?
~Matthew Alper

I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
~Stephen Roberts

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.
~Gene Roddenberry

Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than are lies.
~Nietzsche

The fact that a believer is happier than a sceptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.
~George Bernard Shaw

If God created man in his own image, we have certainly returned the favour.
~Voltaire

When I told the people of Northern Ireland that I was an atheist, a woman in the audience stood up and said, 'Yes, but is it the God of the Catholics or the God of the Protestants in whom you don't believe?
~Quentin Crisp

So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator. But if the universe is completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would neither be created nor destroyed… it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?
~Stephen Hawking

Charles Hatcher (musenheddo), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:07 (twenty years ago) link

Now Jesus existed u cant argue against that history proves it. Therefore hes either of these a lunitic, liar, God,or a prophet. If hes a prophet then he lied making himself not a prophet. if hes God then hes telling the truth. If hes a lunitic then the people who wrote the Gospels would have to know since they spent a good time with him and seen his miracles. If hes a liar why did he get so much credit since there were lots of so called messiahs of that time that were killed by the romans.

This is the silliest proof of Jesus' divinity I've heard. What about other historical religious leaders, like Muhammad? If he was a lunatic, why didn't see it. If he was a liar, how come he was picked amongst other prophets, and how come Islam is the second biggest religion in the world, even though Muslims didn't do missionary work or forced people to convert at the same rate that Christians have done. To claim that you can't start a succesful religious sect without being The Real McCoy is stupid, just look at L. Ron Hubbard, or the guy who founded the Church of Mormon, or...

Besides, it isn't even certain that there was a historical Jesus.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:10 (twenty years ago) link

That should read: "..why didn't people see it?".

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:11 (twenty years ago) link

I'll read the Bible B. if I have a good reason to. Neither you nor anyone else has ever given me good reason.

Faith is not enough. I don't have it and I won't pretend to have it in the hope of getting it on someone's word. (I know you think Jesus's word is different, and fair enough, but I believe that the historical Jesus existed without believing in what Jesus believed or what subsequent Christians believe.)

The existence of God has no basis in sense or science, so why should I go for it, except perhaps to save my soul (another 'thing' that I don't believe in).

Asking people to read the Bible before making a judgement on Jesus or Christianity or God is like asking people to read Mein Kampf before judging Hitler. I judge Hitler by what he did. And I'll judge God by the same method. According to that method, I have no proof that He exists, so I don't see any reason at all to read His book.

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:14 (twenty years ago) link

Robinson, you were at my mum's book group last night, weren't you? Arrrgggggh! Because that was exactly one of the metaphors used, only in a reverse position.

About religion, I feel very confused these days.

My mother is a committed Christian, and an intellectual - a priest. When I talk to her, I feel like the most raging atheist who has ever lived, because I object to the Christian Church so strongly. My partner is a committed Atheist, a strong Atheist to the point where his insistence on the nonexistence of God is as based on faith and belief and dogma as my mother's belief.

I fall somewhere between the two.

On a large scale, I have many problems with The Church, as many other people have already pointed out, so I won't reiterate. On a small scale, however, I do see how individual churches have been very positive forces in various people's lives, so I cannot throw out the concept entirely.

However, my mother wants her computer right now and I cannot think or formulate ideas or write with her standing in the doorway so this is going to have to remain unfinished.

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 13:32 (twenty years ago) link

Sounds like you appreciate the secular aspect of the church.

I appreciate that churches, religion and the belive in God can have positive effects on people's lives. That doesn't make me wonder whether I should believe in God myself. Do you, river fleet?

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:36 (twenty years ago) link

My partner is a committed Atheist, a strong Atheist to the point where his insistence on the nonexistence of God is as based on faith and belief and dogma as my mother's belief.

Insistence on the nonexistence of a god cannot be based "on faith and belief and dogma". If you insist that the Smurfs or elfs don't exist, is that a dogma? It's the same thing with gods. As someone pointed out, the burden of proof is always on the one who wants prove that something exists, because you can never fully prove something doesn't exist. It is impossible to prove that elfs or Smurfs don't exist, just like it is impossible to prove that God doesn't exist. Therefore, an atheist would be dogmatic only in the case the where god would appear right before his eyes, and he'd still refuse to believe in it. Of course, even that could be merely a delusion caused by LSD or a psychosis...

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 23 January 2004 13:54 (twenty years ago) link

I quote the bible & prove B. Robinson wrong, and he responds by saying "the bible says this"...and not quoting the bible

TS: atheism vs. theism, I'll take theism. but if it's atheism vs. Christianity, give me atheism. Christianity is the worst religion ever.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

Why theism, Thomas Tellis?

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago) link

I don't mean to throw it back to you or anything. I'm just interested. Sorry if I sounded aggressive at all

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:04 (twenty years ago) link

because I do think that theism, on balance (that is, weighing it against all the atrocities committed in the names of this or that god), has the potential to bring out the good in people. shoot, even Xity, which delendam esse and sooner rather than later thanks, has served as the vehicle for encouraging selflessness in many people: which quality, i think, is the highest human good.

no offense taken, btw!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago) link

A secular appraciation of religion, then?

I can go along with that. It's not theism, though, is it, because you're not talking about a belief in god or gods or anything of that sort, are you?

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:08 (twenty years ago) link

OK, sorry, got distracted and ended up in a strange discussion with my mum about Episcopalian theology. (And a hundred x-posts that I am going to ignore for now for the sake of space.)

Some things I appreciate about the church-
1) the community aspect. It brings people together, they share a common bond, it teaches them responsibility for each other. If this is inclusionary, this is great. Too often it is twisted into being exclusionary.
2) the moral aspect. It (hopefully should) teach a basic ethical code - do unto others, etc. If people follow the spirit of this code, then it's as good as the Categorial Imperative for me. However, too often people get caught up in the letter of the law and use this to justify vastly unethical behaviour.
3) The concept of forgiveness. (goes along with the moral aspect, perhaps.) Human beings make mistakes. It's a good idea to admit that you've made a mistake, forgive that mistake and move on, rather than bear a grudge and carry on into tribal style vengeance.

Do you need a concept of God to have these principles? Probably not. To me, the concept of God is a shortcut to admitting that there is something greater than yourself, greater than the individual and its animal impulses. You can call that Something Greater "god" or you can call it "free will" or you can call it "rational thought and consciousness leading to enlightened self interest".

Some people have literal, rational minds and call it Free Will and are atheists. Some people have intuitive, symbolic minds and call it God and are Christians (or the religion of your choice.)

I don't think it matters; it is the concept not the name.

My mother says again and again "God (religion, etc.) is an experience, you either have it or you don't" or words to that effect (I'm probably misquoting her.) I don't have that experience.

I always say "Music is an experience, either you get it or you don't" because music offers many of those things to me - community, fulfillment, the sense of Something Higher. My mother is not musical and will never understand or experience music the way that I do. I don't think that makes her a lesser person, just different. The religious/atheist principle *should* be like that. Except many relious (and strong atheists) want to make out that they are a better person for their experience. Which I don't think is right.

Anyway, as an aside. It's hysterically funny to me how many strong atheists spend so much time talking about whether or not music has "soul".

the river fleet, Friday, 23 January 2004 14:08 (twenty years ago) link

Do you agree, then, river fleet, that you have a primarily (or even exclusively) secular interest in religion?

run it off (run it off), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:11 (twenty years ago) link

B Robinson you are Jack Chick and I claim my five dollah

Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Friday, 23 January 2004 14:14 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.