DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived Cleggeron era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7011 of them)

Pretty sure a lot of people were annoyed about strikes in the 70s and 80s tbh.

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Monday, 4 October 2010 09:58 (thirteen years ago) link

totally.

caek, Monday, 4 October 2010 10:01 (thirteen years ago) link

'thatcherbabies' just means 'british 20somethings who grew up under thatcher', right? we don't even know we're born, etc.

no szigeti (c sharp major), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:01 (thirteen years ago) link

Click on "Bob Crowe" on Twitter and treat yourself to a glimpse of the selfishness, viciousness and political illiteracy of the British public. The RMT need to get much better at getting their message out because most people seem to think they're doing it just to make people late for meetings and/or bring about a Marxist revolution.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:02 (thirteen years ago) link

Click on "Bob Crowe" on Twitter

Shan't.

caek, Monday, 4 October 2010 10:03 (thirteen years ago) link

really worthwhile opinion that we needed to be alerted to

can anyone point me towards some sweet anonymous comments on the websites of local newspapers?

― J0rdan S., Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:42 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

caek, Monday, 4 October 2010 10:04 (thirteen years ago) link

I wasn't arguing, I was complaining about self-centred little shits. BIG DIFFERENCE. Thatcherbaby is what I call people who are kind of beyond reaching, because everything complicated that happens in this world is obviously put there to inconvenience and annoy them, their taxes pay for nothing but chavs and lazy assholes, and they focus on (ohhh, say) the wages of a union official 'whine wine I don't make that kind of money, why should he get to...' while letting proper fat cats slide. Maybe if they weren't so immature I wouldn't be calling them a baby anything?

are you robot? (suzy), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:05 (thirteen years ago) link

dom top of the bob crow twitter shitpile

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:09 (thirteen years ago) link

xp I'd axe their benefits etc.

James Mitchell, Monday, 4 October 2010 10:12 (thirteen years ago) link

Osbournes stiff arms in that pic...must not touch the young conservatives...must not touch the young conservatives...

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:15 (thirteen years ago) link

EYES STRAIGHT AHEAD *Frances is going to kill me with GUNS*

are you robot? (suzy), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:17 (thirteen years ago) link

something about checking out the size of his fiscal deficit

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:18 (thirteen years ago) link

RARE SIGHTING OF PRESENTABLE ENGLISH-GIRL ANKLE shame about rest of outfit and clear lack of familiarity with BUTTONS or IRON.

are you robot? (suzy), Monday, 4 October 2010 10:23 (thirteen years ago) link

why are tory women so warty?

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 11:18 (thirteen years ago) link

It's the evil trying to get out.

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 11:22 (thirteen years ago) link

Osbourne pretending that the deficit is solely the result of public spending profligacy again.

Matt DC, Monday, 4 October 2010 11:23 (thirteen years ago) link

Didn't know this was going to be on: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-58/episode-3

James Mitchell, Monday, 4 October 2010 11:35 (thirteen years ago) link

That's the whole reason for the Coulson news revive TBH.

are you robot? (suzy), Monday, 4 October 2010 11:36 (thirteen years ago) link

oh it's peter oborne so it'll be the jews to blame, sorry i mean not to blame

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 11:36 (thirteen years ago) link

to give the scrote some credit, nick robinson just said the reason they're cutting child benefit rather than winter fuel payments is that during the election cameron said something like 'read my lips: i will not cut winter fuel payments'. only osborne said last year he wouldn't cut child benefits. it does seem wrong that two people earning £43k can still claim. both my parents worked full-time throughout my childhood so i can barely get my head around the idea of the 'stay-home mums' the telegraph is whining about. i guess some of my friends' mums didn't work.

laughing out loud lol (history mayne), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:35 (thirteen years ago) link

I gave up work to look after the kids.

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:38 (thirteen years ago) link

I was a "stay-home-and-read-ilx dad'.

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:39 (thirteen years ago) link

i gave up work

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:40 (thirteen years ago) link

(not to look after children)

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:41 (thirteen years ago) link

the details of implementation sound a bit half-baked (lot of gymnastics to avoid calling it "means-tested", but looks like they've created an incentive for to avoid a salary between 41k and 41k+child benefits) and setting aside the axiomatic point about whether cuts are needed and how they should be timed, surely this has to be pretty much the least objectionable thing they could cut. totally fine with me tbqh.

caek, Monday, 4 October 2010 12:42 (thirteen years ago) link

my aul fella took foreign jobs to get away from the kids

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:43 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm not objecting to the cut per se, but (and I would say this of course - see upthread) I think the cut off point should be higher and I don;t understand why households on a lot more than my household should still get the money. That doesn't seem fair or "we're all in together" at all, just seems to be penalising me for going part-time to look after the kids (and read ilx).

