Rape, blame, responsibility, Amnesty, etcetera.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (617 of them)
Threadkillah.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 10:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Probably just as well.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 10:28 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost :-( I am sorry you were raped. I already get nauseous when reading this thread and I haven't gone through this. I hope you are feeling better.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 10:34 (eighteen years ago) link

See, this is part of the reason why I'm logged out.

I mean, there are the obvious reasons, that I don't want deeply private and personal stuff like this ending up on "ha ha Britishes are so funny!" threads for adolescent boys.

But partly because I hate that way it seems to *change* people's attitudes towards you. (My most recent Ex actually found out about it and was "Errr, I don't know how to handle this." F*ck you, because I do.) Don't feel sorry for me, because I don't. It happened, and it sucked, but I've dealt with it in the best way I know how. Feel sorry for the f*cking animals who do this kind of thing. Feel sorry for the police who don't know how to treat this sort of thing with any degree of sympathy.

I don't *mean* to bring threads crashing to a halt like this, but OTOH it does piss me off when people start saying EVERY rape is like this or EVERY rape is like that. Because every rape is different and unique and there's no one size fits all blanket solution or attitude to take.

I Don't Know Why I'm Logging Out For This But I Am, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 10:43 (eighteen years ago) link

wow, logged-out poster. i admire your courage, whoever you are.

and yes, you're right, every such incident is different. and people's perceptions are different too. i'm just talking as an incredibly angry man who fucking hates - hates - aggressively sexual male behaviour in any form. JBR, i didn't mean to sound like my earlier rant was directed at you: it wasn't, and i appreciate totally what you mean about keeping your wits about you (exactly the phrase both mrs fiendish and i used, at the same time as each other, when discussing this last night).

it just shouldn't have to be like that: what gives any person the right to impose themself on someone else, no matter who that person is, what they are doing or why they are there?

but hey. the world is a shitty place full of shitters. we knew that.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 11:01 (eighteen years ago) link

People who agree with Logged Out's take on things might want to read Carol Sarler's piece in today's Daily Mail.

But don't actually buy a copy, for god's sake. Try your local library.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm sorry for being sorry. ;-) I understand what you mean, but you can't deny that an experience like that changes you in some way. I don't think I really treat people any differently if I hear they were raped, I just think of the experience and wish it hadn't happened. So, yes, probably when they do tell me, I will be shocked and perplexed, not knowing what to say... That probably doesn't make much sense...

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:17 (eighteen years ago) link

I think a lot of people say "I'm sorry" when they mean "that sucks" which is perhaps a better, though less formal approach.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:19 (eighteen years ago) link

But partly because I hate that way it seems to *change* people's attitudes towards you. (My most recent Ex actually found out about it and was "Errr, I don't know how to handle this." F*ck you, because I do.) Don't feel sorry for me, because I don't. It happened, and it sucked, but I've dealt with it in the best way I know how. Feel sorry for the f*cking animals who do this kind of thing. Feel sorry for the police who don't know how to treat this sort of thing with any degree of sympathy.

OK... my girlfriend was raped about six months before I met her. Once when we were having sex, I looked down and released that the bed, her lap, and my self were completely covered in blood, from where I'd reopened a wound where she'd had a knife inserted into her vagina. Do you understand what it's like for us though? When every single touch we make runs the risk of triggering off memories of what happened? It's hard. Asking us to treat you as you would anyone who hadn't been raped is a ridiculous thing to do. We do that and we're heartless. We make allocations and then we're pandering. It's... it makes me seem like such an asshole for worrying about myself when I'm not the one that was raped, but to have someone you love, and to know they've been... ruined like that... I think what you're saying is umpossible.

Another Logged Out Coward, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Hey other Anon person. That's a horrible thing for your GF to have gone through, and it's unimaginablye bad that it happened to her.

But as I said above, there really is no "one size fits all" response to rape and its aftermath.

Sure it changes you, and it can change your responses, emotionally, sexually, and otherwise. But the important thing is to talk to the victim about how *they* want to handle it - which does also include how they'd prefer you react to it.

