fad-monger
xp
― just woke up (lukas), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:04 (thirteen years ago) link
i kinda think that via the emergence of the internet of things that profile and location will be more valuable than status and social - so facebook and twitter could remain at the top of their current markets while being simultaneously rendered somewhat irrelevant
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:05 (thirteen years ago) link
also im know im way behind on this covo but i dont think the future of the net is walled app gardens - i dont think theres much demand for the most basic function of the web to be wholesale taken away
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:09 (thirteen years ago) link
twitter's main service is being a top notch celebrity-trolling vehicle
― ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:03 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
haha yes it has allowed us to get closer to our idols than ever before
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link
jordan is engaged to jose cansecos daughter iirc
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:18 (thirteen years ago) link
let us not forget ~solar panels~
timoreilly Tim O'Reilly Solar rooftops as social network? Why @sungevity’s New Hire From LinkedIn is No Surprise http://bit.ly/gZqlsJ53 seconds ago
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:24 (thirteen years ago) link
twitter is like seeing thousands of headlines to articles I never want to read
― it made me wish batman had written an article on mfas (Edward III), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:31 (thirteen years ago) link
lots of tweets are headlines, maybe follow diff people idk
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:34 (thirteen years ago) link
i don't "get" twitter
― ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:49 (thirteen years ago) link
lol u old
― kl0p's son (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:52 (thirteen years ago) link
thats maybe the biggest barrier to twitter mass adoption, when you look at it its doesnt necessarily make sense, all the RT # @ nomenclature particularly isnt doing them any favors
i do think their new thing of calling themselves an information network is a pretty good pithy explanation
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:54 (thirteen years ago) link
the advantages twitter seems to have over facebook: asymmetric relationships, simplicity
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:58 (thirteen years ago) link
the word "tweet"
― unusually tight body for a comedian (Matt P), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:00 (thirteen years ago) link
i dont even know wth twitter is but i will find any excuse i can to say "retweet" out loud
― unusually tight body for a comedian (Matt P), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link
twitter is broadcast, facebook is ephemeral but concentrated
― mh, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah that sounds abt right
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago) link
on the other hand: facebook is a book w/faces in it, twitter is a bird
It's weird, I say random one-off stupid comments on twitter and people who have met me from work will follow me there, but I will say a completely different set of personal things on facebook.
― mh, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:06 (thirteen years ago) link
main advantage of twitter over fb = people use it as an actual breaking news source mainly due to the effectiveness of the trends feature (altho obv trends gets swamped with trivial shit too) and that legitimises conversations/rants to actually take place within twitter where stuff is so often first learned.
― blueski, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:07 (thirteen years ago) link
twitter is more about timely delivery, facebook is more about standing relationships
― mh, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:15 (thirteen years ago) link
classic comms theory is engineers trying to be sociologists, like it describes the shape of something but that's it. "this room is square," well yes, i might behave a little differently because it's square but... not really.
i for one think tombot and tracer hand have been otm so far to which i might add, future of the internet is all about 1) abstraction as a method of control and 2) means of profit 3) around ownership of content and that the biggest semantic developments are going to be about describing ownership of ideas. if u really want to affect / fuck with the future of the internet, affect / fuck with copyright law. but make sure u get lots of money first.
xposts
― unusually tight body for a comedian (Matt P), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:19 (thirteen years ago) link
ehhh it just seems like a blatantly pessimistic/misanthropic forecast not really founded on anything
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:29 (thirteen years ago) link
i mean so far the story of the internet re copyright of content is a weakening trend
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:31 (thirteen years ago) link
Ive tried so hard to find twitter useful and engaging and I just dont. FB sucked me in though even when I didnt want it to. I've always been more of a blogger I guess, so there's that. Heck I still use my livejournal.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link
On aother branch of the future of the internet though:
IPv4 vs IPv6. When's this going to happen? It must be at the point of happening by force now, what with IANA or whoever saying "hey guys we're running out of IP addresses btw" recently.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:36 (thirteen years ago) link
i use google reader prolly how ppl use twitter but i mean i dont want all this information ppl are telling me twitter is too fast slow the f down imo
― plax (ico), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:37 (thirteen years ago) link
I only have like 6 ppl on twitter that I even follow, and i had to un-follow one because without exaggeration he tweeted every 5-15 minutes. My page was just flooded with his random shit.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:40 (thirteen years ago) link
what do people make of Flipbook? I don't have an iPad so I've never used it but a kind of twitterized rss reader with a slick integrated design.. well it FEELS like the future somehow. then again it's not so very different from the "portalmania" of the late 90s
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:59 (thirteen years ago) link
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/WebofAngels.jpg
Found on "take shelf" today!! Totally reading this tonight.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:04 (thirteen years ago) link
JUST FYI the back sez:
The Web links the many worlds of humanity. Most people can only use it to communicate. Some can retrieve and store data, as well as use simple precoded programs. Only a privileged few are able to create their own software, within prescribed limits. And then there are the Webspinners.Grailer is Fouth Literate, able to manipulate the Web at will--and use it for purposes unintended and impossible for anyone but the most talented Webspinner. Obviously he cannot be allowed to live.Condemned to death at the age of nine, Grailer must go underground, hiding his skills, testing his powers--until he is ready to do battle with the Web itself!
