Why Do (some) Men Hate Women?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (423 of them)
Where did all of these posters come from anyway?

I think the angle of Heather's statment might be along the lines of "if thy hand offends thee cut it off." (or something)

When a man uses his penis as a weapon to assault others many people (not just victims) have a primal urge to deprive him of this weapon. Have you never, at any time or on any level, thought of hurting a child rapist?

However one of the things that makes our system of government great is that we have a judicial system that, ideally, acts objectively and keeps the rights of even the accused in mind. If victims and their loved ones were allowed to mete out justice there would be a lot of hobbled assholes walking around this world.

That Girl (thatgirl), Saturday, 8 February 2003 04:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've certainly thought of hurting a child rapist, and I understand the desire to remove the instrument of assault. That being said:
(1) Heather didn't say a word about sexual violence -- in fact, her post specifically implied physical abuse.
(2) I think that you could find a whole lot of people who would still want to see a man castrated/see his penis removed for a sexual crime that didn't involve his penis -- fondling of a child, for instance -- but you probably couldn't find much of anyone who'd want to give a clitoridectomy to a woman who committed the same crime. And I think that ties in to all kinds of toxic assumptions about male sexuality being at root this pernicious, predatory thing, whereas female sexuality embodies the opposite. (Assumptions such as these are damaging to both sexes.)
(3) This is probably the main reason why I posted: there have been a whole bunch of penis-severing references on ILE lately, many of which have nothing to do with sexual violence or explicit behavior; in one case, a poster suggested "Bobbitizing" a man who slept with his partner and then broke up with her. I think that -- counterintuitive as it may seem -- letting that sort of thing slide, dismissing it as harmless fun, etc., contributes massively to perpetuating all of the negative gender stereotypes and assumptions that we all, ostensibly, would like to do away with. (It also ties in with the general tendency in our culture at large to view physical violence, public humiliation, etc. against a man who (for instance) cheats as an appropriate method of retaliation. There's an ad currently running where a woman uses a voodoo website to inflict pain on her ex-boyfriend, shrink his head, and so on; how many of us would find that acceptable were the genders reversed? I hope quite few.) I really do think that, ultimately, letting these things go is to the detriment of both genders -- both because it encourages a climate of bad faith and because it subtly reinforces all kinds of ugly things.

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 05:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ugh, that needed editing -- change "explicit" to "explicitly abusive", and "I hope quite few" to "I'd imagine quite few".

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 05:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think if there is a surplus of dick-cutting jokes on ILx it's b/c dicks stick out, can be funny, and are easy to inflict pain on.

And also b/c ILx is a passel of irreverant, tasteless, incorrigable cockfarmers.

need i say more?

That Girl (thatgirl), Saturday, 8 February 2003 05:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

What's a passel?

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 05:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Yes-I-know-I-can-look-it-up-but-I-thought-it'd-be-more-fun-to-ask)

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 06:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

n. informal A large quantity or group.

That Girl (thatgirl), Saturday, 8 February 2003 06:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

I take your points, Phil, but the fact of the matter is that we are living in a world where men inflict colossally more violence on women than vice versa, up to and including rape and murder, and are penalised far less for it than on the rare occasions where the women perpetrate the violence. In that context, I can't worry too much about a few comments that I didn't take seriously about lopping off dicks.

I barely know who Phil Donahue is - an American talk show host, yes? Is he a feminist?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 8 February 2003 12:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

I guess I just don't agree, Martin.

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 15:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

With what, Phil? You surely don't think that women inflict as much violence on men as men do on women, do you? That's not an opinion that can be supported by the facts. If you mean that those facts still don't make discussion of chopping off dicks trivial, well I can accept that. Besides any other reasoning, my 'there are worse things' argument is a generally poor one, leading to considering almost everything unimportant. Obviously I'm a man and I'm all in favour of maximum disincentives to anyone considering cutting off penises, I just don't think it's such a frequent problem, nor do I think anyone here was advocating it in any terribly serious way.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 8 February 2003 16:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

If you mean that those facts still don't make discussion of chopping off dicks trivial, well I can accept that.

Good -- I can agree with that. :-)

I was preparing a longer post (I haven't decided whether I'll post it yet), but basically, my feeling is that cultural attitudes towards sexual violence against men, and sexual violence against women, are, if not two sides of the same coin, then at least very deeply related, and that it'll be exceedingly difficult to build the kind of society we'd like if we don't acknowledge that. (How are they related? Not just in a Newtonian way, but also as symptoms of the same fundamental human failure to treat other human lives with reverence and respect.)