Personally, *I* would prefer that it didn't affect anything within my sexual relationship(s). Your GF may have a completely different response, and it really is her right to say what that is.

Part of recovering from rape and any other sexual abuse is regaining control over your own sexuality. So it really is her/my/any other victim's call about how to deal with it.

I Don't Know Why I'm Logging Out For This But I Am, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 13:09 (eighteen years ago) link

x-post: what's cowardly about logging out? man, that's ... again, i don't have the words.

anyone who's been through anything like this has my absolute undying sympathy.

other than getting cross and railing at people who sexually assault others in any way, i don't have any more to say. so i'll shut up now.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 13:13 (eighteen years ago) link

i was with you until you said your gf was "ruined", what the fuck

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:04 (eighteen years ago) link

fucking hell, are you being serious? what right does anyone else have to tell anyone who's been through this kind of thing, or had a loved one go through it, how they should feel?

jesus christ. i think "insensitive" has just been redefined.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Ethan you're one to take issue with somebody else's use of loaded terms

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Ethan, that's you in a nutshell. This person has experienced something almost unimaginably heart-rending, and their partner has even more, and then you turn up and bitch at them because they use a word you don't like. Did you even *try* to understand?

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:31 (eighteen years ago) link

i have as much personal claim in this here as he does and for him to make a judgement that his girlfriend is "ruined" (or allow her to make that judgement about herself) is not something i agree with

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:37 (eighteen years ago) link

you cant agree or disagree with the term until you are absolutely sure what the poster meant by it. until then making snap judgements is in poor taste. for my part, i found it an odd word to use, but i thought it was bleedin obvious that the poster would not mean to use it in the sense that caused the surprise.

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:39 (eighteen years ago) link

well i apologize for that, i really do understand how words can be so critical in this situation and its just something that sounded awful to me. i should probably think more before i post shit, i really just meant literally that i was with his post until that word but that sounds really unsympathetic and crass

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:44 (eighteen years ago) link

i have as much personal claim in this here as he does

I'm not sure what you mean here - if you've been in the same position then that's terrible.

I'm still only assuming I am reading it correctly, I could easily not be - I guess he means that his girlfriend has been irreversibly changed for the worse by the experience, scarred permanently both literally and figuratively, and nothing that anyone does can make it go away.

I might be wrong though.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 14:49 (eighteen years ago) link

well i think its really so important to push towards recovery and back into normal life after a rape because it often piles so much on top of what would already be a traumatic, life changing experience - shame, self-hatred, sexual guilt, gender insecurity, bullshit puritan moral stuff, body image issues, a feeling of being "ruined" for life, whatever - and while you shouldnt diminish or ignore the damage done, or the fact that most victims will never ever forget it or be exactly the same again, i think everybody really should understand that you can have a normal life afterwards and that one terrible act cant just break someone down like that. i have the deepest, realest sympathies for you, especially since you indicated its a recent event, but dont give up or think that yall cant get through it together.

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

If I want to get plastered, I should do so but being accompanied by friends who I can trust. (Of course that's a tricky thing: can I trust my friends enough?)

The answer is no, not to distract the thread from the charming ruined versus not-ruined debate. This is the thing that bothers me about most of these discussions, is that basically "Anonymous" is right, every single instance is different, but however studies show, in the US at least, that most rapes are done not by strangers but by people the women knew, friends or boyfriends or neighbors.

There is this great big myth that all rapes are like Jodie Foster in The Accused, drunk off her ass girl in a bar getting banged by a bunch of strangers but it's just really not that common an instance.

So yeah, what I'm saying here is you can "minimize risks" all you want but the bottom line is that there's only so far that goes. grimley OTM, basically.