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 12:50 (thirteen years ago) link

yes, not doing this on total household income being over twice the 40% limit seems (or something like that) seems, at best, stupid.

caek, Monday, 4 October 2010 12:53 (thirteen years ago) link

At the moment this feels like a (rough calculation) 3% pay cut. Ahh, fuck it, it's not like they've suddenly lost my vote, so they could probably care less.

Duncan Donuts (Ned Trifle II), Monday, 4 October 2010 13:01 (thirteen years ago) link

Lot of Tory voters will be on £44k though. Not doing it on combined salary seems kind of ridic, but I'm a bit wary of people being in favour of a cut as long as it's safely outside their own income band. £44k is well inside the top 10% of the country isn't it?

Matt DC, Monday, 4 October 2010 13:09 (thirteen years ago) link

ITV news took a typically lol perspective on it, focusing the questioning of some Tory person on how punishing 'traditional families' with the stay-at-home mum isn't a Tory way to go about things, but put like that it does seem like it could be a nice vote-loser.

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Monday, 4 October 2010 13:12 (thirteen years ago) link

15% according to the today program

xpost

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 4 October 2010 13:15 (thirteen years ago) link

Wonder how many Tory voters are couples earning £40,000 each though as compared to one high earner and a stay-at-home parent.

James Mitchell, Monday, 4 October 2010 13:30 (thirteen years ago) link

it's not a large number. more important cuts to worry about. p sure the opposition won't be complaining about it.

laughing out loud lol (history mayne), Monday, 4 October 2010 13:36 (thirteen years ago) link

Class war on Mumsnet:

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/1054558-AIBU-to-claim-child-benefit

TotorosOcarina Mon 04-Oct-10 09:39:45

"At the moment cb pays for shoes and music lessons and pocket money and the baby's trust fund and our sponsored Malawian child, none of which we could really afford from our household expenses."

<snort>

Mine pays for FOOD.

Thats why some need it , some don't.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 4 October 2010 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link

That should be in italics by the way. That's not my snort.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 4 October 2010 14:56 (thirteen years ago) link

'not overburden the state (eg private education for the DC, private healthcare).' oh do fuck off

damn, mumsnet ain't so mumsy

laughing out loud lol (history mayne), Monday, 4 October 2010 15:01 (thirteen years ago) link

wonder if they have memes

laughing out loud lol (history mayne), Monday, 4 October 2010 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

xp depending on the mums you know tbh

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Monday, 4 October 2010 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

they call them mumes xp

meta the devil you know (onimo), Monday, 4 October 2010 15:05 (thirteen years ago) link

meta mums

Mark G, Monday, 4 October 2010 15:07 (thirteen years ago) link

I have no idea what that means, btw

Mark G, Monday, 4 October 2010 15:07 (thirteen years ago) link

I use my CB to pay the cleaner who might be left unemployed if I didn't use my CB that way. Is that wrong? Would it be better if I sacked her?

Think about it.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 4 October 2010 16:08 (thirteen years ago) link

because everything complicated that happens in this world is obviously put there to inconvenience and annoy them

so much whining today about the strike along these lines

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 16:39 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah I just want to pass them a wet-wipe and coo DIDDUMS at most of them. Having said that, I'm about to enter the melee to go to Turner Prize PV.

are you robot? (suzy), Monday, 4 October 2010 16:48 (thirteen years ago) link

more retired colonels needed to alert us to the dangers of marxist conspiracies to bring down the government and make us all homosexuals

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 16:52 (thirteen years ago) link

OTM. I'm getting increasingly pissed off with so many people's inability, or refusal, to see the social big picture. Whiny entitlement is the default setting. It's like everything good that happens to them is because they're a special flower who's earned it and everything bad is somebody else's fault. They're Thatcherbabies in the sense they really don't understand how society works.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 4 October 2010 16:55 (thirteen years ago) link

yes it's like all the stuff that makes society work happens somewhere else, like in some sort of engine room, and the menials are getting uppity (Bob 'Crowe' is a chav so twitter tells me) just to ruin the cruise

former moderator, please give generously (DG), Monday, 4 October 2010 17:01 (thirteen years ago) link

Think this is probably more about the Internet creating a public forum for every vacuous bubble that floats thru people's brains rather than a major shift in attitudes.

Already WSed last summer (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 October 2010 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.