― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:59 (twenty years ago) link
Is there a height/weight table for men somewhere? I don't imagine they're the same.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:00 (twenty years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:10 (twenty years ago) link
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:13 (twenty years ago) link
― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:26 (twenty years ago) link
― OCP (OCP), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:59 (twenty years ago) link
(not that i have a problem with it. just curious)
― colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:54 (twenty years ago) link
Girls are luckier than boys in a way because they can get away with being SHORT - and being on a diet isn't gonna ever make you taller.
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 12:10 (twenty years ago) link
http://www.geocities.com/lucylurex/shuttup.txt
what no-one knew is that at 5'3" and 140 pounds, she is classed as moderately overweight and therefore not healthy. does lucy suffer in a private fat hell? or is this evidence that such height/weight charts are a crock of shit? i'm gonna sit back with a very large bowl of ice cream while you decide.
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:24 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:28 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:29 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:31 (twenty years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:40 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:42 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:17 (twenty years ago) link
― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:21 (twenty years ago) link
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:22 (twenty years ago) link
― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:28 (twenty years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty years ago) link
(Cymbal noise)
― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:46 (twenty years ago) link
― C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 13:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 13:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:46 (nineteen years ago) link
as for fat women i would of course love and respect her for who she was and never judge her on looks - only on her soul and her brain. (note: best thing about being a fag is being able to say stuff like that and never have to be put to the test)
― anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 13:51 (nineteen years ago) link
what if all the fat is in THAT place???
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (nineteen years ago) link
Plus, from what I've gathered, all girls think they're fat anyway. So in some sense, there are nothing but fat girls everywhere.
I am so proud that this is my first post in two weeks. So proud.
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (nineteen years ago) link
(poster's note: and this dude is like 4' 11!)
― PRINCE! (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:02 (nineteen years ago) link
― C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― the neurotic awakening of sir mixalot (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:15 (nineteen years ago) link
The difference between old ILX and new ILX is that ain't no hater gonna hold me down, no, no I'm just gonna pop off and have my fun let the haters hate and the C-man see oh baby this is like a new millenium of love.
Sorry, listening to R. Kelly.
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:15 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― ¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Øש§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link
it started in 2001 so not sure how it can portray a tangible difference - oh well
― the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:18 (nineteen years ago) link