Also Nick, that study is disgusting. 8% of poll respondents think a woman is totally responsible for rape if she has had many sexual partners. I fail to see what point you were trying to illuminate by posting it. It says the exact same thing the article says.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 15:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean, yes obviously it's not the greatest idea to get plastered and then go home with a football team you've just met, but OTOH who gives a shit if she was fucking naked spread eagled on top of the bar? I mean if a football team goes in and rapes a stripper right after she's done performing, is that like an "Oh well she put herself in THAT position" instance?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 15:37 (eighteen years ago) link

It is still fucking horrible, Ally, yes, but 8% as opposed to 25 or 33% is a big difference. That 8% are still idiots with very nasty world views. I also thought the discrepancies in the survey (which is the same survey that the article was about), particularly the 14% "partially responsible" in that line (compared to the 20-30% average in the other lines) was weird considering the "totally responsible" brigade was joint highest. And of course, as I and everyone else has continually said, it doens't matter if a woman is dressed as a nun on a bus or is naked and pouring champagne over herself on a hotel bed, it is NEVER acceptable, excusable or understandable to rape her, which is the ont thing everyone's agreed on all the way through this thread.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 15:56 (eighteen years ago) link

51% of america voted for a bad liar with a speech impediment to lead us in war and the UK alone purchased 3 million copies of "Jagged Little Pill", pointing out that possibly overwhelming numbers of incredibly horribly stupid people exist is NOT the point you were trying to make.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:03 (eighteen years ago) link

"Ruined" is a weird word for it... I was going to use "stained", but all of these words seem to indicate that it's her fault when it obviously wasn't (brief summary, I really don't want to go into details: her ex got into heroin heavily whilst she was dating him, he didn't take too kindly to being dumped... taht's all you need to know). It's hard, because it's such a fucking horrid subject that talking about it... I'm not going to deal with this thread because I really can't do this. Sorry.

LoggedOut, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:29 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not sure I was trying to make a definite point at all with the survey results; I just thoguht it was interesting and wanted to clarify that it wasn't the case that 33% of people think women are to blame for being raped. 8% in light of the Bush and Alanis thing probably isn't that bad a ratio of idiots in the scheme of things.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:42 (eighteen years ago) link

are you fucking kidding me?

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:01 (eighteen years ago) link

OBVIOUSLY IT'S NOT IDEAL ETHAN BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S A SHITTY WORLD.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:04 (eighteen years ago) link

do you think there would be similar figures for the u.s.? maybe im naive about this shit but those are statistics id expect to see in like iran or some shit

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:11 (eighteen years ago) link

8% as opposed to 25 or 33% is a big difference

Um, 8% think the woman should be completely blamed. You've still got the other 20+% who think it is A-OK to partially blame the victim. Or did you skip that part?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean I'm sorry to be so bluntly rude about it but what, exactly, in those statistics contradicts either what is said in the article and what anyone here is arguing against?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

its ok though because some people voted for bush

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I also love how you keep drilling home the "no one on this thread has said this" argument as if we aren't supposed to argue with the ARTICLES YOU ARE POSTING AND THE STATISTICS YOU ARE POSTING? What reaction do you expect to get, Nick? "Oh ta for that, cheerio, have a cup of tea"? Of course you're going to get people pissed off about the things being posted here, you're posting utterly reprehensible bullshit, whether or not YOU personally agree with it.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean it's like if someone posted an essay on Dick Cheney and everyone got pissed off and the thread starter just kept saying OH WELL NO ONE HERE IS ACTUALLY DICK CHENEY SO SHUT UP ALREADY.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:29 (eighteen years ago) link

its sad cuz i think there might have been a really interesting thread about this study if the question wasnt phrased in a way to make me (and some other ppl) really fucking angry by asking dumb, easily answerable questions instead of the tough ones brought up by living in a society with people who believe this

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

Contemplating that nearly 10% of people think the woman in this situation should be totally blamed is kind of doing my head in a bit, actually, never mind the other 20% or whatever. It makes me kind of wonder what kind of shit goes on in the heads of people you meet on a day-to-day basis, behind the mask of "normality".

