Baz Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (137 of them)
re "two hours" – that said i like the 23940875 hour branagh hamlet a lot! you maybe don't! the megalomania of it is really something.

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 08:48 (nineteen years ago) link

if luhrmann is DO YOU SEE branagh is YOU'LL NEVER NEED SEE ANYTHING ELSE

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 08:49 (nineteen years ago) link

but all the "modernizing" productions of him...rub me the wrong way.

g-off, did you see almereyda's "hamlet" w/ethan hawke? i thought this was an extremely successful "updating" of shakespeare on film.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 09:07 (nineteen years ago) link

but more importantly take place in no-time

I did actually get this impression of R+J: a lot of the signifiers are explicitly modern but recognisable everyday reality is not one of them: it feels much more like taking certain aspects of contemporary life and exaggerating them into some sort of dream world.

I loved this film when I was 14, too: hearts, Greg, for this thread. Also you SO need to meet Ria asap, she was obsessed as well: you can talk to each other about R+J and Gareth.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 09:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I like this film. Not only does it look cool (yes it is on occasion laborious, but crikey it ALWAYS looks cool) but I really liked the acting as well. SO often with R+J everyone's young love naivety is lost, and the grand pronouncements on love are treated like revered pearls of wisdom. Clare Danes in particular nails the youthfulness of it all - the knowing that this is something new and exciting and no-one EVER has been in love this much and OMG this is so cool, you know what teenagers are like. I've seen better productions, but I really like Clare Danes in it. DiCaprio can take a jump though, he's less good, if only for trying to look mean when he just comes across as petulant - but then maybe that's the point?

Johnney B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 10:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I love this movie, and in fact, probably all of Baz Luhrman's movies. It fucked me up to watch it again about a month ago. Not for anything worthwhile though, just noticing that the guy that plays Michael (Harold Perrineau) on LOST was Mercutio! A damned fine Mercutio at that.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 12:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I think DiCaprio coming across as petulant is part of the point: how callow Romeo is, his puppy-dog histrionics.

Oddly, this time around, I didn't like the priest as much.

lundy fastnet irish sea (cis), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 13:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I remember thinking that Claire Danes was the most beautiful woman in the world when I saw this, and it re-confused me as I'd just figured out the whole gay thing and I was like 'oh no! but she is a woman!' She also convinced my best friend that she was bisexual for about five years.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm quite amazed to hear that Luhrmann is not gay.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 13:41 (nineteen years ago) link

i agree with kyle, it's good but i had to turn it off after a few minutes when it was on TV a few nights back. i could never watch it again.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I too loved loved loved this movie when it first came out and remember learning how to drive to the soundtrack. I liked the glitter and the style of it then, and when I tried watching it a few months ago with my friend K, who was my partner in crime in this movie at 16, we were both sorely disappointed. As f--gg says above, all of the effort seemed to go into set and little into pushing the actors. Claire Danes is luminous, but now that I am old and jaded their love seems so childish and hysterical. K, who is now a classically trained actress, said all she could focus on was the mistakes in intonation, dialogue, and how difficult it seemed for the actors to speak the lines where the mark of a good actor is that you shouldn't be distracted that it's Shakespeare. I have nothing against modernizing Shaks. but I hate it when the "concept" takes over the acting and language. But the Mercutio in Baz's version is miles better than any other I've seen, esp. the weak Zeferelli one (Peter York?)

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago) link

their love seems so childish and hysterical

Um...I kinda thought that was the point.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh I agree, it's just that when I was younger I didn't notice so much how foolish they were.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 14:09 (nineteen years ago) link

his name is "baz" = we should be discussing this

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 17:15 (nineteen years ago) link

no, i haven't seen the almareyda hamlet; i also haven't seen the welles othello, or the koscincev (sp) lear. i've seen west side story done by high schools and that's it. i've never seen tromeo & juliet either.

i think i had to watch the zeferelli r&j more than once in high school, and with a STERN WARNING abt the TEEN TITTY each time.

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

But no warnings about Romeo's ass?

Doobie Keebler (Charles McCain), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:24 (nineteen years ago) link

this was post-caruso-nypdb, the world totally changed.

