i don't like jism.
uh oh, angry lesbian.
― kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link
The people who say that are wrong because they don’t understand the concept of useful generalizations.
Not really. Generalization is useful only if you want to simplify matters in the sense of dumbing them down. To generalize feminism or communism or jism is surely going to distort and diminish the complex individual concepts more than anything else? Although I'm not sure I know what you're saying, because
If you believe that men and women shoud be equal in political, economical and social level, you're already a feminist even if you don't call yourself that.
This is like suggesting that someone is automatically a socialist just because he favors, say, greater economic equality. Not so. He may share the goal, but he sure as hell does not agree with the means.
that seems to contradict what you said before? An artist can say they're not part of a movement, but have enough ties with it to rightly be called part of that movement, but someone having the adequate ties to feminist thought doesn't make them a feminist? What means are inherent to the vague tag of feminism?
― Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Classic:
Suffrage More equitable pay and employment The right to initiate divorce Safe, legal abortion The right to obtain contraceptives The term "Ms."
― roxymuzak, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link
MS PAINT
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link
gff is one the money!
so are others, obv
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link
Yes, MS Paint is a feminist achievement!!
― roxymuzak, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v216/sexymollusk/fempaint.jpg
― latebloomer, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link
some fat, ugly, hairy bitch cut off that poor man's legs. :(
― Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link
lol jeb u all kinds of dum
― max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link
why do ppl still bother arguing with roger adultery
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link
Jeb's Roger Adultery?
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
might as well be, he's denied it i think.
― gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link
He's called "Jeb".
― jim, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link
"Jeb" because "Johnny Reb" was a little too obvious
― kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't get it, does the word "Jeb" have some special meaning?
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link
But feminism is by definition just about the goal, not about the means. It's not as narrow as socialism, because socialism isn't just about equality, it's about a certain type of equality. Whereas in feminism you liberal, socialist, anarchist, postcolonial, etc. strands. Sure you can call it ideology, if you see all forms of striving for equality as ideologies, but it's a different sort of a ideology than socialism.
Jeb i wish you'd come off the "hey just pointing things out/just asking questions" game and say what it is you're after. are women just not as bright as men, or what?
is feminism, however you define it, a benefit, or a menace?
― Jeb, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link
Now how is this different to feminism? “Well, it isn’t.” My point exactly.
Sometimes ILX really is like lining up all your imaginary friends and having a tea party!
― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link
Aw come on at my high teas we actually talk about cool stuff, like how to better secure volleyball nets. Velocitus Happenstance has some good ideas on it. Frankie Beans, however, is kind of full of shit.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link
i think it's stoopid when people have a go at "feminism" it's a pretty broad church.
― pc user, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link
must
fight
urge
to join
clusterfuck feminism thread
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link
jeb u didnt really answer this point--
and hey feel free to wear your inner troglodyte on your sleeve!!
― max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link
<I>stevie i dont think either foucault or butler is interested a "utopia" at all! in fact that would be totally counter-intuitive considering their own theoretical commitments. foucault especially is way more concerned with the day-to-day, material concerns of oppression and the mechanisms of power.</I>
Oh no, I realize that. I was being a bit vague in my statement (partially because I am well aware of the fact I know very little about feminism nor my belief in it). I was dragging Foucault and Butler in my statement because that's what I was/am reading at this moment. Honestly, though, I really haven't decided yet... I am forever swinging both ways (Ken C can now interpret this in a totally pervy way!)
But isn't feminism more about a GOAL (or utopia)? I always see it as this, forever chasing that always distant perfect world which is, let's be honest, unreachable. You can prove me wrong, no problem with that, but that's how I see feminism and that's why I am sometimes a little bit... I don't know, sad about it? I look at Laurel and see how angry she is, how defensive she is about her beliefs and on the one hand I really admire that but on the other hand I think: "WTF, how tiring." (Not as a criticism, mind you, but as a... perception?) I often wonder how people like Greer, Butler,... really lead their daily life. How do you "marry" your academic/professional life (which is focused on feminism and battling sexism,...) and then on the other hand live with that knowledge in your day to day life, y'know. It really interests me.
I'm blabbering.
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link
It helps if you killfile a bunch of people, actually. Speaking of which, which of your logins is the store one, and which is at home?
― Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link
Just kidding. I'm not that angry in real life, is the thing. I really believe that we have to be mindful of shit and speak on it b/c otherwise we are tacitly condoning it. Who knows, I was raised as a sort of crazy Evangelical Christian, they think they have to go through every second of every day trying to be more like Christ -- for me it's a good day if I'm trying to be more like myself.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link
And I mean that's a distant unreachable goal if there ever was one, at least in this life on Earth. So maybe I just expect that life is full of ideals to aspire to and I'm okay with that, it's the journey not completion, blah blah.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link
Hah. Angry is probably an exaggeration, just how I sometimes perceive you in these type of threads, which, I repeat isn't a (negative) criticism, more... an admiration. I know this is the worng (contorted?) perception, because, like you just said, you aren't like that in "real" life. Still I find it admirable when people are gung ho (?) about their beliefs. I sort of gave up once I entered my 30s. :-( Which I know is a shitty attitude, because I am condoning a lot of shit I would have stood up against if I was younger.
Nathalie: main computer. Stevie Nixed: every other comp. I couldn't remember my main password, only the Stevie Nixed one.
