I hear you there. (I do own the current DVD, at least.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (eighteen years ago) link
u know we had to wait years in the uk for a proper cd release of the soundtrack. was it the same everywhere else too? over here there was only some silly ass orchstral version availabale instead, up until 1994 when the proper thing came out. easily my favourite soundtrack disc ever.
truly a crime that there isn't some triple dvd thing going on. a *crime*.
― piscesboy (piscesboy), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (eighteen years ago) link
Know what a turtle is Leon? Same Thing.
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:04 (eighteen years ago) link
I think what I loved most was the "near-reality" of it. Sure, it was way in the future, there were flying cars, etc, but it somehow looked plausible and real - rain, crowded streets packed with advertising messages, etc. Which reminds me - why has no-one made umbrellas with the neon shaft? I'd totally use one of those. Sometimes I walk through Chinatown in Toronto and get a very BR vibe...
Biggest thing that used to baffle me was the replicant count conversation at the police station, the cop saying six "skin jobs" escaped, and then later there was a disrepancy between his and Deckard's 'count'... I'm having trouble remembering it all now (been a while), but I never really straightened that out in my head, since it didn't seem to add up (is that more "Deckard is a replicant" stuff?).
There are some pretty OTT cheesy lines in the script, mainly the police/crime story element - "You're not cop you're little people", etc. But there is just soooo much else to love about this film.
Live... in the offworld colonies!
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― Queen Gforvagina not for vangelis, Monday, 17 April 2006 12:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:36 (eighteen years ago) link
vahid, I can see your point about the nerdy focus on certain elements in this film or Dick's relatively unrelated work, but I really don't think absence of empathy with women is evidence of misogyny.
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:00 (eighteen years ago) link
Yup.
You really need to read the Sammon book, m'friend. ;-) (In brief -- originally there were a total of sex replicants; the first to die, Mary, was to have died 'naturally' in the company of the rest as an introduction to the film. The second died in the attack on Tyrell Corporation, and the rest are in the film. They recorded a loop at the time to fix it, but the results didn't look good on-screen in terms of lip-movement and synchronization.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:12 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:15 (eighteen years ago) link
― -+--++-, Monday, 17 April 2006 13:16 (eighteen years ago) link
Anyway, Vahid's got a lot of good points. In flipping through the Sammon book again last night I remembered how Scott and company's areas of critique-as-such re: society, sexism, etc. were so encoded into the film or presented so flatly/subtly that whatever meaning was intended was by and large lost -- no matter what Scott implies or has said, I don't think it's strictly the audience's fault for missing much of it, narration or no narration. The film's not unsuccessful for all that, I feel.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:29 (eighteen years ago) link
(I like Blade Runner a lot but I haven't really thought about it in years.)
― Dan (Old School) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:33 (eighteen years ago) link
Yeah, I was gonna say -- blast from the past!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago) link
xp: nice pic, Ned.
― David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link
I remembered one other thing from the book just now -- Hauer apparently was the one with the idea for the dove as well.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:45 (eighteen years ago) link
I like Blade Runner a lot better than quite a few of the films on vahid's list, but that's because I don't like sci fi.
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:51 (eighteen years ago) link
The winner would be The Thing... Funny thing is that all three movies were released within a couple weeks of each other in 1982.
The replicants, future noir, and story elements of Blade Runner are mostly irrelevant and exist mainly to give us a tour of the future-possible city of Los Angeles. Blade Runner's real success and endurance is as a urban theory/sociology touchstone - fast forwarding through 50 years of suburban paranoia, white flight, and displaced racial anger. Which is what the best science fiction does anyway...
I saw BR the day it opened in Newport Beach - LA's own "off world colony" and it really fucked with people's heads with maximum disorientation. The California Republican fear of Japanese investment, Mexican immigration, and civic squalor was right out in front. It's impossible to write anything about the future of Los Angeles without namechecking BR.
And people were surprised that E.T. was the more successful movie that year?
― LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:51 (eighteen years ago) link
everything else was done later on or before, but not better. the city comes down from lang, sure, but is anyone seriously going to argue that metropolis is a better movie?
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:55 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:57 (eighteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:57 (eighteen years ago) link
― LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:05 (eighteen years ago) link
Rob, looks like you're onto something:
31st January 2006
The Digital Bits has reported on an official Warner's press conference:
"And finally, here's a bit of news that's going to get a lot of you excited (and I made a point to specifically ask about this title, believe me)... Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) is currently on track for release as a multi-disc special edition in time for its 25th anniversary in 2007. The release is far from certain (as usual, there's a lot more that I can't post about this title yet - think of the old saying, "Loose lips sink ships"), but Warner says that work is proceeding, most of the key players are involved and things are "looking good" for release next year. We'll see."
2nd February 2006
As the century has progressed I got a bit tired of saying there is no BR:SE news, but as BR DVD restocking has gradually been diminishing in various regions and I have heard the usual odd rumours, I've been preparing a proper update of this page this week to go along with the sitewide update I'm doing. Then the above announcement was made. But let us put it in context - it came at the end of a press conference where many definite Warner releases for 2006/7 were being announced. This comment about Blade Runner is almost an afterthought - sort of an, "I can't say anything definite, but we're still trying and keeping the hope alive". In other words, not much more than the comment made below almost two years ago. So don't get too excited. 2007 is the 25th aniversary of the release of Blade Runner of course, which is added incentive, but we thought it would be released for the 20th anniversary, so it is still wait and see what happens at the moment.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:07 (eighteen years ago) link
I hate that stupid unicorn scene.
― LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 14:11 (eighteen years ago) link
you both need to pay attention... i said close encounters of the third kind was the forrest gump of sci-fi. close encounters was directed by spielberg.
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:03 (eighteen years ago) link
this didn't mean anything until the movie was recut to have the unicorn dream in it though.
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:22 (eighteen years ago) link
f.h., hence my reading comprehension comment! Go back and read what vahid was replying to when he started on his "SO AND SO CAN DO THIS BUT SPIELBERG CAN'T?" thing (hint: "2. trivializing history"). C'mon guys.
RJG I kiss u still.
Back to the Future...huh.
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:25 (eighteen years ago) link
"Sushi...raw fish."
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:34 (eighteen years ago) link
it's so amazing to me that ridley scott made these two movies that just totally changed cinema sci-fi
I guess I missed a whole lot of post-Alien boring haunted-house movies set in spaceships.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― latebloomer's jazz oddysey brought to you by kellog's corn flakes (latebloomer), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― latebloomer's jazz oddysey brought to you by kellog's corn flakes (latebloomer), Monday, 17 April 2006 20:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 21:10 (eighteen years ago) link
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 21:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Monday, 17 April 2006 21:17 (eighteen years ago) link
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 21:18 (eighteen years ago) link
event horizon! (sooooooooooo bad.)
i'll grant that lang vs. scott is no kind of comparison at all. but i think metropolis is a weak movie, plotwise, with convoluted -- nay, incoherent -- politics and characters who could be generously described as two-dimensional. what it's (rightly, justly) famous for is its design and vision of da future. but that's what blade runner is rightly, justly admired for too, and i think blade runner's story and characters are more coherent, and the cast is a lot better. so i think it's a better movie, lang's general genius notwithstanding.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 17 April 2006 21:20 (eighteen years ago) link