(And no, I'm not under the impression that there's an epidemic of penis-severing going on!)

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 16:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, I think there is more relationship than is generally acknowledged, especially in that the expectations and assumptions about both sexes are a product of the sexist world in which we live, and they have bad effects on both sexes. The adverse effects on women have historically been the greater, and have perhaps been better highlighted in recent years, but there is a flipside. It's hard enough for women to talk about being raped, but I guess it's even harder for men, for instance. Yes, and in your point (too often forgotten) that a lot of violence against either sex is about misanthropy rather than a specific hatred of that sex.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 8 February 2003 16:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

I agree!

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Why do men hate women?
I seriously think that it has something to do with sex-integrated
public schooling. Pre-adolescent girls outstrip boys
so completely, physically and mentally, that it's hard not to
have an inferiority complex which can manifest itself in
disregard or even hatred. Not to mention laws forbidding the
education of girls or women.

Another factor: divorce. It's such a harmful thing; there
are published studies that show that broken-home kids
are generally unhappier than nuclear kids; but I go further
and theorize (not from personal experience, but from the
anecdotal evidence of discussing this with other boys and
men))Many boys learn to despise their mothers and blame them
for "ditching dad" no matter what the circumstances - even
if the mother was justified; it's even worse when the
divorce is frivolous...

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Saturday, 8 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Both of those things are, historically speaking, relatively new inventions. I don't think misogyny is at all new, so I'm not sure I can see much sense there. Anyway, why would kids not blame dad for ditching mom just as often - more often probably, since they generally spend far more time with mom and therefore hear her side of things more?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 8 February 2003 19:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Martin, I have to agree that sexual violence is more commen to women, but that does not make it "trivial" when it does happen to a man, and my main point is men who do get sexuallly attacked should not be laughed at, and be the butt of jokes for stand up comedians! And women who are guilty, should recieve the same sentences as men. I am sure you all remember the Bobbitt incident, but a lesser known case happened right around the same time, a surgeon whose wife was cheating on him, gave her an injection to put her asleep, and proceeded to sew her vagina shut. He recieved 20 years in prison. As we all know Lorena Bobbitt recieved a few months in a mental hospital. Please explain to me the difference here.

Stephen Ancroid, Saturday, 8 February 2003 20:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Skidmore - I dunno why boys would side with their dads,
it just seems to be that way, from talking to them.
Although the divorce problem is a relatively new thing -
well, so is the rampant misogyny of hip-hop; most big
rappers have deadbeat/missing/unknown fathers don't they?

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Saturday, 8 February 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

most big
rappers have deadbeat/missing/unknown fathers don't they?

That was a racist thing to say squirrel.

Irv, Saturday, 8 February 2003 21:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

Stephen, I know nothing of those cases (I vaguely remember the Bobbit one is all), but the clue is surely not just in the times but the locations of their respective imprisonments: I take it Lorena Bobbit was ajudged insane and therefore not sentenced to a prison sentence. I have no idea if she, or the man in the other case, should have been so judged, but that sidesteps any sentencing, it doesn't show that sentencing was too light. And if you look at what I said above - "I'm all in favour of maximum disincentives to anyone considering cutting off penises" - you'll see that I'm not at all trying to support low sentences for this.

When it comes to murder by a partner in this country, the favouritism seems to go the other way - there are multiple cases of men successfully arguing provocation on the basis of infidelity or nagging (yes, nagging!), whereas years of serious physical and mental and sexual abuse has been repeatedly rejected as provocation.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 8 February 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

and my main point is men who do get sexuallly attacked should not be laughed at, and be the butt of jokes for stand up comedians!

Who's laughing and making jokes? Other men! No one who's been the victim of sexual violence would make these jokes. So that means the "1 in 3 women" who are such victims are not the cause of any trivilization.

That Girl (thatgirl), Saturday, 8 February 2003 22:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I suspect John Bobbit became a laughing stock because he didn't have a penis anymore. It wasn't the severance that amused people but the 'lack' in him brought about by the amputation.

Most insults involve a threat of being lessened by the act of penetration: get fucked, you suck, blow me, etc, etc. Also, generally the worst thing you can call someone is a cunt. Women and gay men are objects of derision in our discourse because they are on the receiving end of the phallus. When Bobbit lost his penis he lost his stature. I agree it was mainly men making most of the jokes; I don't think it is funny to be considered inferior because you either don't have a penis or because you have had one inside you.

estela, Saturday, 8 February 2003 22:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Who's laughing and making jokes? Other men! No one who's been the victim of sexual violence would make these jokes.