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link

julie taymor's titus andronicus isn't so hot, either.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 02:42 (nineteen years ago) link

You can't compare an adaptation of Titus to one of Hamlet! They are totally different things! Shakespeare plays are, sometimes:

1. Thematically resonant/modern, today (Othello, Troilus!, R&J, Hamlet, to some extent A&C and Lear, not really the comedies or histories, definitely not Titus)

2. Dramatically, resonant/modern, today, as films judged against films, in terms of how the story is actually told. (Othello, Comedy of Errors, probably nothing else?)

3. The cultural artifacts around which western culture is built (The "great tragedies" and R&J, and to some extent Ceasar and Anthony, less else than one might think).

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:11 (nineteen years ago) link

The man had a completely inexplicable number one single, lest we forget.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Not Shakespeare.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I am always doubtful of the "no place" ideal that f--gg suggests, it seems very unfaithful to plays, more so than a "modernisation" in a way. Two Gentlemen of Verona isn't set nowhere, it's set in a very specific Renaissance idea of Italy, and this is important for what happens.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Lex's first post is spot on, also.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:19 (nineteen years ago) link

(Actually thinking about it non-polemically I think "no place" is a very good thing for a performace of some (most?) of the play to aim at, but I wish they would admit that it was a fiction!)

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:21 (nineteen years ago) link

cis is right, about both things. Priest: R+J loses a bit of what it gains from Titanic, to Brassed Off, maybe.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:23 (nineteen years ago) link

i know, the thread i was wandering a little.

xpost bbbut this "very specific R. idea of italy" would not have been conveyed in any physical sense in the orig productions! so what do we do to be faithful? (not being stroppy with you here; it's an interesting question)

doing shakespeare in contemp (or even 19th cent) theatrical conventions (the proscenium, lights, sets) is as much an adaptation as doing a film really.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:26 (nineteen years ago) link

xposts there.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:27 (nineteen years ago) link

the "places" were always semi-abstractions, some more than others (illyria). Shk never left england! (hence everyone's favorite factoid that the actual balcony in the actual verona was built in 18whatever for the British tourist trade!)

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:30 (nineteen years ago) link

I like it wandering! This is virtually revision!

I think one way (and this is not at all a conclusive answer) people have sensibly-ish dealt with the "very specific idea" is by 'diffrent-historical-period'-style adaptions (eg Ren. audiences know Italy is full of poisoners and creeps, where is the equivalent to the imagination of now?) (haha Italy), and for me the strength of BL's R&J is that it addresses this in a very very clever way - ie saying that what we need to equivolate is as much the sense of Italy as strange magical, a place of dream and intrigue and legend experienced only onstage, as the sense of it being violent, full of poisoners etc...

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:39 (nineteen years ago) link

If that makes any sense.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:40 (nineteen years ago) link

no that's a good argument. goddammit i'm going to have to watch this again aren't i.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I only like it because of the colours really!

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:44 (nineteen years ago) link

well to come around to my complaint one more time: yes BL is good at coming up with this amped-up mythic Florida, where all the details line up like "f:x Shk thing --> my thing." but the Shk things were different in kind and not just degree. film design is opaque, solid, visual, a little fussy, where location in Shk* was auditory, imagined, and transparent.

*but not costume! but these were all anachronistic as well ie no togas in julius caesar etc.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:50 (nineteen years ago) link

brb, laundry! here is some blue, and some orange.

http://www.interinfo.co.jp/102a%20romeo+juliet.jpg

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:56 (nineteen years ago) link

er i really don't want to argue "faithfulness" to Shk here, i'm all turned around... BL can do what he wants, just not suck!!

theater is so wierd; more than any other artform the blueprint for performance is totally incomplete (ok well jazz standards too)

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 05:01 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, i was about to apologise for the faithfulness thing! it is my fault and unhelpful. I'm kinda unwilling to ask people "do you think this wld be a good movie if he'd made up the story" because of my whole 'R+J as aztec statue' take, but it's still basically what determines if one likes the movie, so maybe I should...

Shakespearian texts don't offer a blueprint for performance because they're not designed for performance, thoughmaybe? Beckett gives pretty strict directions, after all.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 05:42 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
Is he still making an Alexander the Great movie? Why?

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:28 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think I could watch this in one go. Fifteen minute snippets, sure, just enough to digest the whole apocalyptic SoCal Leo-does-the-Bard thing, but more than that and I'd crack.