Killfile away. :-)
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link
Nathalie, if we were all waiting to understand a thing perfectly in order to live it, would anything ever get done? If you refused to get pregnant until you were sure you could be a perfect parent, or refused to get married unless you were sure you and your spouse would never be unfaithful or fall out of love, where would you be? Etc.
For me feminism isn't an ideological impossibility that I must look to the academics to tell me about before I can vote for it, it's speaking up in my daily life and trying to make choices that support women and other people whose rights aren't respected, and questioning the gender/social/political/religious status quo.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link
Which mostly isn't that terrible living in NYC b/c the bulk of my peers here are not going to be all "WOMEN IN POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP?? POPPYCOCK! PLS TO FOLLOW GOD'S PLAN" like what I felt where I grew up. But there's still no shortage of bullshit.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link
Yr good people Laurel.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:36 (sixteen years ago) link
This is very true. Even if I believed in some feminist utopia, I'd have to admit that it isn't very likely to happen during my lifetime, so trying to change little things in my everyday life, plus going to demonstrations and working with feminist organizations is the best I can do. I don't think anyone needs to devote her whole life to feminism to be a proper feminist, just recognizing the power structures around us and speaking up when you feel you should is enough. The fact that gender affects almost everything around us may feel overwhelming, but it also means resistance can be done everywhere. Sexism is much more about (often unnoticed) everyday practice than about some conspiracy of men.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 07:47 (sixteen years ago) link
some feminist utopia
sounds interesting....pls describe...
― Bob Six, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 08:39 (sixteen years ago) link
(Reason I ask is cos I relate to environmental issues better because the imagined outcome is less abstract to me...)
― Bob Six, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 08:42 (sixteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnJxqRLg9x0&feature=player_embedded
― Rory's new misogynist car (Gukbe), Sunday, 2 October 2011 01:24 (twelve years ago) link
Video 90% otm!
― so i had sex with a piñata (mh), Sunday, 2 October 2011 02:01 (twelve years ago) link
On Twitter wars between feminists -- seems familiar.
Yet even as online feminism has proved itself a real force for change, many of the most avid digital feminists will tell you that it’s become toxic. Indeed, there’s a nascent genre of essays by people who feel emotionally savaged by their involvement in it—not because of sexist trolls, but because of the slashing righteousness of other feminists. On January 3, for example, Katherine Cross, a Puerto Rican trans woman working on a PhD at the CUNY Graduate Center, wrote about how often she hesitates to publish articles or blog posts out of fear of inadvertently stepping on an ideological land mine and bringing down the wrath of the online enforcers. “I fear being cast suddenly as one of the ‘bad guys’ for being insufficiently radical, too nuanced or too forgiving, or for simply writing something whose offensive dimensions would be unknown to me at the time of publication,” she wrote....
(T)here’s a norm that intention doesn’t matter—indeed, if you offend someone and then try to explain that you were misunderstood, this is seen as compounding the original injury. Again, there’s a significant insight here: people often behave in bigoted ways without meaning to, and their benign intention doesn’t make the prejudice less painful for those subjected to it. However, “that became a rule where you say intentions never matter; there is no added value to understanding the intentions of the speaker,” Cross says.
There are also rules, elaborated by white feminists, on how other white feminists should talk to women of color. For example, after Kendall’s #solidarityisforwhitewomen hashtag erupted last fall, Sarah Milstein, co-author of a guide to Twitter, published a piece on the Huffington Post titled “5 Ways White Feminists Can Address Our Own Racism.” At one point, Milstein argued that if a person of color says something that makes you uncomfortable, “assume your discomfort is telling you something about you, not about the other person.” After Rule No. 3, “Look for ways that you are racist, rather than ways to prove you’re not,” she confesses to her own racial crimes, including being “awkwardly too friendly” toward black people at parties.
http://www.thenation.com/article/178140/feminisms-toxic-twitter-wars
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:16 (ten years ago) link
The left will always eat itself to some extent. Just gotta own it.
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:24 (ten years ago) link
Morbius
Feminist Theory & "Women's Issues" Discussion Thread: All Gender Identities Are Encouraged To Participate
― how's life, Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:29 (ten years ago) link
http://womenagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:28 (nine years ago) link
Discuss.
http://33.media.tumblr.com/faade5ac24ba94974ff7e3fc50942216/tumblr_nce677RTC71syitgfo1_500.jpg
I honestly don't even know where to start with these idiots.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:29 (nine years ago) link
i dont need feminism because:
--I dont understand what structural inequality is--I am on the winning side of patriarchy (for now)--sometimes men are nice to me?--i have little to no historical consciousness
― ryan, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:35 (nine years ago) link
Yes.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:38 (nine years ago) link
https://twitter.com/NoToFeminism
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:38 (nine years ago) link
ryan otm
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:41 (nine years ago) link
http://40.media.tumblr.com/09198f29a631af61191f2397c4fff802/tumblr_na866cAJx61syitgfo1_500.jpg
This doesn't even make any sense. None of them do. Brb I need to go kill myself now.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:43 (nine years ago) link
That twitter account. Dying.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:44 (nine years ago) link
Anyway, women's rights battles are for those ppl too, whether they acknowledge it or not. Feminism has given them the opportunity to be in a position to say those things, to not experience or not perceive that they experience discrimination. That's okay. Odds are at some point in their lives they'll fall out of that protected status because of something, and their views may change.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:44 (nine years ago) link
maybe there is some site where you can pay people to hold up handwritten signs with nonsense of your choosing and all of these people have been hired by reddit
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:46 (nine years ago) link
that's unusually optimistic of you nakh
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:53 (nine years ago) link