Chicago: More Bars in More Places

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2205 of them)

I think I aloted $10 for myself to gamble with. I lost all of it. ha ha
I also meant to mention that I think I'm prone to addictive behaviors, which is why I've avoided smoking/gambling/drugs like the plague.

KitCat, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I am a bummer and no fun at all, I know. I don't get gambling.

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

HEY GUYS $200 TOTALLY IS CHUMP CHANGE FOR ME

n/a, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Give me some of that.

KitCat, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

oh it's awful, for sure. but it's AMERICAN awful, and totally fascinating to me for that reason.

Ding ding ding.

jaymc, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

How many pop punk bands do you guys think have existed with the name "Chump Change"? Like 40? 70?

n/a, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Chump, Change (Your Ways)

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost to hs - I don't get being a problematic gambler, I don't get that at all. But games are fun.

And yeah, that $200 is just part of your vacation budget, no different than setting that amount aside for a dreamt-of meal at a fancy restaurant or whatnot. Of course it's not nothing!

kenan, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

No, I am totally with you, Horseshoe! It just seems sad and depressing and awful. I have no urge to go there if I have to spend my own money -- Sarah's way of seeing it makes a lot of sense to me. I think I would like to see it for like 1 hour and then go somewhere else.

La Lechera, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

but if you eat a meal, you get to eat a meal! if you gamble you get nothing!

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

powering vegas is destroying the west's rivers

xp i mean you are all otm. just because i think it's fascinating doesn't mean i don't wish that someone would just go ahead and carpet bomb the whole thing. and hit the hoover dam while they're in the area.

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

awesome site:

http://www.cheapovegas.com

if you gamble you get nothing!

You get to play a game and sit in a weird, weird place! Your results may vary, obv.

kenan, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

gotta know when to hold 'em
know when to fold 'em

dan m, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i like the sunshine and buffets. eazy has sold me on vegas.

toby wants to go to the grand canyon. this might be a stupid question, but is it doable year round? or does it actually get cold/snowy in winter?

colette, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

gambling to "get" money ---> addiction and sorrow
gambling to pass the time, get drinks and chit chat with your tablemates ---> can be fun, but only if the stakes are low (for me)

xp grand canyon in the winter is fully snowy

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, at the rim. i think there's something like a 25 degree temp differential between the rim and the base, if not more. but i visited in the spring with my parents, and there was snow on the ground, and it was about 40 degrees up top. you have to remember, it's at 5000-6000 ft (?) or something, and in the desert. that equals cold.

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

gambling to pass the time, get drinks and chit chat with your tablemates
see, this appeals to me zero

i would rather be at moody's playing cribbage.

La Lechera, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, horshoe and gambling not-getters: why do you think men have poker night??? to make a little extra spending money?

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

$9 pitcher + games + tablemates who have been preapproved by me = much much more appealing.

i understand how someone would find vegas appealing, i guess, it's just that it sounds like an awful, depressing nightmarish waste of time for me. poker night makes a lot more sense than vegas.

La Lechera, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

(I'm not really arguing with anyone here--there's nothing arguable it seems. there's something aesthetic about the experience of gambling that I've never experienced, I guess.)

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Chicago Fire v. Club Deportivo Social y Cultural Cruz Azul
10/10 7:30 PM

Lots of tix still available, looks like.

http://chicago.fire.mlsnet.com/news/team_news.jsp?ymd=20070914&content_id=117203&vkey=pr_chf&fext=.jsp&team=t100

(if anyone's interested)

dan m, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, of course, rw. I know. it's that aesthetic thing that's unavailable to me.

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

it's basically the same as sitting around and playing cribbage or whatever with your pals, except with the added dick-measuring of who is able to place large bets, and who walks away with everyone else's money

xp and yeah, vegas /= poker night, for many people, but then again going to vegas with your pals is basically poker night on coke, and with more strippers

(many many xposts)

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd go to Vegas just to see the insanity, probably wouldn't gamble much if at all, probably wouldn't go back unless someone else was paying for it.

dan m, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

lol we r all poor

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

right, the aesthetic is unappealing to me, too.

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

but honestly, i've been to some extremely depressing poker nights. sitting in people's basements, listening to deep purple on classic rock radio and seeing some dude lose his car to this other dude? extremely depressing. a valuable experience, but not something i want to do for myself. i mean, he gambled his car away. that's a bad idea.

i guess what i do not like is dick-measuring.

La Lechera, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

rw, do you think the dick-measuring thing is the content of the enjoyment? that would be interesting if it were true...