The Priest's Crucifix backpiece was a nice touch.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago) link

haha wonder if he sent oliver stone a thank you card.

g e o f f (gcannon), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Shakespearian texts don't offer a blueprint for performance because they're not designed for performance, thoughmaybe?

Isn't it that playwrights in Shakespeare's day weren't writing for multiple companies who could be producing the work anywhere, but for a specific troupe they'd be interacting with at the time of production?

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:38 (nineteen years ago) link

exit, persued by a bear.

plain as day!

g e o f f (gcannon), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Isn't it that playwrights in Shakespeare's day weren't writing for multiple companies who could be producing the work anywhere, but for a specific troupe they'd be interacting with at the time of production?

Yeah, exactly. I think what I actually meant by this was somethng like: 'The texts we call Shakespeare's Plays are records of performance, transcribed and printed for reading', but yeah, what you said.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 23:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyway let's anticapate UNTITLED ALEXANDER PROJECT!

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 12 May 2005 00:01 (nineteen years ago) link

three years pass...

i have a real soft spot for this movie

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 9 March 2009 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link

I've never seen it, but Leo was way hotter as a downy androgyne than now.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 9 March 2009 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

i like the idea that there is a difference between people who saw this and knew what florida was, so that it felt like a "modernizing" production, and people who saw this but really had no idea about florida and so the setting was as imaginary as Verona had been to shsksp's contemporaries.

c sharp major, Monday, 9 March 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

least favorite movie of all time

iatee, Monday, 9 March 2009 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

(Luhrmann is gay, right?)
― Gravel Puzzleworth

he's not gay; i think his wife is his production designer.
― Amateur(ist)

Baz Luhrmann is like all the worst qualities of gay males without any of the redeeming qualities.

Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Monday, 9 March 2009 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

wait, I thought that was me!

Dr Morbius, Monday, 9 March 2009 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

i have a softspot for this movie too but it took me a while. was expecting too much when i first saw it, so i was disappointed.

young leo + young claire was great

Surmounter, Monday, 9 March 2009 17:55 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie isn't good but leo and claire are both gorrrrrrrrrrrrrrgeous and do good jobs; every time the movie takes a fucking breath to let them hang out and speak actual full lines it's better than the zeffirelli. pete posthelwaite's good too i seem to remember.

the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:46 (twelve years ago) link

oh and yeah leguizamo.

the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:47 (twelve years ago) link

i still wanna play tybalt. peace?

the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:51 (twelve years ago) link

leguizamo kills it

will never really be able to separate "this movie" from "seeing it at age 11"

max, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:39 (twelve years ago) link

or from "wearing the CD soundtrack out in 6th grade"

max, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:40 (twelve years ago) link

cast of upcoming adaptation by carlo carlei

Hailee Steinfeld ...
Juliet
Paul Giamatti ...
Friar Laurence
Ed Westwick ...
Tybalt
Douglas Booth ...
Romeo
Kodi Smit-McPhee ...
Benvolio
Christian Cooke ...
Mercutio
Lesley Manville ...
The Nurse

max, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:43 (twelve years ago) link

chuck bass at tybalt is kind of inspired, he will be "good" but not good, or good but not "good" or whatever

max, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:43 (twelve years ago) link

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ4NzExMjA4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjE3NDMxNw@@._V1._CR0,0,1365,1365_SS99_.jpg Part, fools! Put up your swords; you know not what you do.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTY2OTEwMDUzOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODU1NTQwMw@@._V1._CR0,0,333,333_SS99_.jpg What, art thou drawn among these heartless hinds? Turn thee, Benvolio, look upon thy death.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ4NzExMjA4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjE3NDMxNw@@._V1._CR0,0,1365,1365_SS99_.jpg I do but keep the peace: put up thy sword, Or manage it to part these men with me.

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTY2OTEwMDUzOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODU1NTQwMw@@._V1._CR0,0,333,333_SS99_.jpg What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee: Have at thee, coward!

max, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:47 (twelve years ago) link

have never seen this film, but Baz's Gatsby is gonna make it look good.