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:34 (eighteen years ago) link

no i think Nick's only 'error' here is just doing what lots of people do on ILE i.e. 'EVERYONE LOOK AT THIS!' like with the 'X celebrity says something racist or homophobic' threads. I mean what is the point of anyone here even bothering to point out that they find the idea that 8% of people in a survey think the victim should've been more responsible is disturbing or whatever. The reactions of people here suggest the whole issue of rape is one that cannot be discussed because it's case closed as far as how you're supposed to feel about it goes, it would seem.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:35 (eighteen years ago) link

pash im with you on that, shit is always so fucked up talkin to somebody you dont know who seems really average & normal and they come with junk like this, i presume everybody has some basic human standards of empathy and it really fucks with me when they dont

_, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:39 (eighteen years ago) link

in terms of wider discussion, surely this:

It makes me kind of wonder what kind of shit goes on in the heads of people you meet on a day-to-day basis, behind the mask of "normality"

is the absolute key. what the fuck is our so-called functional western society DOING to people? that's what needs discussed!

jesus. these people have the vote. they have children. they ... wow, pash's "doing my head in a bit" is a vast, vast understatement :(

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Re: people who believe in fucked-up things -- I used to think that the key thing I needed to survive this world's idiocy was a black sense of humor, but over time the other was the realization that a bit of self-delusion helps too, to maintain the pretense that everyone who you deal with, even if they don't agree with you, still thinks through things the way you do. Because a lot of them, in fact, don't.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:43 (eighteen years ago) link

I tried to address the aspect you guys are dancing around but it got buried in shitting on each other to prove who was the rightest!

People are all sick stupid sheeplike fucks, I assume everybody has as much right to be alive as I do though and that gets me by okay

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link

This is quickly turning into a rousing game of Hunt The Nick!

Dan (Where Are My Jodhpurs?) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I think TOMBOT pretty much nailed what I think upthread a bit - I think in most cases the underlying current is more along the lines of "rapists, muggers et al. are just OUT THERE, they exist, they are a risk, what can y'do" everybody who apportions some part of the blame to the victim of a crime is not necessarily empathizing with the perp, they're usually just thinking along the same lines of thought that people use to blame people for living in San Francisco or Florida. I think that's lazy bullshit thinking but it buttresses society's collective feeling of guilt for all the things that happen which are nearly impossible to police against or protect people from.

Does any of this make sense?

Yes, it makes perfect sense.

-- Sick Mouthy (sickmouth...), November 21st, 2005.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

(Apologies, Tom, for leaving you out of my earlier OTM list; I sometimes forget that you and Ally don't actually meld together into a giant crime-fighting robot.)

Dan (Although That Would Be Awesome) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:48 (eighteen years ago) link

How is it possible that 8% of people believe these things? Did it occur to anyone that those 8% of people might actually *be* the rapists?

I don't think these statistics are common to the UK, either. I can remember surveys of American college students where the questions were phrased quite ambiguously - and it was fightening how many would admit to doing things that were certain morally and quite possibily legally apalling. This was 10, 15 year ago. I actually have a hard time believing that it's changed that much.

Even despite the PC excesses of the early 90s - does anyone remember pamphlets on campus that advocated men asking women at every step of the seduction if they consented to having their knee touched, their breasts fondled, etc. Gah! Who would want to have consensual sex under those circumstances?

How *do* you go about changing these attitudes? How do you go about changing the attitudes of men who think that they *own* their partners, to the point of abuse and marital rape? How do you go about changing the attitudes who think no more of sexually assaulting a drunken woman than they would of picking a lost five pound note off the floor? Are we really going to change anything by flapping and grandstanding here? (Well, apart from upsetting a couple of people who are clearly in pain, because they used words that "offend" our sensibilities.)

I don't know. I'm not sure that anyone does here.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh god, my early sex ed was at about that level of PC-ness....

Occam's Reznor (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not entirely convinced that 8% of the people who responded to this survey are rapists and I kind of think that most people should be killed before they get the opportunity to do something stupid.

Dan (Even I Have A Rose-Tinted Breaking Point) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Do people here really want convicted rapists shot? Even the victims?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:03 (eighteen years ago) link

No.

Castrated maybe, but even that doesn't deliver satisfaction, as it'd probably make them angrier, and drive whatever sick non-sexual violence that makes them rape women in the first place.

The Damp Is Rising (kate), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

No one has said anything about shooting rapists but grimly advocated shooting people who blame the victims of rape and I just advocated shooting people on general principle.

Dan (Yay Misdirected Agression) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.