That's just not true. I've known more than one woman who, when hearing of the conviction of a man of whom she thought ill, jokingly suggested he be careful not to "drop the soap". There are plenty of movies where a cheating husband receives a blow to the groin, or worse, from his partner, and it's almost invariably treated as an empowering gesture. One of the signature moves of the lesbian comic strip character Hothead Paisan was a kick to the groin of any man who crossed her -- and it's been years since I saw the comic, but even in Hothead Paisan's comic world I don't think every single man who received one of those kicks was a rapist or pedophile. And as I said above, there have been posters who have been making jokes on ILE about cutting off men's penises, and those posters have been female.

Phil (phil), Saturday, 8 February 2003 23:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

When it comes to sexual crimes, female offenders do tend to recieve a slap on the wrist. There was a female school teacher not far from me, who was convicted of having sex with a 14 year old male student, she recieved 5 to 10 years, but was released after 2. certainly a male school teacher who had sex with a 14 year old female would recieve a life sentence.

DJ, Sunday, 9 February 2003 00:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Not in Britain (don't know where you are) - I can't give you detailed facts and figures, but never life, and there have certainly been such cases where sentences have been months rather than years.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 9 February 2003 00:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

re: Irv

I think it was very shocking for you to accuse me of
racism.

Any explanation for this shocking and apparently
unfounded accusation?

When did race enter the discussion?

I just know I'm a "Behind the Music" junkie and most
of the big rappers seem to come from broken homes.
I've seen the statistics; Regardless of race, the inner
city poor have a lot of familial problems that go along
with their other social problems.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Sunday, 9 February 2003 00:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Martin. I have been searching the net and have found dozens of cases where women recieved a slap on the wrist, while men recieved long prison terms for similar crimes.

DJ, Sunday, 9 February 2003 02:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hothead Paisan is on the fringes. You cannot use that strip in an arguement to convince anyone that there is systemic man-hating in society. Come on.

re: women who sleep w/young boys and relatively light sentences. The attitude I hear a lot is almost a winking "well, she's doing those boys a good service", kind of thing--again, a predominantly male viewpoint. This attitude I think is largely responsible for lighter sentencing in these cases.

That Girl (thatgirl), Sunday, 9 February 2003 02:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

That girl, it was a female judge in the case near my town.

DJ, Sunday, 9 February 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah for sure the whole "lucky bugger" thing is a factor in sentences, further to this inequality a wider issue also often asrises. While femimists have been sucessful in overhauling discriminatory laws against women there are a raft of laws in many western countires that are unfair and discriminatory against men which remain unchanged and outdated.

These are wide ranging from custody arrangements and child support arangements to sexual and violence charges that only exist for men and not women, to complusary millitary service/draft laws for men. Visit any "mens rights/activism" forum to hear bitter divorced men moan endlessly about such hypocrisay and unfairness....

I dont blame women for such inequality but rather the apathy of men in to such issues, generally discrimination and equality in society is viewed by many males as a female/race issue not a male one.

kiwi, Sunday, 9 February 2003 02:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Concerning Hothead Paisan, kicking a man in the genitals is frequently used as a form of humor in movies and on tv. Even innocent movies such as "home alone" use this as a form of humor. I have never seen genital violence against women used as a form of humor in any movie! I know women will feel this is a non issue, but believe me the pain is exruciating, and can easily cause permenant damage.

DJ, Sunday, 9 February 2003 03:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hothead Paisan is on the fringes. You cannot use that strip in an arguement to convince anyone that there is systemic man-hating in society. Come on.

Sorry, that's a pretty shoddy rhetorical device: you've taken what I was trying to say -- which is that, in my opinion, people (not just men or women) are far more likely to find sexual violence comic and laughable when it's perpetrated against men -- and distorted it completely by taking only one of my examples and pairing it with a wildly exaggerated form of my premise. I've seen far too much intelligence in your other posts to believe you're not capable of a more thoughtful response than that.

Phil (phil), Sunday, 9 February 2003 04:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Besides which: "Max Hardcore is on the fringes. You cannot use his films in an arguement to convince anyone that there is systemic woman-hating in society." Odd how that doesn't sound quite as plausible, no?)