And then there are the Webspinners.
Grailer is Fouth Literate, able to manipulate the Web at will--and use it for purposes unintended and impossible for anyone but the most talented Webspinner. Obviously he cannot be allowed to live.
Condemned to death at the age of nine, Grailer must go underground, hiding his skills, testing his powers--until he is ready to do battle with the Web itself!
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:07 (thirteen years ago) link
Obviously he cannot be allowed to live.
― unusually tight body for a comedian (Matt P), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:11 (thirteen years ago) link
His name was Jon Williams.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:12 (thirteen years ago) link
This is the future of the internet iirc
xp lolololol Trayce, I thought the exact same thing.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:13 (thirteen years ago) link
Tracer, I take it you mean Flipboard? The novelty of it has worn off a little for me, but I still like ... flicking through it idly every so often. It doesn't really scale very well as an RSS reader or tweet-link reader – it doesn't weight stories according to popularity in the way that, say, tweetedtimes.com does. But it's certainly a nice casual reading platform, and if they had more linkups with publishers it would be more interesting.
― Alba, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:20 (thirteen years ago) link
i can't put this into a coherent computer-person post but el tomboto's theory about engagement with apps replacing browsers upthread reminded me of what i miss about the old internet (pre-google), which was the randomness of searches. it was possible to find very tangential connections to one's search criteria even on the second or third page of results in altavista or yahoo, and this enabled what used to be called 'surfing' the internet. nowadays people don't surf, they just plot their paths to and between their destinations: the earlier randomness of catching waves has been lost.
i'd go on but i'd embarrass myself further. over to you lot.
― utterfilth (whatever), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:21 (thirteen years ago) link
geocities had different "cities" i liked to imagine what they looked like and i wished i lived there.
― unusually tight body for a comedian (Matt P), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:23 (thirteen years ago) link
Google results are noticeably shitter these days, so maybe the glory days of surfing can return.
xpost
― Alba, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:24 (thirteen years ago) link
those glory days are gone. all the search results are stuffed high with corporate/business entries. which is why tomboto's app argument makes sense. people won't want to search for 'hmv.com' - even by 'i'm feeling lucky' - if there's an app button to press.
the fact that the future of the internet - in the context above - could be defined by saving a couple of clicks concerns me. there wass a flourishing plurality in the last 15 years. but now the old corporate world has caught it up and smothered it.
― utterfilth (whatever), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:33 (thirteen years ago) link
lol wtf r guys even talking abt, you sound like youre writing some dystopian novel
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:34 (thirteen years ago) link
I don't know if it's really the old corporate world. When it comes to the top search engine results, it's more the crappier end of the new corporate world. Link farms, "answer" sites and such.
― Alba, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:37 (thirteen years ago) link
i don't do dystopian novels, ice cr?m.
― utterfilth (whatever), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:42 (thirteen years ago) link
well plz present some rationale for the entire up until this point internet narrative of creative destruction and inovation to turn 180 to a static corporate controlled futurescape - something better than 'people seem to like mobile apps' and 'google results are not the best' - i mean you know corporate interests wouldve loved to control this thing from the beginning - instead we got the unraveling of the music, print, and advertising worlds and the rise of huge new technology companies more interested in facilitating peoples internet experience than controlling the content of it
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:01 (thirteen years ago) link
i feel like this is connected with why the youtube app search results are so shitty
― plax (ico), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:05 (thirteen years ago) link
I use Twitter - for following people - and I don't see how it could replace my google reader. Twitter is good for a 5 minute 'what is happening at the moment' distraction but I need GReader to help me look through articles at my leisure.
― oppet, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:07 (thirteen years ago) link
oppet, I also actually read tweets, but apparently a lot of people mostly just click links (and then read at leisure in other browser tabs)
― just woke up (lukas), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:20 (thirteen years ago) link
i have links from weeks ago still floating around
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:22 (thirteen years ago) link
don't forget the vanity/competitive aspect of twitter - getting RT'd, follower count etc. easy to get carried away with this nonsense.
― ♘ (blueski), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:23 (thirteen years ago) link
twitter content is much more dynamic than rss cause of retweeting and whatnot
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:27 (thirteen years ago) link
xp http://stackexchange.com/ is a kind of amazing community that really effectively exploits that vanity without ending up like reddit in tone imo
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:28 (thirteen years ago) link
yah thats p much the problem im like hold still xp
― plax (ico), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:29 (thirteen years ago) link