I saw R&M at the Public Theatre about 25 years ago w/ Cynthia Nixon, Peter MacNicol and Anne Meara (aka Ben Stiller's mom) as the Nurse.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago) link

i love leguizamo inordinately. this isn't a terrible film, it's just one of those things made more terrible by a cohort of its fanbase

summer sun, something's begun, but uh-oh those tumblr whites (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:15 (twelve years ago) link

the production & costume design on this movie is crazy good

i love leguizamo in it, and also harold perrineau's mercutio, though despite all this i'd say simply ballroom is the only luhrmann i really like

Hungry4Ass, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:17 (twelve years ago) link

Leguizamo claims to be 47

HAHAHAHA

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago) link

I love him. I feel like 47 could be right, no?

wolf kabob (ENBB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:26 (twelve years ago) link

I know people who did downtown improv with him in '79, and he was out of high school

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:34 (twelve years ago) link

52 if he's a day

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:35 (twelve years ago) link

if only yer taste in politics and baseball teams were as good as yer taste in films, morbz ;_;

i despise baz lurhmann's films generally.

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:37 (twelve years ago) link

moulin rouge shares honors with napoleon dynamite as the worst "good" film that i turned off well before the halfway point b/c otherwise i would've hulk-smashed the DVD player.

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:44 (twelve years ago) link

at least i made it through romeo + juliet ... and was rewarded with radiohead at least.

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:48 (twelve years ago) link

"rewarded"

wolf kabob (ENBB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:51 (twelve years ago) link

Douglas Booth ...
Romeo

That's just good twink-casting right there.

dead-trius (Eric H.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 04:02 (twelve years ago) link

"rewarded"

― wolf kabob (ENBB), Tuesday, January 31, 2012

I thot we were agreed on politics, Eisbaer? fuck em all

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 04:13 (twelve years ago) link

ten years pass...

Just wanted to share this glorious pan of ELVIS
https://www.indiewire.com/2022/05/elvis-review-baz-luhrmann-1234728121/

assert (matttkkkk), Thursday, 26 May 2022 01:35 (one year ago) link

one year passes...

Watching this for the first time in foreverrrrrr and

- had forgotten how good the opening brawl is
- I always remember how great Harold Perrineau’s Mercutio is, Leguizamo’s Tybalt also incredible
- soundtrack remains on point, Talk Show Host for that initial scene with Romeo is so great
- I have NO memory of this sauna with Juliet’s father and Paris
- you really get the textual sense of “These are two stupid and overly dramatic teenagers” in this adaptation, I was laughing at Romeo scribbling in his diary while sulking on the beach
- what was going on with Juliet’s mother and Paris like

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Saturday, 16 March 2024 16:20 (two months ago) link

Luhrmann's first couple of films are really good including this one

Leguizamo same, sadly misapplied talent

Morris O’Shea Salazar (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 16 March 2024 17:06 (two months ago) link

WHY UNCLE, TIS A SHAME is a fucking banner of a line

Also, “give me my sin again”

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Saturday, 16 March 2024 17:22 (two months ago) link

Banger *

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Saturday, 16 March 2024 17:22 (two months ago) link

MAKE A MUTINY AMONG MY GUESTS?

Also love how Leguizamo delivers the 'peace? Peace?' line.

Seen this so many times through teaching the text that I have no distance from it at all. Love it. I must say 'the boys the boys' a couple of times a week.

I would prefer not to. (Chinaski), Saturday, 16 March 2024 18:44 (two months ago) link

Yeah that’s a superb delivery and the pause & crunch is insanely great

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux2FgZizcrc

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Saturday, 16 March 2024 22:36 (two months ago) link

So great, lurzman struck serious gold here, everything else he’s done has been completely not my thing at all, this is so weird and dreamy and sensational

brimstead, Sunday, 17 March 2024 00:15 (two months ago) link

Yeah, he’s such a hacky vulgarian, no idea how he had it in him to make this.

Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Sunday, 17 March 2024 00:46 (two months ago) link

otm to everything in the revive except nv's lament for leguizamo who has had imo a very interesting time of it

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Sunday, 17 March 2024 09:42 (two months ago) link

he may have continued to be really good in stuff i'm not interested in tbf

Morris O’Shea Salazar (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 17 March 2024 10:16 (two months ago) link

what a great film
ages well
time to rewatch

Swen, Monday, 18 March 2024 07:25 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.