Phil (phil), Sunday, 9 February 2003 04:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

And as I said above, there have been posters who have been making jokes on ILE about cutting off men's penises, and those posters have been female.

guilty.

di smith (lucylurex), Sunday, 9 February 2003 04:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

the pain of being hit in the testicles is beyond excruciating. It is not just ordinary pain like bumping your elbow. There are no words to describe it! A women will never be able to understand how much it hurts. I truly feel that an intentional attack on a man's testicles for no valid reason is sexual assault, women will laugh at this statement, but like I said, they will never understand!

Stephen Ancroid, Sunday, 9 February 2003 04:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

A women will never be able to understand how much it hurts.

Oh, I don't know about that -- I've heard getting an ovary bumped can be pretty excruciating (though of course they're not as vulnerable) and may well be a comparable "kind" of pain, if that makes sense. I also think women have their share of pains that men don't have to suffer (menstrual cramps and childbirth in particular), something for which a good bit of respect is definitely in order.

But I do agree that it's difficult to explain, sometimes, just how devastating a pain it is -- and heck, even I don't know: I've never taken a major blow to the testicles, thankfully. From what I've seen, it is indeed one of the most incapacitating and overwhelming pains that a human being can suffer.

Phil (phil), Sunday, 9 February 2003 05:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

Since it is a similar organ, I would assume a painful ovary would feel the same as a painful testical.

Brock, Sunday, 9 February 2003 06:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hey bottom line is, I wish no hurt and pain on anyone, anywhere, anytime, anyplace.

That being said no one can convince me that there is an evil undercurrent of misandry (thanks, anthony) in modern society which impairs, threatens, and grossly affects the life of the average man.

There is for women.

So getting kicked in the balls hurts and people use this misfortune for comic effect. Well, getting anvils dropped on your head will kill you and lawyers don't wear mini-skirts to the office. Get over it. What do you want a chorus of violins and a pity party b/c of a few off-color jokes?

That Girl (thatgirl), Sunday, 9 February 2003 06:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

and lawyers don't wear mini-skirts to the office

Oh yeah, you've never seen one of the lawyers in my office building wooo! hot stuff!!

Brock, Sunday, 9 February 2003 06:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

phil upthread were you including practising voodoo to shrink heads as an inappropriate subject for humour? cz when it comes to real life crime statistics and stuff, this ranks low IMO

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 9 February 2003 12:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

oh i get it, you mean, you would never see an ad in which a guy shrank his g/f's head

sorry

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 9 February 2003 12:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Next time I see you you better be wearing a cup, motherfucker" - Eddie Van Halen

david q roth, Sunday, 9 February 2003 13:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Everyone will see things his/her own way! but you are all overreacting, there is no gender war going on, I work in a hospital with dozens of men and women, and we all get along fine! Never have i seen anyone arguing over gender equality. I am sure this is the way it is with most men, and women.

Tri, Sunday, 9 February 2003 22:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aside from tennis players, most female atheletes are quite ugly! So I do not see any problem in letting men into the locker rooms. It's not like they will be turned on by anything!

Ralfus, Monday, 10 February 2003 06:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

The funny thing is, I have never heard of a male reporter demanding access to women's locker rooms. I guess it's just the internet crowd who is bothered by this.

Heather L, Monday, 10 February 2003 07:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

that is probably because no one cares about womens sports, so it's not like they will miss a scoop or something. If women's sports were as popular as men's, you know damn well they would be demanding access!

Ralfus, Monday, 10 February 2003 07:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think this explains some of the vicious record reviews I've had from women. Rock critics hate themselves, but female rock critics hate themselves even more.

Also, there's a misogynist tone to some of your work, which is just the sort of thing that puts off a woman critic. (Occam's razor: simplest explanation = true explanation)

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 10 February 2003 09:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

The argument that women do not view men as sexual objects, and have no desire to look at naked men in the locker rooms is a load of crock! I was just on a wrestling message board, and the big topic seemed to be which wrestlers had the nicest butts! I am sure alot of these females would love to get into a wrestlers dressing room!

Irv, Monday, 10 February 2003 18:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

(I almost shot iced tea out of my nose when I read the story about the surgeon who sewed up his wife's vagina. Does this make me a bad person?)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

(To be fair, I was laughing pretty heartily at Bobbitt, too.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes but is there any point when dan isnt laughing pretty heartily?!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 10 February 2003 20:35 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.