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(I mean, obviously figurative dickmeasuring, there are women who dig gambling, after all)

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

(although the other half of why Vegas depresses me=fliers for hookers that get passed out on the corner)

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

thinking about gambling turns me into Ned Flanders. ;_;

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

So I take it your screen name isn't a tribute to the establishment in Hammond, IN?

dan m, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Dan OTM, the appeal of Vegas for me has little to do with gambling. I mean, I'd love to go into the casinos and check out the scene, but it's more just about being in the belly of the beast and walking down streets lit up entirely with neon and having a cup of coffee at an all-night 50's-style diner and gazing at the gaudy glass buildings.

jaymc, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Do you play cribbage, Amanda? Did I not know this? Can we do this before it's too cold out in the beer garden?

Gambling as recreation that pays for itself is the ideal. Three hours of poker that costs the same as dinner at Charlie Trotter's is sad. three hours of poker that results in winning a dinner at Charlie Trotter's is rad.

I wouldn't try to talk anyone into gambling any more than I would talk anyone into drinking or drugs or threesomes or whatever. I think part of my interests in poker and wine have to do with moderation, that I don't crave either one and that I wouldn't enjoy them as much if I did.

That said, I know some decent poker players who have enjoyed the recreation of gambling in Vegas but who also profited from playing against tourists for whom $200 is chump change and poker is a goof.

(and I won first place, $380, in a poker tourney a few weeks ago playing against 16 people, including Chicago's finest audio engineers!)

Certainly, part of enjoying the liminal places Kenan and I sometimes enjoy (casinos and bars - I never made it to Clark's) involves enjoying places that other people find severely depressing.

Eazy, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

(yeah, the hotels are amazing; if there hadn't been zombie-looking families everywhere, I might have had a good time.)

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, i think for some guys it really is figurative dick-measuring: they can bet you off the table when you don't have enough cash OR they walk away with all your money. but that's just poker. blackjack is a game, and, moreover, it's a game that CAN be "gamed," which is why there are so many nerds into gambling.

however, anteing up your car in a friendly neighborhood poker game probably means that you are depressed, and the type of person that actually believes that fortune will smile on you this time, when the truth is that she never ever smiles on anyone ever. no one ever actually wins at gambling. that's sort of the point!

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess I have a failure to experience the aesthetic at all? like it never rises to the level of aesthetic because I'm too caught up in the mechanics of it all.

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost to Eric

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

also, Vegas is too effing hot.

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll tell you though -- I've played pool and poker semi-seriously, and there is no greater satisfaction than beating someone who is into dick-measuring, guys who get angry when they lose.

Eazy, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

ha also I suck at pool and poker and I hate being bad at things because I am a big baby. that might play into this as much as the Flanders stuff.

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

the simple joy of the pwn

dan m, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

the "loser gambler" that gets stereotyped is fundamentally lazy and romantic, you know? gambling, like the lottery (also depressing, in a way), encourages people to make ridiculously REAL and LARGE financial decisions based on wholly unrealistic assumptions, with the promise that it'll get them out of whatever mire they happen to be in.

i mean, high-rollers are always rich before they become high-rollers. it's a hobby, not a profession.

xposts i'm with eazy: the few times i've played poker, i've managed to walk away with "serious" players money simply by bluffing. i made $3!

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

nb i am lazy and romantic

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

the "loser gambler" that gets stereotyped is fundamentally lazy and romantic, you know?

you'd think I'd be into it!

ha xpost

horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it was 2 weeks ago (?) that one of the stories on This American Life was about people who play poker for a living. High rollers, pros, lose and win hundreds of thousands of dollars in a night. It's their job. Fascinating stuff.

kenan, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

in a way, the lottery is worse, because while the casual player (say, my dad) might spend $5/week on a few tickets, betting on the fact that he'll get hit by a piece of airplane, some other person is dropping 50-100 on the extremely faulty assumption that that will significantly increase their odds.

...i'd like to crunch the numbers on how many tickets you'd have to buy to get a statsitically significant chance of return. why don't former lottery winners just buy like a million lottery tickets once a year?

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

About Chump Change
One night me (Ben D. Straw), Kool-Aid, and my cousin Mike drunkenly figured we should put together a useless punk/ska band. I mean...It's cool to watch people play, but better to be up there playing yourself.

Jordan, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

With pool and poker you get guys who really should be playing chess instead, ones who are into geometry and math and who really don't believe in intuitition, and I'm kind of a goofball who to a certain extent needs to be disrespected at the table to win, Mr. Misunderestimated.

I played on a bar pool league where each of us had a nickname from a Guns 'n' Roses song. Isidro Matamoros (hope you google this, man, it's been too long) was the best player and was "Patience". Someone else was "Night Train". I was "You're Crazy".

When I signed up for Facebook, I got back in touch with someone I had played poker with here around 2003 -- she and her boyfriend, in their early 20s, ran a game out of their Wrigleyville apartment and moved to Vegas a few years ago to play professionally. A few days ago her status update was "J____ is broke."

Eazy, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

looks like you'd have to drop 10 million to get something close to a 1:100 chance.

http://www.webmath.com/cgi-bin/lottery.cgi?count=6&low=1&high=99

river wolf, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.