Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (424 of them)

Calum, you are a really sweet guy.

So why don't you stop playing the prick?

You've already cut down the retarded vicious insults by 75%, why don't you complete the process and quit starting silly threads?

― eh?, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:30 (twenty years ago) link

what?

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:37 (twenty years ago) link

I almost hate to have to say this, but the day that Calum is patted on the head and Jess is somehow seen as being the disruptive evil one is a very wrong day indeed.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:03 (twenty years ago) link

I dont think Andrew said Jess was disruptive, just that he flew off the handle a bit thats all. No idea wtf the other person's on about with C being "75%" less insulting tho - ha.

― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:09 (twenty years ago) link

stupidist thread evah! even the "controversy"
is boring

― Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty years ago) link

Ned, I think Jess' posts in this thread really are ridiculous, and in this particular instance (as much as I hate to say it) Calum looks far more reasonable and polite.

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty years ago) link

Trayce, I too would like to know the linear index on which someone is annoying. It would make my hatred that bit easier to quantify. ;)

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty years ago) link

no Andrew, don't sully my image of your seamless beauty *sob*

― Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:19 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, I was just being silly. I could never hate anyone.

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:21 (twenty years ago) link

in this particular instance (as much as I hate to say it) Calum looks far more reasonable and polite

Calum suddenly trying to come across all nice and reasonable in a desperate attempt to make him not look like the fool he is? You shock me, sir! ;-)

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:22 (twenty years ago) link

Hey, at least he's trying.

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:23 (twenty years ago) link

And we can't exactly delete his posts where he actually attempts to be nice.

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:23 (twenty years ago) link

Hey, at least he's trying.

Uh, call me incredibly suspicious, doubtful and somewhat unconvinced.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:26 (twenty years ago) link

Oh Ned, you're just incredibly suspicious, doubtful, and somewhat unconvinced!

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:28 (twenty years ago) link

And FAAAAAAAAAAAABULOUS

(I actually did still want more of an answer on this subject via the off-board message last week, though, so if you could respond to that...)

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:31 (twenty years ago) link

I think everyone on here can be an ass a lot of the time, so where the hell would I draw a line? =)

There should be ILX mud wrestling, there should.

― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:35 (twenty years ago) link

Ned really should have met me in LA.

― C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 07:12 (twenty years ago) link

This whole thread is fascinating.

The part of the thread up until the very present touches on a lot of things I've been thinking over and over in my head.

And then it turns into a "thread for updating purposes only" sort of thing. Which is kinda a bummer because I'd have really wanted to participate in the original thread, being that I have a million different thoughts that have historically troubled me, all swimming frantically in my head. Ah well. This is why the good Lord gave us journals, isn't it?

― Tenacious Dee (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 08:05 (twenty years ago) link

The only way the thread will turn back into a dialogue over the original topic will be if somebody starts it, Dee.

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 08:15 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/dga/dga95/weighcht.gif

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:46 (twenty years ago) link

fools.

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:47 (twenty years ago) link

Ha, I saw that one about napoleon's march on Moscow earlier today again.

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:49 (twenty years ago) link

i could try and start it, if everyone wants. i think that the 100 lbs for 5 feet and 5 lbs for each additional foot is rubbish, to begin. and i will just go ahead and say that i am 5'5" and i weigh about 155 lbs. although i could shed a few pounds if i wanted, i have an athelitic build; ie, there is more muscle than fat, and i don't look hefty. if i lost weight, i would look more "hollywood attractive" but i really don't feel the need to do so. also, i am not lacking in dates or anything.

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:51 (twenty years ago) link

IF YOU WNAT TOO START IT THEN THEY NO THEY CANT FINISH IT PISTOLS WE ALL GOT IT ALWAYS THE GLOCK WE ARE GOOD BROTHERS OH IT NOT MY FAULT OH IT AINT MY FAULT THE HEADBUSTER AND IT IS A LINE OF CHALK WE TRUE SOLDIERS WE DONT DIE WE CANT STOP OH IT NOT MY FAULT IT NOT MY FAULT

― Amazing Randy (Amazing Randy), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:53 (twenty years ago) link

okay, so that you can see, here is a photo of me and my roommate, i am in the blue skirt.
http://i.myspace.com/47/25/15274/2565404_m.jpg

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:59 (twenty years ago) link

Oh my.

Is there a height/weight table for men somewhere? I don't imagine they're the same.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:00 (twenty years ago) link

They're not. Actually, though, I don't know who the table I posted above is intended for. Maybe a sort of generalized one for both sexes. Usually when you'd see a chart like that for men and women, it would, naturally, allow for a woman at any given height to be heavier than a man at the same height.

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:10 (twenty years ago) link

no, i think that they usually assume that the men weigh more.

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago) link

You're totally right, I caught that like the second after I posted it. I got all mixed up cause I was thinking like "oh but womens have the boobs though don't they!?"

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:13 (twenty years ago) link

Dan I kiss you!

― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:26 (twenty years ago) link

Vic--what happened??

― OCP (OCP), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

mark, is all this kissing people your new year's resolution to get away from the barry thing?

(not that i have a problem with it. just curious)

― colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:08 (twenty years ago) link

Is that graph above in reference to men, women, or both? If it applies to men then I'm just on the very edge of unheathily thin/healthy at ~150 pounds, 6'2".

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:54 (twenty years ago) link

what i love about that graph is that there isn't a SEVERELY UNDERWEIGHT section - er, if you're 6'6'' and weight 50lbs, you need to fucking pig out, dude.

Girls are luckier than boys in a way because they can get away with being SHORT - and being on a diet isn't gonna ever make you taller.

― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

on the outside, lucy lurex seemed like any normal 24 year old woman. smiling, drinkin', having a grand old time.

http://www.geocities.com/lucylurex/shuttup.txt

what no-one knew is that at 5'3" and 140 pounds, she is classed as moderately overweight and therefore not healthy. does lucy suffer in a private fat hell? or is this evidence that such height/weight charts are a crock of shit? i'm gonna sit back with a very large bowl of ice cream while you decide.

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:24 (twenty years ago) link

and then maybe some chips and dip or a pizza with extra cheese.

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:28 (twenty years ago) link

and several stubbies of monteiths

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:29 (twenty years ago) link

NB: say the wrong thing and i'll squash you with my moderately overweight ass.

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:31 (twenty years ago) link

Weekly World News had a thing a couple of weeks ago headlined "get slim and trim without losing weight!!" and it was about how standard classifications were "normal" body weight were out of whack. I love that paper.

― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:40 (twenty years ago) link

Ms Lurex kicks the ass! And thus the world is again made right.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:42 (twenty years ago) link

i just posted my weight on ilx HAVE I LEARNED NOTHING????

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:17 (twenty years ago) link

Depends how big yer bum is really.

― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:21 (twenty years ago) link

consider yourself squashed, dummass.

― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:22 (twenty years ago) link

Some girls look fine and dandy from the front and then they turn around and it's like, "Whoooa mumma", know what I mean?

― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:28 (twenty years ago) link

I think I do, but I doubt any of us have as much experience of the receding view of women's backs as you, Calum.

― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:33 (twenty years ago) link

moted.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty years ago) link

Ker-Tish!

(Cymbal noise)

― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty years ago) link

NEXT!!

― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:46 (twenty years ago) link

six months pass...

Oh revive this one. People moaning about their weight is always funny.

― C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Mandee

― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 13:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Skipping 324 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.

What is considered a "fat girl" these days? I really want to know.

Vic--what happened??